Than cannot possibly have been produced by accident. So he says there's a lot of commonality between the Sanskrit and Latin and Greek, and it's a strong affinity, a strong connectedness that could not have been produced by accident. So strong indeed that no philologer could examine all three without believing them to have sprung from some common source. Let me underline that. Without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which perhaps no longer exists, there is a similar reason, though not quite so forcible, for supposing that both the Gothic and the Celtic, though blended with a very different idiom, had the same origin with the Sanskrit, and the old Persian might be added to the same family. And so when they started to study the Vedas and look at Sanskrit, they started to realize, well, maybe all of these languages are connected. And now modern-day philologists believe this very strongly the more that they have studied it.