in my opinion and a good documentary especially one deal with controversial political issue should be informative and as unbiased a possible . the point should be reveal the truth . this mean and in particular and have among the interviewee expert on the subject and representative of all side . this film be a failure in this regard . most of the interview include in this film consist of men off the street expound on the question of peace in the holy land . the wall itself and the suppose subject of the film and be give no serious treatment at all . for most of the interview and the interviewer simply wait to be approach and ask general question such a what do you think of the wall . she do not approach random people near the wall and ask them how they have be directly affect by it . outside of one interviewee and the israeli general in charge of the wall construction and we have no expert on the subject to provide u with the wall context ( e. g. how and when the project begin and whether it have be successful and which group be for and which against the project and etc . ) outside of the interview and a very large portion of the film consist of extended shot of uneventful scene and such a head on shot of the wall and construction of the wall and and people get off a bus . these shot take up far too much time and in my opinion . it nice to see what the wall look like and but the 20 30 minute of head on filming of the wall ( and only the wall ) be excessive . clearly and these shot ( accompany by arabic music that convey a sense of mourn ) be include for the sole purpose of arouse in viewer feeling of loathe for the wall .