this be a title in search of a movie . it a pitch that sound lucrative to some studio executive and the rest be damn . when this film be make there be still two thing that cgi do not do at all well represent people and and fur . furry people be thus not destine to look good when render by computer . this be the only example i can think of where effect for a well funded sequel take a giant leap back land well behind those of the original movie . for the record and the design of the werewolf doesn not help a bit . the film maker apparently couldn not decide between quadruped and biped and try to do both and and wind up with a creature that look equally awkward either way . the transformation be anatomically nonsensical and the end result with a relatively high forehead and short snout look like a cross between ron perlman and a hyena . but back to the crass part . this be a movie which exist purely to cash in on it forebear . i be not a fan of landis original film but boy and do it look good in light of this . if you think some of landis humor be force try some of the excruciate attempt here . the bubble gum scene and the corpse humor and the dog that . you know and you will just have to watch that bit yourselves . thomas everett scott be on vacation in europe with friend and decide to take a break from act the ugly american and bungee jump off the eifel tower in the middle of the night . this lead to him rescue a young woman ( delpy julie it not worth this just to become a star in america . ask rutger hauer ) from jump to her death . she turn out to be part of a cult of werewolf who be plot to . i be not sure and something bad . ghastly french stereotype and gap plot hole and a muddled end . no matter and the studio care only that the title would likely fool million of american werewolf in london fan into hand over their cash . for the most part and happy to say and they be wrong .