Question ID:PT43 S2 Q21 Passage:Curator:  A magazine recently ran a very misleading story on the reaction of local residents to our controversial art exhibit. They quoted the responses of three residents, all of whom expressed a sense of moral outrage. These quotations were intended to suggest that most local residents oppose the exhibit; the story failed to mention, however, the fact that the three residents are all close friends. Stem:Which one of the following principles most helps to justify the curator's argumentation? Correct Answer Choice:EChoice A:It is misleading to present the opinions of people with no special expertise on a subject as though they were experts. Choice B:It is misleading to present the opinions of people on only one side of an issue when the population is likely to be evenly divided on that issue. Choice C:It is misleading to present the opinions of a few people as evidence of what the majority thinks unless the opinions they express are widely held. Choice D:It is misleading to present testimony from close friends and thereby imply that they must agree with each other. Choice E:It is misleading to present the opinions of a potentially nonrepresentative sample of people as if they represent public opinion.