Question ID:PT62 S4 Q20 Passage:Many workers who handled substance T in factories became seriously ill years later. We now know T caused at least some of their illnesses. Earlier ignorance of this connection does not absolve T's manufacturer of all responsibility. For had it investigated the safety of T before allowing workers to be exposed to it, many of their illnesses would have been prevented. Stem:Which one of the following principles most helps to justify the conclusion above? Correct Answer Choice:EChoice A:Employees who are harmed by substances they handle on the job should be compensated for medical costs they incur as a result. Choice B:Manufacturers should be held responsible only for the preventable consequences of their actions. Choice C:Manufacturers have an obligation to inform workers of health risks of which they are aware. Choice D:Whether or not an action's consequences were preventable is irrelevant to whether a manufacturer should be held responsible for those consequences. Choice E:Manufacturers should be held responsible for the consequences of any of their actions that harm innocent people if those consequences were preventable.