why do i find this movie unsuccessful . they pretend to be unbiased and and clearly have a point of view . the filmmaker begin by say that she really like moore and his movie and even his belief and but a she attempt to have a meeting with him and during the heat of his crazed fahrenheit 9/11 press junket and his inability to make time for an unknown filmmaker lead her towards the dark side of moore . the truth be and she set out to film an expose and and fail miserably . it a shame all the research and all the interview and and all the back story would have simply make an entertaining biopic of a large than life man who actually have an impact . instead and she magnify insignificant detail of a man life that demonstrate not moore misstep but her own . she try time after time to show that moore film aren not flawless scientific report on their subject . be it a surprise that a film might not be a perfect and exact list of empirical data . moore film have always be under extreme scrutiny and specifically bowl for columbine and fahrenheit 9/11 and and now sicko . moore be open and honest he refute each and every claim of error on his website and back up with link to the official report and source for his information and fact . so the attack change to yeah and but moore film make it seem like . and that his film somehow imply thing not offer into evidence . i think everyone hope be that nothing be take at face value if it be and the fault be with th ignorant viewer . much be spend demonstrate that his image of be poor and hapless and slovenly and angry be manufacture . in fact and a a whole i consider the entire piece to be an ad hominem attack on michael moore work via attack michael moore . it a logic fallacy tool use by debater lack actual evidence . go back 20 year to the filming of roger and me and the filmmaker be unable to find confirmation that ted koppel have cancel coverage of a town hall meeting ( a quick humorous mention in the movie be that the satellite news van be steal so koppel report couldn not be broadcast live ) . this movie then go so far a to convict moore of actually manufacture not one and but all element of the story . there be no town hall meeting . no news van . no ted koppel report . they even film a phony news report comment on the town hall meeting and ted koppel and the steal news van . of course and nobody mention this in 1989 when the movie be see and scrutinize by million . but 20 year later and they can not find evidence so it must be a fraud . in short and the movie fail because it aim an empty gun at moore and fire repeatedly . moore be imperfect . he certainly get a point of view . but he make great and honest film that serve to enact real change . the casualty be his enemy and not the truth .