Or if we wrote it as a decimal, it would be 0.003 of the total area under the curve. So to answer our question, if we assume that the drug has no effect, the probability of getting a sample this extreme or actually more extreme than this is only 0.3%, less than 1 in 300. So if the null hypothesis was true, there's only a 1 in 300 chance that we would have gotten a result this extreme or more. So at least from my point of view, this result seems to favor the alternative hypothesis. I'm going to reject the null hypothesis. I don't know 100% sure, but if the null hypothesis was true, there's only a 1 in 300 chance of getting this. So I'm going to go with the alternative hypothesis.