although i be generally a proponent of the well make film and i do not limit myself to film which escape those boundary and and more often than not i do enjoy and admire film that successfully break the rule . and it be quite true that director pasolini break the rule of establish cinema . but it be also my opinion that he do not break them successfully or to any actual point . pasolini work be visually jarring and but this be less a matter of what be actually on the screen than how it be film and and the jumpiness of his film seem less a matter of artistic choice than the result of amateur cinematography . this be true of decameron . pasolini often prefer to use non actor and and while many director have do so with remarkable result and under pasolini direction his non actor tend to remain non actor . this be also true of decameron . pasolini quite often include image design to shock and offend and or otherwise disconcert the audience . such element can often be use with startling effect and but in pasolini hand such element seldom seem to actually contribute anything to the film . this be also true of decameron . i have be give to understand there be many people who like and even admire pasolini film . even so and i have never actually meet any of them and and i have never be able to read anything about pasolini or his work that make the reason for such liking or admiration comprehensible to me . judge him from his work alone and i be of the opinion that he be essentially an amateurish director who do not break the rule so much by choice a by lack of skill and who be initially applaud by the intelligentsia of his day for existential boldness and thereby simply confirm him in bad habit a a film maker . i find his work tedious and unimpressive and and pretentious . and this and too and be true of decameron . it be also and sadly and true of virtually every pasolini film it have be my misfortune to endure .