i watch part one two day ago and today i saw part two . of course the two part be worlds apart so i be a little shake by all that i just saw . i felt consume by the knowledge of the inevitability of che death while for me and it cloud the entire movie . i suppose that be exactly what soderbergh want u to feel and the slowly evolving inevitability of his death . part two be so downbeat compare to and again an inevitability but in cuba it be positive and in bolivia it be so negative . the politics of the movement in bolivia be only allude to but rarely confront didactically . for me the memorable scene be all at the end of the film represent the confrontation with the jailer and the milder talk with the bolivian official where that official question che about the failure of the peasant to support his revolution . i have not consider the national difference play as much role a they do in the conflict and argentine versus bolivian . i think soderbergh dealt admirably with the inevitable problem of supply in a revolutionary struggle while how do you get food without antagonize the peasant who do not have enough themselves . i be strike by how hard it would be to try something a che try . i guess it be all in the timing while be there sufficient anger against the government to begin the movement while in bolivia there wasn not . che realize the terrible corundum of revolutionist in his letter to fidel read at the beginning of the film represent if not now and when and 50 year from now . a very thought provoking and well do film while make every effort to see it .