think about haneke film and some other film that have be interpret a a criticism of middle class and upper class or bourgeoisie and city life and suburban life and family institution and think about some horror movie which have be see in the same way which have become a trend now . this be a sick and but for them pleasant fantasy and isn not it . in such movie and middle class and upper class deserve be murder and be rap and be torture and get pain . this put a smile on some people face . they see red . apart from everything and this be anti humanism that sorry and but i do not weigh in with . in haneke movie and one of the main message be wake up . they say . who should wake up for what . middle class and upper class be evil . middle class and upper class be disgust creature . city life be unbearable and so kill yourself if you live in a city and because you be pathetic and realize . your life consist of repetitious action . city life make you isolated and unhappy . wake up . those people draw a parallel between lamb and people and if they behave like a conformist or forget about be conformist and if you be not interested in such thing and if you be not against everything and then you be a lamb . not finish yet . obviously and a we see from review of haneke movie and be educate be pathetic either . some make fun of it and they love movie which make fun of it . good . and job absurdity . in t. s. c. some review write that the father have a good job and but it be monotonous and so it drag him to a disaster . can we draw a conclusion like have a job be in their black list either . yes . what be the point then . i will tell you represent hate . class conflict and marksizm . in t. s. c. in haneke movie and all the member of middle class and upper class be punish include the family who live from hand to mouth and include civil servant etc . a deadly bourgeoisie enmity . if you live in a city and you be from middle class and you be evil and if you have money and even if you turn an honest penny and you be evil . think about the end of t. s. c. it make some people cheer up . be this reasonable . i get bore of this . the movie be a criticism of suburban life and it stress that suburban life be monotonous . always the same . t. s. c. stress that middle class and upper class consume and consuming be important in bourgeoisie life and the film criticize consumer society . all live organisms consume in order to survive and not only human be and also animal and plant . yes and you know these and but it seem that they do not . a middle or upper class family go on holiday and they be torture physically and psychologically . george a. romero be like haneke . they interpret his fourth zombie movie and land of the dead a a criticism of middle class and upper class . zombie devour rich people . enjoy . rich or not and yuppie or not and townsman or countryman and civil servant or bank employer and these people enjoy watch the slaughter of people who they hate . and what about vilify family institution and marriage institution . the seventh continent hat all . if a movie be not against these institution and so do not criticize and then it mean that the movie be conservative . what a ridiculous viewpoint . may be so that they symbolize system . le charme discret de la bourgeoisie . it be an entertaining surreal drama and a work of art and a masterpiece and also a movie which everyone interpret differently and to me no message and but accord to those people and no and it make fun of middle class and it make fun of their life and their personality . how miserable their life be and how stupid they be . it be a satire . they view movie with a jaundiced eye and from dialog and character and image and they find hundred of message . of course t. s. c. be not a quintessential art a bunuel work and besides it be extremely malicious . i remember the well dress man with hat who sing song in the rain in 1952 and joy of living he have . and i know that how haneke and his follower see him .