Question ID:PT87 S3 Q22 Passage:Laurie:  In a democracy, public art should bring people together either by expressing a consensus on a subject or by helping people to reconcile their differences and to recognize that no single opinion is definitive. Since contemporary public art creates only acrimony, it has failed in its task.Elsa:  If people hold radically different opinions, public art should emphasize that. No art form can do the impossible, which is what you are asking for. Stem:Laurie's and Elsa's statements provide the most support for holding that they disagree about Correct Answer Choice:CChoice A:what types of public art are most characteristic of contemporary democracies Choice B:whether it is possible in a democracy to create public art that people with radically different opinions can enjoy and support Choice C:what the criterion of success for public art in a democracy should be Choice D:whether contemporary public art creates only acrimony Choice E:whether it is wise for contemporary public art to help achieve a consensus on a subject