lindzen and choi’s paper is viewed as unacceptably flawed by other climate scientists.
lindzen and choi’s paper is viewed as unacceptably flawed by other climate scientists.
global warming controversy:91
judith curry has said "this is a completely unconvincing analysis", whereas naomi oreskes said that the paper shows "the vast majority of working [climate] research scientists are in agreement [on climate change]... those who don't agree, are, unfortunately—and this is hard to say without sounding elitist—mostly either not actually climate researchers or not very productive researchers."