i would like to make it very clear that i be not at all religious . i be an atheist but i could see that richard dorkins be contradict himself over and over again . i would also like to make it know that i be not the sort of person that argue against something with philosophy all the time and but i feel that when compare science and religion we must be philosophical and be willing to question the belief in main stream science as well a question religious belief . i wonder if richard dorkins ever spend any time to think philosophically about belief and anyone who think long and hard enough about science and religion will realise that science be indeed a religion in itself . yes there be a fundamental difference between the way that scientific belief be hold when compare with other religion and but at it root and it faith in a particular human instinct . throughout this series and richard insists that science method be the only right way of thinking and that it make sense to believe in something only if the evidence for it be strong enough . if you dig deep enough into how science function you will realise that it be just as irrational a religion and that it come down to faith in the end and faith in the evidence and faith in our sanity and faith in our sens but more than anything else faith in our instinct to follow pattern of recurrence . this be not easy to explain but think about how the law of physic be decide and it be because they be and still be the most common pattern of recurrence that we be aware of . i think that human being have an instinct that make them believe that the long something remain in a certain state or place of existence the more we just assume out of blind faith that it be more likely to stay like it . for example and we do not expect that gravity will suddenly work in reverse tomorrow and by this i mean push matter away a suppose to attract it . but the only reason why we do not expect this sudden change be because we have know for so long that it have always attract as far a we be aware . however that doesn not mean that it couldn not do exactly the reverse tomorrow or even right now . it doesn not matter how long something may stay in a certain state or change and there be no rational reason to make assumption about it but we do out of instinct . i would ask you to consider what be a long and short amount of time . there be no such thing and i do not know exactly how long it take for these suppose wise men to decide that everything must be make out of matter and sound and light and etc but let give them what they would consider to be an edge way . let say far long than it really be 12 and 00000000000 year . be that a long period of time . 99999999999999999 year make 12 and 00000000000 year seem like an incredibly short period of time . for all we know there could be an extreme amount of change in the so called law of science within the next trillion year . it all about comparison and only when we compare thing can we say that be long or that be short . it the same with big and small and wide and thin and heavy and light and strong and weak and others . i doubt that any scientist could tell me why they think that trust this instinct make sense . i certainly do not see why it should and but that doesn not mean that we a humanity should necessarily stop use it . with this in mind and the most hypocritical comment that richard dorkins make be when he say that faith be irrational and a process of non thinking he say . if what we have in this instinct that i have be describe and this instinct that we all possess on some level isn not faith then i do not know what the hell it be . other time when he be be hypocritical be when he talk about the religion be bronze age and bronze age myth he say . i would like to point out that no matter how much scientific method have be change over the year due to experience and experiment and evaluate and the pure rule of science be get old and old all the time . they could even be describe a the holy bible of science . he be go on about how he be sick of the different religion be stubborn i be right and he be wrong but look back on how rude he be to the various interviewee and he seem to be just a stubborn him self . to be fair to him and at least he doesn not try to bomb religious community . i appreciate his hatred for certain religious belief that generate war and but i do not respect his arrogance in his own belief . as far a i be concern and richard have the right to believe in science if that be his way . i be scientifically mind as well and but i do not think he have the right to go up to religious leader have unfriendly argument and try to force his opinion on to them and virtually describe them a stupid . despite all his education and experience and discovery he seem to fail to have the wisdom to properly question his very own system of belief . i have read what he say in defence of this argument that open mind atheist such a my self put forward and what he state suggest to me that he be totally miss the point . finally the title of the documentary and root of all evil . this state that religion be the root of all evil and it isn not true . there be cause of evil that have nothing to do with religion . all round the documentary series be frustrate and narrow mind and hypocritical and flat out rubbish .