During the Cold War, road signs were posted outside major metropolitan areas warning that specific highways would be closed to civilian traffic in the event of enemy attack.
During the Cold War, road signs were posted outside major metropolitan areas warning that specific highways would be closed to civilian traffic in the event of enemy attack.
A passing detail in Garrett M. Graffâ€™s chilling bookÂ Raven Rock: The Story of the U.S. Governmentâ€™s Secret Plan to Save Itself â€” While the Rest of Us DieÂ (Simon & Schuster, 2017) caught the eye of a vigilant Snopes reader, who wrote in to ask: < In it, he mentions signs seen on Interstate Highways in the â€™50s that said, â€œIn case of enemy attack, this road will be closed to all but military vehicles.â€ I donâ€™t remember ever seeing a sign like this, nor can I find any mention of them on Google. Did they exist? > The subject is briefly broached on page xxii of the bookâ€™s introduction, in which Graff recounts the history of U.S. efforts to prepare in advance for national catastrophes such as nuclear war: < â€¦ Americaâ€™s concrete highways themselves grew out of the fear of attack â€”Â the 41,000 miles of interstates built under an Eisenhower program partly served to help the nation speed war materiel around the nation in case of a nuclear attack. The original name for the limited-access paved road network was the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, and children of the era may recall the signs that sprouted up along the major roads that warned â€œIn case of enemy attack, this road will be closed to all but military vehicles.â€ > There should indeed be at least a few baby boomers who remember such signs, which according to contemporaneous press reports were erected along designated roadways as early as 1951Â asÂ part of a nationwide civil defense preparedness initiative launched by the Truman administration (making them older than Eisenhowerâ€™s interstate highway system, which wasnâ€™t authorized until 1956). The effort was driven by two events: Â the Soviet Union had conducted its first atom bomb test in 1949, and, North Korea, with the backing of both the U.S.S.R. and China, had attacked South Korea the following year, raising the specter of a nuclear confrontation. Beginning with the publication of a civil defense manual (nicknamed the â€œBlue Bookâ€ for the color of its cover) aimed at all levels of government in September 1950 and culminating later that year in the creation of theÂ Federal Civil Defense Administration (FCDA, a precursor to todayâ€™s FEMA), the Truman administration conceived an emergency management system that issued guidance from the top while delegating the nuts and bolts of implementation to state and local entities. For example, a section of the Blue Book calling for the creation of emergency transportation networks to facilitate both military and civilian use of the roadways didnâ€™t specify precisely how it was to be done: < Routes should be designated through large urban centers, and plans and procedures made for dispatching convoys and operating traffic under controlled dispatch and priorities over the transportation network. Police training should include measures to be taken at the time of an alert, including the control of panic traffic, and the keeping of certain thoroughfares free from obstruction for both civilian and military movement. In addition, there must be provision for the limitation of movement of persons and vehicles, both during and after an emergency. > Local civil defense coordinators charged with developing these plans set about the task with varying degrees of urgency. New York City was among the first municipalities to undertake planning for emergency traffic control, with Civil Defense Director Arthur W. Wallender announcing in February 1951 that the use of certain roadways would be restricted in the event of enemy attack, and unauthorized movement of civilian vehicles prohibited. On 9 February, the New York Times published aÂ photograph of workmen erecting a sign on the outskirts of the city that read â€œIn the event of an enemy attack on New York City this highway will be closed to all traffic except civil defense & military vehicles.â€ Â One of these signs shows up briefly (at the 3:19 minute mark) in the short filmÂ â€œOur Cities Must Fight,â€ produced for the federal government in 1951 by Archer Productions (the same outfit responsible for the nuclear survival training film now regarded as a quintessential example of Cold War kitsch,Â Duck and Cover): < The first of a series of signs informing the public that the designated roads would be closed in the event of attack were erected yesterday on Route 1, the Newburyport Turnpike in Saugus. The signs, made by the state public works department, state: â€œIn the event of enemy attack on Boston this highway will be closed to all traffic except civil defense and military vehicles.