“It’s not that there is no evidence the election was stolen, but that no court had the guts to HEAR the evidence. They dismissed the cases, NOT the evidence.”
“It’s not that there is no evidence the election was stolen, but that no court had the guts to HEAR the evidence. They dismissed the cases, NOT the evidence.”
Ce n'est pas le fait qu'il n'y a pas de preuves que l'élection a été volée, mais que aucune court de justice n'a eu le courage d'entendre les preuves. Ils ont rejeté les cas, pas les preuves!