 
 <prompt> Wetin dey happun wen sometin no true? Based on di previus kweshun, write one context wey get di ansa. E fit be 1 - 20 sentences. Context: <response>: No matter how many good results wey dey come out from experimental testing, e no fit confirm any scientific theory, but if one counterexample show face, e go show say the theory dey false. To talk say one statement (like the statement of a law for some scientific theory) -- [call am "T"] -- dey "falsifiable" no mean say "T" dey false. Instead, e mean say, if "T" dey false, then (in principle), "T" fit show say e dey false, through observation or experiment. Popper's explanation of the logical difference between verification and falsifiability dey for the center of im philosophy of science. E also ginger am to use falsifiability as im criteria to separate wetin be genuinely scientific from wetin no be: one theory suppose dey see as scientific if, and only if, e fit be falsifiable. This make am attack the claims of both psychoanalysis and contemporary Marxism say dem be scientific, based on say their theories no dey falsifiable. 