# Bugs in NetHack 3.4.3/Reports
The official list of bugs in NetHack 3.4.3 gives very little information about the bugs in question. This page archives the known original bug reports sent to the DevTeam, to give more information and insight into the bugs.

Contents

1 C341-5
2 C343-379
3 C343-403
4 C343-409
5 C343-421
6 C343-425
7 C343-426
8 C343-428
9 Unnumbered bugs

9.1 Wielding potions of blindness confers blindness resistance
9.2 Turn alternation failure with 24 movement energy
9.3 Grammar and message-related errors
9.4 Worn monster equipment can be picked up while engulfed
9.5 Jumping into portals can print messages out of order or incorrectly pick up items
9.6 Alternative tilesets can spoil the identity of bags, gems, instruments, fake Amulets
9.7 Crash while loading when riding and wielding Sting
9.8 Can't wish for rusty rustproof
9.9 Odd message when player swallowing monster dies by wrath of god
9.10 Crash when picking up an unpaid object between two shops
9.11 Unnecessary head shaking
9.12 Standout inconsistency
9.13 No attacks when swallowed by tame monster
9.14 "You are protected" from a +0 ring of protection
9.15 Randomly placed doors not properly placed
9.16 Robbing rogue not getting +1 alignment
9.17 Drawbridge killed gas spore not exploding
9.18 Removing red dragon scale mail in lava causes no bad effects
9.19 Crash when teleporting onto a sink while equipping levitation boots
9.20 Erroneously rustproof splint mail for samurai
9.21 panic() when trying to drop destroyed object
9.22 Flesh golems are healed for too much from shock attacks
9.23 Long worms and Elbereth
9.24 Monster branch stair usage bug
9.25 Intrinsic disintegration resistance shields the inventory
9.26 nasty() is broken
9.27 cast protection gives too little AC
9.28 Scrolls of light when blind

C341-5
Clarification request send by User:Bulwersator via contact form, response by Dave Cohrs.
C341-5 - request for clarification
On known bug list it appears as "When you see your pet move, the pet may be
referred to as "it"." What are the circumstances in which this occurs?
I am working on fixing vanilia bugs in my fork but this one is so unclear that
nobody knows how to reproduce it.
In general - is it possible to publish at least bug reports send to devteam?

We are very low tech on the backend, so currently, no, we don't have the capability to publish bug reports.
I think I have found one that I believe relates to this issue, but it may not be the only case:
Start a game in wizard mode
Wish for a wand of make invisible
Wish for a tripe ration
Wish for an amulet of ESP
Drop the tripe ration
Put on the amulet of ESP
Zap your starting pet with the wand of make invisible
Step way and let your pet eat
Watch the message "It eats a tripe ration."
Although, it could also be this report, which mentions movement:
My character has invisible pet (it was a cat, but after polymorph it "disappeared" and now it walks around, answers magic whistle, fights...). My character cannot see it. Only - NetHack gave me message "It moves only reluctantly". And I/my character should not be able to see it (I do not even know on which item it was at the time).
Like I wrote, our backend is low tech.

C343-379
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 at 07:12:00 (13:15 CET)

The ID number for this message is '#H1810'

mailversion:
1.40

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:

comments:
Hi DevTeam,

I noticed two spelling errors in quest.txt.

The first in the Healers part: "How are you feeling?  Perhaps a good bleeding will improve your sprits."
(sprits instead of spirits)

and the second in the Rangers: "Is that truely %o that I see you carrying?"
(truely instead of truly)

Although googling on Google Books for "truely" shows that this spelling has
been in use in the past. It might look appropriately dated for use in the
Knights quest texts where currently "truly" is used.

Bye
Patric

C343-403
Reported by ais523, although it was well known in the NetHack community before the report

The ID number for this message is '#H2161'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3 GB
memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor. (The bug
has been verified on multiple patched/unpatched versions of NetHack,
on multiple sets of hardware, including public servers.)

software:
Ubuntu Lucid, running Linux 2.6.32, using a NetHack binary compiled
from unmodified (apart from config.h/unixconf.h and makefiles)
official NetHack 3.4.3 sources compiled for Unix-like systems using
gcc 4.4.1. (Also probably irrelevant, given the above.)

comments:
There's a huge inconsistency in the way that writing scrolls via magic
marker works; in particular, it depends on interface details that
should be irrelevant. These checks were done as an unlucky non-wizard
to minimize the chance of false positives due to writing the scroll by
chance rather than due to having a 100% chance:

1. trying to write unIDed scroll by label:
"What type of scroll do you want to write? KIRJE" fails
2. trying to write unIDed scroll by actual type:
"For what do you wish? scroll of fire"
"What type of scroll do you want to write? fire" fails
3. trying to write called scroll by label:
"Call a scroll labeled KIRJE: X"
"What type of scroll do you want to write? KIRJE" succeeds
4. trying to write called scroll via user-given name:
"Call a scroll labeled FOOBIE BLETCH: wished-for"
"What type of scroll do you want to write? wished-for"
"There is no such scroll!"
5. trying to write called scroll via actual type:
"What type of scroll do you want to write? fire" succeeds
6. trying to write an IDed scroll via label:
(identify YUM YUM as magic mapping)
"What type of scroll do you want to write? YUM YUM" succeeds
7. trying to write an IDed scroll via actual type:
"What type of scroll do you want to write? magic mapping" succeeds

The major inconsistencies here are between cases 1 and 3, and between
cases 2 and 4. Case 3 implies that it's possible to copy a scroll
you've ever owned, even if you don't know what it does; case 1 implies
that it isn't. It's also incredibly unintuitive, if it makes sense at
all, that giving a nickname to a scroll is necessary to be able to
copy it.

