i must have be in a good mood to give this shameful and predictable and embarrassing movie even a 3. what wrong with it . let start with the gratuitous sex although i admit the rotational style of bonking be something i have not see ( nor experience ) before . and i guess they also save a few buck by show the same sex scene three time . then there be the inconsistency . the oakville tribune seem to be in a green part of whatever town it be suppose to be . ( hamilton ontario . ) yet in the scene on the roof and it appear to be in an industrial area with a steel mill belch smoke and flame . also and the inside of the building the newsroom the stairway seem much big than the outside . spoiler here then and when our intrepid reporter finally get fire and she come back to the building several time and once after hour . hardly likely . the end be also pitifully predictable . the classic bait and switch caper in which the good guy turn out to be the bad guy . but my major objection be the fact this be yet another movie finance with canadian and ontario tax credit which be ashamed to set itself in canada and yet again prove that the canadian film industry be craven and opportunistic . a country movie must do more than just provide job . they should reflect the culture . it bad enough that the american studio use toronto a a stand in for new york . but it be embarrass and infuriate when canadian producer ( in this case and canwest global ) do it with help from the federal and provincial government . in a word . bah .