the theft of personal information is known as identity theft.
the theft of personal information is known as identity theft.
the theft of personal information is known as?
identity theft
determining the link between data breaches and identity theft is challenging, primarily because identity theft victims often do not know how their personal information was obtained, and identity theft is not always detectable by the individual victims, according to a report done for the ftc. identity fraud is often but not necessarily the consequence of identity theft. someone can steal or misappropriate personal information without then committing identity theft using the information about every person, such as when a major data breach occurs. a us government accountability office study determined that "most breaches have not resulted in detected incidents of identity theft". the report also warned that "the full extent is unknown". a later unpublished study by carnegie mellon university noted that "most often, the causes of identity theft is not known", but reported that someone else concluded that "the probability of becoming a victim to identity theft as a result of a data breach is ... around only 2%". more recently, an association of consumer data companies noted that one of the largest data breaches ever, accounting for over four million records, resulted in only about 1,800 instances of identity theft, according to the company whose systems were breached.
identity theft
the legal case of r v tessling the supreme court of canada identified that the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy with regards to the information policemen acquired from him. these officers obtained this information by using warrantless infrared imaging to monitor the respondent's home. the court tried to answer the questions of what can be expected to be covered by reasonable expectation of privacy. they specify that information that is covered under reasonable expectation of privacy is called "deeply personal information." matheson (2008) offers the view that deeply personal information can be related to sensitivity. one common functional use to describe privacy and personal information is a matter of control. this type of information is to be treated within the choice of the individual that holds the information. however, the difference between deeply personal information and other information is that this particular type of information tends to be related to how vulnerable and sensitive an individual is to the exposure of said information. matheson (2008) tells us that it is particularly deemed deeply personal information if the personal information would weaken the individual's account or personal story about himself or others if shared. matheson (2008) states that while questionable the canadian court's decision was partly right because the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy when it came to the warrantless infrared search.
expectation of privacy