But then if she got this again, then she would have put a two here, and then she should have said, okay, in how many of these random reshufflings am I getting a scenario where there's a five-minute difference, or where the treatment group is five minutes longer? So what is this saying? So for example, this is saying that 18 out of the 1,000 reshufflings, which she just randomly reshuffled the data, 18 out of those 1,000 times, she found a scenario where her treatment group median was 10 minutes longer than her control group, where bus A's median was, this hypothetical re-randomization, where the treatment group is 10 minutes slower than the control group. There were 159 times where the treatment group, once again, in her random reshuffling, these aren't based on observations, these are random reshufflings, there's 159 times where her treatment group is four minutes slower than her control group. So the whole reason for doing this is she says, okay, what's the probability of getting a result like this or better? And I say better is, you know, I guess one that even more confirms her hypothesis, that the treatment group is faster than the control group. Well, this scenario is this one right over here, and then another one where the treatment group is even faster is this right over here.