diff --git "a/bitcoinforum/5_processing_extracted_data/1_processing.ipynb" "b/bitcoinforum/5_processing_extracted_data/1_processing.ipynb" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/bitcoinforum/5_processing_extracted_data/1_processing.ipynb" @@ -0,0 +1,3277 @@ +{ + "cells": [ + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 52, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "name": "stdout", + "output_type": "stream", + "text": [ + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "skipping id: 8614\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "skipping id: 13412\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n", + "something went wrong2\n" + ] + } + ], + "source": [ + "import pandas as pd\n", + "import os\n", + "import gzip\n", + "import pickle\n", + "import openai\n", + "import re\n", + "import copy\n", + "from tqdm import tqdm\n", + "from torch import save,load\n", + "import time\n", + "\n", + "concatenated_threads = pd.read_csv('../2_train_set_creation/concatenated_threads.csv')\n", + "\n", + "id = 0\n", + "\n", + "hardware_instances = []\n", + "hardware_instances_inc_threads = []\n", + "\n", + "# for i in range(1, 14):\n", + "for (i,file) in enumerate(os.listdir('output_chunks/')):\n", + " i = i+1\n", + " # print(i)\n", + " texts = load(f'output_chunks/outputs_chunk_{i}.pt')\n", + " for text in texts:\n", + " output = text.split(\"Hardware names:\")[1]\n", + " try:\n", + " date = text.split(\"Date:\")[1].split(\"Topic:\")[0].strip()\n", + " except:\n", + " print(\"something went wrong\")\n", + " # print(text)\n", + " id+=1\n", + " continue\n", + "\n", + " # print(\"id: \", id)\n", + " # print(date)\n", + " # print(concatenated_threads.iloc[id]['date'])\n", + " # print(output)\n", + "\n", + " # date = concatenated_threads.iloc[id]['date']\n", + "\n", + " \n", + "\n", + " # figure out how many posts in the thread were actually given to the model\n", + " # we need a regex to match stuff like \"### Reply 2:\"\n", + " reply_matches = re.findall(r\"### Reply \\d+:\", text)\n", + " posts_count = len(reply_matches) + 1 # we add 1 because the first post is not matched by the regex\n", + " dates = concatenated_threads.iloc[id]['dates'].split(\"\")\n", + "\n", + " if len(dates) > 50:\n", + " # check if last date is at least 200 days after the first date\n", + " # dates are in format 2013-04-20 01:49:43\n", + " first = time.mktime(time.strptime(dates[0], \"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S\"))\n", + " last = time.mktime(time.strptime(dates[posts_count-1], \"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S\"))\n", + " if last - first > 200*24*60*60:\n", + " print(\"skipping id: \", id)\n", + " # print(reply_matches)\n", + " # print(posts_count)\n", + " # print(dates)\n", + " # print(\"\\n\")\n", + "\n", + " id+=1\n", + " continue\n", + "\n", + " date = dates[posts_count-1]\n", + "\n", + " sp = output.split(\"Hardware ownership:\")\n", + " if len(sp) != 2:\n", + " print(\"something went wrong2\")\n", + " # print(text)\n", + " id+=1\n", + " continue\n", + " names = sp[0].strip()\n", + " ownerships = sp[1].strip()\n", + " for (name, ownership) in zip(names.split(\",\"), ownerships.split(\",\")):\n", + " n = name.strip().lower()\n", + " o = ownership.strip()\n", + " if o == \"True\":\n", + " hardware_instances.append((date, n))\n", + "\n", + " for (name, ownership) in zip(names.split(\",\"), ownerships.split(\",\")):\n", + " n = name.strip().lower()\n", + " o = ownership.strip()\n", + " if o == \"True\":\n", + " hardware_instances_inc_threads.append((date, text))\n", + " break\n", + " \n", + " id+=1\n", + " # break\n", + "\n", + " # break\n", + " \n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 53, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "data": { + "text/plain": [ + "[('2013-03-26 00:19:57', '3-module one'),\n", + " ('2013-03-26 05:58:09', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-03-26 15:21:55', 'video cards'),\n", + " ('2013-03-26 19:32:53', 'avalon batch 3'),\n", + " ('2013-03-26 19:32:53', 'fpga bitcoin mining (3 ztex quadra)'),\n", + " ('2013-03-26 19:32:53', 'gpu litecoin mining rig with 4 hd 7850'),\n", + " ('2013-03-27 22:02:32', 'modules'),\n", + " ('2013-03-27 22:02:32', 'miners'),\n", + " ('2013-03-28 09:38:41', 'avalon batch 3'),\n", + " ('2013-03-28 09:38:41', 'gpu farm'),\n", + " ('2013-03-27 21:50:02', 'bfl orders'),\n", + " ('2013-03-28 21:18:04', 'corporate datacenter server room'),\n", + " ('2013-03-28 21:18:04', '100mbit fibreline'),\n", + " ('2013-03-28 21:18:04', 'dual 10kva ups'),\n", + " ('2013-03-30 06:08:10', 'modules'),\n", + " ('2013-03-30 15:00:21', 'batch 2 units'),\n", + " ('2013-04-18 16:49:52', 'pcbs'),\n", + " ('2013-04-20 08:38:33', 'qfn-28'),\n", + " ('2013-04-20 08:38:33', 'eagle'),\n", + " ('2013-04-20 08:38:33', 'orcad'),\n", + " ('2013-04-20 08:38:33', 'geda - gschem and pcb'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 04:55:23', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 16:49:25', 'fpga'),\n", + " ('2013-04-24 15:02:03', 'avalon asics chips'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 23:56:58', 'avalon asics chips'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 23:56:58', 'tablet'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 23:56:58', 'laptop'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 23:56:58', 'desktop'),\n", + " ('2013-04-25 17:23:28', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-04-27 06:11:21', 'ataxx'),\n", + " ('2013-05-03 05:12:15', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-11 13:42:16', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-11 13:57:43', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-12 13:53:36', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-15 16:09:55', 'asic mining computer'),\n", + " ('2013-05-15 21:29:05', 'armory offline wallet'),\n", + " ('2013-05-17 08:40:51', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-19 10:46:42', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-19 10:46:42', 'notebook'),\n", + " ('2013-05-14 01:09:22', 'klondike board'),\n", + " ('2013-05-20 10:16:10', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-22 23:26:21', 'pcbs'),\n", + " ('2013-05-22 18:48:24', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-22 18:48:24', 'pcb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-22 18:48:24', 'bfl'),\n", + " ('2013-05-23 12:27:23', 'sample chip'),\n", + " ('2013-05-23 06:20:11', 'cold wallet'),\n", + " ('2013-05-24 08:44:16', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-14 00:30:41', '7970s'),\n", + " ('2013-05-25 17:17:53', 'bitcoin-qt'),\n", + " ('2013-05-26 02:06:09', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-25 15:59:33', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-27 10:24:30', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-27 17:40:58', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-27 18:04:24', '7990 malta'),\n", + " ('2013-05-28 19:04:48', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-29 07:08:01', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-29 16:08:44', 'asicminer usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 10:38:37', 'heatsinks'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 10:38:37', 'usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 11:36:58', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 22:53:45', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 02:25:07', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 21:15:51', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 03:38:13', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-23 14:34:51', '20 chips board'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 19:20:35', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 22:30:37', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-01 14:25:49', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 02:14:05', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 02:36:01', 'desktop fan'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 03:36:00', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 08:23:48', 'working asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 08:23:48', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 22:42:23', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 04:17:16', 'gpu miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 06:03:27', 'bitcoin-qt'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 06:35:58', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 07:14:59', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 07:54:36', 'k16'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 07:54:36', '200x100 heatsinks with fans'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 07:54:36', 'psu'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 07:54:36', 'linux router'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 07:54:36', 'converter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 14:53:25', 'usb erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 19:44:57', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 02:38:40', 'am stock'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 02:38:40', 'bfl'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 02:38:40', 'gpu farm'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 02:38:40', 'rsm'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 02:38:40', \"am usb's\"),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 02:38:40', 'k16 and k64 boards'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 02:38:40', 'complete blades'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 04:27:18', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 03:07:44', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 03:07:44', 'singles (60 ghash)'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 03:07:44', 'jalapenos (5 ghash)'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 03:07:44', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 03:07:44', 'erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 11:58:22', 'butterflylabs'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 11:58:22', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 13:59:37', 'asic unit'),\n", + " ('2013-05-29 11:35:18', 't13hydra'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 21:36:57', 'klondike k16 full miner assembly'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 00:08:32', 'knc miner unit'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 00:22:15', 'kncminer jupiters'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 01:00:54', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 09:29:16', 'chip order'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 09:29:16', 'sample heat sinks for k16'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 16:45:14',\n", + " \"nekonos's scan of his driving licence and electrical bill\"),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 16:45:14', '16 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 20:36:24', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 04:11:14', 'gpus'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 04:23:05', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 04:23:05', 'miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 04:23:05', 'bfl fpga'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 04:23:05', 'gpu miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 06:48:55', \"burnin's 20 boards\"),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 06:48:55', 'bfl devices'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 17:39:06', 'jalapeno'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 17:39:06', 'cairnsmore1 unit'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 17:39:06', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 17:39:06', 'asicminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 08:13:39', 'knc miner saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 12:51:48', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 12:59:46', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 14:57:05', '120gh asic'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 15:19:14', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 19:08:30', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 02:36:24', 'computers as mining rigs'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 20:26:09', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 20:54:59', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 20:58:39', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 22:10:16', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 22:46:19', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 22:53:40', 'saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 23:09:14', 'knc jupiter miner'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 17:10:33', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 23:48:18', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 06:04:41', 'avalon chips 2654'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 06:59:36', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 14:07:05', 'knc 175g miner'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 18:58:38', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 20:21:24', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 22:15:11', 'jupiter 6'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 22:15:11', 'jupiter 7'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 22:39:54', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 22:42:27', '7970'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 00:59:57', 'block erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 01:17:35', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 20:55:58', '3rd asic'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 07:38:22', '120gh asic'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 16:19:43', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 18:14:42', 'third asic device'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 18:31:09', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 18:42:42', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 22:54:53', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 22:54:53', 'miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 22:54:53', 'black erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 22:08:38', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 22:08:38', 'k1'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 22:08:38', 'k16'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 10:32:10', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 23:45:22', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 07:21:29', 'avalon asics'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 07:21:29', 'yubikey-protected blockchain.info wallet'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 10:17:30', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 14:01:25', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 14:14:59', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 23:16:28', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 23:16:28', 'mars'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 00:36:16', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 00:36:16', 'miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 14:18:56', 'bit message'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 20:18:56', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 18:46:39', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 18:46:39', 'radeons'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 23:33:46', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 03:58:26', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 04:02:54', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 15:26:11', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 15:26:11', 'silver'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 15:26:11', 'powered usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 20:58:37', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 20:58:37', 'asicminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 22:55:17', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'raspberrypi'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'powered usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'tower style hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'gpu'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'heatsink'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'extension cables'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'sd card'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29', 'usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 17:06:57', 'gpu setup'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 16:14:25', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 16:14:25', 'ems-envelope'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 16:14:25', 'antistatic workspace'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 16:14:25', 'pincette'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 17:11:24', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 17:11:24', 'envelopes'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 17:11:24', 'tray'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 17:11:24', 'silica gel'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 17:11:24', 'cellophane'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 17:11:24', 'esd-bags'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 17:11:24', 'bubble envelope'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 18:07:15', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 10:29:41', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 12:52:35', 'sample pcb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 12:52:35', 'panel with sample k1 and k16'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 16:18:36', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 16:18:36', 'miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 16:18:36', 'erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 16:18:36', 'sapphires'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 23:17:18', 'asicminer erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-14 07:53:57', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-14 07:53:57', 'k16 miner'),\n", + " ('2013-06-14 15:48:42', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 01:11:16', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 01:11:16', 'usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 12:14:07', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 16:26:45', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 16:26:45', '7970'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 16:32:26', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 16:32:26', 'saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 22:56:18', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-16 11:09:45', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 06:44:23', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 06:44:23', 'manhattan 10-port usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 06:44:23', 'anker 10-port usb 3.0'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 14:59:01', 'miner design using the bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-02 01:37:52', 'zefir batch #3'),\n", + " ('2013-05-02 01:37:52', 'ragingazn628 first batch order'),\n", + " ('2013-05-02 01:37:52', 'reflow station'),\n", + " ('2013-06-16 20:11:41', 'bitfury asic'),\n", + " ('2013-06-16 23:17:46', 'bfl chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 03:27:19', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 10:25:21', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 13:25:12', 'test chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 16:06:23', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 23:44:34', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 10:21:56', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 10:21:56', 'hero gopro3'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 17:36:38', '18gh/s unit'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 21:15:29', 'black one'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 23:11:47', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 23:11:47', 'anker hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 23:11:47', 'usb fan'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 23:11:47', 'computer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 01:10:52', 'asicminer erupter usb sticks'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 01:10:52', 'rpi'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 01:10:52', 'dlink dub-h7 powered usb 2.0 hub'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 01:10:52', 'plugable usb 3.0 high power hub'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 01:10:52', 'bfl jalapeno'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 01:10:52', 'bfl fpga'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 16:03:54', 'asicminers'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 01:07:36', 'chip credits'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 04:52:07', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 04:52:07', 'terrahash 4.5 gh/s unit'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 06:09:02', 'usb miner eruptor'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 11:54:14', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 11:54:14', '15 boards'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 01:55:10', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 03:32:43', 'bfl 4 gh/s chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 15:38:23', 'knc miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 15:38:23', 'bitfury miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 16:19:11', 'kncminers'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 16:19:22', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 17:06:38', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:03:36', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:15:40', 'kncminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 21:04:03', 'avalon chip'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 01:17:58', 'red erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 01:17:58', 'one black erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 15:50:37', 'kncminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 16:08:31', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 21:21:59', 'kncminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 23:16:19', 'bfl 4 gh/s chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 23:16:19', 'jalapeno'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 23:16:19', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 05:14:24', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 07:14:10', 'bfl 4 gh/s chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 18:47:34', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 03:00:14', 'anker usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 06:58:16', 'cognitive boards'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 06:58:16', 'fully assembled boards'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 06:58:16', 'chips + heatsinks mounted and ready to go'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 01:31:58', \"avalon's chips\"),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 03:49:14', 'usb mining devices'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 03:49:14', 'gpu'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 07:09:06', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 12:19:29', '44 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:37:55', 'heatsink'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:37:55', 'fan'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:37:55', 'casing'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:37:55', 'atx computer case with power 750w corsair modular'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:37:55', 'microcontroller'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 21:15:05', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 21:15:05', 'sample chip'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 21:15:05', 'avalon chips from batch 1'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 21:15:05', 'avalon chips from batch 2'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 16:37:27', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 17:26:13', 'bfl asic chip'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 17:26:13', 'btl cupones'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 22:21:06', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 16:00:41', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 16:00:41', 'asic miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 16:00:41', 'anker usb 3.0 hub'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 17:41:48', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 19:46:44', 'knc miner saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 22:31:15', 'jalapenos'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 23:29:32', 'avalon chip'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 06:30:00', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 08:28:05', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 08:28:05', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 08:28:05', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 08:28:05', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 08:28:05', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 15:27:35', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:22:40', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 17:29:14', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 20:34:22', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 23:30:18', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 07:55:44', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 21:43:50', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 15:15:39', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 16:52:29', 'kncminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 17:05:22', 'miner 2'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 17:05:22', 'miner 3'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 17:05:22', 'miner 4'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 17:49:51', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 18:07:37', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 20:48:41', '2nd miner'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 20:48:41', '3rd miner'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 20:48:41', '4th miner'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 06:41:43', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 06:42:02', 'black anker hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 08:25:43', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 11:55:58', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 15:56:23', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 17:26:32', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 18:44:46', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 18:44:46', 'jalapeno'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 20:55:04', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 21:19:51', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 02:13:02', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 09:09:53', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 09:09:53', 'miner number 5'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 09:09:53', 'meat miner 2'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 09:09:53', 'miner 3'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 09:09:53', 'miner 4'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 09:09:53', 'miner 5'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 14:32:46', 'batch #2 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 19:40:49', 'knc miner jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 05:30:26', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 10:42:38', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 15:12:04', '3 module'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 15:12:04', 'surface mount technology equipment'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 15:48:00', '8 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 17:58:59', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 18:43:50', 'asicminer usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 19:35:27', 'jala'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 00:58:35', 'bfl chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 00:58:35', '120w power supply'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 00:58:35', 'astek 510lc'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 00:58:35', 'ir3847mtr1pbf'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 00:58:35', '7970 cards'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 00:58:35', '1.3k watt psu'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 00:58:35', '30 psu'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 01:45:02', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 11:37:17', 'motherboard'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 04:33:41', 'kncminer jupiter miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 04:33:41', 'jalapeno'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 04:33:41', 'cairnsmore 1'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 15:06:04', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 17:23:33', 'jalapenos'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 17:23:33', 'ls'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 17:29:15', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 20:10:19', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 20:34:27', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 22:06:55', 'knc miner jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 23:49:10', '8 chip'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 23:51:18', 'jalapenos'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 06:32:53', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 13:11:41', 'bitfury 120gh asic'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 16:23:50', 'bfl'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 16:23:50', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 19:00:51', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 20:13:59', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 22:20:04', 'pcbs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 22:20:04', 'components'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 22:20:04', 'asic chip'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 03:16:15', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 02:07:04', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 03:31:27', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 03:57:14', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 08:32:28', \"hot noisy gpu's\"),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 13:35:42', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 15:27:22', 'saturn knc miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 16:43:55', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 14:22:45', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 17:18:24', 'saturn knc miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 01:29:31', 'whole mining rig'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 01:29:31', 'complete miners'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 03:24:29', 'usb sticks'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 09:10:25', 'saturn knc miner'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 10:55:09', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 10:55:09', 'test boards'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 10:55:09', 'k16'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 10:55:09', 'k1'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 10:55:09', 'test pcb boards'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 11:27:17', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:24:45', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:24:45', 'ipad'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:49:17', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:56:04', 'jupiter kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:56:45', 'miners'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47', 'miner01'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47', 'miner02'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47', 'miner03'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47', 'miner04'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47', 'miner05'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47', 'miner06'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47', 'miner07'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47', 'miner08'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 17:07:20', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-06 02:03:18', 'gpu'),\n", + " ('2013-07-06 03:36:36', 'power regulators'),\n", + " ('2013-07-06 17:13:44', 'avalon chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-06 17:13:44', 'bitfury machine'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 04:13:33', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 06:42:58', '25 gh/s miner starter kit'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 18:16:48', 'knc jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 18:39:41', 'butterflylabs jalapeno'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 20:09:22', 'jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 20:50:58', 'knc group buy'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 20:50:58', \"k16's via terrahash\"),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 21:59:00', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 08:18:02', 'butterflylabs jalapeno miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 08:56:14', 'avalon overclockable chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 16:06:59', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 20:20:09', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 20:32:09', 'starter kits'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 20:34:44', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 21:23:04', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 20:02:37', 'kcnminer group buys'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 17:15:14', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 17:15:14', 'g7'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 03:40:03', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 04:21:29', 'knc saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 05:00:17', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 06:11:12', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 06:50:18', 'erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 11:57:51', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 12:21:11', '25g miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 19:31:03', 'gpus'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 22:59:43', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 23:00:30', 'saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 00:31:35', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 04:50:49', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 07:31:59', 'unit #1 - august delivery'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 07:31:59', 'bitfury unit'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 11:12:21', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 11:48:06', 'chillies'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 15:28:26', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 16:49:13', 'knc saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 16:55:48', 'gpus'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 18:39:17', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 21:41:53', '8 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 21:48:03', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 22:08:57', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 01:37:54', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 08:36:30', 'graphics cards'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 09:34:31', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 09:48:51', 'asicminer usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 09:48:51', 'raspberry pi'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 09:48:51', 'hub'),\n", + " ('2013-04-27 16:50:25', 'avalon asics chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 13:54:35', 'block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 14:32:24', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 15:54:37', 'usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 21:27:35', 'jupiter miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 22:34:56', 'knc saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 01:30:39', 'bitfountain block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 01:30:39', 'arctic breeze'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 23:28:58', 'fpga boards'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 03:47:05', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 04:22:03', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 06:17:15', 'block erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 14:34:31', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 16:20:24', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 17:52:38', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 18:08:51', '128 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 18:08:51', '100 chip batch'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 18:25:56', 'knc saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-04-16 02:45:38', 'graphics card miners'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 20:37:07', 'usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 20:37:07', 'hd7850'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 21:14:33', 'jalapenos'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 21:52:45', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-13 12:29:03', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-13 20:13:55', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 13:26:41', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-13 21:35:46', 'eruptor'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 06:06:47', 'anker brand usb hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 06:06:47', '12v 4a power adapter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 06:06:47', 'usps priority mail international shipping'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 06:06:47', 'usps express mail shipping'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 06:06:47', 'usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 17:54:00', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 18:15:46', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 21:36:06', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 21:36:06', 'hashing units'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 01:06:46', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 01:54:00', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 02:07:52', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 04:03:06', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 04:03:06', 'anker hub'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 07:24:07', 'anker'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 16:35:23', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 19:44:19', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 21:03:46', 'usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 21:03:46', 'gpu rigs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 21:03:46', 'computers'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 22:17:59', 'anker hub'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 00:27:44', 'usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 08:16:37', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 14:04:36', 'usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 17:31:16', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 17:59:17', '12 free credits'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 02:10:52', 'ankers'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 03:35:32', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 03:35:32', 'white models'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 14:49:20', '104 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 18:29:11', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 19:31:23', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 03:08:56', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 03:11:54', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 03:11:54', 'sample boards'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 03:56:46', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 17:31:35', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 15:32:24', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 16:35:55', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 17:53:48', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 19:30:06', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 20:41:31', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 21:09:14', 'bfl'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 22:11:43', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 11:59:32', '9 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 14:41:51', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 14:46:45', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 17:31:08', '#2'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 17:39:22', 'miner 2'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 17:39:22', 'miner 1'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 20:22:36', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-20 03:36:22', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-20 11:11:09', 'asics'),\n", + " ('2013-07-20 16:10:26', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 04:53:24', '5 miners'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 04:53:24', '6 units'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 04:53:24', 'eligius usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 04:53:24', '10 port all data anker'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 04:53:24', 'aitech'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 04:53:24', 'orico'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 00:21:08', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 09:43:02', 'hashingboards'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 09:43:02', 'bitpay'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 09:43:02', '55nm bitfury hashingboard (october)'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 20:58:20', 'miner 2'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 20:58:20', 'miner 3'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 23:50:42', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 04:29:23', 'd-link usb 2.0 hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 04:29:23', 'raspi'),\n", + " ('2013-06-01 21:28:16', \"zefir's batch 5 200 chips\"),\n", + " ('2013-07-22 23:37:14', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 01:28:33', 'asicminer usb block erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 17:01:11', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 18:05:42', 'miner 3'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 18:05:42', 'miner 4'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 20:11:49', 'knc jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 21:17:26', 'bfl asic miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 11:21:19', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 11:47:13', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 14:15:02', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 17:16:16', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 17:16:16', 'block erupter usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 17:17:13', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 17:17:13', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 17:17:13', 'block erupter usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 17:17:13', 'usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 11:06:28', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 16:28:55', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 17:54:01', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 17:54:01', 'usb hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 13:57:47', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 19:17:53', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 19:17:53', 'usb block erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 23:07:43', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 23:07:43', 'block erupter usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 04:22:26', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 05:11:06', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 10:29:44', 'eruptors hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 10:29:44', 'miners'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 19:24:34', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 19:24:34', 'block erupter usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 01:55:51', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 03:28:24', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 16:00:06', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 16:27:44', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 20:10:42', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 20:13:25', 'miner 4'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 20:13:25', 'miner 5'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 20:42:29', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 21:24:03', 'block erupter usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 21:24:03', 'usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 21:24:03', 'heat-sink front-case 2-in-1 logo-ed (sapphire)'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 21:24:03', 'led'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 01:43:59', 'kncminer saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 02:50:34', 'bfl asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 07:22:49', 'miner 4'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 07:22:49', 'miner 5'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 10:59:09', 'kncminer saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 16:05:05', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 16:12:11', 'kncminer saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 20:26:32', 'asicminer usb block eruptor 300 mh/s'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 02:00:58', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 08:25:27', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 18:46:21', 'usb powered hub'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 18:46:21', 'atx power supply'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 00:59:53', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 07:52:27', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 16:10:24', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 14:00:36', '5ghash bfl'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 14:00:36', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 20:49:33', 'usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 23:15:02', 'bfl board'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 23:15:02', 'power supply'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 23:46:57', '5850s'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 03:07:04', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 04:30:54', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 07:50:09', 'eligius model'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 17:26:42', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 06:26:41', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 06:26:41', 'gpus'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 06:26:41', 'anker 9port +1 charging'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 06:26:41', 'aitech 10port'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 06:26:41', 'rpi'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 06:26:41', 'juiced 10-port'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 05:54:19', 'kncminer saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 12:03:20', 'ferric chloride & hot water'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 13:38:03', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 03:33:43', 'assembled board'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 17:34:58', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 19:16:38', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 19:27:25', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 20:33:20', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 12:23:41', 'usb'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 12:23:41', 'raspberry pi'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 12:23:41', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 01:41:03', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 01:41:03', 'knc'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 01:43:33', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 03:06:27', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 18:55:50', 'kncminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 19:12:49', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 19:12:49', 'raspberry pi'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 18:31:40', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 03:26:02', 'kncminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 03:26:02', 'm5'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 06:46:42', 'kncminer saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 10:48:25', 'asicminer usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 21:02:23', 'blade'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 21:02:23', 'units from the first batch'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 21:02:23', '10 ounces of merchandise'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 18:48:56', 'k16'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 18:48:56', 'k1'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 11:25:34', 'jallies'),\n", + " ('2013-08-04 21:22:31', 'juiced 10-port hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-08-04 21:22:31', 'orico/juiced'),\n", + " ('2013-08-04 21:22:31', 'artic fan'),\n", + " ('2013-08-04 23:32:54', 'kncminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-04 16:53:06', 'hashfast 400gh gn chips'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 08:58:39', '7 port hub'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 08:58:39', 'asus maximus gene v'),\n", + " ('2013-08-05 18:26:46', 'android stick pc'),\n", + " ('2013-08-06 06:08:41', 'jupiters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-06 14:13:17', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 04:11:09', 'knc mercury'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 04:11:09', 'ltc miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-06 17:57:40', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 15:42:17', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 17:06:20', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 18:13:50', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 19:14:24', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 08:43:31', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 08:43:31', 'a/c'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 22:26:52', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-08 12:42:19', 'chip credits'),\n", + " ('2013-08-08 12:42:19', 'custom bfl-based hardware'),\n", + " ('2013-08-08 15:05:07', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 00:10:48', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 00:37:53', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 02:24:34', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 04:11:01', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 04:16:52', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 04:16:52', 'ce+rohs sticker'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 04:16:52', 'heatsink'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 07:01:34', 'bfl'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 07:26:56', 'usb asic erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 07:26:56', 'hub'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 07:26:56', 'generic arctic fan'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 09:56:02', 'hash fast'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 15:12:13', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 21:29:36', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 22:46:35', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 22:49:11', 'asicminer block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 13:12:49', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 00:15:43', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 01:59:47', 'blade'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 07:02:40', 'terrahash'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 10:11:40', 'asx projects'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 13:28:39', 'miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 13:28:39', 'knc jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 17:53:36', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 00:58:33', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 03:06:12', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 15:23:54', 'asicminer blade'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 17:12:53', 'block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 17:12:53', 'blades'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 17:12:53', 'sticks'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 19:42:07', '16 chip board'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 20:45:26', 'hashfast shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 20:45:26', 'electrum wallet'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 20:45:26', 'sdd'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 14:48:26', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 14:48:26', 'usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 02:14:29', 'jalapenos'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 02:24:59', 'bitpay'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 03:07:56', '0.25 share from the first miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-06 20:54:15', 'asicminer usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 09:52:11', 'bfl-chip'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 11:55:04', 'kncminer saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 15:50:45', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 16:22:53', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 03:46:23', 'bfl-chip'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 05:57:08', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-14 00:12:04', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-14 02:32:36', '4 chips'),\n", + " ('2013-08-15 01:57:01', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-15 05:56:03', 'mcxnow shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 04:50:31', 'baby jet'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 04:38:07', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 15:18:10', 'hashfast shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 17:11:39', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 19:10:55', 'batch #2 avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 22:52:14', 'avalon asic chips'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 03:23:16', 'hashfast'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 02:37:39', 'blades'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 11:07:26', 'electronics'),\n", + " ('2013-07-22 23:11:07', 'single board'),\n", + " ('2013-07-22 23:11:07', 'sample chips'),\n", + " ('2013-07-22 23:11:07', 'boards'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 20:22:19', 'usb erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 00:48:57', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 00:48:57', 'blades'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', '3d printer'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', 'robo massage chair'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', 'cnc mill'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', 'cnc lathe'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', 'wireless router'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', 'laptop'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', 'tablets'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', 'smartphone'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23', 'robotic miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 13:56:20', 'knc - saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 16:05:46', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 16:05:46', 'module'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 04:29:05', 'sticks'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 19:14:10', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 02:27:44', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 15:12:50', 'hashfast shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 17:52:11', 'usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 17:52:11', 'usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 18:06:06', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 17:15:32', 'usb stick miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 17:15:32', 'blades'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 18:58:12', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 23:36:48', 'canary'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 01:49:14', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 15:36:18', 'miner #3'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:11:31', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:11:31', 'prototype boards'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:11:31', \"bitfury's\"),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:11:31', 'full units'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 23:29:42', 'hashfast'),\n", + " ('2013-08-21 15:17:27', 'miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-22 14:32:04', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-22 17:38:10', 'hashfast shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 06:06:52', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 16:07:55', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 16:07:55', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 23:46:21', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 02:34:08', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 12:14:42', 'pocket supercomputer'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 12:14:42', 'apple software engineer'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 12:14:42', 'oracle'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 23:52:18', 'asicminer usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-25 11:38:10', 'hashfast shares'),\n", + " ('2013-08-25 11:38:10', '6th miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 17:39:21', 'asicminer usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 17:39:21', 'usb sticks'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 17:39:21', 'anker usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 08:16:12', 'k1'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 08:16:12', 'avalon based miner'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 08:16:12', 'pcb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 08:16:12', 'components'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 08:16:12', 'bfl chips and boards'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 12:16:01', 'chips'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 20:16:38', 'bitfury 400 gh kit'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 20:16:38', 'knc miner jupiter 400gh'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 20:16:38', 'vmc fast hash one 256 gh'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 20:16:38', 'hashfast baby jet 400 gh'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 16:38:55', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 16:38:55', 'bfl'),\n", + " ('2013-08-27 10:39:20', 'block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-27 18:22:28', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 08:15:28', 'pi'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 08:15:28', 'cm1'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 08:15:28', 'bfgminer 3.1.2'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 09:39:16', 'h-board 2'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 05:55:54', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 12:44:41', 'asicminer blade miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 12:44:41', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:02:16', 'blade erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:33:26', 'blade miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:33:26', 'psu'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:33:26', '10 amp fuse'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:33:26', 'green power connector'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41', '65 gh/s erupter blade mining rig'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41', 'erupter blades'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41', 'fans'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41', 'custom build frame'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41', '4pin molex connectors'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41', 'ocz 750w modular power supply'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41', 'netgear 8 port gigabit switch'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41', 'cat5 cables'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 17:54:54', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 19:01:00', 'asicminer usb erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 19:22:49', 'asicminer blade'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 20:35:19', 'erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 20:35:19', 'hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 20:35:19', 'cables'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 21:09:16', 'erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 22:04:26', 'erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 09:23:00', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 09:23:00', 'asic usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 05:47:43', 'asic miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 05:47:43', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 05:47:43', 'rpi'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 05:47:43', 'usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 17:25:46', 'kncminer'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 02:54:41', 'asicminer usb block erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 04:06:06', 'usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 03:34:21', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 03:34:21', 'blades'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 05:33:38', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:36:37', '1 blade'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:36:37', '10 blades'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:36:37', '2 blades'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:36:37', '6 discount sticks'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 12:52:44', 'usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 16:19:54', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 20:01:54', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 20:27:27', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 21:39:13', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 00:36:32', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 03:12:16', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 12:55:37', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 13:15:22', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 16:49:40', 'asicminer usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 16:49:40', 'units'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 16:49:40', 'miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 16:49:40', 'machete'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 18:00:04', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 18:46:29', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 19:26:31', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 20:17:05', '2 joining apartments'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 20:17:05', '2x50 cable connections'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 20:17:05', 'automatic dividend payment software'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 01:46:56', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 07:00:09', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 16:09:17', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 16:09:17', 'usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 17:51:20', 'asicminer erupter usb gb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 20:39:09', 'hashfast'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 20:39:09', 'cointerra'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 21:12:40', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 23:12:54', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 23:10:11', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 04:04:01', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 18:24:09', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 18:24:09', 'jalapeno'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 15:17:43', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 16:46:10', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 17:12:57', 'usb asics'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 17:12:57', 'gpus'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 17:12:57', 'jalapenos'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 18:49:57', 'gpus'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 20:08:01', 'asicminer erupter usb gb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 22:06:00', 'asicminer erupter usb gb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 17:27:31', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-09-02 06:01:49', 'hashfast babyjet'),\n", + " ('2013-08-25 10:30:51', 'central air conditioning units'),\n", + " ('2013-08-25 10:30:51', 'portable 12000 btu unit'),\n", + " ('2013-08-25 10:30:51', 'dehumidifier'),\n", + " ('2013-09-02 20:43:31', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-09-02 20:43:31', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-09-02 20:43:31', 'bfl shares (250 gh/s)'),\n", + " ('2013-09-02 20:43:31', 'bitfury starter kit'),\n", + " ('2013-09-03 04:32:56', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-09-03 14:47:27', 'cointerra 2 th/s'),\n", + " ('2013-09-03 18:19:09', 'asicminer usb erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 06:00:22', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 11:18:30', 'kncminer pre-orders #15xy 1 jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 11:18:30', 'kncminer pre-orders #15xz 1 saturn'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 14:35:52', 'asicminer usb erupter'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 16:38:14', 'miner #4'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 16:38:14', 'laptop'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 16:38:14', 'hashfast baby jet miner #7'),\n", + " ('2013-08-21 06:12:56', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 02:05:40', 'usps express priority mail international shipping'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 02:05:40', 'asicminer'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 02:05:40', 'new blade miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 21:52:43', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 21:52:43', 'usb hub'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 23:10:00', 'hashfast shares'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 00:25:35', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 00:49:09', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 05:05:46', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 05:05:46', 'asicminer shares'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 05:05:46', \"extra's\"),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 05:05:46', 'red and black usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 05:05:46', 'red usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 05:05:46', 'block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 08:43:35', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-05-02 09:36:27', 'prototypes'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 17:57:05', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 06:00:03', 'asicminer erupter usb gb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 15:09:40', 'asicminer erupter usb gb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 15:54:42', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 16:27:25', 'block erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 16:38:45', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 17:59:42', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 18:21:56', 'kncminer jupiter'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 19:27:33', 'asicminer usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 20:44:25', 'cointerra shares'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 20:44:25', 'siavash'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 20:49:50', 'asicminer erupter usb gb#7'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 23:48:07', 'block erupter usbs'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 02:10:49', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 03:29:46', 'cointerra terraminer iv'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 05:16:22', 'usb hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 14:35:34', 'asicminer erupter usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 15:14:53', 'cointerra shares'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 18:44:43', 'asicminer erupter usb gb#7'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 00:05:30', 'usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 17:05:40', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 17:05:40', 'blades'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 17:05:40', 'usb block erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 17:05:40', '3 miners'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 17:05:40', '0.10 coupon miner'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 21:18:52', 'asicminer usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 21:18:52', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 03:16:53', 'usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 13:55:57', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 17:21:06', 'usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 17:53:22', 'asicminer usb erupters'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 18:23:57', 'usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 19:00:27', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 19:00:27', 'new blade miners'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 19:00:27', 'gold'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 19:00:27', 'blue'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 19:00:27', 'black'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 19:00:27', 'usb units'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 23:35:44', 'usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 04:08:33', 'usb'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 08:56:59', 'h-board #3'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 09:11:36', 'h-board #2'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 09:11:36', 'h-board #3'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 15:19:35', 'asicminer erupter usb miner'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 15:19:35', 'usb miners'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 15:19:35', '6-port hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 15:19:35', 'usb hubs'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 20:19:58', 'avalon'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 20:19:58', 'bitfury'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 20:19:58', 'bfl'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 20:19:58', 'miner'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 20:19:58', 'starterkit'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 20:43:06', 'usb'),\n", + " ...]" + ] + }, + "execution_count": 53, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "execute_result" + } + ], + "source": [ + "df = pd.DataFrame(hardware_instances, columns=['date', 'hardware'])\n", + "df = df.sort_values(by=['date'])\n", + "hardware_instances" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 54, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "df.to_csv('hardware_instances.csv', index=False)" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 55, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [ + { + "data": { + "text/plain": [ + "[('2013-03-26 00:19:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: CANCELLED [Group Buy in China] Avalon batch #3\\n### Original post:\\nWhy was it cancelled?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBatch #3 already sold out.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSeems still available, just checked !?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n153 in stock\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhere do you look for that number ?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWill tell you for 2 bitcoins ). Upd: 152\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ngo on try to buy 999 units. it will fail and tell you how many units are actually in stock.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI don\\'t have any left, spent them all on a 3-module one, this morning when they opened the sale\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon batch #3, 3-module one\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-03-26 05:58:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: [Group Buying] Batch #3 is BACK now!\\n### Original post:\\nMan, the first guy hasn\\'t even split with the cash yet and we\\'ve already got a copycat scam.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMost terms are different. You could read if you are interested.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhere\\'s your reputation?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m new here, have no so many posts or trade.In china, we trade in Taobao. My satisfactional rate as buyer or customer are all 100%.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYou joined the forums less than 3 weeks ago and you expect people to send you BTC. At least ask somebody to do the escrow for you like Johnthedong or some reputable Hero member and have him make the Bitpay payment.Do your due diligence people. Anybody who sends BTC to him is taking a big risk.At least my group buy is for local people in Southern California - if I try to run I\\'ll have my medical license suspended for fraud. You have nothing to risk and only BTC to gain.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBTW people could always buy a module from this group buy in China: then ask one of the senior miners to host the module in their Avalon. There are several members who reside in mainland who would probably be willing to host a module - then you only need to spend 25 or so BTC instead of 75 or 100 to get your foot in the proverbial ASIC door.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks!I understand your consideration!I just try to collect BTC here to purchase one avalon and pay you later what you have paid now. Also, try to make friends here.Thanks again for your post!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks for your advise.I want to host an avalon, so I post here.Also If not enough btc is collected, it\\'ll be all refunded. I\\'ll look it as a way to making friends. Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: module, Avalon\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-03-26 15:21:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: group buy opportunity\\n### Original post:\\nFor those who missed out on Coinhoarder\\'s opportunity, my boss is offering the same type of deal. we are new to the mining community, but have the setup to do something similar to what Coinhoarder did. we have a combined hash rate of around 2.5 - 3.0gh/s with multiple video cards on multiple systems, but know that will be nothing very soon. We run a computer business and have the space, manpower, and power to host multiple Avalons if we get the funds. my boss\\'s login is finlof and is a noob to this forum, so anyone that has any doubts can feel free to PM either him or myself. We run a legit computer business in northeast Louisiana and want to get in on this opportunity. below is a link to his post (in the noobie section since he cant post anywhere else yet). hopefully we can offer this opportunity to others that may have missed the other one. lets mine!link to finlof\\'s post - \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: video cards, Avalon\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-03-26 19:32:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: Avalon batch 3 group buy\\n### Original post:\\nHi, all,Avalon batch 3 have still in stockI have 12 BTC and an order on hold with Avalon batch 3 for 3 module unit 76.46 BTC unit.@ the moment I\\'m ruining a FPGA bitcoin mining (3 Ztex quadra, just get from here 4 Enterpoint Cairnsmore1 ) and GPU litecoin mining rig with 4 HD 7850) in my company office . The electricity is flat rate of about 0.09 USD here in Bulgaria.I was wondering if we can make this investment will be payed monthly to the Bitcoin address you send your original investment with. (Make sure you can both send and receive Bitcoins from this address!!)Before dividends are divided up and payed, electricity costs (~.09 Kwh), a 3% hosting fee, and the pool\\'s fee (yet to be determined) will be taken out of the net profits.Dividends will be paid proportionally according to each investors initial investment [investing 1 BTC in a 75 BTC ASIC gets you 1/75 of the profits (after subtracting electricity costs and a 3% hosting fee).]If there\\'s not enough Bitcoins collected to buy an Avalon ASIC, then all funds will be immediately refunded to the address with which they were sent.If I collect enough funds for more than one Avalon, then I will purchase however many the\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon batch 3, FPGA bitcoin mining (3 Ztex quadra), GPU litecoin mining rig with 4 HD 7850, ASIC\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-03-27 22:02:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: Avalon resell and hosting plan\\n### Original post:\\nComing in with some big guns. Kudos. Let me think it over and I will get back to you.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCommenting to subscribe to the thread.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDefinitely interested. Let me know as you sell them what is left\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPlease keep the amount left. I currently don\\'t have the funds but will see what I can do in a little while.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI have get orders for 18 modules and payment for 16 modules, and now 42 modules left. 16 of the 18 modules will be shipped and 2 of them will be hosted.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSorry I think I\\'m not understanding this properly. You have ordered 50 miners with 4 modules each? In which case if u had an extra 15 to sell, what do you mean you have 42 modules left? Are u selling the modules inside of the miners separately? And you mean you have about 10 miners with 4 modules in left?Phil\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWe ordered 50 units and resell 15 of them. We sell single module. If you buy 4 modules, you get a whole Avalon unit. The 60 modules to be resold now has only 42 38 left now.\"Are u selling the modules inside of the miners separately? \" Yes. If you buy, you can chose to let me host it for you, and after all the 50 units arrives, whenever you want, you can chose to have the rigs shipped to your home.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nhow much you want for a modual ?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWill you sell the avalon right now or after the 50 units arrive?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThe payment should be made right now and the shipping will be done after all 50 units arrive. After the first Avalon arriving and before all them get to my house, the owner of this group order will be forced into a contract.We designed the forced hosting to grab the golden mining window opportunity of every ASICs, and to make everyone in this group order feel fairly treated. As ngzhang announced in his Chinese post, the bulk order will be divided into small orders in shipping. So the 50 units may will be arriving between the middle of May and June. Without such scheme, there will be huge unhappy discussion about who should get their rig first and who has the highest priority. In our scheme, every Avalon will be mining right after they arrives to catch the low difficulty. The owners of this group order will get the dividend proportionally. After all 50 units arrive, each owner can decide the shipping date of their own and no one else will be affected.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThanks!Then when is the deadline? for buying a unit or module.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nBefore it is sold out\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nYes.You mean I can still buy one module or unit if they haven\\'t been sold out, even when the units arrive and starts to mine?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nTheoretically yes, but I guess there will no module left long before that\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nFAQ: FAQ1. What is the cost to have the modules host by you?Electricity cost: fee: 10% of the mining revenue, the revenue is what the mining rig get from the mining pool.The hosting service will help Avalon users outside the China boarder to grab the first months window opportunity 2. After all the 50 units arrived, I can have the module/unit shipped to my house whenever I want?Yes, whenever you want.3. Will you overclock the Avalon to extract the potential?We will try and test on our own unit first except you ask me to test on your rigs. After we are confident about the overclock safety, we will email you and get your permission first to overclock the rigs. 4. How often will the mined bitcoin be distributed?At the beginning it will be weekly. Later it will be more frequently.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nPlease update your batch 3 order here : if possible ? Thanks a lot!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nvery interesting.I\\'ve ordered one module here. \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI\\'m extremely interested in this opportunity. Could you please explain a little further about participating in the mining. What is the minimum modules that can be purchased? Once you begin receiving the avalons when can we expect the setup and mining to begin?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWhere do you live? What kind of shipping can I expect to pay?Is there escrow available? How can I trust you?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\ncchan, thank you.1 module minimum. less than 24 hours. I guess it will be start mining half an hour after we open the package I live in Beijing, China.Shipping will be DHL/EMS, cost depends on where you are. I have been in this community for 2 years long, among the board member of ASICMINER, no scamming excuse or warning from ngzhang/yifu, I guess they somehow knew the existence of my order As we need the money to invest other things, so no escrow accepted here.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI want one unit (4 modules) but I may not have the BTC until Friday night... Hope there\\'s one left by then.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nVery interested. I\\'d like to order 2 machines,are they still available? How long do you estimate it will take before you ship the machines to buyers?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nPM\\'ed!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nAfter al\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon, modules, miners, Avalon unit\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-03-28 09:38:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Avalon Batch 3 Group Buy & Hosting\\n### Original post:\\nCoinHoarder closed his group buy again... you\\'re killing me Larry.If there is enough interest to buy at least 1 unit I will start a group buy. Post how much you\\'re willing to commit. So far I have 25 BTC from qwk\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIt looks like there\\'s not too many people in SoCal who want to jump in on this (or they have big bucks and already bought their own units). Since CoinHoarder put his Group Buy on hold I\\'ll open this up to anybody worldwide. I already placed my order for Batch #3 and thought it would sell out by now but looks like the price seems like a barrier to entry for most people.The building I have been mining in the last 2 years is my wife\\'s office and she\\'s been very accommodating of my GPU farm, so having 3 or 4 Avalon units shouldn\\'t be an a problem. I may even buy a portable AC unit just for them if Bitsyncom thinks its a good idea. The building is very secure with cameras and is located in front of a hospital so it even has security guards patrolling at night.- A \"small\" administrative fee of 4% would be paid to maintaining an emergency fund for repairs or maintenance of the unit. Electricity is included in my wife\\'s office lease so for now consider it free for now. Mining will be done on a pool (most likely OzCoin or BTCGuid).- Dividends would be paid weekly until the group has majority agreement of when to decrease frequency.- Shipping costs will be taken from the first dividend payme\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n[my old rubbish deleted, did not really read your last posting]Thank you, and sorry that it didn\\'t work out\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Batch 3, GPU farm, portable AC unit\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-03-27 21:50:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: [OPEN] Avalon Batch 3 Group Buy & Hosting\\n### Original post:\\n25 BTC sent:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOpened back up again. 25 BTC collected thus far towards first unit.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n2.0 BTC received from jongaper, total 27BTC now\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThis is tough but I just checked. Looks like Avalon batch 3 are out of stock now.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsent you a pm Doc...might still be able to get one.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nReceived 25BTC from elduce.The units were going in/out of stock as people place orders and then fail to pay. Total now is 52 BTC. Need about 25 more to make this happen.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOut of stock. are you sure\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nsent you my 6 btc i had on hand\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAn extra layer of trust?So what kind of proof are you going to be giving about real performance and fair division of profit?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThis is something I was wondering how CoinHoarder was going to handle. I was thinking of making a dedicated account on a pool or pools and lock in the payment address. Then we could distribute the login to everybody in the buy-in. That way you could always check on the status and yell at me \"hey dumbass, the miner locked up - restart it\" As far as fair division - I used to invest a little with DeadTerra and he used to keep an Excel file. If you have a fixed percentage column and a running dividend (every week or month) it would be easy to have Excel just calculate that. Only payments would have to be done by hand, and if the group wants to they can assign somebody else to do that if I get too busy.As far as insurance my wife\\'s office is insured for over $250k, should be able to stick a miner in there. CoinHoarder will probably have to reassess his policy with those 7 units as that\\'s almost 50k of hardware.In the even of my untimely demise everybody can harass my wife (since she knows about my bitcoin madness). It\\'s pretty easy to find my Trust if you look through all my old posts.Sadly all these considerations may be of no use as it is in fact out of stock - I\\'ll keep checking ever\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPeewee you have a blockchain link for that transaction? Not showing up in on my end yet.... nevermind, took a while to finds its way.As I discussed with some of the members I will go ahead an buy the unit if it comes in stock using some of my own funds. I already have too much exposure with BFL orders also so I didn\\'t want to spend any more. Plus I think it would be better if I kept out of the group buy to limit conflict of interest.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOK been hitting F5 way too much. It\\'s 4AM here...Gotta get some sleep or I\\'ll kill my patients I keep checking to see if the unit comes in stock. If not I\\'ll send the refund later this evening.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nQuick question: I see in your sig that you will be going on a medical mission in June 2013. For how long and who will deal with any issues with the rig/handle payouts?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYou\\'d have to support proof about the moment you got it too.If everything is properly documented I might put a few coins, but I need proof of your id, etc.Cheerio.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThis year I think I\\'ll just do the Harbor LA 5 day event at the Forum so I won\\'t be traveling. It\\'s harder to leave home than I planned with 3 kids.For those asking for prood and ID, I am PMing theymos (he\\'s the admin for bitcointalk in case you\\'re new). Once I purchase the unit I\\'ll provide all my info to the investors. I do not feel comfortable providing my photo ID to a new user with 1 post. If you do not feel comfortable sending me the BTC then please do not do so.No units seem to have come back into stock. We have a total of 63 BTC accrued. I\\'ll wait for an announcement from Avalon or if you guys wants I can just send the refunds tonight. DO NOT SEND ANY FURTHER COINS. Just PM me if you want to want to be considered for the queue. If the unit does come into stock, I will buy it and then ask for payment. We have enough commitment to get 1 units, we\\'re now looking at about 10 BTC into unit 2\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDrG sent me some contact info, but I have not verified it at all.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nAvalons are sold out! Definitely\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nMost of you are telling me to wait a couple of days to see what happens. I\\'ll refund everybody on 3/29 then since I\\'ll assume they won\\'t get anymore in stock. Anybody who wants their investment returned now just message me. Otherwise I\\'ll just keep checking the site every 10 min like I\\'ve been doing.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI was looking at horserider\\'s resell option and this may be a viable option for the group-buy it may not be ideal as having the unit in our hands immediately but if it is received in China well before other destinations the 10% fee and electricity cut may be negated by the increased earnings early on. It would only make sense to buy a 4 module unit so you could get the whole rig, and then have it shipped when difficulty is high enough that 2 weeks of shipping downtime outweights income lost due to fees and higher electricit\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Batch 3, BFL orders\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-03-28 21:18:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: -Group Buy- Avalon ASIC 63Gh/s unit in Batch 3\\n### Original post:\\nStill holding one Avalon in my cart, and still need 50 coins to pay for it so anyone with 25+ coins is welcome to join.Will only take one person with 50coins or two with 25 each.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAre you sure holding it in cart will cut it ?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBatch 2 incomplete orders were given chance to complete payment. So hopefully same will happen for batch3, if not the Ill just refund the coins, not a big deal, never hurts to try.I think part ownership is way better then paying $15000 for a pre order on ebay.Art\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nTrue.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nBTW my corporate datacenter server room has failover ISPs, plus a private 100mbit fibreline, dual 10Kva UPS, and locked down security access. I could probably host 20 avalons there :-)\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI am probably going do to direct deposit thru cavirtex and buy the unit myself if noone is interested by monday. Just dont have enough funds in my mtgox atm, hence willing to pair up with someone.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAlso I am located in Vancouver BC Canada if anyone local wants to pair up its even better dealing in person.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC 63Gh/s unit, corporate datacenter server room, 100mbit fibreline, dual 10Kva UPS\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-03-30 06:08:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: Avalon Reselling and Hosting Plan\\n### Original post:\\nAs some of the order cancelled because of the spike in the exchange rate, I still have some modules left. If anyone want to create a public contract with me before join this plan, it is totally fine as I can post our contract in the auction board, The post in the auction board cannot be edit, so it will be a easy method for recording.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: modules\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-03-30 15:00:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-03\\nTopic: Gauging Interest In Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nFor avalon batch 1, if can find legit person to sell? Would any people be keen? I have a place to host, and would host for 3% - electric. seems to be the going rate.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhy would anyone in batch 1 sell? They are making a killing right now.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1. because of the price dude no other reason 2. The party want last forever as you know3. Very unlikely because of funny BFL video published latelySome guy\\'s are selling their batch2 units though - look at them also if you are not at the batch 2 queue of course.You will have more room for negotiation there. Batch 1 right now will rip you offI am not selling mine pls do not make me an offers:)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: avalon batch 1, batch 2 units\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-04-18 16:49:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-04\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! 555 / 782.1 BTC Pledged!\\n### Original post:\\nWoah! ryanfromrethink what\\'s your plan for all those chips?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWill an escrow be used to collect the payment? Perhaps John K?I don\\'t think anybody on these forums should be comfortable swinging 782BTC around.Tip him 5BTC for the work of documenting the group buy and have him forward the BTC to Avalon.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nguys guys guys... ill be glad to pay someone a little extra if anyone can ship me an assembled chip.. maybe some donation ill be giving would be my little \"thank you\". i\\'ve seen the page, but im not really an electronics engineer or enthusiast\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou guys are using escrow to hold these funds, right?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWith 9-10 weeks lead time for the chips to be made, plus the time to ship, and the time to build a working system from these chips. You are looking at least 3 months if not longer for a working system. Batch 3 will be shipped in half the that time and will earn you 40+ bitcoins (assuming 4x increase in difficulty) by the time you gets your homemade avalon asic system running and who knows how much higher the difficulty will be in 3-4 months... But I am still in for 60 chips (5 BTC) just for the fun of it! It is not all about making absurd profit.. This is not to say I don\\'t like profit, but I am happy either way for not having to spend/risk too much money.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'m interested: 10BTCThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nput me down for 3 BTCcuriosity, history and maybe some mining\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThere are 240 chips in a regular Avalon, not 230.3 modules, each made up of 8 submodules, of 10 chips each.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPut me in for 2 BTC!Will there be escrow for this order? I might be able to find some additional funds.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYes, my first post out of the newb section! Put me down for 1.5 btc please. I have a degree in computer engineering and experience building PCBs, I can help the design along, or I\\'ll just produce my own. I\\'m interested in making single or double-chip USB miners.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi,Put me down for 2 BTC worth of chips.Thx!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nPut me down for one bitcoin, please! It\\'s been a while since I made a PCB, but it might be fun to dig out the ol\\' soldering iron and play around a little...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nput me down for 20BTC\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nare this post is different from zefir? because he bought all 10k avalon chips\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nZephir used all his own money to buy chips, then re-sell with a small markup (which is fair). This thread is a group buy, for people to pool money together to get the needed BTC to buy 10,000+ chips.His batch is already ordered (and re-sold) , this batch will not order until the necessary funds come together.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI would consider this if Avalon didn\\'t mention possibility of Batch 4...kicking myself for not buying another in Batch 3.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI\\'m in for 3 BTC worth. Fun to play with.Enigma\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nPM\\'d you, I\\'m in here for about 12 BTC !\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nInterested in 20 BTC or 240 Chips\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI\\'m in for 4BTC\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI would be very hesitant to send this person any BTC based on his history on hardforums and elsewhere.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nInterested in chips for 10 BTC if using a trusted escrow (preferably John K. from the forum).\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nAnd what to do with those chips ? Can you make mining board ?? is there some plans how to make 1.5Ths ASIC machine with 500chips ??if you know how to, tell me and i am inn\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nragingazn628 - PM sent - do you have a running total update?\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nDon\\'t forget his heatware. his 88% eBay feedback escrow.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nnevermind\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nSorry guys I\\'ve been busy with RL stuff. Yes we can use an escrow. Yeah the heatware stuff was a misunderstanding. I didn\\'t scam anyone. And as for eBay I just said fuck it and neglected it ;/ - I definitely took my losses though. Lesson learned.Here\\'s the update:People who are interested:17 BTC - Me10 BTC - rttnpig - PM\\'d to see if interested in Chips1 BTC -Luckybit - PM\\'d to see if interested in Chips5 BTC - dmo580 - PM\\'d to see if interested in Chips2 BTC - dazzle - PM\\'d to see if interested in Chips3 BTC - rammy2k240 BTC - Rallye - PM\\'d to see if interested in Chips2 BTC - haaning - PM\\'d to see if interested in Chips10 BTC - GodFader 2BTC - goodney1 BTC - eghoff20 BTC - freeworm390 BTC - ryanfromrethink - PENDING3 BTC - qbits10 BTC - cubism4nerds39 BTC - strombom10 BTC - pcosias3 BTC - DPoS2 BTC - salt1.5 BTC - Todamont2 BTC - perseus1 BTC - sun20 BTC - alexuk3 BTC - Enigma8112 BTC - alexcamp20 BTC - Bicknellski4 BTC - BTC\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nI guess we would have to send our coins to you first so that you then can buy the chips once you have collected all 782.1 bitcoins.I\\'m not sure how an escrow could work here, could you give some details on that?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nI really have no idea I\\'ve never even used an escrow before. I\\'m just trying to give wh\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs CHIPS, assembled chip, single or double-chip USB miners, PCBs, soldering iron, 1.5Ths ASIC machine, mining board\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-04-20 08:38:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-04\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as Escrow! 600+ / 780 BTC pledged!\\n### Original post:\\nI will be retracting my interest as well. I wish you all the best!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI have received the email from OP and I\\'ll verify it when I get home. I\\'m on mobile currently. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m interested. Put me down for 480 chips (37.44 BTC).Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nadded\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhen do you anticipate having the address in place with John K?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThe escrow address is given above in the signed contract.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m interested but who is going to build these PCBs? Are you expecting everyone is going to DIY? This is not a simple matter. Soldering down 200+ chips is very tricky, chances are people are going to damage a significant # w/out the right reflow equipment.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nFor a price you can probably find somebody who will will take your PCB and chips and do all of the reflow work for you. Worth it for large batch jobs and tons of chips. Even for a single QNF8, the soldering would be a pain. There are some of us who have some experience with PCB design. I myself have quite a bit, but not too sure where to start with these ASIC chips at the moment. Has Avalon released documentation for them yet?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nBest I can tell not yet\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nDocumentation is what I\\'m waiting for. I\\'m not going to invest in a set of chips that I may not have the hardware or steady hands to build. I always start with an initial design and a simple BOM before I even bother dropping the money. I know the guys over at the DIY ASIC Build thread have come up with some concepts, but considering nobody really knows anything about these Avalon chips yet it is probably mostly educated guesses, which I\\'m fine with. I\\'ll have to read more and see if any of them found anything. But I will have to see if I can find a place to do batch jobs with a reflow oven. I just want my own, damnit.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAt work (where I am an EE doing PCB design), I or my assembly ladies routinely solder down QFN-28 + thermal pad packages (careful use of a hot air gun). With my current order (12 chips), if I plan on making the PCB myself, for myself, I\\'ll probably go this route. If I find that there\\'s interest in my board on this forum (as I\\'ll also be doing microcontroller firmware and PC interface also), then I\\'ll probably open up a service where I do a batch assembly order (for BTC!). I would imagine theres a bazillion others on this forum planning on doing the same thing though. So it might end up that I just use their services.Once Avalon releases the necessary information (essentially an app datasheet for the Avalon processor), I\\'ll likely be developing applications for single chips (\"just plug it in to USB and go\"), 4 chips, and 10 or 12 chips (depending on data bandwidth scalability of common 32-bit processors). Again, I would imagine many people on this forum are planning the same. Lotta bright people round these parts.But for now, we\\'re all just salivating over the idea of the Avalon processor app note/datasheet.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIf you do that, I\\'d be interested because any amount of simplification in building the system will make it worthwhile in the long run. Once I get those datasheets I\\'m going to designing throughout the night!samurai, do you primarily use Altium or Eagle? I\\'m fond of Eagle, but I\\'m getting into Altium as I like a lot of it\\'s routing features. Eagle to me was like fighting with..well..an Eagle. Haha.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI \"grew up\" on OrCAD 10 through 15, which had tons of bugs and quirks but was powerful once you knew how to work around them. For the past 2 years I\\'ve been using Eagle at work and home. I have not had the chance to use Altium, PADS, Pulsonix or others. Altium seems to be the de facto standard these days, but seats are SO EXPENSIVE.I\\'ve gotten used to hand-routing everything anyway (used to do a lot of analog design), so Eagle is fine for me. Luckily I haven\\'t had to do too much lines, and what I have had to do I\\'ve just calculated/routed by hand.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThat\\'s nice. I wish I had used Altium for my RF projects. I always ruined the trace width in Eagle, since I couldn\\'t group a set of traces to change the width on the final product at the end of the day would have different traces and impedances per line. It was awful. I like OrCAD, but I think it has terrible part integration. I can deal with Eagle more than I can OrCAD, which I just use for simulation.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI do all my work in gEDA - gschem and pcb.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSo we send to John? Or to you OP? Little confused here.Bicknellski20 BTC with fees the total is 20.5 BTC.The total chips is 256.410256410256 or 256 chips in total rounded down to nearest whole number.I agree with the terms and the escrow. We will also need to provide via email our shipping preferences to us and our address or are you going to use only 1 shipping agent OP?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI confirm I have received the follo\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs CHIPS, PCBs, QNF8, QFN-28, microcontroller, PC interface, USB, Altium, Eagle, OrCAD, gEDA - gschem and pcb\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, False, False, False, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 04:55:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-04\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as Escrow! Pledge reached!!\\n### Original post:\\nConfirmed.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLooks like I\\'m landing with a remainder of .64 chips. Should I round my amount down to match? In retrospect this would have been much easier pledging for chips instead of BTC.Let me know ASAP. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYes, rounding down would work .\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI made a mistake. The avalon shipping is divided by 60 people not 65. I looked at the row numbers but forgot we deleted some people.The formula:(# of BTC Pledged)*(JohnK\\'s Fees)*(OP\\'s Fees) + (2.1 |Avalon\\'s Shipping| divided by 60 total people)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPlease post and confirm here- I might be offline so I cannot confirm each payment manually. Thanks guys.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI have sent out PM\\'s to everyone on the spreadsheet. PLEASE LET ME KNOW ASAP IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE A PM!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n---26.4185 coins sent to tx ID by: Bitcoin-QT v0.8.1-beta\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1txid contains my contribution of 1.0744 BTC to Avalon ASIC Group Buy #1.-----BEGIN PGP GnuPG v2.0.19 PGP SIGNATURE-----To validate:Code:gpg --recv-key 0x92c7689c && wget -O - | gpg --verify\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n2.4335 sent! Confirmation link\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n2.1137 sent!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n5.2854 BTC sent:\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nbe sure to send the amount under:BTC Needed to Send to JohnK: (UPDATED!)BTC Needed to Send to JohnK: (UPDATED!)BTC Needed to Send to JohnK: (UPDATED!)not pledged JohnK will update and confirm when he wakes up!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n2.5975 btc sent from address id to add:\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSent 20.5350Hash: \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1Sent 5.6315 btcTX link: PGP GnuPG v1.4.10 PGP SIGNATURE-----\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n5.1BTC sent\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThat was my entire stash of bitcoins... Guess it\\'s time to crank up the old GPU again, hehehe.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nWhat do you want in the signed message? I\\'ll be paying tonight when I get home to my wallet.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n1.06 BTC sent. sure why blockchain wallet sends the remainder of that address to itself. is that a bitcoin thing or a blockchain thing?)\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSent payment. PM\\'d Johnk and ragingazn628.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nBitcoin thing. Outputs = Inputs - Change. Change has to go somewhere.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nSent payment.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI just sent in the rest of my BTC, which I calculated to be 0.3392 BTC for the me know if this was not the right amount.As with last time, I signed the transactions as ID: \\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nPS: I\\'ll manually confirm the payments too when I\\'m back - gonna go out atm. Please send the complete amount in a TX if possible - it\\'s easier to link the payments this way.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThanks for the hard work John, I\\'m sending you a tip as I write this.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA11.0744 btc sent for purchase of 13 Avalon ASIC chips04/22/2013 21:30 EST you! PGP GnuPG v1.4.2 PGP SIGNATURE-----\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\n 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 7 nodesDate: 4/22/2013 19:40To: Avalon Chip Escrow -3.233 BTCTransaction fee: -0.0005 BTCNet amount: -3.2335 BTCTransaction ID: Sent.Thank You!\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nI sent payment (a whole 1.06 coins!):\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\n5.16 BTC sent.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\n14.385 BTC sent to escrow. Thank you, and good luck to all of us.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nhad to email reset my pw on mt gox (out of town) and now they say \\'you recently reset your password, wait to make this transaction\\' or something like thatanyone know how long my account will be in this mode?cant send any bitcoins to anyone.. what a joke\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nIt should be around 24 hours.Everyone, just post your confirmations here(or PM me or ragingazn if you cannot post here) after paying. I\\'m on my phone so I\\'ll confirm manually later.\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\n ---> BTCApril 22, 2013, 9:05 p.m.- 4.135Send to \\n\\n### Reply 33:\\n10.285 SentStatus: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 12 nodesDate: 4/22/2013 18:40To: John K - ASIC Group Buy -10.285 BTCNet amount: -10.285 BTCTransaction ID: PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nvolosator sent 1.75 to my address accidentally.I just sent to escrow\\'s wallet:Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 3 nodesDate: 4/22/2013 21:54To: -1.75 BTCNet amount: -1.75 BTCTransaction ID: confirm.\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nHi, (20 chips @ --> Note: I rounded down from 25.64 to 20 chips. Apologies if this creates difficulties!\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\n5.16 BTC sent\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\ntransaction ID is: have sent 25.6190BTC320 chips.\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\n5.16 BTC sent from C\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 16:49:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-04\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as Escrow! 680/780 BTC PLEDGED!\\n### Original post:\\nWe now have an opening for more BTC contribution to the pool. Someone bailed out. Please only contribute if you are fully committed so you don\\'t waste anyone\\'s time.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI am in!!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow much is the payment now? and how chip?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\npayment sent from freewormNet amount: -20.535 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHow much chips would you like/BTC to spend?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWill update this later as blockchain.info is down. The address is a cold wallet address and I can only check its balance via blockchain.info.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\njohn k,Firstly sorry for not fully understanding whats going on here!! the thread is massive just trying to catch up!!Everyone\\'s chipping in for 10,000 chips yea!! now i know your fully trustedso if i put 10btc in 10 weeks i get how many chips ? plus where they getting shipped from? cheers\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n10BTC (actual amount 10.285) gets you around 128.205128205128 chips. Shipping from USA after the whole batch arrives with the operator. Check the spreadsheet to see what amounts you\\'re getting realistically. ( Note that some extra will have to be paid for the postage from operator -> your place.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n10BTC will get you about ~128 chips a lil more\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nConfirmed thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nTo: -20.998851 BTCNet amount: -20.999351 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\ncount me out of this one, already bought me some FPGA, i was thinking i posted already that im out\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nYour amount is 24.1225 not 20.999351 BTC?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nDeleted.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n./bitcoind sendtoaddress \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nyes understood, more btc on the way - just not sure how fast yet\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nAh, okay. Just confirm by posting here after your amount is in(include this tx too).\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nQuick Announcement.If you guys are wondering where those fractions of chips are going then if there are less chips than contributors just do a fun raffle to see who will get more chip? If it adds up to ~30 chips we can put usernames in and top 30 people will get an extra chip! I think it would be fun!Or you can do your own math and add the additional BTC to round your chip count to the next chip number.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI really want too but i think ill end up with a load of chips and no clue how to get them hashing. unless john k willing to make my rig for a fee of coarse and then sends it to me. ill be intrested other than that ill wait for my 120g/h from blf if that ever comes!!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nPlease add me for 1.25 btc. I am sure you will be missing some of your pledges from people who cannot commit the funds.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nJohn, is it too late to round of my order to 300 with addition of 44chips (256+44) = 3.793btc?Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nRounded left overs should be offered to those who have already paid or pledged. No need to complicate things with the raffle. Then if not picked up by anyone you can take those on the wait list.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nthen where will the BTC from waitlist go... lolIt\\'s not complicated at all just add up the fractions at the end and do a quick random\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI pledge 20.28 BTC for 260 chips. Are new people supposed to send the coins right away?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nYes. Everyone should be sending coins to escrow\\'s address! SEND! This will make the pre-order much faster and more organized! Send so we can confirm you!\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nUpdated this, although your calculation is wrong. Please send the amount I PM\\'ed you. (or check the spreadsheet).\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nThank you! 20.822 BTC sent to in tx \\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nConfirmed.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs CHIPS, FPGA\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-04-24 15:02:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-04\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as Escrow! 745.094/780 BTC PLEDGED!\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ve sent 20.83225, should be for 260 chips I think. John, please \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed - you actually overpaid 0.01025 for 260 chips. The amount will be placed forward for your shipping fees (from OP to you).Thanks.We\\'re at 779.374 now! I will be PM\\'ing those who hasn\\'t done their payments yet as they\\'re in line to get rejected from the queue.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI might be removing those who pledged but failed to respond when new payments are in. The only way to secure your place here is to pay. Those that contacted me with promises to pay before the end of this week will be the last on the list to go, though.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJohn - I paid 20.9 out of 24.1, I may not have the difference in time, so if you need to sell of those 3.x btc of chips before I pay to get the total btc - please do - Thanks atcsecure\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCan you drop me the tx again for the 20.9 payment? If you can settle the balance within 1 week, the 3.x btc of chips may still be allocated to you. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nConfirmed via PM, thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAdded\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAa we are now in striking distance can we get an ETA on the order coming up on the blockchain as processed by Avalon? Thanks guys! This is an excellent initiative for distributed design and hash power safety!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAs soon as the escrow address hits the needed amount of funds I will be sending this order in to Avalon. (provided OP provides me with his address and details in time too, of course)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs CHIPS\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-04-23 23:56:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-04\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as Escrow! 714.4/780 BTC PLEDGED!\\n### Original post:\\n3.485 BTC sent for additional 44chips. total 300 you.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nConfirmed and deleted.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWill update later as I\\'m on tablet now,thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCome on guys, lets get this order out the door. Time is money John. I am interested in having my order shipped directly to Burnin for assembly, save some time in process. I\\'ll pay for any additional shipping costs. If this is doable, can we setup some kind of confirmation method between the involved parties, similar to what they do on zefirs group buy?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n1.25 BTC Sent!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m sorry, i can\\'t pay until sometime tomorrow (if i\\'m lucky, tonight), as i\\'m on my laptop, and not anywhere near my desktop atm.Will send as soon as i\\'m home\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nragingazn628 please start/continue PMming people who haven\\'t paid or gauging interest in replacing spots with other parties... aka earn the 1% fee and get this order in! I know there\\'s interest as zefir continues to get payments on his thread.I\\'d switch this to a first-pledged, first-served group buy. Calculate how many chips remain in the spreadsheet and edit the OP to say we\\'ve still got some availability. 24 hours in and not half of the funds have been collected... Waiting for non-payers hurts everyone. Avalon has sold at least 500,000 chips at this point in time ( and the longer till the order is placed the further back in the production queue we go.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI am interested in this as well. Do we know if Avalon would perhaps ship in two lots (one to Burnin and one to ragingazn628)? If this would cost extra for shipping I am willing to contribute to a secondary pool for those interested.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI have been doing that. Me and JohnK both. I\\'m not just sitting around and hoping people would pay. If you pledged and haven\\'t paid yet then you need to.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI am also interested in shipping the chips to burnin. His post says he\\'s working with you ragingazn628.Once we get the order in, let us know how to coordinate shipping to burnin for creating the PCB boards.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIf you get all the pledges and must return my 1.25 BTC, please request a return address here. Thanks!Will you know by today if you are able to accept the above Tx?Thanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI am sorry, given the number of chips that have already been sold (around 500\\'000) i no longer believe this investment is worth it for me. Therefore I am retracting my offer. Best of luck to you all!Sorry for the \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI would like more info on this as well, after the order is placed.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThe procedure will likely be the same as zefir\\'s group buy: you sign a message to burnin stating that he is to receive your chips.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAre there any other options besides using Burnin\\'s service at the moment? Sending the chips to Hamburg and then waiting in line behind all the other PCB assembly orders seems like it could take weeks if not longer. Ragingazn, you had mentioned working on your own PCB project. Any news on that?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nyes, is there an alternative?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nLet\\'s not get ahead of ourselves guys. Let\\'s get this thing pre-ordered first.Once everything is shipped to me you can decide on whether you want the chips to be shipped to you directly or to Burnin. If you want it to be shipped to Burnin you have to sign his contract or what not.Keep in mind that I am also gathering members to form a team that will develop ASIC miners with these chips as well. We are currently following the DIY thread closely. It\\'s a bunch of local engineers that I\\'ve been contacting. But like I said that\\'s all in the near future. We have about 2-3 months before we actually get the chips but I am gathering info and talking to people now. Let\\'s get all the BTC sent to escrow\\'s address and then we can discuss about the shipment and what you plan to do with the chips.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI hope you realize that zefir\\'s group is now on their 4th batch, right ? So, even if you are able to make this batch order before zefir\\'s 4th, there are still 3 orders of chips before yours reaching burnin (divide that by whatever percent you want, but I would think it would be very close to 90% than 50%).\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSeconded. Although burnin looks to be shipping 500 boards a week (5000 chips); so he\\'ll probably move them pretty quickly; especially if the chips can make it directly to him from those of us who would like him to assemble the boards. There\\'s us and zefir so the total number of chips shipped to burnin probably won\\'t go over 10,000 (assuming even half of both orders ship to burnin). I\\'m expecting about 3-4 weeks turn around (total) after the shipment is paid for arrived. Seems quicker than waiting in line for a BFL.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAhh. I was not aware.That changes things a little.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThe thread title says there are\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs CHIPS, tablet, laptop, desktop, PCB boards, ASIC miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-04-25 17:23:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-04\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC chips, destination Philippines\\n### Original post:\\nIs the fourth letter of your first name the same as the fourth letter of the first name of your wife?The answer will determine if your evidence checks out as legit or not.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThis is hilarious manROLF\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou can\\'t be too careful. These are the bitcoin forums after all.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes it is. Thus my forum name. Where have I seen you before? PM me please. If I am who you think I am, then you can vouch for me.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust a sec.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFunny you talk about the elections, jsut saw that episode of Vice on hbo. that thighlighted the violence in the Philippines during elections Crazy stuff over there, anyway good luck with the offering.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI think greyhawk\\'s Google-Fu worked out again.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWell. This guy\\'s story checks out OK. If he were faking it he would have to have started it 2 years before bitcoin even existed.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYeah, I realized I got google\\'d. hahaha.. ok well, then, for the future con artists, be sure to start your scams 5 years ago.For reference, I asked one of the other thread group buyers if I could just copy his style, and he said everything is ok.For full disclosure, I have an account on localbitcoins with the same nick, but only 2 ratings. I reserved my nick on irc #bitcoin-otc, with no ratings, but GPG authenticated and bitcoin address authenticated. It doesn\\'t mean much, I just made those this year. But, I am heavily relying on the fact that I\\'m a real person. (I don\\'t know how you define real or fake, but whatever.)I live in one city, I work in another (a half hour drive), ... and I like bitcoins. I also bought all I could buy from the first group buy.When the other two group buys are over, I\\'m hoping some other people will come here. But I am also hoping to see a lot of local buyers as well. I may extend the deadline depending on what the other buyers feel, I just want to facilitate this. There are filipinos in other forums that have been mining since CPU and GPU days, so here\\'s my opportunity to help them get in on the ASICs.And I am hoping someone will find a local electrical\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYou are completely crazy if you \"hope\" to find a local electrical engineer to do the assembly. This is no easy task: ask to BFL, bASIC or also Avalon. Just check their machine, what they did to the TP-LINK router, they had to tweak it for it to work as desired, and that means TIME for TESTING.And you know in this game TIME is everything. If you took the time to speak with an electronic engineer without posting your crazy offer, you would know that he needs to know very well BTC mining. Otherwise, when the units won\\'t work, he won\\'t know WHY.Thus, if you don\\'t have an electrical engineer with deep experience in mining BTC with FPGA\\'s leading your project, you will also make your \"group\" to incur in heavy losses, as you won\\'t be able to have working units for MONTHS. Again: ask to BFL.Yeah, you can count that the documentation from Avalon will be PERFECT, that you will be able to easily replicate their machine with that documentation, finding all the components (among which a modified TP-LINK router that is only distributed in China) very fast... But you would be dreaming.Some of you guys are completely crazy, buying +$100,000 worth of chips in order to replicate a machine you don\\'t \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI think the warning signs all over the place are pretty clear. We\\'re hoping the open source DIY folks can come up with something. But pinoys love to gamble. Especially the wealthy ones.So in case you missed it. WARNING! THIS IS RISKY. With that said, go ahead and order if you want a chip.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\ni\\'m pinoy and kinda interested.. will let you know..tnx\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC chips, TP-LINK router\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-04-27 06:11:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-04\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! Opened! Almost there!\\n### Original post:\\nUpped, thanks for the continue sending the BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSweet! Less QQ more pew pew! Lets get this order in guys! Send them bitcoins! Woot! A little update about Neo Asics Our lead developer said that he can put together an Asics machine for the chips easily even without Avalon releasing their schematics. We\\'re researching the necessary parts now another step forward!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhat does this even mean ? Also why do you mention \"Please do not make me regret this decision!\" - what is there to regret ? Either we get full before Ataxx, or Ataxx comes in and fills the rest. Please clarify.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nReally ?! I would love to know how.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWell, we\\'re on the right track again anyway. Hopefully we get this done and settled by Sunday.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'m going with the crowd. Ataxx is seems like a really powerful friend to have. He is buying 206 btc with cash just like that. He owns and operates city.com and has a lot of influence and friends in high places. Seems like a very resourceful and trustworthy guy. I meant that by opening and letting more btc fill up he will be able to buy less so I hope he\\'s not too mad about that. Because originally he wanted in for at least 100 btc.All operations a go! Lets get on the train again! Choo Choo!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHow long have you known Ataxx? I hate to point out that he was just in newbie jail a few days ago.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nTrue but he\\'s provided me with sufficient proof for me to trust him. But anyway you guys are right first come first serve. Sorry about the confusion. Have a good night everyone!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCan anybody tell me what the amount should be for 100 chips with fees and everything? I can\\'t make sense of the spreadsheet. I\\'ve sent a couple of messages to the OP, but I\\'m sure he\\'s swamped right now.I just sent my 6.83077137BTC from address just to ensure I don\\'t get kicked out again, or miss the boat if somebody comes in and closes the buy early by making a large payment...I will submit the balance if/when the seller I just bought another 2 BTC comes through with his end of the bargain.As far as signing my account, do I just need to copy and paste the text of the contract into the message, or what?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nRagingazn, glad to hear you\\'re still here and on board.As far as I can tell, simply posting the link to your transaction on blockchain.info is sufficient.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAdded. The chip calculator says you need 8.03BTC in total, so you\\'re needing 1.19922863BTC more.Signing is not mandatory unless there\\'s conflicts where someone else claims your balance or the balance stays unclaimed for too long.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nGot it. Will forward the balance as soon as it arrives, provided I haven\\'t missed the boat. In the meantime, here\\'s the blockchain link for my payment: \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n84.3535131900003 BTC to go - get this done guys!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAlright everyone we raised 115 BTC in the last 24 hours! 85 BTC to close this out should be a piece of cake!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAgreed.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI want to buy 1 BTC worth. What is the procedure? Should I simply edit the sheet and then send to the address? Or do I pm JohnK? Also, in case I need it shipped outside US, when will the shipping cost be figured out and paid?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nSend the coin, post the TX ID. Only me and OP can edit the sheet. I will add you in the sheet. OP will ask for your address when the order is in, and figure out the costs later.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nCan I assume that these will be shipped to us in the order payment was received?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI would assume all goes out at once as the chips are small. (7mmx7mm each according to someone)The post delays are of course out of hand.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThanks for the reply. So I am sending 1BTC that will be counted for chips only?Yours plus OP\\'s fees plus shipping would be figured out later? Or should I send 1.0744 to book 13 chips and that would be counted as having paid off fees, only shipping to be figured out later?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nDone -confirmed.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nPer the original post, the latter. What will probably happen is this: Your total will be truncated at the chip and the remainder will be used for shipping. This will leave us with a few unpurchased chips that were originally covered by this shipping balance, but that will be very easy to organize at the time.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSend 1.0744 - the 2.5% and OP shipping fees (from avalon to him) is included. Only the shipping fee from him to you is not counted yet.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nNope, everyone will need to pay more for the shipping later on - the amount is not taken from the current balance unless stated when sending. (like the overpayments.)\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nAs a stake holder with a few BTC in I\\'d simply like everyone to listen to the escrow provider.1. Refuckinglax take deep breath and stay the course.2. First come first serve.3. Ragi\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs CHIPS, Neo Asics, Ataxx\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-03 05:12:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC chips, Philippines (Dabs) Asia\\n### Original post:\\nWell, it seems the following are working on making or assembling miners:allten, in United Statesburnin, in GermanyBkkCoins, in in Indonesiaflyonwall, in the Philippines (has personally ordered a significant number of chips from another group buy)All seem trustworthy, as they are gathering orders from a lot of people. I can ship your chips to any of them with your choice of couriers.The lead time is the same for all chip orders from Avalon, but I believe shipping from China to the Philippines (because of distance) will be fastest, then from here to any of the developers above I can ship quickly. Then from them to you the final miner.You can get the chips directly though, if you want to do all the DIY assembly yourself.I think allten won\\'t be doing actual orders, but rather he is doing research and development.If there are other developers that I\\'ve missed, kindly let me know.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUpdate May 01, 2013Updated list of local pick up locations to 19.If you are in the Philippines, I have at least 19 pick up locations all over Metro Manila where you can get your chips (meaning no shipping, just pick it up.)1. Glorietta 32. SM Bicutan3. SM Manila4. SM Mega Mall5. SM Fairview6. SM Mall of Asia7. SM Cubao8. SM North EDSA9. Festival Supermall10. Rockwell Manansala11. Ayala Trinoma12. SM Calamba13. Molito Mall Puregold (near Alabang Town Center)14. Metro Gaisano Mall (near Alabang Town Center)15. SM Center Pasig16. SM Makati Annex17. The Podium18. Hotel InterContinental Manila19. Robinsons Place Manila\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI will be working with BKK and assembly still uncertain yet in Indonesia... but definitely looking to supply Indonesian market with ASICs once we know thatthe board BKK is planning is viable. I will be announcing something for sales ONLY after I have functioning products in hand (AKA my own farm which has to be up and running first). No pre-sales at all, it would only be off the shelf only while stocks last sort of thing. We will do small runs and make the miners available. Those looking at chips... I am not 100% sure yet what I will be able to do for them as I am checking out fabrication houses and even checking around for some PCB designers that can oversee this as piece work for the board assembly of the miners in Jakarta. This for me very much up in the air. First need to marry my 540 chips to boards first then I will be able to gauge from there.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPeople have been sending me PMs, but seem to be hesistant. Let\\'s get this started and going.I will update the order status on a new post as they come in (if I am awake and online.)Please don\\'t forget to sign your order with your bitcoin address, and the tx id would also be helpful but not needed. Your shipping address at this point is optional. I\\'ll need that later when we\\'ve reached the minimum threshold and waiting for the chips.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsent pm. from PH here.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nA\\'right, let\\'s kick this off:Code:Newar; 240; 20.64; like what I see from the Klondike project so far and will probably go that route.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n is a list of currently discussed ASIC bitcoin mining hardware. You can subscribe to our newsletter to get ASIC news straight to your inbox. To add a product or report changes please send an email.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOrder Status (Confirmed Orders)Code:ID Chips BTC Address Note01 240 20.64 9760Avalon has also sent an email update:\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nEstimated shipping for approximately up to ~200 chips (or about 1 kilogram mass/weight):From Philippines to Any of The Pick Up Locations: BTC 0.001 (Basically Free)From Philippines to Anywhere Else in the Philippines: BTC 0.06 (Luzon, Visayas, Mindanao)From Philippines to Singapore: BTC 0.18From Philippines to Thailand: BTC 0.23From Philippines to Malaysia: BTC 0.23From Philippines to Indonesia: BTC 0.23From Philippines to Australia: BTC 0.30From Philippines to Canada: BTC 0.31From Philippines to United States: BTC 0.31From Philippines to Germany: BTC 0.49These are estimates only. Actual prices are subject to change. Especially of the value of the coin goes up against fiat.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAs part of the order, I will be getting some sample chips. These bonus sample chips will be distributed to everyone in the Group Buy proportionally (as much as possible) and you can also \"donate\" them to any other person or developer of your choice; I can send them to anyone who can work on them.It is also possible that I get enough orders such that I get some \"extra\" chips. These extra chips will come from my share and be distributed to everyone in the Group Buy, so it\\'s possible that you get a little bit more than what you paid for, but this is no guarantee, just a good possibility. At the very least, I\\'ll add a token one or two chips on top of your order.So order away, your coins aren\\'t doubling anymore. The faster we reach the threshol\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC chips, ASICs, PCB designers, sample chips\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-11 13:42:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 2 Status: 183 ASICs gone\\n### Original post:\\nDammit! At least I got a little bit into batch 1, hopefully batch 2 doesn\\'t end up too far behind batch 1\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-11 13:57:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 2 Status: 214 ASICs gone\\n### Original post:\\nThe buyer of 27 chips in batch 1 and 13 in batch 2 is asking if someone wants to take his 7 chips so he has only 20 now anymore.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI created a new Sendingaddress for batch 2 at so that its easier to see how many bitcoins are collected for batch 2 already. I will reroute the transactions that go to the old address to the new address.The new address is in a new wallet, that exists only for the group buy. So this wallet only has to be opened again when the batch 2 has to be bought.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-12 13:53:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 1 Status: 8702 ASICs gone\\n### Original post:\\nThe first batch is ordered. There should be some chips left in first batch, i have to calculate the table first, but the second batch comes instantly after the first... Code: Order: #10261 Date: May 11, 2013 Total: 782.10 Payment method: Bitcoin PaymentCode:#10261 May 11, 2013 On-hold 782.10 for 1 item It changed now to Code:#10261 May 11, 2013 Processing 782.10 for 1 item For the full end-list of orders of the first batch please check the first post in thread.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-15 16:09:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 2: 2582 ASICs gone 12582 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI have made a thing for trying to get an asic mining computer by only mining with my laptop.Now its not like i am making hand over fist with BTC\\'s here so I have to ask. What can i do with a chip or two?I do not have the knowledge to design a circuit board myself but I believe i can pull it off if someone gives me blueprints and an inventory list.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCheck out my signature. There is a link showing all the board developers i know yet. Klondike for example will give out a free design and burnin too. It might be that they will wait with that until they made some money.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThank you for the fast reply. The K1 Nano looks perfect for what i had in mind but i just cant make heads or tails out of his documentation so far. Perhaps ill be in touch with some bitcoin fragments.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThe documentation isnt fully ready yet because no chips are there to test it.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, asic mining computer, K1 Nano\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-15 21:29:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 2: 3499 ASICs gone 13499 sold\\n### Original post:\\nSince some are using armory and armories verification system isnt compatible with the official verification system, i now installed an armory offline wallet to be able to verify such signatures. Who used armory to send BTC and isnt verified yet can now send me an armory signature and i can verify it.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: armory offline wallet\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-17 08:40:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 2: 4451 ASICs gone 14451 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI am in batch one and was wondering if I have a need to buy more chips around the time they ship will there be any up for grabs, like from people who did not verify, etc?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIm not sure if i understand you correct but there arent chips from batch 1 available...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-19 10:46:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 3: 838 ASICs gone 20838 sold\\n### Original post:\\nlove it the ordering is going at good speed .. could be the mod is more attentive and alert compares to other ordering thread\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n7 days to fill a batch, nice\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIm getting alarms for new payments (a soundfile gets played on my notebook), have an excelsheet that creates me the header and statustext in first mail automatically, in english and german and the tables are created automatically in bbcode too... so i only need to copy it... in case one is wondering how i can be so fast with a new table sometimes... It were 8 days when you include the half day after the first batch was full. First batch took 10 days.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, notebook\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-14 01:09:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 0.079 - Avalon Chips - Escrow by John K. (Europe / RO) + PCB\\n### Original post:\\nPrice changed: 0.079 BTC for one chip! --> I\\'m not asking anything for the efforts. Period. Just let\\'s fill this batch so i can get started testing the Dev boards with the sample chips that we get by ordering a full batch!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m In32 chips + 1(2) klondike board(s).Skrubalov; 32; 2.844; chips for you\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYeah, i wanted to ask what\\'s with that overpayment Thank you Sir!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi,is there any possibility to pick up the chips in cluj?I have a couple of friends there and i could go meet them and pick up when they are ready...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOf course, let me know and we grab a beer\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThis is what I\\'m interested in. Let me know what your price ends up at!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'ll be taking 720 chips within the day. I have to run out for a family event now.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nhaha enjoy.)..still waiting for enough demand, once it comes, I\\'ll definitely place an order.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI am also interested in this, as well as any DIY efforts, vs buying from companies. Have an order in with Zefir, looking at more options to spread the hash around, keep us updated!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI just had a discussion with someone involved in the Media. I really hope to get the batch done in due time (latest the end of May). I don\\'t want to push anybody, but it\\'s in our best interest to order as many chips as possible. ...Yes, i will order chips for myself, from my own pocket. Next week we\\'ll have some more orders from people i talked with personally (work colleagues). Still waiting for a quotation from the factory to build a single Lancelot device. I\\'ll have a video when (if) that\\'s done.My best regards to all\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'ll order 560-800 chips by the next week (I and few friends of mine)\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n----> E-mail sent!!!The whole Avalon documentation was sent to the manufacturer to get quotes! We will have *rough / approximate* production prices very shortly. I do hope monday, however that\\'s not really possible..Thank you, Avalon team!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'m In 800 chips.Sensei; 800; 63.2; \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'m in with 20 chips!madxista; 20; 1.58; \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nIs there a group buy for the asian market?If not I will take 250 chips in this group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nCheck DABS he is doing ASIAN group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nGreat!Thanks alot!!!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHi madxista,I see the payment, but the address is not the one provided by you. I hope you didn\\'t send the payment from some exchange or something.Steve\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nHey t13hydra,I\\'m very interested on some chips and one ore two boards...How many chips are left now before the 10.000 are complete?How long did you expect will it take before we get the chips after the order is done?Thank you very much, I will have some more questions... but for now it\\'s all.P.S. If you need help for the website you mentioned earlier, I can give some help because I\\'m working as webdeveloper at daytime. Maybe some webspace or a domain could maybe helpful?Best regardsRonny\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nHi Ronny,1. About 8000 chips left, look at the cuurent orders section up in the initial thread.2. The factory\\'s lead time will be 10 weeks after we make the order.About the site, i\\'ve had a discussion with a friend of mine. However, we may need help with integrating some advanced features. I\\'ll remember you and will let you know if we need help.Thank you!Best\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThanks for your fast answer.8000 left, thats a lot. OK I will rethink how much I can afford.Contact me for your website project whenever you want.BestRonny\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\n32 more for meskrubalov; 32; 2.528; \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nIt looks like BitcoinQt generated Change address and sent 1.58 btc from new address I see you already listed my order with this address. I can sign messages with new address so there should be no problem.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nDone, list updatedThanks\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\ncurrently i am out of this group, having bought from another group buy\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI\\'m in, sent payment for chips and another for escrow fee.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nhello,i\\'m in with 500 chips. private message sent.regards\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nWill you ship to Tn, Usa. Im interested if I can be aloud to order 1 or 2 chips. Im mining a ~23khs and would love to get a better miner\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\ni3lome first I just want to make sure you know we are talking about mining Bitcoin not Litecoin (hopefully you meant 23MH/s, unless you are mining on an embedded platform/SoC like a Raspberry Pi). I personally don\\'t think it would be a good idea to order any less than 16 chips, and at 0.079 these would be crazy inexpensive. If you would like some help or to team up for a buy, I\\'m in the Washington D.C. area. I would like to personally buy 42 chips (it\\'s a compulsion brought on by Douglas Adams/\"The Hitchhiker\\'s Guide to the Galaxy\" but I\\'ve found whenever I order products in quantities of 42 it al\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chips, klondike board, Lancelot device, Raspberry Pi\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-20 10:16:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 2: 7580 ASICs gone 17580 sold\\n### Original post:\\nID : Chip : Payment send for 78.427 chip Please acknowledge.BTC: 6.74475777Address: - Forum User Name : dan99Kindly please acknowledge and confirm. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n.427? You want thel to cut a chip in half?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nfor shipping etc...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWe have the second batch ordered... i will post the table soon:Code:Order Date Status Total #10281 May 18, 2013 On-hold 782.10 for 1 item\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI confirm the payment received...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhat does the \"On-hold\" status exactly mean in this case?And is this order still \"On-hold\"?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYes, the order is still on hold. Its strange because the first batch went to processing in minutes. Im not sure what on-hold means now. Maybe they need to approve it only or it goes to processing when they order the chips at foundry? Anyway... the payment is through long time.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-22 23:26:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 3: 3384 ASICs gone 23384 sold\\n### Original post:\\nRegarding the sample chips. The actual status of distribution is:Batch 1 - 30 samples3 burnin3 flyonwall2 BKKCoins + 4 wished2 ryepdx2 allten2 evilscoop2 terrahash2 daemondazz2 innovina6 still open because the feedback of groupbuyers still missingBatch 2 - 30 samples3 burnin + 1 wished3 flyonwall3 BKKCoins2 ryepdx2 allten2 evilscoop2 terrahash2 daemondazz2 innovina5 still open because the feedback of groupbuyers still missing3 for use of entitled groupbuyersWhen more developers and assemblers are coming and describe what use their project will have for the community and one can see (not absolutely me) that they know what they are talking about (so they dont want a chip for free only), more can be entitled to get a chip. There were already some users in the thread that wrote they want one and one wrote me via pm. Only missing is a description in the thread.By the way... i will ask the devs if they will need so many chips anyway. Unnecessary many chips dont make sense... so some other dev/assembler can be happy...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWow, been digging around today to make sure I had some chips in hand when the PCBs came in and you already had us taken care of.Thank You! Two is good, more would be helpful, but beggars can\\'t be choosers.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYes, I want to second this - one of my colleagues has ordered from your batch 2 so I was following this thread to track the progress of his order and got a very nice suprise when I saw your sample distribution list. I hadn\\'t asked for any so wasn\\'t expecting any.THANK YOU!One question, you have 2 listed under both batch 1 and batch 2, is that 4 in total?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIts the current distribution divided per batch. Each batch gets 30 samples. So yes, it can be 4 in total... if not a big number of other devs come new to it that want a chip too and of course only if they are needed. Otherwise other devs will be happy... The chips are spread through the ones that create some value for the community and need chips for this.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, PCBs\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-22 18:48:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] CLOSED -0.081 - Avalon Chips - Escrow by John K. (Europe / RO) + PCB\\n### Original post:\\nAwesome! So when is the order being placed?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWaiting for order status update. Wish i\\'d bought more!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDamn! Missed the window. Any chance for another batch?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAwesome.Now lets get everything rolling.Looking forward!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCongratulation t13hydra, nice work.I\\'m excited to see what the other side of the pond comes up with.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDamn, will there be second batch?If someone wants to drop out, I will buy 32 chips.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYes, very soon, if not today!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nTO ALL: DOES EVERYBODY SEE HIS/HER ORDERS IN THE LIST? PLEASE REPLY IF YOU CANNOT SEE YOUR ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE SENT FUNDS. I\\'M DOUBLE CHECKING THE WHOLE LIST TO MAKE SURE NOBODY GETS LEFT OUT.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCouldnt see my order in the list. Send my BTC around the 760BTC mark.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI don\\'t see mine, sent it close to the closing window but should be inside\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nyes, same question here. hope it was already ordered / order will be placed today.)\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThis is going to be one of those hurry up and wait situations. Direct from the Avalon website and also on the first page of this thread...\"the lead time on the chips is 9 to 10 weeks.\"IMHO, that\\'s a conservative estimate. Still, entering the order a few days from now isnt going to change anything.The main factor is that this group buy closed fast - before the end of May. Major props all around!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'m currently sorting out the payments, making sure everything is ok, processing refunds and passing everything to John to do. Hopefully, i will finish in an hour and notify John to pay for the batch today.Regards\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'m gettin excited I recon we\\'ll be hashing away before even before my August 2012 BFL order arrives!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAwesome - guess this just caught me when I\\'m back. Just drop me a PM to confirm your address and stuff, and I\\'ll pop the order in ASAP after I get the key from the safe. The sorting can be done in the meantime as the amount of chips and total payment will not change anyway.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWhy do I image opening a 5\\' tall gun safe fully stocked along with gold, silver and a folder full of printed QR codes?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThat\\'s about it I guess. I\\'ve sent in the order and forwarded the order email to OP. Funds sent: everyone - now I just need the refund addresses etc at this point.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nPS: We\\'re #10317 The funds are forwarded by their systems to their holding address here: BTC in total!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWoo-hoo!! Commence the happy dance!!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWhat\\'s 10317?Also, this might be late to ask but will it be an issue with me getting the chips etc to Australia?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nHi, the 10317 is the order number Avalon gave us. There will be no issue in that, DHL is everywhere. Or FedEx.. or TNT.. Regards\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nwow... 100k $ on the way\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nOrder #10317 made on May 22, 2013. Order status: processing.From Avalon\\'s own system, processing means that they\\'ve confirmed the receipt of the coins, and the order is officially done.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nThank you all for your time, efforts and orders.For the sake of being fair, i will give up my orders for the two persons, who happened to order a bit late:CryptoMaster and Tigggger, both of you have got a place in this batch. i\\'ve give a long thought to this and i have decided that i will have my own chips anyway, with a later batch, eventually.Welcome aboard this batch. I\\'ll update the main post too, as soon as i get to my laptop.Best regards to all and see you in a few hours for the second batch! Got to go feed my son...\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nWhat a great move, respect for that!\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nRefunds and all fees paid out. to hope they ship out soon.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nThanks for the very kind gesture, but now I feel really bad taking your own personal chips given all the time and effort you\\'ve put into organising this.As we discussed in PM, when I ordered I checked the blockchain and the most recent posts saw it was about 200 short and thought I would buy in to get it over the line, I was trying to help and ended up making it worse.If you change your mind and want them back at any time no need to ask, just send the btc and they are yours again.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nPS: This is for the 2nd batch of group buy OP requested for. PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The escrow address for t13hydra\\'s Avalon Chip group buy is: state and agree to the conditions (if item is received damaged, item lost with tracking, customs fee etc) beforehand.If possible, GPG sign your agreement to prevent any discrepancies later on and please ship with tracking to prevent problems during delivery. GPG signing is not a requirement, and any verbal exchange in the form of private messages or posts on bitcointalk.org, or email is effective as a statement of condition.In addition to that, I confirm the rec\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chips, PCB, BFL\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-23 12:27:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 3: 7951 ASICs gone 27951 sold\\n### Original post:\\nGood news... AlertBox gave me a ping... and i could see that the status at avalon for batch 2 changed to Processing finally... I wonder what brought this change but good that it happened...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI would like to get at least 1 sample chip for my \\'test project\\'.I am waiting for 80 from the Batch#1 so this one chip will be good start for the beginning.With this chip I will try to make the first sample of my project and test if hash algorithm implemented on my processor works. The PCB will be 2 layer. The controller will be some Atmel\\'s AVR processor.If this work I will make my final project with 80 chips - there will be 10 chips per board and modular design, so more \\'sandwich layers\\' could be add If someone would like to have something like this (if it works of course) I could make it and also distribute documentation for other people.Thank you...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAre you planning on using AVR or AVR32?In my opinion: 125ns is too fast for normal AVR. [It\\'s only 2 instructions/second at 16Mhz and while I do think it\\'s possible, it\\'d have to be written in ASM].What\\'s your opinion on this subject?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCurrently I am thinking about some ATxmega processor.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFor the Caterpillar, I\\'m planning on using an Arduino level controller (haven\\'t decided if we\\'ll be using the Aruindo bootloader or not) and an external CPLD to handle the serial comms.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThat is why I wish to have this one sample to make some tests before the first Batch will come I have to check if my idea is good and if not I will change it and make some other.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGood job!Thank you, Sebastian.Now I can start counting \"9-10 weeks\"...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI really, really think that you should use something more powerful. There are plenty of arm developement boards that can be used. [Like the one I plan on using]While it can be done in 2 AVR cycles [hopefully], it\\'d be VERY hard to implement. Do you have enough experience in AVR ASM?Sorry, but based on your technical knowledge [who\\'d use 8-bit AVR for this task?] and lack of research [you didn\\'t look for datasheet], I\\'d assign lower priority to give you sample chips. [Just my opinion, no offence meant.]Sorry, didn\\'t read your post properly.You\\'re right, ATxmega will be sufficent for this task.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI have lot of experiences in electronics: creating, building, programming etc. so it is not a problem for me. I did not review the document you enclosed, I will do it later. Maybe you have right that 8bit is not so good idea... then I have to switch to 32bit, no problem Currently I am wondering, because I do not know yet, how e.g. cgminer communicates with some uC boards via USB. How it sends data and in what kind of format... do you know something about it?If you like we can switch to PM and not making a mess in this topic Edited:No problem\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nNot yet, but I don\\'t think it\\'s complicated. [As you didn\\'t review the document - uC<-->ASIC communication is also preety simple]I think that the biggest problem can be the interference on data/clock buses.Just hope that there will be enough chips for both of us. :-)Yes, let\\'s do the rest of the technical communication elsewhere once we start building our Mighty Minerz :-P\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSebastian has to decide if we deserved on them\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nFirst thing today, the third batch is bought and paid:Code:Order Date Status Total #10369 May 23, 2013 On-hold 782.10 for 1 item As far as i see in the table there are 602 chips in batch 3 open... i will post the table now, then answer pm\\'s and posts...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYou should. I made bad experiences ordering via EMS from China. Clearing customs is nightmare, because either you pay GdSk (Gesellschaft der Schnellkuriere) very much for doing it for you or you have to do it yourself. (I actually tried it but couldn\\'t complete the customs form in which question like \"Kennzeichen des Transportfahrzeugs\" were asked...)\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nBatch 3 has DHL as shipment... im not sure if i can change it for batch 1 and 2... ill try...In dev-list, in my sig, a dev came to it newly... marto74. Here in thread bcdev and szym00 claimed for a chip. Another in german thread, while that is unsure yet. He has to ask back first.So anyone has doubts to give bcdev and szym00 one or maybe 2 chips?I nearly forgot... batch 3 is \"Processing\" already...\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nnevermind, just sended my order\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, sample chip, PCB, Atmel\\'s AVR processor, ATxmega processor, Arduino level controller, external CPLD, arm development boards, uC boards\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False, False, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-23 06:20:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips, (Dabs) Philippines/Asia 668/9332\\n### Original post:\\nOrder Status (Confirmed Orders)Code:ID Chips BTC Address Note01 240 20.64 Confirmed02 128 11.01 Confirmed03 300 25.80 9332\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi Dabs, this is a bit complicated one sec... Have you found someone there that could marry the avalon chips to the Bkk Board? Interested in flying there and putting together an assemble team. Thoughts?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPersonally, I have not found one I know face to face. But if you read around, there is a lot of potential.You fly here and you can get your chips from me personally with free coffee at starbucks. And if you order half the batch, like I said earlier, I pick you up at the airport too. hehehe. (that\\'s 5000 chips.)For now, I\\'m only organizing the chip buy. The developers and assemblers will happen later. We have the specs already.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m just not sure what to do with the chips once i get em, if we could find someone there that for sure can put these together plus hire a few other guys to put them together, we could have a full on production team going \"i\\'m checking in mindanao btw\" I\\'m based in Australia but pinoy ako. We can do alot of business between Aus and Phils.Pretty sure we can get our own lil farms going in phils.I\\'ll be there soon, maybe Angeles to do alot more than mining.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGuys... There are certainly places right near you that can do this.SMT PHILIPPINES, INC.3 Mountain Drive, LIPS II, BGY La Mesa Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines. TEL: Tasu63-49-545-6191, Tasu63-49-545-6192, Fax: Tasu63-49-545-7809 These guys could do everything and they are just outside Manila. They can make the boards as well from BKKcoins design.In Aus should be able to find someone easily.Best bet is do the fab inside of your country and do it locally so you can avoid import duties and shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIt seems that we can not get this going, please send my investment back Dabs, so I can look for other group buys.Regards\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi yolo2222, are you sure? I prefer not to touch the deposit address because it is in a cold wallet. However, I will honor your request and send you back your BTC. Please let me know your final decision here or by private message (PM).I am going to run this Group Buy until at least the end of May 31, so if you can wait a few more days that would be appreciated.Dabs\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOkay, lets give it some more time Dabs.Regards\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nbump.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAs sad as it makes me,I have to withdraw from the group buy in order to make other investments.If we get more people in I will consider reinvesting.Sorry Dabs.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPlease confirm that you got your refund in full. I will also hold you to your deal of re-investing when we get more orders.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nDabs, while youre on it: please refund me as well.Thanks for your work!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nKindly wait a bit. I had to go out. But you\\'ll get yours if you really want. I am replying here as an appeal to keep holding your coins until at least the end of May. But I will honor your request as well. Poor group buy.. I hope someone else buys in soon.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSorry, no. I\\'ll have to step back for the moment, but you can keep me on the list as reserved or something like that. I will definitely be back in if you get enough buyers.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nPlease confirm that you receive your coins. I am sending the exact amount you sent me, to the same address it was sent from.Since my Group Buy is about to die, (Newar, please don\\'t ask for a refund until after May 31, 2013), perhaps you guys might be interested in my little lotto game?Dabs Lotto Number 1. Ends May 20, 2013. 95% payoutI have just held onto and refunded in full more than 36.8 BTC. So if I wanted to scam anyone, I\\'d have done so before they asked to be refunded.Dabs\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAll participants, may I request for a rating on OTC? If you know how, then you can give me a +1 for doing this. Thanks and appreciate any. See signature for OTC info. My nick is Dabs.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nRefund received! Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nNot to worry, I\\'ll stick around.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThanks. That\\'s re-assuring. I have gotten PMs from some interested individuals as well, but they\\'re waiting on their BTC before ordering. Also, after the end of the month, while people are free to request for a refund and I will honor that as well, I will continue the Group Buy(s) as long as chips are available for sale.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nPayment received.Im sad we cant get this group buy to work... maybe post in the thai/ vietnam forum?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nTimer removed. End time: before the end of the month. But, I\\'m still continuing this Group Buy. I posted a couple of messages in the Thai and local forum.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nBump. I\\'m still hopeful.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nOrder Status (Confirmed OrdersID Chips BTC Address Note01 240 20.640 Confirmed02 -128 -11.010 \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, Bkk Board, BKKcoins design, SMT PHILIPPINES INC.3 Mountain Drive LIPS II BGY La Mesa Calamba City Laguna Philippines, cold wallet\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-24 08:44:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 4: 3599 ASICs gone 33599 sold\\n### Original post:\\nJust placed an order with Batch 4, and okay with test chips to promising ventures.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMore chips for means more working asics.When will avalon ship their chips in general? I\\'m on topic just for two days First was ordered on april, right?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYufi said that he will send out sample chips end of may. About the normal chips we only know 9-10 weeks from ordering. No one got a batch yet.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-14 00:30:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: OPEN: [Group Buy] ASICMiner Block Erupter USB in USA. 2.03496 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nI have set up another group-buy at is an International one so it is more expensive but it is available to all of us that don\\'t live in the US/Canada and Europe.NeilEDIT: Anyone in the US/Canada and Europe is welcome though.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI only have enough coin to buy a single unit, not a 5 batch (heh believe me, I\\'d love to grab 5 - 10 of these guys and spread them across a few powered hubs) so I won\\'t waste your time unless this changes drastically. Thanks for taking on the duties of being in charge of a group buy and this really is why I love (most, ) of the BCT community. I\\'m in Washington D.C. and while I do frequent Chicago 2x a year, my first trip was a couple months back and my 2nd isn\\'t until October (otherwise I have a good friend that is a 3rd-year resident at Northwestern, works in the Cardiac Unit, and I\\'m sure he\\'d have no trouble popping out one of my kidneys, then we could work out the exchange rate in Bitcoin ).\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou\\'re welcome to order 1 USB device using this formula: C = (N * 1.99)+ 0.2248) : 1*1.99+0.2248= BTC2.2148\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m in the US and I\\'m interested in buying 20-25 units, but you are so far from the required 300 units. It looks like none of the other buying groups have received new orders in a few days.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI imagine that Canary is having the same problem I am, people actually need to put in orders instead of wait to see if others will do it first.If I were you, I would put in your orders and others may do the same.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nwe will be up to 50-55 units with your order, with 245-250 to go. we have time and momentum as orders like yours start to come in. Besides, all else fails, you get your bitcoins back. no loss for you. shall I take your order then?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m thinking about going in on this... I just can\\'t wrap my head around spending this much for so little hashing. I mean from my perspective - I\\'d make more money buying a bunch of 7970s and reselling them for 75% of purchase price in a couple months.ROI is what... ~6 months? So make that 9 after the 30% increase in difficulty that\\'s coming. I\\'ll think about it some more.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCan you really get 75% from a mined out vid card? That\\'s an honest question, actually, since I simply don\\'t know. After seeing how miners run these things I would not touch one with a 10\\' pole as a buyer for actually running a monitor. As for mining, it seems GPU mining is going the way of the waterbuffalo even at today\\'s BTC prices. I suppose there are always alt coins, but still I just cannot wrap my head around someone paying 75%.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'ve sold used 7970s for anything from 300 to 350. That\\'s not when \"everyone is selling\" them though.I think the key thing here is power usage. If you have expensive electricity, these will pay for themselves quickly if you swap em with your 7970s. And they\\'ll generate profit longer. However, once difficulty gets really really high, you\\'ll be stuck with unsellable items. Your call as to whether that works for you or not.M\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\na 7970 mining + reselling pay for itself in 2 months(you even make profit lol), much faster than anything else, right nowthe mathbuy at 400, mine for two months=220(minus 120 bills), sell at =350total=450\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nStep right up and get your sticks...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI am interested in this as well. At least one, maybe up to 5. I\\'ll have to buy some BTC. Question? After you order what is the time to ship? Are we looking at weeks or months to I get this in my grubby little hand?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nGreat! You did say Avalon though? My question was more about ASCIMiner, I didn\\'t see what their projected ship date is? Do you happen to know?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI intend to get these out to people no longer than 1 day after I receive them. I\\'m going to have everything ready as far as labels and boxes and packaging material and will be ready to ship immediately upon receipt from ASCIMiner. For example, if the delivery gets here in the AM, I have till 7 PM to ship as many as I can that same day. if the shipment gets here in the afternoon, I\\'ll probably finish shipping the next day. I will have help to repackage and ship out so this won\\'t be a 1 man operation.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\ntypo. fixed.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDamn, I was totally ready to pony up BTC10.1748 for 5 Avalons, lol . I wish more people would get in on this, I don\\'t think I\\'m holding up sales by not chipping in my BTC to buy 1 unit, however I am on a fundraising binge and hopefully will be able to stack another 10 - 20 orders on to the unit (I don\\'t know if demand wasn\\'t high enough or if people just don\\'t like paying for products upfront via non-escrow means, feel free to leave a comment if you have passed over this group buy for any reason other than lack of funds).Currently I\\'m selling some coding/illustration services in preparation of E3 (in many circles this is kno\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupter USB, 7970s, Avalon\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-25 17:17:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 4: 5983 ASICs gone 35983 sold\\n### Original post:\\nIf I read and understood ordering directions correctly, Multibit wallet can\\'t sign messages. I installed Bitcoin-qt. It\\'s synchronizing for hours! But batch 4 orders are just over half, so I may be on time...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYou can sign a message with blochain.info wallet !! \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat! Thank you for guidance.One more wallet (although empty right now) and one more password to take care of, but this online wallet has some nice features. And is fast.Order done, verification code sent.Thanks.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Multibit wallet, Bitcoin-qt, blochain.info wallet\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-26 02:06:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: OPEN: USA/Canada [Group Buy @64] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03496 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nOrdered another one...tempestb; 1; 2.2148Transaction id: id: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBenefits of this USB ASICMiner group buy over others I\\'ve seen: Reservation by payment - no tortuous \"collecting payments\" period Shipping included in price Canary already has a shipping strategy planned outThat first point is a big advantage - I\\'m reading threads w other group buys that have essentially stalled out due to reservations flaking on payment.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDigigami; 5; 10.1748; order)txid; \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks! I will combine your orders and issue you a refund for the difference, if you don\\'t mind ofcourse. unless you would like me to ship to 2 different addresses?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThat\\'s cool. If this drags on longer I will order more so maybe just refund whatever at the end, if that\\'s cool?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-25 15:59:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: Block Erupter USB @ 2.10 BTC + parcel -> Shipping to anywhere!\\n### Original post:\\nOne package of an USA group buy arrived today, check it out:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWill put in my order in next 24 hours or less\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou can increase my order from 3 to 5: BV in the Netherlands\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOn the order form... What does \"...with compensation\" mean? Is that British for \"Insurance\"? And how fast is \"Fast Delivery\" versus \"Normal Delivery\"?Also, how do I specify what color I want? :-)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust pre-ordered one.Will we receive a PAID VAT invoice ?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIt is never a good idea to talk about tax matters in public. PM the seller.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nJob done!Well, I am not sure if I can promise there will be all colours available. Friedcat did not specified how he working with the colours distribution.Oh, I almost forgot... That option is for oversea buyers. There is not really big difference between fast and normal delivery in UK. Yes, the compensation is to insure the package content.Yes.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHave requested an order of 5 to help speed up the process of placing order\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIt sounds reasonable as the initial target was 300, maybe A+C should start a new batch for subsequent orders, if interested?I\\'m also interested about the payment terms (i.e. when), now that we have reached the target quantity.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSome extra might be a good idea since someone might not pay...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi A+C,Just sent you an email about adding another unit to my order, hopefully this can be arranged\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOrdered a couple.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI am ready to get this order going! How long do people have to pay, once the order window is closed?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nUp to next Monday.Hurry up!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nShould\\'ve put my order in last night, hope I\\'m not too late (8 order to NZ).\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDo you mean that you\\'ll be sending the invoices on Monday? I haven\\'t received mine yet if you sent them already.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nBTW, one day of delay is 0.0135 BTC at current difficulty\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIf you are too late there is another group buy that has the numbers and just waiting for people to pay at;-\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI say refund the price for everyday delayed\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI\\'m in for 4 if the order is still open. I can transfer BTC immediately if it is.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nFrom what I know is still open today and tomorrow\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThanks for the response.I filled out the form, I guess I\\'ll just wait and see.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nHi A+C can you increase my order from 1 to 3 please ML in the UK (line 95)\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nWhen is the last day when we can pay?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nPut me down for 10thanksedit: just filled out the form with info\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nNo, I changed the Trader\\'s Book to reflect the number of units ordered as I include more pre-orders. I will close the book if there is 400 or more units ordered. I cannot efficiently handle this trade with more than 400 or more units orders.I will send once I close the Trader\\'s Book. I am waiting a response from Friedcat to start to collect funds from the buyers.Yes, your pre-order was accepted.Well, I will include something like that in the service agreement I am preparing.Job done!\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\n2 to Germany please\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nAll right, you are going to be the last. I have more than 400 units ordered.Fill this form:\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nThe Trader\\'s Book is CLOSE for pre-orders.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nMonday is here With the new minimum of 50 units at It would be wise for everyone to get their payments in ASAP so we can get 300 or more units paid for. If not, it is up to A+C to decide when order is sent (obviously we are over 50 units paid for).\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-27 10:24:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 4: 8995 ASICs gone 38995 sold\\n### Original post:\\nrgzen; 120; 10.32; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThe fourth batch is ordered:Code:Order Date Status Total #10401 May 27, 2013 On-hold 782.10 for 1 item 808 Chips are still open at the moment from this batch... i will now answer all PM\\'s, Post\\'s and will post the actual order-table in first post.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-27 17:40:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 4: 9864 ASICs gone 39864 sold\\n### Original post:\\nSo batch 4 is sold out too?I only looked at the first post with the update from May 27 and sent 12.04 BTC for 140 chips. (Took me a while to figure out the \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTime for Batch 5 :-)\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf you want to check my message, please PM me because I had no clue as to how these messages work.My message was:Hi SebastianJu, I will send you 12.04 BTC for 140 Asic chips.(My full \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIf you want someone to verify your message, you need to copy and paste the exact message, with the signature code and the sending address. Otherwise verification is not possible. If you put your email and full name in the message, and you don\\'t want to post that in a public forum a PM would be best.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nBatch 4 is sold out and batch 5 started... Did you send from this address? I cant find a payment from this address.Thats right... you can check if your signature works here: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-27 18:04:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] ASICMINER - Up to 8% discount OR Hosting at 8% fee; John K. Escrow\\n### Original post:\\nupdated pricing and lowered fee from 8.5% to 8% hosting fee.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCan you ask Friedcat if it will ship immediately after payment is received? Just want to see how long the ETA will be.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nfrom what i\\'ve seen ETA ~5 business days or 1 week.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThis is a remake of the following topic because he received negative feedback and scam warnings: This is a scam or a terrible terrible offer. Either way do not accept, you can only lose. Escrow does not protect you in a batch buy like this as he requires funds upfront, and obviously the same with hosting.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ndogie is just mad because I proved he was a complete moron in his 7990 malta thread. maybe next time he should buy the hardware before speculating and acting like a complete jackass.Its funny he claims he has a 200k/ year google job lined up yet he lacks the social skills to even keep a $10/hour job.Getting back to business....I am using John K as escrowHosting fee has since been changed to 8%.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNot at Google, I turned them down after working there You can\\'t escrow a payment first group buy - you\\'re financing the purchase with the buyers money, so you need the buyers money to buy. You can\\'t escrow hosting, you can just walk off with the hardware and the income and nothing stops you.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ni have ~10-15 potential buyers; looking for more if we are to get this rolling I want to hit 25+\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER, 7990 malta\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-28 19:04:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #2 @7] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03636 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nCan you confirm/acknowledge receipt of my payment?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhere\\'s what yours might look like:\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow many of these could my raspberry pi handle using a hub?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFirst and foremost, depends on how much power your hub can supply.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAs a newbie, can someone explain the whole \"signing\" thing. I use Coinbase, if that matters.Thanks a bunch, want to get in on these.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAssuming each of these take about 500mAh I would need like a min of 1amp hub. But lets take that out of the equation, I want to know how many of these could I have on my raspberry pi. I know by standards is that the max you can have is 127 on a regular PC. Can the Pi handle 127 of these lol.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nwith a powered external hub you probably can have many... alot of us are getting these hubs: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n it and your order is listed on OP.Thanks!Hope we reach 50 quickly, so that I can send the order to friedcat ASAP.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI am ordering 5, just need to transfer some BTC from a few wallets to my \\'main wallet\\' and you will have them. 5 PCS will be paid for within a few hours from this group buy (feel free to hold 5 for me and I will send payment asap within a few hours).\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, raspberry pi, hub, min of 1amp hub, powered external hub\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-29 07:08:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #2 @37/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03636 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\n18 17 13 to go\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPlease verify what I sent.Gathering for more....\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMikeMike,everything is tracked on the first post. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMikeMike for an additional 5 making a total of 11pc.next day fee of .12 applied to USB Erupters since 10+ pcs includes next day.Will confirm once BTC clear on my end.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYou got it!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUsing same sig.The Public Note will show it\\'s for- \"addition 5pc USB Erupters total 11pc. same shipping address\"I figured it could help close out this set.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThis is filling much faster than I expected.Intended to add another to my order but funds won\\'t be in til later tomorrow - Canary, do you anticipate running yet another buy after this?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes, I just purchased advertising on Facebook... I will keep running these as long as there\\'s demand and as long as friedcat has them on hand...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCanary,I might be off by .0001 BTCIf so I will make it up on next order.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI want in, but most likely won\\'t have the coin in time. Glad to hear you\\'ll keep doing them!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nLet\\'s get this order placed in the next 12 hours I will order 2 with next day shipping as I need to test them out before my UK group order ships. My payments will reach you in the next two hours. One payment of 4.2118 BTC for two units and one payment of 0.12 btc for next day shipping. If this 2nd group buy lasts more than 24 hours, I may add to my order with my dividends from AsicMiner shares Congrats on your miners from arklan\\'s group buy. I will post my order details properly once my payment has been sent. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nDoes this go by Gox weighted average or what ?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nthat\\'s fine\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\ni believe so\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nlet me know when you send so I can update your order\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSilentSonicBoom; 2; 4.2118 BTC; day shipping; 0.12 btc; 2/unconfirmed, broadcast through 6 nodesDate: 5/29/2013 01:54To: US Canary GB USB miner#2 -4.2118 BTCTransaction fee: -0.0005 BTCNet amount: -4.2123 BTCTransaction ID: 2/unconfirmed, broadcast through 7 nodesDate: 5/29/2013 01:55To: US Canary GB USB miner#2 -0.12 BTCTransaction fee: -0.0005 BTCNet amount: -0.1205 BTCTransaction ID: sent to CanaryInTheMine with details and signed. Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-29 16:08:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: CANADA Group Buy: ASICMiner Block Erupter USB [Expression of Interest]\\n### Original post:\\nIf I can order minimum 1 or 2 I\\'d be in. I realize these will probably never pay themselves off so I think of them more as a novelty item and thus I thinking buying minimum 5 (as on other group buys) is a bit risky.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIm in Canada, possibly interested\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPeople who start these group buys are frequently Hero members.The only way to make money on these devices is to sell them on Ebay, but the market is already starting to get flooded. These devices are completely impractical and way overpriced. ASICMiner knew this would be a fly-by-night operation inwhich they suck the early adopters dry as quickly as possible because they know they will have to start dumping these cheaply later on.The DIY Avalon boards look alot more attractive than these devices.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDuly noted! If this gets any traction, it\\'d be great to have someone with more community trust involved. I wonder if there are any hero I could send proof of identity and contact info to a trusted member. I\\'m a small business owner, and my reputation is everything A minimum order of 1 unit is one of the benefits of doing a Canada-only group buy. Shipping costs are one of the reasons why some of the international buys have 5-unit minimums.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSorry about your mayor.Your location is good for redistribution costs... regional xpresspost from Ontario covers a much wider area than regional xpresspost from NL I\\'d be interested in 1 unit (I already have 5 on the way), depending on how quickly things come together.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi folks,There are several group buys on the go for the ASICMiner USBs, but nothing specific to Canada. The new minimum order size is 50 units, which gives us a good shot at getting an order together quickly, and we can probably save on shipping if we keep it see af_newbie\\'s thread here: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nFirst post updated with this info.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupter USB, DIY Avalon boards, ASICMiner USBs\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 10:38:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: Group Buy : ASICMiner Block Erupter USB (European Union )\\n### Original post:\\nThe minimum order is 50 of these at BTC1.99 each.Anyone interested? If 10 people say yes, I can put together a thread for the terms of the order, etc.I\\'m located in Sweden (Karlskrona) and would ship to any other EU country. reduction: 560mA (emerald) -> 500-510mA We stressed it with 9 Block Erupter USBs in a row without heatsinks heating up each other in a very dense USB hub with 25C without active airflow. No unexpected (non-probabilistic) HW errors ever happen.Speed: This comes after better stability. Now the hashrate converges to its theoretical value of 336MH/s.Appearance: Manual assembly (emerald) -> SMT machine assembly (sapphire)Standard heat-sink (emerald) -> heat-sink front-case 2-in-1 logo-ed (sapphire).LED added.Four types of front-case:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'d like to propose the following as a cost structure:it would be 1.99 + VAT (escrow) + shipping + escrow costs; + 5-10% for my time (depending on total quality 10% for first 50, 5% for 51st and later units)+ shipping cost to you; the VAT amount would get refunded or partial refund depending on what amount actually gets charged at the border; as you know many people in the EU are charging full VAT however I have read about instances where the VAT is not charged or a different amount is charged, and therefor I propose that it is better that the estimated VAT is held in escrow until it actually has to be paid.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupter USB, heatsinks, USB hub, heat-sink, heat-sink front-case 2-in-1 logo-ed, LED, front-case\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 11:36:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 5: 3275 ASICs gone 43275 sold\\n### Original post:\\nLooking to sell 60 of mine from first or second batch. Looking to move to US Based batch to save the environment and such =p Please pm me offers. Maybe Sebastian can be kind enough to escrow.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYou know that the first batch probably will reach before the others because this batch is already in status chips ordered?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m in Sweden and would be interested in these, send me a msg with what you are asking for.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 22:53:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #3 @3/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03636 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nCanary,Many thanks for all of your efforts. I just sent BTC for 2 units and only put my forum nickname on the label. Were you expecting a shipping address to accompany the payment? If so, should I send another small payment with the info on the label or just PM you? Sorry for all the questions. I just bought my first BTC today. Used Bitinstant and ZipZap to fund my first local wallet. And the payment to you was also a first. What is the label for anyway?DBOD\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nlabel is for you to attach some name/description to an address.no need to send more payments for shipping, although you are always welcome to buy more units.you will use the \"sign message\" feature to send me your shipping info. sign with your sending address for the transaction. how to sign: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWill be placing my order between 6 and 7 CST. Anyone around TN up for doing a small local group buy to save on the S&H?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAs soon as my deposits go through i will definitely be putting in an order for 1-4 of these puppies. Had my wife call BFL today for giggles to see when our order would ship, they indicated the first batch of orders from last year \"should receive them by the end of june\". I just wish these little guys were a bit less pricey.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'am going to order one tomorrow, because campbx has temporarily disabled bitcoin transfers in my account for 1 day (because of dwolla )\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPossibly it wouldn\\'t be a bad thing to wait. Either these or something else will likely be cheaper before they pay off their first bitcoin. I\\'m still buying one though. I\\'m just hoping this round will make it to 50 after the last two rounds (seems like there\\'s a good chance though).\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSorry Canary to cause so much trouble. I originally tried to use the bitcoin-qt client for a wallet but after 24 hours it is still not sychronized. I was in a hurry not to get left out of the next group buy so I tried the Multibit client and it worked like a charm. Unfortunately it does not appear to support signing. I\\'d like to export my private key into bitcoin-qt but the latest version does not appear to support this. There isn\\'t much left in the wallet so exporting it to a wallet on the web would probably not be a big issue. Any other suggestions on how to facilitate authenticating ownership so I can give you my shipping address. Thank you.And the rest of you people get ordering to get this up to 50! I need some new toys!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nmaxpower; 1; 2.2218; sent:\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\ncdogster; 1; 2.2218; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIn for two more:Stale; 2; 3.98; (local pickup) Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nit will make it\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI think i finally received payment from your group 2 attempt. let me know how to proceed. did you want it refunded or place order with this group buy?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI was holding off because I figured if it was going to go through, it would be before this group buy closes. So let\\'s use it for the funding.Like I say, I can\\'t sign with it (though I may be able to find a way) but if it\\'s really necessary for the proof for the address, I\\'m sure we can work something out.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIn for another 3 (total of 5 for group 3):Stale; 3; 5.97; (local pickup)\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nboyohi; 10; 19.9; (local pickup)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, BFL\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 02:25:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #3 @67/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03636 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\n*grabs balls*10 more pleaseNet amount: -20.3636 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLOLchalidore; 10; 20.3636; \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 21:15:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy @193] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03496 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nAlready had my coins sent before the buy closed. Just posting the details here.cjellison; 1; 2.2148; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI was interested in purchasing some of these, are you gonna setup a new thread or we just gonna keep using this one?I\\'m working on moving around USD and bitcoins anyways, so no rush\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m interested in 1 or 2. Have been on vacation and only just caught this thread (drat). If the next buy would close in the next 24-48 hours, I\\'d be in.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m thinking new thread to stay sane...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI think it will... I will be creating another thread shortly\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFolks, the original post has been updated with the list below:Orders: CanaryInTheMine; 5; 9.95 (local pickup)RedComet; 5; 9.95; (local 1; 5; 10.1748; 5; 10.1748; 5; 10.1748; Miner-TE;5;10.1748; 3; 6.1948; 1; 2.2148; 1; 2.2148; 1; 2.2148; 1; 2.2148; 5; 10.1748; 2; 3.98; (local pickup)tempestb; 1; 2.2148; (.2248 5; 10.1748; (Canadian order)iluvpcs; 5; 10.1748; 5; 10.1748; 5; 10.1748; (Canadian order)RedComet; 2; 3.98; (local pickup)DustMite; 10; 20.3496; OR 15; 30.0748; (Canadian order)ebildude123; 1; 2.2148; 10; 19.90; (local pickup)josiasrdz; 4; 8.3348; (.15 4; 8.1848; 2; 4.2048; 10; 20.3496; 1; 1.99; (local pickup);aurel57; 11; 22.3396; 15; 30.0748; 2; 4.2048; 1; 2.2148; 3; 6.1948; 2; 4.2048; 2; 4.2048; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAny info on a second group buy?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSecond group buy is up here: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nShoot, I sent you my address but no phone number. I\\'ll PM shortly.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nShipping info sent via PMThanks for making this happen, Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSent shipping info via pm as well.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nShipping info has been sent via PM.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nShipping info sent as well.Thanks Canary.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIndeed! Thank you!My info has been sent.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nshipping via Priority mail sketch:\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nha - knew you had a shipping strategy - didn\\'t know it was geometric!*ahem* I mean yeah, I think that\\'ll work.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nAny chance that in the next batch you\\'ll allow Canadians to enter in with 1 order?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIf this isn\\'t an option, I may be able to sell you one of my 5.I wonder if it\\'s worth setting up a Canada-only group buy?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nit\\'s about $25 to send 1 unit via USPS international priority...my pricing does not account for that...fedex ground might work better...\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nwith a 50 minimum, it probably is...\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nJust got a text from friedcat that the DHL label for this order is being printed...\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nExcellent news!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nyes!regarding colors: a mix would be nice, but unless they\\'re labelled on the outside, don\\'t bother... i don\\'t think your costs account for opening, inspecting, and sorting 200 boxes either\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nAre you still taking orders on these? I would like to order just 1 to start.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nread much?\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nOur order has shipped. Received DHL tracking number.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nAwesome. Thanks for the update mate.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nJust like BFL!\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nHow is local pickup working?PM to setup an individual time/location or group pickup at some starbucks or something?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nso is the shipping... arklan\\'s order showed up in two days\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nsarcasm??\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nI think the meaning has lost itself....\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nafter several PMs requesting this, here you go:2013-05-29: add .12 for next day shipping if your order is less than 10 units and you want next day instead of priority.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nDoes the same offer (or a similar one at a different price) apply to Canadian orders?\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nLOL, poor Canary. Keep up the awesome!\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nno, fedex is quoting me $75 to ship next day to Canada... so it would be .57 bitcoins\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\noof! that\\'s rich. i\\'ll wait\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nI\\'d like to know this as well.\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nYou\\'ll get PMs with pickup info once shipment is received.\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nThat\\'s great news! When is the expected delivery date?\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\ngulp! now you\\'ve got me worried. never dealt much specifically with USPS (or FedEx, for that matter); i\\'m just thinking of my positive experiences with canada post, and the extortionate brokerage fees that UPS slaps on cross-border packages.this actually raises an interesting point -- what\\'s the value of these things for customs declarations? my bitcoins were a LOT chea\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 03:38:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #3 @69/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03636 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nhackjealousy; 5; 10.1818; & Added another order of 5:order 2: hackjealousy; 5; 10.1818; & \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-23 14:34:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] OPEN -0.083 - Avalon Chips - Escrow by John K. (Europe / RO) + PCB\\n### Original post:\\nNews!2013-05-23:- Batch number one Ordered: Batch number two Open. If we move well, we will have the chips in hand by the end of August. I will try to aquire as much funding as i can, to finish the order quick!- I have a final price of 85 Eur for the Klondike16, 16 chip miner. I still have to get quotation for the heatsinks and fans, but the final price covers all.- The chips cost 0.083: Why? a:) There is a lot of work managing the order. Also there is responsibility. You can\\'t joke with people\\'s money. I\\'m putting my unslept hours during the night into all this and i want to make sure you get the device you have paid for. I\\'m here for the long-run. Also, my identity has been confirmed by John. No funny business, no inexistent addresses.- I\\'m opening up the idea of \"Hosting\". No need to send several kilograms across the globe. You will have the opportunity to leave the miner here in Romania, using cheap electricity, being up 99% and being able to control the miner remotely. I will have a chilled environment, secure location, with two internet providers (one for backup) and dedicated support person in case of any emergency. I\\'ll also post some pictures of the place soon.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m starting batch 2 \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nConfirmed, marto74!Thanks for starting the batch!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSzia, Hydra!I\\'ll be using english so everybody can understand, as I have a few concerns I\\'d like to share with everybody to ensure everything goes alright.I have been watching the group buy from the corner of my shadowy man-cave and I would like to congratulate you on your work, and want to let you know that you have my full support, since we speak the same language, and live close to each other. Hopefully we can meet soon enough back in Romania and have that beer we were talking about ! . Firstly, and excuse me if I missed it reading up on the group buy, but can you offer us invoices?Secondly, Can you offer us a secure way of shipping the chips? i.e an insured shipment in case of damages, or lost packages( I realize that the chances are slim, but still)Thirdly, I must admit, I have a sick mind, but this is a business and I need to protect my(others) investments.Have you considered hiring personal guards while picking up the chips? I\\'m sure everybody including me would be happy to chip in for extra security measures to make sure everything goes smoothly. I know this might sound absurd and I am indeed a bit paranoid but this is a legitimate risk that we need to take into considerati\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n@OP:Small nagging request: could you please put the thread updates newest on top (i.e. reverse chronological order) so the freshest news are seen first. Thx\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nRead my mind. Yes, of course\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nJust wondering, were we every able to get a quote on a 32 chip miner? Or a 64 chip miner?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAre you planning to make 32 chip ones? Or 64 maybe?Is the PSU included in the price?I hope you are going to receive -> build -> ship also, i don\\'t know if electricity in romania is so cheaper than somewhere else, talking about ASICs. Maybe i can send you my GPU, that would be nice\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat\\'s important is the K16, the 16 chip design, because it will be daisy-chained together with other 1-3 boards to get to the 32 / 64 chip miner. The nice thing is, that if you connect them through the special connector, you will use only one USB port.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSzia, Ham.1. I won\\'t be able to give out legal invoices, because i don\\'t have a company. In Romania (and not just here), it\\'s a real pain to have a company and have all kinds of government people knocking on your door, asking for their cut from the business income. As i\\'m not sure how constant this cryptocoin hardware business will be, i must admit i don\\'t wish to have a company just yet.2. About the secure shipments, i assure you that you will have the option to ship with insurance and via express services. It only depends on how much are you willing to pay for your shipment.3, About the bodyguards... I believe in security through obscurity. Please feel free to look me up and try to find my address if you\\'re at it. PM with your search results. In case you do find me, i will be hiring bodyguards. Although, i won\\'t be going alone to the customs to pick up our batch and i won\\'t be going unarmed. But still, who am i? Just human... So i\\'m waiting for your results [EDIT: ROFL ) ... i\\'ve shocked myself with FINDING myself and my full address. I\\'ll give your thoughts an even more serious consideration.] @google: you nerds sometimes ain\\'t helpin\\' .. sometimes you do the opposite.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n16 chips board is the final solution or we also hope to 20 chips board?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n16 chips. Easy, cheap, plug&play, connectable, etc\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ndamn it...I preordered 20 chips...too much for 16 board...too little for two 16 \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Klondike16, heatsinks, fans, 32 chip miner, 64 chip miner, PSU, GPU, 16 chips board, 20 chips board\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 19:20:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #3 @79/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03636 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nCurrent Orders: CanaryInTheMine; 1; 1.99 (local pickup)DBOD; 2; 4.2118; 3; 2.2218; 1; 2.2218; 10; 20.3636; (FedEx shipping)cdogster; 1; 2.2218; ; 1 ; 2.2218 ; 5; 9.95; (local pickup)liquidcpu; 1; 2.2218; 3; 6.2018; & 1; 2.2218(2.0718+.15 credit from grp #1); 1; 2.2218; Miner; 3; 6.2018; 10; 20.3636; (Canadian order)chanson; 1; 2.2218; 1; 1.99; 20.3636; (FedEx shipping)boyohi; 10; 19.9; (local pickup)ars.b33p; 1; 1; 2.2218; 1; 2.2218; 1; 2.2218; 10; 20.3636; (FedEx shipping)-- 134% there!Who\\'s next?total = 79, 0 to go\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBFL if you are watching this, and I\\'m sure you are, I have a message for you. Please deliver my moth hair foe king ASICs, or I will be forced to give even more of my BTC to your General of ROBOT-ARMY\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCommanderVenus; 3; 6.2018; \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhephaist0s; 1; 2.2218; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWaiting on confirmations... Almost there.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCanary,The Exchange rate is terrible at bitinstant.I should have had .3 BTC extra and now need to run out again to get another 3/4 BTC deposited.I think I will just make it....\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nsent you for 5 plus expedited shippingfinlof; 5; 10.3018; 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodesDate: 5/30/2013 22:37To: Canaryinthemine (5) USB order (3rd batch) -10.3018 BTCNet amount: -10.3018 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPlease upgrade shipping for my order ; ; <0.12>; \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nif I ran BFL, you\\'d have your miners already\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'m sure that news of next-gen asics would be trending by now.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 22:30:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-05\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 5: 3595 ASICs gone 43595 sold\\n### Original post:\\nJust placed order...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo I did yesterday (240 chips, together with a friend). Batch 5 does not seem to go as fast as some of the previous batches. People, keep ordering!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNot sure if I\\'ve missed it (not following along every post but just skim-reading), are you doing the same thing with the sample chips for batchs 3+ as you did for the first two?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\najas; 200; 17.2; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes please\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nTill now this batch runs 2 days and 16hours, the other batches took this time:Batch 1: 9 days, 9hoursBatch 2: 7 days, 7hoursBatch 3: 5 days, 16hoursBatch 4: 4 days, 14hoursI wonder what the reason is. The only thing i changed is that i only edit the first post with the list of orders now and dont post it at the end again so that the thread goes to the top of threads again.But maybe its the weather or similar only... Edit: Looks like only in german thread a couple of people complained about me posting the list at the end of the thread again. I did this when new orders came in and the last list was posted longer than a hour back. Maybe i should post the list in this thread only again. Maybe edit the list when the post was done <2 hourse and repost it when >2hours. But im not sure if that would speed up anything.Yes, i already ask the owners of the samples in batch 4 downwards. Batch 3 is fully answered, batch 4 has 2 chips that have to be answered still.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, sample chips\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-01 14:25:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Tentative] ASICMiner Block Erupter USB group buy (UK)\\n### Original post:\\nOrdered one of these from MineForeman and after some thought I\\'d see about facilitating a group buy to the UK if their is demand enough for it.I obviously don\\'t have much kudos, but I\\'ve been lurking quite a while. If we go ahead we can use an escrow, I\\'m sure we can find a trustworthy member that people would be comfortable with, unless people wish to place their trust in me. I\\'m happy to reveal my identity within reason if we don\\'t use an escrow to assuage anyone\\'s fears.I\\'d be using Royal Mail Special Delivery so everyone would get their ASICs as soon as possible. Granted this isn\\'t the cheapest delivery, but it is the most reliable and fully insured.I\\'m obviously not looking to make a killing here, but I would like consideration for my time and I\\'d like to be able to get a few of these for myself as part of compensation for me posting on each individual order.Right now this post is just to see if there is enough interest to raise to the limit of 50. I\\'m happy to facilitate an order of any quantity, truth is I have no idea how strong the demand is for these little gadgets here in the UK. Please leave a reply or PM me if you are interested, stating the amount you would like and i\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'d be interested in 1 or 2 devices. Are you still planning to go ahead - there seems to be no other responses.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi stinky, there is another thread where Augusto is offering at a much better price. I\\'ve filled in the form and I am waiting on a reply from him about payment:\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHiThanks for the link. I had already found that offer, and was checking if there were other similar deals going. I too, am waiting to hear from Augusto.Pete\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 02:14:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #4 @26/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nHey Canary, could you let me know if I\\'ve got a unit coming from the GB#1 sell-off this morning? I\\'m 98% sure I got my funds in correctly but I haven\\'t heard anything - if somehow I didn\\'t, I\\'d be interested in this buy.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGuiltySpark343, 5, 10.2118, \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nLooks like I won\\'t make this order.Thought is was closing earliest you start a #5 Buy to close by Thursday/Friday?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nordered 10\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 02:36:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #3 @1/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03636 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\n5 on the low end up to 10pcs.Need a few days.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDBOD; 2; 4.2118; a lot for doing this.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI second that!Thanks for the pic Canary.Gotta find out about pumping them up a bit.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m thinking USB cable extensions from the hub and place the heatsink side on a larger metal block, possibly water cooled?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIt may work to put the \"Hot Side\" down on a thick large piece of Aluminum on a piece of Granite or tile or cement floor...Weight the top down the middle or rig it so you screw the hot side to a larger heat sink or AL plate.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nmy .00015117BTC - these things really dont get THAT hot when you just have a standard fan blowing on them. you dont need to do anything special to keep them relatively cool. i ran 10 of them without cooling at all for 13 hrs with no problems. while they where pretty hot to the touch, it wasnt complete burn type of hot. as soon as i pointed a normal desktop fan on them they were just above warm to the touch, definitely bearable to keep my finger on them for extended periods of time.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nonce we figure out how to overclock them, we\\'ll need something more than just a fan... they will get hotter!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCool! Thanks fin,I want to find a way to overclock these puppies while \"super cooling\" them.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThe one thing anyone can do to make everything smooth and easy is sign a message with a wallet you control. If you can\\'t sign a message with your shipping info, you will create delays for yourself and slow me down too.Next, when signing a message, most of the time I have no clue what the actual message is, it\\'s hard to guess and in order to verify, it has to be precise.For example:You should send me something like this:Address: ship to:John Smith123 Way AveCity, IL \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, USB cable extensions, heatsink, Aluminum block, Granite or tile or cement floor, desktop fan\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 03:36:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #4 @41/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nIn for 5. Will send BTC shortly. USPS Priority to Canada.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSpieder; 4; 8.2218; have ordered more but OKPay won\\'t fund MTGox anymore...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 08:23:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: BFL Group buy - flowdab\\n### Original post:\\nReally... no one wants these useless chips. Why bother?I wouldn\\'t be throwing JohnK\\'s name around like that before you even have any evidence these chips can be shipped... they can\\'t even ship miners how are they going to get chips? They have 60,000 orders to fill in miners first right? Sad. Another ignore.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCrossposting this here\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDidn\\'t see this and I have written a pm to John.K. Thanks for posting.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m not sure why the vitriol. I\\'m ordering these chips. I\\'ve reviewed the facts regarding their WORKING asic chips and feel this is a good decision for me to make with money I have earmarked for fun investment. If this doesn\\'t fit your risk profile or this isn\\'t your cup of tea then do feel free to ignore this post and the group buy. I thought since I\\'m ordering the minimum amount I might be able to help other bitcoiners out with a purchase if they wanted to do one.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIt goes without saying you\\'re going to need a top end escrow.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOf course. That is why I thought of JohnK.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAfter you think of him. Make sure to ACTUALLY CONTACT HIM...and get his approval first.With a newbie such as yourself (or under a sock account) it tickles the mind that you may just be augmenting your own order using others funds. That is the risk.Take the matters of Escrow seriously please. Because I seriously don\\'t see how Escrow is protecting anyone in this specific John takes the money and orders the chips on your behalf. But then the order still goes to YOU and YOUR HOME Address. At that point it\\'s all on faith that you will actually do your part and ship out the allotted chips to people who pitched in.I can imagine why JohnK would be hesitant to start being the hub of these Bulk orders. You seriously need reputation references and/or need to tell us where you are in the world so people actually know where to \"visit you\" if you default on your obligations.If you default, your gonna take JohnK good name with it.You need to redo your intro. I could have slapped together a better intro....Edit: Are you doing a 50% down payment and that is why you are doing escrow? Or are you aiming for the bulk discount at a higher dollar value?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n+1So many < 20 post accounts floating around...i wonder why\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI believe I heard Yufi say these chips were two generations ahead of his.TBH...while JohnK is experienced, he is making an awful lot of coin from this forum. There needs to be others to increase the competition in the escrow market.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThere be sharks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI stated in the initial message that I was contacting him. I never said that he was involved at the current time. I have written him a PM asking if he would be willing to take part in this. He has not yet replied. Absolutely. The risk is via BFL, not via me. There is a risk that they could not ship or that the shipment could be massively delayed. That is the risk we ALL face. Trust me, I am well aware of it give the amount of money I am going to be giving to them. I think there may be some miscommunication. I am doing the escrow ONLY to make people feel better about the process. I posted this thread as I thought I could help people get chips who could not satisfy the minimum order as I am purchasing that amount myself. I\\'m not looking for a 50% down payment or a bulk discount. I just figured I\\'d give people an opportunity to get the chips. Honestly, if I\\'m just going to get shit for this I\\'ll just purchase the chips for myself and wish everyone a good day.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI recently joined the forum as I\\'ve only recently (beginning of April) gotten into bitcoin. I\\'ve been lucky enough to make some money via bitcoin where a bulk order is feasible for me to purchase on my own. If anyone isn\\'t comfortable with my post count they are free to disregard this opportunity.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nObviously.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nNot even taking into account the post count (everybody has to start at zero, not an issue) this ^^ is total shill talk.Keywords: reviewed the \"facts\", \"working\" asic, \"good decision\" for me, fun \"investment\", \"risk profile\", \"help\" other bitcoiners.You have covered enough bases methinks.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAlright guys. You win. I don\\'t need to be talked down to or generalized as a \"shill\" when I\\'m just trying to help people out. FWIW everything I said was the complete truth, but I really am just not going to spend the next couple of days defending myself from people on the internet. I\\'m not sure if I can delete this thread but I\\'ll update the original post. Good day.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWhat about the base of logic when looking at the feasibility of BFL actually delivering on their promise of chips in 100days or so despite of their track record which is the worst to date among bitcoin businesses?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHi everyone. I am purchasing a bit over a 100 chips from BFL and thought I would open this up to a gro\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: WORKING asic chips, chips\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 22:42:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #4 @131/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nUpgrading my order to USPS Express:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCanary, I don\\'t see myself in the updated OP, even though people who ordered after me in the thread are up there. Can you confirm that you got my payment and confirmation? Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nsee OP\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCool. Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 04:17:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #4 @186/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nI just mean that if I wait to put my order in until there\\'s only 2 hours left, what are the chances of my not getting units? Will I still get them or no? Will the manf cut you off at xyz units total?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust waiting for these bad boys to arrive\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nwhitefeather; 1; 2.2518; \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nconv3rsion; 20; 40.8472; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nos2sam; 6; 12.4636; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBitterdog; 6; BTC12.5836; units - Express mailQt 1=1.99*1 + 0.2618=1.99+0.2618= 2.2518 BTCQt 5=1.99*5 + 0.2618=9.95+0.2618= 10.2118 BTC10.2118 + 2.2518 + .12 (USPS Express) = 12.5836\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPM w/Signature sent.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCanary,Will you be putting a #5 Group Order together that closes before the end of this week?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\ncut off is time based. when you see all 00:00:00 the orders are done and I send payment to friedcat\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWhat\\'s the average time from when you send payment to receiving the order that you have observed.I.e. approximately what day do you think I should expect these to arrive in my location?<3\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nnubbins; 5; 10.2118; order!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\npossibly... I will see how Monday/Tuesday goes with batches 2 & 3. I may take a day or two off though after batch 4...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nLol no kidding, this lots like a lot of work. Interesting that the numbers of orders are actually increasing.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\noffcourse they\\'re increasing... people can run these anywhere now...I\\'ve shutdown my GPU miners. it\\'s quiet and not hot anymore.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYou deserve a break!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, GPU miners\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 06:03:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #4 @230/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nWhat is the shipping time like ? When do you expect to receive the units once you place the order ?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI was also wondering this. What shipping speed does friedcat/ASICminer send the USB at?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBased on the first Order:Payment was sent on 27thSome received them as soon as 31stHowever all depends on where the weekends/holidays are in relation to orders.... on the Second Order: Payment sent on 29thAs of the 31st:Package at CINCINNATI HUB, OH - USA to be delivered to Canary possibly Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n2-3 days if no delays\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHey i want 10 I am 90% sure but What wallet will let me send a private signature I have my Bitcoin-qt updating now but it\\'s only at like 60% any other wallets i can xfer my btc too that lets me send a signature?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nyou don\\'t need to send a signature as part of the transaction... you need to send me a SIGNED MESSAGE with an address that you sent bitcoins from.there\\'s 22 hours to go, your QT wallet should download in time.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, Bitcoin-qt\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 06:35:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - Limited qty available IN-STOCK - USA shipping only\\n### Original post:\\nI have started to receive some orders and will change the title when I\\'m out of stock. If I sell out today, I will likely place another order so I can have more in-stock by mid-week. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAre you willing to ship to UK sent you a pm for detials etc\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPM sent. I don\\'t have a whole lot of experience with int\\'l shipping so I was really hoping to keep at least this batch within the US. Perhaps if I end up re-stocking this week, I can spend some time (talking with you?) figuring out how that all might work. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPM Sent for payment info.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPayment sent for 3 on Bitmit.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'ve received a lot of orders - still have a bit of inventory but it\\'s quickly dwindling. Any order received tonight will definitely ship tomorrow AM. I\\'ll do my best to ship orders received tomorrow morning same-day. Anything received after noon will likely not ship same-day as my schedule is a bit hectic tomorrow.One big request for all of you who ordered: PLEASE reply to this thread with feedback on my performance upon receipt of your goods. I have no doubt you\\'ll all be satisfied with these sexy miners being shipped as soon as physically possible. I don\\'t have a lot of rep yet and your feedback would go a long way!I truly believe preorders are ridiculous and really want to set an example that in-stock/ready to ship merchandise is where it\\'s at!Thanks all!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nJust placed another order with friedcat as you guys have nearly bought everything I have! I still have a bit of inventory but if you come later and title says sold out, please check back in a day or two for new inventory (friedcat ships fast!). Thanks so far for the orders everyone - thrilled to be providing such a great service for the community.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nDo you have a PGP key that customers can use to encrypt their addresses sent via PM?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nExcellent suggestion! Added to my sig and OP. Thanks!!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 07:14:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: Group Buy \"Block Erupter USB\" from Denmark/Europe\\n### Original post:\\nHi I got in with 18 units Tom\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThat is Great you are now on the list.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m in for 2 units. However I do not have to release the bitmit escrow before I receive the goods, right? It is a bit unclear from your description.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ni am sorry if that is unclear, but you have to release then, since i do not have all the bitcoinsneeded to make a 50 order. so the escrow is just for if we dont get the 50 units that we need, then i dont have to send the money back\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 07:54:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group buy] Oбщa пopъчкa / Avalon chips Escrow John K / Bulgaria EU 8302 free\\n### Original post:\\nnightyj , 32 , 2.72 help a newbie\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n30-May-2013\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n31-May-2013\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n31-May-2013\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nComplete miner 8x K16 stacked on 4 200x100 heatsinks with fans and enclosure\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nFully enclosed 8x K16 with PSU and space for linux router and converter\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nK1 klondikeJune 3 We got a quotation from diferent suplier for both PCB and assembly for 1000 batch orderI 13.277 EUR + 0.02 BTC sent to developer in batches of 1000 boards\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: K16, 200x100 heatsinks with fans, PSU, linux router, converter, PCB, assembly\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 14:53:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #4 @256/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nPM sent with signed payment info for 1 USB Erupter\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 19:44:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #4 @255/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nI don\\'t know if I did the damn signed thing right plz check your pms thx\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI sent signed messages via PM at the time of payment.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI responded that I can\\'t verify. please use my example in 2nd post of this thread.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCanary, I\\'ve purchased 5 already in this group buy #4. If I were to order 5 more, would I be pushed to the end of the shipping queue or would the 5 be combined with the first order?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOut of curiosity, will there be some sort of benefit if there is 300 ordered since there\\'ll be a discount?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nall 10 would ship at same time for you. you would not be pushed to the end...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ndid someone on this group 4 ask me to hold off shipping their group 2 order and ship when I receive group 4 delivery from friedcat?I thought there was, but now I can\\'t remember? should have written it down...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI think it was bruce willis\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJust sent btc for an additional 5.dribbits; 5; 10.2118; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThat was me, just PM\\'d you regarding Express upgrade vs Priority. No point in wasting the extra $ if they\\'ll still get her before my return date.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOK. I\\'ll take care of it and time it for your arrival.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWait, does Bruce know about bitcoins.. He\\'s my hero\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 02:38:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1 Metabank Bitfury with hosting in the US\\n### Original post:\\nThe new offer is now live. Please follow instructions when ordering. For your own safety only send BTC from an address you are in 100% control of. Should your bitcointalk account get hacked or otherwise compromised I will be unable/unwilling to return the bitcoin to any other address then the one used for sending.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nShare has been purchased. And thanks for the advice guys. If you can\\'t tell I\\'m kinda new :p\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI have received payment of BTC3 and will confirm the transaction for you as soon as I can see the sender address in the block-chain. 1 share has been reserved.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n2 shares purchased. PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI have received payment of BTC3 and will confirm the transaction for you as soon as I can see the sender address in the block-chain. 2 shares have been reserved.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'ll purchase if at the end of the 24 months it\\'s eBay\\'ed instead with a reasonable reserve.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYou are of course more than welcome to do that. I would however assume that with difficulty increases in 24 months the miner will be a novelty at best.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAgreed\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCan I send 2.5 coins then .5 coins an hour or 2 later? I have 2.5 coins I control right now and I will transfer the .5 from one account to the one I control.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n1 share purchased. PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI prefer you wait until you have the BTC3 as it simplifies my organization to only deal with BTC3 increments.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI have received payment and am verifying transaction in blockchain.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOKAY coins cleared i will send 3 btc. 3 BTC SENT AS OF 11:22 am usa east coast time\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'ll take 2 shares. I don\\'t have enough confidence in this company to risk a full 30 BTC, but if they do pan out it\\'d be nice to be in on the first round.Payment will be on the way momentarily.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI think many people feel the same. I myself included. I have fairly high confidence that they will deliver, however BTC30 is quite a bit of money to \\'risk\\' for a lot of people, making a group buy attractive for many people that either lack the funds or want to minimize funds \\'risked\\'.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n1 share purchased, PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nTaking a few minutes to record payments, check blockchain and double check every payment. Seems 1 payment has yet to post to my wallet and I want to make sure that everyone is accounted for and that I do not sell more shares then are available. PM me before making payment, as of now 1 share is left as I am keeping one \\'on hold\\' until one possible payment makes the trip through the blockchain.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI sold off some AM stock to buy into this. I have1) Am Stock2) bfl 3) a gpu farm 4) and now a share of this Within bit coin world i am pretty diverse with my holdings\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nSounds like you are being fairly wise in your diversification. I also own shares in RSM and AM, Have a few BFL orders, A chip order, and early pre orders with Bitaxe.ca, KNCminer and a few AM USB\\'s on the way.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nOut of curiosity, what\\'s your intention for the chip order? Do you intend to resell them or do you have a way to fabricate a system with them?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI actually have no chip-only order. I have an order with a group buy for k16 and k64 boards, and a few orders with Bitaxe.ca for complete blades that I may or may not resell. I was a little \\'late to the party\\' for the chip only orders and decided to sit it out. I don\\'t have neither the time or technical expertise to build anything myself, and even if I took the time I think my time is better spent not doing so.I was going to resell the USB\\'s for a profit on eBay but think I\\'ll just plug em in, let them hash away and keep then as collectors items.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Metabank Bitfury, AM stock, bfl, gpu farm, RSM, AM USB\\'s, k16 and k64 boards, complete blades\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 04:27:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #4 @600/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nbtw, we\\'re at 600+ USBs ordered... will total everything up in a few hrs.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\noh my god. and this is the 4th buy. enjoy your extra sticks, you\\'ve definitely earned them.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nkrayzie32; 1; 2.2518; got smacked around on the newbie forum to get my 5 posts, teach me to stop lurking.Thanks for the work!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you all for your well wishes and your support!! it\\'s much appreciated and helps me stay focused!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWTG, Canary...600 units! GL, I hope there\\'s a few big orders in there otherwise you\\'re gonna go mad staring at shipping labels and Signed PMs!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ntyler26; 1; 1.99; I got my BTCs in time . This will be local pickup.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAwesome!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-04 03:07:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - IN-STOCK and shipping SAME DAY!! [USA]\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m confused. Did you just order 2 units from Canary\\'s group buy not so long ago? now you have ordered a whole batch directly from friedcat? Can you show us pics of more than just the 2?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAbsolutely. I received a couple other PMs about this, allow me to explain (this was originally in my OP, but it seemed very lengthy and I edited it to be a bit more brief). I first ordered one from Canary last week, then upped it to two. Almost immediately after paying him, I decided I wanted more than that, and that I wanted to order directly from friedcat. I kept my order with Canary in the hopes that I might get a mix of colors (I\\'m trying to get all four!). If you read more into that thread, you\\'ll actually see that, oddly enough, Canary has not even received that group buy yet (based on his tracking status, I expect him to receive it today). I received my order Friday and am ready to ship a lot of units. I assure you if that\\'s your reason for not trusting me, it\\'s unfounded; I have not received any units from Canary and the hardware in my pictures is from my own direct order. I\\'m keeping many for myself, and have been \"testing the sales waters\" by selling the remainder for immediate shipment. I was trying to determine if there was a demand for such a service and oh boy is there!Let me be clear: I absolutely understand the concern with a low-rep member coming on here and saying\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHey Kramer what other ASIC\\'s have you pre ordered? Looking for a miner that does atleast 1GH/s+.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFrom BFL: many Singles (60 Ghash) and Jalapenos (5 Ghash)From Avalon: lots of chips which I intend to turn into K16sFrom ASICMiner: many more erupters My platform is I don\\'t sell anything until it\\'s in my hands ready to ship. Hoping I\\'ll have my website up and running (damnit BitPay - do you want my business?!?) by the time more ASICs arrive to make it very easy to see what\\'s in-stock.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWow - what a day! I had no idea these things would sell so fast. Got quite a look from the post lady today If you ordered before noon today, your product is in the mail!Lots of these little guys went out today:Typical packaging. In addition to the already well designed protection of the included hard-shell case, I enclose in enough bubblewrap to prevent shifting around the small priority boxes:If you\\'re interested in purchasing but don\\'t quite feel like I\\'m trustworthy, I encourage you try BitMit.net\\'s escrow service (link in OP) or just wait for feedback to appear!And if you\\'ve purchased from me, you better come back here and leave feedback ... if you don\\'t, I will look for you, I will find you, and I will show you my chest hair.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLooking good. Thanks for taking the criticism in stride and being so great about canceling my order until I saw more proof. I\\'ll be ordering at least one tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI wish i had enough BTC to buy 1\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWhen you receive the Avalon chips, at what price will you be selling the K16\\'s for?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nso the same price as a jalapeno, but 1/30th of the hashing power.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAlso available now. The Jalapeno isn\\'t. If you were to order from BFL now there is no telling when you would receive it, what the difficulty will be then, and what the break-even timeline looks like. You are comparing apples and oranges.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI get it - I\\'m the new guy around here - no hard feelings I look forward to earning your business!As an aside, does anyone have any experience with coingig? I made a sale on there today, completed my end of the transaction, and still haven\\'t received any funds, which is a bit concerning. I\\'m hesitant to continue on that site until I hear some good feedback or I get my money! Support has not responded yet.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThis! A million times - this! I don\\'t want this thread to turn into a debate about profitability, preorder predictions, is BFL a scam, etc - the whole point is that if you want this product, I will ship it to you! What good is even discussing ASICs like the jalapeno if it hasn\\'t shipped? I\\'ve had tens of thousands of dollars tied up in preorders (including jalapenos!) for now nearly a year - trust me, I\\'m just as frustrated. I could have used that money and invested in ASICM at the same time and be a millionaire right now. That\\'s the whole reason this thread exists though, to cut through the bullshit and make a very straight offer - a real physical ASIC in your hands as early as tomorrow for a fair price.And if you can put a batch of jalapenos in my hands to sell in the same manner, I\\'ll put them in inventory and sell them too!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThanks for the explanation and the new pics! Not trying to be a troll, just wanted to trust-but-verify. Good luck with your sales!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIf you still have some tomorrow, I\\'m in for at least one.If not, I definitely will be buying from the \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, ASIC, Singles (60 Ghash), Jalapenos (5 Ghash), chips, erupters, K16s, jalapeno\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 11:58:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - SOLD OUT - eta Wednesday - check bitmit.net [USA]\\n### Original post:\\nWell guys, I hope I\\'m interpreting your feedback right. I just put in third hardware request with friedcat that will hopefully arrive towards the end of the week (reminder: expecting second order either tomorrow or Thursday).I\\'ve got all my cards on the table and am heavily invested in the hopes that you all will continue to support me in developing an ASIC sales business that does NOT rely on preorders! I\\'ll keep stocking inventory and giving you the best service you\\'ve ever seen as long as there\\'s demand!!Thanks for your business thus far - you are all great\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIf you can figure out a way to offer credit card, your business would probably double (just from me . Maybe from Square (squareup.com)? I can only buy stuff as fast as I earn it. I wasted all my reserves on butterflylabs year-long pre-orders.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI realize there is always a risk of charge-backs, but I would like to +1 this comment. I would be happy to slap down a credit card for these, and would even take time to verify my ID if need be. I spent all my bitcoins on Avalon chips, but would love to but an erupter to have blinking around the house.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, ASIC, butterflylabs, Avalon chips\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 13:59:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Russia, Bitfury ASIC!\\n### Original post:\\nbest part\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYeah, this looks strange, but metabank states that they will make a refund only in 30 days.They refund dollars, so i guess no one would like to invest 25 bitcoins, and then receive only 20 or even 15 bitcoins.So ones, i make a pre-order, theres no refunds. corrected\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBitfury ASIC --- are they real??\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNot sure if they are really real?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI have a feeling you\\'re not going to hear a peep out of Bitfury until one day there\\'s going to be a slew of pictures and data posted. I also imagine when it does show up, it\\'ll be something impressive.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nwell they definitely don\\'t look like a scam.so 99% that they are legit.And i think, there wont be big delays\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThey don\\'t look like a scam based on what exactly? I don\\'t speak russian so I\\'m at a disadvantage, but I don\\'t see any pics of prototypes, designs, models, contracts with fabbers, etc. Have they made any previous products, like FPGAs or whatever?The non-refundable no-chargeback bitcoin only sale is nerve-wracking. I\\'m just curious what makes you so confident in these russian fellows.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThat\\'s risky for you and the buyer if price shifts, probably better to fix to fiat via exchange price.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nLooks like guys from Moscow got directly access to china\\'s facility that made ASICS for BFL (lol).65nm, 5Gh .... @ailikun i LOVE your signature .\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI did Not understand this :Do i have to organise my own group buy or could i directly order 5 gh/s from you ?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nIf I understood it right, I can order an Asic unit through you and pick it up in person.You are asking 3250$ for this service, it\\'s a margin of 1090$; fair enough In which or near which big city do you live in Russia ?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\ni agree, but the sellers of an bitfury asic, stated, that they will refund only bitcoins.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nIn Moscow.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYou can order directly from me, and i will host it.But i will be able to order an asic, only if we collect 3250$ or an equivalent of 25.2 bitcoins at the moment(based on the gox price)the preorders are gonna be opened for a few days.if we collect enough money within those few days, i will order an asic.if not, i will refund your bitcoins back.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\noh gosh, people really liked to copy my topic, one by one)Update:theres not that many asics left, around 100 or so.So if youre still interesred, hurry.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nlooks promising to me. At least the price is not as bad as with the others..\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThese are my questions, you can decide if they are valid.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYes, there are reasons to doubt them.But i myself ordered 4 asics.As i once believed in 1-st batch avalon, i believe them to.And hope my risks will pay off.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nIf this project does succeed it will be good to further decentralize the network.I will also be providing cgminer team with access to the unit to get cgminer\\'s code primed for its operation.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWell I still don\\'t see anyone linking any reasoning behind why this isn\\'t just a fly-by-night scam, but I guess we can all just hope for the best.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIt\\'s not like this is the only opportunity we will get to purchase these asic devices.Once its confirmed it will be like avalon batch 2 and batch 3 we will know if the Bitfury chips work some time later this week.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nYes of course.Metabank stated some time ago, that in a few weeks(months ) they will be selling those asics again.But the price would be significally different.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nCould you tell me something more about group buy?I would like to invest some bitcoins...\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\na group buy is only possible if we collect enough bitcoins for atleast 1 unit.at the current moment its 27.5 bitcoins(based on gox price)and, i will host it for a 10% fee, or i can send it to anyone, the group would decide to send it to, and someone else might host it. if the needed amount of bitcoins wouldnt be collected, i will return all the bitcoins collected, back.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nIf anybody is interested: I\\'m with ailikun, he will host for me. I live in germany and I consider flying to moscow and pickup in person. If you too live in germany or near me (I live in the south, so: switzerland, austria,..) or within the EU I can pick your asic up as well for a little fee + customs/VAT/whatev is charged on me. You can then pick it up at my side or I will send it via DHL right to you. If anybody is interested PM me.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nfriend of mine wants to be part of the groupbuy but is still n the noobie zone, so I copy this for her:also another friend is thinking about a groupbuy (5 BTC), but it seems nobody did invest yet. So I think if anybody would start the rest will follow. I hope it\\'s not too late for them\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nYes I approve this information.If somebody is living in europe, dani can personally pick-up your asic from me.Group buy:We\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury ASIC, FPGAs, Asic unit\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-29 11:35:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Batch2 - Avalon Chips - Escrow by John K. (Europe / RO) + PCB\\n### Original post:\\nFoofighter; 32; 2,656; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m willing to buy more chips from batch 1.If anybody wants to sell me, just PM me please.Thanks everybody.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGood morning Steve,Thank you for the efforts of the Avalon chips group buy. I have some questions and I\\'ll try to be quick about them.1) Does the cost per chip (0.083) cover the escrow fee or we should add 2% going to 0.08466 per chip?2) The price of the PCB (including components and fan) for 16 chip devices is 85EUR. Will you be accepting PayPal as a payment method for PCB and Shipping costs?3) Are you offering any kind of warranty for the finished product (16chip device)?3) What is the total cost of KWh where you live? What are you planning to charge for hosting the devices? And what currencies and payment methods do you plan to accept for that?John, does your escrow service cover the slim possibility of Steve running away with the chips or someone stealing them from him? (No offense intended Steve.)Summing Up details not mentioned in OP, for convenience16chip device details (based on Klondike project) - Fully functioning device (tested and ready for mining)- Cost: Chip cost (1.328BTC) + 85EUR for board, assembly and fans (no PSU) + Shipping cost (20-30EUR depending on destination) + POSSIBLE TAX outside EU.- Performance: The device is guaranteed to perform 4,2GH/s- Connection: C\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you,order confirmed. You can find it in the first post.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks for that, Serenata, but i haven\\'t posted the PCB info yet, as i wanted to create another thread for this. But with your help, i\\'ll post the info in this form. Thanks again. I\\'ve made some corrections to the info above, marked with red.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAnother question:Avalon says they will ship only tested, working chips.In case one chip is damaged, are you planning to sell some of your chips t13hydra? I would love to buy 1-2 more to be safe in this case.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi,In case the chip is damaged during PCB production, they will be replaced by me. You will get a fully functional miner. In case the chips get damaged during use, it will or will not be covered by warranty. In this case, we will decide what to do and how to replace your chips. I personally do not have my own chips, as i have given them up to the two last persons in the first batch. Let\\'s see what we can do about spares during this batch.[Edit: you are free do buy 1-2 spares, if you want to, nobody is stopping you)\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nthumbs up\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThe second batch is not really filling up, I want to get another 16 chips but I am not sure what to do now.Maybe someone from Batch 1 wants to sell me their 32 chips ?FFMG\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThere is still enough time to fill it up, Iam also planning to place more orders into the 2 batch as soon as i got the BTC.regards\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nIt\\'ll fill up quickly once it passes the 100~ mark, and accelerate till the end.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI\\'ll be submitting an order for 200 as soon as Gox clears my deposit.Actually 192 or 208, multiples of 16, I have to remember that\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nGathering my BTCs for 16 chips\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nPerhaps this was asked before, but I\\'ll ask anyway. t13hydra, do you get regular status updates of the batch you ordered?If so, could you share those with us? That could keep this thread entertaining till the end of July/early August.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYou asked the wrong person here - I\\'m the one holding the account there. There\\'s no regular status of the sort - the order simply turns from Pending ->processing -> Chips ordered. We\\'re at processing now.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThat\\'s right. Thanks John\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nDon\\'t worry, Romanians just woke up to this GB. ..\"there is a group-buy for Avalon chips.. -- Whoaaa, awsome, let\\'s go get some!\"I\\'m getting calls every day from local people Also, we may have a bigger order (1000-2000 chips) as a result of offline discussions by me. We\\'ll see how that turns out. Until then, i\\'m finishing my website, to be ready for automatic handling of the purchases Cheers everyone, Have a great day!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nGive me a shout if you need help, I am a php developer by trade, I\\'d be glad to help out if you need.Cheers, FFMG\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nSorry about that, I thought you only handled the money side of things.To bad the chip manufacturer doesn\\'t give regular status updates, I\\'d love to have see their process steps and when they take/took place.You know, like pcb manufacturers do. I even know one that allows you to follow the process of making your board via a livestream. But I should have expected this, they are used to having other businesses as customers and they wouldn\\'t care for perks like that. Anyway, I\\'ll be watching this thread.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nAs the escrow here I\\'m also responsible to place the orders so that the funds never reach OP too. It\\'ll be harder to hawk chips on the lo\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chips, PCB, 16 chip device, t13hydra\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 21:36:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] AVALON CHIPs only 5550 left @0.082BTC + Miner Assembly from 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\nThe original post might insist more on what I think is one big advantage of this group buy: the Klondike boards assembly. Since the minimum number of boards has already been reached, buyers can count on the option of receiving ready to mine boards.You could make it more prominent in the original post, with links to the Klondike thread and even the case design thread. I wouldn\\'t have pre-ordered here without an option for a Klondike board, the exchange in the forum between BkkCoins (designer of the board) and other users make it clear to me that his project has matured quite well. This will be a well thought out and tested design before the chips in this group buy will be mounted on the board.I have a question though: is it advisable to purchase a little more chips than needed for the boards (16/board) in case of chip malfunction? More precisely, will there be an opportunity for tests and chip replacement in the case of chip malfunction after board assembly and before shipping? BkkCoins seems to have designed the board in such a way that one chip malfunction doesn\\'t bring the whole board down but I\\'m not sure of the various failure modes and if they make spare chips a good idea.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi gyverlb I will follow you advice and try to add more info in reference to the miner assembly using the klondike design in the OP.In reference to the chips, AVALON said that the chips will be delivered fully tested and functional. Therefore, to be honest, not many people has been ordering more chips to be used for replacement in case it is needed. As you mentioned, BkkCoins is designing the board to tackle chips failures; nevertheless, he is still in process of prototyping and therefore we are still to know the final result. Cheers Orders\\' StatusCurrent chips\\' price is 0.082BTCKlondike K16 full Miner Assembly service price is 60EUR (250 ordered so far)Code:ID No. Chips Total BTC BTC Address Total Miners 12 0.96 0 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC2 32 2.56 2 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC3 224 17.92 14 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC4 32 2.56 2 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC5 48 3.84 3 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC6 16 1.28 1 PM - Unverified User - @0.08BTC7 32 2.56 2 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC8 16 1.28 1 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC9 16 1.28 1 Thread - U\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs, Klondike boards, Klondike K16 full Miner Assembly\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 00:08:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy #2] interest check - KNC Miner, What model?\\n### Original post:\\nI am considering a last group buy of a KNC miner unit as my previous have been very successful (both closed and ordered in >24 hours)I would be using my already verified pre-order number that allows me to order another unit of either Saturn (35 btc) or Jupiter (60 btc).Shares would be 3.5 or 6 btc depending on unit and the buy would be structured just as my previous and much copied group buy. (See. Post footer for info)Just checking forum interest and model interest for now. Please post in this thread if you are interested, and what amount/model you would prefer.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC miner unit, Saturn, Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 00:22:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] KNC Jupiter\\n### Original post:\\nDude they\\'ve dropped Mars...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, but they are allowing to upgrade to Saturn or Jupiter with your Mars preorder\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAh gotcha.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNice idea for spreading the risk. I\\'m still thinking about the overall situation. It\\'s good to have choices.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOk, Gauging interest for a GB for KNCminer Jupiters. I have three preorder slots less than 85 and 1 Mars slot. I am confirming from KNCminer that I can order 3 Jupiters with each slot, and one Jupiter with Mars slot.Once I get approval from KNC I propose a GB with terms-a minimum 5 BTC per share- a share will be proportional to the total collective GB minus OP expenses and commissions-miners will be hosted with KNC-OP will receive 1% to 6% for organizing buy depending on how large or small GB-will provide proof of identitythese are some preliminary ideas, accepting more ideas and termspost or PM if you have any interest?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI was originally enthusiastic about this company becoming a top notch asic manufacturer, but this lottery thing has lead me astray. The whole thing is starting to smell scammy even though they have the reputation of ORSoC behind them... Be careful.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIt is also possible that KNC has not invested in a good Public realtions firm(invested that money into R&D instead?) and is run by engineers and mathematicians\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI am also think about buy one but it looked big risk.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI am very close to making purchase but lots of scammy bits in this TandC (who writes TandC?? I am suppose to take all their conditions seriously and they call it TandC? is that a way to say this isn\\'t really terms and conditions or some such? Where delivery is delayed due to any of the circumstances constituting force majeure in accordance with 11 below or due to any act or omission by the Purchaser, the delivery period shall be extended by such a period as is reasonable in light of the circumstances. The delivery period shall also be extended where the cause of the delay arises after the expiry of the originally agreed delivery period.11. Force Majeure11.1 KnCMiner is exempted from fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement and is entitled to cancel the Purchasers confirmed orders without any liability, in the event of force majeure such as strikes, floods and fires, wars, riots, interruptions in transport, shortage of material or energy sources affecting KnCMiner or its sub-suppliers, accidents or other occurrences which affects sub-suppliers production, bankruptcy or compulsory liquidation of a sub-supplier, accidents of any kind, governmental decisions which affects \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYeah, I would like some clarification on this too, will send them an email\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nLets say you get three Jupiters. How many GH/s will my 5BTC get me?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nassuming a $120 exchange rate for BTC, one share would get you approximately 30GH/s , less my management fee and expenses3 KNC Jupiters 1050 GH/s3 *$6995=$20985 or 175 BTC175 BTC/5 BTC per share = 35 shares35 shares/1050 GH/s = 30Gh/s per share\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThe OP has a pyramid scheme link in his signature. Very shady. Watch out.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIf you had taken the time to read the full business model you would realize your accusations are untrue. But thank you for taking the time to post a useless post in my thread\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI have received a response from KNCminer aka Sam that I can buy 3 Jupiters with each slot. So GB can potentially buy 12 Jupiters. I have four positions under 85Had sent a separate email to confirm refunds in regards to force majeure, and have not received a response to that email yet.I have received some PMs and see some interest in this thread. Will update more once I have confirmation on refund.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIf they confirm a refund in the purchase agreement if unable to deliver I would double the BTC amount I PMed you about.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nLawyers write T&Cs, you get what you pay for there.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI have enough interest to start a GB, it has been started here has purchased 1 Jupiter so far\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Mars, Saturn, Jupiter, KNCminer Jupiters\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 01:00:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] AVALON CHIPs only 5726 left @0.082BTC + Miner Assembly from 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\nOrders\\' StatusCurrent chips\\' price is 0.082BTCCurrent amount in the wallet: Code:ID No. Chips Total BTC BTC Address Total Miners 12 0.96 0 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC2 32 2.56 2 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC3 224 17.92 14 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC4 32 2.56 2 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC5 48 3.84 3 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC6 16 1.28 1 PM - Unverified User - @0.08BTC7 32 2.56 2 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC8 16 1.28 1 Thread - Unverified User - @0.08BTC9 16 1.28 1 Thread - Unverified User - @0.08BTC10 80 6.40 5 Thread - Unverified User - @0.08BTC11 132 10.56 0 Thread - Unverified User - @0.085BTC12 16 1.28 1 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC13 4 0.32 0 Thread - Unverified User - @0.085BTC14 128 10.24 8 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC15 160 12.80 10 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC16 48 3.84 3 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC17 16 1.28 1 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC18 320 25.60 20 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC19 32 2.56 2 Thread - Un\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo it would be possible to pick up the miners in Spain? I might need a nice holiday in about 3-4 months from now!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n; <48>; <3.936>; <3>; confirm\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n; <32>; <2.624>; <2>; confirm.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi. Yes, it will be possible indeed. Thanks. Received, Thank you.Hi, received and confirmed, cheers.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n; <160>; <13.12>; <0>; confirm.Maybe I\\'ll request assembly service later.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs, miners\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 09:29:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group buy] Oбщa пopъчкa / Avalon chips Escrow John K / Bulgaria EU 5762 left\\n### Original post:\\na epec. Check inbox\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI know reservations are not possible, but I just wanted to give you a notice:Our group buy started in the Netherlands/Belgium and we will be sending our first chip order on saturday. Maybe another order will be send, if this group buy is not yet filled at that moment. We already have received payment for 68 chips.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi,I\\'m glad to read thatRegards: Martin\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFirst sample heat sinks for K16\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, chip order, sample heat sinks for K16\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 16:45:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] AVALON CHIPs only 1286 left @0.081BTC + Miner Assembly from 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\nHi I just have a couple of questions:I know that there is no guarantee that chips and miners will be received on time after the the group buy has been met, but:a) Have you imported and exported a large quantity of chips before?b) What will the customs and duties procedure be?c) What is the maximum amount of time before buyers can request their money back?Sorry if some of these questions have already been answered.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ve sent BTC couple of hours ago + PM for 48 chips. Still I don\\'t see my address on the list... or am I doing something wrong\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n confirm\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nwould be a pickup option possible in switzerland? ... where are you located? ...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nlet\\'s say i bought some chips and i send them directly to the miner assembly, the total cost will be, the cost of chips plus 60+ euro?therefore an unit of 16 chip(klondike) will cost about 180 euro?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI confirm the receipt of nekonos\\'s Scan of his driving licence and Electrical bill.Thanks,John\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI wish we could just fill this order soon\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi, yes, more or less. Chips + Any cost related to Customs or Import Tax for the chips in case there is any + Miner assembly + Shipment of the miner to final destination. CheersHi John, this is a great news. Thank you.Nekonos who is the responsible for the miners assembly service has had his identity and address verified as requested by a few users.Hi. The fact that the assembler responsible has had his documents verified by John K should hopefully give the final push.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI transferred BTC for 16 chips, and it was just verified! Wooho\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI may be interested.But I\\'m quite new to these group buys, so bear with me.Just to be certain: if I order in this group buy I could have the chips by somewhere in August right?Should I want to send them to the miner assembly.I would be looking at having the miner by mid September?Did I go wrong somewhere?Thanks in advance\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi, could we have a GPG signature on this message please?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHi, I have asked John K to do this via PM. Cheers. Thanks a lot.Yes, nekonos is located in Spain. Nekonos will be doing the whole process of the assembly using his company. Actually, anyone willing to get an invoice for the assembly service will be able to get one. I doubt the Spanish government will stop local companies for doing business as normal.In the very unlikely case of something like this happening we will be able to do the payments using other ways such as our loved BTC.Cheers.Orders\\' StatusCurrent chips\\' price is 0.082BTCKlondike K16 full Miner Assembly service price is 60EUR (265 ordered so far)Code:ID No. Chips Total BTC BTC Address Total Miners 12 0.96 0 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC2 32 2.56 2 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC3 224 17.92 14 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC4 32 2.56 2 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC5 48 3.84 3 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC6 16 1.28 1 PM - Unverified User - @0.08BTC7 32 2.56 2 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC8 16 1.28 1 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC9 16 1.28 1 Thread - Unverified User - @0.08BTC10 80 6.40 \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nCan John confirm this in this Thread?regards\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs, miners, chips, klondike, nekonos\\'s Scan of his driving licence and Electrical bill, 16 chips, miner\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-06 20:36:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN] Canada Only [Group Buy #1 @10/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03 each\\n### Original post:\\nThis group picks up speed.Please add 4 more units to my order.Transaction ID: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 04:11:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy #1] US/Canada Block Erupter USB@1.994 per unit! John K as the escrow!\\n### Original post:\\nBump!Got us an escrow as requested. Keep in mind that there will be a 2% price increase (This is for the escrow)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUPDATE: This is a group buy for 50 units. Once I reach that goal I\\'ll send the payment to friedcat.UPDATE2: I\\'ve got John K. to escrow for us.Welcome to my amazing Canadian/US Block Erupter USB group buy!My prices don\\'t beat CanaryInTheMine but for Canadians, this is an awesome group buy! Read bellow to find out why Orders Completed:total = 0Product Descriptionpayment accepted is Bitcoin. the minimum order quantity is 50, maximum has not been specified, but there probably will be a maximum. Each one mines at more than 300MH/s, powered only by the USB port. It serves as a replacement of GPUs for mining hobbyists. Your GPUs could be freed from calculating hashes and resume rendering for you. It is also a perfect gift for getting people to learn about Bitcoin and Bitcoin mining. The Sapphire Batch: This is the first batch under production in quantity. Color of PCB changed to blue Adding a LED which blinks when a share is found Fixing the cgminer compatibility problem Reducing the heat generated and the current to <500mACanadian Shipping Cost (Broken down)US Shipping Cost (Broken down)Total Price for CanadiansOption 1:XPressPost (Includes default $100 Insurance + coverage for each mine\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, GPUs\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 04:23:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - IN-STOCK AGAIN - Ships within 24 hours of Ordering! [USA]\\n### Original post:\\nFresh inventory just arrived - all black erupters! Get it while it\\'s hot either on BitMit (preferred) or via PM. I don\\'t expect it to last long and already have another shipment on the way!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI might be looking at ordering 17.... can you hold them off to the side for an hour while I get funds together with a buddy of mine?Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGot my 4 units today as well. Thank you so much for the quick shipment. They are exactly what you said they would be and are hashing away, smooooooth transaction. Left you positive trust/feedback.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOne of these erupters isn\\'t hashing like the others! THIS is why I test them upon receipt. How would you like to wait for USPS all day and be met with such sadness?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI for one a glad you did it... I don\\'t wanna get my 10 and 1 be not like the others!!!!!!and a few bitcents for you just for testing!!! all\\'s fair in love and war.and the black looks so good... any reds left?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNope - just blacks in the batch. But I\\'m sure they all hash just the same!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOK, I just finished ordering 20 Miners from Kosmokramer! I wanted them shipped next day air as I want them hashing ASAP. Not only did he reply to PM\\'s while he was running around from his phone. But at one point we actually talked on the phone as he was trying to get my order sorted out. He then went out of his way to get next day air shipping taken care of for me and even repacked the miners (I think, maybe they weren\\'t packed yet) to make them fit into a smaller box so my shipping costs wouldn\\'t be so much. Kudos to you sir! If you were thinking twice about using him to purchase one ... think again Kosmokramer is a stand up guy and as many have posted his stuff does ship and is packed well (my first order from him will be here Friday, yes I made another) and he goes out of his way to make it right. So I tipped him... he didn\\'t want to make anything off the shipping but DAMNIT HE DESERVED IT! This is what the Bitcoin community is all about. Tip the man just a few bitcents it won\\'t hurt.... well done sir, well done.Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHaha - not to be corny, but honestly the best tip is just getting orders from such kickass people. It was a pleasure talking with you on the phone earlier! You placed a sizable order and I could only imagine how badly you wanted to make sure they arrived this week, so I really didn\\'t even think twice about it. Glad we got it worked out finally and were able to find a suitable shipping option for your bulk order. I\\'m still not convinced you don\\'t live on a remote island though! hahaAs I\\'ve said many times over so far, you guys are all great! My one complaint is escrow not being released on BitMit for orders that are reported as delivered (I need capital to order more!) but I\\'m trying to remain patient as I know they were just delivered today\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI promise I don\\'t, my mail carrier is just a penis! You have my address look it up on google maps! hahahahah anyway it was a pleasure working with you, I have been burnt for BTC in the past ... 35 BTC to be exact when the BFL fpga\\'s came out.. it sucked and it is refreshing to know there are still people in the world that can be trusted. Keep up the good work.NaelrP.S. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE BUY MORE IT ONLY MAKES MY ASICMINER DIVIDENDS GO UP MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nJust about out of stock again! Received confirmation from friedcat that new inventory (biggest order yet) is en route, ETA Friday!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI bought the last 10 Can\\'t wait to use them and get rid of my GPU miners or switch over to litecoin.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI can confirm that I am entirely out of stock. Just looked at tracking status from friedcat and it looks like more will be here tomorrow!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nDo you know when approximately you will be updating the Bitmit page so that I can get in on the Friday batch? Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIF the order is delivered tomorrow, it will be in the afternoon, likely around 5pm PST.I\\'ve been following the tracking status and I haven\\'t seen an update since it received clearance in Hong Kong. The next stop is LA after that, but there is usually a whole host of status updates between HK and LA, none of which I\\'m seeing. This means either it missed its flight to LA tonight, or the previous tracking statuses don\\'t update until it lands in LA (around 3am PST). I should know by tomorrow morning - if it made it to LA, it will likely be delivered, but if it\\'s still in HK, it definitely won\\'t arrive until Monday afternoon Either way, I\\'ll let you all know tomorrow morning what the outlook is.I\\'m now in talks with friedcat about yet ANOTHER order which would be estimated to arrive mid next week, but I\\'m trying to get an idea of what the demand looks like. Would any of you care to chime in so me/friedcat can get an idea of the remaining demand in the US? I know t\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, Miners, BFL fpga, GPU miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 06:48:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: BFL chips group buy #1\\n### Original post:\\nThey announced chip sales. wouldn\\'t either.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nif chips is what you want, look for avalon group buys, there\\'s a few already shipped here on the forum.They have at least delivered in the past, and seems to be trusted. (around 300mhash per chip, and 16 chips per board).\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNone have shipped, as of last week all monies were still sitting in Bitsyncom\\'s chip buying wallet = ~ 760,000 Avalon chips at Bitsyncom\\'s pricing.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCheck. I\\'m going for Burnin\\'s 20 boards. I described the situation and conditions to BFL sales. Awaiting reply.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\naha. thanks. but BFL selling chips at this stage, potentially providing more difficulty ahead of people ordering products a year ago is horrible.I doubt they will send a single chip. And do they really do their own?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThis there is a change of heart from John K. i may throw a few satoshi.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThey outsource for sure, but there is most likely a contract that would prevent us to go straight to source.They don\\'t deliver in <= 100 days - deal is off, good bye. That\\'s the only way with them. No eternal waiting and crappile of excuses.According to what we know, they have the chips (and possibility to order them as they go), but have problems manufacturing the boards.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYou know if John K chooses to honour such purchases from BFL they could be dead in the water. They need community assistance on this.I can\\'t see them convincing DIYers any other way, aside direct credit card payment.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJohn K\\'s escrow would be the optimal way to go. If BFL don\\'t accept, the fish stinks and we know what\\'s going on (again ).I don\\'t want to bother John too much just yet. We\\'ll see what the BFL reply will be. If any.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nanother butterfly scheme, orders not deliver but want to sell chip\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nScam. More money for BFL and 0 delivery... one more person to ignore and one more thread to ignore.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI thing First they must fill all orders and after selling chips! This is not fair, this is not right...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nDude sorry to break it to you, but they are either doing this because;1. They need to fund continued development of your pre-orders after months of set backs.2. They aren\\'t capable of developing your pre-orders and need to open source solutions.3. They no longer want to develop your pre-orders.I suggested 2. last week on this forum and I think it\\'s the best route for them personally.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI would never sink a penny into this idea for 100 reasons Im not going to bother to list. Im not sure why you think BFL will reserve chips for us with zero upfront payment to them. I don\\'t know how you think your going to convince them to go along. What do you think the chances are they will deliver in under 100 days? I think your going to waste your time. They won\\'t go for it and this whole thing is a total waste of time for everyone involved. And this whole escrow thing will just tie up everyones money. John K is ready to pass on this and I don\\'t blame him one bit.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYou also need to consider the shady reasoning as to why this was announced on a Saturday afternoon...Smacks of the corrupt BS Obama/US Gov does when he/they wish the \\'president\\' to sign a executive order on Christmas Day or over the weekend without objection. Actually means less grief come during the week when more people are around to voice protest. Let them digest it over a Saturday night and Sunday, surprise the rest come Monday, when it\\'s old news...\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI wonder if this builds confidence in BFL pre-order customers or if that is like the last red sign before driving off a cliff?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nBreak a leg.(just to make sure there is no language barrier, don\\'t take offense plz, it\\'s a positive reinforcement)\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIdiom meaning, \"Good Luck\"\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThank you KS. Will do my best.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nDon\\'t jinx it!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nUnfortunately, that genuinely was my nickname at uni.Jinx\\'s can be positive as well though...\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI\\'m not giving BFL any money. Read at least the first post please.I\\'m trying to relocate leverages as we are the costumers and we should make the rules. Not supplier.They like to waste time of customers that already paid. Why hurry? Let\\'s change that and give them some motivation.I would be ****** as hell. I have no big order pending at BFL. So I\\'m OK with the chips.There are only a few things right about BFL.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThey do make devices and they have shipped too. Unfortunately they move with the speed of a snail on NOS. Noone trusts them and hell i wouldn\\'t trust them even to hold my beer for a sec. I have thrown out $800 already and now waiting for a device to be shipped on the \"40th of April\"...Anyway, good luck with the GB. If anything moves, maybe i\\'ll jump in, but not now.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nYou realize that you can get your $800 back by just asking for it, right?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, Burnin\\'s 20 boards, BFL chips, BFL devices\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 17:39:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1 KNC Miner Saturn 175 GH/s miner + hosting (35 shares@1BTC) LIVE\\n### Original post:\\nCan I buy more than one share?Can I pay when you have the machine up and running?What happens if you never get the machine?edit: this machine seems sketchy with a 3 month breakeven.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo you have one of 500 early pre-orders, right? Could you show a screenshot please?Also, why don\\'t you pick a new clean BTC address for the group buy instead of used one? Just wondering.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m also very interested, but a screenshot would be really nice! (:I\\'m willing to spend 2 BTC, if you post a valid screenshot I#m going to pay them (:\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSo, if I\\'m reading correctly:This is for the equivalent of 4.16 GH/s mining for 2 years per share?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nScreenshot coming in 24 hours or less.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nany update on this yet? I want to join this group buy but I want to know first if there is any interest for this to fill in 35 shares in 96 hours (not sure if OP gonna change this). thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nso you won\\'t even give back the bitcoins if this all fails? Instead you\\'ll keep them because you feel entitled to them? I can already see where this is going.