Question ID:PT8 S4 Q15 Passage:Consumer advocate: Under the current absence of government standards for food product labeling, manufacturers are misleading or deceiving consumers by their product labeling. For example, a certain brand of juice is labeled “fresh orange juice,” yet the product is made from water, concentrate, and flavor enhancers. Since “fresh” as applied to food products is commonly understood to mean pure and unprocessed, labeling that orange juice “fresh” is unquestionably deceptive. Manufacturer: Using words somewhat differently than they are commonly used is not deceptive. After all, “fresh” can also mean never frozen. We cannot be faulted for failing to comply with standards that have not been officially formulated. When the government sets clear standards pertaining to product labeling, we will certainly comply with them. Stem:On the basis of their statements above, the consumer advocate and the manufacturer are committed to disagreeing about the truth of which one of the following statements? Correct Answer Choice:AChoice A:In the absence of government standards, common understanding is the arbiter of deceptive labeling practices. Choice B:Truthful labeling practices that reflect common standards of usage can be established by the government. Choice C:The term “fresh” when it is applied to food products is commonly understood to mean pure and unprocessed. Choice D:Terms that apply to natural foods can be truthfully applied to packaged foods. Choice E:Clear government standards for labeling food products will ensure truthful labeling practices.