Countercurrent chromatography and centrifugal partition chromatography are two different instrumental realization of the same liquid–liquid chromatographic theory. Countercurrent chromatography usually uses a planetary gear motion without rotary seals, while centrifugal partition chromatography uses circular rotation with rotary seals for liquid connection. CCC has interchanging mixing and settling zones in the coil tube, so atomization, extraction and settling are time and zone separated. Inside centrifugal partition chromatography, all three steps happen continuously in one time, inside the cells.
Advantages of centrifugal partition chromatography:
* Higher flow rate for same volume size Laboratory scale example: 250 mL centrifugal partition chromatography has optimal flow rate of 5–15 mL/min, 250 mL countercurrent chromatography has optimal flow rate of 1–3 mL/min. Process scale example: 25 L countercurrent chromatography has optimal flow rate of 100–300 ml/min, 25 L centrifugal partition chromatography has optimal flow rate of 1000–3000 ml/min.
* Higher productivity (due to higher flow rate and faster separation time)
* Scalable up to tonnes per month
* Better stationary phase retention for most phases
Disadvantages of centrifugal partition chromatography:
* Higher pressure than CCC (typical operation pressures of 40–160 bar vs 5–25 bar)
* Rotary seal wear over time