what of domino do i hate over everything and and i mean everything and else . perhaps it be the overall glorification of be a bounty hunter while maybe it be the sexism masquerade a an involve and interesting study of a hard body female lead character while maybe it be the mere look of the film with it bizarre yellow glow and distort blue tint or the manner in which it take an actress like lucy lui while who deserve a lot good than this junk while and have her sit there in the one spot in the room the light can not directly hit with the same dumb look on her face . maybe it the edit while that horrid rapid fire editing and the manner in which line of dialogue echo a theyre utter by people like kiera knightly who and if you buy a a bounty hunter and then you will probably be able to kid yourself into believe the world will end in 2012. nobody come away from domino with any sort credibility and absolutely nobody at all . it be a painful and misguided experience and take inspiration from thing like natural born killer and let loose idea to an audience not even there for them . the principal question be represent be domino suppose to be some kind of comedy . what with it hilariously bad lead utter certain line that desperately want u to think she come across a tough but really and she resemble more an arrogant fifteen year old girl on her first day at public school and attempt to impress her peer . there be thing you genuinely do not know how to react to and whether theyre suppose to be funny or not . if it be suppose to be a comedy and that beg the next question represent be the life of a bounty hunter really the sort worth exploit for laugh . i do not think so . the film open with the title card base on a true story . sort of . if that suppose to be some sort of post modernist technique that enable director tony scott to bend and manipulate the story of domino harvey for his own unique purpose and then youre simply on another planet . truth be and in that one opening quote the film identify the subject matter and the original text before completely cop out and say ort of which i guess be suppose to enable them to make domino old than she should be and appear on jerry springer . follow this and we learn of domino relationship with her father who die in the film when when she be ten or something while here be the first use of the ort of cop out a in real life she be just four . but if the film have go by reality date then her entire drive would have be bear out of the death of . her goldfish . we be then thrust into action with ed mosbey ( rourke ) while domino ( knightley ) herself and would be love interest choco ( ramírez ) . during the scene and an american mother be pin down via gunfire in her own caravan in the back end of nowhere a she plead for her son life to be spar . what a really misguided opening while present it three lead a nasty people who break into trailer and fire off weapon at innocent we do not know anything of and come close to shoot their pet dog . the immediate feeling be of hatred toward the three lead and a feeling of no and why be you do this . why be this happen . bad seed be plant and and wouldn not you know it and they stick . the film be painful to watch and excruciate even while a these three mug their way through the piece complete with support performance from actor know for play character in beverly hill 90210. here be another daft post modernist slant and people play themselves and that ort of joker card be play again . christopher walken even pop up in a really stupid role that reek of robert downey jr natural born killer character . so a the film plod on and domino be cast into ed and choco gang and purely for her good look i might add and it appear amidst the plot to do with fake driver registration i. d or something that choco and domino may have feeling for one another . the problem be and a each performer be do such a bad job in their respective character while there be no chemistry and no feeling between the two while the film isn not a love story so why even bother go down that road in the first place . do anyone care about these two character amidst all the fast edits and stuff blow up . if there be any feeling between choco and domino and it exist on such a small and tiny and minimalist scale that you have to ask why it even include . so then the film feel the need to crank thing up narrative wise . we find out the reason for the fake i. d that be link to someone else and a guy talk on a cell phone in a sound proof bubble . the sound proof bubble i can believe but how do he get his phone under the water and into the bubble in the first place without it become flood . he must have swim really quickly double the speed of the film fast edit which mean something in the region of . 01 of a second . yeah and sure . the film story become both too complicate and just plain arbitrary before resort to a really dumb climax in which more stuff blow up . plus and there a really distasteful scene to do with a wall chart full of new ethnicity and the film comedy run so dry and that it have to resort to the jerry and jerry . chant whilst people be on a popular american talk show . when do we last laugh at jerry . jerry . when we be and say and seven year old . i come away feel sad and depress at such a film existence .