either by the congress has the power to propose amendments to the u.s. constitution.
either by the congress has the power to propose amendments to the u.s. constitution.
who has the power to propose amendments to the u.s. constitution?
either by the congress
Na
Na
according to james kenneth rogers, the drafting history of article v indicates that states may limit the subject matter of their applications, and that congress has a duty to tally applications separately by subject matter. moreover, rogers asserts that states may "not" make a general application without specifying the subject or subjects to be addressed by the convention. rogers points out that, during the drafting process, the philadelphia convention at one point adopted a version of article v that gave power to congress to propose amendments when two-thirds of both houses agreed, or to propose amendments without a congressional supermajority "on the application of two thirds of the legislatures of the several states." this draft version of article v lacked any provision for a constitutional convention requested by the states, and instead included language almost identical to the final version of article v but giving states the power to apply to congress for amendments without any convention. the draft language suggests that states applying to congress for amendments would have to say what sort of amendments they were applying for, because a general petition (that is, one not limited by subject matter) asking congress to propose amendments would serve little purpose "beyond notifying congress that two‐thirds of the states thought that some unknown changes to the constitution were desirable." therefore, due to the similarity between the draft and final versions, rogers contends that state applications to congress must specify subject matter, and must be tallied individually by subject matter to determine whether the two-thirds threshold of state applications has been met.
convention to propose amendments to the united states constitution