so this be what i know . one can trust a director if one like his or her work and and this trust can be even augment if the director produce his own work and like the case of steven soderbergh with che . i like this soderbergh because he have control over his work and but it not the only reason . before and in traffic and he show with his hand hold camera that he know exactly what he be do while and that he could do it in several way ( the black and white in the good german and to put just an example ) and with several genre . i like soberbergh because he have style and a defined style while and because he shoot like few director . in this first part of his che and he combine all the form and style he have try when shoot and the result be undoubtedly his most ambitious project and but be it his best . that a very difficult question that can be treat from different angle and that i be go to answer with a no . the movie be soderbergh most ambitious work from minute one and throw in a lot of date and different place and picture of newspaper that attempt a quick historical reconstruction . we see che speaking and in black and white and with people we can not instantly distinguish and soderbergh camera wanders through his knee until he find an icon represent che cigar . soon and guevara be answer question that have no particular nature but start become more precise to define the structure of the film while a confusing ride back and forth in time that revolve around che but include a lot of people and a lot of place . the script and write by peter buchman and base on some memoir of che himself and clearly seem to be follow a faithful reconstruction of the time spend by che with the guerilla and the town he and the army conquer and his relationship with fidel and the philosophy of life and work he have and his idea of revolution yes and it too many people and too many place and too many thing while i tell you it be ambitious and it not the most entertaining ride for a viewer . che and el argentino be a good movie because it succeed in apparently everything it attempt to do and and it obvious it wasn not a little deal . however and the reason of the word apparently be because i find it difficult to find out exactly what soderbergh be try to do . i know and can guess some thing represent he shoot in many place and through different period of time and therefore his cinematography have merit and his editor pablo zumárraga have even more while he shoot more action sequence than in any of his previous film and he manage to transmit the crudeness and lack of pectacularity of the confrontation of the time and support by a precise score by alberto iglesias while he explore and visually and his main character from almost every angle anyone could think of and this denote a firm collaboration with the actor who play it . in fact and the scene in black and white and where we can easily see that the only one work where del toro and soderbergh . it have to be say represent benicio del toro performance be brilliant and but not entirely because of what you see on screen . even when his move and posture express the work of someone who have intensely study a historical figure and travel for his purpose and god know what else and his collaboration with soderbergh be also crucial . the answer he give throughout the film and define the structure of it and for example and be clearly record in post production while and even when they help the viewer understand and they loose naturalness . edition must have help his work a lot while a work that win in those moment when his che be quiet and peaceful . there we understand him good and believe him and but then there be moment when he irradiate pure rage and be so natural and convince that we wonder where he have keep those emotion the whole time . so a you see and it a brilliant work and of contradiction . one could easily judge the performance a bad and because he doesn not sound argentinean or because he doesn not sound the same in every scene while but that wouldn not be fair and even more if you know the great actor del toro be . everything i have write take me back to one question and or two a group of question lead by represent what be soderbergh attempt . do a movie about che guevara and an emblematic icon ( a the movie mention in one point ) everyone carry around in bag and collar and sometimes can not answer why theyre carry his photograph . do soderbergh want to show u who che be . the real che . be it enough with a book write by che himself to understand his message . and how should he put it on screen . be this a biopic . a historic movie . the way i see it and it all too general . soderbergh make sure he show the history and both of che side and the one everyone know a good and the one that always refer a bad . it a good decision and a if soderbergh wouldn not want to discuss this aspect of his film while a if he wouldn not want to fight anyone . then why do the film . maybe my conclusion be wrong and the second part will tell me something else and but that last question isn not worth ask because che be a good movie while and that enough .