funny how many of the people who say this be far superior to romero version tend to be very young ( judge by their other post ) . what we have here be a slick and action packed and gory and whoopee fill 2 hour mtv video . frantic editing and pop video camera work and cool music blah blah blahactually it ain not bad compare to other recent remake ( chainsaw massacre be a total disaster ) . pretty good act all round and totally predictable in the who will die next stake and a total cash in on the dawn of the dead name that will generate plenty of revenue alone by fan of the original who will go and see it out of curiosity . don not remake of classic get on your nerve . can they really not come up with something original . why remake dawn of the dead . the thing that make the original special ( the middle segment kid think be so boring be suppose to be slow to show how when you get everything you ever want you still ain not happy ) be totally miss . this be an action flick and plain and simple . the fast the good . if you be into action flick ( and a this and the 2004 version be well do ) fair enough and but for anyone who like a little substance to their film . get ready to sigh ( again ) . watch the cinema over the next few year a we get the godfather series remade by whoever the most fashionable pop director be at the moment and and star war remake and with all the kid say how the new version be mile well cos the old version be slow and boring and hold a camera shot for more than 5 second . not bad and but in 10 year they will still be discuss the romero version and not this pap .