The inconsistency between cases 2 and 4 is much worse, and I've seen
people exploit it on public servers. Suppose a player has ten
unidentified scrolls, and doesn't know what any of them do, but
suspects, say, that at least one is enchant armor. All they have to do
in order to write an enchant armor scroll is to name all ten of those
scrolls via #name-n, and then write enchant armor; if they had one in
inventory to name, they write the scroll correctly, even if they
didn't know /which/ of those ten scrolls it was. This doesn't make a
whole lot of sense, especially as a mechanism for identifying items.

The culprit is line 200 of write.c, which checks to see if a scroll of
the type given by the player has been called (i.e. given an
oc_uname). This check is dangerous without additional safeguards, as
it can let the scroll be written even if the player has no idea what
it is.

C343-409
Reported by ais523

The ID number for this message is '#H2210'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3 GB
memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor.

software:
Ubuntu Lucid, running Linux 2.6.32, using a NetHack binary compiled
from unmodified (apart from config.h/unixconf.h and makefiles)
official NetHack 3.4.3 sources compiled for Unix-like systems using
gcc 4.4.3

comments:
If a player applies an unlocking tool (key, lockpick, credit card) at
an empty doorway containing a mimic pretending to be a door, the game
says "that doorway has no door", rather than reacting appropriately to
the presence of the mimic (say, by waking it and making the player
stick to it, or adding the lockpick to the mimic's inventory with an
appropriate message). The easiest way to reproduce this is in wizard
mode, by standing next to a doorway without a door, and repeatedly
doing control-G large mimic.

The bug's caused by a logic problem in src/lock.c. The check starting
at line 364 checks for mimics, but only for the purpose of not
printing any monster-related messages. Some time before line 385,
there needs to be code to allow for the possibility that in addition
to having a doorway on the square (accomplishable via having a doorway
without a door, which is still IS_DOOR internally), there's also an
apparent door in the doorway which is actually a mimic; the character
would believe there was an intact lock on the square even though they
game knows there isn't.

I would make and supply a patch for this bug, but as the README says,
"we will assume your code is synchronized with ours"; and I don't have
anything newer than 3.4.3 handy to patch against (and I suspect
patches against 3.4.3 wouldn't apply; you've likely changed your code
as extensively as I've changed my local copy in an attempt to make a
fork, but I test all bugs I report against the official 3.4.3
source). If you think a patch would help, let me know and I'll try to
provide one.

C343-421
Reported by ais523

The ID number for this message is '#H2142'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3 GB
memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor.

software:
Ubuntu Lucid, running Linux 2.6.32, using a NetHack binary compiled
from unmodified (apart from config.h/unixconf.h and makefiles)
official NetHack 3.4.3 sources compiled for Unix-like systems using
gcc 4.4.1

comments:
Even after 6 years, it seems that new bugs, or at least buglike
behaviour, is still being discovered in NetHack. Is it intentional
that it's possible to avoid going through all the levels in Gehennom
on the "ascension run" (bringing the Amulet to the surface)?

The issue in this case is that it's possible to use the magic portal
leading to the Wizard of Yendor's Tower to skip several levels on the
way up. Although the player is incapable of leaving the tower (via any
method that works whilst holding the Amulet other than going back the
way they came) and thus this would seem to prevent this being used for
a shortcut, it's possible to drop the Amulet, then teleport it out of
the tower (with a wand of teleportation). Because the player's no
longer holding the Amulet, they can then #sit back on the portal to
leave the tower, level teleport back to the level the Amulet is on
(possible because they aren't holding it), and pick it up, this time
/outside/ the tower. (As an amusing aside, the fact that it's possible
to level-teleport past the intervening levels on the way down makes it
possible to not generate the levels in question at all.)

C343-425
Reported by ais523

mailversion:
1.42

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3
GB memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor.

software:
Ubuntu Lucid, running Linux 2.6.32, using a NetHack binary compiled
from unmodified (apart from config.h/unixconf.h and makefiles)
official NetHack 3.4.3 sources compiled for Unix-like systems using
gcc 4.4.3

comments:
A bug which was just discovered today in my unfinished NetHack fork
AceHack: a player was riding through the dungeon and stepped on awel
landmine, and his warhorse survived the explosion but died from the
fall. This lead to his dexterity permanently decreasing by one point.

Investigation on an unmodified version of NetHack shows that the
bug was inherited from there. The culprit is src/steed.c, line 527
(in NetHack 3.4.3; it's line 532 in AceHack, and I have no idea
what line it is in NetHack 3.5, even though obviously that would be
the most useful line number to give), which sets the wounded legs
intrinsic and extrinsic values to 0 without removing the dexterity
adjustment. Although this could be fixed at that point in the code,
it's probably easier to do it by calling the appropriate functions
instead (adjusting for the change in ride state).

C343-426
Reported by ais523

mailversion:
1.42

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3
GB memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor.

software:
Ubuntu Lucid, running Linux 2.6.32, using a NetHack binary compiled
from unmodified (apart from config.h/unixconf.h and makefiles)
official NetHack 3.4.3 sources compiled for Unix-like systems using
gcc 4.4.3

comments:
If a level is almost but not entirely full of monsters, then a player
hiding on the ceiling (after using #monster in any p or t form),
then when a monster moves onto the player's square, the player
falls to the nearest unoccupied square that the monster didn't come
from, even if it's over the other end of the level. There are no
restrictions on this, so it can be used to, say, cross the Plane of
Air or Astral in one turn, or escape from the Wizard of Yendor's
tower (or phase into it, but that's less useful because there are
various standard ways of luring him out, which as far as I know
are intentional; let me know if they're bugs and I'll report them).

The culprit is a use of enexto() without any sort of check,
on src/mhitu.c line 362 (in NetHack 3.4.3); the check is made
before moving the monster, even though the monster vacates the
square in question, so it won't hit the square that the monster was
occupying. (Every other use of enexto() in the 3.4.3 source to find a
location to place the player also has a check on the maximum distance
that the player can be moved; I obviously can't check to see if more
buggy uses have been introduced in a development version.) The most
obvious fix is simply to make the player and monster swap places,
although that would have issues where long worms were involved.

