human
Why was "The Teeth of the Tiger" poorly received by critics and reviews?
assistant
Critics and reviews for "The Teeth of the Tiger" were "tepid at best. "The Washington Post" described it as a "bloated, boring, silly novel" with "inane dialogue, gossamer characterizations, endless repetition and bumper-sticker politics. "The "St. Louis Post-Dispatch" panned it as well, saying that the most positive thing about the book was that it was "mercifully briefer than its chronological