Question ID:PT36 S3 Q8 Passage:Essayist:  Knowledge has been defined as a true belief formed by a reliable process. This definition has been criticized on the grounds that if someone had a reliable power of clairvoyance, we would not accept that person's claim to know certain things on the basis of this power. I agree that we would reject such claims, but we would do so because we really do not believe in clairvoyance as a reliable process. Were we to believe in clairvoyance, we would accept knowledge claims made on the basis of it. Stem:Which one of the following most accurately describes the essayist's method of defending the definition against the objection? Correct Answer Choice:AChoice A:asserting that the objection is based on a belief about the reliability of clairvoyance rather than on the nature of knowledge or its definition Choice B:asserting that the case of clairvoyance is one of knowledge even though we do not really believe in clairvoyance as a reliable process Choice C:arguing against the assumption that clairvoyance is unreliable Choice D:explaining that the definition of knowledge is a matter of personal choice Choice E:demonstrating that the case of clairvoyance is not a case of knowledge and does not fit the definition of knowledge