the display of wealth for social prestige is called human sacrifice.
the display of wealth for social prestige is called human sacrifice.
the display of wealth for social prestige is called?
human sacrifice
in the 19th and in the 21st centuries, thorstein veblen ("the theory of the leisure class: an economic study of institutions", 1899) and alain de botton ("status anxiety", 2004) respectively developed the social status (prestige) relationship between the producer of consumer goods and the aspirations to prestige of the consumer. to avoid the status anxiety of not being of or belonging to "the right social class", the consumer establishes a personal identity (social, economic, cultural) that is defined and expressed by the commodities (goods and services) that he or she buys, owns, and uses; the domination of things that communicate the "correct signals" of social prestige, of belonging. (see: conspicuous consumption.)
commodity fetishism
another standard of equality is equality of opportunity, "the idea that everyone has an equal chance to achieve wealth, social prestige, and power because the rules of the game, so to speak, are the same for everyone". this concept can be applied to society by saying that no one has a head start. this means that, for any social equality issue dealing with wealth, social prestige, power, or any of that sort, the equality of opportunity standard can defend the idea that everyone had the same start. this views society almost as a game and any of the differences in equality are due to luck and playing the "game" to one's best ability. conley gives an example of this standard of equality by using a game of monopoly to describe society. he claims that "monopoly follows the rules of equality of opportunity" by explaining that everyone had an equal chance when starting the game and any differences were a result of the luck of the dice roll and the skill of the player to make choices to benefit their wealth. comparing this example to society, the standard of equality of opportunity eliminates inequality because the rules of the games in society are still fair and the same for all; therefore making any existing inequalities in society fair. lesley a. jacobs, the author of "pursuing equal opportunities: the theory and practice of egalitarian justice", talks about equality of opportunity and its importance relating to egalitarian justice. jacobs states that
social equality