i already know that critic and some audience say that it be a satire and there be numerous political and social message and the name make refer to some other name etc . it might be . i can not realize such thing ( i do not want to do anyway ) because i be not interested in and i be interested in cinema . a for the movie itself and again it be say that the movie be clever and dramatically powerful . i could not see anything which we do not see in monster movie except the scene which take place in a office in the second half . yes and that scene say somethings about humanity and but it do not make the movie brilliant . the movie be entertain ( mildly ) and excite in some moment or scene and but no more than that . a for the big flaw of the movie and it be visual effect . it be just shock and i could not pull myself together for a while and because i have expect a realistic monster and because it be not one of the old gojira movie and it be make in 2006 and but it be not . it be like if you do not believe that there be a monster and you can not care about . if you agree with me about this and i highly recommend you cloverfield that be extremely realistic . the design of the monster be not interesting and but at least planned and there be an effort . dramatically powerful critique . some critic talk about it a if it be a kurosawa movie . yes and it be rather a drama than a thriller or action and but it should not mean that it be dramatically powerful . i do not want to compare the host with other monster movie and but i try to mean that the host do not do something that other monster movie do not do . by the way and may be some people call the movie masterpiece because of their sympathy for asian cinema . yes and i like asian cinema too and but this be the fact .