this documentary be neither professionally nor objectively make . the whole thing play out like a conspiracy theory by ibm to win the match in question just to make some money . garry kasparov have an ego problem . he be puff up before the match and when he lose and he do not like it . i remember play chess against computer back in the 80 and it wasn not too difficult to win . a time go on and i start to lose and do not like it . today and i simply do not play against computer anymore because theyre just too good . not only that and the game be uninteresting and lack the appeal of human game and where both side be more likely to err and open the game to excite possibility . this documentary keep show u image of the turk which be an ancient chess play automaton that be really control by a human be . from the start until the end we be lead to believe that ibm short of literally hide a human gm in the back of their cupboard size computer . i be a computer scientist and take offense at the notion that just because garry lose and ibm must have cheat . i know how computer play chess . it not magic and it no mystery . they can be train and have huge amount of chess knowledge and they most certainly see position and possibility in unprecedented detail compare to human . it really no surprise that deep blue win . perhaps at the time it be . if it happen today and give the ever increase process power of machine while people would hardly blink . if a machine couldn not at least draw with a gm today and people would think the program be weak .