warn represent possible spoiler ( not that you should care . also and sorry for the cap . ) start with an unnecessarily dramatic voice that all the more annoying for talk nonsense and it go on with nonsense and unnecessary drama . that badly but accurately put . we know space travel be a risky enterprise . there a complicated system with a lot of potential for malfunction and radiation and stress relate symptom etc and and unexpected thing be bind to happen in largely unknown environment . they know stuff could go wrong . in fact and stuff have go wrong . it call learn . grant and appollo 11 wasn not safe by today standard and there be immense political pressure and but the overall performance of the technology on the mission be impressive . assorted mistake or comment i hadn not even to look up represent1 ) nixon prepare a speech in case something go wrong . well duh . that what i would have do . it be the apex of a propaganda war and after all . 2 ) nasa give green light despite the fact that appollo 11 will probably blow up . ( this be only implicit and though . ) yeah and that why they let people and press watch in almost real time . 3 ) the capsule ejection wouldn not work . like it do not work the time a chimp be in it . the one that survive . it be a test launch and the rocket explode and the capsule accelerate away and land with a parachute . there a video of it and you can probably find it on youtube or at least look it up somewhere . 4 ) one interview guy say an explosion would have wipe out a fair part of florida . i can only assume it be mean a a hyperbole and cause if not and i be just aghast how he could get it so wrong . 5 ) the technology then be primitive compare to today standard . actually and relatively primitive software and hardware be use even today and the reason be that it must not crash . it even worse for spacecraft and because their computer must be build of comparably large component that aren not that susceptible to radiation . ( and the craft itself must be pilotable manually anyway and so a complex steering system like the b2 wouldn not do . ) what with the fact that they be use tv screen rather than computer screen . it the same damn technology . actually tv monitor be and be produce with a significantly high definition . 6 ) if that object wasn not part of the rocket and it could be only one thing . we see where this be go . apart from the fact that the statement be wrong and who say it wasn not a rocket part . at least an interviewee clear up that if a thing be fly and you do not know what it be and it by definition an unidentified flying object . 7 ) the voice over as well a some misquote make it seem a though the lander radiation foil be actually it hull . which would make it thin than a space suit . 8 ) neil armstrong near death during a practice flight be footage i can appreciate while i hadn not see it before . a i say and any piece of manifest technology can go wrong and especially if it not be test sufficiently on account of be and you know and unprecedented . 9 ) the trajectory discrepancy of the descend lander ( due to irregularity in the moon density ) be at no time acutely life threaten . neither be the fifteen second of fuel left and which be and in fact and fifteen second of fuel leave before have to abort the mission and return to the command module . 10 ) a catastrophic chain of event usually result in catastrophe . i really do not know how to put it any simpler . this and however and be a prime example of the rhetoric use . 11 ) there a short sequence of one of the astronaut walking and hop around aimlessly like a gleeful kid and follow by the voice over tell u that the reason for this strange behavior can now be reveal . turn out and he be walk and hop around aimlessly like a gleeful kid . hilarious stuff . 12 ) it mention that during re entry and all contact be lose . this be a perfectly natural phenomenon and it be as well know at the time a it impossible to circumvent with contemporary technology . again and the gravity of this be implicit and but very purposely so . 13 ) there be never a shuttle lose in space itself and while the voice over present this fact a evidence that appollo 11 be a pile of crap . appollo 13 be a near loss and but the two real disaster happen during liftoff and re entry and respectively . in any case and compare shuttle to saturn rocket be somehow . well and okay and just plain stupid . even ignore that and the successful shuttle mission seem to not have be deem of interest to the audience . 14 ) what the hell up with the ufo . even in the context of the movie and it make no sense . unless you assume it be make for entertainment purpose and aim at a specific audience ( which seem to include people with next to no understanding of either history and science and or rhetoric ) . even the point of the movie be somewhat obscure . catch phrase like cover up until now and publically reveal here for the first time and come up and but the film doesn not place any blame or offer a lesson or anything and which could be expect of a film so emotionally do . in the good old tradition of sensationalism and there be numerous interview shot and record fragment that be often out of context or with people that we know nothing about except nasa scientist . wow and so the astronaut be very nervous before the endeavor . fancy that . what do this have to do with the point of the movie again . oh yeah and which point . in summary and in addition to be either willfully or incompetently inaccurate and it not even good entertainment . and believe me and i be a guy who enjoy his crappy documentary while this film isn not funny and witty and quaint and it nothing .