C343-428
Reported by ais523

mailversion:
1.42

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3 GB
memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor.

software:
Ubuntu Lucid, running Linux 2.6.32, using a NetHack binary compiled
from unmodified (apart from config.h/unixconf.h and makefiles)
official NetHack 3.4.3 sources compiled for Unix-like systems using
gcc 4.4.3

comments:
This bug was found in a collaboration between me and dwangoAC (we're
trying to determine the theoretically fastest turncount you can get
for a game of NetHack). When a cockatrice nest (the special room)
generates, all the statues in it are always of giant ants. This is
because the code just doesn't initialise the monster type (corpsenm)
of the statues anywhere; mkroom.c:346 calls mk_tt_object requesting a
STATUE, yet mk_tt_object explicitly asks for no initialisation on the
statues it creates (mkobj.c:1043). The comment on the line above is
incorrect, or at least incomplete; it states that it prevents
generation of statue contents, but the lack of initialization also
prevents the statue's corpsenm being set by mksobj like it normally
would be. (In case it matters, and in _tt_-related functions it might,
my test case was with a blank high score table.)

It's kind-of interesting that this wasn't noticed earlier; perhaps
players tend not to pay attention to the statues around cockatrice
nests because they're too busy worrying about the cockatrices?

Unnumbered bugs
Wielding potions of blindness confers blindness resistance
Reported by arxanas, confirmed by ais523 and ishanyx

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Not presently known

hardware:
  Model Name:                 MacBook Pro
  Model Identifier:           MacBookPro8,2
  Processor Name:             Intel Core i7
  Processor Speed:            2.5 GHz
  Number of Processors:	      1
  Total Number of Cores:      4
  L2 Cache (per Core):        256 KB
  L3 Cache:                   8 MB
  Memory:                     8 GB
  Boot ROM Version:           MBP81.0047.B27
  SMC Version (system):       1.69f3
  Serial Number (system):     [redacted]
  Hardware UUID:              [redacted]
  Sudden Motion Sensor state: Enabled

software:
Unmodified 3.4.3

comments:
My dearest devteam,

I write to inform you of a most pressing bug in your game. 'Tis present in the source
release (nethack-343-src.tgz, MD5 21479c95990eefe7650df582426457f9), and as such remains
present in all compilations of our beloved game. To reproduce the bug, one might partake
in the following steps:

1. Get a potion of blindness.
2. Wield it (as your primary or alternate weapon), or ready it in your quiver.
3. Allow a yellow light to explode at you.

Despite the expected behavior of a yellow light causing you blindness, you remain
unaffected. This is a most grievous error, as one could simply saunter through the dungeon
with nary a thought for the poor yellow lights, who give their lives in vain. Even worse
is that archons too cannot blind you, for the issue resides in resists_blnd, and archons
call this function to gaze.

I know that you are all hard at work making the next version of NetHack for us all, so I
deigned to save you some time by providing a possible patch. It took me the better part of
an hour to devise, as the coding involved is rather in-depth and hard to follow. I hope
you incorporate it into the forthcoming new version of NetHack (which I am sure will be
here sometime soon), as I would hate to play the game immune to yellow lights.

Thanks for all your hard work,
[redacted]

(attached documents):
patch.diff:

Only in nethack-3.4.3-patched/: .DS_Store
diff -r nethack-3.4.3/src/mondata.c nethack-3.4.3-patched/src/mondata.c
126,127c126
&lt; 	    if ((o-&gt;owornmask &amp;&amp; objects[o-&gt;otyp].oc_oprop == BLINDED) ||
&lt; 		    (o-&gt;oartifact &amp;&amp; protects(AD_BLND, o)))
---
&gt; 	    if (o-&gt;oartifact &amp;&amp; protects(AD_BLND, o))

Turn alternation failure with 24 movement energy
Reported by ais523

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, but modified

hardware:
Using a qemu virtual machine with QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.12.3,
with 614196 kilobyes of disk space, and 56364 kilobyes of
memory. (We're using snapshots of the virtual machine for more easily
reproducible bug testing.)

software:
Using a version of 3.4.3 modified to show the remaining movement
points of players and monsters, in order to more easily track the bug
down. I don't think I modified anything that would affect the bug (and
besides, I've already tracked it down from the source). Compiled with
gcc 4.4.3. The virtual machine is running Linux 2.6.32.

comments:
A short and sweet bug report: turn order becomes inconsistent with the
rest of the game when a player has 24 movement points exactly, and a
monster has at least 24. Normally, after the player takes their
action, monsters will get one action in response, then (if the player
has actions left in the turn) the player will get to take another
action. However, if the player has 24 movement points exactly, their
action will take them down to 12, at which point the monsters will get
to take all their remaining actions at once, and the player will get
the last action in the turn, rather than alternating turns like usual.

The dependence on the exact number of movement points is weird and
seems to be a bug. The offending line is, in 3.4.3, src/allmain.c line
79 (sorry I can't give you a line number from the bugfixed and
feature-added version of NetHack you're presumably working from, but I
haven't seen it). "youmonst.movement &gt; NORMAL_SPEED" should be
"youmonst.movement &gt;= NORMAL_SPEED".

Thanks to dwangoAC, who found this bug, and the testing system he made
to help me reproduce events in NetHack games under controlled
circumstances. Obviously, being able to rewind games and do something
else is even worse than savescumming from an ascension perspective,
but it helps very much when finding bugs.

Grammar and message-related errors
Reported by Grunt

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably unimportant, but: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66 GHz, 4GiB
memory, 2TB disk space.

software:
Gentoo Linux; NetHack 3.4.3 built using GCC 4.6.2.

comments:
During development of a variant, I've come across the following which
may constitute bugs in NetHack 3.4.3, as checked against a build
unmodified except for one configuration option (#define LINUX).

