Question ID:PT31 S3 Q3 Passage:David:  Forbidding companies from hiring permanent replacements for striking employees would be profoundly unfair. Such companies would have little leverage in their negotiations with strikers.Lin:  No, the companies would still have sufficient leverage in negotiations if they hired temporary replacements. Stem:Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the exchange between David and Lin? Correct Answer Choice:CChoice A:David does not believe that the freedom to hire temporary replacements gives companies any leverage in their negotiations with strikers. Choice B:David and Lin believe that companies should be allowed as much leverage in negotiations as the striking employees. Choice C:David and Lin disagree over the amount of leverage companies lose in their negotiations with strikers by not being able to hire permanent replacements. Choice D:David and Lin disagree over how much leverage should be accorded companies in their negotiations with strikers. Choice E:Lin believes it is unfair to forbid companies from hiring permanent replacements for their striking employees.