int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
	const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
	struct request_sock *req;
	int queued = 0;
	bool acceptable;

	tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;

	switch (sk->sk_state) {
	case TCP_CLOSE:
		goto discard;

	case TCP_LISTEN:
		if (th->ack)
			return 1;

		if (th->rst)
			goto discard;

		if (th->syn) {
			if (th->fin)
				goto discard;
			if (icsk->icsk_af_ops->conn_request(sk, skb) < 0)
				return 1;

			/* Now we have several options: In theory there is
			 * nothing else in the frame. KA9Q has an option to
			 * send data with the syn, BSD accepts data with the
			 * syn up to the [to be] advertised window and
			 * Solaris 2.1 gives you a protocol error. For now
			 * we just ignore it, that fits the spec precisely
			 * and avoids incompatibilities. It would be nice in
			 * future to drop through and process the data.
			 *
			 * Now that TTCP is starting to be used we ought to
			 * queue this data.
			 * But, this leaves one open to an easy denial of
			 * service attack, and SYN cookies can't defend
			 * against this problem. So, we drop the data
			 * in the interest of security over speed unless
			 * it's still in use.
			 */
			kfree_skb(skb);
			return 0;
		}
		goto discard;

	case TCP_SYN_SENT:
		queued = tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(sk, skb, th);
		if (queued >= 0)
			return queued;

		/* Do step6 onward by hand. */
		tcp_urg(sk, skb, th);
		__kfree_skb(skb);
		tcp_data_snd_check(sk);
		return 0;
	}

	req = tp->fastopen_rsk;
	if (req) {
		WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_RECV &&
		    sk->sk_state != TCP_FIN_WAIT1);

		if (!tcp_check_req(sk, skb, req, true))
			goto discard;
	}

	if (!th->ack && !th->rst && !th->syn)
		goto discard;

	if (!tcp_validate_incoming(sk, skb, th, 0))
		return 0;

	/* step 5: check the ACK field */
	acceptable = tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH |
				      FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT) > 0;

	switch (sk->sk_state) {
	case TCP_SYN_RECV:
		if (!acceptable)
			return 1;

		if (!tp->srtt_us)
			tcp_synack_rtt_meas(sk, req);

		/* Once we leave TCP_SYN_RECV, we no longer need req
		 * so release it.
		 */
		if (req) {
			tp->total_retrans = req->num_retrans;
			reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
		} else {
			/* Make sure socket is routed, for correct metrics. */
			icsk->icsk_af_ops->rebuild_header(sk);
			tcp_init_congestion_control(sk);

			tcp_mtup_init(sk);
			tp->copied_seq = tp->rcv_nxt;
			tcp_init_buffer_space(sk);
		}
		smp_mb();
		tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_ESTABLISHED);
		sk->sk_state_change(sk);

		/* Note, that this wakeup is only for marginal crossed SYN case.
		 * Passively open sockets are not waked up, because
		 * sk->sk_sleep == NULL and sk->sk_socket == NULL.
		 */
		if (sk->sk_socket)
			sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_IO, POLL_OUT);

		tp->snd_una = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq;
		tp->snd_wnd = ntohs(th->window) << tp->rx_opt.snd_wscale;
		tcp_init_wl(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);

		if (tp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok)
			tp->advmss -= TCPOLEN_TSTAMP_ALIGNED;

		if (req) {
			/* Re-arm the timer because data may have been sent out.
			 * This is similar to the regular data transmission case
			 * when new data has just been ack'ed.
			 *
			 * (TFO) - we could try to be more aggressive and
			 * retransmitting any data sooner based on when they
			 * are sent out.
			 */
			tcp_rearm_rto(sk);
		} else
			tcp_init_metrics(sk);

		tcp_update_pacing_rate(sk);

		/* Prevent spurious tcp_cwnd_restart() on first data packet */
		tp->lsndtime = tcp_time_stamp;

		tcp_initialize_rcv_mss(sk);
		tcp_fast_path_on(tp);
		break;

	case TCP_FIN_WAIT1: {
		struct dst_entry *dst;
		int tmo;

		/* If we enter the TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state and we are a
		 * Fast Open socket and this is the first acceptable
		 * ACK we have received, this would have acknowledged
		 * our SYNACK so stop the SYNACK timer.
		 */
		if (req) {
			/* Return RST if ack_seq is invalid.
			 * Note that RFC793 only says to generate a
			 * DUPACK for it but for TCP Fast Open it seems
			 * better to treat this case like TCP_SYN_RECV
			 * above.
			 */
			if (!acceptable)
				return 1;
			/* We no longer need the request sock. */
			reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
			tcp_rearm_rto(sk);
		}
		if (tp->snd_una != tp->write_seq)
			break;

		tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_FIN_WAIT2);
		sk->sk_shutdown |= SEND_SHUTDOWN;

		dst = __sk_dst_get(sk);
		if (dst)
			dst_confirm(dst);

		if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
			/* Wake up lingering close() */
			sk->sk_state_change(sk);
			break;
		}

		if (tp->linger2 < 0 ||
		    (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq &&
		     after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - th->fin, tp->rcv_nxt))) {
			tcp_done(sk);
			NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONDATA);
			return 1;
		}

		tmo = tcp_fin_time(sk);
		if (tmo > TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN) {
			inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer(sk, tmo - TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
		} else if (th->fin || sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
			/* Bad case. We could lose such FIN otherwise.
			 * It is not a big problem, but it looks confusing
			 * and not so rare event. We still can lose it now,
			 * if it spins in bh_lock_sock(), but it is really
			 * marginal case.
			 */
			inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer(sk, tmo);
		} else {
			tcp_time_wait(sk, TCP_FIN_WAIT2, tmo);
			goto discard;
		}
		break;
	}

	case TCP_CLOSING:
		if (tp->snd_una == tp->write_seq) {
			tcp_time_wait(sk, TCP_TIME_WAIT, 0);
			goto discard;
		}
		break;

	case TCP_LAST_ACK:
		if (tp->snd_una == tp->write_seq) {
			tcp_update_metrics(sk);
			tcp_done(sk);
			goto discard;
		}
		break;
	}

	/* step 6: check the URG bit */
	tcp_urg(sk, skb, th);

	/* step 7: process the segment text */
	switch (sk->sk_state) {
	case TCP_CLOSE_WAIT:
	case TCP_CLOSING:
	case TCP_LAST_ACK:
		if (!before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt))
			break;
	case TCP_FIN_WAIT1:
	case TCP_FIN_WAIT2:
		/* RFC 793 says to queue data in these states,
		 * RFC 1122 says we MUST send a reset.
		 * BSD 4.4 also does reset.
		 */
		if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
			if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq &&
			    after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - th->fin, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
				NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONDATA);
				tcp_reset(sk);
				return 1;
			}
		}
		/* Fall through */
	case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
		tcp_data_queue(sk, skb);
		queued = 1;
		break;
	}

	/* tcp_data could move socket to TIME-WAIT */
	if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE) {
		tcp_data_snd_check(sk);
		tcp_ack_snd_check(sk);
	}

	if (!queued) {
discard:
		__kfree_skb(skb);
	}
	return 0;
}

This weakness involves numeric computation errors, such as integer overflows, underflows, or precision losses, which can lead to miscalculations and exploitable behaviors in software.