Question ID:PTJ2007 S2 Q6 Passage:An undergraduate degree is necessary for appointment to the executive board. Further, no one with a felony conviction can be appointed to the board. Thus, Murray, an accountant with both a bachelor's and a master's degree, cannot be accepted for the position of Executive Administrator, since he has a felony conviction. Stem:The argument's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed? Correct Answer Choice:BChoice A:Anyone with a master's degree and without a felony conviction is eligible for appointment to the executive board. Choice B:Only candidates eligible for appointment to the executive board can be accepted for the position of Executive Administrator. Choice C:An undergraduate degree is not necessary for acceptance for the position of Executive Administrator. Choice D:If Murray did not have a felony conviction, he would be accepted for the position of Executive Administrator. Choice E:The felony charge on which Murray was convicted is relevant to the duties of the position of Executive Administrator. 