user2329: First a bit of background:
I really like playing the Sicilian Defense as Black and it is my preferred choice of action against 1. e4. I prefer the Open Sicilian with Dragon and Najdorf being my favourite variations.
Now to the question itself:
At my skill level my opponents often play the following variation:
[FEN ""]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bc4!?

Here I find 3. Bc4 to be a sub-optimal move and I usually continue with my plan and go for the Dragon variation, since I don't think a6 achieves much, at this point.
On the other hand he is clearly aiming at f7 and moves like Nf6 and g6 do nothing to counter his threat.
What is your evaluation on this opening position? Can you give me some pointers at what is the best way to exploit White's last move?
Thanks!

user1201: This variation is uncommon, but it's certainly not unheard of. I don't know of a particular name for it, and rather than get bogged down in the endlessly-analyzed lines, let's just take a quick, objective look at what this move accomplishes, and what it gives up.
Advantages

3.Bc4 aims, as you said, at the f7 pawn. If allowed to remain on the diagonal, this Bishop could provide pressure against the Black kingside in the midgame.
It develops the Bishop quickly, allowing White to castle kingside immediately if he so chooses.
It may avoid trading away the Bishop for Black's QN or QB like we see in the Canal-Sokolsky Attack (3.Bb5+) or other variations where White's KB lands on b5. 
It grants White some additional influence over the light central squares weakened by Black's first two moves (c5 and e6).

Drawbacks

By developing to c4 so early, this move appears to invite Black to play ...e6, immediately limiting the Bishop's scope and possibly requiring a future relocation.
On c4, the Bishop is vulnerable to space-gaining queenside maneuvers via ...a6 and ...b5, or ...Nc6-a5.
This move does not provide any immediate threats, so Black is free to continue to choose a system as he pleases.

Ideas
Looking at these two lists, a picture begins to form of the themes for both sides. 
White will likely try to hold onto this Bishop, to assist in his kingside operations. He will likely play 4.d3 to keep the position closed, and to cement his hold on the light central squares. 
Meanwhile, Black may use the Bishop's placement as a convenient way to make his thematic land grabs on the queenside. Black is not compelled to respond in any particular way, though my database suggests that a Dragon-like setup with ...Nf6, ...Nc6, ...g6, ...Bg7 is slightly more popular in this line than the ...e6 variants.
[FEN "r1bq1rk1/pp2ppbp/2np1np1/2p5/4P3/1BPP1N2/PP3PPP/RNBQ1RK1 w - -"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 Nc6 5. c3 g6 6. O-O Bg7 7. Bb3 O-O


Conclusion
This third move choice from White, while unusual, does not seem to be downright inferior. It suggests a tense, positional midgame, with each side operating on his better flank. Good luck!

2329: <p><strong>First a bit of background:</strong></p>

<p>I really like playing the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicilian_Defence" rel="nofollow">Sicilian Defense</a> as Black and it is my preferred choice of action against <code>1. e4</code>. I prefer the <code>Open Sicilian</code> with <code>Dragon</code> and <code>Najdorf</code> being my favourite variations.</p>

<p><strong>Now to the question itself:</strong></p>

<p>At my skill level my opponents often play the following variation:</p>

<pre><code>[FEN ""]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bc4!?
</code></pre>

<p>Here I find <code>3. Bc4</code> to be a sub-optimal move and I usually continue with my plan and go for the Dragon variation, since I don't think <code>a6</code> achieves much, at this point.</p>

<p>On the other hand he is clearly aiming at <code>f7</code> and moves like <code>Nf6</code> and <code>g6</code> do nothing to counter his threat.</p>

<p>What is your evaluation on this opening position? Can you give me some pointers at what is the best way to exploit White's last move?</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>
 1201: <p>This variation is uncommon, but it's certainly not unheard of. I don't know of a particular name for it, and rather than get bogged down in the endlessly-analyzed lines, let's just take a quick, objective look at what this move accomplishes, and what it gives up.</p>

<h2>Advantages</h2>

<ul>
<li><code>3.Bc4</code> aims, as you said, at the <code>f7</code> pawn. If allowed to remain on the diagonal, this Bishop could provide pressure against the Black kingside in the midgame.</li>
<li>It develops the Bishop quickly, allowing White to castle kingside immediately if he so chooses.</li>
<li>It may avoid trading away the Bishop for Black's QN or QB like we see in the Canal-Sokolsky Attack (<code>3.Bb5+</code>) or other variations where White's KB lands on <code>b5</code>. </li>
<li>It grants White some additional influence over the light central squares weakened by Black's first two moves (<code>c5</code> and <code>e6</code>).</li>
</ul>

<h2>Drawbacks</h2>

<ul>
<li>By developing to <code>c4</code> so early, this move appears to invite Black to play <code>...e6</code>, immediately limiting the Bishop's scope and possibly requiring a future relocation.</li>
<li>On <code>c4</code>, the Bishop is vulnerable to space-gaining queenside maneuvers via <code>...a6</code> and <code>...b5</code>, or <code>...Nc6-a5</code>.</li>
<li>This move does not provide any immediate threats, so Black is free to continue to choose a system as he pleases.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Ideas</h2>

<p>Looking at these two lists, a picture begins to form of the themes for both sides. </p>

<p><strong>White</strong> will likely try to hold onto this Bishop, to assist in his kingside operations. He will likely play <code>4.d3</code> to keep the position closed, and to cement his hold on the light central squares. </p>

<p>Meanwhile, <strong>Black</strong> may use the Bishop's placement as a convenient way to make his thematic land grabs on the queenside. Black is not compelled to respond in any particular way, though my database suggests that a Dragon-like setup with <code>...Nf6, ...Nc6, ...g6, ...Bg7</code> is slightly more popular in this line than the <code>...e6</code> variants.</p>

<pre><code>[FEN "r1bq1rk1/pp2ppbp/2np1np1/2p5/4P3/1BPP1N2/PP3PPP/RNBQ1RK1 w - -"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d3 Nc6 5. c3 g6 6. O-O Bg7 7. Bb3 O-O
</code></pre>

<hr>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>This third move choice from White, while unusual, does not seem to be downright inferior. It suggests a tense, positional midgame, with each side operating on his better flank. Good luck!</p>
