 
 <prompt> How person fit show say something no true? Based on the question wey dey before, write one example wey contain the answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: ```Based on wetin dey logical, no amount of positive results for experimental testing fit confirm scientific theory, but one single example wey counter am dey logically decisive: e show say the theory, from which the implication dey come, na lie. To talk say one particular statement (e.g., the statement of a law of some scientific theory) -- [call am "T"] -- dey "falsifiable" no mean say "T" na lie. Instead, e mean say, if "T" na lie, then (in principle), "T" fit show say e dey lie, by observation or by experiment. Popper's explanation of the logical difference between verification and falsifiability dey very important for hin philosophy of science. E still ginger am to use falsifiability as hin criteria to separate wetin be, and wetin no be, genuinely scientific: one theory suppose dey see as scientific if, and only if, e fit be falsified. This one make am attack the claims of both psychoanalysis and contemporary Marxism say dem be scientific, based on say their theories no fit be falsified.``` 