Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,25 +1,23 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-2.0
|
| 3 |
-
pretty_name: Partial orders on lattice paths
|
| 4 |
---
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
-
# Dataset Card for Partial Orders on Lattice Paths
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Consider northeast lattice paths that travel along the edges
|
| 9 |
of a grid from \\((0, 0)\\) to \\((a, b)\\), only taking steps north and
|
| 10 |
east and never passing through the diagonal \\(y = \frac{b}{a}x\\), where
|
| 11 |
\\(a\\) and \\(b\\) are relatively prime. \[1\] defines two
|
| 12 |
-
order relations on such paths called the matching ordering
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
number theory. The matching ordering assigns a
|
| 15 |
number to each lattice path based on the number of perfect
|
| 16 |
matchings of an associated snake graph, while the Lagrange
|
| 17 |
ordering assigns a number to each lattice path equal to the
|
| 18 |
Lagrange number of a certain continued fraction. These
|
| 19 |
-
numbers each define
|
| 20 |
-
better
|
| 21 |
-
We provide datasets for lattice paths from \\((0,0)\\) to \\((10, 9)\\),
|
| 22 |
-
\\((11, 10)\\), \\((12, 11)\\), and \\((13, 12)\\).
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
## Background on Posets
|
| 25 |
|
|
@@ -41,22 +39,13 @@ example, \\(\{1, 2, 4\}\\) covers \\(\{1, 2\}\\), \\(\{2, 4\}\\), and \\(\{1, 4\
|
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
## Dataset Details
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
This dataset contains pairs of lattice paths
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
\frac{n}{n−1}x\\). They are thus encoded by a sequence of \\(1\\)’s (for steps
|
| 47 |
-
east) and \\(0\\)’s (for steps north) of length \\((n + 1) + n = 2n + 1\\). Each pair of lattice paths
|
| 48 |
is a covering pair in exactly one of the two partial orders, the Lagrange order or the matching order
|
| 49 |
(pairs that are covers in both are few and were removed).
|
| 50 |
The task is to predict which partial order a covering pair belongs to.
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
lattice paths are separated by ‘;’. For an 3 × 2 grid, the sequence:
|
| 54 |
-
`1, 1, 1, 0, 0; 1, 1, 0, 1, 0`
|
| 55 |
-
corresponds to the two lattice paths. The first moves right three steps and then up two.
|
| 56 |
-
The second moves right two steps, up one, right one, and up one.
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
The datasets can also be found [here](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Wm9mtZQjXXQ4rl0TU9KtJ1T4RQaGsJNz/view?usp=sharing).
|
| 59 |
-
Data loaders can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets).
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
**Statistics**
|
| 62 |
| | Lagrange order | Matching order |
|
|
@@ -64,17 +53,13 @@ Data loaders can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/
|
|
| 64 |
| Train | 7,589 | 3,875 |
|
| 65 |
| Test | 1,895 | 968 |
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
-
**Math question:**
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
-
\\(O(n^2\\) algorithm that can be found in the references above.
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
**ML task:** Given a pair of lattice paths \\((w, w′)\\), train a
|
| 72 |
model that can predict whether \\(w′\\) covers \\(w\\)
|
| 73 |
in either the matching or Lagrange order.
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
-
If a successful model is trained, it would be interesting to understand whether the model has
|
| 76 |
-
learned an existing algorithm or whether it has discovered something new.
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
## Small model performance
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
We provide some basic baselines for this task. Benchmarking details can be found in the associated paper.
|
|
@@ -95,47 +80,6 @@ The \\(\pm\\) signs indicate 95% confidence intervals from random weight initial
|
|
| 95 |
Data generation scripts can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets).
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
- **Repository:** [ACD Repo](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets)
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
## Uses
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
This dataset was generated to study ML model's ability yield insight on an open
|
| 102 |
-
problem in algebraic combinatorics, specifically, a characterization of Lagrange and partial orders
|
| 103 |
-
of lattice paths.