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThe coins will be sent in the next 4 days for the preorder to KNC Miner. Then it is up to them to deliver on their promise of hardware delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI confirm I have escrowed a sale before for OP, where a name and shipping address was given by OP to the buyer and me. Please note that I cannot confirm 100% that the name and address is indeed the OP (on the situation of account being hacked/sold etc) though.Thanks,John\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI have put in a PM to 5 forum members requesting if they can please post something here about them knowing my name and address here. It is up to them if they wish to respond. I have used John K. for escrow at least twice involving a hardware purchase and a hardware sale. I have bought a Jalapeno from streblo most recently and sold a Cairnsmore1 unit to Bogart when I was a noob. I have purchased USB miners in group buys from CanaryInTheMine and A+C . I have purchased AsicMiner shares in many auctions from various parties and have been active in transactions with burnside purchasing/selling shares at BTCT.CO . This statement is in no way an endorsement from any of the above. It is only to show my involvement in the community and that I have had real transactions with the members mentioned above.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThank you John K. This is an accurate statement. Thanks for the fast reply.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nNot sure what is meant about changing anything. My preorder must be placed within 7 days to maintain my queue in the order process. The group buy is a go. Just need forum members to send any bitcoins for shares purchased in a timely fashion.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nUpdated first post.SHARES REMAINING 33/35 @ 11:10 AM Central time 6/5/2013 87 Hours RemainingWill be gone next 14 hours at lunch and work. If more than 35 shares are purchased, I will refund extra shares money in full. If 70 shares were purchased, I would have the ability to order a Jupiter miner for all 70 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nLet\\'s \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nConfirming 1 Share. Updating main page. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSHARES REMAINING 32/35 @ 11:30 AM Central time 6/5/2013 86 Hours Remaining\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nPlease PM me your sending address for BTC payouts. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHere we go!Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nConfirming 1 Share. Updating main page. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSHARES REMAINING 31/35 @ 11:30 AM Central time 6/5/2013 85 Hours Remaining\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nGood luck with the group buy! I see you took some \\'inspiration\\' from my Group Buys\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThank you. That is why I credited your \"inspiration\" in my original post. Good luck mining to you as well.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nCool, I guess I missed that. I take it as a compliment of course.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nwhat happens if you win lottery? will you give some extra for the 35 shares? or maybe just divide 1/35 if you win\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nIt is a compliment. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThank you for the confirmation.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI would divide it evenly but this can\\'t happen as my order will be placed after lottery closes for extra free equipment. I will still place order within 7 days if this group buy succeeds to maintain my place in the 1-500 batch orders. If I would have known sooner, I would have started the group buy earlier to get access to the lottery. Thanks for the comments.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nI sold and shipped an item to OP. He was excellent to trade with. Past experience suggests working with him on a mining project such as this would likely be fruitful.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nConfirmed. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nThank you for the kind words and confirmation. Good luck in your future endeavours.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nI confirm I have processed an order for OP. A name and shipping address was given by OP to me. Please note that this does not mean that \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Miner Saturn 175 GH/s miner, Jalapeno, Cairnsmore1 unit, USB miners, AsicMiner shares, Jupiter miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 08:13:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1 KNC Miner Saturn or Jupiter miner + hosting (35-65 shares@1BTC)\\n### Original post:\\nI have purchased 3 more shares!Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed. Thank you. Please check out my update on a possible Jupiter miner purchase!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Miner Saturn, Jupiter miner\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 12:51:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy #2] 1 KNC Miner Saturn 175 GH/s miner + hosting (10 shares) LIVE\\n### Original post:\\nNote: I will likely be asleep for 2-5 hours (it\\'s been a few long days) so do not panic if you make payment and do not get confirmation right away. Feel free to check out the 2 successful group buys for verification that I do run a tight ship and order, verify and treat my share holders as I believe they should be.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHow does that photo prove anything? It just shows their shopping cart page.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf you look at the order form and read the KNC miner pre-order discussion you will notice that my account gives access to ordering one of the 500 first units. This means that the group buy is guaranteed one of the first 500 machines, something that is quite desirable.Also: I have already made 2 group purchases of KNC miner and Bitfury in the last few days and was the first group-buy offering for I believe either miner (many following has used my group buy model).\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Miner Saturn 175 GH/s miner, Bitfury\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 12:59:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #5 @37/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\ngood night. will update orders sent when I return...I shut down this puppy and dismantled it: R.I.P.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYep, will be shutting mine down too when I receive my GB #4 devices. The end of an era, kind of sad. But welcome too with summer here.Sam\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 14:57:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: 120Gh ASIC for 19-24,5 BTC shipping, hosting, group buy!\\n### Original post:\\nPurchased 3x 120 for shipment\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\npidobir -Since you are focusing on service 1 now.Are you going to drive into Moscow to pickup the miners if/when they become available?If so, could you reship for those customers while in Moscow? I think many of us would prefer that, to waiting for testing and then a second trip to Moscow.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nhow much for a full unit?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n25,5 btc\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNo, i not going to drive into Moscow. I will send devices from Barnaul.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThe bad news: Metabanks price go up to 20 btc and i cant orders asics todayGood news: Perhaps the big investor declined to purchase 5 units for hosting and soon hosting will be available again.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWaiting shouldn\\'t be much a problem. Metabank claims using \"tested delivery services\" and strictly denies Russian Post delivery. \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 120Gh ASIC\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 15:19:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [ANN] Groupbuy Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) Sold 5! New miner 0/120 shares\\n### Original post:\\nMiner 5 sold! We\\'re paying now and will post payment as proof asap..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMinor glitch; apparently someone is planning a big night out and decided to dump 6k+ btc on Gox causing the BTC price to crash a little. We\\'ll give BTC some time to restore itself before we place the order. We\\'re thinking of how to make this more fair for everyone on the next miner, we don\\'t want to make any profit on the market price either but KNC only accepts USD.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWe\\'ve paid: post the images from KNC as soon as payment has been confirmed! go for the next one! Still 120 shares available ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n2 sharestx has been sent by a change address. Initial and intended address is If you send payments to the change address, could the money be catched by bitcoin-qt client?.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nTransaction confirmed and address noted. Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 19:08:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [ANN] Groupbuy Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) Sold 5! New miner 4/120 shares\\n### Original post:\\nSending BTC3.0003 for 6 shares. Will update with TXID.Update: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAnd confirmed already Thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 02:36:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN - [CANADA only - Group Buy #1 @3/50] ASICMiner Erupter - GTA local pickup\\n### Original post:\\nWhoa nice...1/3 of the way there!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m watching closely However, with about a 7month breakeven i hope we see these for 1-1.5BTC soon!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou may see a price drop if someone else steps up to compete.The little Klondike is a good contended to compete but with no chips shipping from Avalon yet no one knows when they would be ready to mine.I\\'d bet Avalon doesn\\'t ship chips until after they ship their batch 2/3 large miners. If they let out a few hundred thousand chips they will dilute the value of the existing orders greatly and their customers will revolt. (Like what is happening with BFL.)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThe way I calculate it, it\\'s a 6-7 month breakeven point at current diff and we all know what is very likely to happen to diff in the next 2-3 months. I wish I could see how these units make me money because I would love to buy a couple dozen. For me ASICMINER priced the unit too high.Good luck with the group buy guys, being a GTA born and bread boy myself I wish I could support you a little but doesn\\'t really make sense to me at this point!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI will order 10 units as soon as I figure out how to change cash to BTC.My friend just configured 10 units, it makes 3.3GH/s !!!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYou can go to LibertyBit to exchange cash to BTC.What I do not get it, though, is why these items are still profitable.With 0.35 GH/s, one can make (optimistic estimate) 0.4 BTC per month, and it is going to exponentially decrease due to the increase of the hash rates. So, it takes more than 5 months to simply recover the purchase price, even if difficulty remained constant. Even 1 BTC would be a risky price to pay for these items. Think before your buy!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI am not a businessman, I do it for fun! I built 2 computers as mining rigs and bitcoins are the excuse to spend money on computer hardware and have fun (I just finished and all setup costed me $5000 - but fun is priceless)\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGood for you! You are lucky to belong that minority of human kind who can spend $5,000 on fun. But most people here at least want to break even, if not to make some profit. The problem with the devices offered for sale here is that the odds of breaking even are quite low with the current pricing.I further note that if they were so profitable, they would not be sold, but those who already have them would use it themselves.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYou are quite right about both observations. The question is whether it is profitable to buy these devices today. This is what I very highly doubt, and I am trying my best to caution others from being carried away by the prospects of revenue without adequately considering the costs and return.You see, what you sell has quite a bit of potential to break even or bring only very small profits after it breaks even, because the difficulty rate increases exponentially, and with more ASIC, there is no reason to assume that its growth will change.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI don\\'t drink beer and I don\\'t smoke - here comes $5000 easily. Anybody can do it.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI find it very sad how insensitive you are toward poverty and those who are less fortunate than you are. While you may not have had the experience of not having money to buy food, others did, and there are many people who starve not because they are lazy or alcoholic or smoke.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSo, you are promoting a product at a price that is not economic, and that those who buy it have a fair chance to lose money on. Why are you doing it?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nin the early days of iphone apps, there was an app called \"i\\'m rich\" or something like that. it did nothing but display a picture of a gem, and it was something like $1000 to buy. the guy managed a few sales before apple yanked it.what\\'s being promoted is a piece of electronic equipment. whether the price is economic, or whether those who buy it \"lose money\" (or, more accurately, fail to make money) is irrelevant. is the sale of a cd-rw drive irresponsible if the purchaser will never sell enough copied discs to get his money back? to double his money?you\\'re assuming that the end users are only in it for the money, and that the group buy organizers are preying on the gullible. the organizers assume nothing about the end users\\' intentions, and are simply helping people who want to buy these devices get their hands on them. are some people buying these in the hopes of getting rich? perhaps, but isn\\'t it their responsibility to check?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nMost people do not by CD-RW for selling pirated CDs, but rather to back up their own data. Moreover, the cost of a CD-RW is not comparable to the price for these devices.I do not question the right of people to waste hundreds or thousands of dollars of their own money if they choose to do so. However, I am doing my duty as a citizen to caution them that if their hope is to make money/profit, then this is not \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter, Klondike, Avalon chips, BFL, computers as mining rigs, CD-RW\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 20:26:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 5 sold! 6th miner: 95 shares left\\n### Original post:\\n1 share for me pleasetx: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 20:54:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 5 sold! 6th miner: 92 shares left\\n### Original post:\\n2 shares please.txid: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 20:58:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 5 sold! 6th miner: 90 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nAdamlm and Jrnr601, confirmed and thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 22:10:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 5 sold! 6th miner: 83 shares left\\n### Original post:\\n4 sharesTx ID: you guys rock!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed!Thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 22:46:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 5 sold! 6th miner: 77 shares left\\n### Original post:\\n3 shares (1.5 BTC)Tx: address (for payments): \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n14 shares (7 BTC) address: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n4 shares for me please!!!!tx id: address: jski\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 22:53:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1 KNC Jupiter Miner + hosting (30 shares left@1BTC) UPDATE\\n### Original post:\\nSHARES REMAINING 30/35 For Jupiter Purchase @ 3:47 PM Central time 6/7/2013 34 Hours Remaining (Upgrade from Saturn)The Saturn purchase is guaranteed. I would like to make it a Jupiter if we can get 30 more shares purchased @ 1btc each. Need a few more risk takers to make a share purchase. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSHARES REMAINING 30/35 For Jupiter Purchase @ 6:00 PM Central time 6/7/2013 32 Hours Remaining (Upgrade from Saturn)UPDATE 3AM 6/7/2013 Once the first 35 shares are sold, I will continue to accept another 35 more share purchases to facilitate the purchase of a Jupiter 350GH/s miner.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter Purchase, Saturn, Jupiter 350GH/s miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 23:09:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1 KNC Jupiter Miner + hosting (30/70 shares @1BTC) LIVE\\n### Original post:\\nAt last! 1 share for \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed 1 share purchase. Thank you. Please send me a PM with your payout address. 29 more shares to go!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Jupiter Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 17:10:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #5 @40/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nCanary.. Important question.Should I buy more?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n2 orders (per OP) for total of 8 piecesrethaw; 5; BTC10.2118; 3; BTC 6.2318; \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTotal is 48 last 2 sticks\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m so tempted to grab eight more, and set up another hub.How much would 9 hashing at a time produce a day?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGoogle Bitcoin calculatorBut these won\\'t be profitable much longer.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhen will this group buy close?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m in for 2, sent payment and sent a PM for the transaction 2; BTC3.98; \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ncereal, your payment is short by .02 for local pick-up.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWe\\'ll decide tonight on that.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nMikeMike, did I miss your order for this group #5? You sent shipping upgrada fee, but where\\'s your order?or is it still forthcoming at this point?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSorry about that, i sent the remaining amount.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nTroupster; 8; BTC16.7437; shipping, but it\\'s to a PO BOX, so I wonder what my options are. I realize you are very busy, so just let me know.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 23:48:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #5 @52/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nguys, gpu mining is still profitable on litecoins, even with my electricity costs which is 0.17 / kwhrI mean, if you want to shut down your rigs thats cool, but you dont have to.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nall order stats have been updated.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nis this group by still open?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nbitcoinenthusiast; 10; 20.4236; \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 06:04:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] AVALON CHIPs 2654 left @0.082BTC + K16 Miner Assembly from 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\nHey I wish you great holiday !!!Come back to us happy relaxed and sunburned\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n <64>; <5,248>; <4>; 64 chips, with a total value of BTC5,248, all assembled.This was paid for from address this please be confirmed?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n; <16>; <1.312>; <1>; \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi all, if you are not in the order status above, please remember to contact nekonos who is charge to update the status while I am away on holiday.You could check your payment at just to be sure you are in.Cheers,bizwoo\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs 2654, K16 Miner Assembly\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 06:59:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 5 sold! 6th miner: 66 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nmxmz.in and CoinFarmer confirmed; Post updated.Almost bedtime for me; I\\'ll be online again in about 8 hours after which I will update all payments and possibly pay another miner at KNC\\'s Thanks and good night / evening / morning\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSent BTC3.000333 for 6 moar shares!TXID \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m in for 6 sharesTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPayment sent for 2 sharestxID: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n3 sharesTX \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ntx : 17 sharesand i send another 1.5 btc form btc-e.com for 3 shares#43974905 -1.51 BTC Withdrawal BTC to address i wish to have payment addy : \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n6 sharesTX \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n4 share ( 2 ID \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI find it odd you have received over $10,000 worth of bitocins without a single post asking for identity confirmation, escrow services, or any type of re-assurance you wont take the BTC and run. Or even just not pay dividends once hardware is received and hashing. Do you have any previous dealings that could help account for your reliability and honesty? Please explain and prove your credibility. Thanks!*edited for typos.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYour the first one asking. I have tried posting as much info/proof regarding the orders and will continue doing that.Tyrion and me have no problem showing whats needed for John K or someone with the same status.There is no hidden agenda, and we will be as open as possible.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'m not trying to be a dick or anything, but you haven\\'t answered any of my questions. I am mainly asking because this is an investment I can actually afford and am interested in.You have shown images that suggest the preorders have been made, but that part I do not question. I\\'m wondering what stops you and your partner from running of with our bitcoins and/or keeping the mining revenue for yourselves.**edit - ... other than the fact your a hero member. Do you have some previous business ventures that show a history of trustworthiness?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nGood morning! Just woke up, have to dress my daughter and give her some breakfast before I can tally up trust is a difficult thing. You give different example, for which there are different answers. As for identity confirmation, I have no problems whatsoever showing my identity to John or another trusted member. We decided against escrow because it\\'s expensive and doesn\\'t really prove anything. Escrowing these miners would cost 1.5-2% and would eventually only prove that your money was send to KNC, which we\\'ve proven with the screenshots and transactions as well..So we can\\'t run with the money, it\\'s all at KNC\\'s.. As for the last question, running with the dividends, there is no way we can prove we won\\'t do that unfortunately.. Which brings us to the most important risk, being that we also don\\'t know that KNC delivers on time or at all. We took that chance ourselves (so far with a lot more money than in this groupbuy) so you could say we trust KNC. This and the fact that we can\\'t prove we won\\'t be running off with the dividends makes me more convinced we did the right thing in not using and escrow service for the groupbuy.I short, we simply can\\'t give you more reinsuran\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 14:07:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] 1 KNC Jupiter Miner Preorder 1-500 + hosting (18/70 shares @1BTC)\\n### Original post:\\nAlso, this is for a preorder for the first batch 1-500! My order number is 2XX (The lower half between 200-299).\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n2 shares \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ll buy a share, just waiting on a transfer to confirm..\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhi, my address for 1share of KNC 175G miner is thanks for your great work.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n1 Share purchased ! shareholder address is \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n1 share bought (from \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nConfirmed 2 shares. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThank you. Please send this to me in a PM. Confirmed.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nConfirmed 1 share. Please PM me your payout address you listed above. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nConfirmed 1 share. Welcome Germany. Please PM me your receiving payout address. Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Jupiter Miner, KNC 175G miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 18:58:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 7 sold! 8th miner: 41 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nAllright, 79 shares sold already for miner 8!All above transactions have been confirmed and added to first post.Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n3 sharesTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI already bought 4 shares.but i take 9 more shares tx id : \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 20:21:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 7 sold! 8th miner: 27 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nStark-Fujikawa and lucazane Confirmed! Updated post again. Only 27 shares left\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI take 27 last shares, add my 4 previous ones Tx: payment addr: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat! Miner 8 hereby sold!!I\\'ll update the start post and we\\'ll make payment arrangements on miner 8!Selling shares for miner 9\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nLooks like we are good into the Miner09 already\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 22:15:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live][Updated] 7 Sold\\n### Original post:\\nJupiter 6 and 7 purchased, over half way to goal Thanks again to all shareholders\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAwesome, lets keep this moving! This brings up a good point, what if KNC were only to deliver the first 3 miners, then due to production issues, waited 3 more months to deliver the remaining units?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSent payment for 1 share.TX ID: sent.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\none share purchasedtx: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOne other question, once the miners are set up how can shareholders monitor the hashing to verify they are getting paid their due share of the profits? Transparency will be fairly important here since we are not receiving a tangible product.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI am not completely sure yet how KNC will setup my account to view hashing rates. Once established the account will either be verified by shareholder access to account or being audited/verified by a third party etc John K\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPayment Sent for 1 share - 2.25BTCTid: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ndo keep us updated, or u can just put up a new column on the spreadsheet. (just a suggestion)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nand miner_btcAll Added to OPGetting close to Jupiter #8\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPlease put me in for 1 share. Transaction ID: You beat me to it. Just posting here and via PM as per the instructions.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n1 shareTX address: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nTransaction \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPayment sent, 11.25BTC for 5 shares of KNC Miner Jupiter.TX \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSo we\\'re def on for the 2% Fees option\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter 6, Jupiter 7\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 22:39:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN USA/Canada [Grp Buy #5 @101/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nNice! Glad I saw this. Will send in payment for 1 unit ASAP.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 22:42:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 9 sold! 9th miner: 99 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nguys whats the tx id for miner 9 ?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWe are still filling up shares for miner 9.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n3 more shares pleaseTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nsorry for the spam, but this (together with the OPs reputation) looks like a nice play: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n@tyrion70,Would you consider the above if we continue at the current pace?I am still open for 4 shares @ 0.50 by Thursday if you are...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi 2weiX and btceic,We already bought and payed 8 miners, so we could only use his group buy for miners 9 and up. It does however introduce another thing; currently we charge 60BTC for a miner and we\\'ll calculate the difference in BTC/USD in september. We did this to keep it simple in terms of share value and at the time the actual price was 60btc.. The last two miners we bought cost 64BTC. If we use his group buy we would have to start paying 70BTC per miner. Which means we would have to raise the current share price since that would be a bit to much to front.Lastly, the interest timer on that group buy has only 18 hours left and there\\'s only been shown interest in 5 machines so far (of which one is yours 2weiX?): for the tip though!Cheers,\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nyeah, trying to convince him to not cancel the whole thing.trying to sell 80 machines within a couple of hours - dont think so.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nMight actually be good for us if his order is cancelled.. We might just move up a 100 spots in queue In case it fails, feel free to join this groupbuy.. You don\\'t have to buy complete miners here\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI want to, though.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAhh.. Well you should be able to order one from KNC yourself right? I get the idea that they\\'ll try to deliver all orders that are payed this week..\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOh, I do have several on order from KNC.I\\'ll just have them refunded in case this goes through to make good for a couple of places in the queue^^\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSide question for the OP, what pool are these going to be mining on or is it more profitable to solo mine?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n6 sharesDate: 6/9/2013 00:21Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n1 shareTX: \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nUpdated main post with that depends on the difficulty when the miners arrive. I think we will have them all mine on a private pool created specifically for that purpose. We\\'re still investigating our options on that. We can\\'t really test anything at the moment because we don\\'t have 600 spare 7970\\'s lying around which we can use to test\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner, 7970\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 00:59:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN USA/Canada [Group Buy #5@78/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nclose close close\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCount me in for three units. Payment and verification message on the way. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow much longer this group buy open for?Through today at least?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nrequested payment address from friedcat. will put up a timer when received\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOK great. I will get my order in when it comes down to the wire...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhen did ZipZap start limiting money ordersto only $100?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nLooks like this hit 50 and I don\\'t see a timer.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI think he mentioned they could go over once the quota was met. Just depends on when he wants to lock it down.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m interested in at least 1 since I have enough BTC for that if available but I was hoping to order 5. Problem is having to pay with bitcoin since I have never purchased crypto with USD, I normally mine but like you I have had to shut down and face up coming hard times which I assume will get worse. Is there any way to pay cash or buy BTC instantly with a credit/debit?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nDomrada; 20; 40.8472; \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nBitinstant.com is the fastest easiest way.You will lose a fair bit to fees though.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nNo point in closing until I get a payment address from friedcat. Plus it\\'s the weekend there too. He\\'s not going to ship right now either. When it\\'s Monday in china, he will ship.Until then, go ahead and order!!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nVouch for canary\\'s group buys, finally had time to pickup my block erupter from group buy #1\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAfter paying the zigzag fees the fees to CVS for cash gram and the EXTORTION on getting from $ to BTC that the bitcoin mafia hits you with (way over the trading range) you can expect to be down 17% just getting from US$ to BTC. The mob is in the middle of it now.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, block erupter\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 01:17:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN USA/Canada [Grp Buy #5 @102/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nKrellan; 1; 2.04236; with shipping information (signed) has been sent!Edit: Sent in 2 transactions, because of underpayment earlier, sorry about that.2.04236 from from total\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nboor; 12; 24.6654; \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 20:55:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: 120Gh ASIC for 20 - 25,5 BTC shipping, hosting, group buy!\\n### Original post:\\nHere is the MUST READ for the day:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGotcha. I\\'m still interested in 13 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGood decision pidobir. That one transaction for 4 share sent without network fee screw us to pay more. Never sent transaction without net fee (0.001btc) Paying shortly 5x0.084 extra for my 5 shares!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\npaid extra BTC 0.168 for third ASIC \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSorry, I\\'m confused now. Who needs to send the extra BTC? Also, are you going to do another group buy since you have space for more hosting now?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAnyone with shares of the 3rd unit, which includes you.By the time pidobir had got all the btc (mainly due to one user sending without a transaction fee) the price had gone up due to them being priced in $ and the BTC value falling, he kindly paid the difference so we could get the order in.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n1. All buyers who ordered third unit must send extra 0,084 BTC for each share to Yes i have a free hosting place. Now we are going to group buy fourth asic! The price is 0,86 btc for share 5 GH\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMetabank have only 76 units or less! \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nUPDATE.1. BIG investor (auto2nr1) refused to order the 5 devices, so hosting is available again.2. I paid 2,01 btc for third units from my money, and ordered it. So, each investors must extra pay 0,084 btc for each share to I made this decision without you!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOk, I will send you the extra BTC and I would be interested in 1 or 2 extra shares from Batch 4.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nPlease email meta bank\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nwrote PM\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThis spreadsheet looks out of date... It is currently listing Bitcentury with 23 units, but according to their update page they have over 2x that amount (51): seems hard to believe they haven\\'t sold out yet (unless people are already asking for a refund... also hard to believe).Maybe due to the large demand they are going to produce more than the 366 initially listed.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nIts right. These is unofficial spreadsheet, but we have no other information\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nBTC downPrice increase!0,94 BTC for share\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 120Gh ASIC, 3rd ASIC, 4th ASIC\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 07:38:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: 120Gh ASIC for 21,5 - 27 BTC shipping, hosting, group buy!\\n### Original post:\\nPaid 0.252 for the extra costs for 3 sharesSending Address: details: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirm\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 120Gh ASIC\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 16:19:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN USA/Canada [Grp Buy #5 @115/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nGood night folks... I\\'ll update orders in the morning... Expect a short timer tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWell it\\'s 2 am and I am at a loss given my luck with mining/ASIC lately. It seems bitinstant has disabled cash until monday:This is topped by FTC peaking in value on btc-e and I had hoped to exchange the batch I was sitting on but the block chain seems to have forked and my transfer is MIA...so much for selling high lol.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPer update on OP, timer is up. Just under 10 hours to go.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhy did the price have to drop.... I might buy some more.What am I thinking......\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nchadbu; 5; 10.2118; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n2 hrs to go!!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI can\\'t generate them that fast. Maybe next run.M\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n38 mins bump\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 18:14:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: 120Gh ASIC for 24 - 32 BTC shipping, hosting, group buy!\\n### Original post:\\nShit hope my order confirms at 19 btc\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust to confirm: I still need to send you 0,084 BTC (not more) per share for my batch 3 right?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyes, its right\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI think we will know it tomorow.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAre there any shares left for batch #3 hosting ASIC?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPaid 0.42btc difference for my 5 share in third asic device.Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nConfirm\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nMETABANKS MESSAGE Pre-order the first batch completed. You (pidobir) will be notified by mail of the beginning of the reception of funds for the second batch.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 120Gh ASIC, third asic device\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 18:31:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 9 sold! 10th miner: 52/120 sold\\n### Original post:\\nAllright; first post updated with all payments; also extended the groupbuy till midnight Amsterdam time\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n8 sharesID: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 18:42:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN USA/Canada [Grp Buy #5 @150/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'d send and he can refund. He\\'s probably about to email in the order though.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\npayment sent to friedcat.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTalk about skin of my teeth. This is why canary and I are friends.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYep, Aces!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 22:54:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - SOLD OUT - more eta 6/6 - check bitmit.net [USA]\\n### Original post:\\nHe\\'s sold out according to the thread subject but I wanted to confirm that, while I haven\\'t received the actual item yet, I\\'ve received a tracking number. Looking good!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI just placed an order for one of the 3 that were remaining on BitMit. BitMit shows the payment as incoming, and I\\'m currently waiting for their system to show the payment as confirmed on their end - I show 6 confirmations, but I\\'m not sure how many BitMit requires (this is my first time using them).I\\'ll come back to this thread with my feedback.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNo worries - you\\'re good! Payment cleared and yours will ship out today!FYI, I just received a couple more from a group buy that I\\'m adding to bitmit - I kept a bunch from my own batch order and have no need for them (especially because they happened to be red and black, just like my own batch!). Please feel free to snatch up the last of my stock there.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAwesome, thanks - got the tracking #!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThinking hard about buying 2 more. Will be watching thread really close!Got tracking for first one that was fast, are you printing labels off the net??Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWho is \"d500xl9446\" ?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMe. Did you mean to ask why do I have a different user name on there? It was just a random keyboard mash when I created my bitmit account for purchasing crap a long time ago.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes. I enjoy my free time and would rather not spend the day in line at the post office I gotta admit, I haven\\'t used USPS services that much in the past, but I\\'m blown away with their Click and Ship website - astonishingly easy to print labels in batch for you guys!!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI can validate that d500xl9446 and kosmokramer are the same person (or at least, has access to both accounts ).\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nJust checked tracking statuses and it looks like many miners will be delivered tomorrow! Please don\\'t forget to post some feedback ... after you fire those bad boys up of course!FYI: my inventory count was off (I guess due to receiving my group buy today) and I\\'ve just added two more BLACK erupters to bitmit. First come, first served!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nExpected Delivery By: June 6, 2013Almost time to put on my \"Waiting for USPS\" shirt\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThat\\'s exactly what was meant. Thanks for answering up quickly.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPM Sent.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nGiven the difficulties to convert USD to BTC, you\\'d probably need to do a cash advance on your card and then bitinstant via moneygram to buy BTC. So it\\'s doable. Just takes some effort.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI sincerely appreciate your feedback about payment methods. At this time, I can only consider bitcoin as it\\'s the only thing my supplier (friedcat) accepts. Whoa - did I just type that? My USD are no good there - wow, how far we\\'ve come! Haha! I keep encouraging users to take cash to BitInstant.com for a quick USD-to-BTC experience.I see some tracking statuses have been updated to delivered! Excited to hear some feedback and see some pictures of your new little SHA256 babies being put to work!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'m so thrilled you\\'re satisfied! Trust me - the honor is all mine serving such a great group of people. Seriously, you guys are all wonderful and fun to work with. Thanks for the feedback and pictures!!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nGot mine today, plugged it in & was hashing away in no time!Thanks again, highly recommended!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYeah!! I would like to point out for others who may not know - for some reason, BitMinter (the client you see pictured there) is reporting twice the expected hashrate for these devices. Just don\\'t want others to be disappointed when theirs is hashing at half (~330 mhash) of what\\'s in the image above!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nInteresting bug there. Also, I\\'ve seen a few of these notifications, is this normal?2013.06.05 [17:59] Icarus (COM3): Not getting any results. Retuning timers. 2013.06.05 [17:59] Icarus (COM3): Command response 6 ms, hash rate 336.0 Mhps.It then returns to normal.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI can tell you I\\'ve seen that on my personal miners, however, this sales thread probably isn\\'t an appropriate venue for technical support. Perhaps try the BitMinter thread or look for an appropriate ASICMiner thread?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nNp, sorry to clutter the thread. Such a cool piece of hardware\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nYou\\'re telling me. As I\\'ve told others, I about shed tears every time I ship one of these little guys out. They are a work of art. Now that I\\'m sold out, my brother noticed an air of depression and relates it to being an \"empty nester\" - haha. My kids are all grown up and hashing professionally now!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThe three I ordered on bitmit arrived as expected and are hashing away as I type.Leaving trust feedback now.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nIf anyone is curious, lazlo was able to get a quick answer to this on the BitMinter thread. Seems normal.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThank you - I wasn\\'t even aware of thi\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, miners, BLACK erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 22:08:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 9 sold! 10th miner: 64/120 sold\\n### Original post:\\nThis has ended up a big hit thank you Tyrion70 and BTClastBTCoBTCThen it\\'s up to KNCMiner\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nbig thanks to you guys. Lets hope KNCMiner stick to the september release date and hopefully the difficulty doesnt go up to the sky just yet\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThey better keep the information flow right. If not i am going to take the 5 hours car trip to them an make sure it goes as planned.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAllright people, only 56 54 shares left and a few hours. BTC has restored to above 100$ again so it\\'s almost a good time to buy again ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWe are very close to the 10th miner now\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAllright; 45 minutes before closing.. Still at 56 shares. We need to sell at least 14 more shares before we can/will buy the 10th miner. We would like to buy the 10th miner tonight because we have to work tomorrow and we need to get some rest the remaining 50 shares will still be for sale but the miner will already be bought.Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nwhat the hell, i\\'ll buy another share. Sending the BTC in a minute edit: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nhaha, nice! i might just go with u\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n5 sharesTx: addr: \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n6 additional shares sold, so come on people, we need to buy at least 8 shares (4 BTC) in 15 minutes\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n5 \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nCan you confirm there are 3 shares left/required and I will take them if so.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOK, just got some beeps from blockchain.info! we sold enough shares to buy the miner.. Still 40+ left so you can still buy some.. We\\'ll be back with another bitpay screenshot!Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n4 \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMiner will post the bitpay screen shortly..EDIT: has posted the bitpay screen 4 seconds before me lol..I\\'ll be updating the start post in a few minutes. We should still have around 35 shares left. Feel free to buy these. If we oversell we will offcourse return your payment (or if we oversell by 120 buy another one )Thank you all for your trust and kind words so far! Our combined fate is now in the (capable) hand of KNC. We will contact each of you by PM coming week to confirm the transactions, payout addresses and contact & BlastBob!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nBought another 4: \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nreally appriciate your work and effort! Nice way to buy 5.645 Gh for only 1 BTC(to compare: I bought 18 avalon chips for the production of 2 x K1 and 1 x K16 for an ESTIMATED cost of 2.4 BTC = 5.076 Gh)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner, avalon chips, K1, K16\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 10:32:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live][Updated] 8 Sold\\n### Original post:\\n8th Jupiter purchased\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThank you for your payments, added to OPCheers\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTXID: shares - 4.5 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCan someone help me what this means? I thought we only can control the receiving address? How do we control the sending address? What does this mean?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI think I found it. Is it under --File --Sign Message --Tab? Is this correct?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSend the money from a adress that your control, ie, in your wallet (blockchain, bitcoin-qt, armory...) and no from Mt.gox, Bitstamp,... or another chart. You only can sign from your owner adress from a wallet.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n2 shares order --4.5 BTCTxID: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPayment Sent for 1 share - 2.25BTCTxid: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSent correction 0.008 BTCTxID: \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAll added to OP, please send email addresses so I can add you to spreadsheetThank you for contributing\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPayment sent for 1 share - BTC2.25 sentTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nJust a quick one, have you factored in the purchase of a ATX psu for each Jupiter?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNot sure of power source, where did you read this information?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nOn their website:\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n it looks like you may need a 1000w ATX PSU for each Jupiter\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAppears that way, will clarify with KNC.If we need to buy, the group will need to buy 12 PSU\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nPayment sent for 3 shares\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nPayment sent for 1 additional share\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAs no.1 on the list I totally agree\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n+1Early supporters should be rewarded earlier I deliberated for a number of hours and sent my (hard earned GPU mined) BTC in blind faith, as this was a few days before John K had verified soniq\\'s identity - at which point I felt a lot easier about my investment.If the returns are near the 11.44gh\\'s per share, I\\'ll be extremely pleased with this investment I believe the risks now are :-As more ASIC\\'s come on line the BTC prise will fall as the new BTC\\'s are generated too quickly / easily and sold cheaper so investors can get an understandable early return on their investments.Satoshi throws his fortune in the ring (Another price crash)The US Govt - Doing what the US Govt does (Rich from a Brit I know..... Where everything is illegal!) But we need USD flowing into GOX / Other exchanges.KNC doing a BFL!!!!!! (This is the big one for me)\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\n3 SharesTX ID \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nIt\\'s pretty clear in the original post:As \\'early adopters\\' you managed to capitalize on the BTC2.00 share price instead of paying BTC2.25That and you got in early enough to avoid \\'missing out\\' at the tail end of the buy-in. Remember, 30 full shares need to be purchased for a Jupiter to be ordered.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nMore hash power doesn\\'t mean more BTC generated!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nApologies, But this is why I wanted to get an in to ASIC so I could HASH with the big players.Will the difficulty just keep increasing then?All this heavy artillery coming on-line will have an effect on the BTC eco systemAnd my pathetic GPU efforts will no longer be worth the effort (I\\'m deliberating on this now, but I love being a Miner)IMHO.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\n> \"the early bird gets the worm, always. Sonics initial plan seems fair, IMHO, to reward the 1s who got in earlier than the rest. The risk is much higher when no1 is in the game yet - once the ball is rolling the mob mentality kicks in and makes it easier for the rest to join in.\"^ I agree with this principle, but... sprint347 is right, the 1/360th comment did imply there was an element of poolingAlso, what if a Jupiter has excessive down-time at any stage? Do the owners of that Jupiter pay up, or is the risk spread? If the first Jupiter is set up and shares go directly to the shareholders in precise sequence, then it would be unfair later to pool the returns if that Jupiter was faulty or had down-time for a few weeks or longer. Spreading the risk across machines might therefore have its advantages especially for those with a larger share in any 1 particular machine. Something that might affect the decision is the precise pre-order slot of each Jupiter. If they are bunched up together very close 65-85, it is going to be less of an issue perhaps. But then again, if there is a top 10 order slot in there somewhere...\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nOk, I\\'m having a change of mind hereThe pool win or fail mentality is probably fairer in the event of Downtime / failures / repairs etcAnd I did originally buy in to an X/360 share schemeSo as more come on line my share is worth more and if we have a failure / downtime / maintenance window, I do not singularly foot the bill.And it probably easier for sonic to manage it as a pool as opposed to working out / cataloging who owns what bit etc....\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nEven though in 1st on the list I do agree with this, Having a larger pool will spread th\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter, ATX psu, 1000w ATX PSU, ASIC\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 23:45:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live][Updated] 9 Sold\\n### Original post:\\ndue to current BTC price drop.. + due to KnC prices based on USD. would you accept Paypal?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI currently have about $3400 interested in paying by Paypal. Would need the full purchase price of one Jupiter in USD as KNC does not allow payment with part BTC/USD.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyou always can convert BTC in USD..I believe that more people will buy shares from you if you just offer both ways of payment.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n9th Jupiter purchasedGood work everyone\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI would consider it, but currently I dont have the time to convert USD to BTC. I ended this GB a little bit early to give me time to clear up any loose ends with KNC.Interested investors can still buy in after the timer is over.PM me before you send any payments however to verify that there is still time and space to enter GB.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFrom my previous post - just to confirm, did this get in for the 9th Jupiter?\">2 more shares, hopefully 1 more will chip in.Tx ID: Did payment go through OK to make the spreadsheet? Looks good my end. Thx.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI don\\'t understand why there is confusion. We are participating in a GROUP buy and in the opening post Soniq clearly states \"Each share entitles the owner to 1/360th* of the BTC proceeds from the group of 12 KNC Jupiter\\'s mining 24/7 till no longer profitable or sold (less expenses and management fees)\". Since we got to 9 Jupiters, each share entitles to 1/270 of the BTC....As participants we pro rata share the costs and the income, no matter when we stepped in.The equality was for me to reason to step in.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nwhile that seems nice as we receive a bigger share, why dont we let soniq clarify that.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThe share might be bigger, but you do realize the income is also lower with 9 Jupiters compared to the income of 12 Jupiters ?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n+1... Makes sense to me. Frankly this is how I thought this whole thing would be handled or I may not have bought in.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'m 3rd on the list (24 shares) and I don\\'t expect any privileges. As a group, we should share good and bad (what if one of the miners crashes...)\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThis was also my understanding and the primary reason for buying in.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nrefer to post 191 in this thread, original terms stand\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nare there still shares open?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI agree with this for 110%\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\ncurrently , yesinvestor looking to buy 60 slots, so will be shares left on Jupiter #12\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n1 share @ 2.25 would like to receive at \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\n5 share @ 2.25 would like to receive at \\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAdded to OP , welcome to the group :-)reminder to all future investors that anyone coming in after GB is over will be refunded. Currently we have about 12 hours to finish this GB\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nAnother 3 shares: \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThe shares might be bigger and the overall income might be lower, but the net to each shareholder per share should still be the same - ~11.66GH/s (from my understanding, without the extra 30% from the new algo).\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\n1 share: \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSorry if this has been asked but eta till machines are physically in hand?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nKNC is quoting September delivery\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nadded to OP, welcome\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nAnother 3 \\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nbought 1 more share:\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 07:21:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [ASIC] Avalon Chip Group Purchase : Idaho, USA : 8775 Chips Remaining\\n### Original post:\\nGreat, it\\'s always fun meeting up with a fellow bitcoiner 8775 Chips are available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI signed the message in Armory which for some reason is not verifying with other peoples\\' clients.I\\'ve imported the address into a yubikey-protected blockchain.info wallet and resigned the same (everything between quotes, but not including quotes): \"I am Garr255 and I have purchased 10,000 Avalon ASICs with order #10429\"Signature: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThis message did verify for me.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSubscribed\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOk thanks. It verifies for me now thanks\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI think is a good idea to go for the 64 chip model (more energy efficient), but are you going to offer replacement chips? steamboat is offering replacements at BTC0.0939\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks for bringing this up. It\\'s a good idea and I have just answered it in the FAQ.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nlol even your replacements chips are \"cheaper\"\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThat\\'s what happens when you introduce competition in the marketplace Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'m very interested, hoping I can get enough coins to purchase 64 chips before they\\'re sold out. Great job on this Garr!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThanks.Board assembly costs should be finalized this week!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nsteamboat is going to charge $95 for a 16 chip board, are you sure you\\'re going to be able to sell a 64 chip board for $200?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'ll let you know when I get the quotes finalized in a couple days Right now it is looking like the 16 chip boards will be the more viable option however.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nany updates?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nExtremely interested in purchasing 64-128 chips and multiple miner assemblies, really hoping for the 64 model chip board.Since you have already purchased the chips, do you plan on sending out orders as soon as they are received from avalon or will you wait for the 10,000 lot to be completely sold?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nany update about Board assembly service and cost?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYour total chip count is a liitle concerning to me - I sent payment and an email following the OP guidelines on May 31. Can you confirm that you have my order for 35 chips with tx id: \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nUpdated. I only update the OP a few times a week.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs, yubikey-protected blockchain.info wallet, 64 chip model, replacement chips, 16 chip board, 64 model chip board, miner assemblies\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 10:17:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 10 sold! 11th miner: 23/120 sold\\n### Original post:\\ncurrently im awaiting for my btc withdrawal to be confirmed, so as soon i got it in my wallet, i\\'ll send you the 1BTC (for now) payment asap. so considered that Im IN =)EDIT: 0.5BTC its on your way shall send you another 0.5btc soon EDIT2: Just to be sure, this is my address \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 14:01:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live] 9 Sold [2 Hours Left]\\n### Original post:\\n10th KNC Jupiter, Good work everyone\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 14:14:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 10 sold! 11th miner: 75/120 sold\\n### Original post:\\nAll payments so far confirmed and added to start post. Already 75 shares sold, only 45 left.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\njuve4v: 5 shares, 2.5BTC Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nnamzycad3 : 5 shares, 2.5BTC \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\njuve4v, namzycad3 and godzilla confirmed; 88 shares sold, 32 left. Will update start post shortly.Cheers,\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 23:16:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live][Updated]\\n### Original post:\\nI will place orders with KNC as groups of 30 shares are paid for so you can check the block chain for progress.Will also post names of forum members that have been made each group of 30 shares\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nRight now I have interest for 22 shares but no payments yet, will add a countdown of share count to OP\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo 30 shares per Jupiter... Are all 12 in <500 bunch or just 5 of them?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAll 12 Jupiters are in preorder slot lower than 83. I have #77, #78, # 83 and a Mars preorderWill add photos of all preoders, if requested. And a email from Sam at KNCminer that states that I am entitled to order 12 Jupiters.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSorry mate but I don\\'t see why people would trust you enough to send you 720 BTC. That amount should be heavily escrowed, to the last bit of it. Both purchasing and mining part.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nwhen will these ship?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSo each 2 BTC share corresponds to 11.66 Gh/s, is this right?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThey don\\'t, I am sending 60 BTC to KNCminer after every 30 shares are sold. So shareholders will be trusting KNCminer with 720 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHiapologies if my question looks a bit stupid and your thread is then full of inane comments.....I think I\\'m interested in 2 maybe 3 shares (If we\\'re not limited to 1?)so this is ->12 jupiters x 350gh =4200 gh total hash4200 / 360 =11.66 gh per share- 2% management fee and other incidentalsSo at todays difficulty rate = roughly after fees 11.4 btc per month(Assuming 24/7 uptime - reboots maintenance failures etc will prob understandably come into play)-> Are my maths about right?So as a share holder, would I have anything to log onto to see how my investment is coming along?(Most miners love a tweak... so i hope this is read only so my 359 partners do not tweak my investment!)Will I receive anything saying I am a of part ownership etc)Or will I only know how this is going just by the bi-weekly payments of BTC?Will these commence mining in September?Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n350 GH/s/30 shares =11.66GH/s per share\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nInterested for 20 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThey will still have to trust you with 720 BTC when you get miners. You could simply never pay what you mined. Not saying you\\'ll do it but you could and they can\\'t do anything about it.It\\'s just too much trust to one random forum member for my taste. The fact that you went for big number of miners just intensives that feeling.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ninterested in a share to get the ball rolling.payment sent, transaction ID \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHiapologies if my question looks a bit stupid and your thread is then full of inane comments.....I think I\\'m interested in 2 maybe 3 shares (If we\\'re not limited to 1?)so this is ->12 jupiters x 350gh =4200 gh total hash4200 / 360 =11.66 gh per share- 2% management fee and other incidentalsSo at todays difficulty rate = roughly after fees 11.4 btc per month(Assuming 24/7 uptime - reboots maintenance failures etc will prob understandably come into play)yesread only, KNC will be hosting miners and optimizing hash ratesyour payment address in blockchain and I will create a password protected Google Docs spreadsheet with all investorsI hope soCheers\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI have an opportunity to buy 12 Jupiters, it does not mean that all 12 will sell. All my private identity will be provided to shareholders\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nPerhaps you could get a trusted member of the forum to verify your identify, John (the escrow guy) for example?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI have done some transactions with John. I will send him a PM to verifyPS: I have sent a PM to John to verify identityPPS: I am going to be away from the computer for the next 3 or 4 hours, will respond to inquiries when I get back\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nPayment sent for 7 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nPayment sent for 12 shares\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nPayment sent for an additional share taking my total to 2 shares -Transaction \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nSent payment for 20 shares:\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nLooks like Soniq just hit the lottery!BIG TIME!Let me get this straight, IF they deliver:He gets 2% of 12x350Gh/s which equals 84Gh/s,He doesn\\'t put up any BTC,He doesn\\'t have to host,He just sits back and collects.IF they don\\'t deliver:He has to type up some PMs.or am I missing something?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nFind me a cheaper way to get the same ghash/s for a small investment.block erupter just over 2 bitcoin @ 282-300 khash/sshares = 2 bitcoin for 11.66 ghash/s with no electricity or effort.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nbetter wait for those coins to hit >300$ and you are fine. You don\\'t have to get this asic. You can wait and buy an asic later this year when your coins gained in value\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nOne Jupiter ordered sent BTC to a typo of one extra BTC and have submitted to Bitpay for a refund for overpayment. Dont know how long that takes to process-PMs sent -Updating spreadsheet and will update main thread with for\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter, Mars, block erupter, asic\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-09 00:36:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - OUT OF STOCK - more arriving Monday!! [USA]\\n### Original post:\\nWhy is some of the trust feedback not going in the trusted section? Anyone know? WHOOT I HAD THE BIGGEST TRUSTED ORDER... is that good? Or am I chasing a pipe dream because they will never ROI? WHO CARES VIA LA BITCOIN! VIA LA KOSMO!Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGranted, I just discovered the \"trust\" tool a few days ago, but it\\'s my understanding that trusted feedback is from members who are already in the elite pool of trust in this community. For example, OgNasty is one of the trusted members around here, and he made a comment that I served him well, so they separate his comment from yours because perhaps his carries more weight, as he\\'s a very trusted user.Untrusted feedback is still good, but it doesn\\'t carry as much weight as trusted. I could get my family to create accounts here and say as many warm and fuzzy things as possible about me, but it would all, justifiably, go under the untrusted feedback section.This is the trust network: As you can see, Og is pretty high up the hierarchy, so we value his opinion. I saw Tomatocage call out a scammer yesterday - he is pretty good at that which is likely one of the many reasons he\\'s in that trust pool too.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMy feedback was posted as trusted.... on yours and arklan\\'s trust post pages... hmmmm I GUESS I AM A TRUSTED MEMBER! GO ME!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m seeing it under untrusted, no?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI am looking at your trust page and I see only 2 under trusted ... Me and OgNasty... weird!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nhere is what i see\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOk, well that makes sense. When you look at someone\\'s trust profile, they separate the feedback you\\'re reading based on who\\'s opinion YOU trust (or who\\'s opinion they, be default, think you should trust) and who\\'s opinion you may or may not trust (untrusted). So they suggest that you trust OgNasty\\'s opinion of me and clearly you can trust your own opinion, so they both appear under \"trusted\". It\\'s the same with me - when I view your trust profile, my feedback for you appears under \"trusted\" - because (hopefully) I can trust my own opinion of you.Just saw the pictures you posted - looks like it arrived in perfect condition!!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThen perhaps, I don\\'t know how it works or maybe I\\'m not understanding what you\\'re seeing.For reference, this is what my trust page looks like to myself.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nyes sir it arrived excellent and I met the driver at his truck.. thanks for working with me on the postage and thanks for you dedication to making it all go smooth. The pic was a nice added touch! Sorry it was blurry I didn\\'t notice until I posted it.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'ve got some exciting news guys! I was able to work with BitMit support to change my weird user name (d500blahblahblah) to match my bitcointalk name! Less confusing - yay!In addition, I provided them personal information, including my company\\'s business license/articles of incorporation and I am now a verified BitMit seller! Pretty exciting!I\\'ve been trying for some time now to work with BitPay to get my sales website up and running, but they are just ridiculous. I don\\'t know what I\\'m doing wrong, but they won\\'t give me the time of day. Meanwhile, Joachim at BitMit is bending over backwards to help me clean-up my seller profile, change username to match BT, same-day verification, answer questions, etc .... although BitMit\\'s fees are much higher than BitPay, I still prefer them due to outstanding customer service.Very exciting and just wanted you all to be informed that I am now \"kosmokramer\" on both sites ... and verified! I\\'d love to gain \"trusted\" status on this site, but not sure what the steps are to do that. Does anyone know?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nBOTTOM LINE I TRUST KOSMO AND SO SHOULD YOU. Maybe I should put pics of 20 shipped miners on here!Believe me I am happily hashing.one of 2 opened box of 10 (the other isn\\'t mine to open)There be little miners in them there boxes....\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI fixed my pic!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nStill trying to get a BitPay account to better serve you guys. I posted on reddit hoping to get a bit more feedback on what the hell the secret is. Would appreciate upboats if any of you are redditors. Thanks all!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSad to see BitPay doesn\\'t seem to know what is going with your account. Sounds like you have been more diligent than their support team!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nGot the little guy in the mailbox today. Plugged in and running with (almost) no trouble. kosmokramer ships fast.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nPurchased 6 from KosmoKramer... two paypents of 12.6 and .6 for 13.2 \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nPurchased two from kosmokramer and got them in perfect condition two days after I ordered them. Also, most entertaining packaging ever. Great seller!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nBitPay Approval Update: BitPay is going to try to work on my account approval, but they cannot continue until I buy and install an EV SSL Certificate even though I\\'m using their shopping car\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 14:18:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live] 9 Sold [8 Hours Left]\\n### Original post:\\nPM\\'s sent to all existing shareholders Closing GB in 6 hours\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nA price of 2.3 and 2.4 BTC is mentioned in the OP. You might want to correct that ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThank you , corrected. I really need to get some sleep :-)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI got Bit Message running on my Mac.Since I didn\\'t want to use the .dmg package as mentioned on I went through a lot of steps to get it going.Some hints: Download sqlite and Python 3 yourself.Bit Message is now running and it spits out a lot of messages(to say it politely).I wonder if we need this Bit Message. Why not communicate here on the forum like we have been doing ?Same applies to Google Docs, do we really need that ? Google already knows way too much about us...And besides that, I haven\\'t been able to see the document yet, don\\'t know how to open it since I have no link to it.Sorry if you think I am too negative, but that\\'s how I see it.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAnd the question about the power supplies we will need. I would say the participants pay pro rata their number of shares. And we choose a power supply once we know which one are applicable.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHello,I have just sent 2.3 BTC for one share, please add me to the next lot: you!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHello I have no bitcoin acount and interested in 10.Do you know an exchange i can buy and send bitcoins immediately as a NEW user.Or would you accept old school moneyI am already stockholder with candoo - see my first posts - so not jokingYou can pm me tooP.s the 10 shares would be in the 1-500 order group, too?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSoniq please check PM\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nending in 5 hours\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAgree PSU purchase price should be pro rata to number of shares purchased\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nMy payment: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nsorry i just discover this groupbuy, some noobie question.at current rate, does it mean that each share will be 360 - 73 = 287 share ordered, and divide by 350ghs x 9unit = 3150ghs. each share will be 10.97gh/s ?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNo Any outstanding shares that haven\\'t been enough to purchase the next Jupiter would be refunded.This would mean as it stands 9 jupiters would be bought with 270 shares. (17 being refunded)Also bear in mind that the longer you leave it, the higher the chance you would be left on an outstanding order, so roll up roll up, don\\'t miss out etc. Seriously, I think Soniq has worked hard to secure investment for all the outstanding shares, so I don\\'t think it will happen anyway.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAgreed.As dividends will be paid pro-rata this should be applied to costs (eg. BTC0.07 per share for PSU purchases).Just on the topic of PSU I suggest we calculate if it\\'s worth buying a hot spare (eg. BTC0.005 per share for an additional unit) to avoid downtime in case of failure.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nNot too negative, you raise an awful lot of good points!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nReally? We can\\'t use the forum as it\\'s not private. PMs wouldn\\'t work well either, as everyone would have to respond to everyone etc.This fact makes the other points moot.As for Google, if you sent Soniq your email address then he will have mailed it with the sharing link.Just add that mail address as a google account address (no name, address, shoe size etc required).I understand most Apple users have been spoon fed functionality thus removing the need for anything technical beyond topping up an iTunes account, but it\\'s not hard.(Disclaimer: That last bit was a joke btw, I know there is a difference between Mac user and iPhone/Pad user, and mean no offence)\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHi,You can usually get quick BTC at carried out a few transactions there and you can usually buy within 10 minutes or so if doing a bank transfer* - just make sure the seller is - assuming you are in the UK and both banks use faster payments.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHello,I\\'ve purchased 1 share - Am I too late?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n10 shares in, sent\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n1 sharepaidCode:ID: \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThank you for your contribution, added to OP10th Jupiter purchased\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI don\\'t see it in OP, can you check please? Thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter, Bit Message, sqlite, Python 3, PSU, hot spare\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 20:18:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 11 sold! 12th miner: 99/120 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll take them all 21. Will post payment in a moment.10.5 BTC: transaction \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSOLD OUT!!!!!! I\\'ll be updating everything shortly...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTwelve is a nice number ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nTwelve \"Mining\" Monkeys\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-05 18:46:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN [Group Buy Batch TWO] ASICMiner Block Erupter USB INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\n1 confirmed and paid for.I will be adding 5 for myself once I get some of my BTC paid back.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nShipment 1 is on its way from ASICMiner, looks like it will be split up so first person paid will be the first person shipped.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDoes the term \"all included\" (also) mean \"including shipping to wherever\"?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThat was the case with group buy 1, so I would assume so.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n\"Better safe than sorry\" And/or \"assumption is the mother of all f**k-ups\" (seen that one proven to be true, time and time again )Point being, i wouldn\\'t wanna \"waste\" BTC on transaction fees for no good reason\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhy do I feel like your going to ask me to ship to mars?But yeah, shipping is included*.Neil* interplanetary fees may be charged\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNah, no need to be (quite so) \"paranoid\" It would entail \"only\" shipping to Finland\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSame thing?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFor all in Europe:I will most likely also offer something again.here is my old thread: first miner have already arrived at my participants\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nyxt, any idea when that might happen (again)? I\\'m quite eager to \"migrate\" from Radeons (loud and power-hungry) to these nifty little buggers\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nyxt, I missed the first group buy from you so I\\'m interested too\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nsoon TM\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI want one! So what do I have to do now?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nJoin up with us, 6/50 paid now.neil\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSo then, shipping to Finland is included in the 2.6btc price? If it is, i\\'m signing up for one ASAP\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIt is, welcome aboard.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n... Aaaaaaaand done\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI need to know if you can ship to Switzerland before buying.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nwhy do international buyers have to pay an extra 0.6 BTC ?? what are you shipping them by? rocket from your ass?sounds like a rip off\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI am shipping a few there at the moment, I have spotted no additional problems.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nTwo reasons;-1. I don\\'t intend to skip on paying taxes/duty/customs fees.2. I am not an unpaid ASICMiner worker.Besides, they don\\'t HAVE to.Neil.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI need to buy some BTC to get one. Monday\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSo I registered to your site and it says it will send me an email with further instructions. I have not gotten any mail yet!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nSometimes the mail get lost, can you PM me the email you registered with and I will find it for you.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI\\'m assuming that it has to do with customs duties?And I\\'m also assuming that if I\\'m in the USA I\\'d still need to pay the extra 0.6 BTC???\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nFrom me? Yes sorry, each time I order a block of 50 of these it is close to 10,000 USD in value and if it gets locked up in customs because I don\\'t do things correctly..... it is just not a chance that I am willing to take with a pile of other peoples money.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\n11/50 now. The weekend is ending ans things are starting to speed up.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nAny sites with easy to use instructions on how to start mining with these things for noobs? I\\'m talking very basic instructions like what is a conf file and why do I need to set it up. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nyxt seems to have a guide on a thread in here somewhere: \\n\\n### Reply 29:\\n16/50 Paid now,In other news the first 50 devices for batch one are somewhere between where I live (Rotorua) and Auckland and the remaining 65 have just left Hong Kong.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\n21/50 Building momentum.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nWoo! At this rate, the 50 should be filled by the weekend\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\n26/50 Half way there.I also know that there are at least another 5 devices waiting for bitcoins.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\n\"By the way\" - i\\'m guessing you\\'ll *place* the order as soon as the minimum of 50 is fulfilled. How long does the shipping (from the manufacturer/seller to you) take?\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nThat is the general idea, in reality Friedcat is quite busy and sometimes takes a bit of time to accept the bitcoins (I need that Futurama picture of Fry say \"Shut Up And Take My Money\"). In practice it seems that there will be a lead time of 1 - 2 days and I will most likely keep it open with a countdown.As far as the shipping from ASICMiner to me, the DHL website says 5 to 10 working days. I currently have 2 packages from ASICMiner coming to me since last Friday and I will post here when I receive any of them. International shipping is a bit of a random thing though.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nUpdate from Group 1. After driving half way across the country (not really, only about 50k) I tracked down the first package and the first 50 have arrived!As you can see I have arranged them all spitting on top of the sticky labels of their owners ready for me to stick in boxes (not in camera shot).The second lot is still in Auckland with customs.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nWell done sir! Looking forward to checking those puppies out!\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nGreat! Looking \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupter USB, Radeons\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 23:33:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live] 11 Sold [2 Hours Left]\\n### Original post:\\n11th Jupiter purchased, keep up the good work :-)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nis this over now or a new batch?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n11th Jupiter purchased, still selling shares for 12th and final Jupiter\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n10 shares are mine send you PMTransaction IDTransaktions-ID: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNoted and added to OP, appreciated :-)9 shares left to complete group buy\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGlad you got sorted\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 03:58:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN] Canada Only [Group Buy #1 @54/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03 each\\n### Original post:\\nHopefully I\\'m not too late, here\\'s the details:name: melmoNo. Units: 10 Payment sent: 20.3 BTCPayment address: Scarborough\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDid you get my PM? I see 5 confirmations... hopefully that last one doesn\\'t take too long\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHopefully I\\'m not too late:name: JakeTriNo. Units: 8Payment sent: 16.24 BTCPayment address: ScarboroughI\\'ll send you a PM with hash for my signature using address.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 04:02:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] Jupiter KNCMiner (0.5 BTC shares) 11 sold! 12th miner: 71/120 sold\\n### Original post:\\newibit, eule and FloridaBear confirmed and added to start post. Already 71 shares sold!!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI would not start the group buy of a 13th miner, that\\'s bad luck\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhat Tyrion trying to say is that there is ONLY 49 Shares left. So first-come, first-servedSo yes 12TH is the last one in this group buy\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThat is 12th NOT 12TH (we would need a lot more miners then\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\no0o0o0o i am so butthurt right now...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n21 left..\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOnly 21 shares left guys. I need to sleep soon.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI don\\'t believe in bad luckbutWhat could possibly go wrong !!Last seen disappearing into the sunset kncminer guys with pot of gold and two hot blondesjust kidding!!!!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-07 15:26:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - OUT OF STOCK - more arriving Friday!! [USA]\\n### Original post:\\nGot mine today - thanks very much!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYay! Now go and put those blocks in checkmate!!Call me crazy, but I really enjoy seeing unboxing pictures such as yours. I like to see how my packaging held up to various destinations and I think it gives other customers a better idea of what to expect!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat job Kosmo! Just got them today. Thanks for combining shipping and saving me a few bits! I released your money on BitMit. I will be ordering from you again.Everyone else if you got your order, release your escrow funds, let this man get more!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGot my first order today (Kosmo, my USPS postman\\'s ears must have been burning last night because he left it in the mail box) NO sig if you required it! 2 Things.... 1st... there was a hole in the box... they didn\\'t even try to repair it... at least UPS will tape over a hole or if the box is damaged enough they will repack it..But thanks to Kosmo taking the extra care that he does my miner was safe and is happily mining away!Thanks again Kosmo!NaelrPS wow my phone takes great pics... the next ones will not be that large!!!!! sorry gotta run wife and me is going shopping!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNo, thank you good sir! Your big batch just headed out - expect to see it tomorrow morning!!This is why I love follow-up pictures - I had no idea my box could arrive that beat up. So glad the bubblemailers are doing their thang! Now I understand your USPS hesitation Happy hashing!After reviewing your picture, I\\'m going to start taping around both axes a couple of times just to prevent a possible blow-out.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nJust got my awesome red Block Erupter USB. kosmokramer has been a pleasure to deal with - great communication, and super fast shipping!Everyone, please remember to go back to BitMit (if that is how you purchased) and release your coins from escrow once you have received your miners! This way kosmokramer gets his funds quickly for doing such a great job, and can continue to be a great reseller for us.Here it is:And here it is mining away with its silver cousin:\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSo jealous! I still need a silver and a gold to complete my set!!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI have 2 silver. I am missing gold as well. If your next shipment has gold in it, please let me know.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIndeed! Perhaps we can trade some precious metals\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nErupter arrived, expertly packed and shipped by Kosmo. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI didn\\'t know they had gold... these blacks will have me at one of each without the gold.... aw man I thought I was there... if you get any in... I would trade with ya too .. I have 2 silver ... unless you don\\'t want one that has been hashing for a week!edit:yea I guess I did... it looks yellow in the pictures... anyway I would still want one!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nand look what the postman brought ME today! All ready to protect the next batch of shipments. This stuff is TOUGH! Damn expensive but nothing but the best for you guys!!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHey Kosmo - Just wanted to say thanks for the smooth deal on your Bitmit listing. After paying up the deal went off without a hitch, quick communication and fast shipping for my order. Got em in 2 days!Signup for Bitmit was easy, and the escrow worked great too. Will be back for more.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI received mine today. Was my first BitMit purchase. Everything went smooth as buttah. Excellent vendor.Only mining I\\'ve ever done has been three years ago. Non-pooled, CPU/GPU. Where can I find the best guide on getting this thing working on my behalf?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nBtcguild.com is where I have mined forever... get an account and the rest is nice. depends on windows or linux mining... This helped a buddy of mine do windows mining mining is easy get cgminer 3.1.1 and a powered usb hub... sudo ./cgminer-nogpu -u XXXXX -p password --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100 -S /dev/ttysUSB0 (or 1 or 2 or 3 or whatever usb it ends up as being) version 3.2 and up are supposed to be auto detect but when I tried it they didn\\'t work so you need -S I think there is a new version but I haven\\'t tested yet...if ya have any more questions lemme know if I can help.. I have 3 going on linux right now and and 10 more scheduled for delivery tomorrow.Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\ndo pm when you decide to ship to oversea.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nSorry wasn\\'t trying to hijack... your right .... BACK TO PM me if you need a bit of help setting them up! P.P.S. BUY BUY BUY \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nPackage just arrived... Very well packed and UPS is just awesome.. will have some pics later... nice touch with the signed pic Kosmo.. I will hang that on the side of my computer!Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI\\'m going to update the OP - just talked with DHL - package was picked up a bit later than usual in China and did not make the flight to LA, therefore, it will not be delivered until Monday Expect me to up\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, silver, gold, powered usb hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 20:58:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - ACCEPTING ORDERS - Ships Tomorrow!!\\n### Original post:\\nOrdered and paid. Thanks Kosmo. Can\\'t wait till I get it!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrdered 4 more making the last of my bitcoins. Time to make the money back\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi!Do you have any left?Tom\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhy the F hasn\\'t this thread been moved to the for sale forum?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes! I\\'ve reviewed my incoming shipments and I have plenty to cover more orders. I haven\\'t counted it all up, but I\\'d say I\\'m 60-70% sold ... however, the pace isn\\'t really slowing down. I\\'ve been sending quotes/invoices and collecting shipping data all morning, and am still far behind. Boy am I glad I started accepting orders before tomorrow - there\\'s no way I would have had time to process all of these orders if I hadn\\'t started accepting a bit early today!This should always be true: If BitMit says I have some in-stock, then I have some in-stock.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNeither you nor I are the only re-sellers in US. I can assure you that there are others who have sold more than you and I combined.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThe thread was started here because I happened to see that this is where all group buys for the same hardware showed up. Apologize, but I was just following suit!I believe you\\'re referring to the \"marketplace\"? It looks like that\\'s more suited to one-off sales of random this-and-thats. In comparison, I\\'m a direct reseller for ASICMiner and deal in the hundreds. Personally, if I was looking for new, bleeding edge, mining hardware to purchase, I would come to \"custom hardware\" (in fact, I have, several times) ... while if I was looking for say liquid nitrogen, well, I wouldn\\'t expect it to be here.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nLikely true, but I sure couldn\\'t find anyone who stocked them when I wanted one immediately! (hence I joined the group buy) Just kept finding expensive onesie-twosies on eBay/BitMit.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI not remembering voting for Mr. Dropt to replace Mr. Mining Buddy as forum moderator. When that be happening?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n+1Not sure why but this \"Custom Hardware\" subforum has become \"Custom Hardware - Buy/Sell, preorders, group buys, preorders of shares on preordered products that might or might not be ever produced\".Now it is a junk subforum, KNC pre-orders, shares on pre-orders, 1.9TH PCI cards, Nigerian/Indian asics etc, hard to find any technical info on the actual products.All is missing is options on future forward contracts on Avalon/BFL dates or any other events related or unrelated to bitcoin. Pre-order \"hash rate swaps\" anyone? Total madness.PS. I have contributed to this with my small group buy thread.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI think keeping this thread in custom hardware is rather important to the community. What better place to learn about the economy of custom bitcoin hardware than to see first hand the interest others have in purchasing ASICs?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, ASICMiner, 1.9TH PCI cards, Nigerian/Indian asics\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 22:55:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live] 12 Sold [Selling Jupiter #13]\\n### Original post:\\nOne additional share purchased.TXID: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhich order number will the 13th miner have?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTwo shares: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n1 shareCode:ID: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nnoted and added.Just verifying with KNC if Jupiter #13 will get first delivery status\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPayment sent for 3 shares confirm\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n1 more shareCode:ID: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nany news about that?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nnone yetheres is some proof of a forum member visiting opening day \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCould I get link to spreadsheet?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'ll take the 10 shares left on #13 if they\\'re still available.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThey are , make sure you read all terms in OP regarding Jupiter #13, I have not received confirmation of first delivery yet for Jupiter #13If I dont confirm first order delivery, shareholders who buy shares in Jupiter #13 can get a full refund,\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-10 15:04:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [LAST CALL] Block Erupter USB @ 2.10 BTC + parcel -> Shipping to anywhere!\\n### Original post:\\nI can buying a couple more to going with batch 3 and not be affecting already 15 for batch 2 delivery?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, it is possible to participate in the batch 3 without affect the pre-order for batch 2.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nReceived 2 of my units today, they are working great on raspberrypi with minepeon\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThey working just out of the box? You do not need anything to upgrade? Can you explain more please:)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n1. plug the miner into a powered usb hub2. configure pools on the web interface of minepeon.3. modify add this to start options \"--icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100 -S /dev/ttyUSB0 -S /dev/ttyUSB1\" (this is for 2 devices)4.reload systemctl : systemctl bfgminer : systemctl start bfgminer6.maybe cgminer was started automaticaly, stop it : systemctl stop cgminer.service\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI was thinking of something that clamps on the back and on the chip and extends a way out would be ideal, but I have no way of fabricating this. There is not much room between mine in the tower style hubs I bought.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nReceived 10 black in color miners today. Thanks A+C.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI received mine, it\\'s working great Thanks Augusto! It\\'s funny to see such a small thing almost outperforming my GPU\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAlso got 3 of 6 yesterday. Working great, thanks A+C.Running them with rPi and powered USB2.0 hub. They do seem to generate some HW errors, but doesn\\'t seem to affect hashrate. I have a fan blowing air over them, so the aluminum heatspreader isn\\'t too hot to touch. Don\\'t know about the little chips on the other side, though...When the last 3 arrive, i plan to attach them to a large heatsink i have, which has enough surface for all of them. This will require extension cables for the Eruptors, but that doesn\\'t seem to be a problem as i mined few hours with all 3 on different length cables (longest is about 2 meters long)Then again, they mined equally well without any additional cooling, so i\\'m wondering what the thermal specs of these actually are. But extra cooling will give always mean longer life span, so extra cooling it is.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nFor those who received it, did you have to sign anything when you were delivered?I used my office address, which is closed on Saturdays, and the tracking tells me it was delivered today. That leaves only two options, someone at my office is working extra today and signed for it, or they just dropped the parcel in the box without anyone signing for it.Thanks for your answer!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWhen it was delivered here I did sign, the airsure sticker on the package however states \"No sig req\"\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI had to sign for mine\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'ve been trying to use:--icarus-timing shortinstead of:--icarus-timing 3.0=100It seems to be giving me a little more speed: about 335 MH/s instead of 334 MH/sThese options are explained in the file FPGA-README in cgminer source code.The \"short\" options basically finds the timing by calculating it and periodically adjusting it in the first hour it runs. You will see a message in the log about these adjustments every once in a while if you try it.The \"3.0=100\" is probably a safe timing that works fine for every unit. The thing is that all sticks are not exactly the same and some units might be able to cope with a slightly better timing value.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI finally managed to get cgminer 3.2.1 to work with Debian 7.0 ! Her\\'s what I did:sudo cp service udev restartNow unplug and plug again the usb erupter.Restart cgminer and it should work.cgminer 3.2.1 no longer requires to specify the serial device, nor any icarus timing options. I also read that it should improve the hashing rate compared to 3.1.1.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYes, 3.2.1 does improve hashrate slighty and you don\\'t have to specify the devices or Icarus options. Sadly, with rPi, mining ends very soon and all devices are shown as zombies... works on Debian though. Waiting for new version of cgminer\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI was having trouble getting my pi to run. I tried all the editing, demon reloading and everything, no dice.I noticed there was a new version of MinePeon dated 7/6/13, so I re-wrote my SD card with it. It worked straight away with no editing, just the pool addresses. I assume it is running cgminer as it says it is loaded in the scrolling startup text. has the download link for the \"Erupter Bob\" version. \"Butterfly Bob\" didn\\'t work for me.Bob\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nDo you mind sharing what make/model USB hub you used?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nGot mine today <3\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI think maybe he got all black. I bought directly from friedcat and happened the same to me\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nReceived my sticks. Thank you so much, Augusto. I left positive feedback on your trust page.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nBatch 2 delivered and already being post to buyers.24 / 7 days a week working to serve you from UK.All cr\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, raspberrypi, powered usb hub, tower style hubs, GPU, heatsink, extension cables, SD card, USB hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-08 17:06:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] AVALON CHIPs a few left @0.082BTC + K16 Miner Assembly from 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\n; <32>; < 2,624 >; < 2 >; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGood morningI\\'m updating the list and responding mp. Remaining 1210\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrders\\' StatusCurrent chips\\' price is 0.082BTCKlondike K16 full Miner Assembly service price is 60EUR (378 ordered so far)Breaking News: Any user wishing to get the full miner assembled by nekonos, will be able to pay the 60EUR of the assembly service in full once the miner has been completed and before it is to be shipped to its final destination.Latest News: Bizwoo will be on holidays from Saturday 08 June; therefore, please contact nekonos (and copy bizwoo) if you want to place your order via PM or have a question. Please read the full news.This Group Buy will be closed when the amount of BTC hold in the Escrow wallet reaches 797.764BTC. This will represent 9796 chips sold. When this happens, John K will place the order for the AVALON chips. Current amount in the wallet: Code:ID No. Chips Total BTC BTC Address Total Miners 12 0.96 0 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC2 32 2.56 2 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC3 224 17.92 14 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC4 32 2.56 2 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC5 48 3.84 3 Thread - Verified User - @0.08BTC6 16 1.28 1 PM - Unverified User - @0.08BTC7 32 2.56 \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\noper128; 32; 2.624; 2; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n; <16>; <1.312>; <1>; I did everything right.Please confirm.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ni want to purchase 2 more miner at 0.082/chip, ill use the same adress as befor (order id #9 ); <32>; < 2.624 >; < 2>; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n; <160>; <13.12>; <10>; can\\'t wait to get the miners.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWhat is the shipping queue of miners? It\\'s the same as buying chips?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nwow that order filled up quickly.. will keep my eye out if you do this again bizwoo\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCLOSED, very nice\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n~2 weeks for the batch to be ready is what I understood so far, so no queue. With the lead-in time of the chips, I\\'m looking at about ~10 weeks in total after the order has been made.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nDang, I was 4 LTC away from having enough BTC to get 16 chips to build a miner but it wasn\\'t in cards for me. My little GPU setup just couldn\\'t mine fast enough. I got myself all worked up hoping BTC would drop enough to make up the difference Good luck to those lucky enough to get on board ASIC mining, GPU mining outlook is grim at moment with massive move from BTC to scrypt.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'m out for a while! who sells me 32 chip?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWow this goes at crazy velocity.I send mp to Jonhk to make the chips order.And update the list of orders. Please be patient I have 34 mp for last 4h\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI should be ID 121. But it\\'s missing a miner unit. Normally I ordered 16 chips and 1 miner.It also says \"no user\". Will that be a problem? Can I help with that in any way?Thanks Nekonos and Bizwoo!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nOrders\\' Status CLOSED! WOW!Thanks to bizwoo.Gracias, nekonos.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWonderful! I was expecting this to drag on another 2 weeks.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nGreat! Thanks guys!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nHi MrMochiAnnotated, please verify the addressThanks\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nOrders\\' Status CLOSEDCurrent chips\\' price is 0.082BTCKlondike K16 full Miner Assembly service price is 60EUR (464 ordered so far)Breaking News: Any user wishing to get the full miner assembled by nekonos, will be able to pay the 60EUR of the assembly service in full once the miner has been completed and before it is to be shipped to its final destination.Latest News: Bizwoo will be on holidays from Saturday 08 June; therefore, please contact nekonos (and copy bizwoo) if you want to place your order via PM or have a question. Please read the full news.This Group Buy will be closed when the amount of BTC hold in the Escrow wallet reaches 797.764BTC. This will represent 9796 chips sold. When this happens, John K will place the order for the AVALON chips. Current amount in the wallet: Code:[code]ID No. Chips Total BTC BTC Address Note 12 0,96 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC 02 32 2,56 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC 23 224 17,92 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC 144 32 2,56 Thread- Verified User - @0.08BTC 25 48 3,84 Thread- Verified User - @0.08BTC 36 16 1,28 PM - Verified User - @0.08BTC 17 32 2,56 \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\n10 days For first batch I hope we open second batch today, previously I have to talk with John K.Thanks all\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI\\'ve sent you a PM.Thanks again.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nAhah excellent to wake up and see this buy filled. I assumed it would finish strong, those two 50+ btc purchases really helped nekonos, is there anything I can do to become verified at the moment? Or\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs, Klondike K16 full Miner Assembly, GPU setup, ASIC mining, GPU mining\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 16:14:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 5: 7378 ASICs gone 47378 sold\\n### Original post:\\nPossibly good news... i got a EMS-Envelope that has the trackingnumber of the sample chips... Strangely i couldnt track the shipment with this trackingnnumber at EMS-Website but it looks like the samples are here now... Im not at home for some hours unfortunately but the trackingnumber seems to be correct...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ncan\\'t wait for them!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n30 samples were delivered... 20 samples are on its way to burnin... Unfortunately i was 2 minutes too late at the post counter so it will be taken tomorrow from that branch. This way sending via express didnt make sense anymore... so it should be with burnin the day after tomorrow... I worked with antistatic workspace and pincette. I really hope i did everything correctly. Ill post later some pictures of the chips. They are really awful tiny.The other chips i will package today after checking back with zefir.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n!!! YAY\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, EMS-Envelope, antistatic workspace, pincette\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 17:11:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 5: 7483 ASICs gone 47483 sold\\n### Original post:\\nESD-Workspace and working with pincette. ASIC\\'s were in normal Envelopes, on a tray and the tray wrapped in of the chips.Tray alone with the 20 chips for burnin.Burnins chips on the tray + silica gel, wrapped with cellophane (i hope thats ok because otherwise they didnt remain on their places in the tray). Then put in esd-bags. Later put it in bubble envelope.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, Envelopes, tray, silica gel, cellophane, esd-bags, bubble envelope\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-12 18:07:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live] 11 Sold [9 Shares Left]\\n### Original post:\\nI just sent 20.7 for 9 \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\npm sent with tx id for another share. if i\\'m not in time you can just return the btc. thanks!tx: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNo news from KnC open day?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\njust sent BTC for one share:\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWow, seems like there\\'s enough for a 12th, correct?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nhmm, actually looks like tal0n4 bought the last remaining shares. how about a 13th? lucky number.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMaybe we can use this money for the power supplies we need.?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPm-ed with tx for a share As I have explained in pm, I couldn\\'t have sent the payment earlier.If i\\'m too late, please return the BTC. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nDoing final calculations to be sure all my math is right on shares sold. Will be accepting shares for 13th miner as KNC has extended payment window.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n12 KNC Jupiter, congratulations everyone!Verifying all shares to validate who made the cut\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nJob well done!Is there a point in purchasing shares for a 13th now? Finally got some more fiat exchanged and would like to take my share to an even 30 if possible\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHe is still accepting --- see post 264\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nCan you please update the list with my address? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nHi you are added to list, you have to confirm your payment address as you paid with severalPM me your payment addressCheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 10:29:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 5: 9180 ASICs gone 49180 sold\\n### Original post:\\nWe have an ordered fifth batch:Code:Order Date Status Total #10685 June 13, 2013 Chips ordered 782.10 for 1 item\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGreat! That took a while...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThat batch took considerably longer to fill... will there be a 6th batch? (I hope)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGreat!Can you send my chips to burnin pleaseI\\'ll arrange the signed message\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDamn I really wanted to make it into this one.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n\\\\O/ \\\\O/ \\\\O/I saw a 782 BTC transfer to some address, btcs are really transparent for being anonymous cash :-)I kinda like this setup more and more, people can check in and out with their bitcoins at anytime, so there is no need for strict deadlines or committments until the 10000 chip target is reached.Kinda like, \"Yeah you can put your coins here for a while but if you come at fill-up time we might just use them to order chips\"\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSo I think that in next week you should get the Batch#1 Sebastian\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNo first at all will avalon deliver batch 2 and then some weeks later batch 3. After that they might ship then.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n; <297>; <25.542>; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n...the Batch#2 will be before the Batch#1?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHe speaks about batch 2 and 3 of the miners avalon created and sold...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nsoutherngentuk; 25; 2.15; am still in on this batchRegardsEdit : wrong address sorry\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 12:52:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group buy] Avalon chips Escrow John K / BG EU 4168 left +K16 miner from 40 EUR\\n### Original post:\\n12-June-2013\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSample avalon chips on it\\'s way.Sample PCB orderedCan\\'t wait\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHere is the panel with sample K1 and K16, that are in production now\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n; <32>; <2.72>; \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, Sample PCB, Panel with sample K1 and K16\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 16:18:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] - IN-STOCK NOW - Ships Tomorrow!! Start mining this week!!\\n### Original post:\\nFresh inventory has arrived - see OP for revised ordering instructions.Order now and your miners ship out first thing tomorrow morning!!Testing an order to Canada tomorrow so if that goes well, expect more international shipments to come!Now to start packing these little guys for their new homes...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks can\\'t wait to get mine soon\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAnyone know the story with BitInstant still not accepting cash? Is this typical of their service?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThat would be me. Thanks kosmokramer! Can\\'t wait to fire them up.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWow - BitInstant is back and better than ever! The reports of their death were greatly exaggerated\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYup. I was getting worried. Now I just have to go give the cash to Walmart and I\\'ll be ordering an Erupter this afternoon!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAlright guys - lots of packages went out today! Thanks so much for placing orders far in advance yesterday - even still, two of us were up until about 6am opening, testing (two duds), re-packing, packaging, labeling, taping ... the whole works. Running on fumes now.I may end up changing some of the shipping cutoff terms to make life bearable. Right now I\\'m moving the sun and stars trying to make sure your shipments go out same-day if at all possible, but as more and more orders go out every day, that\\'s becoming harder to do. I\\'d prefer to have everything ready for shipment the night before, say by 8pm, so I can do this all in assembly line format for a few hours and ship in the morning. Essentially, if you order within (slightly extended) business hours, your order ships out next day.I\\'ll try to settle on some new terms and update the OP in the next day or two. I do have a (pretty flexible) full-time job, so the only times I can hit it hard are evenings really. Doing my best to keep up and I feel so far I have! Keep coming back here with feedback.First person to post the new artwork this week gets a bit nickel!.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNews on shipping to Germany? should be ~20$ish (USPS flat rate box)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAre these Blades, Emeralds, or Sapphires?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSapphires\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ni have a few over from my GB, shipping from germany\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOrder placed! Fingers crossed for a Saturday arrival!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nLooks good so far. Shipped the same day as I ordered. Got tracking and it looks like it\\'s scheduled to be delivered in 2 days.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSeveral very large buys this morning have nearly wiped out inventory. Hoping to have more soon, but the last is up for grabs on BitMit.After packing erupters until ~4am again, I\\'ve determined revised shipping terms:Orders placed before 8pm (PST) will ship out the next business morning. Special exceptions may be made to this for larger orders or customers who tip With a full-time job, it\\'s quite difficult to receive an order at noon, process/pack it, and make a second trip to the post office just for that order. I just have to create a cutoff point at sometime and 8pm gives me time to process orders for a while and still get some rest before heading to the post office in the morning. Of course I\\'ll still make an effort to ship everything out as soon as is possible, but these revised terms should help to set clear expectations for everyone.Have a great hump day everyone!!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nFound your thread\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nExpected delivery June 15th. C\\'mon USPS, don\\'t let me down!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nIs Priority typically 3-days to your location? I\\'ve seen an average of 1-day to 2-day delivery with these units, but then again, if I recall correctly, you\\'re in a bit of a unique location?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYeah, it\\'s pretty much always in the 3-5 day time frame. But since you\\'re West coast I was hoping for 3 days.(I should have waited for your sale though )\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAs soon as I have it I will post pictures! Thanks Kosmo!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, miners, Erupter, Blades, Emeralds, Sapphires\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 23:17:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN Worldwide] Group Buy #6 @14/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m in for another one. updated OP\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nin for 2 more:freshzive; 2; 3.98; \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSweet!!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-14 07:53:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group buy] Avalon chips Escrow John K / BG EU 4111 left +K16 miner from 40 EUR\\n### Original post:\\nSomebody payed 1.36 BTCWho is this\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSorted\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, K16 miner\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-14 15:48:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips, (Dabs) Philippines/Asia\\n### Original post:\\nRefunded as requested.Order Status (Confirmed OrdersID Chips BTC Address Note01 240 20.640 Confirmed02 -128 -11.010 Refunded03 -300 -25.800 Refunded04 -16 -1.376 Refunded to 9760Still hoping I get more orders. Stick around Newar, you\\'ll see.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGroup Buy Restarted. Come and get your chips! Take note of new cold wallet address and new pricing. Everything else is the same.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCode:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The escrow address for this Avalon Chip group buy June 2013-----BEGIN PGP GnuPG v2.0.20 PGP SIGNATURE-----\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 01:11:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN Worldwide] Group Buy #6 @16/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nYou can add one of these to your order for .54 btc (shipping cost already covered by your USB Miner order)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSigurdDragonslayer; 1; 2.2518; \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks! OP updated\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI recommend for covering up the BLUE Leds, unless you don\\'t like sleeping at night.I just dabbed a dollop on each light using a q-tip, and couldn\\'t be happier with the results. Light still shows through around the sides of the tape, but it\\'s 20% of how bright it was before.Side note, watching the LED\\'s on the miners at night is mesmerizing, like a lava lamp.A lava lamp that\\'s making me money.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWait... you run these where you can see them? Mine are in the basement.. leave the door open at night and you have a nice nightlight. M\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 12:14:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 653 ASICs gone 50653 sold\\n### Original post:\\nBummed I missed batch 5, shouldve known the last 1k would fill overnight. Might just have to wait out this batch.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhats the status on the sample chips ? a small lottery would be cool so that the smaller ppl would get a chance to hash away with the chips aswell\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThe first 30 sample chips arrived and are shipped to developers. 20 went to burnin because 99% of the chips form this groupbuy seems to go to him and he only will build miners when he tested a board fully. The remaining 10 chips went to 10 other developers that applied for them successfully.Before samples can go to other people all the devs should have enough to prove their designs. Without working designs from developers or assemblers small people couldnt hash with the chips anyway.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, sample chips\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 16:26:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN Worldwide] Group Buy #6 @22/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nI made some updates to for anyone who wants to track a wallet for mining statistics.I will add a user interface and clean it up at some point, currently you can load a wallet using this format (Where c = confirmations, 0 to 120): enjoy\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIs this one for real?How many erupters and how do you set it up???\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMine is real, mine is the one without any inputs since i\\'m a lazy biotch. have 26 erupters, which should be 27, but one was a dud and is currently RMA\\'ing to canary for a different one.I also have a 7970 mining around 630 MHPS.Here\\'s a video of the rig, and here\\'s one of Bitminter running.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nnice videos!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIf I bought two how much would postage to AUS be?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPM me your delivery address, I\\'ll respond with shipping options.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGood night folks. Will update orders in the AM\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nFor anyone on the fence, look at this video and tell me it\\'s not fun to stare at\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nirekminn; 5; 11.2128; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAdding one more to previous order, from same address (for 2 1; 1.99; \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nGotta run out to teach a class be back in 4-5 hrs...More orders came in, will update the OP with them and add a timer then.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, 7970\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 16:32:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s [Live] 12 Sold [Selling Jupiter #14]\\n### Original post:\\nedit:2 shareCode:ID: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYou made payment? post your transaction id please and PM me your email so I can add to spreadsheet\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAn email from KNC confirmed that they will try to include Jupiter #13 and #14 in first delivery. OP rules still applyCheers\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\npm\\'d youThanks.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nFor those looking for a group buy, there are a few shares left at my group buy. Please visit and consider it.Thanks! Let\\'s all cross our fingers on KNCMiner!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUnless you have purchased your Saturn already , you have missed the payment cut off deadline and will be moved to the back of the line\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks for the note Soniq. I\\'ve already used my preorder ticket and ordered two Saturns. Just waiting for them to release the final numbers on actual position.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nJupiter #13 purchased - shares sold on #14\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n5 shares reserved plz.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter, Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 22:56:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN Worldwide] Group Buy #6 @23/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nanother 2 for me (5 total now)freshzive; 2; 3.98; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThank you!OP updated. timer added\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-16 11:09:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 658 ASICs gone 50658 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI am short 11 chips from my target. If anyone is interested in selling them to me, ideally in batch 1 or 2, I will pay a premium. Please PM me.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo is where i am supposed to send the bitcoins and the cost of shipping will be added later?Sorry but i cant think straight and think I will be going to sleep for today.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYes, cost of shipping will be added later, depending on your location. Handling and packaging fee is fixed 10US$ no matter where you are and how many chips you have. There is 8-10 weeks window between order and delivery of the batch, so there is plenty of time to decide what to do with your chips.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-15 06:44:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] In-Stock ASIC - 336 Mhash - Ready to Ship within USA!!\\n### Original post:\\nArrived! Thank you!Pic of the new artwork:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWoohoo! Lots of deliveries today I see. PM me your btc address and you get a bit nickel, as promised!Thanks again for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI just added a tip address to my signature. I also uploaded a better quality version of the image.Thank you sir. Now to get hashing.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n0.05 BTC sent! Thanks for your post and happy hashing!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI think both those answers are somewhere in this thread already. It is a known bug apparently, and kosmoskramer posted a link to their support thread.I figure you can look for it as easily as I can.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYes, it is a bug. DrHaribo is already looking into fixing it. Here\\'s the BitMinter support thread so we keep this thread clean: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nKosmoWanting to thank you very much! Am ordering many of these units for delivery to brother in USA from different places and you delivering the best service. Also not charging me arm and leg for shipping. Having 6 different orders made last week with different sellers made and you being the ONLY one delivering so far and I ordering from you THIS week! Everyone else having only excuses but you sending me items.No more buying from other people from today until forever, will only be buying from you. Placing order for 5 more tomorrow and 10 next week Wednesday. You having faithful customer now! Keeping up good working and you will building tremendous business, just not be letting stock running out. Rachael\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nEdit: It\\'s a bug, thanks for your help.Curious as to why my 1 Block Erupter is showing up at double the hashrate in BitMinter. Is this just a bug? It shows the same in both the stable and beta versions.According to the pool I\\'m hashing at the standard 336Mhps. Also is there a support topic for BitMinter on here someone can link me to?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nGreat! I\\'m feeling very lenient today and will continue accepting orders for immediate shipment today. Not sure what the cutoff time will be but I\\'ll try to keep squeezing more in.whonesta, yours will for sure ship out today!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOrdered a bunch yesterday, received a bunch today, mining with a bunch right now! Great job! Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI am especially thrilled that yours was delivered today - I drove 30 minutes to the nearest USPS hub to ensure that I kept my word that your important order would ship out yesterday. Thank you for your business and happy hashing!!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nJust bought 6 via Bitmit.net, look forward to adding them to the mine!Shipped Same day! TY Kosmo\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI do want to buy one more to complete my collection I would love to get a gold one.. please please please let us know when they decide to ship some gold!Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nGot mine running today.... Thanks KosmoKramer.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nExcellent! I would give you and your sister the same rating; you guys have been superb!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nBut of course being superb. (But brother only half superb because being only half Russian and speaking only American.)Thank you for service and units!EDIT:What means \"pffftt\" you texting me? Not being word dear brother.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThanks Kosmo! Received two units today that we bought off BitMit in a record setting short delivery time. They are merrily hashing away! Appreciate the professional service and the artwork. Here\\'s an eBay style feedback/rating for the whole transaction from start to finish:A+++++ WOULD BUY FR0M \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIf anyone needs one of the Anker hubs to power up to 10 of these and wants to buy with BTC, see here:\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAlso, just a heads up, you may or may not see a special coming up where I throw one in for free with certain (larger) quantities purchased If you order 10+ BEFORE the special is advertised on BitMit, add a message to your order that you\\'d like one for free!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nGot mine on other side of country in just 2 days. Thanks Kramer!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nok new and improve setup for you guys to see.Oh, the blue LEDs are so bright I blocked them. By the way, the cheap Manhattan 10-port USB works but I do not know if it can handle more than four. :SThe Anker 10-port USB 3.0 works like a champ with the 10 black USB ASIC.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\n@kosmokramer, is this an imposter? \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nYes! Not me! Don\\'t buy!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nNewman\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI\\'d be getting in touch with BitMit about that listing. That\\'s blatant. I suggest everyone that has purchased from Kosmo report the listing.EDIT:I reported that listing to BitMit as fraud - it\\'s a direct copy of your stuff with \"12345\" photoshopped over your name in the picture. That is an obvious attempt to confuse people into thinking it\\'s your page, and certainly infringement if not outright fraud. That\\'s pretty obviously a scam.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThank you!Yes, please report it. I really hope it gets taken do\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, Manhattan 10-port USB, Anker 10-port USB 3.0\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 14:59:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: BFL ASIC Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll be holding off until there\\'s actually a real plan in place, including chip specs/reference design, and the chips are ACTUALLY for sale.If you ask me, you\\'re putting the cart before the horse. They\\'re not even officially selling the things yet.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ni LOLed at the TITLE. Translation: \"Let\\'s put our money together and get scammed as one!\"\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIgnoring the OP and this thread. Silly to buy from BFL just silly\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCan you clarify this? This sounds pretty damn important. JohnK would be the guy to go to for escrow, and he doesn\\'t want to do it for anything involving BFL?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nTBH, I have more faith in Bitfury than BFL at this point. Needs documentations for the chip, only then I might consider.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThe idea is to start the process and get interest in place early, so that there isn\\'t and delays in organizing once move information is available.I\\'m not going to defend BFL, their track record speaks for itself.Thjs thread is for people who are interested in buying BFL asics, not people who want to debate whether they\\'re a scam or not. I think their FCBGA package opens up interesting enough new board designs that I want to make a.few, and I\\'m sure I\\'m not the only one.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThat\\'s what I thought too. Interesting typo here, \"1/10th the silicon area per GH as the closest competitor\"For a lot of folks, they would say it\\'s about \"0/10th the silicon area per GH.\"\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWise words.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJohn stay far away. You don\\'t need gray hairs at your age.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nDIY ASIC DesignI have begun preliminary planning on a miner design using the BFL ASIC chips. While details are still being worked out and the concept is not entirely finalized (pending the release of documentation and code from BFL), some basic points of the first unit will be below.4 chips - nominally 15-16GH/s depending on gradeDynamic clock and voltage controlUSB control, 12V 6pin PCIe for powerHole spacing designed to allow standard CPU coolers to cover the ASICsDesigned for high densityEach module will be designed to be run stand alone, or chained togetherModule form factor will standardized to allow easy mounting in a 19\" rack casePreliminary size ~ 100mm x 150mm maxThis will probably be spun off into its own thread once it gets more developed and linked to from here, along with any other community designs.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nBumping this up now that BFL is live with chip sales.At this point, I am in for in the range of 30-50 chips.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAlso, from talking to Josh it seems that now that they are shipping a limited number of Singles and close to volume shipment, Nasser will be working on prepping the documentation for the units. While some work is happening now, I really expect design work to take off soon once preliminary documentation gets out the door.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nReserved - FAQ and Other InformationWe are based in the US and Canada.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC, FCBGA package, miner design using the BFL ASIC chips\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-02 01:37:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy#2] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! 1 chip = .078BTC = 282Mhash!\\n### Original post:\\nThanks. Already noted a few days ago.BTW guys, you can buy and resell your chips in this group to other people!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nStarting Group Buy #2.Group Buy #2 Spread Sheet post questions about Group Buy#1 here: thread will be separate for group 2!Product Descriptionthe only payment accepted is Bitcoin.the chips being sold are packaged and tested.the lead time on the chips is 9 to 10 weeks.made to order from TSMC foundry and then packaged and shipped.the minimum order quantity is 10,000 chips and the maximum order quantity is 200,000.the chips are identical to those in Avalon, clocking 282Mh/s per chip.the password is I understand and agree.communication protocol, reference board design provided in early May.everything will be open source from FPGA to PCB design.we do not offer technical support of any kind, this is final.if you do not know what to do with the packaged chips, please do not purchase.Status Updates:2013-04-28: 2nd batch has ~6300 chips left2013-04-27: 1st batch ordered, 2nd batch has ~6800 chips leftOrder StatusCode:#10129 April 27, 2013 Chips ordered 782.10 for 1 itemRemainderOnly send payments from an address you control (i.e. you can sign with it). If you send from MtGox or other exchanges, you risk loosing your funds since you can\\'t prove you sent them.How to sign: up\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ve got about 350chips available from zefir batch #3 (6.1btc) and from ragingazn628 (20.1btc) first batch order - willing to unload at costThanksatcsecure\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI meant that people can buy from this group and resell later. Zefir says you can\\'t resell now.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYou can put me down for 24 BTC worth of chips, maybe more (if i can get money out of places) - can send the 24btc before the weekend\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nthe chips from zefir will be sent to a DIY PCB project.. any update on your PCB plans?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNo not yet.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAt the risk of repeating myself I\\'m most interested in BkkCoin\\'s board , if anyone wants to buy from this group and send to BkkCoin in Thailand maybe we can get something organised?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOf the various projects I\\'ve seen proposed, I\\'m looking most closely at Burnin\\'s, followed by BKKCoin\\'s. I\\'m not ready to commit to either until we actually see confirmed designs (and recommend others hold off too), but they\\'re both quite I\\'m liking the idea of Burnin\\'s \"Double Density\" option, which puts 20 chips per board, and is scaleable with multiple boards. It\\'d be awesome to be able to just get some PCB prints, and have the boards built for a group shipment here in the U.S. and then assembled by the end users. I\\'ve got a local hackerspace shop that probably has a decent reflow station. I might have to join up and get these things assembled there.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAssuming we have the schematics and complete gerber files, I have a source that can assemble and fabricate in a matter of days to a week. I will hopefully have more info on this shortly.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nDefinitely let me know. Every second counts in this race. If my math is correct, and we assume 10 batches of chips shipping in the next 10 weeks (which I think is probably a low number), that\\'s 28.9T/hash coming online by mid-july, JUST from avalon chips ordered so far.That\\'s gonna SKYROCKET difficulty in really short order. He who mines soonest wins.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n10 batches aka 100k chips? I think people had posted evidence of 500k chips being bought?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI haven\\'t seen any hard numbers, and I don\\'t know if anybody really has. It\\'s all just speculation, but like I said, I was going with a conservative number. It could easily be a million chips, for all we know.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIirc the \\'proof\\' was like 45,000 btc being moved. It was damn close to the number for 10k chips x 50\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nExcuse me for the probably stupid question but how do you use these chips?Sure, i\\'d buy some but once i have them what then?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'m working through the same process now - there\\'s a lot on the first group buy that talks about different people who will be offering their services to add these chips that you can buy to PCBs... it seems like an awesome idea but have lots of reading and catching up to do before jumping in as far as I can tell.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nRight, i\\'m gonna read the other thread. Didn\\'t realize it was there. Came from an outside link directly to this thread.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nAnyone have any suggestions on how to attract more people to this group? Would love it if we could get our goal by next week.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nragingazn628, I got into the end of the last group buy (with admittedly a low amount,) could I still get in on this one or are you excluding previous people? I don\\'t know how many exactly yet, it depends on what the going rate of BTC is when Dwolla finishes its transfer.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nEveryone is welcome. Except scary peopl\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs CHIPS, zefir batch #3, ragingazn628 first batch order, PCBs, reflow station, assemble and fabricate\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-16 20:11:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy + pre-order] Russia, Bitfury ASIC!\\n### Original post:\\nHi,i just want to make clear im not associated with alilikun, i simply ordered with him, so theres no confusion.I also have to say that the groupbuy I was managing won\\'t work out, sadly. Others should simply post if they are interested and groupbuy when enough interest was collected\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI see.Well then group buy starting from 0$ again.Pm me if interested.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ni can still order 2-3 inits.Pm me, if someone is still interested.i will also be in Berlin, and Sweden semewhere around october.So if by that time, metabank will ship them, i will be able to meet with you in those countries.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhello. We started to make a open census of those who made pre-orders. If you do not want to publish your nicknames and number orders, you can add as AnonimousXXX (possibly breaking your order into several AnonimousXXX,for greater privacy)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI have already added our orders to that list.Thnx for your concern.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI got a passport scan of ailikun and I think it looks good. I don\\'t want to convince anyone into anything, just saying. It should go without saying I will not post personal details or a copy of that, but like he (i think he said) said he lives in moscow, sounds good for pickup right at the manufacture.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOh come on... thats just nonsense.I guess, your style of life, is propaganda all around you.Do you think, that if someone scammed you in U.S. you will have more chances of finding him.Or do you even think, that you will be looking for him?People all around the world are the same.Bad people and good people... it has nothing to do with russia.Its up to you, weather to believe someone or not.But please, leave this propaganda thing, within yourself.And stop this offtopic.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYeah, just because it\\'s in Russia doesn\\'t mean it\\'s a scam.Each person has to choose what proof they need to be able to send money. Personally I would have a very difficult time sending money to someone I know nothing about, that has done nothing to prove their reputation to me, hasn\\'t proven ability, hasn\\'t shown prior experience... have they even given real names? With the way Terrahash was persecuted, I thought people would be more careful.I hope everything works out, I would seriously be very grateful to any company that can give some hashing to the public. If they start giving information, and it looks good, I\\'ll add them to my list. Please let me know: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSended you a pm.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIt\\'s getting interesting! Bitfury posted that he should recieve the engineering samles around the 13th of june, and he will then send 10-30 chips to alpha testers with EE experience!The more I read from him the more I get excited about this miner, the fact that he can go deep into technical details and is willing to offer some chips for testing make it much more credible Let\\'s hope the samples turn out well and aren\\'t flawed!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nStill some shares left? Wanna come on board Or when someone jumps off - I would jump in\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nshares left?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury ASIC\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-16 23:17:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 100 BFL 4 GH/s Chips @ 0.9 BTC. 5 chip minimum - US ONLY\\n### Original post:\\nI may be interested, but what hardware do you need after receiving the chips to start mining?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCurrently there are a few DYI project builders (Klondyke and Burnin I believe) waiting for specs to be released form the PCM/Boards.As soon as a project here or by anker reputable company is available I expect to be able to help share/chip owners in facilitating building of complete miners.For now, this group-buy is just an early chip order to secure fast chip delivery. I have no doubt that several mining builder options will be available before delivery date (100 days from order at the latest).\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ni am interested in 2 shares maybe morebut i feel more comfortable when i know we have a working pcb or something\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI totally understand that, problem being that when PCB is available I assume the chips to be sold out already. Look at Avalon. No proven PCB yet and 500.000 chips sold.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHow do you propose distributing the chips to participants of the group buy? The chips in a lot of 100 from BFL are not all the same:\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThere are 2 possible scenarios: 1. The chips arrive unmarked/unsorted leaving me no choice but to send chips 100% randomly. Since only 5% are class-D a random selection should leave everyone with well over an average of 4 gh/s in any 5 chip batch.2. If the chips arrive marked with quality/class I will simply send owners as close to the split of chips qualiy provided by BFL in the product statement.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThat sounds fair\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIt\\'s impossible to accurately predict what the ratio\\'s will be in any wafer. Wafers vary from one wafer to the next.BFL\\'s first (working) wafers had tested as 1.76watt per GH/s then later they realized alot of other chips were anywhere from 2 to 6 watts per Gh/s.With that kind of volatility you never know what you will get.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOh I am fully aware of their history, though they do guarantee 3.2 w for chips ordered, and since the numbers posted are Global Foundries specs it seems a lot safer then BFL estimates.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI have to wonder, 4GHz is fast, but in 100 days, will it mean anything anymore? I\\'m tempted to actually just buy 100 chips myself and then sort out manufacturing that into boards later. However at the same time I can\\'t help but wonder- 400ghz, will that be worth it once the time comes? What do you guys think?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI personally think that even with vastly increased diff, the difficulty will of course not increase exponentially. As long as you are buying next gen tech, diff will eventually plateau. If you look at diff/earnings historically I think the CPU/GPU boom is relevant. We are Just seeing the same technological paradigm shift from GPU-->ASIC. If you buy the latest generation ASIC now, it will earn you money as long as it is the latest generation tech available, just as GPUs did until ASIC started hitting the market.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI think that is a pretty good way of thinking about it.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI bought 100 chips from BFL. Consider this: of all the miners/chips projected to come on line in 100 days ( bitfury, kncminer, avalon bulk chips, BFL, etc.), BFL is the only one that both has a working chip and is motivated by the fact that they will get the rest of their 50% payment on delivery. I believe that along with the fact that chips can ship directly from GlobalFoundries without being delayed within BFL\\'s device manufacture chain gives BFL chips an edge over the others.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nany updates regarding a working pcb for the chipsJosh released the chips specs and it can be downloaded from butterflylabs forum.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nsave some money with coupons\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIf i buy a coupon, how will i be able to use it if i cannot buy 100 chips from BFL as far as i know they require 100 minimum chip order\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nmaybe the group buy organizer can consider to incorporate the credit coupon and reduce the cost?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI am looking into the possibility for using chip discounts for this group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nif we can get the voucher discount that will be awesomeand i can buy couple shares\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI have contacted BFL reg possibility of combining chips for purchase under 1 account. I have almost enough for the entire 100 chip purchase myself but would like to see if we can\\'t combine a few accounts and maybe make the group buy larger, or at least have the option to do so.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAll necessary schematics and software for producing miners using BFL chips has now been released. See original OP post for info.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nwould there is a price drop accordingly\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nYes. Actually, people that have chip credits can show their interest here and if it looks like we can fill at least 100 chips I will re-write the group buy to take into account chip credits, and also publish info on credit transfer with payment info.That\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips, PCM/Boards, Avalon, ASIC, bitfury, kncminer, BFL chips\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 03:27:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group buy] Avalon chips Escrow John K / BG EU 2 batch starts + K16 from 40 EUR\\n### Original post:\\nPS: Order will be sent out once I make a visit to the safe. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrder sent in (and fees, refunds etc sent): #10945 made on June 17, 2013.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHere\\'s the second escrow contract, just in case I\\'m out when OP is back. PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The escrow address for marto74\\'s 2nd Avalon Chip group buy is: state and agree to the conditions (if item is received damaged, item lost with tracking, customs fee etc) beforehand.If possible, GPG sign your agreement to prevent any discrepancies later on and please ship with tracking to prevent problems during delivery. GPG signing is not a requirement, and any verbal exchange in the form of private messages or posts on bitcointalk.org, or email is effective as a statement of condition.Do note that I am only responsible for the funds up to the point it is sent to Avalon. Any losses incurred by Avalon\\'s or marto74\\'s failure to ship/reship will not be borne by me, but I will release the following data to aid in litigation actions.In addition to that, I confirm the receipt of:1) marto74\\'s IDThe fine print:This Contract is solely generated for the purpose of facilitating the transaction between the seller and the buyer, which refers to the pseudonyms used on bitcointalk.org. The escrow holder, John, assumes and gives no liability or guarantees on the satisfaction\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, K16\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 10:25:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 638 ASICs gone 50638 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI have a question. i\\'ve ordered 20 chips from the 2nd batch and am seeing that a lot of people have arranged for their chips to sent out to burning (which is what i am planning). How this is possible while the orders are not open yet? did i miss something?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThey did just notify Sebastian that he should send their chips to burnin once they will arrive. But they will also have to arrange the order with burnin when he launches his website.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 13:25:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [ASIC] Avalon Chip Group Purchase : Idaho, USA : 8679 Chips Remaining\\n### Original post:\\nOrder received, thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBummer. not the update i was hoping for. Regardless thanks for taking the time to get back to us.Anyways, may I ask who will be assembling boards and where it will be done? Are they engineers, computer techs, hobbyists? How many people will be working on assembly at a time? Is the expected turnaround still about 2 weeks? Is $130 a near final number, it seems slightly steeper than the majority of board assembly services I\\'ve seen, what sets yours apart.I apologize if this feels like an attack, I assure it is nothing of the sort, I would just like to hear more about the project. I\\'m wary of sending money anywhere too quickly. Due diligence pays tenfold.Cheers G!~Ben\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi Ben,The boards will be produced in a professional assembly house, by trained people who know exactly what they\\'re doing. Because the assembly etc. is being outsourced the operation will be highly scalable, so there should be very little lead time to make chips into hashing miners (most likely under 1 week if you choose to overnight all the shipping). The $130 mentioned above will very likely be the final number, although you should not count on it yet. There is always the possibility that the board designs do not work and we have to go with a more costly board design (and that goes for all of these ASIC projects), although this is extremely unlikely. What I believe sets me apart from other services, is the increased likelihood of a fast turnaround. I will be producing boards for 10,000 chips before this group-buy order arrives, so I will be able to familiarize myself with the process and hopefully make a bunch of clients happy Best,GarrettPS:I couldn\\'t agree more!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHello garr255, I\\'ve sent you an e-mail, waiting for a reply I\\'m jesse11 here and the e-mail will come from me, techjesse\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nReplied, thanks for the inquiry.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nreceived reply. I\\'ll sent an e-mail when I have...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nDeveloper notice:I have received the test chips for this batch and I am auctioning four of them here:\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nUpdate, 16 Jun:I am working closely with a private board developer who is creating host boards for Avalon chips that will be able to achieve a higher hashrate per chip than standard boards. I will only be selling these boards to people who have purchased chips via my group-buy. Specifics will come within a month, after we have created the first batch of boards and stress-tested the heck out of them!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHow many chips planned for each host board?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWill it be possible to send the chips from you to the manufacturer of the boards and then have them shipped to \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chip, boards, hashing miners, test chips, host boards\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 16:06:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [ASIC] Avalon Chip Group Purchase : Idaho, USA : 8710 Chips Remaining\\n### Original post:\\nUpdate :: June 15thHere\\'s the post you\\'ve all been waiting for!These last two weeks have been extremely busy. I\\'ve been working tirelessly with multiple board developers and producers, and finally have some firm numbers.Initially, I am opting for the Klondike K16 boards. As you might infer from the name, these will house sixteen Avalon chips each, hashing at a rate of ~4.5gh/s. I am currently speaking with another board developer who will be selling overclockable boards, so we can get the most out of our chips!Current board costs are tentatively set to $130 (but paid in equivalent BTC), and are subject to change depending on how many boards are ordered. If you order 20 or more boards, the cost will be $10 less per board.Because of the extremely low order number of this batch, the price per chip has been moved to 0.1.Best,Garrett\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, see the FAQ regarding changing your shipping address.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow much is going to be the cost of an assembled board (chip and heatsink installed)?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThe cost specified above is for the fully functional miner including all components. You will have to supply your own power, however.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI just ordered 31 chips, I\\'m going to order 113 more chips thursday (if they are still available) for a total of 144 chips (9 boards)\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIs this the cost of the bare board or does it include assembly and/or additional components (heatsinks, standoffs, fans, etc.)?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Klondike K16 boards, Avalon chips, overclockable boards, assembled board (chip and heatsink installed), fully functional miner including all components, chips, heatsinks, standoffs, fans\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-17 23:44:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: Terrahash DX Large 95% Payout 1 BTC per share\\n### Original post:\\nYou say they have no proof they ordered chips, if they wouldnt ordered chips, how would they get the sample ones they got now ?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThey haven\\'t posted proof yet, they have received a sample batch though and from my discussion with them it seemed they did indeed order Avalon chips about 2-3 weeks ago.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terrahash DX, Avalon chips\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 10:21:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [GroupBuy]Avalon Chips - 0.081 BTC / Klondike Boards - 0.75 BTC (Global+Escrow)\\n### Original post:\\nI see the value of being in batch one has increased exponentially!hhmmm ... wonder if the same will happen to batch 2.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI probably missed a post somewhere, but i\\'m unclear how the value of being in batch one increase exponentially? is it because we are still waiting to complete this batch?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI guess you are right, seen the price the chips go for now, I guess it is true.Been in batch 1 is definitely an advantage, not sure if/when this batch will end, hopefully it will be in time to make the chips worth the effort :|FFMG\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBump!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n32 chips went for 2.592 in batch one .. some just paid more than double THAT .... 15 posts or so above(before this)\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThx, didn\\'t think about the auction value.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIs there a seriously better prices group buy in Europe somewhere i am unaware of, come on guys get in on this one lets fill this group buy out.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI was really hoping the next batch would fill quicker because i missed the first. Still looking to buy but we have a long way to go.I saw on blockchain that some btc was moved about, is the counter currently correct? How many chips remain?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\njammertr; 32; 2.592; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n16 Chips + Klondike Board (2.14) Via Website - sent from \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi, the counter is correct. Some refunds were asked, and honoured, but now they are blocked to secure the batch. Apologies, but there are orders from the site also, that were not processed, because i was away from the city for a few days. I will process those today.Regards,Steve\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSo does this mean that there are no refunds at this point?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nYes, it does. If it is really urgent or really important, PM me, but in principle, no refunds until the batch fills or we decide to cancel.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nOn the website, boards are still 0.85BTC. Should I just order there and pay 0.8BTC per board?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nPM Sent.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nNews:Sample chips arrived! Check out the video here\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nCool! Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSuper.Hope the prototype board will get at least 4,5Gh/s with 16 chips.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nGrats on the delivery, nice video. Make sure to send debugging info to BkkCoins so we can get these boards hashing!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nHow many chips sold in batch 2? Anyone selling from batch 1?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI asked the same question yesterday. What do I do?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nHi,I also want to order two boards (I\\'m in batch one), what should I do? Thanks, bob\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nNice video but you could have used a better camera (sharper focus, better colors, HD for better details) I propose you let me film and edit your videos from now on\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nwhere are we with the \"magic boosters\"? we\\'re about to enter our 5th week of the batch and we are still a far way off of 10K chips.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nSame here: please give a public answer about the procedure to order pcbs linked to the first batch chips, by forum of via the website.Also, great news you received the chips. Can\\'t wait to see some asics hashing in Cluj Napoca\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThank you, order confirmed\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nHi, please PM me you e-mail registered e-mail address on the site. I will create you a coupon code to discount the PCB prices.Regards\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nPM me oyu e-mail address and i will create a coupon so you can checkout. Hope it\\'s not too complicated.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nNo to make bad impression, but it was a Hero GoPro3, Balck edition. It is HD, but i\\'ve reduced it for youtube watching. I guess the camera wasn\\'t set to macro..Sal\\'tare\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nCreate an account on my website, PM me your registered e-maila address and you\\'ll get a coupon to reduce the price of the PCBs.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nI intend to buy:64 chips4 boards with components and assembly.Cost: 0.081 * 64 + 0.75 * 4 = 8.184Is the cost correct ?Is the address still the one provided by John K when is this second batch going to be shipped and how long will it take to prepare and send the finished products?I also see that we are at about 80BTC and need to arrive to 810... no one interested out there?? Regards,ilpirata79\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nSample 6.5 for weeksLet the Batch 1 Count Down Begin!!!\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nYes, the costs are ok. John\\'s address is ok too. However, i recommend you order the chips and boards package straight from the website. I will process the order and segregate the payments. Steve\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\n(We) Need to focus a bit on the chips of this batch. We need to finish this. So if you\\'re ever thinking on ordering chips, order now! I cannot guarantee ordering will be possible next week.Best regards to all,Steve\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nCome on guys, with that last increase in difficulty, you know you GPU guys are starting to really struggle. Asic\\'s are the way forward, get em now while they are still available.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chips, Klondike Boards, Sample chips, Prototype board, Hero GoPro3, PCBs\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 17:36:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Closed] TerraHash Group Buy @ 0.50 BTC\\n### Original post:\\n has announced pre-ordering availability to those folks that have signed up for an account prior to their announcement.As can be seen in the image below, I will be one of the lucky ones to pre-order on Tuesday June 18th at 9:00AM PST.I am planning on purchasing a hosted 18GH/s unit for myself and was wondering if there is any interest in folks that want to get on board with the early I am:I am a 15 year web development veteran specializing in C# MVC with JQuery Mobile working in beautiful south Florida with my wife and twins. I am very passionate about bitcoin and what it could mean for the entire human race.Shares:Each miner will be split into 200 shares for 0.50 BTC each giving hobbyist and new to bitcoin enthusiasts an easy entry into the market, as well as pooling our resources into owning alott of hardware for cheapGroup Buy Terms:Payment will be made in BTC onlyAll Units will be hosted at TerraHash\\'s hosting facilitiesExpected delivery according to terrahash is late julyThe period of ownership of each share will last 24 months from the date of purchase of each miner at which time the hardware will become the sole ownership of CCIH, Inc. (a company that I own\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 18GH/s unit\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 21:15:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] In-Stock ASIC - 336 Mhash - SOLD OUT!\\n### Original post:\\nI guess they can\\'t \"undelete\" JoachimWhere is KosmoKramer\\'s page? I\\'ve been successfully buying from himfor a long time. Why take his page down because \"123456\" is scammingwith a copy of Kosmo\\'s page?Look at your sales history on the two sellers, -> MeHi,One of our staff made a mistake and deleted his item by mistake.We are very sorry for that.---Please let me know if you have any further questions.Kindly RegardsJoachim S.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBackups, holymoly, make backups!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMy reply back to Joachim:You delete items in cases of a dispute, instead of just blocking the listing?? That seems like an incredibly unprofessional way to deal with things. You can\\'t put the listing back from a backup? Are you attempting to run this professionally, or like a bunch of amateur hackers? I\\'m absolutely astonished. At the moment you have a lead in the market, but first mover advantage can\\'t overcome sloppy delivery. You can be a MySpace and fail, or you can be a FaceBook and succeed. It\\'s all in the service you provide.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSo why is this disclaimer showing on your page? Can\\'t buy anything from the listing anyway, but the heading shows this:Seller is currently not active\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThere is an option to show that disclaimer. I am currently out of stock, but I wanted my listing to remain on the site in case another impostor comes along. I don\\'t want someone to buy from a listing that looks like mine thinking it\\'s me.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWill be having more things selling in stock soon?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n@Kosmokramer I received my black one today. Thanks for the continued fast shipping!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nhope you\\'ll get some more to sell\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI got everything worked out with Bitmit and my listing is back up! I am currently sold out though.Here is the update I wrote for my OP:SOLD OUT! Thank you to everyone who has purchased from me. I have had so many awesome customers At this time I\\'m working with ASICMiner to establish new pricing and I\\'ll have more in stock once that is complete. Thanks again!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, black one\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-18 23:11:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN USA/Canada [Grp Buy #6 @2/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nI think I\\'m going to hold steady with the 27 I bought lol.Can\\'t wait for my shipment to get here ThursdayEverything is already wall mounted. I had to use electrical tape paint over the LED\\'s on those anker hubs because they are INTENSE.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhere did you buy your anker hubs from. What is the part number. Also what is the name and part number of your usb fan.Thankyou.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHoping to be in for 2 this round ... and also hoping price goes down.M\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nif price goes down, i\\'ll pass that on, but so far I doubt it...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ntoday I\\'m going to experiment with a bunch of these fans: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'ve got an Idea....\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI got one of those fans and took it apart and modded it into my desk so that I can exhaust hot air from the computer compartment without having a separate plugin for the fan. It just plugs into the computer and when the computer is on the fan is on. It\\'s pretty durable and quiet at its lowest speed.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nBuy #6 is over and I missed getting in by a few hours. Will there be a #7? Thanks.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, anker hubs, usb fan, computer\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 01:10:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] SOLD OUT - *manufacturer contacted*\\n### Original post:\\nTHANK YOU, Kosmo!6 ASICMiner Erupter USB sticks got here in 3 days.I am using a RPi running MinePeon-6-11-2013 and mining with CGMiner 3.2.1. I am using the DLink DUB-H7 powered usb 2.0 hub. I tried to using the Plugable usb 3.0 high power hub, but the RPi failed to recognize the AMU devices. I am mining with the 6 - AMU\\'s, 1 - BFL Jalapeno, and 1 - BFL FPGA.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHonestly I thought about buying some simply to resell. People who want to buy for USD and don\\'t have access to easily convert to BTC will pay a markup. Didn\\'t end up doing so in the end though. (Partially because I didn\\'t have enough BTC myself. )\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB sticks, RPi, DLink DUB-H7 powered usb 2.0 hub, Plugable usb 3.0 high power hub, BFL Jalapeno, BFL FPGA\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-19 16:03:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] SOLD OUT - *friedcat contacted*!\\n### Original post:\\nHey all - just wanted you to all know that I am in contact with ASICMiner about acquiring more inventory. You will all be the first to know when I have more in-stock.I\\'d like to make a comment about resellers - I had hoped I was providing this hardware to end users for a very fair price in order to get more people into mining at a reasonable cost. It appears many of the units that I sold are now being resold for a significant markup. While I know there\\'s nothing I can do to prevent that, it is a bit of a let down to see such high prices on hardware I worked so hard to keep affordable. Really glad to see you\\'ve all been happy with my service - that is always my number one goal and I don\\'t intend for that to change! Whether it\\'s ASICMiners, raw chips, or potato chips, hearing you say you\\'re happy is the best reward there is; especially when it comes to something as historically disappointing as ASICs. It\\'s been an honor to serve you all so far.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nActually, just so you don\\'t feel so disappointed, if you look closer you will find that most of those are out of the US - many in the Netherlands shipping only to the Netherlands. Those were part of a group buy from Augusto Croppo - My sister bought some out of the group buy before she found you. Now she only wants to buy from you since her group purchase of 15 of them ended up on a rather sour note, and we still don\\'t have the units, but paid for them many weeks ago.I\\'m supposed to ask - what are you selling now/next ? She\\'ll buy some...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m waiting for a response from ASICMiner. I believe they are getting more of the USB block erupters manufactured, but I have not heard back yet about an ETA. If any of you urgently need hardware, I encourage you to look into group buys that may be close to ordering - they should all be very competitively priced at this point.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, ASICMiners, raw chips, potato chips\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 01:07:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] BFL 4 GH/s Chips @ 0.65 BTC x5 min, US Only - requires chip credit!\\n### Original post:\\nOk, I have now updated the group buy to reflect price using chip credits. Note that to purchase chips you will be required to HAVE CHIP CREDITS.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI have 384 chip credits for sale for those without chip credits. PM me your offers.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWill you provide some hardware assembly service?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAs soon as a PCB design/DYI design maker that is trusted enough exist, I will facilitate chip usage for building of actual miners. YES\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI am in the process of acquiring chip credits to cover at least the first 100 chips. Stay tuned.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI realize that buying credits, ordering chips and running a group buy is just not in my best interest right now. If you are looking for a chip group buy from a reputable member I recommend Canaryinthemine\\'s group buy here: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips, chip credits, PCB design/DYI design maker\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 04:52:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner\\n### Original post:\\ni am in - 10 shares will be xfering in a few mins (syncing)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAlso, just as a curious question (i am a huge fan of de-centralization and peer networking) any chance we can share mine BTC & NMC? I believe .bit domains are a crucial technology that might come in handy in the near future (the centralised nature of the .com DNS will not last too much longer).\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf merged mining gives additional income i am very positive to that. But stability and effectiveness of the pool is also very important\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ndoneNet amount: -3.00 BTCTransaction ID: the best with this 1 too\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nreserve 2 shares to me, plz\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n-0.60001234 BTCtransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m all for another groupbuy and improving the value of ADDICTION, but ...1) what\\'s the benefit of paying for 2nd batch now instead of when the 1st one gets more details?2) Sam from kncminer said they gonna update us on the energy usage and hashpower of the 1st batch miners in a few days, might be worth waiting for it\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n350/240 == 1.4583 GH/s @ 0.3 BTCI bought 3 of the TerraHash 4.5 GH/s unit yesterday4.5 * 3 == 13.5 @ $750.00 ~= $55.55 / GH/sThis is roughly on par with this group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nthanks for the info! lets hope i do have some funds next week, dunno if my reservation is still acceptable..we\\'ll see how it is first\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nask them, they are very reasonable guys\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nyup they are really do, just i dont want to burden them in case im making a second thoughts on it\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nim so lazy to do the calculation lol so 1 share (0.3btc) equivalent to how much hashrate? anyway, reserve 3 shares for me, though give me a week before i can confirmed this decision. thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHey HasherI\\'ll add you to the list@btceic price is actually exactly $6995 again, the difference with btc price will be paid back as dividend so $6995 for 350GH vs $750 for 13.5We looked into terrahash for doing a groupbuy, but especially if you add the cases it\\'s actually a lot more expensive than KNC.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHey mxmz.inThere is no benefit except for being earlier with the order. Two things can happen; either we get shipped soon after the first batch because we ordered early, or we get shipped later but have the first improved miners. We do not intend to close this groupbuy very sooon though, so it\\'ll definately be still open when Sam\\'s news arrives\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner, TerraHash 4.5 GH/s unit\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 06:09:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USB Miner Eruptor - 1 available\\n### Original post:\\nmods, please close\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI have 1 person who backed out from group 6. please PM me if you are interested in picking it up.it\\'s gone.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miner Eruptor\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-20 11:54:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [GroupBuy]8985 Avalon Chips - 0.081 BTC / Klondike16 - 0.75 BTC (Global+Escrow)\\n### Original post:\\nJust to triple check. I\\'m batch1 with 160 chips, I have to register to the site, PM you ( @bitcointalk) with my Email adress i used to register. then order from the site and pay 8 BTC, and i will get fully assembled boards. ( I\\'m from bulgaria and would like to come pick them up myself. can I do that ? )Edit: Do I need to use the same adress i paid for the first 160chips.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, yes, yes, yes .... yes...No, you can use any address to pay for the boards.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI would like some suggestion for the shipping method from the users..Do you know if it is worth to place an insurance on delivery?Do you know a good company to place an insurance on my package?Do you know a cheaper one? Or one with best service for the price?I\\'m talking about shipping to europe anyways. Thanks everybody!Also: Steve, wich shipping method did you choose for the international delivery of you website?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nrightio, just paid for 15 boards, got the coupon discount, but didn\\'t get a cheaper price for the 10% increase to the bitcoin price I REALLY hope this is all legit and not some massive scam, I just spent the last of my fluid BTC.I can\\'t wait t13hydra! Out of curiosity, how many boards have been ordered at this point, and what do you think your production capacity will be once the chips arrive?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIf anybody is still doubting and reading this; there is still a lot of space left in Batch #2 and we need more people to get these chips, the deadline is coming soon. You won\\'t find a cheaper price, Steve has already lowered his prices for the chips a couple of times.Meet the organizer here: we could team up with the other groupbuys to fill up the last batch? Both marto74\\'s ( and bizwoo\\'s ( 2nd batches are not going that fast..\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThank you! Great help come from great people!This is a good idea and i\\'ll talk to them tomorrow. If anybody can talk to them (marto74 and bizwoo), even personally, please do. It would be great to finally order a few batches, it would help hundreds of \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nLike me I have wrote to Marto that it could be better for me to order my chips by his order because we are in Bulgaria and it is simple for us to organize. Please post if you will make a common order and I am ready to pay for may chips - only to know where to send them.B.R.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nt13hydraI\\'m not going to read all 20+ pages, but I\\'d like to get the prices clarified (and I\\'m sure others will as well). 0.081 for each chip, and how much for a board? 0.75, 0.8, or 0.85 ? (those are the prices I\\'ve seen in the OP and the latest pages.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOkay, from what I have been able to find, the time from finalizing the batch, it will take up to 10 weeks to deliver the chips, and another 3 weeks to assemble the boards - t13hydra, is this correct?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nFrom Bkkcoins topic:Work in progress! I hope you didn\\'t order any pcbs yet :\\\\\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chips, fully assembled boards, 15 boards, chips, pcbs\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 01:55:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 1 sold - 2nd miner: 28/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nSent 3.00 btc for 10 shares.TX ID: already have my info from the first group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGod I wish I had some liquid assets, I would be on this in a heartbeat\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nszmarco40 shares\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n1 share\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ll reserve 4 shares for now (BTC1.20). I\\'ll more than likely be adding to that in the near future. Most of my BTC assets are invested and I\\'ll have to trim a few of them down.I see that there are no intentions to close this anytime soon. Do we have a window on that time frame? I\\'d like to keep my BTC working instead of sitting on hold until \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'ll add them as reserved..No there is no window on closing this, but as time passes it will obviously take longer for miners to arrive and payment to start. Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI can\\'t understand what you mentioned.The Reply by blastbob shows you guys have payed the second device,Right?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 03:32:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .57 btc per chip: 3260 available (40 sold)\\n### Original post:\\nAddress: paid for 4 chips = 2.28 BTCNow 36 chips PWLwfLZ0=\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-11 15:38:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [BFL 4GHs chips Group buy] Interest check @ 100 chips x $75, 5 chip min US ONLY!\\n### Original post:\\nThey also [apparently] expect the board makers to create their own firmware to run the chips.Kinda crazy!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWith the drop in price (from $90+ to $75) per chip and the fact that they DO have functioning miners running the chips. I expect there to be a wide array of DYI projects and miner manufacturing offers well in time for chip shipment though. It took avalon DIY projects just a few weeks from chip announcements to release spec for Klondyke and k64, I would be very surprised if the same is not true for the BFL chips especially since there are sample chips floating around and it is very much in the best interest of BFL to release specs to boost chip sales.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow much is it now for the Grade B through D chips? (Any specs released by BFL on those grades?)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThey lowered the price across the board and are now only guaranteeing 4 GH/s instead of using the \\'hand picked/per chip\\' approach.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI don\\'t understand what that means.4Gh/s guarantee even for Grade D chips?You have to explain it to me or get Josh to clear this up.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFrom what I can tell ALL chips are guaranteed to run at 3 GH/s+ according to: \"Chip grades: Chips come in four grades of performance. Chips are sold in mixed grade lots. A grade has 16 engines, B grade has 15 engines, C grade has 14 engines and D grade has no less than 12 engines. All chips run at a minimum of 250 mhz. Higher grade chips will run up to 294mhz. The percentage distribution in each lot is 60% Grade A, 20% Grade B, 15% Grade C and 5% Grade D.\" from link @ each chip has a minimum of 12 cores, IF a chip happens to be of lowest quality (12 cores) and also of the lowest clock speed @ 250 mhz it would run @ 3GHs. Though I find it unlikely, since my guess is that less cores, would allow a chip to dissipate more heat and likely run at close to or at the highest clock speed of 290 mh/s+ giving even class-D chips around 3.4 gh/s. Best case scenario would be a chip of class A with 16 cores @ 294 mh/s running at 4.7 GH/s. Since chip distribution is 60% Grade-A and only 5% grade D it seems exceptionally unlikely even with a 5 chip order that the average hash rate would come out to less than 4 GH/s. It seems statistically even a random selection would produce OVER 4 GH/s.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI have previously hosted 2 separate group buys for KNC and Bitfury miners that both closed successfully (fully subscribed) within 24 hours of opening. I am considering a new group buy of the just announced BFL 65 NM, 4 GH chips. They sell in minimum quantities of 100 chips @ $75 per chip (See. info: )The group buy would likely be set up as a 5 chip minimum @ around 0.8-0.9 BTC per chip. I would \\'charge\\' around 10% for administration of the buy (In BTC or Chips), and shipping/handling of chips and most likely the management of turning purchased chips into functional miners once PCB designs/specs are available and DYI projects or build services are available. I would also update the group buy with possible DYI or professional building of miners when available. Chip delivery is in 100 days according to website (Delivery directly from Foundry, which makes delays less likely. After all we are dealing with Butterfly labs here and anything that removes delay factors is a positive). If you are interested, post here and I will likely launch the group buy within the hour so we can be the absolute first to receive chips. NOTE: THIS IS BRAND NEW PRICING and the first group buy at this p\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nA couple of questions:How can they give us info on what the spreads are of Grade A through D if they haven\\'t yet fabbed the new chips? (Isn\\'t it 100 days away?)Or are they giving us the old lots they already \"have\" fabbed that are meant for pre-orders? (The ones with power problems)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAre the chip lots marked clearly as Grade A, B, C, D or are they selling them blindly and we get what we get?How do you guarantee we will get Grade A if we pay 75$ per chip for Grade A? (Instead of Grade D\\'s mixed in)\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI would probably purchase 25 chips. Would you consider accepting escrow for the 50% not due until delivery?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nBFL is not charging $99 for Grade A chips (their original proposal). They are charging a discounted $75 per chip for a mixed batch so they don\\'t have to sort them. They are not labelled.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAre the ratio\\'s of Grade A\\'s to D\\'s at least guaranteed?It would kinda suck to end up with a ton of Duds.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI guarantee nothing reg. Chip quality that BFL has not stated. The process I would use would be blind where I ship a random amount of each grade (based off BFL % for Grade A-D) by simply packaging and sending chips without myself knowing the grade (I assume that BFL will send them un-marked). If chips ARE indeed marked I would select chips for each purchas\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4GHs chips, KNC miners, Bitfury miners, BFL 65 NM 4 GH chips\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 16:19:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1 Terahash DX Large [180Ghs] [52/52 Available]\\n### Original post:\\nWhats your order #? Have you paid?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhI sTAT,I haven\\'t purchased it yet. Need to see how many others are interested. I don\\'t want to end up being the only investor. If you want to be a part of a group buy that I have already placed an order on. You can check out my group buy for the KNCMiners. Basically I\\'m spreading my money around.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nif you haven\\'t paid, you won\\'t be receiving it anytime soon. orders are processed by when they\\'ve been paid.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThis is incorrect. I spoke with them and they said the orders have 5 days to pay for the item to keep their queue. Thanks for visiting.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYou getting one Canary?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n100% BS. Orders are filled on payment basis and even if that wasn\\'t true you order clears cart in 24 hours. And that is ONLY if the orders have been made, and are set to waiting for bank transfer. Read the Terrahash thread!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nDue to lack of interest, this group buy will not move forward! Thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terahash DX Large, KNCMiners, Canary\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 16:19:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] CLOSED\\n### Original post:\\nThis group buy is intended to let forum members take part in the opportunity to purchase cheap hash-rate through the recently launched Terrahash Klondike Assembly performed in the USA. I am within hours of their office so if anything occurs, i will take the unit there for repairs if necessary.The Group as a whole will have ownership of the unit. During our group ownership, if an opportunity presents itself to sell the unit early, we will put it up for a vote. If more than 60% agrees to sell the unit early. We will sell and everyone will get their split according to the shares they own. I personally feel this is the fairest deal and its what separates us from other offers. The unit will be housed at a data center so the unit will be properly cooled at a temperature of 67 degrees 24/7. The unit will also be connected to a UPS at all times to ensure theres no electrical issues. [/b]A Little info on Terrahash:TerraHash will sell ASIC Bitcoin mining gear using the Avalon ASIC chips. More information: what we are doing is as follows:We have ordered 20,000 chips from Avalon. We will be ordering Klondike boards, as soon as the design is ready. We are in process of ordering all the o\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terrahash Klondike Assembly, Avalon ASIC chips, Klondike boards\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 17:06:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 1 sold - 2nd miner: 161/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nTransaction ID(txid): for 2 shares (2x 0.3 = 0.6 BTC)Also Pm\\'ed and a signature, hope its all done correctly.Any problems, let me know.Again, much appreciated for putting this together!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ntx id = count me for 10 shares of 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner = 3.0 btc sent to tyrion thanks hoping\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTyrion will update the latest additions very soon Close to buy the third one! Thought is to be one miner ahead.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:03:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 1 sold - 2nd miner: 173/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nStart post updated! All above transactions are confirmed! 173 shares sold so far..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n4 shares plz\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nConfirmed and added thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:15:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] KnCMiner Shares 1BTC=4.375GH/s [Live] 11 LEFT!\\n### Original post:\\nHi, please reserve 4 shares for me: I\\'ll pay you tonight (about 20.00-UTC).Thanks in advanceBye\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHere is my transaction id: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI PMed to you.Bye\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 21:04:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: AyHo.es Shares for the purchase of a Bitcoin Mining 2.8 TH / S\\n### Original post:\\nHello,we have created the following website Ayho.es to create a bitcoin miners farm 2.8 TH / s with ASIC chips.On the website you can buy shares from this farm. Here you can see the prices Every year or earlier. It will double the power of the farm (no added cost, free), the idea is to reach 28 TH / s. After reaching that power would attempt to invest in the DESIGN and MANUFACTURE own chip to add more speed, thus avoiding the dependence on other companies that take months to send you orders, if at sometime. All this process will be completely free, without any cost to the shareholder and completely transparent.- Income payments will be made when a certain threshold (selected by the shareholder) is exceeded. These earnings will be deducted the cost of electricity and internet, plus a 2% for maintenance costs.- The mining would be operational around late November early December.- He put a phone number once started mining to resolve any questions or problems. Also may address any issues or concerns through this page Any issues or concerns will be solved through this page The machines will be hosted in Madrid, any shareholder may come to see them. It also put a web\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nanother one to my scammer listAt one point i might just use white list instead.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSorry about my English I am not native English. This is not the same as cloudhash.com, cloudhash rent computing power for two years, this is for life. In addition we increase computational power farm once a year for free.And yes, we have already made a small order of chips.I\\'m sorry you think so, I have invested much time and money on this project and is not to scam.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nClarified my initial impression. See edit. I am willing to help OP if requested as to clarify project aim, pricing, ownership structure, miner build time and plans.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSo, same thing as cloudhash.com. . . Wow. . Have you even ordered chips or miners yet? And what is the non consistent and poorly worded language around share value and Gh/s.. Seriously, you have to be kidding right?Edit: OP contacted me and informed me that it is a Spanish project, hence the grammatical issues etc. I have offered to help re-write and clarify the proposal. I take NO sides in the validity of the project and am not affiliated with the owners, but will help clarify terms and information if OP wishes.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi to all.It is Spanglish , what it is a good idea. No, it\\'s not scam, because if the Project not start, he return the BTC. Do you know some similar to it? He buy Avalon chip in the Spanish forum (first and second Bath 10.000 Avalon chips) and the miner will be mount in Barcelona in September or October. An the other hand, the price of the hash is most different of cloudhash or hashrack. Could you read the FAQ, please?.And sorry for my English too.Saludos (Regards)Antuam\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASIC chips, Avalon chip\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 01:17:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Block Erupter USB] IN-STOCK but not for long! 336 Mh/s - Ships Saturday!!\\n### Original post:\\nJust posted two more block erupters on BitMit: RED ERUPTER and ONE BLACK ERUPTER - 2.15 BTC each.SOLD OUT AGAINThese will likely be some of the last ones for a while - still working with ASICM to restore inventory.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, RED ERUPTER, ONE BLACK ERUPTER\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 15:50:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] KnCMiner Shares 1BTC=4.375GH/s [Live] 4 LEFT!\\n### Original post:\\nI would like 4 shares.Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nstill available? if so can reserve 1 share?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi, I have order 1 share, transaction id detail as below, thank you.Transaction ID: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 16:08:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 1 sold - 2nd miner: 177/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nfive shares\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhi, order 2 shares please, thank you, and also request a change on payout addressTx Id:\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 21:21:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] KnCMiner Shares 1BTC=4.375GH/s [Live] 10 LEFT!\\n### Original post:\\nPut me down for another 3 address as before.thanks WH\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nin for \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 23:16:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .57 btc per chip: 3200 available (300 sold)\\n### Original post:\\nNext order has been placed.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAddress: 124; 70.68; of ncoITXKA=Signature of uses 2 of my addresses. Sorry for the inconvenience.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNow we\\'re on a roll\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi CanaryInTheMine,I made 2 transactions, totally 72.96 for 128 chips.Transaction 1 - Address: 124; 70.68; of ncoITXKA=Signature of 2 - Address: 4; 2.28; of uses multiple addresses. Sorry for the inconvenience.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI think you should post that link yes I think that will be the case... But we still need to work out some optimizations till then... And then hope that BFL send chips ASAP so my Jalapeno will live...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThought I did!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWhen you get the boards and test them, please let me know. I will try my best to keep an eye on your thread, but please keep me in mind in case I miss your results. Will you be releasing your board\\'s design?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nno worries! than you for joining us!! added to OP\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThere are still some if\\'s. I Need to sell at lest 100 chips to order sample boards. If we fail first time with the plans we need even more. I maxed out with Avalons that I bought... So I\\'m currently doing what cost nothing. As are my friend at other company. I will make firmware modifications and they are looking at boards. They are not willing to get in more in then with free plans for now. But they would like to make some money later on with them. At some point plans will probably be public but I don\\'t think this will happen in first weeks of production. For now we are brainstorming in our free time (and then get drunk as hell ). The main thing that worries us are 4 layer boards. One off\\'s are expensive as hell... If someone know a way around that it would be useful...EDIT: I don\\'t get it. You are selling chips without boards like there is no tomorrow and I\\'m grilled like hell all the time over PM how things will look and so on. Even if it is already in thread funny enough(OK noting new )... Probably you having enough BTC for buying 200 helped a lot...EDIT2: Do not understand that the wrong way. I will earn from 250$ to 500$(depending on payment) with 100 soled chips and use it f\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips, Jalapeno, Avalon\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 05:14:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 1 sold - 2nd miner: 184/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nBoth confirmed and added to post.@notfair PM sent\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhi please reserve me 1 share if possible\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nhi boss, please reserve me 4 shares. thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n6 Shares in this batch...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 07:14:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .57 btc per chip: 3072 available (428 sold)\\n### Original post:\\nAddress: paid for 4 more chips = 2.28 BTCNow 40 chips \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHow much are the chips if we have the chip vouchers? I have 32 that I would like to use.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHe isn\\'t accepting vouchers.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAddress 8; 4.56; for 8 chipsWill be adding more as soon as i have more BTCThanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 18:47:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 1 sold - 2nd miner: 200/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nHi All,All above transactions are confirmed and added to start post.With regard to reserved shares. Please let us know thru PM (if you haven\\'t done that already) when you expect payment to come our way. Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n6 shares - can you hold 4 additional shares?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m from GB 1.Hold 5 shares pls.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI want 10 shares 10 x .3 = 3 coins . so I am sending 3 coins here.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCorrect!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI sent 3 coins to address for 10 shares will post id in a minuteHERE IT TAX ID INFO 3 COINS! for 10 shares! So I get 10/248 of earnings? Minus maintainaince.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nCorrect, but we calculate it over all the miners to spread risk. btw, if you want to receive the shares in Bitfunder to be able to trade them, please PM your bitfunder Userid.ThxEdit: transaction is confirmed btw.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAny updates from KnC?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nNopes.. I expect the next update next week though..\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nok,I look forward to it!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 03:00:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: OPEN USA/Canada [Grp Buy #5 @165/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nA lot of canary usernames. Did I miss a fad?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nreally? i never looked\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCoincanary.com\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIs the Iconic Image of you chipping away at friedcat\\'s mound of Erupters?!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nit may be... I hear supply \"could\" be diminishing...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nsearch of *canary* CanaryBitminter canarynot sure who the last 2 are... it ain\\'t me.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nedit: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nsomeone liked the idea behind my name...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nDo canaries even exist? I\\'ve never seen them in real life, just cartoons. Ps. Auborne recently became a fad after the movie.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nthey\\'re kept in cages\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOr mines...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\npeople ran like hell outta the mine as soon as canary would die...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThey were used to detect poisonous gas in mines, since they would die much sooner then a person. They are real, although I don\\'t think I\\'ve ever seen one either.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nfer chrissakes - don\\'t die on us, canary!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nthe name is just a take on someone/something that can raise an alarm when necessary, that\\'s all.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDeparted Facility in SHENZHEN - CHINA, PEOPLES REPUBLIC\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYes, but in addition to indicating dangerous levels of carbon monoxide, your passage would make many of us incredibly sad EDIT: k - i\\'m good now, had something in my eye\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nArrived at Sort Facility HONG KONG - HONG KONGlooks like these will go out to you folks tomorrow.I\\'ve got boxes ready and all the labels are already printed\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThey shit priority mail from Hong Kong??? That\\'s impressive!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI wish my bowels could do that.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWTF you almost have them already?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nMy mind is sort of blown by the speed as well, I can\\'t even eat breakfast this quickly.Let alone shit from hong kong\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nOh boy... this is what happens when I have to work through lunch at my day job...\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nthat\\'s some funny ship right there!!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nWell that\\'s good. I was going to be happy getting these next month.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nWhaaat?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nlol coming from a bfl mind set\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nIf you can snap a picture or just report, I\\'d love to see what colors you end up with! My batches have been ending up all black and I\\'m still trying to get some silver/gold in!!\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nWill these fit right next to each other on a hub?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nGroup buy 6???\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nLancelot customers are bound your way canary\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nSweet!!\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nI hope it reaches us by Thursday\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nThursday might be a bit hopeful. It takes a day to get form Hong Kong to wherever Canary is at minimum. More realistic one day to get to US and then one more day to get to his place. Then he has to package them and get them back out, and priority mail takes 2-3 days. So they arrived Hong Kong yesterday (Monday). They should enter the US on Tuesday. And get on the truck out to Canary on Wednesday. He ships them on Thursday, so we should be looking at Saturday/Monday delivery?\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nNext day air going to earn my btc back saving those last few days\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\ndepends on a hub, but on this one, yes! : \\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nGroup 6 is up: \\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nStill in transit. DHL will not deliver today as originally thought....It\\'s possible that the delay occurred due to the Dragon Boat Festival () holidays in China: 06/10-11-12/2013\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nDragon boat festival eh? So does this mean our miners will show up charred a bit from all the fire breath of the dragons?\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nYes! It also helps to further build their resilience to heat meaning no heat sinks needed! *jk*\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nI\\'m wondering if dragons can be trained to deliver mail. And if so, would they be more or less reliable than the USPS? On one hand, they\\'d be liable to catching things on fire. On the other hand, this is the USPS we\\'re talking about...\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nProcessed at CINCINNATI HUB - USA CINCINNATI HUB, OH - USA\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nThat\\'s great news! My Anker USB Hub arrived today and is itching for those little guys\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\nI will have everything shipped out by 1 PM... will send tracking numbers later on after that...get in on group 6!! here: \\n\\n### Reply 44:\\nFantastic! Thanks for making these buy\\'s happen!\\n\\n### Reply 45:\\nOff to FedEx. USPS shipped out earlier today.\\n\\n### Reply 46:\\nall shipped\\n\\n### Reply 47:\\nThanks for the heads up.Or should I say Wings Up!\\n\\n### Reply 48:\\nCould I get a tracking number? I live in a condo so I\\'d like to know when I should be looking for my parcel notice.\\n\\n### Reply 49:\\nYou\\'re the best, should I expect a shipping # shortly?\\n\\n### Reply 50:\\nI got my shipping tracking number via PM about 15 min ago, and I was high up on the list so i would expect all of yours shortly I would imagine!\\n\\n### Reply 51:\\neveryone should have received their tracking number. if\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, Anker USB Hub\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-22 06:58:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [ASIC] Avalon Chip Group Purchase : Idaho, USA : 8631 Chips Remaining\\n### Original post:\\nThat is everything you need to run the board except power, so heatsink and fan are included.It will be a modular design similar to Avalon\\'s, where there are a number of chips per \"card\" that can be plugged into the board. This makes it so if one piece fails it is easily replaceable, as opposed to boards where everything is together Yes, this is exactly what the plans are.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAre you still going to use the 16 chip board design?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nStress-testing on the real blockchain or testnet? And for how long? Sounds like you\\'re hinting that I should buy some more cog shares :pAnyway btc for 20 chips headed your way, going to wait to see how difficulty and price fluctuates as well as your plans before considering more.On a side note, and this is probably the wrong thread to ask you, but do you have any plans to put some asic boards into action for cognitive?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n2.0002 btc for 20 chips from sent you an e-mail with required details and signature for verified message, let me know if any more info is needed!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nTesting will be done on both the real bitcoin blockchain. There\\'s no sense in boosting the testnet diff and not making money... that\\'s a lose-lose!Thanks for your order And yes, the Cognitive boards are a part of this group-buy (actually the first in queue) so they will be online as soon as the rest of these!Best,Garrett\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI am interested in purchasing some chips and a board but am a bit new to the ASIC DIY stuff. I am familiar with soldering boards and surface mount, however. I have seen various DIY board discussions, is this different from the other DIY board discussions and group buys?I have seen this thread: a few others.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThen my question is, how many chips designed for each \"card\"?Hope I understand your answer of the hosting board somehow\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes this is entirely different. We are using a custom overclocked board that will use the same chips to achieve a better hashrate, blowing the competition out of the water which achieving over 340mh/s per chip.Yes, you should purchase chips in increments of 16 or 80. Currently we can host 80 chips per controller, between five hashing cards of 16 chips each. We hope to modify our power controls to be able to host 300+ chips per controller, but that will depend heavily on parts sourcing which is being taken care of this week Cheers,Garrett\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSo, there aren\\'t going to be any K64 boards only K16s (standard/OC\\'ed) for $130?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThese overclockable boards are not K16s or K64s. They\\'re designed by a private developer I am working closely with, not BkkCoins.The boards will house 16 chips and cost at most $130 per 16 chips, probably less when we finalize parts sourcing Cheers,Garrett\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nDon\\'t tease us like that! Do you have a rough total as to the number of chips/boards queued for production thus far? Has anything been mentioned about a different assembly completion timeframe from the new private developer?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSeparate from this group-buy, I have over 1000 boards that I will be producing in conjunction with this developer. Design should be finalized and in full-scale production in mid July, which is still before our Avalon chips will even arrive\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSo, you would be selling just the bare PCB or boards fully assembled with chips? (ie. chips I\\'ve bought from this group buy).Would be curious about timeframe also. I.e. \"1 week after chips delivery\" or 2 weeks or 3... Based on your fab capacity.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI will be selling fully assembled boards, chips + heatsinks mounted and ready to go, to group-buy participants only. I expect there to be a 5 business day maximum lead time, but these numbers will not be solidified until parts sourcing has been taken care of.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThanks. Thats a sweet lead time imho.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nShit if you want to pay me in pcb boards ill drive up and help pack up/ship orders! Sounds like plans are coming together, cant wait for some finalized details. I\\'ll be ordering more chips next week when coinbase clears.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nNote: Due to the extremely competitive offering here, I will be raising the price per chip to 0.2 effective Saturday, June 22.If you are in MilkyLep\\'s situation, waiting for money to clear, I will work with you to secure a deposit to lock in the lower price.I\\'m already outsourcing all of that work, but thanks for the offer\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nMAn, I was waiting to see what my eta was from TH before deciding on a refund and purchasing from you at BTC.1.Also, 350 MH/s is not 150% more than other boards. It is 25% more or 1.25 times.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAw, man. Didn\\'t notice the price increase to .2, yet. I don\\'t have that much to put in for 16 chips. No way to get the .1 rate, still?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThe price increase will become effective at 00:00 on Sunday the 23rd.Cheers\\n\\n### Re\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chip, 16 chip board, cog shares, asic boards, Cognitive boards, chips, overclocked board, K64 boards, K16s, bare PCB, fully assembled boards, chips + heatsinks mounted and ready to go\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, False, False, False, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 01:31:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [BFL]0.275 BTC-Group Buy BTC, PayPal, SEPA+Preliminary board designed-12 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI believe the other group buys (e.g. are also highly interested in your plans! They\\'ve already got several 100s batches ordered and are watching this thread.I, personally, find the fact so interesting that the power consumption of the chips is rather low and that heat dissipation won\\'t seem to be the main problem. So wouldn\\'t it be possible to put the boards for example next to each other and only use passive heatsinks? Or at least a heat-dependent fan that operates very silently. This could be a great opportunity for people who like to keep their mining quiet\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nseems your the only European Group Buy and your accepting SEPA thats great\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPassive heatsinks are probably not possible. You still have 16W12W per chip. One would work 2 probably not unless is BIG and you can forget about more. For 4 you need to take away 64W48W. That is midrange CPU... And that are our cooling planes... Cheap CPU coolers... They are not that noisy. We might add auto speed control at later date to the board but current plans do not include it. But if you have other ideas we will not stop you buying it without heatsink.About other GB. Yes you will be able to buy just board or send chips to me for mounting but not before our costumers get them. They will have hi priority and other costumers will be low. If GB fails to get at lest 100 chips boards will not be made and all collected money returned. So let get first chips onboard ASAP.EDIT: Bought too many AVALON\\'s chips so I can\\'t buy more them 8 at the moment.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThere could also be 1-chip sticks. This would allow for very small boards (like an USB flash drive). They could use a passive heatsink and 15 Watts should be manageable by using an active USB port.The ASICminer Block Erupter Sticks are very successful... Although they only got 0.3 GH/s! 4GH/s chips could be quite powerful in comparison.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDamn, you\\'re right. I did the math a few days ago but I guess I got some numbers wrong... This is difficult with only one USB Port!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWe did look into this idea. But you would need more then one port to powering it... Really impractical... Getting 15W+ in pieces of 2,5W is 6 USB ports... And it would still be BIG for USB key... I would be interested if you have any practical idea how to get power from computer... Or active USB hub... I can only see added brick for powering it. Far from simple USB flash drive...EDIT: It would probably be cheaper and more practical to buy 1 chip and one board. Probably even 2 chips with board. But then again those ASICminer Block Erupter Sticks were also a rip-off.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi LuckoRelative noob to all this. But I realise its ASIC or go home.....I\\'m not sure what i\\'d be buying intoWhat is the ETA for actual mining?Can I buy 3 shares? 183 via sepa (tbc)(This seems to be the only European purchase where the thread is in English - I appreciate not your 1st language, but still very good.)Will i just receive a bag full of chips through the post?That I will then have to get assembled somewhere?or ->Can I pay you for assembly?or ->Is assembly included?or ->Is it hosted and fully assembled (I see the POOL comment, and this would be my preference. Currently GPU mining is driving me mad - Heat and Noise!)And i receive a weekly payout? (Minus expenses)In all honesty I need a pay and play solution really I don\\'t want to buy any more KNC Miner shares as these may not appear in September and I\\'d like to spread my risk via different vendors technology.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n12 chips more orderer. Waiting for payment... Slowly but surly...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHi!Lead time should be 100 days from me ordering it. But this is BFL so you never know...When chips are received you have 3 options:1. get chips only2. get boards fully assembled with or without chips3. get hosting(read first post under hosting)But for 183 total cost you will probably not get the board and one chip. You need more. I would recommend minimal of 4 chips. For now this is just a estimate:chips 4*65=260$ (assuming you buy credits for 10$)board 200$Power supply 30$Total 490$VAT 22% total less then 600$(you are EU)That is for 16GH+It is only 60W so it will not heat you more then a llight bulb and it will not be too much noise...EDIT: If you need credits and don\\'t know how to get them I can get them for you.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIs maybe not being clear. This is group by for BFL chips. Maybe when chips ordered boards being developed and chips can be using for board, but this is buying for chips only now.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter Sticks, AVALON\\'s chips, ASIC, KNC Miner shares\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 03:49:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 0.5BTC for 2.5GHs Kncminer Jupiter\\n### Original post:\\nI know I am new to this forum but I\\'d like to start a group buy for the Kncminer Jupiter MinerFor more information, see: this going to work?The device is 350GH/s minimum and selling at 6,995.00. I designed the share as follows:.5 BTC Minimum.5 BTC = 1 Share (at current BTC/USD rates ~$100 )1 Share = 350/140=2.5Gh/s (You need also deduct the gain against 2% fee and other expenses describe in Dividends section)140 Shares totalThe miner will be hosted in Michigan and I will provide a 24/7 monitoring service for you once the miner starts to work. DividendsPayouts will take place bi-weekly. I will send you your profits every 2 weeks to your designated address.The fee will be 2% of your profit + (expenses include but are not limited to, electricity, repairs, shipping, taxes etc.)Note* if you would like to sell your shares later there will be a 5% feeIn case of non-delivery:In case KNC does not deliver I will do everything in our power to refund your (and our own) investments. I cannot guarantee this however. Buying these shares means you agree to not hold us responsible in case KNC does not deliver.In case of hardware failure:In case of hardware failure I will have KNC repair or r\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI am interested, but very concerned about the \"non-delivery\" clause.Surely if KNC doesn\\'t deliver the product, you get a refund from them, and pass it on. What am I missing?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIts a lot risky, as you say, because you are new. why don\\'t you look another bigger group buys like this one organize another groupbuy (very similar to this one) and very successful orderin 12 KNC Jupiter\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes. It\\'s true. I will try my best to get the refund for non delivery because I will personally invest a few shares in it.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI already bought some from the bigger group today, but I wanted to try buying one myself and run it myself. I have several USB mining devices myself and I started with GPU few years ago. Even I am new to this forum, I got quite a lot experience in BTC mining.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Kncminer Jupiter Miner, USB mining devices, GPU\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 07:09:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN] JIT deliv Group Buy #7 @1/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nstill working on updates folks... today has been a very difficult day (outside of bitcoin related activities)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPM sent with signed msg. Thanks alot for providing this groupbuy\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 12:19:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [BFL]0.275 BTC-Group Buy BTC, PayPal, SEPA+Preliminary board designed-42 sold\\n### Original post:\\nWe have 44 chips sold Let\\'s keep them coming\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nnice hopefully bfl will ship the chips ~in time ..\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 44 chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:37:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy Batch 2] AVALON CHIPs 7528 left @0.082BTC + K16 Miner Assembly 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\nhello,can we have a status update on batch 1 pls?kind regards\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWell, looks like we\\'ll be getting more hashes for our money Question for Nekonos:Will the k16 boards be tested? If so, I propose to instead of testing them on a testnet, testing them on the real blockchain. The bitcoins gained by the testing can then be used to lower the assembly fee on the boards. Only, of course, if you and the majority of the buyers agree with this.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nmy 2 mBTC about the assembly etc:I dont understand all these posts about having the miners test period be credited to this or that cause.And then there are other posts almost demanding that the mining profits will be used to reimburse the buyers in some way ....aren\\'t we all becoming a bit greedy, where is the original spirit gone to? The one demanding the designers to be compensated I can agree with, the ones trying to nickle and dime for personal gain are a bit ugly IMHOso I put forward to have the mined BTC during the miners test run be donated to the klondike and other worthwhile bitcoin causes, preferably hardware etc so the whole community can benefit.godless\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nthis is greedy noob shit in my opinion. better say thank you to nekonos, for assembling and all that shit for a fair price, instead of demanding the first bitcents...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSo you give your baker a tip every time you buy a loaf of bread? You tip the butcher when you buy some meat because he did a bang up job cutting your meat?In my eyes Nekonos offers a service and gets paid for it, in the same way a baker makes your bread or a butcher grinds your beef. Call this \"greedy noob shit\" if you will, but why should we tip him for this?I\\'m not saying Nekonos must do as i please, I\\'m just giving my opinion about the whole matter and figuring out a way for us to get more bit for our buck.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi, Johnk will update us all as soon as the order status has changed. Cheers.Hi all,I think it was clear from the news from 27 May 2013 at which states the following:I think all will agree that the miners will have to be shipped as soon as possible after the assembly. If we start to add more requirements during the testing period which will take time off from actual testing then all will become more complicated.Nekonos WILL test each miner to make fully sure it is working before ship it to the buyers. While testing he will use BkkCoins address for some time in order to compensate him for his work. Hope everyone is happy. Besides, it was clearly stated in the assembly service conditions.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPerfect, I think it is very nice to compensate BKKCoins for the development of this design. Glad to see that the hashing power in the test phase won\\'t go to waste on a testnet. I thought I read the TOS, but I couldn\\'t recall that part. Anyway, completely happy now!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWill you be ordering the K16 boards from BKKCoins or having them fabricated in Spain?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nbkk is only doing the final design of the clondike but not producing.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYes, I think BKKCoins initially planned to sell kits ready for assembly and even PCBs. However, nekonos will be sourcing everything in Spain. This is also the reason why he wants to compensate bkk with some mining on his way while testing the miners.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nGreat. I fully agree with compensating Bkk for his work. So do you plan on testing a board with the sample chips before full production?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOf course, I will post if the sample chips are shipped (and PM OP the tracking) I check my order page at least once per day, so no worries of me missing it.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThanks for the update, John K.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHi, indeed, nekonos will use the sample chips to create proto miners for testing before full production.+1\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n@nekonosAny update with regards to heatsink, fan, casing? It would help to know what can or will be done in order for us to DIY the rest on our side.Cheers.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHi all,This week I have a lootof work. I need more hours in a day The klondike16 are testing the prototype and have already noticed some minor power failures that need to be corrected in the PCB.For case for many units I\\'m working with a atx computer case with power 750W corsair modular this can support 15 units with OC. The maximum capacity of the case is 18 units, but keep in mind the power supply.A quick scheme of what I\\'m working. 5 modules of 3 units with heatsink for three units also.Smallest box I have to see what order maybe 4-5 more plates.I have already ordered components for 3 prototype, there are some problems with the microcontroller stock, but I searched compatible alternative.Regards\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nFor only 1 unit the aluminium heatsink will be 90x90x35mm. Fan 100x100 or maybe 120x120 with some modifycation.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHi allFor buyers\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs 7528, K16 Miner Assembly, sample chips, PCBs, heatsink, fan, casing, atx computer case with power 750W corsair modular, microcontroller\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-24 21:15:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 2121 ASICs gone 52121 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI have received my first sample chip, so thank you Sebastian. It looks that everything goes in the right direction!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks for telling. I hope you make good use of it...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nJust to inform you: I sent 2 samples to strombom and his project since he didnt get samples from zefir yet.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHave to sell my avalon chips from batch 1 and 2 \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, sample chip, avalon chips from batch 1, avalon chips from batch 2\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 16:37:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 2131 ASICs gone 52131 sold\\n### Original post:\\n; <17>; <1.462>; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nFirst sample chip arrived today - well, at least I\\'m assuming it is, the wife sent a photo of a Deutsch Post parcel and I\\'m not expecting anything else from Germany!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI hope you can make good use of it... :9\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 17:26:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group] BFL ASIC chip purchase $65/chip. Batch #1 80 chips left\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll kick it off by purchasing the first 20 of batch 1 myself. 80 chips available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nInterested but I would like more info.1. where are you from2. shipping to EU, Slovenia3. do you take BTL cupones(I have 12). If so how much is half?4. any idea how many chips will be per PCB?5. is 65$ biased on you having a lot of cupones or did you get discaunt?6. since price is in $ not in BTC do you take Paypal?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1. US2. Shipping will be extra if outside of US3. I already have the coupons.4. 16 per single PCB if going with BFL spec board5. yes6. Payment will be taken in BTC with value based on conversion rate.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIs there a way I can use my own coupons?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThe BFL spec board that was released was can only support 2 chips reliably, otherwise BFL wouldn\\'t have needed to design the \"longboard.\" With some power changes (better mosfets), it could probably do up to 8 chips. Cooling the chips isn\\'t really a big issue (use a waterblock CPU cooler), but you need to make sure the design doesn\\'t cause other parts of the board to overheat and catch on fire.TLDR; There\\'s a bunch of engineering work that still needs to happen before a community BFL board becomes a reality.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYou are right, I didn\\'t realize they haven\\'t/won\\'t release longboard specs. Hopefully someone is able to design a functional pcb before the chip orders start arriving. Regardless, this group buy is for the chips only.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC chip, BTL cupones, PCB, BFL spec board, waterblock CPU cooler\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 22:21:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] KNCminer Jupiter 2.25 BTC share [Added to 15 Jupiter Pool]\\n### Original post:\\n1 share; 2.3 BTC; hash: nemercry; Already got a Share from the first GB and want to use the opportunity to stock up a little.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwelcome back, added to OP\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 16:00:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN Worldwide] Group Buy #6 @35/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.04236 ea. @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nThank You your service is greatly appreciated!!!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTo prospective buyers:Please do your research in profitability and network speed projections and note that these ASICs will most likely never break even.I am tired of people selling overpriced mining equipment for prices that will never break even, and even worse... people actually buy them.Don\\'t be the sucker that buys them from him please, because you will not make a penny off them (if not lose money which is more likely IMO.)PS: Sorry to crap on your thread OP, but I\\'m not going to let people entice noobs into buying overpriced hardware if I can do something about it.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThere is merit to this statement.However, EVERY investment in bitcoin is a gamble. No one can predict what is going to happen. Don\\'t put more into this than you can afford to lose.As for overpriced, that is a matter of opinion. If it was overpriced, no one would be buying. Seems it\\'s priced just right to me. If nothing else, put serious thought into buying these, don\\'t buy them on a whim.M\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSucks to be you! How\\'s that coin hoard doing for ya?! Oh wait, you\\'re still waiting for your avalons...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAdding ASIC miners only increases my hash rate. As a hobbyist I don\\'t necessarily care about profitability, otherwise I would have looked for a different solution. As the novelty wears off, the price will adjust to that reality. As with everything Caveat Emptor.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI do believe most know that it will take a VERY LONG time for these to make much profit if the price doesn\\'t go back up.I can only speak for myself for buying these, I did because they are available now. They are high priced in comparison to the Avalons you purchased in your group buy. But I have my ASIC\\'s from Canary\\'s previous Group Buy. Do you have your Avalons from yours? Just curious.Sam\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nnamoom; 10; 10 with overnight shipping and an Anker USB 3.0 hub\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSaying that you are only increasing your hash rate as a hobby is like saying you only go to work for fun.While it\\'s very true these miners are not the most efficient, they are definitely some of the coolest out there, and will eventually be a part of BTC history (IMO).It will probably take me 1.5 years to get my return on these, but they make a great piece of art on my wall that is constantly putting money back in my wallet.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nBobs Yerunkle; 5; 10.2118; more.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, Avalon, ASIC miners, Anker USB 3.0 hub\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 17:41:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 2 sold - 3rd miner: 8/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nUpdates payments, transactions are confirmed, thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nthanks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSent 0.6 for 2 shares (previously reserved)TX and good luck to us all !\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'d like to reserve 2 shares please.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\npayment for my 4 reserved shares.transaction ID \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nignore\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHey!Yes actually.. Reservations were for the people that also bought in the first groupbuy and since this post we don\\'t reserve any new shares. So payment = reservation. It causes a lot of administration and it doesn\\'t really matter anyway currently because it takes multiple days to sell a complete miner and we pay KNC before selling the shares.Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nplease reserve another 3 for me too please\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nah ok no worrieswill post again when i pay\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThanks\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSorry, didn\\'t read through the thread about reserves not being taken anymore. That\\'s probably annoying for you. I\\'ll post again when I transfer. Running off a new machine with a wallet backup, so downloading blockchain forever.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI\\'ll post when I buy my shares, hopefully there will be some left\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nBtw, any idea when you\\'ll recieve the miner?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHey guys!No worries about the reservations Regarding the delivery time, the times on the first batch have not officially been released let alone these.. Reason for is to start this groupbuy (and buy more miners ourselves) is that we expect KNC to further improve the design. As you might have heard today miners are now 400GH instead of 350GH. The miners in this groupbuy might even be further improved..We expect that the first 3 miners in this groupbuy will definately be send together since order numbers are pretty close. We also expect (or hope) that these miners will be delivered shortly after the preorder miners are sent. Either they are \"leftover\" from the preorders or we have the first batch of the next generation Jupiter. That being said; for now its guesswork. As soon as we have definitive delivery dates we\\'ll let you know ofcourse!As for shares left; we\\'ll keep buying miners as soon as shares are sold. I\\'ll update the numbers shortly, looks like we still have 75% of this miner left CheersEDIT: Reservations are not annoying; but just not very practical most reservations I put in so far didn\\'t even change the miner (expect for a few that are still outstanding but those are exce\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 19:46:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1 KNC Miner Saturn 200 GH/s miner + hosting(SHARES REMAINING 10/10)\\n### Original post:\\nSHARES REMAINING 6/10This group buy is for one KNCminer SaturnMy order number is #193 and #4797 and #706 10 shares of 4BTC each are available.- 2 shares will be owned by me as payment for power/maintenance of the miner + As soon, as this miner be available, ill pick it up personally from Stockholm.- payment will be made to the address of the shareholders weekly.- Each share entitles the owner to 1/12 of btc proceeds from a KNC Miner Saturn mining. - As soon, as this miner be available, ill pick it up personally from Stockholm.- payment will be made to the address of the shareholders weekly.To purchase shares:- Send 4BTC per share to address: CASE OF NON DELIVERY: I take no responsibility for the possibility that KNC Miner does not deliver the miner.If you require more info etc. Please feel free to ask/post in this thread or please pm me.-Elijah\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Miner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 22:31:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 2 sold - 3rd miner: 33/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nPayments confirmed and updated; jski and voodah addedThx\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks Ty,Have you gotten any closer to where you going to stage all these miners, KNCMiner or somewhere else??\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyou\\'re welcome Yes actually; I\\'m visiting a datacentre this friday to take a look around and see what we can do for eachother. It\\'s has a bitcoin-friendly owner which is a big plus. So hopefully more on that this friday KNC still hasn\\'t given it\\'s hosting prices so far so no update there..Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n3 shares for me = .9 BTCs sent ID: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ntyrion, are you Dutch by any chance?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYes I am @zurg, payment confirmed, I\\'ll add it to post\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAwesome, me too If I buy a share I might visit you and the miners to make sure your not scamming us\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThat shouldn\\'t be a problem if the miners end up getting hosted where I\\'m going friday.. You should buy more than one share though if you want to visit\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSure thing I\\'ll probably buy 2 or 3 shares, i\\'m 15 so I don\\'t have to much money to spend Where are you planning to host the miners?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI was kidding about buying more than one share! Also, especially if you\\'re 15 take care not to spend more than you can afford!That being said; I\\'m looking at a datacentre below Rotterdam this Friday. Also I can\\'t make any 100% promises on this cause the datacentre owner will have to agree to this as well ofcourse We might have to transport you there blindfolded Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI know you were kidding, but I was planning on buying more than 1 share anyways. It\\'s probably best of you knock me unconcious before you bring me there so as to not compromise the secret location On a serious note though, how much Gh/s will 3 shares buy me?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nLOL!Well, with KNC\\'s announcement of this afternoon; a Jupiter will hash 400GH. So currently one share should give 400/248 == 1.613GH, three would give 4.839GHCheers\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNice, way better than buying that jalepino thing from BFL. Hopefully this can earn me a little bit of money on the side Thanks for answering my questions!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nyeah I have 4 x jalapenos on order since jan 2013 they are up to sept 2012. So i grabbed 10 then 5 shares here. a total of 15 so far. I am very tempted to buy 5 more maybe tonight.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nNice! How high do you expect the difficulty to be around September?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nit is 19 mill today. will be 21 mill in 3 days. I think 10% each 10 day adjustment. Adjustments are close to 10 days based on blocks made 2100 usually takes 10 daysSoJune 28 = 21 mill July 8 = 23.1 millJuly 18 = 25.4 mill July 28 = 27.9 Mill Aug 7 = 30.7 mill Aug 17 = 33.8 mill Aug 27 = 37.1 mill then it picks up in sept due to knc 20% each adjustment so sept 6 = 44.5 mill sept 16 = 53.4 mill if I am correct you will be paid off quickly under 2 months . but lots of ifs sooo many ifs\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nyeah it is kind of impossible to accuratly predict what the difficulty will be and if bitcoin prices will rise. Let\\'s hope the difficulty won\\'t be higher than that in september.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner, jalapenos\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-26 23:29:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [ASIC] Avalon Chip Group Purchase : Idaho, USA : 1043 Chips Remaining\\n### Original post:\\nMost of the chips just sold in a large private deal, I upped the price to 0.5 per chip for future orders. Discounts for orders of 100+.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAny updates on the hardware miner?Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYep, the parts sourcing is finalized and firm prices will be coming in later this week. Testing of the final board revision is going to happen on schedule, which is extremely weird for mining hardware haha Cheers,Garrett\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chip\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 06:30:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [CLOSED] ASICMiner Erupter USB delivered\\n### Original post:\\nGROUP BUY CLOSED\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGROUP BUY CLOSED\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 08:28:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 1438 ASICs gone 51438 sold\\n### Original post:\\n90 new sample chips arrived... Unfortunately again packed in Cellophan. Its not good for ESD, burnin mentioned. But maybe the chips itself are already protected against ESD.In any case these are the chips for batch 2, 3 and 4. Batch 5 was either ordered too late to send samples, they dont have samples anymore or they stopped sending samples starting from a certain date. In any case now 90 chips are to spread.The owner of the samples from batch 2-4 already told me what should happen with the samples.Now the list of the devs and assemblers, how many chips they need maximum and how many they got already from here and from zefir:UsernameChips sentMaximum Chips neededStill needed Chips total: 34Those that wanted to donate their samples doesnt need to anymore. There are enough samples that dont belong to someone. So i will mark all chips that should be donated to a dev as owned by the buyer.Remaining rest to spread: 48Needed chips: 34Remaining is a rest of 14, that nobody owns.Will we wait with these chips for coming developers or has someone a better suggestion?I think i now will make some shipments ready for the chips that should go to the developers.The new table would loo\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHas anyone contacted you about merging a number of the current groupbuys together to finish up the last batch(s)? I saw it suggested in a thread in order to fill up these final slow buys. I believe your name was brought up, as well as bizwoo and t13hydra.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYes i was contacted and asked about it in the threads. But no one was really interested in it because of the additional layer of insecurity.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAwesome They haven\\'t arrived here in Austraila yet I\\'ve been hanging out for it!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nnobody from any batch still dont get their chips or burnin miner?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAvalon haven\\'t shipped yet, just the sample chips, and Burnin is still working (probably most of his waking hours!) on stuff. Keep an eye on this and Burnin\\'s threads. You\\'ll know when things start moving - the whole forum will go mad .\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIf somebody from Batch 1-4 wants to sell his 100 chip order i would love to take that.My offer is 10BTC = 0.1 BTC / Chip.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nStrange... but at least a couple of devs got back and said they arrived. I sent out more chips today and will make the pm ready now.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHi,When you asked me a month ago if I need samples I reply atleast 2 having in mind , that I\\'m going to get 6 from burnin.@ the moment We are testing both our design and also K1 helping BKKcoins.If it\\'s possible I\\'ll need 4-5 more chipsThank you in advanceMartin\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYou only wrote that 2 chips are ok that time. But i think its ok to send you 5 more. Its the best use for sample chips anyway.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThank you very much.This will help us.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThe tracking number at deutsche post shows it was handed off International on the 14th. It can take 10 or so business days from Europe, so I\\'m not stressing just yet.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOk... i didnt ship many items internationally so i thought it will be faster. But as long as it reaches in a good enough timeframe...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThe total sum of the current batches of four EU group buys is currently only 6537. Here are the group buys I have considered:1. t13hydra batch 2: 10212. Marto74 batch 2: 483. bizwoo batch 2: 34704. SebastianJu batch 6: 1998Thanks to ujka for the list (\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI think it will rise quite fast once first chips are delivered to any group buy. Because we already know the chips exist, miners from developers seem to be working, so everyone (who still has some money to spend) is waiting if the 9-10 weeks of delivery will be true or not.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSome say all the current batches will be delivered together.So, it would be 9-10 weeks for the first batches, much less for the last batches (e.x. #5).But then, probably for batch #6 it would be 5-10 weeks again...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, sample chips, chips, burnin miner, 100 chip order, chips, design, K1, chips\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, False, True, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 15:27:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] KNCminer Jupiter 2.3 BTC share [Added to 15 Jupiter Pool]\\n### Original post:\\nBought 1 share, txid (matt4054)2.3 BTC sent from to already own one share from 1st GB too, and might buy some more shares Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\na mistake.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhat?!?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nnot sure what the mistake is either?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nthe refund deadline. It maybe should be Jan 1,2014\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAllright, agreed :-) I think we both missed your added emphasis.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ncorrected, thank you\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nhello, why does it say, when we receive the miners, if they are being hosted at KNC? Why would their be shipping or repair costs?Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThe group will most likely host with KNC, so should read when KNC receive Jupiters. But in case KNC\\'s hosting costs are prohibitive, we can elect to host Jupiters ourselves and have them shipped.If KNC hosts the Jupiters then there will be no shipping. If they do not host, then there will be shipping.Repairs are standard on any computer hardware, nothing runs forever. Being hosted at KNC, they should access to parts quicker as well, so less downtime.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n4 more shares:Code:ID: \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nnoted and added to OP, welcomeIf anyone is not receiving KNC newsletter it can be read here\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n1 more share:Code:ID: \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n5 more shares:Code:ID: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False, False, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-21 20:22:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy]12 KNCminer Jupiter\\'s 15 Sold [Closed]\\n### Original post:\\nBalance sheet sent to all GB shareholders in email. If you did not receive balance sheet, PM me your email.John K has agreed to audit my KNCminer account once GB was over. I will do this on Monday June 17, 2013If you are not receiving Bitmessage updates, PM me for address to subscribe too. To clarify, you need to add the Bitmessage address I provide for you and add under subscription tab in Bitmessage. You will not receive any old updates, but only updates I send out after you subscribe.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI confirm that soniq has ordered and paid for 15 KNC Jupiter units.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAnd now we wait...Soniq, thought about putting this on bitfunder/btct.co ?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSeen other GB listing on an exchange and they are diluting shareholder value, and using third party payments. Not something my shareholders or I am interested in I\\'m sure.Asicminer is not listed on any exchanges and doing quite well.Willing to look at any opportunities that will add value to our GB however.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAsicMiner is not listed as such, but a decent chunk of its direct shares have been converted to trade-able shares and have been generating quite some return for their holders... just saying\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCan you tell us more about this ?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYeah I would like to know what you mean by dilluting as well! Also, we offer our shareholders a choice, they don\\'t have to use bitfunder if they don\\'t want to. So how many shares did you buy Soniq?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI PM you with my email address But I did not received you balance sheet yet. Plz resend it .\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOne suggestion I have that might be worth discussing ....IF we get our Jupiters pretty early on in the orders (and I see no reason why not) we would have quite a substantial hashrate at over 5Thash.Surely this would be enough to attract others to join our pool as the first PURE JUPITER pool, hell, we could call it JupiterPool.A 2% fee (or whatever) we could share that out to relax the jupiter restriction to give gpu folks a chance to mine with us etc, spin it however suits.Just a thought.edit: Just thought as well, if the timing is right it could be pretty big ....lots of individuals get Jupiters, first thing they do is attempt solo. Yeah some will hit early blocks but most won\\'t. They will work out that they\\'re better off in a pool for regular return, so what better timing if at that point JupiterPool exists. Perfect, where do I join\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nA 100:1 split may be overly optimistic, but it\\'s not \"diluting,\" which would imply shares being added without compensation to shareholders, which did not happen.ASICMINER is not currently directly listed on an exchange, but there are multiple pass-through listings on multiple exchanges.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nsoniq, my tx id is not assigned on the spreadsheet (line 39). This is my transaction for 1 share @ 2.3BTC. This should bring me to 2 shares in total.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nUpdated thanks\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSorry , misinterpreted I am the largest shareholder in group, that is public information.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nNo problem as for you being biggest shareholder, couldn\\'t see that in the topic.. Guess all of our hopes are aimed at KNC now Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMaybe you guys should join forces. That\\'ll be one hell of a pool. I only promote this since I am in both group buy\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHere is the current list of unclaimed transactions. If you see your transaction here PM me. I will be going through the posts on this thread and checking mountains of PM\\'s as wellUpdatedAll transactions accounted for\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nsounds good to me m in both too\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nWe dont have the same ideas on how a group buy should be run. So many factors that can go wrong\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nHi Soniq,I\\'ve sent you a PM with my bitmessage address few days ago, however I have not received a confirmation or yet. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSent you a PM, the Bitmessage address to subscribe too is in the spreadsheet. Anyone not receiving updates please send me your email.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI waited for you for 2 days . I have pmed you twice.My email is 138910@qq.comMy bit message address is \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nYour address has been added to email list and you should have received the balance sheet.I have confirmed it in the email account. Check your spam boxCheers\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI have checked my spam holder and no your email. It\\'s depresssing using a chinese email service.Plz send to my gmail and update your email list.thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nOk, added and new email sentI have another .qq address with another member, I wonder if they are receiving their email?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI dont find the Bitmessage address to subscribe...\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nStill have four members who have not submitted their email.PM me or post here if you have not submitted your email\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nSoniq,You have listed my BTC address as the change ad\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter, Asicminer\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 17:29:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] KNCminer Jupiter [Added to 15 Jupiter Pool] 15/30 left\\n### Original post:\\nPurchased 1 share @2.3 BTC.ID: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 20:34:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 3 sold - 4th miner: 32/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nAllright everyone, shares have been updated. We bought some shares ourselves as well (so we don\\'t end up buying only the latest shares )Miner 4 is being bought as we speak so from now on you can buy shares on miner 4. Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust saw a update that a machine will be at 400GH/S? \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCorrect We had a lot of good news yesterday:\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDoes the upped hash rate affect how many shares we will receive through bitfunder?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNopes not for this GB. Since this GB also features Jupiters number of shares will be the same.. But... If by the time these miners arrive, hashrate on these miners is higher than the ones that are running; shares will change accordingly..\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n4 Shares pleaseTX ID: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nTransaction confirmed; added two more private transactions.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-27 23:30:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 2 sold - 3rd miner: 98/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nHere\\'s mine.4 shares. 1.2 BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nShares update coming later on guys\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nupdate 2 will buy more soon hopefully if theres some left\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThere is plenty, we are buying 1-2 more today with some luck.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n1-2 more miners??great stuff\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi tyrion70 can you reserve me 7 Shares (2.1 btc), I will send the coins tonight at homeThanks\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIs still my shares reserved for miner 2?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPM Sent\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHey! We won\\'t reserve any more shares for now, but as you can see the 4th miner is being secured as we speak so there will be enough shares left tonight..Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPM sent\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi! I Send it 2.1 btc (7 Shares) from \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 07:55:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Purchase]8985 Avalon Chips - 0.081 BTC (Global+Escrow)-BATCH2 SECURED\\n### Original post:\\nTerrific! Will probably order more chips in the coming days and give you the order for two boards @ 0.75BTC each, but have to gather some new, fresh BTC first\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAuction time!There are 224 chips for sale from the first batch! The starting price is 0.09 BTC for each. The auction ends on Sunday, 23-Jun-2013 22:00 (Bucharest time / EET).Please go to THIS THREAD and bid in the following format: No. Of chips @ No. of BTC offered for eachExample: 224 @ 0.09 (resulting in a total of 20.16 BTC, paid in 24 hours max)To recap, the chips will arrive in August. I\\'ve already received the sample chips from Avalon. If there is no payment for the chips after winning them, they will be offered to the next highest bidder.Regards and good luck!SteveTime left:\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI have read through the first post and I still don\\'t get it. I understand that you take 0.081 and multiple it with how many chips you want.But I don\\'t want just the chips you know...Basically what I want is: chips + k16 board assembled ASAP.Do I go to your webiste or can I join this group buy somehow?The thing is on your website it says delivery is in September..\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIndeed, the delivery is in september. You can go to the website and order from there, it\\'s much easier.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSo Batch 2 will also be delivered in September?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi t13hydra,I already have an order for 32 chips in Batch 2, I am trying to get coins for 16 more chips.Would it be better for me to order it in this batch and then order the boards on your website?I don\\'t want to add to the confusion and order some chips here and some chips on the site, and then order some boards.What do you think is best?FFMG\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi there,Your proposal is perfect. Ortder the chips from here and then order the boards from the site. I\\'ll create you a coupon code to use to have a discount for the \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes. But Batchj 1 will be delivered in August..\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHello again and sorry for being such a pain in the ass.I would like to know about delivery: which kind of service are you planning to use for international shipping? why i didn\\'t receive any email after i choose the \"customer-side shipping\" to set up my shipping? are you storing our shipping addresses in a secure way? some burglars stole avalons in these days, using EXIF or databases or whatever we don\\'t know.. just to tell you\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nlink to that story\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nyxt > \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nEverybody, just wanted to let you know i\\'m leaving the city for the weekend with no WiFi or phone coverage. I\\'ll be back on Sunday. Best regards to all,Steve\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAnyone who has purchased and received more chips than they actually need, let me know I will take them off your hands for a profit.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n@LainZthx, WTF....Luckily I have a trained K9 dog.And an undisclosed number in training.The exact number is a surprise for burglar @t13hydrai sent you a PN regarding the coupon code...but first relax a WE\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n@t13hydra & Why does international shipping price for 1 complete miner is 0.7 BTC?It\\'s almost 1/3 od the miner\\'s price. Isn\\'t there a cheaper option to ship inside the EU?Maybe you could ship via Romanian Post? Why at the checkout I should fill Billing Address, altrough there is only Bitcoin Payment available?3. How much will cost shipping only 16-32 chips (ordered here) to Germany?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDoes this mean batch 2 will close on this date regardless of the number of orders?Will the order be placed on this date and the 10 week count down start?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nBkkcoins has some good news for us:\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI placed an order for 32 chips, now I want to get more chips and pay for the required boards.My question is, can I order more chips for the second batch. And can use the same payment address for the boards. Also sent a pm about this.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n24 hours after Auction ended still no official results and no BTC address. Anyone knows how to pay and get official results from auctioneer? And better question. Do all bids count? I don\\'t know how much I need to pay. It was 2 minutes longer then it should be since forum clock is off by 127 seconds.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI asked the same question, basically you use the escrow address to add more chips and then, when you are ready to order the board, send a PM to ask for a coupon to order the boards without the chips. See : make sure to mention that you are adding more chips to your address.FFMG\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nHi, i just got back from my small vacation. Sorry, but i also have a family to take care of. Will announce the winners in a few hours, because it\\'s 3:30 am... I\\'ll ask around about the forum clock also.Regards,Steve\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI was just worried since I spouse to pay 24 hours after the end. I understand this complicity. You can also figure out time difference at this moment easily. \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 8985 Avalon Chips, k16 board, chips, boards\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-05-31 21:43:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USA/Canada [Group Buy #1 193/50] ASICMiner Erupter USB 2.03496 each @ 5 units\\n### Original post:\\nFrom DHL: \"Notification for shipment event group \"Customs clearance\" for 30 May 13.\"\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nthese are international?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nshipped from China\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThat is great news! Thanks Canary for all you have done!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWondering if it\\'s possible to ship via USPS for Canadian orders (or at least for mine)? FedEx, like UPS, apparently charges hefty brokerage fees at the border.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nswitched to usps\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ngreat! thanks a bunch, i really appreciate everything you\\'ve done so far.i\\'m a screenprinter by day, and i\\'d love to send you a bitcoin t-shirt. what\\'s your size?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWow! thank you... very much unexpected. PM sent\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOnly problem with Chinese delivery is we\\'ll be hungry for more in an hour.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nDeparted Facility in HONG KONG - HONG KONGCustoms status updated CINCINNATI HUB, OH - USA14:48I guess I\\'m going to be a busy bee tomorrow?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ndunno... but I bet chances are good that I will have it tomorrow...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nyep.. waiting for an update out of Cincinnati customs...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThanks for the updates. Very much appreciated.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI second this!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nthieves, all of \\'em!my work requires a lot of supplies that are a LOT more readily available (and at better prices) in the USA, but i\\'ve been using the more expensive domestic sources more and more just because i hate lining the couriers\\' pockets. $35 to fill out a form!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIf the miners do come in tomorrow, would I be able to pick them up in person as opposed to having them shipped? I just so happen to be in the area till monday morning and it would be ultra convenient to be able to have them asap.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\ni don\\'t see why not.I will publish instructions for local pickups soon. you will send me a signed message with your code word, so that I know you are whose forum handle you claim to represent in person . please no vulgarity...\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nDeparted Facility in CINCINNATI HUB - USA CINCINNATI HUB, OH - USA\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nare you going to ship them tomorrow or monday?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nHaving to PM many people who ordered... I can\\'t tell what your message is for be is the actual message textit\\'s between these lines that it\\'s wrapped infor ease of readingJohn Smith123 way avetown, IL, \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIs my message correct?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nIf you wish to have us resend the messages can we get some clarification using this format?The signed message should only be contained between the start and the end but not including the start and end?The last line in the signed message should include the new line character?Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nin the message above, the first character is T and the last character is 4.Code:you can also hit the \"#\" button to wrap your message in a code block\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nYes, status on first post\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nyours verified, see 1st post\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThanks!!\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nSorry, wasn\\'t trying to make more work for you. Just trying to help others out and be precise as possible. Thanks again for everything!\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nOn the first page instead of verified or resend there\\'s \"++++++\" next to my name what does that mean?\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nmeans I haven\\'t tried yet\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nAwesome, thanks for doing all of this!\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nI\\'m off to lunch.When I get back, I\\'m going to print all the labels.This is your last chance to upgrade your shipping if you want.Please double check info in the table on the first post too. Any issues let me know.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nWith delivery courier FRANKLIN PARK, IL - USA\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nThat\\'s unexpected and exciting. I figured if it wasn\\'t out for delivery this morning it wouldn\\'t make it until Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nCan\\'t wait to get my RPI running with these - personal little money factory!\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nI\\'m just sitting here refreshing the page just waiting for the go-ahead to go and pick my pair up. It really does!\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\namazing!i\\'ve been in the studio all day, should have your t-shirt cranked out shortly\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nI\\'ve been obsessively checking the tread like a kid watches a clock on Christmas eve. Bouncing over here...\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nAt first, my heart sank when I saw the box and it\\'s crushed top portion...I blocked the door and would not allow the DHL delivery person to leave till I opened the box... that freaked him out a bit..But!!!!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nThey\\'re all here and all are fine.it\\'s 4:37 PM here, I\\'ve got a few hours to hit the Post Office, so will get some out today.The bad thing is that they all are black in color from the looks of it. The good thing is that they\\'re all black in color, so no one is going to nag at me for not getting the colors they wanted! hehehehe\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nWoo!! Hoo!!!\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nSweet! The black ones were the sexiest anyway. By the way, PM sent abou\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 15:15:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN] JIT Group Buy #7 1045+ ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nall orders are now on OP. please contact me if there\\'s an issue. I\\'m tired as hell, going to bed...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBetatester 5 6.2119 (and others)Tx \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCanary the topic title lists this as being open. You may want to edit since 8 is in progress.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you! Updated.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 16:52:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] KnCMiner Shares 1BTC=4.375GH/s [OPEN]\\n### Original post:\\nCan I get a confirmation for my 1BTC reservation pre-payment?txid sent via pm on reddit (sbjf)The rest of the payment of the reservation is already in the sending account, I\\'ll send that as soon as the 3rd miner is close to finishing.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nRemaining amount on its way debit address (as \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow are you planning to handle the unpaid reserved shares of orders #2 & #3? Give a deadline and then buy them yourself or auction them off?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGood news here - GH/s per share has gone up to 5GH/s before the 3% fee based on this information!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAre miner #1 #2 and #3 all having the same order ID?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI hope will do that, and not just up the fee.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nVery nice Have you thought about the possibility of making the shares here actual shares on e.g. bitfunder? That might make things easier once there are actual payouts. (Although I think there is a 5 BTC fee for registering your own stock, this would need to be split).\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 17:05:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 3 sold - 4th miner: 61/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nHi TyrionDo you know what happened with the order numbers?Why is Miner4 only 9xx ? Did Bitpay reset something ?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHey Voodah,Nopes, we still had a cancelled order in the 9xx range in our account (you can see it here We just found out we could still pay it, which we promptly did :-) we\\'re not sure if it has any effect but it it wont hurt either :-)Cheers,\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDamn, I want some shares of that one now !\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI think it would be great if you update the OP with the link to the IPO of ADDICTION. Some people might not have seen that post yet.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nboss, 6 shares please.tx id: PM\\'d you regarding the arrangement of payment bitcoin address. thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nsendin 1.2 coins for 4 shares of miner number 4. My totals will be;miner 2 = 10 shares miner 3 = 10 shares miner 4 = 4 shares WAITING ON IDHERE IS ID;\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIt\\'s there now.. It can sometimes take a while to get a transaction in the network.. It still needs confirmations though, but thats normal\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nyeah . I checked it and it was missing I figured I would check back in an hour or so.Sometimes they hang up in cyberspace. I am looking forward to this. As I have shares in miner 2, 3, and now 4. I also like the Northern Europe influence on this IPO/Group Buy. My Grandmother was born and raised in Oslo, Norway. It is nice to see that Scandinavian influence on the gear (Swedish built)> Maybe housed in Norway with some North Sea Oil for power. Here in the states BFL has been a huge disappointment Slow shipping. I have waited since Jan of 2013 and I am a lucky one some have waited since June of 2012!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nTransaction not found\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPower and racks are too expensive in Norway. Hosting in .nl seems to be the best solution. Its a short way for both Tyrion and me to fix any problem that should arise.We will have option for remote hands if needed. If the crowd is willing to spend money on that. Downtime again, can be expensive in terms of income losses.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSent 3.00 btc for 10 shares of miner 4tx id: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner, miner 2, miner 3, miner 4\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 17:49:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] KNCminer Jupiter [Added to 6 TH/s Jupiter Pool] 13/30 left\\n### Original post:\\nOrdernumber?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n1 more share:Code:ID: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAdded to OP , Jupiter #16 purchasedWelcome\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIn original GB was order #77, #78 and #83The 2nd GB will try to be included in first order delivery, but not guaranteed.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 18:07:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: USB miners group buy #1 - finlof\\n### Original post:\\nIf you have the BTC to send me today then I will facilitate a group buy. I already have the coin for an order of 50, and one other person that is requesting I include his in with my order. so here\\'s what I will do:1. cost of miners in BTC : (1) for 1.1, (2) for 2.17, (3) for 3.23, (4) for 4.28, and (5) for 5.3. any amount above 5 will be # + 0.3 BTC (ie 10 would be 10 + 0.3 = 10.3). price includes priority flat rate shipping TO THE US. if you want expedited shipping TO THE US then include 0.15 BTC more. for orders outside the US please PM me for the extra cost of shipping.2. send payment to before 6/28/13 @ 7pm SERVER TIME (that\\'s 2pm CST). also PM me a signed message from your address so I know it\\'s legit (if you need help on signing a message look at this post with all the info - once I receive miners I will ship out within the next business day.4. if you want escrow contact John K. or TAT. buyer covers escrow fees.5. any BTC received after deadline will be refunded, unless I have enough interest to do another group buy.Please Note:Only send payments from an address you control (i.e. you can sign with it). If you send from MtGox or other exchanges, you risk loo\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nRESERVED\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nreserved from see PM\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\njust over 3 hrs left before i close this buy.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhat does \"reserved\" mean. I see it as the second post on Group Buys. Is it an escrow thing?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI think in case of adding anything else to the post they write down there.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nmy reserved post was for me to reserve the 2nd post for more information if i needed to clarify anything.the other person that posted is someone who has sent me BTC for a usbminer.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\njust under an hour left\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-28 20:48:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW! 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 3 sold - 4th miner: 88/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nHave a few questions about bitfunder Addiction and these 2nd batch buys. I have 10 shares of 2nd miner 10 Shares of 3rd miner and 4 shares of 4th miner. so that is 24 shares all told. 7.2 btc if my math is correct.My questions are:I missed the first batch so I don\\'t get Addiction shares right off. If that is correct When do I get them? Second do I get 24 x 50 = 1200 shares of Addiction? As the miners come on line?I opened a bitfunder account and gave info to you. You can pm me or answer here.Thanks Phil\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHey Phil,I love it when people give their own answers Your correct assumption on the second question answers the first...Shares on bitfunder will be issued when the miners come online and indeed its 50 shares per share here so 50*24 = 1200.Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAllright, back home Sorry for the delay, but all above transactions are confirmed and added to startpost. 88 shares are sold, so we are at 1/3 of the 4th miner. Today I visited our potential datacentre. I\\'ve had a pleasant talk with the owner, a bitcoin enthousiast himself. I won\\'t disclose to much details here, but so far things are looking great. I got the complete tour, including the power room. Impressive to see all that material Lastly with all the excitement of last week we decided to make this weekend a special weekend:For every miner sold on this groupbuy (except the first because we bought that ) we will give away 2 times 50 Bitfunder ADDICTION shares! Every share bought is a ticket. This Sunday at 2200 Europe/Amsterdam time we will draw the winners.In case you wonder why we\\'re doing this; we simply want to be the biggest Jupiter Mining operation Also we might be able to further reduce costs and risk as we keep and Tyrion70\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWill it somehow affect me if I choose to not use Bitfunder?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNope.. The only thing is you won\\'t be able to trade your shares easily. Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCool !Also, just curious, but why Bitfunder and not Btct?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNo particular reason other than that we had a very pleasant talk with Jon when we were investigating what exchange to use. Personally I like the look and feel of bitfunder more as well, but that\\'s not really a reason.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nLottery has made a final decision Sent 6 BTC for 20 shares.TX ID: already have my info from the first group buy.Cheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner, 2nd miner, 3rd miner, 4th miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 06:41:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #8 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\ndaddyhutch; 2; 2.2418; more from me Canary! (I also had two orders in Group7 --TY!).PM Sent\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWaiting for gox, but will be in for 10\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nczspeedycz; 10; 11.1618; (PM sent)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nsephtin ; 10 ; 10 ; pick up in person. PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nBobs Yerunkle; 10; 10.1618; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFollowing\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSigurdDragonSlayer; 3; 3.2318; \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nbeercoin; 4; 4.2218; \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nmstang83; 2; 2.2418; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'m going to order 20 more this Tuesday\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nsounds good! you might go into group 9 then\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nReservedNote: there\\'s a new payment address for this group, please use ordering 50 units gets 2 free black Anker hubs from me. (while supplies last) \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, black Anker hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 06:42:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #8 122/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nAnyone ordering 50 units gets 2 free black Anker hubs from me. (while supplies last) \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, black Anker hubs\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 08:25:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 3 sold - 4th miner: 108/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nPajo added to list as confirmed payment thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nScraped together all the btc I can spare for 10 more shares of miner 4.tx id: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi All, I Send it 3 btc (10 Shares) from but I want to use this address for payment: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGoodmorning!All above payments confirmed! Will update startpost now Cheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 11:55:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 3 sold - 4th miner: 128/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\njust bought 4 more shares Transaction ID: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 15:56:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 4 sold! - 5th miner: 2/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nAdded Kirk and a buyer through email. We decided to buy some more shares ourselves as well, so we just started the 5th miner! We\\'ll be paying KNC for the 5th miner shortly.Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nsent 3 btc for 10 shares.id have my info from the first buy group.Thank you\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nhi TyrionI was ready to pay few hours ago.But Unfortunately I had to do something very urgent.I\\'m so depressed to find you bought the rest of 4th device.Could you put the 40 shares of mine below in the 4th device? I\\'ll be very appreciated if you do.More 40 shares\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAllright :-) consider it done.. Now dinnertime!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks a lot! Have a good dinner.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 17:26:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 4 sold! - 5th miner: 42/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nThanks!Post updates, Anto, we added yours to the 4th as well\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThank You, really appreciated!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi Tyrion,Miner4 full and we\\'re now on 5 or is there a typo line in the payments post?Can I get moved to Miner4 as well, only 2 shares??\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYeah typo fixed it..Err you\\'re in miner 3.. Anto and Szmarco were in 5.. So you\\'re in the third miner that is delivered, Anto and Szmarco in the fourth (don\\'t look at the order numbers for that). We\\'re trying to negotiate all miners to arrive at the same time anyway\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 18:44:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [BFL]0.275 BTC-GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA+Preliminary board designed-32 sold-USB stick\\n### Original post:\\nThis group buy not seeming to go anywhere very fast.One chip USB plug in with power connector plugging in on side for wall pack power might be interesting - not useful plugging into computer supply if having male USB connector. Could theoretically running 40 Gh/s from ten port USB hub if similar (maybe bigger) like Block Erupter but heat being major problem. Would be more happy with smaller boards 4 chips not being USB but being stackable with holes in corners. Seeing second picture in this:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI was looking all GB are going slow at the moment... I\\'m the only one who manage to sell any chips yesterday as far as I know... But I have interest for 80, 100 and 5 in a pipeline...100 is a local order and they would like a meting whit me. Bad news is that my dother is sick so I can at the moment. But I will probably manage that in a next day or two. So if you are planing to order now would probably be a good time...The picture I see should work with current design. You will lost benefits of connecting them together and use single USB. But I will look into that. It might be done.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNot problem running 10 of 4 or 6 chip boards having separate USB for 160-240 Gh/s using 10 port hub Also not problem if chaining boards with standard I2C connector like usually be doing.Would be happy with ANY board design really working. One chip, 4 chip, 6 chip, whatever any number chips. Just wanting in near future, not \"maybe shipping September\".Would even buying 12 more chips if putting order over limit.