 
 <prompt> "Which company was more lax? Given the previous question, write a context that contains the answer. It can be 1 - 20 sentences. Context:" 

Translate the text above to Nigerian Pidgin. If there is programming code in am, leave am as e be. No add any extra statement for your response: <response>: Nintendo no dey as strict as Sega, wey no gree make third-party publishers publish games until Mediagenic for late summer 1988. Nintendo intention, however, na to reserve big part of NES game money for themselves. Nintendo say make dem be the only ones wey fit produce all cartridges, and say the publisher gats pay in full before dem go produce the cartridges for that game. Cartridges no fit be returned to Nintendo, so publishers dey carry all the risk. As e be so, some publishers lose more money sake of distress sales of remaining inventory for the end of the NES era pass wetin dem ever make as profit from sales of the games. Because Nintendo dey control the production of all cartridges, dem fit enforce strict rules on top their third-party developers, wey gats sign contract by Nintendo wey go make dem develop only for the system, order at least 10,000 cartridges, and only make five games per year. For 1988, shortage of DRAM and ROM chips reportedly cause Nintendo to only gree 25% of publishers' requests for cartridges. This one na average figure, some publishers dey receive plenty, others dey receive almost nothing. GameSpy talk say Nintendo "iron-clad terms" make plenty enemies for the company during the 1980s. Some developers try to bypass the five game limit by creating additional company brands like Konami's Ultra Games label; others try to bypass the 10NES chip. 