Was it really not enough to let one of the trainees make enquiries - assuming enquiries were even necessary - did the chief clerk have to come himself, and did they have to show the whole, innocent family that this was so suspicious that only the chief clerk could be trusted to have the wisdom to investigate it?
¿Es que no era de verdad suficiente mandar a preguntar a un aprendiz – si es que este «pregunteo» era necesario? ¿Tenía que venir el apoderado en persona y había con ello que mostrar a toda una familia inocente que la investigación de este sospechoso asunto solamente podía ser confiada al juicio del apoderado?