<prompt> Bapisa le ho bapisa mefuta e meli ea melao ea boitšoaro ea filosofi - deontological le utilitarian.nan  <response>: Instruction in English: Compare and contrast the two types of philosophical ethics - deontological and utilitarian. . Response in English: Deontological ethics, or duty ethics, is an approach to morality that determines the rightness or wrongness of actions based on adherence to moral rules or duties. In this type of ethics, the focus is on the inherent morality of an act, regardless of its outcomes. Kant, one of the most famous proponents of deontology, argued that actions should be based on a sense of moral duty and should be performed out of respect for the moral law, rather than based on their consequences.Utilitarian ethics, on the other hand, is a consequentialist approach to morality that judges actions based on their outcomes, specifically how much happiness or pleasure they produce. In this view, an action is considered right if it produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarianism is based on the concept of hedonism, which holds that pleasure is the ultimate good and pain the ultimate evil.The main difference between deontological and utilitarian ethics lies in their approach to evaluating the morality of an action. While deontology focuses on the inherent morality of an action, utilitarianism looks at its consequences. As a result, a deontologist may consider an action to be right even if it produces negative outcomes, as long as it adheres to moral rules, while a utilitarian may consider the same action to be wrong if it does not produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number.Another key difference between the two is that deontological ethics is deontic, meaning it is concerned with what people ought to do, while utilitarian ethics is teleological, meaning it is focused on the end-goal or purpose of an action. Additionally, deontology is more rule-based and prescriptive, while utilitarianism allows for more flexibility and individual judgment in evaluating the morality of an action.In summary, deontological and utilitarian ethics are two distinct approaches to morality that differ in their focus inherent morality vs. consequences, approach to evaluation deontic vs. teleological, and degree of flexibility and individual judgment rule-based vs. outcome-based. . Response in Sesotho: Melao ea boitšoaro ea Deontological, kapa duty ethics, ke mokhoa oa boitšoaro o khethang ho loka kapa ho fosahala ha liketso ho ipapisitse le ho latela melao ea boitšoaro kapa mesebetsi. Mofuteng ona oa melao ea boitšoaro, ho tsepamisoa maikutlo holima boitšoaro ba tlhaho ba ketso, ho sa tsotellehe liphello tsa eona. Kant, e mong oa batšehetsi ba tummeng ba thuto ea deontology, o ile a pheha khang ea hore liketso li lokela ho thehoa maikutlong a boikarabelo ba boitšoaro me li lokela ho etsoa ka lebaka la ho hlompha molao oa boitšoaro, ho e-na le ho itšetleha ka liphello tsa bona. Melao ea boitšoaro ea utilitarian, ka lehlakoreng le leng, ke mokhoa oa consequentialist oa boitšoaro o ahlolang liketso tse itšetlehileng ka liphello tsa bona, haholo-holo hore na li hlahisa thabo e kae kapa monyaka. Ponong ena, ketso e nkoa e nepahetse haeba e hlahisa thabo e khōlōhali ho batho ba bangata ka ho fetisisa. Utilitarianism e thehiloe khopolong ea hedonism, e bolelang hore thabo ke eona e ntle ka ho fetisisa le bohloko bo bobe ba ho qetela. Phapang e kholo lipakeng tsa melao ea boitšoaro ea deontological le utilitarian ke mokhoa oa bona oa ho lekola boitšoaro ba ketso. Le hoja deontology e lebisa tlhokomelo ho boitšoaro ba tlhaho ba ketso, utilitarianism e sheba liphello tsa eona. Ka lebaka leo, setsebi sa deontologist se ka na sa nka hore ketso e nepahetse le haeba e hlahisa liphello tse mpe, hafeela e khomarela melao ea boitšoaro, ha motho ea sebetsang a ka nka hore ketso e tšoanang e fosahetse haeba e sa hlahise thabo e kholo ka ho fetisisa bakeng sa palo e kholo. Phapang e ngoe ea bohlokoa lipakeng tsa tsena tse peli ke hore melao ea boitšoaro ea deontological ke deontic, ho bolelang hore e ameha ka seo batho ba lokelang ho se etsa, athe melao ea boitšoaro ea utilitarian ke teleological, ho bolelang hore e tsepamisitse maikutlo ho sepheo kapa sepheo sa ketso. Ho phaella moo, deontology e na le melao e mengata le e hlalosang, ha utilitarianism e lumella ho feto-fetoha ha maemo le kahlolo ea motho ka mong ho hlahloba boitšoaro ba ketso. Ka kakaretso, melao ea boitšoaro ea deontological le utilitarian ke mekhoa e meli e fapaneng ea boitšoaro e fapaneng ka maikutlo a bona boitšoaro ba tlhaho khahlanong le liphello, mokhoa oa ho hlahloba deontic vs. teleological, le tekanyo ea ho feto-fetoha ha maemo le kahlolo ea motho ka mong ho itšetlehile ka molao-motheo khahlanong le sephetho. -thehiloe. 