The management of displaced intracapsular hip fracture in a young patient is surgical and should be done early to reduce the risk of avascular necrosis of the hip. They are not talking about life threatening enough to postpone a necessary surgical procedure or to consider an external fixator following a damage containment policy so we discard option 3. This is a 25 year old patient so we have to pursue reduction and fixation avoiding replacement options (we discard option 2 and 4).

The management of displaced intracapsular hip fracture in a young patient is surgical and should be done early to reduce the risk of avascular necrosis of the hip. They are not talking about life threatening enough to postpone a necessary surgical procedure or to consider an external fixator following a damage containment policy so we [HIDDEN]. This is a 25 year old patient so we have to pursue reduction and fixation avoiding replacement options (we [HIDDEN]).

25-year-old patient, who suffers a motorcycle accident on a Friday night. He is taken to the emergency room and diagnosed with abdominal trauma (negative echo-fast), mild head trauma (Glasgow = 14) and a displaced intracapsular fracture of the right hip. Hemodynamically she is stable, what would be the treatment of choice?

Reduction, open if necessary, and osteosynthesis of the fracture in the first 24-36 hours.

Total hip resurfacing arthroplasty on Monday on a scheduled basis.

Wait for improvement of the cranial trauma and schedule the following week a scheduled surgery consisting of reduction and osteosynthesis of the fracture.

Given the risk of non-union of these types of fracture, I would perform an emergency bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty.

[Femoral neck fractures in patients over 50 years old].

Despite many papers and instructional course lectures, therapeutic guidelines are not clearly defined about treatment of femoral neck fractures. The aim of this multicentric French symposium was to prospectively study the results of current therapeutic options in order to propose scientifically proven options. Three prospective studies were carried out in order to answer to these questions: (1) is it possible with anatomical reduction and stable fixation to lower the non union and osteonecrosis rate? (2) is functional treatment of Garden 1 fractures successful in more than 65 years patients? (3) what criteria are useful to choose the kind of arthroplasty for more than 65 years patients? For the 64 patients between 50 and 65 years old included in the first study, 44 ORIF and 17 prostheses were performed. No open reduction was performed in this series despite a 34% malreduction rate. The risk for displacement after functional treatment of Garden 1 fractures is 31%. For patients over 65 years old, almost fractures are treated in this series by an arthroplasty. The one-year mortality rate after displaced femoral neck fracture was 17%. Functional results were better in total hip prosthesis group than in bipolar or unipolar group. Non cemented stems were not safer than cemented ones in frail patients. For young patients, ORIF should be the treatment of choice: the initial displacement and its effects on the femoral head vascularisation, the quality of reduction and fixation are the two most significant factors for good outcome. For Garden 1, fractures in patients 65 years old or more, it is proposed to performed an internal fixation despite in two thirds of the cases, it should be unnecessary because non identification of predictive factors of failure. For patients over 65 years old, the type of arthroplasty to perform in displaced fractures is to be chosen according to the preoperative mobility and comorbidities. Because of acetabular erosion with long-term follow-up, it is clearly indicated to perform total hip replacement for patients with life expectancy of 10 years or more. For frail patients, unipolar arthroplasty is the best option. The place for bipolar or uncemented implants is not yet well-defined and more prospective trials are needed. In this multicentric study, results appear quite different in terms of mortality, or functional status. These differences seem to be related to technical choice, geriatric care, nutritional consideration or surgical organisation, all factors that may be of major importance for prognostic.

Surgical treatment outcome evaluation of hip joint acetabular fracture.

Since November 1989 till the end of 2007 year we have been operatively treating 752 of acetabular hip fractures. We have analised 750 operated patients, two patients bilateral fractures. The follow up span lasts from 2 till 20 years. The age of treated patients is from 14 till 79 years old. These fractures were divided into those operated to 21 days after trauma--569 operated acetabulum. And those operated after 21 days after trauma--183 patients with the delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures from 22 till 229 days. Both groups were provided detailed assesement. And next we compared fracture reduction of broken acetabulum and assesement of clinical treatment. The types of fractures were defined according to classification of Judet-Letournel. The criteria of fracture reduction due to Letournel. The clinical result was based on Merle d'Aubigne-Matta scale. In the group of treated patients till 3 weeks after trauma, we have received 83.8% of very good and good results, 6.9% fair results and 9.3% poor results. During fracture reduction: 75% very good, 4% in secondary joint congruence, 17.8% fair and 3.2% poor. After fair reduction there was always the right congrugence between the head and acetabulum. The displacements to 3 mm were left in more cases as a part after weight-bearing area. In trauma fracture trated after 3 weeks, the result was very good and good 66.1%, fair 14.8% and poor 19.1%. During fracture reduction: 49.7% very good, 4.4% secondary joint congruence, 32.8% fair and 13.1% poor. We have noticed the crucial corelation between fracture reduction and the final result of treatment. Additional traumae, especially head with long time loss of consciousness and the traumae of chest with insufficient breathing have indirect infulence on treatment results causing the longer operation waiting. The complexity fractures also indirectly influence on the result of treatment decreasing the chances on anathomical fracture reduction.

Displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit, older people: a randomised comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.

