static void resiliency_test(void)
{
	u8 *p;

	printk(KERN_ERR "SLUB resiliency testing\n");
	printk(KERN_ERR "-----------------------\n");
	printk(KERN_ERR "A. Corruption after allocation\n");

	p = kzalloc(16, GFP_KERNEL);
	p[16] = 0x12;
	printk(KERN_ERR "\n1. kmalloc-16: Clobber Redzone/next pointer"
			" 0x12->0x%p\n\n", p + 16);

	validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 4);

	/* Hmmm... The next two are dangerous */
	p = kzalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
	p[32 + sizeof(void *)] = 0x34;
	printk(KERN_ERR "\n2. kmalloc-32: Clobber next pointer/next slab"
			" 0x34 -> -0x%p\n", p);
	printk(KERN_ERR
		"If allocated object is overwritten then not detectable\n\n");

	validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 5);
	p = kzalloc(64, GFP_KERNEL);
	p += 64 + (get_cycles() & 0xff) * sizeof(void *);
	*p = 0x56;
	printk(KERN_ERR "\n3. kmalloc-64: corrupting random byte 0x56->0x%p\n",
									p);
	printk(KERN_ERR
		"If allocated object is overwritten then not detectable\n\n");
	validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 6);

	printk(KERN_ERR "\nB. Corruption after free\n");
	p = kzalloc(128, GFP_KERNEL);
	kfree(p);
	*p = 0x78;
	printk(KERN_ERR "1. kmalloc-128: Clobber first word 0x78->0x%p\n\n", p);
	validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 7);

	p = kzalloc(256, GFP_KERNEL);
	kfree(p);
	p[50] = 0x9a;
	printk(KERN_ERR "\n2. kmalloc-256: Clobber 50th byte 0x9a->0x%p\n\n",
			p);
	validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 8);

	p = kzalloc(512, GFP_KERNEL);
	kfree(p);
	p[512] = 0xab;
	printk(KERN_ERR "\n3. kmalloc-512: Clobber redzone 0xab->0x%p\n\n", p);
	validate_slab_cache(kmalloc_caches + 9);
}

This weakness involves numeric computation errors, such as integer overflows, underflows, or precision losses, which can lead to miscalculations and exploitable behaviors in software.