i have be view the great detective on film a a progression and through the year and since the early part of the 20th century . i be sure it be fascinate for reader of the story to watch our hero develop and and there have since be countless literary exposition on holmes and anything accompany him . it have likewise be a lot of fun watch different portrayal on the screen . i have enjoy the eille norwood production immensely and and of course can strongly recommend monsieur rathbone and brett in the role . other commendable cinematic or televised sherlock include charlton heston and peter cushing and christopher plummer and nicol williamson a lot of good men have play sherlock holmes . but this one be the very bad one i have see and except for a short burlesque by douglas fairbanks sr. mr. barrymore show zero intellectual processing that right and none . he be in a daze . can you can imagine sherlock holmes in a daze . i understand he be intoxicate for most of the production and and it show . if he be a great actor and he be a pitiful interpretor . i would doubt he ever read a holmes story . the film have some good feature and a delineate by mr. morris in the review above this one . it be of some historical interest . it might even be a fairly good movie of it day . but and when lay beside the hound of the baskervilles star jeremy brett and you have a turkey .