To compare internal fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for the management of displaced subcapital fracture of the hip in previously fit patients of 60 years or older. A prospective randomised clinical trial. This multicentre trial was carried out in 11 Scottish hospitals with acute orthopaedic trauma units. The participants were 298 previously fit patients of 60 years or older with displaced subcapital hip fractures. The three surgical interventions for comparison were reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total arthroplasty (total hip replacement). Participating surgeons elected to randomise patients either among all three types of operation (three-way randomisation) or just between fixation and hemiarthroplasty (two-way randomisation). Clinical outcomes were mortality rates, reoperation rates and the complication rates associated with each procedure. Functional outcome was measured using a hip specific questionnaire [Johanson Hip Rating Questionnaire (HRQ)] and a general health status questionnaire [EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)]. Economic analysis compared the costs in the randomised groups of hospital treatment for the initial and subsequent admissions for up to 2 years. Altogether, 207 patients were randomised among all three trial operations, and 91 between just fixation and bipolar hemiarthroplasty. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes, but confidence intervals (CIs) were wide. At 2 years fixation failure reached 37% among those allocated fixation and 39% had undergone further surgery. Further surgery rates after hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement were 5% and 9%, respectively. The group allocated fixation had significantly worse HRQ and EQ-5D scores than both arthroplasty groups at 4 and 12 months. At 24 months the results still favoured arthroplasty, but the overall HRQ and EQ-5D scores were no longer statistically significant. Total hip replacement had the best patient-assessed outcome scores. At 24 months the overall HRQ and EQ-5D scores for total hip replacement were significantly better than for hemiarthroplasty. The mean costs for the initial episode ranged from 6384 pounds Sterling for fixation to 7633 pounds Sterling for total hip replacement. The cost differences were largely due to differences in theatre costs and the cost of prostheses and hardware. The cumulative cost over 2 years of hemiarthroplasty was around 3000 pounds Sterling lower than for fixation (95% CI 1227 pounds Sterling to 7192 pounds Sterling). Compared with total hip replacement, both fixation and hemiarthroplasty were characterised by increased costs arising from hip-replacement admissions. When total (initial episode and subsequent hip-related admissions) hip-related costs are compared, total hip replacement conferred a cost advantage of around 3000 pounds Sterling per patient (versus hemiarthroplasty, 95% CI -pounds Sterling 1400 to 7420 pounds Sterling). In fit, older patients the results of the study show a clear advantage for arthroplasty over fixation; arthroplasty was more clinically effective and probably less costly over a 2-year period postsurgery. The results suggest that total hip replacement has long-term advantages over bipolar hemiarthroplasty, but these findings are less definite. This study provided support for the use of total hip replacement to treat displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit, older patients. A larger trial comparing total versus hemiarthroplasty for these fractures could help to verify these findings. It would also be useful to know whether the findings of this study apply to patients aged 60 years or less who are usually treated with reduction and fixation. A clinical trial comparing arthroplasty versus fixation in patients older than 40 years would be a logical extension of the current study.

Hip fracture

Surgery on the same day or day following the break is estimated to reduce postoperative mortality in people who are medically stable. Intracapsular fractures For low-grade fractures (Garden types 1 and 2), standard treatment is fixation of the fracture in situ with screws or a sliding screw/plate device. This treatment can also be offered for displaced fractures after the fracture has been reduced. Fractures managed by closed reduction can possibly be treated by percutaneously inserted screws. In elderly patients with displaced or intracapsular fractures many surgeons prefer to undertake a hemiarthroplasty, replacing the broken part of the bone with a metal implant. However, in elderly people who are medically well and still active, a total hip replacement may be indicated. Independently mobile older adults with hip fractures may benefit from a total hip replacement instead of hemiarthroplasty.

Changing the consultant on calls from a daily to weekly rotation system reduces time to theater for patients with hip fracture to improve quality of care: a retrospective study of 2 cohorts of patients presenting with hip fracture.

To determine whether changing the consultant on-call schedule resulted in a reduction in time to theater for patients presenting with a hip fracture. Guidelines in the United Kingdom state that patients presenting with a neck of femur fracture should ideally be operated on the day of or the day after admission. However, there is a best practice tariff in the United Kingdom persuading trusts to operate on elderly patients with hip fracture within 36 hours of admission. Differing formats of daily trauma operating lists and varying consultant on-call schedules have the potential to affect a trusts ability to successfully meet such demands. This study retrospectively analyzed whether changing the on-call schedule from a system where the on-call consultant is changed on a daily basis to one which changes weekly resulted in a reduction in time to theater for such patients and an increase in best practice tariffs paid. With the initial rotation system, the average time to theater for a fractured neck of femur was 44 hours 46 minutes, with 44.7% of patients having a time to surgery of less than 36 hours. Patients in the modified system underwent surgery with an average time to theater of 32 hours 19 minutes. In 71.7% of these patients, time to surgery was less than 36 hours. This study demonstrates that changing the schedule to permit a consultant to have a 7-day period of trauma on call at a time instead of only 1 day dramatically reduced the time to theater for patients with hip fracture. This significantly reduced the number of these cases done outside 36 hours and increased trust financial reward.

[Femoral neck fracture complicating orthopedic reposition of a dislocated hip: four cases].

Posterior dislocation of the femoral head with fracture is an exceptional hip injury. Emergency reduction is required. Reposition into the acetabular cavity of the dislocated femoral head may not be feasible. Irreducibility, instability, and more rarely accidental fracture of the femoral neck may also occur. We encountered this latter complication in four patients and report here its frequency and mechanism and propose preventive therapeutic measures. Seventy dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the hip were treated in our unit from March 1997 to February 2003. Among these cases, fourteen hip dislocations were complicated by femoral head fractures. Fracture of the femoral neck occurred during reduction in four. All four cases occurred in men, mean age 49.7 years, who were traffic accident victims (drivers or passengers). There were two Pipkin IV fracture-dislocations and two Pipkin II. The first reduction, achieved under general anesthesia in an emergency setting, was performed by an orthopedic surgeon in one patient and a general surgeon in three patients. Arthroplasty was used to treat the femoral neck fracture in three patients and pinning in one. We reviewed retrospectively the clinical and imaging data before and after reduction. Sub-capital fracture situated 4.0 cm (mean, range 3.5-4.5 cm) from the lesser trochanter occurred in all four cases. The head remained attached above and posteriorly to the acetabulum and was rotated less than 90 degrees . The fragment remaining in the acetabulum was displaced in two cases. In one patient, the fracture-dislocation of the head was associated with a fracture of the posterior rim of the acetabulum. This complication appears to result from an abrupt inappropriate reduction movement. The neck fracture would occur when capsulomuscular retention of the femoral head is associated with a head defect which catches on the rim of the acetabulum during the reduction movement. Neck fracture during reduction of traumatic hip dislocation is a serious complication. Prevention of this iatrogenic event requires a slow, progressive reduction limiting the trauma to a minimum; first intention open surgery may be required in selected cases.

[Hip fracture prosthetics in German trauma surgery. State of the art].

