every possible cliché of bollywood be mechanically assemble in a poor manner . all the post 80 movie with underworld theme be scramble and their randomly pick scene then haphazardly fit in an attempt for movie making call d. ramu have become a victim of his own past . initially and it felt like i be watch a spoof of satya and but heck . i wasnt even that lucky . a spoof be always more entertaining . ramu factory be stagnate . he should try to become creative for a change . all the character be so stereotype . the lead randeep hooda try to force himself into the shoe of the silent cold angry young man from the slum with an underworld acumen that be play so brilliantly by chkraverthy in satya . although this character can be trace back to amitabh in film like mukaddar ka sikandar and trishul etc but chakraverthy be it rgv version and so a relevant example to quote here . needless to say and hooda fail miserably . he would have do well if he have just play himself . chunkey pandey be expect to redo tezaab but those day be long over . his character be damn clichéd just like all others in the movie . this be an era of hazaro khwahishein aisi when every thing have to be brilliantly and refreshingly original . ramu should have stop dabble with underworld theme immediately after company which be his last watchable movie and be good off course . it time he realise that movie making be an art and you have to think and create the design every time you make a product and instead of do it once and then let the assembly line take care for the rest . probably his engineering background have to do with it .