 
 <prompt> ```Who no support the Nazis, Heidegger or Davies? Given the previous question, write a context wey contain the answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context:``` <response>: In im book, Humanism (1997), Tony Davies dey call dis critics "humanist anti-humanists". Critics wey dey against antihumanism, especially Jürgen Habermas, dey argue say while antihumanists fit talk say humanism no fit achieve im goal of freedom, dem no dey offer any alternative project of freedom. Others, like di German philosopher Heidegger see demselves as humanists like di ancient Greeks, but dem believe say humanism dey apply only to di German "race" and specifically to di Nazis and so, according to Davies, dem be anti-humanist humanists. Dis interpretation of Heidegger's thinking dey very controversial; Heidegger include im own views and critique of Humanism for Letter On Humanism. Davies agree say after di terrible experiences of di wars for di 20th century "e no suppose dey possible to dey talk phrases like 'the destiny of man' or 'the triumph of human reason' without immediate awareness of di foolishness and brutality wey dey follow dem". For "e dey almost impossible to think of any crime wey never happen in di name of human reason". But, he continue, "e no go make sense to just abandon di position wey di historical humanisms dey occupy. For one thing humanism still dey many times di only available option to bigotry and persecution. Di freedom to talk and write, to organise and campaign for defence of individual or group interests, to protest and disobey: all dis things fit only dey expressed in humanist terms." 