user20350: I would like to know if it's possible to get a rough idea of what my ELO is and how accurate those methods are.
For example, I did one of those "chess tests" and the results it gave me didn't quite seem right. I did the one on ELOMeter.net, and got the following:

Based on your move choices, our estimate of your Elo rating is 1464,
with a 95% confidence interval of [1302...1627].

That doesn't sound right. Based on how things have been going for me on chess.com, it seems very high. Believe me, I'd LIKE to be higher on the ELO scale. But the result I got from ELOMeter.net didn't seem right.
If I were to look at the United States Chess Federation rankings, I'd probably rate myself roughly either a G (600–799) or an F (800-999).

user12873: Already posted this link as a comment, but since this question isn't closed anymore I'll leave it in an answer too:
ethanlebowitz.github.io/RatingConverter/index.html
Does a decent job of approximating what someone's FIDE rating would be, given their Lichess ratings. You mentioned chess.com though, so not sure if you also play on Lichess.

user31834: Puzzles are not very good for getting a close approximation of your ELO, for a variety of reasons. The  are some websites that allow you to play games with a computer rated at a certain ELO, playing a few of these games (with the clock, and in proper match conditions) can help get a reasonable estimate of your ELO. Obviously the more games you play the better an estimate you can get. For instance if you can consistently beat a computer rated at 1300 ELO but consistently lose to a computer rated 1500 ELO, you’d know your somewhere around the 1400 mark.

user27380: If you have online chess ratings, you can get a very rough estimate here, but you should expect that a significant deviation to your real rating is possible (+-200).

user11144: Puzzles are a notoriously bad estimator for ELO. (Tried myself, wild fluctuations.) You could run whole games by you through an engine (moar input => moar output) and check the accuracy of your moves. There is a whole scientific paper dedicated to how valid this method is.

20350: <p>I would like to know if it's possible to get a rough idea of what my ELO is and how accurate those methods are.</p>
<p>For example, I did one of those &quot;chess tests&quot; and the results it gave me didn't quite seem right. I did the one on ELOMeter.net, and got the following:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Based on your move choices, our estimate of your Elo rating is 1464,
with a 95% confidence interval of [1302...1627].</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That doesn't sound right. Based on how things have been going for me on chess.com, it seems very high. Believe me, I'd LIKE to be higher on the ELO scale. But the result I got from ELOMeter.net didn't seem right.</p>
<p>If I were to look at the United States Chess Federation rankings, I'd probably rate myself roughly either a G (600–799) or an F (800-999).</p>
 12873: <p>Already posted this link as a comment, but since this question isn't closed anymore I'll leave it in an answer too:</p>
<p>ethanlebowitz.github.io/RatingConverter/index.html</p>
<p>Does a decent job of approximating what someone's FIDE rating would be, given their Lichess ratings. You mentioned chess.com though, so not sure if you also play on Lichess.</p>
 31834: <p>Puzzles are not very good for getting a close approximation of your ELO, for a variety of reasons. The  are some websites that allow you to play games with a computer rated at a certain ELO, playing a few of these games (with the clock, and in proper match conditions) can help get a reasonable estimate of your ELO. Obviously the more games you play the better an estimate you can get. For instance if you can consistently beat a computer rated at 1300 ELO but consistently lose to a computer rated 1500 ELO, you’d know your somewhere around the 1400 mark.</p>
 27380: <p>If you have online chess ratings, you can get a very rough estimate <a href="https://chessgoals.com/rating-comparison/" rel="noreferrer">here</a>, but you should expect that a significant deviation to your real rating is possible (+-200).</p>
 11144: <p>Puzzles are a notoriously bad estimator for ELO. (Tried myself, wild fluctuations.) You could run whole games by you through an engine (moar input =&gt; moar output) and check the accuracy of your moves. There is a <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221606300_Intrinsic_Chess_Ratings" rel="noreferrer">whole scientific paper</a> dedicated to how valid this method is.</p>
