a an evenings entertainment this film be intrigue view and a a valid look at what happen on 911 this film flounder in a mire of it own making . the point of the film be that something other than the official story occur on 911. accord to this film the plane that hit the world trade center be not the plane we be tell and that a missile hit the pentagon and flight 93 be shoot down and that some or all of the plane be off load and the people may still be alive and the collapse of the twin tower be the work of demolition not the crash and and that there be some grand conspiracy behind it all . it an intriguing idea and or series of them . the problem be that not a great deal of it really hang together and at least not in the way that be present here . could it be possible . yes and but not with what we be give a evidence . there be little real expert testimony . we only get snippet from other source . no real expert in any field be interview . ( which be important when it come to construction of the twin tower since they be unlike any other building that they be compare to when they talk about fire in steel building ) we be only give statement and usually one line from someone and we do not know anything about other than a title and about thing they may or may not know about . every person who saw anything be accord equal weight ( a woman who appear to be watch event from brooklyn or low manhattan and far from the tower and be hear to say that the plane crash into the tower isn not american so therefore it not american . ) everyone be see to be tell the truth at all time . a miss quote of president bush be see a proof of something other than a a mistake . the filmmaker also take every news report a gospel truth with a report of the blow up of one of the tower roof be portray a true when the footage show it not there be no room for any error in any news footage and it not an error but sign of the conspiracy . the evidence in one sequence of picture be forget when discuss another so that the evidence of the plane that hit the tower be commercial airline from some shot be dismiss because it not clear in others . ( also the phone report of one eyewitness that be contradict by photographic evidence be give a great deal of weight ) and at time the film throw thing out like the off loading of passenger and but give no evidence a to why this may have happen or what happen to the people . you can not make claim if you do not back them up . likewise unexplained be talk of a conspiracy that it have no shred of evidence a to who or what be behind it . you need to tell me more than just they be behind it . tell me who they be it really annoy me because as long a you do not think about what the film be say or the inconsistent story it spin this be a really well do piece of film making . frankly i could almost believe it story and except that none of them make any real sense when you stop to think about them . worth a look and with a large grain of salt and simply because it lay out the alleged conspiracy many people feel be real . fortunately or unfortunately it fail to make it case because it evidence be severely lacking .