pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
{
	struct sched_entity *left = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq);
	struct sched_entity *se;

	/*
	 * If curr is set we have to see if its left of the leftmost entity
	 * still in the tree, provided there was anything in the tree at all.
	 */
	if (!left || (curr && entity_before(curr, left)))
		left = curr;

	se = left; /* ideally we run the leftmost entity */

	/*
	 * Avoid running the skip buddy, if running something else can
	 * be done without getting too unfair.
	 */
	if (cfs_rq->skip == se) {
		struct sched_entity *second;

		if (se == curr) {
			second = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq);
		} else {
			second = __pick_next_entity(se);
			if (!second || (curr && entity_before(curr, second)))
				second = curr;
		}

		if (second && wakeup_preempt_entity(second, left) < 1)
			se = second;
	}

	/*
	 * Prefer last buddy, try to return the CPU to a preempted task.
	 */
	if (cfs_rq->last && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->last, left) < 1)
		se = cfs_rq->last;

	/*
	 * Someone really wants this to run. If it's not unfair, run it.
	 */
	if (cfs_rq->next && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->next, left) < 1)
		se = cfs_rq->next;

	clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);

	return se;
}

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources.