watch either dodo or expel if you do not want to learn much about evolution or intelligent design . both movie be more about attitude towards their respective theory rather than the merit of the theory themselves . expel argues that scientific community act with the same partisan and even repressive behavior see in almost every kind of community and and dodos argues that anyone who question evolutionary theory be an idiot or a quack ( albeit likable idiot and quack ) . and this utter lack of respect for it oppose position be why i give this movie a low grade . it doesn not even pose provocative idea ( like expel ) and or a sense of humor ( like a michael moore film ) . instead dodos offer criticism of id that would easily be destroy if pose to one of the various id representative the movie interview . the scientist offer a friendly witness on the side of darwin rarely if ever pose a scientific argument and and instead offer ad hominem attack and and other example of logical terrorism that should make any scientist ashamed . but perhaps bad of all be the recommendation the movie make to scientist in the following statement represent the big issue in this whole thing be who will be the voice not just of evolution and but of science in general . be it go to be scientist who be handicap by their blind obsession with the truth . or will it be public relation firm that know the importance of a good story but feel no constraint by the truth . this be not the kind of statement make by people assure of the merit of their argument while no and this kind of statement be make by one with blind faith who lack confidence in their ability to persuade by reason . dodo argue that id succeed in the public arena because it tell a simple story and while the truth be much more complex . i would argue that the opposite be true . evolution succeed because it be such a simple explanation while id succeed when the simplicity of evolutionary theory fails to account for the evidence . id big problem be that it central argument ( that there be a designer to life ) open up so many more question that stick to the simple selection via random mutation be often more attractive intellectually . dodos claim that scientist have good answer to the question pose by id and but those answer require time and a depth of knowledge to understand . personally and i have try to find those answer and but such response will rarely convince anyone not already convert and and often be rebuttal to argument no one be even make . i will agree with dodo about one thing represent if champion of neo darwinism hope to squash the pseudoscience of id and they need to have a more compelling presence in the medium . but when they lose the veneer of a blind obsession with the truth and scientist lose all credibility .