â€ > Massachusetts civil defense officials offered insights into the reasoning behind restricting civilian traffic: < The purpose of closing the highways to the public is to provide safe and efficient routes for orderly withdrawal of the civilian population and to expedite military vehicular movements with the least possible conflict. > Â They further explained that: < The decision to restrict traffic was based on experience in Europe during the last war when evacuees on foot and in vehicles clogged highways and impeded military and rescue traffic. The signs, it is believed, will educate the public in advance and will emphasize to motorists the importance of keeping non-essential traffic off primary roads in event of emergency. > Some state and local governments took years to produce tangible results. For example, Marylandâ€™s emergency transportation plan wasnâ€™t rolled out until July 1953 and Virginiaâ€™s â€œclosed in event of enemy attackâ€ signs didnâ€™t go up until 1954 â€”Â by which time some emergency management experts were rethinking the wisdom of restricting civilian access to highways.Â Among them was Eisenhowerâ€™s FCDA Administrator Val Peterson, among whose top priorities was responding to the U.S.S.R.â€™s development of a hydrogen bomb.Â A 14 July 1954 editorial in theÂ Syracuse, New York newspaperÂ The Post-StandardÂ reflected the shift in strategic thinking that had occurred: < Evacuation of cities becomes urgent due to the growing hydrogen bomb power, says U.S. Civil Defense Administrator Val Peterson. The bomb has limited the choices to â€œdie, dig or get outâ€ and cities must develop plans for evacuation, Mr. Peterson emphasizes. Bomb shelters do not solve the problem, he admits, so Americans can die or get out. The choice is further limited by signs outside cities in this state proclaiming that in event of enemy attack the highways will be closed to all except essential traffic. > By 1955, according to a Gannett News Service report, Peterson was openly calling for the signs to be torn down, a proposal that didnâ€™t sit well with some local civil defense directors: < Federal Civil Defense Administrator Val Paterson says the signs are obsolete, reflecting a theory that was valid when the people of a city could only take shelter from atomic bombs. Now that bombs are more devastating and it is possible to give longer warning of an attack, highways should be kept open so the population of a threatened city can get into open country, according to Peterson, Lt. Gen. Clarence R. Huebner (USA, Ret.), New York State Civil Defense director, asserts that the signs â€œare not obsolete.â€ He contends that control over the highways will be needed for many purposes, including aid to bombed areas and movement of people under civil defense direction, in event of an attack. The signs will stay up as long as Huebner feels they are needed, say federal officials, because FCDA is only an â€œadvisory and coordinating agencyâ€ and cannot issue orders to New York State. > Stay up they did (at least for a few more years), but their extinction would be inevitable thanks to the reality of the H-bomb and the Eisenhower administrationâ€™s stated preference for mass evacuation over â€œduck and cover.â€ By 1958, newspaper columnists like Pulitzer-winningÂ Marquis Childs were ridiculing the signs as vestiges of a dysfunctional civil defense system: < Still standing on many highways are the signs that read, â€œIn the event of enemy attack this highway will be closed to all but emergency traffic.â€ The signs were put up when the biggest bomb was in the kiloton (measured in thousands of tons of conventional explosive) range and the idea was that rescue workers would come into the destroyed center of a city. Today the bombs are in the megaton (millions of tons of conventional explosive) range and the whole city is destroyed. Yet the signs stand as pathetic reminders of the sham of civil defense. The states will not pay to take them down and the federal Civil Defense Administration lacks the authority. > In 1961, Virginia Sen. A. Willis Robertson (at that time the newly elected chairman of the joint Senate-House Defense Production Committee) characterized the signs as a waste of taxpayer money: < Concerning the proposed fallout study, Robertson said, the committee hopes to â€œsafeguard public funds from the type of waste heretofore incurred in the erection all over the nation of highway signs concerning the closing of roads in the event of enemy attacks.â€ > We were unable to ascertain when the last of the â€œhighway closed in event of enemy attackâ€ signs finally came down, though weâ€™re fairly sure none survived beyond the 1960s, after which point the only published mentions of them we found were couched in the past tense. A February 1977 article in the Hamilton, Ohio Journal-NewsÂ reminded readers that they had once existed, at the same time noting that they seemed to have â€œfaded from the highway landscape.â€
"highway" AND "closed" AND "enemy" AND "attack" AND "signs"