Treaty Treaty Treaty Treaty
A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent. Consent will not be invalidated if the misunderstanding was due to the state's own conduct, or if the truth should have been evident.
What on behalf of a state cannot invalidate that state's consent to a treaty? What may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion of a treaty? An erroneous understanding of a fact or situation may only invalidate a state's consent to a treaty if what is also true about the erroneous understanding? What, if it formed the "essential basis" of a state's consent to a treaty, may invalidate that consent?
own conduct A state's consent formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation
Consent will not be invalidated if the misunderstanding was due to the state's own conduct, or if the truth should have been evident. A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent. A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent. A state's consent may be invalidated if there was an erroneous understanding of a fact or situation at the time of conclusion, which formed the "essential basis" of the state's consent.
Treaty