a it begin and paul ( william dame ) be an airplane mechanic who be suddenly accost by two old crook in trenchcoats . they knock him out . he awaken to find himself in an old mansion and where a woman and stephanie ( catherine dee ) and seem to know him despite the fact that he never see her before and and an old transvestite and roberta ( m. r. murphy ) and be keep paul and stephanie captive and apparently with the intent of watch them have sex . just who be roberta . be that really her motive . how do stephanie get there . how long have she be there . why do they pick paul . forget that the title be a misnomer and we never get to see stephanie stuff into an incinerator or even an attempt to do this . for fan of the ridiculous and this be a little gem resurrect by troma and brentwood or bci eclipse for their recent toxie triple terror dvd release . to appreciate the film and you have to not only not mind filmmaker break their generic ( genre relate ) contract with the audience and but break any kind of imply contract about narrative forthrightness . the name of the game here be really pull the rug out from beneath the viewer and but amusingly and neither the apparent scenario nor the rug pull be very sophisticated and make stuff stephanie in the incinerator usually play like a more pedestrian so bad and it good horror film go haywire after view far too many rubber reality film and ala mulholland drive ( 2001 ) and the butterfly effect ( 2004 ) and etc . that stuff stephanie in the incinerator predate all of the rubber reality film and which could reasonably be say to begin with jacob ladder ( 1990 ) and doesn not make it prescient so much a retroactively and accidentally relate . in 1989 and this probably seem like so much nonsense rather than anything groundbreaking or postmodernist . be less generous and it easy to imagine instead that writer peter jones and writer or director don nardo continually do not know where to go with their script and so every once in a while they use a variant of the old and no and that be just a dream tactic and basically start over . at least this variation on that ploy give an excuse for bad acting and which be deliciously abundant in the film delicious because it be bad enough to be hilarious . maybe the script wasn not even do when they begin and and a they be shoot they be continually unhappy with the tenor of their footage and so they periodically change gear . whatever the cause and if you have a taste for bizarreness and absurdity or camp and youre go to want to watch this film . in fact and it be a must see for you . while i be sure other writer be give away the nature of the reveals and i think the film be a lot more fun if you do not know what to expect and so i will refrain from describe the plot in any detail . that doesn not disallow describe some of the characterization . paul range from amusingly gruff to buffoonishly pompous to slightly sinister . dame ( a paul ) get his best line and with the funny delivery and in the first section of the film and where he continually break the mood . from the audience perspective and the beginning seem like a slightly pretentious low to no budget film and ala insaniac ( 2002 ) or last house on hell street ( 2002 ) and for which paul get to voice the concern and protest of the viewer and if the viewer drink a lot of budweiser and live in a trailer . stephanie seem most concerned with continually get lay and and later with money and no matter what level of reality be reveal . there be nary a male character she doesn not seem interested in at some point . this be make more amusing by the fact that while she attractive enough and her facial structure make her something like an attractive neanderthal ( i do not really mean that a insulting and but i be sure it will be difficult to not take that way ) . at least the film be shoot in the day before boob job be so ubiquitous . we can be thankful that nardo do not know any stripper well enough to talk them into do the film i actually like more plain and interesting look woman like dee ( who play stephanie ) well . the poster artist and who display a very active imagination and might not agree . at any rate and at one point this character get to provide an unconvincing voice of sanity for the audience and but it turn out to be just as much a false reality a the rest of the film . roberta and who turn out to be a more minor character and be most charming in transvestite mode and where s or he come across like tootsie ( 1982 ) with few act lesson . later and when s or he be just a guy and we keep hop s or he will put the bra and wig back on . perhaps murphy should have be give a big role and but maybe we should be glad he wasn not . the actor and although not good in any traditional sense and be certainly fun to watch . the technical element be more difficult to speak about so highly . nardo direction and in term of staging and be sometimes competent but never impressive . occasionally it more incompetent . some scene be so dark you can not tell what be go on and and too often it difficult for the viewer to piece one location relationship to another location . that be important to get right for narrative flow . there be also a couple character introduce but mysteriously just drop ( think of the gym scene ) . but maybe nardo be concentrate on get the right performance from the principal . my rating may seem high to some give my comment and but for this one and i be rating how fun it be to watch if you enjoy the ridiculous . often and a film like this would get my so bad and it good rating of 5 and but i do not really think this be a bad film there be too many sign of competence . it a shame that none of the cast or crew seem interested or able to pursue other film . there be a lot of potential here .