 
 <prompt> Science get plenti uses. E fit show laws of nature, cure sickness, make bombs, and help bridges to stand. Indeed science dey good for wetin e dey do so tey e dey always dey tempt to put am for problems wey e no fit help. David Brooks, wey be author of The Social Animal, The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement, be like say e be di latest for long list of writers wey no fit resist di temptation.

Brooks don gain fame for some books. But im latest book The Social Animal, e be more serious and ambitious pass im earlier books. E be attempt to tackle some heavy topics. Di book dey focus on big questions: Wetin science don reveal about human nature? Wetin dey cause character? And why some people dey happy and successful while others no dey?

To answer dis questions, Brooks survey plenty subjects. Because of dis, you fit expect say di book go cover different facts. But Brooks structure im book for one unusual, and maybe unfortunate way. Instead of introducing scientific theories, e dey yarn story, within wey e dey try make im points, maybe to hold di reader's attention. So as Harold and Erica, di hero and heroine for im story, dey grow through pikin stage, we dey hear about di science of child development and as dem start to dey date, we dey hear about di theory of sexual attraction. Brooks carry dis go reach di death of one of im characters.

Overall, Brooks's story dey okay but e no too dey inspire. As person go expect, im writing dey mostly clear and, to be honest, some chapters dey stand out pass others. I enjoy, for example, di chapter wey Harold discover how to think on im own. While Harold and Erica no too strong as characters, di more serious problems with The Social Animal dey elsewhere. Dis problems partly involve Brooks's attempt to translate im tale into science. <response>: ```1. Four``` 