out of an extremely interesting pairing of influential film personality come the most obnoxious interview i have ever see . godard can not refrain from intellectually strong arm another filmmaker if in contact with them . i have never see an interview as terrible a this one . not only do godard torture the viewer on purpose and begin right after he question allen about his then recent release of hannah and her sister with abrupt recur title card mean to scoff at allen film and segue without direction into random and exasperatingly repetitive moment where music swell to the point where it drown out the clearly uncomfortable woody and display inexplicable freeze frame of indeterminable screen time . godard show no respect to allen at all and yet allen show a great deal of politeness and respect to godard even when godard belt out question in french without allow his off camera translator to catch up or be hear over his voice . woody make the effort to mask his discomfort and while godard seem determine only to sustain that discomfort by employ indirect tactic design to catch him off guard . godard have now to my knowledge brandish immature affront to two of the most talented filmmaker work today and steven spielberg and accuse him of capitalize on the tragedy of the holocaust with schindler list and and woody allen and for an unclear reason and not to mention jane fonda because of her political activism and just subsequent to direct her in one of his film and which itself serve as political activism . i believe that and base on what i have see of godard work and which be entirely self regarding and faux artsy even when it be good and that he be a jealous intellectual snob . he snip at superior filmmaker for reason that be only projection of his own fault . guilty of sell out in order to market his film contempt in the united state and he falsely blast spielberg for sell out . and frankly and woody and fonda have potentially similar personality and people who make artistic career out of push their audience far toward a more progressive collective conscious and whether incidentally or on purpose . this be something godard want to do with his work and if only in his own condescending way and and i believe he find their similar prompt to be challenge . what make me anxious to see this film and the long and most frustrating 26 minute of my life and be my interest in see two greatly admired filmmaker make each other acquaintance and interact . i believe that they be polar opposite of each other and not in their innate personality but in their intention . out of allen entire filmography and include the movie he have make since this terrible episode and he have never make a pretentious film and but strangely the aim he claim with an indifferent attitude be behind his creative process be admittedly self indulgent . godard every effort and no matter how dormantly and pander only to him and leave the audience to concede to the humble illusion of be below it and yet he claim with suavity to be make social and political and cultural statement as well a the idea inherent in the french new wave movement and which be to challenge the convention of cinema and perhaps reinvent it . why be it that allen almost always succeed in do what godard claim to do without purposely incongruous edit and contrive defiance of sincere film technique and unfocused story . inversely and why be it that godard succeed with allen claim but have never make a film without a pompous affectation . and then why do godard have the big head where woody knowingly demote himself .