 The volume of DNA evidence was unique and criminalists felt they could reconstruct the crime with enough accuracy to resemble an eyewitness account.With over one hundred exhibits, the defense would have to discredit all of them to establish reasonable doubt.The prosecution also produced corroborating evidence - hair follicles, clothing fibers from the victims and fibers from the Bronco - found with the exhibits to corroborate their theory of how the crime was committed.