* When reverse-genociding a nearly-extinct monster, sometimes only one
  monster is generated, but the message is still "Sent in some 

<plural monster="" of="">.", suggesting more than one is generated.  This is best
  illustrated with Nazgul - generate eight Nazgul and then
  reverse-genocide them to see "Sent in some Nazgul[s]." (depending on
  if you're looking at this in a build that has fixed C343-8 or not).
  Under these cases, a more accurate message would be "Sent in a
  Nazgul".

* When attacking a monster carrying a stack of destroyable items with a 
  weapon that destroys them (e.g. scrolls/spellbooks/potions with Fire
  Brand, potions with Frost Brand), if exactly one item of the stack is
  destroyed, the object name is plural, but the message indicating that
  it was destroyed is not (e.g. "The dwarf king's scrolls labeled ELAM
  EBOW catches fire and burns!").  Perhaps the message should use the
  same logic as when the player is hit by an item-destroying attack,
  yielding, e.g., "One of the dwarf king's scrolls labeled ELAM EBOW
  catches fire and burns!".

* The death reason given for choking on an artifact is "choked on {a|an}
  <object>", which can be inappropriate when quest artifacts are
  involved - e.g. "choked on an Eye of the Aethiopica", inconsistent
  with the use of "[Tt]he" as a prefix everywhere else they are
  mentioned.  In the case of quest artifacts, this probably should be
  "choked on The Eye of the Aethiopica", and for other artifacts,
  perhaps "choked on Grayswandir" (skipping the article).  (It could be
  argued that a further bug is treating the unidentified and identified
  cases of artifacts differently, e.g. "choked on a silver saber named
  Grayswandir" in some cases as opposed to "choked on [a] Grayswandir"
  in all cases, particularly when working in a build where objects are
  able to be named after artifacts - "a silver saber named Grayswandir"
  without actually being Grayswandir - as the deaths in those two cases
  would be indistinguishable.)
 
* When a player zaps a wand of striking or casts force bolt at a monster
  that is magic resistant, no "Boing!" message is generated; all other
  cases (player against self, monster against player, and monster
  against monster) generate this message, which is inconsistent.

I hope that pointing out these bits of behaviour is useful to all of
you.

Worn monster equipment can be picked up while engulfed
Reported by bcode

The ID number for this message is '#H2816'

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
It's probably unimportant, but I've tested this on a machine with a
1.5 GHz Intel Pentium 4 processor and 896420 kB of memory.

software:
Unmodified (except for config.h/unixconf.h and Makefiles) NetHack 3.4.3,
built from source with GCC 4.6.3 running on a Linux 2.6 system.

comments:
A player can pick up worn equipment from inside a monster while
engulfed by it. The object still has its owornmask set, so it will be
displayed as "(being worn)" and cannot be dropped; however, the player
is not actually wearing it, so it cannot be removed. Trying to put it
on, on the other hand, gives a message about it being already worn.

Trying to remove the object (by selecting it when asked what to remove)
will output an impossible() message:

| select_off: a blessed amulet of life saving (being worn)???
| Program in disorder - perhaps you'd better #quit.

I think it is easiest to reproduce this in wizard mode; create a
soldier and get him to pick up and put on an amulet of life saving,
then enable #monpolycontrol and polymorph him into an engulfer, for
example a fog cloud. Get engulfed by the fog cloud and pick up the
(worn) amulet of life saving inside.

As a workaround, saving and loading the game seems to make the amulet
removable again.

Jumping into portals can print messages out of order or incorrectly pick up items
Reported by ais523

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
(please select version)

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, but modified

hardware:
Using a qemu virtual machine with QEMU Virtual CPU version
0.12.3, with 614196 kilobyes of disk space, and 56364 kilobyes
of memory. (We're using snapshots of the virtual machine for more
easily reproducible bug testing.)

software:
Using a version of 3.4.3 modified to show the remaining movement
points of players and monsters, in order to more easily track
bugs in general down. I don't think I modified anything that would
affect the bug (and besides, I've already tracked it down from the
source). Compiled with gcc 4.4.3. The virtual machine is running
Linux 2.6.32.

comments:
First, the bug (found today): if a player attempts to jump into or
over a magic portal (I tested with the jumping spell, but suspect
it would work the same for #jump), and there's an item on the square
that the player passes over immediately before reaching the portal,
then the game prints the messages for the portal (while showing
the player standing on the square before), then the messages for
the item, then autopicksup the item (if autopickup is on and set to
pick up that sort of item), and then the player actually moves to the
portal destination. Expected behaviour is for the game to not mention
or pick up the item (as would happen if no portal is involved).

I'd again like to encourage the devteam to cooperate more with
the NetHack development community as a whole on the whole on
bugfixes. Many bugs appear to be already known but not on the
devteam, and for many other bugs, the descriptions on the website
are insufficient for us to work out what the bug is about, or find or
reproduce it ourselves. (Imagine if I'd reported this bug simply as
"Messages sometimes appear out of order when jumping"!) Incidentally,
the bug that's been confusing the community the most is SC343-18;
from its description, it seems to be connected to C343-231, but we
have no idea what causes SC343-18 or even what the bug description
means. Is there some way we can get more detailed descriptions of
official bugs, like the ones we send to you when we find them?

Probably the gold standard for understanding what's causing a bug
is an explanation based on the code; the diff that fixes the bug
is the method of explaining this that causes the least extra work,
but I understand that the DevTeam badly wants to avoid releasing
any code until it's ready (even though this means that nobody else
can help them get it ready on time; and it's also meant that line
numbers in your development version have likely drifted away from
line numbers in, say, community efforts to produce fixed versions of
NetHack, such as NetHack 4, which would not even be as necessary if
the bug fixes were public). In the particular case, the code-based
reason for the bug is that hurtle_step(), which is responsible for
determining whether squares are passable when jumping or hurtling,
calls the code for handling a magic portal when the user reaches
it and then returns FALSE, meaning that walk_path() treats the
portal like a wall. Because the portal code just prints messages
and then schedules a goto, you get the messages first, then the
character stops (and thus picks up items, if necessary), and then
the scheduled goto happens. I don't currently have a working fix
for the bug, although the most obvious methods of fixing it to
me would involve making the jump/hurtle code check for traps when
leaving or landing on squares, as opposed to before entering them.

