this movie be a big surprise . the premise be very original and the script and the direction and the overall acting be actually very good . it about two couple . there this vagabond and petty criminal couple that all of a sudden be confront with an unwanted pregnancy and come up with the plan to make some money out of it by offer to sell the baby to a much high bidder a possible and with the obvious intention to cheat them all by run off with the down payment . and then there this counterpart couple and very well to do yuppie that be desperately in need of a baby and be ready to do anything to get it . both couple meet and and what start off a a friendly and business like confrontation eventually deteriorate into a psychological and physical battle to the death . the story be hang up on an afterwards confession that the woman of the first couple do to a stranger ( peter ) who pick her up at the start of the movie a she be see hitch hike along a deserted road in the middle of nowhere . she tell him her side of the gruesome story ( which we see illustrate in flashback ) and he comment on it in a more or less moralistic and stern and but on the other hand open mind way and by which she be force to reflect on her own deed . hence of course the title hindsight . after the movie i be a bit puzzle by this chosen form . what do they mean by it . a sort of catharsis for this woman . a moral judgment . problem be and that the woman could hardly have survive the deadly attack on her that we witness in the last flashback . so how come we see her walking safe and sound along the road . well and i like to see myself a an intelligent and experienced movie watcher and but i have to read some of the comment here on imdb to see the light represent the woman be already dead and while she be on her desolate way to afterlife she be pick up by peter ( . ) who give her the opportunity to relief herself of the burden of her bad deed and choice . wow and i felt so dumb and instantly i like this movie even well for this very subtle twist . the movie be make with an obvious low budget and with only four actor ( five and if you count the peter character in ) and and most of the action take place within the confinement of the second couple house in the period of one and the same evening and so it more or less like youre witness a theatre play . this feeling be enhance by the sparkling and very clever dialogue between both couple . i be impress by all actor . leonor varela be stunningly beautiful but at the same time a solid actress with perfect timing and a great feeling for subtle comedy . jeffrey donovan be very convincing a the young yuppie represent self assure and condescend and protective of his wife and wealth and ruthless when thing get out of hand . waylon payne be equally convincing a the slightly psychopathic con man and charming and full of bravado but also dangerously impulsive and rough . about miranda bailey much have be say in the comment here and and i can understand the reservation represent she be not a beauty and her role be the least sympathetic of all and so a an audience it almost impossible to relate to her and her motif . but in my opinion she play her character very well represent in her hindsight dialogues she the unappealing and street wise and cocky white trash bimbo who doesn not give a damn and yet her self reflection on the comment of peter impress a genuinely sincere . and when and at the start of their meeting with the other couple and she try to win them over with a performance of a sweet mother to be and she equally convince while and likewise when she later on in the movie be under heavy attack and have to fear for her life and so to me it prove that she a great actress too . my only little and rather practical piece of criticism a to the script be represent how come that the yuppie couple do not have or use a cell phone . they be so well to do and modern and that it totally unbelievable that at least the guy wouldn not have walk around with a cell in his pocket and so that they could have send for help . anyway and this movie give a very convincing and in many way disconcert image of four intelligent people who try to act a if they care for each other and but in the end let themselves only be guide by greed and suspicion and selfishness . and do not bother too much with the moralistic setting and if that not your cup of thee and just see it a an interesting extra and that at least be equally clever do a the rest of the movie . i rank it positive .