 
 <prompt> Which of the following no fit happun as result of experimental testing: positive outcomes, the statement of a law or a counterexample? Given the previous question, write a context wey contain the answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: E no dey make sense say any amount of good results for experimental testing fit confirm scientific theory, but one single example wey dey against am dey show say the theory dey false. To talk say one particular statement (e.g., the statement of a law of some scientific theory) -- [call am "T"] -- dey "falsifiable" no mean say "T" dey false. Instead, e mean say, if "T" dey false, then (in principle), "T" fit dey shown say e dey false, by observation or by experiment. Popper's explanation of the logical difference between verification and falsifiability dey very important for hin philosophy of science. E also ginger am to use falsifiability as hin criteria to separate wetin be genuinely scientific from wetin no be am: a theory suppose dey see as scientific if, and only if, e fit dey falsified. This make am attack the claims of both psychoanalysis and contemporary Marxism say dem be scientific, based on say their theories no dey falsifiable. 