Question ID:PT78 S3 Q20 Passage:The company president says that significant procedural changes were made before either she or Yeung was told about them. But, according to Grimes, the contract requires that either the company president or any lawyer in the company's legal department be told about proposed procedural changes before they are made. Thus, unless what Grimes or the company president said is incorrect, the contract was violated. Stem:The argument's conclusion can be properly inferred if which one of the following is assumed? Correct Answer Choice:CChoice A:Yeung is a lawyer in the company's legal department. Choice B:Neither Grimes nor Yeung was told about the procedural changes until after they were made. Choice C:No lawyer in the company's legal department was told about the procedural changes until after they were made. Choice D:If the company's president was told about the procedural changes before they were made, then the contract was not violated. Choice E:If no lawyer in the company's legal department was told about the procedural changes before they were made, then the contract was violated.