i totally dislike this film and because it just go ahead and throw the james bond of lore out the window . the suave and sophisticated and witty super agent be go . i would rather not offend mr craig and but i must admit that he be the bad casted james bond ever in the history of the series it not his fault though because the filmmaker be the one who choose him . i feel that if mr flemming or mr. broccoli be alive and they would not approve of the casting or even the spirit of this film . the film isn not terrible in a movie sense and but it doesn not fit a a james bond film . james bond have be well establish in the cinema . here jam bond have be reestablish a something else . you can either accept or reject it . i be only 21 and but even i will not accept this reinvention of bond for a new audience or generation . i first discover bond a a child in awe of the magic of the film of old . i consume them all and cheer for bond and indulge in these adventure . sadly that magic have fade and and boring realism and drama have take the forefront in an attempt to reinvent bond and though it may have be acceptable if the bond be right and if the bond spirit be still in tact . the attempt at believability be destroy by an unbelievable james bond and the original foundation be too great . connery and lazenby and moore and dalton and brosnan be all good acceptable james bond . even niven in the original casino royale and bond spoof be acceptable . they be all debonair gent . craig doesn not portray that and he doesn not look or act right . i would argue that craig would be a good villain in a bond film .