 
 <prompt> Wetin Daniel and Kennedy believe say Muslims and Christians get wey dey similar wey make dem get similar concepts wey dem dey share? Given the previous question, write a context wey contain the answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: However, all of these facets of medieval university life dey wey scholars believe say na independent medieval European developments with no tracable Islamic influence. Generally, some reviewers don talk say Makdisi dey too much for im argument by just dey rely on "the accumulation of close parallels", but e no fit show convincing channels of transmission between the Muslim and Christian world. Norman Daniel talk say the Arab equivalent of the Latin disputation, the taliqa, dey reserved for the ruler's court, no be the madrasa, and say the actual differences between Islamic fiqh and medieval European civil law deep. The taliqa only reach Islamic Spain, the only likely point of transmission, after the establishment of the first medieval universities. In fact, there no Latin translation of the taliqa and, most importantly, no evidence of Latin scholars ever show awareness of Arab influence on the Latin method of disputation, something wey dem for sure find interesting. Instead, na the medieval reception of the Greek Organon wey set the scholastic sic et non in motion. Daniel conclude say the similarities in method get more to do with the two religions wey get "common problems: to reconcile the conflicting statements of their own authorities, and to safeguard the data of revelation from the impact of Greek philosophy"; so Christian scholasticism and similar Arab concepts suppose dey seen as parallel events, not the transmission of ideas from one to the other, a view wey Hugh Kennedy also agree with. 