To improve patient safety and quality in joint arthroplasty a certification of arthroplasty centers (EndoCert©) and a German arthroplasty register (EPRD) have been implemented. This should guarantee a long-term improvement in documentation of arthroplasty in the future. Although the stages of operations in elective and trauma-associated joint arthroplasty are comparable, the surgical preconditions are often quite different. As required by the German Society of Trauma Surgery (DGU) this study analyzed the current situation with respect to the proportion of fracture-associated joint arthroplasties among the total volume carried out in Germany. A uniform internet-based questionnaire was sent to all listed trauma centers in Germany by the central office of the DGU. In addition any information regarding hip joint arthroplasty in 2011 was collected from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany. The questionnaire was returned by 324 (47 %) out of 690 of the trauma centers contacted. A total of 34,135 total hip arthroplasties (THA) and 26,753 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) were carried out in 2011 by these clinics. The absolute numbers for total endoprosthesis replacement cited by the trauma centers were 5718 THAs and 3829 TKAs. According to the data from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany 131,966 hip fractures were registered in 2011, including 69,582 femoral neck fractures (patient age >19 years) and 62,384 pertrochanteric fractures. From a total number of THAs of approximately 200,000 in Germany 47,695 (approximately 25 %) of these were associated with trauma. The data analyzed in this study and the results obtained from known literature sources demonstrate that THA is the most frequently performed procedure in trauma management of femoral neck fractures. Because of the ubiquitous and high incidence and the need for emergency treatment due to correlated risks and complications of delayed treatment, a high and standardized around the clock (24 h and 7 days a week) treatment option is mandatory. Long waiting times to treatment or transfer are inacceptable due to the increased mortality and complications.

[Case-control study on retaining articular capsule in the total hip replacement for old patients with unstable femoral neck fractures].

To study the effect of reserving articular capsule and traditional total hip replacement for old patients with unstable femoral neck fractures. From January 2010 to January 2015, one hundred and twenty patients with femoral neck fracture were retrospective review. Among them, sixty patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty reserving articular capsule, the others were treated with traditional total hip arthroplasty without reserving articular capsule. The gender of reserving articular capsule group and traditional group were (male/female) 34/26, 31/29 respectively; the age were (73.4±4.4), (72.3±4.1) years old, respectively. All patients were followed up for six months, the operation time, blood loss, length of stay, incidence of postoperative complications, incidence of postoperative hip dislocation and hip Harris score of the two groups were observed. The operative time of the reserving articular capsule group and traditional group were (95.68±6.90), (93.39±7.90) min (<iP0.05), and the blood loss were (998.78±15.20), (1 000.25±16.80) ml (<iP0.05). The time for hospital stay were (10.74±2.90), (13.25±2.20) days(<iP</i<0.05). The Harris scores were 58.53±5.10, 49.38±4.90(<iP</i<0.05) at 1 month after operation;91.08±7.50, 90.74±7.10(<iP0.05) at 6 months after operation. The method of reserving auricular capsule can not increase the operative time and the blood loss. But it has a favorable effect on decreasing the hospital stay, complication, the rate of early dislocation of the hip joint, improving the function of hip joint.

[Periprosthetic intertrochanteric fracture of the femur following articular resurfacing of the hip joint: treatment with lag screw osteosynthesis].

Improvements in implant design, material combination and operating instruments have led to an increased number of resurfacing arthroplasties of the hip joint especially in younger patients. Therefore, there is generally a higher risk of periprosthetic fractures even with this type of prosthesis. These fractures are divided into mainly iatrogenic fractures of the head/neck part of the femur and trochanteric fractures of the femur caused by trauma. Especially in the second group preservation of the prosthesis is much desired since the patient cohort is often very young and active. We report on a 31-year-old male patient who suffered an intertrochanteric fracture (classification AO 31 A2.1) after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip joint (McMinn BHR prosthesis). The patient was treated with 3 AO lag screws by the percutaneous technique following closed reduction. During follow-up 22 months after the operation the reduction was preserved and the fracture fully consolidated with a good range of motion of the hip joint. The Harris hip score gave a result of 97 points.

Post-operative mortality related to waiting time for hip fracture surgery.

In this retrospective study, we looked at the difference in 1 year mortality between two groups of patients who were operated for fracture of the hip. In cohort 1, 72% of the patients underwent surgery on the same day of admission, 15% of the patients were operated on the next day, the remaining 13% of the patients waited more than 1 day for surgery. The mean waiting time was 0.47 day. The percentage of patients who were operated on the same day of admission in cohort 2 was 18%. Sixty-nine percent of the patients had to wait 1 day before they were operated and 13% waited 2 days or more. The average waiting time was 1.01 days. The date of death for both the 166 patients in cohort 1 and the 197 patients in cohort 2, was obtained from the national mortality register and the 1 year mortality was calculated. These two groups of patients were from separate 12 month periods and the operations performed were either Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or hemiarthroplasty. The two groups were comparable in gender, age distribution and the types of operations. There was an increase of 10.1% (P<0.025, chi(2), 1 d.f.; 95% CI 1.7-18.5) in the mortality of patients in cohort 2. The mortality data of the two cohorts was also analysed after dividing the patients into three groups according to their age. A statistically significant increase in mortality of 16.9% in patients over 80 years of age in cohort 2 was found. The difference in mortality was still statistically significant when only patients over 80 years of age and having a DHS operation were compared. Total mortality at 2 years after the operation was the same in the two cohorts. Mortality rate for patients in cohort 2 was less than that for cohort 1 patients during the second post-operative year. This study shows that survival at 1 year is better when patients who are medically fit for surgery are operated on the same day of admission. This survival advantage is more pronounced for patients who are over 80 years of age.

[Osteosynthesis of intracapsular femoral neck fractures by dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation].

