how much long be we to persist with this flawed belief that once a director produce great and ground breaking work and all future work can not be all that bad and after all and he make such and such . mulholland drive be a case in point and and be in fact unmitigated rubbish . the performance be excellent and particularly from watt and theroux and but a good film they do not necessarily make . what lynch have clearly forget be that just make a film unnecessarily wierd only work when it take the audience by surprise . when the audience be expect the film to not make sense and then the film have to have some substance to keep the audience interested . lynch succeed in the first half of the film and with the murder mystery set up with lot of twist and red herring and and then . plop . the story decends into a quagmire of bizarre halucinations and pointless segue . methinks lynch realise how muddle the film be become and and throw in the lesbian and mastobatory scene to the audience awake and and to stop the male viewer from stand up and leave . watch the film at the preview and i be surround by lynchophiles who have no more idea of what be go on than i do and but leave the theatre comment on the layer and layer of lynch film making . excuse me but these people be the same nitwit who stand in art gallery star at canvass that have be paint white comment on the courage of the artist at paint such a brave work . film like these be make because ( a ) lynch be trade on his previous work while and ( b ) because people convince themselves that unintelligeable film be art and and therefore and must be good . i query a number of the lynchophiles about what they actually like in the film and only response i recieved that wasn not a broad layer type of answer be that they like it when the chick get their kit off . nuff say .