# Talk:Turn undead
Title
Is turn (command) the proper way to title this page? Merging all this information into turn would have been a mess, I think, and it doesn't really fit under turn undead (the spell) either.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadex (talk • contribs) 

Yes, Turn is something completely separate, but the #turn command is similar enough to  wands and spells of undead turning to place them all on the same page. In fact #turn is pretty much the same thing as the wand, but adjusted for your level and alignment, and minus the punning resurrection behaviour. I'd move this page to turn undead and add info on the wand and spell.
Also, have you read NetHackWiki:Style guide? I wrote the How to write a great article section on the community page a long long time ago, and I think the style guide now supercedes that advice. You don't need an ==Introduction== section, the general tone of wiki articles in the main namespace is factual, so you don't need a Facts section, and Commentary and Strategy should probably come under just Strategy.&nbsp;:-) --Jayt 12:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Jayt, those are good suggestions. As you can see, I incorporated most of them. I have read the style guide, but didn't see any guidelines for page sections, so I was following your old comment on the community page. --Cadex 14:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)