--
Alex Smith
NetHack 4 maintainer

Alternative tilesets can spoil the identity of bags, gems, instruments, fake Amulets
Reported by ais523

 mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3 GB memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor.

software:
Ubuntu 13.04 (running Linux 3.8.0-31-generic), using gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-1ubuntu1) 4.7.3. I tested two X11 tiles ports, and the bug appears on both:

- The official source release, compiled according to the build instructions (i.e. nothing was modified but config/unixconf.h, and Makefiles);

- The Ubuntu-packaged version of X11 NetHack (which is installed using secure permissions, i.e. I can't tamper with its files without root access (or access to the games group), and I didn't use it while testing for this bug).

I suspect the bug also exists on other tiles ports, but I didn't check.

comments:
I found a reasonably major (spoiler?) bug in the NetHack 3.4.3 code during the process of making a tiles port for NetHack 4. (The bug had already been fixed in NetHack 4 via NitroHack; I don't have access to the development source of 3.4.4 or 3.5.0 to check if it's fixed there or not, and as such I can't send a patch because I don't have access to the codebase it's meant to patch against, and thus it wouldn't apply.)

The issue is to do with custom user tilesets. In the X11 port of NetHack, the game loads the tileset from a path specified in NetHack.ad. Although this file is read-only and stored in the nethackdir, it's possible to override the X search path in order to use an alternative NetHack.ad, and thus an alternative tileset. This seems like a useful (possibly intended) feature, and not a bug.

However, the code seem to implicitly assume that objects with the same unidentified description also have the same tiles. Simply changing the tileset to give different tiles where previously the tiles were the same effectively gives objects unique unidentified appearances, meaning that, say, bags, loadstones, and fake Amulets can be identified entirely via the tile you give them.

Here's an example of this exploit being used on the X11 tiles version of NetHack (both "prefix/games/nethack", produced by compiling the 3.4.3 official source release, and "xnethack", the Ubuntu-packaged version):

Script started on Thu 26 Sep 2013 02:37:59 BST
ais523@desert:/tmp$ ls distinct-bags/
distinct-bags.x11tiles  NetHack.ad
ais523@desert:/tmp$ diff -u prefix/games/lib/nethackdir/NetHack.ad distinct-bags/NetHack.ad
--- prefix/games/lib/nethackdir/NetHack.ad 2013-09-26 02:23:47.254875282 +0100
+++ distinct-bags/NetHack.ad 2013-09-26 02:33:24.130104957 +0100
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 ! the custom format - to enlarge an XPM file, use processing tools
 ! such as XV or preferably PBMplus.
 !
-!NetHack.tile_file: x11tiles
+NetHack.tile_file: /tmp/distinct-bags/distinct-bags.x11tiles
 !NetHack.double_tile_size: True
 !
 ! The annotation of pets.
ais523@desert:/tmp$ XUSERFILESEARCHPATH=/tmp/distinct-bags/NetHack.ad prefix/games/nethack -D
ais523@desert:/tmp$ XUSERFILESEARCHPATH=/tmp/distinct-bags/NetHack.ad xnethack

You didn't beat your previous score of 4 points.

ais523@desert:/tmp$ exit

Script done on Thu 26 Sep 2013 02:42:37 BST

/tmp/distinct-bags/distinct-bags.x11tiles is a copy of x11tiles (which regular users have read access to), with numbers added on the bag tiles to make them distinct; likewise, /tmp/distinct-bags/NetHack.ad is a copy of NetHack.ad with the tileset changed.

The game on the official NetHack source (which was in wizard mode for testing), I wished for a sack and a bag of holding, then threw both onto the ground. Here's the screenshot: <http: file:tiles-bugreport1-image1.png="" nethackwiki.com="" wiki="">. As you can see from the message buffer, the two bags are both indistinguishable to the character (I farlooked both of them), due to being unidentified. However, the difference in the bags is clearly visible to the player; the sack (tile 194) shows a "1", and the bag of holding (tile 196) shows a "3". This would allow a player to instantly recognise which bags were holding.

In the securely installed game (which I played to prove that this exploit does not require the ability to modify game files), I started a Rogue, and threw my starting sack: <http: file:tiles-bugreport1-image2.png="" nethackwiki.com="" wiki=""> In this case, the character knew its identity; but the point is to demonstrate that the exploit-containing tileset still works (you can see the "1" I drew on the sack).

This exploit is more major than just bags; in particular, fake and real Amulets of Yendor have distinct tiles, as do loadstones.

Other ports and variants of NetHack are likely to have a similar issue, if they use the same or similar tiles code to vanilla. (Interestingly, Slash'EM's default tileset actually has subtly different tiles for the various bags out of the box; I originally noticed this bug because NetHack 4's tileset is based on Slash'EM's, and although it's harder to reproduce in NetHack 3.4.3, it's still possible.) In particular, I strongly suspect that this bug exists on the widely-played Windows tiles version (which also has customizable tilesets).

Crash while loading when riding and wielding Sting
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Wednesday, October 16, 2013 at 03:47:59

The ID number for this message is '#H3031'

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
64 bit intel machine

software:
- Linux version 3.10.7-gentoo (root@localhost) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Gentoo 4.6.3 p1.13, pie-0.5.2) ) #3 SMP Sat Aug 17 14:48:51 CEST 2013
- Windows 7 Enterprise N Service Pack 1

comments:
Hi DevTeam,

A player on UnNetHack's public server un.nethack.nu experienced a crash while
his game was loading while riding and wielding a SPFX_WARN conferring artifact.

This has been traced back to an issue that is also present in vanilla NetHack.
Although there it is less likely to happen as Sting is the only SPFX_WARN
weapon and most players don't seem to consider Sting to be a useful weapon.

