user28052: Elo rating only makes sense based on the population of players. So I wonder, has Stockfish's Elo been calculated in a pool including humans or human-calibrated engines?
Related: How accurate are chess engine ratings?

user15223: Stockfish 15 is about 3620 rating on the FIDE scale. See the ratings in TCEC Cup 10 which played with a Stockfish that is slightly stronger than Stockfish 15.)
We can take the TCEC ratings as "FIDE ratings" because some time ago there was an effort to calibrate the TCEC ratings as such. They did this by benchmarking against Fritz in Bahrain, which was assigned Kramnik's elo rating at the time he played (and drew) that man vs. machine match.
Do remember that the rating of any engine compared to a human will depend on things like the hardware used, the time control, and so on. Ratings against other engines are straightforward in comparison.

28052: <p>Elo rating only makes sense based on the population of players. So I wonder, has Stockfish's Elo been calculated in a pool including humans or human-calibrated engines?</p>
<p>Related: <a href="https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/18893/how-accurate-are-chess-engine-ratings">How accurate are chess engine ratings?</a></p>
 15223: <p>Stockfish 15 is about 3620 rating on the FIDE scale. See the ratings in <a href="https://tcec-chess.com/#game=1&amp;round=fl&amp;season=cup10" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TCEC Cup 10</a> which played with a Stockfish that is <a href="https://nextchessmove.com/dev-builds" rel="nofollow noreferrer">slightly stronger than Stockfish 15</a>.)</p>
<p>We can take the TCEC ratings as &quot;FIDE ratings&quot; because some time ago there was an effort to calibrate the TCEC ratings as such. They did this by benchmarking against Fritz in Bahrain, which was assigned Kramnik's elo rating at the time he played (and drew) that man vs. machine match.</p>
<p>Do remember that the rating of any engine compared to a human will depend on things like the hardware used, the time control, and so on. Ratings against other engines are straightforward in comparison.</p>
