the chargers moved to new stadium on january 12, 2017.
the chargers moved to new stadium on january 12, 2017.
when do the chargers move to new stadium?
january 12, 2017
on january 12, 2017, the chargers exercised their option and announced plans to relocate to los angeles for the 2017 season, making the chargers the second tenant at the stadium and returning them to the market where they played their inaugural season in 1960.









































when the rams and chargers move into the stadium, projected for august 2020, it will mark the return of major professional sports to inglewood for the first time since the los angeles lakers and los angeles kings left the forum for staples center in may 1999.









































section::::tenants and events.:wrestlemania.
los angeles stadium at hollywood park
the rabbis of the talmud and later times interpreted the shmita laws in various ways to ease the burden they created for farmers and the agricultural industry. the "heter mechira" (leniency of sale), developed for the shmita year of 1888–1889, permitted jewish farmers to sell their land to non-jews so that they could continue to work the land as usual during shmita. this temporary solution to the impoverishment of the jewish settlement in those days was later adopted by the chief rabbinate of israel as a permanent edict, generating ongoing controversy between zionist and haredi leaders to this day. there is a major debate among halakhic authorities as to what is the nature of the obligation of the sabbatical year nowadays. some say it is still biblically binding, as it has always been. others hold that it is rabbinically binding, since the shmita only biblically applies when the jubilee year is in effect, but the sages of the talmud legislated the observance of the shmita anyway as a reminder of the biblical statute. and yet others hold that the shmita has become purely voluntary. an analysis by respected posek and former sephardic chief rabbi ovadiah yosef in his responsa "yabi'a omer" (vol. 10), accorded with the middle option, that the biblical obligation holds only when a majority of the jewish people is living in the biblical land of israel and hence the shmita nowadays is a rabbinic obligation in nature. this approach potentially admits for some leniencies which would not be possible if the shemitah were biblical in origin, including the aforementioned sale of the land of israel. haredi authorities, on the other hand, generally follow the view of the chazon ish, that the shmita continues to be a biblical obligation.
shmita