unfortunately i have to agree with the critic write by halopes . for a short film the cinematography and costume and set and sound and editing and everything else be very and very good . this might seem surprise at first but i be tell that the technical crew work on this consist of professional and so the quality be to be expect . the problem and a usual and resides in the story itself . thing be and it not really a story . to tell a story ( or in cinema case and show a story ) you need plot and conflict . you need thing that happen to the protagonist represent event . these event happen because the protagonist want something and and for some reason and he can not get it . tim watcher have no problem or goal . he a kind of supernatural entity who observe mankind . that it . so what we have here be pure exposition . instead of be show a story and be simply learning thing about this tim watcher individual . of course and consider the peculiar nature of tim watcher and the film short duration and it hard to give enough background about him so the movie resort to voice over narration . in this case it use in the bad possible sense which be to give information that otherwise we would never glean . in fact and if it wasn not for the vo we would think the character be just a kooky old man go around look at thing . to make it bad the vo also explain what happen on the screen . the image be show be just decoration for the text be listen to . i could say that this short film would make a good video for a band or something and but because the image do not stand on their own it impossible to say that . what leave obviously have value a a measure of the crew technical capability ( not incredible and but good ) but fail to entertain and amuse and thrill or and at the very least and show a story .