 
 <prompt> text: ```Di term "dialect" (from Latin dialectus, dialectos, from di ancient Greek word διάλεκτος diálektos, "discourse", from διά diá, "through" and λέγω legō, "I speak") dey use for two different ways to refer to two different types of linguistic phenomena.

One usage—the wey dey common pass among linguists—dey refer to one kind of language wey dey characteristic of one particular group of di language speakers. Dem dey apply di term mostly to regional speech patterns, but a dialect fit also dey defined by other factors, like social class. One dialect wey dey associated with one particular social class fit be termed as sociolect, one dialect wey dey associated with one particular ethnic group fit be termed as ethnolect, and one regional dialect fit be termed as regiolect. According to dis definition, any variety of one language na "a dialect", including any standard varieties.

The other usage dey refer to one language wey dey socially subordinated to one regional or national standard language, often historically related to di standard language, but e no actually come from am. For dis sense, unlike for di first usage, di standard language no go dey considered as "dialect," as e be di dominant language for one particular state or region, whether for social or political status, official status, predominance or prevalence, or all of di above. Meanwhile, di "dialects" wey dey subordinate to di standard language generally no be variations on di standard language but instead separate (but often related) languages on their own. For example, most of di various regional Romance languages for Italy, wey people dey colloquially refer to as Italian "dialects," no actually come from modern standard Italian, but instead evolve from Vulgar Latin separately and individually from one another and independently of standard Italian, long before di spread of one national standardized language throughout wetin be Italy now. Dis various Latin-derived regional languages therefore, for one linguistic sense, no truly be "dialects" of di standard Italian language, but instead better defined as their own separate languages. Conversely, with di spread of standard Italian throughout Italy for di 20th century, various regional versions or varieties of standard Italian develop, generally as one mix of di national standard Italian with local regional languages and local accents. Dis variations on standard Italian, wey people sabi as regional Italian, go better be called "dialects" according to di first linguistic definition of "dialect," as dem actually come partially or mostly from standard Italian.

Answers to di following set of questions:

1. How many ways dem dey use di term dialect?
2. Wetin one dialect dey related to for class?
3. Wetin about one regional dialect?
4. Wetin about one dialect wey dey related to one certain ethnicity?
5. How many types of linguistic phenomena?
6. Wetin di standard language no dey considered for di other usage?
7. Where di regional Italian dialects actually come from?
8. Wetin cause di development of regional versions or varieties of standard Italian?
9. Wetin variations on standard Italian dey known as?
10. Wetin be di origin of di term dialect?

Numbered answers:``` <response>: ```1. for two different ways
2. na sociolect
3. na regiolect.
4. as ethnolect
5. two different ways
6. unknown
7. from Vulgar Latin
8. na mix of national and local
9. dem dey call dem regional Italian
10. from the Greek word for "discourse"``` 