 
 <prompt> text: ```Philosophical empiricists believe say no knowledge fit dey properly inferred or deduced unless e dey come from person sense-based experience. Dis view dey commonly contrasted with rationalism, wey talk say knowledge fit dey come from reason independently of the senses. For example, John Locke believe say some knowledge (e.g. knowledge of God's existence) fit dey arrived at through intuition and reasoning alone. Similarly Robert Boyle, wey be advocate of the experimental method, believe say we get innate ideas. The main continental rationalists (Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz) too be advocates of the empirical "scientific method".

Aristotle explanation of how e fit dey possible no strictly empiricist for modern sense, but based on hin theory of potentiality and actuality, and experience of sense perceptions still need the help of the active nous. These ideas dey different from Platonic ideas of the human mind as an entity wey dey pre-exist somewhere for the heavens, before e come join body for Earth (see Plato's Phaedo and Apology, as well as others). Aristotle dey consider sense perception as more important pass Plato, and commentators for the Middle Ages summarize one of hin positions as "nihil in intellectu nisi prius fuerit in sensu" (Latin for "nothing in the intellect without first being in the senses").

Answers to the questions:

1. Their knowledge dey come from sense-based experience.
2. E dey generally contrasted with rationalism.
3. Wetin be that?
4. Wetin be Aristotle explanation?
5. Based on wetin?
6. Plato position no be more important.
7. Commentators summarize am as wetin?
8. Wetin be that for Latin?
9. Aristotle no be empiricist.
10. Na John Locke get knowledge of God's existence.``` <response>: ```1. person sense-based experience
2. rationalism
3. knowledge fit come from reason wey no need senses
4. experience of sense perceptions still need active nous help
5. im theory of potentiality and actuality
6. no
7. nothing dey intellect without first dey for senses
8. nihil in intellectu nisi prius fuerit in sensu
9. Aristotle explanation
10. unknown``` 