 
 <translate> To answer this question, we should know that: Although the work is not gnostic in a theological sense, the author, who considers himself to be a teacher to the unidentified audience to which he writes (see e.g. 9.9), intends to impart to his readers the perfect gnosis (knowledge), that they may perceive that the Christians are the only true covenant people, and that the Jewish people are no longer in covenant with God (3.7).
So, the final answer is the perfect gnosis ( knowledge ) , that they may perceive that the Christians are the only true covenant people , and that the Jewish people are no longer in covenant with God ( 3.7 ). <hau> Don amsa wannan tambayar, ya kamata mu sani cewa: Kodayake aikin ba gnostic ba ne a cikin ilimin tauhidi, marubucin, wanda ya ɗauki kansa a matsayin malami ga masu sauraro da ba a san su ba wanda ya rubuta (duba misali 9.9), yana da niyyar ba wa masu karatu cikakkiyar gnosis (ilimi), don su iya fahimtar cewa Kiristoci ne kaɗai mutanen alkawari na gaskiya, kuma cewa mutanen Yahudawa ba sa cikin alkawari da Allah (3.7). Don haka, amsar ƙarshe ita ce cikakkiyar gnosis (ilimi), cewa za su iya fahimtar cewa Kiristoci ne kaɗai mutanen alkawari na gaskiya, kuma cewa mutanen Yahudawa ba sa cikin alkawari da Allah (3.7 ). 