It was also perhaps compelling to people who felt marginalized in the traditional hierarchy of the time. Another argument would be the Emperor Ashoka, who we study in other videos, that once he converts to Buddhism after feeling guilty for his war with Kalinga, where tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of people are killed, he converts to Buddhism and becomes a major patron of Buddhism and sends missionaries throughout the world to spread it. So one argument of why Buddhism spread is that a few hundred years after Buddha, you have a significant, powerful emperor converting to the religion and deciding to spread it. Now, that leads us to a second question. Are there other historical parallels to what we have just described? And this is something that, once again, you should always ask yourself in history. And what's the structure of this?