 
 <prompt> ```Answer di questions wey dey di end based on di tori.

(CNN) -- For one auction for gallery for New York recently, one piece of artwork sell for higher price pass wetin di auctioneers bin expect: $4,080.

E no too big, na just 8-by-10 inches. Technically, e no even be art. Na glossy black-and-white photograph. E get small k-leg: dem staple am for di upper left-hand corner.

Somebody write all over di front of di photograph. Di person wey write for am na di subject of di photograph. E write:

"To Patricia Keating, with very best wishes, John Kennedy"

Na wetin make di photo get value for person: Kennedy don hold am for him hand, don use pen write for am. Di owners of Swann Galleries, where di signed photo dey auction, believe say Kennedy don autograph di picture for 1956, when him be United States senator. Di picture sef no too get value; but him signature, wey him personalize for Patricia Keating. ...

"As far as we know, she no be anybody wey famous," Rebecca Weiss, one Swann Galleries worker, tell me di day after di auction. "There no particular significance to her name."

Why person go pay pass $4,000 for di photo?

Weiss tell me say di identities of di buyers and sellers for Swann auctions dey confidential, so she no fit talk who consign di photo for sale, or who buy am. But she talk say e get one safe rule of thumb about di sale of autographs of renowned men and women:

1. Who write for di image?
2. Who e dey for?
3. Where dem sell am?
4. E shock say dem sell am for dat price?
5. Wetin be di selling point?
6. E big photo?
7. How big e be?
8. When him sign am?
9. Wetin be him work dat time?
10. Patricia famous?
11. E release who buy am?
12. Dem consider di photo as art?``` <response>: 1. John Kennedy
2. Patricia Keating,
3. Swann Galleries
4. Yes.
5. Kennedy don hold am for him hand
6. No.
7. 8-by-10 inches.
8. 1956
9. A United States senator.
10. No
11. No.
12. No 