 
 <prompt> Wetin make phrases like 'triumph of human reason' ironic and haunting? Based on di previous question, write a context wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: In im book, Humanism (1997), Tony Davies dey call dis critics "humanist anti-humanists". Critics wey dey against antihumanism, especially Jürgen Habermas, dey argue say while antihumanists fit talk say humanism no fit achieve im goal of freedom, dem no dey offer any alternative project of freedom. Others, like the German philosopher Heidegger see themselves as humanists like the ancient Greeks, but dem believe say humanism only apply to the German "race" and specifically to the Nazis and so, according to Davies, dem be anti-humanist humanists. Dis interpretation of Heidegger's thoughts dey very controversial; Heidegger include im own views and critique of Humanism for Letter On Humanism. Davies agree say after the terrible experiences of the wars for the 20th century "e no suppose dey possible to dey talk phrases like 'the destiny of man' or the 'triumph of human reason' without immediate awareness of the foolishness and brutality wey dey follow dem". For "e dey almost impossible to think of a crime wey never happen in the name of human reason". But, he continue, "e no go make sense to just abandon the ground wey historical humanisms dey occupy. For one thing humanism still dey many times the only option against bigotry and persecution. The freedom to talk and write, to organize and campaign for defense of individual or group interests, to protest and disobey: all dis things fit only dey expressed in humanist terms." 