amendment v is the constitutional amendment that protects the individual against self incrimination.
amendment v is the constitutional amendment that protects the individual against self incrimination.
which constitutional amendment protects the individual against self incrimination?
amendment v
legislatively referred constitutional amendment









































a legislatively referred constitutional amendment is a constitutional amendment that appears on a state's ballot as a ballot measure because the state legislature in that state voted to put it before the voters. 









































a legislatively referred constitutional amendment is a limited form of direct democracy with comparison to the initiated constitutional amendment. with the initiated constitutional amendment, voters are in charge of the process from beginning to end, whereas with the legislatively referred amendment, they can only approve or reject amendments which their legislature votes to place before them.









































section::::see also.









































bullet::::- direct democracy
legislatively referred constitutional amendment
although the court declined to incorporate the fourth amendment's exclusionary rule or the fifth amendment's privilege against self incrimination in "breithaupt", the court ultimately incorporated both of these rights to the states in 1964 and 1965. nine years after "breithaupt", the court granted review in "schmerber v. california" to clarify whether admitting involuntary blood samples into evidence in a criminal prosecution violated fourth amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures or the fifth amendment privilege against self incrimination. in a 5-4 opinion, justice william j. brennan, jr. held that blood samples do not implicate the right against self incrimination because the extraction and chemical analysis of blood samples do not involve "even a shadow of testimonial compulsion." however, justice brennan also ruled that ordinarily, search warrants are required "where intrusions into the human body are concerned."
breithaupt v. abram