theodore roosevelt was president during the sherman anti-trust act.
theodore roosevelt was president during the sherman anti-trust act.
who was president during the sherman anti-trust act?
theodore roosevelt
bullet::::- benjamin harrison, brigadier general 70th indiana infantry, fought in kentucky, tennessee, georgia, peachtree creek. u.s. senator for veterans pensions. as president, sherman anti-trust act, mckinley tariff, six western states 1889–1890. 1902 issue.









































bullet::::- william mckinley, major in the 23rd ohio infantry. he fought in western virginia, antietam, winchester, fisher's hill, cedar creek. subsequently in the spanish–american war, appointed several former confederates to high rank as a form of sectional reconciliation. assassinated as president. 1923 issue.









































section::::subsequent commemoratives and definitives.:famous people and the civil war.:abraham lincoln.
commemoration of the american civil war on postage stamps
that the defendants in combination controlled the market and had the ability to and did drive competitors from the business of manufacturing knitted fabric slip covers is abundantly clear from the record. that the defendants in combination fixed and maintained prices is likewise crystal clear. that the defendants in combination and cross-licensing created a situation in the industry which, particularly by agreement for joint action respecting the patents, effectively hindered newcomers in the field, is also established beyond peradventure of doubt. that the harassing suits against competitors, previously discussed in some detail, were designed as and were actually only harassing suits is clear from an examination of the correspondence between the parties and the court feels that such conclusion in inescapable from an objective analysis of the documents. all of these actions taken in concert constitute a clear violation of the sherman anti-trust act and the government has established to the satisfaction of the court that the combination and conspiracy above referred to represents an unreasonable restraint of trade and commerce among the several states of the united states in the manufacture and sale of ready-made furniture slip covers, is unlawful, and in violation of section 1 of the sherman anti-trust act. further, the government, in the opinion of the court, has effectively demonstrated that the defendants combined and conspired not only to restrain trade unreasonably but also to monopolize trade and commerce among the several states of the united states in the manufacture and sale of ready-made furniture slip covers, in direct violation of section 2 of the sherman anti-trust act. the court also feels that by documentary proof the government has established that the defendants have used patent rights unlawfully in instituting, effectuating and maintaining the aforesaid combination and conspiracy which likewise constitutes a clear violation of the sherman anti-trust act.
united states v. krasnov