Question ID:PT55 S3 Q2 Passage:Board member: The J Foundation, a philanthropic organization, gave you this grant on the condition that your resulting work not contain any material detrimental to the J Foundation's reputation. But your resulting work never mentions any of the laudable achievements of our foundation. Hence your work fails to meet the conditions under which the grant was made. Stem:The reasoning in the board member's argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument Correct Answer Choice:CChoice A:takes for granted that a work that never mentions any laudable achievements cannot be of high intellectual value Choice B:confuses a condition necessary for the receipt of a grant with a condition sufficient for the receipt of a grant Choice C:presumes, without providing justification, that a work that does not mention a foundation's laudable achievements is harmful to that foundation's reputation Choice D:fails to consider that recipients of a grant usually strive to meet a foundation's conditions Choice E:fails to consider the possibility that the work that was produced with the aid of the grant may have met all conditions other than avoiding detriment to the J Foundation's reputation