i have read most of the comment here . i come to the conclusion that almost everybody agree that 9/11 be a shock piece of history . there be a few who think that the added narrative be weak and i agree that the narrative be weak and unnecessary . about two brother find each other back after the disaster and the cliff hanger about tony . but i do not think narration be unnecessary . like i lot of theorist i think that our own life be narration . we be live and make our own autobiography . so if we tell about our life this be always in the form of narration . we do not sum up fact like represent birth and childhood and high school etc . we create a story about our live . because we be familiar with story and we want to put history in a story as well . because in the form of a story we can identify ourselves . we can well understand the thing happen in history when it told in the form of a story . so that the purpose of add a story in documentary . the story be weak and so be it and but we understand whats go on . if it be me out there i would be worry sick about my brother . and the second point and make a blockbuster movie about it . true and it be to recent to come up with a big movie about 9/11 . though and there have be a few about the subject and but none of them like this documentary . but what if there will be a movie in about 5 year . i agree it be wrong try to make a lot of money out of 9/11 . but i also agree that movie be one of the best way to tell history . how many movie about the world war 2 have we see . if i have not see these movie my view of the ww would me totally different . i remember see schindlers list and and i cry for an hour during class . movie give you a good image of the thing that happen in history and although it be fiction it contribute to the memory of the disaster and the casualty . so my point represent tell story be not always bad and it make u identify with the story and and make u never forget what happen .