 
 <prompt> How Popper take describe natural evolution? Based on di last question, write one context wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: Popper dey compare im views with di idea of di "hopeful monster" wey get big mutations for phenotype and e dey call am di "hopeful behavioural monster". After behaviour don change well well, small but quick changes for di phenotype go follow make di organism dey fitter to im changed goals. Dis one dey make am look as if di phenotype dey change dey guided by some invisible hand, while na natural selection dey work with di new behaviour. For example, according to dis hypothesis, di eating habits of di giraffe suppose don change before im long neck evolve. Popper compare dis view as "evolution from within" or "active Darwinism" (di organism dey actively try discover new ways of life and dey on top quest to conquer new ecological niches), with di naturalistic "evolution from without" (wey get di picture of a hostile environment wey dey try kill di mostly passive organism, or maybe segregate some of im groups). 