for be the introduction to one of the most enduring horror series in european cinema and frankensteins bloody terror be rather lame apart from be an edit variant of the original spanish cut and bear the more accurate title the mark of the wolfman but one tend to forgive paul naschy the many shortcoming of his script on this occasion because here he be still tread the water and a it be . that say and his penchant of fill the plot with a many monster and weird situation a his imagination could conceive be already well in evidence and a we not only get two werewolf for the price of one but there also a mad doctor and his female assistant involve and who both just happen to be vampire . at such a distance it be easy to forget the impact that naschy presence a either daninsky or his werewolf alter ego make on the movie go public when it first appear ( prove obviously popular enough to generate the myriad sequel and or variation on the same theme and which follow ) for and even if the monster get a fair work out here ( scene from this film be actually lift outright for the abysmal the fury of the wolfman [ 1970 ] . ) and he also chain up for a good part of the second half and a if naschy be a yet unsure how to use his creation . in fact and the vampire dominate most of the proceeding during the latter stage of the film and while early on there also excess footage feature a gypsy couple ( who and for plot purpose and unwittingly revive the werewolf which subsequently amarks waldemar daninsky ) while however and despite the limited resource at the film maker disposal and the gothic atmosphere be well up to par for the course ( though dissipate somewhat by the faded print i watch . ) .