And we could see here, when x is equal to negative three, it looks like g is equal to negative six, and it looks like a relative minimum point there. So what's the best justification? So once again, without even looking at the choices, I would say a good justification is before we get to x equals negative three, before we get to x equals negative three, our derivative, and this is a calculus-based justification, before we go to x equals negative three, our derivative is negative, and after x equals negative three, our derivative is positive. That would be my justification, because if our derivative is positive before that value, if our derivative is negative before that value, that means that we are downward sloping before that value, and if it's positive after that value, that means we're upward sloping after that, which is a good justification that we are at a relative minimum point right over there. So let's see, the point where x equals negative three is the lowest point on the graph of g in its surrounding interval. That is true, but that's not a calculus-based justification. You wouldn't even have to look at the derivative to make that statement, so let's rule that one out.