 para 29 The next question he considered was whether Income Support was a "possession" with regard to Article 1P for the purpose of Article 14. para 30, and he concluded that Article 1P on its own, had not been violated.para 23

Lord Justice Laws then considered Article 14 read with Article 1 of the First Protocol, with regard to Reynolds's claim of age discrimination para 30

Lord Justice Laws then determined that there had been a violation of Article 14 taken with Article 1P but only as far as the Job Seekers Allowance" was concerned.With respect to "income support", there was no violation.