 paras 70 & 71

Lord Justice Laws concluded that Article 1P on its own, had not been violated.para 23, and in his opinion the most important aspect was whether Article 14 read with Article 1P was violated.para 16 He concluded, based on the facts of the case, that he could not see how any exercise of Article 1P right was involved such as might engage Article 14. para 33

Lord Justice Laws then considered Article 14 read with Article 1 of the First Protocol, with regard to Carson's "place of residence", and in that aspect, he was not convinced that there was any discrimination at all.