The treatment of femoral neck fractures shows a relatively high number of poor outcomes, usually due to late complications, such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head or pseudoarthrosis. The latter may develop when the osteosynthesis of osteoporotic bone fails. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate a group of patients treated by osteo- synthesis for intra-capsular femoral neck fractures at our department, and to verify indication criteria and identify the therapeutic procedures that are best suited to our conditions. In the 1997-2001 period, a total of 81 patients with intra-capsular femoral neck fractures were operated on. Of these, 64 treated by dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation were followed up for at least 5 years. There were 33 women and 31 men; the average age was 21.5 years (range, 21 to 74 years). The Garden classification was used to evaluate the displacement of femoral neck fractures. Preferably, osteosynthesis was carried out by closed reduction; only exceptionally was an extension device for the operating table used. A 135-degree sliding hip screw, with a short thread, directed to the head centre and a two-hole side plate were used most often.The average follow-up was 6.9 years. Evaluated were: the occurrence of late complications in relation to the length of time between injury and surgery, quality of fracture reduction, use of an anti-rotation screw and necessity of repeat surgery. Garden I or II fractures were diagnosed in 13 patients, 51 had Garden III or Garden IV fractures. Bone union without complications was achieved in 73.4 % of the patients within 12 months of surgery. Late complications were found in 26.6 %; of these, only one had Garden I fracture and the rest were Garden III and IV fractures. An anti-rotation screw was used in 39 patients (60.9 %) and its use had no effect on the development of late complications. Of the seven patients who developed pseudoarthrosis, the screw was used in four (57.1%); out of the nine patients with avascular necrosis, it was used in six (66.7 %). In the whole group, an unsatisfactory outcome of post-operative reduction was recorded in 29.7 %. In the patients with late complications this was found in 52.9 %, which was a statistically significant difference. Of the 17 patients with poor outcomes, 14 underwent total hip arthroplasty; in the patients with necrosis, arthroplasty was carried out at an average of 26 months post-operatively, in those with pseudoarthrosis it was at 7 months post-operatively. For the treatment of intra-capsular fractures of the femoral neck, surgery is the most frequent approach, but there are controversial views on various relevant issues. An important factor affecting the treatment outcome is the patient's bone quality. Our results show a direct relationship between the extent of fracture displacement and late complications, i.e., avascular necrosis and non-union. The quality of fracture reduction had a greater effect on fracture non-union than on the development of femoral head necrosis. The length of time between injury and surgery played a lesser role than it is believed. The use of an anti-rotation screw was not significantly related to the occurrence of late complications. The DHS method is economical and available, and provided sufficient results whose comparisons with the literature data show that this therapeutic approach is correct.

[Para-articular fracture of the hip joint in the aged--an indication for immediate operation?].

177 patients with fractures near the hip joint were operated on between January 1983 and December 1985. The fractures were treated with Ender pinnings, total endoprostheses and dynamic hip screws (compression screw fixation). Up to June 1984 surgery was performed after the patients had been allowed a stabilisation phase of 4 days on the average, but from July 1984 onwards we aimed at performing immediate surgery within 12 hours. The second group was compared with the first group in a retrospective study in respect of recumbent period and mortality (hospital mortality and mortality after 8 months). The period during which the patients had to remain recumbent in the hospital was found to be considerably shorter, but there were no statistically significant differences in respect of mortality. The causes and consequences are discussed.

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after osteosynthesis of femoral neck fracture.

The reported incidence of avascular necrosis after femoral neck fracture fixation varies widely, and there is no consensus regarding its risk factors. We evaluated the incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head with the use of contemporary techniques for femoral neck fracture fixation. We then sought to determine what potential risk factors influenced the development of avascular necrosis.Between 1990 and 2005, one hundred sixty-three intracapsular femoral neck fractures in 163 patients were treated with internal fixation at our level-I trauma center. All patients were monitored until conversion to total hip arthroplasty or for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Ten patients (10 hips) died and 7 patients (7 hips) were lost to follow-up. The remaining 146 patients (146 hips) had a mean 5.2 years of follow-up (range, 3 months to 17 years). The incidence of avascular necrosis was 25.3% (37 hips). The average time to diagnosis of avascular necrosis was 18.8 months (range, 3-47 months). Patient sex, age, interval from injury to surgery, and mechanism of injury were statistically not associated with the development of avascular necrosis. The quality of fracture reduction, adequacy of fixation, degree of displacement, and comminution of the posterior cortex were significantly associated. After we controlled for patient and radiographic characteristics, multivariate analyses indicated that the important predictors for avascular necrosis are poor reduction (odds ratio=13.889) and initial displacement of the fracture (odds ratio=4.693).

[WAITING TIME FOR SURGICAL FIXATION OF FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES: DOES A DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUP PAYMENT METHOD MATTER?]

Early surgical fixation of femoral neck factures in elderly patients has been suggested to decrease morbidity and mortality and to improve treatment outcome. This study evaluates the effect of the implementation of a diagnosis-related group payment method in our hospital on waiting time for surgery and the short-term outcomes of elderly patients following surgical fixation of hip fractures. Demographic and clinical characteristics of 75 consecutive patients, who underwent surgery for hip fracture in our hospital, before the implementation of a diagnosis-related group payment method, were compared with those of 75 consecutive patients, who were operated on after the implementation of the payment system. Demographic characteristics were similar for both groups. Before the implementation of a diagnosis-related group payment method, 84% of the patients waited longer than 48 hours for surgery, compared to only 24% of patients after the implementation (p<0.001). Medical considerations and operation room availability were the main reasons for delaying surgery in both groups. Mortality and morbidity rates during the hospital stay remained similar, regardless of the implementation of the payment method. The implementation of a diagnosis-related group payment method shortened the waiting time for surgical hip fixation in elderly patients treated in our hospital, with no effect on the mortality and complication rate during the hospital stay.

Bilateral atypical femoral fracture and end-stage arthritis of the hip, treated with total hip arthroplasty.

The prolonged use of bisphosphonates has been associated with an increased rate of atypical femoral fracture. A 77-year-old woman with prolonged bisphosphonate use presented to our office with groin pain and end-stage arthritis, She was scheduled for a total hip replacement. Before the surgery and with minimal trauma, the patient then suffered a displaced atypical femoral fracture. She underwent a total hip replacement as a treatment for her fracture and her arthritis. Subsequently, the patient presented with pain in the contralateral thigh with an incomplete atypical femoral fracture. That side was also treated with a total hip arthroplasty. An uncemented stem with open reduction internal fixation and a long cemented stem were used on the complete fracture and incomplete fracture sides, respectively. At a follow-up of 2 years, the patient had no pain and had excellent function demonstrating the short-term success of both cemented and uncemented stems in total hip arthroplasty after atypical femoral fractures.

[Emergency room consultation policy prevents surgery delay in elderly patients with hip fractures].

