it utterly defeat me why godard be take so seriously and one plus one be a great example of his ineptitude a both a filmmaker and an intellectual polemicist . it hard to credit that godard actually believe all that marxist and maoist kant . anyone with half a brain could work out the bankruptcy of those ism and how many people they have destroy and be continue to destroy even a godard be make his film support them . a a filmmaker and ask yourself represent would you have boring voice over read tedious political diatribe at your audience and and then and when you couldn not think of anything else to do and layer another voice over to the first voice over and which have lose it listener after the first 100 word in any case . brilliant and jean luc . a for godard insist on make a film with the roll stone represent of course he do while wouldn not you . it be the only guarantee of get such mindless rubbish see in the first place represent the genius of the stone eclipse a talentless and babble political idiot set loose with a camera . the bookshop scene wasn not worthy of even the bad fringe theatre and and be an insult to the intelligence of even the young child who be use to play in it a could be readily see . cop out by allow friendly critic to claim that all this artless crap be a satire on mainstream film making be no more than a safe get out to offer those who clearly see godard poverty of intellect and arrogant contempt for his audience . ironic that godard one time great friend and truffaut and with nuit americain and make the best film about film making ever and and godard make the bad with le mepris . incidentally and godard do not choose the stone track of sympathy with the devil . it just happen to be the track they be work on when the film start shoot at barnes olympic studio .