right to property is a human right.
right to property is a human right.
right to property is what type of right?
a human right
the right to private property was a crucial demand in early quests for political freedom and equality and against feudal control of property. property can serve as the basis for the entitlements that ensure the realisation of the right to an adequate standard of living and it was only property owners which were initially granted civil and political rights, such as the right to vote. because not everybody is a property owner, the right to work was enshrined to allow everybody to attain an adequate standard of living. today, discrimination on the basis of property ownership is commonly seen as a serious threat to the equal enjoyment of human rights by all and non-discrimination clauses in international human rights instruments frequently include property as a ground on the basis of which discrimination is prohibited (see the right to equality before the law). the protection of private property may come into conflict with economic, social and cultural rights and civil and political rights, such as the right to freedom of expression. to mitigate this the right to property is commonly limited to protect the public interest. many states also maintain systems of communal and collective ownership. property rights have frequently been regarded as preventing the realisation of human rights for all, through for example slavery and the exploitation of others. unequal distribution of wealth often follows line of sex, race and minorities, therefore property rights may appear to be part of the problem, rather than as an interest that merits protection. property rights have been at the centre of recent human rights debates on land reform, the return of cultural artifacts by collectors and museums to indigenous peoples and the popular sovereignty of peoples over natural resources.
right to property
the views of the levellers, who enjoyed support amongst small-scale property-owners and craftsmen, were not shared by all revolutionary parties of the english civil war. at the 1647 general council, oliver cromwell and henry ireton argued against equating the right to life with the right to property. they argued that doing so would establish the right to take anything that one may want, irrespective of the rights of others. the leveller thomas rainborough responded, relying on overton's arguments, that the levellers required respect for others' natural rights. the definition of property and whether it was acquired as the fruit of one's labour and as such a natural right was subject to intense debate because the right to vote depended on property ownership. political freedom was at the time associated with property ownership and individual independence. cromwell and ireton maintained that only property in freehold land or chartered trading rights gave a man the right to vote. they argued that this type of property ownership constituted a "take in society", which entitles men to political power. in contrast, levellers argued that all men who are not servants, alms-recipients or beggars should be considered as property owners and be given voting rights. they believed that political freedom could only be secured by individuals, such as craftsmen, engaging in independent economic activity.
right to property