Question ID:PT31 S2 Q17 Passage:Because addictive drugs are physically harmful, their use by athletes is never justified.  Purists, however, claim that taking massive doses of even such nonaddictive drugs as aspirin and vitamins before competing should also be prohibited because they are unnatural.  This is ridiculous; almost everything in sports is unnatural, from high-tech running shoes to padded boxing gloves to highly-specialized bodybuilding machines.  Yet, none of these is prohibited on the basis of its being unnatural.  Furthermore, we should be attending to far more serious problems that plague modern sports and result in unnecessary deaths and injuries.  Therefore, the use of nonaddictive drugs by athletes should not be prohibited. Stem:Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage above? Correct Answer Choice:AChoice A:The fact that something is unnatural is not a sufficient reason for banning it. Choice B:There is nothing unnatural about the use of nonaddictive drugs by athletes. Choice C:The use of addictive drugs by athletes should be prohibited because addictive drugs are unnatural. Choice D:Some of the unnecessary deaths and injuries in modern sports are caused by the use of addictive drugs by athletes. Choice E:The use of addictive drugs by athletes is a less serious problem than are unnecessary injuries.