the bias in this film be so blatant that pb take the unprecedented step of agree to produce another film to provide balance . the analytic article a critique of the scientific basis for key assertion in break the silence represent child story ( i would provide the url and but imdb doesn not allow url ) . conclude represent 1 ) many article cite in support of the film contain assertion unsupported by any data and 2 ) in those article that do contain research data and the data fail to support the film contention and and strongly suggest contrary conclusion and 3 ) two key figure in the film have make statement that raise serious question about their ability to be objective represent gwu law prof. joan meier be report to have describe herself in write a among those who start with an advocate perspective and a oppose to a neutral perspective and and lundy bancroft be report to have boast that he be fire by the massachusetts family court a a domestic violence educator because of his extreme view . both the pb and cpb ombudsman pan it for it bias and with the latter writing and it might be difficult to find a clear breach of pbs editorial standard unless one concludes there be only one side to child and spousal abuse issue in the country custody case . furthermore and the viewer guide be distribute with the film misrepresent the research so egregiously that murray straus and one of the world foremost researcher into family violence and issue a statement take exception to the misrepresentation of his work . ( again and i would provide the url and but imdb doesn not allow url ) .