<prompt> Arola khang e latelang ka lihlopha tse matla kapa tse fokolang.Re lokela ho sireletsa tikoloho ea rona hobane ke eona feela eo re nang le eona.  <response>: Instruction in English: Categorize the following argument as strong or weak. . Response in English: This argument can be categorized as weak. The reason provided for protecting the environment is merely stating the obvious and does not provide sufficient evidence or reasoning to support the conclusion. While it is true that we only have one environment, the argument could be strengthened by providing additional reasons or evidence to support the need for protecting it, such as the consequences of not doing so or the benefits of ensuring its preservation. . Response in Sesotho: Khang ena e ka aroloa e le e fokolang. Lebaka le fanoeng bakeng sa ho sireletsa tikoloho ke feela ho bolela se totobetseng me ha le fane ka bopaki bo lekaneng kapa mabaka a tšehetsang qeto eo. Le hoja e le nete hore re na le tikoloho e le ngoe feela, khang e ka matlafatsoa ka ho fana ka mabaka a eketsehileng kapa bopaki ba ho tšehetsa tlhokahalo ea ho e sireletsa, joalo ka liphello tsa ho se etse joalo kapa melemo ea ho etsa bonnete ba hore e bolokoa. 