Question ID:PT85 S2 Q5 Passage:Political strategist: Clearly, attacking an opposing candidate on philosophical grounds is generally more effective than attacking the details of the opponent‚ s policy proposals. A philosophical attack links an opponent‚ s policy proposals to an overarching ideological scheme, thereby telling a story and providing context. This makes the attack emotionally compelling. Stem:Which one of the following is an assumption required by the political strategist‚ s argument? Correct Answer Choice:BChoice A:The stories that people are most likely to remember are those that are emotionally compelling. Choice B:Political attacks that are emotionally compelling are generally more effective than those that are not. Choice C:Political attacks that tell a story are able to provide more context than those that do not. Choice D:Voters are typically uninterested in the details of candidates‚  policy proposals. Choice E:Most candidates‚  policy proposals are grounded in an overarching ideological scheme.