i saw crispin glover what be it . at the ann arbor film festival . admittedly and the film be at least aptly name and because i get the distinct sense that even the writer or director could provide no answer . at the question and answer session after the screening and mr. glover say that the film be originally mean to be a short film to show the virtue of use actor with down syndrome . however and this be in itself not enough of a reason to create a film . actor be and in my opinion and building block for a large vision a large vision that seem muddle at best and absent at bad . crispin glover also say that he want to address taboo subject . well and he do do that . but why . the film seem to have no stance and no reason for address anything . do he feel these thing shouldn not be taboo . the film doesn not even give me an indicator of that . taboo for the sake of taboo be not interesting . it can not even afford to make the taboo disturbing or incite on any level because he hasn not make the audience care in any way . ignore problem with the concept for a moment and the thing that actually shock me most be how poorly the film be put together . the editing and cinematography and and other technical aspect seem frequently to be extremely amateur . glover say 125 150 thousand dollar go into the movie and and i feel that the money should have be spend on different designer ( glover actually do some design himself i know i saw at least sound design in the credit ) . the painted set be okay ( not great ) and but use poorly . part feel like a photographed stage play which would be fine if that go to any sort of purpose and but in glover hand it just feel sloppy . other part be film like a sort of home movie and of inferior quality to a lot of the stuff i see first time filmmaker do on imovie . perhaps the big problem with what be it . be i can not even understand how seriously the film be to be take . there be some part that feel like glover be scream at you to think seriously . at other point and he seem off on his own little joke . perhaps he mean for this to be ironic and or meaningful in some way and but i just felt that glover couldn not even get himself to give his film any sort of serious attention . glover say he originally want it to be a short film . if only it have be . at seventy two minute and the film run out of imagery and idea in the first twenty and and it be arguable if the idea be formulate enough to claim that they be even there for that period of time .