For reproducing start up a knight, ride your pet, wish and wield Sting, save
the game and then try to load again will crash the game. I could reproduce this
on a 64 bit Linux and 64 bit Windows (on Windows, it didn't crash every time
but on Linux it did always).

It's possible that this bug is already fixed with C343-39 "Restoring a game
where the character is wielding Sting may result in temporary display errors
during the restore process." but from the description it's not obvious how to
reproduce C343-39.

The problematic code tries to activate the artifact properties which will
result in a call to display_self() which will try to access u.usteed, even
though the program hasn't properly restored that structure at that point yet.

For fixing it I moved the part where the code calls setworn on all items in
your inventory out of restgamestate() to the end of dorecover(). I couldn't
notice any problems with that and at this later time, u.usteed is guarantee to
be restored.
http://bhaak.net/nethack/nh343-fix-crash-riding-sting.diff

The stacktrace of the crash is this:
Core was generated by `/opt/nethack-tmp/games/lib/nethackdir/nethack -D 4'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x0000000000431658 in newsym (x=66, y=4) at display.c:717
717                 if (senseself()) display_self();
(gdb) bt
#0  0x0000000000431658 in newsym (x=66, y=4) at display.c:717
#1  0x00000000004328b3 in see_monsters () at display.c:1071
#2  0x000000000040ff76 in set_artifact_intrinsic (otmp=0x17243a0, on=1 '\001', wp_mask=256) at artifact.c:451
#3  0x0000000000571ea3 in setworn (obj=0x17243a0, mask=256) at worn.c:98
#4  0x000000000051584f in restgamestate (fd=3, stuckid=0x7fff44f490c0, steedid=0x7fff44f490bc) at restore.c:413
#5  0x0000000000515b65 in dorecover (fd=3) at restore.c:558
#6  0x00000000005844bc in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fff44f49228) at ../sys/unix/unixmain.c:258

Bye
Patric

Can't wish for rusty rustproof
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 08:09:54

The ID number for this message is '#H2285'

mailversion:
1.42

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

comments:
Hi DevTeam,

Wishing for a "rusty rustproof long sword" will only yield a "rusty long sword".

Because of a restriction in objnam.c line 2641:
"if (erodeproof &amp;&amp; !eroded &amp;&amp; !eroded2)"

This seems to have been an intentional change for NetHack 3.3.0 as fixes33.0
says "make sure non-erodable objects aren't eroded or erodeproof (could happen
by wishing or object polymorph)".

Although it is not clear to me why one shouldn't allow a user to wish for such
a thing or why the erosion gets set instead of foo-proofness.

Bye
Patric

Odd message when player swallowing monster dies by wrath of god
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Thursday, December 9, 2010 at 06:59:37

The ID number for this message is '#H2200'

Subject: Odd message when player swallowing monster dies by wrath of god

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

comments:
Hi DevTeam!

If the player manages to be swallowed by an electricity-resisting monster while
drawing the wrath of a god, the swallowing monster will be hit by a wide-angle
disintegration beam and still fry to a crisp (pray.c:495)

I'm no native speaker but that does sound odd to me as IMO "fry" implies heat.
It doesn't look like a proper message for a disintegration death.

Although I'm not even sure how to properly trigger that message in vanilla. I
had to give Juiblex MR_ELEC to test it.

BTW, the message of bug C343-94 has a typo "re-anmiated".

Bye
Patric

Crash when picking up an unpaid object between two shops
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Tuesday, June 29, 2010 at 08:37:20

The ID number for this message is '#H2143'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:

software:
Gentoo Linux with kernel version 2.6.24.7
gcc-Version 4.3.4 (Gentoo 4.3.4 p1.0, pie-10.1.5)
glibc 2.10.1

Hi DevTeam!

Follow this procedure to reliably trigger a crash when picking up an unpaid
object in a shop adjacent to another shop:

You need two populated shops with sharing walls (e.g. minetn-7 the hardware
store and Izchak's store).

Enter part of the wall that is shared by both shops.

You are greeted by Izchak but not by the other shopkeeper.

Enter the hardware store and pick up any unpaid object.

A crash results as bp is 0:
#0  0x081691ae in add_one_tobill (obj=0x823b778, dummy=0 '\0') at shk.c:2107
2107            bp-&gt;bo_id = obj-&gt;o_id;

It's important that this procedure is not interrupted by a save and reload and
that the hardware store hasn't been entered before. Otherwise the crash doesn't
happen.

u_entered_shop() isn't called for the hardware store and that's why the
hardware store shopkeeper's bill_p (from the struct eshk) is not correctly
initialized.

Initializing bill_p in shkinit() from shknam.c fixes that:
diff -uwr nethack-3.4.3/src/shknam.c shk-crash/src/shknam.c
--- nethack-3.4.3/src/shknam.c  2003-12-08 00:39:13.000000000 +0100
+++ shk-crash/src/shknam.c      2010-06-29 14:30:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -408,6 +408,7 @@
        ESHK(shk)-&gt;visitct = 0;
        ESHK(shk)-&gt;following = 0;
        ESHK(shk)-&gt;billct = 0;
+       ESHK(shk)-&gt;bill_p = &amp;ESHK(shk)-&gt;bill[0];
 #ifndef GOLDOBJ
        shk-&gt;mgold = 1000L + 30L*(long)rnd(100);        /* initial capital */
 #else

Unnecessary head shaking
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Thursday, June 10, 2010 at 09:31:51

The ID number for this message is '#H2134'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

comments:
Hi DevTeam!

When the player dies and a shop is on the level, sometimes the message
"$shopkeeper looks at your corpse, shakes her head, and sighs." appears when it
shouldn't (and probably doesn't appear when it should but I didn't check for
that).

You can easily reproduce this bug if you stand in the top right corner of
minetn-5 and die there.