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJust back from another design meeting... Our board designer is really doing grate. We are getting there... As long as we sell enough chips board testing shouldn\\'t be that far off. But we need to sell them to get samples... If everything goes to plan I will be having some computer model pictures tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAre you buying chip credits here as well? How much if so.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAt this moment not. But if someone needs them I will contact you.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI manage to secure 2 sample chips thanks to one4many. Many thanksAlso just orders all necessary hardware for programming boards. As soon as it arrives I will start experimenting with firmware on my Jalapeno... It should be similar enough for this to work... My plan is to add some overclocking possibility...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nInterested. Will read over tonight.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOK it was a crazy day at work... 15 hours... My boss is a slave driver but I shouldn\\'t talk that way about him since it is me Sorry didn\\'t had time for computer model pictures... Did my best to answer all PM questions and I\\'m sorry if I got fostered with anyone. But I will live you with some good news. This is a picture of the order that sample chip donor did.So samples are on there way... Many thanks again one4many...Now I\\'m really sorry but it is time for slipping...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBut that isn\\'t your group buy, right? You\\'re still at 32?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nUnfortunately no this is user who donated chips for board development... It looks like only US GB are going even if they say there will not be a board... I can\\'t figure this one out since it is important to have board ready for chips asap. I should be getting together with some local buyers today but didn\\'t get an answer from them jet when...EDIT: No just notice another SEPA. So 4 more...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYou are welcome Lucko!So, as stated by Lucko, I\\'m going to support this project to get a board of the ground rather sooner than later.As always ... Butterflylabs is going to be the great unknown in this equation. So let\\'s hope they keep their promise for the sample chips.My plan is to pay Lucko actually a visit or two and make some photos and write a small report on how he is doing and document some progress.First visit would be me, delivering the sample chips in person.The second is to document a working prototype with the sample chips ... And (if possible) how a look at some sort of production line.As written before, I like to see that this project is going to be successful. But for that it needed the critical mass of a 100 chips (I\\'m going to supply now).So why did I pick this project?a) Lucko seems to be a very dedicated person to me. But more importantly he is NOT trying to stir too many pots. Meaning developing boards for 3 different kinds of chips (Avalon, BitFury, BFL) ... He is focusing on one and that means the probability for success is significantly higher.b) Everyone seems to have lost faith in BFL, and I can understand that. But I started my own company a few years ba\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI was thinking in destroying my Jalapeno to get them if necessary but thanks to you it will probably live Production line is outsourced... But with enough notice I can probably get you there or I can make you a video... And yes... If you have Jalapeno you can bring it with you(o\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: chip USB plug, 10 port USB hub, 4 chips boards, 6 chip boards, sample chips, Jalapeno\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 20:55:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 4 sold! - 5th miner: 72/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\n3 more shares please. 0.9 BTC sent (there\\'s nothing like a and Bitfunder details as before\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n1 share more (0.3BTC)The same details as in Group Buy 1\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-29 21:19:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 3404 ASICs gone 53404 sold\\n### Original post:\\nSorry for the delay SebastianJu... I just needed 5 more chips added to my first buy! That should be a total of 40 chips.twisted; 5; 0.43; \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 02:13:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #8 166+ ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nCount me in for 9 more units. Will have funds available by midweek and send payment and signed message then. Thanks again.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n5 More!hodginsa; 5; 5.2118; \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCanary, I see friedcat has put these out of stock today. Any idea if this affects any of your pending orders? (specifically 8.1)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'ll buy 10 please.mainichi; 10; 11.1618; (PM sent)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ngeeknik; 2; 2.2418; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nReceived my 4 today, all hashing away now.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYour welcome!!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n8.1 and 8.2 have been placed.friedcat said: \"reserved for resellers\"\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 09:09:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 4 sold!- 5th miner: 148/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nAll transactions confirmed; start post updated..Already 148 shares sold! only 92 left on the 5th miner!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI can squeeze out .3 coins for one share. so let me have 1 share of miner number 5. this will have meat miner 2 = 10 shares at miner 3 = 10 shares at miner 4 = 4 shares at miner 5 = 1 share grand total of 25 shares. will post tx id in about 1 hour as i am waiting on a confirm. thanks phil\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n25 sounds like a good number\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n1 share more (0.3BTC)The same details as beforetx id: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n HERE is my id for my 1 share. Look forward to the drawing on Sun. good luck to all of us!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPlease reserve 10 shares for me. I just sent over 3 BTC to you. Thank you!My Tx Id is as follows:Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nLooks good.Tyrion will add in the list when he wakes up\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNew transactions confirmed, will update startpost shortly!Only a few shares left on this miner! Lottery drawing in 11 hours!Cheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner, miner number 5, meat miner 2, miner 3, miner 4, miner 5\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 14:32:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 3549 ASICs gone 53549 sold\\n### Original post:\\nSince the avalon shop isnt open yet the decision was done to postpone the end of collecting funds to at least 24hours after the reopening of the shop. So it wont end in some hours.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSelling my Batch #2 chips! 50 Chips - One buyer must buy them all:\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, Batch #2 chips\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-30 19:40:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-06\\nTopic: KNC Miner Jupiter Group Buy/Mining Company\\n### Original post:\\nWhere are you from just out of curiousity? I have access to a large space with subsidized (near zero) power costs.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIf you are serious, I live in Arizona, bought 5 jupiters already keeping them for myself so far but if you are serious I would be up for meeting up and possibly moving some of them to your location when they arrive\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Miner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 05:30:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 4 sold!- 5th miner: 220/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nCongratulations\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAllright, Bitfunder shares sent to Pajo, eule, private buyer and tuudle, don\\'t have bitfunder ID\\'s on file for the other users, so minerpumpkin, DanyAC, alzaron and Clintar please let us know your bitfunder userid\\'s so we can send you your shares (you can opt not to use bitfunder btw, I\\'ll add them to the GB1 topic then instead )Cheers and once again congratulations!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n.3 BTC sent for 1 share.TX: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCongratulations\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ncongratulation to the winner!!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCool, just got back from a family reunion and saw that I won. I have a bitfunder id, but I\\'ll have to find it in a bit. Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 10:42:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 5 sold!- 6th miner: 41/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nPost updated again! We\\'ve sold miner 5! Already 41 shares on our way to miner 6. We\\'ll be paying for miner 6 shortly!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBought 26 shares for 7.8 BTC!Transaction ID: bitfunder nick is \"dokosten\"Cheers!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 15:12:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: Australian Built Mining Rigs. (Looking for Investors)\\n### Original post:\\nHi QG - yes, we haven\\'t ordered the chips yet.Yes, air cooling. I own a 3 module and achieve around 65 GH/s running normal speed. Overclocked it gets to 70 GH/s but I only overclock to 300M. We arrive at 102.4 GH/s from 320 chips x 320M frequency. Power consumption would be in the 660w range from a standard PSU.ub3rCoin is our EE. He has practical experience in circuit board design and modification and will post some pictures of circuits that he works on soon. He is also proficient with C.Yes, production is dependant on investor interest. Chips will only be ordered if sufficient interest is here (and if they\\'re still in stock!) Dependent on various factors: pps or pool option / variance & future difficultyWe will be doing the manufacturing in-house. We have access to surface mount technology equipment and source our parts from Avnet, one of the most trusted electrical components suppliers.Thanks, we realise that the chip delays are the big hurdle from Avalon & BFL. We are not locking in with Avalon at this stage and are looking at BitFury chips as a better alternative. We have requested sample chips and will keep this thread updated on any news.More information on BitFury can be fo\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 3 module, 320 chips, standard PSU, surface mount technology equipment, BitFury chips\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 15:48:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.29 BTC-GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA+Preliminary board designed-64 sold-USB stick\\n### Original post:\\nWe have another buyer... 500 paid over SEPA. 8 chips the rest for the board when it will be available...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 8 chips, board\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 17:58:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 5 sold!- 6th miner: 67/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nConfirmed and added! Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIt looks as if you\\'re having a discussion with yourself\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nLol!! Freddy meets Freddy.. I see what you mean ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m sorry, I made a bitfunder account now, but I don\\'t know which is my user ID ...My user: DanyACBtc Adr: you!!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSent! You should have received them Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ncongrats to everyone who won..... lucky\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI just sent another .3 BTC for a share of miner 6TX ID: my bitfunder name is clintari don\\'t mind all shares in bitfunderThanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nReceived!! Thanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYour prize is sent! I\\'ll update your share in start post shortly\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nal have 2 more shares Transaction ID: have 8 now lol wish i could afford more.....i will probably have more shares here and there as i mine LTC and convert it to BTC then buy shares lol\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nConfirmed and updated in start post! Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 18:43:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters (16 units remaining)\\n### Original post:\\nI take 4 units. So 12 left\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-01 19:35:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL ASIC Chips] $59/chip. Batch #1 31 left. FPGA trade in accepted.\\n### Original post:\\n20 more from local buyer. We\\'re getting close..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBump. I will be placing the order early next week.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThese Monday will sent the btc for 3 chips\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHey Crazy -I\\'d like to reserve 2 chips if possible. I will have the BTC in about a week\\'s time or sooner (mining it).I have two coupon codes also from BFL, if those will help discount the price at all. If not I\\'ll just sell my coupon codes on BitMit.I\\'m good on my word. But if you can\\'t reserve the chips and wait for me to send the BTC for 2 chips, that is fine - I understand.Let me know. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'m really trying to keep the minimum order at 5 chips but we have 31 left so I\\'ll allow orders smaller than 5 but you will have to pay shipping. I\\'ll be placing the order within the next few days regardless of if all spots are filled. I will leave the 31 remaining chips up for sale at that point but I will probably raise the price as we get closer to shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n3 money sentjelin1984check it\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGot it, 28 chips left\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOK no problem Crazy. After thinking about it, I\\'m not sure I would get much use out of the chips myself. I was hoping to load them into my existing Jala - but I found out that\\'s not possible.So I\\'ll pass, don\\'t reserve anything for me - but thanks anyways\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips, FPGA, Jala\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 00:58:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.29 BTC-GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA+Preliminary board designed-48 sold-USB stick\\n### Original post:\\nOK. So quoting my brother and me 12 more BFL chips along with needing chip credits. We paying in BTC. He in USA is where boards will be shipping.We will buying 12 more chips per week until having enough so group buy can be going. You will giving us great deal on PCBs and assembly for this doing, no?We most interested in 4 chip 16 Gh/s boards modular/stackable, but 1 or 2 chip single might be interested if cheap enough. Whatever is putting chips to work hashing sooner is what we are wanting.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDon\\'t worry big buyers will get some discounts... And we are looking how to make boards to your liking It is a small change so I think we can accommodate you...And since we have 120W power supply on board(50% more then BFL that was realised) I\\'m getting more confident in saying that 6 chips will work. Maybe even 8... But I\\'m afraid of the fact that BFL had problems that they didn\\'t see. It is same chip so why did they had them? But theoretical max for this board should be 10 chips but it has only place for 8 chips...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBoard with 8 chips sounding pretty awesome, let\\'s get going, yes?If board having own power supply, not so necessary to allow for stacking. Whole point of stacking was to allowing single PSU to be powering 8 boards using standard modular PSU and standard cables. And how big *is* board? Power supply building onto board will needing very large caps and inductors, no? Is big supply to be making 5V @ 24 amp, yes?? Everyone else using separate standard PSU for good reason - isolation of switching noise from rest of circuit and besides single PSU cheap. Components to building ones own big stable switcher 8 times for each one of 8 boards maybe not nearly so cheap as one PSU powering same 8 boards. And you really wanting to be in board business, not PSU business I thinking. And board will be needing 8 heat sinks and fans? One on each chip?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIt is not like that. I was talking about 1V power supplay. Chips are runing at that voltage. So you would still need 12V of PSU...Heat sinks. One for all. If we go to 8 per board(96W) you will need GPU cooler or hi end CPU cooler for sure. 6(72W) would it be posible with good CPU cooler and 4(48W) is any CPU cooler... So the board has 24W additional power just in case with 8 chips. You might use it for overclocking if there will be no suprise... I\\'m looking how in add this in the system... But for now I will say only that I\\'m sure it will run with 4 chips but on paper it should run with 8 overclocked...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nBoards will have connector allowing for CPU cooler to attach? Could easily use low end water cooling system like Astek 510LC if so. Using same on my overclocked 6 core AMD CPUs and is working sufficiently. Those CPUs running at 100+ watts. Maybe separate into two 4 chip groups?Ok excited to get order bought and boards done. I happy with 4 chips, running SOON.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFrom what I see Astek 510LC should work...4 chips groups(like K16) would take more space and make more complicated board. The way we are going you will be able to \"make\" K16 like board. You will need 2 power and communication modules and 4 chips modules... Not sure if you will need 1 PCI-e or two per set of 2 boards jet... depends on number of chips. But since we also need 5 V in there there is a chance you will need molex (or sata) and PCI-e... Need to look at PSU out there to see if this will be a problem...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMost designers including K16 taking just 12V and using various regulators/down convertors like IR3847MTR1PBF to be generating other voltages. not be difficult to getting 5V 250 ma off 12 V supply, if that primary need for USB.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes but if you need more Watts than one PCI-e cable is recommended to be used then adding another or something else is a good idea. And if you need 5V you can take it of PSU molex connector that gives you the rest of the W on 12 V needed...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOne my rigs having dual 7970 cards when hashing mode cards pulling 400 watts each. That being supplied by 2 PCIe connectors off 1.3k watt PSU for each card. That meaning 200 watts per connector or 12v at minimum 15-16 amps. Board needing more than 200 watts??? Not especially wanting all different connectors. Having PSUs with 6 or 8 PCIe connectors. Should be running 6 or 8 boards, yes?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBut you are using 8 pin and 6 pin right? And I think you don\\'t get full 400 W. Anyway. I was looking at my 30 PSU that I used to have in my miner... Receomended load 150 per PCI-e... So if we have over 75W on one side you are OK but if it will work with 8 chips you are not. But then it might be just this cheep PSU... I need to look at some others...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThe difference between 6 pin and 8 pin is just two extra grounds...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYes but still it helps. Read:\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL chips, PCBs, assembly, 120W power supply, 6 chips, 8 chips, 1V power supply, 12V of PSU, Heat sinks, GPU cooler, hi end CPU cooler, Astek 510LC, 6 core AMD CPUs, 4 chips groups, 2 power and communication modules, 4 chips modules, PCI-e, IR3847MTR1PBF, 7970 cards, 1.3k watt PSU, 30 PSU\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, True, False, False, False, False, False, False, False, True, False, False, False, False, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 01:45:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 5 sold!- 6th miner: 89/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nUpdated latest payments\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPaying for my 4 reserve \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI will take 9 sharestx# bigdaubThank You Kindly\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBuying 3 more shares 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 4 nodesDate: 7/1/2013 18:21To: KnCMiner 2 Share -0.90 BTCTransaction fee: -0.0001 BTCNet amount: -0.9001 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nBoth noted Tyrion will update when he wakes up.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nthanks\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIll take 3 more bigdaub\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n 3 shares. please confirmThank you,\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 11:37:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy 2 Ending] AVALON CHIPs 5728 left @0.082BTC + K16 Miner Assembly 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\nOrders\\' Status Second BatchThis batch will clomplete on Sunday 30/06/2013 at 12:00:00GMT. Chips will be ordered a few hours after closing. Please do not send payments after this time or your chips might not be bought. Chips\\' price is 0.082BTCEscrow Address for Second BatchKlondike K16 full Miner Assembly service price is 60EURBreaking News: Any user wishing to get the full miner assembled by nekonos, will be able to pay the 60EUR of the assembly service in full once the miner has been completed and before it is to be shipped to its final destination.Code: No. TotalID Chips BTC Miners BTC Address 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC2 10 0.82002 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC3 160 13.12000 10 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC4 180 14.76000 11 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC5 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC6 6 0.49200 0 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC7 0 0.00000 0 Refunded8 16 1.31200 1 Thread- Unverified User - @0.082BTC9 6 0.49200 10 80 6.56000 5 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC11 480 39.36000 16 PM - Unverified User - @0.082BT\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n- Sounds like arms race...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWould it be possible to buy a circuit board and a bag of bits? I was wondering if a domestic oven would be capable of doing the soldering after a workmate fixed his laptop by baking the motherboard. I have ordered a few boards, but was fancying buying some extra chips and a kit to do one DIY.What heatsink/fan is supplied with the build? I saw mention of a 100mm square circuit board, but the nearest fan sizes are 90mm and 120mm.Bob\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\non avalon store the chips are out of stock!!when and how they will order?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHiYes, this is already known by Group Buys organizers involved in the joining initiative. We have not decided how to proceed yet, but we will most probably extend the closing time if the AVALON store does not become available by tomorrow. Until this moment everything continues as planned.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n; <32>; <2.624>; <2>; ; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi bobsmith652We do not offer electronic components separately. I think klondike BKKCoins creator will offer the possibility to buy the board and components kit.The problem with a oven is control the temperature.Control of temperature and time at various temperatures is important for good soldering. Some people make reflow oven with toaster wih ir.For soldering paste you will need also a stencil.Heatsink will be 90x90x35mm but it depents with the final case. Some manufacture make also 100mm fan.Regards\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs 5728, K16 Miner Assembly, circuit board, bag of bits, domestic oven, motherboard, 100mm square circuit board, 90mm fan, 120mm fan, reflow oven with toaster, stencil, 90x90x35mm Heatsink, 100mm fan\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, True, False, False, False, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 04:33:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] GROUP BUY 100+ ASICMINER ERUPTER USB 1 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m starting to wonder if even at these prices if its worth the investment other than for the fun factor. Definitely not a good idea if mining for profit. At current rate it will take 191 days to break even on the investment of 1 BTC using 1 of these USB sticks. And we all know that number isn\\'t set in stone and will more than likely quadruple the amount of time it will take to break even within that 191 days with all these bigger ASIC devices coming out... Just my 2 cents.I was actually about to jump on and order one until I did the math lol\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOption for local pickup?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nlooking\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you for the comments. This is a group buy thread. There are other threads in the forum to discuss difficulty and break even speculation. Let\\'s keep this thread on topic for my group buy. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nLocal pickup is not available at this time. I live in the great state of NORTH DAKOTA . Shipping times anywhere should be great as I am centrally located in the US. Also, my town has a USPS mail processing and distribution center from which all orders will be shipped!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nakeetlebeetle has contacted me by PM to purchase 1 unit. Thank You!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMight buy some. Hope it stays for a few more days.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nthisisgil has contacted me by PM to purchase 2 units. Thank You!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI will be placing this order on July 5th. Any payments received after my cutoff timer will be placed in another group buy to follow this one. Any orders listed in the OP are included in this group buy. Thank you for your interest.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHave u done other group buys or is this your first? I mean, in simple words, why should I trust you. Hope you understand, it\\'s my hard earned money, and I am interesting in buying from you. I purchased some from canary too.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI have done one group buy for a kncminer jupiter miner. I have done multiple auctions for timely delivery of individual Usb mining sticks recently. I have purchased a jalapeno from streblo and sold a cairnsmore 1 to bogart. I have even participated in group buys from Augusto Croppo, CanaryInTheMine, and most recently kosmokramer. I am trying to build up trust in the community by doing this group buy. Please look at my most recent auctions and ask any of the winners how my service was. I would ask that you place an order in this group buy and see if I deliver. Trust is hard to establish. All I ask is a chance.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nPM sent\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHe\\'s legit. Recently relieved him of a USB stick and everything was smooth.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThank you.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThanks.I will have some BTC in my account soon and will try to get some.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nBought from Canary and will order from you later this week.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nLooking forward to placing your order. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nWill be glad to place an order for you. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nDid you see that Asicminer is coming out with a new lineup on the 10th (including a new USB). We might want to hold off until we see what they\\'re offering.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nLink found. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI will do a separate group buy for any new \"mini blade\" when officially announced and/or available.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThis is the Reddit link. They haven\\'t announced specs yet for the new USB. Let\\'s keep our eyes peeled.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThe slideshow presentation in Chinese talks about a 5GH/s \"mini blade\". Did not see anything yet about new USB Block Erupter USB mining sticks\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\n=== Begin Bitcoin Signed Message ===In that case, I\\'d like to buy 3. I\\'ve sent 3.095 BTC to you at (TX ID: to cover the units, shipping, and insurance. One of the sending addresses is and I used it to sign this message.Thanks!=== End Bitcoin Signed Message \\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nConfirmed. Thank you for your order. I will update OP in 12 hours when I get off work. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI know that these are out of stock right now; will you be placing a back order or do yo have a certain number reserved? When do you expect to have these in your hands and shipping?Where are you located?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI\\'m pretty sure they\\'re not out of stock. They were a couple of weeks ago when Asicminer re-tooled the price. But he brought them back at 1 BTC (it was 2).\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nFriedcat said that they were out of stock here: assumed that he would be getting them from Friedcat.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nwhats the mini blade? any links? the presentation is all Chinese/foreign .You do have the USB\\'s reserved? what if this group doesn\\'t get 100 USB orders? do we still get it?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nInteresting! how will that work for this group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nThis group buy is for the \"sapphire\" version? Just want to make sure.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nI have updated the original post with better shipping prices for larger orders! Thank you for your orde\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB, kncminer jupiter miner, jalapeno, cairnsmore 1, mini blade, USB Block Erupter USB mining sticks\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 15:06:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #16 Sold [Added to 6 TH/s Jupiter Pool] 22/30 left\\n### Original post:\\nCan we make payment via PayPal ?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPayment Done \"1\" share @2.45 BTC.Transaction id (hash): \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAdded to OP, welcome\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 17:23:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] 100 BFL Chips - Only 1 order\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll join you for 8 chips for sure, maybe 16.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nKinda interested.I intend to add supplementary chips (maybe two) on my Jalapenos or LS, but still not sure if it is doable.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOk I actually just join another group before it\\'s too late.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCancelled for now.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhat GB are you joining? I have about 48 credits but am waiting to see if more board prototypes are offered soon.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI did half with Canary and half with LuckoGotta diversify\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI definitely agree. I might just end up putting an order with them as well. Any thoughts on if they actually plan on keeping to their 100 day schedule?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL Chips, Jalapenos, LS, board prototypes\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 17:29:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 5 sold!- 6th miner: 107/240 sold - WITH LOTTERY\\n### Original post:\\nGood morning everyone, all above payments confirmed and added to start post!Cheers,\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nKNC added a new product on their site. \"Low\" Entry @ 100GHs priced at ~2000$. We will still go strong with Jupiters Go large or Go home. We are not far from 20 Miners in total! (In groupbuy #1 and #2)\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n more shares. please confirmThank you,\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nConfirmed and added to start post thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner, Jupiters\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 20:10:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #9 174/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nI pay now and send you the signed messages in a jiff...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 20:34:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 3589 ASICs gone 53589 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI have sent two more sample chips to the developer aauer1 who is creating another USB-Miner Design.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nitod; 10; 0.86; people, let\\'s fill this group buy and be ready when Avalon opens chip-shop again. Where are those 100+ chip buyers? Burnin has completely finished the board design: is mass-ordering the PCBs in a few days. It\\'s no time for slacking\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSeems like Avalon is open again for orders:\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAh, great news!Tonight may be the deadline to order in this group, it\\'s announced that it will be joined with other European groups to close the payment. So, hurry up, I have a feeling later groups will be harder and harder to close.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, USB-Miner Design, PCBs\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 22:06:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] KnC Miner Jupiter shares: $77 ~4Ghash/s\\n### Original post:\\n9 BTC received from riclas\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n\"- Each share entitles the owner to 1/100 of the BTC proceeds from a KNC Miner Saturn mining 24/7 for a minimum of 30 months\"...Doesn\\'t seems strange that you are buying a Jupiter and the shares are for Saturn???\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nthank you for stating the typo error, i will have that edited\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Miner Jupiter, KNC Miner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 23:49:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.325 BTC-GB BTC,PayPal,SEPA+Preliminary board designed-156sold-last chance\\n### Original post:\\n2.6 BTC sent for 8 chip down payment; credit transferred.tx: excited!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSee BTC but not credits. I believe that you need confirm something... I have never transfer them so maybe someone can help who has... Or maybe is only BFL delay...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNow I see I\\'m getting an error:Chip Credit Transfer ConfirmationUnable to find data for the specified key I have no idea what that means. I had them resend the confirmation but still I get the error when I click the link. Believe me, I have credits to burn! I have put in an email to support. Let me know if you have any ideas. No one else has had this problem?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBFL support will be slow. I have 40 credits missing. sent them 4 emails and no reply.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 8 chip\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-02 23:51:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.29 BTC-GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA+Preliminary board designed-88 sold-USB stick\\n### Original post:\\nLucko,Since you seem to know what you are talking about (and I\\'m very new to this chip buying thing).... I was trying to digest everything in this post, and one thing I read I wanted to confirm..If I have a Jalapeno (which I\\'ll have in a few months), can I buy say 2 of these BFL chips - and mount it onto the Jala? Or would I need to send the Jala to someone (like yourself, or your team) and have them mount the chips? Or is this not possible at all? My Jala will already have the 7 GH when I receive it. Can it accept 2 more chips?Thanks for any advice you can give Regards,FAT\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ve seen a guy that says he can do it. You as hell can\\'t do it yourself. You need an oven.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nShort answer, no. Even if you could get the chips mounted (it\\'s very difficult to even add a third chip), and the Jalapeno could provide enough power (it can\\'t), you wouldn\\'t be able to cool it sufficiently - it would get so hot the traces would start lifting off the board.And FWIW: I\\'ve been waiting for my Jalapenos for 13 months now, and don\\'t expect to receive them this year. Don\\'t hold your breath waiting...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you Redacted - exactly what I was looking for.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYou will need to send it to someone with the equipment(like me)... Mounting this chips is not easy. But if you have later revision of the board it should work. It depends of 1 V regulates you have on. If it is one of the first revisions forget it... But yes you need to add cooling... And there is a risk that something might go wrong adding thus chips...EDIT: And it can be additionally speed up by changing firmware...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBut I got my Jalapenos last month and it was an Aug 2012 order.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jalapeno, BFL chips, oven, Jalapenos\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 06:32:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 4314 ASICs gone 54314 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI will be ordering about 450 chips in about 12 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust a quick note that I received the second shipment of sample chips, thanks Sebastian!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n burninSigned PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 13:11:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] BitFury 120Gh ASIC from 1 batch, 4/10 Shares Left\\n### Original post:\\nMy fella, decided to sell his shares of bitfury asic.His selling 5 out of 10 shares.Offering:* 1 Share = 4 bitcoins* Miner will be hosted 24/7 and he will charge 5% fee.* Payout weekly* Guaranteed uptime: until its get unprofitable to mine with it.How to Purchase:* Send 4 BTC to address PM me/and post the transaction IDIN CASE OF NON DELIVERY:* I take no responsibility for the possibility that Miner will not be delivered.* Refunds will be given in case of non-delivery.* this group buy will be refunded after Nov 1, 2013 if metabank fails to deliver.* share holders can elect to wait further-Elijah\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n4 shares left\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSeriously? You are expecting people to invest with THIS little info? No proof of purchase, who is \\'my fella\\'? You have to be mentally slow to buy into this.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nevidence ?, screenshots of emails or PM on bitcointalk? etc etc. something to add more weight before I invest.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BitFury 120Gh ASIC\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 16:23:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.325 BTC-GB BTC,PayPal,SEPA+Preliminary board designed-164sold-last chance\\n### Original post:\\nNot until now...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCollectors items. You won\\'t get the $5400 you want for them, but I have seen them going for about $2200 on eBay.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPM sent, making sure I can still get in.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nShould be able to, I\\'m still waiting for confirmation on credits.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes sorry I do need to sleep. I\\'m GMT+1EDIT: it is 6:15AM... Will look all the msg... But it looks like credit transfer system has some problems...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLucko please post a PGP key.Keeping an old pgp key public will let you verify it\\'s you forever and receive encrypted messages only you can decrypt.This only work if you don\\'t change your public key and you never lose or leak your private key.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nJust joined on for 8 chips @ 50/50 w/ coupons already transferred and confirmed by BFL.Txid for 2.6BTC: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAddress: BTC differene of 44 * 0.035 = 1.54 btc to ase6TWB0=\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJust quick update. Just got msg from my bank.Got 2000euros credit to clear this BFL Paypall problem... I hope I can start using it right ASAP. Cant see them jet in online bank... I am curently at work but dooing my best to stay on top of thigs...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI might be able to take someone\\'s PayPal and give you btc, as long as lucko gives me the order if you charge it backI can sell 28 btcLast price at $90.11\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nindeed a PGP key is important and please upload to a public key server too : \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI can take 10 of those if you are just looking to sell BTC for $$$. It takes forever to get BTC through Coinbase. My sister and I have 56 of the chips in this order (or will once Lucko updates).\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOk PM. I may have to deduct paypal fees.I also need lucko to use your chips as collateral.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks for the offer but I already started process of taking $ off it... And I have moved money into bitstamp(usually it is recorded same day) since it is Slovenian company...Yes they have them... and if you both agree I can do it...I will do it ASAP... Need to take care of some things right now... It is one of those days...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nIt\\'s OK by me - I agree that Lucko should assign you 11 chips if I revoke Paypal after receiving the BTC from you. I wouldn\\'t DO that, even if the whole chip thing turned into yet another of BFLs never-deliver scams, but understand trust has to be earned...\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThat\\'s only 3.575 btc though right?I need 10 btc of collateral.Yes of course I don\\'t expect anything to happen, just in case though. I\\'m only doing full collateral sales.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nJust as info... Since time is BTC order 100 chips. I\\'m not sure if we have enough for other 100 but I will order them anyway as soon as Bitstamp proceses my money transfer...\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYou\\'re thinking 50% and I have fully paid chips, too. Never mind, I\\'ll just continue to get them through Coinbase, slow as they may be.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nSweet now we focus on board and just wait.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nOh ok, well let me know.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\n buyers will received there first update on the mail today... Including this picture uncovered...\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nLucko,Let me know how many you need to fill out a second order and I\\'ll buy them if necessary. I have another 50 BTC coming in from Coinbase, but they won\\'t be delivered until Thursday of next week.If it\\'s faster for you to do the conversion on your end, and it winds up being under 50 chips / $5,000 USD, just send me a PayPal invoice and I\\'ll have you cash as soon as I get your PM. I think PayPal will let me do an instant transfer of that much. PayPal isn\\'t much liking to do big instant transfers for me after the $60,000 I sent off to KNCMiner and the other $50,000 I sent off to Terrahash. They\\'re \"concerned\" about my spending.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nHow about some pictures of the board/facility, too? You\\'ve been promising that for a while....\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nAlso want to confirm chip credit transfer as well as BTC received. OP doesn\\'t reflect it so just making sure I\\'m in.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nYes received... You overpaid by 0.01 BTC I will update all when I get home...Board facility is outsourced as already written... Company that I\\'m working with can produce in house only simple boards having machine that can produce complicated boards is a waist of money if you don\\'t have them working at lest 8 hours a day...Boards are a different story. I would love to post a picture... But I don have a file and even if I had it I don\\'t have Altium Designer... So I can\\'t open it. And unfortunately also last changes were not put in jet since board desiner got the sick. Last time we spoke he had 39 degrees fewer... He cough a bug from my dother that was sick. She just started with daycare and everyone who has kids know that first 2 mouths the child is constantly ill. I can\\'t find the name of the disease in En\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL, chips, board, machine, Altium Designer\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 19:00:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 6 sold!- 7th miner: 106/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nAllright guys,Post is updated again, all payments so far confirmed.. We will close this groupbuy once the 7th miner\\'s shares are sold. We are paying this miner to KNC ASAP. We managed to raise some extra funds ourselves to buy some more shares on miner 7 so 106 shares are sold already. In short, only 134 shares left on this groupbuy.What we will do however is start a new groupbuy with the same conditions as this one (unless btc/usd keeps going down ;-)). Only difference is we won\\'t be paying the miners first but pay for it once the miner is sold in shares.. We\\'ll start that as soon as this one is sold out For now don\\'t hesitate to buy the last shares on this groupbuy Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n4 more shares please !Sent 1.2 BTC - TX \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAdded! Thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 20:13:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 6 sold!- 7th miner: 110/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nsent 2.1 bitcoin for 7 \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUpdated as well as other sales; 103 shares left\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBTW Alzaron you were on of the winners of the lottery: PM me your bitfunder ID so we can send your prize\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 22:20:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 4515 ASICs gone 54515 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI have to send the bitcoins till saturday at 20 o\\'clock GMT, then will be ordered. So dont forget to buy before that and so that i have enough time to calculate and pay everything. I think after that it will be hard to get a whole new batch together.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSomebody can sell to me few chips? I want chek avalon design! Already recived PCBs and components, need ASIC chip Sorry for flood\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIs it a private project or do you offer assembly or something?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nTrying to assembly Avalon project from github. On weekend i will make table for soldering paste stancils and on next week start assembling, but i do not have ASIC chips. I need 1-3 chips to try start Avalon. Here some pics SebastianJu, what about batch#3? You know the approximate date of delivery?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI believe yifu said something about it when i called him today but unfortunately Yifus english sounds like klingon to me. I only understand 2% or so. So i cant tell when the batches ship. Maybe someone other with more english hearing skills can call him. But its a tough game. I had to call him for days every hour when i had time.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nRegarding samples. I can only give you samples when the community has something from it. I cant give it for private projects because then everyone had a right to get some.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, PCBs, components, ASIC chip\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-25 03:16:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] JIT Group Buy #7 @500+/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\ndandannn; 20 ; 21.3236 ; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIm in for 10 headed to cvs....<3 BITINSTANT!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ngeeknik; 2; 2.2418; \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCan you please reconsider the international shipping price? 1btc/100USD is too high.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCIM,When do you think this buy will close?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nralphte;7; 7.1918; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks, Awesome Policy this go round...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nthis guy busts his ass to put all this together. He\\'s sold way over 2000 sticks, I think he deserves a little something for the time he has put in...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIn for 10iluvpcs; BTC 10.1618; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAgreed. I personally don\\'t care if he kept every bit of it. After taking in and re-shipping over 1k sticks Canary definitely deserves the extra $10 profit per stick.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nDeleted original post sorry didnt think it through before posting was just thinking ROI. Please forget about previous question i retract it.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIn for 3cereal7802; BTC 3.0; pickup\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\naurel57 3.2318 BTC transaction: \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIn for 10Bitterdog; 10; BTC10.4618; ND\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n+1000 , However If he wanted too then I would prefer an extra Erupter, maybe for those who ordered 10+.....\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nGreetings! Congratulations on the #7!!Please send 10:Armchair Miner; 10; 10.1618; will stay the same as in #1 and #3!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nDAMN YOU CANARY, fuck lolI\\'m going to go get a few BTC from CVS to make it an even 30.How fast is usps express vs the next day air?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\ntheterabyte; 2; 2.2418; I can finally reply here. signed PM sent this morning (about 6 hours ago), but I couldn\\'t post here until now due to newbie jail.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\naniman; 5; 5.2118; ID: \\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nOgNasty; 7; 7.1923; \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nHello everyone. I\\'m new here and am really trying to get a loan so I can buy 10 of these.If anyone can help me out, please see this thread for more details: have $1800 in my Scottrade account, but it will take at least a week to convert that into BTCs to participate in this group buy. I know 10BTC is a large amount of money, but if anyone could do it I would be very grateful. If anyone wants to do a smaller amount, then I would be okay with that too, and then I could work on getting the rest through Stocks -> USD -> BTC process. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nCanth; 6; 6.2018; \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nAnyone know how long bitinstant is taking atm?I did some last night fine in seconds. Right now it\\'s been 30-40 minutes with no payment??\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nAlready did that before and it\\'s going to stay as is for now. I\\'ve already experimented with different shipping methods and the results...I\\'m sticking to FedEx because I know it will get there and on time. I don\\'t wan to deal with problems or with shipping delays.you get what you pay for.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nshould be same unless you live out in the boonies...\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI did bitinstant earlier today took 10 seconds to get my email confirmation. BTC was in my wallet when I got home within 15 mins\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nUgh. I have quite a bit pending. This is really really frustrating, seeing so many posts about this and hoping it doesn\\'t happen to you.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nWent to wallyworld this afternoon and the txt message hit my phone before I got back to the car.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nI had one few weeks ago that took 4-days.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nQuite a lot of numbers in there! I ain\\'t in America so from my understanding I must add 1BTC onto whatever I order to cover the extra postage? (Assuming I don\\'t order enough to go over 1 pound in weight)\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\naccelerator, 4, 4.2218 BTC sent from address \\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nIt will not even let me place an order stating I am trying to make a transaction over the limit, which I was within the $500 limit. I tried many numbers....I registered to increase my daily transaction limit. Maybe it takes a while for it to register your account??? I am not sure.....stuck at the moment with no bitcoin\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nSo what happens to everyone that bought when the price was 1.99? Canary, are you able to get a refund from friedcat for your past orders and pass some of it back? It\\'s not the greatest feeling to see your miners drop 50% in value... but i do understand it is business...\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nI see dozens ofCode:06/24/13 19:54 MtGox transfer errorand they add more every minute or two.=[ I am probably going to fall asleep here, hopefully resolved when I wake up.\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nWent to Walmart for moneygram with bitinstant. Drove 2 blocks back to my office and it was in my wallet.\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\njust saw this on their website:We are conducting maintenance on our backend that will affect transactions for Mt Gox and bitcoin purchases temporarily.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 02:07:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #16 Sold [Added to 6 TH/s Jupiter Pool] 21/30 left\\n### Original post:\\nhi boss, 1 share please (2.45 btc sent)tx id: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwelcome, added to OP\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 03:31:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 6 sold!- 7th miner: 137/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nHello, I\\'ve made a payment of 1.5 BTC for 5 \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi Guys I\\'ve just transfered 1.2 BTC for 4 sharesTX ID = forward to the groupbuyThanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 03:57:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #9 218/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nOP has been fully updated. if you don\\'t have a \"YES\" next on your order\\'s line, I need that shipping info as a signed message from you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBy the way, where do I pick up orders in person if I wanted to do that?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nChicago\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ngroup buy #10 coming soon?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPlease??\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDont think there will be a group 10 for these... new usb miners coming on 7/10 so friedcat probably liquidated all of these. i suspect it will probably be a faster chip but back up at 1.99B lets wait and seeCanary do you have any updates/ETA on the incoming shipment? they are dropping like a rock on ebay...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThey are still going for $180-200. Except for the lower-baller selling $150 BIN, they are still going well.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nFriedcat will have a rude awakening if he thinks people are going to jump up to BTC1.99 again if there isn\\'t ATLEAST a doubling in hash power in the Next gen Erupter.. With this order of 16 that\\'s 33 I have now purchased thru Canary.. I won\\'t buy another if that is the case\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIMO- two more price decreases are in order.20-30 percent each.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nis there a forum for this topic? where can I find info on the new usbs?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAnnouncement is expected on the 10th of this month.It\\'ll be all over if you\\'d prefer to not monitor the appropriate subforums for this announcement.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, new usb miners\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 08:32:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: European Groupbuy USB-Erupters !\\n### Original post:\\n*placeholder*\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nyxt is the official distributor for this usb-erupter-sticks in europe: price (incl. taxes)01 1,19 BTC>05 1,15 BTC>10 1,09 BTC>50 0,99 BTCMy price for you in this groupbuy is: 1,04 (incl. taxes) each Stick + shipping (same shipping prices as yxt in his thread)iam already doing a german groupbuy, so if you are interested just post your order + country here, oder directly in this thread: will send you then a paypmentadress for payment incl. shipping in BTCFor any questions just send me a PM or post the groupbuy-thread best regardsMenig\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI want 7 Stck in the UK but worried how long it will take you to order from fried cat, then ship out to everyone...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHello Nottm28,yxt said that if everything works fine a delivery is possible against end of next week. yxt delivers from germany - so a paket needs one day to me... after receiving my order i willimmideatly send everyone who orderd on my groupbuys.if this is ok for you - just post an order here \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi, I\\'d like 6 of these please (Then my HOT Noisy GPU\\'s will be on Ebay or maybe mining LTC....... lol)Google Translate gives mePayment will be possible in BTC and (transfer / delivery circumstances).The software is delivered with tracking andafter prepayment.So how can I pay in Euro (SEPA or Paypal)What is the shipping cost and timeframe to Southern England too please?Am I ok to port in English in the German thread?Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHello wedgy2k,You can pay via BTC and of course in Euro via Paypal or Sepa, but be aware that you pay the Paypalfee Shipping to England will be 15 (0.20.BTC atm), because i take the same shipping-prices as yxt . Yep, just write in English in the Thread, thats no problem best regardsMenig\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nDo You ship also by international registered/insured priority mail for 0.083 BTC ? I\\'m interested in shipping to Poland.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\niam shipping to poland to - insured paket (500, so enough for six Erupters) with DHL would cost 10.60best regardsMenig\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThree or four to spain... yo know\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nas i said: order in the but yes: i know ^^\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ncan i still order a few off these?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB-Erupter-Sticks, HOT Noisy GPU\\'s\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 13:35:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy 2 Ending] AVALON CHIPs 3776 left @0.082BTC + K16 Miner Assembly 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\nOrders\\' Status Second BatchChips\\' price is 0.082BTCEscrow Address for Second BatchKlondike K16 full Miner Assembly service price is 60EURBreaking News: Any user wishing to get the full miner assembled by nekonos, will be able to pay the 60EUR of the assembly service in full once the miner has been completed and before it is to be shipped to its final destination.Code: No. TotalID Chips BTC Miners BTC Address 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC2 10 0.82002 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC3 160 13.12000 10 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC4 180 14.76000 11 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC5 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC6 6 0.49200 0 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC7 0 0.00000 0 Refunded8 16 1.31200 1 Thread- Unverified User - @0.082BTC9 6 0.49200 10 80 6.56000 5 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC11 480 39.36000 16 PM - Unverified User - @0.082BTC12 16 1.312 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC13 16 1.312 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC14 480 39.36 30 Thread - Unverified User - @0.082BTC15 16 1.31200 \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAvalon store is open again for orders:\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ll be happy to buy your 16 chips.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThe order claimed was paid from an exchange wallet and therefore the buyer cannot sign a message with it. I am dealing with this directly so please do not try to buy these chips as they might not be transfered.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi allThe AVALON store is now reopened. This batch will clomplete on Friday 05/07/2013 at 12:00:00GMT. Chips will be ordered during the weekend. Please do not send payments after this time or your chips might not be bought. Very last chance to get your AVALON ASIC chips.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDone nothing to see here\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIf we want to order a complete K16 unit do we simply set nekonos as the shipping address for 16 chips?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nDear Nekonos,so do you have any idea how the ordering process of the assambly service will work? Will there be a Website where we can order or just via the Thread here? Upfront payment possible or only after the assambly is finished like mentioned before?Also when will bizwoo ask the final destination of all chips, do we have to write this information now or do you collect it later on?Thanks in advanceBest regardsFoofighter\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHi FoofighterWe are working on a website for ordering, payment, and sending address.I hope this weekend will be operative.Also will offer different products and options. In the coming days will include new products such as fans, boxes, wiring, raspberry pi etc...We study the issue of payments to us is more convenient to manage assembly and shipping in one payment.Maybe we charge a small fee for those who want to pay after assembly with final product.Regards\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs, K16 Miner Assembly\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 15:27:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] [UK] Saturn KNC Miner (19/40 shares) [OPEN] !!!\\n### Original post:\\nHi, I have paid another 1.3 BTCPlease use same address to pay back for both the shares.Please confirm.. \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI would like 4 shares please. Are 4 available? Can pay within 3 hours.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Saturn KNC Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 16:43:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 6 sold!- 7th miner: 154/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nGood morning everyone! Start post is updated again\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nfor my reserved 3 shares\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHiSent 2.1Btc for 7 sharesTx ID: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSent 0.6 bitcoin for 2 shares please,tx: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsent 0.9 for 3 shares.tx: total:miner 02 - 2 sharesminer ?? - 3 shares (this transaction)btw, I want to switch to bitfunder, please let me know the step.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n 5 shares. Please confirmby the way, what is the advantage of bitfunder? should i choose it or not? i am new at this. can anyone please tell me more about it?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 14:22:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] GROUP BUY 150 ASICMINER ERUPTER USB 1 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nCONFIRMED 150 USB MINERS AVAILABLE!AUCTION CLOSES ONCE TIME IS REACHED OR 150 USB MINERS ARE SOLD! Received reply from friedcat today. 150 are miners are available for my group buy. Auction will close when 150 are sold or timer expires. Thank you for your orders!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n$25 for shipping 1-10 to Canada and no tracking? Thats absurd. Talk about price gouging. Why no tracking? It should cost between $10-15 to send 1-10 of these to Canada from the US and still get tracking with USPS. Something is not right with that pricing.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBetter look up your pricing from US then via USPS PRIORITY MAIL. $19.95 No Tracking Available $40.95 Tracking AvailableIf a different group buy has a better price, please buy it there. Also, Canada has an exclusive reseller I believe. Thank you for your reply.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNoob here...where can I purchase bitcoins & is it an instant conversion (USD->BC)? I would like to get in on this GB.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nTry btcquick or bitinstant. For a better price in about 7 days try coinbase. Thanks for your interest.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIf he doesn\\'t have his bank account set up with Coinbase, he\\'ll have to wait a few extra days for it to be verified.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nCan you ship fed ex? I need around 3Best regards,\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI can. The price may be different. PM me your address and if you want it fedex next day. Thanks. I will reply in 13 hours when I get off work.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCoinbase can actually verify your bank account instantly if you give them your bank login and password (for most banks). It will still take a week to actually get the bitcoins that you bought though. That amazes me in the 21st century with an electronic currency.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI have sent BTC1.25 for 1 unit with shipping included to Canada. Payment was from addresses with signed message sent\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSorry - but giving someone your login and password to your bank account is nuts.BTCQuick is pretty fast to get signed up with. Took me about a day.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nConfirmed. Thanks for ordering.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThanks for the replies guys, looking into BTCQuick & Coinbase...but giving my login for my bank account is a no-go for me.Hopefully I can get some BC before the GB ends!BTW what is the average fee % for these is 4% from a BA and 7.5% from a CC.And is it common to pay a \"membership\" fee to use their service?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nCoinbase is probably the best, but not the quickest. They charge a small (1% I think) fee plus a small bank fee.Just checked, for 1 BTC ($90.23) they charge $.90 Coinbase fee & $.15 Bank fee. That\\'s it. But, once you\\'re verified, it\\'ll take a week to arrive. Cashing it out is about 2x as fast, however.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nOk. Thank you. Awaiting payment.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThanks man, Coinbase does has the lowest fees but not as fast...I guess I\\'ll have to wait until the next GB.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWatch for future group buys and auctions I will have. Also, PM me when funds are available, I should have a few to spare\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\ncan you ship to po box in us\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nHe shipped to my PO Box just fine. My USB sticks are hashing away!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nNew forum member DuMONChIK paid for 2 and sent PM. Welcome to the forums DuMONChIK! This was earlier right before Entropy-uc asked to be put down for 8. 67 miners sold with many PMs being received by me stating interest to purchase. Only 150 available (and AsicMiner is still temporarily out of stock). Please get your order in sooner than later so you won\\'t be disappointed. I have a few international forum members interested in around 40 miners each. First come, first served. I will be starting another group buy immediately following this one. However, I can\\'t receive a payment address until new stock for the next group buy is available. Also, an announcement MAY be coming in the future for an USA exclusive reseller agreement(not talking about myself, I would like to be ONE of their resellers in the USA ). If so, I will try to work with that exclusive USA reseller to get the best prices for all group buys and auctions I plan on conducting in the future. Thank you for your support and interest! DuMONChIK 2 2.65 (2 +0.65 INTERNATIONAL shipping/tracking)\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThank you for the compliment. Yes. I am more than willing to ship to your PO Box! Thank you for your inquiry.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI\\'m in for 30. Sent you a PM.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nhephaist0s; 3; 3.05BTC sent; for doing this!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nConfirmed. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nConfirmed. Thanks for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThere are 105 miners sold of 150 available total. 45 units remain. These should all be spoken for in the next few hours. Please get your order in NOW to avoid being disappointed if you were \"sitting on the fence\" debating if to join this group buy or not. Thank you for your orders and support.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI would like 3 \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-04 17:18:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] [UK] Saturn KNC Miner (18/40 shares) [OPEN] !!!\\n### Original post:\\n@Mogumodz - My 2.6 BTC payment has now been sent to the escrow. 2 confirms so far.Transaction ID: sent also with more info.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n4 shares paid Tx ID sent\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\none share paidtx: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks John, Confirmed 2.60 BTC payment for 2 shares. PM Sent.I confirm 5.2 BTC received for 4 shares. I have also PMed you. Many Thanks.Thankyou dozers for your payment of 1.30 BTC, I have also PMed you.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\none for me.tx: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Saturn KNC Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 01:29:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Purchase]8358 Avalon Chips - 0.081 BTC (Global+Escrow)-BATCH2 SECURED\\n### Original post:\\nHow strict are you on your June 30 closing? I don\\'t have BTC available now but I have 1.5 BTC hitting from Coinbase on Wed morning 7/3 and I\\'d like to get in on an Avalon chip group buy, if there are any still up and taking orders at that point...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n830 BTC collected so far in all 4 group-buys combined!Zefir will need little or nothing at all to add.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAt that date, all 4 EU Avalon chip group-buys will combine collected BTC, and make an order at Avalon store immediately.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOrder chips or buy the completed boards on alphah or the samething??Danny\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOrder: #1381 ... please confirm payment ... and place in this all-to-gether EU GB batch ...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHow are the recent changes to the K16 going to affect your production Steve?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAre you talking about the little corrections apported to the k16 project?I think steve is going to order the parts/product pcb only when bkkcoins will have a prototype ready and working.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThis group buy only sells chips or sells chip+board whole mining rig?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOrder #1382 made on June 29, 2013. Order status: on-holdPayment made...Danny\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWhole mining rig. And to answer your next question. Yes you can get it for 3BTC See a bit over 2 BTC. And 0,7 BTC posting. 4,5 gh\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThank you so much sir!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWhens estimated delivery on these boards and chips? Just ordered 1Sorry i dont want to look through 20+ posts... I am hopping over from the Terrahash preorder\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nChips ordered now + 9 weeks chips delivery + a week or two for board assembly = septemberBottom of page \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nthanks so much... appreciate itDanny\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n; <116>; <9.396>; confirm!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHi Steve!I\\'ve ordered 9 complete miners via web page. Please info: \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n; <128>; <10.368>; confirm.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\njammertr ; 128 ; 10,368 ; total comes to 160 chips\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nOkay, I just placed my order:Order: #1386Date: June 30, 2013Total: 2.746Is there anything left to do - I made it in with the current batch #2 order of chips correct? All I do now is patiently wait until august/september when the chips arrive, are mounted to an assembled k16 board, and the complete unit (tested?) is shipped to Canada (presumably in a timeframe of < 4 business days).What\\'s the timeframe on mounting chips to the K16 board with my place in queue? Will my board be ready in the first week from chip delivery, or after 2,3-4 weeks?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSame thing. You can order separately too. (chips here, miners on the site)\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\n want to but this 16 chip+board 2.046 btc but i want to add 16 chip plus. What is the last price can be?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI would imagine you add 16 chips to your cart as an item, and an assembled device as a second item\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nOrder #1372 made on June 27, 2013.P.S. How do I arrange the shipping if I chose Full Control Delivery?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nHow much shipping cost? All expenses included in price? Can you ship whichever company we want ?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nIstvane... ne dai si noua un raspuns...am platit de duminica...un status update...nu ma vad in lista din batch 2MerciAdrian\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nWhen batch2 will be closed? Avalon is open again for orders:\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nCan we expect a news update soon regarding orders placed during this batch?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nYes, i have some great news. I\\'ll post in the morning, because i have to rest a bit now.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nHi,It seems we still have time, so you can send the coins whenever you\\'re ready.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nYes, indeed. I have some of the parts, but i will order the PCB only when really-really ready.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nOrder confirmed\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nOrder confirmed\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nYou call your favorite carrier, tell them you have a package waiting at my house and pay for the shipping. That\\'s it.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nThank you!merci\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nThanks,Dan\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nHi, I have 48 chips in this batch.I would like to order 3 board/power supply etc to go with it. Do I need a coupon or some thing to tie the 2 together?How do I order the boards and tell you that the chips are from the batch?Also, do you have the costs for delivering to South Africa?ThanksFFMG\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nSend t13hyrda a PM. He\\'ll give you a coupon code to get a discount\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nThanks for that Andrew. FFMG: don\\'t forget to send me your registered e-mail address too.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\n; <16>; <1.296>; you!\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\n; <3>; <0.243BTC>; UTC 02:29\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chip, completed boards, whole mining rig, complete miners, 16 chip+board, 16 chip plus, PCB, board/power supply\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 03:24:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] [19/50] Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nI have issued a refund to one buyer who has decided not to proceed. So:Order StatusWe are currently up to 19 out of minimum 50 units required.I also have a few requests to hold units until the buyer can procure BTC. As per the first post, I\\'m not able to do this, however, there is still a few days to run and we may need to delay if the miners are not back in stock by Friday - so plenty of time!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ve just done a purchase of BTC through Bit Trade Australia to fund some of my own USB sticks and the process was very simple and smooth:10.54am - lodge buy request on at - deposit cash over the counter at a Commonwealth branch1.34pm - receive confirmation email deposit has been received and to allow up to 4 hours for transfer1.57pm - receive transfer performed email and payment is in my wallet with 1 confirmation\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nhii\\'m interested in purchasing a few. any word on when they might be available again?also, I need to convert AUD to BTC beforehand. Probably try Bit Trade Australia.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI emailed ASICMINER on Tuesday, but have not had a reply as yet. I believe that the new blades will be availabel from the 10th, so I believe it is reasonable to believe that the USB sticks should be back in stock around the same time.PM me if you do want to go ahead with commiting and I\\'ll send you a payment address.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI will start with 10 Block Erupters, and convert AUD to BTC tomorrow. If they are available on 10th July then when could we expect them in Australia? Have you imported these before to Australia?I will PM you tomorrow for your address.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI would expect it will take around a week from when they are shipped by ASICMINER until you have them based on other people experiences. I haven\\'t imported any directly as yet (this is my first GB) but that\\'s around about what the units I order from an NZ buy took.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOrder StatusWe are currently up to 24 out of minimum 50 units required (with another 19 units people have expressed an interest but not paid for yet).\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI am very interested in these couple of Aussie group buys but unfortunately with the new hardware announcement due in under a week (10th) and that you havent had order response from friedcat I will have to pass this time. If you are not getting a response I can only assume this means that as per his posts on other threads that this means there indeed is no stock available right now.Also a suggestion for another BTC trading company I have used with success was Coinjar, specifically their \\'Coinjar filler\\' service. They accept cash deposits at several of the major banks (Commonwealth bank is their bank, use that for fastest transfer) but one problem is that for the first deposit it cannot exceed $100 AUD, but 7 days after the first deposit they increase this limit to $500. Their fee is 2% which is better than 5.9% on your suggestion and also the turn around time if deposited at a commonwealth bank seems to be usually 1 hour (it was for me too). It\\'s also more or less anonymous as the bank didn\\'t take any of my details, which some buyers might prefer instead of associating themselves with trading BTC as you will do if you buy BTC with a transfer from your bank account (look at what hap\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Block Erupter, USB sticks\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 09:10:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] [UK] Saturn KNC Miner (5/40 shares) [OPEN] !!!\\n### Original post:\\nReserve two shares for me, please. I\\'ll have the funds out shortly.Edit: Transaction ID \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDone, Please see your PMs.Also many thanks and please look at PMs.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1.3btc the sending address will also be my receiving \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Saturn KNC Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-23 10:55:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group buy] Avalon chips Escrow John K / BG EU 2 batch OPEN + K16 from 40 EUR\\n### Original post:\\nThank you JohnSo folks Second batch is open for orders\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUpdate Great news test chips from zefir on the way to us ETA tomorrow,test boards : our own 1 chip test board, 2 K16 and 4 K1 to be ready tomorrow,Full BOM of all other components to be here Wednesday.Our First batch group buy of Avalon chips successfully closed and ordered.John K set an escrow contract for second batch\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPS: I confirm the screenshot above is correct. Marto74\\'s address and name is cut out for privacy reasons of course. The complete screenshot is provided to him via email already.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nilpirata79; 96; 8.16; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nthere is no payment ?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nopaee a yce p batch !\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI answered you by private message. I will pay later on, when the batch is about to be close, if you don\\'t \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nquoted for ref.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat is the purpose of Bitcoin if I cannot even change my mind on a payment?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCoolIt\\'s your money after allMy advice if you are not sure do not postPeace\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYou can be sure of one thing in life...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAnd for all the other things in life you can\\'t be sure. Like someone being part of a group buy if he doesn\\'t pay for his share of the order.So, in the case of this thread, I think that we both can\\'t be sure that you\\'ll get any chips with no transaction at hand\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nDont feed the trolls!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI never asked for chips without paying... wtf are you talking about?I am not going to say more on this \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n6 sample Avalon chips arrived today from zefir.Test PCB boards are ready ,most of the components are here too.Sleepless nights are comming\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\ngood luck!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nGood news, keep posting it\\'s great to follow this up\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nK1 case and heat sink design\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n; <4>; <0.34>; a\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nIs it possible to buy just board? If so how much for fully assembled one with firmware and ready to go?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nYes it\\'s possible but not for the momentI\\'ll start taking orders as soon we have a working protype\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nGreat. I don\\'t have chips and will not have them any time soon so I\\'m OK with that. Any idea about the price. It says from 40 so I guess 40 is not fully assembled or is it...\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nWhat are you going to do with the board without chips.Did you order some chips?The PCB+assembly service is to be made with customers chips.You can order some in this group buyRegards: Martin\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI didn\\'t wont say it but you asked. I was planing to order chips hire but it looks like it will takes months to get to 10.000 chips so I\\'m ordering them somewhere else. Sorry...\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\n40 Euro is the price for fully assembled miner with heatsink. Additionally you can order housing and psu ( judging by the cad schemes that marto has posted)\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nSmall teaser K1 with Avalon and some of the components for PIK and cominication testing\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nlooks awesome, cant wait to see them crunching hashes.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nJust being curious...I don\\'t know what other people think but, to me, the K1 represent a bad cost/GHs ratio compared to the K16.It is a nice entry model, but wouldn\\'t achieve as well as with a K16. Would you destined it only at resale, or would you really mine with that?Regards,\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nIt\\'s easier to make tests of the firmware . hardware and software on 1 chip configuration.You have less checkpoints\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nHey, what\\'s the delivery date for batch 2?\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\n9+ weeks after closing\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nThere seems to be a trick to get less then 10.000 chips...See: you do the same?\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nWhat do you mean ?\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nThey somehow got around 10.000 limit. They have 80BTC worth of chips and they will order...\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nI think they have some big buyer that want to stay anonymous and he is buying all remaining chips in that batch.\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nAlso, there is some (new) guy, selling chips from batch order placed on April, 22: is no evidence jet if he really paid that order. And he is not accepting escrow!\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nThis guy , is makin retail sale of chips. Prices are more expencive\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nIf so they would have placed the order now. Instead, I think that (slightly similar) someone indeed must have agreed to buy the extra amount if it does not complete soon enough in order to get the chips not too late.\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nSo when can we buy complete miners from you? And what\\'s the delivery date on those?\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nJust guessing from what I\\'ve read so far:first, he needs to validate the board designsecond, he will complete the casing design, get more accurate pricing and delay.third, he will get packaging and delivery quotesI\\'m happy he\\'s concentrating on the highest priority first, rather than the last little bit.Of course I\\'d\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, test boards, K16, K1, Test PCB boards, K1 case, heat sink, housing, psu\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 11:27:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY group buy and HOSTING in Poland EU - first shares sold !\\n### Original post:\\nok im in, detailed pmed\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:24:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 6 sold!- 7th miner: 188/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nGood morning everyone,We don\\'t reserve shares anymore as we said here are still 52 shares left. We might sell some shares on the 8th miner instead of keeping them for ourselves though and if enough people still want shares we\\'ll start a new groupbuy.Start post is updated again..Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ve just transfered 1.2 BTC for 4 sharesTX ID = confirm my paymentand if you need more details, please PM me...thank you best regards\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI bought the remaining 48 shares. \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHey all,We are now officially sold out on this GB, we even oversold, cause another 20 shares were bought thru PM this morning We\\'ll probably start another one this weekend, as soon as we\\'ve processed this one completely and send everyone PM\\'s again with confirmations on bitfunder usernames and/or payout addresses..Thanks again for all your & Tyrion70\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI stand corrected... :p my ipad has some hidden feature that enables real stupid typos\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nyou havent update my reserved confirmation tx id yet\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGood one, thanks for reminding me, havent update the other reserved shares either.. Ill update them all in a few hours, sorry..Cheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner, ipad\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:49:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL ASIC Chips] $59/chip. Batch #1 28 left. FPGA trade in accepted.\\n### Original post:\\nBatch #1 has been purchased with BFL, 28 chips are still available and will be available at $59 for the time being. Next week I\\'ll be opening Batch #2, at which point any remaining Batch 1 chips will increase in price.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nExtra 4 buy it check it\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nReceived, 24 chips from batch 1 left\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips, FPGA\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:56:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner\\n### Original post:\\ncount me in for 5 shares please, payment tonight when i get home.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMiner 01 and miner 02 is payed for\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n7 shares 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodesDate: 6/19/2013 18:39To: KnCMiner 2 Share -2.10 BTCTransaction fee: -0.0001 BTCNet amount: -2.1001 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFor status on miners in this group buy check this post - \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 14:56:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [ANN] Groupbuy KNCMiner\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m in... need to cash out some alts...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nScreenshots and tx id# of payments pleez!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI am in.Tx: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSee second post.@ImI: Tyrion will handle it when he wakes up\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nin for 2 shares, thankstx: \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIF we buy now, will be these first 3 ASICs or will be other laters? HOHO tyrion70 and blastbob very powerfull guys. doing very well.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWill add more as soon as funds are coming in. 4 Miners are already bought.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n2 shares.Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n10 Shares\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n1 \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n8 \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nLooks like we have pay for the next one very soon\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nGood morning!Payments have been updated!We almost have enough funds for one extra miner. Cheers,\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n1 Share: \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThx, I see it on the blockchain waiting for confirmations..\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\ni must acquire .5 btc\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWe decided to put the share price lower than the others, so you didn\\'t have to work to hard to get a share\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nFor status on miners in this group buy check this post - \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICs, Miners\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 15:33:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 2nd batch Jupiter KNCMiner - 1 sold - 2nd miner: 28/240 sold\\n### Original post:\\nStatus of bought minersMiner01 - 350GHs - 240/240 soldMiner02 - 350GHs - 240/240 soldMiner03 - 350GHs - 240/240 soldMiner04 - 350GHs - 240/240 soldMiner05 - 350GHs - 240/240 soldMiner06 - 350GHs - 240/240 soldMiner07 - 350GHs - 240/240 soldMiner08 - 350GHs - 240/240 soldShare overviewCode:Miner 08 - Shares SoldUsername # shares Transaction confirmedbenturas 20 220 07 - Shares SoldUsername # shares Transaction 68 40 4 7 20 5 4 7 2 3 5 12 5 20 4 28 06 - Shares SoldUsername # shares Transaction confirmedChoadmeyer 1 buyer 10 buyer 10 buyer 11 buyer 9 26 1 buyer 18 2 1 9 3 3 3 12 3 10 15 34 8 1 10 3 10 25 2 05 - Shares SoldUsername # shares Transaction \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Miner01, Miner02, Miner03, Miner04, Miner05, Miner06, Miner07, Miner08\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 17:07:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] 7 MORE AVAILABLE NOW! ASICMINER ERUPTER USB 1 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\ndoctorgigPaid3 units usa \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed! Thank you. Please PM me your mailing address.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n7 USB MINERS REMAIN IN GROUP BUY. Payment to be sent in next 2 hours if you want them. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n1 1/2 hours left to buy remaining 7 USB MINERS in THIS group buy! First payments to this address are in this group buy to be placed in the next 3 hours! Thanks for your support and orders!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhat if i pay but someone was faster, will you refund?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOrder is being placed today. Can\\'t be faster unless they have them already\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m about your 7 remaining ones. are they still avaiable?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGROUP BUY CLOSED. PLEASE USE MY NEXT GROUP BUY #2 HERE \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-06 02:03:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: US Asic USB Group Buy 0.99 btc 20/50\\n### Original post:\\nfriedcat has released upon the world a new batch of asic usb miners at the low low cost of 0.99 BTC order is 50 ~= 50 BTCI myself would like to purchase at least 4 of these for myself to either replace or supplement my gpu\\'sResell them on ebay for a quick profit, give them to your friends or keep them for yourselves.I will reply to this thread with prices for shipping etc if there is enough US Group Buy OnlyPayment address will be added here when we get to 50.Specs: to on windows 7: addition these are known to work with bitminter.Shiny!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIm in for 5 devices on this group buy. I will be sending from an exchange, the other group buy insists on a signed message, cant be bother with switching to another wallet. Let me know when you got enough to order and I will send payment.thanksjski\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nthanks everybody for the interest, we are moving along now, lets get this done!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m interested in 1. Tucson, AZ.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: asic usb miners, gpu\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-06 03:36:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [ASIC] Avalon Chip Group Purchase : Idaho, USA : 997 Chips Remaining\\n### Original post:\\nYes indeed! This is an exiting two weeks for the board development. If everything goes as planned, which we are extremely confident of, our final board revision will be hashing in two weeks! We are ready for mass production, with the sourcing for parts revised (some power regulators were getting too warm for comfort, so we went with some higher-duty ones) and completed. We are opting for superior components because these boards will be sold with a one year warranty, covering board and component failure entirely but not end-user abuse or Avalon chip failure, because both of those variable are out of our control.Once I have verified that the final revision is perfect and ready to go, I will open up an order form for these boards. For those of you new to the project, these boards will be overclockable to an estimated 350mh/s per chip, as opposed to the ~270mh/s per chip that other producers are offering.Since Avalon is accepting orders for chips again, I will open up a batch 2 tonight. Batch 1 chips are still for sale, but at a large premium because of how early the order was placed (early May) and I\\'d like to keep some for myself as well Further updates, pictures, and videos of the f\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chip Group, power regulators, Avalon chip\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-06 17:13:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY group buy and HOSTING in Poland EU - first shares sold ! 400 GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nCan you confirm the hosting arrangements i.e. will the units be hosted at a residential address? Is there any sort of redundant power supply/UPS and/or redundant internet connection? It isn\\'t clear from the BitFuryStrikesBack product page whether the full kits include cases or racks, will you be providing these at cost if they are not included?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes there is backup internet connection, At the moment there is no need for UPS power backup since I haven\\'t got a single electric power loss since two years. As for any additional stuff as racks, psu or whatever will be needed.I will cover that cost from my pocket and then split that cost to each investor according to number of shares he owns. That cost will be substracted from first payout.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHello all Like pajak666 said we will provide all needed stuff.This is right, if we have single problem with power in future we will provide needed solution like UPS to solve problem.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAny proof that you are legit ?best regardsHektek\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWe a Polish private entrepreneur. I run my own registered IT company since 2012. If you want proof of my or my company identity i can provide all document you need. Also if you would do a little resarch you would be able to give us a phone call easily:)Details under FAQ sectionAlso confirmed Avalon chips orders and order of Bitfury machine via metabank.ru.Bitmit profile? \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nso it is 13% + electricity? seems quite a lot compared to other hosting options I have seen.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI would buy 10 shares. But could you explain me please the plan with Starter boards? The price is +- the same for the same hashing power? So if I buy 10 shares (it si 11 GH/s) I will have then 11GH/s in these boards? And when they will be ready to hash? Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAnd the price is also the same (for the same amount of GH/s)? Thanks for answers\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAnd the air cooling? And the power to run it? And the redundant internet connection? And the space where all the stuff is placed? And all the work made to set up things?No hard feelings but simply imagine all the costs and fact that we you are saving 23% at the beginning of the hosting deal becouse there is no VAT applied. We can provide that since we are legitimate tax payers as registered company.Simple math: You are saving yourself some time and money (+10% even with 13% hosting fee)\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPlan with boards is backup plan, if we will not be able to collect 300 BTC we will order those 25 GH/s boards with money we will collect for our group buy.According to seller they should be available the same time.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nunfortunately not, when we will be forced to order few single 25 GH/s boards, our hashing power will be decreased by ~6.5%, therefore each share hashing power will be slightly lower (-6.5%)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY, UPS, racks, psu, Avalon chips, Bitfury machine, Starter boards, 25 GH/s boards\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 04:13:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL ASIC Chips] $59/chip. Batch #1 has been purchased 24 still available.\\n### Original post:\\nBumpA few have asked to purchase less than 5 chips. I am willing to sell less than 5, however, the buyer will need to pay a $10 flat rate shipping charge in the US before shipment.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 06:42:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group buy] Bitfury chip and TechnoBit assembly service\\n### Original post:\\nReserved\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI ordered starter 25 GH/s miner starter kit august delivery in order to have working device here for tests and comparison.Order: #338Product Quantity Price 25GH Miner Starter Kit (August Delivery)1 1,000 Cart Subtotal: 1,000 Shipping: Free Shipping Order Total: 1,000\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 25 GH/s miner starter kit\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 18:16:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: Can someone start a group buy for the new BitFury miners?\\n### Original post:\\nIf you\\'re not yet aware. 400 Gh/s BitFury miners are now available for 15,000 EUR with an August delivery date or 7,500 EUR with an October delivery date.[ANN] Bitfury ASIC sales in EU and EuropeCan someone start a group buy with hosting and listing on the stock exchanges like ADDICTION did?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhat are the \"requirements\" to do a group buy?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI can do if there\\'s sufficient interest ( Why would only certain people be able to start group buys? I appreciate that people putting money into these things need to trust the organiser, but there are a few mechanisms to make these as secure as possible (Escrow, identity verification etc.) In the end, if people aren\\'t happy that there are sufficient safeguards then they won\\'t join, right?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes.You are right.Maybe the starter kit in August + 15 H-Board in October is a safer choice.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ll check with Blastbob tonight if we\\'re up to it.. Need to check some things first, cuz they are a lot more expensive, so I\\'m unsure of ROI.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'m willing to run a group buy for the Bitfury miners, however only if I can arrange US shipment or hosting, as I am in the US. I have previous group buy experience and a fairly high level of community trust.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nthis one has started, first shares sold:\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nInterest. Would be a plus if this offer would include hosting as well. (and potentially become part of ADDICTION)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m interested, but would like to see how the numbers compare with the ADDICTION schemes.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAllright folks, We\\'ve compared some numbers, but decided against starting a groupbuy. We feel we can only start groupbuys on which we are willing to invest ourselves, in this case the numbers tell us we don\\'t want to..To start with, the current BTC/USD price is certainly not helping. It just dropped to $70 or 55. So below numbers might have been a lot better a few days or week ago.We\\'ve compared the two 400GH options offered. In our own calculations for KNC we\\'ve used 31/10 as delivery date for the jupiters. Likewise we\\'ve used 31/8 and 31/10 for possible delivery dates for bitfury.The prices in BTC for the miners used are:KNC Jupiter: 100 BTC (we bought a lot cheaper, but that\\'s the current price)Bitfury October: 136 BTC (7500/55)Bitfury August: 272 BTC (15000/55)With an average difficulty rise of 14% per retarget period these are the break-even numbers in days:KNC Jupiter: 105 days, top is 115 BTC after 217 days Bitfury October: never, top is 127 after 245 daysBitfury August: never top is 192BTC after 287 daysFor power we took ,67btc per week for the jupiters and ,33 for bitfury (half). As you can see at current prices we might not even run another KNC groupbuy let alone a bitfur\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHave you tried?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThanks for sharing your analysis guys, that\\'s certainly a gloomy picture. Is there any particular reason that you didn\\'t include VAT in your analysis (not that this helps matters)? What the hell has happened to the bitcoin price this afternoon!!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHmm.. you just made it 21% worse :p Reason: I forgot And I\\'m used to exclude VAT..\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSorry, trying to help, not make things worse . At least it\\'s only 20% in the UK!I guess ROI for all of these depends on where we think the bitcoin price will be in the future. Back to playing with my spreadsheet now - you guys have made me think.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nGood of you to point it out.. VAT can be an unpleasant surprise..There\\'s just a lot of factors to take into account. In the spreadsheet we use, i took difficulty as the major variable, so every column has a different difff from 0 to 30%. In the rows are the earnings per week. It became pretty difficult lol.. All in all difficulty is the most deciding factor on roi. We\\'ve seen difficulty go up by more than 20% lately. Last period was a nice one with only 10% but the next one will probably be around % again..We\\'ll see what happens I guess\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI have access to next to free electricity. Only problem is GST (equivalent of VAT) is 7% into Singapore.I can get it shipped to a friend in the UK and then ship it into Singapore.I understand that there\\'s a groupbuy for BitFury miners at the moment and they are reserving 13% + electical costs.Would anyone be interested if I started one for 10% while covering electrical costs?Is there a kickstarter type collection service where people pledge amounts and aren\\'t required to transfer till we have enough to go ahead. Tracking payments is not an issue but it would be ideal if a similar platform for bitcoin were up.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 400 Gh/s BitFury miners, KNC Jupiter, Bitfury October, Bitfury August\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 18:39:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] [Singapore - $0 electrical] KnCMiner Jupiter 18.75$/G# | 75USD/Share\\n### Original post:\\nSingapore? It\\'s a city near the equator....\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes it is Solar Some writeups on Singapore + we pull our own in percapita GDPIf you are worried about temperatures. I am currently running a Butterflylabs Jalapeno (stock) in an airconditioned room (we live off airconditioning here) and it\\'s been running at 5.7 GHz at 42 degrees celcius with no additional cooling. These Jupiter units will be in chilled rooms with much better cooling.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Butterflylabs Jalapeno\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 20:09:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] any Jupiter interest?\\n### Original post:\\nis there enough interest for me to run a Jupiter mining shares ala the rest of such things on this forum?I have an order for Jupiter #127x placed June 6th, 2013, need to pay for it or walk away from it...what say you?EDIT: this thread is now closed. I have changed my mind about selling shares and will not be doing so.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nFolks, I\\'m sorry to have kept you on the fence about participating in share sales by me since you might have been holding off from participating in other\\'s share sales...I regret to inform you that I will not be running a sale for the shares of my Jupiter I have ordered and paid for.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nmods please close\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 20:50:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Investment] 3 TH/s Mining Rig with Hosting at 8%\\n### Original post:\\nim starting out new in the bitcoin phase let me know how I can help\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYou can pledge your share on the project right now so we can start the escrow process and attract more people.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow much is pledged so far?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nRight now, I\\'m just receiving questions. That\\'s why I\\'m asking for pledges, the more people interested the faster we can start to order.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSo, zero?You are accepting pledges, which are payments made to the escrow address, right?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI might consider 3 BTC\\'s worth.What is the expected hashrate for 3 BTC\\'s?Currently I have on order:10 Shares via KnC group buy worth 28 GH/s I paid 5 BTC\\'s7 Shares via KnC group buy worth 9.87 Gh/s I paid 2.1 BTC\\'s3 K16\\'s via TerraHash worth 13.5 Gh/s for $750 or ~7 BTC\\'s\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWe are expecting +/- $40 per GH/s so at current price it will be 2.70GH/s per 1BTC5BTC worth 13.5 GH/s with shipping, assembly and hosting administration, cooling and support for the hardware so you don\\'t have to worry about anything. One single order to do everything for a low fee and you\\'re not forced to purchase the whole miner if you don\\'t have the money right now.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHiSo I could I ask you to recalculate using the new data please?and provide and ETA for up and running please?I also may have 3BTC worth too(one GB i\\'m in is 5.5ghs per BTC *If the H/W arrives!* - Price per Ghs is probably what we\\'re all interested)Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThanks for the request. I will put a Price per GH/s at current price in the OP.Also, the process will be, assembly -> testing -> work. Every miner tested will be put to work ASAP and the lead time sounds like 4 months due to components running out of stock and have 4 to 9 weeks of restocking lead time.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 3 TH/s Mining Rig, KnC group buy, K16\\'s via TerraHash\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 21:59:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 6: 5429 ASICs gone 55429 sold\\n### Original post:\\nI now sent payment for 6000 chips to zefir\\'s address. One batch is already ordered and the second one will be ordered soon. So i think no new payment is possible anymore now.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nShoot Was waiting on some BC to be transferred over, I wanted to grab some. Was hoping I had more time.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf youre fast enough there are still 79 chips there that were ordered but not needed later by the buyer. If you want them are you are fast enough...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOk hoping Bitcoin Brokers gets my money fast then\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSebastianJu,how did it go the transfer? is Zefir ready to order?Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi,I\\'m auctioning my chip order.[AUCTION] 20x AVALON chips from SebastianJu\\'s group buy batch #2\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI will order but can you ship directly to burnin?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes, zefir ordered already.Sorry, batch 6 is closed now already. But i still have 64 chips from batch 6 you can buy because they werent taken by the one that ordered them.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nzefir now ordered the 6. batch. It looks like no 7. Batch will become full anymore, for example there are better competitors products out now, so i wont open a new batch now anymore.The list with the last batch is in first post. At the moment there are still 64 chips in 6. batch you can order from me because they werent taken from the one that wanted them.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSebastianJu, can you be a bit more specific about the status of the batch #6, there is no mentioning of its status in the first post where you pointed. On which day was the payment completed? What\\'s the current Avalon status of the order?Thank\\'s for your effort.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 08:18:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy HOSTING] $0/pm Jupiter G#:18.75 | 95shares @ ≈ 1 btc | 4GH/s ≈ 1 BTC\\n### Original post:\\n< ( GROUP BUY ) >EDIT: Updated prices with a live ticker to keep up with changing prices. Cost per share is 75 USD.L0ft Mining GroupWe have decided to organise a group buy for the KnC miner Jupiter. We are issuing 100 shares at bitcoins each. Price may vary based on exchange rate. 5 shares will be reserved for the organisers. 95 shares at BTC per share will cover all costs including shipping and set-up. Cost of unit: 6995Cost of shipping to Singapore: 1721000W PSU: 200Total Cost of hardware: 7367Total collected: 75 * 95 = 7215The 5 shares will be covering our setup as well as electrical costs. I have access to DataCenters in Singapore and will be covering electrical costs out of the 5 shares. Price per G# 18.75Are we qualified?I started off with a butterflylabs Jalapeno miner just last month. I\\'m a compSci major and will be able to troubleshoot things if required.Are we trustworthy?Yes, we can offer photo identification of the team behind the mining operation if needed.Where will the mining rig be situated?The KnC mining rig Jupiter will be situated in Singapore. The shares issued are only for a holding in the KnC Jupiter, not part of our overall mining group. When wi\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAdjusted pricing to 1 BTC for each of the 95 shares I will cover the difference\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI will get in touch you via PM. Wouldn\\'t want to post all my information online.How does one typically verify information while staying somewhat private?I\\'ve been a paypal verified member since 2002 I believe. on ebay but that\\'s a little more recent.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nscreenshot of the order would be a good start\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC miner Jupiter, butterflylabs Jalapeno miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 08:56:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [ASIC] Avalon Overclockable Chips and Boards :: Idaho, USA :: 991:4400 Remaining\\n### Original post:\\nBought 16 chips \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Overclockable Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 16:06:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #10 35/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01693878 ea. @ 14 units\\n### Original post:\\nI will take 4. funds will be sent via my wallet blockchain. I have to wait until 7PM eastern standard time for money to unlock. So Monday the 8th at 8pm eastern standard time I will send 4.33x btc for 4 sticks...thanks philipma1957\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOP updated with orders up to now...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 20:20:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Limited batch - 17/50 left\\n### Original post:\\nSending payment now.3 units.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 20:32:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY group buy and HOSTING in Poland EU - NO VAT - 46/300 shares sold\\n### Original post:\\nI would be interested if the expense ratio was maybe 8-10% instead of 13%. At 13% you earn something like $2700 in month 1 alone, to cover \"management\" (not including electricity!), then incrementally smaller payments from there. There is already a pretty big premium on group A, and trying to make our way back to a profit at 87% payout rate could be daunting. Just bringing this up since you may have to adjust the GB anyway, depending on what happens to BTC prices.Again, I\\'m interested just a little concerned about the expenses. Thanks for listening.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ve answered this before.I will copy paste it again.And the air cooling? And the power to run it? And the redundant internet connection? And the space where all the stuff is placed? And all the work made to set up things?No hard feelings but simply imagine all the costs and fact that we you are saving 23% at the beginning of the hosting deal becouse there is no VAT applied. We can provide that since we are legitimate tax payers as registered company.Simple math: You are saving yourself some time and money (+10% even with 13% hosting fee)First month that might be quite good payout, since there was no big difficulty jump. But then it might become battle over pennies, and would you like to take care of sth everyday for 300$ a month?this 3% will be hard to feel by investors anyway, but it\\'s necessary to keep the stuff running in good conditions.Sorry to hear that it\\'s too much for you.Feel free to join in anytime\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'d be interested but I see there is no big interest in this buy just a few hours before its end.With current status: 46/300, let\\'s say +10-20 till the end, what exactly are you going to buy? 25 GH/s devices?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes, they will buy starter kits.As we are just shy of three starter kits I added a buffer order.Coiner.de, 1, 10, add this to the very end of the queue and only use as much shares as are needed to get that extra device.That is, please place all following orders ( if there are any ) before this one in the queue.I hope I made my intentions clear and you don\\'t mind any extra effort you have.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAfter reading all details on pajak666\\'s store I can assure that it looks like a legit company, all this can be verified in national business registry etc.I\\'m also from Poland and I am going to support our local bitcoin mining farms adamlm, 1, 2, \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks for your response earlier today!If you are able to reserve 3 shares for me, I\\'ll forward payment tonight when I get home from the office.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY, 25 GH/s devices, starter kits\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 20:34:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Limited batch -14 left\\n### Original post:\\nReceived, 14 units left\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 21:23:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #10 91/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01693878 ea. @ 14 units\\n### Original post:\\nSwimmer63; 7; 6.93; added 7 to my order of 3 from yesterday and paid the difference. If this is not cool let me know.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI will be buying at least 6 once my payment clears.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 20:02:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group buy + hosting] Any interest in Bitfury miner group buy + hosting in UK?\\n### Original post:\\nIf there\\'s sufficient interest I\\'d be happy to set up a group buy with hosting (in the UK) for Bitfury ASIC miners ( Terms and conditions would have to be worked out, but I\\'d use a trusted Escrow service and would verify my identity and address with a trusted group member (other security measures would be considered if you have suggestions). This would only be for assembled miners with hosting, I believe that others will offer chip group buys (e.g. Any thoughts/feedback?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ninterested in this\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIn a safe and cost efficient, especially the case of guaranteed time, there will be a lot of people are interested, I wish you success!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIf you can provide sufficient evidence of honesty, hosting etc. I would consider joining forces in a hosted group buy of October delivery Bitfury for listing as mining coop on BTCT.CO. PM me if interested, I have hosted several previous group buys.I also believe we could avoid the need for escrow as many Hero members etc. are already owners of shares in my initial group buys and I have previously verified my identity with mods and escrow partners.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'m interested, but there seem to be a lot of unanswered questions about this. Time scale, VAT, experience with these chips and/or assembled machines... I\\'ve bought shares in the KcNMiner group buys, what advantages would this scheme have?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLower Watt-usage per GH/s and risk diversification. Also currently probably faster time to delivery over KNC orders made at current date.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ncost per share?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOK, sounds interesting, I\\'d be happy to collaborate if we can work it out. I\\'ll PM you.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI was initially thinking of around 1 BTC per share. This would mean around 300-350 shares for a 400GH/s miner, depending on how they calculate the bitcoin price and the rather unstable BTC value at the moment.Edit: I should add that the number of shares above would be for an August delivery miner with VAT added. October delivery miners are cheaper.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nInterested also.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nDef interested, I need to diversify from just KNC shares.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nTime scale: depends on how much faith you have in but they are suggesting August and October deliveries at the moment. I\\'m trying to get some info from them about their confidence levels with these estimates.VAT: will need to be paid at 20%EDIT: Actually after doing some VAT-related research I think VAT will be due in Finland, where the rate is sadly 24% !Experience: Well bitfury\\'s testing thread has posts which suggest that the hardware is working if I\\'ve followed things correctly. As far as I know there are no \"customers\" with running hardware yet.As with all of these ASICs there are risks and (potential) rewards and everybody needs to do a careful risk analysis.Hope this helps.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOK, sounds like there may be some interest. Just working on some terms and conditions for your perusal now. One or two other bitfury GBs have been advertised over the last couple of days, so you may want to see if they work for you while you wait. I have something \"slightly\" different in mind, which may suit some. Will post ASAP.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHi All, as promised some suggested terms and conditions for a group buy + hosting are below. I\\'ll leave these here for comments and suggestions for a few hours before opening the GB (this will be in a new thread), so if you want to make any suggestions I\\'ll certainly consider them (as long as they are sensible ).I\\'ve exchanged messages with John K. and he has kindly offered to verify our ID and if requested provide an escrow service (2% fee). Please let me know if you would like the escrow service or not as part of this GB. The benefit is a little more security, but the downside is a little more cost for the GB + slightly more complicated admin (i.e. we will need to be in good contact with John K. to ensure that components are ordered as soon as possible when enough funds have been gathered). Note that the T&C below include the escrow, but we can change Terms and have recently announced that they will sell ASIC bitcoin mining hardware (chips, boards and complete miners) for delivery in either August or October 2013. However, they will only ship to buyers in the EU. In order to allow those outside the EU, particularly smaller miners, access to this state-of-t\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nLikewise. This continues to be relevant to my interestseseses.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nLooks good on the whole. I will probably buy-in.Three thoughts -For extra security and peace-of-mind, investors should send you a signed message, so both parties know the address is indeed under the control of the (i.e. if power costs outweigh the amount of BTC being mined by the miner).\"Presumably the power costs are paid in\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury ASIC miners, KcNMiner group buys, ASIC bitcoin mining hardware (chips boards and complete miners)\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-07 17:15:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #9 278/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nMy tracking said ISC CHICAGO until it arrived in my mailbox.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI used to work at a small business that shipped goods throughout the world (arcade game parts and repair).The US Postal Service is great, actually more reliable than UPS (among other things, UPS is known for crushing the edges of boxes in an effort to fit more of them into their delivery trucks).However, with USPS, it is *optional* whether or not they scan the package. The postmen aren\\'t required to scan. So, any tracking you get is minimal. That\\'s a disadvantage.With UPS (and FedEx), though, it is *required* that the workers scan the package, every time it passes through another hop. So, you get really good tracking. However, they\\'re more expensive, and can be full of their own hassles to work with.There\\'s obviously a lot of pros and cons of using various shipping methods. I made a long rant about it elsewhere online, can\\'t find it now, though....Josh\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMy G7 has not arrived either.They had a little break in Hawaii so they should be well rested and ready to work hard when they arrive today, this is not unusual, do not worry about shipping updates and stay calm. EDIT: Arrived and mining Thanks Canary... No Gold ones thou\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nwhen probably the shipping of G9 will start ?can anyone tell me how long takes the shipment from USA to Europe ?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJuly 10th, AFAIK, was to be an announcement for new blades 5GH/10GH. I haven\\'t seen any mention of \"new\" USB miners coming, has anyone?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ndue to the change in the btc/usd rate. any NEW requests for shipping upgrades are based on the following price:USPS Express: .3 btcFedEx ND: .57 btcFedEx ND + Saturday: .79 btcFedEx international: 1.43 btc\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIf you are going to be able to ship today let me know what Saturday delivery fee is and Ill send it\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nstill no tracking # from friedcat yet...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOuch .. lol im starting to have buyers regret with the plummet in btc/usd and the July 10th [ann]. Oh well ive made a few bucks on them. I appreciate the work you put into this.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBTCGuild on the Asic store page says:\"ASICMINER currently has no USB Block Erupters in inventory to ship to resellers or individuals. At this time, they expect new inventory to become available around July 10th.New orders are currently disabled until inventory is ordered from ASICMINER. Sorry for the inconvenience.\"With no tracking # do you think Friedcat is OOS and cannot fill this order? I would think BTCGuild has a lot of pull with Friedcat.Or perhaps Friedcat is going to fill orders with the new product (that would be sweet)Bitterdog we\\'re all in the same boat tell him Bitcoin mining and speculating is like rolling the dice in Vegas. Or like day trading. It could just as well hit $200 per bitcoin this week as it did $62. All the people who bought at $30 when it later hit $260 could have just as easily seen it drop from $30 from $3.The ones hardest hit are the ones that paid $130 x 1.99B = $260 a couple weeks ago and are now mining $65 bitcoins\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'ve contacted friedcat several times using different methods. As soon as I get an indication either way, I can share the info and make a decision on what to do.Stay tuned.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHave you even been able to place the order with him? From a look at the other group buys it seems like they are also having difficulty even getting ahold of friedcat\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nthis is not coming from any inside info but i bet these usb sticks were old inventory that he wanted to clear out in a hurry before gen2 came out with faster hash and/or lower price, and btcguild blew threw them faster than he expected - they ordered 1k, sold it in 40 minutes, then the next day ordered another 3k. if they say he\\'s OOS for resellers he\\'s probably literally all OOS with a bunch of unfilled orders. If anyone has first dibs with friedcat its btcguild.i bet he\\'s finishing production on gen 2 usb sticks and his plan is to do some sort of substitution but he doesn\\'t want to blow the lid off it until 7/10. so he\\'s keeping quiet trying to stall. but starting to piss off a lot of customers in the process.thats my 2 cents worth but its all speculation.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nany news ?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nso we\\'re getting v3... i wonder if the specs are the same or better... we\\'ll find out july 10i\\'m not understanding how he said they were already shipped (does he mean the rest of the old supply was shipped to other people), and that ours isnt shipped yet \"when tracking number is generated\" because arent tracking numbers generated when you generate a label (before it actually ships)?Or is it translation error and he is saying they are in the process of being shipped and will have tracking # when its actually shipped\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI don\\'t know why people have created this idea about July 10th being related to USBs. I have not\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, G7, G9, USB Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 03:40:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #10 130/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01693878 ea. @ 14 units\\n### Original post:\\nAt what point are you shipping then Canary? Daily or every 200 units or ....? Just so I can attempt to guesstimate delivery days. I will likely continue to order a few times a week.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nthat really is dependent on when I get a shipment in from friedcat... so far it\\'s been about every 4 business days or thereabouts...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAs posted in your 9th thread: The official topic still says [OUT OF STOCK] and the OP hasn\\'t been updated from:\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSo worst case 6-7 business days?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nthe quote is from friedcat, pretty much minutes after I had received it from him. I don\\'t have access to his thread to post/change updates on it...I\\'m not sure if you are asking a question here or saying something else?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n<420>; <5>; <5.32714285>; so rich I couldn\\'t resist buying 5 more\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHave you got the tracking number for your pre-order? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nnot yet.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI was just pointing out that I haven\\'t seen any corroborating evidence from anyone else that these are back in stock and shipping and friedcat hasn\\'t bothered to update his thread topic or OP. I\\'m just being cautious!Btw, I\\'ve gone in for part of an order with someone else local to me in your 9th, so I do want to get these ASAP!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThere is another thread corroborating that Erupters are available again to resellers like Canary. PM me if you want proof.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nthis is my 10th group buy...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 04:21:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy 1 (S/O) 2 (18 /40Left]AVAIL 1 KNC SATURN [200GHs Miner] Day 1 Deliver\\n### Original post:\\nCharles,This is great news indeed.While I personally trust you (otherwise I wouldn\\'t have sent the money in the 1st place), I have referenced your GB on the main (\"official\") topic of KnC Miner and all the replies where bashing at \"who\\'s that guy, you\\'re throwing away your money he will run away with it\", basically.To quote you:Maybe you could make your offer more attractive by staying \"almost\" private and only sharing real ID with a very, very trusted member of the community (who else than John K comes to my mind), what do you think about this? I\\'m pretty sure that you would be able to sell more share with a guarantee of this kind, and IMHO it doesn\\'t \"break\" your privacy because John K. won\\'t disclose your ID unless you run away with shareholder\\'s money\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi Matt,Early on if I was not able to sell shares, I would have paid for verification services by John K. But at this stage, the units are almost complete and I\\'m down to a low enough shares available that I am willing to keep them all if no one else decides to purchase. Also a lot of the folks who purchased have actually dealt with me or currently working with me in one way or another. I am confident that they do not have any second thoughts as to my intentions. Charles\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCharles,Thanks for your answer. I just saw that you had not sold any share in 10 days, and I also saw the reaction when I posted in the mentioned topic, so I was just suggesting something to help you sell shares.If you\\'re okay with the number of shares that you sold already, it\\'s fair enough for me Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks Charles, Just transferred for 1 ShareTX ID = Receiving address = get this 2nd unit paid\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nActually it\\'s already paid for, OP is simply turning it into a GB\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSorry yeah i knew that I guess i meant, paid for him\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks! We\\'re now down to 16 Units available. With a few reserved. So probably only 10 available.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC SATURN\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 05:00:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Limited batch - 14/50 left\\n### Original post:\\nSent payment, 2 units.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 06:11:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Limited batch - 12 left\\n### Original post:\\nReceived, 12 left.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSent payment for 5 more units + upgraded shipping.8 units total for me.If the product isn\\'t shipped before the end of July, please let me know. I may be interested in receiving a refund like Radivent.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 06:50:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Limited batch - 7 left\\n### Original post:\\nReceived, 7 left.I\\'ve contacted friedcat and still waiting for a response. Orders for most users are expected to start on the 11th so I hope to receive a payment address soon. If for some reason friedcat does not respond, I will be refunding all payments in full.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAbout to send payment for yet another erupter (total 9).No point in not getting a whole hub running if I\\'m already buying 8 EDIT: Sent. I\\'m down for 9.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB, erupter\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 11:57:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #10 140/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01693878 ea. @ 14 units\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m waiting on some auctions to end. Would you be able to give 24hr-ish notice on the thread before closing? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nfreshzive; 14; 14.23714285 BTC; \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI sent .99 for a second stick. philipma1957 ,1, I sent 1.36724285 for the first stickphilipma1957 ,1, total 2 sticks and 2.35714285 I may get some coins for 2 more , but feel free to close and not wait on me at least I got the 2.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nUpdated OP.need to know whose sending address is?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI have as the sending address for both sticks this is for the second stick .99 btc this is for the first stick 1.36764285 Sometimes the chain hangs confirms and puts a shit load of info extra addresses etc. once the confirms hit the extra address vanish. the first transaction 1.36xx btc has more then 90 confirms. the second transaction .99btc has more then 50 confirms that mystery sending address 1HRHJ........PM dropped off once a few confirms hit.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 12:21:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY group buy and HOSTING in Poland EU - NO VAT - 61/300 shares sold\\n### Original post:\\nbecause there are still some shares left,we will hold a bit with our order to collect a bit more from our investors to make total order bigger\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo I should still send my payment, correct (or is the GB on hold)?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAnyone can buy shares for at least 24h more from that post, I am waiting for some more detailed info from Niko about closing time for orders.I remind that even if we will not collect whole amount we will buy 25 GH/s boards instead of 400 GH/s unit, so no shares will be lost.I got to sleep after long night car driving, in about 8 hours I will make all necessary updates about new shares that were sold.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThere was a clear deadline. Devices should have been bought immediately after the deadline.Buy the devices until 18:00 CET or count me out.Please send all my BTC to the address they were sent from as soon as possible then.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'d like to buy one 25G miner.Could you ship it to me after you receive it? I am in China.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI totally agree with this. If we wait until all 300 shares are sold it is > august already.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAgree.You shouldn\\'t change the rules in that way.People have joined your group buy with certain terms & conditions. The deadline was clear and have passed.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nriclas, 1, 10, you buy the 25gh/s boards for august.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY, 25 GH/s boards, 400 GH/s unit, 25G miner\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 19:31:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group buy 1000 pcs USB Erupters - European Union\\n### Original post:\\nWhen can we expect the Erupters to arrive? Have you already placed an order with yxt? Is so, when?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLet me see if i understood your math:300*0,330GHs = 99 GHz.300*51,00 EUR = 15.300,00 EUR1GHs = 154,55 EURYou will pay 15.300,00 EUR for 99 GHs ?That\\'s a lot of money!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBetter off buying a bigger ASIC miner now and getting more bang for your buck. For the same 1BTC you can get 4x the hash rate with a group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThere is a bunch of threads about what is better, and this is not the one about that. So lets get back on the track.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI am not accepting litecoins... You can go to btce and convert it to bitcoin, dont be lazy\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOnce again, please include all the data in payment so that I dont have to chase down everyone for details... Its like I am talking to myself no one reads the text\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGood news for everyone who is willing to participate. I sold all of my gpus yesterday, as you know theres was a lot , and I will be going for 600-800 erupters, so more chance for group buy to have success\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPut me down for 2 please. BTC payment and signed message with details on their way to you.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nNo, I have not placed an order, as stated in my first post. yxt assured me that he has enough on stock (more than 1000 currently), and more arriving. Order will be placed when the number is reached. When we place an order we should expect the miners in a few days.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAlready got this, 2 confirmations are down\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nGot a guy today to buy 70 pieces, this will boost us for sure, waiting for the sepa\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupters, ASIC miner, gpus\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 22:59:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Limited batch - 6 left\\n### Original post:\\nSent payment for 3 units + shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwhere are you based ?best regards,ilpirata79\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSent payment for 1 unit + shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPayments received, 2 left\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-09 23:00:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: ISO KnC Miner Group Buy in $USD / share\\n### Original post:\\nI am looking for a KnC Group buy with shares denominated in USD. Anyone seen one, could you point me that way?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m about to create one for a Saturn I\\'ll Let you know when it\\'s up.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Miner, Saturn\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 00:31:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY group buy and HOSTING in Poland EU - NO VAT - 69/300 shares sold\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m in for 12 shares in October6btc \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 04:50:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Limited batch - 2 left\\n### Original post:\\nBought 2,sent signed message to you in PM.Hope thats where I was supposed to send it.Thanks !!!!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nReceived. 50 stick purchase is set to go, hopefully friedcat starts contacting non-VIP resellers tomorrow. I\\'ve decided to extend the first group purchase at cost for another 30 chips, or until friedcat provides a payment address.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI must have missed the memo. How does one become a \"VIP reseller\"?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 07:31:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY group buy and HOSTING in Poland EU - NO VAT - 71/300 shares sold\\n### Original post:\\nWe will make order for 25 GH/s boards in about 2 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ndo you accept paypal payment (as a gift payment)if yesplease PM me the paypal account and 1 BTC = USD currency for paypal payments\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nnot good...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI see on the bitfury page, they are out of stock on 25GHs for august. that mean you can\\'t offer the *resend* of those units for august? Are you still even offering hosting shares for august? [update: U.S. site obviously also out of stock \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPayPal payment done for 1 share of UNIT #1 - August deliveryplease confirm my payment I think we must all move to \"UNIT #2 - October delivery\" with double shares...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOr just request refunds.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSo whats the plan now?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI am waiting for reply from insider @ bitfury project.Once I wlll get his response I will post update, patience, not everything is lost, we still got small chance to get our units in August.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'ve sent PM to all the investors about possible refund or possible moving your investment to buy unit with October delivery.the October unit price is 7500 Eur which is half of August price so we should be able to get quite the same ROI.Punin stated that he will open orders for 25 STARTER GH/s boards (currently not in shop) with October delivery so all investors please reply to PM as fast as possible so I can calculate everything once again and don\\'t miss the train and make that October order.NEW SHAREHOLDERS ARE STILL WELCOME\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi pajak666, can you clarify what item #4 means? Thank you...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI have one bitfury unit coming to my doors. Ordered when there was first small preorder with possible delivery to russia. means I will be fully aware of how to set up october unit very fast so we will loose no single minute for starting our mining farm\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI hope that our investors will see possible advantages that come with October order.1) we will get second batch of units, so all previous producer mistakes or bugs will be corrected by first wave of users who had trouble with their modules.2) if they will have some shipping problems or wrong estimated timeline they will be able to correct that in October batch3) unit price is cut down by 50% that is actually HUGE discount so we will be able to get the same or even better ROI.4) until October I should recieve unit ordered with metabank.ru (that one stated in google docs). If I will receive this actual group buy unit, I will be able to set it to work instantly. there will be no single day lost.5) by moving your shares to October order you will get 2x hashing power for the same amount of btc invested.I hope all of our investors will choose to stay with us! Remember KNC has still not shown working unit! Bitfury will deliver for sure:)\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOk, I understand. Are you considering selling shares to the group in that device as well? I\\'m in if so.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nplease put me to the October GB with double share thank you\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 25 GH/s boards, UNIT #1 - August delivery, UNIT #2 - October delivery, 25 STARTER GH/s boards, bitfury unit\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 11:12:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Overtime!!!- 51/50 reached\\n### Original post:\\nsent you another PM on my potential order. thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOk,1.98 BTC sent for 2 more Thanks again!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWill probably be putting in an order for another miner sometime today.Not 100% sure right now, though.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'ll be interested in 2. Will send my payment sometime tomorrow.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 11:48:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY group buy Singapore - NO VAT,free electricity+net 1btc to1.33GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nsave this post first\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nfor frequent asked qns\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nuse escrow, then you might have a good start on this =)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIf priced at 1.025 (for john\\'s fees) would you be interested in groupbuy?Asking John if he can close the escrow and cash out if the value of BTC increases to a point when amount collected/pledged is enough to get a miner.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nQs:1. So your miner from BitFury has not been bought yet? Each unit is divided into 300 shares which equals ~1.3 GH/s and 1 share is 1 BTC?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGot time let\\'s go lim kopi together.Maybe i can put my chillies at ur dorm for 4% charge?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nChillies = Jalapenos? How many?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n1. Yes unit hasn\\'t been bought yet.2. At opening yes divided into 300 shares and each share is 1BTC and is equal to ~1.3 GH/s but if the price of bitcoins rises and whatever is in the fund is enough to purchase the machine. I will close out the Groupbuy and the machine\\'s total hash power will be divided equally between the number of units which have been sold. So if I sold 3 shares and the price of bitcoins goes up by 100x. I will purchase the miner and each of the 3 sold shares will get 400/3 GH persecond\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFree bump and support for fellow Singaporean.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSupporting Singaporeans and college kids. NUS? or NTU?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nJust to ask, are you located in Europe? Because only ships to Europe...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nNot in Europe but will be shipping it to London (friend there) and having someone (family member works for an airline in Singapore) carry it back handcarry (and refund VAT if VAT applies)\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNUS here. You?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nClosing and issuing refund. A relative offered to buy and host it with me for 20% of running costs.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miner from BitFury, chillies, Jalapenos\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 15:28:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #16 Sold [Added to 6 TH/s Jupiter Pool] 18/30 left\\n### Original post:\\nBecause of dropping BTC/US exchange rates I am offering everyone in Jupiter #17 a refund if they request.-Or wait till exchange rate goes back to $100-Or offer 50 shares on Jupiter #17 at 2 BTC to pay for balance- Or refund everyone on Jupiter #17 and buy with Paypal with 30 shares at $240 eachthese are the investors \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi damn that\\'s a shame. I guess I\\'ll take the refund if everyone else wants to do that. Btc down to 68 USD\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nrefund sent, will stay in touch\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nKNC has stated that they will try to include in first day delivery, but nothing guaranteed.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 16:49:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy 1 (S/O) 2 (10 /40Left]AVAIL 1 KNC SATURN [200GHs Miner] Day 1 Deliver\\n### Original post:\\nJust transferred 1 share - Transaction ID & Receiving address sent in PM/Thanks for setting this up!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC SATURN\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 16:55:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #10 68/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01693878 ea. @ 14 units\\n### Original post:\\nWhen are you closing this one?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nyes same question as my funds are locked until 7-8pm tonight and I would like to get the 4 I mentioned earlier.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ndoesn\\'t matter because I\\'ve pre-ordered the units already. so when the total number of units begins to reach what I have pre-ordered, I will close it.we are nowhere near the ordered number yet.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nthank you. I am waiting on 3 btc from coinbase to clear. they said it should clear at 7pm eastern standard time. I have 1.5 coins on hand. I also want to thank as I set up a my wallet with blockchain due to this offer. I had used walletbit but they are going to close down on july 15th. I decided it is too fff\\'ing hot to run my gpus and now that the price is better for the sticks I am selling off my gpus.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n1rst order:mackstuart; 14; 14.23714285; order:mackstuart; 14; 14.23714285; order:mackstuart; 2; 2.35714285; order:mackstuart; 10; 10.27714285; total\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, gpus\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 18:39:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] GROUP BUY #3 ASICMINER ERUPTER USB MINER 0.94-0.99 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nZipTheRip;1; 1.04(remainder discussed and 0.065 pending); Tracking and insurance\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed. Thank you for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhere are you shipping from?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBismarck, ND\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDallasMiner; 3; 3.045; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nConfirmed and thank you for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nhahaha.. no shit? Im supposed to go to Mandan next Friday. But I don\\'t think I want to go into that district.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWhat time next Friday? PM me. If you order or not, maybe we could meet up somewhere.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m debating going. If I get in that BNSF seniority district it might be tough getting out and I would lose any seniority. I\\'m originally from Idaho, and Bismark/Mandan makes Idaho look like a tropical vacation In the winter. Sorry if I derailed your group buy.I\\'ll Have a order on Monday as soon as my coinbase transfer comes in of BTC31. I usually buy from Canary, but with the kickbacks you offer I decided to at least give you a look and make up my mind on whom to go with.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI bought from canary once. now twice with sonic. both great experience!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAppreciate the reassuring thumbs up you gave both. I have purchased 3 times from Canary 33 total usb asics, But business is business if I can get a better deal with another reputable group buy coordinator then it\\'s atleast worth a look. Im encouraged that other buyers give both thumbs up.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 21:41:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.384 BTC-GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA + Preliminary board designed - 244 sold\\n### Original post:\\nLuckoAny news from design of bfl labs board?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes. Yesterday board designer returned to work... I left him some time to catch up on all his work related things and we did speak today and he promised that he will start tomorrow on the board again... So I guess pictures should be close...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDon\\'t forget that you don\\'t automatically get sample chips. Josh left a message on one of the threads mentioning that you have to place a (free) follow up order for sample chips separately after placing a chip order.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPut me down for 8 chips I am just waiting to hear back from Lucko about 6 chip credits (which I may have taken care of myself) and how to pay for the first 50% via paypal. If paypal isn\\'t preferred I can always get coins from Coinbase but I will have to wait 4-5 days for them. edit: I was just reading that there are paypal issues so let me know if another method would be preferred. Like I said above I can always use Coinbase.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'m looking but it looks like it will be hard to find 6... Usually it is 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64... So I\\'m looking and sending PM to all I can find... Don\\'t worry I will include you in this batch... Paypal has now some additional fees since I need to get money off it and change it to BTC but you can use it...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYes I know. I\\'m looking on a way to get replay confirming samples... And you need to contact sells as far as I understood this MSG...If anyone know any direct phone number that would help...EDIT: I don\\'t see any option of a follow-up order...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIf anyone is interested... looks like we are on the right track... More power and 8 chips But it looks like we will need to add more capacitors... Hm... maybe not even that much more power just more capacitors... Need to find a better picture...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYou mean to make board with 16 chips on board? Or 8 chip?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOkay thanks if there are any additional fees for using paypal just let me know and I will include them in the payment. I put a bid in for some credits on bitmit but we will see. Just send me a pm and let me know how and where to send you the first payment, if we can\\'t find any chip credits then I\\'ll owe you a little more money. I\\'m willing to buy 8, it still saves me some money, if that happens I\\'ll just give the extra 2 to you.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIt looks like it is not only my problem but BFL problem again...Anthony is not longer with us, which is why the sample chips have languished. I just corrected this problem today and we have a new person on it... he should be getting the sample chips taken care of over the next couple days.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nKISS (keep it simple stupid)If we had time I would do 16 chips but we have 100 days. It would be grate if the first board would work. So that why we are doing it simple. BFL board and adding power on it. If there will be a better board out there will be used but for now we are going this way. If you look at the long board(BFL single)and Jalapeno that BFL realised...You see that you have more or less the same components but more capacitors... On our board we have planed 8 but I think we need to change that to 10 or more seeing this... It looks like power usage spikes a lot...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nlucko why did not copy bfl labs board???\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSorry what? You probably misunderstand that. It will be close but not 100% same... Why. We need board done in 100 days with who know how long without sample chips. Not a lot time to experiment... KISSPictures are there just to show that we are probably going the right direction... This is not the boardEDIT: Sorry... misread what you wrote... Just coping a board will not do. From what I read even with 2 chips and firmware 1.2.5 and some \"overclocking\" some have overheating issues on 1V power supply... We also plan to add basic overclocking and overvolting in...EDIT2: This overheating is more or less on older models of board but still... New models(one that was released) should support 4 chips, even 6 if there is no issues with them spiking power usage...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: bfl labs board, sample chips, 8 chips, capacitors, BFL single, Jalapeno\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 21:48:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #16 Sold [Added to 6 TH/s Jupiter Pool] 17/30 left\\n### Original post:\\nanon investor, 4 share13 shares left\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-10 22:08:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #16 Sold [Added to 6 TH/s Jupiter Pool] 13/30 left\\n### Original post:\\n3 shares please\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDone, added to OP and spreadsheetPlease send email and Skype handleWelcome\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 01:37:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #10 532/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01693878 ea. @ 14 units\\n### Original post:\\npayment sent to friedcat a few hours ago.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDelivery?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nclosed? but title is open.....damnit i guess #11 it is\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nsince my order is right below the \"above ordered with friedcat,\" does that mean I won\\'t get mine in the first shipment? thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThis groupbuy is closed...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLHB; 10; 10.27714285; message sentthis is my second order, first delivered within 1 week!!thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 08:36:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters\\n### Original post:\\nUK - need 8 units - I would join you\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI am in the UK and would be interested in taking 6 units. P&P, tracked, insured, next-day signed-for, with tracking ID supplied privately on the day of shipping please.I will hold this offer open until Friday 5th July 22:00BST during which time I hope that some timings for this buy, or if it\\'s going ahead at all, might be known by then please.I would have to buy in a lot of the BTC to fund this, and I\\'m also a newb round these parts (but been GPU mining and following BTC as a hobby for 3 months).Because of this I would like to ask if you would accept a UK-UK bank transfer in GBP equivalent.This would be easier for me, no exchanges/fee\\'s or middle-men for either of us, and very secure for you it would be non-reversible just like BTC itself.This would be at a benchmark conversation rate, open to further discussion.If this is not acceptable no offence will be taken, I will buy up BTC accordingly and my offer still stands.As per your offer \"payment doesn\\'t need to be made before hand\" I would wish to make payment at a time you can publically state that you have the units in hand and ready to ship next-day following your receipt of confirmed payment. I look forward to hearing from you a\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat, so about 16 units to go @johncabat, If this buy receives enough interest and goes ahead, I\\'ll make a payment from my own funds for the 50, I wont request payment until YXT confirms he has shipped, and I have a tracking number. This way I can quickly organise shipping for the day I receive them (Yes, escrow is fine for the nervous). If you\\'d prefer to wait until they are in my hands, this is fine but you\\'ll run a risk of a small delay or someone else buying them. With regards to accepting GBP, I can do this as well but I\\'d prefer Bitcoin, as it means I\\'ve then got to exchange it on myself.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi OutCast, Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, fair point about the payment timing and not wanting to miss out. I agree that when you have evidence that YXT has shipped would be a good time to pay.Thank you. As you say that BTC is definitely your preference I will endeavour to pay in full with BTC. I\\'ll start buying some up this week, but not the full amount until we know this has the big full green light. It\\'s just a shame I\\'m not sat on a nice pot of BTC, the only thing making me nervous is the as yet unknown timings of things and me being sure I can sort the fiat<->BTC quick enough. So I could be safe in the knowledge that if I\\'m a coin or two short at the last minute, I would make sure you get 100% of what I owe one way or another. For your inconvenience and fee\\'s in having to handle GBP if necessary I offer a goodwill +7.5% on any GBP part above the agreed exchange rate.I\\'ll just cross my fingers and sit back now for the week, hope you get the additional interest to go ahead.I came here having already looked around at my options to get hold of some of these sticks to the UK. Everything else I saw had issues with either pricing, risk, availability or expensive international P&P. \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi,I am curious as whether you really see any ROI with these. At least within the first 6 months. Or are you planning for ROI in lifetime.The problem is that even if you achieve ROI, after that (in about 6 months time), then it will mine virtually nothing, given the ASIC juggernauts that will be on the market at that time.The big question, as always, is on delivery of the ASIC counter parts. Any delay on them is a gain for what\\'s available now.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThe magic 8 ball says \"try again later\"...Sorry, jokes aside, I really have no idea, and although you do raise a very valid point, I\\'m personally looking to replace a room full of loud and hot graphics cards, for me they\\'re quite ideal even if they do take 6 months to a year to break even.*edit* Can we try to keep this on topic, please only post if you\\'re from the UK and are interested. Cheers guys\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMight be a good idea to update the OP to say Hurry - only 16 units left\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'m interested in purchasing 2\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI provided the wrong tracking# to OutCast3k sorryHe should get the miners today\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters, graphics cards\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 09:34:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY group buy and HOSTING in Poland EU - NO VAT - 239/300 shares sold\\n### Original post:\\nI paid 2BTC for my \"4\" reserved have total 6 shares now...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 09:48:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters (payment sent)\\n### Original post:\\nI may take a few more once I have determined how many my raspberry Pi will support but I will stick with the 4 extra at present. May bump it to 8 or 9 depends on hub space too.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'d be grateful for first refusal on another 6 units if you make a batch 2.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'d be interested in 2 in batch 2.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nme too - for 2 batch two please\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAdd me a total of 5 please; 4 + 1.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUpdated the list of interest above.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nyxt has shipped batch #1 guys. fingers crossed we\\'ll get it before the weekend, I\\'ll start preparing all the packages tomorrow morning so they\\'re ready.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGreat news!Could you guess on a time line from now to you getting them shipped back out to the buy members?Any idea what kind priority service YXT uses inbound to you? 2-day, 5-day etc...Sorry, I don\\'t mean to hassle or anything, it\\'s just the excitement of knowing they\\'re so close\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHey - no problem.Last time I ordered from YXT it took about 3-4 business days (if I remember correctly). I suspect it\\'ll be similar, currently the tracking number ins\\'t showing up in the system, but he did say it was collected 5 minutes ago... Once its updated and I have an idea I\\'ll let you all know.I doubt i\\'ll receive it tomorrow?? but if I do, all I need to do is print everyones labels. (i\\'ll do it either tonight or in the morning regardless so they are ready)\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThe people who\\'ve shown solid interest (in a second batch) are as followeduser / unitsm14yen - 9mkjm - 2jml - 5IYFTech - 6nottm28 - 4DennisD7 - 5qukkM - 4johncabat - 6elpenguin - 2hotwired007 - 2acc85 - 2= 47 unitsSo there are still a few more units to go, but we\\'re not too far off the target of 50.I\\'m not collecting payment, or am I going commit to a second group buy just yet. I want to I see some more interest. Give it another day maybe two and I\\'m sure it\\'ll all be clear.*edit* I\\'ve updated the list above with everyone requests (wow filling up quickly)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters, raspberry Pi, hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-04-27 16:50:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy#1] Avalon ASICs CHIPS! Using JohnK as escrow! CLOSED!!!\\n### Original post:\\nI have 20.1 BTC worth of chips available from this order that I\\'m looking to unload\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust noticed that according to the calculator we have 7.27 chips left for 0.6162365 BTC. (we charged 0.035BTC shipping per person hoping for 60 people in total, but got 78 orders in, thus the balance) I\\'ve asked dancrn if he wants that partial order seeing that he has sent 1.1BTC in extra.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\natcsecure please put me down for 2BTC ... really want in on this.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou guys will have to deal with your own reshipping at this point as we\\'re only sending to him directly to ease the headache. (if 20.1BTC was split to 2BTC lots we\\'ll have to ship ten times for example)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSmart to resell eh? Congrats everyone! We did it! Those who did missed out on this group buy, do not worry I will be starting up another one shortly. Group Buy #2 will get the 200BTC+ from Ataxx pretty much today or tomorrow and my remaining ~40 from my RL guys. I will be start taking your individual shipping addresses for this order. We will do it email style so it will be much easier for me to keep track. Depending where you are located in the world I will do my best to give you an estimate for the shipping based on how many chips you bought. Also remember how much BTC you contributed to the group and how fast you sent the BTC to escrow will be weighted in when I do shipping etc. That is why I am making a list now.Without further a due please email the following to for Address please include as much detail as possible and make it accurate as much as Name:Address:Phone Number:Email:Other Info:\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLOL mutex \\'s order was first according to blockchain. He got his order in and purplesquid\\'s was too late. I\\'ll update the sheet now.purplesquid, please provide a return address.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI feel unlucky now But anyway if there is a cancellation for 20 chips i\\'m inTIAEDIT: maybe i can help in PCB assembly though\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThere\\'s 7.27 chips left.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nDamn! Well, I\\'ll take whatever the balance is (7ish chips) Sent the orginal funds minus the last bit necessary to: Thanks anyway guys!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nhow much BTC is left though? I though we were full? Where are the extra BTC going?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nConfirmed ,thanks!I\\'m returning 1.1 to dan here:And returning 5.8947135 to purplesquid. Whew. Orders in now - will confirm here when done.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThe extra was from the shipping fees we charged everyone (0.035BTC per person). There\\'s 79 here from the anticipated 60 (0.035 x 60), so we actually got the extra there. I will pay to Avalon and see how\\'s the blockchain fee goes, and we can decide what to do with the rest.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nLet\\'s get this order in asap!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nOk the question now is: Where can i get 20 chips for my experiments?Are there any AVALON chip orders availablehelp plz !I would loan for BTC but no one want\\'s to lend me...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYes, cracking open the safe as I say this! Order is already in a couple hours ago so I\\'ll just pay now*.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'m starting up another group buy right now.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI \\'m here but i\\' m looking to buy 2 BTC. Unfortunately the limit for VirWox is 60 Euros so i must wait.Are there any options to buy them with VISA card?help a newbee plz\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSent you the order confirmation from Avalon - funds are being sent as I type this through my sterile escrow netbook. Sorry for the delay - apparently we had 105 outputs.. The tx: via blockchain.info - electrum crashes on me for so much outputs.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWe\\'re order #10129 .\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n@ragingazn628 I\\'ve sent you a PM\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAwesome - everything is set. OP, please expect the package soon.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nHmmmm PM me let\\'s talk.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSOON XD at least 9-10 weeks.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI am glad that user \\'mutex\\' was quick enough to join the party at the last moment. combine our (\\'hardlock\\' + \\'mutex\\' ) orders to be delivered to the same address (the address pointed by \\'mutex\\'). Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nAt least i have 0.41 BTC. Tomorrow the limit is 180Euros so i can send the 1.5 BTC i prommised even to the second batch order.This time i will not missed the next train Anybody interested in for my web site?\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nNICE work JOHNK.... That will do.... that will do.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nyes I can confirm but please send me your info via that email too for verification purposes etc.Alright guys. I will be start taking your individual shipping addresses for this order. We will do it email style so it will be much easier for me to keep track. Depending where you are located in the world I will do my best to give you an estimate for the shipping based on how many chips you bought. Also remember how much BTC you contributed to the group and how fast you sent the BTC to escrow will be weighted in when I do ship\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs CHIPS\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 13:54:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] [ASIC miner] [Block Erupter USB] [Australia] [Low Shipping Cost]\\n### Original post:\\nHey leo, can you put me down for 2 please.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPut me down for 2 as well. Don\\'t care colours.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPut me down for 4 please. Prefer Black\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'d love 2 as well, black preferred but not really a big deal.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'d like 3... 1x white, 1x yellow, 1x redThanks...BTC\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'d like 5 confirmed may take a couple more if it gets the order out quicker.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHave you pre ordered these with friedcat as I believe there is limited stock only for resellers and new orders are being suspended until further notice...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nsoutherngentuk makes a good point that people are unlikely to send you BTC with no assurance or evidence you can even get the hardware to begin with.A group buy in Aus would be great though it cost me 1 BTC in shipping alone to get some from the USA. USA<->AUS postal services are ludicrously expensive.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIs this buy still on? Or are we waiting for the 10th to see what BTCGuild are doing?edit:I am definitely in for 2 units, maybe three.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAny more news on this, i\\'m still keen.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nNEWS UPDATE:I have placed the order and they are on the way. I will start shipping on July the 23rd. I will PM everyone with a unique address. Can you please reply PM with your shipping address?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHow many did you buy? Could I still order some from you?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nif you placed your order, it should not take almost 2 weeks to receive it... so, not sure what you\\'re up to...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n300. Yes.Correct - it should take one week. I\\'m in WA visiting family and having a holiday until the 22nd. It\\'s unfortunate timing - I\\'m sorry.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nhijust to confirm is it 0.99 + 0.05 BTC eachI\\'d like 10 Block Erupters so is 10.4 BTC correct?Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nNo, you missed a decimal place in there. 10 * 0.99 + 0.05 = 9.95 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nCan you please put me down for 10.How and when do I pay?I will have BTC tomorrow for paymentThanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASIC miner, Block Erupter USB, Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 14:32:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #16 Sold [Added to 6.4 TH/s Jupiter Pool] 4/30 left\\n### Original post:\\nIsn\\'t it 3 shares left?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ll take one more if I can send the 2.62 BTC in the morning. I transferred it from an exchange into my wallet but it\\'s still unconfirmed and I can\\'t stay up any longer.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n2 more shares on #17 @ 2.6, tx already had 1 on #16, so 2 more on #17 please Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n2 more shares:Code:ID: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ni\\'ll take 1 more share for miner #17\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nboss, this is for another share of miner #17tx id: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n1 share please 2.6BTCTX ID = \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\npayment done for \"1\" share please 2.6BTC ( I have 1 share before, total 2 shares now...)TX ID = \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAll added to OP and spreadsheetJupiter 17 purchased :-)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 15:54:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN Group buy] 1000 pcs USB Erupters - EU/Int - price 0.89BTC - 109 to go\\n### Original post:\\nWe are heading forward now\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCount me in for 5 pieces. Will send BTC and signed message the moment I post this.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nReceived\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 21:27:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: FS 100GH/S Of my Jupiter. Day 1\\n### Original post:\\nyou are welcome\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust to clarify. You are charging $36 per Gigahash?He or she would be paying 51% of hardware cost, for 25% of output?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nbecause vat and shipping the price of jupiter is8830 dollars.so i think that price is value for moneyi have very early order number day one!if have the money buy or not ,leave itOf course escort fees is pay by the buyer\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFor sell 100GH/s of my Jupiter miner.day 1 ,price is 3500 dollars or that value at bitcoin value.I will sent every week at the buyer, mining btc of his 100ghz/sec part of jupiter.Cost of electricity will be 250W with price 0.10-0.12 euro per kwh(1000w is jupiter so 100ghz/s will be 250w)the hosting will be at greece.will be mining 24/7.Escort fees pay by the buyer\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 22:34:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy 1 (S/O) 2 (7 /40Left]AVAIL 1 KNC SATURN [200GHs Miner] Day 1 Deliver\\n### Original post:\\nbuy 1 share send btc allready\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCharles,Please add 1 more share for me (I already had 1),1 share @ 1.75 btc tx \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nJust bought 1 share via Paypal Cheers.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOkay just 4 more Shares left!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC SATURN\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-03 01:30:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: CLOSED [Group Buy Batch ONE] ASICMiner Block Erupter USB INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\n not post any more bitcoins to the payment address they will be in limbo.Good news though, a second International Group Buy is starting at;- to everyone who has helped made this group buy a is a group buy for Bitfountain Block Erupter USB devices. If you have found your way here you probably already know what they are and what they do. Just in case you need a refresher though you can find the details here;- might already know who I am as well but if not you can visit my website at;- you already know everything you feel you need to know and just want to get on with itgo here;- How much are they at the moment?A: 2.6 BTC all included from here.Q: Why is this website so basic?A: I am not very good at making things look nice and the basic look is better than anything I could manage.Q: What are the terms?A: Click the order link above and they are there, by submitting an order agree to them.Q: Do you need my email and postal address?A: Yes.Q: Why are you more expensave then some other group buys?A: I intend to do this right. This includes import/export charges and taxes.Q: Will you help me evade my local customs/taxes?A: No.Q: Can I see other\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n115 Units, Just finished processing the payments, If you use your confirmation link you should now see no bitcoins in your account but a message underneath your address something like;-Confirmed: 2 units.Fun Facts;-1 person cut it so fine that there were only 2 confirmations on their transfer.1 person stiffed me for .1 bitcoin!!!!!! You know who you are, you will be hearing from me .I have not got a payment address from Friedcat yet but I have all of the bitcoins ready to go.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThey are on their way to me!!Looks like the shipment will be broken up into smaller units, first payed will be first shipped as was mentioned in the terms. Neil\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou mean you are getting them in smaller shipments?andDoes this mean i will be one of the last to get mine? since i was one of the later ones to get my payment in\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNice! Do you have a tracking code? Just for fun....intron\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYep, first one is in Hong Kong already.Yep, you snooze your last :pIn other news;-* Labels are printed.* About 40% of the customs forms done.* Post Shop did not have enough of the boxes I wanted so the rest should be in today.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIf the first ones come in can you please take a pic... I am really happy i am going to have these and not specially for mining but for novillity most btw do we get the cool colored ones or the ones with the simple heatsinks on?and nice job on the work you did already good to see you preparing so fast Specially on customs papers (I hope belgium is not going to give any troubles)\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWill do, they will be labeled \"Miner Porn\".Glad I am not the only one that thinks in 10-15 years these will be museum pieces.They are the colored ones. There is no way of knowing what color they are until they are taken out of the packages though so you get what you get.Talking about customs, I am shipping at least one unit to every continent on the planet (excluding Antarctica, I hear their internet is not stable enough for mining though). I hope everything goes according to plan but with the amount of packages I am shipping experience tells me that it won\\'t.Anyway, if need to buy more help me out with the seccond group buy ( ). I am hoping that I will be able to buy a few for myself in that lot .Neil\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nDon\\'t worry lads. I have a feeling I am one of the last few to receive. Grrr.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'ll be near the back of the queue too, I only paid the day before it closed.Work mate however will be at the front!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOne guy posted his new setup: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWhere can I get some of those fan\\'s?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSearch amazon for Arctic Breeze\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThose look sweet!If only I had the dough and the balls to buy all 30+ of em beauties.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThe dough and lack of brain cells, you mean? (Yes, I\\'ve ordered 2, but that\\'s for reasons other than straight mining!)\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI really want to show ppl these and explain about BTC without the need of a big mining rig or to inv ppl over to see.Just easy to take allong to some friend who you want to explain btc to.and also cause they look cool\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWhat he said...\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nAmazon\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nIn New Zealand they have a local distributor.Altech ComputersUnit 3. 99 Carbine Road Mt. Wellington1060 AucklandNew \\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThe first 50 are in New Zealand now with customs. The rest have not left ASICMiner yet .I would love to be a fly on the wall while these customs dudes try to work out WTF they are.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThanks for the update.I\\'ve just created my MinePeon SD card image and will be getting\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfountain Block Erupter USB, Arctic Breeze\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 23:28:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: OPEN [Group Buy Batch THREE] ASICMiner Block Erupter USB INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\n old group buys are closed and the threads are here;-Group Buy One Buy Two is a group buy for Bitfountain Block Erupter USB devices. If you have found your way here you probably already know what they are and what they do. Just in case you need a refresher though you can find the details here;- might already know who I am as well but if not you can visit my website at;- you already know everything you feel you need to know and just want to get on with itgo here;- How much are they at the moment?A: 2.6 BTC all included from here.Q: Why is this website so basic?A: I am not very good at making things look nice and the basic look is better than anything I could manage.Q: What are the terms?A: Click the order link above and they are there, by submitting an order agree to them.Q: Do you need my email and postal address?A: Yes.Q: Why are you more expensave then some other group buys?A: I intend to do this right. This includes import/export charges and taxes.Q: Will you help me evade my local customs/taxes?A: No.Q: Can I see other peoples usernames and what they have spent?A: No, that is between them and I.Q: What happens if you dont get the minim\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSent a PM regarding payment query. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nUpdate from the other group buys;-Group buy 1 has completed and all miners have been shippedGroup Buy 2 is waiting on tracking/order confirmation from FriedcatNeil\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nstill open? are you guys in the US.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYep, still open. Upto 8 of the needed 50 top make an order.I am not in the US, I am in New Zealand.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI have bad news sorry, due to things out of my control I am going to have to close this group buy sorry.Can everyone involved please reply to your order email with a refund address so I can send your coins back .I may be running group buys again, I just cannot afford to do this one sorry, read this for a full explanation as to why;-\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI have had several people ask me not to close this so I have relented.Lets say I have suspended it until I can work something out. I have had a few offers from organisations that migh be able to help me out moving bitcoins around and I will look into them.If you wish to get a refund though just ask, I have never had a no refund policy anyway.Neil\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSo if Mtgox is giving you problems, wouldn\\'t it be safer to allow buyers use fiat to buy the block eruptors? You get your money in fiat which in the end, you can transfer it to mtgox and trade it for BTC and pay friedcat to get more stock.In the end, miners would be disposing of their fiat by buying miners which generates more BTC which is what I do when I purchase FPGA boards.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI would love to buy these and switch from gpu to asic but honestly, the price is just too high, I would buy 10 of these today around the $50 mark though if your willing.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThats not a bad idea, it would be a lot more work but it is something I will look into.Your joking right? I buy something and then sell it to your for a forth of what I paied? Do I get to charge shipping on top of that .Neil\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWell, Friedcat dropped the price by half, so it\\'d only be half instead of a quarter!Speaking of which, you\\'ll need to work out what to do with order in this batch, offer a refund of half paid or double your order with ASICMINER and provide double to people who have already ordered?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYeah, I am thinking that I just double everyone\\'s order. I have not brought that up with anyone yet because I am still trying to sort out a way to turn BTC into NZD so I can pay the shipping, customs, tax etc..So far I am trying to get hold of someone at bitcurex (I have one of their cards, but it seems no one is home) and I am also doing a bitstamp transfer while getting approved for NZD transactions from ZipBit (I am not sitting idle).In the meantime I have sent a few requests to MtGox to give me back my $3,000 USD so I can buy bitcoin and transfer off their exchange but it is strangely quite over there .Neil\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPlease let me know when you are starting the groupbuy.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'m in again. First group buy transaction was very smooth. Hoping that you will double the order.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\ni am up for some of this action. When is the second group buy? also what is the new price given the 50% discount fried cat has served up!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nLooks like this group buy is closing due to mt.gox problems: \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nAny updates on this? Mt.Gox started withdrawals again so...\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI am keen to buy 3 units at the revised price.Can you please PM me when your ready to go?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAny progress with your MtGox transaction? The two weeks should be over by now, assuming of course that MtGox honours their statement.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nHi All,I have reopend f\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfountain Block Erupter USB, FPGA boards, ASICMINER\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 03:47:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL ASIC Chips] $59/chip. Batch #1 has been purchased. 24 chips still available\\n### Original post:\\n24 chips from batch 1 still available at $59 until Friday.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nin for 8 chips @ $59 (1/2 paid) 2.528 BTC from \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 04:22:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL ASIC Chips] $59/chip. Batch #1 has been purchased. 16 chips still available\\n### Original post:\\nReceived, 16 chips left in batch 1. Please note that batch 1 was ordered from BFL on July 3rd. I am offering the remaining chips for $59/chip for 24 more hours, after which I will be opening batch 2.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 06:17:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] GROUP BUY #3 ASICMINER ERUPTER USB MINER 0.92-0.99 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\ndellstreakone; 28; 27.555\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhy don\\'t you make it 30 to get free shipping and a better price? just a suggestion! I am tempted to get more myself but haven\\'t figured out a way to handle them all as a rig.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyou are right, but i dont have enough btc to order more . I will contact sonic later.Tks\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nsilentsonicboom are those quantity price breaks cumulative? for example if we order 30 @ .97 and next time we order 30 could we have the .95 btc price (50-69 pcs) without the express and usb miner. i\\'m not talking about getting retroactive discounts for previous orders but it would be nice to know that the more you order the better the price is.it would do great for customers to remain loyal since there are several GBs going on and you still do well with the 1000pc discount\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNo. Not at this time. Good suggestion.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThank you confirmed for 28+2 more = 30.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI will be starting a new group buy soon with even lower prices to be competitive with other group buys\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nStubie paid 1.065 for 1 block erupter.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nConfirmed. Thank you.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, block erupter\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 14:34:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - 3 units ordered - 1btc= 3 GH/s - 82% / 800 TH sold\\n### Original post:\\nJust to be clear, all three units are for October delivery, right?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nright, October delivery\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 16:20:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 230+ ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\nall orders have been updated and posted on OP...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ni just got 2 more bit coins can i add to my previous order?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI got mine at $77ish after fees.. it cleared my bank yesterday.. just waiting on it to hit my coinbase acct. I will be pissed if it gets cancelled.. It would cost me an additional $750 to buy now\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMine in coinbase was cancelled.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSent you a message. Let me know when you get itthanks\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLevel 2 takes 30 days though.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWell you have to be a pretty frequent user. If not, they will stall you. I signed up in 30 seconds.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nDomrada; 20; 19.1564706; \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCool...... Alright with all that said, let me get back on topic here............. Canary, I just received the 40 from group 10 and I will test them as soon as possible. Thanks for the quick ship buddy. You are the man as always. I will try to make a purchase for 10-15 on this group thread before midnight CST. God Bless Brother.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nbeercoin; 5; 4.94; N;\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 17:52:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #17 Sold [Added to 6.8 TH/s Jupiter Pool]\\n### Original post:\\n4 shares for Jupiter #18txid: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 18:08:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.335 BTC-GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA + Preliminary board designed - 252 sold\\n### Original post:\\nAwesome work - will watch you!Our group bought too 128 chips and we will forward them to you if your project will be successfull. Maybe when you will make a final board in this time frame, you can send BFL a working one Will you accept too PCB & assembling orders outside your chip groupbuy?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes but at higher price... See first post.BTW did you had any luck with sample chips?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIt looks like something at BFL really changed. Got some answers from them that I was waiting for a long time but still no conformations on sampels chips. But things looking up...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI have enough vouchers to secure a 100 chip batch. If a board assembly/prototype is available soon, I would be interested in throwing up to 100 chips into this. I will keep watching this thread closely for future developments. If burnin or BKKCoins can beat BFL to their own game, they will surely reap the benefits from an army of pissed off customers.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHmmm - think I have read all but can`t find the infos where PCB`s & assembling can be ordered at higher prices.Got too till now no sample chips and no info about it - saw Josh`s post only.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLets hope this is not BS...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHave you requested your samples? I just send them a email to - don`t know if it is essential to get them... have a look:\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 128 chips, PCB, assembling, sample chips, 100 chip batch, board assembly/prototype\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 18:25:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy 1 (S/O) 2 (2 /40Left]AVAIL 1 KNC SATURN [200GHs Miner] Day 1 Deliver\\n### Original post:\\nAll shares are filled for Group Buy 1 and 2. No more Day 1 Shipment group shares are available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGreat to see you sold out all your day 1 shares mate.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks! The shares started flying off the shelf once I updated more often.. hahaIf anyone else besides minerpumpkin sees their names missing or shares missing, please let me know. Give me til tomorrow though. I will be updating the information when I return home.Thanks for joining!Let\\'s all cross our fingers and hope we get the delivery on time!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI bought 2 shares (separately) but only 1 is listed on the Google spreadsheet.Also, please correct username to matt4054Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI bought 1 share via Paypal, you asked me confirmation via pm.thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFYI: I didn\\'t get to finish the spreadsheet last night but I did update your shares.Charles\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC SATURN\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-04-16 02:45:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASICs Batch #4 (Planning)\\n### Original post:\\nOkay 1BTC. Sounds like a good deal to me. What about the logistics?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m in for 5 BTC, but yes, need to know how this will work logistically\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhat do you mean by that? What you put in for the initial investment is what you get monthly. If you put in 5/75 you will get 5/75 of X BTC mined monthly.People who are interested:17 BTC - Me10 BTC - rttnpig1 BTC -Luckybit5 BTC - dmo580Total:33/75 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIt\\'s too early to raise this thread as Avalon still not officially announce it.How do you know the price of batch #4 is still 75BTC?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust lookin\\' for participants. Worst case scenario it will be more than 75BTC, let\\'s say 100 then we already have people... or it won\\'t be announced at all. Nothing to lose.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCount me in 2 btc\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPeople who are interested:17 BTC - Me10 BTC - rttnpig1 BTC -Luckybit5 BTC - dmo5802 BTC - dazzleTotal:35/75 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ni\\'m in with 2 BTC too\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nRead this before even thinking about sending this guy anything.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI thought the name looked familiar but wasn\\'t sure. I do frequent Anandtech and HardForums. Yeah I would just shut the thread down at this point.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nNo harm was done. I didn\\'t scam anyone. It was a miscomunication. Everything was fixed. I\\'ve got nothing to hide\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHow can you be expected to host a group buy when you\\'re not sure how to check a wallet? bite off more than you can chew. You never know what some of the forum members will do if you piss them off\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nthat OP looks quite familiar.I wish people wouldn\\'t copy me word for word like that...I know, it was a good idea. But still... I hope no one got scammed...My thread: No offense ragingazn628, I was not calling you a scammer, more annoyed you kind of copied my post. Everyone should do their own due diligence when investing with forum members.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'ve been using blockchain all this time. I\\'ll be sure not to piss anyone off\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nNice plan, but would be better to wait and see what Avalon does - as Darklore said - there will not be Avalon Batch #4 and that info is directly from Avalon.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSeems by now, Avalon miners are having a large percentage of whole computation power. If still no other competitior jump in, it will be highly possibility that they will not produce batch #4.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI\\'m in 40 btc if this is going to be released\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nWhy would they stop making them? They have the production lines etc. paid for - they might as well keep making them as long as there are people willing to pay. They might have to reduce the price per unit a bit or something in the future, due to the lower return as the difficulty continues to ramp up or if we get new competition (hopefully!).IMO the only thing would be is if they decided to stop production for a while to build a second generation - like a different technology node for the ASICs or tweaks for speed or power improvements. But if anything they can work on that concurrently while continuing to ship.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYou do know there\\'s not too many people working there right? I\\'m sure everybody there is doing 2 or 3 jobs unlike BFL where they\\'re doing 0.2 or 0.3 jobs per person\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nPeople who are interested:17 BTC - Me10 BTC - rttnpig1 BTC -Luckybit5 BTC - dmo5802 BTC - dazzle2 BTC - rammy2k240 BTC - Rallye2 BTC - haaningCurrently have enough for at least 1 Avalon! Going for 2 now!Total:79/75 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nPeople who are interested:17 BTC - Me10 BTC - rttnpig1 BTC -Luckybit5 BTC - dmo5802 BTC - dazzle2 BTC - rammy2k240 BTC - Rallye2 BTC - haaningCurrently have enough for at least 1 Avalon! Going for 2 now!Total:79/75 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nAre you a newcomer to Cryptocurreny? Don\\'t have enough BTC to pre-order an Asics Machine? Don\\'t like taking such a huge risk?Well... I have been in the bitcoin game but recently cashed out when it was $94/BTC. I only have 17 coins left. Assuming there will be another Batch for Avalon, I am looking for people to chip in. I will personally use my remaining 17 coins for this batch. I am looking for people similar to my situation (not enough BTC or don\\'t want to take such a big risk).Read the following terms carefully before investing with me. You are basically buying a piece of an Avalon ASIC that I will host myself for a small fee.Why you should trust me? I have been around these forums and have a good standing with the community. I have traded over $15,000 worth of bitcoins (I can provide proof). With newer technology (ASICs) my graphics card miners don\\'t seem to put a dent in the harder difficulty and I can no longer afford to rebuy my sold bitcoins to have enough for an ASICs machine so I\\'m sure most people are on the same will be payed monthly to the Bitcoin address you send your original investment with. (Make sure you can both send and receive Bi\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASICs, graphics card miners\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 20:37:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN Group buy] 1000 pcs USB Erupters - EU/Int - price 0.89BTC - 85 to go\\n### Original post:\\nBitcoin gone up :/, not good for those not having bitcoins, but still a bargain and cheapScratch that, its going back down, was just a small bubble\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHello,Since the order, how long will it until you send the usb?thanks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI am interested in 5 USBs. Do you have a reputation or trust thread?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAll questions answered, pm sent. Bring it on\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSomeone asked me over chat for shipping to Pakistan. For some reason, the post office doesnt want to send to that part of the world, so no can do\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAnd we have one more 84 to go\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nreserve 20 for me!sending payment soon\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI will take 10. Payment will be sent ASAP.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m interested in this, I MAY buy one to try. Btw, I have 2 HD7850\\'s and they are both pullin 390mh/s, but thats okay, I has 2 golden clockers.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupters, USBs, HD7850\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 21:14:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.3 BTC-GB BTC,PayPal,SEPA+Preliminary board designed-252 sold,52/100 batch\\n### Original post:\\nEDIT: But if you end up ordering boards for 128 chips we can talk discaunts\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHello!I need 10chips, i got cupons from my 2 jalapenos and i live in Argentina....how much have to transfer to you via PayPal to do a full payment (10 chips + oficial post shipment with traking...avoid UPS/DHL/etc + PayPal Fee)?Regards\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi!What do you mean by oficial post shipment? National postal office? I was planing to use TNT... but this probably is UPS/DHL/etc... Will you be buying just chips?You need 6 exstra credits but you are in luck. I had a donation of 20 credits today so you can get 6 for free. But you can donate something to the donator...Paypal fee is 6,5%. Paypal takes 4% when transferring and then it exchanges all into when I take it off and then I need to transfer it back to $ and put it on Bitstemp and there I have 0,5% fee... So if you don\\'t have $ in Argentina you can send in ... It will make no difference to you but I can give you less fee...Yes I did the same but also used some other and contact form on webpage) just to be sure after getting no response...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi,i have twi questions ... maybee i missed the specific answers in the threadwhich assembler will work on the PCB? Any commitment?which assembler will get the sample chips ?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPCB will be our make based in BFL board... We had some problems with sickness but we are all back to normal.This company will make and assemble boards get sample chips...I will be away tomorrow. I\\'m taking family in spa... So I will probably not answering much to questions...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: boards for 128 chips, jalapenos, PCB\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 21:52:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BFL ASIC Chips $59/chip. Batch 1 purchased July 3rd. 16 still available\\n### Original post:\\nPaid in full for 16 - tx: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks, local cash buyer dropped out so there are 20 chips from batch 1 up for grabs until 9pm CST.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-13 12:29:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - 3 units ordered - 1btc= 3 GH/s - 81% / 1200 TH sold\\n### Original post:\\nplease remember before you consider taking part in other GB,that we actually got nice place in delivery queue, that means mining a bit earlier than competitors\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-13 20:13:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] BFL ASIC Chips $59/chip. Batch 1 purchased July 3rd. 8 still available\\n### Original post:\\n4 extra chip buy itcheck itjelin1984total 16\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nReceived, thanks, I\\'ve got you down for 16.This batch is closed, but there are still 4 chips available. I\\'m willing to sell them for $62 each at this point:If you are looking for a better price, batch 2 is now open\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 13:26:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll probably pick up a few more early next week. Thanks for distributing.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGreat pricing!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nA VERY LARGE pre-order has been just placed with friedcat it means I should have a batch in up to 4 business days, ready to begin shipping to you all. Offcourse, I will order more as soon as it is prudent or necessary to do so in order to keep the amount of time you wait to receive your orders to a minimum.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nStay tuned for a pricing calculator. Sorry I\\'m rusty at coding, be up shortly.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ntime to get some sleep! will update OP in the morning with any orders received throughout the night.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAddress: 20; 19.1564706; Y20 with insurance: 19 + 0.0564706 + .1 = 19.1564706 \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAlright, going to go to sleep, I think the calculator is accurate.I will clean up how it displays some information tomorrow when I get time.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nJayCoin; 11; 10.5810588; Ytxid: Yes\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m definitely getting in on this one! Time to get my BTC in order! Lol\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nElideN; 5; 4.968; Ytxid: Yes\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nCan i get 5x blacks?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWhy the hell does everyone want black?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nnot sure... i want all colours...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nMe too. No one seems to want gold.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nhello, here is my CanaryInTheMine Group Buy Calculator: pricing variables for your group buys can be pushed through the url string\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nis Canada considered international shipping?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThis is where I would rap battle you normally.But you win.Nice\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSorry but troupster is more accurate\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nTechnically yes, But shipping rates via FedEx are very good. PM ur address, # of units and I\\'ll quite you.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nHi all, what is the transaction id, and where do I find it?ArthurBitcoin, 14, 13.4395294, Y14 block eruptors, with insurance, please verify\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAll orders have been posted on OP. Any issues, please PM me.working on shipping grp 10 now.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nReserved\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nHere\\'s my attempt at the price calculator. name soon. I may get bored and add some other random bitcoin calculators I\\'ve been using lol.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nthanks!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nDeLorean; 5; 4.94; N\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nnotlist3d; 10; 9.7183; YTX: \\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nxjack; 16; 15.34518; \\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nCorrect me if I\\'m wrong but; besides the fun of these as a novelty item/stocking stuffers, I still don\\'t see how USB Erupters have any kind of decent ROI...\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nSwimmer63; 11; 10.5810588 BTC; - YesTrans ID: \\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nphilipma1957 ;3, 3.068 BTC: yes Trans id; will pm shipping address in a few min I sent pm.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nMining roi is never but ebay roi is a couple weeks\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nah ha!\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nIf you use can dispose of 1/2 of your miners at the right price the other half is essentially free. Dramatically improves mining ROI.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nicknay; 2; 2.09; N\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nJust had a play, how easy is this, hope canary will approve\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nSome of you might be interested in this news from Coinbase:Good news! All level 2 accounts can now purchase bitcoin instantly on Coinbase!With this change comes one additional requirement: all level 2 accounts will now need to complete an identity verification step.To restore your level 2 status please complete your identity verification from the verifications page.Kind regards,The Coinbase Team\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nThey aren\\'t doing it out of goodwill. They\\'ve been losing money when I bought at 67 last week and will get it tomorrow. And they used bitinstant as a test dummy. But I do like coinbase.\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nyeah but yeaahh but yeah but... there\\'s a ton of these on ebay. they don\\'t seem to be flying off the shelves.\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nyou bought @67?? damn!!! did you use any tools to analyze the charts?I\\'ve been thinking that I need to start hedging so that I can keep prices more predictable for USB sales regardless of USD/btc rate... to keep costs predictable for shipping, packing handling etc... any good platforms out there yet to trade in bitcoin/usd rate contracts?\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nCoinbase uses bitinstant?\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nFor the lazy Using troupster\\' s calc :I get the following:1 = 1.1682 = 2.1183 = 3.0684 = 4.0185 = 4.968 6 = 5.918 7 = 6.868 8 = 7.818 9 = 8.768 10 = 9.718 11 = 10.5810588 12 = 11.5338824 13 = 12.4867059address: Note I plugged in usps priority mail with insurance\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nI did coinbase as well at about 68 each. Oh and to the guy that used coinbase and waiting on the funds to hit, just verify your account for Level 2 and you will get your coins instantly on Coinbase. This is the new option that will allow tr\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-13 21:35:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BFL ASIC Chips $57/chip. Batch 2. 5+ Chips Free shipping - 100 Available\\n### Original post:\\nHio Who do you recommend for the final board assembly ?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI know Mr Teal is working on something, not sure if anyone outside of his group can send chips in to be mounted. I will be on the lookout for board assemblers and let everyone know what I find.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCool. Just curious as to how many chips per board..I\\'ll take you up on your eruptor offer, and take up to 5, if you still have some.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips, board assemblers, eruptor\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 06:06:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #4 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.92-0.94 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nUpdated US insurance pricing! 0.01 BTC per $200 Insurance Purchased!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGlad to see some competitive pricing going on. Im liking the lower price. Might order a few soon.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI would be pleased to take your order. I will be the best price period. Thank you.SilentSonicBoom\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSo tempting. These prices! I have a total of 25 now ordered. How are you guys connecting these? 10 on each hub?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes. Try the Anker brand USB hubs that hold 10 that have a better power supply than cheaper hubs. I will post a link later and maybe a picture or two.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nwill the ankers power 10? they\\'re rated at 4a and i thought they only powered 8 of them thats why people plug in a usb fan and a daisy chain to another hub.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nwerewe12; 5; 4.8; .02please confirm, thanks\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nConfirmed and greatly appreciated. PM me your shipping address please.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPM sent, also sent one earlier with some questions about the different group buys. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nReply sent. Let\\'s get the group buy orders coming in. Thank you for your orders!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSpecifically this Anker USB hub listed here . I have had no problems running 10 miners on this one style only. It has a 12V 4A Power Adapter plus Smart chip power management allows devices to communicate idle states and latency tolerance for progressively lower power states and subsequently increased performance and power efficiency. Most USB hubs are less than 4A . The trick here is that you get the 4A(which wouldn\\'t quite be enough to run 10 miners) AND 12V(instead of common 5V) which is plenty together for 10 miners.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAll express shipping rates have now been lowered.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nwoobone 10, 9.85 (express mail) please confirm thanks\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nemc2 ; 7 ; 6.66 ; \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThis is confirmed. I also have an order from sleepypig_2003 through a PM for 5 miners with USPS Priority Mail International Shipping Includes Tracking. Thank you for your order.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n; <20>; <19.8>; <+1 BTC USPS Priority Mail International Shipping Includes Tracking>\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n; <6>; <6.24 BTC>; <0.60 BTC USPS Priority Mail International Shipping Includes Tracking>\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\n; <5>; <5.70>; <+1 BTC USPS Priority Mail International Shipping Includes Tracking>This is the post you requested, as this was already confirmed by pm, thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nConfirmed. Thank you for the order. Greatly appreciated!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n; <1>; <1.03>; < 0.08 BTC USPS Priority Mail Shipping, .01 BTC insurance>\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAll orders before this post are confirmed. Thank you very much. 38 minutes remain to get your order in.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nConfirmed via PM. ssateneth 52 Paid+Free USPS Express Mail Shipping + 1 Free USB MinerThank you for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\n7/13/13 Last call for any people wanting in this group buy or to add to your current order! This order will be placed in the next several hours. Please keep an eye open for my upcoming group buy #5! Thank you for your orders and support. I greatly appreciate them!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nThis is confirmed.Your payment amount seems to be to much. 0.94 X 8 = 7.52 + .08 shipping(not 0.80) and 0.04 insurance = 7.64 Would you like a refund or do you have enough to add to it and get one more?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\ngnarl is sending payment to upgrade to nine units. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nCool, I\\'ll take a 8 9.gnarl; 8, 8.36 (7.52+.08 priority mail+.04 insurance), please confirm, included .04 to 9gnarl; 9; 8.59; priority mail plus .05 ins\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nsilent, i\\'d like to get an order in for 100 units can i do it? has to be this batch, i need it asap\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\njodyjr1980; 1 ; 1.03 ; ; .01 for insuranceConfirmed?\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nYes. Send payment now. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nsuprabitz ; 100 + 2 free; 92.25 (insurance for $5000); \\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nThank you very much. Any others wish to order in next hour or so? Payment is being sent very soon. Thank you all!\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nConfirmed. Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, Anker brand USB hubs, 12V 4A Power Adapter, USPS Priority Mail International Shipping, USPS Express Mail Shipping, USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 17:54:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Just opened! 230/240 shares sold 4 miners left\\n### Original post:\\nSent 0.35 BTC for 1 share. TX: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nboss, 6 shares for me. thanks. i\\'ve invested alot in kncminer, hope they won\\'t let us down. or else i\\'ll jump into river.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI doubt they do, they have all the personal information available on the whole crew. And they use Orsoc etc..But i would like more information about chip process, but they might keep that low due competition.They also allow wire transfer and paypal, so there is possible to trace things there also. Instead of BitCoin only Its better than those one man army shows..If something doesn\\'t go as planned, i am only 4 hours away from their offices with car.From the looks for it, i will get a KnC before any BFL\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nboss, thanks for making me feel better. anyway here\\'s a signed message:address: hi boss, 2.1 btc sent for 6 shares of knc group buy 3 miner #1.signature: id: hope this gb#3 miner#1 will be sold out asap.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi tyrion70,I just sent you 0.35 btc for 1 share.tx id: I\\'d like to reserve another 2 shares, to be paid (0.70 btc) as soon as tomorrow or the day after.Thanks for your hard work!!!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nboss, 1 last share... still for miner#1 tx id: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nStart post updated; bumped your share to miner 1 cuz it was technically just sold out ;-)We\\'ll be paying the miner shortly and post screenshot as usual!Lets get that 2nd miner going\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner, KnC, BFL\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 18:15:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 860+ ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\nOP updated with all orders. if you notice any issue, please PM me!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-14 21:36:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - 2 units ordered - 1btc= 3 GH/s - 75% / 800 TH sold\\n### Original post:\\nhello Sebastian I have total 5BTC in your GBmaybe more next days thank you best regards\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ve figured out that since I have some fiat money on the BTC exchange I can accept Paypal or Skrill payments.I am not afraid of charge back or any other shady procedure, because when you will do something unfair with your payment I will simply remove you from the list and sell those shares to someone else.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDear investors, as promised here is the good news surprise and solid update.I managed to cover additional shares to cover the third unit order with help of Coiner.de (great man) and few of my friends.Sorry for not posting any important updates lately, but I was actually busy finalising our GB. I menage to convert some fiat reserves to BTC to cover the last part of our third unit. Some of you might say THIRD UNIT? what the hell, there shouldn\\'t be even second unit. But YES! due to private investor we were able to purchase two units for group mining and one device for private mining for our anonymous investor. This private unit is not calculated into mining farm as it is funded by one person. That totals for 3 brand new hashing units. I Told you there will be a surprise!:)Here are some order details:Payment confirmation: #2Payment confirmation: #3 which I managed to buy at incredible low price, today\\'s morning btc price peak:)Payment confirmation:\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY, hashing units\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 01:06:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Just opened! 1/240 shares sold 1/5 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nThanks for organizing the 3rd GB.12 shares from me (ffwong)Date: 15-Jul-13 09:05Amount: 4.20 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 01:54:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - 3 units ordered - 1btc= 3 GH/s - 1012 /1200 GH sold\\n### Original post:\\nThis looks like a good group buy. I guess I\\'m only wondering one thing: the payment confirmations don\\'t show who ordered the miners, correct? The blockchain info shows that they were paid for. It seems like the images just show that someone, somewhere ordered and paid for some miners. Forgive this rookie question, but how are we to know that YOU are in control of the account (or accounts) that paid for the miners? Are you able to send signed messages? Nobody else has asked this question, so I\\'m sure I\\'m missing something obvious. And, I know you had John K. look at your identification, so I\\'m not questioning you are who you say you are. Just trying to learn more than anything.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThat is correct And like pajak666 write - we can provide all confirmation you need\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI understand your concern but where can you get some nice receipt like that?payment conf: you can see address was used for payment.My nickname is pajak666Also address used for this group buy was used in the same transaction stated here and this is probably what you are missing: is signed messageCode:this is signed message requested in group buy thread 14.07.2013:) @ bitcointalk.org to confirm that I \"pajak666\" control that you wish some additional proofs simply PM me or post hereIf you really want to, we can go with the same confirmation procedure for unit #1 or you can compare output addresses from first and third order by yourself\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 02:07:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 750+ ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\nupdated OP with all orders up to now... if you notice any issues, please PM me.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTimer removed. End time: 2013-07-14+23:59:59\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nShipping Monday? I\\'ll send label.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nadding 2x more to my previous orderSent 1.89 BTCTotal: 7\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nupdated\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBTC sent at 9:20am\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nadding 1 more to my order. this brings me to 6.my \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOk, please send it. It can\\'t hurt having it just in case I\\'m shipping Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWill update shortly!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSwimmer63; 11; ; YSecond GB #11 Order. Do not hold first order if they can\\'t be shipped together. Need them sooner rather than later. First order use my Fed Ex acct. This, 2nd, can go via your standard USPS Priority method.THANKS Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPlease see PM sent...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 04:03:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 420+ ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\nOP updated with all placed orders...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n you still have my previous shipping address on file?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nplease resend a signed message. thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n*signed message, signature, shipping address sent via PM\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nphilipma1957 ;2; 1.9 btc 2 added to first order of 3. will add tax id and pm later. ______________Pm sent. __________first order for 3 sticks 3.068btcsecond order for 2 sticks 1.9 btcgrand total 2 orders = 5 sticks 4.968btc\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ni have to vent, those stupid verification systems that coinbase and other sites use they use ask me about places i\\'ve never been to, addresses i\\'ve never had. then tell me i fail. whats the deal...EDIT: OMG this is so stupid i found out what the address was its 2100 w corporate drive addison il the corporate address for loopnet.com a commercial real estate listing site. one of my companies that listed a property for sale in virginia so it linked the corporate address of loopnet to MY PERSONAL ADDRESS as if i lived there.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYou might want to check your credit report...the information isn\\'t plucked from thin air.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCanth; 10; 9.718; Y\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFolks, please keep this thread on topic and lets not turn this into a tangent discussion.Thank you\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n(sorry) for off topicBack on topic will you add a 10 hour count down like you did for buy # 10? I am trying to squeeze out 1 more. My miner is at .59 btc I think I can earn enough for one more without dealing with bit instant. A count down would be helpful. thanks phil\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nrmyadsk; 8; 7.818; YThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAddress: 21@0.95= 19.95 + 0.05929413 + .1 = 20.10929413 ; insurance yesTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n ID: included=yes\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nOn a quick note bitinstant closed shop do not know how long but they are closed. I feel lucky I was able to do a small purchase early today for 2.2 coins. All of below was from clicking on the website. WHERE\\'D YOU GO?WE\\'RE HERE,WORKING HARDQ. What\\'s going on?As many of you know, we recently re-launched our website. During this process we introduced many new features and changes to the way customers interact with our services. This process has been a learning experience, and you\\'ve provided a lot of great feedback on how things work and how they could work better. We value this input and the insights that it\\'s led us to and we want to ensure that as we work, you, our customers, don\\'t feel the growing pains associated with these improvements. For this reason, we\\'ve decided that the best way to proceed is to close shop and dedicate the entire team\\'s efforts to creating the next generation of BitInstant.In the short term, we recognize that this may cause our valued customers some inconvenience; it causes inconvenience for us too. In the long run, we are confident that this total commitment to whats next is the right move. Rest assured that our entire team is working around the cl\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nwest17m; +10; 9.5; Yadding 10 to my order this batch\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI tried to warn people in the Group 10 buy. I hope no one lost too much or invested too much.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nBitcoinValet; 11; 11.14105885; an extra 0.56 for the Anker Hub\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nPlesk; 38; 36.30729414; YPM sent with tx, ship address, and sig\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n1rst order:mackstuart; 11; 10.5810588; order:mackstuart; 4; 4.018; order:mackstuart; 5; 4.968; Total\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, Anker Hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 07:24:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 920+ ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\nin case you\\'ve been wondering what else I\\'ve been up to lately, here\\'s the announcement:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ntlr; 4; 4.018; Y\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nEvilMacGuyver; 2; 2.09; N\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nrethaw, 2, 2.09, N\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHow much for 300 units? Sent to you pm.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nslashopt; 1; 1.168; Y\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSent PM\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPlz add 1 Anker to my order - BTC SentPM\\'ed Sig\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\njosiasrdz; 11; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\naddzz; 2; 2.09; N\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI will be updating OP with outstanding orders in the next few hours\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nGot tracking numbers for both preorders for group 11 First one should arrive later today Second has been shipped.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nCanary you are the man . Hmmmm by end of week i might be rocking some sweet sweet erupter\\'s\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nPolyatomic 2 , 3.1136 , , YTx id \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, Anker\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 16:35:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #11 1110 ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\nall orders are posted on OP.please check for correctness and that your line has a Confirmed for signed message column to avoid shipping delays.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYou are missing my added 9. Ctrl F my username to find my post, then confirm on the blockchain my friend. Peace.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPM me transaction ids plz\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBenny1985; 20; 19.1; N;\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 19:44:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - All 3 units ordered - 154 GH/s open - PAYPAL + SKRILL\\n### Original post:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nironm1nd, 2.5244 BTC, \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 21:03:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN Group buy] 1000 pcs USB Erupters - EU/Int - price 0.89BTC - 28 to go\\n### Original post:\\nI have to apologise to every one in this group buy i asked vdragon to leave order for only 30 erupter for me and return me part of money. We just find out that my gf is pregnant 2 months now and need the money for lot of things now. I see that the group buy is doing good and i am sure this will not be a set back.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI found this to be a legitimate reason, and I will be sending you BTC shortly. There is huge interest in the group buy, and we will fill the order anyhow in next few days, most likely by Wednesday anyhow. Congratulations to your girlfriend and to you on the baby, and have fun - it will bring you a lot of joy\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThank you. Arived.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWow, congrats! Let us now when she/he is born\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAll updated\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nhellothe payment for the two erupters has just been sent \\'m going to pm your with the signature !\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI am actually wondering how you are going to get 300 USB ports It seems strange to have 30 Hubs, you;ll still need to have at least 2 PC\\'s for all dem USB\\'sJust wondering, I saw your awesome GPU rigs, I grant you they\\'ll look as awesome, less the heat +noise.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nActually, I have 10 computers ready, its 800 pieces. Still figuring out things... Too busy with this order\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupters, GPU rigs, computers\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-15 22:17:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 650+ ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\n15 units + anker hub with insured shipping. let me know if i fucked up the 15; 14.9211765; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ve gotten several PMs regarding Anker hubs..I do have some... Cost is .56 btc and shipping is included with your USB orders.I don\\'t sell them separately..\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNot left, should be sold or he was just tired\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nmrbrt; 44; 42.02423532BTC; Y\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMy first order came today great packing. fast shipping .Question a link for the anker hub you are selling? I have enough coins to get one. I could add it to my current order for 5 sticks.thanks in advance\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nForgot to account for insurance on the additional units. BTC sent to cover - see PM.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'d like to add another 11 insured to my previous 15 order. i\\'m assuming i don\\'t need to pay the handling fee twice?freshzive; 11; 10.48105883; \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nno more Ankers. all out. I won\\'t answer PMs asking if I have any.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMay be able to get a deal on some USB hubs. Reserve one here: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, Anker hub\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 00:27:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN Group buy] 1000 pcs USB Erupters - EU/Int - price 0.89BTC - 26 to go\\n### Original post:\\nsent payment thanks for all your hard work i sent the signature hope i did it right lol\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ndo you have any confirmation of yxt that you will get your 1000 units soon enough?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nEveryone answered, good night, for today it is enough\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI too would like to know this. He\\'s causing up quite a bit of stir inhis thread\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 08:16:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] GROUP BUY #1 ASICMINER ERUPTER USB 1 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nPAID TRACKING/INSURANCE INTERNATIONAL\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nORDER HAS BEEN PLACED FOR 150 MINERS! THANK YOU. I WILL POST UPDATES WHEN AVAILABLE. PLEASE SIGN UP FOR MY NEXT GROUP BUY IF INTERESTED. THANK YOU!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGreat news! Friedcat just confirmed that these have shipped! Please check out my 2nd Group Buy here with prices on USB Miners LOWERED to 0.99 btc each!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYaaaaay :-)\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n7/9/13 Order in HONG KONG!Taking orders for GROUP BUY #3 here .\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nDo you have a delivery date for this batch yet? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNo. It has to get to US and then through customs to me. It is with DHL HONG KONG at the moment. Hopefully this Friday.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n7/10/13 Order in USA!Looks like these will ship by Friday, if not sooner.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nGreat news!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYou have them in hand now?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nNot yet. They passed customs. Should have them tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n7/11/13 Order past customs in Cincinatti, OH. Now in Omaha, NE.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n7/12/13 Just got off the phone with my friends at DHL. Order should be delivered today!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n7/12/13 Miners have arrived! All orders and tracking numbers will be sent in 24 hours or less. Thank you for your orders. Please order more in group buy #4.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n7/13/13 All US orders have been processed and tracking numbers sent! orders will be processed this morning with tracking numbers to be sent. Please order more in group buy #4.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nCan\\'t wait to add them to my small farm. Thanks for the quick delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\n^^^+1 XD\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n7/13/13 All orders have been processed with tracking numbers sent! Two orders were actually delivered today. Amazing!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI just got mine and we are hashing now.. Thanks again.. going to put in a new order today.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nSame! got mine. Started hashing right away. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThank you! Taking orders for GROUP BUY #5 here !\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nTaking orders for GROUP BUY #5 here . The current group buy is closed. I expect to receive this group buy Friday the 12th of July or Monday the 15th of July. I will ship all orders within 24 hours of my receiving them.7/13/13 All orders have been processed with tracking numbers sent! Two orders were actually delivered today. Amazing!7/13/13 All US orders have been processed and tracking numbers sent! orders will be processed this morning with tracking numbers to be sent. Please order more in group buy #4.7/12/13 Miners have arrived! All orders and tracking numbers will be sent in 24 hours or less. Thank you for your orders. Please order more in group buy #4.7/12/13 Just got off the phone with my friends at DHL. Order should be delivered today!7/11/13 Order past customs in Cincinatti, OH. Now in Omaha, NE.7/10/13 Order in USA!7/9/13 Order in HONG KONG!7/8/13 Order shipped by GROUPBUY IS CLOSED. TAKING ORDERS FOR GROUP BUY #2 HERE 150 USB MINERS AVAILABLE!GROUP BUY CLOSES ONCE TIME IS REACHED OR 150 USB MINERS ARE SOLD! Timer removed. End time: first mass production batch (sapphire) has finished its PCB production and assembly today.I\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB, USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 14:04:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN Group buy] 1000 pcs USB Erupters - EU/Int - price 0.89BTC - 15 to go\\n### Original post:\\nBack, updated and pms answered\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nthis is the best group buy!! im hoping to get more bitcoins and buy more. considering i was paying about double what this group buy is im pretty happy, i have seen people sell theses for 2 bitcoins or some times 3 this is a good deal\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 17:31:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Just opened! 43/240 shares sold 1/5 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nWelcome again!Start post updated; 43 shares sold on miner 2\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi Tyrion70,You have listed me as jamesc460, it should be \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMy bad; fixed it.. Good reminder why I normally always copy-paste\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNo problem, and thank you for fixing it in such timely manner, bodes well for any future problems that may arise. You guys are the best!Jamesc760PS: I\\'m getting ready to send 0.70 btc for 2 more shares soon, today.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust sent you 0.70 btc for 2 shares.tx id: get miner #2 filled!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n9 shares for me please:TX id: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n+ 4 more pleaseTX id: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-16 17:59:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.3 BTC-GB BTC,PayPal,SEPA+Preliminary board designed-284 sold,84/100 batch\\n### Original post:\\n16 chips to the end of the batch...12 free credits left... After that I have a deal for 112 chip credits for 0.01BTC per credit.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCan finish this batch off?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 16 chips, 12 free credits, 112 chip credits\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 02:10:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Quick 2 day group 140+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll be pre-ordering for this group in about 7 hours from now (it\\'s 3 AM in Honk Kong at the moment)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWill be hoping on-board the Canary ASIC express for at least one.*And another USB hub if you still have those available?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ndeskath; 10; 10.888; ID: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAnkers are back in stock on amazon... i am out of them atm.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsent btc for 3 more sticks. this brings total to 8 for group buy 12.philipma1957 ;3; 2.85 BTC sent id : \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBitcoinValet; 11; 10.58105884; Y\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nbitcoiner49er; 11; ; Y\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nFolks, here\\'s a tool that should help you place the order, get a signed message formatted and a string generated to post here on the forum:\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nprometheus; 1; 1.16800000 BTC; YTX ID: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, USB hub, Ankers\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 03:35:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Quick 2 day group 180+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nazwccc; 5; 4.96800000 BTC; YPM sent via it works great.BTW, can I have the link for ankers (on Amazon)?Thanks a lot.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThey had a black one that was more compact, but I don\\'t see it now. The black one listed is 9 port plus a charging port. Which is fine if you are going to have fan.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nawesome!! thanks for the feedback\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHave two of the white models and no complaints, actually look pretty neat.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, black one, white models\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 14:49:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.3 BTC-GB BTC,PayPal,SEPA - 300 sold, 100/100 batch, LAST CHANCE\\n### Original post:\\nFounds send to Bitstemp... Should be done today... If anyone would like to get into this batch you still can but it is BTC only\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n104 chips orderd... I was doing my best to get good exchange rate by Bitpay but when I sew exchange rate 93 and press order I got 91.somting... I\\'m getting together with board designer so I will do a full report later on a buy and board...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 104 chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 18:29:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Quick 2 day group 350+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\n2jase; 11; 10.5810588 BTC; YPS: Really slick message-o-matic. I like it!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nphilipma1957 ;2; 1.9 BTC brings me to 10 for buy number 12 pm sentid:\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTimzim103 ;3; 3.04; N\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nupdated OP with all orders\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-17 19:31:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Quick 2 day group 480+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nKyrosKrane; 4; 4.01800000 BTC; Y\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nchenchunyu88; 4;4.018BTC; Y\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 03:08:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Quick 2 day group 340+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nOP updated with all orders. pre-order payment has been sent to friedcat.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nstatdude; 14; 13.4395294 BTC; Y\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCanary,Just doubled up. you up me to 28? Send another 13.3395294\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 03:11:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .67 btc per chip: 2988 available (512 sold)\\n### Original post:\\nprice per chip set to 0.67 btc\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBFL has sent me sample chips... I have made solid arrangements to provide some to a PCB designer to begin testing.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThats great news\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAt some point, it would be interesting to have some upper and lower estimates on delivered circuit board cost. Clearly that would be highly volume dependent and I\\'d expect the designers and guys that handle the mft to make a profit. I used to do this and know how it is.Cost range would be nice KNOWING it\\'s only a crude guess.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsample boards are getting ordered tomorrow and then assembled with the sample chips for testing...once testing is completed, we\\'ll have some idea on pricing...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips, sample chips, sample boards\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 03:56:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Quick 2 day group 625+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nLadies and Gentleman, please be civil and stay on topic!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nscottycc; 21; 20.10943; Y\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nrmyadsk; 6; 5.918; Y\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJayCoin; 22; 21.06211766; Y\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nall orders have been noted on OP. if you notice any issues, please PM me.about an hour to go...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-11 17:31:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .85 btc per chip: 2988 available (512 sold)\\n### Original post:\\nprice per chips has been updated to .85 to reflect current btc/usd rate.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBfl released jalapeno schematics, at worst, we can make a bunch of jalapenos.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCanary,Did they send you sample chips yet?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJalapenos are fine anything that can be used to mine\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAny links to see itBfl released jalapeno schematics, at worst, we can make a bunch of jalapenos.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI have requested 70 sample chips already.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThats good news.Josh stated that you can receive 2 chips per 100 orderThis way we can have a working unit before we receive the chips and you guys can work out all the details.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nthat\\'s the plan!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHas anyone started any significant work on a BFL chip project?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOut of curiosity how did you do it? Mail? Do you have any direct phone number? I can\\'t get replay from them even after ordering 200 chips...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThis just in from Josh:Anthony is not longer with us, which is why the sample chips have languished. I just corrected this problem today and we have a new person on it... he should be getting the sample chips taken care of over the next couple days.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThanks for sharing!!! this may explain why I haven\\'t heard anything since my request...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI emailed sales\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nLucko, have you got your sample chips yet? If not pm me for contact info.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips, jalapeno, sample chips\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 15:32:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - All 3 units ordered - 87 GH/s open - PAYPAL + SKRILL\\n### Original post:\\npm sent\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 16:35:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Quick 2 day group 690+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nCanary are you going to make a group buy 13?...I want to buy 18 miners\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOZR; 11; 10,58105884; YI hope not too late PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'d be in for 8, and would order right now, but my Coinbase transaction doesn\\'t clear until Saturday morning. I\\'m interested in a group buy #13 also!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI ordered in groups 10,11,12. 6 sticks 6 sticks and now 10 sticks in group 12. Total of 22 sticks.I would order in group 13. BTW my group 10 and my group 11 have been delivered and are hashing as I type. So far you sent all black not a problem but in my group 12 Silver Red and Gold would be fine.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ncheers canary, my miners arrived today in the uklooking forward to a repeat transaction.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI VOUCH!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGroup #12 is officially closed.group #13 is forthcoming shortly.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 17:53:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - All 3 units ordered - 56 GH/s open - PAYPAL + SKRILL\\n### Original post:\\n\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 19:30:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - All 3 units ordered - 50 GH/s open - PAYPAL + SKRILL\\n### Original post:\\nmistermint, 1, \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 20:41:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - 3 units ordered - 1btc= 3 GH/s - 1004 /1200 GH sold\\n### Original post:\\nI wish it was August delivery, but an early place in October\\'s queue is still\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi, my first time participating in a group buy.I sent you 3BTC so: this means ~9Gh/s in October right.Do you need an address from me from which you can send payment to?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf it\\'s different than address you use for payment than yes. By default I will send payment to addresses you have used to buy shares.If bitfury will meet it\\'s specifications then your 3 BTC will be hashing 9.03 GH/s\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCool, can you change my send address to this and thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPM sent.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 21:09:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0.3 BTC-GB BTC,PayPal,SEPA - 304 sold, 0/100 batch\\n### Original post:\\nAwesome and thanks for the patience while dealing with my PayPal payment.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLucko you have bad luck with exchange rate ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNot realy... This is how they calculate it.And since BTC-e and Bitstemp are the one they are looking in this case and not mtgox it wasn\\'t that bad... Currently published exchange rate is 90.somthing and in case of a big order it goes down...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nToday I got conformation from BFL that I\\'m in line for samples... for first order... Yes on a day they should be shipped... Not too good to publicised on GB but I\\'m letting you know about everything...I was started to write report but fall a sleep 3 times during that... I will do it tomorrow...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGet some rest man. Thanks again for the help and support.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYeah man, take a week off. You are the hardest working group buy of them all.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOK back from work... Some quality time with daughter and hire I am...Now boards:This is not only problem for our GB but every GB out there. Chips will probably needed to be mounted with manual pick and place... Automatic will not be good enough in placing the chips. I know it sounds strange to me too since I would guess other way around. Once mounted can\\'t be removed so any error can destroy the chip on board... So now I\\'m looking for the best possible company for placing the chips on boards so no problems will pop up... Company I was planing to use isn\\'t that sure they can do it without errors or with minimal numbers of them... But this problem is still 85 days away... It will be solved... They can do the boards and it looks like it will be about 30 board and 20 mounting(this is just estimate since I don\\'t have exact number of boards)... Components will add up additional 120 but this is again estimate since BOM for BFL board is not in documentation and we have not made it jet(I didn\\'t write it down but if I remember correctly 600+ components)... So we are in a 200$ zone. I know this is close to price of Jalapeo but this board has 50% more power. I know that Jalapeo board has 80W f\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL, Jalapeo\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 22:11:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #20 Sold [Added to 8 TH/s Jupiter Pool] Selling #21\\n### Original post:\\nSold Jupiter #18, #19 and #20Selling shares on Jupiter 21\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n1 share for #21PM sentTx ID \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAdded to OP and spreadsheetCheers\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n2 shares for \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n1 share for address \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAdded to OP and spreadsheet, welcomePlease send email and Skype userWill be using Bitmessage as well, will send you the subscription address in PM\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nwhooahh... jupiter #18 19 20 being sold out that fast??? sonic, are you the one who bought these 3 miners?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nboss, can you please negotiate with knc to include miner#17 to the first day delivery? since miner #16 is already included in first day delivery, might as well include #17. i would really appreciate if knc will allow this request thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nwhen will the order be placed? as soon as all shares have been purchased?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCorrect\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nKNC establishes order queue\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n3 shares for #21.TXID: me know what else you need. Am excited to be a part of this!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAdded to OP and spreadsheet, welcomeSend me your email, and SkypeI will send you a Bitmessage address to subscribe too in PM\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n1 more share for \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n2.8 sent for 1 \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAdded to OP and spreadsheetJust increased share price, so good timing\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThis 2nd GB will be closing with purchase of Jupiter 21The 2nd GB will be listed on Bitfunder as a separate listing from the original GB, but will be merged with original GB once the 2nd group of Jupiters are delivered and miningAm expecting delivery of 2nd group to be close to the original group of first day delivery.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 11:59:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]0,34375 BTC - GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA + board - 313 sold, 9/100 batch\\n### Original post:\\nNew batch started with order of 9 chips...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 9 chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 14:41:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BFL ASIC Chips $57/chip. Batch 2 - 152/176 Available\\n### Original post:\\n24 chips purchased, 152 left.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 14:46:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares 1BTC=5GH/s! 4 SOLD | 72 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nok btc sent as agreed in pm.txid: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nok BTC1 sent for 1 payment address: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ndidn\\'t it reach 100 this week? I saw about 97-98 on mt gox\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNo, unfortunately, it fell back to 90.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 17:31:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - 202/240 shares sold 1/5 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nboss, question: if the miners in 3rd batch group buy didn\\'t arrive at the same time, eg... miner #1 & #2 arrives earlier, and miners 3-5 arrives 1 week later. will the shares for miners #1 & #2 be listed in bitfunder earlier? and shares for miners 3-5 be listed later? or do you negotiate with knc for the batch 3 miners to be delivered on the same day?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIt all depends on how fast we can sell the 5 miners, goal is to get them as fast as possible. If day 2, then perfect.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nboss, what if after purchasing miners 1 & 2, it took 1 week to purchase miners 3,4&5. will there be a possibility that the delivery of miners 1&2 be earlier than 3,4&5? or do you negotiate with knc for same day delivery for this group of 5 miners?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nanyway boss, i think its hard to make clear answers as some things are out of our control. i\\'ll be buying some shares for miner #2. my wallet is draining fast, help me out of this kncmining temptation...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nboss, here\\'s 9 shares for miner#2tx id: \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSent .35 BTC for a share, Thanks. TX: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGood news from KnC. They released more R&D info\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ngreat news, thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPut me in for 4 shares in miner 2tx \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nTyrion will update the numbers later today\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAnother 1 share please TX: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI\\'d like 5 shares in miner 2 BitFunder ID is DavidMc0Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miners #1, #2, #3, #4, #5\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 17:39:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Just opened! 88/240 shares sold 1/5 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nJames & Quantummine added to start post thanks!88 shares sold so far!Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nboss, any idea when will the miners for this group buy be delivered? will it also be on day 2 like those of group buy 2?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHoping for day2, depends on when we got these 5 ready.Funds for the second miner is in.. Third miner is up for grab\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nsent 2.45 BTC for 7 \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n5.25 sent for \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nJust sent 0.35 BTC for 1 share on miner 2 - Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks guys, we will go over the latest shares.We will wait on buying the second minder until price has gone up a little, there is no rush\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI am planning on purchasing an additional 15 shares, by next friday.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThat should be possible\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nthanks blastbob, the way i figure it, this should get me up to 100gh!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nhi boss, is the miner#1 included in day 2? i\\'ve got some shares there. btc price down from 98 to 88. will it rise back very soon? i\\'ve got some btc sitting and i\\'m thinking to buy more knc shares or not. boss, with september delivery still 2 months away, do you think knc is real thing? or there\\'s this bitfury and vmc selling their new miners also. i like knc, but there\\'s still fear with what happened with bfl.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHey,No way of telling shipping date for sure untill KNC actually confirms it.. We can only hope.. That being said; we still believe KNC to be the real deal yeah Start post updated; we\\'ll be buying the 2nd miner shortly!Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n100gh??? Damn, I can barely has 6gh thus far into asic group buy.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner, miner 2, miner 1\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 20:22:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - All 3 units ordered - 17 GH/s open - PAYPAL + SKRILL\\n### Original post:\\nyamaka, 5.68, \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-20 03:36:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN]Group Buy #5 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.91-0.93 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nUpated USA insurance allowed. Now no maximum per order.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThis order will be placed when time expires. I need a little help to reach my 1000 unit price from AsicMiner/friedcat. Please help me out so that I can continue to offer great prices and service to the bitcoin community. All orders big and small are greatly appreciated!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI have been getting a lot of PMs on the subject of availability of USB Miners to be ordered from friedcat/AsicMiner. Yes, they are available from me. I have a confirmed payment address and have placed orders for four group buys in about the last 10 days which as of today have all been shipped by friedcat to me. Group buy #1 buyers have already been sent/received their orders with group buys #2,#3,and #4 to be shipped by me in the next 2-7 days when received from friedcat (possibly sooner). Thank you for any orders.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nok, I will brake the ice.. I am in for 5 more units, Payment will be following later (hopefully) today.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAs soon as my account clears I will be sending BTC your way.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThank you. PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI look forward to placing a order for you.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nA private order #1 is confirmed for 5 miners paid and posted to the OP. Thank you for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPayment and PM sent.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOrder is confirmed. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI have another paid order of 10 units from private #2. Thank you for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nConfirmed. Thank you.Also, another order for one miner listed as private #3. Thank you for your order.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPayment and PM sent.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThank you for your order. It is confirmed.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nGroup Buy #6 Will Start Immediately Following Group Buy #5. Send Group Buy#6 Payments To \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nPut me down for 2 please. PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n9 pieces, payment and PM sent!thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nOP is updated with above posts. These are confirmed. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nPut me in for 5.mpesha ; 5; 4.805; Insurance for $500.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nConfirmed. Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-20 11:11:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [K1 Nano Boards Only] Group Buy - Big Picture Mining Cooperative\\n### Original post:\\n1. Our site is only BTC for now. 2. We will have hosting options in the future most likely but that isn\\'t the scope of this group buy as this is for K1 boards only.3. This is a board buy no chips.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSituation:We have access to fabrication of K1 Boards with all components sans Avalon chips. Big Picture Mining Cooperative notes there are hundreds of thousands of Avalon chips coming into the hands of the community.FocusWe need to find out if the community is interested in buying K1 boards sans Avalon chips. We will take $2 dollars from every board sold and pay BKKCoins royalty fees and we will register with BKKCoins on his site as board we have interest in thousands of boards then we can work with the community on pricing for these boards at a competitive rate. Boards can be available in late July or early August. As this is a group buy we can ship directly to each person directly from the bring in BKKCoins board royalty fees quicker and satisfy needs for those interested in the group buy by providing K1 boards roughly at the time they are receiving chips or those who want to resell K1 boards with their own chips mounted on our group buy boards.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI will be personally pledging 10 x K1 boards for this K1 Nano board buy as I will be using them in our school for bump and reflow of chips to boards with our students. As we get a rough idea of prices for the boards and post them on the website for this group buy then people can order. We will probably have to set a minimum number before production can take place and a cut off date for the group buy. If we don\\'t get enough orders just for boards before mid August our BTC will be returned.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWe will have pricing soon.Terms Well basically same as most group buys we say we want 1000 boards for best price we collect the BTC and if we hit 1000 boards we pay for the fabrication up front and that locks everyone in as we have to convert to pay in Fiat.Return BTC if the buy fails to meet target boards by a specified date.Trying to gauge interest first but we are already committed to a larger production run we are doing as a cooperative thread here: for K1s with chips, so we can actually slip in a large amount of boards as well sans chips at any point and even during production or to keep production going if we have to wait on chips from Avalon at any point.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDYI I think... because if you don\\'t have chips why buy the boards? We are not doing a fab for people as this is just a board buy for those who might need boards. Need to ask our Cooperative members if we have anytime to collect others chips and ship them out finished but that be another thread.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhy would you take BTC as payment only to turn around and convert it to Fiat? All that\\'s going to do is tank the exchange price on BTC.... You guys make no sense... sheesh\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'ll take 16 K1s complete with all chips except ASICs as soon as you can provide them.What is the price?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPrices will be posted on the website when it is up this week.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m interested for 8 boards without avalon chips.Pls post prices when you can.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWill do as soon. Tomorrow maybe.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nInterested.. Waiting for pricing.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWe will have a large production run going and can slip in boards as a service to the community who may need it, make a little extra for the coop members without having to CONVERT these K1 orders possibly. Ok? Also how is 100 to 200 K1 boards value going to some how tank BTC prices. Wow... when did BPMC become APPLE? Hehehe.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNeed to get a minimum say 100? Price will not include shipping.I will post prices Monday after I talk to our member heading up the fabrication on logisitics of this and what minimum we would need as well.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: K1 boards, Avalon chips, ASICs\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-20 16:10:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares 1BTC=5GH/s! 4 SOLD | 64 shares left\\n### Original post:\\n2 shares pls txid \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 04:53:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #11 1119 ASICMiner Erupter USB (YOU WANTED NEW PRICE?)\\n### Original post:\\nJust checking if you finally got my sig/address.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIs #12 in the way?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nwhere\\'s the porn guys?here\\'s 5 miners from a few groups ago, and 5 miners I got from a recent grouphub and miners = 31.6 watts which is more than the PC system they\\'re running off.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAll USPS from 1st batch went out.Off to FedEx.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGood news looking forward to getting my 6 units maybe by wed or thur.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUpdated OP with shipped orders & PMed tracking numbers.Hopefully batch 2 order arrives in the next few days.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nspoke with DHL, package is scheduled to be delivered here tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nReceived 2nd batch. now shipping... you won\\'t find me for a bit...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nyou are the man! Now I just need a 50A 150port USB hub!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCool! do you provide Tracking #s?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYou\\'ll get a PM from him when it is shipped.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSpectacular quick delivery, received today after ordering less than a week ago. Canary is my go-to from now on. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nyou can get a 49 port hub, but it costs an arm and a leg\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAll USPS orders have shipped... tracking numbers will be sent later, later tonight.Off to FedEx for the international orders.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSpiffy =)\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWhen is #12 Starting?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nLOL grp 12 is about to close soon: \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nFound a few for 800. Still better to get the ankers if running on a computer. If I was only running a raspberry pi this would be the best option\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWhere did you find it for 800?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nEven at 800, the ankers are still the best way to go. Hook up five of them either direct to computer or use a seperate 7 port powered usb hub to interconnect them to a rasberry pi. Right?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\ntracking #s have been sent\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThat thing doesn\\'t even do data\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nthis one will do 49 sticks and it does data . too much money 1.1k+ usd\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\ni ordered one of them to use to brand Eligius USBs and to burn in 49 sticks at a time for their mining poolwill also post a writeup/review on the USB thread\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nHow do you brand them?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nLuke-Jr provided software to do that for Eligius pool\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nBut what is different about the device?\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nGot mine today! Trying them out now. Thanks Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nI would like to read that review. I have 4x 10 _________I am waiting on this one; 1 at 49.99 only runs 9 sticks but has a 10th port for a fan ______________this appears to be the same as my 10 port all data anker I have this with 3 different names anker, aitech and orico. They all appear to be the exact same except for the silk screen labels. so if you want a 10 port all data this is good.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nCan someone that completed an order on group buy 11 assist me to complete an order?I sent my bitcoins to Canary\\'s address as posted but I am partially BLIND, friends must read for me or one of my programs will (but that takes forever on a board) evidently I am doing something wrong & Canary can\\'t verify with all the info I have sent and he does not give refunds. I have the blockchain transaction record & can take screenshots if need be.Any help is appreciated, just PM meziggysisland\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nZiggy I can help but I will need access to your wallet. Which one did you use?\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nZiggy,the last message you PM\\'ed me verified, so you must have gotten some good help from your friends!!I\\'m sorry you\\'ve had all this trouble with sending a message which is exasperated by your partial blindness... your order has now shipped and I also included a gift for you that is bitcoin related but you can actually hold it and feel in your \\n\\n### Reply 33:\\n.95 per device plus costs (read Pricing section below).For orders of 50+ units, contact me for a quote. orders of 50+ are handled privately, unless you request to have it publicly posted.Please take a moment to read this ENTIRE post. Absolutely New Pricing, make sure you understand it.I am 4 miles from a MAJOR DHL hub that receives these orders from China. My delivery times are the best. It takes me 11 minutes to drive to DHL when necessary. My location is in a major metropolitan area next to a LARGE international airport that is a hub for shipping for all delivery companies. This gives me access to DHL, FedEx (also just 4 miles away, open till 9 PM for next day shipping). I have access to several Post Offices around me. I can ship USPS till 7 PM.Simply put, I am in the best position geographically and logistically to receive an order and to get it out to you ASAP. Period.This is the ELEVENTH group buy I\\'m organizing. The first one completed here: The second completed here: The third completed here: and the fourth one completed here: the fifth\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, 5 miners, 6 units, 50A 150port USB hub, 49 port hub, ankers, 7 port powered usb hub, Eligius USBs, 10 port all data anker, aitech, orico\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False, False, False, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 00:21:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy \"THE LUCKY\" #13 ASICMiner Erupter USB - 2 day group\\n### Original post:\\nupdated OP with all orders.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nphilipma1957 ;2; 1.88 btc yes pm senttax id to follow:this will bring my total to 6 for buy number 13. Still trying to get more coins. I would like to add more to this order on SUNDAY. thanks phil\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 09:43:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] BitFury Shares (300 GH/s)\\n### Original post:\\nUpdate:Adresse is now ready!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUpdate:The first from the remaining hashingboards has been payed in advance by my funds ... BitPay, waiting on punin change order status to processing .... status is processing Progress | Amount | GH/s | Description | Payment | Status | Order 100% | 1 | 25 | 55nm BitFury HashingBoard (October) | BTC | processing | #550 || 0% | 11 | 25 | 55nm BitFury HashingBoard (October) | open | open | 8% | 12 | 300 \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n74 / 100 available!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nA Full BitFury Miner operates with 16 HashingBoards.To avoid having not filled the last spots of the miner with hashing boards im going to try to fill up remaining 12 open spots.The total hashing power of those remaining hashing boards is 300 GH/s.Thread avoid looses throught currency volatility hashing boards will be buyed Progress | Amount | GH/s | Description | Payment | Status | Order 100% | 1 | 25 | 55nm BitFury HashingBoard (October) | BTC | processing | #550 || 0% | 11 | 25 | 55nm BitFury HashingBoard (October) | open | open | 8% | 12 | 300 hashing power of the shares is provided by those 12 remaining hashing board slots.74 / 100 Shares | Username | Status | Address | Verified 25 | Shareholders | reserved | | || 1 | ewibit | paid | - | Yes 26 |+--------+Price:1 Share = 3 GH/s = BTCFAQ:Why only 300 GH/S and not 400 GH/s?4 Hashing Boards including the mainboard (Starterkit August delivery) are allready reserved for an separate \"Participation\" Concept.Why are this shares cheaper (GH/BTC) then the other \"Participation\" concept?The \"Participation\" Concept includes additional risk distr\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BitFury Shares (300 GH/s), hashingboards, BitPay, Full BitFury Miner, 55nm BitFury HashingBoard (October), Starterkit August\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 20:58:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 3rd! 202/240 shares sold 2 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nWe just bought miner 2 and 3 in this group buy! ADDICTION now got a total of 23 miners running at 400GHs each.Miner02 - Bought - - Bought - \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSeptember is going to be a lovely month. I say we keep going. Buy as many miners as we can like an addict.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWOWDifficulty skyrocket much\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhi tyrion n blastbob, i noticed that you\\'re buying lots of shares for yourselfs. seems that you\\'re really confident that even 3rd batch group buy will bring attractive returns what do you think the roi for this? 100%? 200%? 300%? avalon batch 3 miners arriving today (2 months late) are estimated to earn around 50% only - meaning they invested $79 and will get around $120 in 2 years.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWell it all depends on the eventual difficulty when mining starts and and the exact delivery date, but yes we still think it\\'ll be attractive returns.. At least the first few months should be good. I\\'m still confidend we\\'ll make more than ROI, but it\\'s to soon to tell if it\\'s be 120% or 500%.. The timeframe will be a lot quicker than 2 years I think though, if you look at the rate difficulty is going up.Cheers,\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nwow 500% - tell me how will it be possible to attain 500%? hmm... maybe only if other asic miners will not deliver or be late in delivering... if that\\'s the case, will the 500% be attainable? boss, what do you mean by 120% -> 1 btc investment will bring 2.2 btc?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHo ho ho! I didn\\'t say 500.. I tried to explain it can be anywhere betwee 120 and 500... And 120 is return of 120 for 100 invested.. so 20% profit.to give an example; if difficulty keeps going up by 20% average (which should be a pretty dark scenario).. The first week we\\'ll mine around 8 btc per miner.. however that profit will keep droppign 20% a week then if diff keeps rising.. So you see, difficulty has huge impact on ROI. It\\'ll be most important to just get the miners up and running asap.. To that effect; we\\'re discussing if flying/driving over to pickup both day 1 and day 2 shipments might be better as shipping will most likely take a few days to. If we pick them up ourselves we can have all miners running on day 3 maybe even on day 2. Something we probably won\\'t make if we have them shipped.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSix shares, please.TxID: signed message----There are five sending addresses in TxID first is 1N2RSVV... For this miner\\'s payout, coud I use this typoed the first address in the Tx...)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSorry for the late reply Updated start post! Welcome!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miner 2, miner 3, avalon batch 3 miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-21 23:50:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy \"THE LUCKY\" #13 ASICMiner Erupter USB - 2 day group 236+\\n### Original post:\\nphilipma1957 ;5; 4.6130588 pm sent tx id these 5 bring me to 11 for this buy\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nphilipma1957 ;3; 2.8284 btc this will bring me to 14 for this buy number 13.pm sent tax id\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nLess than 4.5 hrs to go!!!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThis time I finally ordered as many as I wanted 14 all told. I scraped up enough coins. Looking forward to both buy 12 and buy 13 deliveries.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\njust wait until this friday if there is another order...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nreactor; 15; 14.242353; Y-E\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAdding an extra 2 to previous extra 1.8846471 (will confirm signed msg in PM)New total:Ryhan; 20; 20.1264706; Y\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\naurel57; 3; 3.01; ; N\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 04:29:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BPMC K1 Batch 1 WORLDWIDE Group buy 0.8374 btc each\\n### Original post:\\nGroup buy is now OPEN\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nFirst 2 have been sold. Contact me if you are interested. These k1\\'s will be more powerful then the Asicminer block eruptor usb and CHEAPER! These are capable of at least 400MH/s\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m interested in a small number (2 or 3 perhaps). What is the postage to UK? Will they get stuck in customs?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThese are the postage options.EMS PRIORITY MERCHANDISE USD 33,85EMS MERCHANDISE USD 30,11Express Pack USD 50,70 Ordinary Pack USD 28,80 I don\\'t think it will get stuck in customs as it is a small package but I can not guarantee.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAll buyers are responsible to at least check with customs in their country regarding any computer peripheral devices like these USB miners.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThis is the same as the other usb miner.. no ROI.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThat is incorrect depending on how high you clock these you can get a ROI\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat is the shipping cost to Canada sir? Interested in 1 or 2 of these.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThese are the shipping optionsEMS PRIORITY MERCHANDISE USD $23.48EMS MERCHANDISE USD $20.43Express Pack USD $52.80Ordinary Pack USD $24.10\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nCould you quote 1 unit shipped to Canada?I\\'m getting around 1 BTC if I factor in shipping as a cost.. Is this correct?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThe price would be 1.0974BTC you can ship up to 20 k1\\'s in the package. This is if you choose the ordinary package.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHmmm. Can you put one aside for me at that price then?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWould there be any way to cut down box size as well?If you can fit 20 units in a box and I only want 1 its a waste of shipping space. :/\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI will have to talk to the manufacturer about that because they are shipping them. Also yes I can put one aside for you.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThank you sir!I just don\\'t want to end up paying for cargo space I will not be using.. You know?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWatching.I am now undecided if I should go with K1 or Block Erupter. Given that K1 can be clocked higher and costs less, I am leaning towards it. On the other hand, it\\'s not as tested as Eruprers...Maybe I should forgo both and settle for KnC (once they actually start shipping)In any case, could I tentatively reserve 20 units? I\\'ll make the final decision in a couple of weeks.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nyes i understand. it is also a waste of resources.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThat is ok. Just make sure that you get funds in before the timer ends. Also we can ship all 20 k1\\'s for you in one package to minimise postage costs.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWe will be doing a 24 hour burn on each K1 before it is shipped. Given the work BKKCoins is doing I suspect that his design will provide a superior product. The real measure I think is time. How fast will you get those KnCs versus Block Erupters and our K1s. ROI is certainly going to be tight any miner you buy and we are trying to price competitively especially for group buys. Hope whichever you chose it works out for you!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWill these devices be compatible with all mining apps?Especially Cgminer, Bfgminer and Bitminter?Phil.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nCgminer driver is being worked on by bkkcoins.Bfgminer and Bitminter - AFAIK nobody is working on it. Im sure once the devices are out in the wild, people would adapt the driver for other mining apps.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nHalfway there only need to get 25 more pledged and we can start to organise payment and order the k1\\'s!Feel free to pm me or post here with questions.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nhello sir i am from Egypt but alive in Indonesia (Jakarta) how much 10 k1 will cost and any lock pickup ?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThe cost for 10 k1\\'s would be 8.374BTC and postage will be about 0.15 BTC to ship all 10\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThese will work fine with Cgminer and Bgminer will probably update as well.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI think you misunderstand mate,what he means is package, not box.20 units in a package will be bigger than 1 unit in a package, but both will still be 1 package.It would be daft to put 1 unit in a box made for 20 cheers,kev\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nHow are they going to be cooled? Will you have a small VGA memory-style heatsink attached?\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nWe will be using custom heatsinks that fit the the k1 perfectly and provide the best possible cooling.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nBicknellski, I saw your note on the hub thread. Are these K1\\'s going to require USB 3.0 hubs? I already ordered 3 D-Link USB 2.0 hubs, but I can still cancel my order and buy something else, so a prompt reply would be appreciated.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nNo the k1 was built to run off of a USB 2 hub. The dlink hub will be sufficient in powering the k1. I have ordered the same hub for use with my raspi and the k1\\'s.