Question ID:PT51 S3 Q9 Passage:Letter to the editor:  I have never seen such flawed reasoning and distorted evidence as that which you tried to pass off as a balanced study in the article "Speed Limits, Fatalities, and Public Policy." The article states that areas with lower speed limits had lower vehicle-related fatality rates than other areas. However, that will not be true for long, since vehicle-related fatality rates are rising in the areas with lower speed limits. So the evidence actually supports the view that speed limits should be increased. Stem:The reasoning in the letter writer's argument is flawed because the argument Correct Answer Choice:DChoice A:bases its conclusion on findings from the same article that it is criticizing Choice B:fails to consider the possibility that automobile accidents that occur at high speeds often result in fatalities Choice C:fails to consider the possibility that not everyone wants to drive faster Choice D:fails to consider the possibility that the vehicle-related fatality rates in other areas are also rising Choice E:does not present any claims as evidence against the opposing viewpoint