 
 <prompt> **Translate the text above only to Nigerian Pidgin:**

**Read di tori and ansa di kweshons.

For law and goment, de jure (; , "for law") dey describe practices wey dey legally recognize by official laws. For contrast, ("for fact" or "for practice") dey describe situations wey people sabi say e dey exist for reality, even if e no dey legally authorized. People dey use di terms to compare different scenarios, for example, "I sabi say, de jure, dis place suppose be parking lot, but now wey flood don leave four feet of water here, e don turn to de facto swimming pool".

E fit happen say you get multiple conflicting ("de jure") legalities at di same time, and maybe none of dem dey in force ("de facto"). After Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Ghazi seize power for 1526, e make im brother, Umar Din, di lawful ("de jure") Sultan of Adal. Ahmad, however, na di actual Sultan for practice ("de facto"), and im brother na just figurehead. Between 1805 and 1914, di ruling dynasty of Egypt dey rule as "de jure" viceroys of di Ottoman Empire, but dem dey act as "de facto" independent rulers wey dey maintain di polite fiction of Ottoman suzerainty. But, from around 1882, di rulers get only "de jure" control over Egypt, as e don turn to British puppet state. So, Egypt by Ottoman law na "de jure" province of di Ottoman Empire, but "de facto" e be part of British Empire.

1. Wetin be di topic of discussion?
2. E get specific practice?
3. Who be Adal Sultan?
4. Who be di person wey dey practice am?
5. When Egypt dey rule?
6. Which law dem dey fall under?
7. Wetin dey use de jure and de facto to contrast?
8. Wetin be di relationship wey Egypt get with Britain?
9. And wetin dem dey refer am as around 1882?
10. E possible to get more than one conflict at once?

Numbered answers:``` <response>: ```1. Different kinds of laws
2. de jure
3. Umar Din
4. Ahmad,
5. Between 1805 and 1914
6. de jure
7. situations
8. de facto
9. a British puppet state
10. yes``` 