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nNeed to check your HUBs carefully to power any of these USB miners.From what I gather the hubs can be either 2.0 or 3.0 it is just that 3.0 hubs are designed for more power and that is why BKKCoins mentioned it in the brackets. So\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC K1, Asicminer block eruptor usb, D-Link USB 2.0 hubs, raspi\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-01 21:28:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: Avalon ASIC CHIPS Groupbuy AUSTRALIA\\n### Original post:\\nHi all,I\\'m looking for fellow aussies interested in a groupbuy of Avalon Asic Chips.As my status reads I\\'m a newbie to these forums but a solid Bitcoin follower and supporter.I\\'m from Sydney Australia and would like to make contact with other enthusiasts like myself.I\\'m interested in a group buy of Avalon Chips as a minimum and perhaps combining our efforts into getting the chips onto working boards so we can start mining here in the sunny land of OZ. There are PCB board manufactures here that can make the boards to Australian standards.There are two ways to do this. Take trust out of the equation and meet and swap details, perhaps put something down in writing (perhaps not to everyone\\'s liking but preferable and solid)The other is to get a trusted escrow happening. I\\'ve emailed JohnK and because I\\'m new it doesn\\'t make sense to give me the trust unless I put a security deposit down with him and ID. I\\'m willing to do this if we can\\'t get it happening with option 1, but I would want a percentage cut for time and stress!What say you? Any fellow Aussies out there? Should we get it rocking for the land of Oz?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi mate - Im in Perth id be willing to grab some chips but escrow would be a must\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOK. One for Escrow. Are you interested in getting the boards made here as a group as well?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCount me in for whatever needs to be done. I\\'ve ordered 20 from Switzerland already, but we need a big local buy and some people organising PCB\\'s and DIY Kits etc.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'m not sure what JohnK needs down for a security deposit yet, but I\\'m looking for about 2k chips myself.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThat amount would be decided by your participants I guess.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nQLDer here. I\\'m interested. Escrow a must for sure.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHow far along is this? Any pledges yet? Time is of the essence. If you are further along than [Group Buy #2], then I\\'ll tag along with you instead.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJollyGood! jolly bad, I\\'ve already spent most of my BTC on zefir\\'s Batch 5, 200 chips. So I won\\'t be pledging any BTC to this Group buy. Maybe in the future when DIY boards comes to fruition. Be glad to collaborate to get the chips working tho. Are you an EE? I\\'m not, but I work with a bunch of EEs and S/w dev. who said they would give me a hand. Unfortunately they are not into Bitcoins, yet. I\\'ll be following the Open Source DIY project closely. Was that your plan on development? Or do you have a development team?QGPS: BTW, I\\'m in Sydney.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThe pledges are the ones you see here. I\\'m just sounding out the idea to see if there is enough interest. I agree though, time is of the essence.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi QuiveringGibbage. I looked at Zefir\\'s group buy as well. Customs and duty into Europe then Customs and duty into Australia. I liked though that Burinin was \"just down the road\" in Germany and might be able to make the boards. I\\'m not an EE, but I work for a large Consumer Electronic company here in AUS but all our stuff is manufactured in China. I would want the boards manufactured here due to time and quality control. Lets see what the interest here is on the chips. Most people seem to want escrow and I really wanted to meet people and make something more formalized...taking TRUST out of the equation and going for something a bit more solid. Saying that the future is Bitcoin and we have a window of opportunity. If we order a batch here we will get 8 advanced chips from avalon to start developing the boards in May. Lets see where we are with interest this time tommorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI\\'ll commit to 100 chips for now, will probably up my order once I have a more solid idea of the fiat costs in making these usable.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHi ausbitbank. Unfortunately after 24 hours I\\'m going to declare that interest has been too small for me to continue gathering interest for a group buy. It may seem like 24 hours is too short a time but speed is of the essence here, and I\\'d rather that other bitcoiners find a place in other group buys, even if it\\'s international.It\\'ll be interesting to see what the hashrate difficulty is by August when the ASICS finally flood the market vs the price of bitcoin. Regardless of which the network looks like it\\'s strengthening against a 51% attack from all the interest I\\'ve read on these forums.Good luck guys and I wish you all the wealth and happiness as we enter the new age of a global economy and the true start to a class one civilisation!All the bestJollyGood!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHi guys,Well, ... I have a Group Buy. My country isn\\'t that far from Australia. Maybe we can consolidate there. Together, hopefully we get to 10,000 chips fast.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nInteresting times indeed, either way it was good to connect. Best of luck!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nEr .. I\\'d be interested, but bitstamp has no useful info about it\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHey fellow aussies.I found a group buy and I\\'m ordering 160 chips which will cost me\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Asic Chips, PCB board, DIY Kits, zefir\\'s Batch 5 200 chips, DIY boards, advanced chips from avalon\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-22 23:37:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares 1.1BTC=5GH/s! 4 SOLD | 53 shares left\\n### Original post:\\n.4 btc sent for my 4 miners.TXid: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n0.2 BTC sent for my 2 shares.txid: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 01:28:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] [30/50] Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nAustralian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter Group BuyGROUP BUY IS NOW CLOSEDI was very kindly approached by another group buy operator who offered to bundle the orders I have to date with his order. I have taken this option and payment has been sent, so this buy is now closed. I will cover the difference in the shipping cost compared to buying direct from ASICMINER, so the price should be the same for my purchasers. The final tally was 30 Erupters ordered.I am putting this group buy together to service other Australian users who have had difficulty purchasing these for a reasonable cost. This group by will be open until 5.00pm CST on 5th July 2013. If there is still further demand at the end of this period I will consider running another buy.PricingThe price per unit will be BTC1.15. This fee covers paying GST on arrival in Australia and express shipping and handling from me to the seller.On a case by case basis I am able to accept Australian Dollars via direct deposit, although I recommend the buyer purchasing BTC directly through Bit Trade Australia. If you require a direct deposit option please send me a PM. The 4 hour MtGox AUD average exchange rate will be used for AUD purchases, p\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAustralian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter Group BuyGROUP BUY IS NOW CLOSEDI was very kindly approached by another group buy operator who offered to bundle the orders I have to date with his order. I have taken this option and payment has been sent, so this buy is now closed. I will cover the difference in the shipping cost compared to buying direct from ASICMINER, so the price should be the same for my purchasers. The final tally was 30 Erupters ordered.Order StatusAn order has been placed for 30 USB Erupters.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI have received a tracking number for this from the seller. Expecting delivery in about a week, so unless there are any issues buyers should have the Erupters in their hands late next week.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Block Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 17:01:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares 1.1BTC=5GH/s! 4 SOLD | 45 shares left\\n### Original post:\\n1.2 BTC sent. adding 1 share, and including the additional 0.1 for my existing share.What happens in the morning the the price of BTC crashes to $80?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 18:05:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 3rd! 224/240 shares sold 2 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nHi, please reserve last 16 shares from 3rd Jupiter, I\\'ll pay you 5.6btc at about 20.00UTC.Bye\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi,Added you and two others who bought trhu PM to miner 3. Bumped some of our own shares to miner 4 which is now officially for sale! Only 234 shares left! Get them while the\\'re hot Cheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 3rd Jupiter, miner 3, miner 4\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-23 20:11:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares 1.1BTC=5GH/s! 4 SOLD | 44 shares left\\n### Original post:\\ntxid 0.2 btc\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTransaktions-ID: btc extra for my 1 shareKNC Jupiter # 3\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nJust sent 0.2 BTC to secure my 2 shares.TxID: have bumped me down to Jupiter #5, this cannot be so, I purchased shares for Jupiter #4.Please confirm this.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n sent my 2.2BTC for 2 shares.Let me know if covering a few non-responsive (or uncooperative) shareholders\\' 0.1 BTC will move me up the line lol. Obviously I don\\'t want to cut in front of anyone, but if it helps move the purchase date up and they\\'ve already declined....Anyway, thanks for setting this up. Looking forward to it!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nplease reserve 2 shares for me, I am pending a coinbase transfer\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhen will knc deliver the not-yet-ordered Jupiters? Could it be before 1nov?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI think BTC hits 100 today/tomorrow on gox. Buy the miner today! ?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 21:17:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] KnCMiner Shares 1BTC=5GH/s [OPEN]\\n### Original post:\\nI am interested in buying 3.5 of the reserves for miner #3 if they open up.If you don\\'t want to split them, I would do 4, but I would prefer to do 3.5.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTX - Deposit Addr - \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo how is the mining going to be done? Is it going to be solo mining, part of a pool, part of multiple pools?If pool(s), which?If multiple pools, what type of change management strategy will be used?Would you be doing DGM, PPS, or other?Would there be voting on these things?I know that things could change between now and when the boxes come, but I was just wondering the game plan.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThe hash rate does not really allow for solo mining at both the current difficulty and the difficulty that\\'ll probably be the case once they are delivered.I think a pool and two fallback pools would suffice. I believe it would be best to have pools where you can publicly view hashrate and hashrate over time. The only one that has that that I know of is Eligius, but I suppose waldohoover might prefer to have them as part of Mining Team Reddit on BTCGuild. Alternatively, you could use any pool and then use a webinterface for viewing hashrate, supposing such a thing exists for the mining client KnCMiner\\'s machines will support (I know it does for cgminer, it ships with miner.php)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAs a BFL Asic Miner, I like Eclipse MC - using bfgminer.I find with Eligius, it can take a while to get to the min and you can\\'t adjust it, and if we are doing weekly drafts, it may not be best.Another one I like is DeepBit.Ozcoin is nice but I found my returns were smaller than expected.But either way, most pools have an API where you can pull the data, so it would be fairly trivial to create a site to show stats.Also many have email alerts on events, so we could have a forwarding event or parser for that.Depending on how my time is when the hardware comes, I can possibly assist in this.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'d like to reserve 1 Share\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI definitely want a piece of a Jupiter, and I can pay on Wednesday, so I\\'m shopping around now...Is that comment about waiting to order when BTC/USD goes up a joke? Are you seriously just going to sit on everyone\\'s money and not order for weeks or possibly months if the exchange rate stays 80-90 or worse?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCan we set a date where if the price of bitcoins don\\'t hit 100 that we can request refunds and be out of the group buy?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat about making a mandatory change (for the recent GB\\'s anyway) to 1.1? Refund anyone\\'s BTC who doesn\\'t want the new price, and promise to reimburse buyers if BTC hits $X by a certain date. If a buyer will trust you with a BTC, they can certainly trust you to refund the 0.1 should BTC jump higher. At least this way you have a confirmed deal for people to buy in to. I suspect the fact that your deal is in limbo is keeping buyers away. Just an idea...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSo now each share gets [5GH/s - 3%=] 4.85 GH/s indead of 4.375 GH/s?If thats the case, awesome!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi Guys I\\'d like to buy in with a couple shares at 1.1BTC but if i buy in now what is the chance that the machine will actually be purchased and won\\'t just all refund?Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAm interested for a couple/few shares as well. Is this still going forward?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPlease reserve 1 share.Thanks in advance\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'m in for 3 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI also want to buy some shares, is this still going?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'ll take 2 if this is still live.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nPlease reserve 20 shares for me, will pay tomorrow (its already late where i live).\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI\\'d like to reserve 1 share, if this Group Buy is still alive.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWhat can be some other fees? (other than 3%)or, what can be some other fees that we are not thinking about right now.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nTXID: address : \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWhen is Miner #4 going to be shipped? Is it Day #1 (september)?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nHere are my payment details for the 2 shares I reserved Wallet Address: \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI think the best strategy would be to devalue the old 1BTC shares, such that they are only 4 GH/s (5GH/s / 1.25). Anyone who wishes a refund gets one. The remaining amount for a full miner will be new shares, because it won\\'t be going over 100$ anytime soon, so you could bump up the miner #4 shareholders.I think this would be fairest for everyone involved and would lead to the quickest purchase of the miners.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nhay! nice to see you are there is some progress on the #4 Miner. i will pay, the last 0,25BTC in a few day\\'s. and lets hope the BTC is going up too 100$ soon.....\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nBump for 27? left\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nWe hit 104 today so far. Ordered?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nHi All1 share for me please: PM you my details.Lets get this Jupiter No 4 guys..\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nIs it closed? Its a bit hard to go through each post on \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares 1BTC=5GH/s, BFL Asic Miner, Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 11:21:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]$55/chip - GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA + board - 313 sold, 9/100 batch\\n### Original post:\\nAnything new Lucko?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI guess I can share this picture. is a board that will be used for testing if we got BFL board right. The only difference is that it has bank of capacitors on top... So we can test how far it will go... New power supply is not ready jet... But it is smart to use unmodified just to test if everything is OK. If there would be a lot of changes and it wouldn\\'t work you might end up wondering did we got BFL part wrong or are the modifications...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo assuming it works what\\'s the hash going to be for this board?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWell this should work with 2 chips and then we plan to add 2 more and see if it works. If it doesn\\'t we will add capacitors into bank one by one and see what happens... This is not final board... But it was the first we created some time ago and decided that we should used it first just to make sure this part works...EDIT: who knows it might end up working with 8 I don\\'t think so but who knows...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGot this mail from BFL... It is a good bed news kind a thing... Lack of informations and them not answering mails in time...That was for my last order and of I jumped at the chance to get more samples... But I figure out that 2 samples are taken out of the order not given extra...Since I have 16 chips in first batch it is not a problem but not ideal since some might end up destroyed... I asked them if I can increase the orders by 5 chips so we will see what happens...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi guys (Luko),I received a tracking number from BFL for 2 sample chips. As soon as I have them in my hand I will forward them on to Lucko.It looks like they take a week to be delivered to Germany, unfortunately I\\'m away all week next week (hacker camp OHM2013 in NL).So I guess the earliest I can send them to Lucko is Monday the week after next!Lucko ... warm the PCB board up and get ready to do some real testing All the best! one4many\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMan bfl is shady\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'ll say. Taking sample chips out of the number of chips in the order...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAsshole move\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nNow I realy don\\'t get it will I get 2 or 5 samples... I asked for 5 and asked if I can increase orders by 5 and got this replayNow I don\\'t know if this No apples to increasing the order or getting 5 chips... But since speed of communication is increasing I guess I will know that soon...Well that was quick... I must say BFL communications is improving...So I will get 2+5+5 samples and first 2 were send... So I have samples on the way as well...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nGot 2 tracking numbers. One for 2 chips and one for 10 chips... Nice... But they don\\'t work... Well they might start working later...one4many I guess no need to rush with chips... I will let you know if I end up needing them...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSure no problem! I\\'ll be on standbyAll the best! one4many\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAlso I want tell you that for not have problems with customs to sent with simple register airmail and not dhl or FedEx is awful these company always will pay taxes with these\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI know English is not my first language but thous 2 mails contradict each other right?But OK it looks like samples are free just additional chips are taken out of the order...Anyway I\\'m waiting for a quote for test board now that everything is ready... Estimate I got at start of GB was 1000... (one off... so this is more expansive then production)...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYou understand it correctly.The second email was a \"clarification\", more like a correction (yes they do contradict each other). It looks like we get 2 free sample chips for every 100 ordered but you can request additional that would be deducted from the amount ordered. WOW 1000 for the test board...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL board, power supply, sample chips, PCB board\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 11:47:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 4th! 21/240 shares sold; 3 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nCut after dashes to check this message tyrion70, I just sent 5.6BTC with txid Please wait some time before checking for transaction id as my client is still syncing with the network.I signed this message with my own address message signature is \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n there allright Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPaid 1 Share: Name on BitFunder is Regenmacher.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhi boss, 5 shares paid for miner #3 for the reservation reserved thru PM.tx id: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\na friend wanted to join the GB and he\\'s thinking of getting 3 shares, which is equivalent to 150 shares in Bitfunder (1.05btc)and another 3 shares for my own as well (1.05btc)can you reserved it for me please, until i get his money? so im looking at 6 shares to buy\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n14 x more shares on Transaction id you kindly.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n1 share id: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 14:15:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #14 ASICMiner Erupter USB - 2+ day group 21+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nziggysisland; 11; 10.48; Y;\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\njosiasrdz; 5; 4.89; NTX ID: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nreactor; 20; 18.9564706; Y\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 17:16:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN]Group Buy #6 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.92 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nPm Sent.11 ordered with international shipping & tracking\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed. Thank you for your order.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1 hour 20 minutes remain. Thanks for any orders.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n ins\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nConfirmed. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPlease place any orders in the next 7 hours in this thread or PM me. Payment will be sent this morning. Thank you for your orders.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks for your help on these group orders!! My order from an earlier group buy arrived very quickly and is furiously hashing away. Thanks !\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAre you still accepting orders?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAny one wishing to place an order at this group buy prices, go ahead and send payment then PM me with your payment details+shipping address. Thank you. Group buy #5 and #6 should ship in the next two days if not sooner.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSend payment and PM me. I will get you a some USB miners ASAP!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n7/24/13 Group buy #5 and #6 have shipped! Tracking numbers to be sent tomorrow morning as I am off to work right now. Thank you for your orders!7/23/13 Group buy #5 and #6 should ship in the next two days if not sooner.Group Buy #6All USB Miners 0.92 BTC!Timer removed. End time: first mass production batch (sapphire) has finished its PCB production and assembly today.It has significant improvements in:Heat reduction: 500-510mA We stressed it with 9 Block Erupter USBs in a row without heatsinks heating up each other in a very dense USB hub with 25C without active airflow. No unexpected (non-probabilistic) HW errors ever happen.Speed: This comes after better stability. Now the hashrate converges to its theoretical value of 336MH/s.Appearance: SMT machine assembly (sapphire)heat-sink front-case 2-in-1 logo-ed (sapphire).LED added.Ordering:Send payment for amount of miners ordered to the common payment address at send payment from a wallet address you control. PM me your full shipping address (and phone number if along with your transaction id from the payment you sent.Please post in this forum in this format: ; \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n7/24/13 Group buy #5 and #6 have shipped! Tracking numbers to be sent tomorrow morning as I am off to work right now. Thank you for your orders!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, USB miners, Block Erupter USBs\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 17:17:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED]Group Buy #5 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.91-0.93 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\n7/20/13 Payment Sent!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGroup buy #5 and #6 should ship in the next two days if not sooner.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n7/24/13 Group buy #5 and #6 have shipped! Tracking numbers to be sent tomorrow morning as I am off to work right now. Thank you for your orders!7/23/13 Group buy #5 and #6 should ship in the next two days if not sooner.7/20/13 Payment Sent!Group Buy #6 Will Start Immediately Here Following Group Buy #5. Send Group Buy#6 Payments To Appreciation Group Buy #5All USB Miners 0.93 BTC or less!Timer removed. End time: first mass production batch (sapphire) has finished its PCB production and assembly today.It has significant improvements in:Heat reduction: 500-510mA We stressed it with 9 Block Erupter USBs in a row without heatsinks heating up each other in a very dense USB hub with 25C without active airflow. No unexpected (non-probabilistic) HW errors ever happen.Speed: This comes after better stability. Now the hashrate converges to its theoretical value of 336MH/s.Appearance: SMT machine assembly (sapphire)heat-sink front-case 2-in-1 logo-ed (sapphire).LED added.Ordering:Send payment for amount of miners ordered to the common payment address at send payment from a wallet address you control. PM me your full shipping address (and \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n7/24/13 Group buy #5 and #6 have shipped! Tracking numbers to be sent tomorrow morning as I am off to work right now. Thank you for your orders!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, USB Miners, Block Erupter USBs, USB hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 11:06:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 4th! 42/240 shares sold; 3 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nUpdated start post, all above payments confirmed. Thanks@Hasher; when will you be making the payment? I added you to the list already.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nboss, just to inform you that i have 10 shares for miner #3, wherein i paid in two different times. one is 5 shares, another also 5 shares. i see in the OP that i only have 5 shares for miner #3.regards\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\none more plsss thx\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMy apologies, mistyped a name Corrected now!Updated start post as well Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nhoping to seal the deal by end of this week. thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 16:28:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 4th! 53/240 shares sold; 3 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nSent 2.8 btc more for 8 shares\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 17:54:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] GROUP BUY #2 ASICMINER ERUPTER USB MINER 0.99 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nWhoa that was quite fast.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOnce I get these I might order more. Need to first see how to connect them all. Already have 10 running full-time.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n7/16/13 Arrival In Omaha NE!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nany news here? I might get 10 more once I get these running on my new USB hubs. Will have space for 6 hubs on my ports after these!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAll orders will be shipped by tomorrow morning\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n7/17/13 Miners have arrived!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGreat news!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAll orders in group buy have shipped! Tracking numbers are being sent in the next hour.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nTHIS GROUP BUY IS CLOSED. PLEASE SEE MY GROUP BUY #5 HERE All orders in group buy have shipped! Tracking numbers are being sent in the next hour.7/17/13 Miners have arrived!7/16/13 Arrival In Omaha NE!7/13/13 Arrival In Cincinnati USA!7/12/13 Tracking Number Received From Friedcat Arrival In Hong Kong!7/9/13 Payment was sent.CONFIRMED USB MINERS AVAILABLE!GROUP BUY CLOSES ONCE TIMER ENDS! GREAT NEWS! I HAVE RECEIVED A PAYMENT ADDRESS FROM FRIEDCAT AS A RESELLER OF ASICMINER ERUPTER USB MINERS! ORDER WILL BE PLACED WHEN TIMER ENDS! PLEASE GET YOUR ORDERS IN NOW TO AVOID DISAPPOINTMENT! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDERS AND SUPPORT!Timer removed. End time: first mass production batch (sapphire) has finished its PCB production and assembly today.It has significant improvements in:Heat reduction: 500-510mA We stressed it with 9 Block Erupter USBs in a row without heatsinks heating up each other in a very dense USB hub with 25C without active airflow. No unexpected (non-probabilistic) HW errors ever happen.Speed: This comes after better stability. Now the hashrate converges to its theoretical value of 336MH/s.Appearance: SMT machine assembly (sapphire)heat-sink fr\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWELL DONE!!!!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAwesome. Thank you for the prompt shipping and excellent communication. Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAwesome! I can\\'t wait to get it!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThank everyone for your trust and support. Good luck hashing bitcoin with your miners!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDid someone from this group received yet the eruptors?I\\'m checking daily the tracking. My package got stuck in Chicago since Monday and only got release from custom only this morning......\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThat is very strange. Sorry to hear that. Other orders sent international have had no problems with customs and arrived very quickly! Must have been the unlucky one customs randomly pick. Everyone else have received their miners by now.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, USB hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-12 13:57:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #9 317/50 ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nSweet thx\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ngroup #10 is up: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ncool.Please pm fedex tracking when you get a chance.If Coinbase goes thru fast enough might be able to get in group 10 for 30 units.edit: Looks like I better buy 28 units to save for the next batch\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIs it possible to order \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nty got it - great job as always.. now I just wait 4 days for coinbase.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nyes! group 10: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAny update on when we can expect these to be shipped?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAccording to friedcat, they were shipped. However I have not received the corresponding tracking number yet. I think friedcat and company are busy with whatever is getting announced on the 10th and probably haven\\'t gotten to emailing out tracking numbers yet.Additionally, I do not withhold info as it becomes available and I do post it here ASAP.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFolks, I have not received a tracking # from friedcat. As I suspected, him and his company are busy doing whatever they need to do with this whole July 10th date...However!!!I just received a phone call from DHLs automated phone system and a text message informing me that I have a delivery tomorrow.Therefore the remaining shipments are going out tomorrow\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nDude thats the best news - been going stir crazy - so he must have shipped it and somehow the \\'automated\\' tracking # didnt get sent out, maybe a typo typing in your email address\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWoo fed ex even called to check delivery details, my miners had stopped in Hawaii for a vacation before I sentence them to hard labor for the rest of their lives.Thanks again Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nArrived at Sort Facility CINCINNATI HUB - USA\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWith delivery courier FRANKLIN PARK, IL - USA\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nDelivered. shipping out the remaining orders.Raffle, please send me your shipping address as a signed message.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nRemaining orders have shipped out.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'m a little confused because I got your PM with tracking today the 10th (PM sent on the 9th) and delivery is also today the 10th by USPS. I\\'m ready for more USB Erupter goodness though. It says the order was shipped on the 8th and delivery is expected on the 10th.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nmultiple orders were placed and received. multiple shipments were sent out. today all outstanding orders shipped out. except 1, the red NO.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThanks for keeping track! I sure lost it \\') So I\\'m expecting delivery soon, today or tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\neveryone has been sent a tracking number by now. group 9 has been fulfilled.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nthanks dude got my 5 sticks today\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThis is the NINTH group buy I\\'m organizing. The first one completed here: The second completed here: The third completed here: and the fourth one completed here: the fifth completed here: sixth, seventh and eight can be found on forumsStatus updates:2013-06-28: group buy #9 setup2013-06-28: if you order 30+, I will ship via USPS Express service. (USA offer only)2013-06-28: add .40 for next day FedEx shipping within USA to any order.2013-06-28: don\\'t have enough funds to order? Consider using www.bitinstant.com to fund via money gram deposit directly to your (NOT mine!!!) bitcoin address. bitcoins are sent to you as soon as that cash is deposited at your local wallmart, cvs, jewel etc...2013-06-28: HOW TO SIGN A MESSAGE TO ME (YOUR SHIPPING INFO): Please NOTE: the above example is NOT the same as sending a signed message with your transaction. If you are new to this (aka noob), please read this so that you understand what to do. This is the single most problematic step in the ordering process. Here\\'s how to sign a message with a blockchain.info wallet: This group is now open to international orders. It is limited to those countries wh\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 19:17:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #12 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Quick 2 day group 818+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nThe LUCKY 13: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust got a call from DHL that I have a delivery coming on Monday Batch 1 of this group will ship out Monday folks.remaining orders are right behind, but I don\\'t have their tracking number yet although I believe they shipped out too.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI have 2 more tracking numbers and they will arrive either Monday or Tuesday, I will know later today.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ngood news. looking forward to these.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThank you for the work~\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nConfirmed with DHL: Everything will be here Monday for grp #12, and it will ship out to you Monday as well.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGreat news!!!Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThank you sir.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n.95 per device plus costs (read Pricing section below).For orders of 50+ units, contact me for a quote. orders of 50+ are handled privately, unless you request to have it publicly posted.Please take a moment to read this ENTIRE post. New Pricing model, make sure you understand it.I am 4 miles from a MAJOR DHL hub that receives these orders from China. My delivery times are the best. It takes me 11 minutes to drive to DHL when necessary. My location is in a major metropolitan area next to a LARGE international airport that is a hub for shipping for all delivery companies. This gives me access to DHL, FedEx (also just 4 miles away, open till 9 PM for next day shipping). I have access to several Post Offices around me. I can ship USPS till 7 PM.Simply put, I am in the best position geographically and logistically to receive an order and to get it out to you ASAP. Period.This is the TWELFTH group buy I\\'m organizing. The first one completed here: The second completed here: The third completed here: and the fourth one completed here: the fifth completed here: sixth, seventh, eight, ninth, tenth and eleventh can be found here on forumsTimer removed. End \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nReceived. now shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ngreat news!!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSent you a PM.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nFrom Russia with love: \"Incredibly, 2 days! Usually, 2 month. I got a USB Block Erupter. Big thanks! Spasibo\"Shipped on 22nd, he got them 2 days later... most of my international customers enjoy fast delivery without getting stuck in customs. you get what you pay for.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nim not that lucky ;p it says mine was released today from customs so im expecting it tommorow. but anyway it was in my country after only 2 days too so ye thats very fast\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\njust checked your tracking, your package does not show any issues.getting customs release is a normal status message during the course of delivery. international packages take 2 days to MAJOR cities, otherwise it\\'s an extra day or two after it reaches the first distribution hub in your country.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nmaybe u r not looking carefoulyit was stuck long time at customs from wednesday 8am to thursday 3pm and i know message about release is normal dont worry im just telling it took long time at custom bcoz normally it should be done at wednesday toobut maybe they checked all devices or something\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI am looking carefully... the time frame is within expected amount. they probably did check it, but it took 1 day. they weren\\'t checking from 8 am to 3 PM none-stop. it sat in a queue in customs, they got it, looked at it and released it. you got fantastic turnaround with customs due to FedEx. you\\'d be waiting for weeks with USPS\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\ni know all thisand it took 2 days not 1 because package was ready for customs from 8am and its early.. they had all day to do this they finished at the end of next day (working hours)ye im very happy with fedex and dhl for international packages\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nyou love to argue over spilled milk..\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nit was not my intention to aruge i just wanted to post that customs in my country held package litlle longer than normal and as i said package arrived in my city after 2 days from USA so that was very fast\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, USB Block Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 23:07:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED]GROUP BUY #3 ASICMINER ERUPTER USB MINER 0.92-0.99 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nGroup Buy Is Closed! Please Place Any New Orders In Group Buy #4 here Orders for this group buy #3 will be placed after timer expires as originally planned.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n7/14/13 Payment was sent early this morning for group buy #3 and #4 . Thanks for the orders!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n7/15/13 Awaiting confirmation of shipping and tracking number from friedcat for group buy #3 and #4 .\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n7/16/13 Tracking number received from friedcat for group buy #3 and #4 . Miners were just shipped today.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n7/18/13 Arrival at Cincinnati OH for group buy #3 and #4 .\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n7/19/13 Arrival at Omaha NE for group buy #3 and #4 .\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMiners have arrived! All orders will be shipped by Tuesday morning if not sooner. Thank you for your orders!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAll miners have shipped! Tracking numbers to be provided early morning Wednesday(I am off to work right now). Thank you for your orders.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAll miners have shipped! Tracking numbers to be provided early morning Wednesday(I am off to work right now). Thank you for your orders. 7/19/13 Arrival at Omaha NE for group buy #3 and #4 .7/18/13 Arrival at Cincinnati OH for group buy #3 and #4 .7/16/13 Tracking number received from friedcat for group buy #3 and #4 . Miners were just shipped today. 7/15/13 Awaiting confirmation of shipping and tracking number from friedcat for group buy #3 and #4 . 7/14/13 Payment was sent early this morning for group buy #3 and #4 . Thanks for the orders! Group Buy Is Closed! Please Place Any New Orders In Group Buy #5 here Orders for this group buy #3 will be placed after timer expires as originally planned. Group Buy #5 with lower prices is started here I will be starting a new group buy soon with even lower prices to be competitive with other group buys Timer removed. End time: first mass production batch (sapphire) has finished its PCB production and assembly today.It has significant improvements in:Heat reduction: 500-510mA We stressed it with 9 Block Erupter USBs in a row without heatsinks heating up each other in a very dense USB hub with 25C without \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nMiner delivered and hashing! thanks for a great group buy sonic! much appreciated!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, Block Erupter USBs\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 04:22:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares 1.1BTC=5GH/s! 4 SOLD | 14 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nPlease reserve me 3 more shares, I\\'m waiting on a pending transfer. Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 05:11:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [PURCHASED] BFL ASIC Chips $57/chip for a limited time. Batch 2 - 88/112 Left\\n### Original post:\\n112 chips purchased today for Batch #2. I will continue selling remaining chips at $57 through Sunday.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 10:29:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] BPMC K1 Batch 1 WORLDWIDE Group buy 0.77 btc each\\n### Original post:\\n6 days left price slashed down to 0.77 BTC those who have already paid will be partially refunded.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhat is the postage prices to Thailand ?Set me down for 7 pieces please, have to fill up a few slots on my eruptors hubs.Luke\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nhere are the postage options to thailand.EMS PRIORITY DOCUMENTUSD 12,46EMS PRIORITY MERCHANDISEUSD 18,29EMS DOCUMENTUSD 12,20EMS MERCHANDISEUSD 13,30\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThis would be my choice.Give please a message, when you need finally the payment.Luke\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWill do.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI will be reducing my reservation from 20 to 15 miners.Just to confirm: shipping to a European country (outside of EU) will be:Ordinary Pack USD 28,80Correct?Is it OK if I use Bitstamp exchange rate to calculate shipping fee, as that is THE exchange that I am using?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYes that is the correct shipping. Using bitstamp is fine.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCan you quote me a final price shipped to Canada?I\\'ve got enough BTC to pay for this now.. Just need to know how much to send. Cheapest yet most secure shipping preferred.THanks again~!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nShipping options for Canada.EMS PRIORITY DOCUMENTUSD 19,24EMS PRIORITY MERCHANDISEUSD 37,41EMS DOCUMENTUSD 19,13EMS MERCHANDISEUSD 19,13\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nEMS PRIORITY DOCUMENT USD 19,24 Please.Sooo .77 + .207 comes to a total of .977?Are you ready to receive payments now?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYes that is the correct amount of BTC and I can receive payment now.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nPayment is sent.Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nLooks like it has come through. I will check when I get home.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nyes payment has been received i will update the op.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nthank you for confirmationI will PM you shipping information as soon as I know where I will be able to pick it up.Thanks again.Also thank you for making these almost affordable to most. I plan on using this one as is and saving up for a second one which I will try and get running to its full potential without meltdown.. Excited about this. Really really hoping this group buy is successful.Also, Any Canadian users interested in purchasing units I will gladly allow you to come in on my shipping!I have 19 spots left. You only pay what it costs me to ship. If you want insurance or expedited you are going to have to pay for it.I will have mine shipped to Manitoba. I am 7 minutes from a post office. Shipping would occur day received assuming you have sent me the shipping costs.Canada sub-group buy anyone?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nYes if you are Canadian and interested in that I am happy to do that for you.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n4 days left.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nWhat is your current status? Did you mean 3-4 weeks after the GB closes or after you made that announcement (that is in 1-2 weeks from now)?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n1 week after we recieve the chips. So ideally 2 weeks until we are able to ship. Also we have changed the prices at I am closing this group buy and refunding the people who have already payed.People who have payed. If you have not already sent me your BTC address then please do so now.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nBTC0.53?! Great. I\\'ll ve ordering through your shop, then. I think it\\'s much cleaner that way, with no pressure from the counter.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nCan I get my 0.977BTC refund please?Shame the group buy didn\\'t work out.. :/Address for refund: \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nyes refund sent else i need your BTC address\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nyes the price is automated to be $50 USD worth of BTC so it can fluctuate slightly.Also yes it does take pressure off of me\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nThanks. Refund received!I ordered one off the site! Woot!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nOP, can you give some kind of proof or will accept Escrow?there are lots of scam-gbs tried actually, the last one ripped 300 btcso me and i think so will have lots of trust issues at the moment...\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nEscrow?cheers\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI have closed the group buy. I don\\'t see much advantage in hosting it with the current price being a flat $50 for any quantity.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC K1 Batch 1, eruptors hubs, miners\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-26 19:24:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED]Group Buy #4 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.92-0.94 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nThis group buy is closed. Please watch for group buy #5 here . Thanks for the orders!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n7/14/13 Payment was sent early this morning for group buy #3 and #4 . Thanks for the orders!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n7/16/13 Tracking number received from friedcat for group buy #3 and #4 . Miners were just shipped today.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n+1 Thanks for update\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nwhats the ETA to you is it saturday? if so i think dhl offers saturday pickup at the hub\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nETA appears to be Monday as these were just shipped today by friedcat. I was hoping they would be shipped by friedcat Sunday night or Monday morning but no such luck.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n7/18/13 Arrival at Cincinnati OH for group buy #3 and #4 .\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n7/19/13 Arrival at Omaha NE for group buy #3 and #4 .\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nshipping out monday??\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nShould receive them Monday. Will ship within 24 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nMiners have arrived! All orders will be shipped by Tuesday morning if not sooner. Thank you for your orders!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAll miners have shipped! Tracking numbers to be provided early morning Wednesday(I am off to work right now). Thank you for your orders.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAll miners have shipped! Tracking numbers to be provided early morning Wednesday(I am off to work right now). Thank you for your orders. 7/19/13 Arrival at Omaha NE for group buy #3 and #4 .7/18/13 Arrival at Cincinnati OH for group buy #3 and #4 .7/16/13 Tracking number received from friedcat for group buy #3 and #4 . Miners were just shipped today. 7/15/13 Awaiting confirmation of shipping and tracking number from friedcat for group buy #3 and #4 . 7/14/13 Payment was sent early this morning for group buy #3 and #4 . Thanks for the orders! This group buy is closed. Please watch for group buy #5 here . Thanks for the orders! 7/13/13 Last call for any people wanting in this group buy or to add to your current order! This order will be placed in the next several hours. Please keep an eye open for my upcoming group buy #5 here ! Thank you for your orders and support. I greatly appreciate them!All USB Miners 0.94 BTC or less!Timer removed. End time: first mass production batch (sapphire) has finished its PCB production and assembly today.It has significant improvements in:Heat reduction: 500-510mA We stressed it with 9 Block Erupter USBs in a row \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSSB thank you for your great service !!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMiner received and working.Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, Block Erupter USBs\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 01:55:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #14 ASICMiner Erupter USB - 2+ day group 165+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nadded an international order of 100 units\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMore inventory is available to ship immediately!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNo waiting here!! Grp 14 orders are shipping. Order as many as you\\'d like, I ship immediately.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nall order have shipped.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nready for more. I ship immediately. no order is too big or small\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nRicRock; 4; 3.978; Y\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nshipped\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 03:28:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #14 ASICMiner Erupter USB - 2+ day group 169+ ordered\\n### Original post:\\nEveryone has been PMed a tracking number. If you have not seen a tracking number from me, please PM me, I\\'ll get send it over.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 16:00:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 4th! 71/240 shares sold; 3 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nNew another sent 10.5 btc = 30 sharestx id: address: Public Note (for verification): From bitcointalk user joele, payment 30 shares @ 0.35 = 10.50. Groupbuy 3rd batch KNCMiner by tyrion70Thank you\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSent 3.5 btc - 10 sharestx id: address: Public Note: From bitcointalk user joele, payment 10 shares @ 0.35 Groupbuy 3rd batch KNCMiner by tyrion70Thank you\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 16:27:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 4th! 176/240 shares sold; 3 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nAdded your shares to start post Joele, welcome!Cheers,\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCMiner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 20:10:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN]Group Buy #7 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.90 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nTwo private orders received. Will update OP in the next few hours. Thank you for your orders.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPrivate order #3 confirmed for 7 miners! Thank you for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHow many did you want CanaryInTheMine? Just kidding of course. The above orders have been shipped and I am awaiting official announcement from friedcat on any new prices for my next group buy. Once announced, my pricing will be lowered accordingly. Thank you for your \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI will start another group buy if friedcat announces any lower prices. Until then, this group buy is still open. Thank you for your support!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI didn\\'t post this because of pricing. That\\'s a given if and when it\\'s changed.I posted because people who bought through you are PM\\'ing me asking whether they would get the .1 promo since they didn\\'t buy from me...This I can not answer. I already posted my response to rumors here: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAny promos that AsicMiner MAY offer will be handled by me as well.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n ins\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThis group buy will remain open until any announcement of new prices happens. Please look for group buy #8 coming soon with great deals for all order sizes both big and small! Thank you for your support.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nConfirmed. Thank you for your order. This should ship Friday when more inventory arrives!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYour order has shipped and tracking number PM sent. Your order is greatly appreciated.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n51 more ordered privately. Thank you for the orders.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI have received another order for 3 miners privately. Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 20:13:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 4th! 136/240 shares sold; 4 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nMiner 4 is officially sold as well as a big part of miner 5. Will be making payment to KnC shortly.Cheers,\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n4 shares for me,tx id: address: you.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Miner 4, Miner 5\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 20:42:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy \"THE LUCKY\" #13 ASICMiner Erupter USB - 2 day group 369+\\n### Original post:\\nall orders updated on OP.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll payments were sent and friedcat should get the remaining miners out today ( time difference, remember? )\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhen will #14 happen?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDitto ^^.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nfriedcat shipped.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n\"THE LUCKY 13\" is shipping out tomorrow folks.DHL has called with scheduled delivery for tomorrow not bad on speed, huh?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nunbelievable...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nNICE!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nMost everything shipped out.I will follow up with PMs late evening.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIf no PM does that mean it should be shipping today, or did you fall asleep waiting to see if there was a Friendcat announcement?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nwho is friendcat?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\ncanary can u please update the unshipped orders? no pm and been waiting all day and nobody came... no answer to pm hope u are ok...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nEveryone got a tracking number or a PM from me. all updated.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nGroup Buy \"THE LUCKY\" #13 ASICMiner Erupter USB - 2 day group 369+I guess #13 was not to lucky for some of us!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n#13 brings all of expected associations with it...I am on track to receive inventory shipment within 4 business days (tomorrow) so while I didn\\'t exceed your expectation with this group, it will deliver within promised time-frame.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nEverything has shipped outI have more inventory if anyone wants to buy more.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nEveryone has been PMed a tracking number. If you have not seen a tracking number from me, please PM me, I\\'ll send it over.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nReceived! Great transaction all around!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\ngroup #15 is open: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-27 21:24:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED]Group Buy #7 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.90 BTC USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nThis Group Buy Is Closed! Group Buy #8 To Start In An Hour!I will start another group buy if friedcat announces any lower prices. Until then, this group buy is still open. Thank you for your support! Group Buy #7All USB Miners 0.90 BTC!Timer removed. End time: first mass production batch (sapphire) has finished its PCB production and assembly today.It has significant improvements in:Heat reduction: 500-510mA We stressed it with 9 Block Erupter USBs in a row without heatsinks heating up each other in a very dense USB hub with 25C without active airflow. No unexpected (non-probabilistic) HW errors ever happen.Speed: This comes after better stability. Now the hashrate converges to its theoretical value of 336MH/s.Appearance: SMT machine assembly (sapphire)heat-sink front-case 2-in-1 logo-ed (sapphire).LED added.Ordering:Send payment for amount of miners ordered to the common payment address at send payment from a wallet address you control. PM me your full shipping address (and phone number if along with your transaction id from the payment you sent.Please post in this forum in this format: ; ; ; <\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThis Group Buy Is Closed! Group Buy #8 To Start In An Hour!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, Block Erupter USBs, USB hub, heat-sink front-case 2-in-1 logo-ed (sapphire), LED\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 01:43:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Open] KnCMiner Saturn Shares 0.95BTC = 5GH/s | 3/5 Shares Available\\n### Original post:\\n2 shares purchased via Paypal ~ TID: address: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nFee is reduced to 4%\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 02:50:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: UPDATE [OPEN] BFL ASIC Chips $57/chip for a limited time. Batch 2 - 80/112 Left\\n### Original post:\\n8 chips purchased, 80 left.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBump$57/chip price good through tomorrow evening.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 07:22:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Groupbuy] 3rd batch KNCMiner - Buying 4th! 220/240 shares sold; 4 miners sold!\\n### Original post:\\nAllright, miner 4 and 5 have been payed: 20 shares left and then this groupbuy is closed. This will probably be the last groupbuy for some time due to holidays and such.Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nExcellent work tyrion! we all appreciate how much effort, time and resources have gone into this!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n_____5 sharesTX id payment sending \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n7btc for 20shares\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi Tyrion70.There are only 15shares left and I have bought 20shares just now. Please refund me 1.75 btc for 5 shares.Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSold out!Hhee, will refund your 5 shares shortly.@all, thank you for participating in this groupbuy!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miner 4, miner 5\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 10:59:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Open] KnCMiner Saturn 0.95BTC=5GH/s | 3/5 Shares | First 3 Payouts Free\\n### Original post:\\nHi. Is the Saturn already bought and paid for?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, the Saturn was paid for the second I made the order.On the picture, right of the order number, it says Paid (payed)and you can also see here, how the status says \"paid\" that recently got changed from \"new\" to \"paid\"\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPurchased one share:tx \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nExcellent, added you in gorkab. One more space open for the first 3 payouts to be fee free!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 16:05:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares 1.1BTC=5GH/s! 5 SOLD | 34 shares available!\\n### Original post:\\nWhen do you expect a working prototype from KnC?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMade payment 6.6 btc for 6 shares confirm.Thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 16:12:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Open] KnCMiner Saturn 0.95BTC=5GH/s | 2/5 Shares | First 3 Payouts Free\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll take the last two shares.Transaction: address: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSounds great, I am adding you in now BenTuras =]\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 20:26:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [INTERNATIONAL] 0.6 BTC MineForeman/SatoshiMine Block Eruptor USB Group Buy!\\n### Original post:\\nI have heard from ASICMiner and received my new pricing. I have also put in an order so I will have these in stock in a few days!I still insist on paying all taxes and duty so I cannot compete with some but this is a truly INTERNATIONAL group buy, the new details are;-0.6 BTC per ASICMiner USB Block Eruptor 300 MH/s0.4 BTC for shipping (3-10 working days).0.8 BTC for upgraded shipping (2-6 day tracked).Special terms for bulk orders (20+ devices).I ship ANYWHERE!If you want to take me up on the offer order at;-Go to to order.NeilFAQQ: How much are they at the moment?A: 0.6 BTC plus shipping.Q: Why is this website so basic?A: I am not very good at making things look nice and the basic look is better than anything I could manage.Q: What are the terms?A: Click the order link above and they are there, by submitting an order agree to them.Q: Do you need my email and postal address?A: Yes.Q: Why are you more expensive then some other group buys?A: I intend to do this right. This includes import/export charges and taxes.Q: Will you help me evade my local customs/taxes?A: No.Q: Can I see other peoples usernames and what they have spent?A: No, that is between them and I.Q: Can I get a\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Eruptor 300 MH/s\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 02:00:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [SHIPPING] Buy #15 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Shipping Monday .55 btc 750+ shipping\\n### Original post:\\nWhew!! Ok, I think I replied to all PMed working on labels.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ncough cough cough\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nruszip, 1, .55, \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ndribbits; 14; 7.7; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'m in for 10, but my Coinbase transaction doesn\\'t clear until Tuesday morning. I can\\'t wait until I\\'m cleared on Coinbase for the instant transactions! I started that purchase well before this group buy, and new price, was announced.This purchase will put me at a total of 18 erupters (Group Buy #13 & #15). If/when the 0.1BTC/erupter sale is formally announced, would I be qualified for an additional 18 for 1.8BTC?If this group buy is still alive on Tuesday morning, I\\'ll order.saadirt\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nTo be clear is it only the erupters that were bought at 1BTC that are going to be eligible for the discount?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nrmyadsk; 12; 6.6; Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOrdered 50 for pickup today. Thanks CITM-\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSpieder; 1; .55; you please combine this with my earlier order for 5? That would be six total.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\norder sent\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nordy; 26; 14.3; \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\ndc81; 1; .55; \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nReceived an order for 200 units. Working on label Still plenty of stock left to ship to you on Monday\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nbeercoin; 2; 1.1; \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nDang. I might want some of these at that price. I can\\'t get to a computer to transfer until way late today or tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nsephtin; 30; 16.5; \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nevilmacguyver; 1; 0.55; \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\norder picked up by locksmith9. Thanks!!!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nPSA to the community (as if anyone really needed assurances): prepaid for 50 miners and picked them up today. Thank you Canary!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 08:25:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] Buy #15 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Shipping Monday .55 btc\\n### Original post:\\nLooking at your new price I can only infer that the rumors about a price drop and 0.1 BTC for prior customers were true.Can you confirm?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhen will this group buy close. Shipping out from China on Monday?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYeah... Now we are past the point of rumors if this pricing is being offered. Someone has to speak up. :/\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nthese ship out to YOU on Monday from me, so you can enjoy bitcoin production out of them right away without waiting.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHey Canary - how are you managing to sell these for 0.55 ?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBTCGUILD made this announcement:Since all other outlets are announcing this even though it was not supposed to happen until August 1, yes, USB Block Erupters are having a price cut!USB Block Erupters are now on sale at 0.60 BTC per device (free shipping to US). A huge number of units are en route, which will clear the backorder, and leave roughly 1,000 units available for next day shipping by August 1.If you ordered an Erupter at 1 BTC, all is not lost yet. A coupon program is being initiated by ASICMINER and distributed by BTC Guild. 30% of the units sold at 1 BTC will be eligible to purchase a 2nd unit for 0.10 BTC (+0.05 Shipping/Handling). The exact method of coupon distribution will be announced when coupon units arrive, which should be around August 5th.So, I\\'m selling at .55 btc. I\\'m shipping to you on Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSorry man - I still don\\'t understand how you can sell them for 0.55 when BTC Guild state 0.6 per unit - what gives here?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCompetition. Canary probably has a ton of 0.1 BTC promo USB miners ordered and can afford to sell them below retail.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nregarding .10, I will follow the expected coupon distribution, per manufacturers parameters. Once it is available, those eligible will be notified with redeeming instructions.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nyou got it. yours is order #3\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nu forget canary has over 1000+ sales he gets reseller discount... btcguild was selling at 1.05 while canary was selling at .94 GB #14in for 10 cuz its in hand...payment sent\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYou can also purchase through Eligius mining pool here: and receive an Eligius branded Eruptor.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nShip from USA or from china?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI ship from USA\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nBitcoiner49er; 10; 5.5; does it say minimum 50?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nthere is no minimum. sorry about that. fixed!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nShip from USA or china?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYou might want to remove the bitinstant reference. It looks like they are still regrouping.Are you going to place a timer up? I\\'ll be in for a few probably.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nVery Nice Price but International Price expensive.\"Watch\"\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI\\'d have been down for this, but that shipping is so expensive!(to the UK)\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nrethaw, 36, 19.8BTC \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThank you. I hope this comes down the line soon!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nchadbu; 20; 11.0; \\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nDigigami; 12; 7.77; #Canada\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nMWNinja; 13; 7.15; \\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nJayCoin; 40; 22; \\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nShipping to Ontario, Canada?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nTrust me, it\\'s well worth it!! I have lots of UK customers. It take 1-2 days via FedEx. It ain\\'t cheap but you get what you pay for.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nWill update orders on OP soon. working on tracking numbers.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nJust double checking, your shipping units out this Monday? Not ORDERING?\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nCorrect.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nendsgamer; 1.65; 3; \\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nphilipma1957 ;6; 3.3btc id\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nchadtn; 6; 3.3; \\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nmackstuart; 50; 27.5; \\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nAll orders are shipping out MondayI\\'m receiving lots of PMs asking me to confirm. Confirmed.\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nTranz; 5; 2.75; \\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nssinc; 50; 27.5; \\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nphrog; 10; 5.5; \\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nVoyager; 4; 2.2; \\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nblblr; 5; 2.75; \\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nHelipotte; 6; 3.3 \\n\\n### Reply 42:\\naniman, 5, 2.75, had bought 5 additional block eruptors from Canary Group buy #7, expecting to be notified when coupons are available. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\nMicon, 5, 2.75, for helping distribute the hashing power.\\n\\n### Reply 44:\\nInternational so 1.17 BTC added for shipping:markm; 25; 14.92; \\n\\n### Reply 45:\\nxyzzy09910 units Copied the wrong address, sorry. Here is the correct \\n\\n### Reply 46:\\nReservedregarding .10, I will follow the expected coupon distribution, per manufacturers parameters. Once it is available, those eligible will be notified with redeeming instructions. Received a few PMs about USB hubs, here\\'s a good thread on it: of a signed message: and this is what you\\'d PM me by copying from above example:1. below------John Smith1\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, USB Block Erupters, Eligius branded Eruptor, USB hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 18:46:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [SHIPPING] Buy #15 ASICMiner Erupter USB - Shipping Monday .55 btc 450+ shipping\\n### Original post:\\nsteelcave; 1; 0.55; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nbt_spectro; 2; 1.1; 360 secs between posts limit is annoying\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n append to previous order(s)Can\\'t wait for this weekend to be over! Wait a minute?!!? Canary!!! What in Hades are you doing to me here!!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nknightlife999; 1; 0.55; id: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\npixl8tr; 8; 4.4; ID: \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nbenwahbe; 7; 3.85; id: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nRyhan ; 40 units ; 23.17 BTC ; \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSpieder 5; 2.75; \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nooeygooeygold; 7; 3.85; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n are transferred, see pm\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nzac2013; 10 units; 6.67; loads.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nvisdude; 1; 0.55; \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nElideN; 2; 1.1; \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nMichail1; 20; 11; id: \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\ni purchased this USB powered hub will it be powerful enough to run 10 at once?It has 12 USB ports\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\ni don\\'t think so, there is a usb hub review thread on here somewhere ill try and dig it up for ya.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThank you\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHi ordered 10 pcsenergiel; 10;6.67; \\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nryanb; 25; 13.7501; \\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI use that one to power 10. Works good if you modify it and solder a molex directly to it and run it off of an ATX power supply.You have to bypass some parts inside it too. Stable for over a month now.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI would like 14 please with shipping to the UK.Moving the money around now and will send asap.Many thanks for this!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nyours runs six and a fan with 0 better choices no mods plug n playruns 7 no issues 10 no issues fan fan\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nkendog77; 9; 4.95; BTC address sent in PM\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, USB powered hub, ATX power supply\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 00:59:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy \"THE LUCKY\" #13 ASICMiner Erupter USB - 2 day group 369+\\n### Original post:\\nGroup #14 is open: per device plus costs (read Pricing section below).For orders of 50+ units, contact me for a quote. orders of 50+ are handled privately, unless you request to have it publicly posted.For orders of 2 units or less, you\\'ll get a better deal here: fulfill these and they are usually in stock.Please take a moment to read this ENTIRE post. New Pricing model, make sure you understand it.I am 4 miles from a MAJOR DHL hub that receives these orders from China. My delivery times are the best. packages sent to me by ASICMiner are in my hand the same day they enter US. They do not take an extra day or two to travel the country to get to me. It costs you 0.01 btc per USB miner each day you do not have them in hand. It takes me 11 minutes to drive to DHL when necessary. My location is in a major metropolitan area next to a LARGE international airport that is a hub for shipping for all delivery companies. This gives me access to DHL, FedEx (also just 4 miles away, open till 9 PM for next day shipping). I have access to several Post Offices around me. I can ship USPS till 7 PM. I ship to you the same day I receive my delivery. Simply put, I am in the best position \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThank you again Canary for the great service! got the USB miners and have them running! Now will wait for the discount ones and then will buy more.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyou\\'re welcome!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 07:52:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1.15 BTC = 5.7GH/s KnCMiner Jupiter. No fees. 6 SOLD. #7 =38/54 paid\\n### Original post:\\nTo anyone who worries that I\\'m just going to run off with money, today Nickem asked for a 100BTC refund due to financial obligations. He was refunded promptly as shown in transaction id . I\\'m here to stay, and look forward to earning BTC with my shareholders.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSigning below-----Hi Adeel06,My transaction id is \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi Adeel06,I messaged you with my signed confirmation address and have paid my BTC.Thanks,Hylian\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSigning but due to other financial obligations, I\\'m having to reduce my stake to two shares.2.3 BTC paid direct today, transaction ID \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ncompletely fine, i have noted this. thank you,-adeel\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nhi adeel, good day, i\\'m interested to buy 3 shares here. (1.15x3) = 3.9 btc for approx (5.7x3) = 17.1 ghash/s mining power. i\\'m not using bitcoin client so i can\\'t sign my message. can i just send the tx id number, the sending address and the payout address?thanks\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m interested in purchasing 1-2 shares a week over the next couple months. What is the best way to go about this?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYou can start a new wallet on block chain for free and it will let you sign for payments using that wallet. But, understand that the title to this thread was made back when BTC was over $100 so 3.9 BTC doesn\\'t cover three shares anymore. Adeel updated the cost per share info when BTC started taking a dump... basically the Jupiter unit is $7,000 and each share is 1/54th the cost of the unit which is roughly $130 USD. Now that BTC is just below $70, it\\'s closer to 1.9 BTC per share. I\\'ve already bought two units, and the payout will still cover itself in time, it will just take longer due to the drop in BTC value. But then again, that\\'s assuming the value stays this low (or lower), and no one can say where the price will be in 6 months or a year. If you buy a few shares now, and in 10 months BTC is back up to $200, you\\'ll be a happy man.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSigning below-----Hi Adeel06,my transaction id: \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nhi adeel. can you provide us the status on how much btc is per share and what is the running miner number for sell. i\\'m interested in a few shares but i would like to know when will this miner be ordered. thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi Adeel,Any updates on the status of shares sold / expected ordering dates and so forth?Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAny shares available?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nYes shares are still available. We need the last 20 shares to be sold and we will be ready for the next machine\\'s purchase. Nick requested a refund of his 20 shares and now we have to make up that number. Let me know if you guys have any other questions.-Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\ndamn...pm me...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nsent a question via pm yesterday - waiting on a reply!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHi Adeel06,i sent you a pm regarding refund. please reply meThank you,\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI sent updates in regards to this. I apologize for not checking the forums daily however we are almost complete with the new systems\\' groupbuy. Also, we have taken a look at the site where we will be hosting these and taken care of cooling. That is why I haven\\'t been on the forums much as of late, I have been working on the actual project.-Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHows\\' it going guys? Just wanted to see if there are any new buyers. Also, it was recommended to me that we split the shares in half, so that there are 140 shares for a price of 67.50 USD instead of 130 USD. Would this be something that appeals to other members? Let me know-Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYes, I like the idea of halving the shares to $67.5 per share. I am already committed to other group buys and been watching this one as well. I would buy a share here if it was less expensive. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nHow many shares are available to buy right now?And when will the units actually ship?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThere are an unlimited (Upto 50+ machines) amount of shares left. Please let me know if you are interested.We have already placed orders for machines, it all depends on KnC Miner on the shipment. They state that they are still on schedule for a September-October \\'13 shipment.Damiano, the price is based on $130 USD so it depends on the current Bitcoin/USD price, so please do adjust based on that. Thank you,-Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nSystem 4: 30/54 shares (Confirmed and paid for shares)3 shares - xemu Payment confirmed.4 shares - thehun Payment confirmed.1 share - nobunaga Payment confirmed.2 shares - schawmbi Payment confirmed.6 shares - ottuzzi Payment confirmed.2 shares - BGrx Payment confirmed.2 shares - AntiKhris Payment confirmed.7 shares - ricias Payment confirmed.2 shares - RiseofTH Payment confirmed.1 share - David Payment confirmed.Updated share listing for machine #4\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nHave\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 16:10:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: GB EU - ASICMiner Erupter USB - Shipping Tuesday - from 0,57 including VAT\\n### Original post:\\nThere are still some in stock.Ready for shipping today\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust ordered 10\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-24 14:00:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [UK/EU] GROUP BUY Virtual Mining Corp Fast Hash One\\n### Original post:\\nI am looking at organising a group buy for the Virtual Mining Corporations Fast Hash One product.The retail price including shipping is $4,199 for the standard base model. This is around 47BTC at present and this is for 256GHash/second. The units can be expanded with further 256GHash/second chip units, however these are currently priced at $4,999 each. Therefore if there is enough interest in the group buy to purchase more than 256ghash/second I would look to purchase further base units rather than the individual expansion chip units. There is no point spending an extra $1000 per quarter terrahash when it is not required. At a later date the chips are likely to come down in price and which time they could be purchased to increase mining capacity at that stage.At the moment I am looking at general interest and peoples thoughts on this.I am thinking that the investment price would be something like 1BTC gets you 5.4GHash/second. The units would be stored and maintained at my location with running and maintenance costs being paid for out of the mining rewards, 5% seems pretty standard for these sort of offerings. It may also be a consideration to set aside a further 10% for reinvestme\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nsounds good just the delivery time is a bit long. the diff may be too high. \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI figure the delivery time if met is ok based on 256ghash, especially when compared to buying a 5ghash BFL last year and getting it delivered today. Plus by buying more than one unit and trying to sell it for 50% to 100% more when it arrived it should allow for the purchase of 2 or 3 expansion chips, taking the hashing power up to 0.75terra hash to 1 terrace hash, for an initial investment of $8200. Worst case scenario is that we end up with only 0.5terrahash for our investment. Knc are currently offering 200ghash for $4k amd 400ghash for $7k, although shipping dates are september to October and VMC is October to November. So the offer is comparable to Knc in $/ghashThis equates to $17.49 per ghash for the 400Ghash machine whereas VMC works out as $15.23 per ghash. Basically I would happily start off any group buy with the first 50% of shares (approx 25 BTC)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m not aware of a single mining company which has delivered on time so best not rely on prompt delivery I think. If we thought BFL screwed customers over, if one of these next-gen companies fails to deliver it will be just as disastrous as that, if not more so. Even just the Avalon chip orders are going to raise the difficulty enough :/ I think only spend what you can 100% afford to lose\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n\" I think only spend what you can 100% afford to lose\" Yeah that was my thinking. I purchased one unit from profits made reselling USB miners and figured a good way to minimise any further risk is a group buy that would allow many people to only risk a small amount of overall BTC. The one thing I would note though is that even if Avalon get all their chips out the door, there is no reason the buyers will be any more successful than Avalon in getting them hashing in a short time frame. Still I do agree about difficulty increasing hence looking at an expandable miner from VMC at some point in the future as opposed to buying $4000 worth of BFL or Avalon products today.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIf that\\'s the case then sure, why not take a stab at one of these next companies then. Any reason you chose to back VMC/AMC over others btw?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'d be interested. What sort of timeframe are you looking at purchasing?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYour reasoning is sound. I would tend to agree. Ive down some mining, only got into it in april, but tasted cpu gpu and block etuptor asics. I know its transitional period now a big wave is heaving up and everyone wants to catch a part of it. Im sitting on sround potential 20k gbp to invest in something from this arena and not looking for a get rich quick thing thats why this expansion idea sounds goog keeping ahead on the wave and re investing in additional so the diff doesnt outstrip your setup is good. I know weve missed out on the avalon chip thing now unless some people sell big quatities from the earlier batches I would buy , they are very profitabe once you scale up to a couple of 100 gigs. But yes im still interested in this vmc and still lookin at knc also. Some timframes and margins would good.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCost per giga hash is best at present, expansion options are also good. Kraterminer wants twice as much for a 60-90ghash machine (90btc)Knc early orders have been filled and have a higher cost per gnash with no expansion options. Avalon are only selling chipsBFL are BFLI am not familiar with bit fury offers\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI will look to formalise the offer tonight and include time frames. As they price in USD I don\\'t want to be hanging around at the mercy of the exchange rate though do each purchase will be do\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Virtual Mining Corporations Fast Hash One, 5ghash BFL, 200ghash machine, 400ghash machine, Avalon chip, USB miners, 60-90ghash machine\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 20:49:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [Group Buy] [ASIC miner] [Block Erupter USB] [Australia] [South Asia region]\\n### Original post:\\n4 units for me please, prefer black or yellow/gold otherwise all the same colour if poss.Payment to follow later today 4 x 0.99 plus 0.05 shipping =4.01Thanks edit: Paid\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHipayment sent for 10 x USB Block Eruptersand sent you PM with my shipping address.thanksedit: sorry it might take little more time for you to receive BTC payment.I just sent payment 10 minutes ago and I just notice I\\'m still waiting for confirmations (4 of 6) so far for the BTC I just received not long before sending.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m interested in 2. Don\\'t care about color.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou got them now?Shipping still scheduled for the 23rd?Hope you are enjoying your holiday\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi,I\\'m interested in 2, no colour pref.Based in Melbourne.~\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPicking them up tomorrow Holiday has been great - thanks for everyones\\' patience.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nthanks for the updatecheers\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nArrived! Sorry about the colours everyone - I forgot to ask for a mix - only have black in stock.Adding express post as an option in Australia for total flat shipping fee of 0.10 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHi dadj,you\\'re the man...! if we/I choose express shipping do we just send you BTC0.10 to same address as order address?and another question. Can we order more from you at later date?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSent you 0.1 for express shipping.Post out today?Cheersps I would be interested in more if poss edit: forgot to ask where to send, sent to same address as used for payment of usb\\'s\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHelloFellow Aussie bitcoin heads. Wondering if any of you guys might be interested in getting involved with our Sydney based Avalon ASIC group buy and miner assembly. It will be a cheap and easy way to get mining using currently available components. Check it out. \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nok, sent btc for 3 units + 0.1 for shipping as requested.now the wait begins .... yes im impatient\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI asked same thing about express shipping payment, and below was his replyso I think he\\'s implying that \\'express shipping\\' cost of BTC0.10 are for future orders\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHey Merv77, thanks for letting us know.@Dadj, can I have my 0.1 BTC back pls \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\njust received my 10 block erupters. that was quick for regular post.Thanks dadj for perfect servicehopefully ordering more soon.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nMine arrived this morning. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI got mine too Thanks!Another order coming your way soon.Phil.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSent tx id \\n\\n### Reply 18:\\narrived this afternoon...\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nReceived mine this morning.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI\\'d like to buy one!I\\'m in Queensland\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nCheers mate got my 2 in the mail yesterday\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\ni would like to order 4 pls mate\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nOn order Can\\'t wait to get my first ASIC. I should have got one of these ages ago.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nMy first package arrived nice and early this morning.nicely boxed as well.thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nsecond package arrived this morning.amazingly fast shipping Thanks mate\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nSecond package arrived and installed and hashing.thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Block Erupters, Avalon ASIC\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 23:15:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [BFL]$27,5/chip 50% - GB BTC, PayPal, SEPA + board pic - 313 sold, 9/100 batch\\n### Original post:\\nAwesome work :-)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLook what came out of my team... Now I know why it took so long for changes to BFL board... Anyway this is what happen behind my back... So if it turns out working...Now this picture is not completely finished board... And some components are just put on... But this is a surprise I just got on mail...I know but power supply is just a test version... Real will have PCI-e... So don\\'t worry...Now we will do 2 tests I do hope that this board will work since it will cost less...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL board, power supply, PCI-e\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 23:46:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: GB EU - ASICMiner Erupter USB - Shipping TUESDAY - from 0,57 including VAT\\n### Original post:\\nQuite expensive compared to other places!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAre you going to go from thread to thread telling everyone that? you\\'ve already made that statement on 3-4 threads in the past few hours. lol\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIm just seeing if people are interested enough to do a deal, you\\'d be surprised at the responses Apologies if you are offended, and yeah it does look a bit like spam\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHelloWhat is the estimated time to ask the famous discount (below 0.2).When will be available?thanks\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOrdered and waiting in anticipation.Or rather multiple banks of 5850s are...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nJust ordered 4. Shipping today?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGoddammit, we could have just ordered directly trough you instead of that bitch of a vdragon for an even lower price and then we atleast GOT the thing.Damn I\\'m crying...And yes ofcourse I lost all my BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWhen you guys ordered at vdragon, the cheapest rate (50+) at yxt still was 0.99 BTC so don\\'t punish yourself!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAt those prices plus shipping you\\'re looking at losing $30-$20 a piece if you happen to run them for six monthsYou will only make .4 BTC. That\\'s what they\\'re actually worth.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nMaybe tomorrow..\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, 5850s\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 03:07:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares 1.1BTC=5GH/s! 6 SOLD | 17 shares available!\\n### Original post:\\nremaining 3.3 BTC sentTXID \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 04:30:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [SHIPPING MONDAY] #15 ASICMiner Erupter USB - .55 btc 2000+ shipping\\n### Original post:\\noh nice thats good to know phrog bcouse i had issues too with cgminer 3.3.1 (very slow speeds and lags) now im using bfgminer instead.. maybe i will try upgrade system soon\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nmccminer; 12; 6.6; \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nReceived. Now busy with shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\njosiasrdz; 5; 2.75; ID: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nsemicycler; 2; 1.1; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ngot my 2 in today! thanks. I ordered them at the high price so hopefully this coupon thing works out!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nwe keep making multiple runs to the post office\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nis this yours? plz send me a signed message with the first sending addy.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nRent a Uhaul!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nExoskeleton; 2; 1.1; Im sending a PM and a signed message in the next 5 min. Hope Im not too late for your last run of the day.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWhen you get back from the Post Office again... your sig link points to #14.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ntoo risky to drive all packages at once... what if something happens? then no one gets shipments...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nalmost done with Post office... then FedEx... I \"may\" have a few leftover, but won\\'t know till later tonight. will post about any available inventory.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nWould like 10 more if you do.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThat would be sweet if you could squeak my two units in today!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nJayCoin; 38; 20.9; \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI never quite thought of it that way but losing 3000 sticks packed and ready to ship would suck it would be 1650 btc. plus the shipping purchased for it.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAt FedEx dropping off international orders. All but 1 FedEx went out. PM for the one went out. The rest will receive tracking numbers later.All USPSes went out. I think about 3 or 4 folks received a PM where there was an issue with transaction. These will be resolved tonight still and head out in AM.This was a crazy day!! There are no extra units from today\\'s delivery.I will be receiving another large batch in 2-3 days from friedcat.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nExcellent work Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nReceived 2000 units and shipped them. All done in one day by Canary and elves! Wow! Puts BFL to shame.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nDo we order on here Canary or are you starting a new thread?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nPerhaps we could have a group buy to buy out BFL and put Canary in as a community Manager.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nCanary needs to head over to BFL and work his magic...\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nyou can order here, I\\'ll transfer it over to the new group soon\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\ndaddyhutch; 3; 1.65; ID: 3 in the queue for me please. TY!\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nanother 8 for me (ordered 40 8; 4.4; id: \\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nWho\\'s transaction is this: ?.55 btc sent to group #14 address, please let me know who, can\\'t find anything on this address...Sent around 5:15ish PM CSTThanks!!\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nmitty; 12; 6.6; \\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nKyrosKrane; 11; 6.05; \\n\\n### Reply 30:\\ntracking #s PM\\'ed, if I skipped you, please PM me.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nThanks. Excellent service.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 07:50:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: [OPEN] #16 ASICMiner Erupter USB - .41 to .55 btc (CE + RoHS news) 200+\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ve caught up on all PMs. If I haven\\'t responded, plz resend! Ty!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwww.bitinstant.com is out of service in case you haven\\'t found out.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCoinbase.com is an option for USD, but there is a 7 day lead time to receive the BTC for your first buy.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nLevel 2 verification gets it to you almost instantly. It may take up to 8 hours in limbo (one time instance), but from bank account > wallet is usually less than 30 minutes, prices not based on Gox.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks for pointing that out! you are correct... I do believe the other option is Ascension of \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYep, once you get through the 30 day period, 50btc per day is the limit, and instantly too. if nothing else, it\\'s worth to go though with it, just to have this as an option in the future.Just in case... you never know what is coming next.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHave your own FedEx account you want me to use? Feel free! Send me a label and I ship.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nGoing through the process as we speak, to pay back a buddy who lent me for one of your sticks =) Got the eligius model...did those go out Monday? I\\'m in CT.I put in my first order on coinbase down at like 89, now I\\'m locked out from doing ANYTHING for 7 days until the transaction clears. Luckily I have two checking accounts but I would have bought more on this huge run up we\\'re seeing. Oh well.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n150pcs were schedule to order, I\\'m in Vietnam so I have to pay 1.25BTC for FedEx shipping cost?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPM me your address for a shipping quote.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nPlesk; 50; 22.5; \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThen what the F*%K are they based on lol\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, eligius model\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-13 17:26:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-07\\nTopic: More Metabanks 120Gh ASIC from 1 batch!\\n### Original post:\\n1 share, is it available?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi I\\'m interested in your first service to purchase a 120gh unit. But the price here for 120gh is difference between each transaction...How much total should I be sending to John K? Please pm thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI can offer escrow for 0%.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou only send to John K if you\\'re buying shares. The price in shares is listed in the front post. For buying an entire unit, you pay to the metabank address listed.OP: The amount is not listed on the link you posted, this only shows previous purchases. How much do we send to the address to purchase one 120gh/s miner. Lastly, I\\'d like to know if you can see the sender\\'s address, in which case, is this what you will be using to send the btc to that particular address?Will you provide any detailed statistics about the miner, and it\\'s profits for the month, as well as your 5% deduction? I would also feel more confident if John K verified your identity.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes. But override the purchase of the full devices. If we collect the required number of shares quickly, there will be a group-buy\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHello. Now I\\'m waiting for a response from MetaBank with a price and terms of payment. I\\'ll let you know when I get\\'s a response from MetaBank.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIntersted in shares, too.2 shares 100%Reserving 3 more for 24h if possible.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nUpdate12.06 Waiting for an answer of Metabank about price for additional units. Also. Because of the limit for shipment from DHL and FedEX from Russia, now I can order not more then 1 ASIC for each buyer.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nmarkedwaiting for the 4th device shares open.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nCool, Still in for 9 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nToday, there was no response from MetaBank, because in Russia a day - Independence Day!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nMaybe tomorrow.My offer is still standing+I will buy shares from older batches if not paid or an investor wants to sell.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nOk be clear on when I should send to metabank and that it isn\\'t escrowed until shipping. I personally bought 3 units though as a disclosure.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nsounds nice, definatly interested here!EDIT: send a PM to you OPregards\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nUPDATEReceived the following response from MetaBank:\"Hi Andrew, the reserve of 8 additional units for you confirmed. Since we closed the pre-order, now you do not have to pay, but please be prepared to pay immediately after the testing chips (within 14 days of notification will be sent to you)\".Thus, we have the time (14 days or more) to raise money for an additional 8 devices. The price of the device is 2160$, but in BTC it can change every hours. Last price for pre-order was 21 BTC (0,875 btc/share) for hosting and 27 BTC for shipping. I suggest using bitpop as escrow with 0 % fee or you can send btc directly to me. When metabank will sent to me notification about preorder additional units, bitpot or i will send BTC to Metabank. If after 14 days the price will decrease i (bipot) will return extra pay to you, or if the price increase you will extra pay to me (bitpot).So. If you want to buy ONLY 1 asic unit for shipping or 1 or more units or share for hosting write me PM. If you need escrow write me and bitpot PM.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI am interested in 1 unit. PM sent.thxbobsmoke\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nPM sent, will buy atleast one device, hopefully two, hosted at your place. Thanks,*edit if possible on top of my one bitfury, if someone would like to split one with me in exactly half, I\\'m game nvm, pm\\'d for a second full unit, if possible.Thanks for this great opportunity. For pidobir giving me time to convert and transfer my existing budget currencies, I have decided to offer extra 2%.:hi5:\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nwhat\\'s price of your hosting electricity?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n10 cents kw/h\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\ncan you provide a scan of your passport to john k so he can verify your identity?Also, it doesn\\'t actually state the price of the ASIC on the website, just past purchases. What price do I have to pay to metabank to order 1 120GH/s unit?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nbuy one unit if all detail be confirmed\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\n1. Already done.2. The price for additional units from batch 1 - 2160$. It Convert to BTC as the minimum rate btc/usd at mtgox for last 24 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI\\'m thinking about buying one such device.PM sent.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nShares paid, PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nin for 1 unit. PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nIs there a chance to get 1 unit of this type of asic ?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nCan I reserve 1 unit (1miner not share!) for 24h?I invested a lot already in other miners (all payments confirmed by sellers) so I am not a fun bidder.Thank you\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\neverythins is already reserved since hours, as OP told me 1-2 hours ago.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nDamn reservers (hope they are funbidders and not as serious as I am)@foofighter I share from you, tooIf you get the miner and wanna throw it into a pool i wil\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 120gh unit, 120gh/s miner, ASIC, bitfury\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 06:26:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [SHIPPING MONDAY] #15 ASICMiner Erupter USB - .55 btc 1,750+ shipping\\n### Original post:\\nDigigami; 2; 1.1; #Canada // - Adding to prev order here: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nslava_smith; 5; 2.75; \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\noh man how are you going to ship all those shipment for tomorrow?you must got a lot of hardworking elves.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nstill more available for shipment tomorrow? going to buy some coins\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes sir!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSpendulus; 42; 23.1; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nsome posters love to count all the \"bank\" Canary is gonna make... LOL sorry to tell you I am not making all that \"bank\", but I\\'ve created jobs and pay people to help me run this. THere are alot of people without jobs out there who are experienced.that\\'s how I can get 2000 miners out in a day... I created a business out of this... so has BTCGuild recently and Eligius (although Eligius\\'es interest is not monetary)...I\\'m located 10-13 minutes driving from a MAJOR DHL hub. I receive International shipments in hand the SAME day they enter USA. I do not watch them travel 2-3 days across the country to get to me. I\\'m 5 miles from a MAJOR FedEx hub that\\'s open till 9 PM. I see them every day I\\'m located within a dozen Post Offices around me and can get whatever supplies and shipping I need done ASAP.And waay back in a day, I used to work for a big computer parts reseller in their main wherehouse making sure orders got out ASAP and correctly. so a little experience with distribution helps me too...But I don\\'t mean to get my head high in the clouds either... things can go wrong and I do my best to quickly fix them ASAP without letting it screw up the operations...And I won\\'t tell you other s\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ndaddyhutch; 5; 2.75; yThanks Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nadded a private order for 140 Units. shipping out tomorrow afternoon\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nfreshzive; 40; 22; transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nare you still selling the anker hubs? i can\\'t even find the 10 port ones on amazon at this point\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nnope, they stopped making them...Juiced is what you can use in it\\'s place but you may need to put more airflow on that one\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNaelr; 5; 2.75; \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHonestly I dont mind if \"you make bank\", in fact Id expect you to - you need some motivation to do this and be honest about it Given the how badly BFL and Avalon turned out, its refreshing to order btc mining equipment and actually get it a week later.also, is it monday where you are yet and have my 50 units shipped ? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nxjack; 5; 2.75; see if you\\'re faster than Amazon Prime with the hubs.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSwimmer63; 9; 4.95; more, but btcquick is out. Maybe tomorrow.Thanks again Birdman!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI\\'ve been thinking of getting a few of this device. Though I\\'ve been mining for a year now, I\\'ve been relying on GUIMiner to run my GPUs (which have worked well for me) just because I\\'m CLI-challenged and dread the thought of it (cgiminer, bfgminer, etc.). Is there an instruction or tutorial somewhere on how to setup these babies that I can peruse beforehand and see if I\\'m up to the challenge?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nbfgminer is super easy. so is cgminerrun \"bfgminer.exe -G -S all\" that\\'s it... -G is to ignore GPUs if you wish to run on the same box and keep using GUIminer for GPUs.see this page here: running bfgminer, install the driver listed on the above link\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nGot a few PMs about hubs, here\\'s a good thread on it: try to test different hubs too, as time permits.Right now I\\'d go with Juiced, but read the comments about it, you need just a tiny more airflow on it due to spacing. it\\'s all on that thread.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI\\'ve decided to try these two:Anker 9port +1 charging (maybe 9 devices and 1 fan?), with 5A power supply: an AiTech 10port, with 4A power supply: also finally going to go for a RPi. So will be testing 4 diff. 10 port hubs on it. (Roswill, the old Anker (which I hear works), the new Anker, and the AiTech).Feedback from anyone that\\'s tried any of these is appreciated!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThanks, man. Working on the order right now.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nAiTech 10 port case looks similar/identical to Juiced hub, different name only (branding)?once you get AiTech going, please post a review on the USB HUB thread!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSince your using a RPi try to stay clear of raspberian. It has a wonky install of libusb that has been causing problems. Arch Linux has been verified as working.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nKrellan; 8; 4.4; great price!I remember nervously buying my first Erupter at over 2.2 BTC *each*... wow, times have changed!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nvisdude; 1; 0.55; \\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI bought the Juiced 10-port from Amazon and suggest getting something else. It\\'ll run 8 erupters but when you plug in a 9th it starts to lose contact with one, then another, then another and the only way to fix that is \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, anker hubs, GPUs, Anker 9port +1 charging, AiTech 10port, RPi, Juiced hub, Roswill, Anker, new Anker, AiTech 10 port case, Juiced 10-port\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, True, True, True, False, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 05:54:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [REOPENED] KnCMiner Saturn 1.05BTC=5GH/s | 1/3 Shares | First two payouts FREE\\n### Original post:\\nShare #35 is now bought and paid for my ElitePorkPayout address: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 12:03:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 3: 7979 ASICs gone 27979 sold\\n### Original post:\\nDHL from Germany -> Belgium sometimes transfer to local postal service as well.I just got a package this week which came from DHL in Germany, and got switched over to bpost in Belgium.However, it\\'s the first time I got this, normally it always stays with DHL till the end, maybe it was sent with a cheaper version this time\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSounds like i should chose DHL for the next batch... though i doubt, because of lack of communication, that i can change EMS from last batches to DHL... i now tend to do it if possible even though its only a slight, felt, advantage...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWell, at the risk of polluting the thread, thanks again {goes back to lurking mode}\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'d like to apply for one [1] single (or 2 :->) chips from Avalon test batch.I\\'m planning to make an open-source design for a miner that could be made at home.What\\'d be so special about my project?Simplicity - especially designed to be made at homeUse of development board Texas Instrument Stellaris Launchpad [or compatible version - this will take a lot of complexity from the board - programmer, USB as well as [possibly] 32Mhz clock.PCB\\'s that are 2 sided [or 2 sides + 1 layer - they can be made at home], that could be etched using photosensitive spray [or even laser printer if someone can make small enough tracks reliably].Common components, not some strange chips that must be ordered from china.I plan on making a 16 chip version, this uC should handle that without problems. However scaling down won\\'t be a problem.What will you get in return?Both PCB\\'s and firmware will be distributed in open-source fashion. So if you like to make homemade devices [or just have a know-how, but don\\'t want to pay anyone to build it] the design will be available well before the start.Note: I still plan on making a design and open-sourcing it even if I\\'ll don\\'t get the chips. Just the designs w\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSounds good to me... any objections from groupbuyers against giving him a chip or 2 if possible?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks for the quick reply! I plan to very much work the same way as bcdev and many others creating \"small scale\" Avalon board projects. Here is a great thread if you are interested in this as well! fact if anyone would like to get a hold of me, I would like to share my experience in creating a SIMPLE data mining rig. I have been researching and practicing home etching and it\\'s really fun! I have been experimenting with mixtures of ferric chloride & hot water to etch marker drawn designs into PCB board. After you have studied specs like Klondike has been kind enough to release. There are 307 small parts in Klondikes design and I plan to make very clear information on where to get and how to assemble those parts so it doesn\\'t seem too confusing to those new to creating boards like myself. I will make youtube videos that explicitly deal with etching PCB\\'s for home mining rigs. Really this is the key here... I know that Avalon makes their communication protocols open source and I plan to work extremely diligently on cleaning up those protocols for the open source community =D. And unfortunately portions of the FPGA bit stream protocol are still licensed from my understanding, bu\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, Texas Instrument Stellaris Launchpad, PCB\\'s, development board Texas Instrument Stellaris Launchpad, ferric chloride & hot water\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 13:38:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [FINISHED] #15 ASICMiner Erupter USB - .55 btc 2000+ shipping\\n### Original post:\\nregarding .10, I will follow the expected coupon distribution, per manufacturers parameters. Once it is available, those eligible will be notified with redeeming instructions. .55 per device includes shipping. Shipping out to you Monday shipping add 1.17 btc per order.All orders placed as of 9:40 AM (payment received) are shipping out Monday, today see my note on this thread as to how many are leftNew orders will ship out Wednesday/Thursday or Friday at the latest.working on labels... Plenty of stock available to ship your order on MondayI am 4 miles from a MAJOR DHL hub that receives these orders from China. My delivery times are the best. packages sent to me by ASICMiner are in my hand the same day they enter US. They do not take an extra day or two to travel the country to get to me. It takes me 11 minutes to drive to DHL when necessary. My location is in a major metropolitan area next to a LARGE international airport that is a hub for shipping for all delivery companies. This gives me access to DHL, FedEx (also just 4 miles away, open till 9 PM for next day shipping). I have access to several Post Offices around me. I can ship USPS till 7 PM. I ship to you the same \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhen do you sleep? heh..Chad\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nin a few minutes LOL\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCLOSED. next batch is here: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI received tracking info! You got my order shipped by 6:30PM when I paid you about 5PM. Now thats service! BFL and Avalon take note. ASIC miner may have the highest prices, but having units in hand and a re-seller who ships within an hour of purchase is what counts to me these days. I know where my money is going from now on. Thanks Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ndyingdreams; 4; ID \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m going to transfer a few orders from here to #16.I will send a PM to just a handful of people.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nBig thank you to Canary & team, and of course also Friedcat & team. Received my international (Canada) order 5 minutes ago. Outstanding service!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFantastic!! FedEx for international is the only way to go... you get what you pay for.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nReceived mine earlier today as well.Canary delivers as usual (Fast!) Thanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nBig thanks Canary, i got mine around dawn this morning (UK) that\\'s faster than my lurcher.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWow, LIGHTNING FAST shipping!!Always a class act to deal with. The Erupters were put in the mail on Monday, and they showed up at my post office (California) on Wednesday, that\\'s lightning fast!They are now all happily installed, twinkling like little fireflies in the night!The little Erupters are very elegantly packaged, they would make a great stocking stuffer. QC sticker, cardboard box, thin plastic baggie, hard plastic case, foam inserts, then finally the miner itself, just waiting to be plugged in. Even the size of the cardboard box seems carefully thought out, they divide evenly into the size of the most common USPS Priority Mail shipping box, making shipping really easy! Nice! Will definitely order again as funds permit.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nReceived my Package this morning! Thanks!!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nreceived my package today and hashing greatThanks\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nHi, already get it !Thanks for the fast shipment.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nGot my BEs yesterday morning. Thanks for the very fast service If I pay extra for it, can I get Fedex next-day delivery in the US for my next order (maybe today)?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-25 03:33:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] - GROUP BUY of Avalon Chips + DRILLBIT SYSTEM mining assembly\\n### Original post:\\nA couple questions all may be interested in knowing the answer to...At what point will btc be refunded if all 9500 are not purchased? (Is there a cutoff date?)If the buy fills up by August 1 for example, what is the current estimated delivery date of the chips?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHey LajzThanks for the question. The quoted lead time from Avalon is 9 to 10 weeks from date of purchase. This means that is the group buy is filled by August 1st, then we would be looking at receiving the chips around the end of september, beginning of october.In terms of a cutoff date at which point the buy will be cancelled and funds refunded, there currently isn\\'t one. It really depends on what level of interest we get in the project. We are looking into finding some larger investors who will hopefully account for decent numbers of the chip order and assist in getting the order in quickly.If we find ourselves with little interest a month down the track then we will start reassessing. There will perhaps be other avenues of getting our hands on chips at a higher price if we end up not being able to fill the full order from Avalon. If we arrive at this point, i will make this option available to everyone who has put in funds for the purchase should they want to still get miners made.At this point however, we are confident that the word will spread and we will be able to fill the order.Barntech\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSounds good, I\\'ll take the chance on you guys.Sent payment for 16 chips and will be going with an assembled board. As more jump on board I\\'ll definitely be down for some more!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nwhat is this \"Drillbit system\" you speak of? is it another Klondike16 clone?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNice to have you on board Lazj. We\\'re on our way.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNo, the DrillBit system is not a Klondike 16 clone. It is a superior design to the Klondike, designed by our engineer here in Sydney.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGot any pictures or CADs and specs? would be interesting seeing the difference of the design, i assume the design is not under the open source hardware?If anything, fill us all in on the development on the board.... i may just move my weight behind this from terrahash\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThank you for your interest AJRGale. Pics and specs coming in the next couple of days. Stay tuned.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m interested in 16 of these but I\\'m not so sure how long is gonna take to get the 9.5k chips sold. I\\'ll be watching.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWelcome to cache 22/chicken\\'n\\'egg scenario. Im waiting for more information over buying in. Heck, even if I get only the chips to throw at someone else (or experiment with myself) job done...But lets see, Barntech, Care to use Escrow? if you get John .k into this Id be happy to throw everything at you now\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHey guys.So yes, it is a bit of a catch 22 scenario. In my experiences with these group buy situations, more people feel more comfortable jumping on board once that number starts to lower, but in order for that number to lower, people need to jump on board. The main issue is that you end up having to have your BTC tied up waiting for everyone else to throw theirs in, so it os understandably a bit nerve-wracking being of of the first. It is also largely about trust. Now, if we all just threw our money in, then we\\'d be there in no time. But of course you guys don\\'t know me, and so again it is perfectly understandable that you don\\'t trust me. But hopefully we can do something about that.At this point, the plan is to not use John K for escrow, and rather be our own escrow (though i am open to the idea of a third party escrow if that will help the project move forwards quicker). Our aim is to establish an ongoing business servicing miners to the community, and for this reason we would like to establish a relationship of trust with all involved. We are not here to scam anyone. If we ran away with your BTC, we would have no hope of seeing this project through. This is not about talking pe\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWell, since there is a lot of scammers and con artists out there and its all about trust, to get people to trust you, you have to show that you are willing to use services like known escrows. keeping everything open and transparent so we can see everything you do will add points to you trust.. But, since you are neutral, and you don\\'t want to use john .k, find a 3rd party escrow, there are plenty here.Really I\\'m going to poke probe and prod everything out of you to gain my trust, i have already been a victim of a scam, to my own stupidity, now I\\'m to guarded to even drop down any coinage unless i know its clear.If you use john .k, and push his fees to the buyers, the price will rise to ~0.091/chip (his 2% fee) which I\\'m OK with. Now if you have the same issue as \"i sent out XX units worth ZZ amount and the buyer said they only got X amount so escrow only gave me Z amount\", simple fix, Show th\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chips, DRILLBIT SYSTEM mining assembly, assembled board, Klondike16 clone, DrillBit system\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 17:34:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Paypal Accepted] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1 - 170+\\n### Original post:\\nClosing in on 200 Erupters ordered!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 19:16:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Paypal Accepted] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1 200+\\n### Original post:\\nSurpassed 200 orders!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 19:27:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Paypal Accepted] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1 - 190+\\n### Original post:\\nJust ordered 2Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed! Thank you Youngbill! We\\'re currently sitting at 204 sold! only 96 USB\\'s to sell and the buy is closed!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 20:33:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Paypal Accepted] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1 - 200+\\n### Original post:\\n4 More ordered.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ninternational shipping?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYes I do international shipping! PM me for a specific quote\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n215 pieces ordered so far! Group Buy #1 will be closing soon so get in now if you want your USB\\'s shipped out on Monday 8/5!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-06-02 12:23:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: ASICMiner Block Erupter USB group buy (US/Canada) CLOSED AND COMPLETED!\\n### Original post:\\nSo... my USB\\'s were sent \"First-Class Package Service\" for several days when I entered my tracking number... nothing showed up... Now under status I see \"Electronic Shipping info Received\" with a date of May 31, 2013. ...what does this mean? Does this mean they JUST started to send it on my way? I assumed at first this posting method just did not have tracking.(glances over at his lonely Raspberry Pi)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, you will probably see them Tuesday or Wednesday. Once they are accepted and processed the actual expected delivery will show up.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIt means you\\'ve discovered that USPS tracking is useless This is true all of the time and not just with these shipments. Mostly it\\'s only useful after the fact to confirm delivery has happened. In my experience, it is almost never useful in understanding what is happening mid-delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI may cry...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nUSPS told me it would be delivered on Friday, and I received it on Thursday. So... I agree, USPS tracking is virtually useless.M\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nMy tracking now says that my package will get here Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIs there a consensus on the best miner to use with these?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI gave Arklan almost $30 for postage (4 units) and the best you could do is first class mail? I\\'m disappointed.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIf you\\'re using linux, the newest cgminer is supposed to work out of the box. If you\\'re using windows, you have to install few things first. See: people, particularly LukeJr, recommend the cgminer clone, bfgminer. I\\'ve never used it, and I never intend to.M\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nas you can see in this very thread, things got complicated - i wasn\\'t ALLOWED to do more the first class without using the priority prepaid envelopes. which they didn\\'t have. as i\\'ve said before, i\\'ll be happy to send some btc your way if your upset.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHere\\'s a post with someone claiming OK success with MPBM.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThe post office is a mess. It\\'s government run, which explains it all. If it was private, it would have gone bankrupt a long time ago.Shipping hassles, long lines, and being government run is why I use UPS for larger packages (like GPUs and PSUs). M\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThat\\'s why I sent you an email on May 9th suggesting you get in touch with your post office to have them know you will need the priority mail packaging. Ah well... seems they are all shipping now? Hopefully we get them soon. Did they get DoA testing? Any of them prove to be DoA?Would you do it all again knowing what you know now? lol\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI received mine about 10 minutes ago.It WAS signature required FYI y\\'all.Also, yesterday USPS tracking said it would be delivered probably on Monday. This morning it said it would come today, which it obviously did...I don\\'t have time to plug it in and try to get it working until tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI am not bitching because of how everything was run I am bitching because I hate USPS..... package was at my post office at 5:10 am and out on the truck for delivery... because it was signature required my postal carrier never fucking delivers them.... I always get a card saying I have to go into the office. I always ask the same question \"why\" and I always get the same answer \"They aren\\'t supposed to do that\" I was home, wife was home and mother-in-law was home. Wife was in yard most of the morning that fucker is just lazy.... Likewise if the package is too big to fit in the damn box... always get a card.... I hate USPS.... fuck USPS...I will have them monday though.. thanks arklan you did wonderfully.Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\narklan,What is your experience with invalids for the ones you have been running, please?Got mine about 4 hours ago.First testing - mpbm on the pi crashed when I added the two new ones to the mix.Set up on another machine for testing and one of the two:1) always produces a few \"Exception: Mining device is not working correctly (returned e46f2c6c instead of 5eb01f04)\" on start upand2) it is generating 17 to 1 (compared to the other) invalids. About 10% invalid share rate.(With only a 35 minute run-time on them so far.)I am inclined to call one of my two as bad. I don\\'t consider 10% invalid acceptable.I\\'ve got a fan blowing over them and they are both merely \\'warm to the touch\\'.I\\'ll let it run overnight and see what I get. Will report back sometime tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\ni\\'m seeing 2000 accepted shares and 20 hw faults, and between 2 and ten rejects. i\\'m averaging, of course. that\\'s over the last 5 hours or so.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIn a 12 hour run the \\'troublesome\\' one stopped mining at about the 8 hour point. It averaged about 10% hw errors for the period it stayed up. The good one just under 1% hw errors.It initially wouldn\\'t restart by removing / replugging into the USB hub. (Continuous \"returned e46f2c6c instead of 5eb01f04\" errors.)Left it unplugged a couple minutes and it is hash\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, Raspberry Pi, ASICMiner Block Erupter USB, GPUs, PSUs\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-30 01:41:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Bitfury/Knc/Vmc] Multi-Manufacturer Group Buy- Diversify Your Mining Investment\\n### Original post:\\n... I forgot to make the customary reserved post... \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDefinitely interested!But expenses + 5%? How are you\\'re going to keep the share cost (in terms of GH/BTC) below that of Soniq\\'s Bitfury GB?I don\\'t mind paying a little more to achieve some diversification, but when it comes down to going KNC all the way or paying through the nose to mitigate risk, I think I might just rather gamble on KNC.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nsince you havent bought the KNC, instead of September, an October delivery seems to be more plausible\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes, I agree.However, I used the shipping estimates that are provided by each manufacturer. I don\\'t think it\\'s fair that I speculate on how late each company might be, considering there is hardly any information about the inner workings of each company and it is anyone\\'s guess at this point.I make no guarantees that these dates are accurate, we will be at the mercy of the manufacturer.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi,I knew this would come up sooner or later. After doing my first group buy (the hardware is arriving Wednesday), I have learned many things. I lacked the foresight to include the internet bill and commercial rent into the terms and only charged a flat 3% fee. Because Avalon delayed almost 3 months, I will now most likely be operating my first group buy at a net loss .In my opinion, a lot of these newer group buy administrators are going to run into the same thing. If the manufacturer delays months, or if difficulty sky rockets, they will not be able to operate profitably on a 3%-5% all expenses included fee (some will even likely operate at a net loss, like I am with my first group buy).So, to make a group buy worth my time, I have structured this group buy so that I am covered if the manufacturer delays, difficulty skyrockets, etc... Group buys take a lot of time to do share transfers and communicate with the group buy participants, and do other random housekeeping.No offense, but I do not work for free. I am operating my first group buy at a loss and eating the costs because I am a man of my word. If I am to host a second group buy, I need to make sure I\\'m operating with a prof\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'m interested\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThis sounds interesting and I have been wanting to diversify, as I currently have 100gh/s on order from tyrion70\\'s and blastbob\\'s KnC group buy\\'s.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThank you for all of your feedback thus far.I am going to put a minimum number on people interested before I start collecting funds, because I do not want to start collecting funds and have to refund everyone due to lack of interest. I\\'m looking for at least 20 people interested before any funds are collected, so far I\\'ve got 3 people interested.So, 17 more people needed and I will hammer out the details in the OP and start taking orders.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI just reread it as well, and you\\'re right. The costs simply have to be higher, because the Bitfury machines are more expensive. I didn\\'t mean to poke holes in the slightest. Just wanted to make sure that it\\'s explained, and that because the machines are more expensive, the associated costs are kept to as much of a minimum as possible, so that the share price doesn\\'t put off potential buyers.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'m interested too.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nNo problem.I\\'m sorry if I came off as agitated in that post, I am not in the least bit! I was expecting that question sooner or later like I said, so I just wanted to explain my thought process thoroughly so everyone understood. If my fees do turn out to be outrageous and I make a killing, I will be more than happy to reimburse the group for the excessive fees, I just wanted to make sure I didn\\'t operate this with a net loss like my previous group buy.Thanks,Ch\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSounds like a pretty solid plan but might I suggest,1) there be a contingency plan for re-investment in equipment so investors can keep getting a dividend and you don\\'t wind up running at a loss.2) If its successful think about buying in a few shares of my carbon offset program. I am already a big investor in that Count me in as interested!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nInterested.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'d be interested if I could pay with USD. Possible?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nHosting fee reduced to 3.5%I also added to & edited my OP/terms to elaborate more on details.I will probably make at least a couple more revisions to the OP before accepting any funds if there is enough interest, so please still continue to give me your opinions of this offering. Thank you for your cooperation.I also learned from my first group buy (I probably sound like a broken record by now,) it is better to really think about your terms and plans ahead of time instead of just jumping in and ordering equipment without thinking through all the details!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSure, that would be fine. I am a little worried about charge backs, but at the end of \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury, KNC, Vmc, Soniq\\'s Bitfury GB, Avalon, KnC\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 01:43:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Paypal Accepted] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1 - 220+\\n### Original post:\\nOrders still coming in!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n230 USB\\'s ordered! 70 left until the buy is closed! Get in now to secure your miners!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n250 Ordered! 50 left and this buy will be closed!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 03:06:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Paypal Accepted] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1 - 250+\\n### Original post:\\nbeen thinking bout one of these for a while now.just ordered one!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPayment Received! Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 18:55:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] KnCMiner Shares 1.1BTC = 5GH/s *6 Sold - 82 shares available\\n### Original post:\\nI will take 1 share in the miner #6 if it\\'s still available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ntx id: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\npayout address: you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 19:12:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] #16 ASICMiner Erupter USB - .41 to .55 btc (CE + RoHS news) 1000+\\n### Original post:\\nbatch #16 inventory is gone. some orders will be rolled into batch #17 which is due next week.still working through orders. will PM those who will get rolled over into #17\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwhich day next week?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ndid the dhl shipment arrive? you mentioned it would come in 13 hours a while back.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI think it would be a good idea for anyone sending me a PM with a signed message to verify what you send me... this can speed things up..\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCanary - and info on this super-price reduction? Arklan is blowing out .175\\'s on this for previous customers - Any shot of getting this deal as well?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nyay a promo, I was in your first group buy and dropped 2 btc on these things...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nwaiting for friedcat\\'s announcement, per my OP\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nwaiting for friedcat\\'s announcement, per my OP\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\ni was told by Friedcat that previous buyers could buy them at .1 btc, the .075 is for shipping and handling and the like. this is the same deal btcguild was offering to previous buyers as far as i am aware, except their previous buyers were at 1 btc, not 1.99. i\\'ve messaged the cat to clarify exactly what the promo is and told him exactly what i\\'ve began offering. it\\'s entirely possible i might have gotten things wrong and will have to return the payments i\\'ve gotten or alter the deal somehow.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nlol when was the last time friedcat announced anything other than \\'i confirm user xxxx is the owner of x shares\"!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nIf I can get 4 BTC of miners at 0.1 btc that would be the sex...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nCanary,If stock is out for this GB and you\\'re rolling to the next one, do the price breaks reset each group buy? Thanks for your work.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nBaby_ghost, 674, 283.08, \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nssinc, 300, 129, TX ID #1 TX ID #2 \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\niluvpcs; 140; 60.2; \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nCanary, I know you have nothing to do with the manufacturer\\'s parameters but I simply find the thought that those who helped get this product off the ground at 1.99 BTC would be left out of the promotion sad. It would be nice if those were included as well. Some, like me, bought early with the few coins we had available. Didn\\'t complain when the price came down and bought a few more only to see it drop again. It would be nice to see the reward go first towards the early 1.99 BTC purchasers and go down from there.Canary, if you can please pass along this sentiment and suggestion along if possible it would be appreciated.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nhalcy0n3; 25; 13.25; \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThanks! received, verified and am working on it as we discussed.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nGoing to bed. Ready for tomorrow\\'s INSANITYSent 7 PMs to specific folks to send me a verifiable message. if you didn\\'t get a message saying that, please don\\'t send me PM asking if I sent you such a PM.Bad news: no inventory left from tomorrow\\'s batch.Good news: 2000 miners are heading out tomorrow.Good night.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\norders will be rolled into #17, after everything is shipped tomorrow, I will know if anything is left over. otherwise, #17 is arriving next week. please don\\'t ask what day... as soon as I know what day, I will post the info.After #17 I too may be out of inventory till friedcat ships again.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAll looks good to me Sent you 3 pms RE signing (sorry about that, first time signing!).Very smooth so far\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nNOOOOOOO, I thought group was still open since you didn\\'t change subject /o\\\\bt_spectro; 18; 8.64; guess group #17 would do.Anybody knows where can i get a couple more Ankler hubs?, amazon is out of inventory\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSee two posts above You\\'ll be in #17Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nThose hubs aren\\'t worth the price. D-Link DUB-H7, $25 for 6 usable ports. Sure, it takes more hubs... but your per-port price is $4.26 vs $5.55.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\ntry these black and silver whatever cost less\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nagreed, and the dlinks work with raspberry pi\\'s, the ankers don\\'t. Source: I have both.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nPlease change the thread title since no more units available in this batch\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nI can also vouch for the DLink, ran one on a raspberry pi, got 3 total now just waiting on this shipment for it Apologies to Canary - failed to see the second post in thread, so completely did my Signing wrong STILL!4th time lucky.. edit: 6th time lucky, i feel like a right moron now, haha!\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\ncan you make a live poker game vs people yet?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nThe d-link hub ha the best price/performance because it supports 6 usb miners and a usb fan\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nYou might be a bit careful supporting 6 miners and a USB fan. First the hub only ships with a 5V 3A output power supply. 6 USB miners and a fan would be well over 3A. Also, the user manual states: \"It is recommended that the total power consumption of th\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, D-Link DUB-H7, Ankler hubs, raspberry pi\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 18:31:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] #16 ASICMiner Erupter USB - .41 to .55 btc (CE + RoHS news) 450+\\n### Original post:\\nreceived an order for 150 units. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSomeone has said that the ones being shipped out now are revision 4. Is that what we are getting?Ahhh. I found this:USB Block Erupter, Rev 3Energy consumption: 2.5w (approx 500mA @ 5v)USB port required: USB 2.0Average Effective Hashrate: 330 336 MHs (336MHs theoretical maximum, observed average: 333 MHs) Version 3: These are the latest batch that was just released on 7/8/13 with the Amber LED instead of GreenI guess it\\'s these?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCanaryInTheMine, why do we send \"forum_nick; N; C; sending_address\" in the forum thread and not PM you? what is the reason? (also our nick is visible never the less on the forum, why do we put it again?).\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBumps the thread and so it\\'s public information that an order has been submitted.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\niluvpcs; 100; 43; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAmDD; 15; 7.2; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ndyingdreams; 4; 2.2; ID had originally made this order for GB #15, but I don\\'t believe it got included. I had sent a PM, but I did forget to make a post in the thread before it had closed.Either way, it\\'s not that big of a deal, just want to make sure my order didn\\'t get lost. Let me know if I need to resent the PM.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nmusky; 65; 29.25; ID: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI am looking to order 15 more. 15 x .48 = 7.2btcIf I recall your shipment from the \\'cat\\' is due on fri? My coins will be on hand by thur evening. If you can reserve 15 sticks until thur please do so. thanks phil\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n452 sold so far... limit reached?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ntempestb 4; 2.2; \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nsveetsnelda; 114; 49.02; \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\njosiasrdz; 33; 15.84; ID: \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI was ordering some coins from coinbase for the previous group buy but they\\'re still not here yet. I want to buy one of these, can I reserve a spot and pay you tomorrow when coinbase gives me my coins?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nvisdude; 15; 7.2; \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSwimmer63; 50; 22.5; \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nzac2013 ; 15 ; 8.45; you very much, appreciate your excellent service.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIf you pay tomorrow, you should be OK... Friday may be hecktic as that is when I expect delivery and to ship out provided all goes according to the \\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nchadtn; 1; .55; \\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nHow about a timer? I plan on buying tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nYou make a good point. I\\'ll add one tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nCanary, what is the earliest time you estimate local pickup may be available for Friday, assuming prepaid by tomorrow? (Just based on past DHL deliveries I suppose.) Too soon to tell?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\ntoo soon to tell. I\\'m gonna be running around shipping etc... so an exact time is hard to pin down atm.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nCanary does it right, superior customer service in an industry that apparently can barely spell the phrase.I won\\'t buy USB miners from anyone \\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nMellivora; 10; 5; \\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nadd1ct3dd; 20; 10.85; \\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nvisdude; 5; 2.4; consolidate and ship together with prior order of 15 units for a total of 20. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nThat makes no sense. Why should my bitcoin address be public information? (while it is obviously public information, why should I post it on threads?). If needed I can prove the transaction at any point in time anyway.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nRegarding inventory shortage at friedcat and co: all my orders are allocated and shipping.In addition to what is arriving Friday, I have 4 more LARGE orders on their way to me. We\\'ll have stock, no worries!\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nTranz; 10; 5.00; \\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nI think your the reason for the shortage due to the speed in which your selling them!\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nBatch #16 inventory is 13 hours from entering US.\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nyurtesen; 25; 13.25; \\n\\n### Reply 33:\\n+1, friendcat is just gonna say buy here for the time being\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nphilipma1957 15; 7.2 btc id pm sent\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nis FedEx for International insured??\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nDepends on the destination.\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nbeercoin; 2; 1.1; addresses verified during group buy #11 and #15, will sign again upon requestgot a database error trying to post this a minute ago, sorry for any dupes that might appear\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nGermany\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\n[Reposting here, since I got no answer in the old thread]Got my BEs yesterday morning. Thanks for the very fast service SmileyIf I pay extra for it, can I get Fedex next-day delivery in the US for my next order (maybe today)?\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nall info is on OP.\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nworking through orders to generate labels ahead of time...will know inventory #s later on, in a bit.\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nlocksmith9; 130; 55.9; \\n\\n### Reply 43:\\nSigurdDragonslayer; 1; .55; <\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 03:26:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] KnCMiner Shares 1.1BTC = 5GH/s *6 Sold - 80 shares available\\n### Original post:\\nHey waldo,Here\\'s the remaining 6.7 BTC I owe you for my 8 shares on M5, for a total of 8.8. your records, the previous 2.1: address: again for all your efforts\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n guys may have seen this already as it was posted in june. basically, if the average difficulty jump is less than 20%, knc miners will make a profit. If it\\'s more than that, we\\'re screwed.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAccording to The Genesis Block mining calculator, even with the current difficulty and 46% monthly increase and starting in October, KnC miners will be profitable.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares, M5\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 06:46:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [REOPENED] KnCMiner Saturn 0.925BTC=5GH/s | 2/2 Shares | First payout FREE\\n### Original post:\\nLast two shares for 1.85BTC ~!! first come first served.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ll take them. \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nLol, nice ben, I literally came on this thread to take it down and change it back to the 1.05. Glad it could go to you\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 10:48:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters (closed & complete)\\n### Original post:\\nCheers YXT *edit* As long as they are delivered early enough everyone should have their miners (re)shipped out to them today *edit* Keep in mind if I receive them after 4:30PM, chances are I\\'ll have to send them the next day. Will update you all as and when I know.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNew group buy here the delivery from YXT at 2:00PM, shipped the items by 3:55pm, will provide tracking number by email shortly (or possibly PM, as two people didn\\'t send me their email on their order form). Should receive them by 1PM tomorrow (you must sign for the its been shipped! I have a tracking number for the first batch (That\\'s still waiting to show up in the system) Thats the txid for our order with yxt will let you know when I get a tracking ID. starts shipping tomorrow (10th of July) announced here -> has confirmed he can supply us with the units we need for the first batch (good thing I ordered early and kept the unit quantity low). Just waiting for him to provide a payment address and shipping date now. woohoo! has contacted me asking me how many units I want and where I want to ship to, so it looks like there is some progress. Things are looking promising Unfortunetly I still have no idea where we are in the queue still or when he will ship, once I have some more information I will let you YXT has given an update here I showed interest very early on, both via PM (hours after th\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-30 21:02:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Block Erupter USB @ 2.10 BTC + parcel -> Shipping to anywhere!\\n### Original post:\\nWhat about the one they used in the USB Erupter pictures? The blue 10 port powered hub, some come with 2A adapters which is no good for anything over 3-4 but some apparently come with 4A/5A adapters.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThe first batch was dispatch!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat news A+C!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhich delivery service is that?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDHL. They shipped my Blade from Shenzhen to Geneva in less than 3 days, it shouldn\\'t be any longer to London.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI suppose I only have 3 days to think what to tell the missus about how much I spent...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ni told mine they were my mining profits that i was reinvesting\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSince the remaining buyers are not showing interest to pay as soon as possible their pending pre-orders, I am going to receive pre-orders requests from people interested to participate in the group buy. However I will only include the pre-order in the Trader\\'s Book if the interested buyer is ready to pay. I want to close 50 units before receive the first batch to order another batch.There is still 28 or more units available for the second batch. To place a pre-order for the remaining units, fill this form:\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAm be putting in pre-order for 5. If it would be helping, I could be preordering another 10. Could also be picking up any units from first batch that pre-order person not taking.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAll units from the first batch are already paid. You can try to contact the buyers to know if they are interested to sell their units.If you are ready to pay for 15 units, place the pre-order. There is not a maximum limit of units to order the second batch.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nA+C, what is the lead time on the second batch?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI really expect order the second batch up to next Monday to have it delivered before the second week of June.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThat\\'s great. Placed my pre-order for 3 units.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nPlacing pre-order for 10 more units. Not being a problem sending to my brother\\'s address in USA, right?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nIs anybody thinking about playing the lottery of mining solo ?I figured that at the current difficulty with 1 stick you would have 1 chance in 60 of winning 25 btc within the first month.After that the difficulty will surely increase but still further mining will add to your chances.Obviously having more than 1 stick would also help a lot.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWith current network hash rate, would that not being closer to 1 in 400,000 ?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHashrate: 336Average generation time for a block (solo): 4 years, 338 days = 1798 days1798 / 30 = 59.93Right ?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nNo, it is not.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nEvery day independent trial. Each block independent trial. Mining for 30 days just 30 iterations of one block in 1798 days or 1 chance to find block in every 431,520 next blocks over and over again. Not additive. No more chance to find block after 1 year of mining as when starting - being actually much less because of weekly difficulty increases. Not as likely as you might be thinking - could easily mine for 25 years and not be finding block. Finding block solo at that rate about 3.5 sigma event. Difference between 3.5 and 4 sigma events is being very small difference in probability-wise but large time-wise - from once every six years to possibly twice in a lifetime and not difficult to stretch out to sigma 4.5 making once every 4 centuries. Can only say results not being average after 1.4 million years of testing - should find block within 6 sigma - if not, average calculation probably wrong.In meantime straight PPS should paying in your pocket about 18 BTC over same period you mentioning.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nMy brother is saying that you are emailing asking for more in shipping charges than the cost of the goods? Over $1200.00 US for shipping 10 ounces of merchandise? Is this email being correct\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI don\\'t know about total, but he has used uk Royal Mail postal calculator to correctly calculate postage as far as I am concerned!Myrdd\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\n5 Units for 10.5 BTC and then additional 10 BTC shipping ? Nearly $280 USD shipping for each device? UK post calculator says 49.99 GBP = 0.58 BTC for one pound package delivered next day from UK to USA.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI request payment for people which increased their units in their respective pre-orders. Perhaps I made a mistake. What is your brother email?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI just spot your signature... It is not \"red hair\". This is wrong. It is AUBURN hair. That is the correct English word for beauties like you.Now... Well... Auburn, Russian and with Irish temper! What a marvelous combination. I would fall in love with you at first sight (assuming you are she, of course).Ok, you placed a pre-order for 10 units after another pre-order of 5 units. What is the correct pre-order? Your brother thinks you placed just 5.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nAck. Am making confusion. Am placing order for 5, then plac\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupter, 10 port powered hub, 2A adapters, 4A/5A adapters, Blade, units from the first batch, units from the second batch, stick, 10 ounces of merchandise\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 18:48:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: WTB at markup\\n### Original post:\\nWtb 8-12 Avalon chips. At up to 12.5% markup over purchase price8 to 12 @ 0.091125BTC eachPlease pm if anyone is open. Trying to fill other half of my k16 and a few k1\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, k16, k1\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-02 11:25:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: TEST BOARD PIC [BFL] $27,5/chip 50% - GB BTC,PayPal,SEPA - 313 sold,9/100 batch\\n### Original post:\\nAnd since I wasn\\'t asked for an I think it was done in house... That is even better news... Will know more tomorrow...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI see at least one solder bridge. You might need to get out your Exacto-knife and clean that up...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI may have to break out the glasses. Can you describe where you see the bridge?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCOM USB chip? Left bottom? Is that it? Will forward that... Thanks...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOK I jumped a gun a bit. This board we could use but it was found not made by us. It was found when looking on forums, IRC... working on ours... They agreed licencing if we can provide enough samples chips for test run... Well anyway we have 1 in-house project and one outsourced but adopted as ours and we will work together on it... So we have one more front open...They just write that they have a board and will give me more info tomorrow but didn\\'t add it is not ours. Now when I send them info on that solder bridge I got back you didn\\'t publish anything jet right? They forgot that I don\\'t sleep that much...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBig chip just under the Bitcoin symbol. Top row. Count over from the right about 8 pins, just below the open via next to the closed one. Looks like a solder bridge between the two pins about 1/2 way up from the chip. I used to fix these kinds of things for a living - things like that jump out at me. Of course it could just be an optical illusion caused by the way the picture was taken. You need a magnifier and the actual board to be able to tell. And yes, bottom right chip - left hand side bottom two pins look bridged, too.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi,that bridges are intended to be so - these pins are connected in the schematic/layout, too (power-rails).Here are some new pictures from today. Ignore the BFGMiner-Errors, because hashing is difficult without chips \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI would like to say hi and thanks for joining us... Much appreciated...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'d like to echo that sentiment! The pictures are much appreciated! As is the humor - turning electricity into heat and Bitcoins....\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSo they are putting 8 chips on that board? I was just curious, I don\\'t mean to sound sceptical. If so thats awesome.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nform correct me if I\\'m wrong but for 8 probably there is not enough power in this board right? This one is for test and you can add additional power supplys on it. Right?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYes, this power module (that plug-in module behind the ATX-connector) can probably supply up to four of the chips. When we run all tests we will see how many current is flowing, and the final board will get a bigger module or two of them.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI like it. I\\'m anxiously awaiting the test results.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYes but the problem that chips are showing in Chicago now since 24.7. We need to wait for this to clearI asked around and all EU buyers have this problem... So I really need to find what is wrong... Or find someone to send one chip from outside EU...Still waiting for BFL answer... And asked USPS still no answer... Hope to get one soon...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMy one was shipped from Leawood via Kansas City & too since 24 of July in Chicago. I think their tracking system is stopping in Chicago, maybe when leaving for oversea.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nCheck your local country\\'s postal tracking system - there is a reciprocal postal agreement between many countries allowing tracking.I tracked a Canadian order to my house after it arrived in the USA using the Canadian number. It took a bizarre route - Toronto to Indianapolis to Chicago to Los Angeles to Minneapolis, then finally to me.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nGot a replay from BFL:So not a good news...\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nNot worry LuckoIs simple airmail letter will do to arrived to you 10-12 daysAll is ok I see at your USA tracking number\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWill be at you sometime at 5-7 of August\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nMy jallies took about 5 working days to reach me. I\\'m guessing u will have a parcel either today or tomorrow Click to see bigger image\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAt the start of a GB I did promise that I will share all data(good and bed). This is not me being worried I\\'m just kipping my promise... and being a bit frustrated Anyway there is another shipment that is on time and should be hire at the end of a week or at the start of next one... My Jala for experimenting with alternative design and firmware... Would love to use a different method but that is the way it is... 3000 for a board is just too much...\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nWhat about the rumours and reports that they seize or check BFL shipments due to missing CE or RoHS certifications in Europe? Maybe they\\'re on yet another blacklist...\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nAs far as I know only Germany for Jalapeo and only because it doesn\\'t not have a German how-to and has also US powerplug added...But it is interesting that I can\\'t find anyone who has samples received from BFL outsi\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: TEST BOARD PIC [BFL], Exacto-knife, glasses, COM USB chip, magnifier, power supplys, ATX-connector, chips, jallies\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-04 21:22:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: PCI-E to USB 3.0 Port & 10-Port USB Hub Group Buy (gauging for interest)\\n### Original post:\\nHi everyone,I am investigating into buying a large quantity of PCI-E to USB hubs for users looking to upgrade/modify their Bitcoin rigs. More or less, the PCI-E to USB hub turns your former GPU slot into a USB hub for K1/ASICMiner Block Erupters.There are a few makes and models that I can purchase from the factory, but are generally similar, between a few styles. I\\'d like to see if there\\'s interest in this from Bitcointalk members. Given the price drops on the USBs, I imagine a lot of people want/need hubs and handlers for them. I\\'m (also) working on a large order of the \"Juiced\" 10-port hubs. The dirty secret is that there are generally two or three manufacturers of these type of 10-port, USB 3.0 hubs that are powerful enough to handle 10 USBs. They aren\\'t cheap, but everyone is seemingly sold out, which means a direct buy from the factory may yield cheaper prices, if not a guarantee that they\\'re at least available.So here\\'s what I\\'m looking at:These are also available in a vertical configuration, but cost about $2 more at wholesale. Group buy price on these would be about $12.50 USD + shipping if I can get enough orders (MOQ is 200, but I can absorb probably half of that myself)F\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'d likely be in for 2-3 of the 10 port hubs depending on ETA.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhat\\'s the power specs on the usb hub?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'ve had mixed results with Juiced... They\\'re definitely good for 9 ports filled with erupters. The 10th is finicky... I\\'m actually going to have one I bought for testing exchanged to see if its the hub itself..\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI bought 5 of the Orico/Juiced on Monday and just went back to by more. Someone must have bought the rest from the same place as they are sold out. Probably will use an artic fan in the 10th spot if its flaky.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYou cant run 9 erupters + fan, it will crap out\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThe 4 port PCI card does not look like the spacing between the ports is enough to fit the USB erupter. RE the 10 port thing, a better deal is the DUB7 which reliably runs six erupter plus a fan, total of seven. (and it is much cheaper like $27 each) The 10 port unit could work nicely with the right power supply but you know they don\\'t have it.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: PCI-E to USB hubs, Juiced 10-port hubs, Orico/Juiced, artic fan, 4 port PCI card, DUB7\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-04 23:32:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] KnCMiner Shares 1.1BTC = 5GH/s *6 Sold 77 shares avail\\n### Original post:\\nOK, at least I\\'m a shareholder now\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-04 16:53:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Batch #1 for HashFast 400GH GN Chips\\n### Original post:\\nOk, I had seen a couple people state that they had confirmed Uniquify\\'s relationship with HashFast. Now that I\\'ve received my own, though, I feel much better.Yes, I can confirm that we are implementing the Hashfast chip.Regards,Bob SmithSenior VP Marketing & Bus. Dev.Uniquify, Inc.2030 Fortune Drive - Suite 200San Jose, CA 95131Here is what I know about them so far: Yeah thanks Bit, and in my title of all places!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n1btc = > 6 ghash, im in\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIt seems that way. Just to be clear, these are estimates. I got a reply from a personal message that said they will release pricing soon.There are a lot of nuances here too, I talk a lot about 400GH for instance. The chip is being designed for 400GH at max potential. All of that will depend on cooling, though.That being said, quite exciting stuff! I think most people were expecting the time frame on the next big drop in price/GH to be a little farther out. I was still getting used to KnCMiner and BitFury\\'s numbers.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nTentative 10 BTC for a group buy. Assuming we do get those answers and that the group jumps in early of course. Thanks for the effort!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nKeeping an eye on this. Btw, you still have several references to FastHash in the OP.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'m in for shares in a rig5-10 btc\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHard to believe a company and mining machine come out with such close names one after the other. Thanks for catching that.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'d be interested depending on price.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIndeed! It is amazingly early to jump into this, as prices have not been announced. If anyone wants to just post an \"Interested.\" Or something similar to lajz99 that will be helpful too.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nInterested in the hosting option...anywhere from 3-10 BTC depending on pricing and timing. Can you imagine what\\'s going to happen to the difficulty if this company really does start rolling out 400 GH/s chips, consuming 10% of the power per GH, at a relatively affordable price, in October? Move over, Knc.Still a big if, though.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nInterested, in the hardware.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nInterested..\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nInterested and signed up to your news letter ... will be watching close.Blorgg\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nInterested and waiting for more information.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nInterested, depending on price too.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nInterested.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nInterested and watching\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast 400GH GN Chips, KnCMiner, BitFury\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 08:58:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [NOW SHIPPING] #16 ASICMiner Erupter USB - .41 to .55 btc (CE + RoHS news) 1000+\\n### Original post:\\nThe Great Wall from China:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nQuite a sight. lol\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n660 GH/s sitting on your tableDifficulty FactorHash Rate (mega-hashes / second)Exchange Rate ($/)CoinsDollarsper \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n10 per box, have 200 boxes, and we have 2000 pcs on the table\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nso 10 by 20 is 200 boxes in that wall. 10 per box? gives you 2000 sticks. nice hash power. 672gh. this will get you at just about 10,000 sticks sold. Nice!I am thinking how many I can host if I push. I may get up to 200 sticks hashing. I do not think I can do more then that.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nrtt; 2; 1.1; too late for #16, next one, #17 is great too, thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nLMAO!!!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNow calculate the cost of 10 port hubs and the amount of hours you would spend unwrapping and plugging each one in.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nrunning a 2000 stick usb farm would be a lot of work. the cheapest hub I have found is a 7 port hub for 24 dollars it has enough power. comes with a 5v 4a wall wart that is 20 watts 7 sticks is 17.5 watts 6 sticks is 15 watts so 6 and a fan would be 16 watts. no one is running a 290 hub 2000 stick farm. you would need 290 hubs at 24 usd each or 6960 usd in hubs!I may try to run a 200 stick farm not sure. I am running a 39 stick setup now and it is very easy to do. I know I can go to 100 no problem.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nDon\\'t you think for 80 BTC + hub cost, you will get 1 avalon from auctions sub forum.? With 200 sticks, you end up getting only 67 gh/s.Probably buy from someone who has already received it and selling it.I saw one for 90 btc yest.!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI dont think people were being genuinely serious about a 2000 stick farm\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nImagine all the blinking lights... It would be magical.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAm not talking about 2000 stick farm. But philipma1957 sounds serious about 200 stick farm.Am comparing the price and gh/s with 200 stick farm.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAll USPS shipments have gone out\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nGood job\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nImpressive stuff!Guess you have the fun of PMing tracking numbers to everyone now? =D\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nwhat hub and host system you using? i was having issues running 5 x 7 port hubs on a pi (which should do 45) - it would always leave 3-4 sticks on \\'ready\\'. its not a power issue because even if i removed sticks it always left 3-4 hanging... seems like a comm issue. all hubs were plugged into one hub and that was plugged into the pi.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\n anyone wants to see their delivery times by zipcode.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWe\\'re dropping off FedEx shipments... done with shipping 2000 units. I will not be PMing USPS Priority tracking numbers until Saturday evening or Sunday... Time to go and attend a graduation ceremony...I might have some become available on Monday, but it would be a small amount...Waiting for info on #17s arrival... as I have more info, I will make it available here and will create batch #17 thread.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThanks for Everything and Have a Great Time!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWhat is origin zip code?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nAll of them black. I\\'m guessing as price comes down, colors go away.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nFedEx, waiting .....\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nright now I have some good quality boards left over from my gpu farms. an asus maximus gene v will run 100 plus sticks with windows 7 you can use a low power cpu like a 2500t any low cost platinum psu works.this psu with this cpu I had four of them only need 2 and this mobo would run 100 plus sticks I am playing around with hubs having trouble deciding what to use.waiting on these to test. here is a shot of my farm it has 39 sticks in use but I am sure it can go to 100 on each of those 2 pcs in the photo. I get 15 sticks from Canary brings me to 55 sticks.. I will sell a few 6 stick setups on ebay and next order (17) I want 25-50 sticks my farm will also be able to run 4 gpus at lite coin when the colder weather hits. I have got to love Canary\\'s speedy shipping. Make all of this possible. Not trying to side track or hijack this thread. As Canary has made my change from gpu to asic low cost fast and easy. Hats off to the yellow bird!!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI believe it is 60181, or at least somewhere near there.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nyes 60181 is correct\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nWhich hub is that? Any link, please?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nThis is the only hub I could find that matches the product specifications, however it\\'s $35 not $24.I would recommend this one, but I\\'m not sure if someone has purchased it to confirm the power specs on it. However for 13 ports and 45W theres no better deal, aside from buying the cheapest one you can find and converting it to molex.If you have more questions I would recommend you consult or post in this thread.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nThanks. I have followed the thread. I was just curious about which 7-port 5V 4A hub philipma1957 was referring to because I don\\'\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, 10 port hubs, 7 port hub, 290 hub, avalon, asus maximus gene v, 2500t cpu, low cost platinum psu, 13 ports and 45W hub\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, False, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-05 18:26:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: TEST BOARD PIC [BFL]$27,5/chip 50% - GB BTC,PayPal,SEPA - 353 sold,49/100 batch\\n### Original post:\\nHi LuckoSo for psu, something like a \"OCZ 1000W ZX Series fully modular\" with 6 PCIe sockets, would power, 6 boards with 8 chips, or 3 boards with 16 chips.Would there be enough power remaining to drive a cheap motherboard as a host? or is it better host from another pc.I also have an android stick pc with BFL software running (I still need a miner to test this) but it looks very low power around 3 watts.Keith\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOne of the best hosts is in my opinion a Raspberry Pi with Minepeon - have a look at it. Cheap and good\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI don\\'t know that PSU but I think you have enough power... You are using only 12V and and matherboard doesn\\'t need much of that...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIs this sale for chips, boards, or both?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMaybe both soon - for the chip-groupbuy look at this thread: the board there will be a big update tomorrow.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: OCZ 1000W ZX Series fully modular, android stick pc, Raspberry Pi\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-06 06:08:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] KnCMiner Shares ฿1.05=5GH/s 75 left! *6 Jupiters SOLD\\n### Original post:\\nQuick question about overhead.You mention 3% for management, but I can\\'t find anything concerning pool fees.Was really wanting to include them in my SamuelSG\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares, Jupiters\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-06 14:13:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED][OPEN] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Group Buy #2!\\n### Original post:\\nJust hit 225 this morning!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-03 04:11:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] [AUCTION] KnC Mercury USA 1/25 Shares ~4Gh/s *ORDERED***PAID*\\n### Original post:\\nWhat other fees are we looking at here?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m not asking for any fees. Electricity, cooling, maintenance, monitoring, all of that should be factored into the price that you bid.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1I confirm the receipt of the documents below. Please note that I am not a professional nor trained in verifying documents given, so I cannot guarantee that they\\'re 100% authentic or came from the original owner.1. Photo of arthurdent6\\'s Drivers License2. Photo of a letterhead addressed to arthurdent63. Photo of arthurdent6\\'s Firearm Owner\\'s ID4. Photo of arthurdent6 holding a piece of paper with his username 5. Photo of arthurdent6\\'s paid order for KnC.I promise the safe destruction of the data after the successful completion of the group buy. The data received may be divulged for litigation purposes if July 2013-----BEGIN PGP GnuPG v1.4.11 PGP SIGNATURE-----\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWish you the best of luck arthurdent6.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks! I was inspired by your success obviously, Mog. If I don\\'t get any takers, I guess I\\'ll have to take delivery of my miner and hope the BTC revenue makes up the initial expense and who knows? Maybe a lot more :-)\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNo bids here? I am tempted!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNot yet, stex...I would like to start the countdown to the auction close when I get the first bid. Does 2 weeks sound right?The longer time passes, the more it adds value to know that the order is already in the delivery queue!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYou mentioned:OFFERING DETAILS- There are no fees on top of this because I will take the operational expenses out of the shares I keep for myself.I am confused on the number of shares you are keeping. You are selling 25 shares at 4ghs each, right? or, is it less?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m tempted!!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nNot sure. I am mainly watching here. I am in the US too, and can invest a couple BTC here and there where I see value.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nTell us how many of those 25 belong to you\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHey damiano... The shares are each 4% of the miner (1/25, ~4Gh/s) no matter how many I keep. All 25 belong to me as of right now because the miner is paid and my address is on the order. But if you want to own a piece, just make me a reasonable offer My ideal outcome would be to keep 5 and sell 20 for around 80-100 USD (1.0-1.5 BTC) each. BTC bids I will have to accept depending on the USD exchange rate since I paid for the miner in USD. But I might not get interest for 20, I might only get bids for 10. Or if the bidding goes way up for all 25 shares (wishful thinking maybe ) I will sell all 25 and use the proceeds to upgrade the miner.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSorry I missed this question. Hopefully the comment I left above answers it. The reason I can\\'t say exactly how many I will keep is because I don\\'t know exactly how many bids I will get. If I only get a few bids I\\'ll accept them and then I\\'ll just have to keep all of the rest since no one is buying them. Make sense?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI can accept bids and PayPal payments in USD and convert to BTC if that\\'s convenient.If there\\'s any dispute or reversal I will refund the money and cancel the shares and the payouts. There will be a deadline on receiving payment so that the payment couldn\\'t be reversed after the BTC payouts were sent.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI bid 1 share at $80 USD via paypal.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThank you, aoshea, could you please send a PM and sign with your receiving BTC address?I will start the countdown!If you change your mind about staying anonymous / hiding your bid price, you can edit your post\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nPM\\'d with the signed address. Also, will you be hosting any other equipment on site with the Mercury?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nbuy 1 share @ 1btc\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThanks, Elite Would you mind sending a PM signed with the BTC address you will use?Also feel free to edit your post if you change your mind and you want your bid price to be hidden.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI am also building a small collection of LTC miners, but as far as BTC equipment I have no plans to add more.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAuction is closing early next week, with or without bids.If I don\\'t get at least a few more bids I\\'m going to have to cancel the sale and keep all of the shares Compared with the other group buys people are participating in left and right (myself included) I thought this sounded like a pretty good deal, but I guess if there\\'s no interest what can I do?Thanks everyone for looking one way or another!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nNo one wants in? Too bad it looks my bid will be cancelled.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nHello, i will be interested in 1 share @ 1btc, but i dont have it all right now , im mining and will have it by the end of next week\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nMay I know what the min shares to achieve that you are targetting? It seems like you have a number in mind. I\\'ll try to ask around here because bitcoin is \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Mercury, LTC miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-06 17:57:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #23 Sold [Added to 8.4 TH/s Jupiter Pool] Selling #24\\n### Original post:\\nGreenDefender; 2; tx \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n14 shares \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1 share for Regards.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNoted, added to OP and spreadsheetPlease send email and Skype userWelcome to the group\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMikeMike; 13; total.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nsome new faces and some previous GB members all appreciated Added to OP and spreadsheet\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 15:42:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB GroupBuy#2! 243+\\n### Original post:\\nGroup Buy #1 customers are starting to receive their orders!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 17:06:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #24 Sold [Added to 8.4 TH/s Jupiter Pool] Selling #25\\n### Original post:\\nHi,1 share of Jupiter confirm and add me to the list as \"nobunaga\". Receiving address would be the same you,\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 18:13:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #23 Sold [Added to 8.4 TH/s Jupiter Pool] Selling #25\\n### Original post:\\nHi Soniq shares in GB3 please BTC7.2 sent and PM in your inbox(to partner my GB1 shares )CheersWedgy2k\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOne share to compliment my GB2 shares: get the last two Jupiters guys!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nKushedout; 4 \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAdded to OP and spreadsheetPlease send email and Skype user, thank youWelcome to the group :-)Jupiter #25 purchased and selling shares on #26\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 19:14:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #21 Sold [Added to 8.4 TH/s Jupiter Pool] Selling #23\\n### Original post:\\n#22 sold , selling #23\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhi boss, 1 share paid, i guess this is for miner #23, hope it gets filled up soon.tx id: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMikeMike; 10; get this #23 closed.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nboss, please reserve 1 share for me. will be paying within the day. thanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMikeMike; 15; 25.nudge...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n3 shares remaining for miner #23\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nhi boss, this is the payment for the share reserved earliertx id: 2 shares in miner #23thanks\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nMikeMike; 3; total.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\ndude, you\\'re rich\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\ngoodluck to all of us then. i hope this knc will really deliver\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nNoted and added to OP#23 sold, selling shares on #24Welcome\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nActually seriously in debt and trying to dig my way out...Did a job for Walmart.Got screwed 38K.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 08:43:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [SOLD OUT]Avalon Reselling and Hosting Plan\\n### Original post:\\nYifu Guo is offering refund for the Batch #3 ordering. I want to hear the opinions of my customers, and two of you have already written me message about it. You can PM me.I will send out email to you today to discuss the situation. I will try my best to help everyone to have the option as if you ordered the Batch #3 yourselves.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI do not mean disrespect to Yifu, but I believe he should give us 2-3 Avalons, or partial refund credit for each batch #3 order or some sort of decent compensation. The difficulty is not at 10 million anymore and that is what the price was based on. So essentially I paid $6400 for a 3 module Avalon at the time. Now ROI looks like 45-90+ days. Right now, 6/24/2013, difficulty is at 19 million and will probably be 30-70 million before batch #3 ships.I also paid $2800 for 1 module in your plan.My trade-in, I paid $200 to ship and have them signed over 2 months ago as well. I chose not to buy a batch #2 because of this. In hindsight, I should have bought 2-10 batch #s Avalons.But what can I do? Give up? That\\'s not gonna happen. No matter how bitter the pill, I will hold my ground and have faith that you and Yifu come through. I used my money I saved to buy a house for investing in Avalon...I still have faith it will all work out.As a side-thought...I think we should invest in Avalon chips and assemble them on PCB.Very \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSince refund option was offered only a week ago, we might as well wait for refund until NY (2014? 2015?), lol. Avalon treats priority trade-in customers like shit, what can we expect as refugees of batch 3?IMO, we still can get some btc off batch 3, but only if chips are not shipped before units. But i think they will and we will be fucked up.I\\'m very happy though that i haven\\'t ordered 3 module unit for if you order chips now, you\\'d end up in the end of queue of 500 000 chips. With Avalon you can receive them first and become a king. Or only become a king. Or not.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'ve never received an email, do you have me on the list?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nit is not finished yet.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI mean ever I\\'ve PM\\'ed email in case you don\\'t have it\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI also didn\\'t get an email about this either. I\\'ve PMed you about the possibility of refunds. I\\'d be interested.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI also did not receive an email. I\\'d just like to make sure I\\'m on the list, so there isn\\'t confusion later.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat is the state right now?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSaw this posted in another what are these \\'issues\\' ?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nBatch #3 seems to be shipped soon.HorseRider, are your waiting for them to come or asking refund?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nEmails are out. Please check the info in the email carefully, especially about the number of modules and the bitcoin address.I recommend a refund. For those who persist own the Batch #3 unit, I think we can find a solution.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nMany thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nNot sure if you want discussion here or by email, I think here would be better save multiple people asking the same questions of you, so I hope you don\\'t mind if I quote.This is going to be crucial to the decision, and I don\\'t see you getting an answer from Avalon in time to make an informed decisionEG ball park figures$75 at time of ordering, $95 now means on a 4 module unit we could lose 23BTC, obviously that is no good, and we would be better to take delivery as that gives a buffer to get the $ value back. Plus with the new cgminer build they are running a lot faster than originally thought which helps a lot too.I\\'m inclined to keep my order if possible.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI think it is much simplerOP paid avalon with RMB, so Avalon team will of course refund him with RMB since he paid with RMB. But OP still have our bitcoins, so he should have no problem returning the bitcoins that we sent him. Unless he already sold some coins for RMB, which for this kind of order is highly unlikely, and OP is a true bitcoin supporter, he won\\'t sell any large amount of coins I believe\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI also did not receive an email. (((I send my email address to HorseRaider via PM.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWith the refunds going through will there be an opportunity to purchase modules again then? Sorry followed multiple threads trying to figure this out!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI also did not receive the email.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWaiting for the refund...\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nA new email is sent. Please check it.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI still did not get the mail\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nUnits all arrived. Busy in setting up. Air conditioner got some problem , I am handling it. part of the machines are running, For the hosted machines, please track this address for the mined coins.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nWhat A/C are you using? I had some problems with the A/C I\\'m using to cool 7 Avalons, maybe I can help you out.If you are using a similar A/C, it may be the same problem. I am using an industrial portable A/C,\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon, A/C\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-05 22:26:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #8 195+ ASICMiner Erupter USB 1.01618 ea. @ 10 units\\n### Original post:\\nShipment information received HONG KONG - HONG KONG\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSeems we are ahead of schedule on this one...No?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAny chance you have a few more for sale?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m certainly not complaining.Are both batches confirmed en route?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nomg, too late again. I hope you open a 9th Group Buy\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nsome from the OP have shipped due to available supply from 7.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nDHL tracking # received from friedcat\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOooh, does this mean mine have shipped from you already, Canary? I\\'m first on the list, but it doesn\\'t show as shipped in the OP.Edit : I see the last folks on the list got theirs shipped first\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBrilliant!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nJust received my 5 sticks! All five working like a charm!Canary your efforts are greatly appreciated!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI usually hate to agree with contentious post on a forum, but I\\'d have to agree with this poster. Why were the last orders the first to ship? What is the ETA on the balance of the orders?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI believe that he shipped to people who participated in the group 7 buy because he had ordered some extras and shipped the group 7+8 orders together if he could. Also I think that he has just moved the people he shipped to down to the bottom of the list for clarity.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThank you for paying attention to my posts!!!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI didn\\'t want to stir up an issue, I was just a bit confused. Thanks for the clarification.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDitto!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nDeparted Facility in HONG KONG - HONG KONG HONG KONG - HONG KONGI\\'m going to guess that I should have these in hand on the 5th. the 4th is a holiday and I doubt DHL works on the 4th.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThanks for the update!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nIf you\\'re like me, and have neglected laundry while anxiously watching the mailbox, you could probably use a fresh shirt to wear:3-color silkscreen print on 100% cotton shirt. $18 plus S&H, but the price drops to $15+S&H if we can get enough orders. Check it out here: \\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nOut for delivery\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\ndue to the change in the btc/usd rate. any NEW requests for shipping upgrades are based on the following price:USPS Express: .3 btcFedEx ND: .57 btcFedEx ND + Saturday: .79 btcFedEx international: 1.43 btc\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nwell... finally DHL has screwed up... after the 4th, they apparently have double the load to deliver...so the status on my tracking number says delivery attempted, business since business is not closed and there are many people here today.I guess the driver is running late with other packages and decided that today, my business is closed...I called DHL, they are trying to setup re-delivery today but it being the day after a holiday, I\\'m not holding my breath; I have the address of their station and will go there after 8 PM to pickup in person if all else fails.however, i have to warn everyone that worst case scenario is me receiving them Monday 7/8/13.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThank you for the update, very professional response. Well done, Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nDoes DHL deliver on Saturdays?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nNot to businesses except for mucho surcharge.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nmake sure to take a Ice Pick with you. After you get your packages find the van that was supposed to deliver your package and shank his tires!\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nOK... DHL has called me back and said that they will have the package available for me to pickup at 7:30 PM.After I pick it up, i will jet over to the FedEx station and send out those packages that are listed using FedEx delivery method. This does not mean that if you are listed as FedEx ND that you will receive it tomorrow (saturday). you will receive it Monday. Only those who pay for FedEx Saturday delivery are going to receive on Saturday via FedEx. Hope this is clear. The USPS shipping method will ship out tomorrow.All of this is also predicated on me actually picking up the delivery at 7:30 PM, which is in 3 hours from now.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nthank you for your suggestion, I would prefer not to resort to this measure as it will certainly limit my capacity to ship out your orders while being behind bars awaiting bail...\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nThis is the EIGHT group buy I\\'m organizing. The first one completed here: The second completed here: The third completed here: and the fourth one completed here: the fifth completed here: sixth and seventh can be found on forumsStatus updates:2013-06-28: group buy #7 setup2013-06-28: if you order 30+, I will ship via USPS Express service. (USA offer only)2013-06-28: add .35 for next day FedEx shipping within USA to any order.2013-06-28: don\\'t have enough funds to order? Consider using www.bitinstant.com to fund via money gram deposit directly to your (NOT mine!!!) bitcoin address. bitcoins are sent to you as soon as that cash is deposited at your local wallmart, cvs, je\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, 3-color silkscreen print on 100% cotton shirt, Ice Pick\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-08 12:42:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [BFL-Chip Groupbuy] $27,5/chip 50% - BTC,PayPal,SEPA - 353 sold,49/100 batch #3\\n### Original post:\\nJust to let you know...I believe we are the first that have a hashing board\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n2.3GH/s is good enough for a chip though it\\'s only 10 engine running. what are the estimated price for a board to have 8 mounted chips?Kudos to the first working board\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI think so yes... If I\\'m not mistaken theoretical max for that chip is 2.5...If only 10 engine is not do to power supply we are in 200 to 300 $ range for sure... Maybe less with enough orders... But we will need some more time to look at findings to be sure... And test with more chips...EDIT: It looks like chips are the problem...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIf it\\'s 10 engines running, i will consider that to be a faulty chip.According to BFL website, a grade D chip will have at least 12 engines running. this is a sample chip and i guess we can\\'t complain much.It still shows how professional are they to send chips that are below grade D....For my jallyes, I have tried restarting it until i got at least 15 engines running on both chips. It works for me where the engine kinda fluctuate between 13 to 15 engines. Maybe you can try that out.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nFor unknown reason topic was locked... Or someone with power hate that we took the lead... So for now I\\'m waiting to get answer why but it looks like they have changed some polices (see warning next to my PGP key signature)\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAre you referring to the maximum for a 10 engine chip? I thought the typical BFL chips would have more power.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYes but it looks like samples are bin chips...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAs in substandard shit? I\\'m not a tech guy. Just trying to interpret the lingo.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nBin like recycle bin... Looks like samples are chips that they will not even put in Jala...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi,I send my 3 samples for the bigger board on Monday with registered mail to you - should receive soon\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHi Lucko, you need a COINADO sticker on the cooling fan for the units you fully assemble.Any more news on the 16 chip design?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI can make the stickers if anybody need high quality ones, I can too print white and metallic on transaprent vinyl all with contour cut - Lucko has my contact details now too (sample chips). High quality printings need a vector based logo work what have to be in one layer (no overlaying vectors). So just contact me!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nIf anyone\\'s buying chip credits, I still have a ton...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nFirst we need to figure out how much heat is coming off chips... It looks like BFL specs are off... 3 chips 38W... So not by much but they have low hashrates... Only 8GH... And it is not the board it is chips... Samples are low quality...So then we will know heatsink needed and then we can make a sticker...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThey seem to be pretty terrible. I\\'ve had to use a knife to scrape the epoxy underfill off the top of the die on some.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nYes. It is more or less ready and will be made in about 14 days for first test... Based on what we know now we are sure it will work. So it needs only samples now...And it has a name COINTAMINATION I must say I love it!!!EDIT: GB buyers that have chips but not enough to fill full 16 chips board can buy more chips now. Board will be hosted for free(-electricity) till chips arrive and then we will add them to the board.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nLucko I think you have been locking it Yeah pgp urls broke\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI don\\'t think the other thread is locked now. I believe the links are broken because the forum now has issues with shortened links.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYes I also think that is what happened... I was sleeping on(keyboard) my laptop... I need to slow down now... Burning candle on both ends is leaving its mark...If anyone is interested how good samples are...PROCESSOR 0: 10 engines @ 428 MHz -- MAP: B7E4 3: 7 engines @ 354 MHz -- MAP: F206 4: 12 engines @ 384 MHz -- MAP: F6DE 5: 8 engines @ 342 MHz -- MAP: 85DC 7: 9 engines @ 371 MHz -- MAP: 03FE is with tweaked 1.2.5 firmware.... We are still in process of making ours... This is also the best test board can do. BFL power usage data are off a bit. Could be poor quality chips. But just to be sure we will use 4 chips per power module so it will work for sure...\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI think it is funny that I\\'ll have custom BFL-based hardware from Slovenia before I have my march pre-order from Kansas City.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThose are crap chipsThey should be in a $1 disposal salebetter still in the10 cent disposal bin\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL-Chip, hashing board, chip, cooling fan, COINADO sticker, chip credits, COINTAMINATION, custom BFL-based hardware\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-08 15:05:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB GroupBuy#2! 296+\\n### Original post:\\nJust about to break 300! Thanks for your orders so far everyone!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 00:10:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB GroupBuy#2! 350+\\n### Original post:\\nOrder of 50 units just cleared! Group Buy #2 is currently at 356 ordered\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOnly 125 pieces left for this batch! Thanks guys!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOnly 5 1/2 hours left on this Group Buy!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nReceived my Batch #1 order today. Everything hashing away! Thank you.BIll\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYou\\'re welcome Bill! Happy Hashing!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 00:37:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] BITFURY hosting - All 3 units ordered - 4.17 Btc left\\n### Original post:\\nbump as it\\'s open again. see OP for updates\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 02:24:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB GroupBuy#2! 394+\\n### Original post:\\nJust hit 394! Almost at 400 pieces for this order!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 04:11:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB GroupBuy#2! 399+\\n### Original post:\\nCurrently at 399 miners sold with only 1 hour left in the buy! Get in now to secure your spot\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 04:16:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] #16-17-18-19 ASICMiner Erupter USB - .41 to .55 btc (CE + RoHS) 3000+\\n### Original post:\\nAs of right now, about 6 orders will ship out tomorrow plus anything else that comes in before now and 5-6ish PM tomorrow...I think we\\'re over 3000 units by now..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nApheration; 1; 0.55; \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCanary, do you have any more Anker Hubs in stock?? I\\'m going to need a few morethanks for what you do\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSorry, I don\\'t...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ngrchris; 1; 0.55; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThank you! Shipping today...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks received mine today!- Fast shipment - Good prices\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAureum_coffee, 10 units, 5 BTC, shipping address as before\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nlove that proverbial Swiss knife!!looks like you got one of the newer releases with the CE+RoHS sticker... the other modification is the heatsink, it has an angled cut on the edges, with a mirror finish, really looks sharp!!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nshipped.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThanks, the knife was there for some friends to show the size, as it is much smaller then expected (what is good).Hashing away at 334 Mh/sPs: works fine on Mac (Mountain Lion & Mavericks)~ Luc\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOldDutchman77 - This changes constantly but I believe right now Coinbase is among the cheapest ways to buy BTC. But you have a waiting period of 4 days or so before they will release the coins. That waiting period can be eliminated after 30 days if you follow the steps on their site.The fastest option I know of is btcQuick. But you\\'ll pay more.Others may have better info.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nCanary Urgent-Please Help!I am anxious to be able to make the cutoff on this buy-need some guidance, suggestions.First, I hope I haven\\'t violated any forum rules by posting to this board since I am only two days from being a \"Newbie\". I think I am OK because I now show as a \"Jr. Member\". Please note that I have been reading this forum for almost one month since I started educating myself on Bitcoin/mining but just registered.Back to this buy/my problems to make the cutoff:I have fiat but I am uncertain as to how best to turn that into BTC and get that to you in time to buy 14 BEES.I think I may be able to get part of the payment to you within 24 hours with the balance within 2 more days.I have followed this thread and have complete trust in you. I will work with you however you require to get this done. For example, I would gladly get in the queue and have you hold the miners until you have my full balance owed in hand which I will do ASAP with some guidance from you. This will be my very first BTC transaction and I do not want to make any mistakes-have any fiat or BTC go astray. Not the least concerned about you just concerned that I will make some error in a step or more, in for \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks very much for that info Swimmer63. I am afraid, this time, I will have to pay a premium to get this done in the fastest way possible that is still secure/reliable. I expect after I get my feet wet/established I can avoid that premium and likely by following your suggestion. Thanks again.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThanks for the quick reply Canary. I am checking into that and some other options.Would you consider taking something like a Western Union in an amount sufficient to hold the Bees until I get the balance to you in BTC? Obviously no ship until paid in full and if I do not get the balance to you in whatever deadline you set then you could sell the 14 to some else and hold whatever funds I have gotten to you as advance payment for the next batch. Really sorry for the trouble to you on this small order.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nall outstanding orders up to now have shipped. tracking numbers will be PMed later tonight.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nAre these still avalible for me to buy? If so can I buy 2 of them for 1.1 bitcoin?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYes, there\\'s just a little bit of time left...\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nhow long will it take to get to me if i order now i live in ohio\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThey will be packed tonight, shipped tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAnd I can order 2 or what ever I want right?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nOne question: If anything goes wrong with the shipment, e.g. Broken PCB, non-functional miner or worst case scenario the shipment company\\'s plane just blows up with your package inside, who\\'s responsible?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\n2jase; 16; 7.68; \\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nPMs with tracking #s for today\\'s orders have been sent.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\n1 hr to go.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\na nihilist would say: \"why bother?\"\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI believe in philosophical nihilism, not material nihilism. Nihilism branches into multiple fields. In short, I believe in the Simulation Theory. If nothing is true, can everything be real. If nothing is defined as it should be, then it can be what you think it to be, or what you know not whether to be.Sorry, went a little off topic, but on a more serious note, what happens then?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nIs mine shipping out tomorrow then?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Erupter USB, Anker Hubs, CE+RoHS sticker, heatsink, PCB, miner\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 07:01:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] Hash Fast pre-order units mining shares\\n### Original post:\\nSounds exciting!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nInterested\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nInterested...do you plan to make the shares available on btct and bitfunder too?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDefinitely interested.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ninterested, especially if shares on btct too\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNo way, Havelock!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nbetter US$ per ghash, im in!also, bitfunder pretty plzzzedit: paypal payment?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOut of curiosity, there\\'s a lot of folks asking similar questions in regards to delivery timeframe, hashrate vs. price, uncertainty in the market in the various HF threads in Custom Hardware. Can you provide any of your motivating factors for choosing Hash Fast as opposed to any of the other vendors delivering in a similar timeframe? That\\'s a healthy investment and very curious why HF stood out for you as opposed to anyone else or a mix of vendors as a few other folks are doing.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThe words \"expected delivery\" make me cringe. Yes, I am a BFL customer.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nMARK!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nDefinitely interested.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nShut up and take my money!Interested.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nBy my math, the total shares available are around 2,200 per unit. Or around 22k shares total.That is based on cost of the units and current price of BTC.If someone bought 2200 shares, they would get all BTC mined by 1 unit, minus 1% fee and electricity/rent costs?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nthis is really designed to give many people an opportunity at this, rather than 1 person buying everything up... but it\\'s a free market\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSo, how many GH per share?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nGeez Canary...4000 shares x .25 BTC = 1000 BTCYou\\'re charging 1000 BTC for hardware that costs 560 BTC.Don\\'t you think that\\'s a little ridiculous?Did you mess up in your post/math?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nDon\\'t forget the 1% to cover expenses.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThis is essentially what I was getting at.I will probably just buy a rig.I like $14/gh better than $25/gh.I gotta admit, Canary has been awesome with customer service and delivery. Any excuse to throw more BTC at him is tempting.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nyes! it\\'s late... sorry about that! fixed\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n.15 BTC/GH! I am pulling BTC off the exchanges now.Canary, please put up a counter showing how many shares remaining available.I assume these shares will be transferable, and there will be a system to handle transfer of ownership? If so, details on that too please.Canary, it is because of people like you that Bitcoin has been, and will continue to be, such a massive success!Cheers!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Hash Fast, BFL\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 07:26:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] USB ASIC Erupter - 0.55 BTC Each - Shipping to YOU in a few days!\\n### Original post:\\nHere\\'s the deal - I have 9 USB ASIC Erupters coming in sometime in the next few days, and I\\'m looking to get rid of them all at once.0.55 BTC each.If you\\'d like to purchase them all, it would be 4.95 BTC. I also have this hub and the generic Arctic fan that I can ship along with it for a total of 5.75 BTC before shipping costs.Shipping is calculated but should only be a few bit cents within the USA and I will inform you of the cost after receiving your address.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB ASIC Erupters, hub, generic Arctic fan\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 09:56:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] Hash Fast pre-order units mining shares 4Th/s 3060/4000 shares available\\n### Original post:\\nOrder is placed.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ninteresting..\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAs I see how\\'s Canary doing business I think he definetively deserves trust.I\\'m going to buy 60 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFunds sent for 14 shares\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nadded to the list\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nduquevalentino; 60; 9; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nDo you acccept Paypal for payment?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nsorry, I do not.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Hash Fast\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 15:12:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] NOW $57 SHIPPED! ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#2! Batch#2 59+\\n### Original post:\\nFirst few orders of batch two already received! Currently at 59 pieces ordered!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 21:29:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [SHIPPED] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1 - 300+\\n### Original post:\\njust wanted to pop in and say thank you! received mine yesterday!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nExcellent! Happy Hashing\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 22:46:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Paypal Accepted] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1\\n### Original post:\\nWhat\\'s shipping price to US (lower 48)? edit: Just saw it says Free Shipping. Definitely interested, I\\'ll let you know.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust ordered some\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPayment received! You\\'re in the buy! Thanks Joe\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nshipping to canada?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes I can definitely ship to Canada!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nok.I tried the website cart, it didn;t allow Canada.so how to proceed?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nFixed! Try again\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPrices subject to change after we pay?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nNo, once you order I lock in the price for your specific order. I will only change the USD on future orders if necessary.Thanks for the question!P.S. Another order for 10 units just came in! We\\'re almost half way to closing this group buy!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nA few more orders confirmed and paid! If you have any question about ordering contact me ASAP!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nJust ordered 9 from you.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nConfirmed! You\\'re in the buy! Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n2 more orders just received!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWhat a great way to get erupter when you are short of coin. That and paypal removes all the risk ...I am testing the waters with one.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThanks for your order Fractalbc! I\\'ll make sure not to disappoint! Also, the group buy is coming along extremely well! We\\'re already 50% filled on the order so only 150 miners left to sell and Group Buy #1 will be officially closed!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSame for me. Order placed!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nPackage received today and erupter is mining. I got a black one to go with the red one I already had. Nice doing business with you.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nMy pleasure! Thanks Fractal!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-09 22:49:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] $58 SHIPPED! ASICminer Block Erupter USB Groupbuy #1 - 300+\\n### Original post:\\nOne last big order just came in and GROUP BUY #1 IS OFFICIALLY CLOSED!If anyone missed out on this buy don\\'t worry! I\\'ll start another one mid-next week once all the orders from group #1 have shipped!Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI printed labels tonight for all smaller domestic orders so they should have Tracking numbers in Paypal. International Shipments and larger order tracking will be updated on Monday when all the orders ship.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nQuite honestly the easiest block erupter transaction (presuming it arrives functional), to date. I\\'m getting sick of coinbase denying my BTC buys for \"security reasons\", it\\'s quite aggravating when time is of the essence with these buys. I\\'ll update again, but for any skeptic(s), very smooth transaction. After all, escrow is what PayPal does best.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks Millsdmb! I\\'m picking up the order tomorrow and ALL orders will ship on Monday morning. If you paid with BTC I\\'ll PM you directly with a tracking number. Otherwise everyone should be receiving an order update directly from Paypal. If you don\\'t receive a tracking number by Monday afternoon please shoot me a message and I\\'ll get it to you.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAll miners in hand! Now time to pack these puppies!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGroup Buy #2 Located Here : 8/1/2013 :THANKS FOR YOUR ORDERS EVERYONE! WE HIT 300 PIECES ORDERED SO THE GROUP BUY IS OFFICIALLY CLOSED! I\\'LL UPDATE AS SOON AS THE MINERS ARE PICKED UP AND SHIPPING HAS STARTED8/4/2013 - ALL MINERS IN HAND AND NOW SHIPPING! 8/5/2013 - ALL ORDERS SHIPPED!Hi Everyone, I noticed that most of the group buys here are only allowing Bitcoin purchases and I want to change that so I\\'m starting a Group Buy for ASICminer USB Block Erupters! I currently accept Paypal, Bitcoin, and Litecoin. Please follow the directions below if you are interested in purchasing. Update : 7/31/2013 - Great News! I just found out that one of the ASICminer distributors is local to me so I will be able to pick these up in person as soon as the Group Buy closes! Shipping will be super fast on this order and all future group buys!Current Price as of 7/31/2013USD $58.00*Prices subject to change*[[ How to Buy ]]Paypal - Go here => and checkout with the amount of USB miners you are interested in purchasing.Of course discount rates are available but if you want the best price in BTC i recommend either Canaryinthemine or SuperSonicBoom\\'s Group Buys located here :Canaryinthemin\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI received mine and hashing away. Excellent seller.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-28 13:12:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN]Group Buy#8 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.45 BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nprivate order for 5 units confirmed. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSign me up for two!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat. Your name will have to be public unless you delete your post and I delete this one. Please send payment to my address and then PM me your information. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n7 more for private order confirmed. Thank you for these orders! They are greatly appreciated.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nFrom here you ship it?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAdd 4 Miners for me, kinda sucks I couldn\\'t wait to get a ASIC last week or so. You still have my Address on file SSB?Man, these things are so cheap now! About on par with K1\\'s pricing now. I\\'m still gunna order a few K1\\'s myself tho whenever they show up.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThese are not in stock, thus my great prices. They ship from China to me and then I send them within 24 hours from the USA to wherever you ordered from. I hope in a week I will have stock in hand to fulfill orders immediately. As I replied in a PM recently \"I am very efficient at shipping these once they come in. All orders will be shipped within 24 hours of me receiving them even if I have to call in sick to work and stay up 24 hours lol \" Thank you for the question.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI have your address. PM me it again anyways with your order information once payment is sent. I asume its ok to have your order public since you posted it here? Thanks again for your order.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAlso how less you can go 0.35?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI will buy some from you at that price. PM me how many you wish to purchase and I can work out a price. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n2 more orders. private 25 and private 2. Thank you again. I appreciate your support(now bring on the blades )\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWho sent this payment for 1.95 btc? Please PM me or post a reply here. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAnother private order for 21 miners. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nprivate order for 4 more! Thanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMystery solved. Thanks for the PM.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nYeah, just had to clear something up. Should have PM\\'d sooner. I can\\'t wait! Now I can surprise my Mom and give her a miner for her B-day next month.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHow long does it take you to receive the shipment from China? Are you using EMS to get them quickly? I may be interested in about a week; currently waiting for two that I had ordered prior.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYou are not waiting on two prior from me. Maybe someone else? DHL Express is how I receive them. If friedcat ships Sunday night, I should have them shipped Friday/Saturday. If he ships later, I will receive next week and ship all orders out within 24 hours of my receipt. I will be very busy boxing, taping, and stuffing packages in advance so I am ready to go when they arrive. I also should have two helpers available to speed the process along. I would be pleased to take an order for you. Thanks for the question.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAlso, in a week, I should have them in stock for immediate shipment once my first order arrives (thus my listing of 700+miners Paid for by my name )\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWhat is setting these prices? I\\'m confused, can you pm me how many I can get with like 30 btc?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nfriedcat/AsicMiner sets the price they sell to resellers. I and others then decide what we will sell them for at this time. The best way to do an order larger than 20 is to PM me directly. I will PM you for an order of 30 btc. Thank you for your question.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nOrdered, paid and PM Send\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThank you for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nAn Order Is Being Placed With AsicMiner In The Next Hour That Should Arrive On Friday And Ship By Saturday!!! Please Get Your Payment In Now If You Wish To Be Included In This First Group Of Orders!!! If Not, Please Continue To Place Orders As I Will Be Placing More Orders With AsicMiner Very Soon!!! Thank You For Your Orders And Continued Support!!!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nMany more orders have been placed. I have not been able to update the OP. As you may imagine, I have been very busy for the last 7 hours responding to numerous PMs which is a good thing\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nbest of luck my man! sick price. Hope they come soon\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nThanks for the encouraging words\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nLast Call For This First Order, It Is Being Placed Now!\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nOrder coming in for 8, thanks for answering all my PMs and being patient with all the questions!\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nThank You For All The Support And Orders! Please Continue To Place Orders As I Will Be Placing More Orders With AsicMiner Very Soon!\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nThanks for the reply. I had ordered a couple of btcguild, and they are backordered; I just want to make sure they honor the new pricing before I buy more. I\\'ll definitely consider buying some from you when you receive them. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nInteresting, subscribing !\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nIn Romania also in a week? excepting this tax that I will pay (0.45 BTC) I will pay any othe\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, K1\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 00:15:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] NOW $57 SHIPPED! ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#2! Batch#2 70+\\n### Original post:\\nLots of happy customers from Group #1\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ll be opening up an ASICminer Blade Group Buy Shortly!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB, ASICminer Blade\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 01:59:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [SOON]Group Buy#9 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.XX BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nStay tuned in the next 14 hours or less for my new lower prices. Get your btc ready!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nExcited!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSSB has great communication! Please be sooner on announcement lol.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI will see what I can do. I am waiting on a response from friedcat on blade prices but have a pretty good idea what my new lower prices will be for the USB Miners. Keep watching for details\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nwell damn.. i already offloaded most btc into your buy#8\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nJust received new prices from friedcat today and closed group buy#8. Didn\\'t get my blade prices though. This group buy should ship by August 20th. I will be very busy getting order#6 from Group Buy #8 shipped on August 17th. I can always take another order\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, blade\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 07:02:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN]Group Buy#10 ASICMINER Blade Miner 12 BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nThat\\'s the same GH/BTC as the USB erupters currently. What are the advantages of blades vs. erupters?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nif 1 blade = 32 BE then,You have 3 less hubs (50$ a pop) to buySlightly significant power consumption 32 * 500mA vs 10Aeasier to manage? more flexible (overclocking possible)I wish the volume discount would be greater. How many people buy 30+ BEs. When they do, they have a small discount. That does not seem be present yet with the blades.I guess it all depends on firedcat and it might eventually become more advantageous to go with blades than with BEs.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nwish I didn\\'t go balls deep with terrahash, might have had some cash to get a few of these!~But im wondering what the new blade prices are going to be....\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNew blades are very similar to these. Will either be fixed at the low or high hashrate of these old blades. Will be around the same price.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAre these the new gen blades which are set at 10 GH/s or are these the old set which can be OC\\'ed to run at 13 GH/s\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\noldSpec Hashrate: baseline 10GHash/s, rated 10.752GHash/s, maximum 12.829GHash/s with overclocking and proper cooling Power Consumption: 70-75W on 1.03-1.05V, 83W on 1.1V, 100W on 1.2V, 120W on 1.2V and overclocking Hasher size: 233mm x 116mm with a 227mm x 100mm x 19mm heat sink attached to its back Power module size: 192mm x 89mm Ethernet controller size: 86mm x 40mm\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Blade Miner, USB erupters, blades, BEs, terrahash, new blades, old blades\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 10:11:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] Buy a 100GH/s KnC Mercury thru my ID, get $100 or BTC back quickly!\\n### Original post:\\nThis guy(?) apparently spent $1,000 and was pushing \"ASX ASICs\" company just a week or two ago.You have now been banned from /r/bitcoinMining for not following the rules (no group buy organization allowed via the subreddit) and being a fairly obvious scammer.I wouldn\\'t suggest that anybody participate in this group buy. There are plenty of more legitimate names/faces out there to trust your money with.EDIT: And LOL at \"been active on reddit for over a year, see my links...\" section of your post above. You made all of ~10 posts within the first 12 months of your account, and the remainder have been posted in the last few weeks. To be honest it looks like a stolen/hacked reddit account. You have mentioned \"bitcoin\" 82 times in the last 22 days on reddit, and never once before that.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n free to search for \"Bitcoin\", \"ASIC Miner\", or \"Bitcoin Miner\". Note who keeps showing up in all the reviews, warning people of scammers.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYeah, I was trying to make money from these scams too somehow, by warning others. sure that\\'s all evidence of scammer behavior on my part. If it gives y\\'all the warm fuzzies, I\\'ll escrow 5 BTC w/ John K. or BTCrow *before* anyone else\\'s money changes hands directly to KnC. I\\'ll escrow all 10 promised BTC if the majority of buyers want this. The order $ goes directly to KnC & I don\\'t have anything to do w/ payment methods to them.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWoah! Chill dude! If you read that thread I\\'m WARNING people multiple times not to do what I did, which was order too prematurely from \"companies\" not showing enough evidence of working hardware: it was a rookie move that I\\'ve been a little pissed about & warning others about since! ASX Projects sucks! I\\'ve already written those funds off. I\\'m about ready to fake order the rest of their stock so they can\\'t trick anyone else. I\\'ve kinda gone to consumer vigilante mode vs. scammers since then.I said I\\'ll escrow 5 BTC with John K. I\\'ll escrow the whole thing if people want. I\\'m sure if all 10 people complain directly to KnC about Reseller X in Aug.-Sept., they\\'re not shipping any \"free miner\" in October.I\\'m new to Bitcoin mining (& I admit I screwed up forgetting/not reading the side bar rules) but I\\'m *not* new to electronics or to buying/selling new/used electronics on the \\'net. Also, if you dig deeper into my posts here & on Reddit like a stalker like you, you\\'ll see I make many mentions about Kauai the avg. person wouldn\\'t know, which is the *same* island the ebay account which payments may be made from will be used.Here, let me show how these accounts are linked, you\\'ll note both\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMy final comment/evidence (besides pre-escrow) - unless someone else wants to call me a no good, dirty rotten scammer without proof: You can contact my wife via ebay - as long as you use clean language - who does have a 100% feedback rating selling & buying her stuff and my stuff over 10 years with 160 ratings at - don\\'t think there\\'s anyone on this forum that has a comparable trust rating of 160 or more or a 10 year vetted track record. She\\'ll answer any questions you may have about her hubby\\'s new obsession or digital alter ego here.Here\\'s a few successful sales & 1 open auction of my stuff I helped prep to sell (nerdy stuff the avg. wife doesn\\'t care for): (Instead of going to war with PP/BFL for a refund at this time, I turned a negative into a positive. If this buyer goes for a refund in Oct.-Nov., we both lose out on about $100 but the buyer has better protections then most pre-orders elsewhere) (Buyer has $ on hold @ PP, while heavy 3-D printer is enroute via USPS Priority Mail boat/ground; there\\'s an oxymoron)Suspicion of newbies is understood. Calling someone a scammer with ZERO evidence to back it up? Not cool, sorry for venting. I am disappoint.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASX ASICs, 100GH/s KnC Mercury, ASX Projects\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 13:28:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: New Group Buy! $150 per share (5GHs) ONLY 7 SHARES LEFT!!!\\n### Original post:\\nUpdate - 5 shares left!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhow long will the machine run for? 24 months or till not profitable?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n36 months.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n4 shares remaining!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nUpdate - all shares have been sold.We may start another soon as we have had many inquiries after the shares sold.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUpdate - had quite a few contacts asking to buy after shares were gone we are adding another miner.30 shares are already gone.50 shares left.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nBump - 40 shares remain!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n19 shares are left!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n18 shares left!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n Transactions 50 Total Received 8.8202647 BTC Final Balance 0.041325 BTC1 Miner sold and 60 shares gone?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nUpdate! Only 11 shares of miner #2 are left!Miner #1 has been ordered on 8/5/2013! Invoice: ZBE-4FJN-005210\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHere is our Facebook group: the exception of about 7 people everyone that has purchased shares have been friends or family.Here is my personal Facebook page: is the website I have ran for over 15 years: you have any questions just ask.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nDown to 8 shares remaining!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI started a group buy for my friends and family and out of the original 80 shares we are down to only 7 shares left!I have decided to post the group buy here to sell the remaining 7 shares.The miner is the KnC Jupiter and we will be ordering as soon as the last share is sold.Each share is 5GHs and $150.Fees are 5% to cover hosting, power, etc.The miner will be housed in a 24/7 air-conditioned, secured office.Payments will be bi-weekly and share holders can log in to our website and see all past payments, future payments, current status etc. here: #1 - sold out! Miner ordered on 8/5/2013 Invoice: #2 - 72 shares gone, 8 remainTo purchase shares:- Send $150 USD in Bitcoins per share to address: PM me the transaction ID (txid) and your email address. You can also email me at sifuhal@gmail.com. IN CASE OF NON DELIVERY:- I (sifuhall)take no responsibility for the possibility that KNC Miner does not deliver the Jupiter miner. I(sifuhall) have done what I consider a thorough due diligence but as we all know, you can never 100% guarantee anything when it comes to pre-orders. - Refunds will be given in case of non-delivery less 1% for management of GB- this grou\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAll shares have been sold!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miner, KnC Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-10 17:53:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GB] KNCminer Jupiter #25 Sold [Added to 8.4 TH/s Jupiter Pool] Selling #26\\n### Original post:\\n@ soniqGreenDefender; 2; tx \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi Soniq,Sent 4.8 btc payment for 2 shares confirm.Thanksjoele\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nadded to OP and spreadsheetplease send me your email and Skype userwelcome :-)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHey Soniq, I sent you PM of my email. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi Soniq,Sent 12 btc payment for 5 shares confirm.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi Soniq,Sent 12 btc payment for 5 shares confirm.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThank you for your contributions, much appreciated.Please send email and Skype user if you havent alreadyJupiter #26 purchased and GB closedThank you to everyone who contributed :-)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 00:58:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] NOW $45 SHIPPED! ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#4! 55+\\n### Original post:\\nAlready 3 orders in! Remember if you have ordered from me in the past PM me for a Discount on this order! Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n2 more orders in! Keep them coming!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 03:06:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] NOW $43-45 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#4! 69+\\n### Original post:\\nAnother order in!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 15:23:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] ASICminer BLADE! 10-13GH/s+ GroupBuy #3! $1295 SHIPPED!\\n### Original post:\\nAnother order just received! Past Buyers get a special offer so PM me\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLots of interest! I\\'m happy to answer any questions people! Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n3 more ordered!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nKeep the questions and orders coming! Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer BLADE\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 17:12:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] batch #20/21 .31 - .35 btc for USB miners & 10.25 blades\\n### Original post:\\nI just paid .55 for 4 Block Erupters, on the Elgius site, a few hours ago, hopefully I can get an adjustment.Wow these thing were almost 3BTC a couple of months ago.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPlesk; 14; 4.34; used the .31 price as I will provide my own label. Will email label/signature once final instructions are posted in OP.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nFriedcat has my initial orders...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nzombie112; 2; 0.7; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPlesk; 4; 41; 4 BLADES !!!!! =) =) =) =)Will be providing my own label. Thanks Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSwimmer63; 2 Blades; 20.5; later. Sending PM. Will send label when you know ship day. Thanks Canary.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nJayCoin; 65; 21.125; \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ndaddyhutch; 15; 4.95; YPayment Sent!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMonocleMan; 10; 3.1; TX: .31 price, am sending link to shipping label pdf in PM\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThank you all for orders so far... Going to get some rest, will answer PMs in the morning.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nRegarding blades -- I assume this is for the old blades, right?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYes, but new condition never used\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nok so, that \\'other guy\\' who is selling in the US is going to hate me cuz I had been chatting him up and almost ready to order from him but now I find out you\\'re tied in with Eligius, who I mine with currently, AND you\\'re doing the above quoted deal with the shipping, so I may be jumping on the Canary bandwagon now (sorry other guy). ...oh right, my question. It seems pretty easy to open accounts with any of the 3 you mentioned (USPS, FedEx, or UPS) but I\\'m curious...which is best/easiest for YOU to send out through? I would like to go with USPS as they have treated me well for years but if UPS or FedEx is easier for you then I\\'d rather go that route since it seems like you are going to be pretty swamped with the magnitude of orders you are receiving ;PThanks for your time...looking forward to possibly maybe ordering from you soon\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'ve tried PM on forum earlier and your e-mail tonight but no response.. just sent you another message..promise last one, hope i\\'m not bugging you.. just first time customer bit nervous.. message me back pleasee\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nooeygooeygold; 6; 1.86; price! I will email you a label. Thanks canary!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nhe is a very good seller. I have purchased more then 110 sticks from him. buys 10,11,12,13,14 now 20. he has sold more then 10,000 sticks\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nIs normal international shipping still 1.25btc for everything up to 49 Erupters?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nFedEx is not an issue at all , it\\'s a few miles from me and its open 2 hrs longer than USPS.The easiest is USPS, it\\'s 3 minutes away... And I\\'d like to point out that I\\'m the fastest re-seller because I typically receive DHL shipments from friedcat the same day they enter USA. Others wait sometimes another 2 days to receive them. 2 days time on a blade is .25 btc lost.I also mine on Eligius. I think it\\'s very much true to the bitcoin spirit and I support that 100%Look forward to your order!!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nIt would be over 1 pound: (49*34)+(49/10*20) gramsI\\'d need your address to quote it\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nA question on the label I sent. I paid for a usps priority mail medium flat rate box. So far I ordered 30 sticks. I know a medium flat rate box can fit 60 sticks with room to spare 2 layers of 3 boxes. I have enough coin to order 30 more sticks.If I buy 30 more sticks I am guessing you would toss the 60 sticks in the one box.My question is Can it do the third layer and fit 90 sticks? If it can I would push to dig up the coins to get the order up to the 90. If not I will just order the extra 30 to go to 60 sticks. Thanks phil\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nYes, you can have 90 in a flat rate medium box\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nany discount for previous customers?i purchased 43 BE at 0.55 last week group #15\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nthanks I just sent 9.3 btc for the second set of 30 sticks I am at 60 sticks as of now. All payments from the same btc address.below is info for second set of 30 = 9.3 btcphilipma1957 9.3btc , 30 , is info for first set of 30 = 3 btc = 6.3 btc total 9.3 btcphilipma1957 9.3 btc ,30, am going to see how much coin I can dig up to add to the 60.. Ty Phil\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nordy; 54; 16.74; \\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nNemo1024; 30; 11.05; 1: 2: address is the same as before.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI live in Chicago and was wondering if you would be able to sell the .31 btc price if I pick it up? Also since it\\'d be in person, would you take cash?I can only order 2 with BTC, but would purchase more if you accept cash.I PM\\'d you a while back when they were around 1 BTC each but didnt receive a res\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupters, BLADES, sticks\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 19:42:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [BFL-Chip Groupbuy] $27,5/chip 50% - BTC,PayPal,SEPA - 369 sold,65/100 batch #3\\n### Original post:\\nI am interested but the main thing is when will BFL ship the chips and as far as we know BFL -> this may be a long time..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes that is a question not only for BFL but all(well not ASIC miner)... But this time they have motivation to send since they only have 50%...And company that is making them is not BFL...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHe everyone... Today I got a lot of PM so if you didn\\'t get the answer or I missed a part of the question or my answer didn\\'t make any sense because I mistaken you by someone else just resend it...Doing my best... But it is getting hard...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThis might be interesting:\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi, when did you place order 1 and 2? when are you expecting delivery of those? How many weeks are BFL saying it would take to deliver the chips?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHoly cow! That\\'s great news. Good work guys!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHave something else for you...I really should take a time and write a mail to mailing list but I\\'m just to busy...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nTo help you guess...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWe already have an answer...Yes we were testing 16 chip board... But since we don\\'t have it we frankensteined one together...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nwhat dates did you place batch 1+2? when are you expecting delivery?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI see you have Avalon covered but don\\'t you think you could open Bitfury and ASIC miner treads next?One is late other out of stock and fuck a lot of buyers at 2 BTC and 1BTC? You can wait first to see if BFL will deliver... But if you need data they are all published...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHeh, not asking for my poll.. Asking to spread my investment.. Since Avalon doesnt seem to happend.Ok, feel free to update your OP with dates next to your orders! And (days past due...)\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOK sorry then... I was sure you need them for that... So you are asking because you planing to pay 100% and hope someone doesn\\'t pay other 50% so you can take his place? I guess it could happen yes...Delivery 100 days...Order dates:Batch 1 3rd and 4th JulyBatch 2 17th JulySo around October, November...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL-Chip, ASIC miner, 16 chip board, Avalon, Bitfury, ASIC miner\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 20:45:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿1.65=10GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m in for 1 share to see where HashFast ends up out of curiosity.PM sent with details and watching thread.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo here is the extra funds needed for the transfer of my share.Problematic transfer though.Long story short: there is no such thing as a good morning... First I transfer 0.05 too much. Then the wallet I\\'m using won\\'t update. (Electrum).So I didn\\'t receive any confirmation of the transaction. Anyways, blockchain says a transaction was made from my adress is the TX id on blockchain: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi I am in for 4 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHiSorry for the trouble. payment sent for 4 shares\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi again -I\\'m in for 2 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI would like to reserve 3 shares please, will pay tomorrow (my sdd is dead, need recovery my wallet). Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHave you already ordered miner #2 or are you waiting until it\\'s funded? Has HashFast sold all their preallocated miners at this point? I\\'m asking since they are delivering in purchase order. The later its purchased the longer it will be until it can mine.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares, Electrum wallet, sdd\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-11 14:48:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] ASICMiner USB Group buy .99 BTC + Shipping - Purchased\\n### Original post:\\nWorks for me. The .03 refund/unit is a nice touch. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBarely made it to the post office in time, but I received from canary and shipped out all orders today. I\\'ll send tracking numbers tonight. Thanks again guys, sorry I was unable to get in touch with friedcat for direct orders.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDid you get my shipment out? I know I PM\\'d you a little late.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYep, Just in time actually, all have been shipped. I\\'ll contact you each individually with tracking within the next couple hours\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nUPDATE 07-16-2013 - Units arrived from Canary today and were shipped to all buyers on the same day. Thanks for all that participated and I\\'m sorry I was unable to get a direct purchase from Friedcat.I\\'m offering ASICMiner USB units at cost + shipping for the first group buy only. There is no minimum order for this purchase.Current group buy payment address:Group buy #1 - 80 27 units left - .99 * unit count, plus shipping indicated below. USPS Priority Flat rate shipping costs. This is for US orders only. Please PM for international shipping costs.Total shipping cost for 1-5 unitsShipping cost for 6-10 unitsShipping costs for 11-20 unitsPlease send payment from an address you own. Once payment is sent, send a signed message (signed with payment address using bitcoin-qt client) with your shipping - 34 units - ReceivedRadivent - 3 units Partial refund for discounted price Shipped!n4ru - 9 units Partial refund for discounted price Shipped!PhilJ6970- 3 units Payment RefundedDennisD7- 3 units Partial refund for discounted price Shipped!Promethuss - 1 unit Payment - 4 units Partial refund for discounted price Shipped!Total: 53 Units\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks CrazyGuy,got em today & followed the instructions from BTCGuild\\'s tutorial & violia,mining away !!!!!!!!!!!!!!Just changed where I mine to & all is well \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nExcellent, thanks for linking the tutorial!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI just got my USB erupters in the mail, thanks a lot!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSooo,is there any news on the discounted BE\\'s (.175 BTC or something to that effect)?? Can we who bought from you participate?? Thanks!!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nFrom my understanding, you and n4ru are eligible for discounted units amounting to 30% of your order. This comes to one unit for you and 2 for n4ru. Since I ordered through Canary, I am waiting on word from him on the coupons. I\\'ll let you 2 know what it\\'s going to cost when I get word.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWas going to ask about this... thanks. Isn\\'t it a coupon for 0.1 per unit bought though? :/\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nFrom CanaryInTheMine:I think you bought our batch from him,so I figure we should be included,correct If you need a little extra to sweeten the deal,let us know\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nYes, whatever price Canary gives me, I\\'ll pass on to you guys, plus a small amount for shipping. Also, it looks like it\\'s actually 1:1 on the units you ordered from friedcat, he\\'s just guaranteeing 30% upfront. I\\'ll update you guys when I get word from Canary.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI\\'m waiting, I will be purchasing 9 units immediately.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nGood news guys, you are all eligible for 100% of your order amount in Canary\\'s first coupon batch. Once again, Canary will be shipping to me, then I will ship immediately to you. Cost is .15 BTC per unit from Canary. Add .025 per unit in United states for shipping from me to you.Please send .175 * number of units you ordered to the following you are not interested in ordering at the coupon price, or you were the international order, please contact me via PM\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nSending 1.575 BTC to you now. If you need my address again PM me.EDIT: Sent. Do you have an ETA time for it to get shipped from you to us? I\\'d like to know so I can order hubs accordingly.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nOk,.70 BTC sent for 4 BE\\'s Thanks CrazyGuy !!!!!Oh,do you need us to sign our transaction again???\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nJust received the shipment, I\\'ll have your coupon orders out monday morning.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWow!!!Thanks!!! Are you doing another group buy?? If so,can you match Canary\\'s price .31 BTC or lower ??I know some folks who may be interested in a few BE\\'s\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThere are only 3 resellers in us at this point designated by friedcat: \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nVery good,Thanks Canary I may be in touch\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB, USB erupters, BE\\'s\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 02:14:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY, CLOSED] Buy a 100GH/s KnC Mercury..., get $100 or BTC back quickly!\\n### Original post:\\n8/11: Well seems no one\\'s interested in 5% discounted KnC miners on the low end with it being escrowed & all funds being handled by KnC. Interesting that they haven\\'t gotten me a reseller ID yet 2 days later. Guess they\\'ll have to try other marketing techniques. Closing this out.Just signed up for the KnC Reseller program. Unlike others, I\\'m targeting the 100GH/s KnC Mercury at $2K shipping in early to mid-October (most likely). Buy a KnC Mercury Miner through my reseller ID & after 10 sell, I\\'ll pay out 10 folks BTC or Paypal (preferably & faster). I can pay you Paypal immediately or BTC within 3-4 business days.My wife & I are veteran ebay seller/buyers since 2003 & have a 100% feedback rating (links avail on PM). I recently sold 3 Jalapenos there, both in-hand & pre-orders. I\\'ve also been active on the boards here in the short time I\\'ve been here & have also been contacting folks for purchasing their gear for my own use & for resale.Been active on Reddit over a year, here\\'s some links of me sharing BTC & BTC mining knowledge - what little I have): (gotta start somewhere, I guess) sign up here or shoot me a line but I aim to get a discounted Mercury & will pay 10 folk\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Mercury, Jalapenos\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 02:24:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BITPAY] NOW $45 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#4! 83+\\n### Original post:\\nFirst Bitpay order received!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitpay\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 03:07:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] KnCMiner Shares 1BTC=4.375GH/s [Live] 17 LEFT!\\n### Original post:\\nWhen will KnC be shipping?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIf someone wants it, I have a 0.25 share from the first miner that I no longer want to keep, need to sell it quickly (need money for bills).It was 0.25 BTC, which is what I\\'m asking for it. Let me or waldohoover know if you want it.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPlease reserve 1 for me, selling a couple of shares today\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks, and I\\'ll PM you a different address to use so I don\\'t have to transfer it again.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi 1 BTC sent for one share.Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNever mind, i got my answer. heheQ: Do you have the Jupiter? When will it arrive?A: KnCMiner will not begin to ship until September. Our first orders will begin shipping in October. I will begin to mine ASAP!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Shares, 0.25 share from the first miner, Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-06 20:54:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters (discount for gb 1 & 2 - 0.10 btc)\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m in for 34 can you let me have a shipping price Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSent payment for 3\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI ordered 4 before, so I will take another 4 I will pay tomorrow. Let me know if I can order some more for 0.1 because I have enough btc for 8 units but if not, I will be happy with 4 thank you very much OutCast3k!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSent payment for 7 units -> \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsign me up for 4!Going to send payment now Will send payment when i get these batch of coins processed.. hopefully by today or tomorrow\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ncan we combine prices? ie i bought 3 @ 0.99 so could i order 3 from you @ 0.1 and order some others at the higher price? (trying to avoid additional postage fees)\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSame; I\\'ve ordered 2 in group buy #3 that AFAIK haven\\'t arrived in the UK yet. Alright to combine packages?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThis is fine, but i\\'ll be receiving the units for group buy #3 today (at 0.57 btc a unit), and I\\'m not sure when I will receive the units for this group buy, I think it could be 10 days++As long as you don\\'t mind the wait its fine by me, but please PM me to confirm this asap otherwise I will ship as normal.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAh, never mind then. 2 units (purchased in GB #2) please! TX: \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n0.85 BTC paid for 6 \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSo i can pay 1.12 for 3 @ discount price and 1 @ normal price and it should be 1.12 BTC? (0.55 + 0.57)?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOnly 1 for \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nDiscounted rate (@0.10) :for 3 units; (3*0.10) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 0.55 BTCFull rate (@0.57) :for 1 units; (1*0.57) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 0.82 BTCTotal =1.37 BTC.Please don\\'t send me one payment to one address, please send each payment to the appropriate address If you want to combine the shipping, simply leave the order handling fee, and shipping fee off of one (0.18 btc) of the payment and PM me asap. I personally don\\'t recommend this, you could be in for a bit of a wait. Then that make the total 1.12 btc\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n20 for now - more tomorrow tx: OC!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nany ideas how long and what woudl cause the delay?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nNothing solid, I\\'ve not been given a time period, I\\'d guess 10 days+++The delay is caused by huge back log of orders and low stock for yxt and friedcat.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nis it better to pay now or wait? what benefits do i get from paying now over waiting for a week?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThe only benefit is piece of mind... If I\\'m mistaken and yxt accepts my order sooner than anticipated and you\\'re not around to make a payment you could miss out... With that in mind though, you do still have a couple of days, so don\\'t panic if you don\\'t have the funds to hand this very second.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n3 ordered and \\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n2 ordered and \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIs there no way at all I could buy a few units at this price?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nBuild a time machine, go back in time, buy in GB 1 or 2, then wait until now. Job jobbed.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nGood idea! Thanks Or I could go back in time when bitcoins first started and generate like 50000 btc and just hold on to it\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI have one time machine for sale 10 BTC. No escrow, no scam, no paypal, brand new & never used, shipping to anywhere\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\n4 ordered and \\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nAny one else interested in a group buy?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nPaid 0.99btc for 6 units in GB1 and another 6 units in GB2.So please may I order 12 units at 0.1btc in this discount buy. Sent 1.74 BTC -Transaction ID: again to OutCast3k for everything he\\'s done for us on these buys.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nPaid for 7 units = 0.95BTChash: \\n\\n### Reply 28:\\n1.05 BTC paid for 8 unitsHash: \\n\\n### Reply 29:\\n10 @ 1.25 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nHeh - this guy deserves at least 1 unit for such audaciousness\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nUnfortunetly I\\'ll have to issue a refund for you, you wasn\\'t in group buy 1 or 2. *edit* As per a PM; because you sent the funds from a btc-e wallet and want it returned there, can you please confirm an address publicly and I will issue a refund as I\\'m unable to return it to the address it was sent from, or have you sign a message validating the address to send it to.\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nThank you just really hate didnt read the title.. hehe.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nPlease refund the 1.05 BTC to my bitcoin address: you.\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\n\\'Please send from an address you can sign from\\' - 2 rules broken - Hey OC if you have any left over you should definitely let this guy have one for 0.1 - it\\'s either blatent cheek or pure daft - either way it made me laugh\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\n@nottm28, you\\'re probably right, but wait.... remind me how many units do you have hah -@Xeon, refund sent \\n\\n### Reply 36:\\n51 total units in GB #1 & #2 from your very excellent group buys plus 2 units from yxt GB #1 - yeah - gotta be in it to win it Mad thing is, I paid 5.2 BT\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True,'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 09:52:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [BFL-Chip Groupbuy] $27,5/chip 50% - BTC,PayPal,SEPA - 393 sold,89/100 batch #3\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m also punting in a order of 24 chips for warranty replacements.Paid of BTC GB pool...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi LuckoWill you PM to us when the Final chip payment is due, Group Buy plus 90 days?Or will you announce a few days earlier on the forum?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMail... And if there will be no response I will do PM too\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL-Chip\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 11:55:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [REOPENED] KnCMiner Saturn 1.05BTC=5GH/s | 2/5 Shares |First 2 Payouts FREE\\n### Original post:\\n3 shares, TXID \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nExcellent, added.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nLast two are for me, and paid:\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOnce again, gladly ben . CLOSED--- FOR GOOD.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n*grins* Are you sure you\\'re not going to upgrade to a Jupiter and open again ?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn, Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 15:50:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BITPAY] NOW $45 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#4! 89+\\n### Original post:\\n2 International orders added! Keep them coming\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-12 16:22:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BITPAY] NOW $45 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#4! 100+\\n### Original post:\\n100 ordered!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 03:46:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [BFL-Chip GB]$27,5/chip50%-BTC,PayPal,SEPA-409sold,105/100batch LAST CHANCE\\n### Original post:\\nReserve 4 more for me. I\\'ll send payment + voucher later\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nForgot I have to get 8 more. Will send BTC tomorrow.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL-Chip\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 05:57:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL + WORLDWIDE] - NOW $45 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#4! 100+\\n### Original post:\\nordered one via bitpay. from the Philippines\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nReceived! Thanks Drewph\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-14 00:12:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Buy#8 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.45 BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nGroup Buy Is Closed! Please see my other upcoming group buys here and here !\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGroup Buy Is Closed! Please see my other upcoming group buys here and here ! 7:45 PM CST Quick update. All orders are completed. #4 and #5 orders will ship Friday morning. Tracking numbers to come in next 12 hours. Please send in any orders for order #6 to be shipped on Saturday August 17th! Thank you!8/8/13 AsicMiner Promo 0.10 btc pricing - My promotional inventory has been distributed to all my past customers at the 30% rate. You should have been contacted by me and allowed to purchase 30% of past 0.89 btc+ orders from me at the 0.10 btc price. I was told to handle the 30% promo with my customers as I see fit. Thus, ALL(not the last 30%) past 0.89+ btc orders qualify for the 30% promo, not just the last 30% of orders(which would have been unfair to everyone as the last large order I placed was for my own personal use). If friedcat allows 100 % promo on all orders at 0.89 btc and above, I will pass the savings on to my customers. Everyone that is entitled to promo units will be able to purchase them. Thanks for the question and hope this clarifies it for all my valued customers.Quick update. I have been packing and mailing miners for last 16 hours! Orders #1,2\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPicked up my USB sticks this morning, and now they are all hashing away. Thank you - excellent service.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHave they shipped batch#8 as estimated?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAugust 17th if your order did not already ship.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-14 02:32:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [BFL-Chip]$27,5/chip50%-BTC,PayPal,SEPA-413sold,109/100batch LAST CHANCE\\n### Original post:\\nBuying another 4 chips\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 4 chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-15 01:57:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] NOW $57 SHIPPED! ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#2! 470+\\n### Original post:\\n8/14 UDPATE : PICKING UP ALL ORDERS ON 8/15 & SHIPPING ON 8/16 THANKS!Hi Everyone! Group Buy #1 was a great success! All orders are SHIPPED and I have decided to open up Group Buy #2 a day early to celebrate! Group Buy #1 Located Here : Shipping date of this buy is currently set for August 14th-16th. I\\'ll keep everyone updated on the delivery status for each batch as it closes.Current Price as of 8/9/2013USD $57.00USA Domestic Shipping is FREEInternational Shipping is $35 FOR UP TO 14 UNITS! If you want to buy more just PM me Need Express shipping? Just send me a PM before ordering![[ How to Buy ]]Paypal - Go here => and checkout with the amount of USB miners you are interested in purchasing.Of course discount rates are available on large orders but if you want the best price in BTC i recommend either Canaryinthemine or SilentSonicBoom\\'s Group Buys located here :Canaryinthemine : : #1 CLOSED @ 399 unitsBatch #2 CLOSED @ 70 unitsProduct Description: Each one mines at more than 330MH/s, powered only by the USB port. It serves as a replacement of GPUs for mining hobbyists. Your GPUs could be freed from calculating hashes and resume rendering for you. It is \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB, GPUs\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-15 05:56:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿1.65=10GH/s *Second Miner sold\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'d like to reserve 10 shares please\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWow, you guys are ballsy buying from them! Good luck on this, I hope it works out for you all.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m in for one share so nothing to sweat over. Nothing ventured nothing gained.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'d go deeper if I could afford it. Spent a wad on the mcxnow shares a few weeks back. Fingers crossed!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nInteresting: by my maths, if you were to spend about a little over $2.1K in BTC (using today\\'s current Coinbase BTC buy rate), your group deal gives you 13 shares or 130GH/s via HF + Hosting vs. 100GH/s for the equivalent KnC miner (with no Hosting) estimated to be shipping in the same time frame. Of course, this doesn\\'t take into account that you could run a KnC miner for 1-2 months to recover most or all of your investment, and then resell it at a premium (hopefully) to lock in additional future ROI much earlier than 1 year, when all of these pre-order devices will be just about useless if TBG is any indicator. KnC hasn\\'t indicated whether they\\'re shipping in early Oct. or late Oct. but if HF can meet this deadline, in the same time frame, you might be offering the best pre-order proposition anywhere & the 3% host fee is very reasonable too. Since they\\'re domestic, buyers would likely see quicker delivery times.Question to \\\\\\\\u\\\\DidHeJust: Will this miner & future additional miners fall later in the queue or will HF allow you to just increase your order due to your first 2 purchases? Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'m in for 3 shares\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi I am in for 1 share. Will pay in 24 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPayment for my 1 share sent! Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSorry, first time paying by bitcoins. Where can I easily buy some and pay you? The deposit thing makes me headache....Hope you could teach me how to pay you. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIf any of the reserved shares do not get paid in unit 1 or 2, please let me know. I\\'m interested in a couple of shares.Phil\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOk I will check it out when I\\'m awake in the morning.Hopefully could get some coins at a good price.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nLike the other group buy managers, will you post the payments that you made to Fast Hash for each miner with a tx id or screen capture of payment screen??\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI should be in miner 2 right? Just suddenly couldn\\'t find my name after replying here, I think you accidently removed me?. Thanks for checking.I thought you would keep me in after just the reply a few hours ago while I going to buy my bit coins.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks WH. I would get it to you soon! cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nIn for 2 sharestx id = address = \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nReserve me for 3 please. Will pay with in the hour.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n1.65 BTC sent address = if it\\'s will be possible ready for buy a few shares, reserve for me if some one will not pay\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares, mcxnow shares, KnC miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 04:50:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: Logic of a Group Buy and Escrow protection (for noobs)\\n### Original post:\\nThanks for the explanation!I\\'m a bit new here but I just organized a pretty big group buy thread for a Baby Jet and I\\'ll try to get John K to be the holder. Obviously it\\'s kind of hard considering I have no trust, but hey...worth a shot.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYou\\'re welcome! Good for you! I\\'m organizing the same thing as well. PM questions came up from people that are even newer then us at this whole BTC & Group Buy-thing, hence this short guide.I tried very hard to minimize risk exposure for Group Buyers when dealing with a new GB coordinator. I even transferred my AM shares to John as collateral for my first few months of miner payouts.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Baby Jet\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-03 04:38:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Block Erupter USB - kosmo says \"Buy from btcguild.com at cost\"!!\\n### Original post:\\nQuick update:Group buy #1 is in the US - I expect to have it in my hands any day!Group buy #2 has been paid for and I expect it to ship today if it hasn\\'t already\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWonderful, thanks kosmo.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWell this is a surprise - group buy #1 arrived today! I\\'ll be up tonight getting them ready to ship out to you all tomorrow via USPS Priority!!With any luck, you\\'ll be hashing well before the fourth!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you kosmokramer for your vote of confidence. I\\'m working hard to make sure BTC Guild keeps a solid reputation when it comes to handling ASIC delivery. I just wish I had known that 800 units in stock would sell in under an hour. Placing a new order for additional inventory now, while accepting additional orders through the BTC Guild store with adequate warning that any new orders are currently waiting for additional units to be delivered.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCongratulations eleuthria!I think everyone is underestimating the demand for ASIC miners IN STOCK in US ready to ship with USPS priority.....\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nany updates on the group buy #2?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIt\\'s been paid for and I\\'ve requested a tracking number, but no response from the catman. I assume it\\'s shipped and I will update OP with tracking number when available.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAny chance you\\'ll be performing a 3rd group buy?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'ve received many many PMs asking the same thing, and I really would prefer to move away from group buys. It\\'s quite uncomfortable for me to hold onto (or give away) customer funds without shipping them a product same day.I really do recommend BTC Guild for now - hoping they can get more in-stock soon!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBTC Guild is definitely a good way to go, they\\'re handling it like pros. Ordered mine in the first wave, they are arriving and will be mining today (< 72 hours turnround time for US order while he had stock). Great option for future purchases.Any chance AM has provided a tracking number so we have a delivery estimate? Totally selfish reasons for asking, planning some time off in the next ~2 weeks and want to plan it around new hardware showing up so I can get it online before heading out to the country for some tech-free vacationing.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'ve requested a tracking number from friedcat a couple times but have not received one yet. I assume it\\'s shipped and will update the thread with status when/if he makes it available to me.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nBTCGuild is good, but for California residence it charges a sale tax, making it less attractive to me.Anyway once you get more info on the estimate of the second group buy, please update.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWOW! I got mine already today you are awesome Mr Kramer. Is this a good tip jar? do have some sad news though. After 15 of these purchases I have my first DOA :-(It just won\\'t get accepted by Win 7. Doesn\\'t even recognize it. Tried many ports and 2 differet computers that work fine with the others. All others are hashing away beautifully. What is the procedure return for this? Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThat would work fine for tip jar. Sorry to hear about DOA - this is my first experience with DOA in a customer\\'s hands (I used to test these to prevent such headaches). I\\'m happy to handle the warranty claim since I have some in-stock; I\\'ll PM you deets.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nKosmo!I got everything in the mail today.Thanks a lot for the fast shipping and easy buy!!Cheers,Ch\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI got mine in last night, everything seems to be working fine.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nlucky group 1 guys.... do we have info on the group 2 order?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nUnfortunately, I don\\'t have any updates beyond what I posted yesterday. friedcat has been paid for group buy #2, but has yet to provide me a tracking number or confirm whether or not the order has shipped. They\\'re out of stock now, but I\\'d hope since we ordered last week we were well ahead of them running out of stock - hard to say without that tracking number.As always, you\\'ll find out as soon as I know something!And yes, I\\'m quite surprised that pretty much everyone that was in group buy #1 received their packages overnight! Way to go, USPS!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nIf AM pulls another price cut in the time it takes them to deliver + people receive what is now backordered product, a pitchfork in my hand there shall be!Seriously though, my usb hubs are getting lonely up in here. Bummer. :/\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWith the new USB miners being released on July 10th, I can\\'t see how the price of the old miners won\\'t drop.Also, I wonder how friedcat and the shareholders feel about their ASICminer USB Block Erupters being scammed out of the warehouses by the workers and sold on eBay..\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nLet\\'s avoid jumping to conclusions until we hear something from the man himself. Here is the payment I sent last week - you can see, at present, friedcat has yet to retrieve those funds. I would hope th\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, ASIC miners, USB miners, ASICminer USB Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 15:18:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿1.65=10GH/s *Third Miner paid\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m in for 1 share, will pay within 24 hours. Thanks WH!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nis there one left? if so, please reserve.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks! Paid set as payout address.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n3 Shares to \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPut me down for two shares please. Payment will come within the hour.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI will have my shares moved to Miner #1 if that is alright. EDIT, That is, if they become available.Also,TX Id my address is \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nRising difficulties are going exponential.. is there any reason why it is not practical to look at the bottom of the list for your profits / week. I don\\'t think it\\'s crazy to see 250,000,000 difficulty by the time we start hashing on these.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSo when will this invoice be posted here??\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThank you dear You should link this on your first or second post.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPayment for one share sent.tx: address: again WH!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPayment for reserved shares: Waldo, you\\'re awesome.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI think I speak for the majority of us when I say \"Thank you, sir\" for all your effort, and the promise of things to come. Short of you pulling a disappearing act and all of us playing \"where\\'s Waldo\", I think at worst we can expect to break even on our returns, and at best give ourselves a communal pat on the back for picking the right horse(s)\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nYes, you\\'ve been great to work with so far. I\\'m just glad to be getting in the ASIC game. Should be fun. When I saw that invoice I thought, \"My wife would never...\" So thank you sir.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nnodding in total agreement\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares, Miner #1\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 17:11:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: 3Xshares(40 gh/s) from Soniq\\'s first group buy - KNCminer Jupiter Day 1 delivery\\n### Original post:\\nHave 3 shares (13.34 Gh/s per share so 40 gh/s total) from Soniq\\'s first KNCminer Jupiter group buy - Day 1 delivery.Looking for 4 bitcoin per share and would prefer if possible to sell as 1 lot.Original thread here, you\\'ll see my username first in the list for 2 shares then listed again a little further down for an additional share, all in 1st group buy with day 1 delivery. is doing a great job on this group buy running it very professionally with a sky group set up, messages through bitmessage and an online database for members.I believe initial payments will be done on a weekly basis then moving to fortnightly.You also have the option to list your shares on Bitfunder with each individual share listed as 100 smaller shares so the option to trade and speculate on the value.If anyone is interested in the shares ill drop Soniq an email to see if he will go as a middle man for payment until the shares have been confirmed as transferred over to you.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMy offer is 8 BTC for 3 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks for the offer but my price is firm\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIt would be best if you convert them on bitfunder and listed them there.Currently I could pick up 300 shares there for 14.694 @ groupbuy 116 is possible on there maybe closer to KNC delivery (if people panic or really want in)just my thoughtsgood luck!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nso my asking price of 12 bitcoin for the 3 shares (300 bitfunder shares) is a fair price.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIf you are prepared to split them, I will take one share from you at 4btc.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWould prefer to sell as 1 lot unless someone else wants the other 2 share?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nFinal bump before I take the bitfunder route\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n(Deleted) - Looks like the shares gone to BF?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHaven\\'t transferred mine over yet\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWill now take 11 Bitcoin for the 40 G/hash worth of shares.Firm on price.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 19:10:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY AUCTION] HashFast Baby Jet (CANCELED)\\n### Original post:\\nThis auction is canceled. I will delete this topic in a day or two.The HashFast Baby Jet is offered for sale in limited quantity, delivered in order of payment.they ask for $5,600 payable in bitcoin. Prepaid. Delivery estimated for October 20-30. Estimated hash-rate 400 GH/s. Estimated energy efficiency 1.0 J/GH.Previously, I sold income shares in a Batch #2 Avalon. This Avalon is hashing, and the mining income and disbursements are visible on the blockchain. Delivery on this Avalon was anticipated in late March and actual delivery occurred in mid July. The actual hash rate for the Avalon is 80/65 of the advertised rate, and the earnings are less than 1/4 of the rate at the time when many people paid.I have not placed a Baby Jet order. This auction is an attempt to raise about 60 BTC in order to do so. I will only sell about 1/2 of the future income for that amount. Many people in the community have experienced regret in placing pre-paid orders.Due to delays and ecosystem changes, purchasers of other bitcoin offerings are worried that they cannot break even on their purchases. There is significant risk that this group buy will not work out well. I cannot do anything to \"make good\" \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Baby Jet, Batch #2 Avalon\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 22:52:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips (SebastianJu) Batch 5: 9859 ASICs gone 49859 sold\\n### Original post:\\n; <100>; <8.6>; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nall right, now all fits\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n you!