Question ID:PT90 S4 Q16 Passage:Journalist: When judges do not maintain strict control over their courtrooms, lawyers often try to influence jury verdicts by using inflammatory language and by badgering witnesses. These obstructive behaviors hinder the jury's effort to reach a correct verdict. Whenever lawyers engage in such behavior, therefore, it is reasonable to doubt whether the verdict is correct. Stem:Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the journalist's argument? Correct Answer Choice:DChoice A:Court proceedings overseen by judges who are very strict in controlling lawyers' behavior are known to result sometimes in incorrect verdicts. Choice B:Lawyers tend to be less concerned than are judges about whether the outcomes of jury trials are just or not. Choice C:People who are influenced by inflammatory language are very unlikely to admit at some later time that they were influenced by such language. Choice D:Obstructive courtroom behavior by a lawyer is seldom effective in cases where jurors are also presented with legitimate evidence. Choice E:The selection of jurors is based in part on an assessment of the likelihood that they are free of bias.