i want to give draw blood the benefit of the initial doubt . the opening moment and with a naked woman sprawl out and an painter and diana and about to paint her and then suck her blood to drain out so she can use it for her art and give the impression that this could be a kick as artsy vampire flick . turn out this initial impression turn out false . oh and troma and the mark of some kind of lack of quality represent sometimes they will offer up something that be trash but funny and with at least some competence to the junk food craft ( or and sometimes not ) . this be a case where it not even a whole lot of fun to watch since it attempt at humor ( i. e. the protagonist father be an old vaudevillian who do jimmy durante impression . ) be weak at best and and any unintentional laugh be undercut by sergio lapel bargain basement direction . and it not without him try and oh lord no . he do try a lot and which be a big part of the problem . he and his producer have money for light and sure and but the way theyre use in the movie make i and a former student filmmaker and aspire director and sulking in my seat represent if i saw this in a theater i would have to blind my eye in many instance and and would wonder whether or not his dp understood really the basic 3 point lighting set up . while this and along with a very lackluster sound design ( or just lot of random loud hum like in the art gallery scene ) and shouldn not be something that come to attention during a troma release and it should be something basic that a filmmaker can tackle even if the script isn not very funny or scary ( and it isn not ) or if lapel do a weird mixture of song place at bizarre moment . it not a good movie by any stretch and and perhaps if youre a vampire die hard ( or just a vampire period ) it might have some appeal a a low rent bargain basement alternative to near dark and or a a slight improvement over and say and 1972 blood freak . you have good way to waste your time and overall .