 
 <prompt> ```Di phrase "in whole or in part" don dey subject to plenti discussion by scholars of international humanitarian law. Di International Criminal Tribunal for di Former Yugoslavia find for Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic – Trial Chamber I – Judgment – IT-98-33 (2001) ICTY8 (2 August 2001) say Genocide don happun. For Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic – Appeals Chamber – Judgment – IT-98-33 (2004) ICTY 7 (19 April 2004) paragraphs 8, 9, 10, and 11 address di mata of in part and find say "the part must be a substantial part of that group. Di aim of di Genocide Convention na to prevent di intentional destruction of entire human groups, and di part wey dem target must be significant enough to get impact on di group as a whole." Di Appeals Chamber go into details of other cases and di opinions of respected commentators on di Genocide Convention to explain how dem take reach dis conclusion.

Based on di article and di following list of answers, write a list of questions.

1. to prevent di intentional destruction of entire human groups
2. "in whole or in part"
3. by scholars of international humanitarian law
4. di International Criminal Tribunal for di Former Yugoslavia
5. 19 April 2004
6. paragraphs 8, 9, 10, and 11
7. say di part must be a substantial part of that group.
8. unknown

Numbered questions:``` <response>: ```1. Wetin be di aim of di Genocide Convention?
2. Which phrase don dey cause plenty argument?
3. Na who dey discuss am?
4. Who find out say mass murder happen?
5. Wetin be di date of di judgement?
6. Which paragraphs address di matter?
7. And wetin dem find?
8. Wetin Radislav Krstic like chop for dinner?``` 