5 4 3 πp 3 $_{F}$n ( p ) → ∫ d $^{3}$r 4 3 πp 3 F n$_{NM}$ [ ρ ( r )   p ] ρ$_{A}$ ( r )   (17) S$_{PWIA}$ ( q   ω ) = ∫ d $^{3}$p dE P$_{h}$ ( p   E ) [ 1 − 4 π 3 p 3 F n ( p + q ) ] × δ ( ω − E − | p + q | 2 2 M )   (18) It has to be pointed out that the above prescriptions  while being justified in the case of uniform nuclear mat- ter  are questionable when applied to nuclei. In nuclear matter  due to translation invariance  the linear momen- tum is a good quantum number  that can be used to label single particle states. As a consequence  the momentum distribution also provides the occupation probability of the states. In finite nuclei  on the other hand  single particle states must be labeled according to the total an- gular momentum J . In this case  for any given p   n ( p ) receives contributions from states of different J   and may even exceed unity. The available results of accurate nuclear matter calcu- lations can be used to model the particle spectral function of finite nuclei within the framework of the local density approximation [5]  i.e. using the definition of Eq. (14) with where ρ$_{A}$ ( r ) is the nuclear density distribution  normal- ized to unity  and n$_{NM}$ [ ρ ( r )   p ] is the momentum distri- bution of nuclear matter at uniform density ρ ( r ). This procedure has been used in all calculations of nuclear cross sections discussed in this paper. Within the nonrelativistic approximation  in which both the response and the hole spectral function can be evaluated using realistic nuclear Hamiltonians  the valid- ity of the IA can be tested comparing S ( q   ω ) of Eq. (10) to FIG. 5. Energy dependence of the nuclear matter response S ( q   ω ). Solid lines: correlated Hartree-Fock approxima- tion [6]. Dashed lines: PWIA results  obtained from Eq. (18) using the SF of Ref. [7]. Dot-dashed lines: results of the Fermi gas model (with nonrelativistic energies) at k$_{F}$ = 262 . 4 MeV  corresponding to the equilibrium density of nuclear matter. The panels are labeled according to the value of | q | . the Fermi gas model with nonrelativistic kinetic energy spectrum are also displayed. for different values of the momentum transfer q . The nuclear matter S ( q   ω ) at equilibrium density  ρ$_{0}$ = 0 . 16 fm − 3 (corresponding to p$_{F}$ = 262 . 4 MeV)  has been recently computed using the correlated basis func- tion formalism and an effective interaction derived from a state-of-the-art parametrization of the nucleon-nucleon potential [6]. To analyze the interplay between short- and long-range correlations  the response defined as in Eq. (10) has been evaluated in both the Hartree-Fock and Tamm-Dancoff approximations. The results of Fig. 5 clearly show that at | q | < 2 p$_{F}$ the response obtained from Eq. (18) does not exhibit the linear behavior at low ω resulting from the antisym- metrization of the final state. On the other hand  as the momentum transfer increases  the PWIA response draws closer to the one obtained in Ref. [6]. At | q | ∼ 600 MeV the results of the two approaches are within 10% of one another in the region of the maximum. Note that inclu- sion of dynamical FSI  e.g. according to the approach of Ref. [8]  would produce a quenching of the PWIA re- sponse in the top panel of Fig. 5  thus bringing the solid and dashed lines in even better agreement. Theoretical studies of electron-nucleus scattering [15] suggest that at | q | ∼ 600 MeV  the FSI effect at the quasifree peak is ∼ 10 %. Figure 5 shows a comparison between the responses of Ref. [6]  obtained using Eq. (10) and the correlated Hartree-Fock approximation  and those obtained from Eq. (18) using the nuclear matter hole spectral function of Ref. [7]. The main difference between the two calcu- lations lies in the treatment of the target final state. In the IA scheme the state describing the struck particle is factored out  while in the approach of Ref. [6] the final A -nucleon state includes both statistical and dynamical correlations between the struck particle and the specta- tors.To make the comparison fully consistent  the PWIA response has been computed including only the contribu- tions of one-hole final states to P$_{h}$ ( p   E ). The results of The emerging pattern suggests that the assumptions underlying the IA are likely to be valid at momenta larger than ∼ 2 p$_{F}$   while at lower | q | factorization does not ap- pear to provide an adequate description of the final state.