us strategy during the cold war was intervening in foreign conflicts.
us strategy during the cold war was intervening in foreign conflicts.
what was the us strategy during the cold war?
intervening in foreign conflicts
bullet::::- kuznick, peter j., and james gilbert, eds. "rethinking cold war culture" (smithsonian institution, 2013).









































bullet::::- major, patrick. "future perfect?: communist science fiction in the cold war." "cold war history" 2003 4(1): 71-96. fulltext: in ebsco









































bullet::::- marsh, rosalind j. "soviet fiction since stalin: science, politics and literature" (1986)









































bullet::::- mcconachie, bruce. "american theatre and the culture of the cold war: producing and contesting containment, 1947-1962." university of iowa press, 2003; 364pp









































bullet::::- medhurst, martin j. "cold war rhetoric: strategy, metaphor, and ideology" michigan state university press, 1997
bibliography of the cold war
in the first post-cold war year, leffler advocated for the united states to continue its strategy of "preponderance of power". christopher layne claims that the preponderance of power has been the dominant us strategy during both the cold war and the post-cold war periods. "preponderance's strategic imperatives are the same as they were during the post-world war ii era: pacification and reassurance in europe and east asia, and protection of these regions from instability in the periphery." the post-cold war strategy of preponderance holds that "only a preponderance of us power ensures peace" which is "the result of an imbalance of power in which us capabilities are sufficient, operating on their own, to cow all potential challengers and to comfort all coalition partners. it is not enough consequently to be "primus inter pares" [...] one must be "primus solus"."
balance of power (international relations)