Should Mods require that all questions include the state / province / applicable to OP’s post?
Seems all answers’ relevance are dependent on location. This would help people give more targeted answers.

[View Poll](https://www.reddit.com/poll/klwyy4)
[{"id": "ghbykg8", "text": "What is the downside to this?", "replies": [{"id": "ghbz5gj", "text": "People who are not familiar might not post. Not that I disagree with the idea, quite the opposite.", "replies": [{"id": "ghcch8h", "text": "Put your opinion in context.\n\n-\n\nOP has an issue in Mass.\n\n-\n\nRandom poster only has experience in Oregon. Random poster says...\u201dI only have experience in Oregon but here is how we do it here.\u201d\n\n-\n\nSeems very obvious. I still don\u2019t see the downside.", "replies": [], "depth": 3}], "depth": 2}, {"id": "ghc0d32", "text": "I think people post across multiple jurisdictions though. Just because I invest in TX doesn\u2019t mean that the general rules aren\u2019t applicable to a similar building in Florida.", "replies": [{"id": "ghccbvg", "text": "Post by situs obviously. Explain where you derive your opinion from in your answer. All of this is obvious.", "replies": [], "depth": 3}], "depth": 2}, {"id": "ghccrj0", "text": "posters from small states and tertiary markets probably don't want to out themselves", "replies": [{"id": "ghcgg00", "text": "Why?", "replies": [{"id": "ghd0ykv", "text": "Mod here! Please see the comment I just posted for your answer.", "replies": [{"id": "gher84j", "text": "I see it. I just don't see the downside.", "replies": [], "depth": 5}], "depth": 4}, {"id": "ghd2gpf", "text": "CRE is too small a world...", "replies": [{"id": "gher5ka", "text": "Again, what is the downside to giving context? I am not joking. OP provides the situs. Random poster posts where their answer/experience comes from.\n\n-\n\n1. Everyone can still post.\n2. C&amp;P and the law can change greatly by situs.\n3. Nobody is left out.\n4. Answers/Opinions can be explained and we know where the source comes from.\n5. Knowing of the situs will encourage those with ON POINT experience to post.", "replies": [{"id": "ghexwz5", "text": "Downside is that brokers in my market could figure out who I am and go through my post history lmao. I\u2019d prefer to stay anonymous", "replies": [{"id": "ghf0e4u", "text": "Aren't you concerned that they can just look for someone with the last name Supermanfoo13?", "replies": [{"id": "ghfeaox", "text": "I dread that possibility every day", "replies": [], "depth": 8}], "depth": 7}], "depth": 6}], "depth": 5}], "depth": 4}], "depth": 3}], "depth": 2}], "depth": 1}, {"id": "ghcblxg", "text": "The problem is they still wont do it.  Then you have to decide if you want to delete a large percent of everything posted.  \n\nWe used locationbot over at realestate to remind people and then people downvoted it which caused other problems .\n\nA ton of subs like legal advice have this issue too.  It really comes down to mods and tbh this isnt worth spending a ton of time on.  Id suggest editing the submission form to remind people, many still wont do it though", "replies": [{"id": "ghcdat4", "text": "Good to know this for context. Was worth a try (i still hope at least it is placed on the \u2018rules\u2019 even if only as a suggestion lol", "replies": [], "depth": 2}], "depth": 1}, {"id": "ghd0uo3", "text": "Mod here! I see every single post that rolls through here and . . . yes, **quite a few posts are lacking in sufficient details**, but it\u2019s entirely up to you as the commenter to either comment asking for whatever additional details you need to answer the question or move along and not respond. \n\nDemanding every post contain the location isn\u2019t in the spirit of Reddit being a place to ask and receive anonymous opinions.", "replies": [{"id": "ghe3pek", "text": "I hear ya :)", "replies": [], "depth": 2}], "depth": 1}]