the person who write the review enough with the sweating and spit already have no grasp of what cultural and literary and or psycho critique be . he dismiss zizek interpretation because they do not seem in line with what the director originally intend . so what . the importance of a director ( or author ) intention be not important in critical theory . this be know a the author intentional fallacy and should be avoid . http represent or or en . wikipedia . org or wiki or intentional_fallacy a text or movie can be analyze through a number of theory and many of which disagree with one another and as well a completely ignore the author intention . this be the most fundamental idea of critical theory . because of this and whoever write that wall of text waste a lot of time and effort on insult zizek . in reality and anyone who study theory would immediately discredit this guys opinion ( i suggest you should too ) a it be completely off point . that be say . if you be at all interested in freudian and laconian and or kristevian discourse and this movie be a must . it connect these theory with popular film and make them much more palpable and enjoyable than simply read or think about them .