Question ID:PT85 S3 Q19 Passage:Economist:  The wages of many of the lowest-paid corporate employees in this country would be protected from cuts by enacting a maximum wage law that prohibits executives at any corporation from earning more than, say, 50 times what the corporation's lowest-paid employees in this country earn. Currently, some executives try to increase corporate profits‚ and their own salaries‚ by cutting the pay and benefits of their corporations' employees. A maximum wage law would remove this incentive for these executives to cut the wages of their lowest-paid employees. Stem:Which one of the following is an assumption the economist's argument requires? Correct Answer Choice:EChoice A:All of the lowest-paid corporate employees in the economist's country are employed at corporations at which the executives earn more than 50 times what the corporations' lowest-paid employees in the economist's country earn. Choice B:Some corporate executives who cut the pay of their corporations' lowest-paid employees in the economist's country in order to increase their own salaries already earn less than 50 times what their corporations' lowest-paid employees in the economist's country earn. Choice C:No corporate executives in the economist's country would raise the wages of their corporations' lowest-paid employees in the economist's country unless such a maximum wage law linked executive wages to those of their corporations' lowest-paid employees in the economist's country. Choice D:If corporate executives could not increase their own salaries by cutting the pay and benefits of their corporations' lowest-paid employees in the economist's country, they would never change the wages of those employees. Choice E:If such a maximum wage law were enacted in the economist's country, one or more corporate executives would not cut the pay and benefits of their corporations' lowest-paid employees in the economist's country.