Question ID:PT72 S3 Q21 Passage:Literary critic: There is little of social significance in contemporary novels, for readers cannot enter the internal world of the novelist's mind unless they experience that world from the moral perspective of the novel's characters. But in contemporary novels, the transgressions committed by some characters against others are sensationalistic spectacles whose only purpose is to make readers wonder what will happen next, rather than events whose purpose is to be seen as the injustices they are. Stem:Which one of the following principles, if valid, would most help to justify the literary critic's argument? Correct Answer Choice:EChoice A:An artist who wants to engage the moral sensibilities of his or her audience should not assume that forms of artistic expression that previously served this purpose continue to do so. Choice B:A novelist who wants to make a reader empathize with a victim of injustice should avoid sensationalistic spectacles whose only purpose is to make readers wonder what will happen next. Choice C:A work of art is socially important only if it engages the moral sensibilities of its audience. Choice D:If a novel allows a reader to understand injustice from the point of view of its victims, it will be socially significant. Choice E:Novels have social significance only to the extent that they allow readers to enter the internal world of the novelist's mind.