human
What did critics say about Clancy's "The Teeth of the Tiger"?
assistant
Critics panned Clancy's "The Teeth of the Tiger". "The Washington Post" described it as a "bloated, boring, silly novel" with "inane dialogue, gossamer characterizations, endless repetition and bumper-sticker politics. "The "St. Louis Post-Dispatch" panned it as well, saying that the most positive thing about the book was that it was "mercifully briefer than its chronological predecessor in the Jack Ryan series. ".<