I've always found the Museum of Modern Art to be fairly badly used, in that they choose some rather poor exhibitions to stage there.\n\nLast time I went it was the Edward Munch exhibition, which largely consisted of entire rooms holding the same image (predominantly the Scream) in a variety of different colour prints and not many (if any at all) original and finished pieces of art.\n\nI was more interested in the Gallery's more permanent exhibits, such as the giant metallic creature in the cafeteria.\n\nExhibits tend to price in the range of \u00a37-10, which, depending on the exhibition can seem reasonable or not, especially considering the more substantial National and Portrait Galleries are free.\n\nIt's a shame because the venue is nice, set in some lovely surrounding grounds and just a little out of town. Just wish they would up the ante a little.\n\nUntil a decent exhibition comes along, I'd recommend the Portrait Gallery over this.