abo system transferase is responsible for the abo classification system.
abo system transferase is responsible for the abo classification system.
who is responsible for the abo classification system?
abo system transferase
Na
Na
the classification for this sport was created during the 1940s and for much of its early history was a medical condition based classification system. in 1964, the international sport organization for the disabled (isod) was created. they created the first formal classification system, which had 27. this was reduced to 12 classifications for the 1976 summer paralympics and was further reduced to nine classifications for the 1992 summer paralympics. in 1983, classification for cerebral palsy competitors in this sport was undertaken by the cerebral palsy-international sports and recreation association (cp-isra). the classification was based upon the system designed for field athletics events. there were five cerebral palsy classifications for its competitors. class 1 and class 2 competitors could compete in the division 1, class 1 and class 2 events. they defined cerebral palsy as a non-progressive brain lesion that results in impairment. people with cerebral palsy or non-progressive brain damage were eligible for classification by them. the organisation also dealt with classification for people with similar impairments. for their classification system, people with spina bifida were not eligible unless they had medical evidence of loco-motor dysfunction. people with cerebral palsy and epilepsy were eligible provided the condition did not interfere with their ability to compete. people who had strokes were eligible for classification following medical clearance. competitors with multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy and arthrogryposis were not eligible for classification by cp-isra, but were eligible for classification by international sports organisation for the disabled for the games of les autres. by the early 1990s, the archery classification had moved away from medical based ones to a functional classification system. going into the 2000 summer paralympics, there were concerns raised by members of the cerebral palsy community about the need to maintain a multiple functional classification system inside this sport specifically for this class of athletes given the large range of functional ability inside the community with cerebral palsy and other motor functional disabilities. because of issues in objectively identifying functionality that plagued the post barcelona games, the ipc unveiled plans to develop a new classification system in 2003. this classification system went into effect in 2007, and defined ten different disability types that were eligible to participate on the paralympic level. it required that classification be sport specific, and served two roles. the first was that it determined eligibility to participate in the sport and that it created specific groups of sportspeople who were eligible to participate and in which class. the ipc left it up to international federations to develop their own classification systems within this framework, with the specification that their classification systems use an evidence based approach developed through research.
para-archery classification