 
<translate> Ajụjụ bụ: N'iburu ahịrịokwu ahụ bụ́ "Ndị ọkà mmụta ihe ochie abụọ na-enyocha ihe dị n'ebe ha na-egwupụta ihe", ànyị nwere ike ikwubi na "Ndị ọkà mmụta ihe ochie abụọ achọpụtala ihe dị ịtụnanya n'ebe ha na-egwupụta ihe"? Nhọrọ: - Ee - ọ gaghị ekwe omume ikwu - ọ dịghị Ụzọ e si atụle ihe n'usoro n'usoro: Naanị n'ihi na ndị ọkà mmụta ihe ochie abụọ na-enyocha ihe n'ebe ha na-egwupụta ihe apụtaghị na ha chọpụtara ihe magburu onwe ya. O nwere ike ịbụ na ha mebiri shọvel ha ma na-agbalị idozi ya. <eng> The question is: Given the sentence "Two archaeologists are examining something in their dig site." can we conclude that "Two archaeologists have just made a fantastic discovery at their dig site."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Step-by-step reasoning process: Just because two archaeologists are examining something in their dig site doesn't mean they made a fantastic discovery. They may have just broke their shovel and is trying to fix it.
 