gottlob frege broadened the doctrine of philosophy of language.
gottlob frege broadened the doctrine of philosophy of language.
who broadened the doctrine of philosophy of language?
gottlob frege
Na
Na
taking into account that the fundamental doctrine of the college is the westminster confession of faith (the “westminster confession”) and recognizing this to be “highly influential within presbyterian churches worldwide, many of which use it as a standard of doctrine that is second only to the teaching contained within the bible itself”, the appellate court looked at the relevant part of the westminster confession at article viii ch 1 which reads as follows:“the old testament in hebrew (which was the native language of the people of god of old), and the new testament in greek (which, at the time of the writing of it, was most generally known to the nations), being immediately inspired by god, and, by his singular care and providence, kept pure in all ages, are therefore authentical; so as, in all controversies of religion, the church is finally to appeal unto them. but, because these original tongues are not known to all the people of god, who have right unto, and interest in the scriptures, and are commanded, in the fear of god, to read and search them, therefore they are to be translated in to the vulgar language of every nation unto which they come, that, the word of god dwelling plentifully in all, they may worship him in an acceptable manner; and through patience and comfort of the scriptures, may have hope.”pursuant to the principles laid down in overtoun that the question of whether a certain doctrine is in accord with the fundamental doctrines of a religious institution is purely a question of construction, the court of appeal went on to hold that (i) “the vpp doctrine is actually closely related to the vpi doctrine which both parties [i.e., febc and the church] adhere to,” (rejecting the church's contention in [59] of the court of appeal judgement that it is “an entirely different creature from the vpi doctrine");”(ii) “the college, in adopting the vpp doctrine, has not deviated from the fundamental principles which guide and inform the work of the college right from its inception, and as expressed in the westminster confession”; (iii) [i]t is not inconsistent for a christian who believes fully in the principles contained within the westminster confession (and the vpi [verbal plenary inspiration] doctrine) to also subscribe to the vpp doctrine”; and (iv) “[i]n the absence of anything in the westminster confession that deals with the status of the apographs, we [the judges of appeal] hesitate to find that the vpp doctrine is a deviation from the principles contained within the westminster confession.”
khoo jeffrey and others v life bible-presbyterian church and others