not a balanced point of view . the director shouldn not express her opinion a truth . the movie have some criticism of fujimori but it always give him and his family the last word . so few critic of fujimori be provide that it seem the only reason they be include be to be able to say the movie provide both view . but that be not the case . the movie barely show one of the massacre that fujimori be accuse of . and it give him credit for the mastermind the murdering of the mrta insurgents that take the japanese embassy . it be well document that the cia do the planning . there be even picture of a well know cia strategist on the site publish by caretas magazine and other newspaper . the fact that such well know information be not use by the director give u a few possible conclusion represent the director be pro fujimori and purposely and falsely chooses to give the credit to him while the director do not want viewer to note that the cia and fujimori work together while or it be just out of ignorance since the director be not peruvian and be not present in peru at the time the event occur . the explanation provide by other commentator and that fujimori be still fairly popular in peru and do not excuse the lack of accuracy and balanced explanation . also and the statistic provide in the movie for the actual support of fujimori be the high i have ever hear of . most statistic by major poll agency be much low . another point to mention be that the intelligence that be key in the capture of the leader of sendero and discover the secret network be do by a police force lead by ketin vidal and he have complete autonomy from fujimori and montesinos . the first government of fujimori do experience an improvement in overall economic trend ( gdp ) but this improvement be finance by the privatization of several national industry with contract that be not beneficial for the country in the long term . also and the gap between rich an poor continue to increase during fujimori regime . in his second term the economy be suffer and there be nothing else to privatize and by the end of fujimori second term the economy be about to collapse . in term of investment in infrastructure of fujimori regime and they fallow the paternalistic pattern . they be create to raise support for fujimori but be not mean to last long . these structure need continued maintenance but fujimori do not provide political power for the civilian in order to demand further investment . in fact and fujimori regime be able to destroy most form of political organize such a union and grass root group and the increase in informal unorganized labor be immense . finally and the director choose to spend most of the movie talk to fujimori instead of cite the case of massive corruption in favour of fujimori ( the medium and business owner and the military and etc ) that be so wide spread it be impossible that fujimori be not aware of it .