bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page,
				int src_nid, int dst_cpu)
{
	struct numa_group *ng = p->numa_group;
	int dst_nid = cpu_to_node(dst_cpu);
	int last_cpupid, this_cpupid;

	this_cpupid = cpu_pid_to_cpupid(dst_cpu, current->pid);
	last_cpupid = page_cpupid_xchg_last(page, this_cpupid);

	/*
	 * Allow first faults or private faults to migrate immediately early in
	 * the lifetime of a task. The magic number 4 is based on waiting for
	 * two full passes of the "multi-stage node selection" test that is
	 * executed below.
	 */
	if ((p->numa_preferred_nid == -1 || p->numa_scan_seq <= 4) &&
	    (cpupid_pid_unset(last_cpupid) || cpupid_match_pid(p, last_cpupid)))
		return true;

	/*
	 * Multi-stage node selection is used in conjunction with a periodic
	 * migration fault to build a temporal task<->page relation. By using
	 * a two-stage filter we remove short/unlikely relations.
	 *
	 * Using P(p) ~ n_p / n_t as per frequentist probability, we can equate
	 * a task's usage of a particular page (n_p) per total usage of this
	 * page (n_t) (in a given time-span) to a probability.
	 *
	 * Our periodic faults will sample this probability and getting the
	 * same result twice in a row, given these samples are fully
	 * independent, is then given by P(n)^2, provided our sample period
	 * is sufficiently short compared to the usage pattern.
	 *
	 * This quadric squishes small probabilities, making it less likely we
	 * act on an unlikely task<->page relation.
	 */
	if (!cpupid_pid_unset(last_cpupid) &&
				cpupid_to_nid(last_cpupid) != dst_nid)
		return false;

	/* Always allow migrate on private faults */
	if (cpupid_match_pid(p, last_cpupid))
		return true;

	/* A shared fault, but p->numa_group has not been set up yet. */
	if (!ng)
		return true;

	/*
	 * Destination node is much more heavily used than the source
	 * node? Allow migration.
	 */
	if (group_faults_cpu(ng, dst_nid) > group_faults_cpu(ng, src_nid) *
					ACTIVE_NODE_FRACTION)
		return true;

	/*
	 * Distribute memory according to CPU & memory use on each node,
	 * with 3/4 hysteresis to avoid unnecessary memory migrations:
	 *
	 * faults_cpu(dst)   3   faults_cpu(src)
	 * --------------- * - > ---------------
	 * faults_mem(dst)   4   faults_mem(src)
	 */
	return group_faults_cpu(ng, dst_nid) * group_faults(p, src_nid) * 3 >
	       group_faults_cpu(ng, src_nid) * group_faults(p, dst_nid) * 4;
}

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources.