So now they're completely mixing up all of the results that they had, so it's completely random of whether the student had watched the food commercial or the non-food commercial, and then they're testing what's the mean of the new number 1 group and the new number 2 group, and then they're saying, well, what is the distribution of the differences in means? So they see when they did it this way, when they're essentially just completely randomly taking these results and putting them into two new buckets, you have a bunch of cases where you get no difference in the mean. So out of the 150 times that they repeated the simulation doing this little exercise here, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, I'm having trouble counting this, let's see, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, I keep, it's so small, I'm aging, but it looks like there's about, I don't know, high teens, about 8 times when there was actually no noticeable difference in the means of the groups where you just randomly, when you just randomly allocate the results amongst the two groups. So when you look at this, if it was just, if you just randomly put people into two groups, the probability or the situations where you get a 10-gram difference are actually very unlikely. So this is, let's see, is this the difference, the difference between the means of the new groups. So it's not clear whether this is group 1 minus group 2 or group 2 minus group 1, but in either case, the situations where you have a 10-gram difference in mean, it's only 2 out of the 150 times. So when you do it randomly, when you just randomly put these results into two groups, the probability of the means being this different, it only happens 2 out of the 150 times.