 
 <prompt> Wetin be di subject of dis article? Given di previous question, write one context wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: ```Vowel length no always dey consider as one important thing for Dutch phonology, because e dey normally happen with changes for vowel quality. One feature fit dey see as unnecessary, and some phonemic analyses fit prefer make dem see am as one opposition of tenseness. But even if dem no see am as part of the phonemic opposition, the long/tense vowels still dey sound longer pass their short counterparts. The changes for vowel quality no always dey the same for all dialects, and for some, e fit be say no dey much difference at all, with length still dey the main thing wey dey make dem different. And even though e dey true say old words always join vowel length with change for vowel quality, new loanwords don bring back phonemic oppositions of length. Compare zonne(n) [ˈzɔnə] ("suns") versus zone [ˈzɔːnə] ("zone") versus zonen [ˈzoːnə(n)] ("sons"), or kroes [krus] ("mug") versus cruise [kruːs] ("cruise").``` 