what game over represent kasparov and the machine do best be to delve into garry kasparov psyche during the 1997 competition against ibm deep blue . you see him become more and more paranoid and and increasingly unravelled and all because in the second game and deep blue make a move that seem too human for his preconceived notion of chess computer . kasparov thought then and and still do and that ibm cheat . game over try to seem unbiased and but it be clear that the director think that ibm cheat . however and they give no real evidence to support the cheating claim and only intimation that ibm security surround the computer room be because ibm really have grandmaster hide in there override the computer on certain key occasion and and kasparov assertion that the computer do not play like a computer usually do at one point in game two . in game two and kasparov play a game that be design to trick the computer and attempt to sacrifice a pawn in a situation where previous computer chess program would have take the pawn and lead to the computer eventual loss . deep blue do not take the bait and and kasparov be so rattled because the computer seem to play like a human that he do not even see that he could have play deep blue to a draw and end up resign . that game psyched him out so much that he be unable to recover and and after play game 3 and 4 and and 5 to draw and lose game 6 horribly . the question of whether ibm cheat all come down to that single move in game two and where the deep blue make the move that any human would make but that have and up to that point and trip up computer . joel benjamin and a chess grandmaster on ibm programming team explain in the documentary that they know that chess computer always get trip up in that situation and and consequently spend a lot of time and effort program deep blue so that it wouldn not make the mistake that other computer do . if you believe benjamin assertion and then the case be clear and ibm do not cheat . unfortunately and the director quickly move on and never mention ibm explanation for the rest of the movie and prefer to cut between shot of the chess play hoax of the 19th century and the turk and and shot of deep blue and hinting that deep blue be really control by a human a well . a someone who have an understanding of programming and the explanation by ibm make perfect sense if you know what you be do and it would not be terribly difficult to put something in the code so that and if thus and so condition be reach and then do thus and so in other word and tell the computer what to do if a situation like the one that kasparov create in game 2 ever happen . this isn not cheat and it do a good job of program a chess computer . in the end and it eminently clear that the director think that ibm cheat and and the repeat comment about ibm stock rise 15 % the day that deep blue win suggest the idea that ibm cheat to pump it stock price ( kasparov even compare ibm and deep blue to enron ) . however and there be plenty of outside opinion and within both the chess and computer science community and that deep blue win fair and square and that kasparov lose because he simply couldn not get past his view of computer a dumb machine and get psyched out by a machine that do not seem so dumb after all . i just wish that the director have let u see the alternative opinion .