the earliest written code of ethical principles of medicine is called the international code of medical ethics.
the earliest written code of ethical principles of medicine is called the international code of medical ethics.
the earliest written code of ethical principles of medicine is called the?
international code of medical ethics
section::::see also.









































bullet::::- ethical codes of conduct for physicians









































bullet::::- ethical principles for human experimentation









































bullet::::- ethical practices for engineers









































section::::further reading.









































bullet::::- the hippocratic oath today: meaningless relic or invaluable moral guide? – a pbs nova online discussion with responses from doctors as well as 2 versions of the oath. pbs.org









































bullet::::- lewis richard farnell, "greek hero cults and ideas of immortality", 1921.









































bullet::::- "codes of ethics: some history" by robert baker, union college in perspectives on the professions, vol. 19, no. 1, fall 1999, ethics.iit.edu









































section::::external links.









































bullet::::- hippocratic oath, the hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (h2g2).
hippocratic oath
in a study by nancy shore, community-based participatory researchers were interviewed for their interpretation and critique of the "belmont report". interviewees expressed concerns regarding the "belmont report"s ethical principles and interpretations as being one size fits all and advocated researchers to resist the tendency to rely on those principles systematically. it argues that the ethical analysis should be extended to take into account more appropriate factors, such as cultural, gender, ethnic and geographical considerations. debate continues over the ethics and regulations of research involving human subjects because of discrepancies over the meaning and priority of the "belmont report"s basic ethical principles: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. notably, the "belmont report" does not specify how its three ethical principles should be weighted or prioritized. according to albert r. jonsen, a member of the national commission that composed the report, the institutional review board is charged with weighing these principles and deciding how they should be applied. matters become controversial when deciding if the principles should be interpreted as more or less weighty depending upon the particular circumstances of the research in question, if the principles should be viewed as an obligation that society must undertake on behalf of its members, or if it should be viewed as giving absolute priority to respect for persons’ autonomy over the general good of society.
belmont report