 
 <prompt> Wetin be di way wey pipo dey see theories wey dey move from myth go actual science wey fit dey cause wahala for di advancement of theories? Based on di question wey dey above, write one context wey get di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: Popper talk say e don see since 1934 for im Logic of Discovery book say scientists dey develop their ideas inside one kain framework wey dey definite, and so e don anticipate Kuhn main point about "normal science". (But Popper criticize wetin e see as Kuhn's relativism.) Also, for im book Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge wey e write for 1963, Popper talk say, "Science suppose start with myths, and with the criticism of myths; not with the collection of observations, nor with the invention of experiments, but with the critical discussion of myths, and of magical techniques and practices. The scientific tradition dey different from the pre-scientific tradition because e get two layers. Like the latter, e dey pass on im theories; but e also dey pass on one critical attitude towards them. The theories dey pass on, not as dogmas, but rather with the challenge to discuss them and improve upon them." 