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI will go now and ship 10 chips to 10 developers... The probably happy devs and assemblers send you the trackingcode later.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nawesome...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSebastian, how were the sample chips marked on the envelope? What price (and description) did Avalon declare?I\\'m wondering in how big (and heavy) package will those 10.000 chips arrive\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGot your PM, thanks!!!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n; <141>; <12.126>; close that batch Sebastian, I need little more than 141 available chip. Any idea ? Split order or some move possible ?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIf someone have 3 chips not needed in batch #5 or previous ones and want to sell, please send PM.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nBatch 5 Orderstatus:\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 03:23:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] HASHFAST/COINTERRA 1.55 BTC for 10GH, JOHN K. ESCROW, BEST $, 1 LEFT\\n### Original post:\\nHere is my btc address that I sent the coins withPhilipma1957 1 share 1.55 btchere is tax id a note to John K I sent you a pm with a signed message. to show my address above paid the escrow address using the above tax id. I am used to buying asic miner sticks from canaryinthemine so I did the message his way. Let me know if you need more info from me. phil\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI will take a share, will send funds in the morning pst time.Phil\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSent PM.I can\\'t send you PayPal without an address! Like 45 minutes ago I sent John K. a PM about buying the 6 shares through PP Gift. That\\'s sure went out the window fast.I see that only about half the shares are paid in the escrow, too.If anybody wants to back out of their shares I will happily take them. If a few shares are not paid in time I will be happy to pick those up.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYikes! sorry! heading to post office soon. I just found out from helping milkbottlec, that though the PayPal payment was \"Completed\" the actual transfer to my bank acct. is 3-4 business days. Lame. Meaning: I\\'m on the hook for milkbottlec\\'s shares until the transfer is complete.Sorry, I\\'m going to have to take confirmed BTC for the last share.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThat\\'s alright. Also the reason why I told you that I wouldn\\'t be able to do a bank transfer of cash. Getting from USD to BTC and out is a hard task!Hopefully I can sell 6-7 BTC worth of stuff and depending on the situation come out with a few more shares.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPlease confirm if I was in time for the last share. If so will send funds in the morning\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSorry about that. Hope I didn\\'t make you into a big trouble.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi filharvey,I have you down for a soft reservation but we\\'re getting down to the wire & HashFast is running out of stock. Sorry, that\\'s the best I can do right now because things have changed so rapidly on the mfg. supply side.If someone PMs John & sends a confirmed payment for the last share, I\\'m going to have to give it to them for the good of the Group Buy.Got the BTC for the 4 ebay shares, will be sending payment to John for 6 more shares, 2 for me & 4 for ebay purchased shares when I get back from errands.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nNo worries. As long as it shows up next week, rainbowlady03 won\\'t make me sleep on the couch with Butters the cat.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSent Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nConfirmed Phil! Thanks again!Adding 9.3 BTC shortly to escrow: 2 shares for me, 4 ebay shares. Be back soon w/ latest updates. That\\'s all folks! 0 shares remaining. Amazing! Let\\'s hope we can get that escrow wallet filled so that John can order soon. I\\'ll post the order invoice (my personal info smeared or blocked out, of course) and fill you in a little more on the colocation hosting plans. Will also publicly list our share allocation - with some names withheld, since this is the interwebs.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: asic miner sticks, HashFast, Cointerra\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 02:37:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [SHIPPING] batch #20/21 .31 - .35 btc for USB miners & 10.25 blades - USA only\\n### Original post:\\nWooHoo! Can\\'t wait to get my first miner.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n346.2 kilos arriving tomorrow... yeah, they\\'re gonna make special delivery with 1 van... LOLthat\\'s 763.24 pounds of ASIC goodies\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCanary, check my PM for clarifications. I\\'ll be around tonight.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYour neighbors probably think you\\'re building a secret lab in your basement.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nmovellan; 56; 18.2; message sent and verified. Thanks again.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\njcrew; 2; .70; probably figured out what I was doing too late, but next time I will calm down, read more thoroughly and focus on comprehension over panic.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nLanded in US\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI can feel the hashing power approaching.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMay the Hashing Be With You!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWho would have thought SHA-256 could be so exciting and sexy?These blades are gonna be sweeeeeeet!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nthis is good, bitcoin prices are going up...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nvisdude; 1; .34; is in addition to an existing order for a total of 4.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ndelivered. unpacking. DHL did send 1 van for my delivery as i suspected... packing and shipping. won\\'t be able to reply to PMs for a while.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nA whole van dedicated just for you, huh? Gotta makes you feel special! You know what would be cool? A photo of the huge shipment. Of course, then we\\'ll expect you to get packing!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSo the blades are not in a single box like they were previously sold. each one consists of 3 boxes for each component and a separate power connector and a separate fuse.packing is going to be longer than thought...as a result, local pickups are not going to happen today. probably tomorrow.back to shipping, i won\\'t be able to respond to PMs for a while today.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAwesome news!Thanks for the heads up & letting us know.Do what ya gotta do!!!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nwish DHL would make a big delivery like that to me...\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nDropped off provided Express labels.And since you have that tracking number, no need for me to PM you.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nSmall flat rate boxes with provided labels shipped.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nAmazing service. Providing labels saves everyone so much work!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWooHoo!!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nDo you think you will be able to get all Blades + USB Miners out the door today?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nCanary has proven that he is the best!\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nwhen is another buy group opening? i need to order a few\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nExcellent job getting all that back out so fast, truly is amazing to get that done all in one day.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nOgNasty; 15; 4.95, \\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nxatnys; 7; 2.17; send shipping label.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nAcceptanceAugust 15, 2013, 2:32 pmVILLA PARK, IL 60181 Dispatched to Sort FacilityAugust 15, 2013, 3:34 pmVILLA PARK, IL 60181 Scheduled Delivery Day:August 17, 2013\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nBy the end of tomorrow, we will have put 5000*330 + 100*12000 Mh/s into people\\'s hands. 1650000 + 1200000 = 2,850,000 Mh/s or 2.85 Th/s will be added to the network 2.85Th/s / 481.448 Th/s = but today it is barely 0.6% but i love it!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\ncan u look at PM from me ? its pretty important i think\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nYou are the most reliable and fastest re-seller out there. Looking forward to seeing tracking for my 4 x blades + USB\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nTY. USPS track and confirm email just informed me the package was dispatched at 2:36PM. Good job, Canary!\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nSounds great. When can people come by to pickup their gear. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\n@Canary - I am confused...So does this mean you\\'ve finished shipping all of #20 (specifically orders that did not provide self-generated shipping labels) or you will have finished getting the batch shipped out by tomorrow? I was hoping to get mine tomorrow (I live 30 minutes from you so even with regular shipping it should only take 1 day), the suspense is building!...I am like a fat kid waiting to get his Mcdonald\\'s apple pie maker for Christmas (true story)!\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nmy tracking # shows it to be on the way. thank you\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nGlad your so fast! Will go ahead and assume those of us who didnt provide labels will take a bit longer, but good to know your hard at work.\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nheading to FedEx to drop off a few packages there\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nyee ha!\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nYou rock!\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nIf only the ASIC miner companies themselves had this kind of CS\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nYes it does!!\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nAnd it saves you a decent amount of money too!!\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nWas anyone able to pickup their order today or contacted regarding pickup?\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\nWell.... Here\\'s a good lesson...A few group buys ago someone asked me why i did multiple runs to drop off shipments instead of one. I said at that time that its too much risk to have 1000 miners in one vehicle...We were able to get ~2500 miners out today and a ton of blades.As soon as we dropped off today\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASIC miner, USB miners, blades\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 11:07:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] HASHFAST/COINTERRA 1.55 BTC for 10GH, JOHN K. ESCROW, BTC PEND.\\n### Original post:\\nHey Aussie!Sorry! However, I\\'ll add you to the reserve list (you\\'d actually be behind BeepBeep2) if any shares free up. 3 shares have payment pending.Edit: The person who bought the last 4 shares is anonymous & can\\'t quite post to this forum quite yet. Not sure if they intend to stay anonymous, but for now they are.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, I\\'m sorry about that. In his/her defense, this could be his/her first ASIC miner purchase of any sort.Would you like to be contacted if/when I set up any Group Buys in the near future? I have a short list of people I\\'m contacting first if I set something up next month or so. Please PM me if you were happy w/ the quality of my service to the co-op for this GB & would be interested in other GBs I may set up in the near future. My niche is laser focus, out of box thinking to get \\'er done (like the ebay instasales & PayPal payments) & rock bottom prices combined with 30 some years of IT experience, 21 years of system building, 12+ years of Tier I/II IT support, 12+ years of pro IT design experience of IT hardware & networks, and a sense for the relative & rapidly changing values of hardware & technologies. I\\'ve resold over $3K worth of electronics on ebay in the last month alone.OT: BTW, believe it or not, I actually won the First National Internet Football Championship & $10,000 on Dec. 31, 1997 & tickets to the Rose Bowl (which I resold for $400 ea). I went to Disneyland & Magic Mountain with my longtime PC gaming buddy since my fiance couldn\\'t make it due to not being able to g\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASIC miner, electronics\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-22 23:11:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAUSED] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .67 btc per chip: 0 available (3500 sold)\\n### Original post:\\nChris99 at BFL forum is quoting a price of $240 per board which will accept up to 8 chips. I just sent him my sample chips for testing. I think the more BFL clone options we have the better...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes but I think it will not work with more then 4... They are using BFL Jalapeno board with no changes from what I can see. Not that we are taking much different route... But we did modify power supply to handle 50% more... And the price is a good deal for them If BFL send this board with housing, 2 chips and power supply for 273$... And you can get it 25% off...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI trust lucko\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMy understanding is the $240 includes just the board cost and chip installation. Cooling installation cost is about $30. Chip cost and psu not included. Also his board has not been tested yet.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYesterday I got a conformation that I\\'m in line for them... The problem is that it should be shipped already. But we are not at point where this is a real problem since we are still finalize the BOM for the board(BFL didn\\'t give the full list). And there is a small problem with automatic pick and place that is just not accurate enough for mounting this ASIC chips. So we are currently looking for a different solution... It will probably had to be done with manual pick and place unit... I have no idea why this is more accurate but I believe the experts know what they are talking about...In case we need them I will send you a msg... For now I\\'m in line for 6 of them but to see full board working 2 more would help. And some might end up \"destroy\"... They can\\'t be removed from the board once mounted...EDIT: If you know about someone who did BOM for BFL plate can you send me his way...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThis is interesting: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAt those watts I\\'d rather use dedicated psu than get a 2000 watt psu.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi Lucko,Thank you for your comment.We use BFL\\'s Single board which it can mount up to 8 chips. The microcontroller connects all the ASIC in parallel. Also, Voltage specification for every chip is same and current requirement is 100mA max. Means, in the peak load, the chips will draw 800 (8X100 mA), thus no reason to increase power supply. I am sure that know that increasing the power supply,sometimes, has a risk to fry the chips.Boards cost $240 each including mounting of the chips, but without cooling system. I believe that it is one of the most competitive prices in the market, considering how sophisticated and expensive is the manufacturing of the boards plus the assembly cost of the ASICs which needs specific requirements and it is very risky for damaging these delicate chips to be done by hand.More info here: we will upload a photo of our boards!Next week, boards will be ready and then they will need few more days for the assembly and the mounting of the sample chips.Cheers,Chris\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIf you are indeed just taking the board that BFL released and think you will just plop 8 chips on it, you\\'re gonna fail and upset alot of people who you\\'re trying to get to spend money with you.you need to do your research.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThanks for the comment. I absolutely agree with you, that the board that BFL released nobody can manufacture it as it is, as many pieces of the puzzle are missing. We used BFL\\'s design with some modifications. We are a group of engineers working in that project during the last month and we have a lot of experience and facilities in the place we work to manage this project. The boards are already in the manufacturerand we are waiting for both sample chips and boards to test them together and upload a video of our results. Cheers,Chris\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nLast time you told on BFL formu that you are using slightly modified(from picture looked the same) board BFL relised but that is not Single but Jalapeno... And as far as I know BFL failed to use it for anything else then Jalapeno. As far as I know they don\\'t use it in a Single. And Single is 16 chip board not 8... EDIT: You are lucky that you only have 2 chips It will work...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThanks for your comment.You dont have to modify the PCB, which is in the picture. The PCB is the same for boards from 1-8 chips.The components are different and we modified them accordingly.Our board is designed to work with up to 8 chips. Singles have 16 chips as you very well said and mini singles have 8. Cooling will be challenging as they are many asics in close proximity, butwith the right cooling system can be managed \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWell you stated that you are using Single board. Since I didn\\'t see mini single board this is a guess but I think Mini single is longboard with only 8 chipsSee: looks to be same size as single board and it is different then Jalapeno that you posted in BFL forum... There must be a reason why BFL is using a different board...96W cooling is not a challenge as\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips, BFL Jalapeno board, power supply, ASIC chips, microcontroller, Single board, 2000 watt psu, sample chips, boards\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, True, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 20:22:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿3.05=20GH/s *New Pricing!\\n### Original post:\\nHi waldohoover, I am very new to the bitcoin scene and I just ordered some bitcoins through coinbase so I can buy a share in your #4 group. Unfortunately they are telling me that I have to wait until Thursday unti my coins get delivered. I only have about 0.11 coins left in my first wallet that I setup a few days ago to buy my first USB erupter. Can I sent you that 0.11 to reserve my one share and sent the rest on Thursday when I get my coins in my coinbase account?Also should I sent payment directly from my coinbase account or I need to move the coins to my wallet and pay you from my wallet?Thanks so much,GrChris\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThank you so much!Screen shot sent by email.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ll take 1 share. Sending payment soon. When do we expect ordering this one?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI will take a share. Will send funds in the morning pst.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSent you PM with transaction detailsplease confirm 2 shares for me.thanks\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYou should have recieved the payment.TX ID: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHello I\\'m interested in one share but as other user I will be buying the coins trough coinbase, so if i place the order today, i will have it in my hands by august 22. I have some questions since the page of HashFast list 142 BabyJet in stock, This miner would also be sent in the first batch? Could you hold me out a spot if i send you the coinbase recipt of the purchase?Thanks for your Help\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOk i will try it right now\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\ni Tried , but i got this answerYou don\\'t have that much - please visit the Buy/Sell page to add more funds to your account.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThanks !!, i will send you a PM with the Coinbase purchase\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB erupter, BabyJet\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 00:48:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN]Group Buy#9 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.32 BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nNew lower pricing and USA priority shipping!Units Ordered Unit Price 1-20 0.32 BTC 21+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.USA priority shipping 0.06 btc per 100 miners\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nFirst orders should ship by August 20th, possibly as soon as August 17th.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow many orders do you have? Is there a needed amount to complete the group buy?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIf I have this right, 1 miner would be .32 plus .06 for shipping? .32+.06=.38?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMy orders are placed daily. I have no minimums.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYes. If you are located in the USA.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nhow much is international shipping?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nINTERNATIONAL OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1-20 0.32 BTC 21+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.International shipping1-14 0.35 BTC No Tracking/No Insurance Available per 100 miners - 6 to 10 average business day delivery to major destinations.Any Size Order 0.80 BTC USPS Priority Mail International Shipping Includes Tracking per 100 miners - 6 to 10 average business day delivery to major shipping 1.05 btc per 100 miners - 3 to 5 average business day delivery to major (Optional)0.02 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, $500 Maximum Per Order not available with 0.35 BTC shipping\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPlease don\\'t believe the hype that one other reseller is the fastest. DHL shipments did take a day or two longer to reach me in the past. All new shipments are coming a different way and should be here just as quick as other US resellers.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThis seller is THE STRAIGHTEST DOPE. For GB#8 I PM\\'d him with a price and quantity I wanted. He responded with an even better price than I had asked for. I was able to purchase 2 more miners than I originally hoped for. I got them on Friday in superb packing and they were all working and easy to set up. Great communication. Great shipping and price. Great everything! Would buy from again! Will buy from again!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nGot to say he is awesome even though i bought at .35 he is refunding me the difference as the price goes down. Has my business for life!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThanks for the recommendation. I look forward to placing more orders for you and many others in the future.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThank you for the compliment. I will be glad to place more orders for you in the future. Maybe not for life though\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nBought 5 @ 0.45btc on the same day... will you refund me the difference?EP\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYes! Send me a PM with payment address. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSent my order in SSB as per out PMs And thanks again a million bunches for operating such a clean and effecinet group buy!! thanks again for all your hard work to get miners out to the populous!!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYes, I have blades available here \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSSB, does #9 group buy end at any specific time? Like, an ETA for #10?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThis is ongoing. In a week I should have stock for immediate shipment.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nJust want to recommend this seller. Bought some in group buy 2, very happy with the communication, shipping, and packaging. Friendly even if you make a mistake when ordering. Look forward to buying from again when i have the BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nPayment/PM sent for 10 miners, thank you!!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nYour order is welcomed by me and confirmed! Thank you very much!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSo you have Stock?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nNo. Clarification below.This group buy is open. Place an order and it will ship within 24 hours of my receiving it from AsicMiner.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThis group buy is open. Place an order and it will ship within 24 hours of my receiving it from AsicMiner.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nOrdering 12 @ .32, plus 0.06 for priority shipping and 0.06 for insurance. Will send 3.92 BTC upon my receipt of them, which should be soon. I\\'ve been sitting with this message open for almost 30 minutes now. Won\\'t name sites, but I transferred from an exchange back to my personal wallet at 12:01 PM EST and it\\'s now 12:28 PM EST and I\\'ve yet to get a single confirm. Blockchain.info says it\\'s still an hour til it gets confirmed (position 612 in queue).I would support a hard fork so we could get some faster block times/confirmations Til then just know that it\\'s on it\\'s way!\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nHow can I find china Hong Kong contact person? Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nId be all over this if i could pay with $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ not Id even pay over Btc worth !\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nHey SSB, I just got my order from GB8, order #1 today, thanks for getting it here quick!One thing I noticed was that you put the Miners inside a USPS Small flat rate box, and then put an empty Small flat Rate box and some packing material inside a medium flat rate box. Isn\\'t that expensive?? The way they are packaged individually, it would have been fine if you just shipped the Small Flat Rate box as it was packaged.Don\\'t mean to criticize, just hoping to help you save so\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, blades\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:21:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] HASHFAST/COINTERRA 1.55 BTC for 10GH, JOHN K. ESCROW, BTC PENDING\\n### Original post:\\nHi, just sent 3.1 BTC for my 2 shares.I would like to be contact for future group buys and also would like to be in the waiting list for another 2 shares in this group buy in case they become available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nRaja! I have you down for 2 shares Paid (will check confirmation shortly). If it confirms shortly, I can tell John to \"release the hounds!\" Also adding you the \"Future DZ GB shortlist\". Thanks!I believe that leaves 1 share unpaid but that won\\'t stop us from getting the order we already have in, paid up.Update: 1 confirmation. Let me get a few more confirmations & I\\'ll PM John to order & ship it to our colocation facility!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nLast update of the night, 1:20 AM HST here. PM to John requesting completion of OPEN order already sent to HashFast:Hi John,FYI: My epic (well at least to me) first quest to co-ordinate a GB purchase here with your help is almost complete! still have 1 share outstanding but I think we have enough BTC to order now as a trial run on HashFast using BitPay showed 59.19-ish BTC about 2 hours ago including Early Morning AM Overnight Air. I expect 1 more payment which is intended to help secure our hosting contract.Please check your email for order details when you get a chance, and thank you once again for working with me/us on this!Aloha!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAlright, this is the actual final update of night:cypherdoc says this will be a Mid Tower Form Factor. Also, word is: if they have to send chips, supposedly we\\'ll be able to build systems easily & cheaply! Building systems. building systems...hey anyone know a guy that can build a server?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsounds like you! now we wait. reminds me of the Navy \"Hurry up and wait!\" was a much used motto.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSo have all funds been recieved? If we are waiting on someone, I have the funds to loan the GB.Phil\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nCoins have been send regardsHektek\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSeems we got 61.99 in the balance already, if I haven\\'t read wrong great!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nthe group buy address is here: it shows 61.99 btc as of 9:40 am eastern standard time.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nDamn, I should have stayed up another hour or so last night! It was already 3:30 AM here so not much I could do. If all shares are taken and paid, great!If all shares are not taken and paid, great! As long as there is not an extreme amount of microscopic hand-soldering I\\'d be able to build machines for sure. On the other hand, if the design requires massive microscopic soldering like Avalon then no way. Moderately to easy soldering I can do here at home.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYeah, sounds like my time to shine. However, I know the drill. Not mah first rodeo. Reminds me of ops: whole lotta excitement & hurry up, then...nothing but thumb twiddling & guessing which missile port the SM-3 is going to come out of. Some guys (and a few women) so bored, they\\'re taking pool bets with crudely drawn grids.Gentlemen, thank you. It\\'s been an honor and a pleasure to work with the 14 of you (15 including John K.). I truly and really couldn\\'t have done it without you. I had about 1/3rd BTC assets on hand but no way to get the rest (short of CCs. Blech) before HF ran out. I know our wives and significant others are probably scratching their head or even sighing about it but I have a very strong feeling that they\\'ll be very happy with your foresight in a few short years, eheh.We\\'re all paid up and this puppy\\'s CLOSED! I\\'ll update John w/ the latest share ownerships & post it here.To the 60.6BTC goal we were all striving for, I now say: \"AMF!\"BTW, if you would like your miner payouts to go to a different wallet address then please PM me when you get an opportunity. 2 miners have contacted me for this, so far. Some miners choose this method to help keep track of their coin\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThank you for the offer! I haven\\'t soldered anything in the last 6 month or so but it\\'s like riding a bike. To me: welders, trying to weld 2 materials of different thicknesses - they have my respect because it\\'s hard to keep that bead going!This really is the future, I don\\'t have a Robo housemaid (yet) like in the Jetsons but I\\'ve got several now. In the future, futurists believe that we\\'ll all have herds and fleets of micro-, mini-, and even large robots doing our work *for* us, benefitting *us*. I currently have a 3D printer (a single purpose robot for all intents), robo massage chair, a CNC mill, CNC lathe, wireless router (which is essentially an Application Specific invisible robot that quickly routs packets for you), a laptop, tablets, & a smartphone that can access the world\\'s knowledge (but often takes pics of cats), not to mention 20% of this robotic miner that we just placed an order for together (because miner co-ops also seem to be the future). I know we\\'re all impatient for the wonders of the future but...we\\'re already there!Folks lik\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, Cointerra, Mid Tower Form Factor, server, 3D printer, robo massage chair, CNC mill, CNC lathe, wireless router, laptop, tablets, smartphone, robotic miner\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 13:56:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Groupbuy - KnC - Saturn Upgrade - September 1.3 BTC > 5.71 GH\\n### Original post:\\nLast ChanceRegarding to my groubbuy in the german subforum, i would offer you the chance to get sharessold for 1.3 BTC each.Here the references Share ~ 5.714 GHash/sThe device is hosted by me and there would be a monthly paymentless the costs incurred for hosting.Gains less electricity and less 1% = Hostingfee distribution amountShares may be resold. Settlement only about me andagainst an allowance of 3% of the sale, this hike inthe excess wallet for equipment, etc.Since KnCMiner offers an upgrade for existing orders, I would like to use this,upgrade to one or both Saturn. This I imagine you the opportunity available to acquire sharesCost per Share 1.3 BTC corresponds to ~ 5.71 GHash / s15/35 \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC - Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 16:05:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Shipping and Hashing]Avalon Reselling and Hosting Plan\\n### Original post:\\nIt seems that you have solved the AC problems now the logical question is how will the payout be done? How will you charge the electricity costs? In PM you mentioned that it will be done via some automatically pay out script, it will be very frequently, which should lower the risk. Can you please address those questions when you have some time?Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThe A/C problem has been solved, but the outdoor temperature has surpassed the historical records recently in China. So I may not OCing the machines. They are now all running, but at 300MHz. News said this hot weather will end in a week. I think by then we can over clock the machine.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWould also like to know the answers to these questions...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'d like to confirm and Thank HorseRider for his time and 8/12/2013; I have received 1 -module from a batch #3 purchase.Very \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI received my 1 module from HorseRider yesterday. Thank you for the fast shipping and seamless transaction!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ngot it too.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOur first dividend has been paid hashing cost-1.65245902Net rate610.00000000\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThank you very much HorseRider!!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon, module\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 04:29:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: If you sell on eBay or other outlets, please read this:\\n### Original post:\\nInteresting...how much is the handling fee for lets say 30-40 block erupters?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPM me\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ncool offer; if I unload some on ebay it might just take all the hassle out of shipping\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBeing a drop shipper is going to kill future sales from me. As it stood now people who could buy and pay for large amounts were rewarded with a lower cost as it should be. Now your going to turn it into a cut throat deal on ebay where some kid is going to be happy making 29 cents per unit. It would be like ASICMINER telling people if they want they will drop ship at the same cost as the resellers get and killing any reseller markup you might get.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nEbay sales look to have peaked over the last few days anyways. The last order I got in was for $74.95, a measly markup. Now they\\'re far lower. I don\\'t see your concern here.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIf you bought @ $40 per miner And sold @ 75eBay and paypal fees are roughly 13% That leave $63.75USPS Priority flat rate + Sig confirmation = $7.35that\\'s a grand total of $56.40$16.40 profit on $40 This was pricing as of 2 weeks agoThere is still money to be made by people that are not distributers. but not if some kid selling 1-2 miners pretty much gets them for the same price as someone who buys 100-200+ at a time\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSome kid is not going to be using my drop ship service... It\\'s designed for those who can afford to have allocated inventory at my storage facility... Kids won\\'t do that.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOkay I have a great ebay record 1200 plus perfect feedbacks. I have sold about 40 sticks on ebay. Today I sold 27 sticks at 53 bucks a piece based on the new price of 29.50 usd a stick = .31 btc . my profit was just about 23 a stick. after fees about 19 a stick.I think that if the Canary becomes a drop shipper for me it would be a good deal.Upside is I have a prebuilt stellar name as a seller and the work is less with him drop shipping. I could sell a shitload of sticks at a low price . making 20 to 30 bucks on 3 sticks works for me since I have no workload vs making 57 bucks and doing all the work.Downside is I piss off a lot of other sellers with lowball prices. Not sure I want to do that. I need to sit back and think about the ebay idea carefully.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThis isn\\'t anything new, Amazon can do the same for you guys.... At higher cost and you\\'d have to ship inventory to them.And you shouldn\\'t cut your price to the bone, you have to watch the market and maximize your profits...And there\\'s that whole thing about having inventory issue that pops up sometimes Plan accordingly.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCanary,What are the fees to use your shipping elves?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nditto\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nyou have been a great seller . so this idea has a lot of merit for me. I am going to weigh my options carefully over the next few days.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHonestly, if Canary wants to sell on eBay he should sell on eBay and undercut the other resellers there like he does here (pure capitalism). The margins are slim enough on eBay and Amazon now for anyone selling and hoping to recoup profit before the next BE price drop. As-is, it seems like most folks on there about start selling their inventory when the next price drop rolls around, so it is only a matter of suckers buying them at the rate they are buying them before more sellers pop up with lower prices. Plus this muddies things - what if there needs to be a return, what if a unit is DOA, etc.? That\\'s a lot of shipping around to involve a third party in one of those transactions, mailing fees alone for such an error would likely eat up profits for people buying at current prices.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nCanary isn\\'t stupid. To kill the retail market would be equivalent to committing suicide. The usb miner sales will die soon enough. Yoou anger the people who buy large amounts they will remember when the erupter sales are EOL. As it stands now he has a healhy relationship with his bulk buyers. I don\\'t see him ruining that for a short term item suchs as the erupter.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI know he isn\\'t stupid, he understands this business better than most. He\\'s just trying to wiggle into every last facet of sales. It\\'s already obvious he has a majority of sales on the forums, but this ^^^^ is only going to make eBay and Amazon a bigger mess of sellers than it is currently and there are those hanging issues of returns, DOA, etc., that make it even messier. Would have made a lot more sense to do this when they were 1.05/.99 each, USBs are only going to realistically sell for so much longer, let the folks already liquidating do so with the inventory they likely already purchased from Canary or SSB. In other words, this offer is basically going to undercut anyone who previously purchased and is reselling. We\\'ve got enough \\'screw the current customers\\' going on in BTC hardware land as of late (*cough* Avalon, BFL *cough*).\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nMy 2 cents:I b\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: block erupters, ASICMINER, sticks\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 19:14:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] $42.50 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 70+\\n### Original post:\\nTwo more orders received! Now at 70 units and climbing!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLots of international orders coming in! If you want your order shipped internationally just PM me\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 02:27:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] $42.50 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 75+\\n### Original post:\\nA few more orders in! Don\\'t be shy!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPayment Sent (Unique Transaction ID \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nConfirmed! Thanks for your order Mijanur!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 15:12:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿3.05=20GH/s *4th Miner PAID\\n### Original post:\\nHi,Please reserve 1 share for me. Ill send the payment within the day.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi can you reserve 1 share for me please? I will make the payment within the day. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAlso want to participate, find please one share for me\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJust sent 3.05 btc and emailed you the details.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWOW! these are going fast.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIt\\'s because unlike other group buys *cough* Ragingazn\\'s KNC buy *cough* WaldoHoover is actually able to deliver, doesn\\'t disappear, and keeps everyone updated.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nJust sent you the payment will PM you the details later. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi, I have PMed you the transaction details. Thanks.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares, KNC\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 17:52:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN - IN STOCK - SHIPPING] batch #22/23\\n### Original post:\\nyour website is gonna get hammered! how is anyone still paying .60btc on btcguild when you are so awesome?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOh I suspect btcguild will lower the price... but if not, my website is up and I have stock!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nFkin power went out... guess ill get ahold of you when its on again\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nExpect to get many orders from me coming out of Anderson, SC from you!You need a referal program! so when i send people yo your site, i get 1 free usb for every 10 Products i sell. : just a thought....\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nLooking forward to fulfilling your orders!!Good idea on referral!! Let me ask devs about implementing it..\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThank you! Keep up the great work!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nCan international buyers order via your site \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNot at the launch... One step at a time...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFollowing\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\natomriot; 3 Blades; 31.5; i did it all right!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ndamn you logged without answering my pmAnyone know what the hell this is? its a custom 3d printed Box with a Hub and 6 usb miners in it with a fan on top?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThat\\'s interesting I\\'d like to know more about that box\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nId be willing to bet its a 7 port hub with 6 BE\\'s. In a 3d printed case with a USB powered fan on top. Unique for sure for thinking of a different way to market them\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIt worked, some idiot paid $400 for one...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThanks again!! See you again thur/fri\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIf you look thread for this buy does not include price for that specific reason.I\\'m willing to bet he picks a number where it comes out cheaper to answer your question. But at 15 plus it is a jump up easily since you provide shipping costs. And web site prices.... As far as timing i think it has more to do with chips in delay for competitors projects. There are other group offerings that have not used this as a way to gouge you for a little extra.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n\\'International buyers: please contact your respective re-seller: hope your still selling to me, ordering soon.....\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nGuess I should have asked before placing an order but Hey Canary, you mentioned that you have stock in hand but does that include the blades or just the USB Sticks?Or Am I going to be out the cost of shipping one time and have to send another label because I set the ship date for today.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nPer posted info on OP, I\\'m shipping today. I do have both, sticks and blades (blades not a large amount). Your order is heading to post office shortly\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\ngreat, thanks!this is my first \"forum transaction\" and I am glad that it was able to be with such a reputable dealer. so far has been a painless experience.keep up the good work and expect more orders soon!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nok...so I finally figured out my tracking number from my Eligius order and according to USPS my USB miner will be arriving today so yay there. Next question. I\\'m trying to order another unit from your new website but after signing up for an account I do not receive an email with a password or anything. It \\'may\\' be because I don\\'t use a .com address but rather a .info address? Or something is just hosed with your site... Keep up the great work\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nPM me your user id there\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miner, 3d printed Box with a Hub and 6 usb miners, 7 port hub with 6 BE\\'s, USB powered fan, USB miner\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 18:06:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL ACCEPTED] $42.50 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 55+\\n### Original post:\\nFirst few orders already received!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nthers no bitpay payment option?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nLooking to buy about 20 for delivery to the UK, please can you let me know how to pay.Thanks,\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPM\\'d with you quote, Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks! Great service, looking forward to receiving these. Unique Transaction ID add some more later this evening, just waiting on friends to pay me.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nConfirmed for (3) Units! Thanks lemonte!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nJust updated with Bitpay option! Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-18 17:15:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] for large ASICMiner orders 500+ for USB stick miners and 50+ for blades\\n### Original post:\\nReserveda word from friedcat: the new blades will not have a hashing performance gain over the current production of blades. if you were sitting on the fence over this, there\\'s no need to so go ahead and get the current blades and start hashing!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAnd we have our first 500 units ordered under this arrangement Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAre you quiting the smaller group buys in favor of wholesale quantity group buys?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThe resellers and now selling to resellers? I still have yet to see units ship from friedcat for old groupbuys getting their coupon units... strange to see bulk sales going up if there is still a back order to clear.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\na 500 stick order is hard for me. I have ordered about 150s stick so far. my biggest order was 70 sticks. very hard to get past 70-100 sticks at a time for me.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAnd at 0.305 BTC per USB Block Erupters, it\\'d be hard for anyone to resell at a competitive price.Please don\\'t leave us small fries!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAgree.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB stick miners, blades, USB Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 18:58:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BTC WORLDWIDE] $42.50 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 105+\\n### Original post:\\nAnother order received! Over 105 units ordered!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust put in an order for another 11, Paypal transaction \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nReceived! Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-19 23:36:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: gektek Miners League has an announcement...\\n### Original post:\\nIn the effort of being thorough, as I for one honestly never thought I\\'d see my BE, I thought I\\'d add some actual photos for the other skeptics. This was my first ever BitcoinTalk forum purchase and ooooo boy was I ever nervous. Sure, I would have only been out $40 but it was still a nerve wracking experience so wanted to share the end results in case anybody else felt likewise so...Here is a pic of the newborn (I asked for gold but got black...but I never expected to get the gold one anyway ) still in its wrappingHere is little one mining its first few sharesAnd last but certainly not least...the results (yes, it only says 334 but it IS averaging 336 so all is well)So in conclusion...buy Canary...you\\'ll be happy with the results Thanks Canary...sorry for any headaches I may have caused along the way. Looking forward to ordering another one soon\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Canary\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 01:49:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BTC WORLDWIDE] $42.50 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 112+\\n### Original post:\\nJust ordered 14. Paypal ID Can we pick a color? Or do we get what we get?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed! Thanks!All recent miners have been only Black. You can request a color but I\\'m pretty sure ASICminer isn\\'t producing other colors at this time.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBlack is what I wanted anyway. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nExcellent!Btw we just hit 130! almost half way to 300 pieces!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 15:36:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿3.05=20GH/s *Now working on 5th Miner!\\n### Original post:\\nHi Waldohoover,Maybe there is available shares for Miner #2 & 3? I\\'m asking coz see \"reserved\" but not paid shares at least two days, if it\\'s possible I prefer to buy this shares instead of Miner # 4\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI just requested a refund for my 2 shares of Miner 3 so you could grab those I\\'m guessing. This is for personal reasons and in no way has to do with waldohoover or the operation so don\\'t use me as judgment to your investment.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOP mentioned earlier in thread that there\\'s no line hopping. Everyone moves up when someone gets out of line.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPlease put me down for 2 20GH/s shares of miner #5TX ID to \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nreservation paid, details sent by pm\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI need to pay for miner #4, 1 share. Do I pay to this same address in OP?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPerfect, could you edit my name in the list, \"davidsdmg 1 Reserved\" and put paid!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nJust sent 3.05 - from please confirm\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSent 3.05 BTC.TxID: address: \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSo waldohoover, where will be the machines be located? I may have read this somewhere but may have forgotten.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nIs this a datacenter?? You have two group buys already and I am assuming all these miners will be hosted at the same place. Can you share with us the size of this facility, will you have adequate power and A/C by the time these miners ship??\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nMaybe you have already addressed this issue, but what are your plans as far as security is concerned? Cameras, security system, etc. etc.Thanks WH\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPls put me down for 4 shares. Organizing payment now.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Miner #2, Miner #3, Miner #4, Miner #5\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:11:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: ASICs group buy (CLOSE)\\n### Original post:\\nOver the weekend, maybe there will be photos of the prototype device and PCB!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGreat!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHello, any news from Metabank? Can we expect devices to be shipped at the start of September?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIn his last message from 04.08. MetaBank said that everything is going according to plan. Yesterday launched a production line for the test. Shipment will begin in early September. Photos will be later. At the moment there are no problems. Thx.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nChips have been delivered. They already have several prototype boards and still hope to start shipping in early September. However, given the history of the market, I would rather expect them in October.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPublic Service Gh/s (a full unit or 24 shares) are being auctioned by me: early, bid often.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThank you for update L:)\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nTranslation5 boards are hashing, software is being optimized, it\\'s 2.9GH per chip now.After testing of the boards, the rest thousands of boards will be printed until the next week. Components will be soldered the next week.Cases are not custom and are selected from available ones.They\\'re not going to optimize them further from 2.9 to 3 GH/chip. Software tuning instructions will be provided. Everyone understands that 2.9GH now is better than 3GH in 2 weeks.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI have for sale 5 shares.1 share = 5GB PM me with offers.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n20 Minutes left to get shares!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nBitfury\\'s now hashing on the network so looking good for us.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nNobody doubts Bitfury\\'s hashing. Chips have been distributed across the world. However, \\'Bitfury\\' itself denotes only the chip. There\\'s no info on the site, so it can be any Bitfury-based board assembler (European or American).\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nIf I had to guess, this is the 100TH mine project of Tytus: would be ~27x400GH miners ~= 7000 bitfury asics.This probably has little to do with Metabank other than they are both using Bitfury Asics... (well... any more than a release of a dell computer is good for IBM because they both use intel CPUs for example).Edit: Rumor is that this is actually a Metabank project... Not necessarily our miners.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI only posted to show these chips are running in large numbers now rather than test boards, so I see that as good news for everyone with a stake in future bitfury miners.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI rather see it as bad news for Metabank customers. Looks like Metabank is one of the slowest assemblers. So the whole estimated ~400TH of Bitfury chips may be put online before Metabank\\'s devices even reach their customers\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nYou can see first photos on \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThanks pidobir -The pictures look good. Appears that the final system would have 5 of these 24GH cards in them for the 120GH total.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYes, exactly what is planned. May be asics, which were ordered to be hosting, will be with 8-10 PCB and placed in U2 case. At the moment, the optimization of the firmware and soldered board.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI like the white PCB, very slick!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nAnd the little baby asic chips.. So cute.. just want to pinch their cheeks\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIn case someone is freaking out about the recent difficulty rises and want to sell, I\\'m in the market for shares. PM me with your price and number of shares you\\'d like to sell..b\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nreplicate PCB will be green\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI am selling 3 full units here \\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nHi! At this moment we have the following information. This week is making PCB with all the elemental base. From Wednesday (28 August) on these boards will be installed by hand all the connectors and will be assembled devices in case. Approximately a week later (5 September), begins shipping devices to me.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nwhere did you get this info from? russian thread? Any information on production capability? (units per day or week)thanks for the updates though\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nYes, it\\'s from the russian thread. They say 1400 PCBs will be received next Tuesday, which are the whole 1st batch. Then they just have to assemble the devices (case, power supply, connectors).\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: prototype device, PCB, Chips, prototype boards, Bitfury\\'s, 24GH cards, asics, PCB, baby asic chips, full units\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 23:29:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] CoinTerra 1 BTC / 11 GH/s, NO HOSTING FEES, DZ Escrow\\n### Original post:\\nC\\'mon guys, lets keep this moving! 1 share isn\\'t going to get us anywhere near a purchase. Escrow terms still being worked out with DyslexicZombei, but I believe I will be able to handle that within 48 hours. Terms for this Group Buy have been tweaked a little. I will now be persuing 1 TH/s, instead of 2 TH/s, your shares remain the same cost and speed. Since only ~800 GH/s will be for sale, I will now limit buyers to 20 shares / 220 GH/s to give everyone a chance in case a big player comes along.I will try to fund 10% of the cost BY MYSELF up to $850 which I will pay to DyslexicZombei on top of his escrow fees however I will be unable to offer more for collateral.I have a 10 GH/s share in his HashFast Group Buy worth 1.55 BTC, it should be worked out that he does not pay me that share in case I don\\'t come through... -Sam\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: CoinTerra, HashFast\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-21 15:17:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿3 =20GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nReserved\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHow fast is the miner going to be operable?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhenever they will deliver miner, i\\'ll get it from customs and will start mining same day.Ps: I talked with Hashfast, I think they will put this order into Batch 1.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCareful guys don\\'t send BTC unless full escrow with John K. I smell a scam.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDidn\\'t have done a group buy before so yeah I did copied layout and text, sorry for that. Well giving warning is good but atleast check my profile/trades first, I know by default people can\\'t see trust rating untill they go to trust page and click on button.Anyways I don\\'t have any problem with escrow. You can use John etcEdit: Just sent a pm to John k for escrow.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBump. Didn\\'t got reply from John k. contact him yourself if you need escrow. I don\\'t have any problem with that.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nBTC3 = 20GH/s Offering:1 Share @ BTC1.5 = 10GH/s hashing power + 2% hosting feeMiner(s) will be hosted in a 24/7 air-conditioned room. (Delhi,India)Each share entitles the owner to 1/40 of the BTC proceeds from a HashFast Baby Jet mining 24/7 for 30 months or until no longer profitable (whichever comes first)Payment will be made to the address of the shareholders bi-weekly. (*Miner breaking after 12 month warranty, random acts of nature like data center burns down etc.,internet downtime, not covered in 24/7 for 30 months)How to Purchase:Send BTC1.5 to address here, PM or E-Mail (escrow.ms@gmail) me with the transaction ID (Tx) along with your payout address. ONLY use sending addresses you fully control. Some Info about me: I am a currency exchanger,trader living in Delhi, IndiaI have done many exchanges with peoples here, mostly bitcoins to bank or bank to bitcoins related. You can see my trust ratings. I am accepting escrow if you need that and also willing to provide my ID proof etc to John k. If it\\'s necessary For more info, check credit goes to : waldohoover\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares, miner, HashFast Baby Jet\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-22 14:32:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BTC WORLDWIDE] $48 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 143+\\n### Original post:\\nEveryone completely missed out if you didn\\'t already get in! I just had to up the price to $48 per unit... Grats on $120 BTC everyone\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI really don\\'t want to be \"that guy\" and I bought from ssinc on the last group buy, but with this recent increase these are now cheaper on ebay. No preorder either, most are shipping now. Didn\\'t come to crap on the thread, just trying to be helpful for those that are buying with paypal.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI understand where you are coming from but there is one thing I offer that most of the sellers don\\'t offer, \"Worldwide Shipping\".Also if you buy more than 20+ USB\\'s I can beat eBay\\'s prices 100% of the time. Thanks for the bump BigDaddyWooWoo\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJust for the record I think ssinc does a good job and I was happy with my transaction. Yes, sometimes service is worth a little more.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks Still have a few international orders pending!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-22 17:38:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿3=20GH/s *5th Miner PAID\\n### Original post:\\nHi, please reserve 3 shares for me: I\\'ll pay in 12 hours. ThanksBye\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTo: GroupBuy HashFast - waldohoover -9.00 BTCNet amount: -9.00 BTCTransaction ID: note that by mistake transaction fee was setted to zero: let\\'s see if the transaction goes into some block... I\\'ll wait 24h and if does not appear I\\'ll pay again setting a transaction fee higher than zero.ThanksBye\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOk, transaction is confirmed by network!Please consider as the sending address to pay dividends.ThanksBye\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nRefund for the poor people paying 3.05 BTC a mere 8 hours before the price dropped still coming?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGot the refund, cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDo you know how many of these machines are left? I faintly remember they had a small number for manufacture and then they will stop the orders. I like the idea to get a few shares on each of the machines!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nand someone ordered 200 at once! crazy. I wonder if it\\'s the company itself trying to create this hype for their product. I only see a small number of of those orders on these forums!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIf I ordered $1.12 million worth of mining equipment, I certainly wouldn\\'t want anyone knowing who I was, which solar system I was from, etc.That is, unless I was a reseller, which is another possibility.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPayment and Email sent for 1 share.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'m interested. Can you reserved 1 share for me??---BTW Why in unit #4 there is 19 shares, not 20 ??\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nIf I had to guess it would be IceDrill.ASIC IPO fund that bought the 200 units.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI\\'d like a share reserved and can pay by tomorrow when my transaction clears on coinbase.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares, mining equipment\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 06:06:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED THANKS!] ASICminer BLADE! 10-13GH/s+ GroupBuy #3! $1295 SHIPPED!\\n### Original post:\\nUpdate?Blades should\\'ve shipped by now but I haven\\'t heard from you.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPM\\'d!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAnyone get their stuff?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGB #3 CURRENTLY CLOSED! THANKS EVERYONE! UPDATE 8/22 : ALL ORDERS SHIPPED == THANKS!Hi Everyone! WELCOME TO MY GROUP BUY #3 FOR ASICMINER BLADES! As you know I have been selling ASICminer USB\\'s and Accepting Paypal as the payment option. I have sold over 700+ USB\\'s so far to happy customers and now I am extending my Group Buy\\'s to include ASICminer Blades!Group Buy #1 Located Here : Buy #2 Located Here : to know more about me? Join my Facebook Group Buy! Price as of 8/10/2013USD $1295.00If you intend to purchase more than 1 ASICminer Blade CONTACT ME FIRST. I have special discounts and new payment options!USA Domestic Shipping is FREEInternational Shipping is $35 per unit!Need Express shipping? Just send me a PM before ordering![[ How to Buy ]]Paypal - Go here => Bitpay - Go here => Click Here to Checkout Current Order Size : 12GROUP BUY CLOSING :Timer removed. End time: 2013-08-13+24:59:59\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer USB, ASICminer Blade\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 16:07:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BTC WORLDWIDE] $48 OR LESS!!! ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 160+\\n### Original post:\\nAnother order of 10 pending! Remember my buy closes in less than 24 hours!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSO for 10 with international shipping (eta on delivery times to uk please)id be looking at $470 + $50 shipping correct ?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYes and PM\\'d!ETA is 3-5 Business days after it ships which is early next week. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n3-5 Business to the UK? How many days in the US? 1-2? Not bad. I was expecting 3-5 myself.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes I ship USPS Express International which is 3-5 business days Worldwide. I\\'m working on getting GXG as an option but my local PO doesn\\'t offer it for some reason.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nMy last Import of Usb miners using USPS express international to uk got held in customs for 7 days. When it gets to Uk Royal mail handles the delivery and they do not sort out customs charges when the package lands at stanstead airport, instead they ship them all to coventry where they have they own customs sorting facility. Royal mail also wont deliver the package until you pay the fee, which is sent via a letter in post. Never had a problem with Fedex- always 3-4 days from the US , and if you do incur custom charges they send an invoice in post after you recieve package.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMy 5 sweeties arrived today without a problem.Shipped on aug-16, arrived today in pristine condition.My location = Netherlands.Thanks a lot !!!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIf anyone wants me to send their items via FedEX/UPS you can pre-print a label and e-mail it to me in PDF form. I\\'ll use it for your shipment at no charge.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYou\\'re welcome and Happy Hashing!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB, Usb miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 23:46:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BTC WORLDWIDE] $48 OR LESS!!! ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 170+\\n### Original post:\\nAnother international order received\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNow we just need to fast forward 10 hours!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThis GB closes tonight!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhat pushed the shipping dates back?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI moved the shipping date forward one day as just a precaution. If you ordered on the 18-19th expect a shipping notification on Monday. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAwesome. Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 02:34:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/BTC WORLDWIDE] $47.95 OR LESS!!! ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 180+\\n### Original post:\\nAnother order of 10 received!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nA few more order arrived! Just over 2 hours left!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nJust a friendly reminder... I DO NOT SHIP TO UNCONFIRMED ADDRESSES\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 12:14:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [NEW] Introducing: DZ ESCROW Coordinator Services for Group Buy Coordinators!\\n### Original post:\\n[ Placeholder for my Public Signature, decryptable to assure that: \"Hey! It\\'s really me!\" ](Wow, I already see some inbox messages. I\\'ll get to those when I\\'m pau hana or on lunch break using my pocket supercomputer. BeepBeep2\\'s replies come first as my first client.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n[ Placeholder for more details & necessary legal mumbo jumbo. Because Lawyers. ]When I am your Group Buy Escrow Coordinator, or GBEC, for short, you can be assured that any Group Buy Escrow under my protection has been vetted and checked by an IT ubernerd who the govt. has and continues to trust with its secrets. The same govt. & its associated contractors count on me to defend and advance our most cutting edge technologies in Aerospace and other industries. The *logic* behind the buy, and the person/people involved, have all been checked to see if what they\\'re claiming adds up. They will have real world consequences that lose them assets and a real ID and address on record that appears to be their place of residence, if there\\'s any fraudulent behavior by a Group Buy Coordinator. If there is any attempt to scam or defraud Group Buyers I will fully cooperate with any and all local, national, and international authorities. I can\\'t stand scammers and con artists and they really don\\'t deserve to live on the same planet as the rest of us. I\\'ve cooperated in a few real world investigations involving potentially nefarious purposes in my professional life, including catching, documenting &\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAre you Bonded and Insured within the state you reside in?If so would you mind making that information public please.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n[Placeholder for Examples of my mentoring & coaching. Placeholder for & Personal LinkedIn Endorsements: My former manager at the rocket test facility where I supervised the entire e-infrastructure. The current Sr. E-Tech at said facility who I taught *everything* I knew and whom I mentored. Multiple dozen Aerospace & Hawaii IT endorsements. Multiple endorsements from top research scientists and engineers located across the country in other disciplines. An Apple Software Engineer who joined my company as an intern yet showed a lot of self-initiative. A successful VC I once worked with who successfully launched 2 Tech companies in Japan in the 90s & several in Hawaii [praised me personally and publicly for predicting and conceptualizing a large number of Apple related accessories soon after Apple\\'s iPhone launch in 2008 & well before everyone else which...are now in the marketplace (can\\'t win all your battles)]. Employee #5 or #6 at Oracle. Bitcoin Talk Forum User Endorsements: jungle_dave, BeepBeep2...so far! Please PM me if you\\'re willing to offer your endorsement! If you think I did a good job for you or if you like what I\\'m trying to accomplish here, I would humbly ap\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi bitterdog,Thank you for your input! I am perhaps jumping the gun a bit. I\\'m still writing the outlines of this as we speak!Until I get my paperwork in order, for now, I\\'ll only offer it for free (while still offering my job/freedom as hostage) for those willing to take the risk knowing that John K. has my personal info and can and should be contacted for any fraud related behavior from my account at: know it\\'s not the full protection of a bonded escrow holder (yet) but at least I\\'m putting it out there with my job/freedom as hostage for my good behavior, for those that are interested. I also mentioned that I was willing to put a negotiable bond in escrow with an escrow service of your choice for your transaction. Besides John K. there are a couple of co-op members, BeepBeep2 and jungle_dave who also know my personal info & where I work. I\\'ve already contacted John to ask him if we could work together with me as an associate or an affiliate to help take some of the load off of his shoulders. We can\\'t let one person be a failure point for the whole GB forum, for those that need escrow services. I wasn\\'t mad at all because I\\'m long on BTC but we lost precious time and placin\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHmm, talk about some barriers to entry. I believe I\\'ve found the relevant state statutes. I need to publicly retract my offer of ESCROW DEPOSITS for now, until I get permitted and bonded and/or can work out an acceptable affiliate deal. I will still offer Coordinator Services alone for now which would include coaching and mentoring for your Group Buy at 0.1% of your proposed Group Buy. So: some pie on my face for jumping the gun but doggoneit if you might not have saved me some headaches by stepping into such a murky area.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n8/24 EDIT: All info in this thread is null and void. Some sections were recycled because we\\'re green. Info is being kept to show how GBEC Cooperative came about. Please see Version 2.0 Thread: EDIT: I n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: pocket supercomputer, Apple Software Engineer, Oracle\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-01 23:52:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: ASICMiner USB group buy REOPENED! (previous customers only!) .175 per unit!\\n### Original post:\\ni bought from you before and sold it ,can i buy now at .175 btc .Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ncorrect me if i\\'m wrong, but didn\\'t you sell yours before i shipped it?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyes i did , i hope you consider me as previous customers as i bought from you and sold it again because i need the money that time .\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ncomplicated. i mean, yes, in the strictest sense, you are. but then do i deny the person you sold to? seems unfair to them. of course, denying you seems unfair to you... i honestly don\\'t know. as long as we\\'re considering this limited in number of units available, i think i have to see only those who actually received units.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI was a part of the original group buy but also sold to someone before shipped to me. I would be interested in getting in at this new price and would put up some coin to cover others expenses before they order so that we can get this order in sooner rather than later.I fully understand that I sold before shipment, and that that should remove me from taking place in this. If there is room please consider bringing me in, otherwise its fine and dont worry about it, but just know that I can cover others expenses and get the full order paid for immediately.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI agree, if you sold you shouldnt be eligable, but whoever received the unit should be. That is why I am asking if there is room to bring me in.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'ll take another 20 @ 0.175Have not heard anything official about the price drop, though. I have an email to Friedcat about wanting to independently buy another 50 @ 0.1 BTC that has not yet been responded to\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ni hear ya debit. keep an eye here and i\\'ll be happy to include ya if i can.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI am not participating in this buy, whatever benefit there is to be had from my previous participation is available to the new participants at the discretion of arklan\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThat is ok , but if there is room to bring me in plz don\\'t forget me .\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI appreciate it, and will do, I have a feeling not everyone will come back for the incentive, so I would be poised to pick up a bunch depending on how many people havent claimed. I will keep an eye here and will keep in contact about incentives not being claimed.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nindeed. it\\'s odd... but, uh... *shrug* i dun know.well, ok then.that frees up 2!shall i split them between you, tigerfree and debitme?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'d buy more than 4.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nnoted. that brings us to 26 at a minimum. please send your payments when your able, but absolutely no later then the deadline of the 9th.where can i grab a countdown timer anyway? i\\'ll hear from FC and get this whole limit thing sorted soon... can maybe just open to ordering as many as you guys want then.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\noh, and obviously i\\'ll need you all to email me when you\\'ve paid with your addresses, since i no longer have that info from before.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nthis offer is only for former customers, sorry.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nDon\\'t see me on the spreadsheet yet, put me down for 3, more if available. Your fee + shipping costs seem a little high, especially when ordering multiple units. That and my order got a little mixed up last time XD. Maybe put a cap on shipping costs? Shipping 1 and shipping 5 make little difference right?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nall the shipping issues were USPS related, which is why i\\'m using strictly fedex this time.shipping cost wise, that\\'s true. last time i offered (and partly failed to deliver...) overnight shipping on orders over 10 units to compensate. that offer stands, of course.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI\\'ll take 1 for sure since I ordered 1 originally from you.If we can buy beyond our original allocation, I\\'ll take 30.Cheers.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nNot a previous customer but I am interested in 10 at these prices or a little beyond.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nPut me down for 5 and up to 15 units.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nunderstood. i\\'m happy to make other arrangements if need be. for a PO box i can do USPS, as that\\'s obviously the only option.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\narklan! You are awesome. I will buy 15 units at .175 per unit.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI would certainly order another 10, more if allowed.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI will take another 5, maybe more if you\\'re not limited to the number you bought before\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\ni\\'ll put you down for your original 1 and potential total of 15. and henchman24 and photon939, noted. \\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI have the btc to buy 15 at that price.I hope that we are allowed to buy more..\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nyou and me both.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nI will take 1 at .175 for sure, as I only ordered a single in your group buy.. However, I am interested in up to 10 total at that price depending on how you work things out.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nI\\'ll definitely get another 4 to match my original 4, plus more if possible. Thanks for organizing this again Arklan!\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nnoted boys. we\\'re up to a minimum of 53, a\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True,'),\n", + " ('2013-08-25 11:38:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿3=20GH/s *6th Miner\\n### Original post:\\nHi, I\\'ve paid you conifrm?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHow many miners are you ordering? And are shares only for the one miner\\'s hashing power they\\'re attached to, or of the whole lot?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1 more share for me, please.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCongrad on the 6th miner coming :p\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCode:TXID: HashFast group buy \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nMeanwhile, only 46 left in stock and it\\'s decreasing very quickly. I could find 4 more spare BTC if this helps to order faster.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nInteresting miner protection news from them.. will help out with a share tomorrow. Pls reserve one for me.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares, 6th miner\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 17:39:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters #5 (and blades)\\n### Original post:\\nPayment sent for 7 USB erupters @ \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwhen do you expect this group buy to end?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nProbably by the end of this week, maybe the start of the next, I cant see it being longer than that, but it does all depend when yxt receives his next delivery of stock and can reship to us.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n3.85 BTC paid for 9 \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWow great prices, I should have just held off form the last group buy.Time to convert some fiat to BTC\\'s.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAdding my feedback from the other thread to this one, aplogies if it\\'s not appropriate, I recieved my 20 this morning so can vouch for OutCast3k being a great seller capable of delivering quantities quickly, was also great at doing business.James\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHappy hashing my friend\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n3.05BTC for 7 units \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAll looking good guys Anyone interested in the blades? Or are you all holding out for the new model?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'d be interested if they were a tenth of the price.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI will buy 3 more USB sticks, but it\\'ll be early next week before I can get the BTC mined. I\\'m 0.2 short at the moment. So if you could reserve 3 - if I can\\'t get the last bit mined before then, I\\'ll definitely take 2.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nNo problem\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nMay consider a new model - wouldn\\'t touch the old, looks like a real PITA to set up and power.Is the \\'miniblade\\' vapourware?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI believe the mini-blade will make an appearance soon, but I\\'ve not received any news on it yet\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\npayment for 4 \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHmmm, the blade looks nice.Any idea if you will be getting them in the same shipment as the usb miners?Also, any idea how many you could get your hands on?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYes, that\\'s the idea - get them shipped with the USBs to save everyone on extra shipping fees etc.There is a fair few available, let me know what sort of a quantity you\\'re interested in and I\\'ll look into it for you\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIn case anyone is wondering, yxt is still waiting for the rest of the stock, as soon as it becomes available the order will be placed. I think its either in transit or in customs, so it shouldn\\'t be much longer\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nCan you confirm price of 7 units as 3.05? My maths is crap, just want to be sure.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n(7*0.40) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 3.05 btcconfirmed\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\n7 ordered, TX matey.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nAnother 10 please, Sending 4.05 \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nupdated the list\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nHey.What\\'s the current ETA on these miners now?Thanks again,Sung\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nSorry for the lack of updates, I\\'m just waiting for some clarification from YXT about something. I can confirm that the USBs was shipped Thursday so should be with us early this coming week.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nOh great. Thanks for the info. When\\'s the cut-off if I wish to order more?Synf\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nAnyone getting these to sell on eBay, be aware eBay UK are now pulling auctions and banning accounts. Seem they have something against Bitcoins and Bitcoin mining hardware. Tread carefully.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nMost likely due to people selling the stuff in hand when they haven\\'t got it, they have clear rules for pre-orders and as long as you follow them, they don\\'t mind.Then again it could be something else that they are buttmad with, but you never know .\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nPayment sent for 3 buddy, more to follow later I hope.....TxID: \\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nJust noticed that I paid for the extra insurance without hitting the amount needed, no problems though, can you reserve another 2 for me please.Just got to wait for some coins to come in .\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nNo problem at all, If you change your mind I can always issue a refund\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nPft, refunding 0.05 would cost more in time and energy than me just ordering more to warrant the insurance price .Anyway, another .8 for another 2 please \\n\\n### Reply 32:\\n6 USB Miners please (personal reminder .\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nAnother 1 for me please. Total now = 4TxID: \\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nAny updates? Need miners!\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nExpecting delivery today\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nMy rig is ready! (look at all these empty slots!)\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nSame here. Though my TekNet 10-port is a bit dodgy, so I\\'ve ordered an Anker. The TekNet looked like it was soldered by a 4 year old chinese kid in a sweatshop, using a lump of metal heated in a fire, during an earthquake. Horrible soldering, I\\'m amazed it worked at all.\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nAnd everything has been shipped will pm or email tracking numbers a bit later today.\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nApproximation of my face at the moment:\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nMine is more like this.\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nWhere did you order the Anker USB hub\\'s from? I can\\'t seem to find them Looking forward to receiving my order\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nOh I opened my eyes and found one on amazon!Woo.\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\nYeah, 44 FFS. Hope they work bet\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters, blades, USB sticks, miniblade, Anker USB hub\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 08:16:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Group buy] Bitfury ASIC chip and TechnoBit assembly service 2900 chips left\\n### Original post:\\nIam sure there will be a 1 chip Miner for Bitfury, but now its just not the time, because the whole data will only be delivered in case of an chip order.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAgreed; but I can afford maybe 4 chips in the next couple of weeks. Also, does this group buy ship internationally?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOf course if there is enough demand We\\'ll design 1 chip miner\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhere did you get this numbers?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhat\\'s your expertise with developing and assembling boards?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSo October delivery hash board is 350 EUR and the chips inside are 240 EUR ( October delivery) so 80-90 EUR for board and assembly, that is without controler and power group on this board .\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWe are a team of 2 professionalsI have master degree in electro-mechanic systems design and manufacturing. I work in a custom machined parts and tooling shop.I\\'ve spent a few years working on the mechanics with a Bulgarian manufacturer of Pick and Place machines.My colleague is electronic engineer with background of 4 years in design of Microchip based custom electronic devices and a few years in IMS as a designer of electronic devices for automotive industry.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWhere do you planning to solder and assembly boards? Third party manufacturer?Did you made any working boards with avalon chips? Any demos?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFor assembly we are using 2 local companies .We made prototype of K1 and made some debugging.In the same time we are working on our own design Avalon based miner with 16 bit Microchip PIC controler.For the moment we have a test breadboard , and the Avalon chip is hashing. Sample PCB for this project are in productionWe are going to use similar setup for bitfury chip based miner.In the same time We\\'ll offer Klondike K16 assembly service.Videos as soon we have fully populated board working @ full speedc xoe oe o pyc oe o a , o oe oa\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI am a bit confuse here Why H board price only 350 EUR? It said without master board. So it can\\'t be used to hashing yet? Somebody please kindly tell me\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThe M and H board are the ones that the dealer in finland is sellingWe are going to do our own design similar to K16, that have everything on single miner board\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOh, i see. Then M board must be very expensive right now\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHi Marto,What\\'s the \\'theoretical\\' timeline on designing the custom board + production when you get the specs from Punin?What\\'s the expected cost of the custom board (with 16 chips)?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nFinished design end of august. Specs as far the order is palced( bye E-mail from Punin)Production - ready tested design with placed orders for PCB and components end of September.Very rough estimate would be in 60 EUR range.Regards: Martin\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSo theoretically when chips are received in October the custom boards are ready for assembly (1 week?) and delivery (another week?)\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWhat is going on with this buy. It looks like it stopped...\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nObviously there is no demand\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nmaybe in time when new desings are out there\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYea I think many people are already invested in KnCMiner and Avalon chips ATM.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nYes that is probably right but I\\'m in BFL chips and boards but I will still put some money in other options...\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nYou could specialize to get 2.5 gh out of the chips ... as u are assembling the boards form scratch. Would make ur GB much moore interesting ...\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nHelloWhat is the last status of group buy? Cancelled? Will be cancelled? How about board assembling?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nNO it\\'s not canceled.Board design is not started yet as far We are finishing our own Avalon based design.The Bitfury based board will be similar to our Avalon one.At least hashing chips area and same PIC controler.So this is taken in account during design of our HEX miner\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nSo how long would it take for me to get my miner? And what will happen if you can\\'t sell 2900 chips\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThe delivery of the chips is scheduled for October.We\\'ll have designed and tested miner until September.So generally you can have miner shipped in week to 10 days after chips are here\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nIs there any day boundary? I mean if you can\\'t get 2900 chip in 10 days or so what will happen then\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nThe boundary is until We can order October delivery chips.If We fail the funds will be refunded\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nBarntech already receive sample chips & making prototypes.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nmarto74 do you already ordered chips or wait for collect enough funds from preorders ?I\\'m interested in one 16chip miner or chip only.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury ASIC chip, TechnoBit assembly service, K1, Avalon based miner, Klondike K16, custom board, PCB, components, KnCMiner, Avalon chips, BFL chips and boards, 16chip miner\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, False, False, True, True, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 12:16:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [WTS] - 480 chips from batch 1\\n### Original post:\\nIf anyone wants the chips from this group buy BATCH1, 480 chips is up for sale @ original preorder price 0.081/chip.I PM\\'ed Steve about this intension, so you can ask him directly.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI confirm invader\\'s PM, he indeed intends to sell half of his order.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-24 20:16:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] Diversified Group Buy [KNC/BitFury/VMC/HashFast] [Maybe:Cointerra]\\n### Original post:\\nxCrowd has been removed from the list of potential investments. It seems that by far the majority of the group does not want to invest in their products.That leaves us with either Cointerra or HashFast as our next investment. I am suggesting HashFast because of their miner protection plan. If Cointerra delays then we are essentially screwed, but if HashFast delays then at least we get free chips to make up for it.Does my reasoning make sense?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nright now cointerra seems more promising to me, but I don\\'t mind having this GB buyinganother hashfast. Especially since we have enough funds to buy one right now, and for cointerrait\\'s not clear when and if we\\'ll be able to buy it.Personally I might join another GB for cointerra or even xcrowd in this case.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow much more BTC would we need to buy CoinTerra?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAbout 50 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'m in for 5 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks, got ya down.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHey man,Pls reserve 10 BTC for me. Paid.Transaction Reference : pay out \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nConfirmed.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHere we go again... I\\'m in for 50 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI added 1.4 my total participation is 6.4 now\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nGlad to see you\\'re ready for round 2. Thanks! Ok sounds good.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSome people are in for less than 5 BTC total, how does that work?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThats how.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nam i right that total invested currently is 170btc and around 1.7TH on order?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nOn page 1:Thats the orders now in. Theres more investments that have not yet been used for orders yet,So total BTC might be over 500 now.edit: I counted around 543 BTC in. (from transaction list on page 1)\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHi there,would it be possible to reserve 1 share 5BTC for me?I just ordered my coins for this through coinbase and coinbase is telling me they will be in my account on Thursday Aug 29, 2013.I can sent screen-cap of coinbase transaction if needed.Thanks in advance,grchris\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYes, I\\'m at work right now and don\\'t have much time but this seems like a correct assessment. There is about 167 BTC left over in the group account. This will likely go towards:A. CoinTerra 2 Th unitB. KNC\\'s discounted December Jupiter (not sure when they\\'re planning on releasing price for this)C. More HashFast Baby JetsI am negotiating with an ASIC manufacturer for cheaper prices for a bulk buy of their equipment (I will leave this manufacturer unnamed for now- if you are already an investor, I have explained the situation in our forums.) I am talking to the CEO of this company and submitting a business proposal this weekend, and hopefully I will hear back from them sometime next week. This is why I\\'m holding off on ordering for now, I think I can get us a better deal than what\\'s publicly available.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI don\\'t normally do this, but I just bought some extra BTC the other day, so I will send in 5 BTC on your behalf this evening. Please PM me next week when your receive the BTC from Coinbase and I will give you my BTC address.Thanks for your interest.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThanks a million, much appreciated!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nNo problem.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI\\'m in for one share. Tran id: \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nHi !i\\'m in for 10 btc ! can you check and confirm to me , please ?ty ,bye ,transition \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nGot a rough estimate on how much more BTC you\\'ll accept based on the amount of hardware you\\'ll host?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nDone- 5 BTC for you. \\n\\n### Reply 24:\\n186.22720364 BTC ($22,347.26) in group account left over for our final purchases.Hardware ordered:2 - Bitfury 400 Gh Kit - (October Delivery) - 164.8742 BTC800W1 - KNC Miner Jupiter 400Gh - (October Delivery) - 73.1469 BTC1000w2 - VMC Fast Hash One 256 Gh - (October/November Delivery) - 79.03789636 BTC500w1 - HashFast Baby Jet 400 Gh - (Late October Delivery) - 59.1418 BTC375w2675w Total5000w Limit, so 2325w of space left. We have $22,347 which could buy hardware pretty close to the limit depending on how efficient/costly hardware we get. At this point investors will be refunded if capacity is reached. Make sure to send with an address you can receive with!\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nUPDATE:Thanks everyone.I\\'m just giving fair warning, I will likely end this group buy in less than two weeks- possibly as soon as a week. We are nearing hosting capacity. I reserve the right to end this offer at anytime and refund any funds that were not used in purchases. I am sorry for those of you who want to invest and get left out. There\\'s only so much hardware I can host. Thank you for understanding.Make sure to send with an address you can receive with!\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nMaybe time to slant towards Bitfury because of the lower power draw.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\n6 BTC more ID: confirm, when U have time.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nWARNING: The previous post by Roge\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra, HashFast, Bitfury 400 Gh Kit, KNC Miner Jupiter 400Gh, VMC Fast Hash One 256 Gh, HashFast Baby Jet 400 Gh\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-23 16:38:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAUSED] - GROUP BUY of BITFURY Chips + DRILLBIT SYSTEM mining assembly\\n### Original post:\\nLOL true, pbb I will set it up in office and get some free electricity. :pSoooo.....boost it up as much as possible with cooling.Just need to find a good power supply soon~\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHey Barntech,For those electricity- and ROI-conscious, have you considered an under-clocking option? I think I saw somewhere some Finnish dudes came up with a mode where you can squeeze about 1.75Gh/W out of Bitfury, which could extend its life span quite a bit, especially for the stacked units. It gives a lot lower hashrate in that mode, of course.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThe the watts per GH/s will become an issue eventually next year, but at the moment the ROI in terms of BTC per day from the upcoming difficulty hikes is what ASIC miners are watching. Underclocking should be possible, but even with a full overclock, the power consumption of the board is going to typically cost $3-$6 per month depending where you live.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCRAP! Damn paypal making me miss out!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYou still have chance on Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI can read some of you like milkbottlec want to push the chip at its upper limit. I will give priority to run the system on the long term, at least for 6 monthes (what mightycount called \"ROI conscious\"). Pushing it, is a very dangerous game, I wont play with fire. While running at the upper limit, that could drastically reduce the lifetime of the system, chips can break down. The hottest they run the shortest their lifetime. Since drillbit can be tuned at different frequencies, it\\'s up to everybody to set up the system as you like.About bitfury chips, I think the maximum efficiency is around 2Gh/s and the maximum it can handle is 2.7Gh/s (short time boost or with heavy heatsink).\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nburnin has plans to try and push 5GHash/s out of his sample chips.. I don\\'t think he is afraid to catch some chips on fire.. hopefully this will work out!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWell...........an auction would mean a massive profit,so I can see your point in that.I was getting my cash/BTC in order to get in on this...but in light of an auction being the only have to pass Still would like to know if this project is on course to start shipping by October Also,do you offer discounts on any kind of volume Say 15 boards\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThere was less than 600 chips left when I placed an order 2.5hours before the notice went up. Someone after me placed 40BTC order. I would say there are not all that many chips left now.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAh,I missed Last I checked there were 842 I think,oh well\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'m just sooo skittish from Avalon & BFL,god they screwed Well,we\\'ll see monday\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nmegabigpower.com don\\'t have the reels of 3,000 chips on their site anymore. I don\\'t know why, you can buy individual sample chips at 1BTC each but what is the point of samples if you can\\'t then buy bulk?So, a batch #2 is looking shaky atm. which is sad, because I like the specs of this project the way it is. We\\'ll have to wait until Monday to see how many chips are left from batch #1.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHope i haven\\'t missed first batch,Was a little too cautious at first, Lets see what Monday bringsIf there is any space left id like to order a fully build unit,Here\\'s hoping\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI always wait one day too long. Well, maybe there will be a chance Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nBFL completely, completely fucked me, straight-up lied and robbed me. The Avalons I tried to buy got caught in customs, permanently, apparently. Round three, Bitfury. I might have bought from KNCMiner but the fact that they haven\\'t shown a prototype chip and they are supposed to ship in 1 week seems really fishy.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAmen to that!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nJust about all the ASIC manufacturers you mentioned are killing their own markets, incredibly short term thinkers. WTF were BFL thinking last year when they announced the 1,500GH/s Minirig? They got millions of dollars of orders for the things, from people that don\\'t need to be mining at all if they can afford $30k a rig. Why are Avalon taking orders for millions of chips, does the net need that much?Same goes for KNCminer and the Bitfury 400GH/s units. Why release such powerful systems onto the network? By the time they ship they will be over priced and useless. What\\'s the follow up, go 28nm and sell too many GH/s again, then what? That\\'s as far as the tech goes, after that there are only price wars which will close most ASIC manufacturers, Moore\\'s law wont save them, the diff rate increases are way faster. Had these people stuck with a 20GH/s product like the Drillbit board we would all be better off, and they would have had a sustainable market. ROI comes not from the number of GH/s you have, but how much those GH/s cost you. The Drillbit boards at $300 for 20GH/s are better ROI than an Avalon Batch #3 which will never pay for itself, nor will any BFL product shipped af\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY Chips, DRILLBIT SYSTEM mining assembly, ASIC miners, Avalon, BFL, KNCMiner, 1500GH/s Minirig, Bitfury 400GH/s units, Drillbit board\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-27 10:39:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CANCELLED] hashfast babyjet. Best value 1.5BTC 10 GH/0.75BTC 5GHs 80 shares.\\n### Original post:\\nMY Name is moogle. I\\'ve been around a couple months on here. I\\'ve loaned money out, been scammed by vfdragon and bought a few block erupters :-)As much fun as the block erupters are i\\'ve since sold most of them on ebay for profit and am now looking to invest in something a bit more heavy duty!Introducing.. The hashfast baby jet!I\\'m willing to split this down to 80 shares each priced at 0.75BTC which will get around 5GHash per second.Payments would be made at the end of each month with a 3% fee taken out and the miner will be on until it is no longer deemed profitable to do so.The miner will be hosted in England.Shipments anticipated to begin: October 20-30, in order of purchase so not a huge wait for this.I\\'m willing to use escro if need be but the price of this will be added on to the 0.75 (usually only 1.5% with john k so not a major amount)If people are fine not using escro then money can be sent to my inputs.io address: or username BoxxieThe address you send from will be the one used to pay you. Unless you specify otherwise.Any questions.There are: 61 shares 10 - BTC7.5*coin chat user*: 1 - BTC0.75 grchris: 3 - BTC2.25 [to pay]Valgron: 5 - BTC3.75 paid*a\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: block erupters, hashfast baby jet\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-27 18:22:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED - NOW SHIPPING] $47.95 OR LESS!!! ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 180+\\n### Original post:\\nAll orders shipped! I have an extra 30 USB units to sell as well. I\\'m accepting BTC only 0.32BTC /ea!First come first served so PM me quickly.Also, they ship tomorrow morning\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-31 08:15:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters #3\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m going to want some more thanks OC - awaiting incoming coins - watching for now...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n15 - 20 more here my man, depending on the reduced GB price option - watching.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m definitely interested in getting some too\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'ll get more until I get my BE running successfully on a pi with CM1\\'s.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi Yxt, I am using bfgminer 3.1.2 running a pi and I am in the process of finding out why it makes the whole pi crash requiring a hard reset.See here:\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI should be picking up 10-20 ish, just waiting on my ones on eBay to sell, then I\\'ll convert it back to BTC and let you know.presumably if we get over 100, the price may be reduced a bit? (looking at the person you buy from)\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPayment sent for 3transaction \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes, I would aim to pass on the discount if I receive one Not entirely sure how I\\'d deal with it this second though and I\\'d likely aim to put in the order fairly quickly to avoid any extra delays, so we may not actually hit 100+ units...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOk cool My eBay acutions finish at 10pm tonight, then ill be converting back to BTC as quick as i can to buy in!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI might have some BTC to sell...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nIn for 3, pleaseTransaction: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nCount me in for 2. Cheers, will pay this evening\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'m getting a lot of PM\\'s about getting a Block Erupter at 0.10 BTC.I\\'m still waiting for some clarification on this. As far as I\\'m aware you\\'ll only be eligible if you purchased a Block Erupter in a previous group buy at 0.99. When the time comes I\\'ll post another thread and/or PM everyone in the previous group buys. This group buy is for 0.57 BTC per unit, please don\\'t ask to pay 0.10 BTC instead thanks guys\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nPayment for 2 sent, transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI\\'ll probabbly will buy 3 or 4 this week\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThe only thing that\\'s holding me off is the bit of a disappointing price compared to the International group buy - the units are priced at .45 each!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nShipping costs ..\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThat is true, but when you\\'re buying 15-20, it ends up being much cheaper when you pay a lump sum of 1 BTC instead of .1 each erupter\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI\\'ll be looking to buy 1-2 from this round, but am waiting on the info regarding previous buyer rates.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nAs far as I can tell yxt is the offical reseller in europe, he has listed his prices and you can\\'t get them any cheaper... If you can please pm me to point this out.Ordering from outside Europe would mean you would also have to pay extra postage, insurance fees and import duty, not to mention the time to ship will likely be longer, plus you would be waiting several days whilst its in customs and all that nonsense. (i\\'ve had parcels from the U.S. been held up in customs for weeks)Can we please try and keep this thread on topic, thanks *Edit* 15 miners @ 0.45 + 1.5 btc shipping costs (from the U.S), averages to 0.55 BTC a miner, so for the sake of saving 0.02 btc per miner, you\\'ll probably end up waiting 2 weeks longer than everyone else to receive them. Not to mention the custom fees you\\'ll receive. lol.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nPut me down for 10 but I reserve the right to revise based on the deal for previous buyers. I will confirm the order once we have a date for shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nAs per PM - what sort of timeframe do we have left to order by?Waiting back on two people, so my order can shift from 20-50 erupters depending on when it finishes - should be ready either today/tomorrow?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nPut me in for \\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nfew of my friends are also interested, i\\'ll definitely want about 10 , will you stop selling when you reach 50 orders or is this the minimum order number?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI\\'ll accept more than 50 units in the group buy, if we can quickly fill a 100+ thats fine by me\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nHard to say... probably another two or three days , i\\'m expecting the orders to flood in pretty soon.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI\\'m in for 3 this sent\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nLooking at yxt\\'s thread I think we need at least 51 to get the 0.57 BTC price. That posting hints that over 100 would get a lower price - but the administration and/or refunds could be a nightmare for OutCast3k I wish I could afford to buy more units to help acheive this \\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nOnly 12 units to go, people best hurry\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nim going to give this one a skip and wait for the next one my BTC not coming is as quickly as i\\'d hoped - damn these all these cheap miners raising the difficulty! i\\'m holding out for news on the 0.10 miners\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\n2 units: \\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nRumour has it that you\\'ll only be able to purchase miners at 0.10 BTC if you purchased at that the previous rate of 0.99 BTC. Further more BTCGUILD are claiming you\\'ll only get up to 30% of your purchase. So if you ordered 3 \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters, pi, CM1, bfgminer 3.1.2, Block Erupter\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 09:39:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 2/11.17 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNow 2 / 11.17 shares remaining for next component (at current BTC rate shown in the OP)GB now with YACback offer: 50 YAC per paid share in the next component will be given to the purchasers of those sharesYAC will be paid once the component is ordered and paid for. Only available for the next component (H-board #1).\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n that H-board 2 bought! :-D\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: H-board #1, H-board 2\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-13 05:55:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN]Group Buy#10 ASICMINER Blade Miner 10.24 BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nNew Updated Prices! All Blade Miners Ship USPS Priority Mail/Priority Mail InternationalUSPS Express Mail/Express Mail International Is AvailableUSA OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1 10.24 BTC 2 10.23 BTC 3-9 10.22 BTC 10+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.USA priority shipping 0.30 btc per bladeUSA express shipping 0.60 btc per bladeInsurance (Optional)0.015 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, No Maximum Per OrderCANADA OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1 10.24 BTC 2 10.23 BTC 3-9 10.22 BTC 10+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.Canada shipping0.70 btc per blade USPS Priority Mail International Shipping - 6 to 10 average business day delivery to major destinations.1.75 btc per blade Global Express Guaranteed - 1 to 3 average business day delivery to over 190 countriesInsurance (Optional)0.02 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, $500 Maximum Per Order With Priority Mail0.02 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, $2499 Maximum Per Order With Global Express OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1 10.24 BTC 2 10.23 BTC 3-9 10.22 BTC 10+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.International shipping0.85 btc per blade USPS Priority Mail International Shipping - 6 to 10 averag\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPlease get your orders in tonight to ensure you are in the first order#1 for approximate shipping on August 17th!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDo we know what the differences will be between the current and \"new\" blade models? Also, will pricing remain the same?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhat I have been told by friedcat is that they will be similar. The main difference will be they will either be locked at the low voltage lower hashing rate or at the higher voltage rate/hashing rate. Which rate they are to be locked at was undecided two days ago in PM from friedcat.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nwhat is the difference between the old blade and the new one?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nShipping is now per 5 blades ordered!USA OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1 10.24 BTC 2 10.23 BTC 3-5 10.22 BTC 6+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.USA priority shipping 0.30 btc per 5 bladesUSA express shipping 0.60 btc per 5 bladesInsurance (Optional)0.015 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, No Maximum Per OrderCANADA OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1 10.24 BTC 2 10.23 BTC 3-5 10.22 BTC 6+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.Canada shipping0.70 btc per 5 blades USPS Priority Mail International Shipping - 6 to 10 average business day delivery to major destinations.1.75 btc per 5 blades Global Express Guaranteed - 1 to 3 average business day delivery to over 190 countriesInsurance (Optional)0.02 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, $500 Maximum Per Order With Priority Mail0.02 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, $2499 Maximum Per Order With Global Express OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1 10.24 BTC 2 10.23 BTC 3-5 10.22 BTC 6+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.International shipping0.85 btc per 5 blades USPS Priority Mail International Shipping - 6 to 10 average business day delivery to major destinations.2.00 btc per 5 blades Global Express Guaranteed - \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYes, I have USB Miners available here \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n1 @ 11,1101 wallet: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nhi sonic is it possible for shipping via Fedex international? usps its terrible for customs in uk.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n2.00 btc per 5 blades USPS Global Express Guaranteed - 1 to 3 average business day delivery to over 190 countriesThis GXG option is mailed at USPS but fulfilled by FedEx .Don\\'t know if that helps. I currently am not ready to offer the FedEx option. Thanks for the question.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThis group buy is open. Place an order and it will ship within 24 hours of my receiving it from AsicMiner.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThis group buy is open. Place an order and it will ship within 24 hours of my receiving it from AsicMiner.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSo one shipped to Canada would be BTC10.24 + BTC.70 for shipping?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHello! If you shipped to Russian would be BTC10.24 + BTC.85 for shipping(0.85 btc per 5 blades USPS Priority Mail International Shipping)?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAnyone need help setting these up just pm\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWhat is the weight on one blade?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI read your awesome comprehensive guide. Great work!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nany word on rack availability?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYes it is. Thank you for any order that you may place.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThank you for the help and your excellent online guide in the forums. It is of great use! Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI don\\'t know the exact weight or size as I have not received them. I also have not received this information. Thanks for the question.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nNot available to my knowledge. This is not certain though. I will try to get an answer on this.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nUpdate: Multiple orders have been placed. The vast majority of orders ship August 17th assuming I get them by Friday\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Blade Miner, USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 12:44:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED]Group Buy#10 ASICMINER Blade Miner 10.24 BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\n8/28/13 This group buy is closed. Prices for new orders that ship this coming Monday from friedcat have changed. All prior orders from me that just arrived ship today. I paid the higher prices for these. Please watch for new prices and a new group buy. Thank you. This group buy is ongoing and always open. Place an order, it arrives in about 7 days or less from AsicMiner, then I reship within 24 hours of my receiving your order from AsicMiner.Yes, I have USB Miners available here Buy #10 Blade MinersAll Blade Miners 10.24 BTC Or Less!Group Buy #10 Blade MinersThank You For Your Support!New Lower Prices!10.24 BTC Or Less! 8/28/13 This group buy is closed. Prices for new orders that ship this coming Monday from friedcat have changed. All prior orders from me that just arrived ship today. I paid the higher prices for these. Please watch for new prices and a new group buy. Thank you. 8/28/13 Some USB Miners and all blades have arrived! All blade orders will be sent today and all USB miners in hand will be shipped today. Tracking numbers will be sent in the next 24 hours. USB miner orders will be caught up to August 18, 2013, 12:00:00 PM CST. Any orders for USB Miners placed after\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Blade Miner, USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:02:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: Blade Erupter Refunds\\n### Original post:\\nhey everyoneThis goes to silentsonicboom and the other supplierswith the new price decrease on the blades. i dont think its fair as i just had some shipped out yesterday and i paid full price on these.will you be offering a coupon scheme or a refund on btc.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI doubt it, that would not make good business sense\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBuying a blade doesn.t either.. but you did right?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nlol yep I did, at full whack\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nFYI, friendcat also announced a major price drop. Would say setup a group buy but kinda pointless without knowing what new hardware they are announcing for Blade v2. If the price drop is that huge then things don\\'t bode well...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nJust be happy you didn\\'t pay $11,500 for 2 blades like me\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nthat\\'s gotta hurt ouch\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blade Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 16:33:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN - IN STOCK - SHIPPING] batch #22/23 ASICMiner USB + Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\nslava_smith; 1 blade; 10.50; to send shipping label.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI have a question on the blades. Do they come with the appropriate fuse and power adapter?I know you need to splice some wires together but the plastic adapter that you put those wires into is what I am wondering is included or not or if i need to source those from somewhere else.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyou will need a PSU. there\\'s a setup guide link on the OP to help you out10 Amp fuse and the green power connector are included\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI knew I needed a PSU. i have 1 blade currently running but i got it second hand. I just didnt know if i needed to make a run to radioshack before i get my order for new blades.thats the answer i was looking for, thanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDropped off today\\'s packages at post office.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHephaestus; 20; 6.6; in advance!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOkay repeat customer. I want 20 sticks = 6.6 coins. Can I buy you a usps padded flat rate label to fit 20 sticks? so my cost to you is 6.6 coins and send the label for the padded flat rate envelope? Do you have stock to ship on tue the 20th? My 6.6 btc will be ready about 4 pm central on tue the 20th. will that make the cutoff time for tue shipping? I have 3.8 coins in hand now.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nif you can send all that by 6 PM tomorrow , I\\'ll get your order out tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOkay I will shoot for 20 sticks by 5:00pm central time. If I am short I will order 10-14 and go for the small flat rate instead. thanks\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'m expecting additional USB inventory to arrive in the AM. Your orders now ship as soon as they are received.No waiting...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nwoots...just got my order in on your new site (#36) so seems my login troubles are fixed. Thanks much!!!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSwimmer63; 20; 6.6; \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWill you be getting any 0.1 erupters with this shipment? If not any ETA? Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThings got easier!1. PAYMENTPay Canary to the specified address (e.g. Get your transaction ID by double-clicking on your payment line in Bitcoin-QT.Go to and search for transaction ID to make sure your first address is what you think it is. Post in this thread your forum name, quantity of items, price paid, and your sending address, e.g.:BorisAlt; 5; 1.55; to record from this step: YOUR BITCOIN PAYMENT ADDRESS and TRANSACTION ID.2. SHIPPING LABELExample USPS. Send FROM yourself TO yourself, but make sure to click \"I\\'m shipping from another ZIP Code\" box. I use flat rate boxes, since there is so little hassle.Pay with a credit card, save shipping label as PDF. Things to record from this step: TRACKING # FROM SHIPPING LABEL3. SIGN MESSAGE WITH INFO FROM STEP 1 AND 2Use your bitcoin (virtual) shipping address from step ONE to enter in the first line. Use your tracking number from shipping label from step TWO. Remove spaces between numbers for tracking #. Click Sign Message:Things to record from this step: ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE at the bottom of the Sign Message dialog box.4. SEND SHIPPING LABELSend PDF from step 2 to with a body in the followin\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nGreat instructions. I would also add a verification step to your signature.You can use to check that the hash and your message(Tracking number) verify to the sending wallet address.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWill you be getting in any 0.1 erupters? If not any ETA? Do I need to do anything, like fill out a form, to get on a waiting list?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI don\\'t have any additional info except what I posted in OP here: \\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nSwimmer63; 10; 3.3; and Label Sent. Please verify.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nCanary,The blades are much smaller than I expected for some reason(roughly the size of 2 7970 side by side, but much lighter). They are very easy to set up, now that I have done a couple I could set up a new one in 5 minutes or less.They have been running non stop, low clock setting getting right at 11gh each. I have not messed with the high clock setting yet at all.I just used a old power supply that I had out of a broken desktop, cut a few wires and was good to go with power for 2 blades. How many do you have left anyway? Thinking of buying up the rest of what you have.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nmackstuart; 1; .33; 1; .33; 10; 3.30; 1; 10.50; 1; 10.50; \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nWhat\\'s your policy on defective items?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nwoo, got my 3 blades in! Thanks Canary for the excellent (and super fast) service!have to wait until tonight to set them up though\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nphilipma1957 ;12; 3.96btc I will send you a usps label to your email. I am holding off on that for a bit. I am hoping to add 8 more sticks with 2.64 more btc. this would be 20 and I would need to send a label for the padded flat rate enve\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB, Blade miners, PSU, 10 Amp fuse, green power connector, 0.1 erupters\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:35:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: 65 GH/s Erupter Blade mining rig available for Pickup around NY/NJ\\n### Original post:\\nI think you hit the wrong subforum.And I think you are expensive. At that price and current difficulty noone will even get the money invested back !Check: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n65 GH/s Erupter Blade mining rig ready for pickupI have 5 erupter blades in hand just recently received for building a new rig for a customer. The customer has ran into financial problems and cannot complete the pending payment immediately. So have decided to sell it. Each blade runs at 10GH/s which totals to 50GH/s. It can be safely overclocked with cooling to run at 13GH/s which total to 65GH/s. If you want I can overclock them for you.Price: 1200/blade which totals to $6,000 Whats included in this price:I have 2 fans attached to each of the blades, total of 10 fan which are more than enough to keep the blade running cool.I also have a custom build frame for the blades, if you want Ill include it for free.Five 4pin molex connectors for connecting the blades to PSUWhats not included:Power supply is not include in this price, but if you want I have a brand new OCZ 750W modular power supply which I can add for additional $90Brand new Netgear 8 Port Gigabit switch with 6 CAT5 cables for additional $80Im located around NJ/NY area and I prefer local pickup as the rig is already assembled and I dont want to take it apart. Also if you want you can test it and see it running.PM or P\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nUnfortunately for you mate, friedcat just dropped the price to 3.5 btc per blade.Willing to buy everything for 15 btc or PM me you last offer.Let me know if you are interested. btw am from NYC. Local pickup / meetup.Thanks,\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOh really, where can I buy it from for 3.5BTC?Thank you\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n me know about this rig if you are interested.Thanks,\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 65 GH/s Erupter Blade mining rig, erupter blades, fans, custom build frame, 4pin molex connectors, OCZ 750W modular power supply, Netgear 8 Port Gigabit switch, CAT5 cables\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 17:54:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: 8 USB\\'s Avail @ .32 BTC/ea! [SHIPS NOW] ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 180+\\n### Original post:\\n8 left as of right now!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGot my miners today. Thanks!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou\\'re welcome! Happy Hashing\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 19:01:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED THANKS!] ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#5! 180+\\n### Original post:\\nUPDATE 8/26 - DOMESTIC ORDERS FROM 8/18-19 SHIP TODAY ALL INTERNATIONAL AND REMAINING ORDERS SHIP TOMORROW. Domestic Tracking Numbers should be updating in Paypal by this evening or early tomorrow.8/27 - All orders shipped!! Hi Everyone! WELCOME TO MY GROUP BUY #5 FOR ASICMINER USB ERUPTERS! As you know I have been selling ASICminer USB\\'s and Accepting Paypal as the payment option. I have sold over 1000+ USB\\'s WORLDWIDE to happy customers! Group Buy #1 Located Here : Buy #2 Located Here : Buy #3 Located Here : Buy #4 Located Here : to know more about me? Join my Facebook Group Buy! customers PM me before purchasing for a special offer Current Price as of 8/21/2013USD $47.95 [1-9]USD $46.95 [10-20]BTC 0.38*If you intend to purchase more than 20 ASICminer USB\\'s CONTACT ME FIRST. I have special discounts and new payment options!I AM NOW ACCEPTING PRE-PRINTED SHIPPING LABELS FOR DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL ORDERS -- IF YOU WANT YOUR ORDER SHIPPED VIA FEDEX, UPS, etc.=>USA Domestic Shipping is FREE and orders over 50+ units now get FREE EXPRESS Shipping is $50 or 0.50BTC FOR UP TO 14 UNITS and If you want to buy more just PM me =>Need Expres\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSold out! Thanks!I\\'ll be opening up group buy #6 in a few days so stay tuned everyone\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer USB Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 19:22:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] ASICMiner Blade Group Buy. 3.9 + shipping. 20/100 - QUICK!\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m purchasing 20 tonight, everyone is welcome to piggyback off of my order. In the event we reach 100 units, I will drop the price and refund the difference.I\\'m offering ASICMiner Blade units at cost + shipping for the first group buy only. There is no minimum order for this purchase.Current group buy payment address:Group buy #1 - up to 80 units left - 3.9 * unit count, plus shipping indicated below. USPS Priority Flat rate shipping costs. This is for US orders only. Please PM for international shipping costs.Total shipping cost for 1-5 units$50Shipping cost for 6-10 units$85Shipping costs for 11-20 unitsPMGo by current CampBx rate when calculating shipping.Please send payment from an address you own. Once payment is sent, send a signed message (signed with payment address using bitcoin-qt client) with your shipping - 20 unitsTotal: 20 Units\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSorry guys, looks like he sold out before I got my order in. I\\'ll update if anything changes.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ndamn that sucks =(\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFire sale, hardware won\\'t produce ROI without a significant price increase for Bitcoin, which means manipulation at this point because there is very little along the lines of large scale adoption. They\\'ve also been desperately trying to push all v1 hardware without details on v2 yet, so basically \"buy all our old shit before we show any more cards\".That said, props for trying to run a group buy at cost. Very respectable, sorry this group missed out. I\\'m sure they\\'ll show up for sale on some outlet with a \"me first\" markup.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blade\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 20:35:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: 104 USED Erupter USB\\'s for Sale - IN-Hand Ships Immediately\\n### Original post:\\nI am confused as to why there are so many group buys still for .38+ especially when you have to wait a week or more for it to ship... Either way I`ll drop mine to 30BTC shipped to Canada/USA all hubs & cables included (Xpresspost) Ships out tomorrow!!That\\'s 104 USB erupters w/ Hubs & Cables, shipped expresspost to US/CANADA\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Erupter USB, Hubs, Cables\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 21:09:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: 104 USED Erupter USB\\'s IN-Hand Ships Immediately 30BTC for all! w/ SHIPPING\\n### Original post:\\nPM sent\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n9 Sold - 2 orders - Updated First Post with Forum Names & QTY95 LEFT\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nJust saw this post and also noticed that 100 of them are available here for 18.99BTC\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nLess then 100 now available and they ship out immediately. A few more PM\\'s sounds like another 30-40 are gone in the next few hours. Will update tonight when I get home. Any orders w/ payments received before Midnight tonight I will pack-up and ship out tomorrow.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 22:04:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: *Updated* 92/104 LEFT USED Erupter USB\\'s IN-Hand Ships Immediately\\n### Original post:\\nUpdated 92 Left\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-20 09:23:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Block Erupter USB @ 0.20 BTC + parcel -> Shipping to anywhere!\\n### Original post:\\nLast change: 28th May 2013\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks AG, whole thing is moving along nicely!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n.I totally agree...! Compared with the German Reseller & Groubuys you are a god ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFINALLY!Payment made for the 104 Block Erupter USBs: estimated that he will be able to ship from 11th August. If that happens I will got the the parcel up to 14th August. I will start the re-shipment as soon as possible. That means UK buyers will got their orders up to 16th August. I estimate that the other buyers will receive their orders up to 23th August.A happy weekend to everyone!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks for the news Augusto, looking forward to seeing that extra hash power in the mail!Have a nice week-end too\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAwesome! And a happy weekend to you too.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m still gonna wait it out till I can buy some for 0.2 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nMore good news!I got a tracking number this (Monday) morning:I expect the to receive the package by Wednesday.By the weekend I am planning to open the Trader\\'s Book for more orders.Keep tuned in.Thank you all for the trust and the patience.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWeee I would like more.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nJust to let you know, I came back from the post office few minutes ago. All orders were dispatch. So UK buyers will receive their package tomorrow (Friday) and oversea buyers up to 23th August.Once more, thank you all.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nwhats happening with the rest of us who bought BEs @ the original price?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI am going to ask Friedcat if he is prepared to ship the remaining 70% of the original orders. If so, I will let you all know.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nCan buy some ASIC USB at 0.20 btc???\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIf you were part of one of ACs group buys you can.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMine arrived this morning. You came through for us once again Augusto! Many thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nGot mine in the mail today, or maybe even Saturday as I didn\\'t check the box earlier Thanks Augusto!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYou are welcome.I just sent tracking number for all buyers. I am sorry for the delay, I have been a bit busy with other affairs.By the way, I am still waiting responses from Friedcat to continue with the trade. As soon I got a response I will let you know. I hope Friedcat release once for all more than 1000 units for 0.1 BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\ndiscount prog is only to honor/compensate the early buyer--> you can get max the quantity you bought for 0.89/0.99 or moreafaik\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\ncan I get 4 from you for .2 as well?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nwhat about the REALLY early buyers who bought at 2.1 each?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nRead!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nIf you did not noticed, I got Block Erupter USBs for 0.1 BTC as compensation for my early buyers. I am still waiting Friedcat confirm he will ship the remaining quantity promised (70% of the original pre-orders). Moreover, I am quite convinced that Block Erupter USB sales are not going to keep it up for 0.89 BTC each. This price is out of question when compared with other devices being released by trustworthy ASIC vendors. If Friedcat or even you want to keep the sales flowing to clear the stocks, you will have to decrease the price to a very low threshold.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nGot a link to a relevant article? I keep finding misleading information.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nPlease, show where exactly I am misleading people in my I will assume you are casting a false accusation.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThe promotional price of 0.10 btc is for those that purchased units at 0.99 or above, its been stated 100x over - but you keep ignoring that fact and misleading people. Yes the price will drop below the current price of 0.40 btc (its already lower than 0.89 btc as you mention), but it doesn\\'t mean you\\'ll have any right to distribute those units (like you currently are with a 100% markup) you\\'re not even an official reseller!\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nJust look back over the past few pages... Look at the other people who have stated it also. Look at the comment before yours. People are confused by your statements, and feel mislead.Would you like me to quote them?*edit* Here is a few quotes from the past couple of pages:*edit* I\\'m also running a group buy and get several messages a day asking why you sell the units at 0.20 btc\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI am waiting you show where I intentionally mislead people with my statements. Please, show me quotes where I did that, not quotes from people with genuine concerns about my trade. Do not think just because some people felt confused that means I was misleading people. If this is the base of your argument, your accusation is entirely false.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nApparently the courier came today while I was home all day. Kind of disappointed in my local couriers...\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nWhatever... Where is the quotes where I produced a statement which supports your assertion that I \"keep ignoring that fact and misleading people\"?Let me guess, you have none. \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, ASIC USB\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 05:47:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Group Buy] [ASIC miner] [Block Erupter USB] [Price Updated] [Australia]\\n### Original post:\\nBumping because of new pricing. Please contact me if you have bought at 0.99 BTC and haven\\'t redeemed your 0.1 BTC coupons yet.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrdered 2 for cgminer testing.So I can test it with three rather than just the 1st one I got from friedcat back in May Thanks dadj\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou should have asked, I would have gladly sent you two miner out of the MinePeon donation funds. Too late now you spent your own coins .Neil\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nReceived package today and refund for price change.Dadj you\\'re the man !\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGot them (2) just now and hot plugged them into my RPi running the the original 1st AMU\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nMy second batch at the new price arrived today...Thanks heaps, Leo\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIf you qualify for the .1btc pricing but for some reason don\\'t want the extra\\'s, PM me. Im sure we can work out a deal.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPaid for five 1am Monday morning, arrived in REGIONAL QUEENSLAND from NSW on Wednesday morning. SUPERFAST!Make sure you give dadj a really good review if he looked after you!CLICK HERE TO LEAVE A POSITIVE TRUST RATING!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n2nd batch received. I Definitely recommend dadj for doing business Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOne more please Leo, pm\\'ed you and sent payment\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ngot my package in the mail.dadj is a top bloke and very easy to deal with. VERY fast service too.i know i\\'m only new and two cents is rounded down to nothing these days but i highly recommend him.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI paid for two units on Friday afternoon (at ~15:30) with express shipping and they arrived today!Very happy.RAB\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOrdered and received 100 miners from Dadj. Easy to deal with, highly trusted.A+\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nBump - price update\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nanyone got pointers to a good 10 port usb hub and fan set up for these?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSo we get in touch with you dadj for Erupter Blade purchases ? .\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYes, will update info for blades on Thursday. I don\\'t know pricing yet.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI don\\'t think there\\'s easily-available 10 port hubs with enough power at reasonable prices. You need about 550mA per device I think. Would love to hear of anyone\\'s the readily-available Belkin 7 port hub doesn\\'t list its power output anywhere, either online or on the (sealed) packaging in stores.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nthx for your reply. hope we can get some more real world experience/tips\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nContacted via PM and got next day delivery, great service, thanks so much! Hope to do business again!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nhi dadj (leo),do you still have USB Block Erupters in stock.?I\\'d like more please\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nHey dadj, Checking in if you still have these available. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nYes still have plenty in stock\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nthird package received very fast. Only if all ASIC vendors could be like this. Go dadj (Leo) show them how great business is done. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThanks Leo. Great transaction. Got mine within a few days\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nHi dadjI\\'m also interested in USB BE. please check your pmfunds sent, await your feedback\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nAny price updates incoming? These are starting to look a little expensive with oversea\\'s vendors selling @ 0.32 and other aussies suppliers looking at local stock with 0.4.Im looking at ordering some more but im wondering if its worth it atm.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nMaking ROI with these things is tough, but I\\'m doing it as a hobby.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nDadj,Thanks for the super speedy delivery. BE package arrived in perfect order and is already hashing away...)Cheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASIC miner, Block Erupter USB, RPi, 10 port usb hub, fan set up, Erupter Blade, 10 port hubs, Belkin 7 port hub, USB Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-26 17:25:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] Cointerra Shares ฿4.5=50GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nso @50gh*20 shares = 1 THthat means you are going to get the other TH4.5*20 = 90btc 90btc * let\\'s say 105 *2 = $18900this means you are getting your shares for about half as much as other people in your groupbuyhowever, you are charging only 3% fee for everything\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDamn, BTC4.5 is out of my range, any possibilities of lowering that on future miners?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n@waldohoover: I\\'m in on your KNCMiner group buy, and I\\'m interested in this as well. I\\'m done with trying to buy my own hardware, power it, put up with the noise, heat, etc....I 100% understand and see the logic of 4.5BTC to ensure group buy members get a decent chunk of hashing power to make this worthwhile investment...I\\'ll mull it over in a few days and get back to you.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nA new miner now! So tempting.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIsn\\'t the Terra Miner IV warranty only 90 days per their agreement? You listed it here as 12-months...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'d definitely be interested in 10x greater shares/less hash\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Shares, KNCMiner, Terra Miner IV\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 02:54:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN][0.4BTC] Perpetual Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nTwo updates:1. The batch ordered last Friday are due to be shipped from my supplier to me on Saturday. I expect to receive them mid-late next week and will turn around same day depending on what time they arrive. All of the buyers in this batch are in the Australia Post Next Business Day Network from me, so should receive very quickly. All of the buyers in the last batch did receive them the next day.2. I have been able to confirm a price drop to BTC0.4 per unit and have updated the first post with this information. Orders placed from now on will occur at the new price and as per previous batches, this includes all taxes and shipping fees.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhow much is the discount for pick-up in adelaide?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThe discount is BTC0.03 per unit for local pickup.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nFor people currently waiting for their order, there was a delay in my supplier receiving their stock which has had a flow-on effect to me. I was expecting these to ship to me last week but they haven\\'t yet, I\\'m still chasing this up.Reminder: approximately 2 more days until the current batch is cut off and an order placed. As an aside, if my supplier can\\'t guarantee delivery within a reasonable time frame, this will probably be the last batch I order as I feel I can\\'t provide a decent customer service if I can\\'t get stock myself!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI have now received a tracking number for batch 1, so this is now enroute to me. Expecting to arrive Monday at this stage.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSlightly over 21 hours until this order is placed.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ndazz,will the price go down again with the next shipment?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'m reviewing the options at the moment, the price for me to purchase has gone down slightly, but in a couple of cases previously I\\'ve underestimated shipping costs so I\\'ve ended up subsidising the costs myself. I\\'m not looking to make a lot of money on these, but do need to at least cover my costs.On a plus note, the order just finished is double the size of my previously largest order and includes a fair number for stock so I can do a quick turn-around instead of waiting for international shipping. If I continue to have enough interest I plan on keeping enough in stock to cover any orders.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI have gone to the cryptominer website, opened an account and deposited 0.4 BTC, but get \"no orders have been placed yet\" on my order status.Has the order system been adjusted to reflect the price change? The home page still shows the price of an Asicminer USB at 0.55 BTC.Cheers,Phil.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi Phil, I can see your deposit in the backend system (and you\\'ve set your shipping address), so it\\'s definitely there. The website will show no orders until I move the funds from your deposit address to the main address and place an order with my supplier (or ship from stock). Until this is done the funds sit in your account on the website.Thanks for the note about the front page, I have now fixed this so it pulls the value from the database (it was hard coded on the homepage).\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAfter what seems like forever, tracking information finally shows that the first batch of Erupters should be delivered to me tomorrow. My wife will be confirming with me when they arrive and I will be leaving work early to get these in the post to you. Parcel satchels are already labelled ready to go.I have also been able to bump all orders from forum members in the second batch to the first batch using the extras I purchased for stock, so everyone should have them this week.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAre you getting the new erupters? I\\'m looking for every colour.Also looking for every colour of the old erupters ( except black)\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI am not sure if the batch due to arrive now is the new or old colours, but I would expect the one after that will be the new ones. I won\\'t know if they are, or what colours they may be, until they arrive. I currently only have black or red ones in my own farm.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nOK, I have had this call, so they have definitely arrived and will be posted out today. I will email each buyer with their tracking number once I have dropped them off at the post office.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Block Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 04:06:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: *Updated* 92/104 LEFT USED Erupter USB\\'s IN-Hand Ships Immediately .25BTC\\n### Original post:\\nBump to see if any other interest for shipping out tomorrow morning...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nnew USB erupters start @ .17btc ... fyw =)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 03:34:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [CLOSED] batch #22/23 ASICMiner USB + Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\nUSB miners - Stock in hand. Shipping to you today when you place your orderI have no more blades in stock as of now... 8/27/13 more are on their way.With the recent run up in btc, don\\'t spend it on shipping!! Pay with fiat for shipping instead.- no PMing me your shipping address as a signed message anymore. You will sign 1 string only: tracking # of your label/sfriedcat\\'s post is here: buyers: please contact your respective re-seller: provide The Fastest delivery to you, bar none!This batch has a simple setup. you pay 1 price, provide a label and I ship. I don\\'t care where you want me to ship it to is .33 per USB miner. Prices for blades are 10.50 btc. Payment address: Volume Pricing, see here: miners:If you want me to handle shipping (creating a label) please order from www.bitCanary.com or purchase a branded and tested miner from Eligius mining pool here: don\\'t need to spend btc on shipping! spend USD instead:For this group buy you must provide me a shipping label. If you prefer not to and want me to handle shipping, then please place your order through www.bitCanary.com or through Eligius pool instead.To generate your own label\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nthis batch is closed no more orders for USB miners.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWill there be a new group or was that your last one?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIs it safe to assume I my order was the last?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ni\\'ll open up a new one\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nthis batch is closed no more orders for USB miners.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI think he has the hots for someone at the post office. He sure spends enough time there! =P\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCould also be he\\'s getting his CDL to transport the miners.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHas anyone gotten a unusually high number of DOAs out of this last batch?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nnext group is up: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miners, blades\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 05:33:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $36.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#6! 50+\\n### Original post:\\nFew orders in! PM me for QTY discounts! Also previous customers get discounts as well\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 15:36:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [INVENTORY CLEARANCE] 10-13 GH blade for 5 btc\\n### Original post:\\nReserved\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nplease reserv for 3 bladeswill pm you\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow much for delivery to UK (seeing they\\'re a rip-off 12BTC here in EU)?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYea...how much for UK delivery..? :p would like one\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nslava_smith; 4; 20.0; email label soon.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHow much is delivery for 1 blade to The Netherlands ?Thanks,Xeon\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks! 4 will fit into a large priority flat rate box nicely.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nooeygooeygold ;1 ; 5; \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHiCan I buy 10 blades to EU?What would be the shipping cost?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHaving stupidly PMd Canary, I realised that all the info is indeed here if we all stop creaming ourselves and read...TL:DR; International buyers have to buy their own postage labels and send it. Follow this guide:how to create a shipping label by BorisAlt: My only question is:How much does shipping actually cost to the UK? Is it a preset weight, standard size or what?Maybe I just send the coin and wing the rest but that generally is not good practice.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'m in process of understanding the buying process.I will go troug with that. I would want 10 blades, but what shipping cost (weight) I should choose?please reserve 10 blades for me. I\\'m sending btcs\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAny UK\\'ers who have bought from Canary here? USPS is asking me for shipping dates before it will even let me pick the service.Not to mention USPS is telling me that 60181 isn\\'t a valid zip code.Think this is dead in the water for me. Ce la vie or whatever. :-)\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nreserve 4 please\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n@EU guys relax: Will adjust price within the next 1-2h, but i cant sit in front the PC the whole day and wait for asicminers news\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI will take 1 blade. make that 2 blades\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nOk I will wait. I find it difficult to get the lable and stuff. Please if its possible sent me a PM where to purchase them.Best Rgards\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nyour a star mate\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nsent the 10 coins. sent an email with a label. between these 2 blades and the 6 discount sticks I got 22-25 hash for about 11 coins nice. thanks again phil\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n ;2; 10 btc will send a label in a few minutes <<<,,,>>> label emailed\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI will take at least one. Will send BTC and label this morning.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI will take one, please. \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nchadbu; 1; 5; \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThis is a legit price drop or has Canary account been hacked? email says google.com but earlier posts of his use gmail.comIf its legit I will reserve 2 units.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\n Does medium priority box work for this?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI believe it is legit. The holy cat announced the price drop here:\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\n10 for me\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\npaid for 2 and sent a shipping label for a medium flat rate box. i want to be sure if i send 5btc for a third will it fit in the medium flat rate. this would be the third blade for the same box.found info that 3 fit in the same box so here is the 5btc for a third blade ;1; 5btc I will send an email later to add this with the first 2\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nbtcee; 5; 25; \\n\\n### Reply 28:\\ngreat sent 15 coins to this\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nwell the friedcat sale is good I was directly contacted by btc-tc via email;Hello philipma1957,A notification has been posted to TAT.ASICMINER. You have received this emailbecause you own shares of announces 3.5btc 10GHs+ Blade AvailabilitySpec: 10GHhash/s guaranteed. Rated speed 10.752GHash/s. Maximum speed of 12.829GHash/s with overclocking and proper cooling.Price: 1-19 - Not shipping, please contact our resellers. 20-99 - 3.9BTC each (0.363BTC/G, 0.304BTC/G overclocked). 100+ - 3.5BTC each (0.326BTC/G, 0.273BTC/G overclocked).For returning customers from former auctions, you can enjoy the price of 3.5BTC each.Former warranty conditions still hold.Mailing address for sales: address for support: purchase, please send your full name/address/zip code/phone number to the mailing address for sales. you for using BTC-TC This is why I believed the canary\\'s thread he is a reseller and friedcat along with btc-tc say use a reseller.I could see no reason to think canary had an issue. Well hopefully your are wrong and this will be okay.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nAhh, I see ... I will edit the first post to only include a quote from the other thread and let people make up their own mind.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nfound a good sign canary owned this and this address transferred to the one in this thread so I think we are good.this moved from canary\\'s group 22-23 btc To the blades for sale btc so I think it is all good\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nWarning, I have tried contacting Canary and he is yet to respond. He always responds fast and he told me he was out of Blades yesterday afternoon. Unless he was really in a hurry he wrote the wrong ema\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 10-13 GH blade, 1 blade, 10 blades, 2 blades, 6 discount sticks\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 12:52:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: *Updated* 0/104 LEFT USED Erupter USB\\'s IN-Hand Ships Immediately .25BTC\\n### Original post:\\nNo longer available - off forum sale Just listed this on the hardware forum, but it essentially larger then most of the Group Buys and it is IN HAND! So why not here as well...I have 104 USB erupters 95 USB erupters 92 USB erupters for sale, and immediate ship. is a picture of the units all working. **UPDATE** SHIPPING FOR EVERYTHING IS NOW 30BTC with HUBS & CABLES, SHIPPING OUT TOMORROW MORNING! - No longer an option to take all 104 but let me know if you want the remainder, post your offers. USB Erupter .35 each .25 eachI would prefer to use pre-paid shipping labels if you have one send it over and it will go out with your own shipping company. Shipping is as follows 1-15 Units = .5BTC16-30 Units = .8BTC31-60 Units = 1BTC61-100 Units = 1.2BTCShipping SummaryYou Buy 2 Units your total would be (2Units x .35each)+ .5BTC shipping ExpressPost = 1.2BTC You Buy 15 Units your total would be (15Units x .35each)+ .5BTC shipping ExpressPost = 5.75BTCYou Buy 30 Units your total would be (30Units x .35each)+ .8BTC shipping ExpressPost = 11.3BTCYou Buy 50 Units your total would be (50Units x .35each)+ 1BTC shipping ExpressPost = 18.5BTCYou Buy 100 Units your total would be (100Units x \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB erupters, HUBS, CABLES\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 16:19:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 87+\\n### Original post:\\nAnother 10 ordered! Also these will should start shipping by Saturday\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 20:01:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 107+\\n### Original post:\\nJust broke 100 miners ordered!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSpeaking of, I will ship to APO/FPO if any of our military friends are interested in setting up a rig abroad\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI just received word that I will be receiving two colors Red & Black in this order I hope the red are metallics!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAnother order of 10 Almost half way to closing this Group Buy\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 20:27:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 117+\\n### Original post:\\nUpdate! Printing Order shipping labels as they come in and shipping tomorrow afternoon!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 21:39:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 122/300\\n### Original post:\\nAll shipping labels are printed for all the orders so far! Any orders coming in will be printed immediately and ship tomorrow afternoon!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 00:36:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 142/300\\n### Original post:\\nAnother order in! Almost at 150!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrder today / Ships tomorrow!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAll order shipping labels printed up to this point!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nTwo more orders received! This buy is offically over 50% complete!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 03:12:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 173/300\\n### Original post:\\nJust broke 200 pieces ordered!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 12:55:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 209/300\\n### Original post:\\nOrder labels printed up to here I have less than 100 pieces left on this buy! Purchase before noon CST and I can guarantee your order ships today!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 13:15:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 209/300\\n### Original post:\\nTwo more orders in! Now we\\'re at 224!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 16:49:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters (discount for gb 1 & 2 - 0.10 btc)#4\\n### Original post:\\n3 Units here:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust a small update.I\\'m expecting a shipment from yxt to arrive any day. Unfortunetly though I\\'ve not received enough units in this first shipment (a second will be sent this week) to send everyone their units - so I will likely ship out what I can in the order I received payment.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPaid for 4 unitsTxID: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSome of the units from this group buy have now been shipped, due to low stock not all have been unfortunetly.If you don\\'t receive a private message by later this evening, you\\'ll be in the second shipment which I expect to receive from YXT at the end of the week.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nfingers and everything else crossed!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNo PM for me i assume that there are a couple of people getting two shipments? as there are people on the list above me who also ordered additional miners after me?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI was in quite an awkward position and tried to distribute the units as fair as I thought possible. For example, I didn\\'t take the full 30 units I have against my name - i took 9. Neither did others, nottm28 didnt receive all 51 units - I was very limited on stock, but am expecting another shipment for the end of this week - which will clear the backlog Unfortunetly it seemed you was at the cut off point I do have some good news for you though, I\\'ll send a PM now.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nArrived and hashing. Thank you. These seem to be slightly different - the bright green LED is now a more subdued yellow.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMy 14 are waiting for me at the post office. Gonna get them now. Thanks OC. Looking forward to package 2!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBloody hell they went quick\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOutcast, any news on my 3 devices please?ta\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThe remaining units should arrive this week.As always I\\'ll ship them the day I get them.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWill all my units be shipped in one go?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYes, the next delivery will clear the back log - you\\'ll get everything in the next delivery as will everyone else.*edit* it looks like I should receive them today looking at the tracking details, as long as its before 3:30pm I\\'ll ship them out today also.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThanks\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nEverything has been shipped enjoy guys. Sent special delivery - will be with you by 1PM tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nStar player OC\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nUpdate:All units have been shipped! Happy hashing - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hey,This group buy is only available to those that participated in group buy #1 and #2 for units at 0.99 BTC Links to those group buys2, you did not participate in those group buys, you can join this one at a slightly higher rate: StructurePrice listed by YXT here: price per unit is: 0.10 BTCThe order handling fee is 0.07 BTC The current shipping price is: 0.18 BTC (may change, so check before paying)For example:for 1 units; (1*0.10) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 0.35 BTCfor 2 units; (2*0.10) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 0.45 BTCfor 3 units; (3*0.10) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 0.55 BTCfor 4 units; (4*0.10) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 0.65 BTCfor 5 units; (5*0.10) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 0.75 BTCfor 6 units; (6*0.10) + 0.07 + 0.18 = 0.85 BTCIf you want 12 units or more, you need to add an extra 0.04 BTC to the order, to cover the extra insurance and shipping costs. If you want 24 units or more, please contact me first. You are limited to the total number of units you\\'ve ordered previously at the price of 0.99 BTCPlease be aware that this group buy may take some time to complete, YXT has a lot of back orders and Friedca\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI didn\\'t even know they were shipped.but got a surprise, go mine today. cheers outcast\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nGot mine too. Many thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nGood to hear they are showing up Happy hashing everyone!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nAny word on the blades?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nStill waiting to hear back from yxt...P.s. I think you possibly put that question the wrong thread, my other thread would probably have been better -> (not that it really matters)\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nYeah, I realised that after I posted. I also realised I didn\\'t care and you\\'d see it anyway.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nBloody hell OC - talk about safe packaging - I had to take my machete to that box many thanks again for getting us the promo price...\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nSorry about the excessive amount of tape, the boxes this time felt a little flimsy so I did some reinforcing. (perhaps went a bit overboard hahaha)No problem\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters, units, miners, blades, machete\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 18:00:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 227/300\\n### Original post:\\nJust ordered three, sent you a PM about getting black ones if possible, thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed! You\\'ll get (3) Black units and Thanks for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf you want to pay in BTCTC, PM me! I\\'ll do discounts on orders over 10 as well\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nA few still available! If you\\'re interested in getting in on this buy now is the time! PM me!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPaypal is a convenient way to pay! Still deciding how much I want and what payment method to go with. Will post again when ready.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks likeBTC! I\\'ll be happy to take your order when you\\'re ready\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThe eagle has landed! I\\'ll be shipping all orders in the next few hours so I might be slow to respond to questions. Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 18:46:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 247/300\\n### Original post:\\n3 more orders just came in and will go out today\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 19:26:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 251/300\\n### Original post:\\nOff to the post office now! All orders received after now will be shipped out tomorrow in the AM.Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 20:17:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [Group Buy Possibility?] XCrowd Hosted Packages\\n### Original post:\\nSo, as many of you likely know, xCrowd offers hosted mining starting at 15TH/s, for $85,000 outright, plus $5,000 per month. I don\\'t want to run a group buy by any means, but would anyone be interested in running a groupbuy of this mining package, where people could buy, say, a minimum of 500GH/s or so, and pay one outright fee, plus a monthly fee, or one outright fee that would cover 6 or 12 months?For one year, the total cost is around $9670/TH, including the monthly fees. To compare, at a rate of $0.16/kWh, 15TH/s buying their units and hosting them in a datacenter, assuming the only datacenter cost is electric (as $0.16 is a bit high for datacenter electricity), would cost around the same ($9750). Just a thought.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI have .086/kwh where I am, and 8 mo/ year no ac would be needed to cool. Plenty of space at 2 joining apartments, (me and a partner) with 2 buisness-level cable connections (2x50, 99.99% uptime).\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI would be interested Here is my proposal, minimum of 500 GH/s so about 27 BTC per share @$104 exchange rate then a 1.2 BTC per share maintenance fee per monthI will collect the funds, pay for the hosted mining, pay the management fee once a month and send dividend payments once weekly.I already have an automatic dividend payment software in place for my other GB.My fee would be 1%The nice part is down payment for service is escrowed, so If Xcrowd does not deliver you get your money back.My identity is already verified with JohnK and Jon at Bitfunder, and have experience with managing several GB\\'s already.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ninterested too, AND i think we get a Difficulty over 350M latest at first half of November. If i understand right they will double to 30TH/s for free (ok, there are monthly costs)DIFFICULTY RISE INSURANCEWe are aware that predicting the difficulty growth rate can be difficult due to the large number of undisclosed miners and new entrants. Thats why were dedicated to offering the best prices now and in the long term. Although the difficulty rate is up at a exponential growth rate we are quite confident that the difficulty rate will not pass 350 Million within 4/5 months as that would require an additional 3 PH or e.g. 50,000+ Gen1 Avalon units to be shipped before December.xCrowd will be the best hedge against near term difficulty increases due to our low prices. Were also offering a discount of 50% to double your hash rate if the difficulty rate rises beyond 200 million before we start shipping. If the difficulty rate passes 200 Million before we start bulk shipping, our customers will receive a 50% discount on any future blade or unit purchases.For example, if you purchase a low-entry eight blade Olympus unit you will be able to upgrade to another additional eight units for just a\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThought you might be interested?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 15TH/s mining package, 2 joining apartments, 2x50 cable connections, automatic dividend payment software, eight blade Olympus unit\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 01:46:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 251/500\\n### Original post:\\nGood news! I have just been infused with 200 more units that will be arriving tomorrow! This group buy is now extended to 500 units!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll orders shipped up to this point!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 07:00:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 258/500\\n### Original post:\\nTwo more orders received, Packed and Shipping in tomorrow\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 16:09:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / WORLDWIDE] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy #6! 202/300\\n### Original post:\\nWell, not many seem to want to take the time to reply about receiving their orders aok and whatnot...but its late enough that I\\'m willing to take a gamble for one Not that I have much sway here on BitcoinTalk but I\\'ll be sure to post a picture when I receive my one USB miner from order #ZTLC-527278 which I\\'m actually only posting now to see if I can request any color BUT black...if there happens to be a choice Thanks much!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYou will receive a red one! Thanks for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI have a good feeling about you so I bit the bullet and ordered 5 more via the btc payment method this time. So I have the one red one on the way paid via PayPal and 5 more paid via BitPay (the other 5 can be any color though...the not black one was for the wifey ). Looking forward to a relaxing week of hunting down a USB hub on some exciting labor day sale...hahaNjoy1\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks Gektek! Your order has shipped and they aren\\'t black this time\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB, USB miner, USB hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 17:51:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL IN HAND/SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #6! 258/500\\n### Original post:\\nAnyone in the UK fancy combining an order to share the shipping cost?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'d be happy to do that for any group of interested buyers PM\\'d!Also, another few orders just went out and I\\'m leaving now to deliver a local pickup!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB GB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 20:39:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [OPEN] HashFast Group Buy #1 1.2BTC/10GH | Cointerra 3.1BTC/50Ghash\\n### Original post:\\nFirst 2 Shares for the HashFast Paid for, I will probably be buying 2-4 as soon as my escrow transactions clear. I have decided to merge my Cointerra GB with Utilibit, and will be taking on the hosting duties for him. His thread:More info: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, Cointerra\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 21:12:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL IN HAND/SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #6! 275/500\\n### Original post:\\nA few more orders in! All new orders ship out Tuesday AM\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-16 23:12:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [COUPONS AVAIL] Block Erupter USB - kosmokramer\\'s customers get BE USB @ 0.195\\n### Original post:\\nToo much $$$$$ Now..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI think the point is to curb high demand.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nglad you got an answer back! unless you got instructions from friedcat to the contrary, the coupon promo is intended to be 1:1. you can\\'t skip those who bought less than 3 units, people are already pissed about coupons, or lack thereof for 100% at the moment no need to upset smaller buyers further. the 30% does not mean folks get 30% based on the order.30% means that the newest 30% of purchasers get he coupon first. 70% will follow later for a grand total of everyone getting a coupon 1:1so say you sold 1000 units and received 300 units for the coupons (this is an example only)... then you take the latest 300 ordered units from that 1000 and they get the 300 coupons 1:1.it is designed to lessen the price drop \"shocks\" which effect mostly the latest buyers.hope this helps.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI was advised that I was eligible to receive a quantity of discounted units equal to 30% of my previous order volume. I received guidelines, but none identical to what you stated. If that is how the larger re-sellers are fulfilling requests, then I will follow suit.I will update my post accordingly so even recent customers who ordered as few as one can claim their discounted units. Essentially, at this point, you\\'re only going to be eligible if you participated in one of my two group buys, which started on 6/25/2013. Orders prior to that are not eligible at this point. If you do not claim your discounted units within 7 days, you will forfeit them.If your order was prior to 6/25/2013, please feel free to still fill out the form and make payment and once friedcat delivers 100% of hardware at the discounted price, yours will immediately ship.I will not entertain pricing discussion other than to say I put a lot of consideration into determining a fair price. Most customers who PM\\'d me suggested comfort at a price equal-to-or-higher than 0.2 BTC if I would consider re-selling again, even publicly.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPositive response has been received from friedcat.Discounted pricing has been extended from ASICM! - extending to you at 0.195 BTC eachI am strictly serving previous customers at this point. If you purchased any Block Erupter USB from me, you are now eligible to receive a discounted quantity of additional Block Erupter USB at only 0.195 each. The pricing is based on an average of the time and materials required from me on all previous orders, and also is less than the average amount customers reported they would be willing to pay if I resumed selling these discounted units. The maximum quantity you are eligible for is equal to the total amount you previously purchased from me.IMPORTANT: ASICM is only providing me with 30% of the discounted hardware at present, and it\\'s been advised by official re-sellers that the 30% is to be distributed on a 1:1 basis starting with most recent orders. Essentially, at this point, you\\'re only going to be eligible if you participated in one of my two group buys, which started on 6/25/2013. Orders prior to that are not eligible at this point. If your order was placed prior to 6/25/2013, please feel free to still fill out the form and make payment and \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAwesome job Kramer!! Price is fine with me... Happy!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m good with the price, it seems fair. Confused on why the ones bought off bitmit are not eligible? Those were the highest priced ones?Anyway I guess this means if it is 100% I can get 15, or only 3 if 30% after 6/25. Ok to pay for the 15?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWhy this? I bought and paid for qty of 10 on Jun 11th.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThat\\'s the procedure, according to official resellers.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSo if I was in one of the group buys starting 6/25 am I entitled to 30% or 100%? And the ones I bought off of Bitmit have to wait till a later date? Just making sure I have this down before I start sending payments\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSo your 30% fell on Jun 25th?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI only brought 3, and currently am earlier than the cutoff date, so none for me but I appreciate Kosmokramer doing this even though he isn\\'t reselling anymore. It should help folks recover some of that ROI\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThat\\'s a good question; I should have clarified earlier. Customers should eventually be eligible to receive 100% of previously ordered quantity at the newly discounted price. However, currently, I can only ship quantities that were ordered on or after 6/25/2013 (my most recent 30% of sales).If you only have orders from before 6/25, please wait until I make an announcement that all customers are eligible. You can make a request now and pay, but you will not receive anything until 100% of hardware is made available to me.If you have orders before and after 6/25, please only request (and pay for) discounted hardware that you ordered on or after 6/25.If you only have ord\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 23:10:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-08\\nTopic: [PAYPAL IN HAND/SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #6! 277/500\\n### Original post:\\nLocal pickup is an option! If you\\'re in the Chicago-land area PM me and I\\'ll be happy to meet up with you\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 04:04:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL IN HAND/SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #6! 308/500\\n### Original post:\\nA few late night orders have arrived!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-28 18:24:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters and Blades #5\\n### Original post:\\nAt the moment one pleasewith major manufacturers (bar butterfly labs) releasing the 100ghps+ machines coming out in few weeks im in two minds.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPrice is still too high for me, so I\\'m no longer interested. If it were about BTC8 I\\'d jump on it. But BTC12 is far too much considering the difficulty increase recently.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNo problem.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPrice is too high for me also (and they still look like a PITA to set up).I\\'m putting my feeble funds into this BitFury group buy, so I might eventually get something out -> \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNo worries.Good luck with that I\\'ll have more USBs very soon if you\\'d prefer those\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ntry this on excelPaste this on cell A2, put quantity on A1Check with OutCast3k if its correct\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nnice, looks OK to me.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThis makes me sad: for BTC5 - I think something\\'s amiss if the best that can be done for EU customers is BTC12. Customs can\\'t be THAT much.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat\\'s the price on the newer USB\\'s ? Any discount for previous buyers?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nFrom another CanaryInTheMine thread\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ni hope i can get some rebate as i paid 10.20btc each for these. now there slashed by 50%\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n*edit* I didn\\'t read everything correctly. Looks like yxt is aware of this, hopefully I\\'ll have a new price in a few hours.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWhoop! Time to cancel my Jalapeno order then?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nOutcast3kdo you think we can get prices for 3.9btc for 20 blades if you set up a group buy for this.just red friedcat\\'s post 20 - 99 miners for 3.9btc and over 100 - 3.5 btcwould be awesome. I would be in for 10 blades\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nLooking into this now...\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nInterested in two blades if you go ahead with this group buy at the new prices\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n4.1BTC for Asia and Oz customers.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIf everyone interested could leave a comment stating how many they\\'d be interested in that would be awesome if we can get enough interest, and do it quick enough I\\'ll start accepting payments sometime late this evening (hopefully).\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAt 3.9 Btc ea I would take 2 or 3 blades\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nin for 10 at 3.9 btc each\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIf around 4BTC I\\'ll take one for definite.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\n14 units so far then. Just 6 more before we hit the 20 required. Nice Just trying to work out the finer details, once sorted I\\'ll start accepting payment for them. (Should be sometime continue to post if interested...\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nIf the new price is around 4btc, get some bigger boxes in stock cause i\\'d order some.Got to keep the postman busy .\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nHehe, any idea of what sort of quantity your thinking of?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\n2 at about 4BTC, if I can get the funds together\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\n2, maybe 3 .\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\n2x please\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nive managed to sort out my bitcoinsso im ready to place an order of 10 blades whenever you decide to set the group up\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nGreat Will announce instructions in the next couple of hours hopefully\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nprobably looking for about 20- 30 blades, if i can get 3.5btc pricethanks\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nI\\'m afraid friedcat as made it clear that 3.5btc is only for previous auction buyers.That counts out the majority of us. But would be sweet to get them at 3.5btc\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\n was under the impression that a purchase of 100 units would put the price at 3.5 btc a unit.AND users who brought from previous auctions can get \"singles\" from him at 3.5 btc with out having to buy 100+ At least thats how I read it...\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nThat\\'s correct. But it means going for 100 blades. Instead of the 20I reckon you should setup two groups. One for 20 blades and the other one for 100 bladesAs the 20 blade group will be filled quicker than 100 blades group.It would be great if we could reach 100 today and place an order.A bit of wishful thinking\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nI reckon 1 group for 100 will easily be met - I want 2 minimum...\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nHmmm..I\\'m thinking so too, i mean we\\'re already over 50 and its only been a few hours...\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nMe too plsBTC3.5 - would be rude not to\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nDoes anyone know what price goes on the declaration form for each blade? (trying to account for import duty - obviously sent emails, no replies yet)\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nCome on guys lets get to 100 if we\\'re at 50 alreadyI\\'m in from 10 to 11 at 3.5btc\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nWell I\\'m in no panic for them, so I could possibly go for two if the GB goes on longer. I\\'m ready to go on one, but happy to wait.\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nWhere did friedcat say that?I doubt it matters that much anyway, we can still put together a group buy for when they restock..\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nGood eye, thanks for pointing it out.Hmmm... I\\'ll get a price from YXT then and get back to you all..\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nWatching this space\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\nI\\'ll be in for a 1 or 2 if you manage to get some. Guess it depen\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB Block Erupters, ASICMiner USB Block Erupters, BitFury, Jalapeno, Blades\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 15:17:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [COUPONS AVAIL] ฿0.162 Block Erupter USB - (kosmokramer\\'s prev customers)\\n### Original post:\\nWeekend Update!I received word last night from our favorite feline friend that the remainder of our coupon units are en route to me. Due to US holiday, I expect delivery mid next week, but have no tracking number to back up that assumption.There is a reason I got out of the reseller game; because this is a difficult position to be in. How can I, in good conscious, continue to sell these units at 0.195 when they\\'ve been delayed and when you can get them from other group buys for 0.18 (plus shipping)!? Beyond frustrated right now, but I\\'m hoping friedcat sees that and works with me on the cost of these final discounted units that have been significantly delayed so I can extend you last lot a little discount that you deserve. For units that already shipped, I think the previous price was fair (you\\'ll have had those 2-3 weeks before others, which means a lot, considering the current difficulty outlook).I\\'m going to take the initiative here and just discount the final batch further to a price I deem fair, considering the recently significantly reduced market price. I think 10% off of market price sounds fair for the time being, with the understanding that I may also reserve the right to\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNice... really appreciate your great work!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 16:46:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL IN HAND/SHIPS NOW] $32.95!~ OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #6! 369/500\\n### Original post:\\nI woke up to over 15 orders! Thanks everyone! Less than 150 units left to go!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 17:12:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 12/12.16 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nIt\\'s good to see that this group buy is finally getting some legs. It may help others decide to join in, if I state my intention to invest all the Bitcoins mined by my USB ASICs during this month into this group buy. I may even throw in some alt-coins, if the weather cools down enough to let me run the GPUs For all the usual reasons, I don\\'t know exactly how much the total will be, but I\\'ll be disappointed if there isn\\'t enough for 6 shares, or half an H-board. But that leaves plenty of room for more boards.For a bit of fun, is anyone prepared to match this?[Remember, don\\'t invest more than you can afford to lose. My contribution is subject to the usual exceptions, war, famine, extreme weather, family changes and so on].\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHa, a challenge, sounds exciting . Maybe I can add to the fun. How about I give 50 YAC (a recent altcoin for those who can\\'t keep up with them all) per paid share in the next component (an H-board) to the purchasers of those shares. This is a kind of cashback or YACback offer if you like. YAC would be paid once the component is ordered and paid for. You never know what your YAC will be worth in a few months time .GB now with YACback offer50 YAC per paid share in the next component to the purchasers of those sharesYAC will be paid once the component is ordered and paid for.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo, my August total was 5 shares in the end, not quite as much as I had hoped. The price of all my alt-coins has dropped dramatically in the past 2-3 days, so I won\\'t be topping-up the shares fund with them, instead I\\'ll carry them and my bitcoin change into September, and make the same pledge. My Jalapenos may arrive this month, but 10Gh/s extra isn\\'t very much in the present circumstances, I may even sell them quickly on eBay and reinvest the proceeds . With so many unknowns it\\'s difficult to predict how much I will mine in the next month, but with two large increases in the difficulty coming up I\\'m being cautious with my estimate ~ perhaps only 3 or 4 shares in September. Pretty much a guess though.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi Stinky_Pete, it\\'s great to have your continued support, thanks for being part of the group. Things are changing rapidly in all bitcoin and altcoin areas at the moment, so let\\'s keep the group informed, dynamic and responsive and see where the next few weeks take us.If you want the YAC from the YACback fun and games from the last component by the way then send me a cryptsy deposit address or YAC wallet address and I\\'ll send these over. I\\'ll send double the promised amount to partially account for the nosedive in the YAC price that we\\'ve seen in recent days.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nVery generous, thanks. Perhaps all the alt-coin prices will pick up \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOK, 500 big ones heading over to your YAC wallet now - enjoy! Yes, it would be good if prices did pick up or I may finally have to turn the GPUs off - a sad day indeed .\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB ASICs, GPUs, H-board, Jalapenos\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 18:49:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 10/11.18 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nWhat is your mining policy?I would prefer the use of P2Pool and merged namecoin mining, but wouldn\\'t want to impose that on the group.If/when my Bitcoin node is up, you may want to add it to the list of manually selected nodes. Again it is not something I would want to impose on the group.My head hurts after trying to figure out if I would be interested in even holding YACoin (what concerns me the most is the 1 minute block interval)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi, that\\'s a good question, thanks for asking. We\\'ve committed in the OP to \"choosing appropriate mining pools to minimise rejects, minimise pool fees (if appropriate) and maximise pool efficiency\". Our primary focus will be to maximise the revenue from the miner for the group, but I do want to protect the network too, so we would try to use smaller pools or P2Pool if they look like competitive options. I\\'ll look in detail nearer the time at how best to balance pool efficiency against pool fees and how merged mining for other coins would affect the profitability of the miner. I have no objection to merged mining, if it represents a better return for the group (although when I was merged mining with GPUs I didn\\'t get much benefit from it). I\\'d be happy to take a vote on some options nearer the time - I perfer a democratic approach. Not sure how well P2Pool would work with the bitfury miners, but the nice thing about bitfury miners is that they have just started being delivered to the first customers, so in a week or so there will be lots of people to ask about details like P2Pool compatibility etc.Don\\'t worry about the YAC, that was a bit of fun for the last H-board collection. The \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi All, if you haven\\'t been watching the bitfurystrikesback thread then I thought that I would share the good news. Punin and his team have dispatched all of the August delivery miners and there are some great pictures and info being posted about the miners and their performance (e.g. These guys have done a great job and their commitment to meeting their delivery estimates and performance is really encouraging for our October orders .\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nTwo more \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitcoin node, YACoin, GPUs, bitfury miners\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 20:08:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL- IN STOCK / 121 Units left] $32.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #6!\\n### Original post:\\n121 left!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPM Sent i have them in cart trying to see discount on larger order before paying!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPM\\'d and Payment received! Thanks!111 units left at this time!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB GB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 22:06:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL- IN STOCK / 110 Units left] $32.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #6!\\n### Original post:\\nHi just wondering if you could give prices to deliver with FEDEX or DHL?USPS shipping is good but doesn\\'t get through customs fast enough in UK..so express shipping is pointless.Fedex and DHL fasttrack through UK customs and bill you later if there is any customs to pay.as my 20 units has been sitting in UK customs since August shipping labels can be a pain. so was wondering if you could look into that? and price it for us for all united Kingdom customers.Regards Mitch\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ll be happy to discuss shipping options on a case by case basis. It\\'s not convenient to me but I would be willing to handle shipments through DHL or Fedex if it made sense for the order.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB GB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-01 17:27:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] [GROUP BUY] Hashfast Babyjet 1.1 btc = 2.5% / ~12.5gh/s (overclock speed)\\n### Original post:\\nGreat offer. To tell you the truth I\\'m currently on the edge between your offer and Burnin\\'s: is 4.46BTC at the moment for 42Ghs with enormous chances that Burnin will raise that board to 80Ghs. Bitfury just delivered on time yesterday for hundreds of small buyers, see: two offers are by far best ones for small miners. I just may go for both, one share in your group buy and later one Burnin\\'s board, it\\'s wise not to put all eggs in one basket.So - yes, you can count me in as committed under two conditions: - Organize John K. or some other respected member as escort, I\\'ll send 1.1BTC- If we can not collect enough committed people before HashFast sells rest of batch #1 (35 left, see: money should be sent back immediately, no group buy for later HashFast offers without miner protection.Good luck to everyone who want to grab this opportunity!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI agree itod, I think these group buys are a great idea. Thanks for the link to burnin\\'s new project. Combine the fact that these companies have put a face and reputation on the line with refund policies and you already have a better deal than Avalon.Also these beasts will be hosted open source by people like myself and bobsag3 and ur0pl and the list goes on... to help keep the network hash out of one big location like professional hosting.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNo problem man, that\\'s what the community is for Let\\'s try to bring this group buy to success if we can, it would be a shame not to be able to organize in time.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThe price is now BTC1.1 instead of BTC1.2 The total price BTC44.12415498 . i\\'ll pay the difference.It looks like ltod would commit. Does anyone else want to commit to buying shares?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI think I can get serraz to do escrow. He is an op of btc-e and co-owner of give-me-coins pool. I have to ask him, but he offered the other day. Maybe once I get him as escrow, many more people will join.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI have also been talking to SebastianJu from the Avalon group buys. That whole mess has left a lot of people weary and tired I think but he always does good work and could hold funds for people and make orders. Of course he does not know the OP so he can not guarantee any safety on what happens after the purchase is made. Ultibit seems to putting together a coherent group buy collective for the lowest possible rates for fastest hash. \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ni will think about doing escrow if theres enough interest in this. Altho the way OP was just talkign on my channel ill have to have a big think about it.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIt is good to see people reasonably talking and considering. I am open for any help that I can offer to any group buy on hosting any miner at no profit. I want technology and freedom meow. Question everything... I really do not want to help people get scammed.. or give all of these hopes of secure almost free hosting and then whoops.. ASIC dev screwed you again.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAgreed i like to try and do what i can for the community. Main reason started my pools. My issues are al these asic companys offering deal that are to good to be true. The personality of the Person preforming the goup buy also has a impact on the group buys. usally if there offering a deal that would mean everyons loss is the same then i guess as long as your willing to accept the loss on your part its ok but thats up to each person.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI am trying to find the most open source and secure solution to these rigs. I love your work on the pools.. really cool to go to your site and see 0% plastered everywhere. I have been working with bobsag3 who will be living close to me. He has teamed up with UltiBit Cointerra Group buys... this may be a direction the OP and others should consider... I plan to host anything I can for the community.I am also considering starting a group buy for my facilities location where truly open source prices will be the hosting % fee. (My Father\\'s large facility so all of the fees are up to him.. i could just say they are gaming towers hogging his dual ISPs data and kWh but he has a PHD in CS and is privy to the network and willing to see his son work).\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThe fees will have to go back to 1% soon (gotta pay for servers ) i still think its fair tho. Appriciate your feedback on the website we spent alot of time on the pool. If you do decide to use us for hostign pleaase let me know and we can work out somethign to help your group or hosting area we are always looking for new ways to support what people want. The BTC pool needs some love were still workign on new features to draw users\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI think merging the group buys to accelerate the group buy completion is a good idea, if you can get it organized.I will commit to 2 shares at 1.1BTC each (2.2BTC Total) under the same conditions mentioned by itod.I will also require the organizers personal info (name, a\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Hashfast Babyjet, Bitfury, Avalon, ASIC\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-02 06:01:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] [GROUP BUY] Hashfast Babyjet 1.08 btc = 2.5% / WE HAVE ESCROW NOW\\n### Original post:\\nOkay. I secured another buyer. We now have only 19 out of 40 shares left.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Hashfast Babyjet\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-25 10:30:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1.15 BTC = 5.7GH/s KnCMiner Jupiter. No fees. 6 SOLD! #7 =1/54\\n### Original post:\\nHi,Correct me if I\\'m wrong but if I were to purchase some shares now it\\'ll go for machine # 7 that hasn\\'t been purchased yet?Say that it gets funded within 10 days, what is the estimated delivery date?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo, what\\'s the price per share now? Is it 1.15BTC or 1.55BTC or ?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1.55 btc is a little too high considering today\\'s bitcoin price which is around $100. I\\'d consider buying a share here but not at the current price.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nme too\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAs Adeel stated previously, since Knc bases the price of the miner on USD, the price is $130 per share ... which at current BTC mtgox price of $102, would come out to 130/102 = 1.27 BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks for helping me out soapmodem, I partially tore my ACL so I\\'ve been MIA for 3 days, my humble apologies, however he is correct, since bitpay takes money based on current USD prices, the price of 130 USD matters most for us and matters at the date when we purchase the actual system from kncminer.com. If you have any questions, feel free to shoot me an email at adeel06@gmail.com. Thanks guys,-Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPayment made by Paypal for 3 shares.Transaction ID: to this address: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAny updates or is this a bust?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m starting to think this is a bust.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYou must have busted brains if you think you can make even ROI on the KNC machines now, they will ship in October at the earliest if you order today, assuming they are on schedule for delivery, which is a BIG assumption and will likely ship later like all these other pre-order group buys. By October/November, difficulty will have climbed to over 100 Million. You will be lucky to get your money back.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nGuys, the first batch of units that Adeel put in orders for were 5 weeks ago or more, including the two that I purchased. I asked KnC about them and they\\'re in the group that will be shipping at the end of Sept. or early October which is nearly the best you can ask for because everything depends on KnC delivering as planned. I\\'m also in talks with Adeel and he has a medical issue right now which is why he isn\\'t able to be responding on here recently. This isn\\'t a bust, just be patient. The option remains the same. If you want a share of a KnC Jupiter unit, this is one of the few last organized group buys that can still give you that chance. Everybody keeps speculating about ROI, but no one knows what will happen regarding that. As everyone says including the core developers for bitcoin, don\\'t invest more than you are willing to lose. If you think this is a bust, it\\'s not. If you think this is a risky investment, that\\'s a decision you must make for yourself and stop whining about it. It is what it is.Whatever the case, if BTC is $300 six months from now, good luck turning back time to purchase a few shares...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHey guys, I\\'m sorry for being away for so long! I was worried that all hell would have broken loose by now, but thank god everything is okay over here . To everyone who sent payment while I was away, can you please send your payment info, receiving address and transaction ID to me in a private message. Anyway, due to the fact that I am in Oklahoma, the hospital I had my surgery at is actually a Cardiac response hospital and they made me have to live without a cell phone due to people with pacemakers. I have some other news to report, this system will be the last system that we sell shares for in regards to this group buy. We have been selling a large amount of systems locally for a higher markup and have decided that after this system, we will no longer sell anymore on bitcointalk. For this reason, if you are interested in getting in now, please do. These systems will be run for 2 years or until they are no longer profitable and then we will hopefully sell the system and split up the money from the sale as per your share holdings. Also, if you purchase shares over the amount that is available for the last system, you will be refunded. Thank you for your time and \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAlso, I am going to post some pictures tonight of some of the equipment we already purchased. We have installed 2 central air conditioning units and also purchased a separate portable 12,000 BTU unit so that we can make sure the systems are always run at the optimum temperature. There is also a dehumidifier in the location to ensure that the systems don\\'t have to operate in a wet environment.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAlso, in the future if there is any trouble contacting me, feel free to message mupartee and ask him to call me.-Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nIs there any shares left and what would be the price i need to pay for them?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nInterested to get some shares too. Still available at 1.15 BTC?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThere might be some shares left, I\\'ve asked Adeel to figure that out. There were some outstanding\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter, central air conditioning units, portable 12000 BTU unit, dehumidifier\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-02 20:43:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] AVALON, BITFURY & BFL SHARES (250 GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\nShares:I\\'m selling shares from the invested 250 GH/s. At the moment only 70 GH/s are available for sale.20 / 90 (+30 Bonus) Shares \"First Round\": 1. InvestmentBonus Pool: 15 Sharesper Share: 0.3 Bonus SharesBonus Shares \"Second Round\": 2. InvestmentBonus Pool: 15 Sharesper Share: 0.175 Bonus SharesAccounting: donePrice:SOMMER SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 2 Shares = 2 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plzShareholders:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAhhhh.... Tempting. If have btc available after my next few trades, I\\'ll take some more.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nShares:I\\'m selling shares from the invested 250 GH/s. At the moment only 70 GH/s are available for sale.17 / 90 (+30 Bonus) SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 2 Shares = 2 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nShares:I\\'m selling shares from the invested 250GH/s. At the moment only 90 GH/s are available for sale.14 / 90 (+30 Bonus) SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 2 Shares = 2 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nTwo more please:mistermint; 2; 0.906; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n12 / 90 (+30 Bonus) SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 2 Shares = 2 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plzShareholders:\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNEWS:Today the BitFury Starter Kit August arrived!i put it in a box until the case will arrive tomorrow ... and .... turn on!Im unsure about the pool at the moment advice?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGreat news, great pics And how about merged mining some altcoins?Here\\'s a pool for it: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nmining started ... horray!!!thx to bitfury keeping their promise ... even more!on the planned 25 GH ... we are now running with 35-40 GH\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON, BITFURY, BFL SHARES (250 GH/s), BitFury Starter Kit\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-03 04:32:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1.55 BTC = 5.7GH/s KnCMiner Jupiter. No fees. 6 SOLD! #7 =1/54\\n### Original post:\\nBUMP. We will no longer be offering shares very soon so get in while you can. Remember we have very early ship dates for our systems.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNickem just purchased 100 shares for 2 of our systems that were early ordered.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-03 14:47:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [NEW ULTIMATE Group Buy][COINTERRA 2 Th/s]1.0BTC=16 Gh/s[14/25] (John K. Escrow)\\n### Original post:\\nI am in for 2.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nconfirmed\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI will be posting a massive amount of info and pictures on the temporary hosting facility (incase any of my customers current miners to switch locations), and laying out detailed info for the permanent location for all the miners.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi, i am in for 2.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nXlt! Let\\'s go:My 1 share that I\\'ve promised (direct without escrow): PM you details.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nnice one Fraggi, you just made escrow possible!ESCROW NOW LIVE - PLEASE SEND PLEDGES AND PAYMENTS TO JOHN K! HE WILL BE ABLE TO REPLY TO THEM THIS WEEK (MOST LIKELY BEFORE SEPT 8 2013)\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nthanks Dawie\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: COINTERRA 2 Th/s\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-03 18:19:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED - OUT OF STOCK] $32.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #6!\\n### Original post:\\nUPDATE : 8/29/2013 - \"ALL ORDERS IN THIS GROUP BUY WILL START TO SHIP AS EARLY AS TOMORROW\"UPDATE : 8/30/2013 - \"ALL ORDERS WILL SHIP TODAY\"UPDATE : 8/31/2013 - \"ALL INVENTORY IN-STOCK AND ORDERS SHIPPING ON DEMAND\"Inventory in hand and shipping NOW! TO MY GROUP BUY #6 FOR ASICMINER USB ERUPTERS! As you know I have been selling ASICminer USB\\'s and Accepting Paypal as the payment option. I have sold over 1500+ USB\\'s WORLDWIDE to happy customers! Group Buy #1 Located Here : Buy #2 Located Here : Buy #3 Located Here : Buy #4 Located Here : Buy #5 Located Here : to know more about me? Join my Facebook Group Buy! customers PM me before purchasing for a special offer Current Price as of 8/28/2013USD $32.95If ordering over (10) PM me for bulk discounts*BTC 0.25*=>USA Domestic Shipping is FREE and orders over 50+ units now get FREE EXPRESS Shipping is $40 or 0.35BTC FOR UP TO 14 UNITS and If you want to buy more just PM me =>Need Express shipping? Just send me a PM before ordering!Current Inventory Available : SOLD OUT!Current Delivery Date: Inventory IN HAND Current Shipping Date: September 3rd[[ How to Buy ]]Paypal : Go he\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer USB Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 06:00:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ฿0.162 Block Erupter USB w/ free USPS - [kosmokramer\\'s prev customers claim now]\\n### Original post:\\nInventory has arrived! If you have an order with me and have paid, it will ship tomorrow morning.If you are eligible for discounted hardware (i.e. previously ordered from me before 6/25/2013), you now have exactly 36 hours left to complete your order. The timer is short because I have now been accepting orders for several weeks and it\\'s time to wrap this up. If you don\\'t claim your hardware by 9/5/2013 @ 6am (PDT), you will forever forfeit your claim to discounted ASICM hardware through me.Thanks for your business, your patience, and your support all along. Happy hashing!Timer removed. End time: 2013-09-05+08:00:00\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m happy to see this timer, @kosmokramer. It\\'s about time you enjoy your well earned freedom from all these induced obligations. Reminds me of a quote from The Godfather: \"Just when I thought I was out...they pull me back in.\" \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSubmitted - thanks kosmo!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAll orders received up until now have been boxed up and will be going out tomorrow morning. Tracking numbers have been emailed.I do have some inventory that has been declined and will likely be making that available publicly tomorrow when I get a chance at 0.17 - 0.18 BTC each with free First Class Shipping, which means you\\'ll essentially be getting market group buy pricing for hardware that will ship out for free, ASAP. Keep an eye out for an order form to pop-up tomorrow for that limited inventory as I want to get rid of it and move on.Thanks again all for your patience and support - the kind emails keep rolling in and mean more than you know. You\\'re all great. This will be wrapped up by week\\'s end one way or another, unless (as @macromode stated) \"they pull me back in\", haha.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 11:18:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [HOT] KNCminer SHARES Jupiter 400GH/s PRICE DROP mid Nov Delivery Stay Tuned!!!\\n### Original post:\\ni dont understand what you are trying to say. what do you want?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n(I also own 2 KNCminer pre-orders placed on 7/6/13- #15xy 1 Jupiter & 15xz 1 Saturn - pretty useless if in late, and I would like to share them here if we\\'ll find them some-way useful..)these DO NOT COUNT. since you have not paid. your pre-orders expired after 7 days and you went to the back of the line. please do not mislead people.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTo help people like me that atm can\\'t afford a single KNCminer Jupiter for their own, to buy together at least one of them and share their mining resources!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you, I know that! It is written that they are pretty useless... I can remove that line who survived the post draft.. if it may help!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNCminer Jupiter 400GH/s, KNCminer pre-orders #15xy 1 Jupiter, KNCminer pre-orders #15xz 1 Saturn\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 14:35:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED THANKS!] - NOW $45 SHIPPED ASICminer Erupter USB GroupBuy#4! 110+\\n### Original post:\\nGB #4 CURRENTLY CLOSED! THANKS EVERYONE! 8/14 UDPATE : PICKING UP ALL ORDERS ON 8/15 & SHIPPING ON 8/16 THANKS!8/16 UDPATE : ALL INTERNATIONAL & LARGE ORDERS SHIPPED THIS AFTERNOON -- ALL DOMESTIC ORDERS (14 or less) SHIP TOMORROW IN THE AM -- GROUP BUY #5 OPENING TOMORROW THANKS!Hi Everyone! WELCOME TO MY GROUP BUY #4 FOR ASICMINER USB ERUPTERS! As you know I have been selling ASICminer USB\\'s and Accepting Paypal as the payment option. I have sold over 700+ USB\\'s so far to happy customers! Group Buy #1 Located Here : Buy #2 Located Here : Buy #3 Located Here : to know more about me? Join my Facebook Group Buy! customers PM me before purchasing for a special offer Current Price as of 8/10/2013USD $45.00If you intend to purchase more than 20 ASICminer USB\\'s CONTACT ME FIRST. I have special discounts and new payment options!USA Domestic Shipping is FREEInternational Shipping is $35 FOR UP TO 14 UNITS! If you want to buy more just PM me Need Express shipping? Just send me a PM before ordering![[ How to Buy ]]Paypal : Go here => BitPay : Go here => Click Here to CheckoutClosing in : Timer removed. End time: 2013-08-13+24:59:59\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nReceived paypal shipment detail update.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n< to on Miner #4.Let me know.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust got a new laptop for school and want to throw the old one out. Also, changed to an online wallet so can\\'t transfer the address over.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHave \"HashFast Baby Jet Miner #7\" been delivered? and why is \"Cointerra group buy\" not on \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMust say that they plan to deliver Oct 20-30 - No prototype workin yes afaik\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ll take one @ 2.5\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPayment: again, WH. Awesome as ever\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHello,Did you accept Paypal or CC for joined BUY BabyJet ?Virgo\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHow many share left now ? Virgo\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'ll take 2 share, did you accept Paypal payment ? I don\\'t have coin yet.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Miner #4, laptop, HashFast Baby Jet Miner #7\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-21 06:12:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN]Group Buy#9 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.31 BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nAny orders placed after this post, prices and shipping have been adjusted as follows:USA OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1-99 0.31 BTC 100+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.USA USPS priority shipping 0.08 btc 1-14 minersUSA USPS priority shipping 0.14 btc 15-100 miners, each additional 1-100 miners 0.07 btcUSA USPS express shipping 0.50 btc per 100 miners, each additional 1-100 miners 0.25 btcInsurance (Optional)0.015 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, No Maximum Per OrderCANADA OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1-99 0.31 BTC 100+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.Canada shipping1-14 0.35 BTC per 1-14 miners USPS Priority Mail International Shipping No Tracking/No Insurance Available - 6 to 10 average business day delivery to major destinations.Any Size Order 0.65 BTC per 100 miners USPS Priority Mail International Shipping Includes Tracking - 6 to 10 average business day delivery to major shipping 1.05 btc per 100 miners USPS Express Priority Mail International Shipping Includes Tracking - 3 to 5 average business day delivery to major (Optional)0.02 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, $500 Maximum Per Order not available with 0.35 BTC \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nany refunds for previous group buy #9ers?i originally bought at .35, got a refund at .33. didnt bother getting a refund at .32, but now its another bitcent cheaper maybe its worth it\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCould someone please confirm the receiving of erupters ordered via this group buy? And how many time passed from placing an order to receiving it in hand, if you can.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNo. Your orders have been placed and will ship this week. The new prices are for new orders only.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThis group buy has not shipped yet. Orders ship this week for orders placed previously. New orders from today forward ship by a week from now on the 27th of August (maybe slightly sooner).\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi Just ordered 10 pcs of the Asicminer Erupter USB minersPlease confirm, when you recieve the orderBest RegardsPeter\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYour order is confirmed. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAre we still lookin at Tuesday/Wednesday shipping? Every day counts when you\\'ve got 60+ on the way!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nBump for SSB. Great service, CHEAPEST PRICES going.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWhen do you think they\\'ll be shipping?Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nFirst time customer. I order 20 at .31 each = 6.2 coins shipping is .14 total is 6.34. I insure for 200 add .03. The grand total is 6.37 coins for 20 sticks correct? you ship usps priority mail what day do you ship the 27th?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYes. Some USB Miners and some blades arrived today. Orders should be shipped in the next two days. Please continue ordering as I have more on the way!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThank you for the kind comment. The next 48 hours I will be busy shipping out orders. I may be slow to respond to PMs. If you send in payment, your new orders will be placed. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThis week current orders. Seven days or less for new orders.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nWelcome! Should ship by the 27th at the latest for USB miners. Most likely will be sooner for the first few orders that come in this week. Thank you for any order placed. I will treat you right. Many thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n8/19/13 Some USB miners and blades arrived today. More will be here tomorrow and in the coming days. I will be busy the next 48 hours shipping out orders. PMs may not be answered right away. Any payments/new orders will be placed for shipping by August 27th from me. Thank you for the patience while I get your orders shipped.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\ncant wait to get my hands on those usb miners\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSilentSonicBoom,I just want to check if you have new info from friedcat concerning the 30% limit on the 0.1 BTC promo.few sellers seems to have started honoring 100% previous purchases.Thanks,\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThere is no new info. Once any details are released, I will post them in my current group buy. My promos have been handled. Once more are made available to me, the proper customers will get them. Update on shipping, about 33-43% of orders shipped on Tuesday, other remaining orders should ship Wednesday. Some tracking numbers have been sent out. There will be delays in remaining tracking numbers as shipping is my first priority and I have a real life job. Tracking numbers will all be sent by Thursday at the latest(most Wednesday or already sent). Thank you for your patience. Any orders being placed right now should ship in 7 days or less from me(possibly sooner). I will be confirming new orders in the coming days. Shipping first, tracking numbers second, new order confirmations third. Thank you for your loyal support.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nDropped in my order today. 11 x Miners.Cannot wait to get cracking!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nDude... You Rock!!!!! Thanks for the heads up and looking forward to mining..\\n\\n#\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-31 02:05:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 NEW Blade Miners 4 BTC or less!\\n### Original post:\\nNew prices are up! Thank you for your orders!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSSB,The price starts to become attractive.Can you provide more info about what is provided and missingPSU requirements. Fans?When you say backplanes with 10 slots, is it the rack that you can populate 10 blades in it?or you mean the blades posses backplane connectors?this part isn\\'t clear.thanks,\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDo these have ethernet connections like the last ones? Considering purchasing, just need some additional details on the hardware.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI as well would love to know this.. LOVE how the old blades run on their own, it would be cumbersome to have to string raspberry pi\\'s all over the place for USB\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThe only info I have received is posted. I will try to get answers to these questions. Thanks for asking.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIn addition to those questions above clearing up technical specs can you ask about what these can stably be overclocked to and if it is the same process as the \"old\" Blades?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi I am interested but I want to know more.Do the blades have everything needed to run \\'out of the box\\' ?Or is additional hardware needed, such as backplane, PSU, cabling, etc?Are they self sufficient, or do you need to run/manage them from a PC?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nDont know if you guys saw canarys group buy, but he says these new ones are not oc\\'able and have a USB connection(not sure if that means no ethernet connection or not)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIf I buy 1 blade I will pay 4 btc and 0.60 btc for USPS Express Priority Mail International Shipping. Is it right ?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHopefully they will have both connections on them. Power consumption has a lower value so these are more efficient, I\\'m guessing 65nm? IMO the power savings are negligible right now since you can still OC the old blade and get a couple extra G\\\\hash per device and be mining with it tomorrow. The new blades will make BTC longer however since it will take longer to reach the point where the cost of power is greater than the return.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPower consumption is the same... old blade @ 10GH is around 75watts or so, new one is 7w/GH so... 70watts @ 10GH .. roughly the same =P\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nwhat about long pool rj45 or USB ?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nBump for SSB. I\\'m sure he will give us more info as soon as he receives it.You could trust SSB with your sister . Feel free to use that as a customer testimonial lol.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAre these pretty easy to use? plug-n-play?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\ndont think they will be plug and play, but if you have mined before it should be pretty straightforward.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAll orders must pay shipping. There is no free shipping option. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n8/29/13 AsicMiner is to ship New Blade Miners on Monday at the latest. They should arrive in 7 days or less to me(Possibly Friday September 6th from FedEx) ,then I reship within 24 hours of my receiving your order from AsicMiner.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nNo.0.80 btc per 3 blades, 0.35 btc for each additional 1-3 blades USPS Priority Mail International Shipping Limited Tracking - 6 to 10 average business day delivery to major destinations.1.20 btc per 3 blades, 0.60 btc for each additional 1-3 blades USPS Express Priority Mail International Shipping Limited Tracking - 3 to 5 average business day delivery to major destinations.It is 1.20 btc for the first 3 blades.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n11.7 btc sent ! (for 3 blades)Shipping address: Number of blades: 3Type of shipping: USPS Express Priority Mail International Shipping\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nGreat news guys for those people who ordered blades at over 10btc I got an email from friedcat sales team.And they will be doing a rebate with new boards. Details to be announced to the suppliers in September.Which is in a few days\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nOrdered 2 blades.Details in PM.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nIf they are anything like the last blade a 750 watt is not going to cut it due to the 10 amp current each blade pulls. You will be lucky to get 4-5 working stable.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nOrdered 1 and sent payment.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\n10 amp * 12v = 120w.You are saying these will only do 11w / GH/s?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThese do 7w/GH...\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\n8/30/13 Thanks for all the Please continue placing orders. I will be trying to take a well deserved break the next three days to prepare for an exodus of miners next week from me to you my valued customers. I will not be answering any PMs for the next three days but do have a portable wallet with me to continue placing orders daily with AsicMiner. I have multiple orders scheduled to arrive this coming week. PMs being answered next week will slow to a crawl as well. My priority is to ship out orders and tracking numbers. To this effect, I have taken off work next Tuesday-Friday to send orders out. I am a one man crew as my help(son) went back to college and the wife has about had it with miners I will be back at this in full force all of ne\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: New Blade Miners, PSU, Fans, Backplane, Raspberry Pi, USPS Express Priority Mail International Shipping, AsicMiner, New Blade Miners, 750 watt, 10 amp current, 12v current\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, True, True, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-30 21:52:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 USB Miners 0.17 BTC or less!\\n### Original post:\\nIt is now open. Thank you for your orders and enjoy!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nordering 14 now.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThank you!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOrder for 1 on the way\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nInterested. I\\'ll see what I can arrange after I get off work in a few hours.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPM and BTC sent!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nall I\\'ll say is...pm & BTC sent.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks every one for the orders and words of support. It means a lot to me.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAnd what about Group 9? I paid you 29PCS 9 days ago for almost double price and up today no delivery, no tracking number. It is bad for me. Will you make any compensation for it?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThat\\'s the way that the game works, ASICMiner decides the prices and the resellers adjust their prices accordingly. It is not something that can be predicted. The price of the Group 8 units I ordered when from 0.45 to 0.31 to 0.17 and they are still in transit (The disadvantage of International ordering, and manufacturing delays are part of the ASIC game). Anyway, you cannot expect a ROI on these units (even at the current IMO SSB runs the best GB for these units (especially for International orders), I am extremely happy with the service so far. Think of your future savings on your future orders\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'ll take 10 please, payment tonight when I get home from work.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOnce again Silent Sonic Boom delivers a package of properly packed and shipped miners right to my door!Thanks SSB! Will order soon again soon enough!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPM and BTC sent. I guess I\\'ll have to get another USB hub now.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n+9001 rep for SSB. Helped me out concerning a bad situation I\\'m in (I won\\'t go into details). Extremely responsive and very flexible. THANK YOU!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI know how that feels, I think I\\'m gunna have to grab a Rosewill 10 port HUB myself. Ugh, I\\'m so tempted to add another miner to my order now with the new low price..\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n0.17? Selling for $100 on ebay a few days back when I checked. Genuine sellers on this forum?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWhen I last checked it was around 50$, I\\'m expecting prices go to down on ebay soon because of these prices. SSB is a official US reseller for ASICMiner so yes. He is Genuine, Ebay is just slow and a ripoff.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI\\'ll have 2 good sir!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nPM Sent!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nQuick question since you didn\\'t mention it, is this group buy open to anybody?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAll orders must pay shipping. There is no free shipping option. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nYour order ships tomorrow. A few extra miners will be included. I have no control over price changes. These were ordered at the old higher prices. Please see my latest update. Thanks for the order.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI believe I have contacted you since this post. Please see group buy #9 thread for update. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nThank you. It is appreciated!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThanks for the kind words. You are very welcome.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThanks for the reply. I try my best. Sometimes things don\\'t work out like lost shipments from DHL that still never arrived. friedcat did send replacements which is awesome.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nDo you think that it would be feasible for asicminer to continue to drop prices after this latest one or are we at rock bottom.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nNext week they are going to pay you to take them.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nHopefully I will be able to ROI on my shipping costs.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nPM Sent +1 BE for i3lome orderTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nSSB, you need a referral program! I\\'ve been sending quite a few people over to ya!\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nOrder placed!Look forward to seeing this latest revision\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nThe blue ones are nice.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\n0.75 sent to with details\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nPlaced another order for 6 more miners. Btc sent. See pm. Thanks in advance!\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nI sent you a pm. Please reply when you get a chance.\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nI have sent too.8 hours no reply.I hope we are not scammed\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nSSB has sent out literally thousands of these over a number of group buys. I know that I\\'ve bought from several of them. He\\'s not a scammer. Most likely just has a busy schedule and will reply as soon as he can.\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nDepending on the BTC price, he might be able to cut the price in half one more time, but that would probably approach production costs.Actually, it\\'s not the price that has been going down, but the difficulty that has been going up. EDIT: another interesting observation: the cost of the hubs/postage/other infrastructure is starting to become dominant.\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nYeah i know that, so i used proper emoticon\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nI\\'m buying one or two later today!\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nordered 6 miners, Btc sent, PM sent, Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nSecond order placed for a further 9 on top of the original 6. PM and payment sent. Thanks again\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\ni\\'m a little confused... sorry if it\\'s horribly obvious, but for shipping,\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, USB hub, Rosewill 10 port HUB\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-04 23:10:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿2.5 = 20GH/s *All 7 Miners PAID\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll take that share, consider it reserved.Payment coming.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwaldohoover, please check PM. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nthen i will take the last one\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJust to say hi to all other shareholders from the latecomer, glad to be in the group. Good luck to all of us and I hope HashFast will deliver on time.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 00:25:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ฿0.171 Block Erupter USB w/ free USPS - [LIQUIDATION - PUBLIC SALE\\n### Original post:\\nThank you! Was eagerly waiting for this...Just submitted my order. I hope you clear out the inventory (I only needed a small number, but the price is very competitive and your shipping time is probably one of the best here). I hope others buy from you (saving one or two bitcents on the price + free shipping)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 00:49:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ฿0.171 Block Erupter USB w/ free USPS - [IN-STOCK - PUBLIC SALE STARTS NOW]\\n### Original post:\\nWow, 20 minutes - you all bought me out in 20 minutes. May be more stock available tomorrow depending on how many discounts are claimed. If you just ordered, it will ship out tomorrow AM. Have a good night!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ndamn... it was still green when i clicked... but i decided to first write my letter...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 05:05:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB] [Price Update] [Australia]\\n### Original post:\\nI was after a couple more. is the send address still the same?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPrice Update:0.17 btcUpdate on new revision blades.Out of Flat regular shipping cost of 0.05 BTC and express shipping cost of 0.10 BTC on all orders across Australia.New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore and South Asia region. Shipping costs will depend on size of order and contact me via PM or IRC (leotreasure).In case of malfunctioning USB miners, replacements will be issued on receipt of faulty device up to 3 months from date of shipment.Expected returns & Disclaimer:I make no guarantee that a 100% return on investment will occur. This is a high risk investment. You might not make any bitcoins. After sale technical support is not included. Nothing in here is financial advice. If in doubt, consult a qualified financial planner. About me:OTC: make bitcoin themed music like this - am based in Sydney and have been on the 7:30 Report exposing the Crypto Exchange scam - very active in the local Bitcoin community here and am a long term believer in its success.Personal disclosure: I hold ASICMINER shares.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSome info on ROI / break even from my existing two BEs.Each is currently pumping out 0.00367018 BTC per day at ozcoin pool using POT (pay on target) which is only slightly below what DGM would pay out. At 0.17 BTC each, it would take you 46 days to make back that investment. This disregards power consumption and future increases in diff, which will probably +10-30% per every 2016 blocks for the foreseeable future.So I think that these will probably pay for themselves within 3-4 months at current prices. That is pretty good I suppose...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nextra\\'s ordered. PM and BTC sent.thanks for the great price for local units.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n the \"Guess difficulty change% each adjustment:\" at 20 even ...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPurchase one of these earlier today looking forward to seeing it in the mail.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAnd in Russia send?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n11 orders sent and paid. ship to the Philippines\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMoar...Any stock left, Leo?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPut me down for 3 please Leo, just waiting on bitcoin release\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYes, a little more left. Please use same address as before. I have red and black. Please let me know which colour (if important) ASAP.Hi Phil, please use same address as before.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nBlack, black n black pls\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nJust sent payment for my order, very smooth so far..\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nput me up for 3, pm sentCheers\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\ncrap, you didn\\'t tell me you had red ones..\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHi LeoIt was nice meeting you in person. I\\'m happy with the new additions to my BE collection Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHi,Payment sent for 15 USBs.details sent through PM.please confirm the same.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\norder arrived safely.very quick delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWTB 5 block erupters. Please check your PMs, Leo\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nAny left?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nDo you also sell blades?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nLeo does, but he doesn\\'t have any in stock ATM\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nHey Leo, got my latest batch in the post yesterday, thanks.Phil.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nHeh, I know Leo is a reliable guy so I\\'d ... almost ... consider wasting 4BTC on a blade to get one to try adding it to cgminer and help with support.(Pity AM are too greedy to consider that ... I gotta love paying money ... to DO support and help AM make money )If they were in stock and 2BTC that probably wouldn\\'t be a loss for me either ...At 20% diff change each diff, if you got one today, it would make ~3.25BTC in 100 days (and 4.08BTC in 300 days)So are these things actually even available yet?(Difficulty is changing to 87Mil some time in ~ the next hour)Edit: well - forget about it - AM failed to do the USB connector it seems.So it\\'s just a speed limited version of the old LQ GetWork Blade ...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, ASICMINER shares, extra\\'s, red and black USBs, red USBs, block erupters, blades\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 08:43:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ฿0.171 Block Erupter USB w/ free USPS - [LIQUIDATION - PUBLIC SALE STARTS NOW]\\n### Original post:\\nAs stated yesterday, I am now making available some of the discounted units that have thus far been forfeited. Starting tomorrow at 8am (PDT), the entire lot of forfeited inventory will be up for grabs. Currently, a small portion is available for purchase.Again, all inventory is in-stock and ready to ship ASAP (within 24-hours, but likely same day).Units are currently priced at 0.171 each and include FREE USPS SHIPPING. Minimum order quantity is 5 units.If you want 50 or more units, please PM me to arrange an order for an additional discount.Please use this form to view inventory status and purchase forfeited inventory.I\\'ll update my OP later, but for those of you are have been PMing me and watching this thread, consider this your early head start.SOLD OUT OF EXTRA INVENTORY - MORE INVENTORY MAY BE ANNOUNCED MID-DAY 9/5 (Thursday)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-05-02 09:36:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Avalon ASIC Chips - Escrow by John K. (Eastern Europe / Romania)\\n### Original post:\\nGreat choice in Escrow... Go Eastern Europe secure the network!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGreat initiative. Also, I agree, John K is a great choice for the escrow.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPS: I can issue an escrow address when there\\'s more than 5+ buying interest in this. Thanks and good luck.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nif we find someone that can make boards with the chips , im in, if not, i have no use for chips ...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWe have 3 guys already building their prototypes. Plus we will have the full schematic of the Avalon device early in May. Even i want to take a shot at it So the answer to your thoughts is YES, we will have boards/devices.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nok, im in\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nill be in too for 32 once escrow is available\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI am also in, for 20 and, (probably 40), chips if I can get my hands on enough BTC.I will use John K. for Escow, I don\\'t yet have enough BTC to buy and other processes take waaaayyy too long to validate.ThanksFFMG\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSure, but no rush. We have time at least until mid-May. After that, it would be nice to have the all the BTC in the escrow account so we can launch the order. The sooner we order, the sooner will it ship.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYes, by mid-May I should be able to do the transaction(s). At the (slow), rate I am mining I might _just_ make it in time FFMG\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nEdit: Order status to \"Waiting\" (for more interest). After we have an escrow address, i\\'ll change back to \"Open\"\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nokay, ill keep watching\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI can commit to the European group buy with the most momentum over the next two weeks. If this is you, you have an order of at least 200 chips from me. Obviously I would need you to send them to burnin or another equally reputable assembler by then.About the customs fee, what is the rate in Romania? My research show it as 19% on total including s&h. I assume once you have the chips with the customs paid in Romania, the chips can travel, customs fee free, anywhere in the EU. Avalon -> Romania (pay customs fee) -> eu assembler (no customs fee) -> eu customer (no customs fee).\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIndeed, the goods can travel freely in the EU after you have paid the customs tax. I\\'m not sure about the import tax, though. Every single item type has a different import tax. A hazardous material costs much more than electronics, for example. I also do really hope that the documents will not show the value of the goods, however, i doubt it. In that case, the tax will be calculated based on value. I\\'ll make some calls to a few co-workers and i\\'ll get back to you today in the evening, GMT+2 time.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nGroup Buy Sent to: t13hydra on: Today at 08:34:50 AM You have forwarded or responded to this message. Quote Reply Delete Steve,I am interested. Is there enough interest to execute the order?If we proceed I would be buying 200 chips.Kong\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nYesterday i\\'ve had a small chat with company about the devices for these chips. Practically we can throw almost any amount of devices at them and they can execute in a few weeks (2-3) tops, which brings me to a conclusion that they have a big capacity, specially for low or medium complexity boards. The greater news about this is that they can build custom devices housing 20, 60, 180, even 640 or 1280 chips. More info to come in a few days, keep your eyes on the thread!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nwow, great news here..interested.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nGreat idea I\\'m in for 20 chips.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nEscrow contract: PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The escrow address for t13hydra\\'s group buy would be: state and agree to the conditions (if item is received damaged, item lost with tracking, customs fee etc) beforehand.If possible, GPG sign your agreement to prevent any discrepancies later on and please ship with tracking to prevent problems during delivery. GPG signing is not a requirement, and any verbal exchange in the form of private messages or posts on bitcointalk.org, or email is effective as a statement of condition.The fine print:This Contract is solely generated for the purpose of facilitating the transaction between the seller and the buyer, which refers to the pseudonyms used on bitcointalk.org. The escrow holder, John, assumes and gives no liability or guarantees on the satisfaction of all parties involved, although he agrees to mediate and facilitate the deal to the fullest extent he is capable of. On the event that any problems arises, he will release the escrow to whichever party that presents him with the most convincing proof and/or after an open discussion with others or theymos. The verbal acceptance by both parties (or the failure to reject\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThank you, John!The group-buy is Open now, you can send the payment to the address provided by John.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nTo make life easier for now :-t13hydra - 600 Chips (no btc - organizer)rammy2k2 - UNKNOWN NUMBEREvi\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon ASIC Chips, boards with the chips, prototypes, full schematic of the Avalon device, devices, custom devices housing 20 60 180 640 or 1280 chips\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-05 17:57:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #11 USB Miners 0.17 BTC or less! USA Orders Only Please!\\n### Original post:\\nIt\\'s only an issue if you leaving this planet within the next couple of years. If you staying, then... buy now\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAww it\\'s a disappointment. I wanted to place more order after my 14 miners are shipped. But it\\'s understandable. Will PM you once i get vPost working\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSorry but can I confirm the size of the parcel is small flat rate box (1-14), medium flat rate box (15-100), and large flat rate box (more than 100)?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAccording to USPS.com ( Box: 8 11/16\" x 5 7/16\" x 1 3/4\"Medium Box 1: 11 1/4\" x 8 3/4\" x 6\"Medium Box 2: 14\" x 12\" x 3 1/2\"Large Box: 12 1/4\" x 12 1/4\" x 6\"\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n9/5/13 All remaining USB Miner orders should ship today/tomorrow. I am now taking orders for USB Miners that should ship this Friday, Saturday, or Sunday that I have in hand right now.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nfollowing\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi SSB,Order has been place.Sent info. to your PM.Cheer!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ngoing to have another order coming over Fri night / early Sat\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 06:00:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / IN STOCK] $31.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #7! 395 AVAILABLE!\\n### Original post:\\nWhat colours you got?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll units for the order are Red.Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB GB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 15:09:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / IN STOCK] $29.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB #7! 375 AVAILABLE!\\n### Original post:\\nOrder of 20 units in! Shipping Starts Tomorrow!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n15 ordered over the night and... another 30 just ordered!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB GB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 15:54:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1.55 BTC = 5.7GH/s KnCMiner Jupiter. No fees. 8 SOLD! #9 = 10/54!\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m in for one share.Code:1 share of KnC group buy.Address: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOkay, I got you down.-Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI would just like to note that i will still be accepting share payment, but only upto a point as I already have another business that will be utilizing whatever unused shares their are on this system and the many others I have ordered for our company. These will be priced at a much higher rate than the shares that are available here on Bitcointalk.org. So basically, I\\'m just leaving this open to help you guys out, as I don\\'t really need anymore sales from here. We are looking to blow Cloudhashing.com out of the water. InfiniteHash.com will be the leader of Bitcoin Mining Contracts by the end of this year.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI would like to buy in at 1.55btc. Depending on how i feel when I see the first divi\\'s I would like buy a few more. Are you guys ok with that?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNope, the rest of the mining will be used for when it\\'s up. I have bought the early systems so they should be in shortly. Any and all purchases are just to benefit the bitcointalk community as of now and even the ones before!Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n of OP should be improved now! Thank you all again for sharing suggestions and my apologizes again for *firewworks*!!! Cheers!-anykeywhy-\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nA lot of people have been asking when our order date was, look how low our order numbers are! Some peoples order numbers are in the 5,000\\'s!I got flamed a lot for this in the beginning and everyone said I was just a scammer, blah blah blah. Now here\\'s proof of just 4 of our systems ordered, which I took the liberty of paying for our of pocket, before the members on the forums even had put up enough money for the buys. Along with that the $15,000 worth of equipment above can be seen as well. I basically worked my ass off these past 3 months for you guys, and I hope it all ends up being worth it, for all of us!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi,Count me in for 2 shares, should pay by tomorrow. So I should expect the miners to be hashing around mid october rite?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI will allow you to pay until tomorrow. After that, I am no longer accepting new buyers.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi,Just sent 3.1 BTC for 2 shares.Payment address to transaction id is confirm.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nConfirmed. Group buy CLOSED.Adeel\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 16:27:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: Block Erupter USB Out of Stock - kosmo will be back!\\n### Original post:\\nAt this time, all discounted inventory has been claimed. Thanks for your business and for allowing me to earn your trust.I look forward to selling new hardware in the future at the high level of service you\\'ve come to expect. Thanks!!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nyou get any more block erupters put me down on the list\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGood job Kramer. Way to get er done!Whenever you do come back, maybe bring some blades with you.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks for all your hard work and honesty, @KosmoKramer. You\\'ve earned a respite from all this. Everybody leave the good man alone so he can enjoy some freedom.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, blades\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 16:38:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / SHIPS WORLDWIDE] $29.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB#7! 330 LEFT!\\n### Original post:\\nYes, if you want to buy over 10 in BTC I will reduce the price Also, I am shipping WORLDWIDE!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll orders for today are packed and waiting for pickup! I will be making a trip to the post office at 5PM so if you want to order do so now so I can ship it today!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 17:59:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Diversified Group Buy Free Host/Management [Cointerra/KNC/BitFury/VMC]\\n### Original post:\\nShareholders Code:Investor Name: Number of Shares: Share Percentage:voxelot 1/66 Bitfury 400G supporter. 1.51%\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra, KNC, BitFury, VMC\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 18:21:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] 1.55 BTC = 5.7GH/s KnCMiner Jupiter. InfiniteHash BETA\\n### Original post:\\nTHANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO PARTICIPATED IN THIS GROUP BUY! This was a beta for . You guys were awesome! Hope to be sending payments as soon as possible.Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhen are you planning to launch the website?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 19:27:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ASICMINER USB Erupters $30 Paypal, BTC US and International Shipping 80/200 Left\\n### Original post:\\n*Updated currently shipping date*Special Pricing by PM for orders over 10 units.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNEW Promotion.Because I don\\'t have much rep here I will be running a special promotion to encourage orders.The following orders of over 5 units will receive 1 additional unit FREE of \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWhy do you have a new account on bitcointalks? Do you have another account here?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNo I don\\'t have another account here, I signed up a few months ago when I first started mining. I\\'ve also have been selling units on ebay, and linked my ebay profile. I\\'d be happy to provide my details to a trusted member however John K. hasn\\'t responded to a PM I sent over a week ago.Orders placed today may still ship today, if not they will definitely ship on Sept 7th.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 20:44:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] Cointerra Shares ฿2 = 25GH/s *2nd Miner\\n### Original post:\\nbought another share txid : previous purchase was named Siavashpayout address you\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBumpy Bumpy, any updates\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nhugs waldohoover\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIn EU there is a VAT tax, so for EU buyer is IMHO better to buy:80/80 GB shares, than one Terraminer IV\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Shares, Siavash, Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 20:49:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / IN HAND SHIPS NOW] $29.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB#7! 330!\\n### Original post:\\nShipping Time!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrder placed for 3.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks Wrenchmonkey! I\\'ll have it out today with the rest of the orders!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nResponded\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI still haven\\'t received my order from group buy 6. Tracking hasn\\'t been updated since the 4th on USPS and it was supposed to deliver yesterday... Sending PM now...Edit: USPS site just updated and it will deliver tomorrow. Thanks for looking into it!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB GB#7\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 23:48:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Block Erupter USB Out of Stock - kosmo will be back!\\n### Original post:\\n**Entirely out of stock - not reselling at this time. Thanks for your business and for allowing me to earn your trust!!**Depending on when you purchased Block Erupter USBs from me, you may be eligible to receive a discounted quantity of additional Block Erupter USBs at only 0.162 each (see batch statuses below). The pricing is based on an average of the time and materials required from me on all previous orders, and also is less than the average amount customers reported they would be willing to pay if I resumed selling these discounted units. The price was further reduced on 9/1/13 due to batch #2 delays and market price adjustments. The maximum quantity you are eligible for is equal to the total amount you previously purchased from me.BATCH STATUSESIMPORTANT: ASICM is providing me the discounted hardware in two batches and it\\'s been advised by official re-sellers that the hardware I receive is to be distributed on a 1:1 basis starting with most recent orders. Using that logic:Batch #1 is for previous customers who ordered on or after 6/25/2013. This batch is now closed for new claims and all submitted claims have been fulfilled and delivered.Batch #2 is for previous customers who\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust got the USB erupters from the mail, work great!Again thanks a lot KosmoKramer for the excellent work, you are the best!!!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USBs\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 02:10:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / IN HAND SHIPS NOW] $29.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB#7! 290!\\n### Original post:\\nJust received two more orders and now there is less than 300 units left!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll of today\\'s orders are shipped! Any new orders will ship tomorrow in the AM! Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nA few more orders are in and ready to ship first thing tomorrow! PM me if you\\'re ready to buy qty\\'s larger than 10 for better deals Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 03:29:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB] Cointerra Terraminer IV, 1.4 BTC=25GH/s Per Share 55/80 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nHi has the miner been ordered and paid yet? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI would like to participate in this GB, this will be my first hosted system so I would appreciate some advice.Edited post, Read the original - all questions answered in there.Payment Sent - 1.4BTC from my Public Address - \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nconfirmed, thank youAdded to OP and spreadsheetPlease send me your email and Skype\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 05:16:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] batch #23/24 ASICMiner USB + NEW Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\nno shipping to canada right?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCanada has a re-seller: teek. It would be rather unethical for me to invade his territory, as he is the re-seller for Canada. If teek is OK with me encroaching then I would ship to Canada.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ngotcha. well i would love to buy 10 of them but its your call.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDo you have any preliminary stats for the new blades? or an estimated price? That way I can gather the correct amount of BTC up\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMonocleMan; 7; 1.4; \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI will proportion out some colors for you unless you want same color?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAre they in stock to be shipped at the earliest convenience (tomorrow)?Edit: Never mind...I got it.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'d like a rainbow if possible, otherwise whatever :-)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nshipping yellow, blue and black. Enjoy!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI would rather the colors be luck of the draw and have the seals on the white cardboard boxes intact.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThe 10 count cases have a sticker at the end that tells him what color the BE\\'s are. He isn\\'t cracking the seals on the boxes\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYep! Been buying them since Early June, They have always had the colored sticker on them. I had a problem with a Direct reseller that the seals were cracked.. I stopped buying from them unless he has them in stock to ship now and canary is OOS. I would rather pay a dollar or 2 extra for integrety.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nName & Shame!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThank you. Has that always been the case? If so it kind of blows holes in the excuse that the seals were broken to check the color as explained by a reseller who claimed all seals were broken for that reason.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMany are mining with them till they sell out.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI had the same problem with an indirect seller. Got their last few remaining units from the last few batches and all of them had the seals broken and the cases were missing the outer plastic bag they come wrapped in. Nothing like buying used for the new price.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nReservedReceived a few PMs about USB hubs, here\\'s a good thread on it: to send a shipping label:you will essentially download that pdf label from usps and email it to (email used for labels only, contact with questions via PM here)thank you BorisAlt for putting together a quick how-to guide: (shipping from zip 60181)in the body of the email, you will have 4 things:1. transaction id of your order2. 1st payment address of the transaction3. tracking number (no spaces)4. Signature (your will sign ONLY the tracking # from item #3)additionally, if you use this method, you no longer need to PM me shipping address as a signed message. trying to make things simpler for all.I will check that the tracking number in item 3 matches the label an example of a signed message you email me with an attached label (each lines corresponds to #1,2,3,4 from above for your own labels:small priority box fits 14 USB miners medium priority box fits 100 USB miners large priority box fits 140 USB miners20 USB miners fit into a flat-rate padded envelope (Priority or Express)Region A Priority box fits up to 72 USB miners (not a single over 72!) weight: 10 miners \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB, NEW Blade miners, USB hubs\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 14:35:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL / SHIPS NOW] $29.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB#7! 272 Left!\\n### Original post:\\nPacking more orders for today!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 15:14:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] Cointerra Shares ฿2 = 25GH/s *2nd Miner PAID!\\n### Original post:\\nExcellent Tho that brings up the following questions.1) I still see that there are 9 shares to buy, and the topic is labeled [OPEN]. If the miner\\'s already been paid for, what would a newcomer\\'s money be used for?2) Why not just keep it at 71 shares? That way the value of all of our shares is increased\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi, Can you please reserve 1 share for me? thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nReserve them 4 me pls\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPayment sent. PMed you the details. Thanks.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 18:44:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL/SHIPS NOW]0.21 BTC $29.95!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter USB GB#7! 232 Left!\\n### Original post:\\nAnother order for 15 ordered and shipped!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThere seems to be a glitch on the BitPay site for international checkout paying in BTC.If I order 2, the shipping costs are 2x0.4 = 0.8 BTC.If I order 10, the shipping costs are 10x0.4 = 4 BTC.This cant be true, can it?BTW, still waiting on your PM Regards.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYeah that\\'s way wrong! PM me and I\\'ll take your order directly. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nChanged the BTCTC Payment options to a public payment address for the Group until I can figure out the Bitpay situation. Price 0.21BTC Per unit, Free Domestic Shipping or International Express shipping is 0.4BTC for up to 25 units.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust added ASICminer 10GH/s Blades to the store for $595 each including shipping!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer Erupter USB GB#7, ASICminer 10GH/s Blades\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 00:05:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL]!~OR LESS ASICminer Erupter GB#7! 225/400 SOLD!\\n### Original post:\\n175 USB\\'s LEFT!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, ASICminer Erupter GB#7\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 17:05:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN IN STOCK SHIPPING!] Group Buy #11 USB Miners 0.17 BTC or less! USA\\n### Original post:\\nI can\\'t PM you, but I want to place an order tonight, hoping to get in on the last ones before they\\'re gone. I\\'m looking to order 4-5 of them. Is there any other way to get my information to you without posting publicly? This PM restriction is *really* annoying. Everyone keeps saying that I should be able to, but it hasn\\'t worked a single time. EDIT: It *finally* went through and allowed me to PM. Ugh.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI received my order today form groupbuy #9. great packaging, thanks! Will order again soon!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nJust placed an order. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMy miners showed up today! While I didn\\'t get any of the fancy new color ones they are all hashing away quite happily Thanks SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n9/6/13 USB Miners are available for immediate shipment in 24 hours or less(some orders ship same day). No blades arrived today but several shipments arrive early next week. FedEx called three times for three different shipments confused to what was in them They are on the way. More blades for recently placed orders are arriving middle of next week sometime.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGot my 1st order today, thanks a ton...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n9/6/13 Afternoon Update. Blade Orders. My Blade orders were not shipped until Wednesday and Thursday of this week from AsicMiner. I placed orders on 8/28, 8/29, 8/30, 9/1, 9/2 and so on. I have sent friedcat a PM to see if he can offer any form of compensation as initial orders were promised to ship on Monday at the latest. CanaryInTheMine received his on Thursday so I must assume his initial orders were shipped by Monday at the latest. Why mine were not shipped by Monday at the latest, I don\\'t have an answer until friedcat responds to my PM. Thanks. SilentSonicBoom\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOrdered 2 miners. PM with all info sent. Thanks in advance! You rock!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSSB Thank you, ordered last Friday Group Buy #11, Arrived today about to test em out\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPlaced an order for 4 USB block erupters (0.75 BTC) and sent all info via PM. Please confirm; thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAny orders placed overnight will ship Saturday. I have plenty for large orders as well. Thank you for your orders. I am busy tonight. If you paid and sent a pm, your order is good and will ship Saturday. Many orders placed today shipped today! Thank you for all orders big and small. I appreciate them all.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nsent you a pm, not sure if you got it\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nReceived it. PM reply sent. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nJust got my 3 miners in the mail today!!! I ordered them on the 29th so it was very fast. Heatsinks changed a little from the last version which is cool. I also got all black which is exactly what I was hoping for. Overall it was a perfect buy. Only weird thing is that you actually put my bitcointalk username on the postage under my real name. I don\\'t know if there was a purpose in this but I could see it being problematic for users with obscene usernames.Anyways thanks a bunch and I will probably order here again if we see yet another price drop.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAny obscene usernames would not be listed. Glad to hear your order arrived fast. Thanks for the order. I am taking orders for immediate shipping for USB Miners.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHi Silent! Just send my next order in!0.10 coupon miner from GB 40.17 normal price miner0.06 postage0.33 sent in total!lol and as always if you wanna toss an extra in the box ill pay you for it asap!!!thanks again and if you can confirm at your convinence ZipTheRip\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nConfirmed and order was shipped yesterday. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nPlease PM me your shipping address once again. This will be sent out today. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAnybody want to sell there coupons?I plan on giving a few away to some co-workers.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, Blades, USB block erupters, 3 miners, 0.10 coupon miner\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 21:18:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ASICMINER USB Erupters $30 Paypal, BTC US and International Shipping 70/200 Left\\n### Original post:\\n*Update 70 Units left, Shipping date September 7th.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI took 6 for the promo deal of buy 6 get 7. I will post back as soon as I get the order. So far, there had been great communication.~ismo\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo where\\'s your inventory from? You\\'re not on a list of resellers, so did you get inventory from a reseller?I\\'m all in favor by the way, but don\\'t recognize you from my end. and the last thing resellers for ASICMiner want to see is a possible scam because it will damage ASICMiner and us, the resellers. Hope you \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI can vouch that thomas_s has bought USB Miners from myself. What he charges or how he sells them is up to him. Just thought a reply was necessary to put buyers minds at ease. Hope thomas_s is ok with this. Have a great day\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n=) Order confirmed last nightI\\'ve been doing my orders with SSB.Thank you for the post.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Erupters, USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 03:16:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #12 NEW Blade Miners 4 BTC or less! USA Orders Only Please!\\n### Original post:\\n9/5/13 All remaining USB Miner orders should ship today/tomorrow. I am now taking orders for USB Miners that should ship this Friday, Saturday, or Sunday that I have in hand right now.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nFollowing\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ve being talking to you for almost a week to make the purchase and I just finished collecting the btc for express shipping to Argentina. Can you please accept my order? I can pay right away.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n9/6/13 USB Miners are available for immediate shipment in 24 hours or less(some orders ship same day). No blades arrived today but several shipments arrive early next week. FedEx called three times for three different shipments confused to what was in them They are on the way. More blades for recently placed orders are arriving middle of next week sometime.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n9/6/13 Afternoon Update. Blade Orders. My Blade orders were not shipped until Wednesday and Thursday of this week from AsicMiner. I placed orders on 8/28, 8/29, 8/30, 9/1, 9/2 and so on. I have sent friedcat a PM to see if he can offer any form of compensation as initial orders were promised to ship on Monday at the latest. CanaryInTheMine received his on Thursday so I must assume his initial orders were shipped by Monday at the latest. Why mine were not shipped by Monday at the latest, I don\\'t have an answer until friedcat responds to my PM. Thanks. SilentSonicBoom\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI think I can help answer that.A) I decided to order from youB) Fate enjoys kicking me in the ballsI\\'m very sorry to everyone else that has been affected by my purchasing decision.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI sent you my order on the 2nd, was it shipped with the rest since they shipped late or will I be receiving mine at a later date?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOrders like yours are borderline should be received in 7 days or less by me and reshipped within 24 hours. The delay appears to affect orders placed before Tuesday the 3rd. Hopefully I receive a reply overnight from friedcat. I will post updates here in forum. I have multi piece shipments of blades scheduled to arrive Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, etc. of the coming week. Orders are being shipped to me. Initial orders were delayed for some unknown reason to me.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI want 1 ASIC blade when you will have it from friendcat\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAny new orders should be received in 7 days or less by me and reshipped within 24 hours. I do have a few extra on the way that may ship sooner but no guarantees. Thanks for any order placed! Have a great weekend!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n9/8/13 First Blade Orders are stuck in customs clearance in China. I have requested a trace from FedEx and offered to give any information to get them cleared. I also have asked friedcat via PM if anything can be done on their end. I have 3 more orders shipped AFTER the first one sent the same way that are scheduled to arrive Monday and Tuesday. Other orders should arrive later this week. No compensation was offered as the main delay appears to be customs in China(just my luck once again). I will do what I can to make things right the best I can. Depending on any delay, I will include extra USB Miners in orders as my out of pocket expense. I would offer refunds but the BTC was already paid and the product is on the way. My sincere apologies to you my customers.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n9/8/13 All USB Miners are now 0.16 BTC each or less from me as I have these in stock for immediate shipping. Thanks for all orders placed with me.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nDo you anticipate the blades dropping anytime soon?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nNo. Thanks for the question.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAny plans to reopen UK / international sales? Purchased 14 from you at the start and would love to get some more...\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n9/8/13 Late night update. No more blade orders are being taken as AsicMiner is out of blades for at least a week. Any orders placed before now will be fulfilled.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nNo. I am only shipping orders to USA addresses. Thank you for the question.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miner, ASIC blade\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 13:55:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN IN STOCK SHIPPING!] Group Buy #11 USB Miners 0.16 BTC or less! USA\\n### Original post:\\n9/8/13 All USB Miners are now 0.16 BTC each or less from me as I have these in stock for immediate shipping. Thanks for all orders placed with me.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n9/8/13 Late night update. No more BLADE orders are being taken as AsicMiner is out of BLADES for at least a week. Any orders placed before now will be fulfilled.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nUSB Miner orders are still being taken for immediate shipment.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWill be there in near future shipping to EU?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNot normally. I will mix it up if I can. This group buy is closed.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNo. I only ship to USA addresses due to personal time restraints.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, BLADES\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 17:21:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL - IN STOCK! SHIPS NOW!] ASICminer Erupter GB#7!\\n### Original post:\\nClearing out the rest of this order for $24.95 per unit! I\\'ll be out of stock soon so order now!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, BLADE, ASICminer Erupter GB#7\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 17:53:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ASICMINER USB Erupters $25 Paypal, BTC US and International Shipping 55/200 Left\\n### Original post:\\nWeekend orders shipped, I live near the post office so I can still ship out today.Price dropped to a little under 25 (around 24.90 / unit) BTC price dropped to .185 / unit international customers price dropped to .17Coupon code changed to give the price drop. nud6echu\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 18:23:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL - PRICE DROP! SHIPS NOW] ASICminer Erupter GB#7!\\n### Original post:\\nAnother order received! 70 left!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, BLADE, ASICminer Erupter GB#7\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-07 19:00:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK SHIPPING!] batch #23/24 .18 btc USB + 4 btc NEW Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\nHey Canary,I know you\\'re probably busy, but I\\'ve sent you an email and I was hoping to get a response on my issue.I\\'m the one that derped and sent you the wrong transaction ID for the tracking slip email. I\\'m 100% available for verification since I\\'m now at the desk where I sent the payment from originally. I can send you another signed message for verification if necessary. Please let me know. (Thank you for being patient for my fuckup.)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nemailed\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyou should be receiving them tomorrow. enjoy!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI have an issue Nary. Check your PMs. I forwarded labels on all but 1 transaction.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n priority express flat rate 1 day delivery need it there by Monday.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWill a blade order placed now w/ Express label still go out today?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nwhats the bottom board on the new blades? how many can it hold?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThats the backplane. 10 blades will fit on the backplane.1 backplane comes with every 10 units from AsicMiner. I haven\\'t found much more information other than that anywhere as far as purchasing backplanes.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPistachio; 2; 8; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nthank you!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHey Canary,As requested I re-sent you packing slip information with the correct transaction ID and a new signature from a signed message I made this morning. You\\'ll find it labelled as \"AM USB - USPS Shipping Label\".Please let me know if there are any issues.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nexcept for 1 or two emails with labels, everything emailed before 3ish PM today shipped out.please check your tracking info. have a few more to pack up and drop of tomorrow late morning.now on to fedex\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHelipotte; 2; 8; sent.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nBitcoin Soldiers:\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\ncan i mine any sha256 with the blade on a stratum pool?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nMiners in hand. (15 minutes later) They are hashing.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nsoy; 1; 4; \\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nBlades? If so, 1 will fit into a PADDED priority flat rate envelope. It\\'s definitely there among the choices.Up to 3 blades WILL fit into Region A box too.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI wish to use a priority box instead of the priority envelop as the USPO cardboard priority envelops are not padded I think and don\\'t show padded on the order page. So, I see 2 fit in a medium box but am unsure if 1 will fit in the small priority box or if you\\'d rather not pack it in a small priority box in which case I\\'ll go with a medium. So....Okay, I see now (this added with edit). When one finally gets to the package page they are more descriptive and I went with the padded envelop.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nBuyer99; 1; 4; \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThank you. All done. Practice makes perfect.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nIf you use a stratum proxy for the blades.The blade itself doesn\\'t do stratum\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSwimmer63; 1; 4.0; Tracy, CA\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nmy 20 came today . have to set them up. only 2 gold 2 blue and 16 black. next order I will need more colors. thanks again\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nAll orders have shipped. no backlog. any orders placed now ship immediately.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThank you for your professionalism.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nyou\\'re welcome!\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nBest Source of Mining Hardware! No Question About it!\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nAgreed!\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nAnother 105 units received today! thank you. Feedback posted\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\njcrew; 3; .54; \\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nchadbu; 2; 8; \\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nGood news, I\\'ve got region A boxes and it fits 3 new blades.Cheaper shipping for you!Cheers!!\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nBtw Canary, thank you for being patient with me on the messup with the packing slip email. Will definitely buy from again if price falls anymore = )\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\n280 USB Units received today. Great Service.\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nzoxerz; 34; 6.12; \\n\\n### Reply 36:\\npacked and shipping. ty!\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\n logistics... logistics... ever wonder why Amazon and others have their warehouses and distribution centers at certain locations??? yes, because it matters!!!I have PLENTY of BLADES for your orders.\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nmackstuart; 1; 4; 1; 4; 5; .90; \\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nAre there any locations in the South??