Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,41 +2,52 @@
|
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-2.0
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
-
# A Combinatorial Interpretation of Schubert Polynomial Structure Constants
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
## Example
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-
We multiply Schubert polynomials corresponding to permutations of
|
| 18 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
## Dataset
|
| 21 |
-
Each instance in this dataset is a triple of permutations
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
-
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
X = load_datasets.get_dataset('schubert', n=5, folder = folder)
|
| 35 |
-
```
|
| 36 |
-
|
| 37 |
-
The basic statistics of the datasets are as follows
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
### Permutations of size $4$
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
All structure constants in this case are either 0 or 1 (so the classification problem is binary).
|
| 42 |
|
|
@@ -45,7 +56,6 @@ All structure constants in this case are either 0 or 1 (so the classification pr
|
|
| 45 |
| Train | 851 | 833 | 1,684 |
|
| 46 |
| Test | 201 | 220 | 421 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
### Permutations of size $5$
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
All structure constants in this case are either 0, 1, or 2.
|
| 51 |
|
|
@@ -54,7 +64,6 @@ All structure constants in this case are either 0, 1, or 2.
|
|
| 54 |
| Train | 42,831 | 42,619 | 170 | 85,620 |
|
| 55 |
| Test | 10,681 | 10,680 | 44 | 21,405 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-
### Permutations of size $6$
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
All structure constants in this case are either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.
|
| 60 |
|
|
@@ -65,27 +74,30 @@ All structure constants in this case are either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.
|
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
## Data generation
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
-
The Sage notebook within this directory gives the code used to generate these datasets.
|
|
|
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
-
- For a chosen
|
| 71 |
-
- For each of these pairs, extract and add to the dataset all non-zero structure constants
|
| 72 |
-
- Furthermore, for each
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
## Task
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-
**Math question:**
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
-
**ML task:** Train a model that, given three permutations
|
|
|
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
## Small model performance
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
| Size | Logistic regression | MLP | Transformer | Guessing majority class |
|
| 83 |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|
|
| 84 |
-
|
|
| 85 |
-
|
|
| 86 |
-
|
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
-
The
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
## References
|
| 91 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-2.0
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
+
# A Combinatorial Interpretation of Schubert Polynomial Structure Constants
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
Schubert polynomials [1,2,3] are a family of polynomials indexed by permutations of \\(S_n\\).
|
| 8 |
+
Developed to study the cohomology ring of the flag variety, they have deep connections to
|
| 9 |
+
algebraic geometry, Lie theory, and representation theory. Despite their geometric origins,
|
| 10 |
+
Schubert polynomials can be described combinatorially [4,5], making them a well-studied object
|
| 11 |
+
in algebraic combinatorics. An important open problem in the study of Schubert polynomials
|
| 12 |
+
is understanding their *structure constants*.
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
When two Schubert polynomials \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha}\\) and \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\beta}\\)
|
| 15 |
+
(indexed by permutations \\(\alpha \in S_n\\) and \\(\beta \in S_m\\)) are multiplied,
|
| 16 |
+
their product can be written as a linear combination of Schubert polynomials
|
| 17 |
+
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha} \mathfrak{S}_{\beta} = \sum_{\gamma} c^{\gamma}_{\alpha \beta} \mathfrak{S}_{\gamma}\\).
|
| 18 |
+
Where the sum runs over permutations in \\(S_{n+m}\\). The question is whether the
|
| 19 |
+
\\(c^{\gamma}_{\alpha \beta}\\) (the *structure constants*) have a combinatorial interpretation.
|
| 20 |
+
To give an example of what we mean by combinatorial interpretation, when Schur polynomials
|
| 21 |
+
(which can be viewed as a specific case of Schubert polynomials) are multiplied together,
|
| 22 |
+
the coefficients in the resulting product are equal to the number of semistandard tableaux
|
| 23 |
+
satisfying certain properties.
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
## Example
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+
We multiply Schubert polynomials corresponding to permutations of \\(\{1,2,3\}\\),
|
| 28 |
+
\\(\alpha = 2 1 3\\) and \\(\beta = 1 3 2\\). Writing these in terms of indeterminants
|
| 29 |
+
\\(x_1\\), \\(x_2\\), and \\(x_3\\), we have \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha} = x_1 + x_2\\)
|
| 30 |
+
and \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\beta} = x_1\\). Multiplying these together we get
|
| 31 |
+
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha}\mathfrak{S}_{\beta} = x_1^2 + x_1x_2\\). As
|
| 32 |
+
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{2 3 1} = x_1x_2\\) and \\(\mathfrak{S}_{3 1 2} = x_1^2\\) we can write
|
| 33 |
+
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha}\mathfrak{S}_{\beta} = \mathfrak{S}_{2 3 1} + \mathfrak{S}_{3 1 2}\\).
|
| 34 |
+
It follows that \\(c_{\alpha,\beta}^{\gamma} = 1\\) if \\(\gamma = 2 3 1\\) or \\(\gamma = 3 1 2\\)
|
| 35 |
+
and otherwise \\(c_{\alpha,\beta}^{\gamma} = 0\\).
