And that would be the gambler's fallacy. That if you have a long streak of heads, or you have a disproportionate number of heads, that at some point you're going to have a higher likelihood of having a disproportionate number of tails. And that's not quite true. What the law of large numbers tells us is that it doesn't care, let's say after some finite number of trials, your average actually, it's a low probability of this happening, but let's say your average is actually up here. It's actually at 70, right? Like, wow, we really diverged a good bit from the expected value. But what the law of large numbers says, well, I don't care how many trials this is, we have an infinite number of trials left, right?