Question ID:PT6 S2 Q23 Passage:Book Review: When I read a novel set in a city I know well, I must see that the writer knows the city at least as well as I do if I am to take that writer seriously. If the writer is faking, I know immediately and do not trust that writer. When a novelist demonstrates the required knowledge, I trust the storyteller, so I trust the tale. This trust increases my enjoyment of a good novel. Peter Lee’s second novel is set in San Francisco. In this novel, as in his first, Lee passes my test with flying colors. Stem:Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage? Correct Answer Choice:EChoice A:The book reviewer enjoys virtually any novel written by a novelist whom she trusts. Choice B:If the book reviewer trusts the novelist as a storyteller, the novel in question must be set in a city the book reviewer knows well. Choice C:Peter Lee’s first novel was set in San Francisco. Choice D:The book reviewer does not trust any novel set in a city that she does not know well. Choice E:The book reviewer does not believe that she knows San Francisco better than Peter Lee does.