Question ID:PT49 S2 Q25 Passage:Cecile's association requires public disclosure of an officer's investments in two cases only:  when an officer is authorized to disburse association funds, and when an officer sits on the board of a petrochemical company. Cecile, an officer who is not authorized to disburse funds, sits on the board of just one company, a small timber business. Therefore, there is no reason for Cecile to publicly disclose her investments at this time. Stem:The conclusion of the argument follows logically if which one of the following is assumed? Correct Answer Choice:CChoice A:Cecile will not be appointed to a position in the association that authorizes her to disburse funds. Choice B:Cecile's office and her position on the timber business's board create no conflicts of interest. Choice C:The association's requirements provide the only reasons there might be for Cecile to disclose her investments. Choice D:The timber business on whose board Cecile sits is owned by a petrochemical company. Choice E:Cecile owns no investments in the petrochemical industry.