<prompt> Hlalosa phapang pakeng tsa likhopolo tsa Darwin le Lamarck tsa ho iphetola ha linthonan  <response>: Instruction in English: Explain the differences between Darwin and Lamarcks theories of evolution . Response in English: Both Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck were prominent scientists who proposed separate theories about how evolution worked. While both theories were attempts to explain how species changed over time, the mechanisms proposed by each scientist were quite different.Darwins theory of evolution by natural selection, which was published in his book On the Origin of Species in 1859, states that species change over time due to the process of natural selection. In essence, Darwin suggested that within any population, there will be individual variations in traits such as strength, speed, or intelligence. Those individuals with traits that are better suited to their environment will be more likely to survive and reproduce, passing on their advantageous traits to their offspring. Over many generations, these advantageous traits will become more common in the population, leading to the development of new species.On the other hand, Lamarcks theory, which is now often referred to as Lamarckism, was first proposed in the early 1800s. Lamarck believed that species changed over time due to the use and disuse of certain traits, as well as the inheritance of acquired characteristics. According to Lamarcks theory, if an animal used a particular body part, it would become stronger and more developed in their lifetime, and that development would be passed on to their offspring. For example, Lamarck believed that giraffes evolved to have long necks because their ancestors had to stretch to reach high branches, and this stretching caused their necks to grow longer within their lifetimes, which was then passed on to their offspring.One of the main differences between these two theories is that Darwins theory of natural selection relies on the idea of random genetic variation, while Lamarcks theory relies on the inheritance of acquired characteristics. These are fundamentally different mechanisms, and over time, Darwins theory has gained much more support from scientific evidence than Lamarcks theory. In fact, the discovery of genetics and the study of DNA have shown that traits are inherited through genes and cannot be significantly altered within a single lifetime, which has largely discredited Lamarcks theory. However, its important to note that both scientists made significant contributions to our understanding of how species change over time, and their theories were important building blocks in the development of evolutionary biology. . Response in Sesotho: Charles Darwin le Jean-Baptiste Lamarck ka bobeli e ne e le bo-rasaense ba hlaheletseng ba ileng ba hlahisa likhopolo tse fapaneng mabapi le hore na thuto ea ho iphetola ha lintho e sebetsa joang. Le hoja likhopolo-taba tsena ka bobeli e ne e le boiteko ba ho hlalosa hore na mefuta ea lintho tse phelang e ile ea fetoha joang ha nako e ntse e ea, mekhoa e hlahisitsoeng ke rasaense e mong le e mong e ne e fapane haholo. Khopolo ea Darwin ea ho iphetola ha lintho ka khetho ea tlhaho, e ileng ea hatisoa bukeng ea hae ea On the Origin of Species ka 1859, e bolela hore mefuta ea lintho e fetoha ha nako e ntse e ea ka lebaka la mokhoa oa tlhaho oa khetho. Ha e le hantle, Darwin o ile a etsa tlhahiso ea hore hara baahi leha e le bafe, ho tla ba le mefuta e sa tšoaneng ea litšobotsi tse kang matla, lebelo, kapa bohlale. Batho bao ba nang le litšobotsi tse loketseng tikoloho eo ba phelang ho eona ba tla khona ho phela le ho ikatisa, ba fetisetse litšobotsi tsa bona tse molemo ho bana ba bona. Ho theosa le meloko e mengata, litšobotsi tsena tse molemo li tla ata ho baahi, e leng se lebisang ho ntsetsopele ea mefuta e mecha. Ka lehlakoreng le leng, khopolo ea Lamarck, eo hangata e bitsoang Lamarckism, e ile ea hlahisoa ka lekhetlo la pele mathoasong a lilemo tsa bo-1800. Lamarck o ne a lumela hore mefuta e fetohile ha nako e ntse e feta ka lebaka la tšebeliso le ho se sebelisoe ha litšobotsi tse itseng, hammoho le lefa la litšobotsi tse fumanoeng. Ho ea ka khopolo ea Lamarck, haeba phoofolo e ne e sebelisa setho se itseng sa mele, e ne e tla ba matla le ho hōla haholoanyane bophelong ba eona, me tsoelo-pele eo e ne e tla fetisetsoa ho bana ba bona. Ka mohlala, Lamarck o ne a lumela hore lithuhlo li ile tsa iphetola hore li be le melala e melelele hobane baholo-holo ba tsona ba ne ba lokela ho otlolla ho fihla makaleng a phahameng, me ho otlolla hona ho ile ha etsa hore melala ea tsona e hōle nako e telele nakong ea bophelo ba tsona, e ileng ea fetisetsoa malinyaneng a tsona. Phapano ye nngwe ye kgolo magareng ga dikgopolo tše pedi tše ke gore teori ya Darwin ya kgetho ya tlhago e theilwe godimo ga kgopolo ya phapano ya leabela, mola ya Lamarck e ithekgile ka bohwa bja dimelo tšeo di hweditšwego. Tsena ke mekhoa e fapaneng haholo, me ha nako e ntse e ea, khopolo ea Darwin e fumane tšehetso e ngata ho tsoa bopaking ba saense ho feta khopolo ea Lamarck. Ha e le hantle, ho sibolloa ha liphatsa tsa lefutso le thuto ea DNA ho bontšitse hore litšobotsi li futsitsoe ka liphatsa tsa lefutso me li ke ke tsa fetoloa haholo ka nako e le ngoe ea bophelo, e leng ntho e nyarosang haholo khopolo ea Lamarck. Leha ho le joalo, ke habohlokoa ho hlokomela hore bo-rasaense ka bobeli ba ile ba kenya letsoho haholo kutloisisong ea rona ea hore na mefuta e fetoha joang ha nako e ntse e ea, me likhopolo tsa bona e ne e le litšiea tsa bohlokoa ho ntsetsopele ea baeloji ea ho iphetola ha lintho. 