is_smb_response(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, unsigned char type)
{
	/*
	 * The first byte big endian of the length field,
	 * is actually not part of the length but the type
	 * with the most common, zero, as regular data.
	 */
	switch (type) {
	case RFC1002_SESSION_MESSAGE:
		/* Regular SMB response */
		return true;
	case RFC1002_SESSION_KEEP_ALIVE:
		cifs_dbg(FYI, "RFC 1002 session keep alive\n");
		break;
	case RFC1002_POSITIVE_SESSION_RESPONSE:
		cifs_dbg(FYI, "RFC 1002 positive session response\n");
		break;
	case RFC1002_NEGATIVE_SESSION_RESPONSE:
		/*
		 * We get this from Windows 98 instead of an error on
		 * SMB negprot response.
		 */
		cifs_dbg(FYI, "RFC 1002 negative session response\n");
		/* give server a second to clean up */
		msleep(1000);
		/*
		 * Always try 445 first on reconnect since we get NACK
		 * on some if we ever connected to port 139 (the NACK
		 * is since we do not begin with RFC1001 session
		 * initialize frame).
		 */
		cifs_set_port((struct sockaddr *)&server->dstaddr, CIFS_PORT);
		cifs_reconnect(server);
		wake_up(&server->response_q);
		break;
	default:
		cifs_dbg(VFS, "RFC 1002 unknown response type 0x%x\n", type);
		cifs_reconnect(server);
	}

	return false;
}

This weakness involves numeric computation errors, such as integer overflows, underflows, or precision losses, which can lead to miscalculations and exploitable behaviors in software.