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
-
### Direct Use
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
We use this dataset for a classification task distinguishing between covers in the Lagrange and partial orders.
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
None.
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
## Dataset Structure
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
Each line in a file is the concatenation of two \\(0\\)-\\(1\\) sequences (one for each path) for a length \\(4n + 2\\) row of \\(0\\)’s and \\(1\\)’s. The
|
| 116 |
-
lattice paths are separated by ‘;’. For an 3 × 2 grid, the sequence:
|
| 117 |
-
`1, 1, 1, 0, 0; 1, 1, 0, 1, 0`
|
| 118 |
-
corresponds to the two lattice paths. The first moves right three steps and then up two.
|
| 119 |
-
The second moves right two steps, up one, right one, and up one.
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
## Dataset Creation
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
Data generation scripts can be found
|
| 124 |
-
[here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets).
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
-
### Curation Rationale
|
| 127 |
-
|
| 128 |
-
This dataset was generated as a test of current AI system's ability to advance
|
| 129 |
-
research mathematics.
|
| 130 |
-
|
| 131 |
-
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
-
Helen Jenne wrote code to generate this dataset using [SageMath](https://www.sagemath.org/).
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
We only provide data for lattice paths from \\(10 \times 9\\), \\(11 \times 10\\), and \\(12 \times 11\\) in this repository.
|
| 138 |
-
We are happy to generate (subsets) of datasets for larger values of \\(n \times n-1\)).
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
## Citation
|
| 141 |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
pretty_name: Partial orders on lattice paths from (0,0) to (10,9)
|
| 4 |
---
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
+
# Dataset Card for Partial Orders on Lattice Paths from \\((0,0)\\) to \\((10,9)\\)
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Consider northeast lattice paths that travel along the edges
|
| 9 |
of a grid from \\((0, 0)\\) to \\((a, b)\\), only taking steps north and
|
| 10 |
east and never passing through the diagonal \\(y = \frac{b}{a}x\\), where
|
| 11 |
\\(a\\) and \\(b\\) are relatively prime. \[1\] defines two
|
| 12 |
+
order relations on such paths called the *matching ordering*
|
| 13 |
+
\\((\leq_M)\\) and the *Lagrange ordering* \\((\leq_L)\\), motivated by questions in
|
| 14 |
number theory. The matching ordering assigns a
|
| 15 |
number to each lattice path based on the number of perfect
|
| 16 |
matchings of an associated snake graph, while the Lagrange
|
| 17 |
ordering assigns a number to each lattice path equal to the
|
| 18 |
Lagrange number of a certain continued fraction. These
|
| 19 |
+
numbers each define a partial order. Mathematicians are interested in
|
| 20 |
+
better understanding the relationship between these orders \[2\].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
## Background on Posets
|
| 23 |
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
## Dataset Details
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
This dataset contains pairs of lattice paths encoded by a sequence of \\(1\\)’s (for steps
|
| 43 |
+
east) and \\(0\\)’s (for steps north). Each pair of lattice paths
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 44 |
is a covering pair in exactly one of the two partial orders, the Lagrange order or the matching order
|
| 45 |
(pairs that are covers in both are few and were removed).
|
| 46 |
The task is to predict which partial order a covering pair belongs to.
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
+
Data loaders can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
**Statistics**
|
| 51 |
| | Lagrange order | Matching order |
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
| Train | 7,589 | 3,875 |
|
| 54 |
| Test | 1,895 | 968 |
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
+
**Math question:** Characterize the relationship between the matching
|
| 57 |
+
and Lagrange orders.
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
**ML task:** Given a pair of lattice paths \\((w, w′)\\), train a
|
| 60 |
model that can predict whether \\(w′\\) covers \\(w\\)
|
| 61 |
in either the matching or Lagrange order.
|
| 62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
## Small model performance
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
We provide some basic baselines for this task. Benchmarking details can be found in the associated paper.
|
|
|
|
| 80 |
Data generation scripts can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets).
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
- **Repository:** [ACD Repo](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
## Citation
|
| 85 |
|