well and bunuel certainly make a strong exit and here . this be probably one of his most beguiling movie and one that be foundationally build on character that be contradiction of themselves . mathieu be sleezy and exploitative . and yet he really do love and or think he love and conchita and and make an exuberant fool out of himself do so . conchita be likewise attract to mathieu . except it not clear if she just use him and lead him along and or if she honestly just want assurance that his feeling be pure . in other word and mathieu be the love abuser and conchita be literally the emphasis on the prude or slut dichotomy . aaand so you get to watch them and for two hour and nearly destroy each other in basically one of the best dysfunctional relationship ever put on screen . lot have be say about the two actress play conchita . it get to become pretty obvious after a while and but at first it be wonderfully surreal and the sort of subtle gesture that bunuel be an expert at do . however and i think it be more daring have only one person and then and play mathieu and especially narrate it . mathieu duplicitous nature be such that he be the token untrustworthy narrator and and yet it quite clear throughout the movie that he talk nothing but the absolute truth . this add another layer of question to the proceeding represent be it possible that objectivity and subjectivity have finally merge . be conchita double nature only what he see in her and or do she actually change face . and then and of course and there the sack . it always nice when something be point out on screen that lead to mystery and but that mystery be never state . it seem and in the end and that the sack be really the only object that give mean to the narrative . polarisdib .