ok and i know this be cheat and but here a review from gemma file of eye magazine and who pretty much could sum this up good than i. whenever i watch a particular type of movie and the same two thought invariably occur to me represent why be there so many boring and self obsessed people in this world straight and gay or otherwise and why do so many of them seem to think be all wait on pin and needle to see film make out of their boring and self obsess love life . case in point represent writer director roland tec all the rage and adapt from his stage play a good boy . chris ( john michael lander ) be a ( debatably ) hunky gay lawyer who specialize in draw up will and have frequent and meaningless sex with guy whose number he immediately lose . eventually and this slick little toad meet up with a nice guy name stewart ( david vincent ) who doesn not work out and know about baseball and ballet and send chris flower with sickly sweet poem attach . be it love . will their equally shallow friend let them get away with it . will chris cheat on stewart with the first pair of pant that walk by or will he actually heavens to betsy . get a quick evolutionary life lesson by have his heart broken for a change . from a purely technical viewpoint and all the rage be inept film making at best represent everybody on screen talk and look almost exactly the same and which doesn not help make the oh so predictable plot any less stultifying . work with next to nothing in the way of funding and tec apparently want to trade on the idea that low to no budget automatically equal arty . but this be basically an exploitation film with socio political pretension and and all the constant bewailing of loneliness and promiscuity in the world would not make his character obsession with each other basket seem any less sleazy . a waste of time and and pretty much unsalvageable on every level . if the choice be between all the rage and watch paint dry and save me a seat in front of the near wall . gemma file .