constantinople was designed to be the center of the christianity religious world.
constantinople was designed to be the center of the christianity religious world.
constantinople was designed to be the center of what religious world?
christianity
barclay was born near strabane in county tyrone, ireland, his family being of scottish extraction. he was educated at trinity college, dublin, and proceeded b.a. in 1854 and m.a. in 1857, but showed no particular powers of application or study. in 1854 he was ordained to a curacy at bagnelstown, county carlow, and on taking up his residence there began to show very great interest in the work of the london society for promoting christianity among the jews. the question of jewish conversion was at that time agitating the religious world in england, and barclay supported the cause in his own neighbourhood with great activity, till in 1858 he offered himself to the london society as a missionary. he left ireland, and after a few months' study in london, was appointed to constantinople. the mission there had been established in 1835, but no impression had been made on the 60,000 jews calculated to inhabit the town. barclay stayed in constantinople till 1861, making missionary journeys to the danubian provinces, rhodes, and other nearer districts.
joseph barclay
feuerbach starts out from the fact of religious self-alienation, of the duplication of the world into a religious world and a secular one. his work consists in resolving the religious world into its secular basis. but that the secular basis detaches itself from itself, and [then] establishes itself as an independent realm in the clouds can only be explained by the cleavages and self-contradictions within this secular basis. the latter must, therefore, in itself, be both understood in its contradiction and revolutionized in practice. thus, for instance, after the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the holy family, the former must then. itself, be destroyed in theory and in practice. feuerbach, consequently, does not see that the “religious sentiment” is, itself, a social product, and that the abstract individual [person] whom he analyses belongs to a particular form of society.
marxist–leninist atheism