Question ID:PT59 S3 Q22 Passage:Since anyone who makes an agreement has an obligation to fulfill the terms of that agreement, it follows that anyone who is obligated to perform an action has agreed to perform that action. Hence, saying that one has a legal obligation to perform a given action is the same as saying that one is required to fulfill one's agreement to perform that action. Stem:Which one of the following statements most accurately characterizes the argument's reasoning flaws? Correct Answer Choice:DChoice A:The argument fails to make a crucial distinction between an action one is legally obligated to perform and an action with good consequences, and it takes for granted that everything true of legal obligations is true of obligations generally. Choice B:The argument takes for granted that there are obligations other than those resulting from agreements made, and it fails to consider the possibility that actions that uphold agreements made are sometimes performed for reasons other than to uphold those agreements. Choice C:The argument contains a premise that is logically equivalent to its conclusion, and it takes for granted that there are only certain actions that one should agree to perform. Choice D:The argument treats a condition that is sufficient to make something an obligation as also a requirement for something to be an obligation, and it takes for granted that any obligation to perform an action is a legal obligation. Choice E:The argument rests on an ambiguous use of the term "action," and it fails to consider the possibility that people are sometimes unwilling to perform actions that they have agreed to perform.