 
 <prompt> Wetin be di state of reporting for di 18th century? Based on di question wey dey before dis one, write small tori wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: As federal judge Alex Kozinski don talk, binding precedent as we sabi am today no dey exist when dem dey frame the Constitution. Judicial decisions no dey consistently, accurately, and faithfully reported for both sides of the Atlantic (reporters often just dey rewrite or no dey publish decisions wey dem no like), and the United Kingdom no get coherent court hierarchy before the end of the 19th century. Furthermore, English judges for the eighteenth century believe for now-obsolete natural law theories of law, by which law dey believed to get existence independent of wetin individual judges talk. Judges see themselves as just dey declare the law wey don always theoretically dey exist, and no dey make the law. So, a judge fit reject another judge opinion as just an incorrect statement of the law, the way wey scientists dey regularly reject each other conclusions as incorrect statements of the laws of science. 