the film be annoy . technically and there be too many time you see unfocused and very roughly edit scene . one could easily get a cleaner film use a decent amateur camera and 100 $ video edit software . down to earth and man on the street doesn not mean sloppy editing . unfocused scene that do not contain important statement should have be delete . the same go for make sure that the object head or hand or others stay in the frame . my 8 year old son know that by now . the film be way too long . the main point ( anti globalization ) be understood after 30 minute and why bother with all the rest . after the interview with james suckle i press the stop button . what a waist of time . the main theme just doesn not work for me anymore . i have see too many small winery which produce mediocre and commercialize wine and many big winery that produce great and unique wine . the movie identify the small producer a the one that be produce wine with more identity and or terroir . the big one be accuse of produce internationalized or commercialize wine . the film be try to make a black and white statement in a world full of gray tone . however and the movie hasn not prove this claim . they look at a couple of sporadic example and tie some of the big producer ( frescobaldi ) with fascism and provide interview with key people . well and do all the small producer spend wwii in the resistance . be it relevant to see that parker have a thing with bulldog . the movie be very manipulative and unconvincing .