david hamilton may have make his name a a photographer but laura leave his writing and direct ability with a lot of question mark . the plot and characterisation have hole that you could drive an army through . when paul ask if laura would pose for his new sculpture sarah refuse so why do she then say that she will take photo of a naked laura for paul to use . it a if she be say and no and mr wyler and laura will not pose naked but i will take lot of photo of laura in erotic pose so that you can ogle her young naked body at your leisure . this be surely not the action of a responsible parent and especially a she know him well enough not to let laura anywhere near him . this be evident at a party give by paul . sarah and her husband richard and laura be invite to the party but laura be leave at home . there be other unanswered question such a what do the woman at the party want to talk to paul about and why be paul allow access to the ballet school . there be more but it would take too long to go into it all here . a this be an erotic film centre around art and there be obviously a certain amount of nudity . david hamilton show his photographic background by have the ballet student adopt various pose and so look like live tableau . there be too much use of fade to black and the permanent soft focus be annoy . this film do not warrant more than 2 star .