Clinical guidelines for the management of hip fractures strongly emphasize the critical role of early surgery as a major factor affecting better health outcomes. Shortening the time from admission to pre-operative consultation by bringing the consultants to the emergency room, before patient admission to the orthopedic ward, is am efficient cost effective hospital policy that enables adherence to guideline recommendations. Early pre-operative specialist consultation is an efficient cost effective policy for preventing delay of surgery following hip fracture in the elderly.

Bilateral posterior hip dislocation associated with right Pipkin II fracture: A case report.

Bilateral posterior hip dislocations are very rare injury, requiring a very hight trauma energy. We present a case of 40-year-old male who sustained bilateral posterior hip dislocation with associated right femoral head fracture Pipkin type II following a hight energy trauma without neurovascular deficit. A prompt closed reduction was made, it was successful in lift hip but incomplete in right one, therefore, an open reduction was indicated, performed through a modified Hardinge approach permitting internal osteosynthesis with two Herbert screws. Posterior hip dislocations are an orthopaedic emergency that must be reduced within 6 h to avoid sciatic nerve compression and avascular necrosis (AVN). They are most often associated with femoral head fractures commonly known as Pipkin's fractures, that need anatomic reduction and osteosynthesis through posterior approaches, rarely external or anterior approaches. Anatomic and functional results were good at two years follow up excepting a right hip non-bridging heterotopic ossification; the patient returned to his work normally without any functional sequelae.

When is the ideal time to operate on a patient with a fracture of the hip? : a review of the available literature.

Fractures of the hip are common, often occurring in frail elderly patients, but also in younger fit healthy patients following trauma. They have a significant associated mortality and major social and financial implications to patients and health care providers. Many guidelines are available for the management of these patients, mostly recommending early surgery for the best outcomes. As a result, healthcare authorities now put pressure on surgical teams to 'fast track' patients with a fracture of the hip, often misquoting the available literature, which in itself can be confusing and even conflicting. This paper has been written following an extensive review of the available literature. An attempt is made to clarify what is meant by early surgery (expeditious versus emergency), and we conclude with a personal view for the practical management of these patients of variable age, fitness and type of surgery performed within services that are often under considerable pressure of finance and available operating theatres and qualified staff. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1573-81.

Initial promising results of the dynamic locking blade plate, a new implant for the fixation of intracapsular hip fractures: results of a pilot study.

The osteosynthesis of intracapsular hip fractures results in a 19-48% failure rate. Only when the anatomical reduction is secured by stable fixation, revascularisation of the femoral head can take place and the fracture can heal by primary osteonal reconstruction. The common implants lack rotational and/or angular stability. Also the relative large volume of the implants within the femoral head compromises the (re)vascularisation. The combination of an anatomical reduction and a low volume, dynamic implant, providing angular and rotational stability seem to be crucial factors in the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures. This assumption formed the starting point for the development of the dynamic locking blade plate (DLBP), a new implant for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures. This report describes the first clinical results of the new implant. Internal fixation with the DLBP was performed in 25 consecutive patients with an intracapsular hip fracture within 24 h from admission. Failure of fixation, due to non-union, avascular necrosis, implant failure or secondary displacement of the fracture, was the primary outcome measurer. Functional outcome was assessed by the Harris Hip Score. Following internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures with the DLBP, a failure rate of 2 out of 25 patients and excellent functional results were seen after a follow-up of more than 2 years. The initial clinical results of the DLBP are promising and justify the start of a randomised controlled trial.

"Acute Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Combined Posterior Acetabulum Fracture with Ipsilateral Associated Posteriorly Dislocated Femoral Head with Femoral Neck Fracture. Using of Femoral Head as an Autograft Would be an Advantage".

Traumatic posterior hip dislocation with comminuted fracture of the ipsilateral acetabulum and femoral neck is a rare fracture pattern. These injuries are associated with high energy trauma and pose challenges during management. Controversy exists between hip preservation and replacement surgeries in middle-age patients. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) have a high risk of non-union, avascular necrosis, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis of hip requiring total hip arthroplasty hip replacement (THA) as a secondary procedure later. A 56-year-old male presented with posterior hip dislocation and comminuted fracture of ipsilateral wall and column of the acetabulum, and femoral neck following a high energy trauma. He was managed by acetabular reconstruction using femoral head structural autograft combined with acute primary uncemented THA. At 2-year follow-up, the patient had good functional outcome with a satisfactory range of motion without any difficulty in weight-bearing and doing his daily activities. Although uncommon, acetabular reconstruction using femoral head structural autograft and acute primary uncemented THA is a viable alternative treatment option compared to ORIF in middle-age patients with fracture of ipsilateral neck and acetabulum. This facilitates post-operative rehabilitation and avoids further operations for possible developing AVN or secondary arthritis.

[Treatment of intertrochanteric comminuted fracture in aged patients by replacement of artificial long-stem bipolar femoral head].

To discuss the clinical effect of hip arthroplasty for the treatment of intertrochanteric comminuted fracture in aged patients. From February 2004 to March 2006, 89 cases with intertrochanteric comminuted fractures were treated by replacement of artificial long-stem bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty with bone cement, including 34 males and 55 females, with the average age of 82.6 years (ranging from 70 years to 92 years). There were fresh fractures in 76 cases and old fractures in 13 cases. According to improving-classification of Evans-Jensen, there were 32 cases with type III fracture and 57 with type IV. Osteoporosis was graded by Singh-index, and there were 24 cases with level IV, 46 with level III and 19 with level II. The operation was delayed from 4 days to 36 days (6.5 days on average) after the injury. The surgery time lasted from 50 minutes to 70 minutes (62 minutes on average). Bleeding volume was from 100 mL to 250 mL (150 mL on average). The time in hospital was from 16 days to 25 days (18.6 days on average). All incision primarily healed except 1 case which delayed union by revision with infection. Steel wire rupture occurred in 1 case, invalidation in 1 case. They were not treated because there were no uncomfortable symptoms. The consciousness disability happened in 2 cases 2 to 3 days after the operation, 2 case with the infection for the system of urine and breath 1 week after operation, were healed through the treatment. Eighty-five cases were followed up for 14 months to 39 months (26.5 months on average). The function of the hip was graded by the system of Harris and the choiceness rate was 84.7% (excellent in 16 cases, good in 56 cases, fair in 12 cases and poor in 1 case). The treatment of intertrochanteric comminuted fracture in the aged patients by replacement of long-stem bipolar femoral head prosthesis is effective, but indications and techniques of the operation must be paid much attention to.