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
## Dataset
|
| 38 |
+
Each instance in this dataset is a triple of permutations \\((\alpha,\beta,\gamma)\\),
|
| 39 |
+
labeled by its coefficient \\(c^{\gamma}_{\alpha \beta}\\) in the expansion of the product
|
| 40 |
+
\\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha} \mathfrak{S}_{\beta}\\). We call permutations \\(\alpha\\) and \\(\beta\\)
|
| 41 |
+
*lower index permutations 1* and *2* respectively. We call \\(\gamma\)) the *upper index
|
| 42 |
+
permutation*. The datasets are organized so that
|
| 43 |
+
\\(\alpha\\) and \\(\beta\\) are always drawn from the symmetric group on \\(n\\) elements
|
| 44 |
+
(we provide datasets for \\(n = 3\\), \\(4\\), and \\(5\\)), but \\(\gamma\\) may belong to a
|
| 45 |
+
strictly larger symmetric group. Not all possible triples of permutations are included
|
| 46 |
+
since the vast majority of these would be zero. The dataset consists of an approximately
|
| 47 |
+
equal number of zero and nonzero coefficients (but they are not balanced between quantities
|
| 48 |
+
of non-zero coefficients).
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
**Statistics**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
All structure constants in this case are either 0 or 1 (so the classification problem is binary).
|
| 53 |
|
|
|
|
| 56 |
| Train | 851 | 833 | 1,684 |
|
| 57 |
| Test | 201 | 220 | 421 |
|
| 58 |
|
|
|
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
All structure constants in this case are either 0, 1, or 2.
|
| 61 |
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
| Train | 42,831 | 42,619 | 170 | 85,620 |
|
| 65 |
| Test | 10,681 | 10,680 | 44 | 21,405 |
|
| 66 |
|
|
|
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
All structure constants in this case are either 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.
|
| 69 |
|
|
|
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
## Data generation
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
+
The Sage notebook within this directory gives the code used to generate these datasets.
|
| 78 |
+
The process involves:
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
+
- For a chosen \\(n\\), compute the products \\(\mathfrak{S}_{\alpha} \mathfrak{S}_{\beta}\\) for \\(\alpha,\beta \in S_n\\).
|
| 81 |
+
- For each of these pairs, extract and add to the dataset all non-zero structure constants \\(c^{\gamma_1}_{\alpha,\beta}, \dots, c^{\gamma_k}_{\alpha,\beta}\\)
|
| 82 |
+
- Furthermore, for each \\(c^{\gamma_i}_{\alpha,\beta} \neq 0\\), randomly permute \\(\gamma_i \mapsto \gamma_i'\\) to find \\(c^{\gamma_i'}_{\alpha,\beta} = 0\\) and \\(c^{\gamma_i'}_{\alpha,\beta}\\) is not already in the dataset.
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
## Task
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
+
**Math question:** Find a combinatorial interpretation of the structure constants \\(c_{\alpha,\beta}^\gamma\))
|
| 87 |
+
based on properties of \\(\alpha\\), \\(\beta\\), and \\(\gamma\\).
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
+
**Narrow ML task:** Train a model that, given three permutations \\(\alpha, \beta, \gamma\\), can
|
| 90 |
+
predict the associated structure constant \\(c^{\gamma}_{\alpha,\beta}\\).
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
## Small model performance
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
| Size | Logistic regression | MLP | Transformer | Guessing majority class |
|
| 95 |
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|
|
| 96 |
+
| \\(n= 4\\) | \\(88.8\%\\) | \\(93.1\% \pm 2.6\%\\) | \\(94.6\% \pm 1.0\%\\) | \\(52.3\%\\) |
|
| 97 |
+
| \\(n= 5\\) | \\(90.6\%\\) | \\(97.5\% \pm 0.2\%\\) | \\(96.2\% \pm 1.1\%\\) | \\(49.9\%\\) |
|
| 98 |
+
| \\(n= 6\\) | \\(89.7\%\\) | \\(99.8\% \pm 0.0\%\\) | \\(91.3\% \pm 8.0\%\\) | \\(50.1\%\\) |
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
+
The \\(\pm\\) signs indicate 95% confidence intervals from random weight initialization and training.
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
## References
|
| 103 |
|