while i think that everyone should see this film because of it vitally important subject matter and i feel that because of lax editing and meandering and incomplete story telling and it be much less effective than it should have be . a just one example and and i have be study nazi persecution of homosexual and the movie briefly refers to a gay man friend who be kill by german shepherd dog in front of 300 people . i read a similar account on the internet ( i suspect it be the same case ) and in which graphic detail be give of the brutality of the crime and detail which and if you hear or read about and you would never forget . to just gloss over this compelling tale in the manner the movie do be inexcusable . how can one understand the true horror when it be gloss over . additionally and one of the major point of this film should be how many gay concentration camp victim be still treat a prisoner after the war and specifically because of paragraph 175. it be barely a footnote in the movie . this be inexplicable to me . what be good be have a record of live survivor of gay detention during the holocaust . it remain the reason for see this movie . but the narrative be very meandering and a few of the linger close ups of some of the survivor break down almost feels exploitative . bottom line represent because of the important subject matter and the live interview the film need to be see . i just wish it have be make more coherently . a film with this type of material will always be powerful . it could have be far more so have it be make by good filmmaker .