Hip dislocation

Management Hip dislocations are a medical emergency, requiring timely placement of the femoral head back into the acetabulum (reduction) in order to reduce the risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Most professionals recommend closed reduction (nonoperative) barring operative indications such as irreducible dislocation, delayed presentation, non-concentric reduction, fracture requiring excision and/or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) among other operative indications. Prognosis is worsened if reduction is delayed more than 6 hours. If the reduction is stable, the patient can proceed to protective weight bearing which includes crutch-assisted walking (ambulation) with weight bearing as tolerated for 4-6 weeks succeeding a short period of bed rest. If reduction is unstable, 4-6 weeks of skeletal traction is necessary before protective weight bearing.

Inability to obtain formal informed consent in the face of a standard surgical indication.

A thirty-eight-year-old intoxicated man was admitted to the surgical trauma service following a single motor-vehicle accident. He had a severe closed head injury, bilateral pulmonary contusions, a fracture-dislocation of the right acetabulum, and an open injury of the right knee joint. The acetabular fracture pattern was an associated both-column fracture with the femoral head dislocated into a widely displaced posterior-column fracture line. The treating physicians agreed that it would be in the patient's best interest to take him to the operating room for emergent debridement and irrigation of his knee wound. At surgery, the patient also underwent attempted closed reduction of the acetabular fracture and placement of a skeletal traction pin. Radiographs obtained with the patient in traction showed reduction of the femoral head beneath a displaced superior dome fragment, but there remained a 12-mm gap in the posterior column, greater than 3 mm of step incongruity, and a large articular fragment entrapped in the anterior aspect of the hip joint. The patient remained intubated and sedated for several days. Upon weaning from the ventilator, it became evident that his head injury would prevent him from being able to give informed consent in the foreseeable future. The patient's family members refused to become involved with his care or medical decision-making, as he had become completely estranged from them as a result of his chronic alcohol abuse. Further delay in surgical treatment for the acetabular fracture would be associated with greater difficulty in obtaining an anatomic reduction, the potential for additional articular damage to the femoral head, and an increased risk of surgical complications. The question that arises is whether it is in the patient's best interest for the surgeon to proceed with open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabular fracture without having had the opportunity to fully inform him of the treatment options or the risks associated with an extensive surgical exposure.

[The hip head-conserving management of traumatic medial cervical hip fractures with big-fragment screws: a biomechanical examination].

With the growing number of elderly people in the population and the increasing incidence of proximal hip fractures the question of how to manage the medial hip head fracture is of increasing importance. Especially in Hungary and the Scandinavian countries surgeons prefer hip head-conserving therapy although the redislocation of this fracture and necrosis of the hip head opposes this point of view. Encouraged by two theoretical and mathematical calculations, we tested two different possibilities to screw hip head fractures. Our results show that the hip head-conserving therapy with two cranial screws and a three-point-supported screw at Adam's arc has essential biomechanical advantages compared with the situation after conventional osteosynthesis. This result encourages us to prefer the minimally invasive head-conserving therapy of medial hip head fractures, especially for treatment of Pauwell's I and II injuries.

[Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study consists of a retroactive evaluation of results of surgical treatment in patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip replacement and a comparison with results reported in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the period from 2003 to 2013, a total of 83 patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip replacement were treated at our clinic, namely 69 women and 14 men. The mean age in the cohort was 74 years (range 47-87). The Vancouver classification was used to grade the fractures. The cohort included 31 patients with type B1 fracture, 25 patients with type B2 fracture, 8 patients with type B3 fracture, and 19 patients with type C fracture. Altogether 80 patients underwent a surgery, 3 patients with non-displaced type B1 fracture were treated conservatively. The mechanism of injury was a simple fall in 75 % of primary endoprostheses and in 56% of revision endoprostheses. The average time to fracture was 7.6 years in primary implant and 3.6 years in revision endoprosthesis. In fractures with a well-fixed stem (type B1 and C) plate osteosynthesis was used. In case of a comminution zone, osteosynthesis was followed by spongioplasty. In patients with a loose stem (type B2 and B3), the fracture was treated with a revision uncemented stem. In two cases a combination of a revision stem and a massive corticocancellous bone graft was used. The evaluation was performed using the Harris Hip Score and the minimum follow-up from the surgery was 3 years. RESULTS In the group of patients with type B1 fracture, 28 patients were treated surgically. An excellent result was achieved in 22 patients (84%), in 4 patients (16%) the result was very good. The remaining 2 patients failed to meet the requirement of the minimum follow-up of 3 years. In the group of patients with type B2 fractures, composed of 25 patients, the femoral component was replaced with a revision uncemented stem with cerclage wires or titanium tapes or cables. Osseointegration of the stem was recorded in 24 patients, one female patient died 4 months after the surgery. An excellent result was achieved in 16 patients (64%), a very good result in 4 patients (16%). The remaining 5 patients (20%) failed to meet the minimum follow-up of 3 years. In 8 patients with type B3 trauma, the reimplant of a revision stem was supplemented by spongioplasty, in 2 cases by solid corticocancellous bone grafts with cerclage. In this group osseointegration occurred in all the cases within 6-9 months. The follow-up was affected by the older age of patients and 6 patients died during the follow-up period. The requirement of a follow-up longer than 3 years was met in 2 patients (25%) only and the result was considered very good. In the group of 19 patients with type C fracture, plate osteosynthesis was performed, which was in 12 cases complemented with spongioplasty. Healing occurred within 6 months in 13 patients (72%), within 9 months in 3 patients (17%) and in 2 patients (11%) reoperation was carried out due to fixation failure. One female patient died 16 days after the surgery. An excellent result was achieved in 15 patients (83%), in the remaining three patients the follow-up was shorter than three years due to their death. DISCUSSION Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip replacement is a rare but feared complication. Its incidence ranges from 0.1 to 4%. It occurs most frequently 7 to 8 years after the primary implant and 3 to 4 years after the revision of endoprosthesis implantation. The main risk factor is the loosening of stem of endoprosthesis. Another risk factor is osteoporosis. Age, sex and obesity do not constitute significant risk factors. Stem stability and presence of bone defects are the main criteria in favour of surgical treatment. If the stem remains well fixed, the osteosynthesis is opted for, whereas if the stem is loose, its replacement has to be performed. The management of bone defects is an integral part of femoral reconstruction and restoration of endoprosthesis stability. CONCLUSIONS Surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures, thanks to the introduction of new implants for osteosynthesis and development of new stems for revision endoprostheses, helps achieve ever better results. Of major importance for choosing the treatment method is correct classification of fracture and stem stability. Poor bone quality is a common feature, therefore a perfect mechanical fixation is necessary. The long-term results are affected primarily by the patient s age. Key words: periprosthetic femoral fractures, surgical treatment, results, complications.

