the statement of an organization's purpose or reason for being is called its make one's bones.
the statement of an organization's purpose or reason for being is called its make one's bones.
the statement of an organization's purpose or reason for being is called its?
make one's bones
it is important that a mission statement is not confused with a vision statement. as discussed earlier, the main purpose of a mission statement is to get across the ambitions of an organisation in a short and simple fashion, it is not necessary to go into detail for the mission statement which is evident in examples given. the reason why it is important that a mission statement and vision statement are not confused is because they both serve different purposes. vision statements tend to be more related to strategic planning and lean more towards discussing where a company aims to be in the future.
mission statement
horkheimer's book, "eclipse of reason", started in 1941 and published in 1947, is broken into five sections: means and ends, conflicting panaceas, the revolt of nature, the rise and decline of the individual, and on the concept of philosophy. the 'eclipse of reason focuses on the concept of reason within the history of western philosophy, which can only be fostered in an environment of free, critical thinking while also linking positivist and instrumental reason with the rise of fascism. he distinguishes between objective, subjective and instrumental reason, and states that we have moved from the former through the center and into the latter (though subjective and instrumental reason are closely connected). objective reason deals with universal truths that dictate that an action is either right or wrong. it is a concrete concept and a force in the world that requires specific modes of behavior. the focus in the objective faculty of reason is on the ends, rather than the means. subjective reason is an abstract concept of reason, and focuses primarily on means. specifically, the reasonable nature of the purpose of action is irrelevant – the ends only serve the purpose of the subject (generally self-advancement or preservation). to be "reasonable" in this context is to be suited to a particular purpose, to be "good for something else". this aspect of reason is universally conforming, and easily furnishes ideology. in instrumental reason, the sole criterion of reason is its operational value or purposefulness, and with this, the idea of truth becomes contingent on mere subjective preference (hence the relation with subjective reason). because subjective/instrumental reason rules, the ideals of a society, for example democratic ideals, become dependent on the "interests" of the people instead of being dependent on objective truths. in his writing horkheimer states, "social power is today more than ever mediated by power over things. the more intense an individual's concern with power over things, the more will things dominate him, the more will he lack any genuine individual traits, and the more will his mind be transformed into an automation of formalized reason." nevertheless, horkheimer admits that objective reason has its roots in reason ("logos" in greek) of the subject. he concludes, "if by enlightenment and intellectual progress we mean the freeing of man from superstitious belief in evil forces, in demons and fairies, in blind fate – in short, the emancipation from fear – then denunciation of what is currently called reason is the greatest service we can render."
max horkheimer