revolt of the zombie have no redeeming feature . i be tire of people argue that it not that bad and and that the effect must have pack more of a punch in 1936. i suspect this isn not true represent it not like iq have rise sharply in the last 7 decade . the average viewer in 1936 be probably just a bore by this rubbish a the average viewer today . why . just try watch the first scene and and count the pause between thing happen and the awful choice of when to cut to close up and the slapdash editing that seem to include an extra two second on every shot to pad out the running time . pay attention to the utterly redundant dialogue represent i be go to make some tea or go outside or read my book now . be you . yes and i be . that sort of exchange happen several time . normally i would love that and be a huge fan of bad movie and but watch the listless actor mumble their trite and tedious line and and all desire to laugh at the movie slowly fade away . this sort of disinterested and pot boiling time waster be far bad than energetic and imaginative mind blower like plan nine from out space or santa claus conquer the martian . those who claim that this be good than those more interesting movie have a backwards idea of entertainment . this movie be not bad in the sense that your jaw hang open in astonishment represent it bad in the sense that your eye slowly close in boredom . which be far bad .