Question ID:PT93 S2 Q21 Passage:Essayist:  Commitment to relationships or careers is commonly held to be virtuous. But all commitments should be seen as morally neutral. After all, what one is committed to might be either good or bad; for example, commitment to a relationship that benefits none of the people involved deserves no praise. Often, commitment is nothing more than involvement that has outlasted its original justification. Stem:Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the essayist's reasoning? Correct Answer Choice:EChoice A:Any commitment that is morally neutral either has outlasted its original justification or deserves no praise, or both. Choice B:Commitment to a relationship or career is virtuous when, but only when, the relationship or career is good. Choice C:If a commitment deserves no praise, then that commitment is morally neutral. Choice D:If a commitment has outlasted its original justification, then it cannot be virtuous. Choice E:All commitments are morally neutral if there are any commitments that are undeserving of praise.