\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nShipping\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nCanary, can I get one blade with a backplane and how much would it cost? I can\\'t afford getting 10 blades immediately. I grew my rig with your USBs and now ready to jump to blades, but can do it only slowly. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nIt\\'s reserved for orders of 10 at a time. I\\'ll ask friedcat for more and let you know.\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\nSwimmer63; 1; 4; 1; 4; 1; 4; 1; 4; \\n\\n### Reply 44:\\ndo you ship to switzerland?\\n\\n### Reply 45:\\nAll 3 labels have been sent. Sorry about that slight delay... I was doing a few upgrades\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miners, NEW Blade miners, backplane, PADDED priority flat rate envelope, Region A box, priority box, gold, blue, black, USB Units\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False, False, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-09 23:35:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL - 68 USB\\'s LEFT] ASICminer Erupter GB#7!\\n### Original post:\\nA few reserve orders in! I have a feeling this buy will be closed very soon!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGot my order, hashing away. Thanks for the fast shipping!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, BLADE, ASICminer Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 04:08:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL - 48 USB\\'s LEFT] ASICminer Erupter GB#7!\\n### Original post:\\nYou\\'re welcome! Happy Hashing!Update : Another 5 orders in! i\\'ll be closing this group buy by tomorrow morning for sure PM me now or go directly and checkout if you\\'re ready to buy!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nStill up packing orders! If you need some USB\\'s PM me!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, BLADE, ASICminer Erupter GB#7\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 08:56:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 2/11.00 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNo problem, I\\'ve made a note in the OP. Welcome to the group.Now 2 / 11.00 shares remaining for next component (at current BTC rate shown in the OP)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMany thanks, will update later today with payment.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf my payment doesn\\'t come through in time, then go ahead and put it through and I\\'ll pay you back directly. I don\\'t really see what difference \\'escrow\\' on my half BTC payment will make in the grand scheme of things, since the hardware is all coming to you anyway... But I\\'d prefer to have a nice neat clear paper trail regardless. I\\'m still hoping to be able to complete the re-index by the next couple of hours. I\\'m at work, and the internet connection here is WAY faster than my home connection, so hopefully it will finish before then.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOK, sounds good. Keep me posted. I\\'d also prefer a neat paper trail and it sounds like you\\'ll probably be done soon, so we\\'ll hold on for you unless you let us know that there\\'s going to be a big delay (in which case we\\'ll go for plan B ).\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'m down to 7 weeks behind (block 247300 of 256959). At this rate, it SHOULD complete within the next couple of hours.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDate: 9/9/13 11:00To: -0.50 BTCTransaction fee: -0.00000001 BTCNet amount: -0.50000001 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGot it, thanks wrenchmonkey. Which of the two sending addresses would you like to use to receive mined BTC?We should go through the process of verifying your address using a signed message (as described in the OP + second post) when you get a chance.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPM Incoming.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nis it possible to contact john K for me , I want 2 shares @ 0.5 BTC each\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi manawenuz, no problem, we have 1 (or possibly 2, depending on what happens with the share that monkeynutts reserved) shares left in H-board #3 (I had a share contribution come through via bitmit before your post, which I need to add to the list). We will then continue to collect for H-board #4, which you would also be welcome to join. There was quite a bit of action last night (John K placed an order for us and I need to check on the status of recent so I need to do the calculations to see where we are and give you all an update. Just doing it now.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nso I\\'ll be waiting for your response , thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOK, so I\\'ve done the calculations based on what John K. paid last night (see the OP for details) and we\\'ve benefited from a better BTC:Euro exchange rate than expected . This means that only 10.76 shares were issued in H-boards #2 and #3. Depending on what monkeynutts decides to do we may have one share left in H-board #3 (I\\'ll pm him/her and ask what their plans are) and I\\'ve opened the collection for H-board #4. I\\'ve reserved you two shares in H-board #4 for the moment in case you want them, so just let me know what you want to do.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury miner, H-board #3, H-board #4\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 09:11:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 9/11.00 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nTime for an update. John K. was kind enough to place an order last night for both H-board #2 and H-board #3 - thanks John . The VAT was calculated correctly on these components, so I\\'ve updated the OP with the correct price paid and final number of shares issued for these components. Just as a side note, we\\'ve not heard back from yet about the VAT for H-board #2, which was not calculated correctly at the time of order, so this still needs to be paid. We\\'ll send them a reminder today.Here\\'s a link to a screenshot with the order in our bitfurystrikesback account ( now got 100 GH/s of bitfury hardware on order. A cool milestone I think .\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThe collection for H-board #4 is now openNow 9 / 11.00 shares remaining for next component (at current BTC rate shown in the OP)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: H-board #2, H-board #3, H-board #4\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 15:19:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: CLOSEDGroup Buy#9 ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner 0.31 BTC Or Less USA/INTERNATIONAL\\n### Original post:\\nMy erupters arrived today (international, package sent on 21st) and are now hashing away happily Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n8/29/13 All remaining orders ship by tomorrow. I have included a free miner/miners for orders of 10 or more in your shipments. This does not apply to recent orders of promo units but any order of 10+ miners at the old higher price that have not already shipped.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n8/29/13 All remaining orders ship by tomorrow. I have included a free miner/miners for orders of 10 or more in your shipments. This does not apply to recent orders of promo units but any order of 10+ miners at the old higher price that have not already shipped.8/28/13 This group buy is closed. Older outstanding USB orders in it ship this Friday when shipment arrives. Orders in the last week or so will either ship Friday or Wednesday. Please watch for new prices and a new group buy. I hope to have stock in hand end of next week. Promo units can still be ordered. If you need any extra for new orders, please wait until next group buy is posted. All orders are first come first served. I have not received any new lower priced product but will be taking orders for a new group buy in the next 24 hours!This group buy is ongoing and always open. Place an order, it arrives in about 7 days or less from AsicMiner, then I reship within 24 hours of my receiving your order from AsicMiner.Yes, I have blades available here Buy #9 USB MinersAll USB Miners 0.31 BTC Or Less!Group Buy #9 USB MinersThank You For Your Support!New Lower Prices!0.31 BTC Or Less! 8/28/13 This group buy is closed. Old\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks, SSB! That\\'s really nice of you about including another miner!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nmy miners are inside my country!!!! today or tomorrow ill get them yaaay.im planning to buy a blade. any discount?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\njust got my 6 usb miners thx a lot for your great service\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nReceived my 15 erupters today, nice. I have just enough ports to run them all with a couple 6-port hubs, perfect. 5GH/s steady. They run pretty hot, I should probably do something about that. If BTC goes up to 200 I\\'ll even make ROI. Now to get serious about overclocking these badboys, I\\'ll let you know how it goes. They all run at *exactly* 335MH/s so I\\'m thinking at least some of them will overclock much higher. Thanks SilentSonicBoom, and SUCK IT BFL!!!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nReceived my USB Miner, great packing! Thanks SilentSonicBoom Will do more biz with you!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThis: \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nGot my tracking from promo yesterday. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nReceived the remainder of my promo units!! Thank you SSB.Feedback left for you\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI received all my miners. I don\\'t have enough USB hubs to run them all yet, but thanks SSB!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Erupter USB Miner, USB Miners, 6-port hubs, USB hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 20:19:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [SHARES] [MINING!!!] AVALON, BITFURY & BFL SHARES (250 GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\ngona take a look at \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi, could you please reserve me 12 remaining shares please! I would like to have more if were availables..I\\'m moving my funds now, hope you understand! Sent PM to you for buying price / special offers!!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOk, think about it: you mine BTC/DVC/NMC/IXC/I0C at the same time and you could for example exchange all mined DVC/NMC/IXC/I0C to BTC on weekly basis, there would be some additional BTC for us from it.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI created an API Token at the BitMinter Pool. Shareholders and other interested persons can now watch our Miner in action on their mobile phone or PC.Possible Apps on different operating systems: (Chrome: Bitcoin Mining Monitor, Android: Bitcoinium, iOS: BTC Miner)Balance and worker summaryCode:Pool: BitMinterKey: Payout:I will start the first payout round at the end of this week. The goal for me is to get used to the process and to build some automatic tools to get it faster done. This way I will be ready for the additional \"Hashing-Power\" which should be delivered at the end of this month.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n12 / 90 (+30 Bonus) SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 2 Shares = 2 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n.. it looks great ...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNEWS:Mining Pools ... I have changed to \"load balanced\" mining. The hashing power is divided on to threee pools, BTCGuild, Eligius & Bitminter. The goal is to get a constant payout on found blocks and to make sure that If a pool goes down we still hash ... on the other pools.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n8 / 90 (+30 Bonus) SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 2 Shares = 2 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPaid 1.009 for 2 shares, not sure what details you require from me, blockchain info below\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nyour payout adresse :-)\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThat would help, wouldn\\'t it :-)My public address is (same one I sent payment from)(Will you be sending info to Shareholders regularly via BitMessage, Google Docs or email ?)\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nUntil now i informed with PM ... as we are now in the mining process ... I will schedule more often notifications ... also for payouts ...like I gona try gather the eMail adresse ...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n6 / 90 (+30 Bonus) SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 2 Shares = 2 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks for the info, as you can probably tell this is my first \"dip in the water\" for Shared mining in a GB - will be buying more if things go well.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n2 GH/s isn\\'t much so here is 1.024BTC for another 2 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n... okay done.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n0 / 90 (+30 Bonus) SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 2 Shares = 2 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI think I took the max. out of what i can do with out starting to solder stuff ... I did some hardware tuning and manual chip tuning ... to get this ... noncerate which is pretty much impressive ... remeber we ordred a Starterkit which should run with 25 GH.Here some informations about each chip ... and his rate .... i turned off autotune as im getting better results in doing some manual adjustments.I still have some hiden aces ... for the coming boards ... which might get useful ... ggI\\'m really happy about those boards they do a good job, the thing Im still working on is finding a pool that fits .... as you see I change from eligius to eclipsemc. Im still load balancing on 3 pools. Feel free to get me some advices ...\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n... a new try in the second biggest pool ... ... the chips feel at home there ...\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nsoon new shares available .... !!!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON, BITFURY, BFL, Miner, Starterkit\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 20:43:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAYPAL - 14 USB\\'s LEFT] ASICminer Erupter GB#7!\\n### Original post:\\n14 sold! and 14 left!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDo you have blades on hand? If so and I use the website/paypal, about how many days in transit to a US address?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, BLADE, ASICminer Erupter GB#7\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 22:06:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED - SOLD OUT] ASICminer Erupter GB#7!\\n### Original post:\\n9/5/2013 - \"ALL ORDERS IN THIS GROUP BUY WILL START TO SHIP TOMORROW\"9/6/2013 - \"ALL ORDERS SHIPPING NOW\"9/9/2013 - STOCK RUNNING LOW! LESS THAN 100 units left!9/10/2013 - SOLD OUT AND ALL ORDERS SHIPPED THANKS EVERYONE!WELCOME TO MY GROUP BUY #7 FOR ASICMINER USB ERUPTERS! As you know I have been selling ASICminer USB\\'s and Accepting Paypal as the payment option. I have sold over 2000+ USB\\'s WORLDWIDE to happy customers! Group Buy #1 Located Here : Buy #2 Located Here : Buy #3 Located Here : Buy #4 Located Here : Buy #5 Located Here : Buy #6 Located Here : to know more about me? Join my Facebook Group! customers PM me before purchasing for a special offers Current Price as of 9/9/2013USD $24.95If ordering over (10) PM me for bulk discounts*BTC 0.18*=>USA Domestic Shipping is FREE and orders over 50+ units now get FREE EXPRESS EXPRESS Shipping is $48 or 0.40BTC FOR UP TO 25 UNITS and If you want to buy more just PM me =>Need Express Domestic shipping? Just send me a PM before ordering!Current Inventory Available : 14Current Delivery Date: IN HAND Current Shipping Date: IMMEDIATELY[[ How to Buy ]]Paypal : Go here => \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust sold out of all the USB\\'s! Blades are still available on demand Thanks everyone!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer USB Erupter, USB, BLADE\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-11 02:47:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN][Group Buy] HashFast Shares ฿2.5 = 20GH/s [OPEN]\\n### Original post:\\nReserve that for me please. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPayment sent. Will PM you the details soon. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat. Thanks.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 17:20:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group Buy] Cointerra 2TH/s Miner\\n### Original post:\\nI hope this doesn\\'t come off as a scam but I plan to sell shares in a new 2TH/s Bitcoin Miner from www.Cointerra.com for $200 each. Once the miner is delivered and installed shareholders will receive 1% of the net income generated by the miner. Your effective mining rate would be 20GH/s for only $200.There is a 100 Share limit. For more information visit payments accepted.Thanks, Norman Moore\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhy would anyone think this was a scam? You have made a whole 8 posts and have 0 trust. How would anyone know they can trust you? Do you have any references or experience hosting mining equipment? Not trying to be a jerk but nobody is going to take you seriously unless you put a little more effort into it.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOk. Although I am new to the Bitcoin Community, I have 20 years experience in IT and have a Bachelors degree in Business Administration. In my day job I oversee payroll operations for over 20,000 employees with over $300 million dollars in wages. I\\'m a bit of a hack and have deployed websites that are used by several hundred customers per day. What I have found out about the Bitcoin business in a few weeks is this...1. It is relatively impossible for newcomers to mine a meaningful amount of Bitcoin unless they have several thousands of dollars at their disposal or enter \"group buying\" arrangements. 2. Bitcoin hardware consumers appear to be tired of hardware vendors who take \"pre-orders\" and months if not years to deliver on their promises. 3. 330 MH/s USB \"Block Erupters\" are a waste of money. I setup a website to see if I could help myself and others mine a little Bitcoin without losing their shirts and minds in the process. I am confident that I have the experience to install, host and maintain a Bitcoin Miner. I am also confident that I have the background to keep my customers happy. If you would like to offer assistance and help in this endeavor my please feel free to send me \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDude, you registered like 19 days ago with 9 posts, hosting mining equipment and selling 1% mining payout for $200. You are definitely not a scammer.....what is written in those Big Text Blocks?? your CV I suppose, I didn\\'t had time to read actually.Good luck with your sales\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWould be interested in a Cointerra group buy for chips if someone would organise one and if someone could actually assemble them.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWell I am glad to invest in your offer, since I am also a new into bitcoin mining and have a difficulty to startup.Do you plan to buy it alone or after enough shares are paid??\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThis is a group buy for a pre-order so it is impossible to say that Cointerra will deliver. I know I am still waiting for avalons and do not think we will be waiting on Cointerra anyway. Would you be interested in merging your group buy with bobsag3 group buy?I could also organize a group buy for Cointerra ASICs if you guys are interested. I am a bit of dev working on K16s and wouldn\\'t mind donating some time to getting some reels of Cointerras out. I will consider this.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nvoxelot doth speak some wisdom in the fact that: it\\'s better to succeed together then to fail separately; esp. as a newcomer. Then again: I am biased as I am representing bobsag3 who is a vetted Group Buy Coordinator and the top Bitcoin Miner Host in my index at the moment. He\\'s thought about how to run these in a professional manner. He\\'s serious enough that he\\'s close to setting up his own dedicated building for hosting with a 120A backup generator. Oh and voxelot is close to also being a vetted miner host in my matchmaking services as well. Hi Norman,Would you happen to work at Ceridian in Atlanta? If you can send me proof to this effect [clear photo of Govt. ID and clear photo with you holding ID] and agree to send me a duplicate message through this forum *and* LinkedIn, then I may be willing to vet you as a Group Buy Coordinator on behalf of the forum (basically stick my ass out on the line for you). I will treat your credentials with confidentiality as many of the co-op members and clients of my GBEC services I work for can confirm.You\\'re probably wondering whoTF are you and why do you want my ID to \"help\" me? Well, as a relative newbie (I had a bit more exp. on this forum &\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJust letting you guys know, he\\'s agreed to the vetting process but he\\'s dealing with a family emergency. Please don\\'t write him off quite yet until I\\'ve had a chance to further vet him after things settle down. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n200*100=20000$. 14000$ is cointerra\\'s price. Where\\'s the rest 6k vanishing? 20GH/200$ means 1GH@10$. There are GB offers for Cointerra out there for 1GH@9.15$ and even 1GH@7.8$. Even they haven\\'t yet garnered enough interest b/c the wait till December end is kinda insane. With the amount of ASIC power being pumped out in october/november the difficulty w\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra 2TH/s Bitcoin Miner, 330 MH/s USB \"Block Erupters\", Cointerra ASICs, K16s\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-11 15:10:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ASICMINER USB Erupters $25 Paypal, .17BTC International\\n### Original post:\\nReceived my USPS tracking num. woot.Thanks thomas_s\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNo problem, thanks for your order, enjoy mining.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSent you 0.185 bitcoin for 1 USB Eruptor to Fort Smith, Arkansas. Should be fun to play with. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nConfirmed, order edited to accept proper payment, PO is closed right now so it will go out in the morning. Enjoy.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI like it how all the competitors bombing this thread. Every time the free market is moving in a direction that is unfavorable for competitors, all eat at each other and troll like crazy. lol\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThe only \"competitor\" that made a post was canary, and it wasn\\'t bombing it was simply a question to help protect everyone.In the end he is not a competitor he is an official reseller but only does business in the US not international and only accepts BTC as payment.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI wasn\\'t necessarily referring to Canary. I was speaking in general terms.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI didn\\'t notice anyone else, where did you see a bombing, and by no means did I mean any offense to canary, I think he\\'s great.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'m willing to reship any resellers (that are only shipping their USA customers the lower priced units).You purchase the units from them and ship them to me, I deal with the customs forms and international shipping. The price you pay me is 0.10 BTC per order + shipping.I\\'m willing to give any info required to JohnK (if you can get in contact with him) or another escrow provider that is trusted as well as the resellers if requested.I am 2 days away from SSB with standard shipping and not 100% sure with canary (think it would be 2 day normal priority mail).\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n10 Units left for packaging tonight100 Incoming in the morning any orders placed tonight will be fulfilled with the incoming shipment.Yes the website has a problem with figuring out USD - BTC pricing, if your paying in USD / paypal simply apply your coupon or check out, for BTC you just need to do the math and send the correct payment to the address the website gives I personally check all orders and will approve the order if the system doesn\\'t automatically pick up the payment as being complete.You can also send me a PM and I can provide you with a BTC address to send to (if I\\'m on)\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSeptember 11th 2013 Update.100 Miners arrived today for restocking. Colors received are Blue, Red, Silver and a few black. Thanks SSB for the multi colors =)International backers have been forgetting to add shipping, please don\\'t forget to add this as it slows shipping down.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-10 04:48:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK SHIPPING!] batch #23/24 .16 btc USB + 4 btc NEW Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\nI need assistance with postagewhat do i need for 7 usb miners and one blade?let me know asap so i can send a payment and pdf mailing label\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nspecify 2 pounds of weight and select Region A box. <-- best rate for shipping for this combo. thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nryanb; 5.05, 7 usbs + 1 blade \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi.I want buy 10 ASICMiner Block Erupter USB 330 MHz Sapphire Miner, how much you can do for me ? discount ?and the shipping for brazil how much ?zip code: Brazil, fortaleza-ce: 60347830Regards Dante\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ngreeners; 1; 4.0 btc; 10; 1.5 btc; colors are good.Thanks for the help\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nthundertoe; 1; 4BTC; \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nChronikka; 2 Blades; 8 BTC; you a PM and email with details and a usps label\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAt USPS dropping off today\\'s shipments...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nTo bad BTC-e is not allowing BTC withdraws right now, otherwise I would have placed my order for another Blade this morning. Thanks BTC-e :-(\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI ran into that problem today too. I bought ppc at btc-e. Then transferred my ppc to cryptsy. Converted back to btc and withdrew. Took like an hour. But your right btc-e sucks.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nDo not want to hijack this thread but further on COINBASE.Not happy about the INSTANT limit change right before I was scheduled to complete my 30 days on 11 Sep.Interestingly, COINBASE now says my 30 day probation ends tomorrow the 10th of SEP? This just changed moments ago.Also, BITSTAMP, which to me was the closest predictor of the BUY/SELL prices on COINBASE has not had a price update for slightly over 4 hours as reported on BITCOIN CHARTS, do not have an account with them so cannot determine directly if all is normal. If anyone has a BITSTAMP acct. would appreciate a current status report. TIANow I see above that BTC-e is not allowing withdrawals of BTC.There has been some interesting prices action with BTC since the start of this Syria thing. Hope the various operators of the above cited operations have not gotten themselves into a trickbox making big, greedy and wrong bets on price direction.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI can\\'t find any current information on how to plug the new style Blades into a standard PSU. My order from Canary for 2 Blades just arrived today and all of the old how-to instructions only apply to the old design with different power connectors. Was I suppose to get some kind of adapter?I have a backplane coming from a different source. Hopefully that will make it easier. I\\'d rather not be fashioning my own connectors. Frankly, that\\'s just ridiculous.Thanks in advance for any help!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThe green plugs should be somewhere in the package.. Mine was just down in the padded envelope. Almost missed it....\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI did just that this morning only to find I had overlooked the connector in the padded envelop as it was outside the brown box. Still using the fabricated connector made from two smaller drive connectors cut down from 4 to 3. Still slinging the accepted shares back to the pool as it has all day. Love it.The provided connector takes stripped wires. One fashions the opposite gender of hard drive plugs from power splitters and drives the Blade from two drive plugs. One also needs to jump the ATX motherboard plug green wire to a black wire or use an ATX power supply checker to get the supply to wakeup. Not sure about quality server supplies from old servers as I tried one today, jumped what appeared to be the green wire to a ground and it didn\\'t work. Tried a supply checker and it seemed to show it was bad only showing +5VDC. I put the supply back in the server and mashed the off/on button and it woke up properly. So, the server supplies may be different.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI feel stupid now! I had two orders from Canary today. 20 USB Erupters in a padded envelope and 2 Blades in a box. In my haste, I checked the envelope for the connectors and forgot to look in the box. Lo and behold (whatever that means), buried under the styrofoam peanuts were my green connectors!Now to figure out how to wire these puppies. :/\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nPlesk; 14; 2.24; coming as soon as USPS site is functional again.Thanks =)\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n9/10/2013: I will resume shipping either late Thursday or Friday. Need to take care of a few things here.I have plenty of New Blades and USB miners, both are in stock and ready to ship.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nCrap. So my order I just placed won\\'t go out tomorrow?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nDamn I was just about to send coin.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nIt will... I\\'m still wrapping up for today\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nSo when are prices dropping again? I know its a game of mine and wait but currently neither the blades nor the usbs are profitable by my calculatution. Assuming btc stays at 130 for the next 6 months. (And thats assuming no pool fee)Im not a hater, i have 4 blades churning away un\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miners, Blade, ASICMiner Block Erupter USB 330 MHz Sapphire Miner, USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-17 18:12:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] batch #20/21 .31 - .35 btc for USB miners & 10.25 blades - USA only\\n### Original post:\\nCLOSED to new orders for immediate shipping. new orders placed here will roll into the next group which will be setup here in a few days.next batch is going to be processed next week.NOW SHIPPING YOUR ORDERS further orders will be moved to the next group which has shipped from friedcat. I would estimate it will arrive early next week.A large delivery is set for tomorrow see my note on the thread here had alot of fun and a fantastic run so far guys and gals being a reseller for friedcat / ASICMiner... To celebrate, batch #20 is going to be your best deal yet with fastest service. friedcat\\'s post is here: buyers: please contact your respective re-seller: Large orders are coming from friedcat and they are priced to move fast!! Fastest delivery, bar none!I expect to receive inventory this Thursday/Friday. Shipping to you same day.Prices are .31 - .35 per USB miner or less. Prices for blades are 10.25 btc. Payment address: miners:If I handle shipping costs, the price is:1 unit: please purchase from Eligius mining pool webpage here: .35 each3-14 .34 each15-20 .33 each 21+ .325 each100+ .32 each200+ .31 each1000+ PM me.you don\\'t need to spend btc on\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI just received 7 Block Erupters I ordered. It was perfect timing as the USB hub I ordered arrive together with them.They are hashing right now, and all of them seem to be working well. \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI have no information for TX ID: PM me what i need if this is yours.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\noff to drop off today\\'s packages...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCanary, hope there aren\\'t any more sleigh troubles for you or your elves and watch out from them kitty kats. Can you please check to see I was able to re-send you the correct verification info. when you get a chance. thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n*prays for that lovely PM with as tracking number*\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWhen will you be able to ship out my order from batch 20. You said you would contact me later regarding shipping and I haven\\'t heard back from you.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks for replying via pm.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThanks for the heads up!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nwaiting on tracking #\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nyour order will ship out next.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\ndone with FedEx.today\\'s shipments received a PM.the group buy remains CLOSED. we are going to catch up with outstanding orders tonight based on inventory and then we will open up the next batch.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ntime to get some rest. good night all!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nheya heya! You deserve your rest...but for in the morning...I got my confirmation for my Eligius order but after the part where it says \"and your tracking number is\" its just blank. Then when you click on the link that says \"You an also view your order information here\" the page it takes me to has the title of \"Access denied | ELIGIUS\" and the body states \"You are not authorized to access this page.\"Sooo...I\\'m gonna go ahead and assume my order is on its way and this is just an informative message for you in case the same thing happened to all Eligius orders...OR tomorrow at some point you will reply to this asking for my particular Eligius order number to double check things...OR its very late, I\\'m very tired, and completely reading everything wrong.Whatever the case may be this has been an amazing thread to watch and I\\'m excited and hopeful that a goodie may arrive for me some time next week. Keep up the great work!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSame here. It\\'s nice to know that my order shipped but a tracking number would be nice too.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nArrived. Perfect seals. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nUSPS sent status update that it\\'s out for delivery this morning. This is some insane service given $5.35 shipment label I purchased for a small flat rate box. Puts this in perspective considering these things crossed the border two days ago. Canary\\'s logistics are top notch.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI received my EXPRESS less than 20 hours from the time The Elves shipped it!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nFor some reason my 3 day priority order is going to take it till Tuesday... when it only needs to go ~200miles. Huh.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nDelivery date showed on their tracking page can be inaccurate - I live ~30 miles from his shipping zip code, there is no reason priority should take longer than 1 day, but tracking showed it was going to take 2 days until 4 hours before it was actually delivered (shipped august 15th, showed estimated delivery as the 17th then at 6 AM on the 16th it changed to delivery date on the 16th).\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWhen they say 3 days, the post office means 3 Business days...But typically if a weekend is involved, it\\'s less than 3 business days...USPS is not the best estimator of correctly displaying dates, but they are good at delivering\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\ngot a hold of an admin at Eligius... they are looking.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nMy package came today. I opened it and have checked 3 of the 7 \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupters, USB hub, Eligius order\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-12 04:04:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] coupon from ASICMiner .15 btc per USB miner in STOCK SHIPPING\\n### Original post:\\nPM Sent and Email with Label sent. (Think of my payment for shipping a thank you for dealing with my last order.)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi.I want buy 10 ASICMiner Block Erupter USB 330 MHz Sapphire Miner, how much you can do for me ? discount ?and the shipping for brazil how much ?zip code: Brazil, fortaleza-ce: 60347830Regards Dante\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPer OP, I don\\'t ship internationaly. Sorry.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI did too order the \\'new\\' 10-port Anker ( which is really 9+1. It ships with a 5A PS though which is good, and there were a couple postings stating that you can use all 10 ports. I have one of the older 10-port Ankers today, though because the older PS was only 4A it get\\'s problematic to use more than 8 Erupters on it. We shall see, it should arrive sometime today.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIf you purchased directly from anker you can use all 10 ports and burn the thing out and request a RMA for it, I\\'ve used the AiTech and Orico with all 10 ports and no problems as of yet.The new anker I\\'ve only used 9 of the ports on so.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAre these extras the new verison colors or the old ones?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAll colors are the \"new\" colors.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nMaidak; 20; 3BTC; \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIf you purchased directly from anker you can use all 10 ports and burn the thing out and request a RMA for it, I\\'ve used the AiTech and Orico with all 10 ports and no problems as of yet.The new anker I\\'ve only used 9 of the ports on so.[/quote]New hub arrived (the 9+1 version), a BE in the +1 slot will start up to a constant green light, but it never shows up in device manager. I\\'ve tried a couple combinations to make sure it wasn\\'t a bad BE, so it looks like that +1 port can\\'t actually run a BE (aka, power only).Sucks, now I have 1 BE left over with no more USB ports... Dare I order another hub with more BEs...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nkeeron ; 20; 3 BTC; customer, so using the coupon price. Also PM\\'d with detailsThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nCannary, when you get a chance - any update on the availability for these .15 miners? It we should use the new pricing (tiered) that you just posted?Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThese coupons are still available. So is the tiered pricing.Tiered pricing is slanted heavily towards bulk buyers/reseller. You get the most savings by buying in bulks for reselling on eBay/Amazon or wherever else you may be selling.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNew hub arrived (the 9+1 version), a BE in the +1 slot will start up to a constant green light, but it never shows up in device manager. I\\'ve tried a couple combinations to make sure it wasn\\'t a bad BE, so it looks like that +1 port can\\'t actually run a BE (aka, power only).Sucks, now I have 1 BE left over with no more USB ports... Dare I order another hub with more BEs...[/quote]The new one has 1 port for charging and doesn\\'t connect to the computer, the 10 port I was referring to is the old model that isn\\'t made anymore.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThe new one has 1 port for charging and doesn\\'t connect to the computer, the 10 port I was referring to is the old model that isn\\'t made anymore.[/quote]I did this same thing but with 3 of those hubs So I used the one charging port for fans\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI did this same thing but with 3 of those hubs So I used the one charging port for fans [/quote]Adding some air movement is an excellent way to make sure your sticks work well and for a long time. Even a small USB fan over the sticks can make them run 10-20 degrees cooler!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAdding some air movement is an excellent way to make sure your sticks work well and for a long time. Even a small USB fan over the sticks can make them run 10-20 degrees cooler![/quote]The way my computer / devices are set up are near a large powerful fan so a small one isn\\'t really worth it for me, the large fan wind hits all my hubs / usb\\'s and myself so its a win win, and I can barely hear it spin.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThanks, makes not an ebay person anymore So will stick to the buying in small quantities.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nTimer removed. End time: 2013-09-14+23:59:59\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nBulk pricing is here: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupter USB 330 MHz Sapphire Miner, 10-port Anker, 5A PS, AiTech, Orico, USB fan\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-08 04:12:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [NEW OPPORTUNITY - First Avail. Reserv.] Cointerra/Hashfast Bare Rig Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nHey Zombie.Sounds good. Always nice to have spare hands and brain to keep on top of all this stuff. Sounds like it could be good to see what we can do together. It would be nice to start seeing what kind of interest there is out there for either a fast-hash-one based project or a cointerra based project are both offering chips for what looks like a January delivery. The smaller size of the fast-hash-one chips is more appealing to us at this point as they can still be accessible to smaller scale miners, and most likely can be built into the expandability of our current equipment. If you are reading this and would be interested in either a $3200ish contera 500 GH/s miner, or a $550ish 32 GH/s miner, please speak up and it may come to pass. Barntech\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI would be very interested in both.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHoly cow! Who the heck wouldn\\'t! I\\'d def. be interested in buying as well as helping.bobsag3 - who has super cheap miner hosting - & I agree to be your helping hands in whatever way we can help because you\\'re more then worthy of our support. It appears lemonte is interested as well in some way, we\\'ve been in contact & I may be vetting him shortly.I can also speak for jungle_dave that if he has access to the right he\\'s got some interesting ideas to improve hashrate *without* overclocking as he has a background in cryptography as an EE/Network Engineer. He\\'s dying to work on his improvements but needs some help. You may want to speak with him about his ideas as they\\'re over my head even though I used to run actual network before there was Bitcoin. I\\'ve done procurement for various R&D projects over the years so I\\'m not exactly a stranger to dealing with mfgs. and resellers as far as the wholesale pricing aspect.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhile the Cointera (was contera a purposeful misspelling?) has a 3x better GH/$ initial cost, I can\\'t justify that level of spending myself at this time. As a result, I\\'d be interested in the $550ish miner. But that might change if I knew GH/W numbers too.Oh, and if anyone needs a programmer to help with anything, I can offer my services. I can also build websites, webstores, etc. My day job involves writing and supporting the whole component stack involved in FX trading systems.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIf we also need $$$ to buy the chips ahead of time, I can come up with it given the headsup/\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNice! I think that between all the volunteers that showed up, Barntech won\\'t have to worry about the front end; as in: site, sales, marketing, customer education (I know I was probably a PITA when he was setting up) & customer service (which can take hours and hours), refunds, dispute resolution, having to do all the project updates...oh, all kinds of stuff. He can tweak things or adjust things as he sees fit for the good of the Group Buy.I believe he\\'s already had some help with his site but perhaps you can come to an arrangement with him for some services.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHey Barnetch,Yup, as the posts above point out: whatever you want us to do, we\\'re more then willing to help. My evil angle is that the less of the customer service & day to day stuff you have to deal with, the faster you\\'ll get product out the door. Moohahaha.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAnd money for me and my hosting? I ALSO LIKE USPS BOXES. I have waaaaaaay to many of of them. hint hint\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nthe 500-600 dollar market is underserved a 32gh miner at that price point sounds like what I want. for 2 years 400-600 dollar gpus were big news for mining the idea of a 32gh unit vs a .6gh gpu . uses less power less noise is appealing. If this can be done without huge leadtime it would be very nice. gpus were a 1 day wait from amazon. the only fast ship gear right now is from AM. We need a 550 piece of gear that can ship fast under 2 weeks . Waiting for a chip until Jan is the sticking point as I see it.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHey allLooks like there is decent amounts of interest in this stuff. Good to see, and thanks everyone for putting yourselves forwards offering assistance. Feels like we could do something cool here. I definitely do like the 500-600 mark for smaller more accessible miners more than the larger offering from Cionterra. I totally agree that getting this stuff moving quickly is ideal, but at this point it seems we\\'re looking at January for either of these chips. As far as i can tell, none of them actually exist yet. I have a phone meeting set up with the guys from VMC on Monday so i will be able to get more details then and share them with you all. If i feel comfortable with their vibe, then it may well be worth moving quite quickly to secure early chips. Bobsag, your offer of some upfront cash may well come in useful to just place an order without having to wait for a group buy to fill up, though i do think we\\'ll be able to reach the batch price quite quickly. 500 chips \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra 500 GH/s miner, 32 GH/s miner, USPS BOXES, 500-600 dollar market miner, 32gh miner, 400-600 dollar gpus, 550 piece of gear\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-12 16:42:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #12 NEW Blade Miners 4 BTC or less! USA Orders Only Please!\\n### Original post:\\n9/9/13 Some blades arrived today. They will ship by tomorrow and include one or more FREE USB Miners due to the delay. If you get a tracking number in the next 24 hours, your blades shipped. If not, your orders are coming in the next few days.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo China strikes again huh? I wonder when we learn to stop doing business with them.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYay I hope one of those is mine\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhen the work can be done for the same fraction of the price here in America.So never.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n9/10/13 UPDATE I am REFUNDING IN FULL + 5% for the delay ALL orders as I don\\'t know when my 60+ Miners stuck in CHINA customs will arrive. I am shipping out orders today of what I have received so far with tracking numbers being sent tonight to those that shipped. ANY US orders that wish to receive a refund + 5% must wait until tomorrow evening as your order may have shipped today.This is not what I wanted to do but with 60+ blades delayed and may only arrive next week, I have no choice. When I receive the blades in customs hell , I will sell them for shipping to USA addresses at whatever my going price is at that time plus shipping. ALL orders can request the refund by sending a PM to me with the total you paid for any blades and USB Miners purchased. Refunds will be sent in 24-72 hours as time permits.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n9/11/13 All Blades in hand shipped with tracking numbers. INTERNATIONAL ORDERS please send me a refund request on any blades/miners ordered as I am refunding ALL INTERNATIONAL blade orders at a rate of 105% of what you paid for the delay and non delivery(As I patiently wait for them to show up someday ). USA orders on blades can request a refund if you did not get a tracking number today. USA blade orders were PMed today if yours did not ship yet. MANY USB Miners have shipped today with tracking numbers being sent around 12 AM tonight/early morning. I still have inventory at the 0.13 promo rate but inventory is going fast! Thank you for your many orders and continued support\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n9/11/13 All Blades in hand shipped with tracking numbers. INTERNATIONAL ORDERS please send me a refund request on any blades/miners ordered as I am refunding ALL INTERNATIONAL blade orders at a rate of 105% of what you paid for the delay and non delivery(As I patiently wait for them to show up someday ). USA orders on blades can request a refund if you did not get a tracking number today. USA blade orders were PMed today if yours did not ship yet. MANY USB Miners have shipped today with tracking numbers being sent around 12 AM tonight/early morning. I still have inventory at the 0.13 promo rate but inventory is going fast! Thank you for your many orders and continued support9/10/13 UPDATE I am REFUNDING IN FULL + 5% for the delay ALL orders as I don\\'t know when my 60+ Miners stuck in CHINA customs will arrive. I am shipping out orders today of what I have received so far with tracking numbers being sent tonight to those that shipped. ANY US orders that wish to receive a refund + 5% must wait until tomorrow evening as your order may have shipped today.This is not what I wanted to do but with 60+ blades delayed and may only arrive next week, I have no choice. When I recei\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nStill offering refunds at 105% of what you paid for international orders. If i get these, ship them, and the next day the price drops... there will be no compensation as a refund was offered. Thanks for your understanding in delay of remaining orders being delivered.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJust in case anyone missed this. PM me to request your refund. Thanks.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blades, USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-12 21:04:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ASICMINER USB Erupters $25 Paypal, .17BTC International BlueRedSilv\\n### Original post:\\n70 Left,The following are included in quantity left6 Awaiting shipping payment from forum member, payment will be refunded if no contact from customer within 48 hours, or if units are sold. - Paid20 Requested for local pickup.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI got my order today! Thank you.That shipment was ultra fast and it was packed well. All 7 miners are hashing away.I would definately buy from \"thomas_s\" again in the future.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAlmost all units gone.I may attempt another shipment if there is demand. Message me if your interested in any so I can gauge a proper order size.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-13 09:03:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB] Cointerra Terraminer IV, 1.4 BTC=25GH/s Per Share 48/80 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m wondering what is better: 1.4 BTC for 25GH/s in this GB or 2 BTC for 50GH/s, also Terraminer IV but in January 2014 (like this: .... ? What if cointerra fails to deliver in December and all hardware will be shipped later?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI entered both in and looks like Jan delivery is a better returnI am going to send a PM to all current investors and see if they want status queue or switch to Jan delivery?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDifficulty level could skyrocket by January IF they deliver in December.Just like what\\'s happening now with all these high end machines getting delivered and put online.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV, high end machines\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-13 13:14:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 7/10.39 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNow 7 / 10.39 shares remaining for next component (at current BTC rate shown in the OP)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi All,We would like to gather opinions from group members and potential group members about whether or not to diversify this GB to include a different hardware supplier in addition to bitfurystrikesback. For those of you who have followed the Avalon chips disaster story you will know that burnin designed and assembled a very nice board (the bitburnerXX) for Avalon chips ( but that this project was hampered by the big delays in chip deliveries from bitsyncom. Burnin proved himself an excellent hardware designer and a very honourable person to order from during this project. Burnin has recently announced that he will sell a bitfury-ASIC mining board ( which should cost around 470 Euro + VAT (19% in Germany) and should give > 40GH/s. It appears that his delivery estimate for these is early October. We already have a personal bitburnerXX order and it seems that as existing customers we will have earlier access than the general public to order burnin\\'s new bitfury boards. Could you let us know by posting here whether you think that the group should switch to collecting for burnin\\'s bitfury miners rather than additional H-boards for a while? We always have the option of cont\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1.5 BTC sent txtid : manawenuz , signed hash \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGot it and verified the address, thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury miner, Avalon chips, bitburnerXX, bitfury-ASIC mining board\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-13 14:47:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSE] GB BabyJet batch #2 - MINER PROTECTION PROGRAM - 26/50 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nFriday 13th update, GB closed due to lack of interest.All participants will be refunded.According to this post:After my very successful previous group buys I decided to expand mining farm to FastHash mining units.Here is one of my previous GB with Hosting for 3x Bitfury 400 Gh/s units. decided to collect funds for GB of hashfast batch#2 babyjets with miner protection program. unit should be able to give 400 MH/s but that is really irrelevent due to miner protection program.Also please keep in mind that those units projected power consumption is 0.65 W/GH so they will be able to run profitable much longer than other miners.ATM they seem like the most reasonable way to invest your precious BTC and don\\'t get screwed by difficulty rise.SHARES OPEN TO BUY: 26/50 BTC (any funds above what will be used to pay for miner will be distributed back list:- pajak666 - 20BTC- maraoz - 1BTC- greenbone - 2BTC- thomas_s - 1BTC--Hashing power distribution will be calculated the same way as in previous GB SHARESBe aware to use only adress you control.In other words adress that you can send signed message with.Terms and Conditons are the same as for current projects except\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGB closed, all funds refunded.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: FastHash mining units, Bitfury 400 Gh/s units, hashfast batch#2 babyjets\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-13 16:59:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [REOPENED] KnCMiner Saturn 1.05BTC=5GH/s | 2/3 Shares |First 2 Payouts FREE\\n### Original post:\\none half share bought by thomas_s,\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nReserve one for meeee. Gonna buy some BTC today and will pay you then.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGet the BTC today and you got it other than that, if you can\\'t but can only get half of the coins, I can hold your position until the weekend is over.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSent, check PM.Address: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPerfect.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-11 11:45:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Promo USB Miners .13 btc each or less for past SilentSonicBoom Customers\\n### Original post:\\nThey are definitely getting cheaper.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPM information when payment is sent. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPM\\'s and payment\\'s sent...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m guessing their cost on them is BTC.10 so this is as low as it goes probably without paying us to take them!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPayment and pm for 14 sent. Transaction Ids: again.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHey man I had bought 3 in the most recent group buy and I am not interested in buying any more as my hub is full....Are we allowed to trade these credits to others?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI don\\'t believe these are credits, if you previously ordered from him you can now order at that price. To be simple if you know someone who wants them that didn\\'t buy from him in the past you can just have them shipped to your friend.IE if you made a purchase you can basically buy as many as you like (I may be wrong on this but that\\'s the way it seems)\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThere is no credits. If you bought from me in past, you can order any amount now at promo price until my inventory is depleted shipped to any USA address.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOrder placed to an additional 8 units, to be added to the order you are currently holding.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nJust sent over my 4th or 5th order from you! Thanks, much appreciated!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOrder Placed for 7 units +$100 insurance. Info in pm.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\npm sent\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPm sent\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n45 plus shipping 6 BTC sent\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nDo you not ship, under any circumstances, to Canada?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDo you have pricing for those of us who are not SSB customers yet? I\\'d like 5 BE\\'s to fill out a hub, but I haven\\'t bought from you yet.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nPayment sent to add on a few more to my existing order. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nEeeesh, these things keep cheaper and cheaper. Too bad I\\'m done getting BE\\'s. I\\'m stuck with mine for a while.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYou can place an order at my group buy #11 prices if you want. USA addresses only please.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSorry. Only past customers of mine and only USA addresses for shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nPM sent, I\\'m in for another fistful of the things.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nCan I place order here if I have a USA shipping address?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nYes you can. Thank you for any order placed.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nsending a pm shortly, waiting for btc to clear, want 10 -o\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nreserved\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\npm sent\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\npm on the way sent\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nPM/Payment sent. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nIll be ordering seven after I get off work in the morning.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nI honestly think asicminer is producing these at as little as 0.03 BTC. They have no middle men for chips and other items so that brings cost down considerably.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nPayment sent.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nBTC and PM sent SSB. Hit me up!\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\n6.63 BTC sent SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nThey might be producing them at that amount but , do you work for free? I don\\'t think they are going to sell AT COST\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nThey might just stop making them after some time it seems. Maybe they already stopped. Who knows!\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nYou would think there is a new chip coming from them. But if there is they will just use it themselves for 9 months then sell it.\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nThat sounds good!\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nPM sent about another order\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nI\\'m fairly certain there will be something new soon. Let\\'s hope SSB offers to past purchasers first when the time does come!\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nNo I don\\'t think they will sell at cost either. They will only continue to sell as long as they are turning a profit. I would assume the lowest they will sell at is 0.7-0.8\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nTheir sales force (resellers) will drop out before it gets that low. If you can\\'t make $5-6 a miner it\\'s not worth the work.\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nThat is true. I think 0.1 is the cheapest resellers can go.\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nI disagree the resellers will just force a minimum buy. A sealed box of 10 sticks will be the minimum buy. or 2 sealed boxes of 10They must be sealed so the handling is easy. 2 boxes fit in a padded flat rate envelope. shipping is only 6 bucks 50 insurance and tracking for free in all 50 states.so a 20 pack for 1.5 coins that the reseller paid 1 coin for gives him a .5 coin profit if the buyer pays for the label. I for one would love to be able to sell that. The real problem is not the sticks the problem is the hubs. shit hubs burn up and good hubs cost a lot. If 20 sticks cost the above price of 1.5 coins for 20 and 6 bucks to ship the miner needs 3x 7 stick hubs or 2x 10 stick hubs. So far the cheapest I have seen is about 3 bucks a port so if you can setup that would be 60 bucks plus the 190 for the 20 sticks total of 250 for 20 sticks and hubs. frankly I went with good hubs and it cost more. I paid 6 bucks a port for much better gear. So my cost for 20 mining sticks would be 310 usd. vs 250 usd. at 250 it comes to 12.50 per stick counting the hubs at\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Promo USB Miners, hub, BE\\'s, asicminer, sealed box of 10 sticks, sealed boxes of 10 sticks, 3x 7 stick hubs, 2x 10 stick hubs\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-14 08:33:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 8/10.29 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nHi Guys, thanks for your thoughts. These were the kind of things that were in our minds too. I will be away from a PC for most of today, but will post some more thoughts later.Update: John K placed orders for H-boards #4 and #5 for the group last night, so we now have 150 GH/s on order. I\\'ll post screenshots of the order details etc. later today.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n150 GH/s already ordered for the groupNow 8 / 10.29 shares remaining for next component (at current BTC rate shown in the OP)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: H-boards #4 and #5\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-14 11:16:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN][0.2BTC][IN STOCK] Perpetual Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter\\n### Original post:\\nThe shipment of 100 USB Erupters I was expecting later in the week arrived this morning, so I will be getting all current orders into the post today. I wasn\\'t expecting these until Thursday, so they are a couple of days early, which is great!This does mean that I now have extra stock on hand and will be able to ship orders made before 7am Adelaide time each day the same day. Orders made after 7am will be included in the next day\\'s shipment.I have also updated the CryptoMiner website with knowledge of the Australia Post national next business day delivery network, so it will be able to estimate when you will receive your order.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll outstanding orders have been shipped as of this morning (most of them have already been delivered!) and I have several dozen in stock for immediate shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ni know this might seem like a silly question but do you have colors other than black or red?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNot a silly question at all, but unfortunately no, the only ones I have in stock right now are black. Out the nearly 200 I\\'ve received, I\\'ve had about 30 red, the rest have all been black.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nFirst daily order shipment has been posted out for today. Thanks for the orders! I still have plenty in stock for same or next day shipping!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks for the super quick delivery!Cheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-06 17:12:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] - GROUP BUY of BITFURY Chips + DRILLBIT SYSTEM mining assembly\\n### Original post:\\ni believe there is no waiting list , but if there is put me for waiting list as well , 2 8chip boards , thank you\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI see long term problems with large ASIC farms, they have overheads that backyard rigs don\\'t, such as staff, air-conditioning, space rental etc. I think they are doomed to failure from a shareholders perspective. I don\\'t see a bright future for the likes of ASICminer unless they make hardware sales their main focus, even then, the ASIC chip industry is due for a shake out in the next 12mths. there are too many players.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAgreed, this part of why i\\'m more interested in mini-farms scattered around the place more than one centralized farm, and yes i agree, big changes ahead for the coming 12 months for sure. Will be an interesting ride.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOh, and nice to see that people are interested in that idea.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThere is currently no waiting list. Further Bitfury chip purchasing is looking very unlikely at this point unfortunately. If i can work something out, i will acknowledge the waiting list requests posted here, but at this point it\\'s most likely just going to be one batch. A shame. If we do get a Cointerra GB happening, you will of course all be invited to join that. Barntech\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks for the vote of confidence Barntech! I\\'ve got some ideas (that I will also share) on how to run a small and efficient operation. Monitoring and compact cooling would be pretty key to keep costs down!Speaking of the Cointerra chips, I\\'ve heard Hashfast may be selling bare chips as well. I know they plan to for the 250TH/s mine they are sourcing. It may be a good idea to contact them and see if they have any plans for additional sales. Has anyone else heard anything about hashfast and bare chips?EDIT: Speak of the devil... \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI have made contact with hasfast and not heard anything back yet. Could be a possibility if they do end up offering chips.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nespecially when their miner protection plan gets triggered (which I expect), there will be loads of bare chips looking for a home.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThere is also Virtual Mining Corp, they are doing pre-orders for Fast-Hash-ONE 16 GH/s Chips (500 Lot) $75,000 which works out to $150 a chip. I have been trying to find information on them in the forums but there does not seem to be much and I can only search every 90 seconds or so.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHere ya go: all there is for now,waiting for more info myself No prototype.....no info....no buy!!!!!!!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nInteresting about thailand. Shows you how stuff gets blown up huh?Here\\'s the fully assembled thumb.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nLooks lovely Loving the red colour scheme.Now to see it hashing\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nVery cool Barntech!!!!!!!!! You need some smokestacks on that thumbs dude & racing stripes too\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nVery cool, keep up the great work mate.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThat is kind of what I was thinking. They have introduce the PCIe hashers like bfl with a release date of 12/31/2013 also like bfl.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSome Bitfury chips for sale here, about twice the reel price though. October delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nGreat work! Now get that thing hashing!A general comment about Barntech:He has been a dream to deal with via PM, I had issues with PayPal a few times (as well as getting in JUST before the close of regular sales). Great communication and showing some awesome progress in a short time.Pity there probably will not be any further boards for sale at the great price we (some of us) got during the original pre-sales round.Keep up the good work!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI really cannot wait to see these things going.Excited much?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYeah, this is pretty exciting to be involved at the floor up level with someone like Barntech. Watching things develop and the product being created before our eyes.Really is exciting.And again, hey, how great is a hobby/passion that can maybe pay for itself or even profit? Not to mention make the world a better place (those bad bankers ;-)IAS\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nOh how I wish my other hobby/cash-job idea of aerial photography with a bloody huge hexacopter didn\\'t cost me more than buying a boat Silly me didn\\'t check the Cival Aviation laws for my country and now need a $10k licence just to charge people for photos I take with it...I find this 3 days after spending $10k on my car on totally unnecessary things.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI have a bridge for sale you might be interested in....only kidding. checking this thread way too often to be healthy !\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI`ve clicked rtefresh so much on this thread my F5 is wearing out. I should get out more.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI had to do this idk how many times past few days xD I\\'ve been waiting to see the finished boards. Times like this are when I wish I still used opera... It had an adjustable auto refresh on a timer...\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nRacing stripes DO add 3-\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 2 8chip boards, ASICminer, Cointerra chips, Fast-Hash-ONE 16 GH/s Chips, PCIe hashers, Bitfury chips, hexacopter, car\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-14 18:48:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 6/10.29 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNow 6 / 10.29 shares remaining for next component (at current BTC rate shown in the OP)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nFirst thoughts:- I\\'m glad I wasn\\'t involved in the bitburnerXX schemeThe hardware on offer seems to be standalone boards, rather than direct plug ins for our M-board (expected in October). So they would need a power source, fans, and some sort of physical support. Does jlsminingcorp have these available, or would part of our money be used for these parts? I\\'m assuming the useful life time of a PSU and fans is far longer than the mining boards, and don\\'t favour buying new equipment. I do have a spare PSU that could be used if it is required.I don\\'t see that the >40Gh/s speed is guaranteed, rather it seems to be a design goal. End-user overclocking also appears to be a design goal, so final speeds will probably be variable from board to board, and dependent on PSU and cooling efficiently, as well as the end-users views on safe chip temperatures, life time, and general gungho-ness. Does jlsminingcorp have any experience in overclocking similar hardware?Do I recall that the equipment will be in a domestic setting? I hope there is good ventilation since I imagine these boards will surpass GPUs in the heat produced.The timetable is unclear, as one might expect. But it seems that CryptX w\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n message sent by PM.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi Stinky_Pete, thanks for giving this some serious thought. I can give a bit more info on some of those thoughts now, but others we may just have to wait and see how things develop with the project.Yes, what a shame that was for all concerned . To be honest, I think burnin was probably the most shafted by all of this - think of the time and effort and money that he must have put in to get that off the ground. Anyway, he\\'s moving on and so shall we!Yes, they would be standalone boards, but if the design is bitburnerXX inspired then they are easily stackable and can be connected together with CAN bus to make larger \"clusters\" (e.g. Some power sharing, as well as data sharing, is possible between bitburnerXX boards and I\\'d imagine will be here too. We have a power supply ready that will run the bitfurystrikesback miner. In principle it should be possible to run both sets of hardware from the same PSU, but I\\'m a bit wary of this, so another PSU would be better. We don\\'t have another suitable PSU free at the moment, so borrowing one or finding a suitable second hand PSU would probably be the best way to go (only ~ 40W needed per furyburner). I don\\'t believe any fans or su\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOK, so could we call the furyburner board \\'component 7\\' and collect funds separately from components 6 & 8 (or whatever)? I\\'m still of the opinion that we should have funds ready to go when the orders are opened - if the performance/price when orders open is not good enough then we just let the opportunity pass and get an H-board instead.I\\'d like to see how you propose to deal with the (most-optimistic) timetable if the furyburner board arrives in \\'early October\\' and starts hashing, then the bitfurystrikesback starter kit comes a couple of weeks later. I haven\\'t thought of a good scheme yet...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nyou could stick to the OP rule of payout only for delivered boards just for the H-boards while treating any Furyburners as a hedge for the whole group. In case the Furyburners arrive early the payout rule would change and payouts would be made to all share holders for the time being. Thus there would be an incentive for existing share holders to agree to this fury hedge. I for one would buy more shares to get this fury hedge going... not sure though how much this arrangement would discourage potential new share holders from buying into those slightly less attractive shares of the furyburners... just my 2 cents.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI agree that this would be better as a separate group buy. I\\'m on the fence as to whether I will participate in this group buy, but I would participate in a burnin bitfury group buy\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury miner, PSU, fans, physical support, CAN bus, power supply, H-board, Furyburners\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False, False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-27 03:53:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED / GROUP BUY] HASHFAST(BATCH1) 1.55 BTC for 10GH, JOHN K. ESCROW, MAHALO!\\n### Original post:\\nI live in New Jersey so what state do I need to drive to? Oh This is me on ebay me on a few tech sites coin buy I did coin buy\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi there! Staten Island, NY here\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi guys.I checked the latest bill again and it seems that we got a nice raise in electricity cost to a whopping 6.86 cents / kWh. My grandfather, on the other side of town, still pays 5.4 cents / kWh, but he does not have internet access. If the 6.86 cents / kWh is still the lowest rate or close to it, I\\'ll be open to hosting the machine. Keep in mind this is a residence, not a commercial building, and I am a freshman in college, most definitely not the oldest guy around. As lame as it sounds, my parents own this house. I should be able to set up the miner to be web-accessible for monitoring however that would probably leave me vulnerable to DDOS or other attacks...we will have to see what works out. Time Warner likes to switch DCHP IPs around every other lease renew so it is hard for me to be able to even access my own network, some of the time.If someone or two would like to come down and meet me that\\'s fine, I\\'d be happy to set up an appointment for that purpose.-Sam\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ncool I have 4 or 5 friends living there.to beepbeep2 what state bro? ps I could be your dad if you are in college as I am 56.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nBarberton, Ohio\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nJust a bit to far too drive for me. LOL\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nphilipma1957You have a bit of experience IMHO !!Maybe you know a good secure location in NJ?The problem I have with a collocation site is that we need security even with one box as maybe we want to expand in the future. We are actually working with money making machines, that is even if the diff rate is going up x10 its something we have to think about. Just putting 6k in someones basement is a risk, Hawaii is out until volcano power is feasible, research that DZ!! but in the short term we need an east coast or maybe mid west site to host our first box.My 2 satoshi\\'sJDPS Brazil is out, too complicated with imports. But Venezuela might be something to think about in the future... Cheap power, good internet..\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'m in UK :p\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI could run them in my garage, but and this is the big but, power is 18 cents a k watt. I ran a 3400 watt gpu farm for about a year and now I am running a 100-130 usb stick asic miner farm about 600 watts rather then 3400 watts.. Not so sure If would want to run it. Now I just ran this mining calculator and 500 watts at 18 cents is 65 dollars a month. As for security I live in a low crime town my and the wife no kids no smoking no pets. I have a few good quailty ups from eaton I could run the unit for up to 3-5 hours in a blackout. In the cold weather cooling is not as issue in the heat which is just about to end My garage is attached to my house and does get air-conditioned. Also I run www.bitminter.com 100% all or nothing keeps accounting easy. How many different share-holders do we have?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nphilipma1957Full respect on your current setup and your vision. As I said before you have some real life experience that is an asset to our group. You also understand that the equipment we will use today will probably change in the next 3 to 6 months and the power/complexity of that equipment will demand upgrades.My only concern is that we might need a facility that can grow with that demand and provide the extra power and network resources as we need, to grow exponentially and not result in your divorce .That said you are in a cheap power zone and have a good existing setup. 65$ a month for 400 gh/s is not a bad price for power. It sounds to me like someone is always home so that is a plus too.Security is always an issue in this world..Comments?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nJ dave we have spots in the usa with 12 cents a k watt even less . while I could run the gear.there has to be some one with a better power price then I have. also if I see the gear on the site correctly each unit is like a mid size pc tower. since the usa is going into the fall season most any home can run 1 or 2 of these and cooling is not a problem. Oct to april the north east and or any northern state and the heat the unit give off is free heating for a home. But to be frank my wife is tired enough of me running all the gpus . Now sold off letting me buy the AM usb sticks and take a flyer or two with a group buy like this.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIm not part of this buy, but i get .086 out here by me/ kw or lower.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAwesome! I knew we had a good group going into this, but this just confirms it. jungle_dave is correct we do need to keep in mind security esp. as awareness of BTC continues to rise. HashFast may actually have been on to something though, with a mid tower form factor, this probably *won\\'t* look much too different from your usual water cooled gaming PC (not \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, 3400 watt gpu farm, 100-130 usb stick asic miner farm, ups from eaton\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-14 21:51:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: NEW!! ASIC miner block erupters in person downtown Austin $20!!!\\n### Original post:\\nHave a batch of brand NEW ASIC miner block erupter USB\\'s ready to go, in person delivery downtown. Let me know quantity desired, cash (or Bitcoin, ~.16BTC). Expect to have them for no more than 2 days so contact me ASAP!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASIC miner block erupter USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-15 01:55:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ASICMINER USB Erupters As low as $17 each Paypal , 0.13BTC\\n### Original post:\\nThe USB Erupter came in today. Very well packed. Setup was easy and now hashing at 335.2 Mhps on bitminter. Thanks!The price decrease makes me want to purchase a few more... 3 more USB eruptors for 0.39btc to Arkansas OK? If so, I\\'ll send a payment over to you.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPlease check pricing on the site if at all possible as there are multiple shipping options to choose from.The price for 3 with standard priority shipping in the USA would be 0.48BTC\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrders have been shipping within 24 hours of placement.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWould you be willing to ship 2 to Canada for 0.3 BTC? Or your lowest offer, please. I\\'m in Ontario. PM me!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPurchasing is still active awaiting new shipment (Tuesday - Thursday).All current orders are still processed, this delay only applies to new orders.Place your order now to ensure its one of the first ones out the door when the shipment arrives.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhat\\'s your best price on 100 shipping to Canada. It will need to be paypal. PM me.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-14 01:28:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Group Buy #11 USB Miners 0.16 BTC or less! USA\\n### Original post:\\n9/9/13 This group buy is closed. I will be offering USB Miners(limited to quantity in hand) to my past USA customers at a special promo price from AsicMiner. Only my past USA customers qualify for this special pricing. They will be offered first come, first served to past USA customers only. Once they are gone, I am not sure when more USB miners will be available. I will start a new group buy for this promo in the next 24 hours.9/8/13 Late night update. No more BLADE orders are being taken as AsicMiner is out of BLADES for at least a week. Any orders placed before now will be fulfilled.9/8/13 All USB Miners are now 0.16 BTC each or less from me as I have these in stock for immediate shipping. Thanks for all orders placed with me.This group buy is ongoing and always open. Place an order, it will ship within 24 hours. All orders are first come, first served.Yes, I have a blade group buy here .Group Buy #11 USB MinersAll USB Miners 0.16 BTC Or Less!Group Buy #11 USB MinersThank You For Your Support!New Lower Prices!0.16 BTC Or Less! 9/6/13 Afternoon Update. Blade Orders. My Blade orders were not shipped until Wednesday and Thursday of this week from AsicMiner. I placed orders o\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n9/9/13 This group buy is closed. I will be offering USB Miners(limited to quantity in hand) to my past USA customers at a special promo price from AsicMiner. Only my past USA customers qualify for this special pricing. They will be offered first come, first served to past USA customers only. Once they are gone, I am not sure when more USB miners will be available. I will start a new group buy for this promo in the next 24 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDid you place an order? I can fulfill it at the current prices listed. I don\\'t believe you were a past USA customer of mine so you would not qualify for the new promo prices to be posted shortly in a separate group buy. This group buy is closed but I will fill your order at prices listed here if you want.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nReceived my miners today. Thanks a mint!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nUse the address in this group buy please.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDamn, I was waiting for the miners to arrive before I place another order >_<\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSSB, you rock man...came home yesterday to two nice boxes\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n5 more requested -- PM information sent\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nReceived 2nd order yesterday. Nice packaging and good delivery time. Thanks man!PM me when you are going to ship to the Netherlands again. Will order again.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nReceived my order todayvery nice packaging, and fast deliveryThank you SSB you rockI am sad to hear that you wont send any more packages my way, since i\\'m living outside USBest regardsPeter\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSecond that\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nReceived my first 2 batches yesterday and today! Thanks SSB Got another 2 coming soon, very happy and would certainly recommend you to other miners!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nJust checked back in on this to find it closed... I missed out lawl... just as my BTC arrived.ETA on the next one a new customer can get in on?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI will sell some to you at 0.15 each plus add my shipping to the total.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nExcellent service as usual! Received the 4 usb erupters on Monday; all are functioning perfectly! Thanks again SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nReceived my order (13 usb). Thanks SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\ngot 10 Block Erupters in friedcat Box in USPS Box in FedEx Box\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSSB could I buy a stick here and then become a customer for purposes of buying on your promo thread? I am wanting to buy up to 50 total. For what it is worth I almost pulled the trigger with you several times in the recent past.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nGo ahead and place an order. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n10 @ .10 with shipping?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nBest quote with shipping for 1BTC please?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nYou\\'d get about 7 if you live in the US if not you would have to purchase them elsewhere.May I suggest me for international or if you wanted to pay with paypal. Check my signature for the link to the thread.*Not stealing SSB customers I order from SSB*\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThank you. On the way.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nIts like a Cardboard Russian Nesting doll filled with Bitcoin goodness.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, BLADE, USB erupters, Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-15 14:44:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [SHARES] [MINING!!!] BITFURY SHARES (300+ GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\n20 / 110 (+40 Bonus) SALE \"quantity discount\"!!!20 Shares = 20 GH/s = BTC10 Shares = 10 GH/s = BTC 5 Shares = 5 GH/s = BTC 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz### Swiss BTC Mining Association ###\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSALE:3 for 2 PRICE: BTC\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n- I\\'m still missing eMail adresses from following your not intrested in giving me your email send me a PM plz. - PAYOUT:Next payout will be again sunday, after that the payouts will be scheduled daily to test a process.If this process is working well we will keep for the future, means daily payout!*If you have some improvements or other stuff just get in contact with me.- NEWS: - BITFURY:Seems like the hardware is going to be here in time! - MINING:Concerning our mining pool I made the decision now. We gona mine on ghash.io, why? Because we can! (jk)I did my decision based on following criterias:* good size (2. biggest pool)* daily payout schedules* moderate fees PPLNS 3%* good monitoring possibilities (email, phone)* our chips are feeling well thereThat\\'s it ...PS: All slots of the miner are now occupied by orders for h-boards, which I did already payed in advance (11 early oct) & (3 late oct). If my interpretation of the switch from early to late is right.(link)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI am just a small fish here but I have to praise your work and communication.Thank you for that.I will probably buy more shares in the future. Grim\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAnother small fish who is also impressed with the handling of the this GB, I would buy more but just spent all my BTC on a 10GH/s home miner Do you accept IOU for BTC ? lol\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n+1This is how a professional GB should look like I hope we will have decent results in BTC.PS, PMed darkfriend77 with my email.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ni have pm\\'d you sir!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY SHARES (300+ GH/s), 10GH/s home miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-15 19:54:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: Re:[OPEN!/32/40 shares avail] R2: Bitmine/CT + Hosting, BTCrow ESCROW, Est.$5K\\n### Original post:\\nI hear ya Philip! No worries, you\\'re already helping us out big time on the Baby Jet, PSU/batts, *and* fans!jungle_dave & firsttimeuser: Nice!Thanks and welcome aboard again! LOL, I had no idea I was doing a GB 2 days ago but now seems to be a natural time to do it since everything\\'s squared away with our HF miner except for my payment to Philip for shares available! These are soft reservations up until we get to 20 shares left. so: 12 more soft reservations to go before we go to actual sales.Related to hosting: As his online agent (Full Disclaimer) for his hosting services, I\\'ve seen the inside of the building bobsag3 photographed, and it seems to be well suited for expanded miner hosting with 400A available and 120A backup generator all right next to Google Fiber. He\\'s gone the full step to running it as a business so he won\\'t be an amateur for much longer & he may not be able to hold prices this low for too long.=====Also I\\'d like to open up Cointerra II as an option: with Bitmine, unless it\\'s hosted in Europe (not out of realm of possibility since kaz911 has hosting there) there\\'s going to be a shipping delay having a unit shipped from Europe. Looking at\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine, PSU/batts, fans, HF miner, Cointerra II\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-22 06:16:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: ASICMiner USB group buy- orders closed, pay for extra!\\n### Original post:\\nok fellas. we are BACK and taking order\\'s! each PREVIOUS BUYER can place an order for USB miners at .175 per unit. the .075 is for my fee and shipping - which will be fedex ground.Ordering is open until august 9, 6 pm mountain time (that\\'s friday, about 1:20 from current forum time) payment is due ASAP so i can place the order and get the shipment from friedcat on it\\'s way as of the 10th.Timer removed. End time: email all three of these fields to Arklan:-Address you sent payment from that you used in line 1-message entered in line 2 -signature that bitcoin-qt populated.On Arklan\\'s end, he will use those 3 pieces of information in the verify tab and it will confirm that all the information is correct.Do not make any of the info public. Make sure everything is copy and pasted verbatim. Make sure only the seller knows this information.Hope this \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nok, all caught up - need to send pm\\'s about the 4th\\'s to a few people, and photon, we still gotta sort this. i\\'m feeling real stressed by the delay, to say the least. if anyone has any suggestions on how to get a hold of FC, or if you want a refund, speak up.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks for the 4th extra matey, cant wait for them to get here!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAny updates on when the next order process would be available?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHe\\'s waiting on FC to get in contact. So far, no news.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nActually i was just taking to CanaryInTheMine. He\\'s received USBs he purchased since August 11th. However he has not received units meant for his coupon customers, just like i haven\\'t. So, basically, ARGH.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nArgh is right. I\\'m patient, but apparently some of these other folks aren\\'t. I\\'m betting that Friedcat is focused on getting the new blades out. Hopefully he will get these USB miners out soon.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI have a vague feeling that I might be one \"of these other folks\" that you speak of! Na, if Arklan can\\'t do anything, he can\\'t do anything. I trust him and he\\'s been good to me. I just wish all of these ASIC suppliers would get their shit together and start delivering products on time. I know the industry is new, but geez.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFWIW, I\\'m still waiting as well for a response to be able to place an order for the last 70% of a batch @ 0.1BTCWith CanaryInTheMine and others receiving regular stock, we have to assume that friedcat is prioritizing limited stock for higher margin purchasers at the moment; can\\'t really blame him.Here\\'s hoping stock levels stabilize over at the ASICMiner camp. Sounds like they are super busy over there.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHas mine not shipped yet?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n*cricket sounds*\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nFriedcat hasn\\'t responded to Arklan\\'s multiple requests to pay. Nothing will happen until Friedcat responds. Ball is in his court.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'ve been in a few group buys for these. Every other one has gone for \"~30% of the users will get a coupon\". This one is the only one where 100% was stated.. but if you run the numbers, it\\'s about 30% that shipped.Time for mass refunds until if/when the next set becomes available?M\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'ve had word from friedcat. He said the others we\\'re waiting on should be ready to send \"in a few days.\" Thanks for the patience guys.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nhe\\'s definitely working on getting resellers the remaining inventory but it\\'s taking time to make it... friedcat is a person who does not like to specify a date when something is not 100% in his control...these have to be made on a schedule at a factory. and delays can and do occur (external factors beyond control).if we were given a date and it was missed, it would be worse than current situation. and there would be comparisons to other manufacturers who provide dates, but no product arrives on the promised date. anyway... i digress.people have really laid the brunt of their anger at resellers, but we\\'ve shipped what we got ASAP... give us a break already for crying out loud.in arklan\\'s case, he\\'s the very first person to organize a group buy for the benefit if all who participated... he really worked his tail off and in the end which one of you gave him a tip for all the hard work? anyone? speak up!! recently he was asked to find out about getting coupons for the first group buy, he has done so at your request... he had no obligation to do this. so now please be patient as arklan will get these out ASAP when they are received.in retrospect, I really wish friedcat never did these \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThere is frustration, but I recognize that its not your fault.IOWs, I believe in your good faith and that you\\'re just as \\'irritated\\' as the rest of us with this.With hindsight, things might have been done better. But isn\\'t that always the case?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nASICminer shares took a HUGE fall it\\'s not even funny.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThey peaked at what, 5 something? What\\'s it down to? I haven\\'t been watching. Might be wo\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miners, ASICMiner USB, blades\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 00:15:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB & New model Blades] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nok. ill start this off. at this stage im looking at 10 + shipping to 3805. im assuming shipping will be similar to the last ones express.i have sent an email.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ll take 14, please let us know where to direct our BTC.Can you guarantee a shipping date, or can we wait until they show up at your door before we pay?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWait until I have them in stock and I\\'ve quoted shipping. If your location is within the Australian express post network, and you pay in time for me to get things packed and to the post office by 3pm- it should be delivered next business day.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nUSBs are in & SilverIf you pay today - and you\\'re within Australia Post\\'s Express Post Network - I\\'ll have them packaged and posted for Monday delivery.PM me here or email with order, and I\\'ll reply with unique payment address.Please include your phone number to put on the delivery info.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYou able to ship to Canada? Please PM me full price for 1 BE including shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNow less than 30 USBs in stock. Orders received over the weekend will be shipped Monday. I expect another small shipment of a few hundred USBs to arrive some time next week.More blades (& backplanes for orders of 10) arriving Monday or Tuesday.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPrice for Blades is 3.85 BTCFor orders of 10 - price is 3.8 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nLess than 20 USBs in stock.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI have some Blades & Backplanes in stock.3.85BTC per Blade.3.8BTC for orders of 10 or more.1 Backplane included (for only cost of shipping) per 10 ordered.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, New model Blades, USBs, Silver, Blades, Backplanes\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 00:26:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB & New model Blades (3.85BTC)] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nMy USB\\'s arrived already, Cheers julz!+Trust\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, Block Erupter USB, New model Blades\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 01:00:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] USB Miners .13 btc each or less all customers shipping to a USA address!\\n### Original post:\\nPM sent. 6 usb erupters ordered.TX id: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSent payment for 14-1.89 email on the way and more orders to follow. Thanks SSB. Got my wallet issue sorted out. NOTE TO ALL: There is a Bug Fix for Bitcoin-QT wallet correcting a problem with the blockchain becoming corrupted. Download ver. 0.8.5. If you open QT and get a message that the blockchain file is corrupted it is best to not do a re-index. Shut down QT, download the new version and run. That should fix the problem without the wait(long) to re-index.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSent payment for 14-1.89TX send PM in a sec.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSent payment of 1.89 for 14 usb miners and shipping. Thanks for the promo \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n9/14/13 This group buy is closed. I will start a new group buy in the next 18-26 hours for USB Miners and Blade Miners. Please keep watching for details. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWish I\\'d seen that before my looooong wait to re-index :pHappily, getting my Eruptors in this group buy did not entail a long wait, and they\\'re happily hashing. Thanks, SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Erupters, USB Miners, Blade Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 03:32:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #14 USB Miners 0.13 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nThis group buy is now open! Thank you for all orders placed! Have a good evening!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\npm sent6@0.13 + 0.06 BTC = 0.84 sent\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThank you for the order. As always, all orders are greatly appreciated by me. PM confirmation has been sent. Have a great evening. Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 03:36:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: Group Buy #15 Blade Miners Reserved\\n### Original post:\\nI just want to thank you for the rapid shipping of my first order and I will definitely be ordering more soon.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNeed a quote for a bulk order of 98 Blades.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou are most definitely welcome! All orders big and small are greatly appreciated. Have a good night!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPM sent and thank you for any order placed.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blade Miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 03:46:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN/PAYPAL/IN STOCK] ASICminer Erupter GB#8!\\n### Original post:\\nBuy with confidence from this guy!BTW, you might want to update your sig with your new prices.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUpdated and thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrders pouring in\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\npm sent\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\npm sent\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nReplied\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWho did you bribe at your postoffice ?My parcel already in Holland!!In three days !!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHappy Hashing!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI did not expect this many orders!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAnother order of 25 sent to a happy international customer!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAll orders paid today have shipped! I\\'ll be going to the post office later today to ship any stragglers\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nShipped out all orders up to here.Added some inventory and I have a new color! GOLD!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNew orders rolling in! All of them ship Monday morning\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nBIG ORDER IN! Keep em\\' comin!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAnother few small orders! Remember all my equipment is in stock and shipping Monday Morning guaranteed! No waiting\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nlots of orders in! I\\'ll be packing tons of miners tonight! PM me now if you want to order!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nIn Stock and Shipping now! More orders trickling in! By the way less than 200 units left!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nNEW v2 ASICminer 10GH/s Blades Still Available each w/ Free Domestic Shipping! International shipping depends on the speed you want and you location so PM me for a quote!Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, BLADE, ASICminer Erupter GB#8, ASICminer 10GH/s Blades\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-14 07:26:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ANN] NanoFury NF1 USB stick - GROUP BUY of BITFURY chips + US PRODUCT ASSEMBLY\\n### Original post:\\nI would prefer to buy one once other people received it and so on.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo will there be a way to overclock from software rather than having to resort to mild hardware modification? That\\'s a pretty serious feature on the Bit Fury chips.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nokay I would buy 10 fully assembled plug n play. so are we looking at 6btc for ten? I have other questions will these run with bitminter\\'s plug n play java client. I am running 100 asic miner sticks on bit minter as i type so this is a perfect upgrade item for me.. 10 of these would be 45 to 60 am sticks. frankly I am very adverse to any preorders no preorder has delivered correctly to me and I have 5 outstanding preorders. so if I preorder 10 of these for 6btc how long before you want my coins oct 1 to give the coins up to oct 31 to get gear is what I am reading. I am not sure I want to wait 30 days. I would have to think about it.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPM\\'ed\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIt seems punin has put up pricing for September chips, approximately 0.21633 BTC if I did the math correctly.So the high end of the final estimated price per unit is 0.6BTC + 0.21633BTC = 0.81633 BTC correct?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nmissed the high range which looks like it is too high for me. .well at .81633btc for 2gh it is okay, but the oct 31 delivery is a long time off. adjustments will be:sept 14 = 107 millsept 25 = 133 milloct 6 = 166 milloct 17 = 207 milloct 28 = 259 mill these are 25% adjustments. I can get .333 ghs sticks in 3 days.6x .333= 2gh = 6x .15 btc = about .9 and I will be hashing with the sticks by monday the 16th of sept. So as much as I want them to upgrade.I will wait until sept 28-30th to commit.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ndentldir sorry for the confusion - I guess I need to expand on the pricing box a bit more.The anticipated final price (including BitFury chip AND assembly) is in the 0.3-0.6BTC range. It is made of two components: BitFury chip (0.2-0.3BTC anticipated for October delivery) plus assembly and all other components (which we anticipate to be in the 0.2-0.3BTC range depending on quantity).So the high-end estimated final price is 0.6BTC at the moment.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWho is WE?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThe NanoFury team\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nExcellent. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n0.4BTC for a stick is eccellent... propabilly will never ROI, but I always can resell them!So if I want to order 5 o 10 of them incl. shipping to Italy what I\\'ve to do?The amount of 5 is 2BTC, right?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI will get some at the price of .3 btc fully assembled. I will commit to 6btc on sept 30. so if it is the max price of .6 I get 10 sticks.if it is the min price of .3 I get 20 sticks. .I will book mark this thread.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nDefinitely watching, would be a neat fun factor evolution over the asicminer stick.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nyeah if it is .4 btc and is 2gh at 2.5 watts it would be pretty nice. that is about 3x the price of an am stick but 6x the hash. same wattsI have the hubs so it would be a lower setup cost for me. I can run 100 sticks so 100 at 2gh would be good.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nBased on the schedule you\\'re really in November by the time these are in my hands. And that is only if everything goes perfect. November, even with NO cost on power never returns their value. And by never, I mean before I die of old age. (Based on the Genesis Block) At this point, the only safe play is to wait until these can be shipped on-demand to know what the difficulty level is and btc price. Otherwise it\\'s a loser. Not to say I wouldn\\'t like to have them, it\\'s just that they won\\'t actually make me any money.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'m interested in 25 if this GB starts to get going.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI have emailed/pmed them about it to 0 response\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHello bobsag,we did exchange a few messages:Is this what you\\'re referring to? Or was there another message? (which I may have somehow overlooked? and my apologies if that\\'s the case)\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n=== PRICING UPDATE ===With both punin and buzzdave now having officially released October pricing it seems the BitFury chips will be closer to the 0.2-0.25BTC range. If we exceed the initial target of 3000 devices that would put the final price also closer to 0.4-0.5BTC (as assembly and all other components will likely also get closer to 0.2-0.25BTC).The final cost of course will be dependent on the number of devices this GB attracts. But even at the low range of 500 that still leads to a bit lower final price (than our initial estimates) which will likely be in the 0.50 - 0.55 BTC range.We\\'ll keep you posted.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI will still keep a 6btc commitment by sept 30th. I will turn in 6btc. hopefully I will get 15 sticks (.4btc each) for that rather then 11. (.55btc each)\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWill this design be opensource? I\\'m asking this because I think components + assembly can be lower than 0.2-0.25, especially if you consider + shipping costs for us European based. If n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: NanoFury NF1 USB stick, Bit Fury chips, asic miner sticks, .333 ghs sticks, .4BTC fully assembled sticks, hubs\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 06:02:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] New ASICMiner USB - In Hand .13 BTC + Shipping\\n### Original post:\\nI have a limited number of usb units direct from friedcat. I look forward to running future group buys for the community and plan to have blades up soon.Update 05:54 AM UTC 2013-09-16:I\\'d like to note that although I am not currently an authorized USA distributor for friedcat, I am working on becoming one. These units are from friedcat but he has not notified me of official distributor status. I am also aware that there are official distributors for certain regions of the globe. I will not sell to international buyers from these areas, so please do not ask.If I\\'ve upset any international sellers, please forgive me. I was hit pretty quickly with these units and not aware of the zone distributor restrictions. I have no outstanding orders for any buyers inside of any foreign distributor\\'s zones.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 07:04:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: Avalon chip refund request\\n### Original post:\\nthe address \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nplease refund chip order number 10129. It is under John K and our group buy has waited weeks for it. thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chip\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 08:59:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN][0.165BTC][IN STOCK] Perpetual Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter\\n### Original post:\\nThanks for the nice feedback kabopar.PRICE DROP I am please to announce that I can pass along a price drop to BTC0.165 each, still including Express Shipping within Australia. Currently have 49 in stock ready for same or next day shipping.At this stage I am not planning on getting more units in for stock, so once they are gone they are gone.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER USB Block Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 18:53:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN/32/40 shares avail]R2: Bitmine or Cointerra + Host,BTCrow ESCROW,Est.$4-5K\\n### Original post:\\nThis PM below (with editing corrections) contains snippets from a PM sent to someone already soft reserving 4 Bitmine chips and unfamiliar with the GB ownership process and payout guarantees from vetted miners and miner hosts. I\\'m giving him or her additional Bitmine options that he/she could switch his soft reservation for, even if that includes switching his or her soft reservation to Bitmine\\'s official chip reseller: zefir, if he/she wants. I *love* customer service and educating others if they\\'re willing to listen to me blather on, eheh:Hi XXXXXXXXXX,If you participate in my Group Buy or any GB on this forum by a vetted GB Coordinator, you get access to the risks and benefits of owning a partial share of the best values as far as stock manufacturer hardware from various manufacturers. If you\\'re buying hardware, the very best values are only available at $5K and above but they\\'re out of the range of most miners, but we can band together to get purchasing power that gives us access to the best hardware with the lowest possible costs.For example, if you owned one-fourth of this Group Buy, which would be: 10 shares at $100-125 ea. (final price dependent on group majority weighted v\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCode:Round 2: Bitmine Coincraft or CointerraII. We need to reach 20 Soft Reservations - no BTC or cash paid - before sales begin. 2.75% Host/Management | Username | Wallet Address | Share Status| Additional Optional Shares / Notes 2 | DyslexicZombei | | Soft | 8 / Your GB Coordinator / Net. Eng. / Primary Remote Admin || 1 | bobsag3 | TBA | Soft | World Class vetted Hosting Avail., W/ Lowest hosting costs || 1 | Anonymous | TBA | Soft | 1 || 2 | jungle_dave | TBA | Soft | Backup Admin, former EE/Net. Engineer. Plants trees in Amazon! || 2 | firsttimeuser | TBA | Soft | 2 / DZ Co-op Round1 HashFast BabyJet Vetted Miner Host |11 shares are optional shares that may be purchased at any moment by the Soft Reservation holder. 12 more shares needed for sales to begin with refunds available at any time before product shipmentat a small restock fee after actual sales begin (1.5%).\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf you like my writing and ruminations of an amateur historian/IT Specialist that\\'s successfully benefited from personally and professionally investing in new technologies my entire life, please read my thoughts in the Custom Hardware forum top thread: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhat is your expected return per share?I am interested and so far your GB looks good.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi Andrew,Thank you! I try hard to provide a great value at the lowest possible costs and lowest cost miner host fees.Expected return per share? Honestly, your guess is as good as mine! We can play with calculators from BitcoinX and The Genesis Block all day long, but those are just estimations roughly grounded on future network difficulty changes. We all hope to make a profit but if things go sour, well at least risk is shared and any refunds requests will be handled as promptly as possible. We also hope to sell the unit(s) at the 6-7 month mark to recoup investment costs and split the proceeds among owners.We do know that from user FCTaiChi\\'s hard work that the current #1 and #2 pre-order options as far as estimated returns are CoinTerra IIs and IVs. Group Buys are meant for those miners trying to get access to the best values at the lowest prices and are hoping to hedge their bets across multiple strong bets. Shall I put you down for a soft reservation for 1 share?===Additional info from a PM sent to another interested potential Group Buyer: Hi XXXXX,Thank you for saying that you have no problem trusting me! I hope you don\\'t trust any ole person that comes along. Just kidding. I\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUnderstood partially, apparently I\\'m a little confused.If the miners will be sold at 6-7 month mark, when is ROI achieved? 4 months in? 5 months in?Can you please put an estimate profit as you see it? You seem to know your stuff and your guess is better than mine at this point.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nCompliments on Bobsags setup!!Research is showing me that Cointerra is a better bet at the moment, that said I do like the upgradability of Bitmine. The question is how much for the upgrade mods and how much juice will they really use?If we could get a Bitmine rig upgraded to 2 TH/s in Jan. 2014, for under $6000 it starts to make sense.At the moment Bitmine asks $ 14,999 for 2 TH/s (not so good). Cointerra (IV) $6000 promises 2 TH/s in January at a much better $3 a GH/s. Even with the worst predictions in Difficulty we have a good chance of making a bit of profit.Im starting to feel bad about all the KnC shares I bought. Its not looking good for ROI at the moment, but thats life and a bit of the risk we all take in this game.At the moment it looks like cointerra IV is the the best choice \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine chips, Bitmine Coincraft, Cointerra, HashFast BabyJet, CoinTerra IIs, CoinTerra IVs, KnC shares\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-17 02:43:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN=29/40 shares avail]R2: Bitmine or Cointerra + Host,BTCrow ESCROW,Est.$4-5K\\n### Original post:\\nI wanted to share this because this is a pretty strong endorsement via anon. PM for both myself and for bobsag3\\'s services. Keep it up Bob! They\\'re appreciating your hard sound, mining will be for the big boys, blades and erupters will be obsolete. 28nm will be the next big thing. customized boards will be the one who will push the market for these big monstrous rigs higher...so everybody need to means co-op. Actually DZ, you put the XX BTC on whatever you decide, i\\'ve just placed my other order with ultibit for cointerra 2TH. I dont know ultibit even a bit. Just saw bobsag3 name, im okay with it.i will be investing every other month on BTC for GB things. so only two group buys i will join so far:1. ultibit (cointerra iv)2. DZ (DZ himself)im done with:1. Avalon2. mining boards3. Erupters4. BladesGood luck to us. God you for your trust. I\\'m humbled by your endorsement which you allowed me to share anonymously. I promise you that I\\'ll continue to be transparent and open in all Group Buy decisions.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine, Cointerra, Avalon, mining boards, Erupters, Blades, cointerra 2TH\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-17 05:10:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED][OUT OF STOCK] Perpetual Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter\\n### Original post:\\nCLOSED: Perpetual Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter Group BuyI am now completely sold out and will not be re-stocking. Thank you to all of my customers who have purchased these from me, it has been a pleasure to be able to provide this service. The number of repeat customers who have returned 3 or 4 times has been amazing to me, and tells me I was doing something right.For any future sales, please see Julian\\'s thread at am putting this perpetual group buy together to service other Australian users who have had difficulty purchasing these for a reasonable cost. This group by will be open until further notice and I will place an order approximately every two weeks, or when we reach enough units. My first group buy was successful and is at DROP The price per unit is is performed via the CryptoMiner website at This will provide you with a unique payment address and provide a count on the number of Erupters ordered and countdown to the next estimated order date and time.Please only send BTC from an address you control and can use to sign messages. I will require you to sign your shipping address before I am able to send any units out.RefundsRefunds \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCLOSED: Perpetual Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter Group BuyI am now completely sold out and will not be re-stocking. Thank you to all of my customers who have purchased these from me, it has been a pleasure to be able to provide this service. The number of repeat customers who have returned 3 or 4 times has been amazing to me, and tells me I was doing something right.For any future sales, please see Julian\\'s thread at \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Perpetual Australian ASICMINER USB Block Erupter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-17 07:12:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN/29/40 shares avail]R2: Bitmine or Cointerra + Host,BTCrow ESCROW,Est.$4-5K\\n### Original post:\\nNo problem. I would caution however that for the next few months in-hand ASIC hardware is still going to sell for a premium and that if you\\'re waiting for in-hand stock besides AM that ships tomorrow, we all may be waiting for a while.Received a PM from another interested member. 3 more shares reserved! Thank you and welcome aboard!29 shares available. 9 more shares need to be reserved before we go to actual shares.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nReceived a PM from a new co-op member. This is this person\\'s first Group Buy after giving up on solo mining. 3 more shares reserved! Thank you and welcome aboard!29 shares available. 9 more shares need to be reserved before we go to actual sales. This co-operative is now up to 18 members at the moment with: four admitted IT pros included two Network Engineers (one former NE), and two Electrical Engineers (jungle_dave\\'s other career besides being a former Network Engineer, and absolute rock bottom miner hosting/management fees. Updated: added another reservation from post #223. 28 shares available. 8 more shares to go for sales to begin.Another page update: 5 more share reservations from Commandermk! Thanks and welcome aboard!Code:Round 2: Bitmine Coincraft or CointerraII. We need to reach 20 Soft Reservations - no BTC or cash paid - before sales begin. 2.75% Host/Management Username | Wallet Address |Share Status| Additional Optional Shares / Notes 2 | DyslexicZombei | | Soft | 8 / Your GB Coordinator / Net. Eng. / Primary Remote Admin || 1 | bobsag3 | TBA | Soft | World Class vetted Hosting Avail., W/ Lowest hosting costs || 1 | Anonymous | TBA \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASIC hardware, Bitmine, Cointerra, BTCrow ESCROW, Network Engineers, Electrical Engineers, Co-op member, IT pros, Net. Eng., Primary Remote Admin, World Class vetted Hosting Avail.\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-17 04:37:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB (0.16BTC) & Blades (3.85BTC)] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nemail sent.Wouldn\\'t mind a gold and silver to finish the collection haha\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nlol was thinking the same thing.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\noooo dammit! I don\\'t have that one either!Anyway - for everyone else - julz has been nothing but awesome to deal with.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJulz,Thanks for the quick BE transaction on Sunday, it was a pleasure to met you in personDo you still offer a discount to prior customers?Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nanother delivery received.awsome to deal with. my only issue was aussie post doesnt want to work weekends I got the blue color and red color on the right. i handt noticed that the left red and blue were different until just now. i might need to order 2 more\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNice meeting you too Yes - the discount is available to customers who bought from me or Leo.For those who happen to be near the lower north shore of Sydney,I\\'m generally happy to do a quick meetup near St Leonards station for those ordering Blades, or 5+ USBs.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYou got the shiny red one on the right of that pic? Strange - I thought all the ones from that batch were the plain red.If colour is important to you - let me know and I\\'ll open the individual boxes to confirm, as both the red and metallic red/purple arrive in boxes with the same red sticker.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOk.. it looks like I\\'ve got at least one colour I hadn\\'t seen before.Now also have metallic pinkish-purple with concentric ridge effect. I don\\'t have the red one on the left, or the metallic blue on the right in this pic:\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAnother shipment of USBs has arrived.I have plenty in colours: & metallic pinky-purple0.16 BTC each10+ price 0.155 BTC eachPrevious customers0.145 BTC each10+ 0.14 BTC each\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\ndoesn\\'t bother me but thought it was worth mentioning, the red ones i got were shiny with the pinkish colouring through it too...just figured they were like that tho, but i\\'d be interested in some of the darker red if available.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, Blades\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-17 20:51:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 16/20 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nHi All, Stinky_Pete and I had some discussions off thread yesterday and decided that the bitburner fury does indeed offer some attractive possibilities. Firstly, the estimated shipping start date for these is the first week of October (although we don\\'t know yet if they can realistically achieve this) and as we all know the earlier we start the better with difficulty increasing as it is; secondly, as jlsminingcorp had an order with burnin for bitburnerXX hardware we could place an order for bitfury burners yesterday that would be processed in a separate queue to public orders potentially securing an earlier delivery (*see below); finally, there is the potential that the bitfury burners will have a quite competitive hashrate (the quoted range is 40-80GH/s, but apparently burnin has had one chip in his test rig hashing at 4GH/s over the weekend - see for info). CryptX the distributors have stated that they will offer a 100 Euro rebate on the order if the board does not reach a hashrate of 64 GH/s. As such, we decided to take the initiative and place an early order in for a bitfury burner using funds from jlsminingcorp and Stinky_Pete ( Please note that the \"discount\" on \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: bitburner fury, bitfury burners\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-17 21:47:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 7/10.29 shares left\\n### Original post:\\n150 GH/s already ordered for the groupNow 7 / 10.29 shares remaining for next component (at current BTC rate shown in the OP)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi All, so here\\'s a link to the order page for H-boards #4 and #5 as promised do the calculations and update the OP with the correct prices paid now.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi scotjam, thanks for your input, it\\'s very useful to get some insight from potential group members. As I mentioned to Stinky_Pete, we\\'re not too keen on splitting into two GBs. I do appreciate where you are coming from, but personally I think that we should be trying to get the best hardware (bitfury based at any rate) at the best prices for this group and if an alternative supplier comes along that may provide this then we should be highlighting this to the group and (if there\\'s agreement) potentially switching suppliers. If somebody started selling H-boards at 60% of the price of bitfurystrikesback then it would be pretty clear that the group should buy from the new supplier (as long as they seem reputable etc.) I don\\'t think that we would be discussing a new GB in this case. I don\\'t see burnin\\'s bitfury offer as being so different from this situation, although the exact form of the hardware is different to the H-boards. My concern is that if we split into two GBs then they will inevitably compete with each other and both will be weakened as a result. However, this is just my feeling and if the majority of the group want to continue with this GB as we are then this is what we w\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThey\\'re on sale!!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ve changed my mind, I now think the Bitburner Fury boards fit into this group buy, and I think we should buy one (with heatsink) or more as quick as we can.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI agree that it\\'s not as good as we expected. Have I seen a figure of 65 Gh/s actually achieved with one of these boards?I have been looking at the numbers. If we order in the next couple of days we should get delivery \"in the first week of October\". Our \"October starter kit\" should come at the end of that month with the additional H-boards coming in later. The difficulty is going up by 33% every 10 days which is equivalent to 235% in 30 days. So spending BTC10 now gets us 4 Gh/s very soon which will be producing bitcoins; one month later spending BTC5 gets a 4 Gh/s board which will only yield half as many bitcoins. (I\\'ve assumed that the 33% increase is from sales of many, many USB ASICs and a few big players bringing their machines into the network - if KnCminer bring their machines to market in September that\\'ll make the increases even higher). I suspect the retailers are using similar figures and are pricing their machines as high as they can so that the purchasers might just get a ROI, but may not make it. In late October and November other bitfury powered hardware will be arriving, the Drillbit boards from Australia, and two different makes of 2Gh/s USB sticks.So from a purel\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThe cheeky sods were supposed to email us loyal customers when the site opened, and yet did an email arrive ?Anyway, thought that you would all be interested in some pricing on these boards - not quite what was initially announced !Burnin bitfury board + chips + heatsink + postage + VAT (> 40 GH/s) = 895.40 Euro = 9.95 BTC (at 90 Euro/BTC) = 4.02 GH/s/BTCH-boards (25GH/s): October delivery: 390 Euro + VAT = 483.6 Euro = 5.37 BTC (at 90 Euro/BTC) = 4.66 GH/s/BTCThis doesn\\'t look good in terms of GH/s/BTC if we assume that the burnin boards run at 40 GH/s. Since nobody has demonstrated chips running much faster than this it would be a bit of a gamble IMO to assume that they will run outside the 40-50 GH/s range (anything else would be a bonus - if anybody can do it then burnin can though). There could be an advantage with burnin boards in terms of delivery dates if burnin meets his early October delivery estimate.So after being quite keen on the idea of using burnin as a supplier (based on his early estimated prices) I\\'m now not convinced there\\'s necessarily a case to switch. It all hangs on delivery estimates now, which are fairly hard to predict.Anybody else have any thoughts? Stin\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'m on board with Stinky_Pete. The longer it takes us to get mining, the longer it will take for us to reach our ROI - if we ever can. We should get mining as soon as possible.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nNevermind on the confusion. I saw the first post of this thread and it cleared it up.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi, not quite no, sorry if this is confusing. We\\'ve updated the OP, which I hope will make things clearer.* All current orders and contributions to ordered components will stand as they are. They have to, since we\\'ve placed orders with bitfurystrikesback for these components.* The next component that we are collecting for will be the bitfury burner (rath\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 150 GH/s, H-boards #4 and #5, Bitburner Fury boards, Drillbit boards, 2Gh/s USB sticks, burnin boards, H-boards (25GH/s)\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-18 00:28:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.16BTC or less, Blades 3.85BTC] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nMy order of 10 arrived yesterday, all installed and working in Ubuntu with cgminer, no issues, many thanks I guess I\\'d qualify for the previous customer discount now?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI now have all colours except the flat-red on the left.Black, red, blue, silver, gold, hot-blue, fuschia\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIncluding the mysterious \"metallic pinkish-purple\" colour?Or is that just what the metallic red looks like?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes - I\\'m calling the pinkish-purple one fuschia now - after advice from style counsel (My fiance)Perhaps I should call the ones with the patterned surfaces hot-blue & hot red?I don\\'t like referring to them as \\'metallic\\' any more - as they all have a somewhat metallic look.I actually have 3 or 4 of the flat red if anyone is in need - will only supply 1 per person until they\\'re gone.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThe plot thickens...There are/were actually 3 reddish ones.The earlier ones were a flat red - without the CE markings. The one on the left of the picture. I have only the one pictured - which I intend to keep.I have plenty of the 2 on the right - I guess I\\'ll call them \\'flat fuschia\\' and \\'hot fuschia\\'I know most people aren\\'t too fussed about the colours anyway - but there are a few collectors out there.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, Blades, Ubuntu, cgminer, flat-red, Black, red, blue, silver, gold, hot-blue, fuschia, metallic pinkish-purple, hot-blue, hot red, flat fuschia, hot fuschia\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, False, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-18 00:35:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN=4/40 shares avail]R2: Bitmine or CT or KnC + Host,BTCrow Escrow,Est.$4-5K\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll take the last 4 shares also, that should give me 7 total.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIf someone would like my share, I have not paid for it yet (stupid escrow) and if you can pay before me thats fine with me!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks for pointing that out. It\\'s two important details Commandermk mentioned right before Bob (sorry Bob): the operating temps and delivery window. 1. Any overclocker knows cooler is better, so if you start of w/ something that\\'s designed to flush heat and/or generate less heat in the first place you have much, much better chances of overclocking in the first place, and being able to overclock somewhat aggressively if that\\'s what the R2 Co-op members vote on. I told one potential miner client that my first overclock was a Celeron II overclocked 50% from 300 Mhz to 450Mhz, the first major CPU overclock from an Intel chip (man, I feel old saying that). Fortunately, as far as our miner, bobsag3 has AC to spare & then some, so we should have a high upper limit to Overclocking on Round 2 if we vote on that.2. Last I heard from Giorgio, it was starting to get into the Dec. 21 shipping date window if everyone had their BTC somehow ready to go. Keep in mind, delivery windows get shot to pieces when faced with the onslaught of actual X-mas deliveries. That Bitmine unit may slip shortly into the January timeframe in which it has to compete with the CTII.I also have to point out that I expe\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine, CT, KnC, Celeron II, CTII\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-18 02:08:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] New ASICMiner Block Erupters - In Hand - .13 BTC + Shipping. 33 Left!\\n### Original post:\\n30 units left. In hand and ready to ship. All orders placed before midnight CST will be shipped tomorrow morning.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-18 06:37:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED, PM 4 Backup shares] R2: Bitmine or CT or KnC + Host, BTCrow, Est.$4-5K\\n### Original post:\\nAnd we\\'re closed again. Whew! I\\'m gonna go take a break, give my fingers/eyes a rest, and get back to work on the spreadsheet in a bit. Hopefully, all the relevant changes have already been made as far as share ownership/ratio and voting rights for 13 shares.Cheers everyone!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCode:Round 2: Bitmine Coincraft or CointerraII or KnC. We need to reach 20 Soft Reservations - no BTC or cash paid - before sales begin. Payouts sent every 2 weeks. Before payout, 2.75% Hosting/Management fees are deducted every 2 weeks once operations Username | Wallet Address |Share Status| Additional Optional Shares / Notes 2 | DyslexicZombei | | PAID | 8 / Your GB Coordinator / Net. Eng. / Primary Remote Admin || 0 | bobsag3 | TBA | HOST? | World Class vetted Hosting Avail., W/ Lowest hosting costs || 1 | Anonymous | TBA | Pend. | 1 || 2 | jungle_dave | TBA | Pend. | Backup Admin, former EE/Net. Engineer. Plants trees in Amazon! || 2 | firsttimeuser | TBA | Pend. | 2 / DZ Co-op Round1 HashFast BabyJet Vetted Miner Host || 3 | Anonymous | TBA | PAID | Votes ceded to GBC. Votes avail. for manual override by owner || 1 | Anonymous | TBA | Pend. | || 5 | Commandermk | TBA | Pend. | Current 2nd largest share owner with earliest vote | | 7 | aneutronic | TBA | Pend. | Current largest share owner with earliest vote | | 4 | Anonymous | TBA | Pend. | || 2 | Anonymous | TBA | Pend. | || 10 | Anonymous | TBA | Pend. | Votes ceded to GBC. Manual override\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNew update that may have an effect on voting: is now taking Paypal/CC if we choose to go this route & payment method! That means a 3rd party chargeback is possible & we can get our BTC/money back if it all goes to hades. Thoughts? Anyone want to recast their vote?BTW, current official voting (open poll doesn\\'t count): 5 share votes for Bitmine, 1 for Cointerra (via PM) 34 votes pending or 16 more Bitmine weighted votes needed, whichever comes first. No pressure but: Voting needs a resolution before we all know how much we\\'re paying per share and who we\\'re ordering from.15 GBC controlled votes are parked, or held in statis, until the end of voting with tiebreaker vote held by GBC, if necessary.Please vote so we can get our order in ASAP and secure our place in the outbound Q for whatever miner we decide on. ==I\\'m surprised at how quickly this Co-operative expanded. Thank you! Here\\'s a summary of my GBC & GBEC services since August 15 (Aug. 1 for ebay sales):Approx. value of GBEC / GBC ASIC pre-order sales or pre-sales of shares on this forum by DZ in last 5 weeks: $10.1-11.1KApprox. value of DZ ebay sales (including 4 HF Baby Jet shares listed on ebay/BTC Talk GB forum & purc\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine, Coincraft, CointerraII, KnC, HashFast BabyJet\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-16 13:35:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group buy] Avalon chips Escrow John K / 1 and 2 batch PLEASE VOTE\\n### Original post:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAdress: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n patica, 320, 27.2, \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n written before, I have another 16 chips from user vellen, which marto74 keeps ignoring to transfer them to my purchase and obviously I can\\'t sign for them. I\\'ve confirmation for purchase on PM and I can dig up the transaction in the blockchain if this is required. Those 16 chips goes for refund, too.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAfter running some calculations I vote for a refund even tough I already paid for with \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGB1 Refund requests- SIGNED32 ... darkfriend77 ... refund LINK2112 ... dimomit ... refund LINK188 ... Minr ... refund LINK320 ... patica ... refund LINK1320 ... hacko.bg ... refund LINK66 ... mbd4 ... refund LINK48 ... fex ... refund LINKWe are @4086 ... Chips! Signed votes!- UNSIGNEDquest ... 128 ... refund LINKjoeventura ... 16 ...refund LINKsouspeed ... 32 ... refund LINKvarunsin ... 16 ... refund LINKpajak666 ... 36 ...refund LINKBetatester ... 33 ... refund LINKLainZ ... 32 ... refund LINKhookthem ... 16 ... refund LINKjkminkov ... 980 ... refund LINK\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCode:GB#1, jkminkov, 980, 83.3, with \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n4086+980 makes 5066 .Time for a refund\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nRequest:Code:GB1, mitty, 214, 18.19, that you won\\'t find my address in the original order list since I bought the chips from dddbtc. Here are the details of the ownership dddbtc, hereby transfer ownership of 214 avalon chips from marto74 batch #1 Order No #34 to mitty.dddbtc\\'s address: containing details of dddbtc\\'s ownership: for this line: you!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nCode:GB2, BenTuras, 400, 34, We\\'ll sort something out on the ordered boards and hosting, for example Fury16\\'s ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nGB1 Refund requests- SIGNED32 ... darkfriend77 ... refund LINK2112 ... dimomit ... refund LINK188 ... Minr ... refund LINK320 ... patica ... refund LINK1320 ... hacko.bg ... refund LINK66 ... mbd4 ... refund LINK48 ... fex ... refund LINK980 ... jkminkov ... refund LINK214 ... mitty ... refund LINK......Refund requests reached more then 50% for GB1!Please do the appropriated steps to request a refund asap ... !\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nFor the ordered boards they are scheduled for populating in wednesday.So no refund there except if somebody takes your place. The needed chips for this will be bought from zefirI\\'ll send a message to jhon.K to do refund now.Everybody that ordered and paid PCB\\'s will get them no refund there.Everybody that wants chips will get them too.This is efective for both GB1 and GB2Martin\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSo I\\'m totally confused with all this... I was expecting some clarification regarding ordered boards. Do you have all the chips needed for all the ordered boards to be populated? I\\'m trying to figure when I\\'ll receive my boards (even though if I had the chance I would ask for refund for both chips and boards). Do you have in mind any other option besides refund for the boards (i.e exchanging our orders with S-boards)?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThat\\'s news for me. My chip order is GB2(so chips not in yet), but I am in the board order you made. Ok, I can live with that.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nFurther clarification needed: I\\'m in GB1 and ordered three boards - will those be populated this week?If yes: Great! If no: As GB1-chips did not arrive, please REFUND my chips and keep the boards as a gift. However, please return the 30 for shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nWhy cant you refund the shippings costs of the hardware if we dont want it shipped ?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI\\'ll be able to give you confirmation until wednesdayMartin\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nEven with the news known that started this mess, marto ordered the PCBs. That really was a bad decision.Don\\'t know what he was thinking. Now us people with orderded boards are basically screwed, forcing us to take the boards and chips.Anyone know the price zefir is selling the chips? I seriously hope he doesn\\'t get them at a reduced price without compensating us.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nYou are not wright.The time for confirmation for the first batch of PCB\\'s was 30 of August, everybody was free to walk out before that.That is my statment from 28-th of AugustThe messy part of this Avalon Saga was officially announced same day from Zefir after 28-th of August I have more than 100 orders for HEX16.I do understand your anger . Believe me I\\'m angry to Avalon team too. I\\'ve tried to contact them many times since GB1 delivery time had come with no success.On top of the ordered PCB\\'s I have paid and delivered components for more than 1000 boards, and also significant amount spent on components for the failed for now Klondike project.What I promised is that every order\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, PCB\\'s, boards\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-18 13:59:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [UPDATED] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 13/20 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNow collecting towards a bitfury burner board (40-80 GH/s, estimated 64 GH/s, early October delivery estimate). This has already been ordered and paid for (we have an early order, which should ensure early shipping).Now 13 / 20 shares remaining for this component\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: bitfury burner board\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-18 17:24:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [NOW OPEN] ~2.5 GH/s BPMC \"RED FURY\" USB MINERS 0.90 BTC / $139 SHIPPED! GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nCan you provide a link to drivers for this device? or best info thread?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nthis is very simple I want to run this with bitminter the java client. will it plug n play like the am stick?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m working on putting that information together right now. I have been told that there also will be Native CGminer support for the device in the next few weeks so it might be plug and play by the time customers receive their units. I have also purchased one of the batch #1 units that should be arriving here soon so that I can test it out and I\\'ll be discussing it fully right here in my thread.I will find out about this as well.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI just ordered 2. Hopefully these will be in on time and working with CGMiner\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks for your order & I hope so too\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nplease find out as I am running a lot of usb sticks on my hubs. (90-110) this stick would be the perfect upgrade.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nwatching\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI have contacted DrHaribo about bitminter support.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nNot trying to cause any problems or anything, but what is the reason to buy these units at this price? Are those interested more getting these for a hobby without concern for if they make back the investment, or am I wrong to think that at these prices, there is no way these will ROI? Just wondering the logic behind it. I was interested in getting one (or a few) but I did the math, and it doesn\\'t make sense. Perhaps my math is wrong. Are these at least in some way profitable? Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYour math is correct. This price puts them on the same level as the ASICMiner usb\\'s, except that they use less electricity and space.So the reasons for buying them are the same. These will replace the AM Unit in the market, if supply can keep up.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOkay, yeah that\\'s what it seems like. It is cool you can fit the hashing power of around 7-8 Asicminer usbs in the same size. I\\'ve debated getting the usb sticks before but the prospect of knowingly losing money isn\\'t the coolest. Even if they were priced to break even I think it would be nicer to run these. It looks like they would have to be around .5 btc to essentially break even on these devices if they got delivered in october. So if we are talking profit, how many do I have to buy to get them for .4 btc a unit?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n^-- ditto what he said, how much\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nmy thanks to you\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIf you are like me and are running AM sticks as I type these are great to buy. I have 100 AM sticks running as I type.(I mine Between 75 and 100 sticks). I sell AM sticks on ebay low margin not greedy. If I buy 10 of these and they hash at 2gh that is about 10 x 6 = 60 AM sticks. But only 30-35 watts vs 175 -200 watts. It Also allows me to sell off the Am sticks on ebay. At a low price. Say I sell a 10 AM stick set on ebay for 210 usd which would be the lowest price on ebay. I would clear around 190 usd = about 1.5 btc add in .3 btc and I have 2 sticks hashing at 4gh-4.5gh. out of pocket for me would be .3btc and essentially trading in the AM sticks. So for .3btc my hash jumps from 3.3gh to 4.5gh and my power drops from around 35 watts to 10 watts. And $0 money for a hub.If you have a stick farm these sticks are really good.I sold this yesterday on ebay at the time it sold it was the best price for 10 sticks of AM down the road I would sell these on ebay at low margin allowing others to upgrade the Am sticks they purchased. They can also use the older am sticks to teach friends and family about mining. For btc to keep working mining need to grow at the small end user level...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n^- Bingo. Just lastnight I built more powered hubs for the incoming sticks which will be tested before resale.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThe price the buyer the mind should be clear...\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\non the order page for paypal i getSorry, 2.5 GH/s Bitfury1 \"REDFury\" ASIC USB Miner doesnt ship to Netherlandsdo you send to the Netherlands ?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI only accept Paypal for US based customers currently. Please order with Bitcoin if you would like your order shipped internationally.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 2.5 GH/s BPMC \"RED FURY\" USB MINERS, AM stick, ASICMiner usb, AM sticks, powered hubs\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-18 19:34:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Sold Out] New ASICMiner Block Erupters - In Hand - .13 BTC + Shipping. 30 Left!\\n### Original post:\\nAll units shipped, I\\'ll send the remaining tracking numbers tonight. Stay tuned for batch#2\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-18 20:47:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group buy] Avalon chips Escrow John K / Please send your e-mails\\n### Original post:\\nemail sent, thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHow to sigh this message, what must to paste in field \"enter a bitcoin address\"?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nenter a bitcoin address must be the address from which you paid for the chips.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI bought the chips from someone else who bought from the original purchaser in GB1... hope my refund request goes okay.Mail sent, thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMarto,I want my 4 HEX16 assembled with the chips i ordered.I paid for assembling and transport.Do i need to confirm anything?On the other hand i ordered 2 x K1 and 2 chips, is it possible to get refund for K1 and 2 chips?Kind regards,\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nif 1 person failed to send you an mail we can wait forever\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nthat\\'s why I think it\\'s better to have a deadline. The remaining funds can be transferred to a wallet controlled by marto about the K1\\'s: if they will not be produced, I guess the chips and boards will be refunded...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSo Let\\'sset a dead line Friday 18:00 GMTPlease, send your requests before that.All requested refunds will be processed by Jhon.KThe rest coins will be transferred to Zefir in exchange for delivering rest of the chips to me.All these chips will be here ready either for assembly or delivery by your wish.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nok, that\\'s clear Is there any news about K1?If the news is availible after the deadline and if they will not be produced, can the chips and boards be refunded after the deadline?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, HEX16, K1\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-19 00:29:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [NOW OPEN] 0.9 BTC OR LESS! ~2.5 GH/s BPMC \"RED FURY\" USB MINERS! GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nI updated the OP and hopefully cleaned it up a bit so it\\'s less confusing 10 orders received so far\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI just ordered 2. Hopefully these will be in on time and working with CGMiner\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks for your order and I hope so too\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nLet me know when you get under $5 per GH\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWill do BKM\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPlease double check your Paypal accounts before submitting payments. I will only accept paypal orders from USA CONFIRMED ADDRESSES.If you have any issues confirming an address I suggest you order with Bitcoin instead.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNow Offering FEDEX Express Shipping Worldwide, Delivered in 1-3 Business days for 1BTC\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"RED FURY\" USB MINERS\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-19 04:29:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GROUP BUY] HASHFAST/COINTERRA 1.55 [btc] for 10GH, JOHN K. ESCROW BEST DEAL\\n### Original post:\\nExact email from John K. from Round 1 GB (CLOSED): read a lot of proposals for group buys at this point, and I must say that yours came across as one of the best written and thought out. Everything seems right on track, and I guess I could hold the shares in escrow for the mining payouts, for say 2-3 months until most buyers are comfortable enough for them to be returned to you here. Just get a thread up, and I\\'ll post the contracts etc as the new guy here but I\\'ve been buying and selling electronics on the \\'net for a long time, including reselling giant CRTs and pre-order Wiis. I recently resold 3 Jalapenos on Ebay via my wife\\'s acct: With me acting as my wife\\'s co-seller for IT related items we have a 160 perfect feedback rating as a Buyer/Seller on ebay built up over 10 years. - I\\'m a former Sr. Electronics Technician & a current IT Network Engineer. I\\'ve allowed John to vet my ID in preparation for this GB. Organizing something like this is a piece of cake compared to designing prototype IT Hardware for the DoD at low TRL numbers. I\\'ve sent my LinkedIn profile link to John as part of my verification process. Here\\'s some stories & pics of me working\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Hashfast, Cointerra, Jalapenos\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-19 17:51:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] R2: Bitmine/CT/KnC? + Host, BTCrow. Please Vote! Think of the children.\\n### Original post:\\nReceived another vote via PM. This vote is for 2 shares for KnC. This person has voted for KnC. Reasoning: \"My vote is KNC (are you kidding me 50-60 days before any of the a good point. We\\'d be paying about $12.50 more a share each but be getting the miner anywhere from a month & a half to 2 months ahead of Bitmine (just mentioning, if anyone had a change of heart w/ their share votes).Current voting: 9 Bitcoin Rig, 1 CoinTerra, 2 KnC13 public votes outstanding by my count, 15 late votes currently held by myself (unless the owners of those 13 shares would like to vote).Please feel free to change your vote all the up until the voting ends and a winning option is announced among our options.===Also, I received another unsolicited payment for shares worth 1.97BTC from a R1/R2 co-op member! These shares are valued at $126.22 (current Coindesk price) and will be applied to shares. If we go with ~$137.50 shares via KnC and BTC hasn\\'t appreciated up to ~$137.50 by the time we transfer BTC to the mfg., I may have to ask this member (and the other pre-paid gent) to chip in a little extra. 7 Shares paid up by 3 R2 Co-op members: valued at up to ~$126 ea. or current value of BTC (\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCurrently I have to go with KNC also if there is a good shot at getting delivery that much earlier. I\\'m flexible though if someone can make a better case for another choice.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI already voted for Bitmine, but now I think KNC will be better choice, DZ please change my voteSome information, speculation and my thoughts that led me to change my vote:Assumed KNC ship date - 20th November, with 23rd November delivery, Bitmine ship date - 23rd December, with delivery in the end of December/beginning of January.KNC Jupiter will be probably 500+ GH/s (but not upgradeable) and delivered min 30 days before Bitmine - this could be crucial. Majority of return will be gained in first 3 difficulty jumps even before Bitmine devices ship.Worse J/GH/s ratio of KNC Jupiter against Bitmine devices isn\\'t important with cheap electricity.Network hashrate jumped to 1270 TH/s (only ghash.io is 190 TH/s) and there will be huge jump with KNC September/October delivery in 1-2 weeks. The sooner we start mining, the better chance to ROI.Estimate of ASIC pre-orders (6,000 to 8,000 TH/s by end of 2013) by DeathAndTaxes\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI know my vote doesnt mean much, but KNC\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSo what\\'s the total vote now? I think we are a little late to the KNC party, but the window of profitability for any of the mfg. we are considering is pretty short. So I\\'m inclined to throw my vote to KNC just so we can get this going. Time is really of the essence right now.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nTop o\\' the Morning, gentlemen!Thank you for the re-votes. I may have another option that may cause you guys to re-vote those re-votes! Thanks to my GBEC services, I make contacts on both the buyer & seller side for both Group Buys *and* Matchmaking services for hosting. One potential client I befriended a few weeks ago that\\'s looking for low cost miner hosting, sent me the following offer. I\\'ll need some sort of proof of ordering before we set this up (& if we do, I\\'m setting it up in escrow *at cost* via BTCrow: 1% since I\\'ve never traded with this potential client before) but this is an intriguing offer: you\\'d essentially get a Miner Protection Plan (2-4X our original hashrate) *AND* an even earlier placement in HashFast\\'s order Q (which I might add is in California; much closer than Europe to our most likely host site in Missouri:\"Hi DZI have 1 babyjet order #616 == Babyjet 64I paid $5400 + 400 shipping to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, although I intend to change the shipping for USA hosting in Washington with bitcoinasichostingI have invested heavily in KNC, early queue delivery and nolonger \"need\" my babyjetIt\\'s not big deal to keep it, it\\'s paid for, non refundable etc, but in case your g\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n 616..\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSorry, typo. Hey, I just woke up! Fixed it. BTW, Order 616 was paid for 9 days before our R1 GB HF BabyJet that\\'s heading to your island. Can someone run the TGB numbers for a Nov. Hashfast 4 cent electricity? Mining pool fee would basically be around 2.7% as an est. of the 2.75% + 4 cent electricity. I gotta head to work in a bit.Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat\\'s your take on this new news? You and the other R1 gents & I would be doubling up on a HashFast bet but, wow, we\\'d get it in very early Nov. instead of laaate Dec. or most likely January (KnC: late Nov.) with other options. Costs a little bit more than the intended $5K max size of this R2 GB, but the profit projections (and industry best MPP) make this very attractive.My take: this might be our very best shot at meeting ROI in the short to mid term compared to any other avail. option.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWell HashFast #616 is my v\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC, Bitmine, CoinTerra, KNC Jupiter, ASIC, Babyjet\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-19 18:29:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] USB Miners .13 btc each or less New BLADE and USB group buy coming soon\\n### Original post:\\n9/14/13 This group buy is closed. I will start a new group buy in the next 18-26 hours for USB Miners and Blade Miners. Please keep watching for details. Thank you!9/13/13 This group buy is open to everyone shipping to a USA address! Thank you for your orders!This group buy is for past SilentSonicBoom USA customers only. Only SilentSonicBoom past USA customers qualify for this special pricing. I will only ship to USA addresses. They will be offered first come, first served to past SilentSonicBoom USA customers only. Once they are gone, I will stop taking orders and refund any extra payments made. All orders placed will ship in 24-48 hoursYes, I have a blade group buy here .USB Miners .13 btc each or less!All USB Miners 0.13 BTC Or Less!USB Miners 0.13 btc each or less!Thank You For Your Support!New Lower Prices!0.13 BTC Or Less! 9/11/13 All Blades in hand shipped with tracking numbers. INTERNATIONAL ORDERS please send me a refund request on any blades/miners ordered as I am refunding ALL INTERNATIONAL blade orders at a rate of 105% of what you paid for the delay and non delivery(As I patiently wait for them to show up someday ). USA orders on blades can request a refund if y\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwoot... i got them - in silver thx!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, Blade Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-19 20:32:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Open] 1btc = 15GH/s with lifetime hosting\\n### Original post:\\nThere are at least 2 other GB around 1.5 BTC for 50 GH/s if we\\'re talking about CoinTerra. The timeline just isn\\'t worth it\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMany don\\'t believe in the price going up again, or much. If you get 10 times as much GH in a future where the difficulty is 10 times higher, then the devices that come sooner are only better until the cointerras come out. Those who aren\\'t in the cointerra game at that point will be behind.As more devices come out that are superior, I\\'ll be staying in that game and getting those as well, letting all my buyers know which devices to stay on top of. I also purchased part of an oct KNC, which beats the USB easily.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nInvest now to stay ahead of the curve later.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhy should we trust you, your only a member I am not trying to be rude Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHey no prob. I have an amazon account and ebay/half account that you can buy from instead (great feedback), ebay says they don\\'t accept Bitcoin, but if you message me we can make it work, (have before with other buyers). Here\\'s the ebay link: my feedback.Let me know if you\\'re interested. Oh also I have a forum to unite all the buyers in discussion here: \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYeah, you posted in Waldo\\'s GB, so you know. I\\'m not saying CoinTerra\\'s won\\'t be worth it, but one should wait until they ship first batch in december. IF they do, go for January batch at almost 1/3rd price. I intended to invest in Waldo\\'s GB but rather invested in a KnC Saturn. IF that ships in time I\\'ll make a lil bit and add some more to go with a CoinTerra GB. BTC is gonna rise? Yeah maybe it will, if you\\'re betting on that, you will make far more investing in buying BTC low and selling them high. That\\'s what I do with WDC. I pump and dump it. Look on cryptsy. Been dumping loads of cheap WDC to bring it down from .000032 to .000027, And then I bought a load of WDC to sell when it goes back up :p But WDC mining is nascent, BTC mining aintEDIT: Oh so it\\'s you! :p Sorry to be harsh, lots of scammers around\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'ve called up Cointerra for the first device I had ordered with several other buyers with them and asked where I was on their list. I ordered really early, and I made it for the first batch (first two weeks), but if you order now it\\'ll likely be mid January. Now I know how hype works, and I know their orders will be slowing down some, but if you wait till December to make a purchase, you\\'re probably waiting till March to get the device.Cointerra also has a pretty solid guarantee so they don\\'t pull a butterfly on you.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYou *really* called them? I read on the forum about their phone numbers not working or something like that. CoinTerra haven\\'t been really very public with details. I\\'m putting my trust in KnC for now. They\\'ve been quite communicative. I might invest in a GB next month, dependent on circumstances.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYes I called them, twice actually. It was the same person, so I\\'m pretty sure that guy might be very busy considering how many millions are being invested in the device. Have you ever tried calling them? You might as well at least try if not before speculating that it\\'s impossible to reach them.I didn\\'t get through one or two times because they were probably busy (I called soon after the new $6K deal was offered).\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: CoinTerra, oct KNC, KnC Saturn, WDC\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-20 06:04:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED/OUT OF STOCK] ASICminer Erupter GB#8!\\n### Original post:\\n9/12/2013 - New Stock In Hand and Ready to Ship!!WELCOME TO MY GROUP BUY #8 FOR ASICMINER USB ERUPTERS! As you know I have been selling ASICminer USB\\'s and Accepting Paypal as the payment option. I have sold over 2500+ USB\\'s WORLDWIDE to happy customers! Group Buy #1 Located Here : Buy #2 Located Here : Buy #3 Located Here : Buy #4 Located Here : Buy #5 Located Here : Buy #6 Located Here : Buy #7 Located Here : to know more about me? Join my Facebook Group! Price as of 9/12/2013USD $19.95If ordering over (10) PM me for bulk discounts*BTC 0.15*Colors Available : Blue, Silver, Red, Gold=>USA Domestic Shipping is FREE and orders over 50+ units now get FREE EXPRESS PRIORITY Shipping is $35 or 0.3BTC FOR UP TO 25 UNITS and If you want to buy more just PM me =>Need Express shipping? Just send me a PM before ordering!Current Inventory Available : 0Current Delivery Date: IN HAND Current Shipping Date: IMMEDIATELY[[ How to Buy ]]Paypal : Go here => Payment Address : AM NOW ACCEPTING PRE-PRINTED SHIPPING LABELS FOR DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL ORDERS -- IF YOU WANT YOUR ORDER SHIPPED VIA FEDEX, UPS, etc.IF YO\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWaiting on payment for 1 order and I will be officially SOLD OUT!Thanks everyone!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGot mine in today, and they are hashing perfectly. When do you anticipate getting more in? Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI will no longer be selling ASICminer USB Erupters. Please check out my new Group Buy #9 for BPMC \"Red Fury\" USB\\'s. Thanks & Happy Hashing\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer USB Erupter, BPMC \"Red Fury\" USB\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-20 10:19:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [NOW OPEN] 0.83 - 0.9 BTC ~2.5 GH/s BPMC \"RED FURY\" USB MINERS! GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nI just received word that there will be a working version of CGminer for this product in only a few days. I\\'ll confirm that it works as soon as my test unit arrives\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n36 units ordered so far! I\\'ll be updating new confirmed orders in my second post once a day\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHow many sales do you need for this group buy to go off?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOrder placed for purchase of 1 Red Fury USB Miner.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWow, that kev guy is a real ass.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhy is that so? Somebody is using his work without permission and he is an ass and not that other one?!? Using pictures like this is classic method of deceiving buyers you are already far ahead with some project while you actually lagging behind and big red flag for buyers.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNot a problem. Removed. I\\'ll take my own photos of the product when it arrives.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThe Group Buy is on so it doesn\\'t matter what amount. I\\'ll submit all received orders and have them shipped once the manufacturer is ready to ship in about a week and a half.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nConfirmed! Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAnother order in! keep them coming!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWill you be selling these on ebay like you did with the Block Erupters or are we going to have a chance to do the same thing we did with the erupters? Buy a few to offset our costs by selling some on ebay at a profit?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIf you are interested in buying in bulk and reselling on eBay contact me as I am setting up a reseller program similar to Canaryinthemine\\'s Group Buy\\'s where you sell on eBay and I will fulfill the shipments, all you need to do is provide a shipping label\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ndoes it on work on bfgminer under raspberry pi?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'m Currently using bfgminger and Kevin\\'s video shows it working with that miner. I see lots of questions about CGminer.Just want to make sure before buying. Will this work with bfgminer?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYes, It does work if you compile it yourself with the drivers supplied by BPMC. Beastlymac confirmed that they are working right now with Luke_Jr to get it working out of the box for Windows which should be completed soon.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI will not be selling these on eBay. Only directly to customers here and through my webstore. If you are a eBay re-seller contact me for special bulk pricing and handling options.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nOrder placed, going to have to try some of these out .\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI am gathering coins for a 20 stick buy. I plan to order 20 a week sell 15-17 on ebay.I may try to set up a small buy for bitminter.com minersI would like to order 20 run them for a day and sell them knowing they work. I run the sticks on bitminter.com java client since it is the most newbe friendly client for mining. I sold a few hundred AM sticks on ebay like this trying to make it easy and fairly low cost for a new miner to get started. I Should have my coins in order in 2-4 days. I want sticks in hand and pretested by me with my mining farm to be able to sell on ebay as I believe this is the best way for a new miner to start up. Send in a payment and the item ships out in 1 day. I don\\'t mind doing a preorder to get started with stock. But I want the ebayers to know I ship it out fast. This really worked well for me with the AM sticks. Since you have the earliest delivery date I am gathering coins to buy from you. Knowing these work with bitminter.com java client is a must. BTW dr h of bitminter thinks they will since they are serial port com type devices\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nConfirmed! Thanks for your order\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nOver 60 units ordered\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nYes we will be setting up some units that DrHaribo can ssh in and work with. We expect bitminter support soon.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThanks for the update Beastlymac\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nFew more orders in! Order confirmation Post Updated\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nPlanning the same thing, ssinc here was good enough to say he wasn\\'t going to be competing with us on ebay this time around like he did before with the AM sticks, wondering if the other two resellers for this will do the same or if they\\'ll be our competition at their pricing. That\\'s about the only thing that\\'s holding me back from placing an order the about same size.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Red Fury USB Miner, Block Erupters, AM sticks\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-20 11:49:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [UPDATED] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 6/20 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNow collecting towards a bitfury burner board (40-80 GH/s, estimated 64 GH/s, early October delivery estimate). This has already been ordered and paid for (we have an early order, which should ensure early shipping).Now 6 / 20 shares remaining for this component\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nbought another share ,here\\'s the txtid \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGood news from Cryptz (supplier of the bitfury burner board)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: bitfury burner board\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-20 14:31:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [UPDATED] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 0/20 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNow collecting towards a bitfury burner board (40-80 GH/s, estimated 64 GH/s, early October delivery estimate). This has already been ordered and paid for (we have an early order, which should ensure early shipping).Now 0 / 20 shares remaining for this component\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: bitfury burner board\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-21 04:19:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #15 Blade Miners 3.60 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nThis group buy is now open! Thank you for your continued orders and support!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n9/16/13 Due to requests from customers, I have lowered my prices to 0.125 BTC or less for USB Miners effective immediately!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nany backplane that can be purchased on their own from previous group buys or left overs?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOne of my blades up and running thanks SSB! Once i get done with all my work tomorrow hopefully i can get rest up .\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNo. Only if you buy 6-9 at the same time I will sell one backplane at 0.25 BTC. If you buy 10 Blades at once, you get the backplane for free.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYou are very welcome. Good luck with the rest!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks for another quick sale!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCould you do this deal for united kingdom??\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nDoes anyone know about USB port connectivity? I do not have access to a router that I could use these with, so a USB connector on them would be very helpful and I could get a bunch.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThe do not. same Ethernet control as before.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n9/17/13 I have USB Miners and Blade Miners in stock ready to ship within 24-48 hours of receiving your order. All current orders have shipped. Have a great day!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThanks for great service as always SSB! I have one up and hashing after today and getting through rest of things i have today hopefully rest will be up and running Top notch service as always.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n9/17/13 Backplanes are no longer available with orders of 10 or more blades. I did not receive any backplanes in my order of blades. I will update here if they become available in the future.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWOW.Way to reward your customers and resellers friedcat\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThey may be sent in future. I did not get any today. I have sent pm asking where they are. I will post an update if I get an answer.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIts more of a consistency thing.You would think after shipping how many thousands and thousands of these hes had to ship, he would know that for every 10 you should get a backplane... to atleast have a option to pay for it.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nGot mine all hashing away today!!! Thanks SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\n9/17/13 Late Night Update All blades in stock are sold! I will be confirming orders in the next six hours in order of payment placed. Please continue to place orders for shipment from me this Saturday or next Tuesday at the latest. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n9/18/13 I just got home, opened all Blade boxes, and I had a surprise. Instead of sending the green power connectors/adapters to include in each box, they sent the actual green pieces that are soldered to the board Unfortunately, I only have a few extra power adapters. I did get a hold of friedcat and he is sending out adapters express tonight(should be here by Friday at the latest,maybe sooner) and he is shipping some backplanes that will arrive early next week. I will confirm all orders that will ship and let you know if you have to wait for power adapters or more blades to arrive.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\ni have about 10 spare green power adapterscan ship today from eu if you are interested.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nPrice for shipping to uk please ?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI am only shipping to USA addresses. Thanks for the question.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nJust received my first v2 blade today.Has anyone else received damaged boards like this?I know it probably won\\'t ruin anything, but I will have to revise my plans for mounting/cooling :-/...just kinda bummed that I can\\'t even power the board due to missing the power adapter, and it\\'s already got 2 chipped corners.I\\'m trying to figure out if they came from friedcat like this, or if it\\'s the awesome work of the USPS.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nLook at some of the posts and posts in canary\\'s thread, they\\'ve all been breaking like that but it doesn\\'t affect the performance, seems to be people are thinking it was there just for assembly.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nMy 2 have looks like that.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nmine from canary was broken as well on the bottom edges\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\n9/19/13 I have 15 blades in stock ready for shipment and hope to receive more on Friday for Saturday delivery or on Monday for Tuesday delivery. First 15 blades ordered will ship within 24 hours. I don\\'t have any backplanes at this time.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nOrder received and it\\'s hashing away. Thanks for the great communication and fast shipping.Interested in backplane news as it evolves. I think the demand for them is higher than friedcat might have expected.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nGlad you received them right away and that they are working for you. Still waiting for more backplanes to be shipped. Thanks for the order.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\n9/21/13 All blades are out of stock. More should arrive for shipment on Tuesday of next week. If I confirmed your order already, you will get your blade/s miner/s. Please place orders for shipment next week Tuesday or Wednesday. Thank you.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, Blade Miners, backplane, green power connectors/adapters, green power adapters, v2 blade\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-21 04:30:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R2:Bitmine/CT/KnC/HashFast early November!? + Host, BTCrow. Please Vote!\\n### Original post:\\nWell I already have one on order and was looking to diversify but this deal shouldn\\'t be passed as it\\'s likely hf will ship before a new knc order.... do it.Also interested in a R3 GB.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nExcellent! I agree with your assessment as well but I wish KnC all the best as a new friend (Phoenix1969) has quite a few KnCs on order, besides the gentleman that\\'s generously offering us his place in the Q at cost.19 votes for Hashfast, 1 for Cointerra (I think, please PM me if I have this incorrect). 2 more votes for Hashfast for the automatic win!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n1 last thing & I promise to stop jabbering away for a while until new news:- Another R1 Co-op member, a 4th R1 member, has decided to reserve backup shares in R2.- I\\'d like to announce that I\\'m publicly reserving two shares if any reserve shares are declined by this 4th R1 Co-op member.I think there will be healthy demand for backup shares for R2 since the shipment is so early compared to comparable available GBs. Please send me a PM if you\\'d like to be 3rd or 4th in line for backup shares for R2. Tanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHashFast wins! I voted my 2 votes at the end, since the other voters were shy. Details of potential proposed buyout of HashFast Batch 1, Order 616, PM sent to Seller, assuming HashFast wins the vote in a few hours:\"Hey XXXXX,Hope, you don\\'t mind if we do this through BTCrow Escrow so I can allay fears from the co-operative that you don\\'t bail with everyone\\'s money/BTC. It isn\\'t going to cost you a thing except a few hours to a day at the most since we\\'ll pay the 1% fee. If it was just between you & I, by now after that free tip you gave me that could\\'ve led to a lot of work (it didn\\'t, but I still remember that) I would\\'ve just trusted you enough to just pay you directly if it was all up to me and if it was just my money/BTC involved.The way I was hoping we could set it up is that you would be the Seller on the BTC Escrow site, BTCrow: 1. An Escrowed transaction for the whole sale at BTCrow, with me paying you a lump BTC from everyone\\'s BTC once I receive everyone\\'s BTC (they can do a *separate* escrow for this GB share itself but that\\'s an additional 1.5% fee on top of the 1% fee we\\'re building into the $151.50 share price so that we can have escrow protection and dispute resoluti\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine, CT, KnC, HashFast\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-21 07:33:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R2:HashFast FTW! + Host, $151.50/share w/ BTCrow. Payments in 48 hrs plz\\n### Original post:\\nSo close! Anyway, I don\\'t need to use votes under my stewardship to finish this vote off. As you probably expected: I vote my 2 shares for HashFast!Therefore: HashFast is the winner! 21 votes for HF, 1 for CT, 18 Abstaining (AKA chillin\\')I\\'ll update the title thread with the new price & info of $151.50 per share.Wow! Nice turn of events, and it\\'s true that fortune favors the prepare, I suppose. Pats on the back all around gents!Payments are due by Saturday night, 8PM Hawaii Standard Time or shares are forfeited and fair game for backup share holders such as myself & the 4th R1 DZ GB Co-op member.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWe can make the USD/BTC exchange rate on a case by case basis or we can try to figure it out as a group.I propose Coindesk or Coinbase as proposed BTC exchange sources for this R2 GB and my Co-operative, in general.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI like this one \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThat sounds relatively fair although I\\'m showing their BTC value as higher than both Coindesk *and* Coinbase. As long as we\\'re within 5% either way, I\\'m fine with this. I just didn\\'t want to end up Mt. Goxed & having to pay an extra 10-15% out of pocket. This buy out of Order 616, of a little more than $6.1K adjusted for the seller\\'s local currency changes, will essentially use up everything we put together; any tiny left over, if any, is going to be directly applied to a UPS/Battery solution, as bobsag3 has redundant power but it\\'s meant for longer outages. One reason he can charge such low hosting prices is he\\'s depending on the miner to decide how much local battery backup/UPS voltage regulation + power filtering protection the client wants for their machine(s).Guys, please keep sending in the payments for your shares so we can get this buy out taken care of. I\\'m currently seeing about 10.4BTC in the wallet for this buyout: is the wallet that we\\'ll be transferring funds from when the buyout transaction is set up. I already have about 8BTC in mcxNOW shares there I\\'ll sell for my share of the BTC when ready. I had 0.538 BTC in this wallet prior to GB R2 deposits. I con\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhile payments are being sorted out for R2...There seems to be interest in a Round 3, as another anonymous gentleman has contacted me with an offer to buy half of a Sierra if we can work together on Round 3. That way he can use Round 3 as training wheels to be a GBC as an introduction to running his own GB on the Group Buys Forum. Essentially: there\\'d be 2 GBCs on the next round, the largest shareholder/new GBC (who is or will be vetted thoroughly by me) and myself. The new GBC would be taking the lead for Round 3 after pre-planning, with me advising behind the scenes, stepping in where necessary, and having override decisions as the veteran GBC/mentor. I will say that this person already handles people\\' IDs, cash, etc., etc.. regularly with no issues.I would also be the remote primary admin for the R3 miner as well as handle payouts, troubleshooting, and incremental overclocking (if that\\'s what we vote for), so no worries about the a GBC running off w/ the co-op\\'s miner or siphoning off hashrate as long as the majority are satisfied with the shipping/hosting location.==Let me know if there\\'s interest in starting a Round 3, and perhaps this gentleman will step out of the shadows sh\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, CT, UPS/Battery solution, Sierra\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-19 16:42:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #14 USB Miners 0.125 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\n9/16/13 Due to requests from customers, I have lowered my prices to 0.125 BTC or less for USB Miners effective immediately!USA OrdersUnits Ordered Unit Price 1-14 0.125 BTC15-60 0.120 BTC61-100 0.117 BTC101-220 0.115 BTC 221+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Thank you!USA USPS priority shipping 0.06 btc 1-14 minersUSA USPS priority shipping 0.11 btc 15-100 miners, each additional 1-100 miners 0.06 btcUSA USPS express shipping 0.38 btc per 100 miners, each additional 1-100 miners 0.19 btcInsurance (Optional)0.013 BTC per $100 Insurance Purchased, $5,000 Maximum Per Order\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGreat guy! Cant explain the amount of customer service you get. I have 40 of my new ones hashing away next up setting up my blades and then hopefully in next day or two set up rest of usb miners once hubs are in Again great customer service you wont regret order. Have done multiple orders of different types of items. Always treated me right.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nnotlist3d,I might finally jump on these(getting impatiant waiting for my knc jupiters), did you buy 8 of these plus an anker 9 port hub plus an arctic breeze?I don\\'t see a 10 port anker, your advice is appreciated.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAnker doesn\\'t make 10 ports anymore, I didn\\'t like them they burnt out on me fairly quick.The new Anker 9 ports come with a 10th port for charging (you can plug the fan into this one as it won\\'t transmit anything to the computer), I do use a large fan to hit all my hubs and myself so I just have that port empty as it can\\'t do anything but use power.I like the dlink 7 ports there cheap and can be purchased quickly.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSo cheap wow.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n12 ordered. PM sent. Thx!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI happen to have some old anker (and offbrand anker 10\\'s laying around) using them work great. The original\\'s are really tough metal bricks almost. I personally use every usb spot with a miner, and use a desk fan (overkill) but it makes it where i don\\'t take up a usb spot with fan on multiple hubs. Kinda of fun though to have a few rows of them. Anker quality is top notch, but recently with all the hubs I have been more into the price per port on hub as my main factor. Sadly the new Anker 9 went down a port and also changed one to charge so you get 8 true ports, and 1 fan at a cost per hub that is a little high.The new hubs i ordered are MCM (if you google there is a 15 percent off promo code i believe on official site) cant vouch for it yet personally but its price per port is extremely cheap if you need multiple. They seem a little slow at shipping though at MCM. SSB is so good he beat my hubs here lol . has a really good comparison of hubs and how many people can get successfully running on each brand and a lot of testing.If you do decide to order some are lots of fun to actually do some mining. I have lost track of order number\\'s with SSB but if you decide to try some ou\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCannot decide. These are good for giving gifts but not for mining. I will buy a few later on from you SSB. Do not want many right now.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nwhat about for alts like ppcoin?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nGood suggestion.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nReceived my last order. Thanks SilentSonic*!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYou are very welcome. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThis is my first purchase I sent 2.99 btc for 24 sticks. I sent a pm and here is the trans action id which I signed. please send colors other then black if possible thanks phil.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nJust wanted to give feedback to SSB, order shipped on friday, received yesterday afternoon. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI received my order today! Thank you SSB all items working good!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n9/17/13 I have USB Miners and Blade Miners in stock ready to ship within 24-48 hours of receiving your order. All current orders have shipped. Have a great day!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n9/17/13 Late Night Update All blades in stock are sold! I will be confirming orders in the next six hours in order of payment placed. Please continue to place orders for shipment from me this Saturday or next Tuesday at the latest. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI have plenty of usb miners in stock for shipping in 24 hours or less.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nBump for ssb. Great to work with!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nOrder placed for 9 USB Miners. Check PM for all of the necessary info. The BTC should already be in your wallet.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIt will ship 24 hrs from today (his update yesterday states plenty of usb miners and last time he said he had plenty that inventory lasted a few days)It is .125 + .06 for a single device. 2 device is .125+.125+.063 device is has a day job so shipping has to happen early morning / late afternoonI have ordered about 200 USBs and 2 blades from SSB over the past few weeks so I kind of know what I am talking about..\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nYes. USB miners are in stock. I work usually early afternoon to late at night. Place a\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, Blade Miners, Anker 9 port hub, Arctic breeze, Dlink 7 ports, Anker 10\\'s, Desk fan, MCM hubs, SSB hubs, USBs, Blades\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-21 06:53:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [EU/UK GROUP BUY] RedFury USB miner 2.2 - 2.7 GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nI was hoping you would be running a group buy .Still think you need to be an official distributor for something, perfect service with 0 issue. DOO EET!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\npieh0 i swear you take all my money that I give to Outcast3k on bit bargain\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ll certainly take one initially, just to see how it works. I\\'ll pay later, when we\\'re closer to the end of the GB.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nExcellent!!2x please will pm you later\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n10 on reservation please, if thats ok.Once we\\'re close to the 250 mark, i can settle with you .\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI will take 2 units, maybe a couple more. but 2 for sure.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI was hoping you would run a group buy for these, but I think they are too expensive. I\\'ll think about it. Do they still think delivery time from Indonesia is about 10 days?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAt 0.87, they are cheaper than 7.5 asicminers, which would come to BTC1.275.Making an ROI is a question that\\'s always going to be an issue with current tech, until you can pull 10gh/s out of a chip.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI agree, really they are a \\'fun\\' item. I\\'m a bit short of funds at the moment, which tends to colour things. Perhaps I can shift something on eBay before I join in.Who gets to keep the BPMC memory stick? OutCast3K I guess.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWhat is the deadline on this group buy?Is it linked to the Red Fury 9pm 20th Sept deadline?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI believe they\\'re shipping around the start of October, so around then.Its not linked to that deadline. no.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nFantastic, I will be able to order a few more then. Please put me down for 5\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n5 for me too\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'m more interested in the novelty factor, rather than ROI. I like tinkering with these things.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nGreetings, OutCast3k.I want to buy 2 RedFury USB Gizmos.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI can verify that we are working with OutCast3k as a distributor of our products\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nGood to hear.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nDo it, he\\'s been perfect with every group buy i\\'ve been in and has lightning fast shipping when he gets the stuff to send.Time to promote this guy from GB organiser to Distributor.Plus it would be nice to have a supplier of something bitcoin related in the UK, rather than ordering from the other side of the world .\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nCoolCan i mix them in the USB hub with my BES\\'s?Does CGMINER just pick them up?And as above, Outcast3k is a gent and you will have no trust issues here.(And I trust no-one these days.....)\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWe are working on cgminer support right now. Should be compatiable in the next week or so. Ckolivas has recieved one of our units to test with. Also Luke is working on bfgminer and DrHaribo will start working on bitminter soon.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nFantastic news!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nCan i reserve 3 please\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nGood Luck OutCast, you really deserve to be a distributer in the UK\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nReserve me 10 for now please\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThanks for all the kind words everyone Will add those that requested to be reserved to the list.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI will look at reserving 5 please\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nwatching\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nPlease reserve 3 for me. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nfrom where they will be shippedI can let them pick\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\noutcastis there a cut off date for paymentthanks\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nProbably around the 27th-28th of this month to make sure we\\'re ready for the shipment that is expected for early October.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\ncheers\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nwatching!\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nPlease reserve one for me. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nIs possible shipping to Spain?How much would the shipping 4 units?Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\n(4 * 0.85) + 0.55 = 3.95 btc\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nOk!! Sorry... I had not read well.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nhello, shipping outside UK is too expensive, dont you have cheaper solution\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\ncould I reserve one for now please\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nPlease, from where they will be shipped?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nOk, UK... jejejeI will aim to ship the miners on the day I receive them, as long as the delivery is before 3:30 PM.Collection is also fine (I\\'m in the UK, near the Dartford Tunnel)\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nI\\'ve added a few other options.\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nHiCan you reserve 2 for me?\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\njust a quick question, are these already batch produced and ready for delivery say next week/within a month or are these preorders of when they are mass manufactured? theirs a bit of a difference, would be great to knowTHanks!\\n\\n### Reply 44:\\nI believe Beastlymac will have stock that will be ready for shipping very early in October. I\\'ll update the original post to make it clearer.\\n\\n### Reply 45:\\ncount me in for a few then will send payment shortly\\n\\n### Reply 46:\\nHello OutCast3k,Could I reserve 5 USB miner RedFury for me, please?Thank you very much!\\n\\n### Reply 47:\\nSkalman usbs 3 paidHere\\'s to Outcast, thank you for the superfast replies man !Cant wait to get my hands on these baby\\'s\\n\\n### Reply 48:\\nHi OutCast3k,I want reserve 2 more, p\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: RedFury USB miner 2.2 - 2.7 GH/s, asicminers, BPMC memory stick, RedFury USB Gizmos, USB miner RedFury\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-17 13:25:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Coincraft A1 28nm ASIC] - Discuss Group Buy Chip to Miner (DIY: THE WASP)\\n### Original post:\\nThis sounds like a interesting opportunity, to get ready for the future mining market ...I would be willing to be part of it ... also for organizing stuff and such ... I\\'m from Switzerland, so might be useful for the communication or other stuff with bitmine.ch ... !\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCould be a winner, watching.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nFeel free to PM me or post more questions.Basically we are working on some concepts for the miner based on what we know of the chips from this point obviously early days but there seems to be some headroom and longer term ROI for this chip. Potential for alternative cooling as well. We will be working out more details on the plan but feedback here is also welcome so we can work out a fair equity for those doing the hard lifting for design and fab. We are hoping to make a design that will also be able to upcycle so that parts can be reconstituted should there be a new revised chip.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDefinitely something to follow. Looks like details are coming out this month on the chips pertaining to a data sheet if it hasn\\'t already?At those numbers (8.5$ per Ghash) and a quick swag at the term it looks like these would need to be ready to ship in around the next 60 days at $1700 per 200 Ghash to make it towards a ROI projection. Looking at getting them out in November at 200 Ghash or possibly December if they can hit 400 GHash (4.25$ per Ghash) should be a target. If that isn\\'t realistic or at least close it may be a tough sell!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nFor such a community project, I will donate my hosting for the cost for power/cooling. No profit/parts, I would be honored to help out\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCrazy Canadian.... Good luck, hoping for some W1/W16 for Christmas!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPretty rough rough numbers so hard to really say yet.The point of this is cutting out the \"middlemen\" to certain degree and going at this from a more collective perspective, so in terms of costs it be a lot more reasonable to do a DIYer or even the novice miner using this methodology, than say purchasing a similar ready made \"off-the-shelf\" unit from someone else and given that the group buy members are the owners of the project there won\\'t be the same sort of lack of information for the members that can occur. I would hope also that we can look at this rig in some way to upcycle or reuse it for other purposes rather than just a dead miner. There needs to be some sort of way to give ASICs a secondary value if they become redundant as miners. Vanity Address Generating Engine? But yes we have to look very closely at the numbers what sort of target price do we need to make it viable?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAssuming a dec-jan delivery, My cooling will provided by the 2 4 ft exhaust fans bringing in the 10f outside air .\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWow! That be great but I think we should value your contribution a bit more than that, so I am sure a collective of members such as this would be willing to work out something that at least covers your costs and a bit to maintain and upkeep the systems? I am thinking cooling is going to be an important part of these newer units where a \"turbo\" mode doubles the hash.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWow.That is definitely nice in the winter... come summer? I am kinda keen on oil submersion have components priced out going and have space on the 3rd floor of my building for a test tank something that could hold 100 to 200 of these units and maintain constant temperature year round. PM me or email we can bounce some ideas back and about the \"hive\".These units could be racked together so that you can expand a farm pretty quickly. Start with one and add more as you expand. 1 hive can be stacked on another hive for even greater density.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI fully support the idea and believe in the community collective with detailed DIY service or some of the community members stepping up to provide a low cost assembly for those that can\\'t or won\\'t chance assembly. As long as it is expandable as mentioned similar to the hive reference that would allow scalability. I have not done enough research to even throw my hat in the ring as to \"What else\" ASICs can do to comment intelligently on that front. As far as the price goes That\\'s a probability and statistics professors dream problem. There are inverse relationships that are interdependent on each other as you know:PriceTime to a balancing act but a simple economics equation. If they can be created and shipped while the projections show a probable ROI they will sell plain and simple. If they are close to ROI, but can be expanded with expected dropping prices for each batch that then project ROI the original batch has a higher chance of selling than being a stand alone product.At $1700 as I mentioned doing 200Ghash they would need to be out in November and at 400Ghash December. That\\'s using genesis block projections, but there are people that have more in\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Coincraft A1 28nm ASIC, miner, 2 4 ft exhaust fans, test tank, hive\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-22 02:21:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 47/100 shares avail.]R3: HashFast Flash Sale 72 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\nDibs on host, + 1 share. Ill pay thru metal when he gets on and have him let you know. Also might want to put the $/hash\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n2nd GBC under DZ\\'s tutelage.At least 51 Shares.I\\'ve done 1 rolling GB on the forums selling AM Erupters me being vetted by DZ from a GB that I was going to run but canceled / refunded all orders that had been paid. also have 2 shares in R2.I have already talked to DZ about part of this but I am making it public. After my short time here on the forums I\\'ve seen a lot of people making comments trying to help others, and in a few instances scam others but the amount of communication that DZ has + the people he brings on board his team is just something that I\\'ve never expected to see.The post that DZ made in R2 about another GB member helping a GB member from R1 that was experiencing difficulties in life moved me with the amount of kindness shown to a complete stranger.1 of my purchased shares will go to the R1 GB member1 of my purchased shares will go to the R2 GB member that at of the kindness of his/her heart gave a share from R2 to the R1 member.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI knew it was you!K make that one share paid in BTC, one in fiat thru metal\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOMG bob you\\'ve beat me in posts every time I post, lol edit* and you did it again\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIm addicted. Dont tell anyone.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNice! Thanks gents! I humbly thank you for your statements of support....And welcome to your co-Group Buy thomas_s. for a discounted MPP HashFast Sierra!thomas_s. can tell you that we might\\'ve been the straw that broke the camel\\'s back as far as this price break out of the blue (+ VMC Board difficulties) & rising net. difficulty. I was pleading my case with John S. at HF that this co-op deserved Institutional Discounts for our 3rd at-cost HashFast Group Buy.I wish you all the best & you know that I\\'m here to help. Please feel free to take the lead on this R3 thread with my support as co-GBC and for any dispute resolution. Taking a break but I\\'ll BBL. Cheers!Please keep those reservations coming! We only have 3 days to take advantage of this flash sale.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYou\\'re the primary host site for the host site at the moment...but this is a representative democracy and if the co-op votes for someone else, say firsttimeuser who does have 24/7 A/C, Security, and recording in addition to $20/month all inclusive electricity, lives a block or two away, can leave anytime, and is home most of the time, then I would have to cede to the will of the majority in this co-operative since we\\'re a representative democracy (except one that actually gets things done).I was trying to help him get a refund or sell one or more of his BFL pre-orders so he may have space for one or more rigs now.However, since you\\'re set up as a business entity, my vote goes to you, what little they may be, and only available at the end of voting decisions: for bobsag3 as the primary site for hosting and as someone who\\'s business insured and AFAIK is the only person on the forum that has been double vetted. Others can come forward to offer a secondary host site in case of emergencies but I already have a backup host site in mind I will contact if there\\'s more reservations that come forward. You\\'ll have to be vetted by me to serve as a host or backup host for any miner that\\'s purch\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AM Erupters, MPP HashFast Sierra, BFL\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-22 03:20:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB] Cointerra Terraminer IV, 1.4 BTC=25GH/s Per Share 45/80 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nCoolSent a PM with a signed message to change address.First signed message - hope it works!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhat was the countdown about in the OP?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIn order to get December delivery, looks like January delivery now. Looks like a better rate of return anyways. Will adjust terms\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDon\\'t we have enough coins for the order yet?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsoniq, it seems to me that you are wasting time.The address has 21.5 BTC collected plus 20 \"anon\" shares x1.5 BTC is 51.5 BTC total, which is $6200 at current Bitstamp rate, more than enough for the order!If your math is different, please post how many more coins we need.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPart of my issue is I am travelling and am having issues with my Bitcoin-qt wallet working on my Mac properly. Was working fine before I left on my trip. My main desktop is a PC and wallet is having no issues, will have to resort to using remote desktop, if I cant get my wallet on my Mac working properly soon.Am trying everything possible to get it working properly again.Will complete order as soon as wallet is restored.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks! You can also import your wallet.dat into blockchain.info. This is probably the easiest way.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ngood idea , works fine at me. Btw makes it sense to connect all pc and laptop wallets (if you own more then one) toblockchain.info as a protection against software crashes (not for better security of course) ?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSoniq, you are in Canada. How about customs on entering Canada? Did you include that in the price?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV, Bitcoin-qt wallet, PC, Mac\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-22 10:42:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED, Backup shares only]R3: HashFast Flash Sale 72 Hours only, At-Cost+Host\\n### Original post:\\nHi Tom,You got it! I can\\'t believe it: We\\'re all filled up in about 12 hours. I believe that\\'s a GB forum speed record for a $10K+GB.Thank you and welcome aboard Tom!Zero shares remaining. Backup share slots available!Please PM thomas_s. and myself for backup shares. There\\'s a decent chance a few shares may spring free as I had pre-reserved a couple of shares from R2 gents I haven\\'t heard back from yet.I also may have backup shares available for an Aug. 9 purchased HF Baby Jet, due to ship on Day 1 (64th paid) and arrive on Nov. 1 to Missouri on my R2 thread.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Flash, HF Baby Jet\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-22 13:37:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 20/100 shares avail.]R3: HashFast Flash Sale 72 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\n2 more shares reserved! These 2 reservations are from a DZ co-op member from Rounds 1 & 2. I really must be doing something right. Only 20 shares left! That\\'s 80% filled in about 12 hours! Thank you!And big kudos to new GBC thomas_s. who with his promised 51 shares (2 donated to others) I wouldn\\'t have even fathomed attempting R3 so soon after R2 without him approaching me about a R3 GB. You\\'re going to be pretty stoked when you wake up to read this thread, buddy. It\\'s possible that you and your 51 promised shares, our pre-planning for R3, plus my persistent sales pitch to HF that may have ticked off John S. may have possibly triggered or been the figurative \"straw\" that broke the camel\\'s back to end up with this Flash Sale; the first in HashFast\\'s history and rare in the ASIC pre-order business, on a weekend, no less. The timing is curious, no?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwow this thread escalated quickly.Thanks everyone, I couldn\\'t be more happier I log on before work to check the thread see it closed and say to myself \"what happened\" and read that all shares were reserved/sold.Today will be a good day.If there is a big enough demand for more shares I will be happy to let others hop on board, I\\'m not going to make a profit off of selling the shares and they would be at cost just like buying out of this thread.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-22 16:47:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 22/100 shares avail.]R3: HashFast Flash Sale 72 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\nExcellent! Ok I have you voted as 20 votes for the MPP option with a promise of up to 2-4X our out of box hashrate.Only 22 shares remaining out of 100!Thank you and welcome aboard! I promise you that you won\\'t be disappointed, at least about the performance of this GB Coordinator in matters related to defending your interests and rights.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks DZ - glad to be onboard.I\\'m getting the feeling that this will soon be the only way for non-corporate miners to go in the very near future. I mean think about it - I haven\\'t really figured out how I\\'m actually going to be able to manage and run 8 Jupiters and some additional Saturns in my house without running power cords all around to different circuits - and leaving the windows open all winter to keep them cool.... Heh...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHa! I must be speaking to someone else that drank the BTC Kool Aid they were giving out. I also agree about this being the only way to keep up w/ net. difficulty if you\\'re not made of money or Bitcoin.Payment details were updated in post 2 or 3. Thanks! Please only send BTC from addresses that you control. Also, try not to send BTC to anyone when you\\'re tired or sleepy. My 2 satoshis. ==1 more vote for MPP. 21 votes for MPP, 30 more votes required for majority win.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHey! I paid for those 2 shares at 3 am leave me alone Also thomas- if we have time... 2nd sierra?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiters, Saturns, 2nd sierra\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-13 00:53:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK SHIPPING!] batch #23/24 .105 btc USB + 4 btc NEW Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\ninteresting...in china still shortage for the product\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo is friedcat already working on a next generation chip or is he out of the game?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCheck ASICMiner\\'s website for updates and publicly available info\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMetal Jacke1: 1; 4; 5; 0.8; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIs it possible to buy the backplane separately if you didn\\'t order ten blades?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCurrently, there is not enough supply of backplanes to be sold backplane per 10 blades.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMore blades have arrived today\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nTHANK YOU!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nit\\'s that time:Timer removed. End time: 2013-09-14+23:59:59\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCanary can you pm me tracking for the 20 I ordered and let me know if you made it held for pickup?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nnow if only you would let me send you cash via Moneygram..... lol....\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nReceived the V2 Blade today and got it set up and running. Hashing away at about 10.9GH/s. Thanks again Canary!Was a bit nervous about shipping in a padded envelope, but arrived very well packed. Blade itself comes in a plain brown box with antistatic bag and foam padding, then that was inside a padded envelope, then that envelope was inside another padded envelope. Any concerns disappeared after pulling the envelope out of the mailbox and seeing how well it was packaged.What are the two surface mount components included in a baggie with the Blade, by the way? Extra fuses I assume?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ni got my package today and blade is hashing awaythanks\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nsunsofdust; 1; 4; \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI guess I missed something. What is the timer for?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI got my blades today! Most of them are perfect... but I think one of them has a dead chip.Code:Chip: way to fix that? If not, does that qualify for warranty replacement?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nCould just be a power issue..\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI have this sometimes on a v1 blade. If i start in low power mode then switch to high its fine. Or i just adjusted the power and its fine again in high power mode.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nHow do you switch from low/high-power modes? Is it a hidden configuration setting or do I have to jumper something?I\\'m running the blades off a backplane that\\'s being fed by one of those HP DPS800\\'s that the plane is designed to work with.Out of the whole plane, I just have one \"x\" chip out of the whole setup. It \"might\" be a power issue, but I\\'m more inclined to think it\\'s just a funky chip. I\\'ll happily troubleshoot anything though.EDIT: These are the non-overclockable blades. Does that mean there is no such thing as low/high-power mode?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nYep, extra fuses (ceramic vs. the legacy 10Amp car-style fuses).\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThe timer is for when I close this batch...\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nNever done that. The only cash deal I ever did was a pickup...Don\\'t wish to deal with anything but btc otherwise.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nthen im at the mercy of waiting bitmit buyers to pay up... ;/ no big deal... i\\'ll get something on the next go round...\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nYea i would guess its just not an option on the v2 blades.its a button on the configuration page of the v1 blades. Right by switch server, refresh and update/restart\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nyou can\\'t overclock the new blades\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nSo Canary does that mean that there\\'s no way to troubleshoot the dead chip? What are the terms for warranty service in that case?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\ntalking along warranty. i got 50 sticks today. one bad one. so far out of the 200 plus sticks I have ordered this is the second bad stick. first time I sent back the doa stick you sent me a replacement with my next order. mailing back a .55btc stick is not too painful.mailing back a .15 btc stick is a little more painful to do. can I send a shit load of photos of it rather then mail it?it gives me timeout on 7 hubs and 2 pc\\'s none of the other sticks do this. I am going to order on sat or sun. you can shoot me a pm as to what to do.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nbobsag3; 1; 4.00; \\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nits a dead chip. thats why the blades are rated at 10.0 Ghs and everything above that is \"freebie\". that allows for up to 2 chips to be bad and still be over 10ghs.i\\'ve seen about 5% of blades have bad chips. one is not so bad. more than one you may have an issue with your PSU.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nThat\\'s what I\\'m starting to expect - difference between \"nominal\" and \"guaranteed\" is a little wiggle room to allow for a dead chip.Still, doesn\\'t hurt to ask and know for sure!\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nr7970; 1; 4.00; \\n\\n### Reply 31:\\n 2; 8; with label sent.\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nResuming packing tonight... Shipping should resume tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nWill you also be shipping my 5 blade connectors. Thanks again.\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nkeeron; 2; 0.30; is in addition to the 20 I ordered earlier... if not packed, can re-use the same box :-) )\\n\\n### Repl\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB, NEW Blade miners, backplane, V2 Blade, HP DPS800, 50 sticks, 5 blade connectors\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-22 21:15:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 98/100 shares avail.]R4: HashFast Flash Sale 48 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\nHe had to go to work so I\\'m stepping up to help; another nice thing of having two GBCs co-ordinate the same thread (as long as they\\'re on the same page (or at least the same chapter in the same book )).Hmm, darnit Bob. I was hoping to enjoy my Sunday & watch men smash into each other at high speed. But since my team doesn\\'t play till Monday night anyway...Alright, since R3\\'s $12K GB sold out in 12 hours & you have that massive host facility in Missouri that need ASIC space heaters for the winter:Looks like R4 is OPEN!R4 *will* initially be a $6,000 1.2TH/s+ Sierra Batch2 expected to be delivered on Dec.1. There\\'s no MPP, I repeat there\\'s no MPP with this R4.Since bobsag3\\'s the troublemaker that started R4 on my nice peaceful Sunday, he and I have the first 2 share reservations, 1 ea. to start. Guess I\\'m off to ebay to see if I can round up some folks via the ebay/PayPal route since we\\'re short on at-cost shares available at $69 each!- Est. Hashrate: 12-15GH/s per share. No MPP.- 2.75% Host/Management fee at a Professional Colocation Facility in Missouri (likely backup sites in NY or Ohio). Lowest Fees around.If there\\'s an outcry among R4 shareholders for HashFast MPP at\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI plead the 5th. Ill send you the payment for my share when I get home. Also just my personal vote to get it with MPP.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBob, we\\'re short on time. I\\'m locking it in at $69 a share for R4 until further notice. I\\'m already juggling 3 current GBs at the moment, my man.We\\'ll look at upgrading the share price *after* we\\'ve secured a $6K order for R4. You or thomas_s. can float the ebay shares for R4 if necessary since I\\'m already still floating 7 or more shares in R2. ===And since you\\'re kolohe, or a rascal, here\\'s the ebay listing I just put up for 10 shares (hope this link works, can someone confirm?):\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nRound 3 NEWS:Need to confirm in a bit but 20 shares PAID by -Redacted-! Thank you and officially: Welcome Aboard!Plus, 2 shares paid by bobsag3, plus I already have funds on hand for my 3 shares for R3 at mcxNOW.25 shares paid for in R3 already and thomas_s. to pay for 51, so that\\'s 76 shares off the bat paid or to be paid by GBCs for Round 3.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nFigured it was just better to get them paid and out of the way. I wouldn\\'t mind picking up a few backup shares for the first two GB rounds if any shake loose. Feel free to PM me if anything comes up....\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLol...this thread keeps escalating quickly lolI get home and were getting a second sierra? I\\'m down I think.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nUhmm the link works but I didn\\'t know the sierra\\'s came with a kitty cat.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNah, mate, that\\'s my g\\'luck charm!That\\'s Butter\\'s the cat, an indoor/outdoor cat that\\'s just the coolest lil cat. He\\'s the family baby that just curls up in a ball & purrs if you cuddle him.He\\'s a Kauai native that brings cockroaches and small reptiles (newts, geckos, salamanders) into the house to torture/play with. ===I\\'m going to take a break & straighten out the ownership of all the GBs. Hope to straighten out spreadsheets in all 4 GBs & eat some lunch, so I may be offline a few hours. Please take the wheel, Thomas. A gentleman has contacted me to buy 2 of my R1 HF GB shares so that I can apply the BTC to this R4 GB. If so, I\\'ll be in for 3 or 4 more shares.Thomas, any shares you want to claim on this R4? No MPP, but it looks like it doesn\\'t need it, from what we can tell w/ best projections.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'ll take 1 or 2, maybe more gotta factor out how much BTC I\\'ll have left over.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Sierra Batch2, HashFast Flash Sale, R3, R2, R1 HF GB shares\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-22 21:26:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [USA - NOW OPEN] 0.79-0.9 BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.2-2.7 GH/s USB MINER! GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nBtw I just updated the OP! These units will be using Blue LED\\'s instead of Red! So they are now dubbed.... BLUE FURY!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\njust made my day, might order a few more now... hahathough not sure what I\\'m going to do with my extra 0805 blue smd\\'s now... \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nJust purchased one and sent email.TX ID: \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nConfirmed! Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 0.79-0.9 BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.2-2.7 GH/s USB MINER, 0805 blue smd, usb erupters\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-22 21:31:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 42/100 shares avail.]R3: HashFast Flash Sale 72 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\nJust in case anyone missed my addition to the 2nd post:** By agreeing to participate in this Group Buy, you agree to NOT use your money that was primarily meant for: food, clothing, rent/mortgage, short term emergency funds, car payments, insurance, 401(k), IRAs, or children\\'s college funds. These are considered HIGH RISK purchases of hardware, with funds tied up for weeks, and are NOT meant for those trying to \"get rich quick.\" ** We are also not your financial adviser or attorney so use your own careful judgments in all BTC transactions. **==Also: 2 more shares reserved! 1 share for a R1 gent back for more, and 1 more share for me. 42 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIdealy I am working on getting enough funds by monday to maybe be able to buy 2-3 of these my self, in addition to what ever shares I buy here. Prices are just too good.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo...shall I put you down for 1 more share? You can always donate blood or some of the underpants navy for cash somewhere right? Thanks FCTaiChi! I owe him 0.1 BTC when he finally goes to GH/s instead of MH/s (for everyone\\'s sake): ROI analysis from FCTaiChi w/ new Flash Sale pricing: now #1 value option on his chart. Hmm, we just happen to have over 60% of one already soft reserved and a lot of the funds in place or almost in place. Just sayin.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks your explanation helped. I\\'m new to group buys. I\\'ve done one for a few Asic usb miners and one for 5 g/hash in a miner. This would certainly be a more complicated one for me.I\\'ll be thinking about joining this one while this sale is on.Good day.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ll go for 20 shares, BTC, fiat, or whatever combination you prefer, your choice. PM me, please, so we can set up the payment arrangements..... Given the current rate of network hashrate increases, and the probablility of KNC delivering in the next two weeks, along with a second round of Bitfury stuff in the next 5 weeks, my vote(s) (once you sell me some shares.) would be for the MPP...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUpdate: Here\\'s the calculations without MPP and including the 1RU Control Unit user dropt pointed out: Sierra without MPP vs. $10K with MPP.Opening up poll for MPP vs. non-MPP. Please let your opinions be heard & also vote publicly or privately so we can resolve this quickly.Pros: non-MPP = lower shares costs by about 40%.$69 shares vs. $115 shares (with a promise of up to 200-400% more hashrate).\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nLatest profit projections tailored to fit GB variables as closely as possible (please PM if you see an error). This projection is with MPP: would want to sell it at the 5-6 month mark, with these projections, then split the resale proceeds among the co-op based on everyone\\'s proportional share. Hey, check it out. Blue ROI! Sweet, sweet light blue ROI projections. [Legal blather: I\\'m not your lawyer or financial adviser]It\\'s modest but to even see such a thing is a rare sight on TGB nowadays. Besides, we\\'re selling this baby to make extra profit when we\\'re in the black (or light blue, in this case), if voters have their say.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYou\\'re welcome! Sorry, if my Group Buy is too long and complicated to read and understand.These things really are complicated to think through every angle to make sure everyone\\'s protected on both sides throughout any GB transactions here. I truly am here to try to help grease the wheels for both buyers *and* sellers. I\\'m naive enough to think I could\\'ve helped Yifi before Avalon was completely ruined as far as rep (IMHO): \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHere\\'s my evidence as to why thomas_s. & I may have been the straw that broke the camel\\'s back vis-a-vis this weekend flash sale. A major promotion...on a weekend (note, times are all wacky, I sent the orig. PM Saturday, in the late morning Hawaii time sometime). ====Re: Institutional Discount for Third HashFast Miner? Sent to: HashFast on: September 21, 2013, 07:25:58 PM Reply with quoteQuote ReplyReply Remove this messageDeleteQuote from: HashFast on September 21, 2013, 05:51:43 PMI need you to buy new machines - buying machines from existing customers doesn\\'t really help me...What pricing are you looking for?JohnMy response:Hi John,Well, we were looking for an Institutional discount on the MPP Sierra. Anyone running numbers at TGB - which has quickly become the standard mining calculator - can easily see that every mfg. option looks like a negative ROI at this point.Although I didn\\'t buy Order 616, I\\'ve raised over $12K in the last month for 2 HashFast units, and have buyers on hand for about 50-66% of a Sierra if you can work with us. I think I was patient with working with you guys & did not disparage the 3 week resolution to our Customer Service issues or \"buyer purgatory\" of\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Flash, Asic usb miners, 5 g/hash miner, 1RU Control Unit, Sierra\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-08 18:13:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ASIC] Avalon Overclockable Chips and Boards :: Idaho, USA :: 991:4384 Remaining\\n### Original post:\\nI know you\\'re going to address these questions eventually, but I\\'m impatient! 1. Any updates on order \"rounding\"? I\\'ve ordered 48 chips, so I need only 2 more to populate 5 boards.2. Do you have a tentative cost of the 10 chip board without the chips?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI would like to order a couple of complete mining board. Is it possible yet?best regards,ilpirata79\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n bitcoins your way for another order. Let me know if you got the batch 1 order.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHas there been any notable progress on board production, possibly a prototype to test with sample chips? If this 10 chip module is definitive now has that changed any of the accessories we will need?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nA large update regarding all of the above, and initial pricing and order forms will be coming in the next seven days.I\\'m hard at work getting into pre-production stage, and things are progressing quite nicely Cheers,GarrettPS: Batch one chip pricing temporarily lowered from 0.5 per chip to 0.2 per chip!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLooking forward to your update.For people that haven\\'t already bought into an early group buy I think you are the only alternative to TerraHash for getting a miner anytime soon.When you show a working miner I think your remaining ASIC chips will disappear quickly. Glad that I am already in line.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI don\\'t get it. Is is 0.08 or 0.2 per chip?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi Garr255,Just a few question1) The boards that you are designing are mean for 10 chips? What is the estimated hashing power?2) The pricing of a full complete working module is (10 * 0.2 for the chips) + 130. This is less the PSU? What power supply is needed?Regards\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nChips from batch 1 (ordered in May, should arrive in August) are BTC 0.2 each.Chips from batch 2 (will be ordered when 5000 chips have been sold, should arrive 10 weeks after that) are BTC 0.08 each.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi Garr255 If I\\'m in Germany, would it be possible to just order 20 or 40 chips (and maybe a couple extras to be safe) from you and have you send them to in Germany to be assembled in one of their units?Not that I favor them, but I thought it would be quicker and and cheaper with customs?I\\'d like to get in on the .2 per chip BTC price if possible from that first batch.If not, how much would a 20 chip or 40 chip unit cost from the first batch of chips?Thanks,IAS\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYes I will be able to ship chips purchased in this order anywhere you\\'d like Final revision boards are on their way back to the lab from the fab in China. I will be posting an update this week with pictures of the hashing board and finalized \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHello,1) Yes that is correct. Estimated minimum power is 350mh/s per chip * 10 = 3.5gh/s. we might be able to squeeze out 450-500 mh/s per chip with proper cooling however.2) That is correct. A standard ATX PSU will be suitable for this.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nIs the batch two chips ordered ?Can i cancel my previous batch two order and buy some chips from first order ?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nwell you were not responsive as expected , i dont wanna continue with this anymoreI have sent emails and pms regarding my batch 2 order few days back no replies yet as its not ordered yet after a month of payingplease refund 1.28 BTC TX ID: my wallet id: \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nRefunded. understand that it is not my fault that Avalon has not sent the chips yet. In the purchasing agreement you actually agreed that there will be no refunds because of Avalon not delivering within a given time frame.Board prices are finally finalized and coming your way via a post later tonight!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDo you have any pics of the boards yet? Looking forward to seeing the design and final pricing...\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nwaiting to see Board details/prices\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nLet\\'s say hypothetically you received the chips tomorrow. How long for assembly (of 10 chip boards?) then packaging and shipping for all batch 1 orders?You mentioned you had video of a prototype?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nTwo weeks turnaround for assembly is reasonable for offshore work -- and I think that is what he is using. This is what every board supplier I have contacted is saying anyway as to reasonable expectations.The Avalon chips are (to me anyway) the most difficult issue. Best estimates seem to be between Aug 14th and 21st is when some people might get some chips. This could even be true, or not. Probably a dart board with the numbers 0-31 ( or maybe even 62) and a couple of darts could do as reasonable a pair estimates -- assuming you hit the board.He seems to be doing no worse than others in the same I then saw this thread!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nHey all,It will be a ~2 week turnaround time after receiving the chips, yes.Order forms are open! are not included with any of the miner configurations.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI see the minimum \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Overclockable Chips, 10 chip board, complete mining board, ASIC chips, ATX PSU\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-21 16:14:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN][Paypal] ASICminer USB $19.95 & Blades $539.99\\n### Original post:\\nI will bite, who are you, why should we trust you, and why should we buy from you.P.S.SSB has the USB\\'s for .125BTC you are selling them for .20BTC\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhe\\'s not selling for 0.2BTC, but for $20. That\\'s 0.14 ~ 0.15 BTC\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI see...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHow long does it take to arrive in the Philippines?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks for spotting our error! Eventhough we do accept Bitcoin (because Bitcoin is awesome), we mainly cater to those that are unfortunate and have none. Hence the title for Paypal.Yes we do ship to the Philippines. (About 7 to 10 business days for standard shipping) Email me \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWill vouch for this guy - done $$$ business with him and continue to do so.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n$47 shipping to the EU. Ouch!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI placed a (small) order with them a couple of days ago.Will update with feedback.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhy? Resellers are selling them for tons cheaper.0.2 BTC does not equal $19.95 USD.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThis time it was convenient for me to pay using PayPal. My only reason.BTW actual price for a Block Erupter is 0.15 BTC (that screenshot above spotted a mistake and price got fixed on the website).\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI ordered a couple just now, will post with my experience. Again, Paypal, free shipping, and super easy website order and checkout process made it way more convenient for me. I keep my hard earned coins for something a bit bigger like THs future miners\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nUPDATE:10 for $4999 with backplane and PSU INCLUDED.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer USB, Blades, Block Erupter, THs future miners\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-23 08:21:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 93/100 shares avail.]R4: HashFast Flash Sale 48 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\nBack to the business at hand: corather reserved a share and others need to be added up from PMs. For now:93 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUpdated Post 1 & 2 editing to make R4 description and payment section more clear with better editing.Updated Payment info in Post 2. TL;DR: Payments aren\\'t due until 75 reservations are filled for Round 4, if we\\'re fortunate to get that far.Ok, back to catching up on Personal Messages.15 Hours left for payment on both R3 *and* R4. [That or ordering 1 or 2 units, partial payment, and stalling a day or so, ehehe]\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIn most Group Buys there\\'s some sort of restock fee. The seller expects to be compensated for all the behind the work scenes even if the darn thing failed 5 months later. It\\'s tons of work behind the scenes to keep these things humming and to even succeed in a single GB on this forum in the first place. If it was easy, we\\'d have many more members trying to launch GBs. With that in mind, one of the services I offer is coaching & mentoring to new GBCs like thomas_sI\\'ve waived my usual 0.1% Pre-paid Pre-Planning fee for in-depth planning for those ambitious enough to attempt their first GB here to get R3/R4 off the ground & to help out thomas_sBack to refunds: Mass Refunds are usually handled on a case by case basis WRT to the GB, from I\\'ve noticed. Since I\\'m an advocate for both Buyers *and* Sellers, and since I believe in karma, so rest assured: In this at-cost co-operative, there\\'s no 1.5% restock fee if the majority of the group (in each respective Round) vote for a mfg. refund.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nStall tactics on your behalf. PM to John S. at HashFast:\"HI John,I was hoping to call you tomorrow morning about 7:15AM HST. I think that\\'s about 10:15AM PST.I def. have 1 Sierra sold - we pre-sold 100 shares for the MPP Sierra in less than 12 hours. I have part of a Round 4 HashFast non-MPP Sierra GB reserved as well, so we\\'ll see how that goes and we hope to buy a 2nd one before the deadline.The reason I want to call is that: even though the sale ends tmrw night at midnight, about a quarter to a third of the funds are in transit via Coinbase for a major shareowner in Round 3. Tomorrow night before your deadline: I was hoping that our at-cost co-operative could pay 50% of the MPP Sierra, and 50% of a non-MPP Sierra to secure availability for both of them to the GB forum.I\\'m about 100% positive we can pay the balance for both of them by the end of the business week as I already have over 10% interest for a non-MPP Sierra even after that 12 hour sellout of the Sierra yesterday (which is really fast for the GB forum). This Flash Sale almost stands out like a sore thumb as far as ROI compared to current \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, MPP Sierra, non-MPP Sierra\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-23 08:48:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 91/100 shares avail.]R4: HashFast Flash Sale 48 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\n2 more shares reserved!Also a couple of ebay inquires. Hopefully, some more shares are sold on ebay again for HashFast shares (sold 4 HF shares on ebay last month).91 shares available on this non-MPP $6K 1200GH/s+ (likely 1500GH/s) Sierra miner that needs to have an order in within 13.25 hours.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast shares, 1200GH/s+ (likely 1500GH/s) Sierra miner\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-23 09:37:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 90/100 shares avail.]R4: HashFast Flash Sale 48 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\nRegistering tripppn\\'s reservation for 1 share.90 shares left!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nReddit mention of thomas_s and the anonymous hero\\'s awesomeness: you\\'re Reddit Bitcoin famous now, FWIW. Because no good deed should go unpunished. Heading to bed. Hopefully R4 takes off, if not: at least we have 100% have a Sierra to be ordered & paid tomorrow night for R3. I will pull funds from my R2 buyout of Order 616 & my mcxNOW account to make sure of it, if we\\'re a little short. Also, we\\'ll see what John S. at HF says about 50% secured Flash Sale Sierras. Cross your fingers.As for the R2 funds I use for R3/R4, if necessary: I can always replenish what I use for R2 intended shares via Coinbase for my own use.Spreadsheet updates to follow tomorrow. I\\'m sure y\\'all would rather I work my okole off doing work then making ASCII code spreadsheets look purty (as long as the info\\'s all up to date & correct in my other records).\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, Sierra\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-23 04:56:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 94/100 shares avail.]R4: HashFast Flash Sale 48 Hours only, At-Cost +Host\\n### Original post:\\nOk, just put me down for 3 more. You want to update the thread using the same color format?Thanks!94 shares avail. Please send anon. reserve PMs to thomas_s. , por favor.==Hmm, the groms are finally sick of their ipads & TV, & want to finally go to the beach. Imagine that. I may be gone longer than a coupla hours. Sorry, that spreadsheet update will have to wait but no worries, y\\'all have PM exchanges w/me for your etc..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTo speed things up you can send PM\\'s to me I am a GBC of this GB, it\\'ll free up DZ\\'s time so he can tend to other things.Send Reserve requests / questions to me.For reserve requests I just need to know how many you would like to reserve and if you want to be anon or posted publicly.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYup, that\\'s correct! Nice to be able to tag team and have access to more funds/BTC for these flash projects. BBL gents!These shares are only $69 each, at cost for something that projects as actually blue on TGB...just sayin\\'...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDZ HF R1 GB, 2 shares, red@ct. Picking up two shares of the R1 GB from DZ @ $155.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIm glad DZ Is better at speadsheets than I am.This is why he does what he does, and I run the power cables. And make sure my cats dont light any of the machines on fire. Things like that.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYou have room down there to host 6 or so Jupiters in a week or so? If so, how much?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI have 2400sqft, with 95kw peak demand capacity.Answer your question?shoot me a PM, and Ill send you my number so we can talk.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHave you considered putting in a backup generator? That way we dont have to worry about ups backup but I dont know if it would be worth the cost.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nRe: Bob\\'s 120A generator.My understanding from talking w/ Bob is that it\\'s meant for longer outages, hence the need for our own local battery backup & voltage regulation. That\\'s why there\\'s a minimal price built into the share price for Battery/Backup performance. From the homework I asked Thomas to do, it came out to about $1K+ for us to have 1 to 1.5 hours of backup power which would\\'ve added almost 10% to the share price for a $11K GB. I already knew that but I wanted him to learn on his own. That\\'s partly why he can offer true professional colocation services at the world\\'s lowest costs. If you were running an industrial rig by yourself, do you only want 2-4 min. backup from a $100-150 UPS? By all of us ganging together for UPS/Battery costs, we all get much better value by getting more battery power per dollar spent, thanks to our greater purchasing power & access to better from the beach. Dinner w/ the fam in a bit & then I\\'ll be working thru PMs in a bit. Please be patient w/ me & Thomas. I heard back from John S.; he says he\\'s *not* easy to piss off and wasn\\'t sure what I was talking about. Nice to hear that at least one of the heads of marketing of these new mf\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi,I\\'m considering purchasing some shares in the GB - I see that the price is $69/share, but I have a few questions:* the payment address is a BTC address. I\\'m trying to calculate out the total pricing, but it would help to know how many BTC you consider $69 to be? Or do you accept USD as a payment method?* If HashFast is unable to deliver at all, does the 1.5% restocking fee for refunds apply?* I see that there are 26 people involved in the management of this - is this a formal company with another purpose as well? This question is really more geared towards what is the exposure if a few people decide they want to retire from this - who\\'s left?* Can we visit the equipment if we\\'re in the area? * What happens if the machine is damaged and considered outside warranty?* I see the projection is resale in 7 months. If BTC/USD exchange rates increase so that it is still profitable to hang onto the equipment, is the existing hosting arrangement prepared for a \"long haul\"?* Will there be any written agreement documenting the co-op?Thanks for answering my questions - just trying to accept any risk here! Sorry in advance if any are dumb questions.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n1) we will be using bitstamp on this GB to calculate conversion as that is what hashfast uses.2) we believe hashfast will be able to deliver however this question would need to be answered by DZ as he is dealing with the monetary side, (I thought he posted it tho)3) Each GB that is run here by DZ is like a democracy, everything is voted on and the decision is made based on majority ruling.4) This would be a question for the host (right now I think the only person that has requested the hosting / received any votes is bobsag3)5) From what I\\'ve read the warranty is 10 days from defects, if it can be fixed (we would have to vote on weather fixing it would be more cost effective, we would be able to sell it to someone who\\'d want to fix it most likely)6) See #3.7) Ever\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ipads, TV, Jupiters, 120A generator, UPS\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 00:11:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [UK GROUP BUY] Hash Fast Baby Jet Upgrade 0.1BTC = 1G/Hash\\n### Original post:\\nHash Fast are now offering a Baby Jet Upgrade Kit, this allows you to expand your Baby Jet:This will double the hashing power of the Baby Jet from 400 G/Hash to 800G/Hash.I already have a unit on pre-order and am offering 300 G/Hash from the expansion at 0.1BTC for 1 G/Hashi.e.1 G/Hash = 0.1BTC10 G/Hash = 1 BTC100 G/Hash = 10BTCThe Hash Fast offer is on a first come first served basis so I am looking to purchase the expansion quite soon. If there is reasonable interest I will make the purchase before the group buy is completed providing it looks like it will complete.If you have any questions let me know. otherwise payment can be made to this send me a PM or post in this thread with your bitcoin payment transaction ID, how many shares it was for and your BTC address for dividends. Mining will be done on a shared pool (I generally use Slush\\'s pool) with dividends being paid weekly.In case of non-delivery:I (qukkM) take no responsibility for the possibility that HashFast does not deliver. I (qukkM) have done what I consider a thorough due diligence but as we all know, you can never 100% guarantee anything when it comes to pre-orders.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Baby Jet Upgrade Kit\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 04:12:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: << USA/OPEN >> 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nIt\\'s ALIVE!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCongrats\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAny support for OSX with Mac Miner BFG Miner?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYeah the v1 is stable at 2.504 GH/s. Pretty happy so far\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER, Mac Miner BFG Miner\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 07:42:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 73 shares avail.]R4: HF Flash Sale 24 HRS ONLY, At-Cost+Host, NON-MPP $6K\\n### Original post:\\nYup, the gents in my Round 1 and Round 2 Group Buys must be doing mental cartwheels right now.100% more hashrate at only 25% more cost? For a 40 share miner, it comes out to about $38-40 a share after shipping.Update: Sorry, the $1K is meant for the R2 buyout when I doublechecked records. I\\'m only buying 1 PP share by BTC this evening for an anon. co-op member (unless they want to claim it publicly ). I expect to buy 2 more PP shares tomorrow.BTW, 1 share of thomas_s R3 shares sold to our new member from ebay! I\\'m sorry to call attention to you, but I believe that you\\'re our first woman co-op member (unless someone else wants to please prove me wrong). If true: Awesome!Mahalo and welcome aboard! This member is buying 2 shares: 1 in R3, 1 in R4. Please feel to state your opinions freely in this co-op. Even those with only 1 share (heck even no shares) deserve to have their opinion or insight heard.1 share (from thomas s) reserved from R3 (some of our many backup shares: we have shares avail. in R2-4 still; please read appropriate thread for details. For R2 please contact me directly, those are the ones with the least free shares I believe)1 share reserved for R4 the anon. new co-op \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTotal downpayment paid for both miners: BTC so far...Not too worried though, I know the bulk of it\\'s coming in a couple of days, three at the most.Worse comes to very worse, we\\'ll have an MPP Sierra to divvy up thanks to thomas s R3 shares, moohahah.==Ok, checking out. Please follow up with thomas s in a few hours if you have pressing questions. I\\'ll be checking msgs. thru the day but it would probably be best to go through thomas first.I need to reconfirm share ownerships but the main thing is having either: A) a PM to thomas or I or B) a public declaration of your ownership, Tx ID, etc..A is preferable but B works too. I\\'ll count myself down for another share so we can keep things moving. My count goes up to 3 shares for R4.==73 shares available at Flash Sale Pricing! This is the only place you can still find Flash Sale pricing (this one on a non-MPP unit). Offer good till Friday.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 40 share miner, PP share, MPP Sierra\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 07:48:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 74 shares avail.]R4: HF Flash Sale 24 HRS ONLY, At-Cost+Host, NON-MPP $6K\\n### Original post:\\nQuick update: 4 more shares reserved! This is for 1 share & 3 shares to two anonymous gentlemen.Please send PM reservations to thomas_s for the next few hours, and when he needs to go, he\\'ll make a public statement here letting you that his \"shift\" here is over. Thanks! No time to get to PMs right now, but it\\'s the first thing on my list when I get home tonight.74 shares available at $69/ea. worth 12-15GH/s est. Dec. 1 delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nFor my hosting facility update:Got the building, power internet all setup today. Tomorrow I get all the cable, surge protectors, racks and a half pallet of PSUs.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThe nerd in me wishes that I was there to see all that nerdcandy.A few more shares were just reserved for R4\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPictures, or it isn\\'t true\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAs soon as I start getting it in, Ill take as many pictures as I can w/o compromising security.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHey ive dropped 20k on my hosting facility for these things... just trying to get my money back\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAnd that\\'s why you\\'re my boy, Blue! Oops, wrong movie (ref: Old School). In all honesty, what you did is beyond the reach (or sanity?) of most BTC miners. ====As for the R3/R4 wallet: Seeing 47BTC total in there. Blockchain shows the current value of that to be a little south of $4.8K total.====Getting to who paid what & how much in a minute. I may have to answer R1 & R2 related PMs later tonight or tomorrow.Floating a couple of shares via PayPal as well so I\\'ll be buying BTC on behalf of 2 people and their 1 share each; trying not to make a habit of it but it\\'s not my fault that PP is so anti-BTC & makes it so difficult for you to convert it to a much better electronic currency.I\\'ll add some funds from my mcxNOW account, separate from the R2 funds, so you may see a smaller payment in the blockchain after the main deposit.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI still owe you for a share right?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nBack on the case: focus is getting a down payment on 2 Sierras tonight at Flash Sale Pricing. Target: 50% down payments on Round 3 and Round 4 Sierras$5400 for Sierra w/ MPP$3000 for Sierra, naked as the day it\\'s gonna be bornIn less than 4 hours I\\'ll be sending the biggest possible down payments I can to secure both Sierras. I promised John we\\'d have the rest by Friday. Right gents & ladies?John\\'s exact words were \"send what you can\", so I\\'ll take him at his word. Looks like there\\'s share movement. Amazing thing about having 3 GBs that show up as light blue on TGB is that I can offer people that come to me different at-cost pricing options and delivery times that fit what they\\'re trying to do.==Alright, I\\'ll be back to update numbers. Lots of pressure taken off that we don\\'t have to have 100% payment on both. But try to get whatever you can in before 8:30PM HST (approx. 2 Hrs, 20 minutes from now). Please label your payment & associated PM with the Round number you\\'re paying for to keep the record straight for both of us. Getting to PMs in a second. Please be patient w/ me. You can also send you share reservations & payment details to thomas_s so we can both bear the load since we\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYup, also feel free to float some shares Bob since R4 was your idear. LOLDid I mention I\\'m buying $1 to 1.3K worth of PP for BTC? It\\'s on behalf of *three* different anon. users (including 1 that saw our ebay link).\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPayment due in less than an hour. Target is 69.331BTC. I have an invoice open for 2 miners.This is for a combined order to save time.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAttempting to buy a PP share at Coinbase: all buys paused for a few min.?Also, will be buying my 2 R3 & 2 R4 shares via BTC to HF in a few minutes.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nMain payment from deposited funds: shares (2 in R3, 2 in R4 followed) with an extra 0.538 BTC added by me to help things along & possibly keep another share in R4 w/ that overpayment. My total BTC contribution to R3/R4 - 2.754 BTC: \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nTo show that I didn\\'t send it to some guys selling me this sweet, sweet bridge: dunno though. That bridge deal sounded nice.== Here\\'s a share paid via a PayPal/me/Coinbase float (I actually triggered it too early, but ah well): \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIm to lazy to read how much a share is, so I sent you 1 btc for my last share. anything else can be donated to someone who might just be short/ could donate for a good cause.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HF Flash Sale 24 HRS ONLY, cable, surge protectors, racks, PSUs, Sierras\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 17:16:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [69 shares avail.]R4:HF FLASH SALE PRICING thru FRI! At-Cost+Host,NON-MPP $69 ea\\n### Original post:\\n51.6877 BTC sent for R3/R4 so far. BTC total needed to pay for both miners by Friday night.Not too worried though. We have the best pricing on a GB HashFast unit anywhere for the next few days and 1 guaranteed Sierra at the very least. ...and the Flash Sale pricing still beats the stuffing out of anything else out there at the moment.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSent payment for 10 shares, please confirm\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nEvery time I go to sleep I feel like we sell a machine lol.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R3, R4, GB HashFast unit, Sierra\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 17:29:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB] Cointerra Terraminer IV, 1.5 BTC=67GH/s Per Share 10/30 shares left Updated\\n### Original post:\\n5 shares, here is transaction\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDo you know when you are going to order the miner? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCan you please explain how the whole thing paying dividends bi-weekly relates to hosting of shares of bitfunder , i don\\'t fully understand this concept.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nListing on Bitfunder is an option that allows the public trading of the equity easier. Dividend payments are the same amount and same time cycle if you elect to list on Bitfunder or not.When 30 shares are sold\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nin for 1 share, tx \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nwelcome to the groupShares added to OP and spreadsheet.Please send email and Skype userCheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 18:50:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB] Cointerra Terraminer IV, 1.5 BTC=67GH/s Per Share 9/30 shares left Updated\\n### Original post:\\n2 shares just paid for -Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOP and spreadsheet updatedKNC GB and Cointerra GB member\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 20:21:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB] Cointerra Terraminer IV, 1.5 BTC=67GH/s Per Share 7/30 shares left Updated\\n### Original post:\\ni\\'am in for one \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAlso in for one share\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAnd 1 share for me.tx: in PM\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n2 shares: \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi Larry,would like to join you on a venture once again.Payment for 2 shares sent: you so far,Kernel\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 20:27:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB] Cointerra Terraminer IV, 1.5 BTC=67GH/s Per Share 0/30 shares left Updated\\n### Original post:\\nThat was a nice ending, looks like we have 30 shares now\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 20:33:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: Repost (2 KnC Jupiter 400Gh/s)160shares 1BTC/share = 5Ghs/s 140 shares avail\\n### Original post:\\nStill 60 shares left on miner 1\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSent the remaining 2 Bitcoin and dropped you a pm about purchasing some more shares.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMarkj113 has purchased 20 shares for 13.75btc...This is from the promotional rate when I had the first share sell off. Still have shares available and will be online to update and answer any questions.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nRepost (2 KnC Jupiter 400Gh/s)160 1BTC/share = 5Ghs/s 140 shares leftedited for increase of btc since last post.I am selling 160(now 140) shares @1.BTC p/share if you msg me I can email you the invoice which has my phone number which I will answer now and the address they will be sent to as well. I will charge a mangagers fee of 4% check it out @ To purchase post amount desired and send btc per share to address: I will update with each buyer, share bought, and block chain infro. I can not ensure the rigs will be delivered but I will ensure a full refund in the event they are not. Contact me for personal info. Thans too Waldohoover for all the help man and has agreed to let me use his template! I\\'ve been following [KnCMiner]( for quite a bit and I really like what their team is doing. I\\'ve been seeing tons of group buys for their units Jupiter 400GH/s and Jupiter 400GH/s and wanted to get in on these. After doing a bit more reading, I made a jump and purchased a few of my own Jupiter 400GHs miner. ___Who are you and why would I trust you?* 4+ years good standing on eBay and Paypal* I\\'m always open to meet in person and for non-local share holders- provided proof will not\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nFurther 17 shares purchased,pm\\'d about another 9 shares, awaiting some info.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGuys hold off purchasing any shares, I have my concerns this could be a scam.Im awaiting contact from GaiusMaximus to put some details straight\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGuy is confirmed scammer - cancelled his order with KNCminer after taking payment for the shares.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter 400Gh/s\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 21:21:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [59 shares avail.]R4:HF FLASH SALE PRICING thru FRI! At-Cost+Host,NON-MPP $69 ea\\n### Original post:\\nNot only did he kick off R4, he\\'s going to be hosting a batch of KNC Jupiters for me down there, too....\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHehe, it\\'s your fault we have this R4 going on, you rascal! You saw where the R3/R4 miners are going? Some state far away from me.thehun is confirmed PAID on his 10 R4 shares.59 shares left out of 200 total for 2 miners, get \\'em while you still on TGB \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nITS SO SHINY I COULD DIE.EDIT: Also, a warehouse full of science is pretty dam cool. Might put it that way on my resume.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGreetings allJust wanted to drop in and say helloI\\'ve just bought into Round4 and am very happy to be part of the group\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWelcome! Glad to see you finally escaped from newbie prison....\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThat depends. Actually, I think a warehouse full of explosives would be much more interesting...But I\\'m cool with science, too... How much to host, say, a relatively small tokamak reactor?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks,you might have to launch round 5 soon!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNice Bob! Glad to see you\\'re getting more miners from folks trying to save BTC on hosting at a professional colocation site.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Jupiters, R3/R4 miners, tokamak reactor\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 21:33:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.6 BTC=67GH/s 30/30 shares, 1 Sold\\n### Original post:\\nHow many more left or is there another one\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nselling second Terraminer IV nowa few familiar faces here, welcome againPlease send your email to be added to spreadsheet#1 Terraminer purchased, selling shares on Terraminer #2\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 22:27:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [54 shares avail.]R4:HF FLASH SALE PRICING thru FRI! At-Cost+Host,NON-MPP $69 ea\\n### Original post:\\nI was doing Round 2 just last week. 3 GBs in a week has been a bit rough but who knows... people seem to like the at-cost HF miner shares so it\\'s possible! My next focus after our co-ops HF Miner #4 is secured this week, is checking in with R1/R2 members to finalize decisions on whether to double our Baby Jet hashrate to 800GH/s at only 25% more cost.5 more shares reserved! Reserved by 2 (so far) anonymous gentlemen.54 shares remaining.==Also, quick check: I believe someone just added 47BTC to the Group\\'s wallet for R3/R4. Who was that masked man?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWho\\'d you think? lolMines\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThought it was you. Or someone dropping a chunk for the rest of the open R4 shares, eheh.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nConfirming that thomas_s paid for 50 shares for Round 3, including shares for:- thomas_s, 47 shares- PP payment to Thomas on behalf of an anon. member, 1 share- Anonymous R1 member, 1 share donation (adjusted for 1.5 shares after 3rd donation to member) from thomas_s- Anonymous R2 Hero who had donated .62 BTC to the R1 member with major physical disabilities. Was rewarded for good deed by thomas_s for 1 share in R3 (which was donated to me who donated half to our R1 member, and half to the Anonymous Hero\\'s favorite charity in Asia)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HF Miner #4, Baby Jet\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 23:56:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ANN] Exclusive Extended HashFast Sierra Sale (Friday Deadline)\\n### Original post:\\nJust checked PMs: make that *thirty five* co-op members (someone paid for 10 shares), and 59 shares remaining.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYour title is just a little misleading.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIt\\'s true. I called John S. at HashFast yesterday morning to secure this pricing thru Friday on our co-op\\'s behalf.This really is the only place anywhere you can get fractional at-cost shares in a Flash Sale priced Sierra without MPP.TL;DR: HashFast Sierra, 1.2TH/s+, 1 share on R4 = 12-15GH/s. $69 ea.==Guesstimating Sierra can take one more GN so possibly up to 16-20GH/s, if we buy a 4th GN upgrade in the near future.Thomas deserves a pat on the back for his debut GBs (Rounds 3/4) for his first fundraising for an Industrial Class ASIC rig. I wouldn\\'t have done a Round 3 so soon after Round 2 (a Baby Jet buyout of Order 616) if he hadn\\'t approached me with this project idea.He also donated 2 shares to 2 other people! Our at cost 34 member co-op is so neat that, without solicitations at all, 3 of us even managed to raise $400 worth of BTC and GB shares for 2 others!We have 69 shares available at the moment (out of 200) at $69 ea.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n48 shares remaining.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Sierra, R4, 4th GN upgrade, Baby Jet\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-25 02:32:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN,78 shares avail.]R4: HF Flash Sale 24 HRS ONLY, At-Cost+Host, NON-MPP $6K\\n### Original post:\\nI can\\'t get to PMs this morning. I\\'ll have to address them this afternoon. My news! I just talked to John at HF.I\\'ve secured *TWO* Sierras at Flash Sale with payment due this Friday. We need to pay 50% (his exact words: \"send whatever you have\") for both units (1 MPP, 1 Non-MPP) with payment due at the end of the business week.Great news! Thx to your GBC\\'s diligent efforts: We don\\'t have as much pressure to reserve all 90 shares today for Sierra #2!==With that said, I\\'ll hold -Redacted- to what he said about 10 shares to move things along. To compensate, buying won\\'t open for R4 until we hit 85 shares reserved. BTW, R3\\'s payments are still in movement from co-op members. R3 order\\'s secure; we just don\\'t have all the funds quite yet (but most of \\'em).So: 78 shares available! And we have till Friday to pay for the balance of both R3 & R4! ====All 4 spreadsheets for all 4 of my active GBs will be updated tonight.Also: tidbit you won\\'t anywhere else - John S. needs to confirm w/ eng. team but even a Pi w/ enough powered USB ports should be enough to control a rack of Sierras. He\\'s marketing; not 100% sure, but he says any cheap 1RU server (or even Pi) should be able run a r\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOh - like that\\'s fair - you\\'re going to give it an entire extra week on the GB just to get me to cough up for another ten shares.... Offer still stands, with THIS COMING FRIDAY as the deadline to get the other 90 shares in place....\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks! Hey, at least I moved it up to 85 shares reserved before sales start. If we get to 85 shares, I\\'m guessing the last 15 will vanish soon after, the way these things go. ...And since I took the extra step of calling John this Monday Morning to stall on full payments for 2 Sierras, this appears to be the only place *anywhere* you can lock in Flash Sale pricing that ends tonight, all the way through this Friday....still digging ditches and carrying water, for y\\'all. I\\'ll add more details of my 12.5 minute call with the head of HashFast marketing this morning, including stuff that\\'s not available in any other thread or news site.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDid I miss the news you were talking about back in this post? I\\'m a news/info junkie!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes, we have the price locked in for both units until Friday. Meaning if you\\'d like to purchase the shares at cost ( of the sale) + host / ups system you have until Friday or until the shares are all gone.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Sierras, Pi, 1RU server\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-25 02:41:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [48 shares avail.]R4:HF FLASH SALE PRICING thru FRI! At-Cost+Host,NON-MPP $69 ea\\n### Original post:\\n6 shares reserved by PM by a Round 3 co-op member. Thanks and welcome aboard again. 48 shares remaining.Looks like we\\'re on track to sell out this loverly 4th miner before Friday night (crossing fingers).\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI dunno - you still have 33 shares to go before I have to worry about paying, and 38 to go before my buy of those last ten shares kicks in....\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou still don\\'t know how many I can get =) but me buying all the sierra\\'s isn\\'t really a GB now is it.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWell, I guess if you buy a group of machines you could classify that as a group buy, for you... How about we don\\'t get into a contest about who has the most money, or we\\'ll be trying to out-sierra each other...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'d suggest you just buy up the 10 shares now\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nActually, I think DZ already has them counted in... He\\'s tricky that way...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHow about we all agree that we all drank the Bitcoin Miner\\'s Kool Aid and that we all hope to be laughing in a few years about getting in while it was still the groundfloor.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI guess I\\'m just going to have to pull a and hope that there are enough shares for my BTC\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI already have -Redacted- down for 10 shares for R4. He was hoping one of the co-op members would sell him an R2 share so he could complete his DZ Miner\\'s Cooperative GB share Boxed Set.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAnd if so, could I get that share in blue? I don\\'t have that color in this set, and I think it has the most RAM...Wait.... What are we buying here, exactly ?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nScience!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSHINEY! I\\'ll take 10. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI kinda did that with singles. I regret nothing.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nNo... this part...\"I\\'ll add more details of my 12.5 minute call with the head of HashFast marketing this morning, including stuff that\\'s not available in any other thread or news site.\"Especially the part in red\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nBTC sent for 4 shares of R4! Thanks gents wontons\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R4 miner, sierra, DZ Miner\\'s Cooperative GB share Boxed Set\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-25 09:49:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [PAUSED] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 8/10 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nHi All, so October delivery H-boards are now showing as \"out of stock\" from bitfurystrikesback. This is probably a good thing, as it means that they are being realistic about what they can delivery in their October batch. As such, we\\'ve paused the collection for the moment until we find out what bitfurystrikesback will be offering going forward in terms of both prices and estimated delivery. I\\'ll post here when we have some news.manawenuz, please could you let us know what you\\'d like to do with the 1 BTC that you just sent to the escrow account for the collection towards H-board #6? We can keep it in the escrow account until the collections open again (presumably for hardware with later delivery estimates) or we can ask John K to send you a refund. Just let us know.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ni guess my BTC can wait with John K for a little while so , i\\'ll be waiting for updates , would be nice if you could pm me if there was any developments .\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSorry to change my mind jlsminingcorp , is it possible for you to ask John K to refund my 1 BTC , i guess i need it for an upgrade in another GB.thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi manawenuz, no problem at all. The US reseller (megabigpower.com) have stated that they will now wait until they have kit in stock before taking new orders, so if bitfurystrikesback take a similar approach then it may be a while before we could order new kit anyway. This means that getting your BTC back is probably a good idea.I\\'ll pm John now and copy you in. I have been having problems getting in touch with him over the last few days (we need to move BTC around for the bitfury burner still), I know he gets very busy from time to time, so I do hope that it doesn\\'t take too long for you to get the BTC back.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: H-boards, bitfury burner\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-18 16:57:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Closed] AVALON CHIPs @0.082BTC + K16 Miner Assembly 60EUR\\n### Original post:\\nOrders\\' Status - Second batch CLOSEDOrder #11321 made on July 6, 2013. Order status: processing. @07/07/2013Code: No. TotalID Chips BTC Miners BTC Address 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC2 10 0.82002 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC3 160 13.12000 10 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC4 180 14.76000 11 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC5 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC6 6 0.49200 0 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC7 0 0.00000 0 Refunded8 16 1.31200 1 Thread- Unverified User - @0.082BTC9 6 0.49200 10 80 6.56000 5 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC11 480 39.36000 16 PM - Unverified User - @0.082BTC12 16 1.312 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC13 16 1.312 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC14 480 39.36 30 Thread - Unverified User - @0.082BTC15 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC16 80 6.56000 5 Thread - Verified User - @0.082BTC17 16 1.31200 0 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC18 32 2.62400 2 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC19 16 1.31200 1 PM - Un\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCongratulations for the closing of second batch and order made. But please don\\'t forget to keep us in the loop, in relation also to batch one.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAlso looking forward to the opening of nekonos order website!regards\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi, thank you. Be assured that as soon as we have news from any of the batched we will publish it here. We should be about to hear about sample chips for batch 1 but no news yet. Cheers. It is in the oven :-)Orders\\' Status - Second batch CLOSEDOrder #11321 made on July 6, 2013. Order status: chips ordered. @08/07/2013Order #11321 made on July 6, 2013. Order status: processing. @07/07/2013Code: No. TotalID Chips BTC Miners BTC Address 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC2 10 0.82002 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC3 160 13.12000 10 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC4 180 14.76000 11 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC5 16 1.31200 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC6 6 0.49200 0 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC7 0 0.00000 0 Refunded8 16 1.31200 1 Thread- Unverified User - @0.082BTC9 6 0.49200 10 80 6.56000 5 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC11 480 39.36000 16 PM - Unverified User - @0.082BTC12 16 1.312 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC13 16 1.312 1 PM - Verified User - @0.082BTC14 480 39.36 30 Thread - Unverified User\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCongratulations on both successful batch orders!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nExcellent! Ready to see whats next and where we take this from here. Has there been any further discussion on hosting the assembled boards? As an international customer I figure this would avoid the hassles of shipping and customs for everyone. (Yes I realize there would be hassle in setting up the operation initially but surely that would be nothing compared to the of shipping.) Then we could mine for nekonos/bkkcoins for a day then maybe even have a bizwoo groupbuy pool and the pool fee would go to bizwoo for operating expenses etc.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi bizwoo,As with the others in these 2 group buys you\\'ve run, looking forward to delivery of the chips.I\\'m very impressed with the way you\\'ve managed both group buys. Especially, with the forward thinking to consolidate other group buys to complete the latest purchase.I\\'m hopeful, that you\\'ll start a 3rd Group buy soon with the same intent as the previous 2.Hat off for you excellent work, along with Nekonos for build services.Best regardsNex\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThank you guys.nekonos will soon open a website where the assembly service will be able to be ordered and also paid. He is also looking to offer hosting so be patient and soon there will be more information.I am not planning a 3rd group buy because the second one took long time to fill. It was only thanks to the initiative of the other Group Buys organizers from EU and zefir that we managed to buy two batches between all. Therefore, I would need some big pledges in order to try another batch.I ordered a few hundred chips more from batch 2 myself and would be looking to get 0.1BTC per each. In case someone is interested please PM me for more information. There is limited availability.We are still waiting to hear news about sample chips from batch 1.Cheersbizwoo\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIt looks like it\\'s quite time to get boards ready! \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHiFor those of you that missed the second batch there is a few chips up for grab in this auction.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAh sweet sweet BTC progress!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHi all,Seems Avalon have begun sending chips in china.We don\\'t have any \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: AVALON CHIPs, K16 Miner Assembly\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-25 17:28:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [43 shares avail.]R4:HF FLASH SALE PRICING thru FRI! At-Cost+Host,NON-MPP $69 ea\\n### Original post:\\nShare reserved via PM by a user starting w/ the letter J. They also already paid. Thank you and welcome aboard!43 shares left.===BTC Total in R3/R4 wallet: 51.6877BTC already sent for R3/R4: 51.6877 Total BTC in hand or paid: 106.87, 77%Total BTC needed for full payment: 138.662\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n106.87516728 BTC sent: of the way there and we still have 43 shares left. Not bad! We\\'ve secured the R3 miner and more than half of the R4 miner.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNice,I\\'m here and awaiting any PM\\'s to get those last few shares.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIf you\\'re on the fence about getting the shares please do so now, if you\\'ve reserved shares please send payment to the address as soon as possible so the units can be paid in full tonight.A little birdy told me that there won\\'t be many if any shares left tomorrow morning.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R3 miner, R4 miner\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-25 18:28:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [20 shares avail.]R4:HF FLASH SALE PRICING thru FRI! At-Cost+Host,NON-MPP $69 ea\\n### Original post:\\nA lil birdy might be right!23 more shares reserved via PM by gents w/ names starting with: \"A\" (20 more shares for 23 total) and \"J\" (3 more shares for 4 total).20 shares left! Then that\\'s all she wrote!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPlease send R3/R4 questions and reservations, payment confirmations to Thomas. I gotta head to work. I\\'ll get to PMs tonight I missed from yesterday, or if possible please mention your urgent concerns to Thomas.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTwo important questions1) Is there a spreadsheet for all past and current GBs that indicate the # of shares each person has purchased?2) Did you post the actual purchase receipts for the currently ordered devices?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n1- DZ is currently finalizing the spreadsheet. (It should be done soon as the GB is basically sold out)2-\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust sent you payment for my 10 shares of GB-4....\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGot it. Please see your PM.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nFinalizing but I\\'m sending to Thomas this evening so we have all shares and proper ownerships accounted for in R3/R4. I\\'m taking care of R2 spreadsheet separately as that\\'s still very much in flux (I think 2 R2 shares are unpaid so there\\'s an opportunity there too if payments aren\\'t made by 8PM HST). If there\\'s overpayments after 8PM HST due to people trying to scramble to get those last 2 shares, I\\'ll refund anyone that paid too late, immediately.Please be patient with us. We\\'re essentially working for free at the moment for the GB Forum. It\\'s been a ton of work behind the scenes to give you these exclusive at-cost prices and sell 3 HashFast miners in a week. The pre-planning we had already accomplished is why we were able to go live w/ a HF Flash Sale within an hour of the email blast.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIn for 2 shares!Wish it could be for more, but thats all thats in my wallet at the moment.Happy to be part of this BG with some experience at the helm.Thanks DZ / Thomas and others for making this happen.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHere - just in case those two (blue!) shares of R2 open up, I sent you $303.50 for them.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-25 20:12:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [18 shares avail.]R4:HF FLASH SALE PRICING thru FRI! At-Cost+Host,NON-MPP $69 ea\\n### Original post:\\nYou\\'re welcome! Sorry to be brief via phone but welcome aboard!18 shares avail\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIll have some picture-porn of the inside of the warehouse later tonight with all my current hardware\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf you need some cheap cat 5e cable I found a good company to deal with over the summer at my summer IT job.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHa! The ultimate dibs, you wily miner you. No worries, I\\'ll refund you immediately if those 2 wayward R2 gents show up for their payments. If not: well, fortune favors the prepared!Also, thx for confirming wallet address. Plz confirm your wallet address for payouts and include the Round # (some people want to keep miner earnings separate from other miners they own shares in)!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWell, if there happen to be any other drop out for some reason on the previous rounds, I\\'d be interested in picking up the slack.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI have 3x 1000ft Cat6 boxes with heads etc, and I ordered like 100 25ft cables from monoprice. I might die to cable-tangle\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNoted! Thank you, you\\'re first on the list for Backup shares for R4.28.8025344 BTC in R4 payment wallet: BTC on hand or already paid of ~138-ish BTC owed to HashFast for 2 Sierras. Almost there Woohoo!==After we secure the 138.66 BTC to HashFast, BTC deposits above 138BTC are intended for at-cost UPS & Battery Backup for your particular round\\'s miner; we should be able to get away w/ one larger UPS for both units w/ a good sized battery bank, with the additional funds we raise w/ the shares still available. So: TL;DR: Additional funds collected above 138BTC is going to at-cost UPS/Battery Backups for approximately 20-30 minutes of backup protection from short outages (blackouts), as well as voltage sag (brownouts), and voltage spike protection to protect circuitry.Also, -Redacted- has funds in the R4 wallet meant for 2 shares in R2 if wayward R2 gents don\\'t pay their shares before 8PM HST tonight.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI have contacted metal_jacke1 via PM. Assuming we can get together for payment I will take the last 18 @ $69.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI contacted thomas_s and paid for 5 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAll shares are accounted for, if you\\'ve messaged me already requesting shares your covered.If shares open up (which they might) DZ or I will post.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI am sorry at the moment all shares have been accounted for if any open up DZ or I will be sure to post, some R3 shares may open up later this week.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cat 5e cable, Cat 6 boxes, 25ft cables, Sierras, UPS, Battery Backup\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-21 10:54:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group buy] Avalon chips Escrow John K / Please send your e-mails until Friday\\n### Original post:\\nmail 31; patica; 320; 27.2; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\na c ao ca ya ca a c pae a ocaa a eea oee, 12 aca ee eoae oa apa o oc, corrupted DB...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ncare to translate?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI would still like my chips please Assembly was ordered via dnaleor\\'s group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI understand that this is frustrating , but I really need signed msg with payment address.If you do not send me signed e-mail, I\\'m not able to proof to Escrow your ownership.Sending signed e-mail is helping Jhon.k to process payments to you faster.That\\'s why I\\'m asking this.Working with signed msg was written in the OP of this Group buy and is part of the deal conditions.Best Regards: Martin\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhat about who already ordered some boards? Can they be refunded as well?I have four of them to sell if that\\'s not the case. Still not delivered. I will give 10% discount.Best regards,ilpirata79\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nCan you confirm the emails you received ... or can you give us a list of missing confirmations refund or chips?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ni\\'ll send you the email a few hours before the deadline so the members of my group buy have the change to react until tomorrow edit: any news about K1? If they will not be produced, these chips will be asked for refund...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMartin,Just purchased 2 boards, you should end up with a chip over, use as you see fit. I only payed for boards + packaging at the moment. Do you have a cheaper shipping option, time is no-longer that important.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'ll check and send you a PM\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'ll provide a list of the participants wishing refund tonight.Then you\\'ll be able to check and send me info on any corrections until sunday afternoon.then I\\'ll send instructions to John to process these refunds\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThanks for your hard work Martin\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n <16>; <0,93852>; chips at the price of 0.07821 = 1.25136Why the refund amount is 0.93852?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nMy mistake , correctedSorry\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nthere\\'s no need for a vote, design fees should be included in PCB cost, not on chips which we never received, at last we saw why your board price is cheaper than another - cause your calculations are all wrong!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI agree.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nagreed. Also there was no word on the HEX16 being designed at the start of this GB1 when we paid for the chips. It was not part of the terms.Also, even if this wasn\\'t the case,I\\'m not willing to pay a design fee when you still have given no word on what will done with boards of people with a chip refund.Can they be refunded when gen2 arrives and new people start ordering? If not there would be no need for a design fee since you then basically got free boards to sell.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\n+1Edit: do we need to sign for this\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYou do not need to offend me.Just say that you think I do not deserve payment for organizing this group. THAT IS ENOUGH\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nmail sent\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI also think that is is better to let john pay it directly so that you don\\'t have to ask for it later.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI have lost two months worth of wages here, and I have every right to offend every female collateral relative of yours.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nYeah, i see now. reading and logic in a sleepy state is\\'t the best. Deleting that post. Sry guys. if he just mentions the Original 9% fee, instead of PCB fee. i wouldnt be confused.If its indeed only the 9%. we all signed up for the 9% when we paid for the chips. we knew what we were getting into. its in the terms in the opening post. marto74 deserves the 9%. still bit high for my likes but he earned the 9% with everything he has went through here. including my erroneous post\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nCould you all please calm down ? We\\'re all sitting in the same boat and it does not get better if we start to throw stones at our heads, because the harbour closed their doors(i.e avalon). @racquemis: What you say isnt true ? How do you get to those 18,3% ?He takes 9%(8.68% to be exact.) what it exactly what was stated on the first page. It\\'s 0.9% less than SebastianJu and Zefir wanted to take.782.1BTC * 1,09 = 852,489 pet batch.Makes 0.0852489 BTC/ChipIn my example 32 Chips at 0.0852489 BTC/Chip that makes 2.7279648 BTCI only payed 2.72BTC because the rest was ceiled down.