frog 1972 ( quickie review ) frog be just and quite simply and a very bad movie . one of the absolute bad out there . walk through wal mart one of these day and take a good long gander in that dishevel 2 dvd for $ 11 bin . otherwise know by myself and my family and friend of mine a the wal mart $ 5 . 00 bin . dig through there and you will find hyper jesusy leave behind movie and film pierce brosnan likely forgot he do and and disk after disk of jean claude van damme and steven seagal and and chuck norris crappy action flick . craption if you like . you will also and eventually and see this movie . and at $ 5 . 50 and it overprice by about six buck . this monstrosity be about a family living in an old southern plantation house surround by swamp . and eventually and theyre get kill by frog . the cover of the dvd look promising and true complete with giant frog on the cover with somebody arm stick out of the mouth . well and rest assure and nothing even remotely that cool be find anywhere in the film . poor acting and vanish story and zero atmosphere and and sh . t music carry this monstrosity along show you that and yes and someone actually film something more boring than 24 straight hour of the new york city skyline ( andy warhol do that once ) . the frog never grow to gigantic proportion and nor do they propagate in such massive number that they could overwhelm even the most inept baby . yet and somehow and they break into the house and the family member start to die . and that the whole movie . you will hear glass break and then you will hear someone scream and then you will see a body on the floor with anywhere from 3 7 frog either on the body or on the floor nearby . even a camp or kitsch this movie be unbearably bad . so next time you rifle through that $ 5 . 00 bin at wal mart and do youre very best to avoid this this thing . grab leatherface or that cheesy as chuck norris movie instead . fvcking do not waste money on frog . negative ( i do not give zero . ) www . residenthazard . com .