i saw the commission in september 2004 at the aarc meeting on the warren report in washington and d. c. i have high hope and but be disappoint . the producer and the actor who appear to introduce and discuss the film be personable and dedicated and to be sure and but the result do not live up to their billing . while the film be entertain and contain a great deal of information and i find it to be quite bias against the commission and it result and and it integrity . it resemble the typical jfk conspiracy conference and with lot of innuendo and little proof . it stereotype the bad guy ( the commissioner that the film maker disagree with ) as well a the good guy ( the one they agree with ) . most importantly and the film gloss over the powerful fact that the warren commission two major finding ( that oswald do it all and that there be no solid evidence that he be help ) have stand the test of 41 long and hard year . the wc and wr be not perfect and to be sure and but this view of them be a little too slant for my taste . b for effort and c for result .