(We all did, just an example on my own investement)(2.72 /32) = 0.085 BTC/Chip * 10000 = 850 BTC/BatchCompared to its original price: 782.1/850 = 0.9201176 Now lets build the inverse of this 1/0.9201176 = 1,0868175Which results in a margin taken by marto of 8,68% instead of 9%.Which now builds the discrepancy on that what you paid and the deducted fee from marto. In other words deduct 8.68% from the original price of 0.0085 btc and you got the right solution.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\n+1Lets leave this mess behind us and sail to new grounds. : )\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\n+1martin indeed deserve the 9% for all his work t\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, boards, HEX16\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-26 01:04:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] USB - 0.11BTC ea - orders of 50+ immediate shipping [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nI have USBs in all colours available for immediate shipping to Australia/NZ (and nearby countries not served by other ASICMINER distributors)This thread is for orders of 50+ units only. 5.5BTC for 50, plus Shipping & Handling (Express post unless you specifically request ordinary post) Payment for this deal is BTC only.Units are in boxes of 10 - so you must order at least 10 of a particular colour.+ Black PM - or email \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMiners arrived this morning. Fast & well packedCheers!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USBs\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 19:21:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [USA - NOW OPEN] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nAdded a few orders & simplified pricing in OP. If you want to order 100+ PM me for a personal quote.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrder and email sent, just adding to the Paypal order from last night. Hope I got the transaction ID right.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrdered 5 units with BTC at the following Transaction ID: You might want to amend the order list. You still have the 6 I ordered on 9/21 via Paypal listed.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhello ssinc, email with order has been sent. thanks a million satoshis\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nConfirmed! Thank you!Confirmed! Thank you!Confirmed! Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n214 units ordered and climbing!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nssinc, not sure if it was mentioned, but when does this pre-order end? I might try to get another order in if I can round up the btc (xbt).\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI think he said fri or sat coming up.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCorrect, this group buy will be closing this week. I\\'m waiting for confirmation from Beastlymac on the exact date and I\\'ll add a counter to the OP.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nFYI : I\\'ll combine all orders received before I close the group buy into (1) shipment. So if you want to order 1 now and 1 more in a few days that is not a problem.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n2 ordered; 1.8 sent ; transaction sent with shipping details\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nReceived! Thanks for your order\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nFirst Redfury Unit in hand I\\'ll update once I have this puppy cookin\\'\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nPictures of both sides and a comparison against a block erupter if possible please Oh and a screenshot of hashing.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nand some ice cream and pop corn too\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\ni have a question where will these be built and are the chips in hand.i had a piece of these very small piece. are not these the same chips? should we be asking for refunds and closing down our ebay listings. the deal in the thread above is dead. refunds are to be issued. so does this mean our preorder is dead?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nSetting up a linux box right now to run this guy because there is no window native support currently.Here are some more photos :For reference I am using a Aitech/Anker 10 Port USB hub. Beastlymac has confirmed they will be using thinner heatsinks for the new revision so clearance between multiples on the same hub will not be an issue.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIndonesia I believe. I\\'ll double check that with Beastlymac but I believe they already have chips so this will not affect them.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nwowza\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWhat do you mean \"no native windows support\"? Is this going to be a problem with customers when these start shipping?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nRight now there is only a Linux build for the Redfury for BFGminer. BFGminer, CGminer, and Bitminter are all in the works as we speak and should be available for Windows Builds way before delivery so there is not much need for concern\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nYou get that thing rolling yet? lol\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nTo get running you will need to compile the \"bigpic\" branch of bfgminer from github. I ran \"sudo ./bfgminer -S from the command line. You can see what the device name is when you plug it in by looking at the /dev directory and see what new devices pop up. For me, it was /dev/ttyASC01\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nInstalling Ubuntu right now on my VM so it might be a bit as im really rusty with Linux\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThanks Jay! These are the instructions I received from Beastlymac as well :Also, thank you for your order\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nWindows support working now but has a few bugs that need fixed before we release it.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nWow that\\'s much bigger.... ---> that\\'s what she said ... anyways; How does the temperature feel in comparison to a BE (with or without fan on it)? Wonder how they\\'ll look in a juiced hub where the ports are closer. What did the packaging it came in look like?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nso being linux i can run this on raspbian?\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nYes you can.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nIt came without a box, just bubble wrap. I only assume because it was a dev unit. I\\'ve been running it all night and it is completely cool to the touch. The heatsink is very efficient on these.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nFYI: The \"bigpic\" branch has been merged into the main \"bitfury\" branch, and now requires a -S bigpic:/dev/ttyACM0 option instead.This is still experimental code, use at your own risk.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nThanks for the update Luke-Jr!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER, Redfury Unit, Aitech/Anker 10 Port USB hub, block erupter, linux box, raspbian\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-25 05:13:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] GB #1 BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner 2.2~2.7 GH/s 0.90 or less~BTC $139 Paypal\\n### Original post:\\nYeah - its totally understandable haha I don\\'t blame for the PP price I blame paypal for that\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIs there any other stock photos besides the one all the resellers have?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo are we going to be getting the blue ones or red ones?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWe are sending out units with a blue pcb and red led.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCan you ship worldwide if yes minimum order required ?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHow do I order more than 1 unit with Paypal without paying $25.00 for shipping each\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI am trying to limit international orders to only 1 for paypal contact me by PM if you want to order multiple units.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGot a few more orders in getting closer to the 100 this is gonna be closing on the 25th at 11:59pm EST\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHi Maidak!I\\'ve just send an email and 1.14 BTC to you. Please verify.Transaction ID: me know if you need anything else.Thanks and hope you reach your target.My ranting:I\\'ve given up on BFL.I\\'ve yet received their over priced paper weight.It would be something if I receive this Fury first.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nGot it verified thanks for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOrdered 1 from Maidak. Paid via bitcoin. Nice and easy transaction. Very helpful when saying how to sign a message!Can\\'t wait till it comes in!Maidak: You got some trust feedback too. Keep it up and I am sure we will be dealing again!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n^You ain\\'t the only one in that boat mate... I\\'m right there with ya. I\\'m sure plenty of others are as well lol\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThought I would give this a spin before I (might order a few more) to see what can be done with Adler aka Onryo --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x2B4B58FEP.P. (Now broke on BTC atm =/)Web Accept Payment Sent (Unique Transaction ID can I expect this thing in Sweden?All the best!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI would like to place an order, but I cannot figure out how to sign messages in Armory. Anyone know how to do this?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nLogical I sent you a PM.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'m interested in purchasing one, I\\'d just like to clarify that for US orders (I\\'m in Ohio too) the shipping is including in the pricing?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYes shipping is free for paypal orders and bitcoin orders all usa domestic if your close to the 43430 area code you can even do local pickup if you would like, just send me a PM or contact my live chat support if you have any questions!Currently up to 60 total orders! Just would like to thank everyone and note that this will be closing on the 25th at 11:59pm EST, I am currently working on a dedicated website for future group buy purchases that will even further simplify btc and paypal orders. You will no longer need to sign messages verifying your shipping address.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI noticed your Ebay order. Do you plan on adding more to it? Also, if i wanted more, would you be willing to work with me through Ebay instead of the group buy here on the forums?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWhats currently listed on my ebay is the max i\\'m able to do for the month i cant add anymore unfortunately, I believe there is 13 available still though if you would like to order.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nLink to product details?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nProduct Description:Rated hashrate 2.2 - 2.7 GH/sElectricity consumption as low as 2.5 watts and 500mALarge aluminium heatsink will lower the chip up to 20 degrees celsiusPowered by the USB port without any other power sourceFirmware is open for more optimization, using highend microcontroller AVR by Atmelalso here is a video of the unit hashing \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThanks! so who is making these USB. Sorry, I am not able to find the company who is making these.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\n+1 from paypal from me. Placed order for some bitcoin on coinbase then realize it wont release intime for me to order that way :-(\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nBack again with hopefully my last question for awhile -Will these currently run/be recognized under Windows 7? If not do we have any kind of time line on support?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nfacebook page doesnt even exist i have only one question: that iron throne is included in the package???\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nLol no unfortunatly they do not and it should exsist i may have strict privacy problems\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nIS there going to be details on how to properly mine with these or are they going to be plug and play?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nIt is my understanding from the release thread that this software should be ok or soon be ok\"Software that supports or is working to support Blue Fury release details of the shipment we are getting in on here: \\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nIs the delivery time guaranteed ?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nCurrently it only runs in Linux. I have a setup guide in my Group Buy OP that is really easy to follow.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\n:/ Hmm.. I hope it may run on the Pi. I will look at your post.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nI also need them to run on my Pi !! Using PIckaxe right now and it runs GOOD \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner 2.2~2.7 GH/s, BFL, Pi\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-26 06:21:38',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN, 4 shares avail!]R2:HashFast FTW! + Host, $151.50/share w/ BTCrow,upgrade?\\n### Original post:\\nOk then. A toast to your GBs !Don\\'t forget that I sent to the wrong wallet...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIs there an R5 yet?Nahh - I never sleep much more than an hour or two. So many group buys. So little time....\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-26 14:59:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] HashFast Shares ฿1.2 = 20GH/s | Ships in Nov *2nd Kit PAID\\n### Original post:\\nIm in for an upgrade!1 - I am on miner 12 - I have 2 shares3 - I am upgrading 2 shares - 0.8 BTC sent4 - TXId - got a refund from a groupbuy that I no longer had much confidence in my other groupbuys and seen this upgrade opportunity.Every cloud has a silver lining and all that!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPayment sent1. Miner #42. 1 share owned3. 1 share upgrading 4. \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nInteresting! I have 1 share in miner #4, will upgrade for 0.8 BTC. Sending BTC soon with the format you requested. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nby bi-weekly, do you mean twice a week or every 2 weeks? i suspect every 2 weeks... but doesn\\'t hurt to ask also: for those already using the service, have you broken even yet?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHere it is (0.8 BTC)!1. Current Miner(s) you have shares on: #42. Amount of current shares: 13. Amount of shares you are upgrading: 14. TxID for payment: \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYou need my original payout address for miner #4? \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi I am in for Upgrade1 - I am on miner #12 - I have 4 shares3 - I am upgrading 4 shares - 1.6 BTC sent4 - TXId - confirm.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi Wh , i\\'m in for upgrades ... 1) Miner #3 Miner #6 Miner #7 2) Miner #3, 1 share owned (x10 Gh/s) Miner #6, 4 shares owned (x20Gh/s) Miner #7, 2 shares owned (x20Gh/s)3) 7 shares upgrading for a total of 5.2 4) confirm me, #bit_p\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHi,I have shares on Miner 4.I have 1 current share.I want to upgrade 1 share.The id is payout address is confirm.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miner 12, miner #42, miner #4, miner #12, miner #3, miner #6, miner #7\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-24 00:36:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R2:HashFast FTW! + Host, $151.50/share w/ BTCrow. Payments due Wed. 8PM\\n### Original post:\\nUpdates:- Lots of shares paid! Spreadsheet updates still pending, as things still much in flux. If I haven\\'t listed your shares as paid on the spreadsheet quite yet, no worries, you know I\\'ve PMed you to confirm your payment. Something like 80% of shares already paid (or in transit to be paid).- I\\'m in talks with John S. about a possible discount on a R3 MPP Sierra since it would be a *third* at-cost HashFast Miner Purchase I organize, or co-organize in this case. We\\'ll see what he says. If not: hey, it\\'s a wide open marketplace & we can all vote with our dollars/BTC/votes in this co-operative, on the decision for the next R3 miner mfg., if necessary. Whatever\\'s decided for R3, I\\'m seeking institutional pricing, since as an at-cost Miner\\'s Cooperative, we provide a ready pool of share reserves for any mfg. with good pricing for institutional investors/buyers, and we\\'ll have an established track record of 2 GBs organized with miners purchased and shipped in an open, transparent, and democratic process (where I, the GBC, don\\'t even have local physical access to the miners at host sites; only remote admin 6.601 shares paid via PayPal! I didn\\'t intend to do this again, but \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDarnit! I also forgot to mention how nice an anon. member was in the co-op. I\\'m sorry. The first person that paid their shares (3 BTC) was refunded 0.621 BTC this morning and is keeping 2 shares instead of 3 (this backup share has already been claimed & paid). Instead of taking the refund, this anonymous Round2 Hero donated it to an anonymous Round1 DZ Cooperative member who\\'s been having a hard time. Wow! That is *very* generous (esp. if you consider future potential BTC values) and was much appreciated by the Round1 recipient, esp. since he or she has had such a hard time recently. I won\\'t say what his or her disability is, but it\\'s rather substantial. I had intended this previously but hadn\\'t announced anything, but half of 1 of my 10 shares for our R1 HashFast miner is also intended for this gentleman or lady, in case you\\'re wondering why my payouts for 10 shares of R1 in November may be lower then expected.This R1 co-op member *could* be scamming the both of us, but from the previous PMs I\\'ve had with this person and our shared love of culture and history, I highly doubt that this is the case. There were also no solicitations for help when I was notified of this condition, mor\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNews from Simon Barber on CH Forum: Look forward to a special promotion just for those first batch customers. Launching soon.Lucky us gents!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWe lost a share owner / co-op member. This was an anonymous person that voted for Cointerra. I hope we can work together in the future. Cheers!Anyway, I bought the share, so I\\'m down for 3 shares for Round 2, Order 616. PM if you want this share, otherwise I\\'m keeping it for my wife\\'s cousin who\\'s interested in BTC & I may be able to pay him w/ this share in a GB share for work done while he\\'s visiting. Nice to have a Day 1 MPP HashFast pre-paid order on hand. We just got lucky!We still have 3 shares with payment pending from the anon. owner of 10 promised shares if you\\'re also still interested in backup shares. Please PM me for those shares as well, if you\\'re interested.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nsierra upgrade It\\'s only fair, a lot of the b1 customers were grumbling and rightly so. This is either the first asic maker with a conscience or a better scammer than yifu... hope it\\'s the former, my ass is still sore from the latter. I\\'m giving you credit for starting something that should force the competition to offer reasonable pricing... nice work.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nA sierra would be really nice Waiting for details....\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI talked to John S. this morning. He said he wasn\\'t pissed at all about my comments via PM. Unlike Inaba & Yifu, from my dealings with him, he doesn\\'t appear to have a paper thin skin; a necessity in the Customer Service biz.I didn\\'t mention the B1 update/promotion stuff but had some interesting insights as to how thing\\'s are going from their POV.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nLooks like we have a decision to make: know what you are thinking, this group buy is getting more expensive all the time!FYI: I vote for an upgrade\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThis would push back the date of getting it by about a month (maybe 2) if I\\'m not mistaken, and the miner we have has the MPP.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nNope no delay. The original miner ships regularly. They would ship a 2nd chip to us when Batch 2 starts shipping. We would install the chip on our end, it just drops into the board. This upgrade would allow us to double our hashrate approximately 1 month after we start mining. With overclocking, we could have ~1TH/s in December. I like that idea\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAlso the MPP doesn\\'t kick in until 3 months in, that is a long time in the Min\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R3 MPP Sierra, HashFast Miner, Cointerra, B1, sierra\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-26 19:51:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED] R2:HashFast FTW! + Host, $151.50/share w/ BTCrow,upgrade?\\n### Original post:\\nHmm, I count 40 shares. I need to reconfirm payments again but it looks like we\\'re all paid. I hope someone didn\\'t send to the wrong wallet since there was an R3/R4 wallet too. I was just confirming payments & may have missed it being sent to the wrong wallet.Code:Round 2: Bitmine Coincraft or CointerraII or KnC. We need to reach 20 Soft Reservations - no BTC or cash paid - before sales begin. Payouts sent every 2 weeks. Before payout, 2.75% Hosting/Management fees are deducted every 2 weeks once operations Username | Wallet Address |Share Status| Additional Optional Shares / Notes 2 | DyslexicZombei | | PAID | Your GB Coordinator / Net. Eng. / Primary Remote Admin || 0 | bobsag3 | TBA | HOST? | World Class vetted Hosting Avail., W/ Lowest hosting costs || 1 | a........m | TBA | PAID | Payment sent to wrong wallet. Sorry, fixed. || 2 | jungle_dave | TBA | PAID | Backup Admin, former EE/Net. Engineer. Plants trees in Amazon! || 2 | firsttimeuser | TBA | PAID | DZ Co-op Round1 HashFast BabyJet Vetted Miner Host || 2 | Anonymous | TBA | PAID | Votes ceded to GBC. Anon. R2 hero! || 4 | baros008 | TBA | PAID | || 5 | Commandermk | TBA | PAID | Current\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Coincraft, CointerraII, KnC, HashFast BabyJet\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-27 02:22:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN][Paypal] ASICminer USB $19.95 & Blades $539.99 (10 for $4999..\\n### Original post:\\nAny update on shipping? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGoing out tmw morning. Swisher right? Free Priority Mail upgrade.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrdered a couple myself. We\\'ll see how it goes.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nReceived today. A bit slower shipment than from Canary, but still very good services with no issues.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nwhere do you ship from?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCanary has such fast shipping..... I\\'m starting to think maybe he just lives in the back of a post office shipping miners.....\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nKY... the state not the jelly.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nGot mine today, they were factory sealed and are currently hashing away.Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer USB, Blades\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-27 09:31:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] HashFast Shares ฿1.2 = 20GH/s | Ships in Nov *3rd Kit PAID\\n### Original post:\\npaid 0.8 BTCid : share in miner #5\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n1 share pls @ 1.65 btcTx-ID: above is my original purchaseof 1 share, for hashfast miner 2.The upgrade of 0.4 btc has been sent to you just confirm.Grim\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miner #5, hashfast miner 2\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-26 20:04:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R2:HashFast FTW! + Host, $151.50/share w/ BTCrow,upgrade?\\n### Original post:\\nClosing GB while I sort out payments. May need to transfer from R3/R4 wallet if folks sent to the wrong wallet. Sorry for the confusion, if so. It does appear everyone is paid but I\\'m triple checking.It\\'s not all the time I run simultaneous GBs. I prefer to do 1 at a time but this Flash Sale wasn\\'t to be missed.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAh, found the mistake. No worries, rookie move. A payment or two was sent to the wrong wallet (plus I sent deliberate overpayment to help things along JIC).Ok, no wonder the other Round\\'s wallet seemed too big & the other one too small. Didn\\'t make sense w/ confirmed payments. Ok both wallets should be properly balanced. Please let me know if you think this is incorrect.Thanks. With all the time spent doing detective work & rebalancing wallets to reflect proper Round/wallet...I need to check out & will work on R3/R4 spreadsheets tomorrow, sorry for the delay. But now we can pay! Contacting seller.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTx ID: seller before bed that we paid. Then I\\'m out. Peace!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nLooks like payment to the BTCrow escrow wallet was confirmed when I was away: has been contacted w/ my IRL name and email address to pass on to HashFast who has already been notified of the buyout on Monday via phone call to John S. and a follow up email. Here\\'s a link to the BTCrow escrow transaction (prior to payment a few days ago): Order 616: shipping has transferred to Missouri, our escrowed payment will be immediately (manually) released to the seller. Thanks again for working with us!Love that chip news which I missed, so thanks! Sounds like they est. 3-10 days to install paste/fans in (hopefully) Plug N Play rigs ready for some brians, I mean brains, an ASIC brain (AKA chip). HashFast paid a premium to ensure that they get these chips on time. They\\'re hand carrying the first chips on a flight when they\\'re ready. We\\'re all pulling for them in this co-op.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIs there still 4 unpaid (avaiable) shares?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNo, it was payments sent to the wrong wallet address that I thought were unpaid shares. I went thru the R2 shares/payments w/ a fine tooth comb & found the errors. 2.46BTC for R2 was sent to the R3/R4 wallet on purpose by -Redacted- in case shares opened up. I had also sent extra BTC there to help out which I moved back. Long & short: we\\'re all paid up for R2-R4 and we\\'re only awaiting 1 payment for 1 share in R4, for all GBs.2 shares opened up which he had already pre-paid & it was immediately applied to our Buyout, which should take 1-3 days depending on HashFast getting back to the Seller; I know John\\'s on travel so hopefully he\\'ll authorize Cara to do the ownership and/or Shipping location change. If the MPP kicks in, I may have to have the Order 616 seller mail us the extra chips at our cost.==As for open shares in the co-op: Thomas & I are taking backup reservations for R4 in case there\\'s refunds anywhere in R1-R4 and someone would like to apply their R4 backup share reservation to R1-R3.Refunds aren\\'t fun from a GBC\\'s POV, but sometimes stuff happens & people need to drop out (which is why a good GBC has some BTC on hand for instances like this; it\\'s not expected you keep 10\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPlease update the OP, it still says 4 shares left in bold red lettersthanks DZ\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nOf course! thank you! Hey aren\\'t you supposed to be sleeping or something? heheEdit: Hey our official Toast icon! Thanks, haha!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOuch. I\\'m sorry. I hear ya on that. The family baby: Butters the cat, a Kauai native, seems to wake me up to be pet usually about an hour before my alarm, almost without fail. He was born outside, we tamed him, shots, neutered, and now he cruises in and out of the house and lives in cat heaven with all the freedom he wants.I\\'m trying to get to bed earlier to try to compensate. Hasn\\'t worked out so well. As for R5, I may take a break, but I may *host* the co-op\\'s GB in a R5 thread & take a true backset as a co-GBC on the next one. Worked with 2 GBCs (with a few minor bumps, sorry) so why not 2.5 GBCs and 1 or 2 vetted miner hosts? These things take time & don\\'t want to piss off the wife. The last week\\'s required a lot of extra attention. It\\'s been a successful week for these 2 GBCs and 1 vetted miner host: The co-op\\'s done about $24K worth of at-cost ASIC and UPS/Batt. sales in the last week for 3 miners. Glad we did well but...That couch isn\\'t comfy.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSorry.Done (well, at least w/ my posts; I won\\'t delete people\\'s posts in any of our co-op threads unless they\\'re hurtful or trolling).Thanks Adam! As always, everyone\\'s input and help is appreciated and welcome.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nStrange.. I still see it\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nDoh! I changed the title thread but missed removing the top thread additional text.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nall good now!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThank you! When you said OP \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, ASIC, UPS/Batt.\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-26 13:53:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! USA SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nAlso, I\\'ll be posting a quick Linux tutorial with step by step instructions tomorrow so everyone is on the same page\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhey, you mentioned it was open\"Firmware is open for more optimization, using highend microcontroller AVR by Atmel\"is there anywhere i can see that source?-x3\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nhuge order in! Over 300 units ordered total now!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nUbuntu Linux Setup Instructions :1 ) Download Ubuntu x64 from : ) Install on a PC or on a Virtual Machine.3 ) Once installed Find and Open Terminal by pressing CTRL + ALT + T4 ) Type the following lines and press enter after each one :Code:sudo add-apt-repository apt-get updatesudo apt-get install bfgminer5 ) Plug in your Blue Fury Miner in your favorite USB hub/port6 ) Find the Blue Fury device name in your /Dev Folder. Mine was named ttyACM0 (yours should be similar)7 ) Type the following into Terminal :Code:sudo bfgminer -o [pool name] -u [username] -p [password] -S change everything in brackets to your personal pool settings.8 ) Hash Away!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nClosing date/counter coming soon!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIf I choose your default shipping option can you ship to a PO Box in the US?Any news on when the BitMinter mining software will support these?Thanks ... T\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nBitminter mining support coming soon! Also, Group Buy closing tomorrow evening (OP updated with a timer)! If you are pending payment please PM me and confirm you are going to pay before the buy closes so I can secure your USB\\'s!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWill know if buying in the morning. Will PM you if I will be ordering.Can you ship to a PO Box?Based on how this group buy has done do you think you will do a second one?T\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIf you pay in BTC I can ship to any address\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n305 units ordered and Closing in less than 24 hours!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nGuess I\\'ll add two more to my order... You\\'ll have an email soon.Edit - Email Sent.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOrdered a couple using PayPal because I am lazy.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nConfirmed! Thank you!Thanks for being lazy\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWhen do you plan to ship this group buy if I order now?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nShipments from BPMC are estimated to arrive between the 1st and 2nd week of October and be immediately reshipped as soon as they arrive (same business day).\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nOrder sent in, email sent in.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI just wanted to point out again that the six I ordered and then cancelled using paypal on the 21st are still being listed in your order log. You might want to make sure you\\'ve got the correct tally. Also, I\\'m still looking to get some more BTC together to buy a few more by Coinbase is being less than ideal right now. I\\'ll keep you updated.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nConfirmed! Thanks!Fixed! Now hurry up and get some coin!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAlso just hit 350 pieces ordered! Aiming for 400 before closing\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nless than 12 hours left!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nso, from what I read. As of now, cannot run on windows, right?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nOrdered 5 units. E-mail and money sent.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nDang got this from coinbase. Your BTC will arrive on Thursday Sep 26, 2013 around 08:25AM PDT.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nSucks. You have to be Level 2 authorized for instant purchases of BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nIts still not instant it can take an hour or so to get to your coinbase wallet then takes at least 6 confirmations before you can send it to another wallet.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI moved a lot in the navy and don\\'t remember every street name I lived at 20 yrs ago so I keep failing the verification quiz.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI kept failing the verification since I no longer know my ex-spouse. There was also a question about which bank is the lean holder on my car. Since the car was paid off about 5 years ago I chose \\'none of the above\\' - evidently I was wrong./cet\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nOrder placed.. Signed email sent..Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nAt this moment Linux only. Setup instructions are in the OP. Windows versions of BFGminer, CGminer, and Bitminter are being worked on as we speak.PM me and I can probably reserve a few units for you Confirmed! Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\n6 hours left! If you want to reserve any PM me before the Group Buy closes!\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nJust ordered 4 using PayPal.Set to ship to my PO Box address, PayPal shows it as a Confirmed address.Let me know if I need to do anything else.T\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nGood to go! Thanks for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nJust jumped over 400 units ordered! Only a few hours left!!\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nPM sent but no reply\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nAdditional miner ordered\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nI don\\'t have them in hand yet. Confirmed! Thanks for your order(s)\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nJust confirmed : CGminer support will be available within a week\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\n3 more additional miners ordered. Pmnt and email sent.\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nConfirmed! Thanks for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nIf you want to send out my miners first -- I\\'ll beta test it for y\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blue Fury Miner, PC, Virtual Machine, USB hub/port, ttyACM0, additional miner, additional miners\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-28 15:35:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CANADA][Paypal] 0.95 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! GB#1\\n### Original post:\\nThanks for the Chat via PM\\'s BobSag3!Order for 5 sent and confirmed via PayPal.Come one guys, get your orders paid, we need to reach 100 before he can place the orders!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n15 Paid for!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nokay, I know i said i would offer a sub-groupbuy, but at this time i do not see these being profitable enough to meet my own use requirements. However, at the next price-drop (whenever it may be), consider me interested. At that time i would be glad to organise at least 20 units for ontario residents with the option of pickup/dropoff in central toronto\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-29 03:41:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [BPMC] Blue Fury USB ~2.6GH/s [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nHi All,I think I\\'ve now responded to all by PM or email.If you haven\\'t received a payment address yet, let me know.Shipping & handling (Australia) for up to about 5 units will be 0.1BTC (I expect 5 units to come in under 500g)Shipping & handling for 10 units is \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThank you Julz,Payment for my order of 10 is in.Now we wait :-)\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrder paid and emailed verification. Cheers Julz.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nEDIT: Cancelled order for 4... will be busy *bummer*\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blue Fury USB\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-29 04:11:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CLOSED!!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! USA SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nso now we wait. how many did you order? 350 or 440 you had 2 sets of numbers. paid for and waiting payment. I anxiously await my 20 sticks. the 26 to the 10th is 14 days, I am hoping for the 10th or a little bit earlier\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMy coinbase clears in 8 hrs\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSent my email with transaction details. thank you for letting me reserve space while my coins cleared coinbase.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWaiting on Beastlymac to say he\\'s ready to accept my order and I have a few pending customers that need to submit payment.He\\'s busy getting everything ramped up for production at the moment but I\\'m sure he will announce publicly the timeline for delivering.Sounds good Not a problem! And confirmed by the way I\\'m sending them all out the same day I receive them so you and everyone else can beta test at the same time\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWindows drivers and BFGminer just posted!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNice. Still waiting for bitminter.com and Doc H. to confirm the java client will work. I really would love to swap out my 100 AM sticks with these. I could have a 200gh farm plug n play. On bitminter.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIve never seen this project either\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nJust to clarify this, but he is already in production, correct? You just meant he is INCREASING production quantity. The way you worded it, it sounds like he has not actually started producing these yet. I hope I just misinterpreted that statement\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nExcellent news! I\\'ll try it out on my V1 and see how it does\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYes as far as I am aware he\\'s busy \"producing\" not starting. My mistake\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPlug and play 2.5GH/s sticks is what I am hoping for as well. My hubs are waiting eagerly for these to arrive\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nTry it out yet?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nYou haven\\'t paid attention during the class, teacher may be angry: \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nlol I don\\'t look in the Marketplace unless directed to\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nPayment for my additional 3 reserved units has been sent! Thanks again!Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nNot a problem! Thanks for your order\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nLooking good on Windows 7 I\\'ll update the OP with instructions shortly.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nIt doesn\\'t work on raspian it is for desktop only. I will have a guide on how to setup raspian ready in a hour or so.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nok cool thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\ndone\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nthanks so much for such a fast response, ill give that a shot tonight.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI clicked on the link to download the bfgminerWin.zip file and my antivirus software ( Sophos ) popped up a message saying that access to a High Risk Website was blocked.The site indicated was and it was identified as Mal/HTMLGen-A.Did not download the file since I don\\'t have my Blue Fury sticks yet.First time downloading bfgminer or from the MediaFire web site so I don\\'t know if this is common or not.T\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\n\"High Risk Website\" looks like sophos just blocks anything that might possibly be risky.... \\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nNot necessarily:From the \"14 Most Dangerous Websites\" list at: File hosting| Global rank in malware hosting: 9\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI thought we were talking about Mediafire?\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nOh.. I thought the Sophos alert was from the driver download link. There is a reason I use noscript and don\\'t download files from sites that need me to run javascript.Anyways: I look forward to trying these out on Raspian, Ubuntu, and Win8\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nSorry, my post was not as clear as it could have been.I clicked on the link to download bfgminerWin.zip from the mediafire.com web site.I got a pop up from Sophos about a problem with a file from another web site, presumably because that site and file were linked to from the mediafire.com page. I suspect this is very common.I did not mean to imply that the bfgminerWin.zip file or it\\'s contents were flagged by Sophos. Note that I did NOT download the zip file so I have no idea if Sophos will flag it or it\\'s contents at this time.I have used Sophos for several years and while it may be more aggressive than some other products it does a good job at keeping junk off my system.I may have overreacted when I got the pop up but since ssinc had already download and installed bfgminerWin and he made no mention of getting a waring I was surprised when I did.T\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\ntested with block eruptors and works.now i just wait for my new blue fury\\'s\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER, AM sticks, V1, raspian, block eruptors\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-29 17:01:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.7 BTC=67GH/s 26/30 shares\\n### Original post:\\nWhat happens if you have unsold shares?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIf there are any unsold shares, the BTC will be returned to the members on the applicable Terraminer .\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIs it accurate to say only 4 shares have been sold on the second miner?what are the sales expectations on the second miner?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n14 sold on Terraminer IV, could sell out today, or in a week, I never can tell.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-29 19:26:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] HashFast Shares ฿1.2 = 20GH/s | Ships in Nov *4th Kit PAID\\n### Original post:\\nSweet!I\\'d like to double my 10 shares on miners #2,3#. I\\'ll be sending 4btc your way as soon as my fresh funds arrive Monday or Tuesday the latest Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo 1 Share cost = 2 Btc , Per share hashing at @ 40Gh/s , expect November delivery,,is this correct ?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miners #23\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-30 01:46:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [CANADA/US][Paypal] 0.95 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! GB#1\\n### Original post:\\nnow selling to the US due to the closed US GB\\'s!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYou Canadians need to step up your game. I think the US resellers are well over 500 units SOLD And PAID FOR. If you want a supplier in canada step up and make it worth his time!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI ordered 2 last night. How many are we up to now Bob?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOrdered and paid for 10 using paypal\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGot it!makes for 27, plus the ~3 I will probably get.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDue too lack of intrest, I will be closing this GB. Refunds will go out tonight.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-30 01:55:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [10 Left] New ASICMiner Block Erupters - .11 BTC or less. Fast cheap shipping\\n### Original post:\\nThanks CrazyGuy everything working and hashing away. I look forward to hearing from you later this week.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNice setup! I appreciate your business. I\\'ll be receiving another shipment of usb miners this week, along with a few blades, so stay tuned!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupters, usb miners, blades\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-29 02:00:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [Group Buy] 1 Metabank Bitfury with hosting in the US [ORDERING CLOSED]\\n### Original post:\\nNew update at bottom of thread-head. Group purchase now closed while holding for up to 2 hours for last payment of 1 share. New update at approx 1.45 pm central time. (2h 15 min from this post)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWe have original purchase price verified, I have sent BTC3.05 (1 share, plus expedited transaction fee) from my own wallet to the wallet designated for purchase and am waiting for transaction to become available. I will then make the purchase and send everyone final confirmation together with transaction log for the purchase. I will also provide copy of contract/invoice from BitCentury as soon as they send it out (should be available by the end of business day today).\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPurchase has been made and I am awaiting confirmation from Bitcentury. As soon as this happens I will send every share holder a copy of Purchase confirmation, Transaction info showing payment from the receiving address (where you send BTC) to Bitcentury\\'s official receiving address and screenshots of the payment process. CONGRATULATIONS everyone! We seem to have made the first batch of available units (as far as I can tell).\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ngood sounds like a bit of fun may end up better then my other bfl investment.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAwesome. Thanks for helping us share the risk.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nConsidering the amount of \\'proof\\' that is available around Bitfury, Bitcentury and Metabank I feel fairly confident that the miner will indeed be delivered and maybe even on time\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIt would be nice about 120Gh divide by 12 = 10Gh a share. maybe 110Gh divide by 12 = 9.167Gh a share\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYeah, well if they do delivery on time it will still be by FAR the cheapest GH/s that I know of.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nhello. We started to make a open census of those who made pre-orders. If you do not want to publish your nicknames and number orders, you can add as AnonimousXXX (possibly breaking your order into several AnonimousXXX,for greater privacy)\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nQuestion to the share holders: Instead of PM\\'ing everyone left and right, would you mind if I just publish your profile link, TXid, receiving address and share amount here as verification and if anything is wrong you PM me? Then I can send out the contract copy via PM to all share holders.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThat seems okay to me. 1 share for 3 coins. you can post my info.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nFine by me\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAnyone interested in a second batch? I can probably put down 15 btc.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI might be willing to run a second auction, the price is now 32 btc though I believe. If there is e ought interest ill consider it.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nNo objections. Go ahead and publish what you need.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'m a bit low on funds. Might come up with a single share though.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nNot sure if I can swing another 3.2btc. I have 2.2 and mining away at about .2 a day. That would mean 4 or 5 days till I get to 3.2. I could try and sell my last shares of Am but I kind of want to hold on to the two of them. I will get back to this on WED about 12 hours from this post.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nNo problem, I haven\\'t even opened a second group buy yet.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI\\'ll watch the thread, but if you do happen to open a second group, I\\'d be interested as well. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSure, I don\\'t mind it either.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nShare holder list posted. If you for any reason would like me to take down the info, or remove your transaction from the list just PM me. It seemed a majority was fine with this share holder list confirmation but of course I will honor your request. I will also likely take the info down at a later point as there is no real \\'reason\\' to publicly show it other then to verify to the share holders that the group purchase has been made as described and allow \\'capping\\' of info for future reference.As you will notice I own not 2 but 3 shares, and this is because I ended up paying for the 10th share out of pocked to finish the purchase ahead of schedule. Just for clarity.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nIf anyone is interested in picking up a single share in the Group Purchase, I have 1 of my 3 personal shares left and would be willing to sell it to cover some expenses. IF you are interested, PM me asap. No more than 1 share will be sold.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\n3BTC sent. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nIf you are (somehow) able to get unit(s) out of the first batch I would be interested in a group buy for another unit.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\ni sent a pm about a change of btc address. please guide me through what is needed to do this. thanks phil\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI was able to get in touch with walletbit.com and they have organized a new wallet company. they transferred my previous address to their new company. so this means I am still using my same btc address that I paid the 3 coins to you \\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nAny updates or estimates about when expected shipping dates might be? I realize there are \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Metabank Bitfury\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-30 19:38:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.7 BTC=67GH/s 16/30 shares\\n### Original post:\\nBTC is on its way up , are u going correct share price for btc upward movement.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ntransaction ID BTC 5 sharesThanks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nwelcome to the group, added to OP and spreadsheet.Please send me your email and Skype user\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-30 20:17:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #15 Blade Miners 3.50 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\n9/21/13 All orders placed so far have shipped! New orders will ship this Tuesday or Wednesday. Prices have been adjusted slightly lower for new orders. Thank you for your support!Units Ordered Unit Price 1 3.50 BTC 2-3 3.45 BTC 4-5 3.40 BTC 6-9 3.35 BTC 10+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n9/22/13 All USB miner prices have been adjusted lower in price. They are in stock and will ship within 24 hours of order being placed. Thank you for your continued orders!Units Ordered Unit Price 1-14 0.120 BTC15-60 0.117 BTC61-100 0.115 BTC101-220 0.110 BTC 221+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n9/23/13 Blades have arrived and are in stock. Any new orders placed will ship within 24 hours!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\njust in time for the next difficulty increase....Bitcoin difficulty (estimate): 149,493,100\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI would be glad to take an order from you. Have a great evening!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSSB,Thank you for fast order and shipment processing.Btw, can you keep us informed about the backplane situation please?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPM Sent. Address adjustment before shipment! Contact Me.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI have received a limited amount of backplanes tonight. Any new orders of 10 blades in one order will receive a free backplane. I don\\'t have extras to sell as I only received a limited amount of them.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSo no luck for yesterdays order of 10blades?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI will send you one.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nJust wanted to Chime in and Say SilentSonicBoom is A++++++ in my book. Placed an order around 4am had tracking info emailed to me within about 6 hours! Keep Up the Good Work!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI WILL 2ND THE ABOVE\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks to everyone for your positive comments. I appreciate your support!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n9/25/13 Backplanes are available with orders of 10 or more blades for free while supplies last.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n9/26/13 Plenty of USB Miners, Blade miners, and free backplanes (for orders of 10 or more blades) are available for immediate shipping from me within 24 hours of payment being made.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n9/26/13 I am now accepting preprinted USPS shipping labels for orders. Please PM me for details when placing an order if interested. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\n you! Order placed for 30 miners on 9/24, order received on 9/26. Exceptional seller here. Such a person is a rarity in the world of bitcoin group buy scams where most are more than happy to make off with your hard earned Btc.You have certainly secured my future business. Thanks again!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nBlade came today! Thanks SSB.... Hopefully i\\'ll get it up and going tonight...\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI am now accepting USPS preprinted postage labels for shipping priority and express. Send your pdf label to me with your forum name and the words \"shipping labels\" in the subject line to .If you are a reseller, I can ship your orders for you. I can ship orders both big and small with USPS preprinted postage labels. The shipped from zipcode is 58503. Please print the instructions on the postage label (1 label per page) with your label to help me out.Guideline for printing shipping labels:USB MinersSmall Flat Rate Priority Box holds 14 USB MinersRegional A Priority Box holds 70 USB Miners(Weight can be listed at 1 pound for each 10 ordered)Medium Flat Rate Priority/Express Box holds 100 USB MinersLarge Flat Rate Priority Box holds 140 USB MinersOrders over 140 USB Miners pay for order and request a quote for what shipping labels should be printed.Any express orders that don\\'t use Medium Flat Rate Box, pay for order and then request a quote for what shipping labels should be printed.Blade MinersFlat Rate Priority/Express Padded Envelope holds 1 Blade MinerRegional A Priority Box holds 3 Blade Miners (Weight can be listed at 2 pounds for each Blade ordered)Medium Flat Rate \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nHappily Hashing @ 10.5ghs on the blade! 98.9% efficency after 12hrs! SSB Rocks!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThank you. Nice pictures. Good luck mining. SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miner, Blade Miners, backplane\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-30 22:23:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-09\\nTopic: Round 5 Payment Details\\n### Original post:\\nReserved for payment details.Remember: thomas_s is taking his first run as a primary GBC for an Industrial class rig (since a Baby Jet\\'s a little more comprehensive than a Jally).Payments will be directed to thomas_s for R5 but I will have co-admin to this wallet for auditing or for payments if we\\'re in a rush. He\\'s done 3 GBs under my tutelage, and he\\'s ready to lead this one, IMO.9/30 AM UPDATE: -Redacted-: Owner of the KnC Jupiter Miner for Round 5, Version 2.0. Thanks man! Send Paypal payments to him. DZ MC Boxed Set owner! PM CC -Redacted- and thomas_s please.thomas_s - co-GBC during R3/R4. R2 member. Primary GBC for Round 5. Send BTC payments and questions for R5 to thomas_s . Set up Online Auto Reservations for the co-op! Thank you! PM CC -Redacted- and thomas_s please.DZ - Need escrowed Group Buy shares? For a 2% extra fee you get 3rd party fund holding, dispute resolution, and $500 insurance per transaction at BTCrow. [DISCLAIMER: I, DyslexicZombei, am an approved Escrow Affiliate at BTCrow.] Please PM Carbon Copy -Redacted- and thomas_s please prior to escrow payment.Let\\'s wish him luck! G\\'luck Thomas!Thomas is handling questions and collecting payments for R5 (unless you\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter Miner, DZ MC Boxed Set\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 00:14:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN!, 48/100 avail.]R5: KnC Jupiter, BELOW-COST + Hosting! Auto reserve!\\n### Original post:\\nPM reserved to pass on to Thomas and -Redacted-.15 more shares reserved via PM. Thank you and Welcome Aboard!48 discounted shares available for Round 5.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nok, 3 shares for me, please\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThomas_s returned the money paid, so we\\'re even on the Cypherdoc deal. Just 5 shares for me...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 00:27:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 97/100]R5: HF Order #1,Baby Jet for $5K,10.7% off B1 prices.Auto reserve!\\n### Original post:\\nThis one has MPP right.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHey tripppn,Yes, this order and all other Batch1 units have MPP worth 2-4X our original hashrate, in the form of chips, built-in to the price.One of the reasons we offered R5 is we still had people contact us that missed out on Round 4 & were disappointed.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n10 shares reserved. I get to pick the color once you start taking payments, right?Let me know if you might be interested in doing an R6 group buy for one of my Day-1 KNC Jupiters - I\\'ve got a number of them that will be headed down to MO for hosting when they are shipped. These will be going out the door From KNCMiner in the next few days and should be hashing late next week or very early the week after.These don\\'t have an MPP, but they are minimum of 400 Gh/s and supposedly much more - possibly 500 Gh/s from the sounds of things - and will be here well before the HF boxes. And, of course, I\\'d turn them over to the co-op at cost...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou really want to have the complete set lolUpdated reservation code.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWell, if one of these HF group buys is worth having, they should all be, right? And why not collect a few shares in each color? This one is for the very first HF being shipped out the door. Historic, and these will probably end up being gold colored shares.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDamn, now I don\\'t know whether I want to wait for a Day 1 Jupiter to potentially come in, or pony up for the HashFast. What a good problem to have!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThe R5 is real, there might not be an R6. Who can resist being a part owner of Hashfast order #1 ??\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAs for the upgrade so no one is pressured to purchase it immediately, when we have the unit purchased I will front the BTC required to get the upgrade anyone who wishes to upgrade their hash power for the @ cost price may do so prior to the ship date of the main unit.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAre you meaning an R5 upgrade? Do we have enough shares reserved for the buy yet? Where are we with it?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'ve updated the current reservations, were about half way to opening up payments.For the R5 upgrade if we are able to raise the funds for the unit no one will be compelled to immediately purchase the upgrade kit / upgrade their shares, I will front the BTC to purchase it and if you want to upgrade your shares you can do so until the main unit ships out.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI guess i should not miss R5. Reserved 10 shares and hoping to make the list this time.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nGlad to have you on board, the best part of R5 is that it will be shipped before R1. Kind of funny, (well the might be shipped same day but R5 is first order).We are close enough to 50 shares to open payment, if you reserved / reserve prior to me setting up the main payment check your PM\\'s for the payment address and payment amount. If you want more shares than you reserved please wait until the main payment is set up.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nPayment has begun, if you reserved the payment address has been sent to you with the total needed, price per share is currently $56.50.To purchase additional shares visit the DZ Miner\\'s Coop site will make sure we don\\'t over sell as well as calculate the BTC / USD conversion for you, you are not required to create an account however it will help with order tracking, if asked for an address please make one up the only \"first name\" can be your bitcoin talk user name and please use a real email address (you may create one just for your DZ miner GB\\'s)\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIt\\'s a shame the Force can\\'t put more BTC into my account for more shares I stole this video from WaldoHoover\\'s GB (which I\\'m also a part of also), and the (theoretical) limit of these miners is 576 GH/s!!! Link to official KnC video where they announce this rate: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Baby Jet, Day-1 KNC Jupiters, HashFast\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 02:47:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED] GB #1 BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner 2.2~2.7 GH/s 0.90 or less~BTC $139 Paypal\\n### Original post:\\nGroup buy is official closed almost hit that 100 mark but close enough thanks alot guys looking forward to shipping these out!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUgh, if I\\'d have made my initial order of 8, you\\'d have been fine :/ But if you will have some still left over next week, I might scoop up a few more\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m getting extra that I will use I didnt add them to the group buy though, only the original 5 I started this off with, so technically I did hit over 100.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHope you or someone picked up some for resale or more will be available cause if I have money and they pan out well will get more for my setup!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWell i got a ubuntu machine all by its self just waiting for these fury little miners.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi Maidak,Thanks for the pm. Nice to know all went well with the payment. Will you be sending a email with a tracking number when the time comes? Just so we know you actually sent our devices. This also would be a bit of a safety for you since you are selling with PP. Would be nice if you could also put our names down on the list. All this will build seller trust for future group buys you make. All the best! Can\\'t wait for my stuff to arrive\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAll tracking for paypal payments will show as tracked and you can check from there, I will also be sending out a email. As for all bitcoin payments I will also update by email.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSuppose to be first or second week of oct lets hope for first so we can get these baby\\'s hashing faster :-)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nLet\\'s also hope a diff jump doesn\\'t happen between now and then lol\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOh they updated hardware post with some beta windows drivers for those that wanted the windows side - \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nnext time they\\'re for sale, send me a PM\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWill do! Ill open up my second group buy the day the first shipment comes in.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ncome on i want some more good news today. Do you have an eta yet?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nthe order for the bitfury chips were sent to the manufacturer all they need to do is slap the chips in the pcb and send them out to me. As long as everything keeps going well like it is should have these shiped out by the first week. Ill update you all as soon as I hear anything new this is what i have been told so far.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nwell tomorrow is the beginning of the month. depending on where you live... lol.cannot wait.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWell these are being shipped to me via express, I just got word in it looks like a more accurate date for shipping is going to be between the 11th and 15th of this month. Of course this could be sooner however I have reopened and it looks like I can still get a limited amount of orders in until they ship to me.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner 2.2~2.7 GH/s, ubuntu machine, fury little miners, bitfury chips\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 03:18:59',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #14 USB Miners 0.120 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\n9/22/13 All USB miner prices have been adjusted lower in price. They are in stock and will ship within 24 hours of order being placed. Thank you for your continued orders!Units Ordered Unit Price 1-14 0.120 BTC15-60 0.117 BTC61-100 0.115 BTC101-220 0.110 BTC 221+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks, Just sent an order, I expect to order more soon.Thanks in advance!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n9/23/13 Blades have arrived and are in stock. Any new orders placed will ship within 24 hours!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou all are very welcome. Thanks for the orders and continued support!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust received a small amount of backplanes. Orders of 10 blades will receive one backplane free until I run out of backplanes. I have none to sell individually.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n9/25/13 Backplanes are available with orders of 10 or more blades for free while supplies last.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nis pleasure to deal with youyou are \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nwow nailed it.. bitcoin network dif is now 148mili\\'ll need more blades soon!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n200 million next, well ahead of the forecasted end of the year. Looks like the BTC cow has ended producing milk to all the ASIC manufacturers. They will now have to lower their profits if they want to sell any and that may actual stabilize the network hash, we\\'ll see when that will happen. Well, there\\'s always math challenged people that will continue to buy them. For those, go to and chose the expert mode\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nJust got the miners, thanks for great purchase! Order was confirmed in no time, shipped the very next morning and is in my hands before end of business 48 hours later. Very nice. Placing another order in a few minutes.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nJust got my order as well, thanks!!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n9/26/13 I am now accepting preprinted USPS shipping labels for orders. Please PM me for details when placing an order if interested. Thank you.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nTXid: TXid: miners requested. Thanks SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI am now accepting USPS preprinted postage labels for shipping priority and express. Send your pdf label to me with your forum name and the words \"shipping labels\" in the subject line to .If you are a reseller, I can ship your orders for you. I can ship orders both big and small with USPS preprinted postage labels. The shipped from zipcode is 58503. Please print the instructions on the postage label (1 label per page) with your label to help me out.Guideline for printing shipping labels:USB MinersSmall Flat Rate Priority Box holds 14 USB MinersRegional A Priority Box holds 70 USB Miners(Weight can be listed at 1 pound for each 10 ordered)Medium Flat Rate Priority/Express Box holds 100 USB MinersLarge Flat Rate Priority Box holds 140 USB MinersOrders over 140 USB Miners pay for order and request a quote for what shipping labels should be printed.Any express orders that don\\'t use Medium Flat Rate Box, pay for order and then request a quote for what shipping labels should be printed.Blade MinersFlat Rate Priority/Express Padded Envelope holds 1 Blade MinerRegional A Priority Box holds 3 Blade Miners (Weight can be listed at 2 pounds for each Blade ordered)Medium Flat Rate \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nGot mine today. Thanks for the fast shipment!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nYou are welcome. Confirmations of orders shipped today have been sent. I will confirm orders placed today/tonight sometime in the morning. Thanks for your continued orders! SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miner, Blades, Backplanes, ASIC, Miners, Blade Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-26 19:34:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED, PM 4 Backup Shares]R4:HF FLASH SALE PRICING thru FRI! At-Cost+Host\\n### Original post:\\nWell, that\\'s it I suppose. Please contact Thomas for backup shares. wontons is currently in pole position for first crack at backup shares for R4 that may become available.Thank you Thomas for co-ordinating R3 and R4 with me. It\\'s been a pleasure! We wouldn\\'t have R3/R4 available if it wasn\\'t for him.Thank you to everyone that reserved and/or paid for R3/R4 shares. It\\'s an honor to be your co-GBC and primary remote admin for these Sierras. 0 shares remaining. Please PM Thomas for backup R4 shares.Also, please contact me if you\\'d like to be a 3rd remote admin for R3/R4 (or even R2 if you have shares there).\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n=)After talking with bobsag3 we have decided to open up R5, it is for a new unit called the superamazingminer clocked at over 9million gh/s costing $1.6mil. R5 will be first come first served.1/1 share available\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPayment for 5 shares in R4 for anon. user PAID and confirmed. Thank you and welcome back!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWow with specs like that its gotta be a BFLDelivery is Jan 2020 I assume?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIf it was BFL it would have a delivery date of eventually* *actual time may vary.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nTwo weeks, remember?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nRemember when Josh was like \"hey guys, we\\'ll be caught up by the end of September.\" and now here we are... still waiting for my little single that will maybe never come. Hopefully Hashfast will work out better for all of us.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIT BEGINS\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSo much excitement!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSo..... r5?(I swear I didnt say anything)\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHa! You just have all that capacity, you instigator. I need to take a little break. A bit GBed out at the moment trying to track 3 diff GBs with short deadlines. For those checking our R3/R4 wallet, someone or someones in R2/R3 sent payments to the wrong Round wallet which explained 1 wallet being too big and the other too small (by the strangely coincidental same amount. ).I was confirming payments but didn\\'t notice the wrong wallet addresses on a couple. I apologize for the confusion. However, we can afford a really nice UPS and Battery bank, gents!We\\'re all paid up & our miner should be in the order Q when they get caught up. I\\'ll post the invoice as soon as I get it, as usual.Cheers!P.S. R3/R4 spreadsheets coming tomorrow night. Sorry, a bit slammed with 3 GBs & gotta get to bed.===BTW, I floated this idea in the other thread but no reason I can\\'t *host* R5 and take a true background role as a co-GBC for 1 or 2 other GBCs. I suppose you guys can use the same wallet & I can handle payments/shipping details if you guys want.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nNice start Bob!Here\\'s the 3rd and final payment to HF: that msg. I added on our behalf? ]Congrats gents! We did it! We even paid on Wednesday instead of Friday, so we ended up ahead of schedule. I need to go thru spreadsheets, starting with R2 with just had recent movement. Sending it to Thomas tonight hopefully. Getting to work now, so I may not be able to get to PMs.Please PM Thomas for questions, concerns, he should be up in a few hours.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWow. Nice picture. Did someone sneak in and take a photo of the BFL shipping area?So this is our hosting center ?? I had expected something slightly, more, errr, ummm..... Blue?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHere\\'s all 3 transactions for our 2 miner purchases: Bob, you may want to check with HashFast as to what 19\" racks they recommend as some racks have diff. bolt patterns (says this server monkey).\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nEveryone that contacted me or thomas_s with a Tx ID has been paid and confirmed. I still need to reconfirm R3/R4 payment/ownership tonight in my R3/R4 spreadsheets I\\'m sending to Thomas tonight but as far as I\\'m concerned: everyone that reserved and sent a payment in is PAID and CONFIRMED. Was a bit surreal sending out about $24K worth of BTC last night on behalf of the co-op for 3 miners being sent to Missouri. We received \"Costco\" type pricing *and* Costco-type deals (R2 buyout, extended flash sale pricing), by all of us banding together, so pats on the back everyone!BTW, I didn\\'t notice new member slayernine sneaking onto the thread. I had gotten used to seeing him via PM I forgot that was his 1st intro to the co-op.Thank you and welcome aboard!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'m down with an r5 but gotta work some stuff out first.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nFor future co-op GBs I don\\'t directly run, I suppose for a 0.5% management fee: - I can handle setting up a DZ Miner Cooperative R5, Rx, etc., thread or threads under my username with the caveat that I\\'m definitely taking a backseat assist as the overall DZ Miner\\'s Cooperative Coordinator- Updates to top thread in GB to update latest share reservations and paid shares.- Wallet collection in a wallet that\\'s done over 200BTC of transfers on behalf of the co-op- Contacts at HashFast including John S.\\'s work cell #, to get things done quickly- Paymen\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: superamazingminer, BFL, Hashfast, UPS, Battery bank, 19\" racks\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 06:29:52',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN! 40/100 avail.]R5: KnC Jupiter, BELOW-COST + Hosting! Auto reserve! Oct.7?\\n### Original post:\\nThere seems to be a slight glitch in the website it assigned 3 orders the same payment address have no clue how this happened. It seems to be fixed now thoughThe problem arises from 2 of the orders were for the same exact BTC amount.Order 25 Order 26Both of these orders will need to be confirmed to claim ownership to the transaction.The third order was for a way different price so that one doesn\\'t need to be worried about.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSorry being Noob but how much Btc per share , & how much Gh/s per share\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n$57* in BTC for 4-6 ghash.Also Im in for 1.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nare you sure ?not 78 ?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 16:11:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN! 40/100 avail.]R5: KnC Jupiter, BELOW-COST + Host! Auto reserve!Oct.7? $78\\n### Original post:\\nOh, I thought it said 56 when I found this group buy. I think I\\'ll hold off on this. Thanks for the opportunity, though. Please ignore my reservation, sorry.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi,please reserve me 5 shares, thanks! And how I will pay for it? On the website?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi, I want to reserve 2 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nConfirm 10 shares for baros008 paid.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI may do a little better than you might think. I\\'ve been hashing with 66 Gh/s of Bitfuries since September 4th, and I\\'ve already made much more than that - just under 10 BTC. Of course, I don\\'t hash for straight PPS rates....\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWell I grabbed 5 shares as I am an optimistic sort. How many are left?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m not certain how many shares are left. At a guess maybe 20...You can check up on the current KNC Jupiter they are tuning up and have hashing on an Eligius account:\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nit is at 700gh? so is it more then one unit?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nBought 6 shares. Order: #35Tx_id : address : you,Ashitank\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nNo - that is a single unit hashing. They\\'re tweaking it. I don\\'t know how much of that hashrate will be delivered with what they ship, but 600 Gh/s seems pretty likely. The possibility of O/C is one of the reasons I bought 1050 watt PSU\\'s for these boxes instead of the recommended 850 watts.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI am excited enough to do a second order. so order 36 for 5 shares is paid order 37 for 2 shares is paid you get a chance please confirm these. thanks again.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nfuck it I spent all my coins did one more order for 2 shares order # 38 for 2 shares # 37 for 2 shares order # 36 for 5 shares so I am in for 9 shares grand total of about 5.5 btc\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThomas or DZ will have to confirm, I don\\'t have access to anything BTC related (I just do the PayPal part.) I don\\'t know how many shares are left, but there is no need to worry. We actually have four day-1/day-2 Jupiter orders available. Worst case - if we run over the number of shares available for this GB, we can roll them over into a GB-6, or 7, or even GB-8 for one of the other boxes. All four machines are supposed to ship from KNC within a day of each other. Thye should all land at the hosting site within a couple of days from when they leave Sweden.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSOUNDS GOOD to me!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSo I\\'m order #26 and I got an email this morning saying that my payout address is the same as somebody else and that I should sign a message to prove it\\'s really me. Who should I send the signed message to?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'d love to jump in for a share if you all can let me slide a couple of weeks to pay. I am, sadly, a wage slave and can\\'t blow this paycheck\\'s gas money.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nWord is our KNC units ship today and tomorrow Could/should arrive this week...\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSHINYWell shit. My electrition better hurry up. I have 8x new 20A breakers going in JUST for KnC\\'s\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThe site sends a reminder email (some people might close out the page). For some reason its not updating automatically but it is very easy to confirm manually, as I\\'m not getting slammed with PM\\'s with transaction id\\'s and I can change the order to processing after I enter it into the spreadsheet.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nPlease send it to me.I had a feeling it was you as the payment arrived very close to when your order was submitted.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nOn a second note before I head over to work.While / After placing your order please add a note to the order with your payout address.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI\\'ve figured out how I\\'m going to handle the boxes. The first Jupiter that arrives will immediately be put to work mining for the GB. The second Jupiter that arrives will be shipped down to hosting. Once it arrives there, and it\\'s set up with the GB wallet address and hashing, we\\'ll cut them over - that way not a single minute of GB hashing time gets lost. Third and fourth boxes will just go straight down to hosting, followed by the first box once the other two are set up and running.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nIm going to wake up and find the UPS man boxed me into my apartment with all these KnCs lol\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI bought one share: Order 39Tx ID: \\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nForgot to say- since Redacted already paid for first months hosting, Ill be waiving half my 2% fee for the first month.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nBought 6 shares. Order: #35Tx_id : address : 5 shares. Order: #43 { Forgot to add payout address in notes }Tx_id : address : conform total of 11 shares for me.Thank you,Ashitank\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nI bought 4 shares, paid 2.44552438 BTC. ID: address: \\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nI am order number 32 -- for 2 shares. Purchased using the website but instead of sending bitcoins I sent $156 to Redacted by Paypal. Payout address is in the paypal \"you\\'ve got mon\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter, 1050 watt PSU, 20A breakers\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 22:46:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 53/100 avail.]R6: KnC Jupiter, BELOW COST+HOST, Day1 shipping, $78 ea.\\n### Original post:\\n55...make that 53 shares available! Thanks and Welcome Aboard!Reserving 31 additional R5 shares from PM overflow for R5 (could actually be a few more once I take another look at PMs)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter, R5\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-28 03:27:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: Additional voting and major decisions for DZ Miner Cooperative, Round 1 gents\\n### Original post:\\nYou can vote via PM or public voting. You\\'re free to state your case as to how much or how little overclocking we attempt. We\\'ll step up overclocking to check stability instead of taking huge jumps as far as clockspeed, whenever possible. You just need to vote before...gee, delivery in November, so there\\'s no rush. Please vote or check in with your opinion whenever you have time. Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ni vote 10% first week. then do a new vote depending on results. no more then 15% no less then 5%my case for 10% is long term use goal. {24/7/365 =longterm } as it is easy on gear.I ran a lot of gpu\\'s to mine and slight under volt with a bit of core over volt allowed for trouble free running. if we had 5 setups I would say do 0% 5 % 10% 15% 20% 25% and if one dies we have more running. we have 1 chip and 1 board so 99% up time would be better then over clock with a big time crash.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat points Philip. Vote and concerns noted. Thanks for voting.\\'Tis true we only have 1 rig if we push things too far & release all the magic smoke from our mysterious black box. Also, don\\'t forget this unit is operating in firsttimeuser\\'s house! I think his wife/GF and/or roommates will probably be a tad upset at us if our mysterious black box sets fire to the furniture or whatnot.Besides: We all know what happens to mysterious black boxes once all the magic smoke comes out right?Edit: I\\'m showing 3 votes on the poll, but I only have 1 official vote so far.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMy personal opinion is go for overclock but do it in stages. We may be able to abuse it more then we thought originally\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhat no Oil Cooling?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNah man, didn\\'t you hear that the kewl kids are cooling their server rooms with hot air nowadays? firsttimeuser has 24/7 AC and I\\'m not sure how happy he\\'d be about 3M or mineral oil leaks all over his home if anything bad happened w/ leaky seals or components.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNews from Simon Barber on CH Forum: Look forward to a special promotion just for those first batch customers. Launching soon.Lucky us gents!==Also R3 Co-op member -Redacted- bought 2 of my shares for R1 so I can apply them to R3/R4 if necessary. Thanks -Redacted-!I also donated half of one of my R1 shares to one of our fellow R1 members who has some difficulties in life, you & I don\\'t face. So: For Round 1, my share/voting power is down to 7.5 shares. This is down from 10 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWith the latest news about the B1 promotion: Who\\'s down for doubling our hashrate (100% more) at only 25% more?Place your votes here either publicly or via PM. I\\'m voting immediately with my 7.5 shares for the upgrade.Cost should be $38-40 per share, depending on shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nUpgrade\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCame out to $42-43 per share with shipping when I calculated it in the R2 thread. Shipping was $138 - 187 IIRC w/ my fake order.Gents, I tried PMing everyone but I\\'m limited to 5 members at a time & I\\'m starting to fade out here tonight. Here\\'s the DropBox link and ownership updates.Here\\'s the latest ownership breakdown. -Redacted- bought 2 of my shares. Also, I\\'m donating half a share to a R1 member but I won\\'t list it so as to not call out the member it\\'s being donated to. let me know if you have trouble viewing the spreadsheet or if you have any questions. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI would pay 42-43 for the upgrade\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYes. Question. Why does line 9 get to have their withdrawal address listed in a bigger font when I own more shares? ( )I would go $42-$43 for the upgrade...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'m sorry I didn\\'t even notice TBH. Aren\\'t all numbers the same in the minds of math teachers? Do you suppose they prefer some #s over others?Thanks for noticing my awful spreadsheet editing late last night. What I don\\'t notice, I can\\'t fix cuz I ain\\'t perfect because I use the word ain\\'t. Don\\'t worry, I\\'ll change it during the first miner payout. Edit: Ah! I got it. Political spin: it was merely an abstraction to show that we\\'re all equal in this co-op.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'ll set up a wallet tonight for fundraising for the double hashrate upgrade, if you gents want to collect BTC for this.With express shipping, it appears to be $43 per share, using bitstamp rate at time of your BTC purchase or transfer.If we don\\'t raise enough funds in, oh about a month?, I\\'ll refund anyone that paid, with no restock fee.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nGents,For those that may have been away or on travel: If you missed the news: HashFast is currently giving Batch1 owners an opportunity to double hashrate at only 25% extra. Est. to ship 1 month after our miner is delivered & it would double our hashrate well before any MPP could kick in at 3-3.5 months. The cost per share would be $43 with Express Shipping AM delivery.Just for Round 1: Here\\'s the wallet I\\'ve set up for our HashFast Baby Jet upgrade if you guys want to go for the upgrad\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: gpu, chip, board, server rooms, HashFast Baby Jet\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-02 02:41:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #14 USB Miners 0.110 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nNew lower prices!Units Ordered Unit Price 1-13 0.110 BTC 14-59 0.110 BTC 60-99 0.110 BTC100-219 0.110 BTC 220+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI got the 320 USB erupters you sent me. Thank you so much, SSB! I will be back for more.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI understand that this is USA only. I wish I could find BE\\'s in Europe at these excellent prices...Edit: nevermind, think I found it\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'ve reshipped them before if you needed.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNew lower prices for shipping on Monday morning. Thanks for your orders!Units Ordered Unit Price 1 3.10 BTC 2-3 3.10 BTC 4-5 3.10 BTC 6-9 3.10 BTC 10+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Every order of 10 blades receives a free backplane while supplies last.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGlad you received them. Thank you for your orders and support! Have a great week!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI would like 5xASIC USB Erupter Miners please.I don\\'t have enough BTC now. So should I go to a trading service and buy the amount needed to satisfy the contract?I have some partial BTCs in my wallet and some with Bitminter and some in 50BTC. Is there a way to minimize commissions?Do you recommend a service that you prefer to deal with?I also have Paypal if that would help. If I transfer the $ via Paypal and you use Paypal to buy something then there is no commissions. Right?I\\'m easy going. Let me know what works for you.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nTry coinbase or btcquick to get some btc. It may take awhile to receive the btc this way. Thanks for any order placed.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI just sent you payment for 9 miners and a shipping label to your email address as directed.Please let me know either by email or via PM that you have received the messages and that all is well.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI was interested in these as handouts/gifts to friends to get them interested in BTC and crypto-currencies, but from what I\\'ve heard in the past these run pretty hot. Are these newest units as hot as the older ones? Would it be ok if someone who didn\\'t know what they are doing (plug & play as it were) just let it hash away, or is there the potential for the miner to destroy itself or the usb port?Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThey get hot enough to burn your fingers but do no damage to themselves or the USB port. Plug and play, well almost you have to download the driver, for noobs point them at Bitminter.com as the java client supports them.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAwesome, thanks for the quick reply. I\\'ll definitely be placing an order once I get my BTC from Coinbase.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThank you for your help. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n10/1/13 New lower prices on blade miners in quantities of 2-9 blade miners.Units Ordered Unit Price 1 3.10 BTC 2-3 3.05 BTC 4-5 3.05 BTC 6-9 3.05 BTC 10+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Every order of 10 blades receives a free backplane while supplies last.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n10/1/13 New lower prices on USB Miners!Units Ordered Unit Price 1-13 0.1100 BTC 14-59 0.1085 BTC 60-99 0.1070 BTC 100+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nDidn\\'t you mention that 14 fit into the shipping box nicely?Ninja edit, quoted wrong post...\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHe is very good at putting them in a box nicely. You can get much more then 14. Not sure what number triggers next box but it much higher. Have received multiple shipments always has been great on packing them neatly.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB erupters, ASIC USB Erupter Miners, blade miners, USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-02 07:20:05',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] HashFast Shares ฿1.2 = 20GH/s | Ships in Nov *7th kit PAID!\\n### Original post:\\nPlease reserve me 3 shares1. Miner 12. 3 shares3. 3 shares to upgrade - 1,2 BTC4. Will be addedThanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nif i buy a share at 1.2 for 20gh/s on 7th miner , i can upgrade to 40gh/s for 0.8 btc? total 2btc?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWitch miners gives 20Gh/S per share? All of them?Wich miner is near to be paid out?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPaid, thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Miner 12, 7th miner\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-02 09:01:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] HashFast Baby Jet Shares ฿1.2=20GH/s Ships in Nov *PAID *discount rates\\n### Original post:\\nAlrighty, 4btc on their way for 10 shares on miners 2,3.Receive Address: (same as before)TxID: for waiting!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miners 23\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-02 15:57:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #15 Blade Miners 3.10 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nNew lower prices for shipping on Monday morning. Thanks for your orders!Units Ordered Unit Price 1 3.10 BTC 2-3 3.10 BTC 4-5 3.10 BTC 6-9 3.10 BTC 10+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Every order of 10 blades receives a free backplane while supplies last.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwithout fail..... everytime i order something ASICminer... price drop a few days later\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ni half expected it... but what can you say... in hand products and fast shipping! ASICMiner Resellers are still the best! almost 30ghs in USB minersand 21.2ghs in blades\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks for the orders and good luck mining!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nConfirmations of orders shipped today have been sent. I will confirm orders placed today/tonight sometime in the morning. Thanks for your continued orders! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nStupid fast and great as always!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n10/1/13 New lower prices on blade miners in quantities of 2-9 blade miners.Units Ordered Unit Price 1 3.00 BTC 2-3 2.95 BTC 4-5 2.95 BTC 6-9 2.95 BTC 10+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Every order of 7 blades receives a free backplane while supplies last.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n10/1/13 New lower prices on USB Miners!Units Ordered Unit Price 1-13 0.1050 BTC 14-59 0.1050 BTC 60-99 0.1050 BTC 100+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYou are very welcome. Thank you for your orders.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer, USB miners, blades\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-12 09:47:31',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: GROUP BUY of BITFURY chips + NanoFury NF1 2GH/s USB stick PRODUCT ASSEMBLY in US\\n### Original post:\\nWouldn\\'t this be in the group buy section. Also looks similar to the k1. Good luck.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTo be honest - I couldn\\'t really tell which option is better since this is both a custom hardware _and_ a group buy .And yes - the design is based on BKKCoin\\'s K1 in terms of physical dimensions. We also kept the heatsink holes exactly the same - that\\'s in case if a heatsink is needed so that we can reuse the same parts.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ninteresting project ...did you have a working prototype ... ? to test heat, power drain and hashrate ...I\\'m unsure but from my experience, already getting 2 GH from one chip drains a lot more power and generates a lot more heat, then what they are supposed to use in there normal 1.5 GH running mod.Did you calculated with that? ... Just looking at my own boards ... 1.6 more power drain .... fully cooled the pcb temp. went from 41 to 49 ... having front and back fans with 1200 rpm .... and most of the chips are still running under 2 GH ...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nInteresting.. You got the PCB\\'s in hand?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIt\\'s on its way - according to FedEx:Estimated delivery : Thur 9/12/2013 4:30 pm\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSigh.....Please notify us when you have a video of a working prototype.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nTo be quite honest I\\'m not concerned as much about the temperature. If we have to add a small heatsink - so be it. They\\'re cheap. The board is already designed for one, so it will be just a matter of choice. The goal here is to get the most hashes for the $. If adding a $5 heatsink will get us 0.5GH more then that might be worth the effort. If adding it will give us 0.1-0.2GH then maybe not as much.There were also plenty of notes on bitfury\\'s FREE MONEY thread with feedback and also a lot on the Russian thread. According to this:In our case VCore will be lower - 0.800V-0.815V at least initially. There are also various options for the clock settings - instead of 54 bits we\\'re looking at 53.Also bitfury\\'s test results using the same board - roughly translated via google-translate:So getting the 2GH is not the question. It is if the passive cooling will be sufficient. If we get better bang for the buck at 1.8GH then that may be the \"stock\" hashrate. The primary goal here is simplicity, even if that means that we may have to sacrifice a few hashes.Have in mind that those chips are quite \"overclockable\" - there is nothing stopping you from trying to get 3.2GH/s. The board would likely s\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThe ultimate \"show me the money\" question We\\'ll definitely do that. Hopefully it wouldn\\'t take more than a week ( BFL(TM) )\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONSEmails received regarding questions outlined in this FAQ will be asked to review the information contained is a TX ID?A transaction ID is a number that is generated every time coins are moved from one address to another. In order to find the TX ID of your purchase you can right click and select show transaction details within the bitcoin-qt software, or go to blockchain.info and enter your payment address.How do I sign a message?In order to sign a verification message, you must use a wallet that supports this feature.To sign a message with bitcoin-qt: click File, Sign Message. Input your sending address and message, and then click sign. The sending address, message, and signature must be included to verify the message.When including a signed message, please use the following Name:Name:Street type:Phone Number:Email Address:Number of NF1 boards:Payment amount:Service type: (Fully Assembled NF1 or Address:TX Do you accept are on a first come, first serve basis, and all orders must be paid in full.Can orders be split and/or transferred?We are not responsible for any splits or \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIf you would be willing to let John K escrow the BTC until you prove that you got it running with said specs and are ready to deliver, I\\'m sure you will get a lot more interest on this.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nJeezy - I appreciate the feedback. We actually did consider the idea initially. But the more I look at it the more I don\\'t see any real advantages. Instead of the extra 2% fees you can just keep an eye on the project and decide for yourself if you want to order or not. And besides - having escrow is really no guarantee that everything will happen the way everyone expects it. (just look at what happened to all of the Avalon group-buys with escrow). Since it really serves you no advantage, while it cost (your) money, and has the potential to slow the project and other headaches - we thought we\\'d rather save ourselves the hassle.With all that said I want to add that I\\'m open to opening an escrow if that would make any difference. I just don\\'t see the benefit - you may as well just wait a week or two, see the videos and then \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY chips, NanoFury NF1 2GH/s USB stick, PCB, heatsink, front and back fans, BFL(TM)\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 16:14:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK SHIPPING] batch #25/26 .11 btc USB + 3.1 btc Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\nWeekend promo: Blades are at 3.1 btc. Have a good amount on hand, would like to move them into your hands\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWelcome back! The setup I brought from you is working awesome!Is the price going back up on Monday? If so, what\\'s the non promo price?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPost a pic!! I\\'m hoping my blade inventory doesn\\'t last through Sunday night..\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nsteelcave; 4; 0.44; \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\npacked and shipping. Thanks!!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nForgot to ask, did you use bfgminer for the proxy?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nFantastic, thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWish I had money for blade but Erupters will have to do....Molex1701; 8; .88; like all colors you have please.Making a shipping label will get off to you shortly.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n(^_^); 1; 0.11; \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'m using the mining stratum proxy. yes, I am drawing power for the fans from the green connectors. I figured the backplane power and the green power jack were the same circuit.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nguytechie; 2; 6.2; Erupter Blades, not USB miners of course, lol.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYep, I figured as much... Building the second rig?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nCashing out by selling one, using mined BTC to buy 2. ;-). Hoping to hop along until 2nd gen ASICMINERs comes out. Or if Bitfury blades start to come out...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSelling some to recoup costs along the way is a good way to reduce overall costs and get ahead in terms of btc. I\\'ve seen many people do that successfully...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nHi my order for 19 sticks plus 1 replacement for a dud arrived today. I got the the 19 sticks but you forgot to send me a replacement for the dud. So you owe me a stick. Not to worry I am placing another order today. I would want 9 more sticks at .11 = .99 btc plus the replacement stick.Please let me know we are on the same page. and that you realize I am entitled to the replacement. I know you handle 1000\\'s of sticks and this is only a 1 stick error. I have ordered more then 300 sticks from you and this is the first error on your part. I am sure you can fix it pretty easy . Thanks philthis was the payment for the 19 sticks let me know we are on the same page here.. Thanks again.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nstrange... i grabbed 2 blocks of 10 from inventory and packed them up and shipped them out... but if you say so, OK...\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nyeah I was surprised as it was a pair of ten packs. But the gold ten pack was short 1 stick and mixed with 6 gold 3 black. I just set them up for overnight test all 19 work fine. I am going to setup an order for the 9 plus the one in about 10 minutes. Sales on ebay have slowed done quite a bit but i am still selling a few 5 packs. Thanks for fast reply phil\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nsounds good! i\\'m going to the post office in about 30 mins, so yours should head out shortly as well.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nphilipma1957 ;9; .99btc .99btc for the 9 sticks and the one replacement. will send label asap.email with a label has been sent. thanks again. paid for 9 plus 1 replacement total 10 sticks.. TY\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nstarting to get jealous..... i need more blinking green lights....\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIf I have bought from you before, do I need to send you a shipping label?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI\\'ll be happy to send some your way!!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI need a shipping label per order/box. I don\\'t think post office would let you re-use the same label a few times over. instructions are on post #2. it\\'s pretty easy.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\ntoday\\'s orders have shipped out.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nCanary -- Any hint on what AsicMiner might have in store for us in the future? I\\'m looking forward to Gen 2 stuff from them, given the rise of competition powered by Bitfury, KNC\\'s emergence, heck even this blackarrow fellow is hawking Gen 2 stuff (albeit for a 2014 delivery date).\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nHey Canary, do you include the green power connector with every blade?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nTo that point, any word on the usb interface? When these new boards were introduced I was hearing they might have a USB connection, which obviously isn\\'t the case. Is that going to be offered in the future?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nI do, but for those using a backplane, they\\'re not needed.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nCanary, I understand I can receive a free backplane if I order 10 blades, but is there any way I can purchase a backplane with my order of 1 blade?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nHello, I emailed you about this but wanted to do a post as well. Unfortunately, I had only received 4 of my order. Canary believes he sent me 8 but only 4 could fit in box he sent with the form packaging he used. He either mistakenly shipped my order to someone or just forgot. I don\\'t think he is trying to scam just mistaken. If anyone receives an extra four hopefully they can contact him about it. Also if he counts his inventory and finds he has an extra four then I\\'ll change my distrust. But since he won\\'t won\\'t believe me, I\\'m going to hav\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blades, USB miners, Erupters, ASICMINERs, Bitfury blades, green power connector, backplane\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-07 04:32:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R6: KnC Jupiter, BELOW COST+HOST, Day1 shipping, $78 ea.\\n### Original post:\\nCLOSED until further notice.We may have sold out; the accounting takes a bit longer with 3 gents involved & we don\\'t want to oversell this below cost miner.Please send a PM to Thomas if you\\'d like to be added to the backup Share list if shares free up due to people dropping out or non-payment after 48 hours.There\\'s a good chance some shares may be available in R6 (if not in R5 and R6 then somewhere in R1-R4) so please feel free to send in your reservations for any backup shares that may be available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n10/1 PM Update.For now: Please do not to send PMs to Thomas or rush him for spreadsheet code at the moment until he gets caught up. If you have pressing concerns please PM me & I will collect them for forwarding to either -R-, Thomas, or both.I may have missed some PMs in the avalanche I\\'ll need to go back thru but I seem to be caught up to PMs at the moment (about 8 hrs later). See: if we go gentle on his inbox he *might* uncover 5 or 10 more shares that are double ordered or were phantom orders. For the good of the co-op: There\\'s always a method to my particular madness.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nthats cool. I know I did 4 different orders for a total of 15 shares. so 15 % of a 550gh miner = more then 80gh for about 9 btc or 1170 usd I hope this all works out. 80gh is nice\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYup, I have you down for 9 shares in R3, 6 in R4 when Thomas & I compare notes, and me owing you $525 for R1 UPS/Battery Backup in about a week and a half. In hindsight, $525 (with a good chunk out of my pocket) may have been overkill for our R1 BabyJet\\'s UPS/Batts to be utilized by firsttimeuser but we all benefit, eheh.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThank you so much for doing this! And for taking the time to carefully sort out the spamalanche doing it caused =).\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThank you -Redacted-, DyslexicZombei and Thomas for your hard work.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThe spreadsheets have been made and are being reviewed / compared to our records.If your staying up to check on it I\\'d suggest not doing so as it is highly possible that it will be up tomorrow night (we want to make sure we have everything in right).Notes before you see them,-orders were not combined if you placed 3 orders you are listed 3 times.-all purchases are assumed to be anonymous unless you specified it either in PM or as an order note. (Do not PM me now asking to be listed as public wait until the spreadsheet is shown)-most orders from the site didn\\'t include bitcointalk user names, the \"first name\" on your checkout is used for the username or if you placed a note on your order.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWhat am I, chopped liver?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nPretty much at this point. Watching cat videos on YouTube doesn\\'t count unless you\\'ve sub\\'ed the work out to someone else in China. But, the good news is, you get to start doing all the heavy lifting starting in just a couple of days\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBob, remember the old Pennsylvania Dutch saying: \"Annoying the cook will result in smaller portions!\"The same applies to the hosting engineer, I think..... In truth, all of you are going beyond the pale to sort out this goat-press - our thanks for all your hard work!DickMS\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI really was only kidding. Honest. I sincerely apologize, MC, if that comment came across wrong or was offensive. It was meant to be a joke... It was based on the programmer that won various development awards, up until the time that someone found out that he had outsourced all his development work to a team of Chinese programmers, and basically just sat around for about a year watching cat videos on YouTube while waiting for them to email him his code for the day...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSigh - my post was supposed to be light-hearted, too - I appreciated your joke, and surely no harm was imputed.... Just goes to show how skewed life gets when stress is high.Good work, folks - y\\'all get kudos, and drinks of your choice when the hashing starts - on me!Dick\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nJust up on edge because some people already have tracking numbers for their day-1 orders, and ours are still just sitting there \"PROCESSING\". As best I can tell, they should go out tomorrow - it appears that KNC only just-barely got started shipping orders today. It\\'s going to be really tight getting them here by Friday, and I really was hoping to have them hashing for the two GBs over the weekend. That would almost have to be some kind of record-time for a group buy to go from \"JUST OPENED\" to \"CLOSED AND HASHING\".We\\'ll see, should be able to tell tomorrow once we get tracking numbers....EDIT: Everyone please make sure we have the mining payout wallet address that you want your R5/R6 mining proceeds to be sent to...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAnd we are live again!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nAnd we sold out during the forums being down.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nTypical.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\npaper work is a mess due to the outage. will take some try to fix it.I placed orders# 36 # 37 # 38 # 51 and a\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter, R1 UPS/Battery Backup, BabyJet\\'s UPS/Batts\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-07 07:12:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [Open] .8 [btc] = 15GH/s with lifetime hosting\\n### Original post:\\nHi Delmonger,I\\'m definitely not trying to steal your thunder or sales here; I currently don\\'t have any open shares available for sale in a GB, at the moment & I help out new GBCs and Miner Hosts mostly for free. I\\'m closing out a 2nd GB in a month but I don\\'t have any shares available, right now.I\\'m sorry if this is elementary, but you\\'re going to have a really, really hard time trying to make sales here as a non-vetted newcomer. If you\\'re serious about Group Buys, you really need to get vetted by a trusted GBC or Escrow Agent here such as John K, SebastianJu, Dabs, or even myself. I vet new GBCs and Miner Hosts for free, with the hope of doing future business with these gents as well as to offload some of John K.\\'s workload across the whole spectrum of BTC economic transactions.The last gent I vetted, it only took 90 min. from my initial post in the new GBCs thread to completion of his free vetting process. The process goes like this: free to ignore my free advice but I\\'m just trying to help. [BTW, if you\\'d like: I can help you by providing access to 3rd party Escrow Protection via BTCrow, as a Trusted Escrow Affiliate, for anyone that wants escrow protection in a GB; even \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHey thanks for the help, I\\'ll get started on this soon.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nLet me know how to get started and I\\'ll get right into it.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI can confirm that user Delmonger has contacted me for free vetting services.Cheers!DZ\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThank you DZ.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLadies and Gents, welcome back to the BTC Talk Forums! Shortly before the forum outage I was contacted by Delmonger for vetting.My main PC w/ PGP signing is down for a few days but I can confirm that Delmonger has passed my vetting process, which although there\\'s no charge for my vetting services, it\\'s the most thorough vetting process I\\'m aware of on these forums.I can confirm that Delmonger has his ID and address on record with this Forum Vetting Agent, and that he appears to be a well intentioned Group Buy Coordinator. Please send me a PM if you have any questions about the authenticity of any GBCs or miner hosts who claim to have been vetted by \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: PC\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-15 19:13:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] New ASICMiner Block Erupters - In Hand - .13 BTC + Shipping\\n### Original post:\\nIf I am not mistaken, next group buys for these will start under 0.1 each in the next few hours.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWhat advantages do you have over the existing distributors of ASICMiner hardware and what references? You say directly from Friedcat but he doesn\\'t list you as an authorized retailer?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyour shipping rates are not logical. a small flat rate box is about .05 btc it will fit 14 sticks so shipping of .12 btc for 11 sticks is too high.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nwhat source do you have for a .09 a stick price?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSilentSonicBoom said the price is coming down today but he hasn\\'t been told what the new price will be(as of 10 hours ago at-least)I\\'m hoping asic blades drop to under 3BTC so I can pick up another one. I\\'m not worried about the usb asics as once you include the usb hub the $/mh/s is way higher than the blades.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI have units in hand and my handling fees are reasonable. Canary and Silent are great sellers, I\\'ve purchased units in the past from both of them. However, it is apparent that 2 distributors may not be enough to handle all USA orders. I\\'ve asked friedcat to be considered for USA distribution, and this is my first shipment.I\\'m in Dallas Texas, a major shipping hub, so units will be coming in and going out as quickly as possible.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nShipping rates include handling.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI am on the road and will respond to questions this afternoon.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYou are able to ship to Canada right?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThere are 3 US resellers and we can handle all the orders just fine. There\\'s not a lack of resellers, but there\\'s a lack in demand as difficulty rises. Most demand nowadays is spurred by when the next price drop comes...To add more sellers would mean that there\\'s more useless throat cutting for 4-5 days following a price drop. There are resellers who always misprice ASICMiner gear which leads to a reduction of interested sellers on eBay for example. (Theres no margin for them). So more resellers (who are really distributors, not resellers) would wipe out those who sell on other outlets. Which will decline overall sales.ASICMiner doesn\\'t need more distributors, it needs more resellers who buy from distributors, IFF distributors would price items correctly.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThis.Although for special one-time large orders for customers it would be nice if emailed friedcat wasnt Russian ruelette.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nBTCGuild is not selling at wholesale prices. From my point of view, there are 2 resale distributors available. I\\'ve experienced shipping delays first hand from both distributors when units are in hand. I\\'ve also paid exorbitant shipping fees for coupon units in excess of 50 units($300+ at .05BTC per unit). I\\'ve expressed my concerns with friedcat and he has agreed to consider me as another distributor.This is not a bad thing guys, it means higher availablity for buyers and less workload on the current distributors. This is my first run with bulk units from from friedcat. If all goes well, I expect he will be adding my name to the list of authorized sellers.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI don\\'t like it, your not very responsive, nor active as a seller. you tell me to PM you, I do, and you still haven\\'t replied, BUT you have replied to this thread.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nCheck your PM. I\\'m on the road today, I will respond to the bulk of PMs tonight. I have been an active seller on the forums for the past 2 years.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThere is no 0.09 stick price. Not even close. Blades may drop slightly and I am starting new group buys tonight. USB miner prices will be similar to the recent coupon prices.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI have been able to handle all orders sent to me for USA distribution. I appreciate all orders placed and I ship very quickly. I don\\'t think we need more distributors. friedcat can run his business as he sees fit but stating current distributors may not be enough to handle all USA orders is not really true. People that wish to resell on Ebay, Amazon, bitmit, btc stores, websites, and more are encouraged to place orders with official resellers. All orders are appreciated by myself. New group buys are being listed tonight. Thank you for your continued \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI\\'m going to go with Canary on this one. Unfortunately with lack of further evidence as a reseller (especially a statement from Friedcat) I\\'m putting my BTC with the resellers that have been providing me with good service, good product, GREAT shipping and great communication. Adding another reseller would just boggle this up.Don\\'t mean to thread-crap here just my .02BTC\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI did not believe they would be .09 btc which is why I asked him. I will most likely stick with canary but my support is with both you and canary as the two of you have been around for a while.Not knocking the new guy but the sales are dying off on ebay as I type. what we really need is a better stick. not a\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Block Erupters, asic blades, usb asics, coupon units\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-17 04:54:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] NanoFury NF1 USB stick - GROUP BUY of BITFURY chips + US PRODUCT ASSEMBLY\\n### Original post:\\nship to the 50 states in a small flat rate box. it runs about 5-6 bucks. give the buyer the chance to send a label to you. like canaryinthemine does.. and force buyers to purchase at least 2 sticks. the 2 stick minimum purchase rule would help your handling costs a lot. also a buyer that purchases 2 sticks is more then happy to spend for tracking and free 50 dollar insurance. at least he should be.you have to understand your market upside is huge! why?30 k am sticks have been sold by canary in the mine. and at least 10 k by silent sonic boomthat means lots of people have hubs giving them an upgrade from 3.3 gh on a 10 port hub to 20gh is golden.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYup! Totally agree with what he said. Plus, it would force the cost of the other miners down, or force their buyers to look this way.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI mine about 90 am sticks. I can mine 150 sticks no problem. (i i have the hubs and have mined at 137 so far as a max.)I sold about 200 am sticks on ebay. I am drooling at this new product it would allow good sales on ebay and allow me to upgrade my personal mine.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nInterested in grabbing a some... But (and I\\'m sure this is answered somewhere in this thread, just have a headache and don\\'t feel like searching atm) not sure what the estimated price range will be for the remainder after the 0.40BTC initial. Will try to keep an eye on this thread and read more tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ll be updating the opening post tomorrow and for now the latest pricing information is in the PRICING UPDATE post : \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nShipping to the 50 states is a given. For small orders (less than 10 units) it is most likely going to be USPS. For larger orders USPS is not as competitive - for example 2lb box will get from Los Angeles to Seattle in 2 days with either USPS or FedEx ground, except that FedEx is half the price. Anyways - my point is - there are options and we\\'ll look at the ones that make most sense.If you want to send me a prepaid shipping label - I\\'m fine with that too. I guess in that case we\\'ll just have a flat buck or two charge to cover for the shipping materials and the unfortunate soul that will be in charge of wrapping, packaging and shipping - in my opinion it should be included in every order, but I am inclined to leave it optional for now. Anyways - more details will be in the shipping update coming at some point later in the week.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI can ship a 2lb box 2 days for 5.99, 1.95 and ~16... all via flat rate, and the boxes are free.I got a quote for shipping a 100 blades to UK via fedex/ups, and then USPS, and it was no contest USPS\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSo this is one of those bring your own chip deals?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI am monitoring this thread. Could be interested in reserving 20-25 NF1s.The only things missing are:1. I hate to hand over money to strangers. Have you conducted successfully GB in the past?2. So far, you are only pseudonyms on a online forum, Can you share real life identity of the NF1 members and contact info?3. I am waiting to see a video of a working prototype.4. I have red this thread and you really like to know what you\\'re talking about. I would like to know if this is your first electronic project or if you have accumulated a serie of similar realisations in the electronic field and/or if you have relevent professional background that would help potential customers to trust your ability to fulfill this project successfully.If you\\'re able to address these points, I am pretty that I will be interested to invest in this venture and probably many more will with these info as well.Good luck and be your enterprise successful!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI am definitely interested in purchasing some depending when the product will ship and the final price\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThat is indeed one of the two options. We can use your chips, or we can buy the chips on your behalf.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHi,on the various questions:#2 : I understand your concerns. Would it work for you if I provide my info to John K? For a number of reasons I would prefer not to publish team members personal info.#3 : We\\'re working hard on that. Getting the chips running is one thing. Rewriting the mining software to support them - quite a different challenge. We\\'ve been in talks with several mining software developers (ckolivas, luke_jr and DrHaribo to name a few). While we\\'re probably going to launch with limited support for just cgminer we are also going to provide those developers hardware and whatever further assistance they need for incorporating support for NF1 in their miners. This however may not happen right away and most likely after we have the mass-produced miners. We\\'ve set aside about a dozen devices to be sent out to developers for that specific reason.#1 and to some extent #4 : I have been in the electronics and software field for over 20 years (I think one of my first hardwa\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: NanoFury NF1 USB stick, BITFURY chips, 10 port hub, 2lb box, 100 blades\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-08 03:42:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: John K Escrow Alternatives\\n### Original post:\\nwhoever you choose I would make sure that you choose someone who doesn\\'t have a hand in a hundred different fires that way you can get some specialized attention to make sure that everything goes as planned no cross-contamination no steering you towards interest that they may have in other projects.. etc\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDyslexicZombei\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nKluge is great for escrow.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\ni can do escrow too.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI can do it. Been trading btc since march 2011, have over 100 rating on bitcoin otc and have been pretty active on bitcointalk. I have a lot of free time since I only have 3 classes this semester at school. I can get a handful of references and will give docs to a trusted 3rd party if anyone wants to consider it.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGood choice... BUT - Too many things going on with him at one time. Has like 7 group buys going on that he is running\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'ve done escrows here and there before...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIve trusted this guy with over $30,000 in the last 120 days. I wouldn\\'t hesitate to use him if you are searching for a perfect candidate for you escrow services.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nActually no, he only has 2-4 (I\\'m running most of the others but he\\'s there if needed)\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPlease re-send me any PM\\'s if you don\\'t get a response from me after seeing me going online. And no, I\\'m still waiting for bobsag3 to contact me regarding the \\'discuss shipping and hosting related issues\\' as you said he would. The quote for the miner changes according on the exchange rate by bitpay ( ,so I do not think I can give you an exact quote up to the point it is ordered.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'ve started offering escrow, as I\\'m nearly always available and have a long and positive trading history. \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHi John KWe didn\\'t know that we had to resend PM\\'s. Is there any reason behind this that we should bear in mind so that we can communicate more effectively with you?We have communicated with bobsag3 and pushed him to contact you immediately.The quote would include the shipping, taxes, escrow fee, etc which will enable us to refund the remaining bitcoins back to our buyers.Kind RegardsUltibit\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHi Ultibit,I\\'m sorry to hear about the escrow difficulties. I really was pulling for you & bobsag3 teaming up as I encourage all new GBCs to provide value and variety to our forum. We all need to realize that John has a lot of demands on him and he does have a life too, just like anyone else. I had offered to team up with John previously but then decided to just launch my services and focus on this forum (and to a lesser extent the Custom Hardware forum).You & I have worked together before, and I do offer my Escrowed share services to anyone participating in a GB even if they joined a GB that doesn\\'t have an Escrow Agent or Service set up previously.If I was looking for escrow services I\\'d recommend Dabs and SebastianJu, but in the future, if you\\'re in a hurry & you want to send folks my way to do semi-automated escrowed GB shares (with manual release of funds by buyer) I\\'ll be more than happy to help out your Group Buyers. For escrowed sale transactions my response time is 24 hours or less. For people wanting escrow protection & GBCs needing access to acquisition funds (perhaps to make a mfg. downpayment to secure a miner?) I\\'ll make the time on their behalf.At the moment...we\\'ve \\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'m only doing 1 Group Buy now, so I think I can handle some others. There is an escrow list where a bunch of us are listed. course, John K is number 1. Kludge is 2. And I have the bronze medal, for now.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI\\'ve done a couple of escrows lately and would be available too. Feel free to check my post history and trust ratings.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nSebastianJu or me\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n last escrow I handled was for transfering bitcoin and a 6 bfl single order from one to another over 20k total I transferred between the 2 parties.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThere\\'s so many options. Not really sure how to select. How about if all escrow providers write a total amount of funds that they\\'ve escrowed and include the signatures so that we can look them up and confirm them to be true?Please also include a link to your escrow service website if you have one.The escrow service we select will be one that has a good service, high total escrowed amount and a good reputation.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nUltibit, there might be a privacy issue with you request. Group buys are public. Person to person escrows are usually private and only 3 people know the bitcoin address used.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nDannyHamilton? Doesn\\'t he do escrow?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nAppreciate thread recs., but I\\'m not particularly interested in touching group buys.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI haven\\'t been an escrow so far, but Ive transacted well over 1000 BTC here and there and have a ton of transactions on otc from 82 people and have no negs.To prove my worth, I have no problem insur\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 6 bfl single order\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-08 05:00:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 14 LEFT]R2B:HashFast + Host, Dbl. HashRate Upgrade, $43, 10-13GH/s MPP\\n### Original post:\\nIN for 4.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, Host, Dbl. HashRate Upgrade, 10-13GH/s MPP\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 01:18:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [IN STOCK] New ASICMiner Blades - 2.75 BTC or less - Free BFL ASIC chips!!!\\n### Original post:\\nthese should be BTC2.1 each\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLet\\'s keep the thread open strictly for buyers with questions.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ndo you ship to UK?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNo, sorry. USA only for the time being.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ve scratched the raffle. I will be giving 1 free BFL ASIC sample chip to each of my first 4 Blade buyers. There is no minimum quantity to qualify, the only rule is that you can not purchase privately.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blades, BFL ASIC sample chip\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 01:23:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] New ASICMiner Blades - 2.75 BTC - Plus Free BFL ASIC chips!!!\\n### Original post:\\nBFL ASIC Rafle Info and Rules:I\\'ve been informed by MrTeal that mixing sample chips and production chips is not a trivial feat. Because of that, I\\'ve decided to raffle off my sample chips. Every purchase of 2 Blades receives 1 entry into the raffle for 2 BFL ASIC Sample Chips. Only 1 buyer will receive 2 BFL ASIC Sample chips. A 4 blade purchase gets 2 entries and so on.Rules- Entrants can not be anonymous. Anonymous purchasing is allowed, but you will not be entered into the drawing.- Entrants must buy at least 2 blades- Winner determined by entry number and network accepted block #263000( can I do with these sample chips?(rev A)- Find someone who is mounting sample chips onto boards and make yourself a 8gh/s mining rig- Make some neat jewelryCurrent Entries...The first four purchases get 1 free BFL ASIC sample chip!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blades, BFL ASIC Sample Chips\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 03:44:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED][Group Buy] Cointerra Terraminer IV Shares ฿1.5 = 50GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nalright! sending 3 BTC over you have me down for 2shares.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n2 shares (3BTC BTC )TxID: address: you very mucho!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYes Please!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 05:49:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.13BTC or less, Blades 3.1 BTC] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nI have a small number of Blades left in the current batch.There has been a price drop - and they are now 3.1BTC each.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi Julz,Do you still have some Block Erupters?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi Spudz,Yes, I still have USBs of all colours - prices as specified in the first post.Cheers,Julian\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHey julz,seems there has been another price change: you going to be getting that too?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes - I can now supply at 0.074 each0.073 for 50+There are also apparently to be some deals available with USB hubs from FriedCat - but I don\\'t yet have any in stock and I don\\'t know the specs. Hopefully we\\'ll find out more about that soon.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blades, Block Erupters, USBs, USB hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-09-30 14:40:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: 10 port powered USB 2.0 hub $14.99\\n### Original post:\\nIt\\'s looks like the same generic 10-port USB 2.0 hub that\\'s all over the Bay and the Zon (comes in a variety of colors) that can be had for cheap. What makes your offering special to command a price that is more than twice the prevailing interweb market price that also offers free shipping? I\\'m just curious. Thank you in advance.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThat hub would be lucky to run 4 block eruptors. It has a 2A 5V power supply, all usb asics are 2.5W, or 500mA which is USB spec. J\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIt just needs a beefier power supply. Once I get mine in I will find a supplier with 5v4a or 5v5a to handle 10 usb asics and then make a combo.Some people already have, or know where to get, bigger power supplies for cheap.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI don\\'t trust these hubs at all. I\\'ve fried a few USB Block Erupters on them. They only run 3 erupters with the power supply it comes with. You can buy these for like $8 on eBay. I switched to the Rosewill 10-port hub ($25 a hub). They work great. I have 45 miners running on 5 hubs without a problem.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nLike these?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYep! I have a few of these hubs but only use them as daisy-chained hosts for the hubs with the BEs. The wall wart that comes with it is cheaply made; I wouldn\\'t load them to the theoretical max of 4 BEs (4 x 0.5A = 2A). Any power supply shouldn\\'t be loaded to the max anyway. They become less efficient and produces more heat (a direct result of wasted energy). I make it a point to load them between 50% and 65% which is close enough to peak efficiency (50%); up to 75% tops if I\\'m in a bind and find the need to push them.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI have a wide selection. I consider the $14.99 entry level or on a budget.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'m sure some of you are already aware of this but Nemo1024 has done an amazing job compiling valuable data about hubs here and are discussed extensively.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThat would be them. I bought them from Newegg\\'s eBay store. \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCoolBtw, has anyone tried the Manhattan? wonder how many usb asics it could handle with a bigger power supply.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ndeleted. nvm\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nGot the manhattan to hold 6 anything more shuts down the whole hub, not sure about messing with the electronics to make it more powerful.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nDon\\'t be a wanker, switch to an Anker!!ps: you might wanna keep yours cleaner than i do. i know somewhere out there in the world, an OCD person is beating their face into the keyboard after seeing all that dust.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIt looks like the RHB-500 has a 4amp psu while the RHB-520 has a 3.5a psu. If you have already been running the RHB-500 i would continue with that model.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYou\\'re right. I was thinking the RHB-500 only had 3 amps for some reason. Anyways, I will probably buy a few RHB-500s from you. Where are they being shipped from? Shipped via Priority Mail?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIt varies, but its always 2 days, on very rare occasions 3 days. If you order before Sunday night it should be there by the 2nd. If you order in the next couple hours maybe even the 1st.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI carry those too. I agree, Anker makes some of the best usb hubs.If anyone buys an Anker hub from me please be aware that it will not ship out until October 3rd. It comes with Free Shipping but it is 3-5 days instead of 2 days.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nAdrian Monk is twitching and convulsing right this very moment.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nOrdered some Rosewill hubs from you on Bitmit. Can\\'t wait to get them.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nstill selling, only one left\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThank you for the order. If you have any problems just let me know.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nTried 4A adapter with them and the adapter melted. 4A adapter cost about 17.5 USDThen I got 8A adapter to use with them and the DC connector on the USB hub melted... 8A adapter cost about 26.20 USD\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nhow does the adapter melt? There would have to be a dead short for that to happen and then I\\'m amazed you didn\\'t just trip the power strip b4 it melted.Just to be clear, you haven\\'t ordered anything from me. None of the $14.99 hubs have even been delivered yet. lol\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nYup. I did not buy any from you. I got the USB hub from a local electronic store and \"sometimes\" it comes with 1A adapter. Sometimes it doesn\\'t.The store that sells the 4A adapter \"BS\" me saying I turn it on 24/7. Saying it\\'s not supported to use 24/7. Lucky it\\'s a lady or i\\'m gonna give her a piece of my mind.So I asked for a higher amp adapter and they gave me 8A.Plug in 7 OCBE and the DC connector melted.Final form,Though I have some re-arrangement with the BEs. But all 4 hubs are running with 8A 5V adapters\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nIts good to know that I was right about using a beefier power supply. I\\'m sorry to hear that you melted one, I\\'m betting that hub had a dead short inside.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThe one I ordered for myself came in today.The psu says 1,000ma which is 1amp, yet its running 4 usb as\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 10 port USB 2.0 hub, block eruptors, USB Block Erupters, Rosewill 10-port hub, Manhattan, Anker, RHB-500, RHB-520, 4A adapter, 8A adapter, 1A adapter, 8A 5V adapters\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, False, False, False, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 13:13:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R4: Extended HF FLASH SALE PRICING! At-Cost+Host, Await. HF confirmation\\n### Original post:\\nI have an extra $120 USD that I sent down to bobsag3 hosting. You can apply that as my UPS contribution across all the boxen...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAnd I\\'m a UNIX guru, if that\\'s a consideration....\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThere you go, you got your volunteer. ^See how I did that.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHa! Perhaps you guys should do rock-paper-scissors to see who\\'s the 3rd admin. Or as we call it in Hawaii: \"Jun Ken Po\"\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOK. Paper.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nRock. Darn it, I lose. It\\'s all you. However, if you guys do end up needing another admin, just let me know.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNo - you are winning. Rock smashes paper, yes? Rock also smashing scissors - rock always winning. Rock can even be smashing other rock. Is why I always losing when playing strip \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI use Ethernet cable. Beat that Also: GOOD NEWS EVERYONE!I found out today I had my first power outage. Only at my apartment complex. I drove all the way to my warehouse without noticing if the power was on, only to find everything working great! So... 1 for the city 0 for me early in the morning.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nTMI Sis. Ha Ha, paper wraps rock, so I win. So, now I\\'m a or something ??\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nLet\\'s see. Paper wraps Ethernet cable so it doesn\\'t work. Scissors cut Ethernet cable so it doesn\\'t work. Rock smashes Ethernet cable so it doesn\\'t work. Doesn\\'t seem like much of a winner, that one. Probably best not to use it in cable games...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nDrop box of ethernet cable on other player > victory!Or Switch is better?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nPretty sure an Iphone/ipad can stop a 22, but not sure about a glock. IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nElectronic devices don\\'t fit into that paradigm very well. Someone needs to invent a more modern version of the game, maybe somethnig along the lines of \\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThese miners need to be delivered so I have something else to do besides watching YT videos of people shooting various electronics.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nCan I score a job with you? Much better than what I have to do everyday lol.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHehehe, for those not following updates in R1/R2, Copy/pasta from R1:Talked to Cara at HF a little while ago: - Great news! They\\'re still on track for that Oct. 23-30 shipping window. That may be the very latest HF news on the forums ATM. - Cara says she \"hearts\" us! I was giving her my elevator pitch about providing access to double and triple digit pricepoints HF can\\'t hit yet and she said she \"gets it\" and that she hearts us. So there. <3 Also mentioned the co-op may be up to 45-50 members once we sort out numbers.- Touched base on R2 Order 616 buyout and she mentioned the R3/R4 order confirmation should be showing in about 2 days.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nUpdate now that the forum\\'s back up. These two Batch 2 Sierras still appear to be on track for a early November shipping.HF is still on track WRT to delivery window, last I heard, and I will sort out wallet addresses tomorrow night for R3/R4 with Thomas now that the forums are back up. Please let me know if your wallet address changed for R3/R4 or if you would just like to re-confirm your R3 and/or R4 wallet payout addresses.Mahalo!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nR4 finally squared away. Thomas & -R- had to reduce shares & be refunded for 2 and 3 R4 shares, respectively.Final users finalized in R3 and R4. Thank you for your patience. For future reference: PLEASE sign transactions or if this isn\\'t possible send a PM with Transaction ID and details. These two simple steps will save your Group Buy Coordinators hours of stress if there\\'s any complications.OP updated and new code below:Code:[DRAFT; finished editing; xfer to Excel 10/9]Round 4: HashFast Sierra Flash Sale, with NO MPP. 20-30 minute UPS/Battery Backup built into at-cost share price. Payouts sent every 2 weeks. Before payout, 2.75% Hosting/Management fees are deducted every 2 weeks once operations Username | Wallet Address |Share Status| Notes 0 | DyslexicZombei | | PAID | / Your GB Coordinator / Net. Eng. / Primary Remote Admin || 0 | bobsag3 | TBA | HOST | R3 member. Ultra low cost vetted Hosting/Mng. Fee. 2.75%|| 5 | TomDraug | TBA | PAID | || 5 | a..........m | TBA | PAID | || 0 | jungle_dave | TBA | N/A | Backup Admin, former EE/Net. Engineer. Plants trees in Amazon! || 2 | firsttimeuser | TBA | PAID | DZ Co-op Round1 HashFast BabyJet Vetted \\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThanks a lot DZ and Thomas for resolving my problem and help to get sharesCheers,Tom\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Ethernet cable, Iphone/ipad, glock, miners, HashFast Sierra, HashFast BabyJet\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 16:07:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: GB Coordinators: What did you learn from the \"Great Forum Outage of Fall 2013?\"\\n### Original post:\\nJust wondering how my brethren and sisteren handled the forum outage. I know that Thomas, -Redacted-, and I were nearly stopped in our tracks trying to finish selling out KnC Jupiter GB shares.Fortunately we had a new site that went up because Thomas had the availability to put up a barebones site. We contacted folks via email for Group Buyers from whom we had addresses. We used that new site to communicate initially with our customers. sent approx. 150+ emails to one another to try to co-ordinate w/out the forum and without our customers.We then set up a subreddit that is now a backup means of communications and I hope will continue to be a benefit and sidebar/backup means of communications without slowing down Group Buy threads with extraneous stuff (says the master of OT blather) that albeit funny, could probably take place in a separate thread or subreddit. evolve and adapt quickly. It\\'s what we do as the Apex Predators of this planet. During this outage: I\\'m proud of the other Group Buy Coordinators in my Co-op and also our customers for finding us outside of the forums, and for being adaptable themselves.So Group Buy Coordinators: What\\'s yo\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nBetter have email, or another website. I actually got a few orders when the forum was out.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHey Dabs! Good to hear from you again. Glad it didn\\'t stall you completely.I saw a PM that came in from you the last day but I have a whole day\\'s worth of PMs missing (20-40?) that I\\'m worried has important info in there regarding GB payments or wallet addresses. Your PM was one of the ones that ended up not making the restoration. What about you? Any missing messages? Seem to be missing hours worth of messages.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNo missing messages for me, it seems, and I still have the one I sent you. So in case you didn\\'t read it, I resent it. hehehe. And the forum should be able to email you for every PM you receive. I set mine up that way. So I get all PMs.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHey guys.I set up an alternate backup forum here to continue communicating with everyo9ne from my group buy. It had all the same funtionality as this one and actually worked and looked better. I kind of liked it more to be honest. It was nice to continue discussion and great to have the ability for people to create sub forums to discussion particular thing.In the strange times of the silkroad going down and various different branches of the bitcoin universe being attack it was great to still have contact with this online community. I realised what a big hole was left but this forum going down. I spend so long on here each day and thoroughly enjoy the discussion that arise, not only about bitcoin, but about life, the universe and everything.Glad to hear that you guys also found other ways to stay connected. As you say, people always find a way to adapt. All that said... it\\'s nice to have the mother forum back. Barntech\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHeh, same. I only login for a little bit a couple times a day, but more than once I found myself typing in \"bitcointalk.org\" before realizing that it was down.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI think we can all agree that we missed \"the mothership.\"If the forums ever go down again, the easiest way to re-check IMO is to open a command prompt and ping bitcointalk.orgThat way, whenever you want to check, you just click your command prompt window, arrow up to your previous command and hit the enter key. I suppose if you\\'re the desperate sort, you could set your command parameters to infinitely ping their site until it\\'s back up. I\\'m sure they wouldn\\'t mind. I kid, I kid. You shouldn\\'t do that, but you can do this ping tip as this is the sort of thing a network engineer does to check if a site is up and to help trace routes and measure latency.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nping works, when you have a command prompt. But usually I just fire up the browser. Once every few hours is good enough, I don\\'t need to know the exact minute it\\'s up.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI was actually quite happy.I had a few days of vacation planned for the 2nd to the 6th, so the forum outage just fit perfectly\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter, command prompt, browser\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 18:05:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [Open] 1.8 [btc] = 30GH/s with lifetime hosting\\n### Original post:\\nWould be good if you add a google docs, detailing how many shares are there, how many sold, how many available. All that and any updated price in the first post and thread name. People WILL judge a book by its cover.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nty I\\'ll look into updating\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ve made over 40 sales now on ebay:So far we\\'re working on the 4th device queued at Sept 23Device Names and StatusCointraction : FullExcavator: FullMinero: FullDe-Crypter: 28/100 (last update on Oct 9)Mining starts in January 2014 If you would like to hop on board here\\'s the pertinent information:Terms and Ebay payment method: payment: btc = 15GH/sMessage me transaction information if you pay with Bitcoin.Bitcoin Payments to you:Bitcoin payments to you will be made Monthly or sooner. Payment will be in bitcoins based on your GH ownership and how many Bitcoins our machines were able to collect (we will be using a very low/no commission pool). Hosting:How the hosting works. Lets say you own 30GH, and you earned 1.200 bitcoins for the month then we subtract 20 cents per GH equivalent as per the going rate of the bitcoin value (value is determined by the leading bitcoin trading site, currently mtGox). If the bitcoin value is $125 then the total hosting fees would be .048 bitcoins, leaving you with 1.162 Bitcoins after hosting fees.Why Does it need to be hosted? Since there are several part owners for one device the item needs to be hosted at one location and maintain\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointraction, Excavator, Minero, De-Crypter\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 22:36:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.7 BTC=67GH/s 11/30 shares\\n### Original post:\\nI have 5 shares available from 1st round. PM me if interested in buying\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHow many shares are left and when is the cut off date?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI think there\\'s only 7 more shares to go! Let\\'s buy it up people so we can seal the deal!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 01:07:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .50 btc per chip: 2988 available (512/3500 sold)\\n### Original post:\\nupdated price to reflect current btc value\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCan I please have a refund?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSorry... Chips were already ordered. Btc spent. Maybe someone wants to buy your chips here?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSelling 50 chips \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI am interested to get 64 chips at the rate of .50 btc if delivered with in first week of october 2013\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWho is developing boards for these chips? I don\\'t see anyone listed in the OP talking about board design.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIf they are here as expected around Oct. 1st, then you can have them that week Plz PM me. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWe are building the boards. Now in need of chips \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSweet!!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCanary I would like my 50 chips sent directly to lucko.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOnce shipping costs are established, you can send them anywhere you\\'d like.However, I won\\'t ship international, unless you supply the label for that.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThis is our miner board Still waiting for some of the components for assembly and more chips from BFL.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nLooking good! what are you cooling it with?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThey are using Aluminium 6061 material as heat sinkAnd Two fans of 40x40x28 used in the enclosure\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI am hearing few people have got an email from BFL asking them to pay the remainder 50% and the chips will be delivered with in 1 week or so. Have you got it as well?If yes, count me for those 64 chips at 0.5 BTC each I can do the payment once BFL ships it to you and u have the tracking number\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nAnyone buying chip credits anymore I got 16 I\\'d like sell Sorry for off topic post\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nIs this GB still open Canary?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI apologize profusely to those who have been waiting for delivery from BFL, in some cases for over a year, but they appear to be sending out bulk chip orders on schedule. I received my chips today, exactly 100 days after paying my deposit. I bought from KnCminer and Metabank at the same time and have received nothing so far from them. No sure whether this is because it\\'s much simpler to send just chips (Avalon chip buyers might disagree) or because BFL was motivated to collect the balance due on delivery. However this might be a better pre-order model going forward: Collect half upfront and half on delivery...\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThat is very good news\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI think Lucko\\'s associate is farthest along: MrTeal and chris99 are close behind.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThanks doc!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nAny 3rd party boards for BFL chips actually hashing yet?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nAs you have quoted my response, i just want to know if you are willing to sell the chips?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nOur is, yes.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nYes for some time now... This was the first run of the prototype... we have a production board but not full 16 chips working... We need to put them on by assembly house... So you will see that soon to.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nGiven that there is less than a week until the due date, are there any updates from BFL?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nIs there any word on actual shipment of the chips from BFL?Is there any preferred mounting vendor (with their own board designs)? How much would it be to have the chips mounted on boards and have it shipped to US address?I have some chips credits from BFL - can I use them in this groupbuy?\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nDo the 8 chip boards connect to my PC via USB?Do the boards come with cooling, a mount or feet of some sort & a power supply?Do the miners run with the bfgminer software?I see the price of the chips posted, but how do I find out how much it would cost to have the rest of the miner built such that I can use it?I\\'m interested in getting an 8 chip model, but I have these unanswered questions I don\\'t see the answers to anywhere that I need to know first before I commit.Please would someone advise?Thanks a lot.Regards,NginUS\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nChips still available for sale ? Any revision in the price ?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nThey are, I\\'m really staying quiet for the most part until I have them in hand so that I can ship as soon as an order is placed. hopefully very soon... Watching my email for shipping notification...\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nSpieder 6; 3.0; send you a signed message in a bit.Thx\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nI am selling my 4chip slot for 1BTC right now, 1st and 2nd half of the payments paid.This is hashing power equal to 4 x 4 GH/s = 16 GH/sYou can PM me if you are interested.SOLD, THANKS\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nGood news! I should have the chips in hand tomorrow. Those with existing orders, you\\'ll need to email me a shipping label and send me a small handling fee if I have to buy anti static bags etc... Once I know the packaging cost, I\\'ll know what the fee will be.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nwhat kind of shipping label i need?i purchased 8 chips\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nProbably small flat rate box, but I\\'ll know for sure once they are delivered.\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\ndo we have anyone \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips, miner board, Aluminium 6061 material heat sink, Two fans of 40x40x28, 3rd party boards for BFL chips, production board, 8 chip boards, 4chip slot\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, False, True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-10 05:58:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group buy #1 Red Fury USB Miner 2.2~2.7 GH/s 0.83-0.90 BTC or $139 Paypal\\n### Original post:\\nI went ahead and started this off with a purchase for 5 units for myself.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nConfirmed Orders:Code:9/18, PP 59/19, PP 19/20, PP 69/20, PP 19/20, PP 19/20, PP 69/20, PP 19/20, PP 39/21, PP 19/21, PP 19/21, PP 19/21, PP 29/21, PP 19/21, PP 29/21, PP 19/21, PP 19/21, PP 39/21, PP 19/21, PP 19/22, PP 19/22, PP 19/22, PP 19/22, PP 19/23, PP 19/23, PP 39/23, PP 19/23, PP 29/23, BTC 19/23, BTC 19/24, BTC 39/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/24, PP 49/24, PP 19/24, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, BTC 29/25, BTC 19/25, BTC 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25 BTC 89/30, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/25, PP 19/29, PP 19/29, PP 19/29, PP 19/29, PP 19/30, BTC 19/30, BTC 109/30, PP 410/1, BTC 110/2, PP 110/2, PP 110/2, PP 110/2, PP 110/2 BTC 510/5 PP 110/9 PP 2Total Units 122\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Red Fury USB Miner 2.2~2.7 GH/s\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-10 09:22:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.074BTC or less, Blades 3.1 BTC] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nEmail sent regarding an order\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLikewise\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPayment and email sent.Cheers julz\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, Blades\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-01 02:54:00',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [LMTD AVAILABLE!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nI have a small amount of units still available because a few pre-orders didn\\'t pay on time! PM me quickly if you missed out because there are only a few!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n2 for 1.8 btc\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nConfirmed! Thanks for your order! 31 units left!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI am confused I thought you closed this buy down> I have 2 questions:one can I add to my order of 20?Two does this have windows 7 bit minter.com java client support? I know Doc H was working on it. I would order a few more if It works with bit minter. thanks phil\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHe had a cancellationTalk to bitminter. I\\'m waiting for cgminer myself but the bfg in the op should work\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n\"Accepting PayPal\", where? It thought there was a link before.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYes I had a reserve order cancel partially so those are now available again Bitminter is being worked on but I don\\'t think it\\'s ready yet. CGminer in linux and BFGminer in Windows and Linux are working, check the OP or Beastlymac\\'s info page for installation is working in linux and I\\'m sure it will be ready for windows very soon.I won\\'t be accepting Paypal for these last 31 units. Just BTC at this time.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIn for 2! Email sent.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhen do these ship?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nFirst post. Big green text under shipping prices.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThanks\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nConfirmed! Thanks for your order!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAdd another two more to my order, I\\'ll send you an email with confirmation and transaction_id, waiting on confirmations as I had to move some BTC back over instead of selling on the exchange. lolEdit: Sent you a PM with a question.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nHello!I am in for two, just send you the BTC\\'s (2.1, because of international shipping, USPS Priority), and the email with transaction ID and shipping data.Please confirm when you can and let me know if you need some other info.thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nResponded! Thanks Confirmed! Thanks --Also, 16 units left!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI -FINALLY- got Coinbase working! If you\\'ve still got some available on Thursday, I might be up for getting a few more.Also, it seems these now work with cgminer in Windows and Linux! (\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nNo worries! Because of the huge response in interest for the few I had left I contacted Beastlymac and asked if I could get another 100 units and I was just barely able to secure them as they\\'re about to start production this week! So now I have 104 units left!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nTrying it now to confirm\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nEmail sent. TY.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nReplied! Thank you\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nHow many left?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\n3 more. I sent additional 2.6 btc5 x .88 = 1.8 + 2.65 total\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nDo the Furys need a cooling fan?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nNo I am running my one without it and the heatsink is comfortable to touch (not incredibly hot)\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nconfirmed! Thanks for your orders\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nSee post#1 it is being updated with # avail right now:Pre-order units left : 99\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nJust updated 79 units left!\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nI just sent in 3.4 coins for a total of 4 more units. 4 sticks 3.4 btc new order today 9/30 20 sticks 17 btc older order 9/22grand totals 20.4 coins for 24 sticks. TY\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\n.9 BTC sent, confirmation information via emailAdd to existing order~nh\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\n.8 BTC sent, confirmation information via emailAdd to existing order~nh\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nConfirmed! Thank you!Confirmed on both! Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nand thank you. and please please please pretty please with sugar on top of it deliver them on time!!\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nI\\'m in on 40.. please from me too! Lol\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nOpen Paypal again I want two more!!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nSorry because of the time crunch on how soon these will be shipping I don\\'t have the time to transfer funds from Paypal to BTC.I\\'ll have Paypal available again when I open up my next Group Buy for sure though.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nSorry if I missed this in thread, but will these be loaded w/ cgminer?\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nLoaded? Just plug them in and cgminer will recognise them. Any cgminer including or after 3.5.0\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nah perfect. Sorry I\\'m noob to mining. But, I do have cgminer now. Do I need to do nething running a 6 port hub? Like d/l some other s/w? or configure cgminer in some different way?\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nYes get zadigAnd you better have 4 amps on that power supply\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nI looked up zadig, and don\\'t get why I need to install drivers. BPM says tat cgminer will just plug n play no?Also looked up my hub and says it\\'s only 3.4 amps. Does this mean that I can only power up like 2 or 3? Really sorry guys, just really new.\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nthe hub may only run 3 sticks. is it 5 volt brick or a 12 volt brick.\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\n3.4 is borderline good for 6. .5 amp each.Yes you must use zadig. in your usb then replace the driver with winusb using zadig.\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nYall are the best. TY. tho, I gue\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"Blue Fury\" 2.7 GH/s USB miner, cooling fan, heatsink, 6 port hub, power supply\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-10 17:15:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #16 USB Miners 0.075 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nI have plenty of USB Miners for sale. Other resellers are selling at cost of 0.07 each. I thank you for your orders and support!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI have to share with you my experience.In Group Buy # 11 I ordered 10 Miners, but USPS lost my package. And package was uninsured. Terrible situation... but not at all. SilentSonicBloom is really amazing. He sent refund.... even though insurance was not taken on package. Absolutely amazing!!! I am very glad there are people like you!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n0.07 ! this looks like last drop before it all goes out! I will order some. What is the color availability ?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nmy price is just above 0.07 as that is resellers wholesale cost. I have red silver blue and gold. Thank you for any order placed.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOrder for 20 coming as soon as confirmations go through.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\npayment sent, you have a pm\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThank you! Pm sent with tracking number. Have a great week!SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-10 17:28:53',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 92/100 shares avail.] R7: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost + Host, $70=8GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nNice! I have you down for 2 soft reservations. Welcome back! Delivery is expected late December/early January.Edit: 1 of the 2 DZ MC Jupiters are at -R-\\'s for testing, but should be heading to Missouri soon. Hashrate is being split to R5/R6 for both machines.92 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIm in for 2 shares, Thomas will have to pm me to remind me because im running around with my head cut off... DZ did you get my email?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI am in for 3 shares or 3x 70 = 210. Not the strongest commitment as I am having a bit of a problem with coins and fixing this other group buy. I have 7.5 btc invested in this buy and it has an issue that if resolved I will buy 3 shares here. If this buy ends up as a total loss (hope not) I can\\'t buy the 3 shares here.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nProduct added to site enjoy.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDo I need to PM you my details if I paid through the site? I paid in BTC and you should have my address already from the web form I filled out.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, DZ MC Jupiters\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-10 17:32:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 85/100 shares avail.] R7: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost + Host, $70=8GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nThanks bobsag3! I had -R- down for 3, since he paid for 2 more, he moves up to 5 for R7. 85 shares available.==PAID2, thomas_s5, -Redacted-1, DZ2, bobsag3RESERVED2, thyatis3, philipma1957 (may be paid by DZ)15 shares PAID or RESERVED.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI hear ya. Still not sure what happened with Round four when I lost my boxed set in my own co-op thanks to oversales at the end. BTW: Also we did pick Bitmine because it\\'s supposed to ship a month earlier.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCan we pay via PayPal?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi ishkur,I\\'d rather we don\\'t because the only way it makes financial sense is if it\\'s sent as a gift. Too many gifts may get my wife\\'s ebay-linked account flagged. Another thing is it takes 3-4 business days to transfer to checking so I can buy BTC at Coinbase at a 1% fee. Your alternative is BTCQuick at 7.5% fees. I already promised 1 other person a PP payment to get this GB going. I\\'ll take one more PP, which can be yours if getting BTC is too difficult. But that\\'s my limit for this R7 GB, which is 2 PP payments sent as a gift so I don\\'t have to deal w/ fees, illegal chargebacks, and fraud.The only way I\\'d take more than 2 PP gifts for this R7, is if the buyers agrees to an additional 3% Paypal fee (it\\'s normally 2.9% + 30 cents so just rounding up) over the $70 share price, so they\\'d be $72.10 instead. Of course, that opens up another can of worms with chargebacks which is another reason why merchants love BTC...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'d like to reserve a share, if I may! I\\'ve got the coins floating around now, I just need to move them around. Should I pay via the website? What would you guys prefer?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUse the website\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIn process now!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nBought 4 shares through the site and paid in BTC. Thanks! lets hope I get more than 2.25 BTC in return\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nDo you guys actually think R7 will be profitable if we don\\'t get hardware till January?Is there any reason the difficulty won\\'t be sky high by then?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nROI will not be made unless the price of bitcoin rises\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHey slayernine, I think it\\'s a given that it\\'s going to be high. I think it\\'s also a given that mfgs will continue to struggle to put our hardware. The reason being: it\\'s damn hard and expensive to develop and produce ASIC wafers. bobsag3 & I were up late on skype last night talking about how KnC\\'s rollout was only a semi-success (pissed premium host customers that weren\\'t first & some paid $4k a jupiter per yr to host, and many people still waiting on day 1 orders). Bitmine\\'s customer protection plan is that for every 10 days late they are, you get 10% extra hashrate. After 60 days lateness, they will give a full refund. We\\'ve pretty much decided too: that since we\\'ll have an extra cold A/C cabinet we\\'re overclocking the stuffings on these rigs (safely of course).I\\'m not sure how awful it\\'ll be if it comes to a full mass refund but in my dealings with Giorgio I\\'ve found him to be reasonable like an adult, instead of acting like a child like we\\'ve seen from 2 companies that were early entrants,\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, boxed set, ASIC wafers, jupiter\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-11 04:00:10',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 87/100 shares avail.] R7: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost + Host, $70=8GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nRoger that. I have you down for 3 reservations and 2 for bobsag3. Don\\'t forget that I owe you $525 in a few days for the R1 UPS/Batts. If you\\'d like, we can subtract the three R7 shares from what I owe you & I sign the Tx w/ your ownership & send in a 3 share payment to the R7 wallet on your behalf that Thomas is in charge of. I would owe you 3 R7 shares and $315, if you wanted to go this route for my payment to you.Also, please keep an eye out for a letter from me & the missus via ebay for your 4 PayPal shares in R6. It should arrive Friday/Saturday if anyone will be home to sign for it. I\\'ll send your payment to -R- once it clears.87 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\neyes peeled for the paypal shipment. on that 525. 43 goes to hash boost on buy 1. IIRC so it is only 482 owed to me.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOk, would you like me to pay for your three R7 shares and subtract this from the $482 as well? The $525 I owe you would be paid as: 1 R1B share ($43), 3 R7 shares ($70/ea), and $272.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou guys went for Bitmine instead of Cointerra for the 1month lead time right?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMy 2 shares have been purchased thru the site!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAnd I bought a couple of shares via the website, too...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI need to opt out as my other knc buy looks to be troubled. so the 525 will use only 43 for the r1 boost. My group buys just have not panned out. sorry. but very grateful that r5 and r6 from dz and co look good.maybe someone will deliver and i can get back in on this r7. but not for now.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R1 UPS/Batts, R7, R1B share, R7 shares\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-11 11:40:36',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 51/100 shares avail.] R7: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost + Host, $70=8GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nNo worries. I understand & I\\'m sorry to hear your GBs haven\\'t been going well. I\\'m sure I\\'ll see you again. So 1 R1B share @ $43 + $482 for the UPS/Batteries.BTW, hope you don\\'t mind: after talking it over with firsttimeuser, while he could still use spare PSUs, I may ship that overkill UPS I\\'m buying from you to Missouri to help service R2-R6 Jupiters, Baby Jets, and Sierras to Missouri and buy a smaller UPS/battery backup for R1 which is only about 350-400W.Would it be ok if I send you a label to print later this week after I pay you?It would help the co-op out much better this way IMO. I think that\\'s a much better investment of my resources into the co-op. What do you think?==56 shares remaining on our site, 5 shares in soft reserve.Reserved2, thyatis3, slayernine51 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi redtime, Welcome aboard! Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYou didnt tell people about my offer did you? I swear ill write my PMs in caps from now on.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHey ! I can\\'t miss R7!!! I think we have the best team and GB 2 shares for meI might go with 5 but for now 2 is goodI am transferring btc to my account tomorrow\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nmakes sense\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nR8 - Cointerra?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWho knows? I just flow with the go. For instance: if someone came to me to become vetted as a GBC, and happened to suggest that...oh...they have (or will soon have) funds to buy half of an $11K MPP Sierra...then you might have the fastest Rig GB buyout of that size, in this forum\\'s short history. Sounds like sci-fi if you were to read that last sentence in 2008, but it actually happened and the co-op has become much, much stronger and diverse with thousands of dollars worth of expert pro bono work and funds donated by myself and 5 others to make this at-cost co-op operate well and thrive.I can\\'t tell you what a pleasure it is to be dealing with other responsible adults. I love that the Co-op\\'s leaders know what to do without needed to have their hands held thru the whole process. No man or woman is an island and this GB Coordinator is humbled and proud of this lil co-op that could.You guys make me laugh, I\\'ve made friends who I\\'m positive I\\'ll be friends for years, and it\\'s an honor to co-lead this merry band of glass half full optimists.===BTW, I won\\'t go into details, but some heavy RL stuff happened near -R- so please go easy on him for requests & such, if you can for a bit. He\\'\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHahaha I see what you did there, also I still win so far on fastest GB.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOK, put me down for 10 shares.Still angry that I missed R5/R6 due to travel and being ill...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, UPS/Batteries, PSUs, R2-R6 Jupiters, Baby Jets, Sierras, Cointerra, MPP Sierra\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-11 17:28:35',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK SHIPPING] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .50 btc per chip\\n### Original post:\\n10/09/2013: Chips in hand. Ready for delivery to you.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCould you answer our PM please regarding Delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWorking on figuring out the best way to package the chips for delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMuch thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAny update on what we need to get you to have the chips shipped?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOP updated with shipped out orders.PMs went out to the rest of folks who ordered chips. Need your shipping labels.Plenty of chips still available, in stock and ready to ship out to whatever destination you choose (within US).\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nand shipping from zip code 60181 like the blades?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nyes, it is!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 17:22:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R6: KnC Jupiter, BELOW COST+HOST, Arrives Oct. 7 for testing!, $78 ea.\\n### Original post:\\nLooks like we oversold R6. I\\'m willing to split up a Saturn into 50 shares to handle the overflow - it\\'s supposed to be arriving on Thursday, with tracking number due today...Everybody - please stop sending me money...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nR7!!! Here we go\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNo.no.no.no.... Please. Stop sending me money. Aaargh.....The problem is, I don\\'t have a good idea of when the third or fourth boxes are going to show up, so I can\\'t give anyone a guarantee of when they would be hashing - and 500 Gh/s this week is worth more than 500 Gh/s next week...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes, please stop throwing money at -R- for R6. We\\'ve been sold out since yesterday while the forum was still down. We\\'re still sorting out the oversold situation but we\\'re going to do our best to accommodate people into R5-R6. There\\'s discussions about moving the R6 overflow to a 3rd Jupiter -R- was sending to Missouri to be a backup miner for the co-op. If necessary, the 3 GB Coordinators organizing R5/R6 have agreed to reduce our shares in these two rounds to try to help accommodate late orders.Please stop sending PP & BTC for R6 as it\\'s done and now oversold.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ni am scared: \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGB6: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAny news on the final spreadsheet? Thanks guys!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThomas_s is working on something to use the BTCGuild API keys to display current stats.Finishing up some hardware stuff - don\\'t panic, I\\'ll get the GB-6 spreadsheet out soon. Your shares were the last 8 in R5, as I recall....\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nActually Mootinator is, I\\'m just putting his code on the site.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThanks to mootinator the site now shows the worker stats from BTC Guild.Round 6 amazing troubleshooting (try deleting and retyping it) worked flawlessly. Remember when in doubt hit the restart button.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHaha was just checking, thank you so much for everything you\\'ve been doing. For R6 I had bought 2 shares before the announcement of the big 37 shares buy.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThese guys kick ass but I\\'m not sure if they remembered to take names before they started the kicking of asses. Received this from our R2 Seller of HF Order 616:\"The KnC miners are ok. I have several terahash. Believe it or not I am still waiting for one more \"day 1\" unit which is only \"in progress\"Looks like it will be more like day 10+Oh an the ASIC board of one blew up (each Jupiter has 4 separate ASIC boards)\"\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWow, thank you mootinator. It\\'s very much appreciated by the rest of us. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYeah - I have two like that, not the blown up kind, the stuck in the \"IN PROGRESS\" state kind - since the first of October.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nhere is a short cutthese are the btc paid out by btcguild toround5 and round6 round 5 round 6 these will be lower then what is earned since earnings reach a number before sent to our knc payout address\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nNo problem! Thank you all for setting these up in the first place.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI sent KnC an email asking why two out of three of my orders that were paid for at the same time are still stuck in \"IN PROGRESS\".Received tracking numbers a few hours later.... Yay!!!Since Monday October 14th is a holiday in the US, they will likely arrive here on Tuesday October 15th. So, once the second Jupiter is running, I\\'ll owe the GB 5/6 shareholders 8 days worth of hashing... The other machine in that order is a Saturn which I owe some hashing on to another person....and\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI want my shinies tho\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYeah - you might have to rustle up a 140 MM fan for the first one, if you plan to run it with the case on. It runs with the lid off. Believe me, I don\\'t need multiple Jupiters hashing in my apartment - unless I make plans to re purpose it as a sauna or something.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nMy data is correct!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWell, I was bound to get one line right out of 26...\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nThree lines out of 26.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\n2 out of 25, I collapsed your two orders down to a single line\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nmy order # 51 for 6 shares is correct. I did buy the ebay sale for 4 shares that is my secondary ebay account. I am not sure if it is posted above or will be carried to buy 7. ebay gave me a lot of cash back incentives to buy and it was a good deal for me. I would like clarification on where that will go to group buy 6 or 7.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nUh oh... Hey DZ - did 4 more R6 shares slip away that I didn\\'t know about and that I need to sandwich into R6 still? Dang. Mr. DickMs is going to end up owning my whole Saturn box - and it hasn\\'t even had a chance to arrive yet... I might just need to have it shipped straight to him....\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nyeah it happened when the forum was down. I think they are not listed above. I am pretty flexible, but you are just about the only group buy that has done well for me. 1) My knc buy at this link is a mess I am not sur\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Saturn, KnC Jupiter, ASIC board\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-11 21:36:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [85 AVAILABLE!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nPlease add one more to my existing order for a total of 6. BTC0.88 sent.Tx: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-12 17:34:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [AVAILABLE!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nConfirmed! Thanks for your order!Also only 65 units left!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-12 22:12:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #17 Blade Miners 2.75 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nI have plenty of blades for sale. Thank you everyone for your questions and support.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPrices have been adjusted again. Thanks for the orders\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThank you for your continued orders. They are very much appreciated.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAll orders have shipped today. Have a great weekend. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nReceived my blade and the usb miners.Delivery was fast.Packaging was done very well.Blade is up running perfectly.Several of the usbminers are up and running also. The shipping was so fast that I wont be receiving my usb hubs from amazon till middle of next week.Great transaction.Thanks SSB.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYou are very welcome. Have a great weekend!SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: blades, usb miners, usb hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-13 06:58:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [100 AVAILABLE!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nI just received word that I have 100 more units allocated to this group buy!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI have 24 on order. put me down for 6 more . price would be .85 for 20 plus so 5.1 btc . I need to clear coins for this. I will know in the morning.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nReserved! Thanks for your order(s)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI will see my coin status later and let you know.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNot a problem! Already down to 91 units\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPlease allocate 1 more for me ... I need to free up BTC and will send shortly\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nReserved!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nSent; Txid: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nConfirmed! Thanks for your order(s)!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nRight now I am in on 2 knc group buys. I have not been paid from either one as they are both just starting to hash. I think I will stick with the 24 and not add these 6. My knc coins may take more then 5 days to come in. Sorry but in the world of asics waiting has become the name of the game.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nNot a problem. If things change let me know\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER, knc group buys\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-13 14:50:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [59 AVAILABLE!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nssinc,How we looking man? I just got my btc released from camp so I\\'m ready? You still got some left right?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYep! 58 left!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nJust sent you an email!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nReceived and Confirmed! Thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-08 13:45:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK SHIPPING] batch #25/26 .07 btc USB + 2.75 btc Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\nupdated prices: .07 btc for USB miner and 2.75 btc for a blade\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nand i thought i was done with the usb sticks... great price!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nso 60 usb sticks = 4.2 coins? 70 usb sticks = 4.9 coins? up to 72 fits in a region a box correct? I will be sending coins soon. along with a label I need to check on my coins in reserve\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHappy belated birthday Canary, glad to see the forums back up\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes happy Birthday. I also purchased 60 sticks.philipma1957 ;60; 4.2btc will send an email with all info asap. ie the label etc. i sent you an email with;tx id btc addresslabel numbersignaturesend mixed colors please. ty phil\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCare to explain why you are selling USB miners at wholesale cost? Inquiring minds would like to know. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nLiquidate prior to next diff jump?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThe price just dropped earlier today. As a reseller myself, I am interested as are my customers.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n has been sent.Please get a gross of BitFury\\'s!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nthank you sir! indeed, it is good to have the forums back!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\npacked and shipping out in 15-20 mins... thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\npacked and shipping out in 15-20 mins... thanks!!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nCanary! Please keep 10 USBs for me. Lost power to computer and now it\\'s reindexing blocks on disk.I will be giving them out as candy at work.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nPower consumption may have something to do with it. Blue Fury offers 7x performance at same power consumption. Essentially, even if Block Erupters are free, you will be loosing money on them in 5 months. No ROI is expected. As candy they are great for discussion at a water cooler.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nASICminer will probably have these for 0.05btc or less after next difficulty increase.... these only make 12 cents a day each right now... thats with free power.... granted 2.5w each isnt much as far as power consumption, but when earnings are that low every penny helps...\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWELL CANARY HAS SOLD 15 TH OF MINING STUFF.THAT IS 15,000,000 MH OF EQUIPMENTTHATS EQIVALENT TO 45,000 YES 45000 USB\\'SSAY HE MADE AN AVERAGE OF $10 A PIECE FROM GOOD TIMES TILL NOT SO GOOD TIMES(REMEMBER EVEN THE PROMO ONES HE TOOK A MINIMUM 0.05BTC) UNLIKE SSB WHO WAS DECENT TO US WITH NO EXTRA CHARGEHE HAS NOW MADE $450,000 OR HALF A MILLION DOLLARS FROM ALL OF USWELL I THINK HE IS RETIRING AND LAUGHING AT US ALL THE WAY just putting things in my prespective\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\na lot of that hashrate is blades not the usbs, your whole presumption is false... and im willing to bet its more like 24TH/s+\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\neven if you are right ok so its a quarter of a million still very goodbut i think half a million is closer anyway why are you not happy for canaryhe is a good businessman and knows how to run it well\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nhow much he has made is not really our business, as long as he delivers what we buy, at the prices we agree to at the time.... is all that matters!Canary Rocks!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nAgreed. Besides does it really matter what he made? You bought his items. Don\\'t buy them if you don\\'t want him to make money ASICMiner has no means to distribute so somebody had to step in and fill that roll. Canary has done an excellent job distributing along with SilentSonicBoom and Eleuthria (BTCGuild) to name a few. They all had pretty much the same prices through out. If anybody is getting rich off of us its Friedcat...\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nany news on an affordable hub that holds 40+ usbs and uses atx psu?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nShould be well under $5 per port. About mid October for release info.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nAre the ports spaced out enough for other usb (BitFury) miners?When are you getting some or do you have a no-compete clause (via reseller agreement)?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nDo you have a problem with someone making a profit? Perhaps because it\\'s not you who is profiting. Canary took advantage of a surge in demand, stepped up to the plate and provided a supply for that demand. No arms were twisted to buy BE\\'s from him. Compitetion; it\\'s the American way. What are you, some kind of communist?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI have previously requested on a couple of forums that the Blue Fury manufacturer or re-seller post exact figures on wattage and amp draw for the Blue Fury units. Also requested that same post hash/wattage tables for the units. I have not seen any concise figures posted as yet. I would like some proof that they are indeed \"plug \\'n play\" replacements for BE\\'s.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nyeah and my january 2013 bfl order for 2x jallys is still unfilled. and I am banned as a troll on their site for explaining why they should buy am usb sticks over jalapeno\\'smean while I purchased 500 plus sticks from canary sold 400 at a decent profit and have 100 hashing for free. I am happy if Canary made 500,000 cause I made about 3000 on my resales. BTW my ebay buyers were happy to buy from \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miner, Blade, Blue Fury, ASICminer, BitFury, Block Erupters, jallys, jalapeno\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-13 23:49:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.6 BTC=67GH/s 9/30 shares\\n### Original post:\\nPayment for one share senttxid \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWelcome to the group, added to spreadsheet and OPPlease send me your email and Skype userCheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-14 01:37:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN,28/100 avail]: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost + Host, $70= 8-12GH/s +UPS\\n### Original post:\\nOk, you\\'re leading our merry bunch for this Round.You heard the man. 28 shares available. Payment *will* be sent tonight to secure Free Shipping.If/when people show up, they\\'ll be shifted to R8 which is going to be shipped at the same time and exists on the same chassis anyway.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, R8\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-14 19:03:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #16 USB Miners 0.0725 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nLove SilentSonicBoom\\'s packaging. Bought a ton of these from him and he\\'s delivered fast, consistently and been a wonder to work with. Almost makes me sad that it\\'s the last batch.-Tong\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNew lower blade prices! Thank you for your orders!Units Ordered Unit Price 1 2.05 BTC 2-3 2.05 BTC 4-6 2.05 BTC 7+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Every order of 6-10 blades receives a free backplane while supplies last.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThrow in another order for 10 Erupters for me, payment will be OTW.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, blades, backplane, Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-14 17:52:41',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [56 AVAILABLE!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nThis may sound dumb, but do we ship by weds the 16th. any guesses to ship date. My concern is this thread they are 2x the power of your stick. even if they only go to 4gh they will be pretty good. If they are sold in hand in early Nov. they will hurt this buy.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThese dates are not jiving with what Beastlymac is saying now. They will at BEST only ship 300 units out next week. \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThe price of those Bi-Furys would have to be less than 1.8 BTC otherwise they are almost the same as Blue Furys. Also, don\\'t worry guys, just keeping buying from this group or mine, eventually the price of the Blues will also go down in late November or December when the price of the raw chips also go down. (But don\\'t wait till then to buy or else you won\\'t be mining till after then.)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nRed vs blue??\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWe will start shipping next week. Should see at least 250 shipped out. Once pcbs come from China we can produce 400 a day so the rest of the units should be shipped out the following week.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYeah I have 24 of these on order.. total of 20.4 btc It looks like I will get them too late to do me any good.I had to return 6 ebay presales sales today. I rather just get a 17 btc refund. and take a 3.4 btc loss.So very disappointing maybe they will come before NOV 1. SSINC I am not directing this at you as I know you are in the middle.Just the suppliers of our gear sooo very typical. But if you want to refund me 17 btc and keep 3.4 btc as a fee send me a pm.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPre-selling a pre-sale is asking for trouble.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nwhy I never cashed in the money... I only sold 6 of the 24 sticks kept the money in my paypal account refunded them in full in less then 10 minutes once they asked for the refunds and I am sending them some free asic miner sticks to help them not feel abused. I can do this because real builders made gpus you ordered one from amazon and got it the next day. I made a lot of coins from gpus.The problem is no one really believes in this and just looks to rip it off until it dies. I am trying to promote the industry by being the absolute best fairest most honest stick sell on ebay.Sold a lot of sticks and I get no help from asic builders just delays. please read my feedbacks and see the right way to treat customers. don\\'t blame SSINC it is the entire asic building community that is doing this. I try to push in the right direction and get zip. I am done for the night before I say something too nasty. I offered SSINC a 3.4 coin profit if he refunds me in less then 24 hours from now. If I did not like him I would not offer that to him.I will see what he does.Frankly I lost faith in the builders of asics not so much the sellers.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOUCH! I have 40 coming - didn\\'t presell any till I have a tracking number from SSINC\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWe are doing our best to get these out the door. We should be producing the 250 tomorrow and will have them shipped out Wednesday or Thursday. Once the batch of pcbs come in (the delayed ones we are waiting for) we should have them all produced in 4 days max. We have done testing with the fab etc so they know exactly what is needed to be done. Right now we are just waiting on the pcbs we tried to source them from other places that are not linked to China but can\\'t find enough of they are incredibly over priced. We are working our hardest to get these to you on time but the holidays are causing delays. We have been transparent with this issue and announced it almost a week ago now.Sorry for the issues.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHow many did you order?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThanks for the update Beastlymac. Anyone who doesn\\'t receive a tracking number from me next week as promised will be compensated for the delay.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nssinc did you prepay bitfury?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nBitfury? No. Beastlymac? Yes.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI\\'d cancel my order if you can get your money back. If not, it\\'s cool.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWe are working on some kind of way to compensate people for the delays.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nSSinc has refunded me my asked amount. thank you\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYou have any Scandinavian women dressed in fur Bikinis? Id settle for Australian ones If I had to\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nBe anti-fur and skip the Bikinis\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nsadly all they have in New Zealand is hobbits\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nOh dear lord.. NO HOBBITS!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nWelcome to the HOBBIT GROUP BUY!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThat is not accurate. They have a lot of sheep too...and they\\'re very furry.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nNow I wonder when Gandalf will knock on my door and drop off \"my precious\".... ...or 6 of them\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI do the same. No need to put my customers through my anxiety and the missed timelines of the GB leaders. You get more for in hand sales anyway.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nPlease add 1 more unit to my order of 9. Sending you an additional .87 BTC to cover the additional cost at 1\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER, asic miner sticks, gpus\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-15 05:10:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.6 BTC=67GH/s 5/30 shares\\n### Original post:\\n5 shares left welcome Unosuke to the group, added to OP and spreadsheet\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nfive sharestx \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nany share left ?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nClosed out Terraminer IV #2Welcome\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-15 06:56:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 10/100 avail]R7: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost + Host, $70= 8-12GH/s +UPS\\n### Original post:\\nHey Frank,HashRate per share is rated at 1/100th of 800GH/s for this Round 7/8 vs. 500-550GH/s for the R5/R6 KnC Jupiter. DZ MC Jupiter below-cost shares went for $78 for 4-6GH/s albeit at an earlier delivery date.However, the Bitmine Rig has a native turbo mode (speed unknown), and we\\'ll seek to go even fast then this, if we can push the limits safely without risking our hardware. Thanks to the work of 4 co-op GBCs teaming up (and with the help of a college full of engineers helping bobsag3 out next door), the DZ MC is having a specially built A/C cooled cabinet within an already cooled facility, so that we can push hashrate & improve our chances of finding blocks.==With that said: 10 shares available.1 more hour before payment. I thought the deadline for free shipping was last night but its in about 90 minutes.==Semi-OT: but I\\'ve vetted a 9th GB Coordinator and/or ASIC miner host! This is the first GBC I\\'ve vetted from Asia.He\\'s already an active GBC with a successful track record, but he contacted me for my free vetting services. If he so chooses, he\\'s now also free to team up with our co-op\\'s 5 GBCs (so far) to pre-reserve chunks of future ASIC miners to help bring low costs an\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nUpdate: Bitmine told me/us to wait for full payment of the full 800GH/s instead of sending in BTC piecemeal, or trying to do a 2nd new 500GH/s rig w/ the original R7 6-7% down payment applied as upgrade we need to reach ~53.xx BTC before we can fully pay for the 800GH/s module and officially move from the reservation Q to the production Q. We actually targeted 56 BTC (or about $7K at the time of GB setup) as the goal for this GB so that we can buy UPS/Battery protection of about 20 minutes. At the moment, we appear to have 46 BTC on hand or already paid to the R7 BM wallet (~3.3 BTC) or to one of my two go-to co-op wallets: Thomas S. funds for 9-12 R7 shares in one co-op wallet, the bulk of the R7 funds are in this co-op wallet: wallet address has been used for well over 200 BTC of transactions without incident, mostly for DZ MC functions.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nUnder no circumstances send BTC to that address for your payments, that is just where it is being stored prior to sending to bitmine\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'m going to go out on a limb and say that the supermen running the hardware will squeeze at least 1 TH/s out of this baby. So, if BTC hangs in at around 130USD, this round should pay back the investment in ~35 days, which includes fee deductions. (Say, +10% or -20%/fud dispersant = 30-40 days.) YMMVIf power and cooling costs don\\'t eat our lunch this should be a paying proposition for at least another year. Sweet. I should get a couple more of these shares./Frank\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, KnC Jupiter, DZ MC, ASIC miners\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-15 14:00:13',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.074BTC or less, Blades 2.9 BTC] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nBE\\'s arrived today Julz, many thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTime for me to be decimated....LOL\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHehe it\\'ll be a bit longer until I can install the rest, waiting for MSY to get their stock sorted out for some more USB hubs so I\\'ll just have to last with 50 mining for the time being!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nemail and pm sent regarding order\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOrder received, thanks julz\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nJust ordered, looking forward to it!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, USB hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-15 15:17:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 94/100 shares avail.] R7: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost + Host, $70=8GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nAnd R7. It was hard enough collecting all of the first 6 that I\\'m not going to let a fresh new R7 get away from me....\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nRound 7 Miner status: Down payment already sent, entered official Bitmine Reservation Queue last night (10/8).PAID2, thomas_s3, -Redacted-1, DZ\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks -R-. Fixed, just like my 2 cats.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'ll add a few shares to that, as long as *I* don\\'t have to do the spreadsheets for it....\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n2 at least, when is the delivery date?is it at redacted home already?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHere\\'s a screencap of the order: was updated as to what\\'s going on with our payment. You\\'ll be able to check the wallet address to see our 6 shares paid for the down payment.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThis was Thomas\\'s idea, so he gets to be spreadsheet master for R7. Moohahah.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNo. I don\\'t have anything to do with this one. Not my hardware.... I\\'m having a hard enough time keeping track of the last 2.5 group buys....EDIT:One Jupiter hashing, the other on the way. It will be here either Friday or Tuesday (Monday is a holiday)...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJust ordered 1 share via the web site. Thanks very much!-- Phil\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nRound 7 Payment Details (Similar to R5/R6 sans PayPal, for the most part)You can also state your soft reservations below if you need some time to get Bitcoin together. Soft reservations usually have a 48 hour window of payment but I won\\'t be strict about that on this GB, as this isn\\'t a Flash Payments will be directed to thomas_s for R7 but I will have co-admin to this wallet for auditing or for payments if we\\'re in a rush. We\\'ve worked together on 4 different Group Buys with great success including 2 of the fastest GB sellouts in the forum\\'s history for Industrial class Rigs.After your payment, please follow up with a PM to Thomas: Subject: DZ HF GB R7, x shares, x BTCDetails: Please include Tx ID and your wallet address for payoutthomas_s - Co-GBC during R3-R6. R2 member. Primary GBC for Rounds 5-7. Send BTC payments and questions for R7 to thomas_s . Set up Online Auto Reservations for the co-op! Thank you! PM CC -Redacted- and thomas_s please.DZ - Need escrowed Group Buy shares? For a 2% extra fee you get 3rd party fund holding, dispute resolution, and $500 insurance per transaction at BTCrow. [DISCLAIMER: I, DyslexicZombei, am an approved Escrow Affiliate at BTCrow\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI just added 3 shares (total 4) on the site. FYI. Thanks again for putting together a great cooperative.Phil\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-09 14:31:14',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [PAUSED] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW)\\n### Original post:\\nHi All, just a couple of quick updates:John K has very kindly made the transfers that we requested to cover the costs of the bitfury burner and the VAT on component 2 (Bitfury 25GH/s H-board #1 (October delivery)). This means that the total cost for component 2 in the OP is now have now begun to ship october orders ( Although they have had some unexpected problems with hot capacitors, and sorting this out is causing them to ship a bit slower than expected, this is generally great news. They really do seem to be doing a great job. Fingers crossed our components may begin to come through soon . The interesting thing to note in punin\\'s post is that when they open the shop again they will only be selling components that are on hand - no more pre-orders . We now have things in place that should allow us to start mining as soon as the components arrive. In addition, we have a few \"add-on\" items that should be arriving next week that will hopefully make the GB run smoothly (spare RPi, spare SD cards, a watt meter (for power consumption at the wall) and a shiny new multimeter). The next job is to decide on some pools to use. We have a couple in mind already, based on the \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThis just landed in my inbox. Looks like cryptx are bang on schedule with the bitfury burner (thanks guys!).No news on hashrate yet, I guess we\\'ll see in a couple of days!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi All, welcome back after the blackout. I guess you only realise how important the forum is when you loose it! In order to keep you all informed of any updates we really need to find another way to communicate in addition to the forum (we tried to start a discussion about this a while back but didn\\'t get much of a response). It would be very useful to us, and to you I think, if group members could pm us with an email address that we can use to contact you. If you don\\'t do this then please be aware that we have no way to contact you if the forum goes down again. If you pm us then we will send you an email address for jlsminingcorp so that you can contact us too. We\\'re in the process of setting up a google+ group as well, so this may be a useful way to get updates, hashing videos etc. out there.Now for some updates:1) Bitfury burner: The FedEX notification that we received a week ago was apparently autogenerated when cryptx printed the shipping labels ( so as far as we know the bitfury burner has not shipped yet. This is very disappointing, but there are some reports of these boards arriving (e.g. so I certainly hope that we\\'re not far behind. I\\'ll post an update\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBitmessage looks interesting, I\\'ve not come across this before. Anybody else have any thoughts?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI believe setting up both a mailing list and a group in bitmessage would be more than enough .much safer and better G+ and forum alone .\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n+1 Bitmessage\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi All, just a quick update to let you know where things stand:1) Bitfurystrikesback: These guys seem to be getting through their orders really well and they suggest that orders in the 600s and 700s should get done this week ( Since we have an early 700s order for the starter kit I hope that this will ship to us soon. Our H-boards are in the 900s and early 1000s, so we still have a wait for these. 2) Bitfury burner: This is not going so well . We still have no update from cryptx on when this will be shipped and although there is evidence on the cryptx thread that people are getting their bitfury burners, they don\\'t seem to be coming out very quickly. I will let you know as soon as our fedex tracking details are updated and we know that the unit is on its way to us. The final thing to note about the bitfury burner is that the \"hashrate protection\" offered by cryptx looks like it will be active. There\\'s no report of them hitting the 64GH/s target yet (50-55 seems to be the limit), so group members with shares in the bitfury burner should be getting partial refunds (we\\'ll get 100 Euro back for the whole board). Again, I\\'ll let you know as soon as we receive anything from cryptx \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAfter a quick look over of bitmessage, it\\'s something that I would have to install and configure and check from time to time. It seems to me that we would want to have a communications medium that everyone already has....such as email. I don\\'t need to set up yet another account and have to check yet another source (facebook, twitter, linkedin, email, forum posts and then add bitmessage on top of that).Just my BTC.02\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThanks for your thoughts. Email is the obvious choice and, of course, is fine for us, but I appreciate that some people would like to protect their anonymity more than this. Ideally, we\\'re looking for a single solution that everybody agrees on, which makes it easy for us to co\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury burner, Bitfury 25GH/s H-board #1 (October delivery), spare RPi, spare SD cards, watt meter, multimeter\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-15 20:55:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 12/25 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNow collecting towards 3 drillbit boards from drillbit\\'s batch 1 (~60 GH/s, late October early November delivery estimate). These have already been ordered and paid for. (Note: Orders from drillbit\\'s batch 1 are currently sold out to new buyers.)Now 12 / 25 shares remaining for this component\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nim in for a share on the drillbit system please.ty.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: drillbit boards\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-10 01:06:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [LIMITED] GB #1 BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner ]~2.5 GH/s 0.90 or less~BTC $139 Paypal\\n### Original post:\\ndamn. thats more like the 3rd week of october.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI think the reasoning for this is incase any hicups happen during manufacture. They hopefull should be in sooner but well see here ill know more by the end of this week.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCorrect\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi, just put in an order for 10. Paid with BTC and sent email with signed message for shipping address.--Michael\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOrders confirmed I\\'ll email you tracking # when they are shipped out!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGot about 60 more units left extra that can be added on to this first group buy!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n^Paypal payment sent.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nReceived thanks for the order!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMaybe I\\'m just being retarded tonight, but when I go to the paypal check out, how do I change my order quantity from 1 to 2 lol? Dumb question I know... I blame the alcohol lol\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\ni had heard from somewhere that you could only buy 1 via paypal.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nContact Maidak if you want to order more then 1! I order 2 via PayPal.@MaidakAny News on shipping ??\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHaven\\'t heard anything new as to a closer date but as soon as I have them I will post hopefully end of this week early next.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWhy not use PM on here to transmit order/transaction info just like other distributors do or at least, make it available as an option?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIf you wan\\'t it PM\\'d feel free to let me know. I\\'ll be sending emails to all the paypal emails and replying to the bitcoin ones when I have tracking info for your orders.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nOK. Thank you for making it an option and for your prompt reply.Edit: Also, since I don\\'t see shipping rates for the US in the OP, is the shipping included in the prices then?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nOrdered 2 more plus the one I had previously. Good days are ahead..... I can feel it Let\\'s just pray the diff doesn\\'t go through the roof in the mean time lol\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nNext Diff. in 4D 16H -> 180M ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nEven at that rate... still making bank. So its all good to me\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nSorry if this question has been asked before, but where will you be shipping these units out from Maidak?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI believe he is located in Ohio\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI believe he is located in OhioThanks ssinc!I figured I would ask since my FAVORITE CHICAGO distributor sold out on all his already!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nsorry! demand is high for these\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nYes he is.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nThanks for the quick relies guys. I must have derped cuz I just noticed it say\\'s it in the OP. Jeez, Reading Is Fundamental!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nYup located in ohio northwest area and I can do local pickup to you anyone interested in that as well.edit: got 120 orders in keep em coming!\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nDa Update is needed sir.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nAny News on shipping ??\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nI\\'ll know more by tonight and update when I hear back.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nYAY! The forums are up! Now I can get my drivers for the Fury\\'s when they come! WOOT WOOT!\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nokay its night... Update.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nMight be a few days delay it would seem. From OutCast3k GB on this same device. --------OutCast3kAs far as I\\'m aware after speaking with him the PCBs are manufactured in China and there was a Chinese holiday at the start of the month which delayed shipment of those slightly, on top of that beastlymac initially wasn\\'t able to contact the bitfury team because of the forums down time. All of which put this project behind schedule slightly. I was told at very worst they would ship by the middle of the month to myself and the other Chinese holidays have caused some issues with pcb availability. Everything is ordered and inbound to Oct 1 - Oct 7 is so called \"National Day Golden Week Holiday. Well back to the sweat shops kids!. \"Happy week\" is over!No wonder there are so many people in China with this much free time - Chinese people legally enjoy over 115 days off including 104 days of weekends and 11 days of festivals.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nChinese people also enjoy a very overbearing government that kills them if they want to speak out against it. So yeah pick your evil...lol\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nStill taking orders in for these I\\'ll be closing either when we hit the 100 extra units ordered or before they are shipped to me. If your ordering by paypal check out the new store I am currently working on bitcoinminerz.com btc payment also works and no need to sign any more messages. There is no registration required just put the item in your cart and checkout.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nI was trying out the site and when I went to setup the shipping I got this:Free USPS Priority Shipping:$99.00I am not sure that is setup correctly. Unless I am really not hip to this new meaning/concept of \"free\". I have ordered some from ssinc already, but I would like to order a couple more from you to hedge my bets (so to speak). Suss this out and I will order two more via the \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-16 00:30:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Cointerra Terraminer IV Shares ฿1.5 = 50GH/s\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'ll take the 6.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Cointerra Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-07 21:19:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R5: KnC Jupiter, BELOW-COST + Host! Arrives Oct.7! $78 + Bonuses!\\n### Original post:\\nYeah excited to have Miner\\'s ready to hash as onslaught of difficulty is going to be a challenge.Once the miners are running next step is to see how much can we overclock the Miners\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nthere is some new info from knc about stable 550 at 1 watt per gh trying to find a link for that\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBe careful with the Miner\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nyeah not sure how many caps on how many different machines have done this. i think it is under 3\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nExcellent! I assume that this means that we\\'ll be hashing tonight then?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThat\\'s the intention. Have to pick up a spare router on the way home - they\\'ve made it somewhat difficult to SSH into the box because the default gateway is set to something other than what my network uses, and that\\'s the only way into the box....There is supposed to be another Jupiter here on Thursday. The two machines for R5 and R6 should have arrived at the same time, but KNC seems to be having some shipping issues. My intention - to keep things fair for everyone that bought into R5 and R6 is this:Split the hashrate of the first box 50/50 between R5 and R6.Split the hasrate of the second box that\\'s supposed to arrive on Thursday 50/50 between R5 and R6.I\\'ll also split the hasrate of a third Jupiter between R5 and R6 for as many days as we were only hashing at 50%. Assuming the boxes show up when they are supposed to, that would mean I\\'ll be splitting the output of a Jupiter between R5 and R6 (and both GB\\'s would be mining at 150% or 725 Gh/s) for three days - from Thursday through Sunday some time.And if the boxes don\\'t end up showing up in a timely manner and we hit a difficulty increase, I\\'ll also split the output of a fourth Jupiter between the two GB\\'s for a couple of days -\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nOkay, you are just too cool.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWaiting for me at home. Another couple hours before I can leave work. I\\'ll take some unboxing photos....\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCongrats!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWell, I guess if it doesn\\'t just blow up when I turn it on, we\\'ll be all set !!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nLeft at front door?? Whats your home address?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nUmmmm.... I live in Kansas. Yeah, that\\'s it - Kansas. 123 East Nowhere Street, Podunk, Kansas. Drop by any time....Actually they left it at my apartment door, which is in a gated, controlled access building with 24x7 security camera monitoring, and live security people during the day. Costs a freaking fortune per month to live there. It\\'s like a data-center for people....And I have dogs. And guns...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSeems legit OMW with more dogs and more guns . If you have 3 Dogs im bringing 10 dogs. If you have 10 guns I\\'ll bring 50\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWhat can I say , Just blown away by your preparedness\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMay the force be with you master !\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIf it blows, we\\'ll be able to track the heat signature and find you.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n-R_There are a lot of details here:- new firmware- people with the fan issue\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\ndamn, but a lot of people on the knc forum predicted this problems. i hope everything works fine!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nYou may need a security set:They come in handy.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSo, did someone say \"my preparedness\"? eheh...Problem number 1 - the box arrived pretty torn up. No evident physical damage to the case, but....Problem #2 - there are cooler fans loose and rattling around on the inside of the case.Problem #3 - I have no freaking idea what kind of screws hold the case on. Quick trip to the hardware store coming up.TO BE CONTINUED....\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nhere is the link to the fan problem \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nIf you need help- you have my cell #\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nSo, the screws are something called star drive SD-20...Case off, fans repaired, ready to unbox the corsaire PSU... Having done this many times in the past, I know enough to not put the case lid back on until after I have it running. Possible problem #4 - besides the 4 6-pin PCIe connectors, this also requires the kind of rounded 4-pin power connector they used to use on hard-drives. I sure hope the PSU has some cable that provide that, or I\\'ll be heading out to Radio Shack (or somewhere) trying to find one of those, too....-R-\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\n4 pin molex? All PSUs should have that.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nYep, have one. Connected up, ready for smoke test #1 - 10 seconds on, check fans, see if any blinky lights blink....EDIT: Cooler fans turn, blinky lights blink. There\\'s a blue LED on the inside that is so bright it lights up the whole room when it blinks.Problem #4 - only one case fan works. Trying to plug/unplug, but the connectors are in a bad spot just under the fans. And the board they plug into has full 4 pin connectors and the fan plugs are only three - they have to be forced down onto the 4 pin connectors because they don\\'t fit....EDIT again: OK - skipping the fan for now. Each fan plug in under the other. I have\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Miner, KnC Jupiter, router, corsaire PSU, cooler fans, star drive SD-20 screws, 4 pin PCIe connectors, 4 pin molex connectors\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-16 04:21:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED] Fundraising for HF R1 Upgrade Promo, DZ Miners Co-op., Round 1 gents\\n### Original post:\\nAlso: based on R1 open voting, it looks like we\\'re shooting for a 20-30% Overclock, possibly pushing for 30%+ on the Overclocking.Please PM me if you have any strong objections to this plan. Mahalo!==Also, some R1 folks are trickling in via PM so we\\'re going to be oversold and some upgrade shares will be refunded.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWe can pay for it today.11.1 BTC is $1554 at today\\'s rate..\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIt turns out to be a bit more complicated than that:A. 26 R1B shares were bought by someone that wasn\\'t in R1. Now, much of this buyer\\'s funds may be used for Round 7 or another Round. 5-10 R1B shares will likely be kept by this buyer.B. To offset these shares going out: baros008 has 8 or 10 R2B shares moving to R1B that\\'s currently sitting in the R2B wallet. I\\'m awaiting word as to whether he prefers 8 or 10 R1B shares. I\\'ve also given him access to my eight R1B shares since he was kind enough to move his 8 R2B shares to here (or to the target HF wallet) when it we became oversold in Round 2B.C. I\\'ve also been hearing from R1 folks starting to filter back to the GB forum (some were lost, sorry about that; R2 was a spur of moment decision). I do expect payments from 1 or 2 R1 members shortly.Let me take care of A tonight, because that\\'s the one thing I can control at the moment. I hope to have further clarification and hopefully a resolution tomorrow for R1B.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAgain I sent the BTC to push the order thru...if R1 shareholders claim them as long as they pay me the amount I paid per share they can have their shares back, otherwise from what was posted earlier they become mine =)\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R1, R1B shares, R2B shares, R1B shares\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-16 05:43:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [14 AVAILABLE!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nIf someone wants to take my 40 prepaid miners off my hands in one shot for BTC.84 each Id be more then happy to transfer the whole batch , starting to get buyer remorse. Not going to break up the order. Its all or nothing.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-16 07:21:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.5BTC=67GH/s 30/30 shares\\n### Original post:\\nopen for another 30 shares, share price updated to reflect exchange rateCheers\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n6 share = 9 BTCTransaction ID: wallet id \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-16 08:02:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 100/100 avail]R8: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost +Host, $70= 8-12GH/s +UPS\\n### Original post:\\nFirst time I added a product to my own co-op\\'s site. I did it all by myself... Well, me and Control C+Control V...and the site Thomas built, hosted, and patiently taught me to use. Other then that: all by myself.Site is open for Round 8 ordering now. Cheers!BTC Option (least expensive form of payment): you or someone you know only have PayPal funds available, there\\'s still a PayPal at-cost option available via my wife\\'s eBay acct. where I\\'m her co-seller/buyer for eBay IT related items: course, this option is more convenient but it\\'s more expensive, as it includes at-cost eBay + at-cost shipping fees that aren\\'t incurred through our site.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nR8 is now open again for those that want Bitmine hashrate in December.R7 is locked at 95 shares w/ the addition of OldGeek\\'s 2 eBay shares as the last R7 shares.New R8 purchases will be allocated to upgrade modules from the R7 Rig.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, UPS\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-16 19:18:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 91/100 shares] R9: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury Chips!Below cost 40%+\\n### Original post:\\nWelcome back guys!With frontbit\\'s 2 PP payments to -R- + 3 purchased shares + 4 shares for co-op leaders (so far):91 shares availableRemember: This is NOT A PREORDER. This is a limited quantity, premium priced bullet run being offered 3 months before Prosperos officially launch except with Bitfury chips instead of BA Minion chips.==Also, I have eleventy PMs in my inbox, I may not be able to get to them until tonight. If you have any R3-R9 questions please contact thomas_s, -Redacted-, or bobsag3 with your question(s) or please leave a support ticket at our site: dzminercoop.com\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI went to the D..Zombei site and reserved 4 shares. I will pay the 3.6... btc in about 2 hours. I am Waiting for r5 and r6 payments are they coming today.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThey should be as a miner hit the hosting location -R- will be getting a chunk of BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGoodies that have been ordered on behalf of the Coop: Big server grade UPS.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIt would be cool to have a webcam access or at least some kind of dashboard to see the cool tech stuff \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI have that. Just it will not be for users eyes, only for security purposes.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitfury chips, BA Minion chips, server grade UPS\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-16 23:22:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: Round 9 Payment Details\\n### Original post:\\nRound 9 Payment Details (Similar to R7/R8, for the most Payments will be directed to thomas_s for R9 but I will have co-admin to this wallet for auditing or for payments if we\\'re in a rush. We\\'ve worked together on 4 different Group Buys with great success including 2 of the fastest GB sellouts in the forum\\'s history for Industrial class Rigs.PayPal payments (UPDATE): If payment is being made by Paypal place an order on the site and place a note on the order when you place it saying you\\'re paying by paypal...then give whoever you are buying BTC from the order # and the payment address. Please make sure to send it as a gift to \"friends and family.\" This helps keep your share prices as low as possible (no PP fees) and well as protects us against illegal chargebacks after BTC deposits have already been paid out in November.If there\\'s any concerns about registering your payment, please follow up with a PM to Thomas or a support ticket. There\\'s two methods to resolve this:A. Send a support ticket on our website PM to thomas_s on this siteSubject: DZ HF GB R9, x shares, x BTCDetails: Please include Tx ID, your wallet address for payout, and any concerns you may ha\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Industrial class Rigs\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-17 04:24:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [REOPENED] KnCMiner Saturn 1.05BTC=5GH/s | 0/3 Shares |First 2 Payouts FREE\\n### Original post:\\nHash fast, while the euphoria lasts...\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGlad I snuck in with last share. Does this mean we will get 12 g/hash? Considering stable at the 500. They mention more but would have to see if it makes it to ours. Can\\'t wait to see those btc come in.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDidn\\'t read what you\\'re buying? It\\'s a saturn, not a Jupiter that is getting all the love and attention. Sats will see around 275+ gHps, that\\'s official....so maybe more. We have to wait until reviews spring up. Keep your hopes upto 6.5 gHps.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHrm, guess not but since it was posted shiunsai, I thought it was related our group buy. My bad.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nBecause they\\'re essentially same products. Mercury has 1 board, Saturn 2 and Jupiter 4. Increase on one is increase for all.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHello, Ofc site had been down... But hopefully we can get an update.Good Day.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWhat coldbreeze said.....just cous i posted the vid for the jupiter dont mean its a saturn -_- haha. news for jupiter just means obvious news for saturn.anyways, no tracking number yet, still waiting .\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAt least 250 GHPs is in order from a saturn \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYeah can\\'t wait, no tracking # yet.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCan they make it before their 15 Oct deadline, yet?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWe can only hope. At least its shipping and not vaporware.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\ncan only hope so...doubtful since no tracking #\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI guess not?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWhat was the date and mode of payment? They\\'re getting to it\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nits on gp, and yep, switched to in progress!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThey\\'re switching a lot of orders to \"in progress\" to quiet people as they\\'re already past 15 oct, but I guess further delays would be minimal. I saw it\\'s Paypal, missed the date: July 10+?Hopefully it\\'ll be hashing in 4-5 days, let\\'s just pray to God it reaches in one piece :p\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nOh god, dont even say that! If it came not in one piece, I\\'d shit a brick. As far as hashing 4-5 days, might say a bit longer since it hasn\\'t been shipped yet so hoping it ships out by the weekend, I\\'d be expecting it by Wednesday/Thursday of next week? It better be hashing by next weekend that\\'s for sure. I\\'m very excited, I\\'m sure you all are too =D =D\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn, Jupiter, Mercury\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-17 04:55:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN]R2B:HashFast + Host, Dbl. HashRate Upgrade Fundraising (PM Plz)\\n### Original post:\\nCounting 26 shares paid out of 40. -R- has 2 shares paid in R1 he\\'d probably agree to transfer to R2, if necessary.Can you please contact me if you\\'re one of the 2 orig. R2 Share owners that paid for 2 shares each? Can\\'t seem to find the PMs or public statements for those 2 Transactions.HF Baby Jet R2 Upgrade Shares, $43 ea. with Express AM DeliveryPAID13 - baros008 (1 pending)7 - aneutronic5 - Commandermk2 - firsttimeuser2 - -Redacted-2 - DZ2 - thomas_s 2 - jungle_daveI\\'m sure I\\'ll find the mystery owner is if I keep digging but if you can help a fella out tracking or helping to track 8 Rounds (including 2 upgrade rounds), I\\'d appreciate it. 14 shares outstanding before double hashrate upgrade can be purchased.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HF Baby Jet R2 Upgrade Shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-16 04:33:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R2B:HashFast + Host, Dbl. HashRate Upgrade, $43, 10-13GH/s MPP\\n### Original post:\\nbobsag3 just paid for 4 upgrade shares w/ the understanding of the pre-sales conditions.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI understand sale conditions and will sell shares to original share owners if they want to buy them...9 shares paid, 1 remaining share will by paid when my bitcoins are out of escrow on exchange\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCool! Thanks baros008! I\\'ll keep an eye out for it. Tracking down shares paid & the owners behind them at the moment.That moves you up to 14 paid R2 shares, or over a third of the 2nd Chip\\'s hashrate, once you finish payment on the last 1.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI had hoped to work on spreadsheets updating wallet address for this November delivery, but as Thomas can attest I\\'ve been spending hours playing detective with R3/R4 shares!It would be really nice if people followed the payment directions that we take the time to clearly spell out. How the hell do they expect us to keep track of their payments if they don\\'t PM us, custom sign their Blockchain Tx, or even list their Tx ID publicly, like we ask them to?All 3 is preferable but if you can even do *1* of these 3 that would really help when you\\'re spending hours trying to track down people\\'s payments during a freakin\\' Flash Sale. You can\\'t tell me that you paid for X number of shares as proof, unless you PM me and Thomas the Tx ID or list the details publicly. Sorry, that shizz ain\\'t good enough. Anyone can claim a random unsigned Tx ID, that\\'s why we\\'re supposed to sign \\'em or include a PM! sigh...too much time playing detective, it\\'s 11pm & a workday tomorrow. Heading to bed.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n1 remaining upgrade share paid\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nTo my defence, armoury does not alow for signed transactions.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi DZ,I saw the mistake, That was my payment for 2 upgrade shares.I see that the transaction was unsigned now Sorry about that !\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHey Dave, no worries. I knew this one would be easy to figure out.It was this R3/R4 transaction for 2 separate groups of shares, involving multiple wallets with 2 unsigned transactions & notification of only 1 payment and 1 Tx ID given. Now I like a good challenge but this was dang hard. Was driving me nuts because I\\'m not psychic. Thomas helped me figure it out. I think I may have gone insane by now if it wasn\\'t for him helping to fill in pieces of the puzzle I was missing.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJust may have???\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWasn\\'t it Seal that cornily said that hope is never gonna survive unless we get a little wacky? UPDATE: I saw that the last payment went in earlier today/late last night but wanted to be home before I contacted the orig. R2 seller for Order 616 to do the upgrade as we\\'re supposed to only have a 1 hr. window to pay; although I supposed I could\\'ve did a partial payment...So payment should *hopefully* be tonight if our Australian friend is available. We have each other\\'s real IDs, and we did do a 50.5 BTC escrowed transaction so I\\'m going to go ahead & ask him to set this up, CC HashFast and the orig. R2 seller, and either pay immediately if I get a screencap or wait to hear back from HF re: wallet address, if we don\\'t.Any objections? While I\\'d make a small commission, Escrow will likely slow this down 36-48 hours and I didn\\'t account for the extra cost of escrow in the upgrade price.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n our payment to HashFast\\'s wallet for the upgrade. Woohoo! Glad to get that out of the way. We just doubled our hashrate for 25% more!I CC\\'d HashFast and the orig. R2 buyer the Tx ID. It\\'s late here, I\\'ll add more details tomorrow and hopefully a HashFast update if I hear from them. Any leftover funds that aren\\'t mine are going to R2\\'s share of the UPS/Batteries for R2-6.Don\\'t forget: if the orig. share owner comes calling before the upgrade parts ship, you\\'ll need to sell them their upgrade share(s) at-cost. That\\'s the only reason we went forward when we didn\\'t hear back from enough R1/R2 owners WRT to the promo.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHF Baby Jet R2 Upgrade Shares, $43 ea. with Express AM DeliveryPAID13 - baros008 (1 more pending)7 - aneutronic5 - Commandermk2 - firsttimeuser2 - -Redacted-2 - DZ2 - thomas_s 2 - jungledave, Tx ID: 04...b6 or 11...9c, 0.69 or 0.68 BTC4 - bobsag3I\\'m sure I\\'ll find the mystery owner is if I keep digging but if you can help a fella out tracking or helping to track 8 Rounds (including 2 upgrade rounds), I\\'d appreciate it. Sorry about that: omelets and eggs, and all that.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThis came in yesterday: R2B payment and ordering via the Orig. 616 Buyer is COMPLETE. Thank you everyone!===Updated R2B paymentsHF Baby Jet R2 Upgrade Shares, $43 ea. with Express AM DeliveryPAID4 - baros008 (refund for 10 pending OR 8 shares move to R1B and 2 shares refunded)7 - aneutronic5 - Commandermk2 - firsttimeuser2 - -Redacted-2 - DZ2 - thomas_s2 - jungle_dave10 - m...04 - bobsag340 R2B shares PAID.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nNew goodies ordered for hosting! Big s\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast, Host, Dbl. HashRate Upgrade, 10-13GH/s MPP\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-17 08:40:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 44/100 shares] R9: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury Chips!Below cost 40%+\\n### Original post:\\nIn for 1 share, Order #253 via website. Please confirm receipt. I can provide wallet payment address when needed either via E-mail or PM. I am very new to a Group Buy with Bitcoin, soassume I know little or nothing about the mechanics of the whole transaction.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrder #252 entered for Thomas via my site account.19 shares removed from R1B wallet, converted to 7 shares in R9 with some BTC left over. He had 1 share in reserve so we decrement the stock counter by 6, although he paid for 7. masked man or woman bought another 4 shares (or that\\'s multiple incognito orders) so:44 shares remaining.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run, Bitfury Chips\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-17 15:30:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [11 AVAILABLE!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nAny more news on \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n+1Ssinc, I\\'ll have to cancel my 6 if they are not shipped by the 25th. Pure logistics consideration (I do want those furies in my hashing collection!) as I won\\'t be around to receive them. That\\'s also the reason why I went hosted with a late KnC order.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIt looks like they should be shipped next week now :\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"Blue Fury\" 2.7 GH/s USB miner, KnC\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-17 20:12:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 34/100 shares] R9: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury Chips!Below cost 40%+\\n### Original post:\\nMy final update of the night, was delayed from sleep by a Skype chat with Giorgio from Bitmine. He\\'s likes the idea behind our co-op, and the GB market access we can offer them and other manufacturers at double and triple digits instead of four digits USD.34 shares available.Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi 1 share for this R9Order: #254Already paid $123 in BTCTX ID: By: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi, would like to buy 5 shares via Paypal. Put an order in on the website but need an address to send the money to. Could somebody contact me please? Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nJust paid for 5 shares. Order #257.Since that is an automated order system, do you need any additional information from me in this thread?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSend a PM to -Redacted- on the forums, if he\\'s able to do it he\\'ll need you to provide the details of the order (amount of BTC / address)**Edit there were some orders in over the night I won\\'t have time before work to enter them into the spreadsheet so it\\'ll be when I get home.You\\'ll get an email either saying the order is complete or an email with a note added to your order asking for more information.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n1 share purchase. Order # 258. TX ID: confirm.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIF website is correct, we are down to 10 shares, but Ill wait for thomas to back me up\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI am actually getting 3 shares (not 2) sending via paypal to -R- (waiting to hear back from him)\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI purchased 1 share. Can you confirm I am on the list too?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nPP sent to -R- for 4x shares. Order # on the website is 259. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPP received and website order #259 paid off.-R-\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nPM sent.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R9, Bitfury Chips\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-17 20:53:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 99/100] R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off + Host + UPS\\n### Original post:\\nGiven you\\'ve started so many buys and I don\\'t have time to look through them all, I\\'m genuinely curious if any of the buys you\\'ve started currently have any hardware in possession and mining?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHey lajz99, I\\'m a fan of your work in the BFL refund thread. Curiously enough R5 and R6 have arrived first because -Redacted- gave us access to two Day 1 below cost Jupiters. R5 is at the host site currently hashing away, and R6 is enroute. I believe -R- begins testing R6 tonight. The Bitcoin is being split on both machines: half goes to R5, half to R6. The first payment is tonight, if -R- is ready (which I believe he is, having confirmed everyone\\'s wallet addresses since yesterday).Here\\'s the R5 KnC Jupiter which arrived in Missouri yesterday: have 5 rigs due right around November 1: 1 in NY hosted by vetted miner host firsttimeuser, and 4 in Missouri with vetted miner host bobsag3. The Black Arrow rig(s) come with a money back guarantee if they\\'re not shipping by November 1.The only co-op rig that is scheduled for a December delivery, at the moment, is the combined Round 7 and 8 Bitmine Rig.Cheers!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R5, R6, KnC Jupiter, Black Arrow rig, Bitmine Rig\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 01:05:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 4/40]R1B: HashFast Baby Jet Upgrade Promotion - Round 1 gents please\\n### Original post:\\nThanks -R-. I need doublecheck #s (you know how it goes) but I\\'m adjusting this down by 1.I\\'m paying philipma1957\\'s R1B upgrade (funds also in R2B wallet) as part of my buyout for the R2-9 Big ole UPS unit (one of several) so we need 4 shares paid to proceed.Here\\'s the thread w/ payment info: \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n1.19461036 BTC sent for the last 4 shares....\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R1B upgrade, R2-9 Big ole UPS unit\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 02:06:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.5BTC=67GH/s 22/30 shares\\n### Original post:\\n15btcs for 10 shares.Tx \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nadding to your account :-) done and added to OP and spreadsheetCheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 06:13:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 54/100 shares] R9: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury Chips!Below cost 40%+\\n### Original post:\\nThanks Philip. Welcome back again. 54 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI really need to stop spending my BTC as soon as I get them and actually save some up so I can get in another GB with you guys. Can\\'t believe your already up to Rd-9 CRAZY!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWe are just getting started! Besides this GB should be hashing within 2 weeks\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIt does tend to make things easier when there\\'s 4 of us sharing the work and we\\'re also getting help from jungle_dave, mootinator, and unknown.usr.If I was solo I\\'d probably be on R3 or R4, which I\\'d be fine with but co-op members and online friends keep coming to me and go: hey, let\\'s buy an MPP Sierra, I have half the funds... or hey, you want to buy a Day 1 below cost Jupiter or two... how about 40% off Black Arrow Bullet Run boards...and so it goes.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHow about we....ehh I\\'ll wait my turn\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWe have a ticket system and an email address people can submit stuff too.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi,I would like to buy 4 shares, but I have 2 questions that I can\\'t find the answers to in this thread.1) We don\\'t have to actually set our shares up to mine, other than give you our pay-to address which receives payment (- fees) bimonthly? Like we don\\'t choose which pool or anything?2) How long will the miners be ran for? I imagine, unless you get free electricity, it will cost in excess of fees for you to run the miners. When that happens, will we no longer receive any payout, and do you anticipate when that might be? I.e., what is your criteria for turning off the R9 miners?Hopefully there are still shares available in the morning when I check for a response, unless you see this before I go to sleep.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIm more than happy to answer your questions.1) We will probably go with a poplular 0% pool like elgius, or a big pool like BTC guild, or a mix. YOu wont have to set it up, but you certainly have a say in it (if you buy shares)2) We are working to move to a system where the flat cost in power per month is deducted from each payment, then processed out to each buyer, So the machines will be run for as long as profitable power wise, and or when we decide to sell them.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHa! Correct me if I\\'m wrong but 1 HF Sierra and our Bitmine Rig were suggested by some guy I know that works in finance.I also forgot to mention the online friend that derailed our R2 Bitmine Rig with an at-cost Day 1, 64th paid, HF Baby Jet with MPP. That was pretty cool too, and threw the whole co-op involved for a loop so that we all re-voted for our choice of Rig (which was an open decision in R2, because I was open to good deals). It\\'s almost like I should set up a thread soon for...people that want to sell their rigs to us at-cost or below-cost...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHi glongsword,Thank you for your questions! I appreciate it as I can get too close to the trees to see the forest at times. My thoughts on this:1) Part of the value of your at-cost or below-cost share is your access to true world class IT expertise. I\\'ve been an IT pro for about 13 years and I\\'ve designed many DoD certified systems and networks that will never see the light of day, or are only used in labs and field tests, for many cutting edge research projects for about 10 years. -R- is a well paid IT consultant who also may have a security clearance (if I have to tell is a retired EE / Network Engineer (who also knows the exact research lab I work at) who plants trees in the Amazon. bobsag3, our primary miner host, is an IT veteran who has a better hosting setup and pricing then you\\'ll find *anywhere* IMHO.I\\'ve also done well with arbitrage over the years selling CRTs, pre-order Wiis, a BFL Jalapeno at $1850, two July 4 BFL pre-orders at a $100 premium instead of a battle for a refund w/ BFL (lemonade is a specialty of mine). Our co-op is also different in that we vote on things. I designed this co-op as an amateur historian (80-85% of a US History degree only w/ an \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: MPP Sierra, Day 1 below cost Jupiter, Black Arrow Bullet Run boards, HF Sierra, Bitmine Rig, HF Baby Jet\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 07:38:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED*]R1B: HashFast Baby Jet Upgrade Promotion - Round 1. Batch 1. Mahalo!\\n### Original post:\\nThanks -R-! I have you down for 4 shares PAID in R1B, also with 2 shares from the original R1. Here\\'s the Tx IDs: order is finally in the order chain! Still sorting ownership. Priority was getting this in official Order Q before the promo ended or quantities ran out. Will list official ownerships shortly.One thing you guys could help me out with is sending me a PM for an email address I can reach you, as well as a confirmation of wallet address for payment of R1 and R1B shares you own. You can also reconfirm your R1B ownership and wallet payout address with me, if you\\'d like, via PM so I can be absolutely sure I get your records straight. Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThank you to firsttimeuser and the rest of the co-op for keeping this upgrade promo alive!I listed this as Closed with an asterisk because orig. R1 shares owners *still* can purchase their allotted R1B shares all the way up until the upgrade parts ship.However, I think it\\'s fair if you pay the R1B purchaser of your allotted share $2 extra per share because they basically loaned you your share(s).\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Baby Jet\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 09:11:09',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN][1 BTC = 20 GH, HashFast Private Sale Limited offer]\\n### Original post:\\nHi, Do you know the estimated delivery date yet? Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nStated by HashFast, around November 30th in order of purchase.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ve already spent all my budget purchasing five HashFast units. I can\\'t afford to invest any more at this moment, so I\\'ve decided to take advantage of this opportunity and sell the private sale to everyone here.Once five HashFast private sale units have been sold, I will close this thread down.Dividends will be paid out weekly. The Contract will start once the units have arrived.Benefits-No electricity costs-Get to buy partial amounts and keep within your budgeting-Private sale, so you get more Giga-hash per BTC-100% uptime guaranteed, we will pay for any down timeInfo-60 Shares in total to sell-1 Share = 20 GHTo buy shares-Amount of BTC to send is calculated to the given USD price of the market.-Price used: will be calculated at $150/Current BTC price-To buy shares, post the amount of shares you want to buy. AndI will reply with the amount of BTC to send depending on market pricing.You have 12 hours to send that amount or my offer becomes invalid and I would have to recalculate.-PM or post TXID, only send from an address you fully control.TermsThe 100% uptime guarantee is not valid during power outages, natural disasters, hardware failure or any other unforeseen events tha\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast units\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 10:28:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 100/100 avail]R8: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost +Host, $60= 8-13GH/s +UPS\\n### Original post:\\nPrices have been reduced 15% for this Round 8 thanks to Bitmine\\'s New Halloween Sale!I just happened to be the first person in the world outside Bitmine to find that out thanks to a Skype conversation when he told me about it. Therefore: this is the first Public Notice of this promotion.At-cost Share Prices have been reduced from $70 a share to $60 a share!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSince you just ordered the other rig a couple days ago you should try and get this pricing on both.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHey, DZ, all, - I want to buy 10 shares in R8, for $600... but how is the translation determined into BTC? Would it be acceptable to simply PP-gift the money to \\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nOur order was complete 2 nights ago. We had already canceled our first order from last Friday and applied the money to our order on the 15th to save about 4-5 BTC (which is the first time with 7 Industrial class ASIC rig purchases I\\'ve ever had to do this). I had to do a bit of back & forth with Bitmine to make sure it was coordinated correctly. I\\'d feel bad about cancelling *yet again* esp. when Giorgio and I both know that the new promotion started last night. Keep in mind: they\\'re a small startup much like many of the new ASIC mfgs. I don\\'t want to abuse their ordering system further then I already did as I\\'m trying to build longer term business relationships with various manufacturers to benefit our co-op. We already saved 12% off the at-cost BTC cost simply by using the higher exchange rate this week.These 12% savings were already passed on to the R7 members in the form of only having to raise 91% of our targeted shares, so that 9% extra hashrate is being split amongst the 91 PAID R7 shares.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHey Dick,Welcome back! I also saw that you\\'re working on a BM board design. G\\'luck! Perhaps you might want to sound out co-op members if you need help. I know jungle_dave a former EE/Net. Engineer, with a cryptography background, and has some ideas to improve hashing efficiency. There\\'s also a couple of other EEs in the co-op.WRT to R8: Please contact -R- to see if he can fit you in. I\\'m still floating 4 eBay shares I need to get to him for R6 and 2 more eBay shares for OldGeek for R7.We use the current Bitstamp rate when you\\'re doing your purchase. This helps us deal with currency volatility which is why you see DZ MC GB shares priced in USD since Round 2. We\\'d only change this if a Rig we targeted was priced strictly in BTC.==BTW, I noticed on Reddit that you mentioned that you have a CNC mill? I do too (CNC mill & lathe and 3D printer), but I\\'ve never seemed to find the time/inclination to train on this CNC gear sitting in my garage. I should probably sell this gear. It\\'s worth a bit. Let me know if you\\'d be interested in helping me with a side project. I have a world class machinist buddy that helped me come up with something interesting but he\\'s far too busy it seems to help m\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHello folks,soft reservation for 10 5 shares, please (after looking at R10, I need to reallocate funds)\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n5 shares ordered and paid.Cheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, ASIC rig, CNC mill, CNC lathe, 3D printer\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 11:59:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #16 USB Miners 0.0715 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nThank you very much. Have a great afternoon!SSB\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll orders were shipped yesterday. More orders being shipped today. Have a great week! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGot my miners yesterday. thanks again for quick shipment !\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you for your order. Have a great week! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ll like to order 6 units please. Cancel that. I needed the BTC elsewhere.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 16:00:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 80/100 avail]R8: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost +Host, $60= 10-15GH/s +UPS\\n### Original post:\\nAlso: I updated the OP with the newest HashRate estimates from Bitmine:1 share was listed as 8-13 GH/s originally for R7/R8. Shares are now being listed as 10-15GH/s thanks to the latest news from Bitmine.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n1 share for me, order placed and paid #279Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, UPS\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 16:19:18',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] HashFast Baby Jet Shares ฿1.2 = 20GH/s | Ships in Nov *All Miners PAID\\n### Original post:\\nWhat is the status of this GB? Are there still shares available? If so I would like to pick one up.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAlright, 1.2 on the way to you.TrID- address- \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi can you put me down for 3 shares please at 3.6BTC?Could I possible send payment monday morning?Chris\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nUpgrade, please!1 - Miner 32 - 1 Share3 - 1 Upgrade, 0.4 BTC4 - txID confirm!thanks\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nperfect\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHow many shares are left , also BTC price is up , will the share price be corrected accordingly ?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nReserve me one!! I will pay you in a 2 days max How do I find the TxID on blockchain?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPlease reserve me one.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nReserve me for 2 Shares @ 2 Upgrades.Which totals 4 BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWaldo, simple question: why people buyin GH/s now? As I see in earnings calculator, there will be no profit. For example I\\'ve bought 50 GH/s, they cost for me 825$ in Miner #3, here is the picture for this case: \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI paid the share:TxID: address: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n1 share paid: Transaction ID: btc address: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Baby Jet, Miner 32\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 17:58:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 50/100] R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off + Host + UPS\\n### Original post:\\nJust talked to Thomas S., our spreadsheet master and the co-op\\'s other leader handling the day to day operations of the DZ MC.We\\'re upping the stock for R10 by 40 shares due to a few big double orders and non-paid reservations.50 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNice! Welcome back philip! For those new to our co-op, Philip\\'s an original R1 co-op member and our local backup miner host for R1, which will be hosted by vetted miner host firsttimeuser in New York.Not sure if you noticed but the R1B HashFast Baby Jet upgrade was ordered last night and you\\'re PAID and confirmed for 1 R1B share to match your R1 share.I believe that I\\'m finished paying you for the $1100-ish UPS/Battery Bank heading to Missouri as additional UPS protection. I\\'m updating R1B share ownerships tonight but you\\'re all set (along w/ most of R1) and the equipment\\'s on order thanks to -R- jumping in for the last shares to up his R1B shares to 6.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ngood news I just paid for 2 shares. of this buy.tx id my btc address.I will get rest of ups gear in order for shipping. will ship it sat/mon. the battery packs will go out in flat rate boxes. the cases will be parcel post or UPS ground. should save over 60 in shipping this way. Maybe over 75. The Extended Battery Module Would have been 1 74 pound box NJ to MO. Now it is 2 medium flat rates and a 17 box parcel post or ups ground.look like it would ship for about 45 vs 75. don\\'t know the ups yet.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R10 BLACK ARROW Bullet Run, R1B HashFast Baby Jet, UPS/Battery Bank, Extended Battery Module\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 18:53:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 46/100] R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off + Host + UPS\\n### Original post:\\n46 shares we bought the R1B HashFast Baby Jet upgrade tonight and doubled our hashrate at only 25% extra! We also added an additional 400-600GH/s to the co-op\\'s total mining power in the process.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIn b4 the picture porn.You guys ready? \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI just bought 2 shares and want to pay via paypal. It is order #280. What is my next step?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi yomamanodros,Funny username. What\\'s dros? This is our last Round with direct, informal PP payments. Please contact DZ MC leader and remote admin -Redacted- to see if he can fit in any more PayPal shares for this Round.For our next round, since our co-op appears to be growing up, we\\'re in discussions with a provider that\\'s FinCen compliant, runs a MSB, and can directly convert USD to Bitcoin for only 3%.==Also: thank you to -R- for sending out the co-op\\'s first miner deposits last night. Nice! Thanks -R-! The 2nd Jupiter from R6 arrives in Missouri to our pro colo ASIC facility run by bobsag3 on Tuesday.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n-Redacted- helped me out with that Paypal payment and has sent the BTC TxID: BTC address for mined coins is is actually from a Method Man song. My name is short for \"your momma don\\'t wear no drawers.\" So dros is actually short for underwear.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nLOL! I love old school hip hop. Here\\'s my true school spotify playlist if you\\'re running spotify. Might find a few gems you might like in there: again and Welcome Aboard!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R1B HashFast Baby Jet, Jupiter from R6\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 17:51:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK SHIPPING] batch #27/28 .07 btc USB + 2.05 btc Blade miners\\n### Original post:\\nUpdated OP: order of 6 blades gets a backplane.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust a reminder to all that the post office is closed today.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nlazy government workers... get too many holidays.... nice price on the blades\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nmackstuart, 50, 3.50, \\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHelipotte 2, 4.10, Helipotte 5, 0.35, \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nmackstuart, 20, 1.40, \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nShipping out in an hour and a half\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI sent you a pm you can do something with that?Thank you very much beforehand\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\ndon\\'t see a PM from you... please resend\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nmobile, 5, 0.35, & email sent. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\ntoday\\'s orders have shipped out\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nOrders since last night will ship out in a couple hrs\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nBitcoin smokes!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nSwimmer63: 1: 2.05: Label emailed with signed message info.Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nThanks!! shipping\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nmackstuart, 30, 2.10, \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nmackstuart, 10, 0.70, \\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nToday\\'s orders are heading out in about an hour.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nDropped off more packages at USPS\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nGot my blades and USB\\'s today. Love the \"Peanuts\" Canary uses! Now I have hundreds of little foam miners!Great job getting this stuff here fast BTW.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nHey Canary,Thanks for yet another awesome shipment, but I think you sent me the wrong package. This one has a bunch of what I can only assume are prototype USB 4 miners. They are all white and don\\'t fit any of my current ports.You should really be more careful with your prototypes. \\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nrumlazy, 40, 2.8 \\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nCanary,Is another box required for the 8; 16.4; Sent!\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nregion B box, but I sent you a PM about this too\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nShipping update: I can now ship 4 blades PLUS a backplane using 1 Priority Large Flat Rate Box label OR 6 blades can be shipped using just 1 Priority Large Flat Rate Box label.\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nPMed emailed you\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nI sent you a Region B USPS Priority label (+large flat rate box label). That Region B box is a good deal!Thank you Canary!!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB miners, Blade miners, backplane, USB 4 miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 21:48:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #14 USB Miners 0.1050 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nPrices are updated.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust sent BTC and pm for x8 plus shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi SSB, do you do international shipping on this group buy? I don\\'t see international shipping or prices for it anywhere here.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI only ship to USA addresses. Thanks for the question.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAlright thanks anyways!Hmmm, need to find a Canadian place to buy these from. Guess I need to compare WTCR and BTCGuild prices now. Looking for 2-3 for a RPi miner setup.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIf you look through op resellers for the areas are listed:Canada: teek\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSSB let me place an order through e-mail while the forum was down, got them today! Thanks SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYou are welcome. Have a great week! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI know but with WTCR it costs about 0.17 BTC per erupter I think with taxes and shipping, so kind of meh.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, RPi miner setup, erupter\\nHardware ownership: True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-18 22:13:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 98/100] R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off + Host + UPS\\n### Original post:\\nExcellent! Thanks again for your help getting that beefy UPS to our colo site Philip.Looks like Thomas moved almost everyone in R10 to R9. Therefore: stock is being revised upwards again.98 shares available.They\\'re multiplying like raving rabbids.==Latest update from bobsag3: Latest word is that the Black Arrow Bitfury boards should be done in the next 72 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nQuick UpdateWaiting on blockchain should have payment in for Order: #281 Date: October 18, 2013 tomorrowThanks DBA\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHappy to have you on board! lol I made a pun. And bought chips from punin. Hehe.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: UPS, Black Arrow Bitfury boards, chips\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-19 04:43:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner Blades - 2.05 BTC or less - Pre-made power connectors!\\n### Original post:\\nDid I mention that all of my orders come with a pre-made power connector?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blades\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-19 15:52:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #18 Blade Miners 2.02 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nAll orders have shipped today. Thank you! SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blade Miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-12 00:18:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R5: KnC Jupiter, BELOW-COST + Host! Arrived Oct.7! $78 + Bonuses!\\n### Original post:\\nRedacted , what have you found about down Jupiter , what is the reason for failure , would you know ?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI heard a rumor on the R6 thread that it was the PSU being overloaded.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIf that is the case & magic smoke is still inside the box , redacted has other PSU he can use so it should be a easy fix , hoping for best.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThe PSU had shut down - overheat I guess. We\\'re pulling something like 950 watts out of an 850 watt supply. This will not be a problem once it gets down to hosting, there are 1050 watt supplies waiting for them there. And firmware update 4 should fix this, or update5 or 6 - whatever. I\\'m waiting for a stable version where no one on the forums is complaining that it\\'s blowing up/screwing up their machines...My computer room breakers just kicked out. Don\\'t have enough juice to run 2 Jupiters and a Saturn with the other stuff I\\'m running. I\\'m quite sure I can\\'t run that other Jupiter - will get it sent on it\\'s way to hosting at bobsag3 on Tuesday morning. Now I\\'m going to see if I can manage to run one Jupiter and the Saturn....Just got a Netgear WN2500 set up as a bridge to my Belkin WiFi net. Too many boxes and not enough ports.....More pictures later....-R-\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThis is why I have 12 spare routers. or more... I havent counted\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCan\\'t you move one machine to a different circut in your house. Hate to see you loose the coins and I don\\'t even have shares in this one\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYes we are mining this weekend. PSU works just fine now that it had a chance to cool off a little.But... I won\\'t be pointing a second machine to our BTCGuild accounts. It\\'s going down to hosting and will run from there. Once it\\'s running there, I\\'ll be matching the amounts that we\\'ve mined, and doing the first payout. The BTC payout match I\\'m doing makes up for only having 50% of the hardware running for this first payout period. However much we\\'ve made at 50%, I\\'ll be matching that to give 100% payouts to everyone, and we\\'ll have 100% hardware running from there on out.If I point another machine at the group buy accounts right now, I\\'m not going to able to tell how much I need to match to bring everyone up to 100%. So, until Tuesday morning this machine will be mining for me, to make some of the coins that I\\'ll need to pay out when I do the match. So two machines ARE running for the group buys, it\\'s just that I\\'ll be paying out the other machines coins to the group buy wallets once we hit 100% hardware.....-R-\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes - I have an extension cord run across my apartment to a 30 amp circuit behind my washing machine. The wife is OK with that (just barely) as long as it will only be there until Tuesday morning.And I currently testing firmware revision on my Saturn and the second Jupiter. If that all seems to run OK, I\\'ll upgrade the one that\\'s mining for the group buy at the moment....-R-\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI have no idea how your wife is ok with that- my cats would throw a shit fit, like they do at the ethernet cable I had to run up the stairs at my apartment.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWell, like I said, she\\'s just barely OK with that. But she won\\'t be cooking as long as that \"orange thing\" is running across her living room. So I get to take her out to eat for all the meals between now and when I ship the machine down to hosting and remove the extension cord....\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThank you so much! I can imagine the setup and the heat !\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThe second Jupiter got dropped somewhere along the way. It\\'s hard to see how bad this dent in the case is because the material is so reflective, so the pictures don\\'t show it very well. But trust me, it took one hell of a bashing to bend up and make a dent like that in the aluminum case....This one shows it a little better, I think.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHoly crap- through the box? And the box was not damaged?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAnd it\\'s pretty obvious from the state of the fans inside that it got some rough handling....\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nNo - the box had a hole there. I didn\\'t take a picture - i figured people could imagine the box from the condition of the contents....\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThe Saturn managed to keep one of of it\\'s two fans attached...\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nHoly crap, thats some pretty rough handling.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHere\\'s the two girls all put back together good as new, connected up to a wireless bridge, and doing some test hashing after upgrading to .95 firmware...\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n2 things1) why do the two of them side by side look different? Is one the saturn2) you\\'d think KNC would package them better, was there any foam / packing stuff or was the miner just thrown into the shipping box?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI just want to know which of the delivery guys won the Rock`m Sock`m Robot tournament these units were obviously involved in\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nThe one of the left is the Saturn - it only has two hashing modules.They are well packa\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter, PSU, Netgear WN2500, Belkin WiFi net, routers, extension cord, Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-15 08:46:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED] 1.55 BTC = 5.7GH/s KnCMiner Jupiter. InfiniteHash.com BETA\\n### Original post:\\nWe are shooting for this Monday, but there are tons of little nuances we\\'re still working on, so I\\'m keeping my fingers crossed. Did not think it would take 3 months of work to finally launch this business, but boy was I wrong. Haha\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCan i get an update on the website cause i might want to purchase a contact considering the miners should be shipping soon.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHey guys, wanted to post a few updates. Our power supplies have arrived, they are the coolermaster v1000\\'s and are fully modular. This will give us enough power to run all the jupiters and even give us some overhead incase we decide to overclock. In regards to website, we have run into a slight delay with coding but it should be ready to roll by next week. I would like to once again thank our supporters! Adeel InfiniteHash.com\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nGreat job Adeel!Looking forward to mining soon !\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThank you Dave! The suspense is killing me\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAny updates on foreseeable delivery of the miners?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWhen I called KnC two weeks ago, they said the end of September, but seeing as how they are just now populating their PCBs, I don\\'t see that as possible. I will update once I speak to them again. One thing of note is however that we have a pretty high up spot in their shipping list, which is great news!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi Adeel09Has the miners for this groupbuy been shipped already since KNCMiner already started shipping their orders. Really excited to see them in action.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThe systems that are for sale on InfiniteHash.com not this beta, have prices as follows:2 GH/sEarns You Up To ~$415 - $830* **(Up To 2.8-5.6 BTC)*One Year ContractPre-Order Customers Begin Mining In OctoberAll Others Begin Mining 24 Hours After Placing An Order24/7/365 Access To Client Control PanelSave 33% Compared To CloudHashing!Join Today for $150.00 (Cross out the $150) $109.99Free Technical Support5 GH/sEarns You Up To ~$1,012 - $2,025* **(Up to 6.95 13.9 BTC)*One Year ContractPre-Order Customers Begin Mining In OctoberAll Others Begin Mining 24 Hours After Placing An Order24/7/365 Access To Client Control PanelSave 29% Compared To CloudHashing!Join Today for $350 (Cross out $350) $249!Free Technical Support10 GH/sEarns You Up To ~$4,050 - $8,100* **(Up to 27.9 55.8 BTC)*Two Year ContractPre-Order Customers Begin Mining In OctoberAll Others Begin Mining 24 Hours After Placing An OrderFree Technical SupportInfinite Re-investment Program24/7/365 Access To Client Control PanelSave 27.5% Compared To CloudHashing!Join Today for $625 (cross out 625) $459.99!20 GH/s Earns You Up To ~$8,100 - $16,200* **(Up to 55.8 111.6 BTC)*Two Year ContractPre-Order Customers Begin Mining In Octob\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n have an auction available for our current kncminers that we purchased ourselves. This has nothing to do with the group buy but it is for KnCminers that have already shipped since we paid extra to get early shipping. If you are interested in bidding on one of these auctions, let me know,-Adeel Anwar\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAny updates on shipping status? Are you still going to launch the website?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nYes, the website was coded by me and I also run 2 businesses so it took time. However. we had Day 2 shipping on Bitcointalk.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI am curious. 70 shares per machine / 400GH (estimated hash rate at time of order) = 5.7 GH a shareJupiters have been upgraded to 550GH so now it would be 7.85 GH / shareAm I correct on this?, or are you going to pocket that extra hash power?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n(bold emphasis by Adeel06)However, I wouldn\\'t rely on 550GH. I\\'ve mostly seen customer reports of 500GH so far.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI think it was 1 share out of 54 shares from a Jupiter whatever hashrate Jupiter provides- lower or, higher. Adeel has already changed once I guess 5.7 GH/s from 5 GH/s. So hoepfully, he will be generous enough to adjust hashrate accordingly\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nIt\\'s 70 per machine, but only 54 are for sale per machine\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nAny updates? Have the machines been shipped? when will the website be ready?\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nWhen will you guys be recieving payouts apprx?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nNot sure, we haven\\'t heard any news for a while and we don\\'t even know if the miners have arrived...Edit: I can see Adeel has been logging in but he isn\\'t answering to my messages. It would be nice to have an update since other people who have placed orders at Knc are already mining\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nUnfortunately, not with these order numbers yet: \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWhen was our order placed? Why doesn\\'t Adeel06 show up on that list?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nLooks like this is the order from Adeel, I copied form the previous post.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThanks. So it was apparently ordered on the 26th of June but there is no order from that day on KnC\\'s thread. Also, Adeel\\'s lack of communication starts to make me suspiciou\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter, coolermaster v1000, PCBs\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-19 23:25:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R6: KnC Jupiter, BELOW COST+HOST, Arrived Oct. 7 for testing!, $78 ea.\\n### Original post:\\nI have other news then- Im very glad I picked up HX1050s and not 850s for these. May even end up using the EVGA 1300w\\'s I have left over from singles\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes. Glad you decided that you wanted something bigger than 850\\'s so you made the check out for.... Wait... What ? ? ?How about this guys singles? I didn\\'t know that BFL had actually shipped that many...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHaha good joke but BFL hasn\\'t shipped that many units.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHaha - That was exactly my first comment.. That\\'s a real, no shit, screen grab from one of the guys in the private pool I hash in.He bought them all in one order, first day they went on sale. Must be why it took them so long to get through June 26th orders for singles....50 * 1300 watts each. Hate to be paying his electric bill....\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI had 21 running for one day. No thanks. Not again. Ever.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nbump up to the top\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNice equipment! Was the miner shipped to your location?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNew goodies ordered for hosting! Big server grade UPS.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nA juptier is on route to hosting now should arrive tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYup. 1/2 for the GB, 1/4 total.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSo not in time for the 15th cut off?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nDepends on what you mean - the cutoff for this first payout period will be some time this afternoon. There\\'s been hardware hashing for both group buys since, what, the 4th roughly? So the terms of the guarantee were met - hardware hashing by the 15th - and the payout coming tomorrow (or the next day) will make sure it is equal to what 100% hardware would have produced (once I do the match), so no one should feel shorted. -R-\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nStupid UPS taking forever. I got up early and everything. Should have been taken right from the truck> UPS store.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSo, my guess is they probably hit the UPS store last, so they can pick up outgoing stuff for the day....\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nNot what they KEEP telling me. Stupid liars. According to them anything \"Air\" is delivered, then anything else, so at minimum it would be the last \"air\" package dropped off. Who do I know, UPS around here stinks\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nArrived, on location, and hashing!\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nsweet. best news all day.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nWARNING: PICTURE PORN AHEAD\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI can\\'t believe those machines are just sitting there out in the open fornicating with the blockchain.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nGood company there on the desk - that Redhash machine is an awesome piece of engineering. You should pop the lid off the Jupiter, the airflow through the case pretty much sucks. Star. SD-20.Just requested a manual payout from BTCGuild for the current balances. Will be matching those funds later this evening. First GB payout will be tomorrow evening - to allow everyone 24 hours to double check their info. Keep an eye out for an email headed out to all the GB members and check your payout info carefully when you receive it. -R-\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI have every single star bit known to man, except that one.