 
 <prompt> ```CHAPTER III 

After three weeks don waka pass, I determine say I go beg Erskine well well make e do justice to the memory of Cyril Graham, and make e give di world im wonderful interpretation of di Sonnets--di only interpretation wey sabi explain di problem well well. I no get any copy of my letter, I dey regret to say, and I never fit see di original; but I remember say I go through di whole matter, and cover sheets of paper with passionate repetition of di arguments and proofs wey my study don suggest to me. E be like say I no just dey restore Cyril Graham to im proper place for literary history, but I dey rescue di honour of Shakespeare himself from di boring memory of a common intrigue. I put all my enthusiasm inside di letter. I put all my faith inside di letter. 

No sooner, in fact, after I send am, a curious reaction come over me. E be like say I don give away my capacity to believe for di Willie Hughes theory of di Sonnets, say something don comot from me, as e be, and I dey perfectly indifferent to di whole matter. Wetin happen? E hard to talk. Maybe, by finding perfect expression for a passion, I don exhaust di passion itself. Emotional forces, like di forces of physical life, get their positive limitations. Maybe di mere effort to convince person to believe for one theory involve some form of renunciation of di power of credence. Maybe I just tire for di whole matter, and, my enthusiasm don burn finish, my reason dey left to im own unimpassioned judgment. However e happen, and I no fit pretend to explain am, no doubt say Willie Hughes suddenly turn to me na just myth, an idle dream, di boyish fancy of a young man wey, like most ardent spirits, dey more eager to convince others than to convince himself. 

1. The author keep copies of im letter?
2. E fit find di original?
3. Na who e dey write to?
4. For wetin purpose?
5. E put plenty effort for di writing?
6. How long e wait before e start to write?
7. Wetin Cyril interpret?
8. After e send di letter, e still feel passionate?
9. Who turn to myth for am?
10. E fit narrow down wetin cause am to lose im interest?``` <response>: ```1. No
2. No
3. Erskine
4. Bring back Cyril Graham to im correct place for literary history
5. Yes
6. three weeks
7. Shakespeare
8. No
9. Willie Hughes
10. E hard to talk.``` 