i have watch all 21 bond movie make so far . casino royale be not the bad made of the series and just the most offensive one . the only other time the bond franchise attempt a complete departure from the establish bond formula the result be the complete flop of license to kill and which lead to a change of direction and the fantastic goldeneye . but unfortunately this time the experiment be a success and so i be afraid of what will follow . both license to kill and casino royale have be praise a a return to the fleming spirit and when in truth they be nothing more than shameless attempt to cash in on popular fad of their time represent the bronson or arnold or stallone action film of the 80 in the case of license and the bourne or transporter film in the case of casino . daniel craig be not a bad actor and but he be no doubt the bad bond impersonator so far and his lack of class and charisma be almost astonishing . of course his do i look like a give a damn line and his fighting prowess will wow 15 year old and but those who remember connery and moore and dalton ( in the living daylight ) and brosnan and even that weirdo lazenby and may feel like cry at what have become of their beloved icon . of course you could ask the producer why this supposedly first mission of 007 be set in 2006 and if that mean they have dare to completely write off 44 year and 20 film that allow them to make this one and but their response will probably be do we look like we give a damn . if casino royale do not pretend to be a part of the bond series and i would give it 6 out of 10 and but it do and so it a 2 .