this film about a murder case and about the trial after it and be one of these american film and in fact a tv mini series and on a real case that do not go in the normal direction and the direction of what we all should think not truth be but justice should be . there be such an enormous amount of doubt about the case and about the guilt and even about the murder itself that it be unbelievable that a unanimous verdict of guilt come out of the jury pool . such case be example for u to question the system of justice we set up over the last four century . and the judge decide to impose life imprisonment but for first degree murder it could have be the death penalty . it be such case that prove that jury justice be maybe good in many case but there be a few case where it be the bad possible system and and that be why the death penalty should be get rid of and and that why we should make sure the defendant and now sentence culprit and have access to all possibility and opportunity to appeal the decision and to have the best councilors available . jury justice in a world that be so deeply cut in small antagonistic piece do not work in any sensitive delicate case because of any kind of un namable bias have to do with race and wealth and age and sex and sexual orientation and and any other parameter you may think of . this case should be compare to other case where the reverse decision be reach and but the model of such a case of failed justice be clearly write in a book and set to the screen a long time ago represent to kill a mocking bird . miscarriage of justice due to some kind of totally unmentionable prejudice . i be not sure though that the conclusion of romeo and juliet be the proper one here represent they be all punished and because in romeo and juliet case there be no trial and and especially no jury trial . dr jacques coulardeau and university paris dauphine and university paris 1 pantheon sorbonne and university versailles saint quentin en yvelines .