people say that the first part be a great classic and and that the sequel be bad . well and they be idiot . the first film be a piece of excrement and with fly on it and all and and the sequel should not even be describe use word because no language have word bad enough to describe it . can i call a film a son of a bitch or a bloody idiot . no . then let me refrain from describe it till it become possible to just call a movie a damn bastard . i would not go into stuff that others have already mention and save one represent behold represent the dog have a flashback . this be so groundbreaking stupid i think every single review should repeat it . the bloody dog have a bloody flashback . how stone a writer have to be to think of such an idiotic thing . i will jump over the laughable effect and colourless blood and and beat to decomposition ( not just beat to death ) clichés and and go straight to how annoy the flashback from the first movie be . i do not think i have ever see a sequel that have a much content from the first movie . i be not clock and but i know that if you take out those flashback and the film would be much short . let me finally speak of nudity . film have different kind of nudity and it might be essential ( malèna ) and it might be casual ( godfather ) and artistic ( manderlay ) and or exploitive ( basic instinct ) . but nudity in the hill have eye 2 do not fall into any of these category . actually it need a whole new category call something like nudity that make straight men go gay . it look a if they approach the cheap and most worthless actress and pay her an extra $ 50 to bare her ugly breast when no such thing be due and need and or fit at all . pure cinematic abomination .