Dataset.from_generator consistently freezes at ~1000 rows
### Describe the bug

Whenever I try to create a dataset which contains images using `Dataset.from_generator`, it freezes around 996 rows. I suppose it has something to do with memory consumption, but there's more memory available. I

Somehow it worked a few times but mostly this makes the datasets library much more cumbersome to work with because generators are the easiest way to turn an existing dataset into a Hugging Face dataset.

I've let it run in the frozen state for way longer than it can possibly take to load the actual dataset.

Let me know if you have ideas how to resolve it!

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```python
from datasets import Dataset
import numpy as np

def gen():
    for row in range(10000):
        yield {"i": np.random.rand(512, 512, 3)}
        
Dataset.from_generator(gen)
# -> 90% of the time gets stuck around 1000 rows
```

### Expected behavior

Should continue and go through all the examples yielded by the generator, or at least throw an error or somehow communicate what's going on.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.8.0
- Platform: Linux-5.15.0-52-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.29
- Python version: 3.8.10
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 1.5.1

By default, we write data to disk (so it can be memory-mapped) every 1000 rows/samples. You can control this with the `writer_batch_size` parameter. Also, when working with fixed-size arrays, the `ArrayXD` feature types yield better performance (e.g., in your case, `features=datasets.Features({"i": datasets.Array3D(shape=(512,512,3), dtype="float32")})` should be faster).

Our support for multi-dim arrays could be better, and we plan to improve it as part of https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/5272. > By default, we write data to disk (so it can be memory-mapped) every 1000 rows/samples. You can control this with the `writer_batch_size` parameter. Also, when working with fixed-size arrays, the `ArrayXD` feature types yield better performance (e.g., in your case, `features=datasets.Features({"i": datasets.Array3D(shape=(512,512,3), dtype="float32")})` should be faster).
> 
> Our support for multi-dim arrays could be better, and we plan to improve it as part of #5272.

Thanks for the explanation! The Image array was just for demonstration, I use PIL Images in practice. Does that make a difference? What's the best approach for a dataset with PIL Images as rows? It's best to use the `datasets.Image()` feature type for PIL images (to save space) :)