Like the player did in this game:
http://un.nethack.nu/users/ctaboir/dumps/ctaboir.last.txt.html

The shopkeeper of the general store will come and look at your corpse even
though he shouldn't.

This is due to a misplaced ')':

diff -uwr nethack-linux/src/shk.c nethack-shk/src/shk.c
--- nethack-linux/src/shk.c     2008-05-26 19:47:02.000000000 +0200
+++ nethack-shk/src/shk.c       2010-06-10 15:21:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@
        /* the simplifying principle is that first-come */
        /* already took everything you had.             */
        if (numsk &gt; 1) {
-           if (cansee(shkp-&gt;mx, shkp-&gt;my &amp;&amp; croaked))
+           if (cansee(shkp-&gt;mx, shkp-&gt;my) &amp;&amp; croaked)
                pline("%s %slooks at your corpse%s and %s.",
                      Monnam(shkp),
                      (!shkp-&gt;mcanmove || shkp-&gt;msleeping)&nbsp;? "wakes up, "&nbsp;: "",

Bye, Happy Hacking!

Standout inconsistency
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Wednesday, March 10, 2010 at 11:56:33

The ID number for this message is '#H2095'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

comments:
Hi devteam,

The option "standout" isn't correct documented in the Guidebook.

It states there:
  standout
    Boldface monsters and ``--More--'' (default off).

But in the current codebase standout is only used for highlighting the end of
pager windows.

Looking at code from 3.0.x it probably was true at that time, but no longer
nowadays.

Also, this option doesn't do much and as the standout terminal sequence is
usually shown as inverse on modern terminals, wouldn't it be best to integrate
it into use_inverse?

Bye
Patric

No attacks when swallowed by tame monster
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 03:42:45

The ID number for this message is '#H2084'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

software:

comments:
Hi DevTeam!

kerio92 from #nethack on freenode told me about some interesting interaction
between tame monsters with engulfing attack and ring of conflicts.

While wearing a ring of conflict the player can get engulfed by a tame monster.

If the player takes off the ring of conflict inside the tame monster, the
player can stay indefinitely long inside the monster and is *not subject to any
attacks* (no digestion from purple worms, no elemental damages from vortices,
etc.).

As those attacks are more of a passive nature (I don't think a tame purple worm
can stop his stomach from digesting) I think they should also work with tame
monsters.

This patch should fix that:
--- nethack-linux/src/monmove.c 2008-05-26 19:47:02.000000000 +0200
+++ nethack-tame-engulfing/src/monmove.c        2010-02-11 09:30:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -548,6 +548,8 @@
 /*     Now, attack the player if possible - one attack set per monst   */

         if (!mtmp-&gt;mpeaceful ||
 +           /* Attacks work even when engulfed by tame monsters */
 +           (u.uswallow &amp;&amp; mtmp == u.ustuck) ||
             (Conflict &amp;&amp; !resist(mtmp, RING_CLASS, 0, 0))) {
                 if(inrange &amp;&amp; !noattacks(mdat) &amp;&amp; u.uhp &gt; 0 &amp;&amp; !scared &amp;&amp; tmp&nbsp;!= 3)
                 if(mattacku(mtmp)) return(1); /* monster died (e.g. exploded) */

"You are protected" from a +0 ring of protection
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Thursday, January 14, 2010 at 09:08:25

The ID number for this message is '#H2076'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

comments:
Hi DevTeam!

If one is wearing a +0 ring of protection one gets the "You are protected."
message during enlightment.

In general, if intrinsic and extrinsic protection neutralize each other, you
get this message.

The code in cmd.c:1016 only makes a distinction between values lesser than 0
and the rest. No special treatment of a value of 0.

Is this a side effect for getting this message while wearing a cloak of
protection?

Bye
Patric

Randomly placed doors not properly placed
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Wednesday, December 23, 2009 at 03:36:29

The ID number for this message is '#H2063'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, but modified

hardware:
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 4
model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz

software:
Gentoo Linux with kernel version 2.6.24.7
gcc-Version 4.3.2 (Gentoo 4.3.2-r3 p1.6, pie-10.1.5)
glibc 2.10.1

comments:
Hi DevTeam!

I've been having a "rn2(0) attempted" bug in UnNetHack for some time and now
found the reason for it. It's not a off-by-one bug that gets triggered with the
room levels of vanilla, but it prevents random placed doors to get placed at
every possible place.

If I just add a level like the following to the vanilla code, it triggers a
"Floating exception" in vanilla by calling rn2(0) (I've replaced bigrm-1 for
easier debugging):

LEVEL: "bigrm-1"
ROOM: "ordinary" , lit, random, random, (76,17)
NAME: "room"

SUBROOM: "ordinary", lit, (60,12), (6,1), "room"
DOOR: false, closed, west, random

The problem is that the height of the room is only 1 tile and a door should get
placed randomly on such a short wall.

In line 623 of src/sp_lev.c this results in a difference of 0:
dpos = rn2((dwall == W_WEST || dwall == W_EAST)&nbsp;?
  (broom-&gt;hy - broom-&gt;ly)&nbsp;: (broom-&gt;hx - broom-&gt;lx));

I'm not sure if this bug is the same as S343-2 ("1x1 room in special level can
trigger panic due to off by one error (does not affect official room set)").

Although in the vanilla code there are no rooms that small, randomly placed
doors never gets placed at the last possible place because of this bug.

Happy holidays!
Patric

Robbing rogue not getting +1 alignment
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 at 07:39:18

The ID number for this message is '#H2003'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

software:

comments:
Hi DevTeam,

When robbing a shop as a lawful character one gets a -1 alignment penalty.

A chaotic character gets a +1 alignment bonus but not if it is a Rogue.

Does that make sense?

