From hence I sometimes was led too far, to invade the sovereignty of Providence, and, as it were, arraign the justice of so arbitrary a disposition of things, that should hide that sight from some, and reveal it to others, and yet expect a like duty from both; but I shut it up, and checked my thoughts with this conclusion: first, that we did not know by what light and law these should be condemned; but that as God was necessarily, and by the nature of His being, infinitely holy and just, so it could not be, but if these creatures were all sentenced to absence from Himself, it was on account of sinning against that light which, as the Scripture says, was a law to themselves, and by such rules as their consciences would acknowledge to be just, though the foundation was not discovered to us; and secondly, that still as we all are the clay in the hand of the potter, no vessel could say to him, “Why hast thou formed me thus?”
De ahí que, a veces, me metiera demasiado en la soberanía de la Providencia, como si acusara a su justicia de una disposición tan arbitraria, que solo a algunos les permite ver la luz y luego espera de todos, igual sentido del deber. Entonces, me detuve a pensar un poco mejor las cosas y llegué a las siguientes conclusiones: 1) que no sabíamos según qué luz ni ley serían condenadas estas criaturas, puesto que Dios, en su infinita santidad y justicia, no podía condenarlas por vivir ajenos a su presencia, sino por pecar contra aquella luz que, como dicen las Escrituras, es ley para todos y, por aquellos preceptos que nuestra conciencia considera justos, aunque no podamos reconocer sus fundamentos; 2) que todos somos como la arcilla en manos del alfarero y ninguna vasija podía preguntarle: «¿por qué me has hecho así?».