 
 <prompt> Wetin dem analyze? Based on di question wey dey above, write small tori wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: Historical interpretations of John don change well well over the years. For medieval chroniclers, dem be di first people wey write about John's reign wey dey happen for their time or close to am. One group of chroniclers write early for John's life, or around the time wey he become king, like Richard of Devizes, William of Newburgh, Roger of Hoveden and Ralph de Diceto. Dem historians no too like how John behave under Richard's rule, but dem small small like di very early years of John's reign. We no get plenty correct tori about di middle and later parts of John's reign, but Gervase of Canterbury and Ralph of Coggeshall write di main tori; none of dem talk good about how John perform as king. Most of di bad reputation wey John get later on na from two chroniclers wey write after the king die, Roger of Wendover and Matthew Paris, di last one talk say John try convert to Islam in exchange for military help from di Almohad ruler Muhammad al-Nasir - a tori wey modern historians believe say no be true. 