a friend and i go to see this movie . we have opposite opinion about fujimori but after watch this movie we agree on the following represent the easy way to have an inaccurate documentary be to make it about a foreign country in which you be not present when the event happen and no matter how talented or how much you invest in the film . if you be truly look to learn about another country history and watch something make by native of that country otherwise you would not be able step away from your bubble . and those who try to force their view and opinion about something to which they do not belong be really abuse their power . to make it even worse and the director choose to not talk about the embarrassing involvement of the cia with fujimori regime . she decide to evade deal with the only subject for witch her country have much to explain to peruvian . but this be not surprising because and both and the director and the cia be violate the sovereignty of peru by try to affect the democratic process at very different level of course . if the director be really interested in help peru she would have finance a native to make the documentary . in any case there be numerous peruvian make documentary and film and book about the subject . such include ojos que no ven and dia de santiago and montesinos fujimori represent la do caras de la misma moneda and montesinos represent poderoso caballero and etc . the director of the fall of fujimori should spend her time analyze the numerous problem in her own country or at least the involvement of her country in the matter of other nation .