Question ID:PT93 S3 Q12 Passage:Columnist: Vagrancy laws are supposed to reduce criminal activity, but they don't. Making vagrancy illegal means transforming many innocuous everyday occurrences into crimes. Thus, vagrancy laws increase crime while purporting to reduce it. Stem:The reasoning in the columnist's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument Correct Answer Choice:EChoice A:presumes, without providing any justification, that most innocuous everyday occurrences are harmful to society Choice B:mistakenly infers, from the claim that vagrancy laws are associated with an increase in many innocuous everyday occurrences, that vagrancy laws cause that increase Choice C:fails to specify what is meant by "innocuous everyday occurrences" Choice D:fails to consider the possibility that crime will increase even in the absence of vagrancy laws Choice E:does not adequately distinguish between an increase in criminal activity and the reclassification of certain occurrences as crimes