user3131: I always play both blitz and standard time control chess games. But in blitz I make a lot of mistakes and I'm not able to find a lot of good and tactical moves whereas in standard time chess format I can play better.  
I think blitz is only for Applying our chess skills and only standard time control chess will help more to improve our chess skills.(I'm not against blitz :D)

Will blitz help more than standard time control to improve my chess skills?
If yes how? If No when and for what purpose should i play blitz ?

Thanks in Advance.

user291: 
Will blitz help more than standard time control to improve my chess skills?

No.

If No when and for what purpose should i play blitz?

1) To learn openings. After every blitz game you play (especially if it is online and automatically recorded) look up the opening and see if you made a mistake, and what you should have done instead. Ideally you will have some way to store and remember this information as well.
2) To have fun because it will keep you motivated to improve at chess.

user3872: standard time controls will help more than blitz, however, the inability for blitz to improve play has been exaggerated. Blitz can help you practice your openings. Blitz can help you spot simple tactics. Blitz can help you avoid hanging pieces. Blitz can help players familiarize with how pieces move. Blitz can help you cope under time pressure situations. Of course, standard time controls have their advantages that outweigh the benefits of blitz, but for beginners, it is not too bad play blitz. I almost exclusively played bullet and blitz chess and became 1800 uscf ( I also studied from youtube). I got stagnated however, and it was standard time controls that got me out of 1800 and improve.

user2429: 
Will blitz help more than standard time control to improve my chess
  skills?

No. Standard time control chess always helps more to improve your game than blitz chess because in standard chess you spend more time analyzing the game. 
Chess is a game of intelligence but even more so of knowledge. The more (structures, endgames, openings, etc.) you know, the better you are. 

To make a rather primitive classification, the average grandmaster
  knows about 1,500 - 2,000 typical positions, including the opening,
  possible middlegame plans, and some outlines of endgame. Super GMs,
  like Kramnik or Anand, have a wider and deeper knowledge. As for
  Kasparov, his knowledge is truly head-spinning, I guess, his number of
  positions might exceed 10,000. Garry's memory is phenomenal! I think
  it even impedes him during the game. - Valeri Tsaturian

Knowledge is hardly acquired in 3-5 minutes (blitz) and even if it is, it is quickly forgotten. To gain chess knowledge, you need to spend more time studying the game. 
The more time you spend studying a position, the more you understand it, the better you remember it, and the more insights you gain into it. It also helps you correct your faulty decisions in the post-game analysis, because, if you're wrong, it can show you to what extent you're wrong in your judgment of certain positions. 
For example, I played a game recently in standard time control and in one position, my opponent was really surprised that I didn't capture his bishop with my knight. During the game, I thought that the trade of bishop for knight wouldn't help me in that position, but in the post-game analysis, my opponent proved me wrong and demonstrated how it was good for me. I went home and analyzed with a computer and found that my opponent was right. If this had been just a blitz game, I could have just excused myself saying "well, I didn't have enough time to consider the consequences of that" and thereby prevented myself from recognizing this flaw in my own knowledge. 

If No when and for what purpose should i play blitz?

You can play blitz to
1) Enjoy yourself.
2) Check your opening preparation. 
3) Develop a rough understanding of certain types of positions with the intention of analyzing them in depth later. This third point is crucial, because it is the best way to use a blitz game. You may not learn much during and immediately after the game, but if you analyze your blitz games, you will still learn a lot. 

3131: <p>I always play both blitz and standard time control chess games. But in blitz I make a lot of mistakes and I'm not able to find a lot of good and tactical moves whereas in standard time chess format I can play better.  </p>

<p>I think <strong>blitz</strong> is only for <strong>Applying our chess skills</strong> and only <strong>standard time control</strong> chess will help more to <strong>improve our chess skills</strong>.(I'm not against blitz :D)</p>

<ul>
<li>Will blitz help more than standard time control to improve my chess skills?</li>
<li>If yes how? If No when and for what purpose should i play blitz ?</li>
</ul>

<p>Thanks in Advance.</p>
 291: <blockquote>
  <p>Will blitz help more than standard time control to improve my chess skills?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>No.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>If No when and for what purpose should i play blitz?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>1) To learn openings. After every blitz game you play (especially if it is online and automatically recorded) look up the opening and see if you made a mistake, and what you should have done instead. Ideally you will have some way to store and remember this information as well.</p>

<p>2) To have fun because it will keep you motivated to improve at chess.</p>
 3872: <p>standard time controls will help more than blitz, however, the inability for blitz to improve play has been exaggerated. Blitz can help you practice your openings. Blitz can help you spot simple tactics. Blitz can help you avoid hanging pieces. Blitz can help players familiarize with how pieces move. Blitz can help you cope under time pressure situations. Of course, standard time controls have their advantages that outweigh the benefits of blitz, but for beginners, it is not too bad play blitz. I almost exclusively played bullet and blitz chess and became 1800 uscf ( I also studied from youtube). I got stagnated however, and it was standard time controls that got me out of 1800 and improve.</p>
 2429: <blockquote>
  <p>Will blitz help more than standard time control to improve my chess
  skills?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>No. <strong>Standard time control chess always helps more to improve your game than blitz chess</strong> because in standard chess you spend more time analyzing the game. </p>

<p>Chess is a game of intelligence but even more so of <strong>knowledge</strong>. The more (structures, endgames, openings, etc.) you know, the better you are. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>To make a rather primitive classification, the average grandmaster
  knows about 1,500 - 2,000 typical positions, including the opening,
  possible middlegame plans, and some outlines of endgame. Super GMs,
  like Kramnik or Anand, have a wider and deeper knowledge. As for
  <strong>Kasparov</strong>, his knowledge is truly head-spinning, I guess, his number of
  positions might exceed <strong>10,000</strong>. Garry's memory is phenomenal! I think
  it even impedes him during the game. - Valeri Tsaturian</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Knowledge is hardly acquired in 3-5 minutes (blitz) and even if it is, it is quickly forgotten. To gain chess knowledge, you need to spend more <strong>time</strong> studying the game. </p>

<p>The more <strong>time</strong> you spend studying a position, the more you <strong>understand</strong> it, the better you <strong>remember</strong> it, and the more <strong>insights</strong> you gain into it. It also helps you correct your faulty decisions in the post-game analysis, because, if you're wrong, it can show you to what extent you're wrong in your <strong>judgment</strong> of certain positions. </p>

<p>For example, I played a game recently in standard time control and in one position, my opponent was really surprised that I didn't capture his bishop with my knight. During the game, I thought that the trade of bishop for knight wouldn't help me in that position, but in the post-game analysis, my opponent proved me wrong and demonstrated how it was good for me. I went home and analyzed with a computer and found that my opponent was right. If this had been just a blitz game, I could have just excused myself saying "well, I didn't have enough time to consider the consequences of that" and thereby prevented myself from recognizing this flaw in my own knowledge. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>If No when and for what purpose should i play blitz?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You can play blitz to</p>

<p>1) Enjoy yourself.</p>

<p>2) Check your opening preparation. </p>

<p>3) Develop a rough understanding of certain types of positions <strong>with the intention of analyzing them in depth later</strong>. This third point is crucial, because it is the best way to use a blitz game. You may not learn much during and immediately after the game, but if you analyze your blitz games, you will still learn a lot. </p>
