how important be the director and anyway . in this film and make in the politically tumultuous time of the late 60 where question of social organization be prime conflict and ask that question by make a movie that turn the camera away from the action and only beg to reveal the director and william greave . it be an important work and a it show like no other movie show the difficulty in block and organize and and set the scene while it reveal the role of the crew and something most director frankly would like to disappear completely and that the invisibility of be essential for suspend disbelief while and it also put into consideration the role of performance and scripting and how they match or do not match reality and what that have to say about how the director ultimately influence reality ( if at all ) . the documentary and or pseudo documentary and or fictional narrative ( whichever you prefer and via your interpretation of the theme ) have it brain in the over educate and over intellectual crew and it gut in the lost performer struggle to understand the vague and ambiguous direction and and it heart in the director and who stand in a the desire to portray and to represent and to express without any idea how to do any of those thing or why he want to do it . it a film that purposefully repeat banality just to see if they can become more than banality . it a film that sometimes show the multiple shot simultaneously and just to leave the editing to the audience and also reveal how disturbingly different shot change perspective . it an important work and and something that everyone interested in the industry and process of film making should watch and understand . it and like many experimental film and have no real mass audience appeal it not for them . it for the industry and and it for the 60 and ask what to do with a group effort medium that still rely on a single voice and author . polarisdib .