 para 15 In addition, it was beyond the powers of this Regulation in violation of Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 1P because it discriminated against Carson on grounds of her "place of residence" without any "objective and reasonable justification".The Regulation also constituted a violation of Article 1P taken on its own.The UK Government claimed that, in the original hearing, Justice Burnton should have dismissed the case from the beginning, since there was certain evidence that should not have been introduced in regard to Article 1