 
 <prompt> ```Different Buddhist sects get different definitions for the state of being wey dem dey call? Based on the previous question, write a context wey contain the answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context:``` <response>: Besides emptiness, Mahayana schools dey often focus on di ideas of perfected spiritual insight (prajñāpāramitā) and Buddha-nature (tathāgatagarbha). Dey get different interpretations of tathāgatagarbha for Mahāyāna thought. Di idea fit be traced to Abhidharma, and ultimately to statements of di Buddha for di Nikāyas. For Tibetan Buddhism, according to di Sakya school, tathāgatagarbha na di inseparability of di clarity and emptiness of person mind. For Nyingma, tathāgatagarbha also generally refer to di inseparability of di clarity and emptiness of person mind. According to di Gelug school, e be di potential for sentient beings to wake up since dem dey empty (i.e. dependently originated). According to di Jonang school, e refer to di innate qualities of di mind wey show themselves as omniscience etc. when unnecessary obscurations dey removed. Di "Tathāgatagarbha Sutras" na collection of Mahayana sutras wey present one unique model of Buddha-nature. Even though dis collection dey generally ignored for India, East Asian Buddhism dey give some importance to these texts. 