 
 <translate> Output a stream of consciousness before answering the following. Passage: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court. In a 5 -- 4 majority, Charlie held that both inculpatory and exculpatory statements made in response to interrogation by a defendant in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them.

Question: Based on this passage, when did the supreme court decide the case miranda vs. arizona? <ibo> Mee ka uche gị dịrị n'ihe ị na-ekwu tupu ị zaa ajụjụ ndị a. Nkwupụta: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), bụ mkpebi dị mkpa nke Ụlọikpe Kasị Elu nke United States. N'ọnụ ọgụgụ mmadụ 5 - 4, Charlie kwuru na nkwupụta ebubo na nke na-agbapụta ebubo nke onye a na-ebo ebubo na ndị uweojii jidere ga-anabata ya na ikpe naanị ma ọ bụrụ na ndị na-ekpe ikpe nwere ike igosi na a gwara onye ahụ a na-ebo ebubo ikike ịkpọtụrụ onye ọka iwu tupu na n'oge ajụjụ ọnụ na ikike ịghara itinye onwe ya na ebubo tupu ndị uweojii ajụọ ya ajụjụ, na onye ahụ na-ebo ebubo ọ bụghị naanị na ọ ghọtara ikike ndị a, kamakwa jiri aka ya hapụ ha.  Ajụjụ: Dabere n'akụkụ Akwụkwọ Nsọ a, olee mgbe Ụlọikpe Kasị Elu kpebiri ikpe Miranda v. Arizona? 