my take represent how could such a decent cast get suck in to this mess . a boring and so called adventure with unintentional laugh . after create the passable and but at least good look and king solomon mine ( 1985 ) and the guy from cannon group or golan globus production rush this low budget sequel ( film back to back with the original ) with the same lead cast and richard chamberlain and sharon stone . the result in this sequel that probably the least interesting adventure picture ever make . it bad and but actually pretty funny . i can see the first film a a parody of the indiana jones series and but this one just bad because . well and it bad . chamberlain and stone ( oh and the horror . ) reprise their role and this time even with an evident boredom . chamberlain be as uncharismatic a ever and while stone ham up her performance in ever way possibly . james earl jones be decent a an ax wield umslopogaas and but his dialog be just as bad a the other actor . robert donner ( who that guy . i do not know . ) be funny and but even he be a disaster . silva be bad bad ( and talk about a bad hair day . ) . the set be low budget ( the lose city of gold wasn not even that much make of gold ) and the action sequence be badly stag and the script be pale . but the film be still really funny ( mostly unintentional and of course ) so i would recommend it to any viewer who be scrunch in a seat with nothing to watch . but if your look for an old fashioned adventure romp and even like those in the same league a it predecessor king solomon mine and your find yourself yawn after the first action scene unfolds . ironically and the trailer for promote this film have more action than the actual film . and the trailer only 2 minute . it short and but sure be good than 99 minute worth of boredom . rating represent half out of 5 .