the uk changed from fahrenheit to celsius on 22 october 1995.
the uk changed from fahrenheit to celsius on 22 october 1995.
when did the uk change from fahrenheit to celsius?
22 october 1995
in the present-day fahrenheit scale, 0 °f no longer corresponds to the eutectic temperature of ammonium chloride brine as described above. instead, that eutectic is at approximately 4 °f on the final fahrenheit scale.









































the rankine temperature scale was based upon the fahrenheit temperature scale, with its zero representing absolute zero instead.









































section::::usage.









































the fahrenheit scale was the primary temperature standard for climatic, industrial and medical purposes in english-speaking countries until the 1960s. in the late 1960s and 1970s, the celsius scale replaced fahrenheit in almost all of those countries—with the notable exception of the united states—typically during their general metrication process.
fahrenheit
michael graham of the "national review" praised "celsius 41.11" saying that "unlike michael moore’s film, "celsius 41.11" is an actual documentary" and that the film was "far more logical" than "fahrenheit 9/11". however, graham also added that "41.11 isn't nearly as emotionally powerful as moore’s film", a view with which duane dudek of the "milwaukee journal sentinel" concurred. philip kennicott of the "washington post" described moore's film, "fahrenheit 9/11", as "well crafted" believing that, while moore had angered the targets of his film he "went the extra mile, creatively, to do so". in contrast kennicott described "celsius 41.11" as "dull, lazy and inconsistent". "celsius 41.11" was criticised for sharing some of what reviewers perceived to be the flaws of "fahrenheit 9/11". for example, desson thomson of the "washington post" (although generally positive about "celsius 41.11") said that in the case of both films "the spleen factor could poison small children". writing in the "milwaukee journal sentinel" duane dudek said, "as with "fahrenheit 9/11", it's impossible to separate the facts and analysis presented in "celsius" from the filmmakers' intent." however, "celsius 41.11" was additionally criticised for failing to share what the reviewers perceived to be virtues of moore's film. robert koelher of "variety" said that "..."celsius" shares moore's blatant agit-prop but none of his humor or entertainment sense". similarly, michael atikinson of "the village voice" regarded the film as "deliberately ap[ing] michael moore's modus operandi, minus the humor or any sense of sympathy for real people." wesley morris of the "boston globe" concluded that "..."celsius 41.11" doesn't have anything on anyone as pointedly damning or funny as some of what moore shows of the current bush administration."
celsius 41.11