Does anyone have experience with Reonomy? What are your thoughts
[deleted]
[{"id": "h528k6q", "text": "Good for identifying owners, gives lots of numbers and emails for cold calling/prospecting unlisted property. That\u2019s about it.", "replies": [], "depth": 1}, {"id": "h528wi8", "text": "do any of you folks know what that runs cost wise?", "replies": [], "depth": 1}, {"id": "h529rgx", "text": "I had a limited trial and it was ok. Email accuracy was less than 50%, but ownership entity and phone numbers seemed to be pretty accurate. I remember it being cost prohibitive and our shop ultimately decided against. \n\nUnsolicited $0.02: If emails were more accurate I would look at it closer, but ownership entities, mailing address, and phone numbers can be found using a handful of other tools (appraisal district, [corporationwiki.com](https://corporationwiki.com), rocketreach, etc.)", "replies": [], "depth": 1}, {"id": "h52e0ts", "text": "Not good. Stick with co star.", "replies": [], "depth": 1}, {"id": "h52rld8", "text": "Reonomy is good for one and only one thing, and that\u2019s identifying ownership info and contact info as well (which is one place where CoStar lacks). Besides that, it hasn\u2019t benefitted me at all", "replies": [{"id": "h5312dz", "text": "Where are you located?  Most states and cities Have resources for this as it is typically public knowledge. For example, in NYC you can use their ACRIS program to pull deeds (which dont often have buyer name legible) and mortgages (which DO have it more accurate).  Then head on over to the DOB website, pull the address, and owners direct contact information is listed on permits, emergency information, etc.", "replies": [{"id": "h5317v8", "text": "Bay Area, and since LoopNet was founded out here and that\u2019s where a good bit of the CoStar data comes from, my experience might be a little skewed", "replies": [{"id": "h531fbw", "text": "Ah ok. I'm curious to see what their government databases look like now!  I've done this in Miami, NYC, Chicago, philly, etc. But for some reason never there", "replies": [], "depth": 4}], "depth": 3}, {"id": "h53y147", "text": "Does NJ have a similar program?", "replies": [{"id": "h54967k", "text": "I personally have not worked in NJ, but I am happy to look. \n\nSome searches I did for other regions included searching \"department of finance\" \"state\" and \"tax block/lot\"\n\nThat ended up uncovering the information I was looking for", "replies": [], "depth": 4}, {"id": "h549mzx", "text": "UPDATE:  nj.gov/transparency/property/\n\nShould be a start. Dont see any contact info, but it's all about cross referencing multiple sources", "replies": [{"id": "h55fbl5", "text": "Thanks!", "replies": [], "depth": 5}], "depth": 4}], "depth": 3}], "depth": 2}], "depth": 1}, {"id": "h55ntrz", "text": "$700 per month for me after a slight discount. They give you a users to start. It was decent for prospecting and email lists, but that\u2019s it.", "replies": [], "depth": 1}, {"id": "h58on2q", "text": "As others are saying it\u2019s really good at getting owner data, but I use it in combination with costar.", "replies": [], "depth": 1}, {"id": "h75e9sn", "text": "We use it gather building information (when it was built, size, etc) in a few markets. We get that information for about 10k, access to 150k buildings.", "replies": [], "depth": 1}]