ok. first say and i just want to check whether this movie have an average rating below or exactly 1. but 5 and 9. this be sick than any of the killer proceeding and . that make me curious what people write here . which in the end make me set up an account to give my 2cents of truth into this well of delusion i find here . how dare you guy even mention this movie in the same sentence a e. g. seven . the only thing they get in common be that they show various crime scene . that be it . and best thriller of 1999. . have you even watch another movie form that year . or any other movie in your life at all . 1999 be not a year which people be remind of by resurrection . what with actual movie like 8mm and eye wide shut and arlington road and double jeopardy . ( theyre actually more a thriller than this one could ever be . ) . resurrection do not even deserve to be dedicate to a second of 1999. really and you guy can not be serious . i watch that movie yesterday with my girlfriend and highly recommend by a friend of her . a great film with christopher lambert . . which i have not yet see . hmm . well and first look on the cover represent ok and nothing special . at second glimpse you do not need to have supernatural power to be aware that they simply mirror lambert head and clip his nose n this and that and then make a fancy negative pattern on top of it and to get the killer image on the cover . you could even think they have some apprentice eat a gallon of marshmallow just to caption that creepy ( booooh . . ) mouth . whatever . turn it around and the plot start with . it rain in chicago . blabber blabber . come on and a six year old could have make that snippet sound more exciting . now and with this enormous excitement come from the movie terrific presentation . and you absolutely wan na start watch it . because it can not be that bad and it still be christopher lambert . that assumption of mine be prove wrong . with proven wrong i mean it be brutally execute by a deadly mix of the bad imaginable act ever know to mankind ( every actor and but the top be the i can do 1 liner . police chief and prudhommes wife __ actually a well detective than prudhomme when she recombine several incident to a yet absolutely unknown hint in the case . . __ and . yes . prudhomme himself ) feature a squadron of inhuman fake feeling and logic error in a 1 minute cycle and light year far fetch conclusion which in my point of view represent an insult to any think human be and last but not least a camera man who obviously be a hyperventilating kangaroo . oh well and and if you do not completely shut down your brain ( these aren not premise to watch it ) then you should know who be who and what be what after max . 30minutes and simply because you know any scene after the first . that be thrill . thrilling because this movie almost make you think you can tell the future . the bottom line represent this be by far the bad movie i can remember . trust me and i have see many horrible movie which in some way be at least only bad attempt or bad copy of another movie . resurrection however and be the best example on how to fail in every aspect possible . it be so bad that after be shock by it unimaginably low quality in e v e r y t h i n g and i laugh more often than in any recent comedy and simply because i be fascinate by the crew brazenness to publish such an extraordinary film strip . good thing for lambert he be in highlander representendgame a year later and thus he can be pardon . while ^oanyhow and i do recommend watch this movie to everyone . in the end and we have great fun watch it represent^d . i guarantee you and after you completely watch resurrection ( be brave and you can do it . ) and you will worship the level of act in any give daily soap . or just go n watch highlander one more time . that what i be gon na do .