sometimes you have to take thing to a point to make a point . michael moore have many time be accuse of lie or be naive and not show the whole picture but the truth be that if you be document the type of phenomenon that he be you have to take thing to the very edge to be able to show your point of view . even far and you can not tangle yourself in semantics and rhetorical endless discussion if you want the regular ordinary man on the street to get interested . this be moor dilemma . he try to make very complex matter simple and it not an easy task . now and i be the first to agree on that he not always accurate and sometimes not even right and but he finish his mission which be while to make people think . and this be far more important sometimes than be 100 % true . he even get mr wilson to make a movie about him . and that why we be here . wilson be try to use moore own rhetoric back on him . he be even get a attorney or author ( sic . ) to claim that moore have some personality disorder . he use the same technique a him and get the man on the street to air his opinion and a a coincidence and they be the same a wilson . to boil it all down and he be try to make a fahrenheit 9/11 about fahrenheit 9/11 . now and of course you should challenge moore idea . of course you should make up your own mind and try to find the fact yourself . that the whole point of democracy . but where moore be brilliant with express his point and political viewpoint and wilson be far too blunt . it even get to the point where you get the feeling that wilson be not even challenge moore but be in it for his own personal witch hunt out of some personal dislike . which be exactly what he accuse moore for do to mr c. heston and g. w. bush . and this and of course and be not good since a a fact he then become moore . at a point i could almost see him cry off camera because moore doesn not return his call . and and come on wilson and why do you try to make a point about if he curse or not . a big difference between moore and wilson be also this while where moore get people to speak their mind and wilson will get to use the interview as long a they do not look bad . don not look bad . that the whole point of investigate journalism and if it look bad it probably be and you should bring it out in the open . not the corporate approve statement and view . far more and the section with penn ( yes and penn from penn and teller ) scream you should only show what be government approve . i can not help to recall what the late bill hick say represent you be free to do what we tell you . here 16 channel of american gladiator to choose from . now and it might be that we in europe be more used to harsh journalist that dissect everything and but i get a feeling that wilson do not fully understand how and why you do an investigating documentary . if people toe be go to be step on . sure . if people be go to get mad because thing be show that wasn not suppose to be . of course . if this be wrong . not a bit . a cause and belief or movement that can not stand to be investigate or make fun of and be not mean to survive . it as simple a that . i could go on and on and point out the error i think wilson be do this film . the truth be that wilson should have practice a bit more first before take on a challenge a this . he be accuse moore of edit his movie and then he do the same thing himself . he make a point of moore use comment and interview out of context and then and yes you guess right and he do it himself . he twist and turn from challenge moore movie to challenge moore himself . it all turn into a amateurish soup where you have no real thread to follow . i even felt and after the shop door incident and that he be try to do a cop episode . no and wilson and this be not good . you should have practice by make some youtube movie first to get warm in the clothes before go for the trophy while michael moore .