 
 <prompt> Wetin papers no dey do with their tori? Based on di last question, write one context wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: Intense media interest for the opinions and private lives of di royal family during di 1980s don cause plenty sensational tori for di press, wey no all of dem dey entirely true. As Kelvin MacKenzie, editor of The Sun, tell im staff: "Give me a Sunday for Monday splash on the Royals. No worry if e no true—as long as dem no too much talk about am afterwards." Newspaper editor Donald Trelford write for The Observer of 21 September 1986: "Di royal soap opera don reach level wey public dey very interested well well so tey dem no dey sabi di difference between fact and fiction again ... e no be say some papers no dey check their facts or accept denials: dem no send if di tori true or not." Dem talk, especially for The Sunday Times of 20 July 1986, say di Queen dey fear say Margaret Thatcher economic policies dey cause social divisions and she dey vex for di high unemployment, series of riots, di violence of miners' strike, and Thatcher refusal to apply sanctions against di apartheid regime for South Africa. Di sources of di rumours include royal aide Michael Shea and Commonwealth Secretary-General Shridath Ramphal, but Shea talk say im remarks dey twisted and added to with plenty speculation. Thatcher allegedly talk say di Queen go vote for di Social Democratic Party—Thatcher political enemies. Thatcher biographer John Campbell talk say "di report na just journalistic mischief-making". Despite reports of quarrel between dem, Thatcher later show her personal admiration for di Queen, and di Queen give two honours wey dey her personal gift—membership for di Order of Merit and di Order of di Garter—to Thatcher after she comot as prime minister give John Major. Former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney talk say Elizabeth na "behind the scenes force" for ending apartheid. 