How did this property become no rent controlled?
non\* rent controlled; title typo fail... anyway.

I've been a real estate analyst for about 5 months and my focus is on the Southern California Area.

As some of you may know the city of LA, among others, has rent control for properties built before 1978/79.

Recently I underwrote an apartment building built in 1929 firmly within LA, not in any unincorporated area or anything. But it is non controlled according to ZIMAS and the OM advertisement.

Any ideas how that is the case? Off the 200+ apartment properties I've written this is the first example of this I have come across and I'm confused about how it came to be.
[{"id": "eklhb68", "text": "Call the broker and ask.", "replies": [], "depth": 1}]