 
 <prompt> Even though dem get plenti similarities for their doctrines, which two practices no too likely influence each other? Given di last question, write one context wey contain di answer. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: However, all dis parts of medieval university life wey dem dey consider for standard scholarship dey independent developments for medieval Europe wey no get Islamic influence. Some people don talk say Makdisi dey exaggerate hin argument by just dey rely on "the accumulation of close parallels", but e no fit show convincing channels of how Muslim and Christian world dey relate. Norman Daniel talk say the Arab version of Latin disputation, wey dem dey call taliqa, na only for ruler court dem dey do am, e no dey for madrasa, and the actual differences between Islamic fiqh and medieval European civil law dey deep. The taliqa only reach Islamic Spain, wey be the only place wey fit transmit am, after the first medieval universities don dey established. For real, no Latin translation of taliqa dey and, the most important thing be say, no evidence say Latin scholars sabi about Arab influence for Latin method of disputation, something wey dem for sure find important. Instead, na the medieval acceptance of Greek Organon dey start the scholastic sic et non. Daniel talk say the similarities for method get to do with the two religions wey get "common problems: to reconcile the conflicting statements of their own authorities, and to safeguard the data of revelation from the impact of Greek philosophy"; so Christian scholasticism and similar Arab concepts suppose dey see as parallel events, not say one dey transmit ideas give the other, a view wey Hugh Kennedy also agree with. 