 
 <prompt> text: ```For scientific nomenclature, synonym na scientific name wey dey apply to one taxon wey don get different scientific name now, even though the term dey use somehow different for zoological code of nomenclature. For example, Linnaeus na di first person wey give scientific name (under di current system of scientific nomenclature) to di Norway spruce, wey e call "Pinus abies". Dis name no dey use again: e don be synonym of di current scientific name wey be "Picea abies".

Unlike synonyms for other contexts, for taxonomy, synonym no fit replace di name wey e be synonym of. For taxonomy, synonyms no be equal, but dem get different status. For any taxon wey get particular circumscription, position, and rank, only one scientific name dey consider to be di correct one at any given time (dis correct name dey determine by applying di relevant code of nomenclature). A synonym no fit dey on its own: e always dey alternative to another scientific name. Since di correct name of a taxon dey depend on di taxonomic viewpoint wey dem use (wey result in particular circumscription, position and rank) a name wey be one taxonomist's synonym fit be another taxonomist's correct name (and "vice versa").

1. Wetin be di current scientific name of the Norway Spruce?
2. Who give am di original name?
3. Wetin be di relationship between di two terms?
4. Dis type of synonym similar to other types of synonyms?
5. How dem dey determine di correct synonym?
6. Di correct name dey objective?
7. E fit dey on its own?
8. Where Picea abies dey from?
9. Which scientific field dis article dey discuss?
10. When Linnaeus name di Pinus abies?``` <response>: ```1. Picea abies.
2. Pinus abies.
3. Synonyms.
4. No.
5. By applying the relevant code of nomenclature.
6. No.
7. No.
8. Norway.
9. Zoology.
10. unknown``` 