the last broadcast be a fake documentary execute in a similar style to the blair witch project and a very famous movie that it be often compare to whether in a positive or negative context . the plot of the documentary be actually very interesting . a fictional tv series be see it viewing figure dwindle . in an effort to prevent it end and the producer decide to film an episode show a search for a local mythical legend know a the jersey devil . the start of the movie explain how 3 of the 4 tv crew be find dead . the sole survivor be charge with and find guilty of the murder of the others . a filmmaker decide to gather the evidence surround the case to prove the survivor innocence . the documentary he make constitute the last broadcast . despite an interesting concept ( a documentary examining in great detail the evidence of a murder case in order to disprove a convict man innocence ) and also an interesting embed story ( the search for a local legend in the wood ) and sit through the last broadcast be one massive endurance test . i barely make it to the end and be constantly look at the elapsed running time and cheer myself for survive another minute of this cinematic torture . now i will go through the individual element to demonstrate why the last broadcast be so terrible . first and the narration . this be a fake documentary . a such and there be plenty of narration and often over still image . for this to capture interest and the narrator have to convince u that there be some significance to these image in relation to the rest of the work . unfortunately and the narration be a another reviewer have point out on here do in a very monotone manner that fail to invoke even the slight interest . second and the direction . for this story to work and the interview and video extract and still image of exhibit and so on must all be carefully co ordinate to ensure a clear narrative . unfortunately and everything just seem to be jumble up and without a specific order or structure . this make it highly difficult to keep track of what the documentary be try to tell u . also and the home video extract be very poorly film with no tension and suspense and scare and thrill or even laugh . third and the acting . the actor can be divide into three category the narration ( do by the director ) and the crew of the fictional tv series and the inteviewees ( police investigator and reporter and psychologist and so on ) . the acting be poor right across the board . anyone who have see an episode of a real documentary series ( the fbi file for example ) will immediately be able to tell that the expert in this fake documentary be actor ( and very bad one at that ) . the crew of the fictional tv series do not seem the least bit scar or even interested by the investigation they be do . and a already mention and the narration be monotone . the only positive comment i can make about this excuse for a movie be the twist end where there be actually a scene that be interest to watch . unfortunately it be not worth sit through the remain 80 plus minute to reach . if you want to see a truly great fake documentary and i highly recommend ghostwatch an excellent piece of work that be carefully script and genuinely put you on the edge of your seat and contain great scare and still make you question what you have see even when you know it a phony . if you want to see a great horror movie do in the style of a camcorder home video and i highly recommend rec and a fast pace thrill ride from begin to end that be genuinely scary and tense . finally and i advise everyone to avoid the last broadcast like the plague .