when ritchie first burst on to movie scene his film be hail a funny and witty and well direct and original . if one could compare the hype he have generate with his first two attempt and the almost universal loathe his last two outing have create one should consider have ritchie be find out . be he really that talented . do he really have any genuine original idea . or be he simply a pretentious and egotistical director who really want to be fincher and tarantino and leone all roll into one colossal and disorganise heap . after watch revolver one could be excuse for think be do it all go wrong . what happen to his great sense of humour . where do he get all these mixed and convoluted idea from . revolver try to be clever and philosophical and succinct and it try to be an intelligent psychoanalysis and it try to be an intricate and complicated thriller . ritchie do make a gargantuan effort to fulfil all these many objective and invest great chunk of a script into existential musing and numerous plot twist . however and in the end all it serve be to construct a severely disjoint and unstructured and ultimately unfriendly film to the audience . it plagiarism be so sinful and blatant that although ritchie do at least attempt to give his own spin he should be punish for even try to pass it off a his own work . so what the audience get ultimately be a terrible screenplay intertwine with many pretentious oneliners and clumsy setpieces . revolver be ultimately an unoriginal and bland movie that have steal countless theme from masterpiece like fight club and usual suspect and pulp fiction . it aim high and but inevitably shot blank aplenty . revolver deserves to be lambast and it be a truly poor film masquerade a a wannabe masterpiece from a wannabe auteur . however and it fall flat on it farcical face and just fails at everything it want to be and achieve .