<prompt> Na polelo e latelang e ka nkoa e le syllogism e nepahetseng? Likhoho tsohle ke liphoofolo tse anyesang, linonyana ha se liphoofolo tse anyesang, kahoo linonyana tsohle ke likhohonan  <response>: Instruction in English: Can the following statement be considered a valid syllogism? All chickens are mammals, birds are not mammals, therefore all birds are chickens . Response in English: No, the given statement cannot be considered a valid syllogism. A syllogism is an argument composed of two premises and a conclusion that follows logically from them, based on the rules of deductive logic. In this case, the two premises are contradictory, making it impossible for a valid conclusion to be drawn. Also, the conclusion doesnt logically follow from the premises. From a logical standpoint, just because birds are not mammals, it does not imply that all birds are chickens. . Response in Sesotho: Che, polelo e fanoeng e ke ke ea nkoa e le syllogism e nepahetseng. Syllogism ke khang e entsoeng ka meaho e meli le qeto e latelang ka mokhoa o utloahalang ho tsoa ho eona, e thehiloeng melaong ea ho fokotsa maikutlo. Tabeng ena, mabaka a mabeli aa hanyetsana, a etsa hore ho se khonehe hore ho fihleloe qeto e nepahetseng. Hape, sephetho ha se latele ka nepo ho tsoa sebakeng. Ho ea ka pono e utloahalang, hobane feela linonyana hase liphoofolo tse anyesang, ha ho bolele hore linonyana tsohle ke likhoho. 