 
 <prompt> Which of the following qualities no dey necessary for theory to be scientific: falsifiable or logical? Given the previous question, write a context wey contain the answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: E no dey make sense say any amount of good results for experimental testing fit confirm scientific theory, but if one example show say the theory dey wrong, e don finish. To talk say one statement (like the statement of a law for some scientific theory) -- [call am "T"] -- fit "falsifiable" no mean say "T" dey false. Instead, e mean say, if "T" dey false, then (in principle), "T" fit show say e dey false, by observation or by experiment. Popper's explanation of the logical difference between verification and falsifiability dey important for im philosophy of science. E also make am decide say falsifiability na im criteria to separate wetin be genuinely scientific from wetin no be: a theory suppose dey see as scientific if, and only if, e fit be falsifiable. E make am attack the claims of both psychoanalysis and contemporary Marxism say dem no fit be seen as scientific, based on say their theories no dey falsifiable. 