the republican budget plan "says that 10 years from now, if you’re a 65-year-old who’s eligible for medicare, you should have to pay nearly $6,400 more than you would today."
the republican budget plan "says that 10 years from now, if you’re a 65-year-old who’s eligible for medicare, you should have to pay nearly $6,400 more than you would today."
barack obama
apr 13, 2011 ... it's a vision that says america can't afford to keep the promise we've made to care  for our seniors. it says that 10 years from now, if you're a 65-year-old who's  eligible for medicare, you should have to pay nearly $6,400 more than you would  today. it says instead of guaranteed health care, you will get a ...
aug 22, 2012 ... a romney campaign ad wrongly claims that “money you paid” for medicare is  being used to pay for obama's health care law. but the .... ryan estimated that his  “path to prosperity” would spend $6.4 trillion on medicare over 10 years (table s- 3), and obama's fiscal year 2013 budget estimated $7 trillion for ...
oct 11, 2012 ... he said, i wouldn't move heaven and earth to get bin laden. he didn't  understand it was more than about taking a — a murderer off the battlefield; it  was about restoring america's heart and letting terrorists around the world know if  you do harm to america, we will track you to the gates of hell, if need be.
failure to enroll in medicare part a when first eligible (at age 65 for most, or when  the five-year residency threshold is crossed if later) means a 10% premium  penalty for .... you can opt out of your employer-based insurance and buy a plan  in your state exchange, but you will not be eligible for a premium subsidy if you  have ...
jul 6, 2017 ... medicaid isn't worth its cost–that's not my evaluation that's what people who use  the program think, at least as far as we can tell from their actions. ... if as group  people making $14k-$23k/year decided health insurance was important enough  to pay $6,400/year, rents would fall homes would get smaller, they ...