user16923: I recently bought a set of wooden chess pieces, which I liked for its simplicity.
I'm not sure, however, which one is supposed to be the king and which one is supposed to be the queen.
I would say that the one with the spike is the queen, and the one more flat is the king. Am I right, or is it the opposite?


user19348: It's very simple. The piece with the pointy top is the "King". As such, the other piece is the "Queen" by default.

user15415: The piece on the right clearly reminds me of kings from German "Bundesform" piece sets, which are still occasionally used in Germany, although very rarely in tournament play. The left piece does not exactly look like a "Bundesform" queen, but it is still somehow similar.

user19347: It doesn't matter.
As long as you and your opponent are in agreement about which one is the king and which one is the queen,  it doesn't really matter what they were "supposed" to be. 
That said, if they're easy to mistake, then you run the risk of someone making a misplay because they got confused about which one is which.  Which would be unfortunate.    If you and your opponent have different intuition about which one "looks" like the king, one of you will be disadvantaged by the arrangement you choose, no matter what you choose. So talk things over with your opponent before the match begins. 

user19343: At first glance, the taller piece with skinnier top would appear to be the King while the shorter, rounder piece would appear to be the Queen.
There are a few reasons why this would appear to be the case.
 The King often has a cross on top and the taller piece with the spike appears to more closely resemble that than the shorter piece, and in some sets the King looks like a larger bishop and the taller piece more closely resembles that, too.
 The Queen in some sets looks like a larger rook and the shorter, rounder piece more closely resembles a rook than the other piece.
Note: re prior commenter: the bundesform chess sets I have seen are even simpler in design than this and while some have tall bishops, the King is still taller than the Queen

user15989: In general, a chess set has the king as the tallest piece, followed by queen, bishop, knight, rook and pawn in that order. Notice in the starting position how the piece height decreases smoothly from the centre to the edge. (Also, when buying a chess set, usually the height of the king is given as a guide to the size of the chessmen.)
Thus I would say the king is the taller of the two pieces, which from your picture looks to be the one with the spike on the left.
This ordering of height may not hold for particularly ornate decorative sets.
However, if you're not going to use the set to play against other people in tournaments (where usually Staunton pieces are mandated anyway), the correct answer would probably be: the king is whichever piece you think it is.

16923: <p>I recently bought a set of wooden chess pieces, which I liked for its simplicity.</p>

<p>I'm not sure, however, which one is supposed to be the king and which one is supposed to be the queen.</p>

<p>I would say that the one with the spike is the queen, and the one more flat is the king. Am I right, or is it the opposite?</p>

<p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/b10BM.jpg" alt="Chess pieces, one with a pointed crown on the left, and one with a rounded crown on the right"></p>
 19348: <p>It's very simple. The piece with the pointy top is the "King". As such, the other piece is the "Queen" by default.</p>
 15415: <p>The piece on the right clearly reminds me of kings from <a href="http://www.chess-museum.com/german-sets.html" rel="noreferrer">German "Bundesform"</a> piece sets, which are still occasionally used in Germany, although very rarely in tournament play. The left piece does not exactly look like a "Bundesform" queen, but it is still somehow similar.</p>
 19347: <h2>It doesn't matter.</h2>

<p>As long as you and your opponent are in agreement about which one is the king and which one is the queen,  it doesn't really matter what they were "supposed" to be. </p>

<p>That said, if they're easy to mistake, then you run the risk of someone making a misplay because they got confused about which one is which.  Which would be unfortunate.    If you and your opponent have different intuition about which one "looks" like the king, <em>one</em> of you will be disadvantaged by the arrangement you choose, no matter what you choose. So talk things over with your opponent before the match begins. </p>
 19343: <p>At first glance, the taller piece with skinnier top would appear to be the King while the shorter, rounder piece would appear to be the Queen.</p>

<p>There are a few reasons why this would appear to be the case.
 The King often has a cross on top and the taller piece with the spike appears to more closely resemble that than the shorter piece, and in some sets the King looks like a larger bishop and the taller piece more closely resembles that, too.
 The Queen in some sets looks like a larger rook and the shorter, rounder piece more closely resembles a rook than the other piece.</p>

<p>Note: re prior commenter: the bundesform chess sets I have seen are even simpler in design than this and while some have tall bishops, the King is still taller than the Queen</p>
 15989: <p>In general, a chess set has the king as the tallest piece, followed by queen, bishop, knight, rook and pawn in that order. Notice in the starting position how the piece height decreases smoothly from the centre to the edge. (Also, when buying a chess set, usually the height of the king is given as a guide to the size of the chessmen.)</p>

<p>Thus I would say the king is the taller of the two pieces, which from your picture looks to be the one with the spike on the left.</p>

<p>This ordering of height may not hold for particularly ornate decorative sets.</p>

<p>However, if you're not going to use the set to play against other people in tournaments (where usually Staunton pieces are mandated anyway), the correct answer would probably be: the king is whichever piece you think it is.</p>
