 
 <prompt> ```Who definitively considered himself NOT a humanist, Jurgen Habermas or Heidegger? Given the previous question, write a context that contains the answer. It can be 1 - 20 sentences. Context:```
Translate the text above to Nigerian pidgin. If there is programming code in it, leave as is. Do not add any extra statement in your response:

```Who definitively consider himself NOT a humanist, Jurgen Habermas or Heidegger? Given the previous question, write a context wey contain the answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context:``` <response>: In im book, Humanism (1997), Tony Davies dey call dis critics "humanist anti-humanists". Critics wey dey against antihumanism, especially Jürgen Habermas, dey argue say while antihumanists fit talk say humanism no fit achieve im goal of freedom, dem sef no dey offer any alternative project wey fit bring freedom. Others, like the German philosopher Heidegger see themselves as humanists like the ancient Greeks, but dem believe say humanism only apply to the German "race" and specifically to the Nazis and so, according to Davies, dem be anti-humanist humanists. Dis interpretation of Heidegger's thoughts dey very controversial; Heidegger include im own views and critique of Humanism for Letter On Humanism. Davies agree say after the terrible experiences of the wars for the 20th century "e no suppose dey possible to dey talk phrases like 'the destiny of man' or the 'triumph of human reason' without immediate awareness of the foolishness and brutality wey dey follow dem". For "e dey almost impossible to think of any crime wey never happen in the name of human reason". But, he continue, "e no go make sense to just abandon the ideas wey the historical humanisms don already establish. For one thing, humanism dey sometimes the only option wey dey available to fight against prejudice and persecution. The freedom to talk and write, to organize and campaign for individual or group interests, to protest and disobey: all these things fit only happen based on humanist beliefs." 