The relevant source code is in shk.c in rob_shop() at line 494 (at line 984 in
make_happy_shk() is the reversal of the alignment change):
if (!Role_if(PM_ROGUE)) /* stealing is unlawful */
  adjalign(-sgn(u.ualign.type));

Bye
Patric

Drawbridge killed gas spore not exploding
Reported by Patric Mueller

Below is what you submitted to The_DevTeam on Tuesday, April 7, 2009 at 06:52:37

The ID number for this message is '#H1843'

mailversion:
1.41

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

comments:
Hi there!

Killing a gas spore with a falling portcullis doesn't cause it to explode.

The gas spore explosion part is handled in corpse_chance() in mon.c.

e_died() in dbridge.c calls xkilled with the option to not generate corpses and
therefore corpse_chance isn't called in this case.

Bye
Patric

Removing red dragon scale mail in lava causes no bad effects
The ID number for this message is '#H3032'

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3
GB memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor.

software:
Ubuntu raring, running Linux 3.8.0, compiled from unmodified
(apart from config.h/unixconf.h and makefiles) official NetHack
3.4.3 sources compiled for Unix-like systems using gcc 4.4.3

comments:
If the player's only source of fire resistance is red dragon scale
mail, the player enters lava while wearing the RDSM, and then removes
it, the lava has the same effect as it would on a fire-resistant
player, even though the player no longer has any fire resistance
sources. (The player can even sit on the lava in that state with no
bad effects other than a few points of damage.) I'm not 100% sure on
the cause, but it probably involves a failure to call spoteffects()
somewhere where it needs to be called.

I've been trying to determine whether this is on the bug list
already, but the only bug that potentially seems to fit is
SC343-18. Is this that bug, or something else?

Crash when teleporting onto a sink while equipping levitation boots
The ID number for this message is '#H3033'

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

hardware:
Probably irrelevant, but it's a Toshiba Satellite netbook with 3
GB memory and 4 GB swap, and an Intel U2700 1.3GHz processor.

software:
Ubuntu raring, running Linux 3.8.0, compiled from unmodified
(apart from config.h/unixconf.h and makefiles) official NetHack
3.4.3 sources compiled for Unix-like systems using gcc 4.4.3

comments:
If a player is putting on levitation boots, then during the
helplessness period (negative multi) afterwards, gets teleported
onto a sink (this is easy to test via means of a quantum mechanic,
teleport control, and no magic cancellation), the game crashes.

Basically what happens is that Boots_on() (which is called at the
end of the helplessness period) looks at uarmf in order to determine
which item to wear, with no NULL check. If the boots get unequipped
while wearing them (e.g. via a sink), uarmf is NULL by the time
Boots_on() runs, meaning that the game segfaults. The easiest fix
is to add a null check to the *_on() functions, that causes them to
not run if the armour is no longer equipped by the time its effects
would start applying.

(The "most correct" fix would be to use an occupation callback,
combined with tracking the item being equipped the same way that,
say, the 'book' global variable does for spellbooks. This would be
symmetrical with A, rather than symmetrical with T. I'm currently
in the process of rewriting NetHack 4 to do this, but the patch is
very large and would not easily be backported to NetHack 3.4.3.)

Erroneously rustproof splint mail for samurai
The ID number for this message is '#H3034'

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

software:
NetHack 3.4.3, found in the source release.

comments:
As a samurai, splint mails generated via mksobj()
on the first turn of the game or in the quest
branch will always begin rustproof. This is
supposed to "simulate lacquered armor" (mkobj.c,
line 564); however, this applies even to
splint mail you e.g. wished for. As this allows
you to receive rusty rustproof splint mail from
a wish, I think this is not intended, given that
this specific result isn't normally allowed
(objnam.c, line 2641 only proceeds to set the
erodeproof flag if you didn't also wish for the
object as eroded).

Additionally, you will know about the rustproof
state of the object; this is also inconsistent
with the normal outcome of wishing for an
erodeproof object.

panic() when trying to drop destroyed object
The ID number for this message is '#H3039'

mailversion:
1.45

nhversion:
3.4.3

nhfrom:
Our 3.4.3 source release, unmodified

software:
NetHack 3.4.3, present in the source release
(tested on multiple systems)

comments:
When using the 'D' command to drop multiple items at once, the game will
panic if it tries to drop an item that has been destroyed in between
("extract_nobj: object lost"). Mostly, this shouldn't happen. However,
if one of the items is a lit potion of oil and you are levitating,
it will explode when it hits the floor, possibly destroying other items
you were going to drop.

The problem seems to be that the code assumes the items selected to be
dropped still exist when they are to be actually dropped, i.e., that
dropping items will not affect other items. As shown above,
that isn't the case.

Flesh golems are healed for too much from shock attacks
Flesh golems are supposed to only be healed for 1/6 the shock damage that
would occur if non-resistant, but is healed the full amount instead due to
a typo

Long worms and Elbereth
If a long worm is scared by Elbereth but can't get anywhere, it will hit you,
bypassing Elbereth. This attack pattern will use the otherwise unused
wormhitu() codepath, leading to each tail segment next to you also hitting
you for damage.

Monster branch stair usage bug
Monsters never use branch stairs to escape, due to a bug in find_defensive
that assumes that branch stairs are not considered stairs.

Intrinsic disintegration resistance shields the inventory
Intrinsic disintegration resistance protects against armor damage -- you may
or may not consider this a bug, but scshunt [a DevTeam member] changed the
behaviour of this in NetHack4 last year

nasty() is broken
nasty() is broken in several ways: replacement monsters can be asleep/non-hostile,
the "retry if chosen monster isn't aligned with caster" instead makes the summoning
create several monsters (capped at 20) until one neutral or coaligned summon is
created (where it bails out to the next summon), creating potentially up to 200
monsters in theory (this is however incredibly unlikely due to the selection of
nasties).

cast protection gives too little AC
A typo for the "AC without the spell" value results in the protection spell
giving less AC than it's supposed to.

Scrolls of light when blind
Scrolls/spells of light is blocked if you're engulfed, which makes sense.
This block is lifted if you're blind, which makes less sense.

</http:></http:></object></plural>