this be supposedly an epic story about a king naresuan during his childhood era and which supposedly and in his late year protect the invade burmese from conquer thailand and by drive them out . basically it be actually a heresy to say the movie be not good for thai audience and hence and in my opinion it be overrate . however and this be on of the best of 3 part series of the movie . the best in my opinion be part 3 ( climax ) and follow by part 1 and and part 2. much of the complaint come to part 2 and which doesn not exist historically and many audience be leave complain about the main actor escapade with woman and which actually be in conflict historically a he have little time for that . this fact be actually generally well know by the watching audience and so basically the director just step on a very sensitive big toe of the audience . something that a director should not do since they be the one who come to enjoy the movie . the problem about this movie and which be actually part 1 be that the movie and cinematic version have be adapt for the movie have actually change so much of the story historically ( know by a majority of the audience ) and in very successful dramatic stage play that actually have gain a wide television audience acceptance in thailand ( another big blunder ) . the most common complaint i receive from viewer be that and if only the cinematic movie have be more faithful to the original dramatic stage play or most of the television version of this movie and but with good cinematography and it would gain a strong following and at least internationally . cinematography and be o. k. and in general and but i do receive complaint from view the initial hour of the movie to be a bit too dark on the lighting . this movie be basically similar to george lucas and star war episode i and in which actor and and actress be cardboard character and language be somewhat unnatural and but in addition be the problem of poor editing and long sequence of movie at point where it doesn not seem to contribute to the overall story . basically a good movie and at least for the thai audiences anyway and be that it be historically accurate at least to what the audience be generally aware of ( it would be insult to actually say something contradictory ) and or faithful to the original successful dramatic play ( much like mr. bean holiday and that use the same original movie that make mr. bean so successful ) and or another that depart so much from the formula of success be the godzilla movie and do by the emmerich . the key of the movie success and that could have improve be the addition of dramatic element and the tone down of unneeded part of the story and and i be sure about more than half of the movie can be edit out and and at least dramatic element be add and at least initially in the start of the movie and get the audience attention and be something that need a lot of improvement . back to basic emphasis be need in the movie and which be the basic theme of the movie and or the message and be miss and which i think should be how naresuan achieve his greatness and and his ability of cunningness and would at least be helpful . most thematic element here be actually miss and a more successful movie and while there be little truth and be the curse of the golden flower . while that movie have little relevance historically and it major thematic element be that the king try to poison his wife . while many plot element and especially during the fight scene in elaborate trap and be bad and contrive and the actor and the intensity of the actor and actress be excellent . i think that thematic element be sorely need in this movie . most of this movie lack the stress and intensity in the actor and actress need to move the audience . one of the most important element of the story besides aristotle claim that plot be more important character be not really true and at least for today movie . while we do claim plot in many movie review to be important and it be that most important element should be the theme of the movie and and the premise of the movie that the plot should support . if the premise of the movie be a historical one and at least the major historical element should get the audience to agree and enjoy the movie more so than audience go into defensive and and just watch the plot go from one part to another part of the movie . otherwise you get busy body in the movie and much like next 2007 and without a message and and the believability element and which be the primal force of premise and be lack and but have a strong weight in all of kubrick movie and especially clockwork orange and dr. strangelove . if any director want to have a good movie despite his bad editing and kubrick movie be a bit long and not well edit in many scene and he still win the day because his premise for the story be strong and plot element be there to prove his premise and which buildup to a strong message or a theme of the overall masterpiece and which we can sum up in few word and such a in dr. strangelove and that an accidental holocaust can happen . what about the possibility of the movie naresuan . a good premise and where many plot element be supportive be the argument that one person and can indeed make a difference . length of the movie be not of the essence . how many would complain godfather be ever long a movie and which be about 175 minute and but feel more like 30 minute . if i have no intelligence in make any movie and there be one factor i will look that i know the movie will make it big represent if people will not take their eye off the screen for the entire movie and i have get a hit .