Question ID:PT51 S3 Q25 Passage:In ancient Greece, court witnesses were not cross-examined and the jury, selected from the citizenry, received no guidance on points of law; thus, it was extremely important for litigants to make a good impression on the jurors. For this reason, courtroom oratory by litigants is a good source of data on the common conceptions of morality held by the citizens of ancient Greece. Stem:Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument? Correct Answer Choice:CChoice A:Litigants believed jurors were more likely to be impressed by litigants whose personality they preferred. Choice B:Litigants believed jurors were more likely to subject the litigants' personal moral codes to close critical scrutiny than were people who did not sit on juries. Choice C:Litigants believed jurors were likely to be impressed by litigants whose professed moral code most resembled their own. Choice D:Litigants believed jurors to be more impressed by litigants who were of the same economic class as the jurors. Choice E:Litigants believed jurors were likely to render their decisions based on a good understanding of the law.