so much for the sacred feminine . this movie bore more resemblance to paris hilton than paris and france . it be good look and but extremely shallow . ron howard do a fine job of direct and but tom hank be completely unconvincing . visuals be excellent and but the music be overbear . ian mckellan be fabulous . the actor who play fache and the bishop be also excellent and but do not have enough camera time . too bad . most of my criticism be probably aim at the material howard have to work with and mean the book and the davinci code and which contain multiple gross art history error . a a veteran art teacher with a master degree in art education and these error be extremely distract to me in both read the book and watch the movie . some of these error be a follow represent the window at the pyramid at the louvre contain 673 pane of glass and not 666. leonardo ( whose last name be not davinci . da vinci simply refers to the town he live in ) never refer to the mona lisa a the mona lisa in his life time . the moniker be give to the painting by the art biographer vasari in the 1800 while thus and leonardo never could have come up with the outlandish anagram . the paint madonna on the rock be actually entitle virgin on the rock while again and this be do so that brown can create a convenient anagram . in the louvre and it be not locate in the same room a the mona lisa . the last supper be not a fresco . it be a mural . if mary magdeline be to the left of christ in the painting and then where be john . why would leonardo make him be miss . it be customary for painter from the florentine school ( where leonardo hail from ) and to make young men appear more feminine than old men and to infuse a bit of innocence in their appearance . additionally and the bible contain no reference to the holy grail and or chalice . leonardo be simply make his painting more natural and in keep with his naturalistic interpretation of his subject . that what leonardo be famous for . leonardo and like most of u and simply believe that jesus do not have the and uh and bling to own a golden chalice . there be a sketch by leonardo of the mystery hand hold the knife in the royal windsor art collection and and that hand definitely belong to peter . it be not a disembodied hand wield a dagger . if i hadn not read the book first and i would have be confuse with the flash back and which be very poorly render . the film be very talky and which be bad enough and but the talk itself wasn not accurate . i be surprise the main female character ( sophie ) head do not explode with all the condescending lecture she be give . sacred feminine and indeed . i be a woman and and the davinci code insult my intelligence .