Question ID:PT70 S1 Q3 Passage:Editorial: The legislature is considering allowing oil drilling in the Cape Simmons Nature Preserve. Supporters claim that, because modern drilling methods will be used, there will be no damage to the environment. However, that claim is easily disproven by looking at nearby Alphin Bay, where oil drilling began five years ago. The land there is marred by industrial sprawl, drilling platforms, and thousands of miles of roads and pipelines. Stem:Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the editorial? Correct Answer Choice:DChoice A:The Cape Simmons Nature Preserve is one of the few areas of pristine wilderness in the region. Choice B:The companies drilling for oil at Alphin Bay never claimed that drilling there would not cause any environmental damage. Choice C:The editorialist believes that oil drilling should not be allowed in a nature preserve unless it would cause no environmental damage. Choice D:There have been no significant changes in oil drilling methods in the last five years. Choice E:Oil drilling is only one of several industrial activities that takes place at Alphin Bay.