Question ID:PT27 S4 Q22 Passage:Words like "employee," "payee," and "detainee" support the generalization, crudely stated, that words with the ending -ee designate the person affected in the specified way by an action performed by someone else.  The word "absentee" seems to be a direct counterexample:  it ends in -ee, yet, if it makes sense here to speak of an action at all‚ that of absenting oneself, perhaps‚ the word can refer to the person who actually performs that action.  Clearly, however, putting forward the following resolves the impasse:  if a word with the ending -ee refers to one party in a two-party transaction, it refers to the party at which the other party's action is directed. Stem:The reasoning in the argument could have remained unchanged in force and focus if which one of the following had been advanced as a counterexample in place of the word "absentee"? Correct Answer Choice:EChoice A:honoree Choice B:appointee Choice C:nominee Choice D:transferee Choice E:escapee