i first saw this docudrama in the uk in the 1980 and and find myself intrigue and then astonish at how such good intention could go so wrong . previous commentator ( who be australian ) have explain the unfolding plot detail well than i ever could and but i would like to make an observation about what may lie behind the governor general uk sovereign power . all modern law and a i understand them and need an ethical or philosophical root to exist in the first place and to become a law at all . that be the case and and if say the conner or khemlani mess have be possibly set up and ( just how many businessmen or millionares have be serve by khemlani and presumably without complaint ) and then the labour government could have be victim of entrapment and which would surely have have to have be investigate by the governor general a or until he could see that the budget standoff be a genuine result of whitlam fecklessness and and not elaborate entrapment and sponsor by person or person unknown . if it the case that kerr in effect do not have to refer to the law because fiscal circumstance override everything and then royal power border onto unreason while the implication in any commonwealth country be that fiscal rule literally and and that any person or organisation have carte blanche to break any other rule and physical or mental and so long a they have the control over the purse string ultimately .