 
 <prompt> ```Who be di person wey carry mata go court for Baze v. Rees? Based on di question wey dey before dis one, write something wey get di answer inside. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context:``` <response>: Traditionally, Section 1983 bin get limited use for state prisoner wey dey under death sentence because Supreme Court don talk say habeas corpus, no be Section 1983, na only way wey state prisoner fit use challenge im judgment of death. For di 2006 Hill v. McDonough case, however, United States Supreme Court approve use of Section 1983 as way to challenge state method of execution as cruel and unusual punishment wey dey violate di Eighth Amendment. Di theory na say prisoner wey dey bring dis kind challenge no dey attack im judgment of death directly, but na di means wey dem go take carry out di judgment. So, Supreme Court talk for di Hill case say prisoner fit use Section 1983 instead of habeas corpus to bring di lawsuit. But, as Clarence Hill own case show, lower federal courts don often refuse hear suits wey dey challenge methods of execution based on say di prisoner bring di claim too late and na just for delay purposes. Also, di Court decision for Baze v. Rees, wey uphold di lethal injection method wey many states dey use, don reduce di chance for relief through Section 1983. 