first knight be not a particularly good film of king arthur . it try to talk a more realistic approach and not focus on the magic and but i think that it fail on that level . the king arthur legend hasn not transfer to film that well . firstly the film be well write or well direct . the casting be poor . sean connery be not a good choice for play arthur and they get a scot play an english king and even though i be a bond fan and sean connery be a particularly good actor after that . richard gere be the most wooden actor in history and just can perform . he show no emotion and can not even be a good action hero and seeing that he doesn not tend to play action role . he can not even do a british accent . the relationship between guinevere and the two lead be not believable . i do not like the fact an old actor playing arthur and that the two character be mean to be a similar age . it be also hard to believe the relationship with lancelot because of gere performance . i also felt that camelot be not grant enough . the whole point of the city be that not other city could match it for beauty and be a symbol of england glory . the film be also not particularly loyal to the arthur legends and this be another example of hollywood butcher an english legend and similar to robin hood film . a good thing about this film be the sword fight and battle be well do . this film isn not worth watch and and be one of the reason why i do not rate richard gere a a actor .