[Analysis of the prognostic factors influencing the time elapsing until the contralateral hip fracture].

Although several national studies reported on the risk factors for contralateral hip fracture, there are no data about the prognostic factors of the time until contralateral hip fractures. The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of different prognostic factors on the time until the development of contralateral fracture and to determine the incidence of contralateral hip fractures after femoral neck fractures. Patients aged 60 years and over with contralateral hip fracture between 01 Jan 2000 and 31 Dec 2008 were identified among those who suffered their femoral neck fracture in Hungary in 2000. Risk factors as age, sex, comorbidities, type of fracture and surgery, place of living and hospitals providing treatment for primary fracture were analysed by one way ANOVA focusing on the time until the development of contralateral hip fracture. 312 patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of contralateral hip fracture after femoral neck fracture ranged between 1.5% and 2.1%, the cumulative incidence was 8.24%. The mean time until the development of contralateral hip fracture was 1159.8 days. The incidence of contralateral hip fracture showed no significant deviation. Significantly shorter time (p = 0.010) was detected until the contralateral hip fracture in older patients with femoral neck fracture. The yearly incidence of contralateral hip fracture showed no significant difference by patients with femoral neck fracture over 60 years. The shorter time until the contralateral hip fracture by the older age groups highlights the need of elaboration of prevention strategies. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(38): 1543-1547.

[Fracture Type and Injury-to-Surgery Interval as Risk Factors for Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head after Internal Fixation of Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture].

The aim of the study was to investigate the occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head following the osteosynthesis of intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck in relation to the time interval between injury and surgery and the type of fracture. The data of patients with intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck surgically treated in the period from 2001 to 2011 were reviewed. Of 1555 patients treated for this fracture, 125 (7%) underwent osteosynthesis. The evaluated group included 115 patients who came for examination at one-year follow-up. There were 59 (52%) women and 56 (48%) men. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) osteosynthesis with an anti-rotation screw was performed in 103 patients and lag-screw osteosynthesis involving three parallel cannulated cancellous screws was employed in 12 patients. The patients were allocated to groups according to the injury-to-surgery interval and to sub-groups on the basis of the Garden classification of femoral fracture stage. In the group of 58 patients treated within 6 h of injury, AVN developed in 10 (17%). When the type of fracture was considered, 4% of the non-displaced fractures and 30% of the displaced fractures developed AVN. The patients with Garden stage I and II (non-displaced) fractures treated within 6 h of injury had a significantly lower risk of AVN development than those with Garden stage III or IV (displaced) fractures. The group treated between 6 and 24 post-injury hours comprised 21 patients, of whom four (19%) had AVN. In non-displaced and displaced fracture sub-groups, 25% of the patients in the former and 16% in the latter had AVN. The stage of displacement had no effect on AVN development. The two groups together (patients treated by 24 h) had a significantly lower AVN incidence than the patients treated after 24 h (p = 0.0025). In this group of 36 patients, 16 had AVN (44%) and the fracture stage made no significant difference (p = 0.6985; nondisplacement sub-group, 41%; displacement sub-group, 55%). The study showed a significantly lower AVN occurrence in the patients surgically treated within 24 h of injury. In the patients treated within 6 h of injury, AVN incidence was significantly lower in the patients with non-displaced fractures, as compared with those who had displaced fractures. This was not true for the two patient groups treated later (6-24 and later than 24 h) in which the differences between AVN development after non-displaced fractures and that after displaced fractures were similar.

Approximately half of all hip fractures are displaced intracapsular fractures. The standard treatment for these fractures is either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. The recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on hip fracture management recommends the use of 'proven' cemented stem arthroplasty with an Orthopaedic Device Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of at least 3B (97% survival at three years). The Thompsons prosthesis is currently lacking an ODEP rating despite over 50 years of clinical use, likely due to the paucity of implant survival data. Nationally, adherence to these guidelines is varied as there is debate as to which prosthesis optimises patient outcomes. This study design is a multi-centre, multi-surgeon, parallel, two arm, standard-of-care pragmatic randomised controlled trial. It will be embedded within the WHiTE Comprehensive Cohort Study (ISRCTN63982700). The main analysis is a two-way equivalence comparison between Hemi-Thompson and Hemi-Exeter polished taper with Unitrax head. Secondary outcomes will include radiological leg length discrepancy measured as per Bidwai and Willett, mortality, re-operation rate and indication for re-operation, length of index hospital stay and revision at four months. This study will be supplemented by the NHFD (National Hip Fracture Database) dataset. Evidence on the optimum choice of prosthesis for hemiarthroplasty of the hip is lacking. National guidance is currently based on expert opinion rather than empirical evidence. The incidence of hip fracture is likely to continue to increase and providing high quality evidence on the optimumCite this article: A. L. Sims. The World Hip Trauma Evaluation Study 3: Hemiarthroplasty Evaluation by Multicentre Investigation - WHITE 3: HEMI - An Abridged Protocol. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:18-25. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.51.2000473.

A Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture with Characteristics of Atypical Femoral Fracture.

