Question ID:PT55 S3 Q10  Passage:Lawyer: This witness acknowledges being present at the restaurant and watching when my client, a famous television personality, was assaulted. Yet the witness claims to recognize the assailant, but not my famous client. Therefore, the witness's testimony should be excluded. Stem:The lawyer's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed? Correct Answer Choice:DChoice A:If a witness claims to recognize both parties involved in an assault, then the witness's testimony should be included. Choice B:There are other witnesses who can identify the lawyer's client as present during the assault. Choice C:It is impossible to determine whether the witness actually recognized the assailant. Choice D:The testimony of a witness to an assault should be included only if the witness claims to recognize both parties involved in the assault. Choice E:It is unlikely that anyone would fail to recognize the lawyer's client.