 
 <prompt> Which of the following was not attacked as unscientific: psychoanalysis, philosophy or Marxism? Given the previous question, write a context that contains the answer. It can be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: Logically, no amount of positive outcomes for experimental testing fit confirm scientific theory, but if one counterexample dey, e dey logically decisive: e show say the theory wey the implication dey come from, na lie. To talk say one particular statement (e.g., the statement of a law for some scientific theory) -- [call am "T"] -- dey "falsifiable" no mean say "T" dey false. Instead, e mean say, if "T" dey false, then (in principle), "T" fit show say e dey false, through observation or experiment. Popper's explanation of the logical difference between verification and falsifiability dey for the center of im philosophy of science. E still inspire am to use falsifiability as im criterion to separate wetin be genuinely scientific from wetin no be: one theory suppose dey see as scientific if, and only if, e dey falsifiable. This make am attack the claims of both psychoanalysis and contemporary Marxism say dem no fit claim scientific status, based on say their theories no dey falsifiable. 