 
 <prompt> text: ```Make use of the article to answer the questions.

For epistemology, rationalism na di belief say "reason dey important pass and e dey test knowledge" or "any belief wey dey appeal to reason as source of knowledge or justification". More formally, rationalism dey defined as methodology or theory "wey di criteria for truth no be based on senses but on intellect and deduction".

For one old argument, rationalism bin dey against empiricism, where di rationalists believe say reality get logical structure inside am. Because of dis, di rationalists argue say some truths dey and intellect fit grasp these truths directly. Dem talk say certain rational principles dey for logic, mathematics, ethics, and metaphysics wey dey so true say if you deny dem, e go cause contradiction. Di rationalists get high confidence for reason sake of say empirical proof and physical evidence no dey necessary to know some truths – in other words, "there dey significant ways wey we dey gain concepts and knowledge wey no dey depend on sense experience".

Different levels of emphasis on dis method or theory fit lead to different rationalist standpoints, from di moderate position "wey reason dey important pass other ways to get knowledge" to di extreme position wey reason na "di only way to get knowledge". Based on old understanding of reason, rationalism dey same as philosophy, di Socratic life of inquiry, or di zetetic (skeptical) clear interpretation of authority (wey dey open to di underlying or essential cause of things as dem dey appear to our sense of certainty). In recent times, Leo Strauss bin wan bring back "Classical Political Rationalism" as discipline wey understand di work of reasoning, no be as foundational, but as maieutic.

1. Wetin Leo Strauss wan bring back?
2. How dem dey see rationalism for epistemology?
3. How e dey formally defined?
4. Abi rationalism don ever cause argument?
5. Wetin e dey against?
6. E dey illogical or logical?
7. Wetin be di argument for rationalism?
8. Mathematics dey part of di argument?
9. Ethics dey involved?
10. Wetin be di last thing wey dey involved?
11. Dem get confidence for dis or dem dey unsure?
12. Wetin be di type of proof wey dem get?
13. Wetin be di type of evidence wey dem no need?
14. Wetin be their words on top dat?
15. Dem get one standpoint or many for dis?
16. Wetin be di moderate one?
17. Wetin be more extreme?
18. Wetin rationalism dey same as?
19. Wetin zetetic mean?
20. E dey consider as discipline?

Numbered answers:``` <response>: ```1. Classical Political Rationalism
2. e dey see reason as di main source and test of knowledge
3. one kain methodology or theory "wey di criteria for truth no be based on senses but on intellect and deduction"
4. YES
5. empiricism
6. logical
7. say some truths dey and di mind fit grasp these truths directly
8. yes
9. yes
10. metaphysics
11. confident
12. empirical proof
13. physical
14. dey significant ways wey we dey gain concepts and knowledge wey no dey based on sense experience
15. many
16. say reason dey more important pass other ways wey we fit take get knowledge
17. di only way to knowledge
18. philosophy
19. skeptical
20. yes``` 