i do not have particular feeling for or against the work michael moore do and so hopefully you would not see this a a pro moore attack on naysayer . the argument and support evidence present be be weak and blow up and and in most case hypocritical . a typical example of this be juxtapose footage of moore arriving at the oscar and while nearby protester demonstrate against the war . try to imply that moore be just a glory seek filmmaker who would rather hobnob with celebrity than join in the protest and the point fall flat when you consider how the now infamous acceptance speech make by moore ( and the film itself ) do more for the anti war cause than a street protest ever could . i be all in favour of film to counterbalance the polemic of michael moore and but please do not accuse him of manipulate footage and then do exactly that and add sinister music . a badly make film present a poorly make case .