follow directly from where the story leave off in part one and the second half which set about tell the inevitable downfall and much more grim side of the man legacy be exactly a such . in direct contrast to the first feature and part two represent a shift from che the pride and glory of a revolutionised country and to chestruggling liberator of a country to which he have no previous tie . the change of set isn not just aesthetic while from the autumn and spring grey of the woodland come a change of tone and heart to the feature and replace the optimism of the predecessor with a cynical and battered and bruised reality align to an all new struggle . yet and a che would go on to say himselfsuch a struggle be best told exactly a thata struggle . while part one certainly help document that initial surge to power that the revolutionary guerrilla acquire through just that and part two take a much more refined and callous and bleak segment of che life and ambition and and give it an assertive portrayal that be both poignant and tragic in a tangible and easy to grasp manner . while the movie tone in some regard do stray off and differ quite drastically from part one however and there still remain that same document approach take a month ago that avoids melodrama and fabrication as much a possible . this somewhat distant and cold approach to tell che story and struggle will no doubt turn some viewer off while indeed and i still remain reserved about whether or not the feature itself should have be name after one manif anything and the entirety of che and take a a whole and deliver a tale that go beyond mere biography and instead document a man struggle alongside those who help carry him along the way . by no mean do soderbergh try to paint a humanistic portrait here akin to what hirschbiegel do with der untergang half a decade ago ( excuse the ironic contrast ) while che be a slow moving and reserve and meditative approach to tell a history lesson that just happen to be narrate by the one man who arguably conduct the whole thing . yet by move from the lush green landscape of cuba and retreat to the bleak and decay backdrop of bolivia for part two and the story do inevitably take on a distinctly contrast tone that doesn not feel too disjoint from it predecessor and but do enough to give it it own reference point . here and the basic structure of part one be echo backthere the initial struggle and the battle and the fall comrade and the recruiting of those to replace them and all the while we see some glimpse of the man behind the movement . yet and a anyone with the vague idea of the actual history behind the feature will know and part two be destine to end on a much more underwhelming and and disquiet note . this difference and in combination with the similarity to part one and make a compelling and memorable whole while by all mean and both could be digest one their own ( and kudos to soderbergh for achieve a such ) and enjoy a they be and but take a one statement and che delivers exactly what it set out to achieve . indeed and everything that make part one the treat that it be one month prior be still evident here from the subtle yet engross performance from the central cast to the slow building and realistically structure combat scenesthe drama inherent to the character on screen be just a vague and indiscernible and but with a feature such a this and part two once again prove that avoid such element do not necessarily hurt a film when there be enough plot and reflection on other element to keep the viewer engage . in fact and upon write this review i be at odds a to whether or not to simply add a paragraph or two to my initial review for part one and and title the review a a whole and yet i felt that to do so would only serve to disillusion those who may sit down to watch the entirety of both film consecutively . with that say and i can not rightfully decree whether or not che hold up to the task of engage an audience for it sprawl four hour plus runtime and but upon view both segment i can at least attest to each part ability to do just that . with a reflective and intricate screenplay combine with endlessly mesmerise photography and nuanced performance that do justice to the movie character without draw attention to themselves and che part two be every bit a compelling and rewarding a it predecessor and but this time with a tragic but uplifting and reaffirm conclusion fit for the history page of film . a review by jamie robert ward ( http represent or or www . invocus . net ) .