user1435: I am beginner in chess but in my mind one question overcome, Does white have an advantage with the first move?

user35: Generally white is considered to have a slight advantage, and black needs to "equalize". However there are also voices (e.g. András Adorján with his "Black is OK" books) who challenge this view and attribute the results of black to a mix of inferior, too passive openings ("defences") for black and the power of "self-fulfilling prophecies". 
Personally I think the truth lies in the middle: White has a slight edge, but it would be smaller if players with black would be more confident and aggressive.

user657: The advantage of the first move gets more significant as you go up the rating scale. At the GM level, white typically scores about 56% to black's 44%.
I would expect as you go down the rating tree the advantage of the first move would disappear, as lower rated players typically need a larger advantage in order to convert it to a win, and also lower rated players are more prone to making mistakes that give away the advantage (or the game).
By the time you reach "normal" club-level players, I'd be surprised if the advantage of the first move was more significant than the probability of a an error giving away the game.

user1382: It really depends on what level of chess you're looking at. At the amateur level (<2200), I would hypothesize that white's supposed "first-move advantage" is relatively insignificant. However, it's quite evident at the higher levels that white has an advantage when playing mainstream openings - please reference the Shredder Opening Database for the details of individual moves. For example, out of the 242,221 Grandmaster games where White has played 1. e4, he has scored 54.5%. 
Chess players and theorists generally agree that White has a certain first-move advantage. The page on Wikipedia is certainly a fascinating read.

1435: <p>I am beginner in chess but in my mind one question overcome, Does white have an advantage with the first move?</p>
 35: <p>Generally white is considered to have a slight advantage, and black needs to "equalize". However there are also voices (e.g. András Adorján with his "Black is OK" books) who challenge this view and attribute the results of black to a mix of inferior, too passive openings ("defences") for black and the power of "self-fulfilling prophecies". </p>

<p>Personally I think the truth lies in the middle: White <em>has</em> a slight edge, but it would be smaller if players with black would be more confident and aggressive.</p>
 657: <p>The advantage of the first move gets more significant as you go up the rating scale. At the GM level, white typically scores about 56% to black's 44%.</p>

<p>I would expect as you go down the rating tree the advantage of the first move would disappear, as lower rated players typically need a larger advantage in order to convert it to a win, and also lower rated players are more prone to making mistakes that give away the advantage (or the game).</p>

<p>By the time you reach "normal" club-level players, I'd be surprised if the advantage of the first move was more significant than the probability of a an error giving away the game.</p>
 1382: <p>It really depends on what level of chess you're looking at. At the amateur level (&lt;2200), I would hypothesize that white's supposed "first-move advantage" is relatively insignificant. However, it's quite evident at the higher levels that white has an advantage when playing mainstream openings - please reference the <a href="http://www.shredderchess.com/online-chess/online-databases/opening-database.html" rel="nofollow">Shredder Opening Database</a> for the details of individual moves. For example, out of the 242,221 Grandmaster games where White has played <code>1. e4</code>, he has scored 54.5%. </p>

<p>Chess players and theorists generally agree that White has a certain first-move advantage. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-move_advantage_in_chess" rel="nofollow">page on Wikipedia</a> is certainly a fascinating read.</p>
