Question ID:PT54 S4 Q10 Passage:Albert: The government has proposed new automobile emissions regulations designed to decrease the amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) released into the atmosphere by automobile exhaust. I don't see the need for such regulations; although PAHs are suspected of causing cancer, a causal link has never been proven.Erin: Scientists also blame PAHs for 10,000 premature deaths in this country each year from lung and heart disease. So the proposed regulations would save thousands of lives. Stem:Which one of the following, if true, is the logically strongest counter that Albert can make to Erin's argument? Correct Answer Choice:DChoice A:Most automobile manufacturers are strongly opposed to additional automobile emissions regulations. Choice B:It is not known whether PAHs are a causal factor in any diseases other than heart and lung disease and cancer. Choice C:Even if no new automobile emissions regulations are enacted, the amount of PAHs released into the atmosphere will decrease if automobile usage declines. Choice D:Most of the PAHs released into the atmosphere are the result of wear and tear on automobile tires. Choice E:PAHs are one of several components of automobile exhaust that scientists suspect of causing cancer.