Question ID:PT49 S4 Q11 Passage:Consumer activist:  When antilock brakes were first introduced, it was claimed that they would significantly reduce the incidence of multiple-car collisions, thereby saving lives. Indeed, antilock brakes have reduced the incidence of multiple-car collisions. I maintain, however, that to save lives, automobile manufacturers ought to stop equipping cars with them. Stem:Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict in the consumer activist's statements? Correct Answer Choice:AChoice A:Drivers and passengers in automobiles with antilock brakes feel less vulnerable, and are thus less likely to wear seat belts. Choice B:Under some circumstances, automobiles with traditional brakes stop just as quickly as do automobiles with antilock brakes. Choice C:For inexperienced drivers, antilock brakes are easier to use correctly than are traditional brakes. Choice D:Antilock brakes are considerably more expensive to manufacture than are traditional brakes. Choice E:Antilock brakes are no more effective in preventing multiple-car accidents than in preventing other kinds of traffic accidents.