Question ID:PT71 S1 Q21 Passage:Lawyer: If you take something that you have good reason to think is someone else's property, that is stealing, and stealing is wrong. However, Meyers had no good reason to think that the compost in the public garden was anyone else's property, so it was not wrong for Meyers to take it. Stem:The reasoning in the lawyer's argument is flawed in that the argument Correct Answer Choice:CChoice A:confuses a factual claim with a moral judgment Choice B:takes for granted that Meyers would not have taken the compost if he had good reason to believe that it was someone else's property Choice C:takes a condition that by itself is enough to make an action wrong to also be necessary in order for the action to be wrong Choice D:fails to consider the possibility that the compost was Meyers' property Choice E:concludes that something is certainly someone else's property when there is merely good, but not conclusive, reason to think that it is someone else's property