 
 <prompt> According to Popper, wetin we no fit get when e come to theories? Given the previous question, write a context wey contain the answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: To Popper, wey be anti-justificationist, traditional philosophy dey waka for wrong road sake of false principle of sufficient reason. E believe say no assumption fit ever dey or need ever dey justified, so lack of justification no mean say doubt dey. Instead, theories suppose dey tested and scrutinised. E no be to dey claim say theories dey certain or justified, but to remove errors for dem. E write, "there no dey good positive reasons; we no need am [...] But [philosophers] obviously no fit believe say na my opinion, talk more of say e dey correct" (The Philosophy of Karl Popper, p. 1043) 