 
 <prompt> Wetin for Christian world dey look like Islamic fiqh even though many people dey argue say dem no dey similar at all? Given di previous question, write one context wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: However, all of these aspects of medieval university life dey considered by standard scholarship to be independent medieval European developments with no tracable Islamic influence. Generally, some reviewers don talk say Makdisi dey too much exaggerate im case by just dey rely on "the accumulation of close parallels", but e no fit point to convincing channels of transmission between the Muslim and Christian world. Norman Daniel talk say the Arab equivalent of the Latin disputation, the taliqa, dey reserved for the ruler's court, no be the madrasa, and say the actual differences between Islamic fiqh and medieval European civil law dey deep. The taliqa only reach Islamic Spain, the only likely point of transmission, after the establishment of the first medieval universities. In fact, there no Latin translation of the taliqa and, most importantly, no evidence of Latin scholars ever show awareness of Arab influence on the Latin method of disputation, something wey dem for sure find interesting. Instead, na the medieval reception of the Greek Organon wey set the scholastic sic et non in motion. Daniel conclude say the similarities in method get more to do with the two religions wey get "common problems: to reconcile the conflicting statements of their own authorities, and to safeguard the data of revelation from the impact of Greek philosophy"; so Christian scholasticism and similar Arab concepts suppose dey seen in terms of a parallel occurrence, not of the transmission of ideas from one to the other, a view wey Hugh Kennedy also share. 