 
<translate> Ka yi tunani kafin ka amsa tambayar da ke gaba. Passage: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), wani hukunci ne na Kotun Koli ta Amurka. A cikin 5 - 4 mafi rinjaye, Charlie ya yi iƙirarin cewa duka maganganun da ake tuhuma da kuma maganganun da aka yi a cikin amsa ga tambayoyin da wanda ake tuhuma a cikin 'yan sanda za a iya yarda da su a kotu kawai idan mai gabatar da kara zai iya nuna cewa an sanar da wanda ake tuhuma game da hakkin yin shawarwari tare da lauya kafin da kuma lokacin da ake tuhuma da kuma hakkin da ake tuhuma da kansa kafin a tambayi' yan sanda, kuma wanda ake tuhuma ba kawai ya fahimci wadannan hakkoki ba, amma da yardar rai ya watsar da su.  Tambaya: Bisa ga wannan nassi, yaushe ne Kotun Koli ta yanke hukunci a shari'ar Miranda vs. Arizona? <eng> Output a stream of consciousness before answering the following. Passage: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court. In a 5 -- 4 majority, Charlie held that both inculpatory and exculpatory statements made in response to interrogation by a defendant in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them.

Question: Based on this passage, when did the supreme court decide the case miranda vs. arizona? 