 
 <prompt> Wetin be di kain event wey Schachter theorize say dey affect emotions? Based on di previous question, write one context wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: Stanley Schachter formulates im theory based on di earlier work of one Spanish doctor, Gregorio Marañón, wey inject patients with epinephrine and come ask dem how dem dey feel. E dey interesting say Marañón find out say most of di patients feel something but without any real emotion-evoking thing, di patients no fit interpret their physiological arousal as emotion wey dem don experience before. Schachter agree say physiological reactions dey play big role for emotions. E suggest say physiological reactions dey contribute to emotional experience by helping to focus on cognitive appraisal of any physiologically arousing event and say na dis appraisal dey define di subjective emotional experience. Emotions na result of two-stage process: general physiological arousal, and experience of emotion. For example, di physiological arousal, heart dey beat fast, as response to an evoking stimulus, like seeing bear for kitchen. Di brain go quickly check di area, to explain why di heart dey beat fast, and e go see di bear. As e be so, di brain go interpret di fast beating heart as fear of di bear. With im student, Jerome Singer, Schachter show say subjects fit get different emotional reactions even if dem dey for di same physiological state after injection of epinephrine. Dem observe say subjects fit show either anger or amusement depending on whether another person for di situation (a confederate) show that emotion. So, di combination of di appraisal of di situation (cognitive) and how di participants take receive adrenaline or placebo na wetin go determine di response. Dis experiment don get criticism for Jesse Prinz's (2004) Gut Reactions. 