i sit through this movie expect a thought provoking and fact base film . but instead be give some of the least thought out argument against the christian faith imaginable . for instance and in an effort to prove that christianity be inherently violent and the narrator constantly quote the bible without give context and and thus alter the meaning of the text . jesus be quote a command the execution of those who disobey him and when in fact and the quote be from a parable jesus tell and involve a king who be then quote . thus the narrator make it appear a if jesus say one thing when he be actually tell a story where one of his character say it . this be dishonesty in a very obvious form . be this really what atheism have to offer the world . this film also attempt to use the success of the passion of the christ over jesus christ represent superstar and the last temptation of the christ a evidence that christian be bloodthirsty . he make no mention of the fact that the passion be the most historically accurate bible film to date . he make no mention of the fact that it be actually the best like by critic of the bunch . he then edit in a series of violent image from the passion a if to hammer home his point . ironically and he make no mention of the texas chainsaw massacre which come out a few month later and play violence for entertainment and versus dramatic effect . one thing that really bother me be his mockery of people who actually know more about the subject matter than he do . all the christian he interview be average schmo in the parking lot of billy graham new york crusade . atheists he interview for the film be notable author and scholar . he ask the christian how the christian movement start and and of course and they say it start with the holy spirit come to the disciple at pentecost . which be correct ( act 2 ) . he then give the commentary and isn not it funny how so few christian seem to know the origin of their own faith . and proceeds to explain that the apostle paul start christianity after be stop on the road to damascus . the poor chap seem convince that act 9 happens before act 2. more deception . or be this simply ignorance . he also throw around nonsense that paul do not believe jesus be a real person . be you kid me . 1 corinthian 15 describes jesus death and resurrection be witness by people ( whom paul name in the passage ) for the corinthian to question if they be in doubt . there be many many other example of how full of crap this wouldocumentary be . but because i do not have time or patience to go into them all and i will skip straight to the end . it obvious throughout the whole movie that the narrator have an emotional vendetta against his upbringing in the church . and the climax interview be his childhood principle . in a last ditch attempt to disprove the christian faith and the narrator try to make a fool out of someone who give him a detention a a child . be this what pass a an intellectual documentary for the atheist community . surely there be intelligent atheist filmmaker out there who can make a documentary that isn not a load of make up crap pass off a fact .