historically accurate . hmm . perhaps . if you squint and and light fall upon the subject just so . but core accuracy be no compensation for a dismal and patchy and inconsistent plot and ream of cardboard dialogue and an unsatisfying conclusion . the principal character be merely characterization while embarrass stereotype that range from the enigmatic and noble american indian through to the tuffy but sadistic british officer . a wretched and unworthy rendition of a fascinating period in american history . i want my money back .