Although the definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFF) excludes periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF), the number of reports about PFF with characteristics of AFF is increasing. We present the case of such a fracture in this report. An 87-year-old woman who underwent bipolar hip arthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture 38 months prior reported left thigh pain with no history of trauma. Radiographs showed a simple transverse fracture at the level of the stem distal end with features of AFF: periosteal thickening of the lateral cortex, a medial spike, and a noncomminuted fracture. She presented other features resembling AFF: history of bisphosphonate use, prodromal symptoms, no associated trauma, and lateral bowing of the contralateral femur. The fracture showed nonunion after the initial osteosynthesis, and a revision surgery of the arthroplasty and osteosynthesis was performed. Nine months after the surgery, bony union was achieved and she regained the ability to walk. It is supposed that the fracture was influenced by a stress force related to implants and lateral bowing concentrating on the fracture site as a mechanical factor in addition to bisphosphonates as a biological factor. It would be important to recognize that AFF could occur at the peri-implant location, and early detection and treatment are essential.

Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

The treatment of choice for a displaced femoral neck fracture in the most elderly patients is a cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA). The optimal design, unipolar or bipolar head, remains unclear. The possible advantages of a bipolar HA are a better range of motion and less acetabular wear. The aim of this study was to evaluate hip function, health related quality of life (HRQoL), surgical outcome and acetabular erosion in a medium-term follow-up. One hundred and twenty patients aged 80 or more with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck (Garden III and IV) were randomised to treatment with a cemented Exeter HA using a unipolar or a bipolar head. All patients were able to walk independently, with or without aids, before surgery. Follow-ups were performed at four, 12, 24 and 48 months postoperatively. Assessments included HRQoL (EQ-5D index score), hip function (Harris hip score [HHS]) and radiological acetabular erosion. The mean EQ-5D index score was generally higher among the patients with bipolar hemiarthroplasties at the follow-ups with a significant difference at 48 months: unipolar HAs 0.59 and bipolar HAs 0.70 (p = 0.04). There was an increased rate of acetabular erosion among the patients with unipolar hemiarthroplasties at the early follow-ups with a significant difference at 12 months (unipolar HAs 20% and bipolar HAs 5%, p = 0.03). At the later follow-ups the incidence of acetabular erosion accelerated in the bipolar group, and there were no significant differences between the groups at the 24- and 48-month follow-ups. There was no difference in HHS or reoperation rate between the groups at any of the follow-ups. The bipolar HAs seem to result in better HRQoL beyond the first two years after surgery compared to unipolar HAs. Bipolar HAs displayed a later onset of acetabular erosion compared to unipolar HAs.

Osteosynthesis and outcomes of traumatic periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the treatment of traumatic periprosthetic femoral fractures with open reduction and internal fixation. The outcomes with the use of the surgical techniques were also reported. Between September 2017 and September 2019, 25 patients with traumatic periprosthetic femoral fractures were managed by open reduction and internal fixation in Ain Shams University Hospital, Egypt. The fixation methods were selected based on the surgeon's preference. Outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and EuroQol 5 Dimensions - 5 Level (EQ5D-5L) prior to and after surgery. Patients were regularly followed up for one year. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The mean age at surgery was 77 years (range, 51 to 95 years), 64% (n = 16) were females. According to the Vancouver classification, there were 1 type AG, 15 type B1, and 9 type C fractures. Postoperative complications included wound site infection (n = 2) and non-union (n = 1). The mean pre-trauma Harris Hip Score was 77.44 ± 8.63 (range, 65 to 90), and the mean Harris Hip Score collected at the final follow-up was 72.47 ± 8.85 (range, 60 to 86) (P < 0.05). The mean pre-trauma VAS was 2.20 ± 1.21 (range, 0 to 4), and the mean VAS recorded at the final follow-up was 3.00 ± 1.41 (range, 0 to 5) (P < 0.05). According to the EQ5D-DL assessed at the final follow-up, no patient felt that their daily life and activities became more problematic. This study provided added validation of the current management of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Using the proper fixation and implant can achieve a reliable fixation and good functional recovery. IVa.

[Comparison of effectiveness of three operations in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly patients].

To compare the effectiveness of internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients so as to provide the evidence for the selection of therapeutic methods. Between May 2005 and April 2008, 108 elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were treated by internal fixation with compression screw (IF group, n = 31), hemiarthroplasty (HA group, n = 37), and total hip arthroplasty (THA group, n = 40). In IF group, there were 8 males and 23 females with an average age of 73 years (range, 65-80 years); fractures were caused by tumbling (25 cases) and traffic accident (6 cases), including 17 cases of Garden type III and 14 cases of Garden type IV; and the time from injury to operation ranged from 8 hours to 13 days with an average of 4.2 days. In HA group, there were 10 males and 27 females with an average age of 74 years (range, 65-80 years); fractures were caused by tumbling (29 cases) and traffic accident (8 cases), including 21 cases of Garden type III and 16 cases of Garden type IV; and the time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 14 days with an average of 4.4 days. In THA group, there were 11 males and 29 females with an average age of 73 years (range, 66-80 years); fractures were caused by tumbling (32 cases) and traffic accident (8 cases), including 23 cases of Garden type III and 17 cases of Garden type IV; and the time from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 14 days with an average of 5.6 days. There was no significant difference in general data among 3 groups (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in operation time and blood loss among 3 groups (P < 0.05), and IF group was less than other 2 groups. All patients were followed up 1 year and 4 months to 2 years and 3 months with an average of 1 year and 8 months. In IF group, HA group, and THA group, the rates of early postoperative complications were 19.4% (6/31), 8.1% (3/37), and 7.5% (3/40), respectively; the rates of late postoperative complications were 29.0% (9/31), 13.5% (5/37), and 7.5% (3/40), respectively; and the reoperation rates were 29.0% (9/31), 10.8% (4/37), and 5.0% (2/40), respectively. The rates of the early postoperative complication, late postoperative complication, and reoperation rate were significantly higher in IF group than in HA group and THA group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between HA group and THA group (P > 0.05). The mortality rates were 16.1% (5/31), 13.5% (5/37), and 15.0% (6/40) in IF group, HA group, and THA group, respectively; showing no significant difference (P > 0.05). According to Harris hip score, the excellent and good rates were 65.4% (17/26), 81.3% (26/32), and 85.3% (29/34) in IF group, HA group, and THA group, respectively; showing significant differences among 3 groups (P < 0.05). According to patient's age, life expectancy, and general conditions, THA is a reasonable choice for the patients aged 65-80 years with displaced femoral neck fracture.