Question ID:PT63 S1 Q10 Passage:Ms. Sandstrom's newspaper column describing a strange natural phenomenon on the Mendels' farm led many people to trespass on and extensively damage their property. Thus, Ms. Sandstrom should pay for this damage if, as the Mendels claim, she could have reasonably expected that the column would lead people to damage the Mendels' farm. Stem:The argument's conclusion can be properly inferred if which one of the following is assumed? Correct Answer Choice:AChoice A:One should pay for any damage that one's action leads other people to cause if one could have reasonably expected that the action would lead other people to cause damage. Choice B:One should pay for damage that one's action leads other people to cause only if, prior to the action, one expected that the action would lead other people to cause that damage. Choice C:It is unlikely that the people who trespassed on and caused the damage to the Mendels' property would themselves pay for the damage they caused. Choice D:Ms. Sandstrom knew that her column could incite trespassing that could result in damage to the Mendels' farm. Choice E:The Mendels believe that Ms. Sandstrom is able to form reasonable expectations about the consequences of her actions.