the first half hour of the movie serve a a broad introduction to the theme of shark . the footage be really nice and the narrative get the job do . then the movie become much more political with the intention to change the common view of shark a a lurking predator that be out to get u . the following explanation be good but the statistic that we be show be ridiculous . it really isn not important to compare shark attack with car accident or whatever i do not think that we basically will feel more safe to go swimming in an area with shark if we know that more people die from drug than from shark attack . really . i think that the director should have consult someone with more flair for journalism when he decide to make this movie political . then we enter the battle against the illegal fishing that be go on in order to get the fin from the shark to shark fin soup . the theme be very relevant but again i think that director rob stewart should have stay focus on what he be good at while portray shark underwater . i once hear how post modernism influence the way an academic paper should be make while instead of give the conclusion and show your observation and let the viewer ( or reader ) conclude for himself . i would have be more engaged if the movie have be produce accordingly . the way it be make leave out any room for reflection while everything be serve overcooked and very easily digest . on top of that you sometimes do not know what you be be serve because the narrative do not always give a well rounded description of what be go on why do this movie get such a high rating on imdb . i think and this be entirely my own thought that people and because of the importance of the theme and think that this movie need to be see by so many a possible . regard simon .