cronica de un desayuno combine the bad defect of mexican cinema and a rare feat nowadays . it pretentious represent it want u to believe that it be deep and only because some scene be out of focus and another be pseudo surreal and yet another play with the eisenstein infante caifanes tradition of laugh cry face and the edition be fragment and and it be all so solemn . it have a weak script represent the main story hardly develop and so it have other three small and needless story and stick into it . they be only good to make the film last longer . most of the acting be bad . a true feat and baring in mind that many of the best known mexican actor be cast . there be an abuse of unnecesary foul language . to the point that the character of paloma and who symbolize the dream of freedom of a child and use it throughly . it be homophobic . the character play by eduardo palomo be the sorriest and and most punished and representation of a transexual i have ever see . it be very boring . i end up envy the people that leave the theater before the end of the film . whatever it try and it have be do well and in mexico and elsewhere . in other word represent para partirte la madre and nada como una mala película .