user4594: Consider the following line
[FEN ""]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Ba6 5.b3 Bb4+ (5... Be7) 6.Bd2 Be7 (6... Bxd2+)

Black hardly ever plays 5... Be7 directly (I could only find one such game), but rather plays the above sequence (this sequence happens 1573 times).  The variation 6... Bxd2+ happens 54 times.
This suggests that it is better for black if white has the Bishop on d2.  But I cannot see why this is.

user7497: According to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen%27s_Indian_Defense

"The effect of Black's check has been to lure White's bishop to c3 where it blocks the c-file. 
  This, the current main line of the Queen's Indian, is considered equal by theory and became a frequent guest in grandmaster praxis in the 1980s."

You should be able to get some understanding from this page. Then look at  those games you found.

user7473: White's intended setup involves fianchettoing his dark-squared bishop on b2. The "free move" 6. Bd2 brings more harm than good:

Transferring the bishop onto the long diagonal, if white wishes to, will still take another move (i.e. Bd2-c3), but more importantly, if he does, the bishop on c3 takes away the square for the knight, which is preferred in many lines.
In many lines, white wants to play d5, aiming for a Benoni-like structure (which is bad for black in these cases); the bishop on d2 blocks the queen's defence of the d5 square, making this push harder to achieve.

For case 1: consider the "old" line, and compare this to a possible variation that arises after giving the check on move 5 instead:
[FEN ""]
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 (4... Ba6 5. b3 Bb4+ 6. Bd2 Be7 7. Bg2 Bb7 8. O-O O-O 9. Nc3) Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 Ne4 8. Qc2 Nxc3 9. Qxc3 f5 10. b3 Bf6 11. Bb2

Clearly, in this case, having the bishop on d2 is worse than having it on c1!
Long story short: the check disrupts white's set-up.

4594: <p>Consider the following line</p>

<pre><code>[FEN ""]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Ba6 5.b3 Bb4+ (5... Be7) 6.Bd2 Be7 (6... Bxd2+)
</code></pre>

<p>Black hardly ever plays 5... Be7 directly (I could only find one such game), but rather plays the above sequence (this sequence happens 1573 times).  The variation 6... Bxd2+ happens 54 times.</p>

<p>This suggests that it is better for black if white has the Bishop on d2.  But I cannot see why this is.</p>
 7497: <p>According to Wikipedia: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen%27s_Indian_Defense" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen%27s_Indian_Defense</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"The effect of Black's check has been to lure White's bishop to c3 where it blocks the c-file. 
  This, the current main line of the Queen's Indian, is considered equal by theory and became a frequent guest in grandmaster praxis in the 1980s."<br></p>
</blockquote>

<p>You should be able to get some understanding from this page. Then look at  those games you found.</p>
 7473: <p>White's intended setup involves fianchettoing his dark-squared bishop on b2. The "free move" 6. Bd2 brings more harm than good:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Transferring the bishop onto the long diagonal, if white wishes to, will still take another move (i.e. Bd2-c3), but more importantly, if he does, the bishop on c3 takes away the square for the knight, which is preferred in many lines.</p></li>
<li><p>In many lines, white wants to play d5, aiming for a Benoni-like structure (which is bad for black in these cases); the bishop on d2 blocks the queen's defence of the d5 square, making this push harder to achieve.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>For case 1: consider the "old" line, and compare this to a possible variation that arises after giving the check on move 5 instead:</p>

<pre><code>[FEN ""]
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 (4... Ba6 5. b3 Bb4+ 6. Bd2 Be7 7. Bg2 Bb7 8. O-O O-O 9. Nc3) Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 Ne4 8. Qc2 Nxc3 9. Qxc3 f5 10. b3 Bf6 11. Bb2
</code></pre>

<p>Clearly, in this case, having the bishop on d2 is worse than having it on c1!</p>

<p>Long story short: the check disrupts white's set-up.</p>