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nPayouts for GB shares coming soon. See the R5 thread for details: \\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nFinal tally...Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodesDate: 10/17/2013 17:44To: -0.59278699 BTCTo: -0.35567219 BTCTo: -0.11855739 BTCTo: -1.18557399 BTCTo: -0.71134439 BTCTo: -0.71134439 BTCTo: -0.35567219 BTCTo: -0.59278699 BTCTo: -0.35567219 BTCTo: -0.11855739 BTCTo: -0.35567219 BTCTo: -0.23711479 BTCTo: -4.38662376 BTCTo: -0.23711479 BTCTo: -0.23711479 BTCTo: -0.35567219 BTCTo: -0.23711479 BTCTo: -0.47422959 BTCTo: -0.23711479 BTCTransaction fee: -0.0001 BTCNet amount: -11.85583978 BTCTransaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 23:\\n picture porn!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nNice work gents! That was the co-op\\'s first miner payouts and the first shipment of co-op ordered equipment.Thanks for sharing new pics of the co-op\\'s equipment. We budget for about 20 minutes of UPS backup protection for everything we purchase.The growth and success of our co-op has meant that we could allocate extra funds to a gas generator, extra UPS units (there\\'s more on the way), a dedicated AC unit just for us, a custom cooled cabinet, and even a 4G modem/router for even more network redundancy during long outages. Your co-op BTC, at work.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HX1050s, EVGA 1300w, BFL, Redhash machine, Star SD-20, gas generator, UPS units, AC unit, custom cooled cabinet, 4G modem/router\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-20 02:06:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED] R9: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury Chips!Below cost 40%+\\n### Original post:\\nHere\\'s the link for new R10 Black Arrow orders since R9 sold out in a little over a day: again everyone! Round 9 is officially CLOSED, and another successful round of DZ MC fund raising is in the PM Thomas if there\\'s any questions/concerns about your share purchase(s) so that he can reconcile our books and make sure he has your wallet address on record.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPlaced an order on the web site (255), specified PP as a method of payment in notes as requested. So far nobody contacted, and the order appears to be on hold. What should I do?Thanks,/DVB\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDont worry- Ill make sure you get you shares\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'ve been having discussions with some of the gents. We may have to codify a small fee for PP shares. Whatever we decide on: it\\'s still going to be a better deal then having me list DZ MC GB shares on eBay via my wife\\'s acct (rainbowlady03). Listing on Bay leads to a about a 15% markup while still being at-cost.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThanks bobsag3 for your succinct, and DZ for your extensive answers to my questions!I submitted PP payment for 4 shares to -R-.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYou\\'re welcome! Thanks for joining our co-op and Welcome Aboard! Quick question: did you order and reserve shares through our website? It appears that there\\'s a number of R10 buyers that will be automatically shifted to R9 due to either double orders or non-payment of reservations. R10 stock numbers may go up, if so.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPP payment was there when I checked this morning, 3.5909839 BTC sent to payout address for his order.TxID: DZ will have switched to a regular PayPal provider by the next time a PP payment is requested. I know there is some kind of plan for doing that in the works....-R-\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAdd a small issue with my payment. I will get things sorted out today. I think I have 4 shares in R9 and 4 SHares in R10 on hold right now. Sorry about that.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIn b4 the picture porn.You guys ready? \\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYou are actually building them? or is this like a sample board?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIf I\\'m not mistaken these are pics from production.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nStrait off the assembly line. Mounting of parts/ASICs has already begun.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'ll brb gotta change my pants\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nLooks like Thomas (actually our site) moved paid R10 shares to R9.Getting more crowded in this round. Latest word is that the boards should be done in the next 72 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nWho like more photo porn?\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nMore great news! I hear that they\\'re even working weekends in order to get this to us faster.If you guys haven\\'t seen it, here\\'s Black Arrow\\'s acknowledgment that bobsag3 (AKA Miner Hosting LLC) is their official US Reseller: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R10 Black Arrow, R9 Black Arrow, ASICs\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-08-29 01:07:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [Group buy] Avalon chips Escrow John K / BG EU 2 batch CLOSED + K16 from 40 EUR\\n### Original post:\\nHi,For those who missed the batch 2, or want chips earlier (from batch 1 ordered mid-june), I am selling some chips there:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n2-nd batch order\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYeah. Go go go\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDoes someone want to sell 48 chips?best regards,ilpirata79\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi ilpirata79,Yes, I am selling some here:\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFIRST BATCH CLOSED THIS LIST IS NOT FINAL!!! I\\'ve checked list it\\'s OK by me.PLEASE everybody check your orders in the list and PM me if there is something wrong by your opinion!!!!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi marto74,Just to keep your list tidy and pretty, I am reformatted the new additions to match your existing format... if you prefer.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nmarto: What is the powerconsumption aprox. of one K16?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nA standard K16 without overclocking will consume aprox. 32W.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYes that\\'s correct\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nto is there any available chips of FIRST BATCH ?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nwilling to part with my 96 chips from the first batch\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nmaybe willing to buy 2 chips if the price is right\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nNitrox, 16, 1.4 , (1.4 on confirmed via blockchain)fex, 48, 4.2 , (2.8 on confirmed via blockchain)gorkab, 16, 1.4 , (1.4 confirmed via blockchain)Mavy, 16, 1.4 , \\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nList in the second post updated\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI wanna buy 16 chipsif anyone wants to sell, PM me with your Batch #, order #, Group buy ID (cause i posted this in one more GB) and pricethanks\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI\\'m still in for 2 chips. I know it\\'s an odd number. Just tell me your price, if i\\'m interested, I will respond\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nLooking to buy ~200 chips from batch #1, PM me if somebody is interested.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nCode:I\\'m willing to part with 176 of my 1300 chips in favour of link to trade offer buyer BTC address is will be completed as soon as I receive cleared payment to my bank account - 2640 BGNsigned jkminkov, \\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI am interested in buying chips if anyone is still selling. My location is Bulgaria, so you won\\'t be dealing with logistics.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nmy trade is done, payment received\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI\\'m selling 18 chips from batch 1. PM me.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nLooking to buy ~100 chips. PM Me.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nThe ordering site for miner assembly service is OFFICIALY OPEN 0:00 4-th of August 2013technobit.eu\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nI transfer my chips from first batch \" 40 18 1.53 \"to PsychoticBoy .After i receive the payment marto74 will confirm the trade .\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nSend me a Btc address so we can make this trade happen.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nPaid for the chips.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nWhat\\'s the difference between the klondike and the x16?best regards,ilpirata79\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nHEX16 is overclocked to 450MH/s per chip.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nIt is a different design and can be overclocked. I think it\\'s not overclocked by default.\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nCode:I gave 16 of my 1124 chips to link to trade offer buyer BTC address is jkminkov, \\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nI\\'m looking to buy ~100 chips, please send your offers!\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nI may be interested in selling as well: marto74 batch #1\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nLooking to buy 48 more chips.Anyone selling?\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\n30 sample chips from batch 1 received here.Got info from Zefir and bizwoo that sample chips for batch 2 are received too.Let\\'s hope Avalon will ship soon.\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\nthat\\'s what we\\'re all hoping when the chips arrive, can you start assembling them immediatly? Or do you need to wait for boards?\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nMy hopes have led me to purchase 32 chips from dddbtc... He will be posting the transfer info when it clears... Thanks for the work here in this group buy.Lets see those chips!Regards\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nCode:I, dddbtc, hereby transfer ownership of 16 avalon chips from Order #34 in marto74 batch #1 to voxelot in exchange for TxID wish him best of luck during the prototyping process for the Klondike K16 \\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nCode:I, dddbtc, hereby transfer ownership of an additional 16 avalon chips from Order #34 in marto74 batch #1 to voxelot in exchange for TxID wish him best of luck during the prototyping process for the Klondike K16 \\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nIs there any available chips from FIRST BATCH ?I need 4 chips. PM me if you have.\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nI suppose refunds of a group buy are nearly impossible: every costumer needs to agree with the refund.And a lot of people already made investments (boards, cables, etc)Unless... Avalon offers partial delivery to group buys.\\n\\n### Reply 42:\\nAgreed.. Here is a quote from zefir today...\\n\\n### Reply 43:\\nYufi is making refund forms.I vote for refund... dddbtc you are welcome for the BTC0.032 donation i gave to for buying your chip order for 32 @ BTC0.086.I expect a re\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon chips, K16, klondike, x16, HEX16, sample chips, 32 chips, 48 more chips, 30 sample chips, 32 chips, 16 avalon chips, 16 avalon chips\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False, False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-20 17:24:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: Purchased [OPEN] BFL ASIC Chips $59/chip for a limited time. Batch 2 - 80 Left\\n### Original post:\\nUPDATE 07/25/2013 - Batch 2 was purchased from BFL 7/25/2013, transaction ID below. is my second BFL chip purchase, Batch 1 was purchased July 3rd here: have used my chip credits to facilitate a 112 chip group buy of BFL ASIC chips at a discounted price. You are not required to provide any chip credits for this price. Price includes shipping to continental US.Current price is $59/chipPlease go by last Campbx sale price, or bitcoinstore rate when completing purchase. Mtgox is no longer an accurate representation of bitcoin value.Current Batch and payment address:Batch #2 - 80 Chips left - will be expected to pay 50% up front per bfl purchase requirements. Payment amount should be determined by buyer, using mtgox weighted average or ticker in thread. At the time of purchase, I will re-evaulute price based on BTC conversion rate and refund or request more money, dependent on where the conversion rate stands. The Second half will be required before shipment. To avoid shipping delays for all buyers, the second payment will be required within 12 hours of request. Inability to pay second half will result in forfeit of chips ordered.Please contact me before sendin\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n80 chips still available.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n80 chips available at $59/chip through Sunday.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n80 still up for grabs\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nReceived my 3 completed Chili boards on Friday, and they are beautiful! Thanks, CrazyGuy, not just for the GB but for facilitating matching the chips with boards as well!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips, Chili boards\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-20 18:19:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 73/100] R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off + Host + UPS\\n### Original post:\\n73 shares available.Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOkay, thanks to Bob I have just completed my purchase of 10 shares.the transaction ID is : my BTC address for payments is: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks! Nice to know who it was, even though I don\\'t mind if people want to stay incognito. We were just discussing this on Skype. We meet up quite a bit on side channels to improve coordination and we\\'re no longer taking any more PP funds for Round 10 or Round 8. Sorry, we\\'ve been getting swamped by those & we\\'re all full up. ==If you\\'re in the US, we recommend Cash into coins for 3% or Coinbase. international customers, I recommend Bitstamp as that\\'s the exchange rate we use, and they also have low fees.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBobsag3 will be accepting wire transfers (for 20+ shares) and chase quick pay (any quantity of shares). and credit cards by Square will be accepting TD bank and CitiBank (USA) checks (any quantity of shares). At this time no other banks checks are being accepted.*These payment options are only available for Rounds that don\\'t need BTC conversions. (At the moment the only open Round(s) is/are 10)I\\'ve also located the reason for the zombie rounds...apparently there is a bug in the site where it reduces the stock when the order is placed and when it is paid.The updates on the forum were going by what the site displayed which was effectively doubling what was actually sold so that\\'s where those shares magically popped up from\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThomas to be clear is it 20+ shares for wire transfers, quick pay and the credit card link or only 20+ for wire transfer?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNeed at least 20+ for wire, QP and credit card for any amount.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n20+ shares just for wire transfers just in case there are any fees for bobsag3 The other things are any amountI believe I can get free incoming wire transfers if so then I can offer them for under 20 only thing is international ones may take some time to be received.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nCopied from R9, but relevant to this R10:I hear that they\\'re even working weekends in order to get these boards to us even faster.If you guys haven\\'t seen it, here\\'s Black Arrow\\'s acknowledgment that bobsag3 (AKA Miner Hosting LLC) is their official US Reseller: \\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSorry, I don\\'t fully understand what we\\'re buying. We get 1/100 ownership of a 1000gh/s machine or 10gh total. But then do we receive a piece of hardware or do we own 1/100th of the piece of hardware that we then have to pay hosting fees on?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYou own 1/100th of the 1th/s or more if it can be overclocked. If a vote is placed to sell the hardware you will also gain 1/100th of the value its sold for.The hosting fee is taken out of the earnings that the 1th/s gains so it would be split by 100.This is what Round 5 is looking like appx hash rate is 500gh/s and can be seen at the bottom of the chart.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPlease keep in mind that it\\'s showing a current ROI at -76% for the simple fact that we\\'ve only been running for less than 2 weeks, and had 1 miner payout so far! The better way of looking at it: we\\'ve already made about a quarter of our BTC back, in only 2 weeks (less actually).\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIs there a place we can see the list of R9 and R10 shares?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWho doesn\\'t like pictures of equipment that will help keep our BTC flowing no matter what? That\\'s an example of the buying power our co-op can assemble thanks to all of us teaming up. We have yet *more* equipment on the way, including a heavy duty UPS/Battery bank worth $1.1K originally shipping from philipma1957 in NY.==BTW, Thomas appears to have repaired an issue on our site where every order gave us a double order! This whole democratic mining experiment is most definitely still a work in progress, so expect a few eggs broken here and there as we attempt to make omelletes for everyone. We also moved additional R10 sales to unfilled R9 slots. Therefore - please consider this number below an updated correct number:73 shares available\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury, UPS/Battery bank\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-21 01:43:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [REOPENED] KnCMiner Saturn 1.9BTC=~6.25GHs | 2 Shares with CONFIRMED DELIVERY\\n### Original post:\\nMost recent update : Brussels - Belgium Processed at Brussels - Belgium\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-21 01:53:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [REOPENED] KnCMiner Saturn 1.9BTC=5GH/s | 2/2 Shares | Confirmed Delivery\\n### Original post:\\nStatus just turned to Shipped. Can count on hashing before the end of next week. f yeah.*Pops bottle of champagne*oh, btw, I opened up two of my personal shares for 1.9BTC\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nShip it, ship it good. Its kind of a shame though this will only double my hashing power\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyeahh, but with bitcoin price rising, it could change a lot of things.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWith the increase in btc price, I am accepting 1.75BTC for one of my personal shares, or 3.3BTC for both my personal shares.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-20 18:14:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #16 USB Miners 0.071 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nMaybe next time. USB Miners at 0.071 or less. Thank you for your orders and support!SSB\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll orders have been shipped today. Thank you! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWith the recent price increase, how much are USB block eruptor miners now?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nPrice on ASICMiner stuff is based in BTC not USD so the prices don\\'t adjust when the price per BTC changes, same thing goes when the price of BTC falls.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ntranslation .071 btc = 11.83 usd at 166.66 usd a coin..071 btc = 7.45 usd at 105 usd a coin. Why these two usd numbers.Todays usd price per coin is 166.66. One day after silk road was busted coins dropped to 105 usd. So as smart as I thought I was buying 4 coins at 105 usd each then buying 60 sticks for 4.2 coins (the other group buy) then selling the sticks at 14 usd (97.99 sets of 7) each on ebay. I was dumb as I under purchased. Even though I made about 5.50 usd a stick profit of 330 usd . Could have been much more. oh well. those buyers did well as ebay sticks have risen in price just a bit.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFor BTC to really take off as a currency it needs to stand alone and not be compared to others in exchange. If a gallon of milk is $3 USD it\\'s $3 regardless if the euro is $1 to 1 or $1.50 to 1... Using that as the standard in comparison, the value of BTC hasn\\'t risen, the dollar has just weakened according to the world currency of BTC. And especially lately with the unrest caused by U.S. politicians. Now compare BTC in other currencies and you\\'ll notice the rest of the world market hasn\\'t moved as much in comparison, therefore the comment stand of the fact that the $U.S. dollar has weakened in the world market.Tong\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\n\"Overlaying CNY/BTC and USD/BTC trading history, it becomes clear that USD/BTC trading has been largely responsive to the Chinese markets\"\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPrice for usb sticks = 0.7 BTCPrice per BTC risesPrice for usb sticks = 0.7 BTCPrice per USB doesn\\'t change as the USB stick is priced in BTC not USD or another fiat currency\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nBingo my point exactly (or at least what I was trying for) best part has to be:All that because our politicians.Anyways back on topic before this becomes a political thread.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nKeep up the discussion if you like. Maybe someone will buy miner This is interesting indeed. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nyou are all correct but there is another very improtant point which people forgetmost people buying usbs in bulk are to sell on ebayif btc/usd goes up to wherre it is now it is not worth the hassle anymorefriedcat price of lets say .07 btc when btc was 120 made sense for ebay.REMEMBER FRIEDCAT PAYS FOR PRODUCTION IN FIAT (USD OR CNY)he is now making 30% more per piece so he can afford a 30% reduction in priceremember the resellers have not paid him yet for the full stock they only pay once people pay them. so friedcat can afford to lower prices like 30%i know people are going to say but look at things in btc and price hasn\\'t changed. well good for them but they don\\'t sell on ebay and as i wrote above friedcat is making 30% moremaybe we can see a reduction to 0.055happy mining everybody\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIf friedcat chooses to exchange his BTC to FIAT then that\\'s up to him, and he can keep his losses/gains when he does. As far as the ebay thing, most people have done that over and over, I did over 400 units myself all on ebay (mainly from silentsonicboom btw,. thanks for fast shipping/great packing), and took looses when the price changed here and either I hadn\\'t sold out yet, or was waiting on pre-order. It\\'s a gamble. However for the currency to really survive, it needs to be disassociated with other currencies, in fact it shouldn\\'t be 1BTC = $166, it should be $166 = 1BTC, making BTC the driving factor, the foundation, the (insert word here cause I forget it) causing things like this:IF everyone in the wold chooses BTC for global reserve status, add another 0 to it\\'s value (in comparison to USD), making people who have stockpiles of BTC ridiculously rich.Now is that cool? Heck no, I\\'m an American and it makes us weak in comparison to the world, devaluating our economy and making us poorer in the whole world scheme of things. What am I going to do about it? Next time I go vote I choose anyone that doesn\\'t have an (i) next to their name, and make them fear for their jobs like I do\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nIt\\'s amazing... What friedcat sells at now is apparently profitable by a decent margin. Think back to before... June 23rd for instance, he was selling them for .99 BTC per. Can\\'t even imagine what his margins were back then... And couldn\\'t understand back then why people were lining up to buy so many of them? Even more shocking, I saw someone thanking one of Friedcat\\'s US resellers for selling him hundreds of them just recently! Is there any way those things can turn a profit? I mean for the buyer? C\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, USB block eruptor miners, ASICMiner stuff, 60 sticks, ebay sticks, miner\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-21 04:14:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [14 LEFT] GB #1 BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner ~2.5 GH/s 0.9BTC or less $139 Paypal\\n### Original post:\\nBuying another one through the store... much easier.Naelr\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrdered one. Mail sent.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAre there any provisions for refunds (partial or full) or any planned compensation for the delay? That was a pretty gnarly diff jump this morning and these don\\'t seem to be moving.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWow relax its not that much over due yet. This is the way any asic hardware goes with preorder haven\\'t seen much of anything ship right as scheduled for the whole batch...lol.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMaidak: Did you hear anything?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYeah that diff jump was ass. Like an 80% increase in one jump... freaking blows hard lol.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWe\\'ve gone several days without a substantial update and I\\'d like to know where things stand. I still believe my questions to be both fair and legitimate and I\\'d still like some answers. In another group buy thread Beastlymac posted the followingAnd I\\'d like to know if anything has been communicated to those organizing the Group Buys, and since I participated in this GB I decided to direct my questions here.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nProduction will be starting Tuesday or Wednesday next week. Compensation is still being figured out once we have some solid decision I will inform everyone in the product thread.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThese group bys are reseller threads that are authorized by the product company so any compensation from main should be passed down. But until beastly sets something up which would be posted in main thread there wont be anything to know here. Basically follow this and the product thread and you pretty much have all the info you are gonna get :-)\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSo Tuesday or Wednesday which would be the 22nd or 23rd, production will start? So does that mean we can expect actual shipping during the last week of the month or the first week of next month (November)?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-21 10:46:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: 1.55 BTC = 5.7GH/s KnCMiner Jupiter. InfiniteHash.com BETA - Miners OTW!\\n### Original post:\\nSo... are we mining?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTheHun,They are set for pickup at 8:00AM our time, because of the waste of time associated with UPS driving only 30 minutes in 6-8 hours, they don\\'t seem to understand that time is money apparently, and didn\\'t with my 27 phone calls to 1800-PICK-UPS. So right now I\\'m just sitting here anxiously awake, awaiting 7:15AM so I can drive over there . I will post pictures of their hashing rate today, if they don\\'t produce at least 500 GH/s I\\'ll be really pissed because some of the people on KnCminer\\'s forums have been getting 420-480 GH/s... and that doesn\\'t fly. Anyway, at least they\\'re in state.-Adeel\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI guess the guys at UPS don\\'t understand the math behind Bitcoin Anyway, thanks, that\\'s good news. Regarding hashrate, do you think it is possible/worth overclocking? What is the risk/reward ratio in doing so?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-21 19:02:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 70/100]R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury! 40% off, $123=8-10GH, Nov 1\\n### Original post:\\nThanks Thomas.With all the movement to R9, and phantom double orders here\\'s the latest corrected/PAID numbers:70 shares available.That\\'s enough for 6 more boards worth another 250-300GH/s of hashrate. Fortunately these boards are modular so we can buy 6, 10, 15 more, etc., etc..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWant to confirm That I just recived payment for 50 shares via Square Via User Ridicuss.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nnice buy bro. I just grabbed 2 shares of this buy myself.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nmy tx id for 2 shares of buy 10 payout now have :1 share in r1 10 shares in r5 --------------9 shares in r6--------------- these two were the best of all groups buys I am hashin over 100gh between the 2 of them.6 shares in r92 shares in r10\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSo that should put us at 70-2-50=18/100 shares left! Time to starting ramping up R11 I guess.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWhat\\'s the expected ROI at this point? I hesitate to buy into any more mining until everything stabilizes. Also, when will Paypal be back up as an option. I\\'m not planning on spending any more BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nUnless someone would like to start collecting funds with paypal it will most likely not come back, (paypal isn\\'t the most fun to deal with while selling BTC related items)We are accepting wire transfer, credit card via square and certain types of bank checks (citibank (US) and TD Bank).\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI will personally never be able to offer paypal, again. They locked my account, limited my funds and are still holding 12k of my funds \"just in case\".\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThat is very unfortunate, it isn\\'t that hard to get BTC so I\\'m not sure why people insist on Paypal.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPAYPAL suffered large losses from our favorite ASIC dealer BFL so when ever they see BTC they are very cautious. I am a 10 year customer/seller on ebay. More then 200k in sales and 100k in purchases with paypal. I sold about 500 AM usb sticks from July to OCT this year they held up a few orders. My buying selling record is spotless. Or to quote paypal/ebay reps \"remarkable\"Yet they held funds on 2 or 3 orders until they were delivered. These were in hand orders shipped the same day and the money was frozen for 2 or 3 days.To slayermine :Also many slick buyers attempt to return goods after 30-40 days of mining so paypal sales are tough . I purchased DZ\\'s ebay/paypal sale on miner 6 to prevent some a hole from hurting the coop or his wifes account.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run, Bitfury, AM usb sticks, miner 6\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-21 19:50:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [SHARES] [OPEN] BITFURY SHARES (430+ GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\nNEWS:As we had additional hashpower incoming last week (splitted over the full week),I was forced to do the accouting by hand, calculating everyones GH hours. (Link)\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY SHARES\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-21 22:10:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.35BTC=67GH/s 8/30 shares\\n### Original post:\\nNew members added to OP and spreadsheetWelcome\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nbtc at bitpay is now over $175 -- ( more than expected $ change)have you converted the BTC in $ yet ?Is it possible to re do the shares ? as it now close to 1.15\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyes I have looked at the possibility already, at purchase time I would adjust your share count accordingly. But final share price is deicided at purchase time however , GB is not closed yet\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nthanksI am happy to round up ( IE sent BTC balance for extra shares)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThank you, payment received , Terraminer IV purchasedBecause of appreciating BTC prices the group closed early. I have adjusted current members share number according to the purchase price of the miner. Final share price was 1.19 per share so took your share payment and divided by 1.19.Any positive BTC balances owed on shares will be paid out with first dividend payment\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-22 00:17:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [UPDATE] BFL ASIC Chips $59/chip. Batch 1 purchased July 3rd.\\n### Original post:\\nGroup buy members, please start preparing for the second half of your payment. I expect BFL will be requesting payment soon and I want to ensure we receive our order in a timely manner. Also, I will be sending my chips to Mr Teal for mounting and I can do the same for everyone. Please let me know if you are interested. I do not have a price yet, but will update when I have one.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, I am interested in having my chips sent to Mr Teal for mounting once the details are worked out on his and your side. Looking forward to the update. BTC ready to go\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nUpdate 09-23-2013 - Prepare for second half of payment and make decision on mounting Please start gathering funds for the second half of your payment. I expect BFL will be asking for payment shortly. Also, I will be sending my chips to Mr Teal for board mounting. Please let me know if you would like me to include your chips in the order.Update 07-13-2013 - SOLD OUT Thanks for all that participated, batch 2 is now openUpdate 07-12-2013 - Fire Sale!! Cash buy dropped out and 20 chips have become available. Closing batch 1 at 9 PM CSTUpdate 07-03-2013 - Batch #1 order placed on July 3rd. There are 24 chips still available from batch 1. $59 price is valid on remaining chips until Batch #2 is opened next week.I will be using my chip credits to facilitate a 100 chip group buy of BFL ASIC chips at a discounted price of $59 per chip. I will be doing 2 batches if there is significant interest. You are not required to provide any chip credits for this price. Price includes shipping to continental US.Original Price: per chip total per chip up frontThis batch is closed, but there are still 4 chips available. I\\'m willing to sell them for $62 each at this point:If you are looking for a better pr\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThanks for the great group buy! This was well organized and you managed to get the chips to the right board designer to get everyone the quickest custom BFL board delivered! I am very happy with the way CrazyGuy handled everything for this group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n+1 Thanks for the great group buy. Very well organized and executed. Hope to do business again in the future\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL ASIC Chips\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-22 02:14:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.074BTC or less, Blades 2.8 BTC] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nLess than 10 Blades in stock. No ETA for further Blade stock at this stage.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nemail sent\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMy Order arrived Friday, Super fast delivery and I really love the Gold colour! Thankyou very much.I\\'ll be looking to order some in the future.Julz,Do you have any more info on the USB hub deal from Friedcat?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\njulz - i\\'ll have more to buy in a day or two as per my email.Everyone - this guy is FAST at delivery\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYep, that\\'s how buying ASICs is meant to be, you place an order for stuff the supplier has in stock, and it ships the same day. Not this pre-order crap that has been forced upon us, that\\' not how modern PC hardware sales work. It\\'s the realistic delivery that has kept ASICminer sales ticking over.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n38 received real fast, i didn\\'t even know auspost could work this fast, anyway email sent regarding another order.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nEmail sent!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, Blades\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-09-21 21:41:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [USA - NOW OPEN] 0.79-0.9 BPMC \"RED FURY\" 2.2-2.7 GH/s USB MINER! GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nhow thick are these compared to the asicminers? will they fit into my dub-h7\\'s? thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWell, I don\\'t have an ebay account. You guys buy from whoever is closest to you. If you\\'re from my half of the world, it would make sense to get from me. If you\\'re in the States or Canada, it would make sense to get from ssinc.Our prices will be the same, if his looks lower, or mine, it just means we haven\\'t updated.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ni want to order between 5-9 usbs but i dont have all the btc nowif i place my orders one after the other do i still get the discount once i go over 5usbs?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHad a delay in getting BTC delivered. So ordered one by paypal. If the GB is still open when the BTC is in my wallet I\\'ll order a 2nd.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYes if you place multiple orders in the same buy you will qualify for the higher tier discounts.Just PM me before you start submitting payments so I know to mark them.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNot a problem! Thank you for your order\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI should be receiving one unit in a few days so I\\'ll take photos and dimensions so you know what to expect from these\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\njust ordered 2 i can\\'t wait\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nConfirmed! Thank you for your order\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nUpdated confirmed orders! FYI : This Group Buy Will be closing in less than a week. I\\'ll make an announcement and put up a countdown timer in a few days.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI have 11 coins. I am working to get 6 more to order 20 sticks\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI look forward to handling your order!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWaiting for a few confirmations then shooting over a small order for two...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks in advance for your order\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nand email is away. Interested to see these in action for myself\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nOrdered 4 using Paypal. PM me if you need anything else.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nJust ordered two with Bitcoin\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI just ordered 1 more (for a total of 3) via PP. Since the address is the same, I would assume you would ship them in one package to save on shipping costs - so just a heads up.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nJust a head\\'s up, once I get verified from coinbase I\\'ll be able to get a little more bitcoins so I can put in for 2. May take a couple more days though.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nNot a problem! I don\\'t expect this group buy to close until the 24th-25th of September so you have time still Thanks in advance for your order!Not a problem! They will be shipped together Received! Thank you for your order! Confirmed! If I need anything else I\\'ll let you know! Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nhello ssinc. Question for you....Is this a guaranteed delivery of 1st week of October, and is there any chance that this group buy could get cancelled and all payments refunded??\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nMan getting the 17 coins together is a hassle. I am at 13.2\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nThe chance exists but is HIGHLY unlikely. BPMC will manufacturer all of the the orders on demand starting next week and begin delivery the following week (first week of October). If for any reason BPMC cannot deliver I will refund everyone\\'s orders.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nSo close!\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nA few more orders added! Almost at 100 pieces\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nJust curious. Not trying to run off your business or anything. But isn\\'t it cheaper per gh/s to buy asic blades? I know the power consumption will be lower but the asic blades are already pennies a day to run.Like right now I can get 10.7gh/s for 3.65btc by buying an asic blade.or I could buy 4 Red Fury USB miners and get 10gh/s for 3.6btc.But here is the kicker. I can get the asic blade shipped to me in under 3 days and be hashing immediately.I would have to wait 2+ weeks to receive a Red Fury. We should see asic blades drop below 3btc each within 2 weeks.Also difficulty of bitcoin will go up quite a bit in 2 weeks. We all know the more time it takes to get an asic the less you will make and the chance of making ROI goes down dramatically.Its pretty obvious if you are going to be buying mining hardware that you should get an asic blade.Can anyone counter this argument?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nYes. If you haven\\'t got 3.65btc then for less that 1btc this is the best you are going to get.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nDon\\'t forget blades aren\\'t the most user friendly for new miners.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nConfirmed orders updated! Closing in on 200 units sold\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nI can counter this.... you can still get usb erupters for about the same cost as blades. 30 erupters @ .12 is about 10GH for 3.6BTC. Shipped tomorrow . Still user friendly and about exact same cost of blades. I think people are looking longer term with red fury\\'s based on the insanely low electricity. It is negligible when we\\'re talking about 1-2 units, but when you venture off into the 333 Gh range @1k units =2500 kw/h month ($250/month @.10) which is no longer pennies. Same hashing power can be bought with red furry\\'s for 7.5 x less electricity, consequently bringing electricity down to 33\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: RED FURY USB MINER, asicminers, asic blades, usb erupters\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-22 17:06:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #16 USB Miners 0.07 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nPrices adjusted lower again! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll orders have been shipped today. Thank you! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAny idea if the USB price will drop due to BTC price?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThat would be up to asicminer. Last I heard, the current USB Miners were being cleaned out then no more for sale. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThere is a serious need for a price decrease on the Erupters.Pleeeezzz\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThey are already being priced at cost, any lower and it will be like the resellers are paying you to take them.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNot anymore with the rise in BTC price they are over priced.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nNope they are priced in BTC not USD, so changes in exchange are not taken into consideration. It would be different if they were priced at $100 and then BTC went up to $200 a coin but FC sets the price in BTC.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nUnfortunately you are looking at it from a different perspective.I\\'m concentrated on the fact they are selling for less than you can buy them for after fees.There is no profit advantage to resell.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYes in the current market it isn\\'t profitable to sell on ebay or in fiat currencies. And its returning little to no profit in BTC as the currency, these are being sold at cost (remember they, resellers SSB / Canary etc. buy them in prices set in BTC)\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYes I do consider that.However massive profits/and fees were made and now it\\'s time to give back.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWhy not consider the exchange rate? How many people get paid in BTC? Most BUY it with their local currency, and if they earn BTC they SELL it. Until my employer pays me in BTC and I can spend said BTC at my local grocery store, I will always consider the exchange rate.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ncanary already dropped his price!50 units minimum for 1.75 = 0.035 each.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nNew prices coming shortly! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nPrices lowered. No minimums\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHory sheet. I\\'m picking up 10 at that price good sir. (gimme a while to scrounge some BTC. )\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nthank you. All orders are appreciated! SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, Erupters\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-23 02:38:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [10 LEFT] GB #1 BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner ~2.5 GH/s 0.9BTC or less $139 Paypal\\n### Original post:\\nPlease update post #2. I\\'m asking You to do that because I didn\\'t even received confirmation mail as an reply to my signed address email.TXID from two days ago:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI ordered one by paypal on the 13\\'th of Oct. Hope you got my order.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYup all orders are logged and are going to ship same day I receive them. If you want to get email updates sign up on the bitcoinminerz.com newsletter.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMay i please pay for 2 on Tuesday , Maidak . Messaged you on #bitcoin-OTC.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIf Production is able to start at full speed they can produce 400ish a day meaning if they start tomorrow group by coordinators might have by end of this week and then be reshipping to us. This is best case of course.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAny new updates on this yet for us?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nProduction started today and the shipping should be happening this week or early next week they produced 200 units today and plan for 400 tomorrow. Until 1800 is reached then they will be shipping to me.On another note I have added a special bitcoin price on the store for the last remaining 21 extra units I have plans to sell of 0.7 BTC per unit ordered here I only have 21 units of my own left to sell. This price adjustment is due to the increase in BTC recently.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-23 04:27:24',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 18/100]R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury! 40% off, $123=8-10GH, Nov 1\\n### Original post:\\nThanks Philip. And that was much appreciated.Thanks for buying half of R10, Ridicuss. Welcome aboard! Since we\\'re a democratic cooperative, we vote on when to sell our miner in this co-op to maximize our returns. Essentially: your vote +1 vote decides when we\\'ll sell this R10 \"Rig\" of 20 boards.This GB is still rolling. Looks like we\\'re down to the last 20%.18 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIf you haven\\'t gotten an email your shares aren\\'t accounted for on the spreadsheet. You\\'d get 1 of two emails.1) Your order is complete.2) Missing a payout address please reply to this email with one.The first means you are either on the spreadsheet as Green / YellowThe second means your on the spreadsheet as RedIf you have got no email I have no record of payment / the site is past your order. If this is the case you must contact me to manually review the order.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMay opt for credit card then. Not a fan of paypal either.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYou may want to update the site, it says R10 is sold out, but the title and posts here say 18 shares left.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThe sites waiting for some shares to be paid its sort of sold out but there may be a few openings in the next day or so.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ncredit card purchases please! Also, when will there be some 28nm asic group buys? I hesitate to buy the bitfury 55nm.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWe\\'ll be talking to someone about the credit card part tomorrow and see how that goes.28nm will be as soon as someone starts to produce one, hmm I think R3/R4 are 28nm from hashfast if I\\'m not mistaken\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHi pandemic,We have Bitmine Rig modules active in a Round 8 28nm ASIC GB. I think it\\'s a pretty good deal. There\\'s a Halloween sale going on at the moment: 15% off, which our co-op was first to publish this news (which was later corroborated by Giorgio from Bitmine in their CH thread). R8 was adjusted to be 15% cheaper than R7 shares due to this sale. The R8 modules will coexist with the R7 modules and Rig.Round 8, Bitmine Rig modules: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R10 \"Rig\" of 20 boards, Bitfury 55nm, Bitmine Rig modules\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-22 16:22:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #18 Blade Miners 1.85 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nPrices adjusted lower again! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nA lot of price cuts over the past few days....\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPrice cuts from resellers selling at cost, not from AsicMiner past few days....All orders have shipped today. Thank you! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n[/quote]Price cuts from resellers selling at cost, not from AsicMiner past few days....All orders have shipped today. Thank you! SSB[/quote]I am not understanding why you would be wasting your time selling at cost.the way friedcat set it up with resellers is that they do not have to pay in advance, rather once they sell a certain amount of stock they pass him the money. otherwise every time friedcat dropped his prices the resellers would loose loads of money on all the stock they had left. so therefore why do you keep getting more stock in just to sell at cost.anyone care to explain\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPlease ask other reseller. I am just matching prices. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPrice cuts from resellers selling at cost, not from AsicMiner past few days....All orders have shipped today. Thank you! SSB[/quote]I am not understanding why you would be wasting your time selling at cost.the way friedcat set it up with resellers is that they do not have to pay in advance, rather once they sell a certain amount of stock they pass him the money. otherwise every time friedcat dropped his prices the resellers would loose loads of money on all the stock they had left. so therefore why do you keep getting more stock in just to sell at cost.anyone care to I have both usb and blades I have paid for in advance. I expected a small profit.There is no more profit for me selling below cost after expenses. I am just trying to sell my remaining inventory at cost to match other reseller pricing. If you need a deal on 100 or more USB miners or 7 or more blades, pm me and I will see what I can do for you. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nNew prices coming shortly! SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blade Miners, USB miners, Blades\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-24 05:37:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [REOPENED]KnCMiner Saturn 1.7BTC=6.25GHs | 2/2 Shares Delivered Has left Sweden\\n### Original post:\\nAny news so far about shipping?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI so hope arrives soon. BTC To THE MOON!!!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI got my order (32xx) last Friday.. so it should be hashing. News?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI guess shiunsai is busy getting it to hash... Right shiunsai?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nMy Saturns took 2 days to arrive to the US - less than 48 hours via DHL. Shipped Wednesday, arrived Friday morning.So this one was shipped Wednesday, maybe Thursday, which puts the delivery day on Friday or Monday, respectively. I certainly hope you\\'re not holding out on us, Shiunsai. I\\'ve made $600 worth of BTC per Saturn and counting already..\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThat would be awesome.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIt\\'s even silly I need to post this, but shouldn\\'t you have fixed that before the shipment could arrive, or am I too smart ?!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes, I\\'ve been fucking up and having to find out that my ethernet ports on the combined cablemodem/router that cox supplied me screwed me over and halted my hashing until tomorrow when radioshack opens sucks.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThat\\'s awesome, I guess you\\'re lucky because from Sweden to US two days? That is the exact speed it would take if I were to order a flat rate box from two states away. So you\\'re saying it took you two days to get from Sweden to US, interesting.It took two days for mine to leave the country.tuesday- delivered but was not home (was home but broken doorbell)wednesday - received, need to get new routerthursday - will have a new router when radioshack opens up and start hashing by noon.I HAVE IT OKAY. My router was fucked up and I need to get a wireless router to hook dd-wrt to it to get it running. This has been a much more stressful day dealing with this shit when I wanted it to just be plug and play and now I am dealing with all this. Just have a little patience and wait til freaking noon tomorrow and I can post a screenshot of it hashing which is what we all want. edited so we can all get some peace.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn, ethernet ports, combined cablemodem/router, router, wireless router\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-24 05:41:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [REOPENED]KnCMiner Saturn 1.7BTC=6.25GHs | 2/2 Shares Rig Arriving Tomorrow\\n### Original post:\\nMmhm. So all of the sudden they\\'re delivering tommorow, eh? Wow, what a freakin coincidence that as soon as you\\'re called into question, they\\'re magically delivering tommorow.FYI: KnC ships DHL Worldwide Express. Yes, 2 days from Sweden to the US. Planes fly pretty fast, you know. You\\'ve obviously never heard of a little thing called logistics. Things are pretty efficient these days. 2 days is relatively easy for them in this day and age.You\\'ve had the miner for at least a couple of days. Just admit it. What\\'s the tracking number?Here\\'s mine:\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\num, no, not all of a sudden, and I checked and wrote this when I got on btctalk, I missed the weekend, you didn\\'t, they didn\\'t ship it because they thought I wasn\\'t home. Not giving the tracking because that\\'s my personal information. And I said it took two days to get from Sweden to US, then monday Cincinnati OH to my City, Tuesday I missed the delivery, Wednesday Received, but the truth is my routers ethernet ports are not working and never have, only wireless. Purchasing a new router tomorrow morning and setting up dd-wrt because of this issue. Sorry that I am shifting everything one day forward, but it was easier than admiting the embarassing fact that I didn\\'t know kncminer was ethernet plug, thought it\\'d be usb. I want this thing to be hashing just as much as all of you and I have been troubleshooting it all night, and once morning comes im getting dd-wrt to run the miner.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n October 17th 2013:KnC Saturn has confirmed delivery and has been shipped as of today. Because of this, I have opened up two of my personal shares for anyone who would like to get in on the last chance. 1.7BTC for one of the shares, or 3.3BTC for both sharesOctober 20th 2013: Shipment has said \"Brussels - Belgium Processed at Brussels - Belgium So on Monday, it\\'s considered left the country and in no time it will be hashing. 2 personal shares available, post or pm if 1 Share @ 1.7BTC= ~6.25GH/s hashing power + 4% Fee~ Miner will be hosted 24/7 in my house, fee will pay help pay for electricity and any fees such as wallet fees.~ Each share entitles the owner to 1/40 of the BTC proceeds from the KnC Saturn Miner that will be mining 24/7 for 24 months, two years starting on the closest Sunday before or after to receiving the miner to make payments consistent on Sundays. ~Payments are made every Sunday.~ Miner breaking after 12 month warranty, such as any random act of nature or internet downtime, is not covered in 24/7 for 24 months (not likely to happen).How to Purchase:~ Send 1.7BTC to wallet address ~ PM me or post the TxID and your payout address in t\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Saturn, router\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-24 11:02:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [SHARES] [OPEN] BITFURY SHARES (620+ GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\n40 / 395 (+50 Bonus) availablePrice: 1 Share = 1 GH/s = PM for price offer ...New buyed shares start hashing instantly for you!### Swiss BTC Mining Association ###\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n20 Share = 20 GH/s = 1.75 BTC! not valid anymoremax. 40 shares ...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY SHARES\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-24 08:01:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R5: KnC Jupiter, BELOW-COST + Host! Hashing in Missouri! $78 + Bonuses!\\n### Original post:\\nRedacted I am not sure if you have updated to firmware 0.95 but now we are earning the right mount of BTC that is above ~ 1 BTC for 24 hours at current difficulty & worker 1 hash rate seems to doing good & matching worker 2 hash rate\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI had to reboot the worker-1 machine because cgminer went crazy on it. Since I had to reboot anyway, I did do the upgrade to firmware .95.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWORKER 1 HASH RATE 0 Gh/s\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYup. Its currently in the mail on its way to my hosting facility. It will be back up and running tomorrow morning within 20min of UPS dropping it off.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThat doesn\\'t explain why the hashrate is 0Surely between -Redacted- and bobsag you guys coulda come up with a way to keep it up and running during transport A very large extension cord and packed UPS\\'s perhaps???C`mon I have faith in you\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI too am saddened by your non-use of magic.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI have faith in bobsag3 and -Redacted- I don\\'t have faith in UPS lol*Magic is expensive if it wasn\\'t everyone would be using it\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nMy magic dealer ran out of magic\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMagic extension cord deployed...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWent the other way with the hashrate for a while to make up for the time at zero....\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThank you Mr. Humanly perfect\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nBoth miners are at my facility, and hashing away happily Now rolling the .96.1 update out. expect no problems.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHi Bobsage,Worker 1 hashrate seems a bit low , dont you think. Worker 1 was hashing at 267 ~ 278 gh/s but now it is down to 240.Is worker 1 Jupiter on 0.96.1 firmware , I think 0.95 firmware worked best so far.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nWorker 1 Hash Rate 234.868 Gh/s -> Worker 2 Hash Rate 280.07 Gh/s ->\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI got them all running .96.1, and all 4 that I have (2 GB 1 personal 1 other) are showing 520+\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHey Bobsage , KNC just release 0.97 firmware LOL , No rest for u bro Checking this thread for more test results on 0.97 firmware : \\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI think he just applied .97 to fix the flushwork problems. Don\\'t know how they\\'re running with it - it takes a few hours for things to settle down and stabilize.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nYeah both are running .97 smooth.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nIs there some easy way to see our hash rate?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThe round pages Round 5\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIf the 24 hour BTC looks low, keep in mind there\\'s a delay on PPLNS before the BTC gets credited, so it might still be a few more hours before that doesn\\'t include shifts where one of the units was being shipped.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nWorker 1 Hash Rate 229.523 Gh/s Worker 2 Hash Rate 282.208 Gh/sWorker 1 is not as happy as worker 2 on 0.97 firmware it seems but we can wait for few more hours to conform this , probably best revert to 0.95 for worker 1 Jupiter.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nUpdated to your newest version, thanks to mootinator it now shows USD ROI / amount of money made in USD\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nDarnit, I missed adding an empty td tag. So annoying, and yet so... not urgent.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nWorker 1 Hash Rate 238.228 Gh/sWorker 2 Hash Rate 269.533 Gh/sBobsage worker 1 hashrate is still not-up to the mark & also earner btc for 24 hours is still not 1.xx which it should be, I suppose we should revert to firmware 0.95 on worker 1 Jupiter only , worker 2 Jupiter is very happy on 0.97 firmware.We are loosing out on 0.2xx ~ 0.3xxx btc due to worker 1 rather low hashrate on 0.97 firmware.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nThe 24 hour bitcoin is an average from BTC Guild it has to do on open shifts which one of the machines went down for a little while which lowered the average 24 hour BTC gathered, someone did post when those shifts close the 24 hour BTC will grow.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nOk Thomas , but what about worker 1 hashrate being much lower than Normal for 24 hours or more now\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nI\\'ve just talked with bobsag3 about it, he said that the two miners R5/R6 (worker1 and worker2) are averaging 520 / 556, its possible that the site isn\\'t displaying the correct info its not updated in real time and the information isn\\'t gathered from the miner.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nAlso not all units were created equal. The first Jupiter I got down here has been solid 550+ the entire time, the other is more like 520. + 3 small downtimes for firmware updates (.94/.95 > .96 > .97 with reboots in between) would account for the small difference.\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nThank you guys , I think we can re-group in 6 hours time to check on 24 hours BTC earned by that time pool shift e.t.c should be done ? , if 24 hours BTC earned is still lower that 1.xx BTC then we have a problem Capitan.\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nI\\'ve been in the line of work of Test & Evaluation and R&D for 10 years at mostly low TRL numbers, and I can tell you that these miners are all essentially prototypes. There was no long term testing so it\\'s natural to have variability in chip yield and board performance. Firmware \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiter, worker-1 machine, UPS, magic extension cord, miners R5/R6\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-25 02:18:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.035BTC , Blades 1.1 BTC] [Australia/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nPrice drop on the USBs - now 0.035BTC each - minimum order 10.Buy 50 in one order and get a 49 port USB hub included.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHah I should\\'ve waited for this instead of buying 100 @ 0.073 BTC, I still have plenty sitting around waiting for USB hubs but I don\\'t have any BTC left in my accounts after the last purchase.What are the details on the 49 port hub, does this have some sort of external power that can power all 49 BE\\'s at once? Can these be sold separately? Is there an option for paying in AUD?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThe 49 port hub is powered by the main ATX connector on a PC power supply (the main one that normally plugs into a motherboard).It is made by ASICMINER - so presumably it is designed to power 49 BE\\'s at once.I\\'m not currently selling these separately, or for AUD, but may do so towards the end of the batch.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI want to order 100 of those, with two hubs, but problem is im in EU.I have successfully got some from AU a while back though, if interested inform me to proceed\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThat doesn\\'t seem fair, how do I run the 50th one?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPlug it into your PC.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYou did see my smiley right?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nBlade arrived today. Thats less than 24 hrs for delivery . BFL should hire you. Anyways, I had some hassles, after bench testing whilst i worked out how to set it up on a PI, I went to put it in its new home, fired up my psu and nothing Turns out the fuse holder wasn\\'t soldered on one side to the pcb. I had to remove the holder and solder the fuse direct. No Problem for me but wanted to let you know in case others have problems.Anyway all is good.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYeah I swear julz has ordered pre-packed in various quantities ready to go. Damn he is fast.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nMy order of 50 more BE\\'s (ordered yesterday afternoon) arrived this morning, looking forward to getting home and messing around with this 49 port USB hub\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, 49 port USB hub, PC power supply, fuse holder, psu\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-25 02:29:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner 49 port hubs + 50 units! In Stock.! 1.75 BTC - Hub only 1.1\\n### Original post:\\nPricing added. I don\\'t have very many hubs so they are going to sell out fast.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner 49 port hubs\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-25 03:19:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 96/100] R11:BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off. $123=8-10GH Nov. 1\\n### Original post:\\n96 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI like your style so I just ordered 2 shares to test the waters, order #332.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m so happy you ordered the way you did, no need for me to do math of how much goes into R8 / R11\\'s wallets.R11 has one order.R8 has another.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 2 shares\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-25 08:20:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [NEW ULTIMATE Group Buy][COINTERRA 2 Th/s] 1.2BTC=40 Gh/s (John K. Escrow)\\n### Original post:\\nAre the miner already ordered\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nconsider switching any buying this \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThink it\\'s best if we get it straight from the Manufacturer so that we have more security behind our purchase.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nwell the only reason i said this, is because the guy is a trusted member of the forum and it comes in december.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI sen\\'t some BTC and an e-mail earlier today, I might just be the first on this one!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nInteresting, What is the delivery date?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nJanuary 2014. Please see: for additional information\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nWhew, we sorted everything out on Skype (with the cointerra site acting up on me) . Thanks for being understanding and sorry again for the delay! Thank god we got into the Jan Batch.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nGood news!If you\\'ve already bought from Ultibit\\'s TerraMiner IV 1 order then you\\'ll be glad to know that the order\\'s been placed! If you\\'ve wanted to buy from Ultibit but haven\\'t trusted us in the past, now you know that you can!This TerraMiner IV 2 offer is still accepting purchases!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nCelks just pledged 1\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nThanks Will let me post here now!Chris\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAaah...at last. Good to hear we\\'re still in for Jan! I\\'ll stop spamming you then\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'ll pledge for 2. Im actually in for more I just didn\\'t want to take up a bunch of pledge slots. So after the first 10 are met I\\'m sure I\\'ll take 2 more. I wish I had gotten in on the first one. Sorry guys it\\'s moving kind of slow here and I have other commitments now. I do stand by the statement that I wish I gotten in on the first one\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSent Coins and TX ID!Can\\'t wait. Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nTerraMiner IV 1 is in the process of being ordered. We\\'re just waiting for John K. to respond to our PM. TerraMiner IV 1 is ordered!TerraMiner IV 2 hasn\\'t sold enough yet\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n40 GH/s in Jan is good for 0.8BTC\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nare you going to drop the BTCprice\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nDone.Current buyers: You will receive refunds of BTC0.4 (Your purchases are still safe and valid). Check your email inbox for further notice. *Receipts are available upon request\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWow I like the way you work! Refunds are always a +\\'s . I HOPE the guy who is doing my GB see your honesty and follow your example:!) im NOT Saying my guy is not Honesty the guy is on top of his game!!!Question? Why are you giving your customers a Refund Just to put it out there?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nWe\\'re trying to make Bitcoin better, not worse So if it\\'s possible to mine more competitively, we\\'ll make it happen for our customers.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: COINTERRA 2 Th/s, TerraMiner IV 1, TerraMiner IV 2\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-17 19:55:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED] BITFURY hosting - All 3 units ordered\\n### Original post:\\nHi pajak666, do you have any updates on the currently state of this project?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOnly updates I got are those that according to buzzdave post we should receive our units in early October, there will be probably two October batches. We are October batch #1\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nUpdate 09.08.2013 - Closed, all shares sold Update 09.08.2013 - Some of my IRL friends still didn\\'t pay for their shares, so there are some more shares to buy. First come first served. Currently there are shares worth 4.17 BTC left for potential buyersUpdate 14.07.2013 - I start to accept paypal and skrill payments. If you will request chargeback or do any other weird thing with your payment, I will simply remove you from the shareholders list.To avoid mess and constant editing of original post I\\'ve decided to start new thread.previous thread is here: WE ARE?We are Felipeo and pajak666 we run online store which is currently in beta stage. Once you click FAQ button, you will see our company adress and that we are fully registered company in Poland.Also here is confirmed Felipeo ID by John K.Details of our current mining farm can be found here: Punin is only shipping his Bitfury units only to Europe me and my friend Felipeo decided to expand our mining farm project. aware to use only adress you control.In other words adress that you can send signed message with.Terms and Conditons are the same as for our current farm except we reserve 13% of hashing power.When\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhithere is my auction3 BTC for 4 shares price!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIs it possible to still buy some shares ?Tnnx\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nPmed ? Sorry for the noobness but what does this mean ? Send you a PM ?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi pajak666, any updates?gb\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI second that. An update would be nice.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSo...any update?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\ni see pajak666 is trying to sell a 120 GH bitfury miner: was on the forum today saying he is 57 btc down: an update would be nice please ...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHelloSorry for not providing any updates but as you know I was busy collecting email addresses from group buyers.At the moment I am working on automating payouts, that\\'s why I need your email addresses (each participant will be able to log in to his own mining cabinet and make payouts when he want\\'s to).I have also received tracking numbers, it should be delivered on monday according to UPS tracking system.Data center is set up, PSU\\'s are waiting, so we are ready to go.Probably tommorow or at sunday each group buyer will receive email with further instructions and acces to his mining cabinet.How did I even missed all that new posts in this thread asking for updates...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nthanks for update!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAll shareholders should receive email or PM (if they did not provided valid email).Code:Dear Shareholders!Today we have received first mining unit.We start hashing today.Each of you will be able to menage his own payouts, either manually orin automated way.Please go to www.polmine.pl and ask for password reminder (use emailaddress which received this message).In your \"user statistics you should be able to see you share percentagefrom miner \"Bitcointalk\".Share percentage is calculated according to this spreadsheet: will be distrubuted from master account automatically each timepool will find a block.Our current hashrate will be visible here: can sort it by Mh/s or by name or just use ctrl+f to find our miner.Except that, either I will post graphs from miner statistics in Groupbuy thread or I will give login details to master account to someonetrusted (forum trusted) from our GB.If something is unclear please contact hashing.Bitcoins FTW!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nGood to hear that this GB has started mining\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nother two units are on my waythey left Finland @ fridayestimated delivery time is wednesday but I really hope to see it tommorow.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nGreat work with integrating GB payouts with polmine pool, very convenient. My first share is now visible :\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nConfirming as well. Good job, Pajak666.Here is to hoping that UPS won\\'t be brutal with our remaining miners...\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nReporting in!All miners are hashing:)Promised hashrate is meet, hope it will stay stabil.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAwesome work Pajak!\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nJust a heads-up to all members of this Group Buy. Please check your accounts at Polmine for correctness.My Polmine user name has been changed and I lost access to my miner shares and payout history.Whether it is an external hacking or insider job remains to be seen. I informed Polmine via PM to one of their forum admins. Waiting to hear anything back from them.FYI: I do not reuse passwords on different websites..EDIT: I got in touch with Polmine admins (via their forum). They confirm it was an internal reconfiguration, due to some account conflicts. Now my account bala\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY units, 120 GH bitfury miner, mining unit, miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-25 12:08:51',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.035BTC, 49 port hub , Blades 1.1 BTC] [Aust/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nGot the hub and BE\\'s all plugged in, working well! Would really like to have some more of these usb hubs for the other 40 BE\\'s I haven\\'t found a home for yet\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, 49 port hub, Blades\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-23 02:51:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [WAIT LIST!] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nwhen do you expect the next group buy to start with what type of delivery time frame?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGlad I got in when I did Looking forward to getting these things hooked up and mining!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAs soon as Beastlymac announces a second run of Blue Fury units I\\'ll immediately start a group buy for it. Anyone that misses out that is on the wait list will get priority on the second batch as well.You and me both!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\na little hashing pr0n for everyone\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWell we already missed one difficulty increase and it looks like we will have another before they are in our hands. Not your fault you can\\'t ship what you don\\'t have but ouch.Next week means by the 26th so maybe by Nov 1 in our hands?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nCorrect, I\\'ll ship all the orders as soon as they are in hand so exact delivery depends on your location and the type of shipping you chose but it should be 1-3 business days.Beastlymac is working on a compensation plan for everyone that receive units from this Batch #1 group buy. I\\'ll notify everyone as soon as he announces it.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI would be open to a buy one get one free situation applied retroactively to existing orders\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nA little love for ssinc. He\\'s great to work with, wish everyone I purchased things from was as nice and easy to work with as he is.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThey probably won\\'t know until after Beastlymac starts shipping. That way we will know the magnitude of the delay. I\\'m hoping he will make \\'next week\\' but might not. I\\'m also hoping he is spending his time making it happen instead of working on \\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOh god no coupons please... lol they didn\\'t turn out well for Friedcat\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWorked ok for me at btcguild. But I hope not either. I don\\'t want to spend more right now.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWill you ROI with a usb like this? Or would you need to buy in bulk so you can get that nice discount\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI hope I don\\'t hurt your feeling by telling you.. You got fucked over by btcguild. The prices were way higher then you could get from canary or SSB. BTCGuild made it seem like you were getting a great bargain by this huge release of \"Coupons\" When the reality was you could buy them cheaper all day long on these very forums.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYes and no. I agree I would not buy them there now. But I still saved some BTC. Not as much as elsewhere but it did work. But back to topic I would rather get something other than a coupon from Beastymac.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nany more left?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nActually, it\\'s a sound Yes. They have been always cheaper from me or SSB. btcguild was able to maximize the pricing because of it\\'s target audience (I won\\'t go into an exact explanation other than most newbie miners start at btcguild, you can figure out the rest) and from a capitalist point of view, btcguild did very well for it\\'s owners, I can\\'t fault them for being able to maximize their profits. after all, the re-sellers are shovel and picks vendors...\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nDid you get a chance to watch \"GOLD FEVER\" mini series on the Discovery channel the last few weeks? If not its a MUST SEE\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI will have to join the refund group if there is not some action here this week. Sorry, its just business.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nMe too\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\ni want to sell 12 of these that i have reserved in this group buy (i have 30 paid for). pm me best offer.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nIf they don\\'t ship this week I want a refund as well. Thankfully though. I was just informed that production has started and shipping starts this week. I\\'ll notify everyone as soon as I have tracking for the order.Also, compensation is about to be announced.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI am on the refund list as well, I understand you\\'re kinda in the middle here. This is just business, Id def. contact your supplier and state your concerns. Not to mention, I believe it was already stated that (this is not an attack- just biz)\"they will start shipping units next week\" - last week\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nFrom whom? In what form?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nFrom BPM beastlymac to be announced\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nwill sell now for .78 each for all 12.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-25 01:44:32',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [TONIGHT] ASICMiner 49 port hubs! In Stock, ready to ship!\\n### Original post:\\nHoping you\\'ll know whether or not these will work with Rasp Pi?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ncould you post dimensions also.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nWOW await more informations\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nInterested.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nInterested\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThis you?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nCrazy is in Dallas, TX\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks for the pics, no that\\'s not me on ebay. I\\'m prepping one for a demo, stay tuned.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHOW CLOSE TO 163 usd will the hub be? I see it is a usb 2 and I like it. I also know most of these are hard on a psu as most newer psu\\'s only do 25A at 5volt.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI have a lot of atx psu\\'s on hand. I have this new in box:Seasonic Platinum-760 rates at 125 watts for 5 voltI have this new in box and have to do a review for newegg.corsair rm 650 rates at 130 watts for 5 voltyou know for 160 usd plus 100 for a psu you are at 260 usd for 49 hubs. which is about 5 bucks a port. 7 dollars a stick and you have 49 ports for about 600 or 12 dollars a port. that is about 16gh for 600. still I would not mind 1 of these\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nHopefully he does it the same way the Australian reseller is doing it: Free with a purchase of 50 erupters: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAnyone tested that ?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nbe careful, a BE consume 500mA+\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner 49 port hubs, Rasp Pi, Seasonic Platinum-760, corsair rm 650, erupters\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-26 07:43:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN][Paypal] ASICminer USB $14.99 & Blades $399.99\\n### Original post:\\nUp.Hi there.I vouch for these guys so far. Dealing with my two small orders they were nothing but perfect. Fast in shipping, communicative and customer oriented. Right way to conduct business in my opinion.Cheers.GBM\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICminer USB, Blades\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-26 21:21:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 89/100] R11:BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off. $123=8-10GH Nov. 1\\n### Original post:\\nHi Nick,Thank you and welcome aboard! Please keep in mind that we run our co-op a bit differently in that we vote on important matters and we vote before the 5 month mark to see if the majority of the Round\\'s owners want to sell the miner as used online, or in-person, since much of the annual mining output (90%+) should likely be produced by then.*We then split the resale proceeds based on one\\'s proportion of ownership of that Round\\'s miner, in order to help recoup investment costs.==89 shares Not your lawyer, financial attorney, or dear ole mum]\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOk, snagged 1 share for myself. No idea if it will ever pay off but what the heck I like the idea\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run, Bitfury\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-26 21:58:47',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury! 40% off, $123=8-10GH, Nov 1\\n### Original post:\\nJust stopping by before I dive into a PC rebuild.Sounds like we need another Black Arrow GB.I\\'m sure bobsag3 won\\'t mind. ==Thank you everyone for making R10 a success! ZERO shares available. Round 10 is CLOSED**Pending all payments for reservations==Round 11 will be starting shortly. Good ole copy/pasta thanks to bobsag3 securing more Black Arrow Bullet Run boards for the DZ MC. Thanks Bob!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThe first batch of boards are complete.Here\\'s the world\\'s first pics of fully populated Black Arrow Bitfury Prosperos: bobsag3!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nis R10 actually closed or just waiting for people to pay?Is there a deadline for R10/R11?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi Etienne,There is no real deadline on this. However, these units are now scheduled for shipping today/tomorrow from Black Arrow and expected to be hashing by Wednesday/Thursday. For those that join later, their payouts will be prorated based on how many days they were fully PAID in that mining period.For example: if they buy their share 7 days into the mining period, they would receive about half of that period\\'s payout per share.==We may be offering cloudhashing for this and have plans in the works for pro cloudhashing with other investors and co-ops, completely separate from our at-cost GBs here. If we branch out into cloudhasing this would be operated on a separated site, with full incorporation. It would still be priced to the best values out there in that niche.So...that is what\\'s going to go on with some of any extra unsold hardware.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Black Arrow Bullet Run boards, Black Arrow Bitfury Prosperos\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-27 01:28:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner Blades (Rev2) 10.7gh/s - 1.1 BTC - Pre-made power connectors!\\n### Original post:\\nI have a few blades left. I\\'m still shipping with pre-made power adapters.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blades (Rev2) 10.7gh/s\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-27 01:34:40',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [CLOSED] KnCMiner Jupiter Shares GB3 .1/per share = .4Gh/s\\n### Original post:\\nJust curious but what is the ETA on the reservations in terms of placing the order?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThis Wednesday.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHey KnCMiningOp - Any updates?Thanks and hope all is well,IAS\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHad some people not make payment. So 48 shares still left. I might make a quick loan to the op. Tomorrow is my absolute deadline to get this thing ordered.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks for the update. I\\'m flat broke so can\\'t pick up any more shares. Hope you find a way, but if not, still appreciate all the work you did.We need a more transparent system so people who reserve shares like that and then don\\'t pay don\\'t do the same with other auctions. Yes - A handle list somewhere. No judgment, just sharing.IAS\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI understand where you are coming from and do think that some people should be on a list like that, but not everyone doesn\\'t pay out of malicious reasons. Peoples finances change and things come up. I would be more for something along the lines of expanding the current trust system to incorporate \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAgreed, I don\\'t think we should penalize a person for canceling 1 time. But if someone has a history of it, then that should be integrated into a trust system. As, they basically stopped others from getting in and perhaps even are partly responsible for killing an auction. That then puts people like me (and the others in this auction) looking for another auction and then being further down the list. It also stops people from going into more than one auction and just seeing which one reaches the end first and canceling the other.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPlease post here: our first & second successful group buys: & have decided to do another group buy for another KnCMiner Jupiter 400Gh/sYou can see the financials of the mining op here: info:1000 shares total:750 shares public.50 shares myself for management. 200 shares being issued to the mining operation for weekly on Saturdays. Please note that these group buy 3 shares will not start receiving a dividend until this unit is up and KnCMiner Jupiter $7,131PSU: ~$250AC Unit: $100 Shelf & misc: $50 Weekly:Miner estimated power usage: ~$15Standalone AC unit: ~$15 Monthly:Rent: $0Internet: $0Management Fee: $0Future Plans:Short term investments on BTCT.Create PT shares on BTCT.Save profits and buy additional units.Payment & Escrow:John K escrow.Or the mining op address is: you send your payment please pm me the txid, your dividend address and your email address. Price per share is .1 BTCFAQ:Are the shares transferable?Yes they are.Can I pay with Paypal?Yes @ $10/share. Please PM me for details.Can I pay via BTCT?Yes you may. Please PM me for details.What are the short term re-investments?See the Shares table here: ar\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nMajority of shares have been sold and paid for. 1 person is waiting on Coinbase and because he is already a partial shareholder I\\'ll extend him the time required for Coinbase to finalize the transfer.All 3 Jupiters have been order so for all practical purposes we can say this GB is closed!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAny news on shipping yet?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI\\'m curious when the cut-off date was for October deliveries. I emailed KNC with that question.Anyone know, that might tell us where we stand? If you look at the KNC Miner thread, you can see approximate order numbers shipping now and those about to ship.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nany updates on this?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHe\\'s been sending emails all 3 are online and there have been distributions made.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYes! All three Jupiters are up and hashing. I just sent out a dividend. Also you can keep an eye on things here: \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner Jupiter 400Gh/s\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-27 17:22:33',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 64/100 avail]R8: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost +Host, $60= 10-15GH/s +UPS\\n### Original post:\\n64 shares are available.Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI ordered 5 shares of R8 a little while ago, order #333, but I see it\\'s showing as \"sold out\" on the site now. Maybe somebody swooped in for the rest or the counter is off?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrder 333 is showing as paid so your still good, not sure why its showing as sold out there are shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n5 more days left in this promo if anyone wants to take advantage of the 15% Halloween Sale at Bitmine.Whatever BTC we have on hand by October 31 will be sent to Bitmine to purchase whatever hashrate we get, and this will likely close out Round 8. Any advances made in the price of BTC since you bought your share(s) will be applied to extra hashrate per share at no extra charge! This same situation led to 9% extra hashrate being slated to be spread amongst R7 share owners since we had enough funds on hand to buy our target hashrate of 800GH/s with only 91 shares bought.This still leaves open the possibility of a Round 8B for extra Bitmine modules for the R7 rig after October 31.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n$60 for 10-15gh/s/ is a pretty damn good deal. On the site, R8 says it\\'s sold out. I\\'d like to pay with credit card if possible.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'ve edited the product page it should say in stock now, at the moment we don\\'t have a credit card processor.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSo do we still send a message through the site to reserve shares? I\\'d like to snag a couple.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R8, R7 rig\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-07-08 21:11:50',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [closed][Groupbuy] !NEW batch KNCMiner - 8 sold! SOLD OUT\\n### Original post:\\nEDIT 2013-06-30: We\\'ve asked John K to verify our identities. You can find his posts here: the successfull groupbuy in the pre-buy period, we decided to start another groupbuy for the second batch of KNC Jupiter miners that will be released. Unlike the first groupbuy there is no delivery date set yet for these miners so it has a higer risk.Learning from our earlier groupbuy we made a few changes. First of the share price. On the first groupbuy shareprice was 0.50 BTC. We still saw a lot of people only buying one share and some having trouble getting the 0.50 BTC. So, we decided instead of putting 120 shares in a miner we\\'ll split it into 240. Last time we had bad luck with the BTC price. What we do this time is set the share price slightly higher. Any difference in the final price of the miner will be added to first payout (after first expenses are deducted but before issue to ADDICTION). Price is therefore set at 0.30 BTC per share.Another difference is the ADDICTION asset on Bitfunder. We will be releasing this asset shortly for everyone who joined the first groupbuy. Because delivery of these miners is later than the first batch, we can\\'t and won\\'t issue new ADDICTION sha\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAnd Miner08 is bought - TX 1 has 12 MinersGroupbuy 2 has 8 MinersTotal of 20x400GHs\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ni\\'ll buy a sharedo i need a bitfund account or?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHey rusty,We just closed this groupbuy today. We are planning to open a new one, but with the recent btc crash we\\'ll at least wait with it untill btc price has recovered or at least stabilized a bit.Cheers,\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nno prob, i should have bought sooner give message on the dutch forum if you are starting up a new buy and i\\'ll order some shares grtz\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI sure will! Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\ntyrion70 && blastbob,Now that terrahash has proven to be unreliable and a possible scam, it is even more important that the slack be taken up by outstanding members of the community such as you.I have requested a refund from my terrahash orders and will be re-deploying those funds (when I get them back) towards additional hashing power from somewhere, I would like to spend that money with you, as you have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are willing and capable of pulling this off.I would like to get in total 100GH/s of hashing power of which I currently have ~60+ between the 2 KnC group buy\\'s that the two of you have put together.Please re-consider additional group buy\\'s.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ni concur as well, you guys are doing a real good job and you have me as an investor as long as u remain functioning Also, I placed an order for a 50 Ghz BFL bitforce way before this GB - IF it ships, is there anyway I can add it (small compared to a jupiter, but I still have to ask) to our mining farm? I paid 24BTC for it and have just put in a request for a refund (doubt i will get it) but if i don\\'t I am going to use it. Was wondering if it would be in anyway useful to the mining power of this GB.You are more than welcome to say no, as a matter of fact anyone else can say no too - i was just mentioning it to see if it can in anyway add to our total hash.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHey guys,@btceic, thank you for the compliment! We are planning a new groupbuy, but with the current BTC prices we feel we should wait at least a bit to see if it goes down more or stabilizes. If we were to do the same groupbuy again, we\\'d have to raise the shareprice to at least 0.42 to ensure we don\\'t have to add our own money again. We\\'ve had to do that twice and even though we\\'ll get it back when the miners arrive it\\'s starting to become quite an amount @KSV with regards to the BFL miner; we can add hashing power but at a set \"price\" per GH as described in the IPO agreement. One addiction share equals 32.23MH, so we could issue 50.000 / 32.23 =~ 1550 addiction shares at market price if we add the miner. At current price that means 1550 * .0111 = 17.2 BTC. We would also require that the miner would be physically added to the existing ones. So as things are standing now, we can\\'t But we\\'ll have to see how things look when we start hashing..Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWould you consider $usd vs btc to help spread the risk do to the current volatility?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nActually yes, we\\'ve been thinking of using paypal. The only problem is costs arent transparent. I\\'ve done a paypal transaction last GB, which ended up with little over 5% transaction fees! This was due to payment coming from another continent i believe. The receiver has to pay the costs.We could do paypal, but then we\\'d have to make sure we can buy a whole miner thru paypal before anyone actually sends any money. Any ideas are welcome..Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSomeone else mentioned paying as a gift gets around the fees in PayPal? but not sure if that works. But either way we could have the buyer pay the extra amount if w\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Jupiter miners, Miner08, MinersGroupbuy 2, 50 Ghz BFL bitforce\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-28 02:53:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.035BTC, 49 port hub ] [Aust/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nNo more blades in stock.I\\'m down to a few hundred USBs.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Block Erupter USB, 49 port hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-28 17:08:28',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [In Stock] ASICMiner 49 port hubs + 50 units! 1.75 BTC - Hub only 1.1 BTC\\n### Original post:\\nI received my second batch of USB hubs today. I will update the thread when stock is depleted. All of today\\'s purchases will be packaged tonight and shipped tomorrow morning. Also, I\\'ve arranged for an individual to handle shipments during the day. Starting tomorrow, all orders placed before 11:00 am CST should be shipped same day.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner 49 port hubs, USB hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-28 19:38:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [SHARES] [OPEN] BITFURY SHARES (680+ GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\nTx-ID: Link\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nbtc sent for shares\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY SHARES\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-28 20:49:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 59/100 avail]R8: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost +Host, $60= 10-15GH/s +UPS\\n### Original post:\\nHey madpoet,Yes, please do. It\\'s the easiest way for us to track things and export to spreadsheets. Also: very important, if you\\'re buying from 2 or more DZ MC rounds, *please* separate the transactions so that Thomas doesn\\'t have to pull his hair out trying to figure out who bought what, for how much (a limitation of our free tools, at the moment; upgrades are planned shortly).==59 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGreat news for the owners of the 41-45 or so shares paid for R8! Thomas bought a few shares so this Round so that the ordered hashrate could be kicked up to 600GH/s for Round 8! For the co-op: We were able to take advantage of the rise in price of BTC to lock in a payment just a little north of the $200 USD mark.Ergo: your hashrate just became more valuable due to the rise of BTC\\'s value since your payment(s). You directly benefit without any additional cost!We\\'ll sort out just how much hashrate bonuses you guys scored once we have final numbers but the calculation for payouts in R8 will be:1) Proportion of HashRate for R8 is: Total Hashrate - Round 7 Hashrate = Round 8 HashRate.1400GH/s - 800 GH/s = 600 GH/s Nominal HashRate This is therefore equivalent to 42.86% of the Bitmine\\'s combined Hashrate and concomitant payouts. This is assuming we were unable to split hashrate fairly between R7/R8 at these exact proportions in software.2) Within Round 8, after fees of 2.75% hosting/management fees are applied, the payout calculation per miner is:Total BTC Mined * Your Shares / Total R8 shares PAID = Your R8 payoutEx. 10 BTC Mined by R8 modules. 24 shares PAID out of 48 SOLD in R8. There\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s\\nHardware ownership: True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-29 08:25:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [ASICMINER] [Block Erupter USB 0.035BTC] [Aust/NZ]\\n### Original post:\\nOrder arrived this morning.very nice . thanksAlso any recommendations on a power supply for the HUB? any spec\\'s etc on it?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nCan anyone who has the hub tell me what size fuse is in it? Mine from BTC Guild didn\\'t seem to come with one.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSeems to be a 40 Amp, 32V Blade fuse... looks like the same sort as used in a lot of cars.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMINER Block Erupter USB, power supply for the HUB, 40 Amp 32V Blade fuse\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-07-19 06:51:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [Closed]Avalon Chips - 0.081 BTC (Global+Escrow)-BATCH2 SECURED\\n### Original post:\\nBatch2 is now officially closed. The chips will be ordered this weekend and they will arrive in September. Please stop sending BTC to the Group-Buy\\'s address.Regards\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi t13hydraI have send you a PM regarding shipping... I didn\\'t know what full control shipping is but now I fond it explain in hire. How can I change shipping to \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHey t13hydraI won 10 Chips in this Auction: I can\\'t find My Adress in your Batch #1, what\\'s happend?edit: I forgot to send you a pm, now you have a pm (:\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDid I forgot to do something? I have also 32 chips for Auction...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI think so, souliouz said in our confirmation pm, that we should pm hydra with a signed message from our wallet to verify our ownership\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI thought is was optional in case of disputes... Need to figure it out if this is possible with Ufasoft multicoin...And I got msg from t13hydra regarding chips...\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHi t13hydra,do we manage to add something like 48 chips in the second batch? I think it would not be difficult to ask for a little increase in the number... Let me know and best regards,ilpirata79\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\n\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nNice, I got nothing -.-What did he said?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSee PM\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nokay interesting... I send him another PM seems that he ignored my fist pm (maybe accidently I dont know)\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWell I know that when my GB starts production faze I will probably miss a PM or two. At that time I will probably do more or less only mailing list updates and hoping that real thing is as good as samples and everything will work... So I think you can forgive him...\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nof course (:he pm\\'ed me today, so everything is fine now ^^\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nany updates? Its been a while since i sent payment...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nHi all, sorry for answering so late, i\\'m very busy lately and i also might miss some PMs. I\\'ll try to answer everybody as i usually do.Regarding the shipping, i can change that for you on the website if you let me know your order number.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nHi there,We cannot add to the second batch, because it\\'s already ordered and everybody has his own share of chips from there. You could, however, order a complete miner on my website. That goes through a different channel. Your lead time would be 10 weeks starting from the completion of your payment and i can guarantee you the chips no matter the status of these batches and group-buys conducted here on the forum.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nKlondike_bar,Can you share a TX checksum, please? Or some detail about your payment? Please PM me.Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nHi, I sent you a PM a few days ago, not sure if you had a chance to look at it yet.Let me know if you want me to re-send it.FFMG\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nPM sent, though the concern isnt really my order in particular (i have email confirmation of payment), but rather the turnaround time. I am order # 138X, and am curious whether my unit will be made with batch1 avalon chips or batch 2 chips.since the \\'groupbuy\\' for batch 2 ended, there has not been much new info presented by you/AlphaHPC (i understand the klondike design is still not 100% finalized) and I just want to know if there is any news pertaining to timeframe\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI can sell you my 16 or 32 chips from Batch 2 (PCB order already paid) if t13hydra agrees to manually move my order to you.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI will gladly move the chips, but i\\'m going to have to refund the board costs to you, Baloo.\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nHey hydra would ordering the complete board and chips off your site be faster or buying the chips from batch 2 be faster? Faster in terms of me receiving it in my handsDanny\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nDo you still intend to offer hosting ?\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nFinal beta of bkkcoins seems working fine. I\\'m waiting for updates now\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nI would like to sell 16 chips from batch #1. Please PM me with offers.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nDoes anyone know of a group buy that has received their Avalon Chips?\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nIn last \\'newspaper update\\' Avalon said shipping chips batches will begin in mid July, according to the order of purchase.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nHi,Buying the chips from batch 2 will be faster.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nYes, indeed. Will have another video of my own proto board when it will be working. The board itself is assembled already, but we need to test it using the beta software at hand.Regards,Steve\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nWill you be able to take fiat to pay for the board?I have some chips in batch II, (48), but getting coins to pay for the boards and delivery is not that easy.I can do Paypal/Google and so on...FFMG\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nT13,Are you still planning to source boards or buy from Klondike (@$6 per board) and which pic will you be planning on using.Regards\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nHi,No - the prebuilt boards cannot be put into the SMT machine to mount the chips on it. It takes ages to mount 16 chips x\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Avalon Chips, PCB, complete miner, complete board, proto board\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-07 19:19:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [SHARES] [MINING!!!] BITFURY SHARES (360+ GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\n17 / 130 (+50 Bonus) availablePrice: 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTC 3 Share = 3 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz### Swiss BTC Mining Association ###\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n... S.B.M.A. Blog ...... I maid it for all participants of my project, feel free to comment or ask stuff ...... I will try to get back to you asap.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n14 / 130 (+50 Bonus) availablePrice: 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTC 3 Share = 3 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThank you for all this positive feedback ... this is what makes it even more worth to put time and energy into this project.Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nNEWS:1. Refunds:- BFL Investment 100% refunded! (5 GH)- Avalon Investment 50% refunded, rest should be refunded soon (Bizwoo, marto74)! (45 GH)2. Hardware:Project Hardware (Status: Mining)Project Hardware (Status: Waiting on delivery)POOL: estim. 360+ GHSo there should be no negative effect on our project from the incompentent business practice from BFL & Avalon.2. Tuning Round:Today I got my new multimeter so I was ready for an other round of tuning our hashing boards. They are about 5% hotter now, at least it\\'s what I\\'m measuring from the boards surface.### Swiss BTC Mining Association ###\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI do have to say- very very impressed with how you have handled this!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nthumbs up from his largest share holder\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nLikewise. Very professional indeed!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nthx a lot for the positive feedback... NEWS:Yesterday one board stopped working, after dropping a lot in Hashrate and getting really hot. I shut down the miner and tried a restart, the board speeded up right to 37 gh .... and stopped a few minutes later again. I was forced to remove the graphite from the resistor and restarted the system. Everything was fine again except that the first board was running at 20 gh, the untuned speed.I couldn\\'t resist ... and reapplied softly some graphit until about 1.2k.24h! ... seems that the board is again stable!Cross fingers.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n11 / 130 (+50 Bonus) availablePrice: 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTC 3 Share = 3 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nSALE:3 for 2 PRICE: BTC\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nA bit tempting\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nNEWS:1. Hardware:It seems that our ship will get speed again soon ... !Whatever will come it will be with UPS Express ...2. Payout:Today is the next scheduled payout, let\\'s see what we have mined this week on \"ghash.io\". I will do the transaction and accounting later this day.3. Tuning:We had a little incident this week with our miner (regulator shutdown, because of too much OC), but overall the hashrate was constantly increased by modifying the resistor and some software tuning. The bad part of this is that now ... it probably only can get worse ... :-)That\\'s it!### Swiss BTC Mining Association ###\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n...more Overclocking vs. StabilityI had to decide for stability, the recent improvement got one board in a unstable zone. We reached the first time an avg. higher the 70 GH/s, but the stability was bad and I had to restart the miner sporadically.We are now on a moderate tuning of each h-board to 32-33 GH which is about 30% higher then the expected hashingrate.Here the actual pool avg. speed ...\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n8 / 130 (+50 Bonus) availablePrice: 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTC 3 Share = 3 GH/s = BTC 8 Share = 8 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n5 / 130 (+50 Bonus) availablePrice: 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTC 3 Share = 3 GH/s = BTC 8 Share = 8 GH/s = BTCPRICE CUT!!!**for other price proposal PM plz\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nSOLD OUT! At the moment! / 130 (+50 Bonus) available\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nNEWS:The Miner is now stable in the 70 GH area!Today is again payout ... !The hardware should arrive probably next week ...Heatsinks, Fans & SMD-Parts it\\'s all ready!\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nNEWS:The first delivery of oct. boards has arrived ... I started to tune them and add some heatsinks and stuff ... later today I will start with software tuning and some more \"modding\". What I\\'ve seen sofar seems good ... let\\'s see ..\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nNEWS:Goal: Pool 360 GH done!Hardware:The Operation ist running more or less stable right now, I got still 2 boards which do some problems from time to time. The Project is running right now for a short period with more then 360 GH (around 410+GH). The Bitburner is beeing sold on (ebay), Cause: No installation for cooling! Mainfocus now is stability and performance of the miner.Investment:In the near future I will start again some Investments to raise our total hashpower. It will be based on products from punin bitfury. If you\\'re interested in more GH just send me a PM or an eMail.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\n20 / 170 (+50 Bonus) availablePrice: 1 Share = 1 GH/s = BTC 3 Share = 3 GH/s = BTC 10 Share = 10 GH/s = BTC 20 Share = 20 GH/s = BTCNew buyed shares start hashing instantly for you!PRICE CUT!!!**for othe\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY SHARES, multimeter, hashing boards, graphite, regulator, Heatsinks, Fans, SMD-Parts, oct. boards\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-30 13:39:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.2 BTC=67GH/s 30/30 shares , 3 Sold\\n### Original post:\\nCould you show us the adjusted member\\'s share number? So we can confirm it.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nyou have the link to spreadsheet?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI spend 15btc for 10 shares of the 3rd miner. According to your purchase prize, I should get 15/1.19=12.6 shares. Why my shares is only 10 on the sheet?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI see 12 shares on the sheet, did you refresh page?the .6 will be paid out with first dividend payment\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI have download Bit Message, what is the BM address ?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSo whats the final BTC BTC price per share\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThe final share price is in OP\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHello,i own one share in GB 1 which i want to refund now for the initial price.Would be nice if you could do this.1 Share BTC-Address: 1Regards.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI\\'ll buy nemercry\\'s 1 share from GB1 if he/she wants out\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYou can sell your share, but a refund is only available if hardware has not been purchased yet or Cointerra does not deliver.Cheers\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nDid you get an answer on your guestion?I\\'d like to know the address as well...\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV, 3rd miner\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-30 16:35:04',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN, 75/100 avail]R8B: Bitmine Rig, 600GH/s, At-cost +Host, $60= 10-15GH/s+UPS\\n### Original post:\\nIs projected hashrate per share 12-15? (600GH/s - 850GH/s)I trust you guys will be able to get turbo out of it with your experience :p.I should be able to put a dent in them shares before Oct 31st, when is the delivery due?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, that seems to be closer to actual hashrate. We\\'ll be kicking the tires on overclocking since we have site specific conditions that baby these miners vis-a-vis reminds me: thanks to the extra value of BTC that we just passed on to you all, the actual nominal and turbo hashrates for R8 shares is now officially estimated to be 25GH per Coincraft chip at nominal, 40GH/s per Coincraft chip at Turbo, so I can give you some estimates. Therefore:R8 Share ~= 600 GH/s / 47 shares = 12.76 GH/s ea.R8 Share - Turbo ~= 960GH/s / 47 shares = 17.87 GH/s ea.Not too shabby for $60 and with all of our exclusive co-op bonuses included.Remember: These are estimates and if the hardware is behaving well, we\\'ll see about getting even more hashrate without damaging our equipment.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDoesn\\'t seem like we are going to hit the 75 shares unless there is a huge spike\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWELL this one is too far down the road for most of us. The gear is due dec 20 - jan 10 that is a long time from now. I would order from r11 before I would order here.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYeah I know, and I have\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOrder# 368 from me. I picked up 2 R8B and 1 R11. Same payout address across the board.Thanks again.nuffsaid420\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, Coincraft chip, R8B, R11\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-30 18:03:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [UPDATE] CrazyGuy BFL Group buy #1 and #2\\n### Original post:\\nAll 210 Chips have been delivered for assembly in Austin!I personally delivered the chips to ChipGeek on Saturday and I\\'m told assembly started today. I had the privilege of holding their last rev production board and I must say, I\\'m impressed! MrTeal and ChipGeek have done a great job with the design and I think you will all be impressed with the final product along with the benefits of a modular design. Assembly and testing will go on throughout the week and I hope to have assembled boards in the mail by next weekend. Please keep an eye on MrTeal\\'s thread for updates, but I\\'d like to ask my group buy participants to contact me with any questions. You\\'ll need to purchase your own pads, backplates, pci brackets(optional), and coolers. I\\'ve ordered enough thermal pads for 24 boards, and I have a few of the other items as well. Please contact me if you would like to purchase some.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMrTeal and ChipGeek are making progress assembling our boards. Their current estimate for completion of batch 1 is early next week. My group buy participants - Please follow MrTeal\\'s thread for updates, but try to direct questions to me. I think it is best we let them spend as much time possible, in these last few days, perfecting the firmware.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ngo goi am batch 1 wait 2 boardsplease\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWe are getting close to delivery, if you haven\\'t sent me your shipping address, please do so now.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nGot my Chili board up and running. CGMiner recognized it immediately, it has a lower HW error percentage than my Jalapeo. Gotta say that CrazyGuy went above and beyond for me while I went through a difficult time with a sick family member. Just wanted to add that he has quickly become my primary source for mining hardware.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Chips, rev production board, pads, backplates, pci brackets, coolers, Chili board, Jalapeo\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False, False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-30 18:26:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [Open] CoinCraft Desk (1000) Shares - Escrow by SebastianJu *Updated W/New Miner\\n### Original post:\\nI will provide Escrow here. The Escrowaddress is: the needed amount is reached i will order the Miner with the target address provided by SolarWindMining.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nhow many GHs is one share?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI am working on a reply, I should have it ready with in the next 24hrsThe miner and Share Count may also change because of an email I have received from Bitmine.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI have completed a detailed explanation of how layouts are structured, you can view the documentation here Details On Outlay per Share - How You Get PayedThe simplest version that I can offer is thus:A total of 100 BTC invested in a given HPC (Hardware Purchase Cycle), the mining hardware has generated a 100 BTC profit that is designated to be split in the Profit Sharing Pool for the given HPC. Total BTC invested = 100 BTC, Profit Sharing Pool = 100 BTC, so we divide Total BTC invested (100 BTC) by Profits from pool (100 BTC), or, 100/100 BTC = 1 BTC.Price of Founders Contract is 1.5 BTC, 1.5 BTC x 1 BTC = 1.5 BTC - So the credit per Founders Contract is 1.5 BTCPrice of Standard Contract is 0.5 BTC, 0.5 BTC x 1 BTC = 0.5 BTC - So the credit per Standard Contract is 0.5 BTCThe same process is used to determine the layout credits for BitShare on the Rollover options you choose you will see different layouts, to understand these terms thoroughly you should read the The SolarWind Mining Company Investment ProgramI am changing the mining rig back to a Jupiter KnCMiner due to a negative email I have received from Bitmine. (No biggie, its just that Bitmine will not be able to \\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Miner, Jupiter KnCMiner\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-30 19:39:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [21 LEFT] GB #1 BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner ~2.5 GH/s 0.5999BTC or less $129 Paypal\\n### Original post:\\nTried to buy 7 with Paypal and got: \"This recipient is currently unable to receive money.\"\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI got it fixed\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDear god, the recent diff jump was brutal :-/391 million now\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWilling to bet some of the nah sayers that bought via paypal were doing chargebacks caused his account to get bound. Come on people these aren\\'t that far behind just relax!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThis is exactly what happend I am currently dealing with the fraud risk management department with paypal. I have however corrected it to where I can at least receive payments, but the company labeled me as a e-currency dealer/exchanger Which is not what I am doing I\\'m just selling the hardware. This is with the paypal compliance department. I have to fax them a notarized document explaining my business model.As for the fraud department, they are very very weary about the $13k+ USD that has gone into the paypal and out of it. They do not approve of the \"pre-order\" business model if I want to continue using Paypal in a future group buy I will need to look into getting a small business loan since all funds now going into my paypal are on reserve until products have been shipped. I did not think I had this many hoops to jump through to run a group buy but it has been quite hectic I do thank you guys for holding your orders and supporting me in this and for your patience. Absolute worse case senario I drop paypal as a payment processor and I add direct credit card processing on bitcoinminerz.com to still give it a ease of payment for the guys who can\\'t acquire bitcoins as easily.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFor the direct card processing Not sure what cart system that is but I\\'m sure authorize.net should have a payment module for it as they do most major ecommerce system out there. Most any of these will require a merchant account and all that jazz though just FYI.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI did snag one this morning. Sorry pp is such a hassle for sellers.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYeah it has been quite a pain. Any orders through paypal right now would really help to cover the costs of refunds theres now 18 units left over from the total ordered.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nGuess that number hasn\\'t drop like it should of with people increasing it backing out. Oh and they announced their compensation on product thread today for all those who were worried about it...hehe\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\ndo you still have any of these?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nyes he does.... \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSo whats the word on shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHey I ordered with PayPal and was wondering how will the compensation be for us? I do not want to cancel because I support what your doing and don\\'t want to cause more issues with your PayPal account but by now i could have gone and bought more GHS at CEX.IO.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nSo, can I order Blue Fury from bitcoinminerz.com and pay with paypal?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nYes you can order on bitcoinminerz.com and pay with paypal. I have tracking information and its scheduled for delivery friday. Depending on the time I will have a majority of the units out friday or saturday.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nCool cannot wait.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-30 17:17:48',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN] R11:BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off. $123=8-10GH Nov. 1\\n### Original post:\\nRe-opening R11 so that when R10 runs out we can just shift over seamlessly to this Round.100 shares available. ** Rough estimate: may be more or less.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMade an order (#358) for 20 shares. Didn\\'t realise payment was possible from multiple adresses until I made the order so I sent funds to one adress from which I would send the payment to the required payment adress. But now I have to wait an estimated two hours before the transactions are confirmed before I can make the payment.So if you see a cancelled order and a new one for 20 shares, those are mine :p.Edit: never mind, I think I\\'m just in time .Order #358 paid for, transaction ID: adress: \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI am happy to report I have received the tracking number for the boards, and should have them within 48 hours!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIts no problem, yes paying a partial payment will lock that address into your order so it would extend the time you have to pay it, if you send nothing the address can be reused by the site and will be automatically.Its the ultimate form of reserving you gotta put some sort of down payment =) and its out of my control\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust jumped in for 4 shares. If I get more money together and did a seperate transaction is they any way to combine them?Order #360 paid for, transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nIn the spreadsheet for ease of tracking each order is done separate, before payouts for ease of sending payouts I\\'ll more than likely combine shares that payouts are issued to the same address.So if you get more funds just place another order, the payment address will be different and the site will only say you purchased the 4 shares for the tone order.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThat works for me. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI didn\\'t make a partial payment within the 1 hour deadline. But I managed to pay the full amount within 90 minutes or so. Anyway, my order status says \\'Processing\\', so it\\'s all good I assume?Do we get some form of confirmation of completed payment?\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nAfter it gets entered in the spreadsheet you\\'ll get emails, either its completed or missing something. If its processing that means its good and the site detected the payment on the blockchain\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOk, thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWe have a UPS tracking number. Our BA boards are on their way, and are scheduled for delivery at the end of the day on 10/31, to be fully hashing on 11/1.Thank you to everyone that participated in this exclusive Group Buy Bullet Run Sale with Black Arrow boards. AFAIK: As Black Arrow\\'s Official US Reseller, bobsag3 will be *the* first US Custom Hardware vendor who will have actual miners on the shelf, ready to be shipped as soon as someone pays for them. Congratulations Bob! That\\'s a heckuva accomplishment from one of our own.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nFirst boards are already in the US! The last tracking location was Louisville, Kentucky. It needs to pass Customs essentially. From the UPS site:\"Registered with Clearing Agency. Shipment release pending Clearing Agency review. / Shipment submitted to Clearing Agency, awaiting final release. \"BTW, R10 is closed, so we can move any additional conversations or purchases to this thread. Cheers.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'m just waiting to work out payment details via quick pay now...I capped out r10 and bumped it back into r11 hehehe\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIm in for 9 shares,order #364 paid forTxID I change the payout address from my own, with which I paid for this order, to another one, shared with my venture bud and soul brah?Thanks,\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI think it is just a typo but I wanted to bring it to your attention on the DZ site there are two conflicting claims.\"Ergo: 1 share = $123 = 8.34 10 GH/s + 20 min. UPS backup + 1 month free hosting thanks to bobsag3 with the worlds cheapest professional insured ASIC hosting+ TO BE SHIPPED NOVEMBER 1, 2013 OR YOUR $/BTC BACK!\"Then down a few paragraphs:\"40% (or more) Below-cost Share price is: $123 for 10-15GH/s, shipping November 1 or your $/BTC back!\"I am already in and excited, but I wanted to bring this up. The way I am assuming is that 8.34 GH/s is almost guaranteed and 10 GH/s is hopefully what we will get. I would love 15 GH/s though\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nYou have it right- 8.34 is the minimum it will produce (Or I will add extra boards to make up) with hopefully some OC\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nYea that\\'s fine.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI purchased 1 more share order #369 1 sharetx id have now a total of 10 shares in r9/r10/r11#369 = 1 share------------- processing#349 = 1 share------------- processing#306 = 2 shares>>>>>>> complete#282 = 2 shares>>>>>>> complete#248 = 4 shares>>>>>>> complete total of 10 shares = 83 to 100gh of hash starting on the first.I have 19 shares in R5-R6 = about 108.3 gh of hash working as I type.So in a day or 2 I should have close to 200gh hashing with the coop.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nShenzhen, C\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Black Arrow boards, BA boards, miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-31 08:09:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.1 BTC=67GH/s 30/30 shares , 3 Sold\\n### Original post:\\nUpdated Balance sheet added to spreadsheet showing prorated balances for current purchases.Share price updated in OP to reflect current exchange rate. Now 1.1 BTC per shareCheers\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHiI\\'m happy to buy one share of GB1 if anyone is interested in selling. Please PM me.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nMay as well get the ball rolling on the fourth one Put me down for two shares please.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSelling GB1 share.If Interested PM me.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHow does the process work when you sell your shares, Soniq?I\\'d like to sell the 2 GB2 shares I bought back when they were 1.67 BTC each. I imagine I only get 2.2 BTC for them now since the share price has changed.Do I simply conduct a transaction with an interested party via a PM, then PM you with their username to let you know of my transaction with them & authorize you to transfer my shares to them?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWelcome, added to OP and spreadheetPlease send me your email and Skype user\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWell not necessarily as was proven with the rollout of KNC. I was promised 2nd day delivery for same later orders and turns out they were 10 days later. So earlier members will get priority if there are late delivery issues.Yes, conduct your transaction ( I can escrow if you like) once complete the seller must send me a signed message from the payment address authorizing the sale and transfer.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI don\\'t understand what this means and what it would mean with regard to the 2 shares I would be selling. It wouldn\\'t change the price of the shares I already have, that I\\'m selling, would it? Would you mind explaining this further so I can understand what you mean before I go & offer up my shares please?Thanks.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV, GB1, GB2, KNC\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-31 09:48:23',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [SHARES] [OPEN] BITFURY SHARES (700+ GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\nThis is your 19:33:48 ( this time the BTC/EUR prices was at 150.028 ...The prices in the thread are on a fixed euro value. In this case it is ...10 Share = 10 GH/s = BTC which correspond to 10 Shares ... and equal to a share price of 15 .At the time you payed your share the price was @0.0999813368171275 BTC.The +50 bonus are already distrbuted under the shareholders, which where active at the time of the investments 1-4.You are eligabled for bonus shares from the comming investment 5, which hasen\\'t been ordered till now.If you have more question or you feel not well with your investment please contact me PM or email.Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ntnx for explanation\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyou\\'re welcome\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI have to admit it was probably completely overpriced including shipping costs, with 199 + 150 shipping cost (overnight express) .. and not to mention that I had to pay taxes for it for around 50 ... but at the end I needed one of those boards to have a testing environment for some cards, that where under performing.I haven\\'t got my aluminium open air case to get it fixed right ... but my daughters LEGO stuff ... made it to at least carry some boards for testing purpose.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY SHARES, aluminium open air case, LEGO stuff\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-31 20:08:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [IN STOCK] Second batch of ASICMiner 49 port hubs +50 units! 1.75 BTC\\n### Original post:\\nReceived my package today... running like a champ... time to sell it off .... lolThanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\ngot mine today . having a few issues but 34 ports work fine. right now I am using a 225 usd sea sonic platinum 1000 watt psu. running 34 ports . I am pulling 117 watts at the wall . not surprised as 34 x 2.5 = 85 watts divide by 70 percent you get 121 watts. so my efficiency is in the 70\\'s near as I can figure my hub has 2 bad banks row 8- 14 and row 15-21 are powered but do not detect the hubs. 1 lone port does not work in bank 42-49 hard to tell why. one thing for sure it is a nice size for am sticks . you can use just 2 fans to cool it.I will test more psu\\'s as I would like to find the best one. for running 34 sticks.it also may be that running this hub on a different pc will allow more then 34 sticks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nIs it powering the units and your controller is just not recognizing them? Try isolating the two banks in question and unplugging all other units.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI got it to work on a different pc. right now I am running 44 sticks using a Nzxt psu a 650 watt model rated for 5 v 25 amp. I am also using the four pin 12 volt cable to run a pair of 12 volt fans. total power at the wall is 159 watts for 44 sticks and 2 fans. seems to be a decent piece of gear. but it may vary from pc to pc. I am going to run more tests and post later today and tommorow. On wed. thurs I get 2 surplus 20 dollar psu\\'s.. if they work I will give links to buy them.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n32 running off this cheapo bestec PSU 5V 30A.... I sold the other ones off before I tested =/Been running 20 mins\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nFYI the wire gauge on this power supply is 21AWG it is not warm at all35 are running off of this bestec cheapo now.Make sure you have the BE seated firmly all the way in the hubPower Supply Im using is\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI have 45 sticks running on this psu. and 2x 12 volt fans. I used the 4 pin out wire from the NZXT to run the fans. the psu is running 45 sticks and 2 thermaltake usb fans kill a watt reads 159 watts for this hub and 4 fans. So I am probably right on the line of what this psu can do. I will run it over nite. this review is the non modular one I have the modular one my 5 volt rating is for 25a. the none modular rating is for 28a. they may be the same unit with different ratings. IE this may just be 28a even though it reads 25a.any how what I really like about this is it is a small hub, you can cool it with 2x 12 volt 120 mm fans and 2 plastic grills. use 2 of these to prevent shorts or damage to the sticks. attach them to your fans lay the grill right on the stick tops. have the fans blow right up to the ceiling. seems to work.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'ve got all 49 hashing using that PSU I found at Frys...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHow much for 1 hub + 50 sticks with express delivery to France?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI decided to keep one with this batch for testing as well. I\\'ve got a few PSUs I\\'ll be testing and will provide updates on what I find. I\\'ve got to say, I like your idea of stacking them with spacers and I look forward to seeing some of the rigs you guys build.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nUSA only for the time being, sorry.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI\\'m in for 1 if they\\'re available now please. What address for BTC and total is 1.82BTC correct? Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI sent a pm to you about surplus PSU with 36 amp 5 volt rating .\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAnyone know if a Rasperry PI will run this?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThis is a good & cheap option for power, 32amps at 5v, I bought one for my pc build a couple weeks ago from here: these back in stock yet? I\\'d like to purchase one.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI\\'ve got 3 left that I can send with sticks.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nthat\\'s an awesome PSU for this purpose... (based on listed specs and price)\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSounds good, I\\'ll take one then. Send to address listed at start of thread?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nHold a second set for me.here are some photosPhotos second shotthird shot\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nSome more photossee silverstone filter stops short issuespsu is 163 at the plug it is doing 46 sticks 1 usb fan and 3 x 12 volt fans from the other wire\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nPhil you have a RAS PI?\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nat bitterdog this is running off a hi end asus maximus mobo left over from all my gpu rigs. (it is a 1k pc)I have 3 pc\\'s left from the 13 I ran gpu rigs with. two in the photo and one in another room. you can also see the 20 port hub to the left of the 49 port hublast set current bitminter mining the 20 hub plus the 49 port . I think I have it at 19 of 20 ports and 46 of 49 ports. 4 fans. the grand total power of 301 watts. I want to add a second 49 port to this rig if I can. I would be at about 450-460 watts and about 111 sticks\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI sure hope guests don\\'t have to sleep on that mattress in the background... it needs to go to the DUMP! lol\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nI have 1 usb hub + 50 brand ne\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner 49 port hubs, sea sonic platinum 1000 watt psu, Nzxt psu, 12 volt fans, thermaltake usb fans, Rasperry PI, silverstone filter, asus maximus mobo, 20 port hub, usb hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-26 12:05:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK SHIPPING] BFL 4 GH/s Chips - .30 btc per chip (batch 29)\\n### Original post:\\nany more price updates?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMight be looking to buy some chips.PM IF you have ones to sell.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSent you a PM regarding renewed pricing.Could you check it out please.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nthey are in stock as long as the OP says so PMed you back\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n.2 could seal a deal.It\\'s out of my hands.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nany open design for the board available?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nMrTeal has a project as well as Lucko\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nLucko may have just dropped out.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nOuch!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nMrTeal stated that batch 2 is the last one they will run\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOuch!!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI\\'m sure if there\\'s enough volume we might see a batch 3.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nMaybe. It would have to be pretty decent volume though. I\\'m pretty doubtful to be honestJust an FYI, I ordered a few extra boards so we have space for about another 50 boards as of now. If you want to get your chips mounted, give me a shout at need the chips no later than Thursday.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI can get those chips to you by Thursday if anyone gets some...Quick q: how many chips per board on these extras?\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nSame as the others, 8 chips per board.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BFL 4 GH/s Chips, chips, boards\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-31 20:24:22',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-10\\nTopic: [SOLD OUT] Second batch of ASICMiner 49 port hubs +50 units! 1.75 BTC\\n### Original post:\\nEvery order placed so far, including phil\\'s, is ready to go. I am out of USB sticks but will be receiving more later in the week. At this point I have a few usb hubs I can sell for 1.1 BTC a piece.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'m interested on a hub, how do I order?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCrazyguy is on the ball! Looking forward to getting my new Hub and sticks.Nice setup btw Phil. Any good, old server PSU suggestions that have enough power on the 5v rail to run these? Makes me wish I\\'d kept some of my PSU\\'s from the original AMD Athlon days when we needed the beefy 5v rails.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI know, i\\'m ordering another one to go with this hub. I sent you a pm crazyguy.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThis PSU looks very promising, and it helps that it\\'s really cheap. Let us know how it goes.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI\\'m not an electrician so I am not sure if this PSU will be suffiencent for my hub. someone look at it and let me know? If not I have to go buy one.Thxipxtreme\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nTechnically you need around 24.5 amps at 5v. That has 25 amps at 5v... However you need some wiggle room, I wouldn\\'t trust that to run a full 49 miner setup.. PSU\\'s are often overrated in what kinda of power they actually make.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nthanks!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI built MCM\\'s search engine, ha. Its funny to see websites you have worked on over the years pop up.Actually they recently left our company, but I worked on their search and navigation for years....\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nAll orders up to now are going out today. I\\'ll send tracking numbers this evening. I still have a few hubs left.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAh crap, that\\'s a disappointment. When you say burn up?...\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nThe 30+ amp isn\\'t delivering!!?? Seriously? False advertisement or bad PSU?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThanks again philipma1957 for spending your money and testing this for all of us. Send me your btc address so I can send you a tip to by a beer.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nForget the tip, send him a mattress.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nwill the mattress be in the new photos?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner 49 port hubs, USB sticks, USB hubs, server PSU, AMD Athlon PSU, PSU\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 02:05:46',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN, 40/100] R11:BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off. $123=8-10GH Nov. 1\\n### Original post:\\nAs of about 2 hours ago we were down to 40 shares available.Someone anonymously bought 50 shares! Thank you and welcome aboard! [Or should I say: welcome back! ]40 shares available.==If our site says that we\\'re out of stock, you should still be able to place a backorder which will count as a normal order once we sort things out.Once we exceed 100 R11 shares, any PAID shares after 100 R11 shares will be automatically shifted to an R12.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOrder:#3311 share paid (oct 24th) still says missing payout address...So if possible Id like to change the address.Should I pm or email it?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrder 380 1 share.I\\'m in!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWell, I also snagged a few more but guessing they will be rolled to R12. Confusing Is there a sheet anywhere we can see what we have where? I think I now have them in R10, R11, and R12!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThey will all end up pretty much the same, Just that R9\\'s and R10\\'s boards are out for delivery, the rest of the boards are coming either late tonight or tomorrow.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHey madpoet,Sorry, about the confusion. bobsag3 cleared some of it. I have to apologize about the ordering process. Here\\'s why it\\'s all janky:- Our site currently uses free tools that aren\\'t very old or well developed at the moment as far as the intricacies of e-commerce, IMO.- Double or phantom orders can still occur with this current site (essentially our beta site) due to nonpayment of orders entered. That means a Round could show as out of stock, even when it\\'s really not.- Because of this, and since this is all the same Bullet Run with ample stock at the moment, we set up stock with backorders allowed, so that people wouldn\\'t be locked out of making an order due to double or phantom orders.We\\'re in talks with two good programmers to redesign and relaunch our site. We\\'re even going pro and will be launching a for-profit (but still cheapest) cloudhashing arm of our operations. Please PM us if you\\'re interested.==BTW, R11 is CLOSED.R12 is already halfway sold out, but backorders are allowed. Please move new to the R12 thread. Mahalo!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m Back!40 Shares through websiteThomas, I will PM you with a payment address later today.Thanks for the patience guys.MTXID address added payout and txid\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nDarn I thought R11 would start hashing the same day as R10, guess the R10 beat R11 slightly.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run, Bitfury\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-25 14:16:20',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #19 USB Miners 0.035 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nnice one!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nTouche. lol\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI am going to grab some sticks maybe 60\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI would love to take your order. Thank you. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCan I please buy some with USD?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI changed my mind send me 70 am usb sticks please. sent 2.45 btc 70 x .035 = 2.45 my btc address I will email you with a label....... Email sent with a label. please confirm I did it all correctly Best Regards philipma1957\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPM me. Anyone else wanting to pay in dollars, please pm me and I will try to help you out.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI was not looking to under cut you in anyway. I am going to sell 50 of the 70 I purchased from you today on my ebay store.I know you normally only take BTC. So I mentioned that I will go back and delete it. Sorry about that. Best regards phil\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI deleted this post.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSorry guys, didnt mean to start anything!SSB,I am looking to purchase 21, ill pm you for details.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nPM\\'d for questions/details\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAddictive! Need to order a few more.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\ndamn... I guess I should have waited a day before buying that last set from ya I figured they\\'d still go down, but not a cut-in-half, damn it\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nIt\\'s not that bad if you converted your USD-to-BTC to get these USBs. You only lost 20-30 % as compared to what you think! Maybe ?My order is in! Thanks SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI haven\\'t converted USD to BTC in awhile.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\ni am not understanding as you are saying that both you and canary are selling at cost price.but canary says that if stock is low there will be a delay in other words he will soon get more stock in but there might be a delay.now why would anyone want to get more stock in if they are only selling at cost priceanyone care to explainthank yousee here\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nAsicminer has stopped manufacturing and are clearing inventory. They\\'ll take whatever they can get for the rest.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nyeah and people that want sticks need to understand what they are buying. ie free power in your sticks are good. also do you live in the USA and heat your home with electrical power well then sticks are great for home heating. for example 100 stick setup on a pc will pull 400 watts 24/7. hash at 33gh and break even at the 2.1 bill diff mark but it will give you about 2000 btus of heat an hour 24/7. I live in the Northeast so every day from now (until 2.1 bill diff) on I will generate about 50000 btus of heat that will help to heat my home. So sticks still work for the right buyer these will be earning for me until APR of 2014. A quiet space heater sounds good to me.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nThis is exactly my plan for this winter! Keep the heat off and run mining equipment all around my home to keep it toasty.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nYeah my den was always cold until BTC. Last year I pulled so much power with gpus my house was down right hot. From oct to apr. This winter I will run 88 - 100 sticks in my den it will keep my den warm.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nInvite CNN to your house, you will be in news !\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\npayment for 9 sent: label LaterTong\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nTX ID: USB, 1 BladePM Sent, Label Sent\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nMy sticks and blades keep rooms comfortable, but it\\'s my GPU farm which really brings the tropics to the house.This past week with air temperature outside in the 50\\'s and the windows open, the house was averaging 86-88F. 3,000sq/ft house, with all the doors open to all the rooms were sharing in the thermal load. Fans were bringing in cool air too, it wasn\\'t stagnant. GPU\\'s just make things toasty. At a few points on some of the middle-of-the-road scrypt coins, I was more than half the network hash rate lolVery warm lol\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nIf I had to guess it\\'s because he\\'s making profit anyhow. For the longest time he\\'s been taking payments only in BTC, and at a teensy weensy profit. Over time prices have dropped to meet market values but he\\'s still always received more BTC than he\\'s needed to lay out to fund the venture, meaning he has made BTC for himself.Even if he sold at market value, he\\'s moving volume and I\\'m sure he gets kickbacks from friedcat for that (free equipment likely).So he has BTC for free and most likely mining equipment for free. Selling at cost isn\\'t hurting him. He probably wouldn\\'t want to do it for life, but it isn\\'t hurting him. He recently started selling on ebay as well, taking USD/PayPal, so this tells me he feels pretty secure.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\n10/25/13 USB Hubs arrive sometime next week. Price will be 50 USB miners at 1.75 btc receives free USB hub plus add shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nIs this the 49port hub I saw this on Crazyguy\\'s thread? I thought it was a really good deal.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nYes. That would be the one. A limited supply will be arriving sometime next week. Thank you and everyone for any orders placed. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nTempti\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, sticks, USB sticks, gpus, sticks, blades, GPU farm, USB Hubs\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 05:09:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #20 Blade Miners 1.10 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nBlades now 1.10 btc each or less! Thank you for your orders! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHoly Cow! Great prices!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nwhy are people getting angry over stuff.... If you buy something from SSB you will get it..... Period.... nothing to explain about it..... you pay, he ships, it gets delivered...... its a simple concept really...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\npm sent\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\npm sent\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAny one selling these in Asia?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPM sent\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAgreed.SSB is legit.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n10/25/13 USB Hubs arrive sometime next week. Price will be 50 USB miners at 1.75 btc receives free USB hub plus add shipping.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n10/26/13 I am taking preorders/payment for ASICMiner 49 port USB Hubs + 50 USB Sticks at the cost of 1.75 btc plus 0.07 btc shipping for each 50 pack/free hub. I will have limited quantities and they will start shipping next Wednesday. The price is the same no matter how many 50 pack/free hub units are preordered. Once I run out of my allocated orders, I will post a message in my group buy and any extras paid for will be refunded their bitcoin payments. Please send PM with payment now to get these as they may all be sold out by next Wednesday. Thank you! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nwhats the weight of the 49 port hub with smps?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI don\\'t know as I don\\'t have any yet. I assume 50 USB and the hub should fit in a medium flate rate USPS box. Thanks for the question. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHi Silentsonicboom, I pm\\'d you about a payment of 7 btc released to your address which was a mistake. Please respond at your earliest convenience.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nJust received the pm as I was out of town. Payment sent back of 7 btc. Have a great week! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nOrdered a blade on Wednesday night and I received it on Friday...gotta love it. Configuring my first-ever blade: Not too bad, I just found out that you can\\'t use IE to try to open the config page...it wouldn\\'t work. Installed Firefox on my mining rig and it was up and running shortly after.Total SSB! Next time I\\'ll get a backplane to go with my next blade purchase.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nwould be nice if you update once i know, cuz reshipping international costs calculate per weight\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI will update for you once I know. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\n10/28/13 I have had many requests to sell backplanes and the new USB hub individually. I have limited quantities of backplanes available now and will have a few extra hubs available for shipping on Thursday. Please PM me if interested. Pricing as follows - backplane 0.75 btc each plus 0.08 btc shipping49 port USB hub 0.75 btc plus 0.04 btc shipping\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n10/29/13 I have in stock now limited quantities of ASICMiner 49 port USB Hubs + 50 USB Sticks at the cost of 1.75 btc plus 0.07 btc shipping for each 50 pack/free hub. I will have limited quantities and they will start shipping from me on Wednesday 10/30/13. The price is the same no matter how many 50 pack/free hub units are ordered. Once I run out of my allocated orders, I will post a message in my group buy and any extras paid for will be refunded their bitcoin payments. Please send PM with payment now to get these as they may all be sold by tomorrow Wednesday 10/30/13. Thank you! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nThe weight of hub in box is 1 lb 6 ounces. The dimensions in box are 6 1/2 x 11 x 2 inches. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\n10/29/13 I have had many requests to sell backplanes and the new USB hub individually. I have limited quantities of backplanes available now and will have a few extra hubs available for shipping on Thursday. Please PM me if interested. Pricing as follows - backplane 0.60 btc each plus 0.08 btc shipping49 port USB hub 0.65 btc plus 0.04 btc shipping\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nhas anyone used a 24pin splitter with the 49 port hubs?\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI have not. My opinion only is that you should not use a splitter as you need all the amps you can get to power the 5V pin connector for the USB Miners. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nNew payment address. Everything else is the same. SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blade Miners, USB Hubs, ASICMiner 49 port USB Hubs, USB Sticks, backplanes, 24pin splitter\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 05:42:25',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN*] R12: Black Arrow Bitfury Bullet Run $123 = 39% cheaper than cex.io!\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m told the R9 and R10 boards are already at our colo site!\"Boxes and Boxes...\"R11-12 boards are about 12 hours behind.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI just picked up another share.Order #385Tr Id- address- \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'ll definitely take 1 if we get to wait for our R6 payouts. Hehe.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCan I confirm when you are receiving R11?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHe said R11 was arriving today with R10 I thought.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nBah, I\\'m just .1 short, and that\\'s the amount I lost gambling the other day, lol.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks for the info - i just purchased 2...hope it\\'s closer to the 30 GHs...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks guys. Welcome back!Hey high110. Thanks and welcome aboard!These boards should be in tomorrow for R11/12. We had expected all rounds to arrive at the same time but they had to break it up in order to ship to us faster and not delay the entire shipment an extra day. In other words: Black Arrow was looking out for us by doing it this way. This seems to be a recurring pattern from what I\\'ve seen so far from this particular company.I had heard from bobsag3 that the shipment arrived today for R9/10. I haven\\'t seen him online much which is rare So I know that he must be being a busy bee with other fellow nerds. Thanks Bob! Chug chug chug away, my man.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHe\\'s busy getting them up and running =) they will more than likely be all brought online tomorrow as tweaking needs to be done to keep them stable.akaHe\\'s playing with his new shinies\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nMy transaction has 82 confirmations but I haven\\'t received an email saying that my order is complete. Can I get an acknowledgement that my payment was received? I\\'m sure the past few days have been a bit crazy with equipment arriving and multiple GB\\'s filling up and I just want to make sure that everything is in order. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nAs long as your order changed from Oh-hold to processing, it should be fine. I believe they have to \\'complete\\' the order manually.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nExcellent, it looks like it is processing! Thank you very much!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nCan I buy using bitcoins? Well this is interesting. Also can I sell the shares back?\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYes you can pay in Bitcoins.We do allow you to sell your shares to other users if you really wanted to but they purchaser would need to pay a 0.75% fee for the exchange.I\\'m working on orders now so if you entered everything correctly you\\'ll see it change to completed, if not you\\'ll get an email asking for whatever is missing. Both of these means your on a spreadsheet.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThat fee is for an exchange of your share or shares to another person, where the new person pays the exchange fee (since we can\\'t force the orig. buyer to send us BTC if they bailed with the buy out funds). Hopefully, the new buyer won\\'t be blindsided by this fact, as that\\'s not right to sell a share without giving them this info.We\\'re GB Coordinators, we\\'re not an exchange, and to handle tons of exchange requests doesn\\'t add any value to the GB that we work hard to build, and would slow us down from our primary goal of providing some of the world\\'s best values to as many people as we can.==As for pre-orders, we offer refunds at a 1.5% restock fee up until the hardware ships.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: R9, R10, R11, R12\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 07:49:21',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: Logic of a Group Buy and Escrow Protection (for noobs)\\n### Original post:\\nThis short guide is for newbies to Bitcoin mining that are interested in participating in a Group Buy on this forum. I\\'ll go over the logic of a Group Buy and how escrow *can* protect you if it\\'s set up well.Logic of a Group Buy: By leveraging the buying power of multiple miners you\\'re able to practice economies of scale...on a smaller scale! Companies like Costco & Walmart are able to offer the prices they can because they have such huge economies of scale and order at such volumes that it affords them a much stronger position when negotiating with suppliers (sometimes to the detriment of the supplier in Walmart\\'s case). This allows them special considerations, lower pricing, exclusives, etc., etc.. and the lower costs get passed on to you.What you\\'re seeing here is the same type of purchasing power that is afforded to larger entities. Group Buys are a logical conclusion for those miners that see the benefit in banding together their purchasing power to allow them access to either higher quantities (think: volume discounts) or plain access to a high priced product that couldn\\'t be easily purchased by the Group individually. For a Group Buyer, access to a small, ready pool of equit\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI just missed your run. I tried to contact you through ebay so i could get a hold of some Sierra shares. But, i guess sold already. Any upcoming GB\\'s\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nHi umdorado,I\\'m sorry I missed you! My wife usually mentions if an ebay msg. comes in via email notification, as that\\'s her account & I just list things there for sale & buy electronics occasionally. She said she didn\\'t get a notice, so that\\'s odd.Thomas (user: thomas_s ) will likely be leading the charge on the next round, Round 5, when he feels ready, or he\\'s also free to branch off on his own and start his own thread. I\\'m taking a little break on GBs as I\\'m still getting caught up from selling 3 HashFast miners in about a week. You wouldn\\'t believe how much work it is behind the scenes for these things. I\\'m planning to do more of an assist role if he decides to team up again for a 3rd co-GB, so if you\\'re interested in another round of at-cost HashFast shares, I\\'d send him a PM with your interest. I\\'d say the more PMs he receives in interest for a R5, the more likely he\\'d be to run one. Edit: It\\'s crazy to think I helped sell $30K worth of 4 HashFast miners in about 5 weeks since I wrote this; especially when I had never done GBs before in my life and now I can set up escrowed GBs for GB shares for new GBCs that need this service. Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI\\'d say that working with Thomas, bobsag3, and -Redacted- has worked out well to provide great Group Buy values and improvements.Only 1 month and 4 days later: we nearly quadrupled our sales from $30K to $112K! I can only assume that people are interested in getting access to the best value miners at the lowest possible costs via Group Buys.==And as always - don\\'t forget that when in doubt: use escrow!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Sierra shares, HashFast miners\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 19:43:02',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 1.1 BTC=67GH/s 28/30 shares , 3 Sold\\n### Original post:\\nOk, thanks for clarifying that souspeed.I\\'m selling my 2 GB2 shares.PM me if interested.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwhats the price???Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nRight now let\\'s say it\\'ll be 2 shares for 2.1 BTC. I\\'ll give .1 BTC off list price for anyone who buys this weekend.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV, GB2 shares\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 20:23:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [IN STOCK] ASICMiner 49 port hubs +50 units! 1.75 BTC - Last batch\\n### Original post:\\nFor those looking for a psu to run this hub Rosewill 350rv has +5V@35A and is dirt cheap. I should see my hub/miners and psu this afternoon, well report back on how it does.I\\'m adding it to this pair of Pi\\'s.Me too!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner 49 port hubs, Rosewill 350rv, Pi\\'s\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 20:34:19',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [SOLD OUT]ASICMiner 49 port hubs +50 units! 1.75 BTC\\n### Original post:\\nI got a Corsair AX760 that ran my hub for awhile with 49 erupters with no problem and now i am running it off of a Corsair CX600M No issues still. Running an average of 99.85% Accepted Shares.Do keep in mind people that any kind of power flicker reaks havic on electronics. Spend the money and get a UPS(Battery Backup ex: APC).\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nDamn you covered the mattress. That\\'s only reason I came to this thread.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyou are the first to notice!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhahaha!If anyone is wondering I\\'ve had a customer of mine report these work PERFECT with a Raspberry Pi\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nBack in stock. I\\'m receiving more usb units and hubs today. I\\'ve also been informed that usb stock has been depleted and they will no longer be manufactured. So, get them while the getting is good! All of today\\'s orders will be shipped out tomorrow morning.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDO YOU THINK I can get a third one to work on the same pc? be fun to try.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI think USB port limitations is 127 in Windows.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nDepends on how many you are running on each hub. You could always get another cheap controller like beaglebone black or raspberry pi, although I never had any luck with the latter. In fact I\\'ve got a defective RPi I\\'ll throw in with the first order of 2 or more hub/ stick combos. Not sure what\\'s wrong with the pi, it resets on me and I haven\\'t had time to take a look at it yet. It may have a bad poly-fuse and easy to fix, or it may be a new doorstop, but who cares, it\\'s free!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nyes i have read that as the limit which with my mobo using 1 port for mouse/keyboard 1 port for each of the 49 port hubs would be 127-4 = 123 sticks max.now I put in a 5 port usb pcie card in this pc and it claims i can run 127 ports on each of its 5 ports. right now It is running the 2x 49 port hubs. I would like to know a if the pcie card lets me get past the 127 port limit. this asus mobo has run 113 sticks and it said I exceed the port limit when I went to the 114th stick. I used a lot of hubs and no pcie usb2 card to get to the 113 which is the most sticks I ever run on a single machine. It would be very nice to get to 120 plus\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThe physical limit per usb port is 127 usb devices, this INCLUDES hubs, windows, linux, OSX, doesn\\'t matter.Assuming the PCI-E card runs each port individually and doesn\\'t have it built in as some cheap ass 5 port hub you should be able to run 127 USB devices/port, if it does has some built in cheap ass 5 port hub thing then you\\'ll be limited to 126 devices between all 5 ports.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nYEAH I Think it could run 5 hubs at 49 stIcks each. I will most likely order one more hub tonight\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nOMG, now that\\'s a good use for 1-2-3 blocks... jeez I hope those are cheap enco\\'s and not some high end staretts or brown-n-sharp... I almost fell out of my chair once I saw those. Is that your daytime job?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nSHARP EYE those are enco I had 60 of them found them at an estate sale.got 30,000 aluminum rivets and 2 sterling silver trays for about 30 bucks. did well with that buy.I have had a lot of jobs but not in a machine shop. USN ------Computer tech.IRS -------Collections ------Worst job ever.Accounting ---------- Mostly doing tax returns and protecting people from getting in trouble wit the IRS.Speaker buildingPc buildingMac mini upgrading .Those blocks rock for cooling.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Corsair AX760, Corsair CX600M, UPS(Battery Backup ex: APC), Raspberry Pi, USB units, USB hubs, Beaglebone Black, Raspberry Pi, 5 port USB PCI card, ASUS mobo, Pcie USB2 card, Enco blocks, Enco I, Aluminum rivets, Sterling silver trays\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True, True, True, False, True, True, True, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 21:28:39',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] HashFast Sierra Shares ฿1 = 20GH/s | Ships in Nov *All Miners PAID\\n### Original post:\\nHi! I\\'m interested in 1 share. What should I do?Transfer the bitcoin to your wallet and post here my address?Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi!I\\'ve made the transaction of 1BTC for a 20GH/s share.My address: Morales\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAny news on when Sierra will be shipped?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nsimple and maybe stupid question:OP said the miner is already paid....so if I buy 1 share - this shareholding come true, even if the maximum of 60 shares is not reached?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: HashFast Sierra\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 23:27:03',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN, 26/100] R12: Black Arrow BF Bullet Run $123 = 39% cheaper than cex.io!\\n### Original post:\\nCan one pay with USD ?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nVery nice . How is the performance?Edit: Never mind, just read the R11 thread.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo are these miners performing at 8 GHS and not 10 GHS? How will we be compensated?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHi stex2009, please see post 2 of any of my Rounds for payment info. We offer a variety of options that a lot of GBCs don\\'t offer.We take USD but under certain conditions. A service we can recommend is www.cashintocoins, if you\\'re in the US.==Latest pics: Unboxing screenshot, 96 chips: board stack, working: screenshot from this stack (slight under performance which should be improved by native chainminer support): realized that I\\'m a little bummed that they\\'re underperforming, but sometimes things don\\'t always work out with initial implementations. But on the bright side this was guaranteed to be shipping by Nov. 1 and we\\'re fortunate to have already received it! kano has been shipped a simultaneous shipment so he\\'ll hopefully be able to tweak some improvements while he adds native BA support to chainminer.Group Buyers are going to be compensated for any under performance of the 8.34 GH/s mark per share that was promised.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nAwesome! Welcome back!I have an update: some good news, bad news.Bad: He\\'s still working out the chaining of the miners. This is important because he only has so many Pis. We\\'re also seeing a little under performance as far as hashrate but kano is working on the cgminer chainminer integration so we should see improvements on that. Such is life on the bleeding edge of a bullet run.Good: Since bobsag3 is basically Good Guy Bob he\\'s going to make sure that to add a board to our 20 board stack to get our min. hashrate to 8.34GH/s as promised while software issues are worked on. He also managed to stack 6 boards, so far, even with the issues he\\'s seeing.Bobsag\\'s busy as heck but I\\'ll post some pics he shared with me as soon as I upload them to my cloud photos.===Also: 26 shares available. There will be a pause before R13 so that we can let bobsag3 get caught up so that R9-12 are taken care of properly.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSorry if that wasn\\'t clear in the good news/bad news update a few posts up. In my defense, I\\'m under heavy antibiotics and dealing w/ a sinus infection, so I might not be Englishing the best right now.Since he\\'s the official BA US Reseller, he has extra boards. For underperformance: he\\'ll add a 21st board to the chain in order to get to that minimum 8.34 GH/s hashrate. He\\'s not going to leave you out to dry. We\\'re not you-know-who: those two companies which shouldn\\'t be spoken of IMO. He was getting within 10% of the advertised rate with his latest update.A good sized shipment of Pis are also due in today and is out for delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nWithin 10% out of box w/out any software tweaks.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nPM sent to thomas_s\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Black Arrow BF Bullet Run, miners, Pis, cgminer chainminer\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-02 13:41:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN, 19/100] R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury! 40% off, $123=8-10GH Nov 1\\n### Original post:\\nAs the person not in charge of the spreadsheet and since R9-R11 is going to all be in the same towers of of Black Arrows at bobsag3\\'s colo facility: sounds good to me! This stuff all gets sorted out eventually and we\\'re not going to have to worry about squishy sales numbers when we upgrade to our new site, as the new site will only have sales show as complete with full payment. Talking to a programmer this morning/afternoon is on my to do list today.==19 shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nLatest pictures from prototype testing: is estimated for TONIGHT. We should have a tracking # this evening.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo tiny! Trying to get a couple more shares but confirmation is moving slow as hades tonight for me.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNo kidding. Im waiting on confirmations for ~83btc\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nPayment made to Bobsag3 for 5 shares. Order #348 on the site.Payout address: guys!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI am happy to report I have received the tracking number for the boards, and should have them within 48 hours!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nGreat, looking forward to getting them hashing.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIn for a couple more\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWell this isn\\'t good... my payment is still unconfirmed. What happens if the hour goes by and you still don\\'t have it?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nIt should be fine as long as its pending, as its expecting it to come in but just isn\\'t confirmed yet. I\\'m looking at the wallet now and it doesn\\'t show any pending so I\\'m guessing your all set.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nFast question on these black arrow shares. I made four ordersorder # 248 = completed 10/16/2013 4 sharesorder # 282 = completed 10/18/2013 2 sharesorder # 306 = completed 10/21/2013 2 sharesorder # 349 + processing 10/27/2013 1 share this order was paid for :tx id below is my payout correct.Since I have 9 shares paid for from 10-16 to 10-28 how do they get counted for when hashing starts? I would guess first in first out?\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nprocessing just means its paid but hasn\\'t been entered into the spreadsheet or has been and is just missing a payout address. If it says \"On-hold\" that\\'s the problem.Orders are entered to the spreadsheets first paid first entered\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nthanks for info\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nMy order - #351 October 28, 2013 - still shows as processing.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nMissing a payout address.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThanks for update, PM now sent with addressCheers\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Black Arrow Bullet Run, Bitfury, boards\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-02 20:30:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN, 29/100] R12: Black Arrow BF Bullet Run $123 = 39% cheaper than cex.io!\\n### Original post:\\nCorrection: 29 shares are available at the moment.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks for the response...much appreciated. I\\'m pretty new to buying GHS - anyway we can see how the miners are hashing, like online? How frequently are the payments made? I\\'m pretty noob..if all of this is in a FAQ somewhere...can someone just point me in the right direction?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nyes, I bought 10 shares as a trial run. I\\'m assuming we can see the machines hash once they\\'re up and running? You may have covered this before, there\\'s just a few Magiklair on DZ miners coop.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSo how are these performing currently for older group buys? U guys getting at least 8 ghs for each share?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nIve bought 2, but if someone can provide some feed back, I might buy more if it\\'s good =)\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nGents and ladies, a Saturday, 11/2 update:- Bob\\'s been having problems chaining the miners beyond a certain point which has limited his ability to stack miners as he only has so many Pis to go around. He seems to have gotten past much of the earlier issues but can\\'t stack more than 6 at the moment (the goal was 10 boards per Pi)- He\\'s blown a few Pis and a couple of PSUs during his testing.- He\\'s currently up to almost 1 TH (our target is 3.2 - 4 TH, combined from all 4 Rounds- He\\'s currently short Pis due to them failing,and his overnight shipment of a bunch of extras from Amazon is stuck at UPS till Monday- We\\'ve learned a lot too: Bullet Runs can be messy, best to have waaay more supplies than you think you needed- Because I promised optimistically that the boards would be running by now, we\\'re going to make up the hashrate difference based on the following schedule:Rounds 9/10 should be up to 1TH today, the target is 1.68 - 2TH/s: This pool has just started mining, but there\\'s no dashboards set up yet. When mining deposits appear they\\'re heading to this Black Arrow Bullet Run wallet address: calculation purposes - Since yesterday, Nov.1, for daily coins expected to be mi\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m seeing some very good \\'customer service\\' and behind-the-scenes work going on according to DZ\\'s updates. I\\'d like to give the team compliments for being so quick to dedicate extra boards, hard working and communicative about what\\'s going on. GJ.Also, in case you are stressing out, don\\'t :p.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks! We\\'re really trying our best for everyone in the co-op. We\\'re different in that we attempt to be as open, honest, and transparent as possible with the co-op\\'s issues and updates (That and we highly encourage direct representative democracy and voting on major issues in this co-op).I def. know what it feels like to be an ASIC pre-order customer being kept in the dark like a mushroom being fed BS. At least, this way, we\\'re all getting to see how rough a Bullet Run launch can be with the best of intentions; we\\'re essentially all getting to see how \"sausage\" gets made. I should have some more pics shortly, but I\\'m taking a little break before posting them.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miners, Pis, PSUs, boards, ASIC\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-03 02:22:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: 49 port with splitter\\n### Original post:\\nended up using this splitter to run both my pc and the hub off of a 850w 30a Corsair PSU him $6.99 and he excepted it)Im able to run at least 46 on the hub (4 of the ports are dead) But if they were not dead im sure it would run all 49\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 49 port with splitter, pc, hub, 850w 30a Corsair PSU\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-23 19:36:07',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [CLOSED] KnCMiner Shares ฿1.05=5GH/s *Merged with new HashFast GB [CLOSED]\\n### Original post:\\nI see their delivery date got pushed back?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo how is the power supply situation going to be handled?The KnCMiners don\\'t come with one.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nBud All ok about my share order (the last KnC)?TMC\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nSorry to bother you waldo, but am I in one of these orders? Is the list available publicly?I completely forgot which ones I was in. My fault I know.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI am \"Juan\" I send you the payment last Aug/24th to send me a confirming mail.There is any list of the owners of each share?RegadsTMC\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nwaldohoover,I don\\'t see my payout address in the google drive page you made, I had bought 1 share in miner #6, you can see it on middle of page 17.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAwesome updates on the PSs and payout spreadsheets. Thanks for all your efforts, now I\\'m really looking forward to October!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ngot your pm, waldover. my bad, went to see my addy on and when I clicked on the miner 6 icon, the little window that pops up didn\\'t show my address. I guess it cuts off at the bottom somehow.anyway, thanks for straightening me out!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nJust wondering, when are the miners scheduled to arrive?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBefore October 15, says the latest announcement from KnC.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nInteresting! Checking here after a long time. Thanks for sharing the pictures waldohoover.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHello,I have one share to resell.Any offer?RegardsTMC\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI am open to pay an administrative fee to change the ownership.:-)TMCPD: Anyway... I see no offers\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'ve said it before, and I\\'ll probably be saying it again-Everything looks incredible and I appreciate all your effort. Starting to let myself get excited again!\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI feel like I\\'ve asked this before, but are we part of the before October 15 shipment?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nLatest News, Kncminer now has 576 GHs and shipping today\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nGreat googly moogly that\\'s a lot\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nA very good day!TMC\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nWill you post in here when you receive tracking info from KNC?Just curious.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nGreat news. Thanks for keeping us updated. I am sure you are ready to start putting that room to some use! (and earning some coin to help pay for the work you have done)\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nReal nice!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nAwesome news, can\\'t wait!\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nOr we receive the KnC now or we will never recover the investment.:-)\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nHey WH, have you received any additional info about shipping dates for the later Jupiters?\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nSounds like we might have a bump in our road to mining. I like that they addressed this problem though. It probably could have been a much bigger problem if they just left us all hanging.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nFeels like a week or two possibly added on to ensure they address HW & SW issues.\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nAny idea when the first units will arrive?TMC\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nSo, it is 10/15 and we have not got our miners yet.We are all doomed\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nNetwork speed is incredible, last 6 blocks mined in 10 minutes: from 263805 to 263810!\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nExcellent! Were shipping numbers provided at all?\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nWell if you come home to find a bunch of boxes piled high, now you\\'ll know what they are\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nHeeeellllooooo pizza delivery guy lol.\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nThanks waldohoover, i like the chart!The next estimated rise in difficulty is kind of earth shatteringly depressing though..\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nThats what i like to hear! Thats what im doing with my measly block erupters. haha\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nKNC has manufactured about 1400 miners so far. Order #17xx may be produced today. It will take about a week for DHL to deliver it to US from Sweden. We will be hashing by end of NEXT WEEK.\\n\\n### Reply 35:\\nSo, what\\'s the tracking say is the ETA?\\n\\n### Reply 36:\\n(per the KNCminer thread) He hasn\\'t received ETA yet, just tracking. Here\\'s to hoping that ride is as smooth as possible.\\n\\n### Reply 37:\\nYou probably already saw it, but just in case you didn\\'t and you think you might need it here is the DHL form you can sign and leave on your door if you have to leave for any reason:\\n\\n### Reply 38:\\nHey WaldoHave you considered starting a Skype group for these types of future updates and discussions between investors? It works quite well for the other GBs.Or even Bitmessage.\\n\\n### Reply 39:\\nIm not in this GB but im happy for you guys ))))))))))))))\\n\\n### Reply 40:\\nExcellent! Now the rest of them need to come in and start hashing as well.\\n\\n### Reply 41:\\nSo Order #1760 (KnCMiner Miner #1 and KnCMiner Miner #2) shipped, but instead of two Saturns its just one Jupiter?If that is not the case then why arent there Saturns in the KnCMiner Earnings Calculator?Also i see that KnCMiner Miner #5 is making profit, but not KnCMiner Miner #1. I figured Order #1760 would start mining first. Why is this?I understand that you are probably busy right this moment. Patient\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnCMiner, power supply, miner #6, KnCMiner Miner #1, KnCMiner Miner #2, KnCMiner Miner #5\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 03:27:42',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK] batch #32/31 .035 btc @50 USBs + 49-port hub. 1.1 btc /Blade\\n### Original post:\\nany price cuts coming to be more in line with avalons price of 4btc for 60ghs?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes these would be a great deal if you could drop the price a bit.They might be profitable to re-sell at this price but with mining your talking about a chance you might not even ROI, IMO. Could you drop the price if I opted for 50 miners without a hub? (I have the intent to re-sell them, not mine, thus a hub is useless to me)\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\ni was actually referring to blades pricing...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDropping off USPS packages..\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nSo I\\'m considering buying, could you point me at a power supply online somewhere that would be compatible? If the power supply has two 6 pin connectors could it power two of the 49 port hubs at max capacity? hoping you guys would know.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSee my post above please: got it at a local Frys (they are on ebay as well)and some pics are here: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHere are the stats on the 49 port HUB (pic above) running for 18+ hrs so far:\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIt\\'s interesting that all your erupters show up as the old Emerald (BEE) erupters. All of mine show up as BES (Block Erupter Sapphire).No idea if it even makes a difference...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nInteresting observation... I am running this on bfgminer ver 3.1.3 and using \"-S erupter:all\" command... one of these 2 things is probably causing them to get the BEE label instead of BES.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nToday\\'s orders were dropped off at USPS before 7 PM.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nMine is due to my home on weds I will test it and post in this thread and in crazy guy\\'s thread. they had a lot in stock . I just went to the link and added 200 to my cart they only have 153 in stock... So waiting may be smarter then buying. My results should post in about 20 hours.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nmackstuart, 10, .35, \\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nyou are welcome the psu part should arrive in about 7 hours. I will post.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\npacking USPS orders...\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n\"out for delivery\" looks like delivery will be about 48 hours after payment. maybe BFL needs to make a new hire corsair 1200 claims 30 amp on 5v up to 180 watts between 3 and 5 volts and it\\'s currently only being used on 12 volt so should be setwill update with pictures on delivery\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI am often imitated, but never duplicated! the 30 amp 5v ATX should work like a champ for you! 122.5/180 = 68%\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nmining @ see how this turns out. have 8 \"extras\" going to try and sell off for paypal at a markup.....hubs i planned on using them are not handling them very nice\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nAwesome!! warms my heart!! P.S. todays packages went out about 30 mins ago...\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nany idea if i can use a 24pin splitter?\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nthese are a fail I blew up a pair of them at about 30 sticks\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nphilipma1957 has found this PSU: use code afc909 get a 15% discount to under 14 bucks plus shipping!It should be tested Wed/Thur to know for sure, but from the specs, it looks to be a great PSU to power one of these hubs (for the $).DO NOT BUY ABOVE PSU. it does not work.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nAnd it\\'s a no go on this MCM PSU... Bummer but I guess you get what you pay for... I\\'d say it seemed too good to be true.DO NOT BUY THE MCM PSU. it does not work.\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nIf you are thinking of trying to power up multiple hubs, you will need a 5V rail with about 30 Amps for EACH hub.that\\'s just not going top happen with a \"normal\" off the shelf PSU.\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nquick update...not sure what changes i made (moved a bunch of cables around...pretty much) but all 57 are now hashing and powered by the 30amp 5volt (along with a usb wifi card) and some 12v miners. power supply is a champ!\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nthat\\'s \"roughly\" 57/2 = 28.5 amps if all are powered exclusively on the 5V ATX rail... that\\'s pushing it... but yes, that is one good PSU, hope it lasts!\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nbitdigger2013;50 + Free \\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nThank you! shipping out.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nwhat blew? the PSU, the wire or the plug? Its says its to have 36amps on the 5v side so should have powered more than 30?\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nMost likely the output diode on the 5V rail. Could of been the switching mosfet(s). I have seen some PSU\\'s come in my shop that claim very large outputs but I open them only to find parts capable of maybe half. Under normal conditions where max load it demanded maybe .5% of the time this is OK. Put a constant 80-90% load on it... poof!\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nyeah I knew I was in trouble . The physical weight of the units made me realize they were labeled very optimistically .\\n\\n### Reply 31:\\nhave been hashing away with 70 erupters using this genssi s-200-5 and for $30 on ebay is unbeatable\\n\\n### Reply 32:\\nUsing this PSU as well with 56 block erupters, going strong for over a month.\\n\\n### Reply 33:\\nCan one of you show how it\\'s hooks up?\\n\\n### Reply 34:\\nso i can buy it and PLUG into \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 49 port hub, 24pin splitter, PSU, MCM PSU, 30amp 5volt ATX, usb wifi card, 12v miners, genssi s-200-5\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-08-07 05:22:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Diversified Group Buy [KNC Jupiter/BitFury 400Gh/VMC Fast-Hash-One]\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m interested. I\\'ll crunch some numbers and get back to you.BTW, how much Gh does the dog put out?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nOk cool! He does about negative 50Gh (as in.. that\\'s how many Gh it takes to feed him.. he eats a lot!)\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI am interested in 15 BTC. Some questions remain:Have the miners already been ordered? Which delivery day is the KNC miner at?Whats the GH output per BTC?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nHas anyone taken delivery of a VMC Fast-Hash yet?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThey are not shipping yet. They are scheduled to ship October/November this year.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nHi Ch,I just sent 50 btc. Please confirm receipt.I think your idea of diversification of suppliers is great. It\\'s the biggest risk that we face. Delays cost money!I\\'d be ok if you were to change your terms to provide you with the flexibility of mining alt coins rather than bitcoins later on. Who knows what will be the best use of the gear in a few months time?I will also be ok if you were to dispose of the miners via eBay or auctioning on this forum etc. Hopefully there will be future group buys where we can get the latest equipment.I love your dog!Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nSee answers in bold.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks for getting us started. I can confirm I received 50 BTC from you, I will get an owners list started. The other person whom was interested as well, should be sending in his funds soon so we are well on our way with about 170 BTC already!\"I\\'d be ok if you were to change your terms to provide you with the flexibility of mining alt coins rather than bitcoins later on. Who knows what will be the best use of the gear in a few months time?I will also be ok if you were to dispose of the miners via eBay or auctioning on this forum etc. Hopefully there will be future group buys where we can get the latest equipment.\"I think these are good ideas, I will probably go ahead and add them to the terms pending the other investor\\'s approval. As of now we only have two people + myself, so it would be easier to change them now than in the future.I love my dog too. Robbers beware, this 125 pound beast will rip you to shreds (he wouldn\\'t hurt a fly!) Thanks again,Ch\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI sent 4.26 (all I had on me right now. But I\\'m a previous investor .\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n$8k = 75 btc at gox. 400ghz / 75 = 5.33 Ghz per 1 BTC.Let me see how many btcs I can afford...\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nCH, I\\'ll probably invest some. Let me see what I can gather up, spreading the risk is a good idea!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nConfirmed.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nOk guys. No hurry I suppose, I will leave it open until I reach my hosting limit.I won\\'t have my BTC to invest until a few days either. All of my first couple dividend payments from the 7 dwarfs (yes, we nicknamed our Avalons) are going to go towards this too.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\n130 BTC sent.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\n100 BTC sent luck to us!\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThanks guys.I will update the list of investors and put in our first orders tonight for a KNC Jupiter and Bitfury 400 Gh!Next funds received will go towards a VMC Fast-Hash-One. I also hope Cointerra releases product information and prices soon, I would like to add them to the list of hardware investments.. they seem like a very experienced team.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\n6.1 BTC sent.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nConfirmed & updated.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nCH,Are there any plans to re-invest profits to purchase new hardware once the purchased hardware is hashing?\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\n5 BTC sent. do this again . I hope delays won\\'t be as bad as the avalon group buy.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nWelcome to the new group!Yes.. lets pray for no delays and we will all be very happy!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nNot at this time. Like our last group buy, I imagine it would be hard to get everyone to agree on a reinvestment plan.I myself would love to come up with some type of reinvestment plan for the group. I usually have no available BTC, because its all wrapped up in investments. I prefer it this way and I would like to keep it that way. This ensures I can\\'t spend it on stupid things like gambling, and my involvement with BTC stays purely a long term investment as I originally intended it to be.If we can agree on a reinvestment plan that is approved by a majority vote of share holders, I would be willing to implement it. Worst case scenario, the people whom would like to reinvest can start a new group buy like I have done here.\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nUPDATE:The first hardware orders have been placed. Congratulations, you are all owners of the following:1 October Bitfury - 400 Gh - Tx ID: KNC Jupiter - 400 Gh - Tx ID: VMC Fast-Hash-Ones - 512 Gh - Tx ID: Gh ordered so far!We have about $6,586.51 in our group account (61.630353 BTC) towards the next purchase of a second Bitfury Obtober 400 GhI am watching the Xcrowd, Cointerra, and HashFast situations closely and considering ordering hardware from them as well, please give me your opini\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Jupiter, BitFury 400Gh, VMC Fast-Hash-One, Avalon, Cointerra, HashFast\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-05 00:51:34',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] RED FURY - USB Miners - USA Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nWhats the spec on these?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nokay I want one but I need these to run on bitminter.com via the java client. just a simple plug n play. I sold around am 1000 usb sticks on ebay. my buyers want only bitminter.com java client units. . these are 2.5- 3.0 watt 2.5 gh? BTW I saw your ad on ebay today your price is better here which is cool\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSpec: Rated speed 2.4 - 2.6Gh/sPowered by the USB port without any other power source.Electricity consumption as low as 2.5watts.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nhave they been tested on bitminter\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nShould be soon...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI will message him. It would be nice to have a plug n play upgrade.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nthese look nice, but with a 10.7ghs blade at only 0.80btc, its hard to justify the price...\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nMaybe if you sent DrHaribo some extra units he can use them for more testing. We are out of units.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHas DrHairbo had even any communications with you since he received his Dev unit?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYes I was talking with him yesterday.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nMANY Asic usb stick buyers on ebay (I resell some sticks keep some for me) can run a small hub with 4 sticks or even a 10 port hub in a free power setup. Think dorm room. A 7 port hub link this one. will run 7 asic miner sticks at under 30 watts. 1 blade needs 70 watts . It is not plug n play on bitminter\\'s java client. A lot of ebayers use doc h\\'s java clientSo if someone has 7 AM sticks running right now on free power. selling one of these will be an easy sale plug n play.More then 500000 AM sticks are hashing at this time worldwide. these will sell they are a natural upgrade to any AM stick owner. I do agree that .49 btc is high 7 am sticks cost .245 btc half the price. These could be lower priced if they can make a lot of them.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI purchased one . thanks looking forward to using it.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nThese simply look awesome. Look forward to the reviews to start trickling in! Cheers...\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nfigure they will get cheaper as production increases... i bought one\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThe problem with your assumption is these guys are not the chip manufacturers. The reason Asicminer could keep dropping prices is because they made the chip also\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nyeah these may never get to the correct price level. still I want one. should have it in a few days.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nThese will likely never pay for themselves at 0.49BTC a piece.You might break even at $25 a piece ... or 0.12BTC a piece.M\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nAny discounts for purchasing 10+? Any chance of someone becoming a reseller?\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nis there uk group buys planned for this?thanks\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: RED FURY - USB Miners, 1000 usb sticks, 10.7ghs blade, Dev unit, Asic usb stick, 7 port hub, 7 am sticks\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-02 09:21:49',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [SHIPPING] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nI got a scheduled delivery of Nov 2nd as well, but I gave my office address and nobody will be there.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI did everything in my power! If they are unable to deliver to the address you should be able to pick it up at your local Post Office.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nReceived 135 Blue Fury units at 4:00pm today and had them packed and at the post office before 5:30pm! If you didn\\'t receive an e-mail with tracking yet your order will be shipping in Batch #2Here\\'s a few photos I took while packing:\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nChecked my e-mail and spam folder this morning: no tracking number for me. So there\\'ll be no delivery this Saturday. This starts to look like a 50% chance that I threw BTC5.88 out of the window.I can have the following outcomes:- Someone in the family will collect them. If it\\'s not possible without my ID, then they\\'ll eventually be returned to sender.- If they are successfully collected, that someone in the family will plug them into the prepared USB ports. Then I\\'ll remote to the machine at a later point and will try to launch them. If all goes well without my physical presence, then they\\'ll be hashing, if not, they\\'ll be sitting around doing nothing for a couple of months...I know, it was stupid of me to actually expect that this time it would be different and ASICs would be manufactured on time and I would have the units in the first week of October... That would be inconvenient, given I have about 70 BES on each machine running them. I\\'ll just plan to deploy BlueFuries on a third machine....I asked Luke-jr and he replied here: as ever.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI think he was saying what I was trying to. The \"all\" statement make it probe all COM ports and it won\\'t work with both types of miner. If you run them on the same machine then you will have to specify the COM ports in each instance so it doesn\\'t probe. So yes with 70 BES that would take some time to setup.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI run Block erupters and a Red fury on one machine. Compiled cgminer without bitfury support and bfgminer with only bitfury support and I run both on the same computer.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI canceled my order a while back due to the delay. I wanted to sell them to my bitminter clients . I had sold about sticks of am on ebay many people wanted to use these as the upgrade to am sticks. So,1: when is the next batch?2: plug n play for bitminter java client?3: separate pc\\'s one for am sticks one for fury sticks??\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHey ssinc, got my tracking number, set for delivery tomorrow. woo hooo!!just waiting on my refund now....thanks a million satoshis!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYou\\'re welcome! And sent! Tracking received\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nReceived my tracking order, looking forward to getting these hashing! Thanks SSINC.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nReceived mine today they are hashing but with horrible error rates 58%+ and only hashing at 2.3GHMiner Version ID Temp MH/s Accept Reject Error Utility Last ShareBPM 0 N/A 2313.506 93 0 [0%] 387 [59.36%] 11.093 20:24:44BPM 1 N/A 2218.942 93 0 [0%] 446 [62.91%] 11.093 20:24:48Totals 2 4532.448 186 0 [0%] 833 [61.13%] 22.186\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nFor now I would recommend everyone use cgminer or our version of bfgminer 3.0.99 until we fix it. I have been communicating with Luke and we are working out the issues.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nWhat are the switches needed for cgminer?I know of bigpic:all for bfgminer\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI think it is bf1\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nWhat version of cg miner is required?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nswitched to your specific Raspbian Wheezy Setup Bfgminer build and still only getting 2.3GHLook like these are performing 20% lower than spec.I\\'m running only two of them in a D-Link Hi-Speed USB 2.0 7-Port Powered Hub (DUB-H7) and 1 raspberry Pi as controller\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nSSinc : I PM\\'d you about my order (yesterday) -- I haven\\'t seen tracking info though...can you check when you get a moment, thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSorry about that! PM\\'d you back! Your order ships with Batch #2 that should be arriving on Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI am running a single BF, on Win7 per the instructions in With bfgminer ver 3.2.0 and the recommended batch file (bfgminer.exe -S \"BF1:all\" -o ...) it runs without H errors, but with the same lower hash rate that you are getting (about 2.26 GH/sec)....\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI am currently doing some testing. Running it on Ubuntu on a vm. I am getting 50-100mhs more on our version if bfgminer. The usbs are hashing at a speed of 2.5-2.8 for me. I would highly recommend Ubuntu virtual machine until we can get windows problems fixed.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI now run both my BE\\'s and single BlueFury on the same Win7 64 machine with 2 separate instances of bfgminer (3.2.1 for the BE\\'s with the -s erupter: all in the short-cut\\'s target command line and 3.2.0 with bfgminer.exe -S \"BF1:all\" -o ... in a batch file (as per Beastlymac\\'s mining support thread)). I\\'m getting the same performance as when I ran\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blue Fury units, USB ports, Block erupters, Red fury, D-Link Hi-Speed USB 2.0 7-Port Powered Hub, Raspberry Pi, Win7, Ubuntu virtual machine, Win7 64 machine\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True, True, True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-20 15:53:55',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Bitfury miner group buy + hosting (with ESCROW) 11/25 shares left\\n### Original post:\\nNow collecting towards 3 drillbit boards from drillbit\\'s batch 1 (~60 GH/s, late October early November delivery estimate). These have already been ordered and paid for. (Note: Orders from drillbit\\'s batch 1 are currently sold out to new buyers.)Now 11 / 25 shares remaining for this component\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nHi All, I\\'m very pleased to say that the starter kit arrived safe and sound today. It\\'s now hashing away nicely at 32-33 GH/s . A big thankyou to Punin and all the team. Talk about \"under promise, over deliver\" - that\\'s a 30 % hashrate increase (compared to the advertised 25 GH/s) out of the box without any manual tuning, pencil modding etc! At the moment all of the hashpower is directed at eligius on the same address as the bitfury burner so you can follow its progress at Once it\\'s bedded in a bit I\\'ll switch over to load-balanced mining on all of the three pools that I mentioned the previous post (eligius (using bitminter and HHTT (using the same address This seems to be the only way to have some kind of failover capability using the chainminer software (it\\'s a bit different to cgminer in that respect).Just to let you know, before starting up the starter kit I made a note of the BTC balance and kWh that the bitfury burner had generated up to that point. This will be used for the first payment for those who contributed to the bitfury burner (I still plan to make this payment at the weekend - it\\'s not a job for late at night). The \"miner\" is now \\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGreat newslooking forwards to more to come in the future\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nA nice fit in that case and a good bump in the hashing power.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nOK, so I\\'ve made a test payment (just a small amount of BTC to ensure that the system we have in place is working) for GB members with shares in the bitburner fury. Details are below. Please could you let me know if there are any problems receiving coins, as I\\'d like to make the full payments for this week ID: the second payment (0.0005 BTC) to 11EmQ.... is the hosting charge.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nThe micropayment yesterday seemed to work OK, so we\\'ve now sent this week\\'s full payment to GB members with shares in component 7. This corresponds to all BTC mined (0.314947 BTC) before we added the BFSB starter kit (component 1). Please see below for the details. We\\'ll make the payment for BTC mined since the starter kit was added later today. Apologies, the accounting for this will be a bit complicated until all components are here and mining! If anything is unclear let us know.Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPayouts for GB members with shares in components that are currently hashing (#7 and #1) has just been made. See below for details. Please note that some shares on eligius have not yet been paid and this payout only constitutes what we have actually received to date.Transaction ID: \\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nA quick hardware update for you:Bitburner fury: The hardware has been running fairly stable at around 48 GH/s for some days now. Over the first 2-3 days it crashed a couple of times with a particular \"usb_write error on avalon_write\" error that seems to be common with these boards (based on reports on the forum) and this could only be recovered by re-flashing the firmware. I noticed at this point that the firmware that was controlling the fan speed was keeping this rather low and switched to powering the fan directly from a 12V supply. This is a little louder, but has significantly reduced the board temp and things have been running stable since. Keep your fingers crossed that it stays this way! It really feels as though these boards are pushing the chips to their limits, so we\\'re not going to tinker with this hardware now, just let it get on with things. On the cryptx thread there are reports of a couple of people getting their \"hashrate protection\" cashback. We\\'ve not had this yet, but when we do we will let you know before sending an appropriately sized refund back to those who contributed to this component.BFSB starter kit and H-boards: So far the BFSB kit has been very reliabl\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nForgive my confusion here, but I thought the deal was supposed to be that earlier investors would be getting paid before later investors. Meaning that your shares get activated when later orders go online, but not when earlier orders go online, until your hardware is online too.Seems a little messed up that group 7s hardware shows up earlier, and all the earlier groups are still waiting. Wasn\\'t that the system that was put in place, in order to encourage earlier investing? Not complaining, or trying to be a pain in the ass, just trying to figure out what the deal is.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nApologies for causing any confusion wrenchmonkey. There was some discussion on the thread about this before we o\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: drillbit boards, starter kit, bitfury burner, BFSB starter kit, H-boards\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-05 22:22:54',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #21 USB Miners 0.035 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\n11/1/13 Blade prices are now 0.80 btc each plus add shipping! USB Miners when out of stock will not be replenished. They are done being made by AsicMiner. Backplanes for 0.50 btc each plus add shipping. Thank you for your continued orders! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIn less than 3 days of my placing the order, it\\'s in my hands. Thanks again for the quick shipment, SSB!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nThank you for the positive feedback. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nCan you tell us if they\\'ll be making other devices to replace them and/or the blades as well?\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThere will be a new product called a cube that will be as follows:Cube (overclockable without manual adjustment of voltage): hashrate - 30GH/s guaranteed, 38.4GH/s theoretical maxPM me if interested in purchasing the Cube based on this minimal information. Price for customers to be determined with availability arriving in two weeks or less.The blades are limited in quantity at these current prices. That is all the info I have at this time.Thanks for the question. SSB\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nInteresting! Do you know estimated pricing on these?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAbout 3 times the price of current blades. If you wish me to place an order with no other info at this time, please PM me and I can order one for you. Thank you! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nHey SSB, Do you still have USB ASICMiners? Did you remember me\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nYes I remember you. I believe I sold you your first usb miner and possibly first bitcoin transaction. I still have USB miners at 0.035 each. If you buy 50USB Miners + 0.07 shipping, you get a free 49 port AsicMiner USB hub(supplies are very limited right now on hubs) while my supplies last. Thanks for the message. Glad to see you are still around. Have a great weekend! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYes, you did I didn\\'t see this: If you buy 50USB Miners..... I just wanted two more USB Miners. PM sent.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n11/2/13 I am now out of stock of the 50 USB miners + free hub. I still have backplanes available for 0.50 btc each plus 0.08 btc shipping. I have a limited amount of USB miners left before they are gone for good!Prices are as below:Units Ordered Unit Price 1-13 0.035 BTC 14-59 0.035 BTC 60-99 0.035 BTC 100+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\n11/3/13 Any new orders of backplanes are now 0.45btc each plus add shipping of 0.08 btc each(or send me a prepaid USPS regional B box label).\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nAll orders shipped this weekend on Saturday and any newer orders ship Monday morning.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nFast Shipping. Thank You! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nThere are good chances I will buy one. Let me read in the forums here and see what info I can get, so I can decide.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\n11/5/13 Any new orders of backplanes are now 0.30btc each plus add shipping of 0.08 btc each(or send me a prepaid USPS regional B box label).\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\npayment and PM sent\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nSSB delivers in the usual manner, extra packed and ready for an apocalypse, and thank god this time, they beat the crap out this box he sent me, looks like death. Here they all are on a dedicated PSU all hashing away (well all but 2).Hey philipma, if you catch this, send me a pm.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\n<~Jelly\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI bet if you would make those cables/connectors they would sell well\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, Backplanes, Cube, USB ASICMiners, 49 port AsicMiner USB hub\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-06 20:39:56',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [SHIPPED] 0.9 OR LESS ~ BPMC \"BLUE FURY\" 2.7 GH/s USB MINER! SSINC GB#9!\\n### Original post:\\nAny ETA when compensation will be sent out now that all orders should be \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nokay I cancelled my order here and I order 1 red fury. simple question has anyone got one of the blue furies to run on bitminter? with the java client?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nstill waiting on my shipment.. looks like it should be here tomorrow. I might crack one open and try it before I unload them all Anyone wanna buy 40 blue furys?.45 BTC each SHIPPED!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nssinc suggested in a PM and I agreed to that he mine with my 6 units for me until they can safely be sent to me at a later date. Now waiting for them to show some signs of life on my designated address on Eligius. For the record, I offered ssinc 3% of the total proceeds from this \"hosted\" mining.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhat\\'s being considered way under spec? I know Beastlymac made a comment about being under 2GH/sI\\'ve got two that seem to end up as \\'DEAD\\' in bfgminer after 5-10 hours, and they are also the same two that are under 2GH/s (one sits at 1.21GH/s apparently atm the other is at 1.75GH/s, they\\'ve been on for 3hr 19min thus far), it\\'s always the same two as well.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAnything that\\'s DEAD after 5-10 hours might just be a software issue. I noticed my units start to slow down after running for a day. I woke up today with everything hashing at 100-200 MH/s which was really strange. After a reset they seem to be fine though.I don\\'t know what Beastlymac deems as out of spec but I would consider anything under 1.8 GH/s definitely not working correctly and I would replace it without question.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThe majority of comp as already been sent out. I\\'m still waiting on replies from a handful of people for payment addresses. So if anyone else hasn\\'t received a comp yet please PM/Email me.Setting up a separate pc for them right now actually Also, if anyone has a DOA unit or a unit performing way under spec PM me or e-mail me to setup an exchange as limited replacements will be available later this week.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYea that\\'s why I asked... I\\'m still assuming there\\'s a lot of software-related issues at the moment.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSent you an email about comp. Thanks!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: red fury, blue fury, 6 units\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-10-07 06:54:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [TENTATIVE] Avalon Gen. 2 Chips Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nI\\'m interested, obviously depending on the details when they are released\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nRyan,I\\'m interested. Hopefully the K16 design will be stable by then and we can start hashing earlier. I\\'ll probably have 4 K16s to load with Gen2 chips, so potentially 64 chips depending on price.Cheers,Tom\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSorry, I really don\\'t know how you can trust Yifu after everything he\\'s done to your fellow miners. A lot of \\'em.I, for one, will *never* deal with unprofessional, uncaring Avalon and BFL.Yesterday, I had a phone call with John S., the head of marketing at HashFast. I found him to be a true marketing professional. He appeared to care about his clients, and I found it easy enough to work with him to convince him to let us have access to HashFast Flash Sale pricing up until Friday night thanks to a partially reserved 4th miner, even though the sale ended last night.Contrast that with Inaba fro BFL & Yifu from Avalon. Over a month ago, I, a true CSR pro and Tier I/II/III IT support person (in addition to network design) offered to help Yifu out of his self-inflicted hole when he came out of so-called \"mafia\" hiding. I would\\'ve gotten every one of those refunds done in a week, two weeks tops. So instead of letting people that actually like doing CSR work fix the problem he created, he just ignored me like everyone else he ignored...and people and some Group Buys are still waiting months for refunds.You can do whatever you want, of course, since we have free will. But from what I\\'ve see\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI understand where you are coming from. Part of me hopes that this time will be different, since they have pledged to only sell what they already have on hand. Primarily I am looking to recoup the sunk cost of the Klondike components I\\'ve bought. The group buy I was in has opted for a refund, and I\\'ve got thousands of dollars in Klondike components sitting around and waiting for Avalon chips. I don\\'t imagine I\\'m the only one in this situation. On top of this, a few of the people who decided to use my assembly service contacted me in public and in private to see if I was willing to do a group buy for the generation 2 chips. So here I am. :-)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nExcellent! I totally understand where you guys are coming from, trying to recoup whatever you can from your Avalon expenditures.I really wasn\\'t trying to stop sales or steal your thunder, but provide more of a gut check because Yifu\\'s behavior is disturbing IMO, no matter what the heck might be happening behind the scenes.==If you guys proceed, I wish you all the very best!\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nDyslexicZombei, though I agree with you, I am one of the people ryepdx is speaking of. The only chance of me recouping some of my losses on the chips, parts and assembly is to use it for gen2 chips. With that said, I still need more details, dates and numbers before making final decision. I just can\\'t simply trow away thousands of dollars just to make a statement.For anyone else, I agree, stay away from the likes of Avalon and BFL.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI\\'m interested, from the same standpoint of still having some BTC invested in hardware which now will never have gen 1 chips in it, but could maybe see life with gen 2 (I have 3 Stumptown board orders).\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'d be interested\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nSince I\\'ve paid for two full K16 assemblies with steamboat I\\'d be interested as well, providing steamboat doesn\\'t directly handle this. Watching, jic.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nInterested. Paid for 51 K16s, and I\\'d like to see some chips on there if Yifu pulls through.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nJust saw this thread. I\\'m interested.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nIf you need an escrow, and your favorite one isn\\'t available, I\\'m here. (I could also do a GB but it\\'s probably better you do it.)\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI\\'m interested in this as well.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThanks for all the feedback, guys. I\\'m going to go ahead with a group buy, then, as soon as Avalon\\'s terms of sale are available. And again, if you\\'re interested in being notified when that happens, PM me or watch this thread. I\\'ll be announcing it here when it happens.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nRyan,Perhaps you should also talk to sensei (he\\'s in Michigan) he mentioned on the K16 thread that he has enough parts for 500 boards - that would go a long way towards making 10k for a group buy (presuming the quantities will be the same the second time around).Also, from steamboats buy, it is good to be clear up front about your right to make decisions on behalf of the group in the event things go wrong - lost in shipping, cancelled by bitsyncomm and set expectations on how much refund, if any, buyers would expect should things go wrong.I\\'d like to participate but I\\'m waiting to hear from steamboat about the parts I\\'ve bought from him.Thanks,Tom\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI am also interested. Need to use all these components sitting on my desk\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nI\\'m interested also, but the price and the hashrate\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: K16, Gen2 chips, Klondike components, Stumptown board orders, K16 assemblies\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-07 05:37:45',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #22 Blade Miners 0.80 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\n11/1/13 Blade prices are now 0.80 btc each plus add shipping! USB Miners when out of stock will not be replenished. They are done being made by AsicMiner. Backplanes for 0.50 btc each plus add shipping. Thank you for your continued orders! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPayment and PM Sent.... SSB u rock!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGot my order thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n11/2/13 I am now out of stock of the 50 USB miners + free hub. I still have backplanes available for 0.50 btc each plus 0.08 btc shipping. I have a limited amount of USB miners left before they are gone for good!Prices are as below:Units Ordered Unit Price 1-13 0.035 BTC 14-59 0.035 BTC 60-99 0.035 BTC 100+ Please PM me how many you want for a quote. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n11/3/13 Any new orders of backplanes are now 0.45btc each plus add shipping of 0.08 btc each(or send me a prepaid USPS regional B box label).\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAll orders shipped this weekend on Saturday and any newer orders ship Monday morning.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nAmazing Service Again SSB! Products Delivered this afternoon! I\\'ll test them out tomorrow!can someone suggest a good 16 port switch?would this work good for running 14-15 blades?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIf you are still trying to buy for your network.... you will lose.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nhello mr. BOOM, I sent you a pm in regards to a quote for some blades. Wondering if you still have blades in stock? Please let me know, thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\n11/5/13 Any new orders of backplanes are now 0.30btc each plus add shipping of 0.08 btc each(or send me a prepaid USPS regional B box label).\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\n11/5/13 Any new orders of backplanes are now 0.25btc each plus add shipping of 0.06 btc each(or send me a prepaid USPS regional B box label). I am now out of stock of USB miners for sale. I have blades and backplanes for sale only at this time.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAll orders shipped today. Thank you!\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USB Miners, Backplanes, 16 port switch\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-07 19:36:43',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [SOLD OUT] ASICMiner 49 port hubs +50 units! 1.75 BTC - Last batch\\n### Original post:\\nSold out.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI got one of the two hubs running. All 48 on the running hub are hashing away. CrazyGuy!-herener\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nOrdered my hub and this PSU tell you how many it can run when I get my rig up.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nThat\\'s an extremely tidy setup! By the way fellas, I didn\\'t receive a batch of USB units today, it was all blades. I still hope to receive enough to pair with the available hubs within the next couple days. My apologies to those of you who had your hopes up.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nwhats that monster in the background? looks like 70 BE\\'s?\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nthat looks like 7 of these have 2x 49 port hubs running they run 41 and 44 hubs each and I am running a 20 port hub.one of my 49 port hubs has a bad row of 7 it has power but no hubs can be read on it. it is okay as I am using a few of those 7 dead ports to power usb 3 fans.I think a good mobo can do 3x 49 port hubs and up to 120 sticks 40 on each. I have a third hub on the way. and I am using this 5 port pcie usb2 this mobo windows 7\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nIs there any consensus on a good Power supply to buy if you are running 40+ sticks. I pulled an old 380w Raid Max out of my retired computer hardware box and have been running 43 block erupters and 2 usb fans. Seems like new ones on the low end are just not up to snuff. I realize it has something to do with the power going to the rails on new PSUs from reading through the forum, but my understanding of electronics is limited. Seems like a better idea to go digging through the garbage than online shopping at this point.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI\\'ve been using one of these for 2 months in my pc I built with no problems.I bought another one last week to use with my hub, it handles 49 miners no problems. Been running it few days now. It\\'s a really nice and cheap option. since these run on 5 volts, you need a psu that puts out enough amps at 5v. If your using an old 350 watt pc power supply I doubt it has enough amps at 5 volts. Theoretically you need at least 25 amps at 5 volts. But power supplies are always over rated and you don\\'t want to run them at their max capacity. The one I listed above is 32 amps at 5 volts.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nThanks, that looks like a good deal overall, I will try one out, I plan to resell it eventually anyway. My old PSU says it is 29 amps on 5 volts. I tried running 47 miners and 2 fans at one point, but the power supply powered itself off when I went to run bfg miner. Since then I have left a few slots open and everything has been running well.I know I read that 25a on 5v thing here a few times, but I just now am understanding what that means and what to look for on the psu sticker, so I appreciate your reply.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThe Rosewill 350rv +5V@35A psu I tried would run up to 40 sticks, produce heat, wire harness warm. I replaced it with a butt ugly Apevia AS520W, runs all 49 ports, fans on lowest speed blow room temp, no heat in harness. If you don\\'t mind the blue leds and green sleeves, it\\'s a great psu for the price.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nA friend of mine has this one which I can use for free. use this one?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner 49 port hubs, PSU, USB units, blades, 20 port hub, 5 port pcie usb2, 380w Raid Max, block erupters, usb fans, 350 watt pc power supply, Rosewill 350rv +5V@35A psu, Apevia AS520W\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-08 18:05:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner Blades (Rev2) 10.7gh/s - .80 BTC - Pre-made power connectors!\\n### Original post:\\nNew stock and new pricing, all units come with a pre-made power adapter(molex to green connector). 7+ orders get free backplane.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAny chance of free shipping this weekend?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nNo plans for free shipping but I can always work something out for larger orders.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAny price change with new BTC level?.8 if BTC<$300 else .X?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blades (Rev2) 10.7gh/s, pre-made power adapter(molex to green connector), backplane\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-09 06:29:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: ASICMiner hardware Craigslist Scam disguised as from Canary\\n### Original post:\\nDa#@ scammers.They need caught, branded with a \"S\" on their forehead and then infected with that virus from a scifi short story that made themhave shock/fear aversion to use technology of any kind!!!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nMan, craigslist in LA is rough....guy got killed here last week or two trying to buy a phone in south central (at nite of all places) in front of his kid through craigslist add.....buyer beware on craigslist.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nfigures, they landed in prince anyone?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nMaybe my untrained eye doesn\\'t see it .. but I don\\'t see anywhere they are trying to impersonate you...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nthe email communication was signed as CanaryThe buyer assumed it was CanaryInTheMine and actually asked the \"seller\" whether he was same, while i didn\\'t see a direct response to that, the rest of the story was designed to give an impression of someone who is a reseller... that combined with Canary as the sig, easily confused people....I shall publish email exchange later, need to clean it up first...\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI almost got Scammed too then!!-----Hey There,The blades are 0.5 BTC each, and every order of 10 does ship with a backplane. I am in Chicago. If you have any questions please don\\'t hesitate to ask. is a post in the miami Criagslist\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\noh wow.... people can be such scumbags\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\ndamn.... this sucks...\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWow!I just received a PM from a forum member (1 yr old account) who apparently got scammed on Craiglist by someone trying to make it look like the post is from Canary, thus leading this person to believe they were dealing with me.I DON\\'T distribute on Craigslist, so anything on Craigslist isn\\'t from me.Bummer, I\\'ve not had anyone try to impersonate me yet, this feels like shit!!I have the email exchange forwarded to me by this person and if I get their permission I will post here...Scammer posts: putting together a quick reddit post to bring some attention to this scam, please upvote if appropriate and share this thread\\'s link as well as reddit\\'s as necessary. I\\'d like to bring attention to this problem not only for my purposes but to prevent any further scamming as well as negative publicity to ASICMiner, and ALL resellers of ASICMiner.reddit: at the bottom of any CL listing there\\'s a message:Avoid scams, deal locally! Do NOT wire funds (Western Union, Moneygram). Beware cashier checks, money orders, shipping, non-local buyers/sellers. More infoIt\\'s time for CL to add bitcoin to this list. It\\'s worse than wiring funds, to send btc first on Craigslist.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nThis scumbag will get his.. Karma is a bitch and this individual will learn this soon enough.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nso far, the scammed btc have made their way to here: here: provided this as the payment address to someone who got scammed: \\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nCrazy shit! Craigslist warns u for sending wires or similar irreversible payments. I also wonder, for a craigslist buyer what difference does it make if the seller says he\\'s canary. He would probably not know who he is! It\\'s only us here on these forums, I thought.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner, blades, backplane\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-09 08:13:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN, 28/100 avail]R7: Bitmine Rig, 800GH/s, At-cost + Host, $70= 8-12GH/s +UPS\\n### Original post:\\n28 listed as available on our site, 15 shares still in soft reserve.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nJust bought two through the ebay link. PM to follow./Frank\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\n2 shares purchased via websitefrom: 1.10529196 BTCtx: payout to: ...gb\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI am a bit confused. This offering is priced in $USD, and yet it\\'s supposedto be paid for in Bitcoin? What\\'s the expected exchange rate, or do I getto choose my own rate? I am not surprised that it\\'s priced in $$$, since virtually all the \"inputs\"(i.e. the miner, shipping, etc) have a $$$ price attached and not a Bitcoinprice. Since I am a complete on Noob on actually completing a transaction withBitcoin, will I get a TX-id if I send the Bitcoins from my newly openedCoinbase account?Thanks for your patience.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThe site calculates the exchange rate it uses an average rate so if there is a slight spike (that happens in 10-15minutes) or a low point that doesn\\'t last for long it doesn\\'t affect the price.I\\'ve always used electrum to send transactions so not sure how you can get your txid from coinbase I believe you can but its better if you send the coins from an address you control.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nJust paid for 4 shares via the website, order #231Tx ID: address: again guys! So far I\\'m in for 6xR4, 4xR6, and 4xR7. Should be an interesting few months ahead\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPaid my 10 shares a while ago.TX ID what is planned for R8?\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI think since the Bitmine is somewhat modular, it would be add on modules for the existing rig. Or cointerra...in which case I hope I have btc available to throw at that too.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHmmm...Sierra in November ($8/GH/s), TerraMiner IV in December ($7/GH/s) or TerraMiner in January ($3/GH/s)? That is a gambling question, given recent difficulty increases.On (un)related note. Would any of fellow Co-Op members be willing to sell a share (or a fraction of) in R4 and R5/R6? It is a collectors\\' thing :-)I saw it coming...\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOh no! Are you doing a DZ MC Boxed Set too? J/K: thank you for the compliment! An internet toast, my man. (We really need a beer toast emoticon here)For myself, I oversold on R4 and somehow ended up losing my own Boxed Set in my own co-op the oversales.==BTW: payment is being sent in today for whatever is in the R7 wallet. If we don\\'t have the full amount, we\\'ll hopefully have enough for at least 500GH/s to secure Free Shipping before the promo ends tonight in about 8.5 hours. Thomas or I will follow up with a PM and email to adjust our order to secure the Free Shipping.Saving money with free shipping saves us about $2.20 per share.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nOn the same note, any shares that were reserved are now up for sale if you had a reservation and have yet to pay do so now as they are available to anybody. First come first served.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nHow will this hash rate compare to Round 6?/Frank\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nHi, payout address as above has not been added to spreadsheetthanksgb\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bitmine Rig, R4, R6, R7, R8, Sierra, TerraMiner IV, TerraMiner\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-10-31 02:41:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [CLOSED] R9: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury Chips! 40% off + HOST + UPS +Bonus\\n### Original post:\\n reserve shares automatically and for easiest spreadsheet export, please visit the new DZ Miners Cooperative IS NOT A PRE-ORDER. THIS BULLET RUN BATCH IS ALREADY IN PRODUCTION.Ladies and gents: we appear to have another Flash Sale type situation!Except this one is even better because it\\'s being offered 40% cheaper than elsewhere,and shipping is GUARANTEED by November 1 OR WE GET OUR MONEY BACK. This is an EXCLUSIVE OFFER just for the DZ MC. Confirmed by Black Arrow: one of the DZ MC leaders and our primary vetted miner host who runs a professional insured ASIC colocation facility,is now an Official US Reseller for Black Arrow!Because of this: he is offering us first access to BELOW COST prices on Black Arrow\\'s Bullet Run using Bitfury chips! We will be getting the very first Black Arrow miners over *THREE MONTHS EARLIER* than Black Arrow\\'s official launch on February 24 (using their 100GH/s Minion chip instead). Bob\\'s paid a hefty premium to get this done in a jiffy and production is ongoing as you read this. I won\\'t mention the assembly partners yet (perhaps bobsag3 can shed light on this) but I consider them to be trusted forum with good \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSpreadsheet uploaded as there were many orders in this the key wasn\\'t included in the screen cap. So I will provide it here Somethings missing from your order (usually its your payout address)Yellow- Everything is fine (Not anonymous)Green- Everything is fine (Anonymous)The following orders are in you don\\'t see your order listed on the spreadsheet /it has a problem or in the R10 current orders then something went wrong the best course of action would be to open a support ticket.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSo both orders 4 + 2 shares are in R9 looks good. I may buy some for R10 I will decide on Monday.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI would request that you re-check your spreadsheet and incoming orders, because I appear tohave completely vanished. Back on the 17th, I posted to the Forum my order number of #253,which appears to be missing. Coinbase seemed to take the better part of hour to confirmthe transaction to me in an E-mail. I would also encourage you to check the \"Support Tickets\"on the dzminercorp website. Right now I am feeling out some .89 Bitcoin with little tono recourse.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nHi alh,I\\'m sorry that your order hasn\\'t been sorted out yet. Thomas is handling the order tracking but I do understand that he was having some difficulties with the site re-using wallet addresses of previous orders that weren\\'t paid. We\\'ll get this figured out. I don\\'t want anyone in our co-op to feel like they\\'ve been denied their fair purchase. Please be patient with us, as we\\'re still evolving and growing. We\\'ve built this co-op on a shoestring so far, so sometimes our free tools can be a bit clunky. I know that Thomas hasn\\'t had an easy time with some of our site\\'s quirks, so please give him time to sort this out. We\\'re here to help the miner community, not frustrate it, which is why we work hours and hours for you guys putting together the best deals and dealing with co-op issues, to keep this co-op (relatively) humming.Our site at the moment is still very much a beta site but we\\'ve become to see the limitations of WordPress and its associated plug-ins. Going forward, we\\'re looking at setting up a pro site very shortly and better e-commerce tools so that these unfortunate situations don\\'t happen. The DZ MC is likely going pro. I know that will please Thomas immensely to not ha\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOrder# 253 is listed on R9\\'s Spreadsheet 7th order down in Red (Missing payout address)\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThanks guys. I looked at the spreadsheet and thought the lines had been in sorted order. The obvious place for #253 wasn\\'t there and hence I thought it was missing. I should havelooked at the spreadsheet in total.Payout address sent to thomas_s via PM.Thanks for your patience.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIts no problem, the spreadsheets are based on time paid so the order numbers for the most part are in order unless payment came in later than someone else.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nCopied from the R11 thread.10/25 update. World\\'s first pics of fully populated Black Arrow Bitfury Prosperos: bobsag3 and Black Arrow!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nLatest pictures from prototype testing: is estimated for TONIGHT. We should have a tracking # this evening.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI am happy to report I have received the tracking number for the boards, and should have them within 48 hours!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWoo Whoo!\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nGO GO bobsag3Thank you for all your effort in making this GB a success (and that goes for the rest of you guy too)\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYour welcome.Good news everyoneBoards cleared customsLouisville, KY, United States 10/30/2013 9:57 P.M.Registered with Clearing Agency. Shipment release pending Clearing\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Black Arrow Bullet Run, Bitfury chips, 100GH/s Minion chip, Black Arrow Bitfury Prosperos\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-02 20:16:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [CLOSED] R10: BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury! 40% off, $123=8-10GH Nov 1\\n### Original post:\\n reserve shares automatically and for easiest spreadsheet export, please visit the new DZ Miners Cooperative update: I\\'ve been wrong before, but I do believe that R10 is now OFFICIALLY CLOSED. Thank you! Please check the R11 thread if you\\'d like to purchase Black Arrow Bullet Run GB shares. Also, the first Bullet Run boards for R9-10 have arrived in Kentucky! The rest are only 12 hours behind.THIS IS NOT A PRE-ORDER. THIS BULLET RUN BATCH IS ALREADY IN PRODUCTION.Ladies and gents: we appear to have another Flash Sale type situation!Except this one is even better because it\\'s being offered 40% cheaper than elsewhere,and shipping is GUARANTEED by November 1 OR WE GET OUR MONEY BACK. This is an EXCLUSIVE OFFER just for the DZ MC. Confirmed by Black Arrow in R9: one of the DZ MC leaders and our primary vetted miner host who runs a professional insured ASIC colocation facility called Miner Hosting LLC, is now an Official US Reseller for Black Arrow! Congrats Bob! of this: he is offering us first access to BELOW COST prices on Black Arrow\\'s Bullet Run using Bitfury chips! We will be getting the very first Black Arrow miners over *THREE MONTHS EARLIER*\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThanks everyone for making R10, the Revenge of R10, a success.Please move new buys and public questions to the R11 thread.Cheers!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nGood news everyoneBoards cleared customsLouisville, KY, United States 10/30/2013 9:57 P.M.Registered with Clearing Agency. Shipment release pending Clearing Agency review. / Released by Clearing Agency. Now in-transitEstimated Delivery 10/31/2013\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nsweet deal! trick or treat! give us bitcoins\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI have one order on hold, and one processing, so we have a duplicate in the #380October 31, 2013 Processing$123 for 1 item#320October 22, 2013 On-hold$123 for 1 itemI sent in payment for 380, so you can nuke the one or the other and put me on either 10 or 11.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nRolla, MO, United States 10/31/2013 7:45 A.M.Out For Delivery10/31/2013 7:38 A.M.Arrival Scan\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI have an update: some good news, bad news.Bad: He\\'s still working out the chaining of the miners. This is important because he only has so many Pis. We\\'re also seeing a little under performance as far as hashrate but kano is working on the cgminer chainminer integration so we should see improvements on that. Such is life on the bleeding edge of a bullet run.Good: Since bobsag3 is basically Good Guy Bob he\\'s going to make sure that to add a board to our 20 board stack to get our min. hashrate to 8.34GH/s as promised while software issues are worked on. He also managed to stack 6 boards, so far, even with the issues he\\'s seeing.Bobsag\\'s busy as heck but I\\'ll post some pics he shared with me as soon as I upload them to my cloud photos.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nLatest pics: Unboxing screenshot, 96 chips: board stack, working: screenshot from this stack (slight under performance which should be improved by native chainminer support): realized that I\\'m a little bummed that they\\'re under performing, but sometimes things don\\'t always work out with initial implementations. But on the bright side this was guaranteed to be shipping by Nov. 1 and we\\'re fortunate to have already received it! kano has been shipped a simultaneous shipment so he\\'ll hopefully be able to tweak some improvements while he adds native BA support to chainminer.Group Buyers are going to be compensated for any under performance of the 8.34 GH/s mark per share that was promised.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nDamn was really hoping they would push to 10. Good work though.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nRemember these are new boards, software hasn\\'t been configured for them yet so if they are operating slightly under spec its not a bad thing when software is finished they should be much faster.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI have the utmost faith that bobsag3 will squeeze the best possible performance out of these biotches for us. We are dealing with cutting edge mining tech and there will always need to be tweaking.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nGood points, I need patience\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nGents and ladies, a Saturday, 11/2 update:- Bob\\'s been having problems chaining the miners beyond a certain point which has limited his ability to stack miners as he only has so many Pis to go around. He seems to have gotten past much of the earlier issues but can\\'t stack more than 6 at the moment (the goal was 10 boards per Pi)- He\\'s blown a few Pis and a couple of PSUs during his testing.- He\\'s currently up to almost 1 TH (our target is 3.2 - 4 TH, combined from all 4 Rounds- He\\'s currently short Pis due to them failing,and his overnight shipment of a bunch of extras from Amazon is stuck at UPS till Monday- We\\'ve learned a lot too: Bullet Runs can be messy, best to have waaay more supplies than you think you needed- Because I promised opt\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Black Arrow Bullet Run, Bitfury chips, Pis, PSUs\\nHardware ownership: False, False, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-01 23:22:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [CLOSED] R11:BLACK ARROW Bullet Run w Bitfury. 40% off. $123=8-10GH Nov. 1\\n### Original post:\\nThanks madpoet!We had 50 shares open up in R10 so all R11 shares that have been paid up till now have been moved to R10.Therefore: R11 is closed until 24 R10 shares can be sold.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nIn for 5 Shares - hope to hear from you so I can get 5 more\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPlease keep the orders coming. If R10 runs out, feel free to buy more R11 shares as they\\'re all part of the same hardware batch.Copied from other DZ MC BA threads: Latest pictures from prototype testing: is estimated for TONIGHT. We should have a tracking # this evening.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nIf you\\'re order 348, that was your order that *may* get moved to R10, depending on what was sold or not sold.Edit: NM that was JBFru45 in R10. I guess you\\'re talking about a different 5 share purchase.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\n reserve shares automatically and for easiest spreadsheet export, please visit the new DZ Miners Cooperative PM Update: Our Bullet Run Black Arrow boards cleared customs in Kentucky! They arrive in Missouri tomorrow. We still have 40 shares available in R11. Round 11 is closed. If we run out of stock, please go ahead and still place an order as backorders are allowed and will be fulfilled. Once 100 R11 shares are all sold out, any additional PAID R11 shares will be automatically moved to an R12.10/28 Update, boards are due for shipment TONIGHT. We expect a tracking number shortly. Latest pics from prototype testing: Update: We have a shipping estimate update. These boards are due for shipment in the next 24 hours and is scheduled for delivery to Missouri. They will be installed and running ASAP: bobsag3 will be joined by 2 EEs and a CE on that first day, in order to help get miners up and running quickly.THIS IS NOT A PRE-ORDER. THIS BULLET RUN BATCH IS ALREADY IN PRODUCTION nearly complete.New Pics from Black Arrow Bullet Run: update. World\\'s first pics of fully populated Black Arrow Bitfury Prosperos: and gents: we appear to have anothe\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nNo worries, somehow somewhere I have 10 shares worth of hashing Just was curious what is where.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nPaid for my 4 shares! (#394)There was a 20$ usd difference from current coinbase price and price from the site. Is that normal?Thanks\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks for the update DZ!We know you are working hard Bobsag3, Keep up the hard work buddy!M\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nHi Etienne,Sorry to hear that. We\\'re all about trying to save you guys money. BTC is still so young there\\'s tons of volatility between exchanges.We use Bitstamp as the rate we go with because it seems like all of our mfgs. we\\'ve bought from so far priced their product at this rate. ==I have an update: some good news, bad news.Bad: He\\'s still working out the chaining of the miners. This is important because he only has so many Pis. We\\'re also seeing a little under performance as far as hashrate but kano is working on the cgminer chainminer integration so we should see improvements on that. Such is life on the bleeding edge of a bullet run.Good: Since bobsag3 is basically Good Guy Bob he\\'s going to make sure that to add a board to our 20 board stack to get our min. hashrate to 8.34GH/s as promised while software issues are worked on. He also managed to stack 6 boards, so far, even with the issues he\\'s seeing.Bobsag\\'s busy as heck but I\\'ll post some pics he shared with me as soon as I upload them to my cloud photos.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nYou\\'re welcome! Most of the hard work\\'s at the moment is being done by bobsag3, so let\\'s all give him a virtual pat on the back. Latest pics: Unboxing screenshot, 96 chips: board stack, working: screenshot from this stack (slight under performance which should be improved by native chainminer support): realized that I\\'m a little bummed that they\\'re underperforming, but sometimes things don\\'t always work out with initial implementations. But on the bright side this was guaranteed to be shipping by Nov. 1 and we\\'re fortunate to have already received it! kano has been shipped a simultaneous shipment so he\\'ll hopefully be able to tweak some improvements while he adds native BA support to chainminer.Group Buyers are going to be compensated for any under performance of the 8.34 GH/s mark per share that was promised.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nWhere is the best place to track performance of these shares and how do you plan to handle payouts exactly? Will there be a URL to pool stats or anything like that?Good luck working out the kinks!\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWhen everything is ready there will be a page similar to the R5 / R6, I also like the payout method used in R5/6 on the 1st and 15th of the month, the payout sizes are a nice sized chunk not small bitcents each, remember the less times we have to do payouts the less we have to pay in fee\\'s.Anyone elses thoughts.R5\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI like the way it has been working the past couple \\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Bullet Run Black Arrow boards, Black Arrow Bitfury Prosperos, Pis\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-03 02:06:30',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [CLOSED] R12: Black Arrow BF Bullet Run $123 = 39% cheaper than cex.io!\\n### Original post:\\nWe can now watch the hashrate remotely here via the link below. Thank you Thomas! all rounds have now been combined for easier accounting and as a bonus to Round 11 and 12 customers. This doesn\\'t effect Round 9 and 10 Group Buyer payouts in any way, but it does allow Round 11 and 12 paid customers earlier hashrate access!bobsag3: needs his own forum meme as Good Guy Bobsag3.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nGreat job guys\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI just checked PMs. R12 is definitely SOLD OUT.If R12 is oversold, bobsag3 will be running it in an unofficial R13 that is not for sale (meant only for oversales). R13 will only come online once R9-12 are fully up to speed. He needs the pause to get R9-12 up to speed and to catch his breath.Thank you everyone for making the Black Arrow Fundraising for Rounds 9-12 a huge success!\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nNow its getting exciting!GB team, Thank you for putting this all together. I really cant thank you guys enough for doing these group buys. I know its taxing on you guys to do these and you will have to make some changes in the future. But just think of all the people you might have saved from possibly giving money to some bad people. I think most of us here have had our not so pleasant experiences. Even when I was getting frustrated during the roll out of R10 It was a million times better than the experience I had with a company I would like to pull the wings off of. Keep your head up Bobsag3 your doing great. I\\'m sure it seems all the pressure is on you but dont forget to eat, sleep and drink. Ok, only drink a little. Best of luck to all of us!And thanks again.M\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nDarnit phil, you literally just gave me an involuntary shiver. They wouldn\\'t refund my 2 Jally pre-orders (or even deign to tell me they weren\\'t refunding after 5 days), and PP was past the 45-60 day window (whatever it is) for refunds, so I went to my CC company for a chargeback.Now PP has limited my wife\\'s ebay PP acct. because they saw it as an unauthorized transaction. Now we have to go thru 4 diff steps or more to get it back to normal. Also, lost $100 profit I had built into that deal (offset with winning a 2BTC bet that BFL wouldn\\'t meet Sept. deadline for July 6 Jallys).All because of some bug, still being a worm.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nSame BFL said no PP said its past our 45 days and credit card said screw them heres your money back. Took 1 phone call and a quick fax and my account was credited and the funds were taken back by them from paypal / BFL\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nHa! Hilarious! FWIW: I\\'m told our facilities are absolutely 100% smoke free.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nZERO shares available out of 100At cex.io on 10/30 PM, 1GH = 0.1 BTC. Therefore: 1 BTC or about $200 (at BTC rates of $200) equals 10 GH/s there.In this GB, $123 yields you the *same* hashrate which will be hashing by November 1 at about 39% cheaper than cex.io!We also price our shares in USD so you don\\'t get screwed over by BTC volatility. We are also using Bitfury chips, so it\\'s not like their 39% more expensive 10 GH/s boards are better than one of our 10 GH/s boards. reserve shares automatically and for easiest spreadsheet export, please visit the new DZ Miners Cooperative update: R10/R11 boards have arrived! R11/R12 boards should arrive tomorrow. 10/30 PM Update: Our Bullet Run Black Arrow boards cleared customs in Kentucky! They arrive in Missouri tomorrow. You can still order here: still actually have 40 shares available in R11, at the moment. This thread is set up to handle overflow from R11 sales. If we run out of stock, please go ahead and still place an order as backorders are allowed and will be fulfilled. Once 100 R12 shares are all sold out, any additional PAID R12 shares will be automatically moved to a Round 13.10/28 Update, boards are\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\n11/2 update: R9/10 is up to 1.7TH! We\\'re met our minimum hashrate target!Also, we just passed a co-op milestone that I need to point out...We just passed the 10 TH mark for PAID orders! It only took 2.5 months to community fund and build this mesh network of miners/investors.We also just passed the $113K group fundraising mark, meaning that even including our co-op bonuses of: business insurance, world\\'s lowest hosting fees, access to veteran IT pros in software, hardware, networks, and information security, my marketing and project management skills, our tight knit group of co-op creators (11 so far, including mootinator, unknown.usr, philipma, firsttimeuser, and an oil VP that\\'s not on our forum yet), and of course you:our customers.For which we wouldn\\'t be celebrating this milestone without you. Thank you from the bottom of my heart, on behalf of the DZ MC Co-op leaders and contributors.Cheers and best wishes!\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nBlack Arrow deserves huge credit alongside with bobsag3. We can\\'t thank Black Arrow enough for being Good Guy manufacturers about\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jally, Bitfury chips, Bullet Run Black Arrow boards\\nHardware ownership: True, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-09 16:49:01',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK] batch #32/31 0.75 btc per Blade\\n### Original post:\\nGoing to make a quick run to USPS in 1 hr..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nPlease advise on host of PM\\'s on Backplanes etc so we can get them shipped this morning.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USPS, Backplanes\\nHardware ownership: True, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-10 04:54:37',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner Blades (Rev2) 10.7gh/s - .75 BTC - Pre-made power connectors!\\n### Original post:\\nLowered price, free shipping through Monday. Fully assembled power adapter included with each blade, free of charge.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blades (Rev2) 10.7gh/s, power adapter\\nHardware ownership: False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-10 05:00:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] BTC up, RED FURY down to .35 - USB Miners - USA Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nI have a 49 port hub from block erupter sale. Do you think I can replace a few of my BEs for this red fury? Has anyone tested that? What challenges will I face?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSize it looks like the fury units won\\'t fit properly.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI can replace 14 BEs for 7 of these? 7 ports will not be used in that case. Will this work?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nI use the 49 port hub with Blue Fury\\'s. The BF\\'s will squeeze side by side but too thick to stack them on every row - have to skip a row.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nCan you provide some photos? I was considering buying one of the hubs but I didn\\'t think units would fit.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nthese are still overpriced.Once they get down to 0.3 or less I will buy some more as long as the diff has not gone up to much\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nThats a nice shiny 1-2-3 block you got there!\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI would like to purchase one of these from you. Can you please PM me an address to send btc too?Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWish price came down more on these.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nfinally got my stick to work. I am using bgminer 3.5.1 and bitminter it is hashing at 2.4gh. i may want more of them.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nhi oaxaca,payment sent few days ago, can you confirm things are in motion please? thanks\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nI just wish I could get it to work. I wanted plug n play on bitminter just like a BE they are far from plug n play.I can photo for you. you could fit 20 or more and 20 AM sticks. giving you 20x 2.2 = 44gh and 20 x .333 = 6gh = 50gh a hub\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI ordered 3 more so far the 1 I have is chugging along at 2.37gh. These could turn out to be okay. I may order more once I get these 3.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI don\\'t see how you figure? Even with BTC at $350, you\\'ll never get close to recouping your costs.M\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nit hashes at 7x am sticks. so if i sell 7 of my 160 am sticks for 15 each on the bay that is 105 bucks. fees - 7 = 98 bucks shipping = -6 = 92 bucksso put that 92 against the 110 this stick is and I am paying 18 for it. I have been getting 5 sticks for 74 on ebay the last few days due to the rise in BTC price. 5 sticks at 74 usd is 14.80 a stick. so add 1.40 and i am getting these for about 19.40 each. i mine at the same speed and my 160 am sticks pulling close to 500 watts becomes 24 of these pulling 70 watts.24 of these would be about 500 out of pocket. my ebay sale is doing okay\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 49 port hub, BEs, fury units, Blue Fury\\'s, stick, bgminer 3.5.1, am sticks\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-05 20:00:27',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [Shipping] GB #1 BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner ~2.5 GH/s 0.5999BTC or less $129 Paypal\\n### Original post:\\nok, I\\'m making order now... thxEDIT: uh, shipping is almost 38 $.. I have to think a little bit more about ordering..\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nThese look expensive!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nDid you get a tracking number? Any indication of how many units you\\'ll be recieving in your first shipment?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes I got tracking number of units I believe is 80 currently I should get tracking for remaining units but I will be packing the first 80 in the order the payments were received. As for any compensations I will be waiting to organize this after all units have been shipped out and is hashing at your home please refrain from PMing me your btc address or paypal addy for refunds.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI would like everyone to know there will be 11 extra units in stock you can order them through bitcoinminerz.com they\\'ll be shipping next week.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nWhen you getting BTC payment fixed on the site maidak?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI would like to order one does it plug n play to Bitminter java client? If not why?I have to say these sticks are nice looking and I could sell them like hotcakes on ebay. The roll out has been really bad on these. AM sold close to 1/2 million usb sticks. this is such a perfect upgrade I just don\\'t understand why they are not being pushed correctly.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nDrHaribo is currently working on incorporating it right now. I had a chat with him a couple of days ago and he is making good headway. In regards to the roll out yes I agree it was a bumpy ride but we have learnt a lot for the future!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nthanks for a fast reply. I do hope that these get into smooth easy sales like the AM sticks did.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nI\\'m working on putting it back on today, units are in KY right now was hoping to start packing up this morning does not look like it will happen until the end of the day.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nI just want to inform everyone here that looks like I wont be shipping today they had it scheduled to arrive but apparently customs is holding it and requesting my tax ID its only a state away :\\\\ I\\'m currently waiting a call back from them. Looks like I will be shipping either saturday or monday.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nAnything new in the past couple days on the status of these yet?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI was wondering the same thing. I\\'d hate to think they\\'re still sitting in customs.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nYes they got released from customs as soon as I gave them a tax ID number they were suppose to come saturday I called and looks like I wont see it until monday, I\\'ll be shipping out the units monday.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nCan\\'t wait to put these in with my usb erupters course I hope I can get em to work with cgminer in winblows since that is what my current setup is but the support thread seems to indicate otherwise.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThere out for delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nAll the orders are out for delivery ?? Or just a few .... ??\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nI think he means they\\'re on the street for delivery to him.\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nOohhhh ... Shooott. Was hoping, there on there way to us ;-)\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nI just ordered two via paypal. I hope they will work with MinePeon.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nUnits just came in time to start packing\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nI know you\\'re busy packing but when you get time, did you get your entire allotment? Or, if not, when do you expect to receive the remainder? (Since I doubt I\\'m in the early group.)\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nJust got my tracking number :-)\\n\\n### Reply 23:\\nMe too... for a minute I forgot that was the company name\\n\\n### Reply 24:\\nJust finished packing all the units I have received a total of 80 units, I\\'ll be sending them out tomorrow morning. The remaining units I got tracking for so these should be shipped out by thursday or friday.\\n\\n### Reply 25:\\nWoohoo! ThxGetting my Raspi configured this week\\n\\n### Reply 26:\\nno tracking number.\\n\\n### Reply 27:\\nDont worry your close in line you\\'ll see tracking today after i\\'m off work or tomorrow when the second half of my shipment arrives. Its scheduled for thursday by the end of the day. Just dropped off the first half of the units as for compensation from the manufacturer how I will be handling this is a secondary thread after your package has arrived you will be using your tracking number to confirm the amount of units and btc that will be sent to you. This will be after all units are shipped so you guys who have units on the way keep ahold of your tracking number. Also if you paid a price of $129 each or less per unit you will not be eligible for the manufacturer discount. This is because your wait in line with the pre order was far less then the others who paid a higher premium. Hence why the price was reduced essentially it was included into the pricing structure.\\n\\n### Reply 28:\\nWOOT! I got a tracking number\\n\\n### Reply 29:\\nSucks most people are only getting 2.25Gh ish outta these max but still ready to get mine added to my lil farm...hehe\\n\\n### Reply 30:\\nYeah there needs to b\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BPMC BLUEFURY USB Miner, AM sticks, usb erupters, Raspi\\nHardware ownership: False, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-10 18:40:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #22 Blade Miners 0.75 BTC or less! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\nFinally got all my blades up and going! Thanks SSB\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blade Miners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-10 19:17:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [GB]Terraminer IV, 0.7 BTC=67GH/s 22/30 shares, Deadline Approaching\\n### Original post:\\nSoniq could you please transfer 1 of my 2 shares -Message signed with my registered payment address -I Mark Jones agree to transfer one of my two shares to SimpleStevie.His payment address is you could also let me know the address to send the transfer payment too,Thanks,Mark.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\n1 share still available for miner no.1, drop me a pm if interestedWill also take PTS as payment\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Terraminer IV\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-10 20:52:16',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Thunder#1 KNC group buy 10ghs 120$ or pay with btc\\n### Original post:\\nFor how long will you keep the miner running?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nwill run until no longer + returns or close to that time may take an opportunity to sell off the hardware. If hardware is sold off profits will be split among shareholders.I just checked the numbers and it looks like we can run in the + for 26 weeks using very very pessimistic numbers.Here is a decent calc to give and idea of how long ito an roi and time before it runs negative.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nI\\'m in for one share. PM forthcoming.M\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nWhen I tried clicking on payment link, coinbase said pay to \"New User\". Is this your name?Edit: just trying to figure out how coinbase payments work. If I figure out, will get 1 share.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWhen will you get this machine? Are these in stock?How do we trust you!$120 is a good price for 10ghs\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\n$120 is a good price for 10Ghash... Really? to me like expectations should be to return about 21.4BTC in the \"positive\" lifetime...21.4 /55 = .3890 BTC per share...Assuming BTC is still $350 ~ $136 per share...If BTC hits $490 -- your share return would be about $191 -- about $71 profit.You need to make the best estimate you can and set expectations accordingly.Edit: Like all BTC \"investments\" it\\'s speculation against the exchange rate.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nBeen busy with banking issues this morning.New user is you. KNC states this unit will ship \"mid november\" they have a good track record of shipping on time.Trust is always tricky on the net. All i can offer my history on these forums since 2011. For character i could say im not hiding my identity or any personal details. I have a clean personal track record i have been fbi background checked and fingerprinted many times during working as a Nurse. Im not a legal expert but i would think that this deal puts me under a implied legal contract and could be held liable for damages in court if i pulled something shady.120$ is a good price i wish i cold buy the whole thing outright myself... im not sure i can take the wife aggro though. Right now im hoping for a wed trigger pull on the buy. If funds are short on wed im liable to gather them myself out of pocket to complete the buy.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAgree, it\\'s speculation. What I meant was, If you see other group buys, this is a decent price for the hash rate and mid November delivery.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nI have been using other peoples group buys, however they are getting overpriced and drying up.At the same time im sitting in a ice cold garage and house with high humidity. if we use gas heat then we have to run dehumidifiers anyways and this is year round. Dry elec heat form these units is not an issue and will be useful most of the time for me. Yearly avg temp 54f .. im in a coastal fog bowl at about 5 feet above sea level. I have a ranch with horses so there is somebody here 99% of the time and i already run mining rigs 24/7. I have 220v power ready to use for another 5kw continuous now. Hosting fits well with my situation i think. If i was rich i would be buying these outright for myself.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nOK, I am game. I sent one share worth through coinbaseLinked to Order XXXXX$120.00 USD payment for \"10ghs asic\" to New Order XXXXXWhat do I do now? How do I find transaction ID from coinbase that I can sign?I am wondering how many people actually tried doing this and found it impossible to get \"warm and fuzzy\" with this group buy. Please provide a bit more instructions on how to actually GIVE YOU money and it may speed up\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nIn your bitcoin client, double click the transaction. It\\'ll have a transaction ID on it at the bottom. Then go to blockexplorer and paste it in there to see the addresses it came from. You probably want to sign with the address that the bulk of the payment came from.M\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nno no noI followed the link and approved purchase through Coinbase. I know how to pay directly with my Bitcoin wallet and find transactions. These were not the instructions in OP, however. How do I prove to OP that I actually paid, is the question.All I have is Coinbase\\'s Merchant Order.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nGot a PM from thunder toe confirming the order. Trying to figure out how to complete.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nI\\'m slightly confused. I just used Coinbase as well for a share here. I used my local wallet to send to the address specified by coinbase. I then used that transaction ID as proof I paid for it, and it worked for the op. Not sure what you and I did differently?M\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI did not touch my Bitcoin wallet for this transaction. I had some bitcoins in my Coinbase account and once I clicked \"Submit\" after following the link above, I got \"Successful Pyament\" green box on my phone. Never touched Bitcoin wallet that I keep on a computer at home. When I got to Coinbase transaction page, I see \"Merchant Order\" but it does not give me any useful info, like Tx ID.\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nI did not touc\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: miner, hardware, machine, mining rigs\\nHardware ownership: False, False, False, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-11 12:22:06',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: Confirmed Orders Blue Fury USB Miner\\n### Original post:\\nConfirmed Unit id paid Units bitcoin address 10.74 12 0.90 1 0.90 1 17.50 20 1.80 2 1.80 2 5.82 6 NewarBatch 1 is CLOSED.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Blue Fury USB Miner\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-11 15:49:44',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner Blades 10.7gh - .75 BTC - Pre-made power connectors! Free Ship\\n### Original post:\\nHow quick are these to use? Are these plug and play?\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI\\'ve made it\\'s bit easier to setup by providing an assembled power connector. You\\'ll need to have basic networking knowledge and the ability to setup a local stratum proxy.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nCan someone direct me to the setup page? I just need to see what extra equipment I need,like PSU, wires etc. and the setup process.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nDogie\\'s guide is the best out there in my opinion. Ignore the part about making the power adapter as I\\'ve already done that for you.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nThanks for the link, will go through this today.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blades 10.7gh, power connector, PSU, wires\\nHardware ownership: False, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-11 19:00:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] Group Buy #21 backplanes are now 0.25btc each! Shipping to USA addresses\\n### Original post:\\n11/5/13 Any new orders of backplanes are now 0.25btc each plus add shipping of 0.06 btc each(or send me a prepaid USPS regional B box label). I am now out of stock of USB miners for sale. I have blades and backplanes for sale only at this time.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nAll orders shipped today. Thank you!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nany word on if asicminer is gonna keep making the v2 blades? i\\'d like to work on building another 108ghs.....\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nBlades are now 0.75 each. Need more than one? Send me a pm for a quote. I have backplanes at 0.25 btc each. I also have 20 USB hubs only(NO USB MINERS) at 0.40 btc each plus 0.03 btc shipping. Thank you for any orders placed! SSB\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\npackage received with phenomenal quickness and suburb packaging. Awesome seller, great communication and service.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nAre the hubs still in stock? If so, would shipping be 0.03 btc for each (shipped individually) or can more than one hub fit into a certain priority box?\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nyes, i would also like to know\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nYes. I have a few left. Shipping is for each one.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: backplanes, USB miners, blades, USB hubs\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-11 17:50:11',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN, 100/100 avail.]R15: 2 KnC Jupiters, $110 = 11GH/s. Nov. + DZ MC Bonuses\\n### Original post:\\nLooks very good again. One ordered. Many thanks\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nWill you have Google docs link similar to for this round?\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nAll rounds get a spreadsheet made, 9-12 will receive one more prior to the payout.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nAdded:+ Corsair HX1050 / Seasonic 1050 PSUto OP as part of purchase costs.In addition: the R15 funds will pay for an additional APC 900W UPS with Battery Bank *and* a *second* gas generator just for the DZ Miners Cooperative.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI\\'d like to reserve 4 please. I expect to have the BTC within 24 hours.M\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nUhm, I guess I need help. I sent $220 worth from Coinbase, sent a PM to thomas_s. My Bitcoin wallet is doing reindexing. It\\'s been more than one hour (not by much) since I sent that payment. By the time I am able to send from my wallet that I have access to (as in for signing messages) it will be significantly more than one hour. Coinbase address that was used to send the payment is clearly not the same one as I will want to use for this GB. Here is the transaction: address will be and I will be happy to send another satoshi from that address\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nYou don\\'t have to pay from the address you want to receive to. They allow you to supply a different address.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nI surely hope so Once I see my address in the Google Docs, I will be all warm and fuzzy.\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat was posted by madpoet is true it doesn\\'t matter what address you send from, we don\\'t publicly show any addresses so if you can link an order with an address and or some other data then whatever payout address you give will be used.No signing is necessary if it was being made to one address where everyone can see on the blockchain then yes you would need to sign or control the sending address.Edit* Well I fell asleep no idea why I was off today, DZ woke me up with a phone call so might as well enter the new orders into the spreadsheet. BTW if you were looking and paid a while ago and your order was on hold something happened with the site which should be fixed now if you paid and the order was on hold it should now be processing, if you are transferring your refund that will be changed later when I enter these into the spreadsheet.\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nSorry, there\\'s no reservations allowed for this GB round. We also expect a number of R13 GB share owners to move their refund or R13 order to this round, and they will be given priority for R15 shares.The closest thing to a reservation for R15 and R15B is to buy 4 shares and send a tiny BTC payment to hold that wallet address and order from expiring after 1 hour.BTW, for those asking, this order was made this weekend, and we are Order #1068xx.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nK. I just sent payment for 5, order #61x. PM forthcoming.M\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWoo! I can finally post things on bitcointalk! 3 shares ordered.\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nI am wondering what you mean by \"easiest spreadsheet export\"? For example, when I go to I see a screenshot of something that looks like Google docs and some gross stats below it. Am I missing some painfully obvious feature? Sorry, my first try at shares\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nThat\\'s not a google doc, thats a spreadsheet that was converted to a jpg and uploaded. The spreadsheet changes frequently so I don\\'t upload them.Theres only 1 address missing from 9-12 and its one of the management people so, yea good job customers for getting it all submitted before us.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nPM sent to thomas_s\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nPayment for order 626 sent. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 16:\\nDZ, I sent you a PM yesterday about something else (another GB) but R15 went to these 2 Jupiters. Maybe you can PM me an email address you read too, I have some different ideas. Thanks.\\n\\n### Reply 17:\\nOrder: #631 : Payement sent.Cheers !\\n\\n### Reply 18:\\nI\\'m temporarily taking R15 down, based on the site\\'s wallet it seems its highly possible its full and I don\\'t have time to confirm.If it is we will see about getting another jupiter.\\n\\n### Reply 19:\\nAnd you really had to do this while I was adding 6 shares to my order? :| Please put me on a waiting list then.\\n\\n### Reply 20:\\nI am wondering if anyone is interested in selling any of your shares in existing DZ MC co-ops? (ones that are currently hashing....)If so please PM me with your price, shares and rate. I understand there is a small transfer fee for the work involved, I would of course pay this fee.Thanks!\\n\\n### Reply 21:\\nWe have 2 on order right now, and if thomas is correct and they are both full, I will make another order for another 2 this morning. [BTW I am fronting all the BTC for these orders, untill the BTC is collected by the group. Saves time, and gets us in the Q faster]\\n\\n### Reply 22:\\nI have a question. Do you mine only BTC? Couse I think you for sure tried to mine different coins before and know what is most profitable for now.In another topic on this forum I found information tha\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiters, Corsair HX1050, Seasonic 1050 PSU, APC 900W UPS, gas generator\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-10 19:01:26',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [SHARES] [OPEN] BITFURY SHARES (740+ GH/s) (Switzerland)\\n### Original post:\\nThat image up there that shows commitment! haha keep up the good work and dont leave your daughter whitout legos!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nNice job. Regards.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nbought 3 shares - lets see how it goes :-)\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nblockchain\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nJust wanted to hop in and say that darkfriend is a very trust-worth guy.Thanks for the opportunity\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nYes +1 I just wished I had had the funds to get in earlyer.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI second that - got my payout without any problems.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nAvailable 50 GH ... start hashing right now! ... .-)first come first serve!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nIs this sale of shares where the new bonus\\'s start?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nHow much does a share cost?\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\ndepends on quantity .. and on btc/usdsend me a pm.\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nSweetDoes it play jukebox hits as well?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: BITFURY SHARES (740+ GH/s)\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-11 19:47:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [Closed] Thunder#1 KNC group buy 10ghs 110$ or pay with btc\\n### Original post:\\nWelcome to the Thunder KnC Asic group buyThis group by is Sponsored by (Thundertoe on btc talk)This group buy is for a hosted share of a KNC Jupiter rig. I pay shipping, I pay for the power supply the setup and maintenance. The KnC Jupiter Bitcoin Mining Rig is our flagship Bitcoin miner providing hassle free hashing, permitting users to mine for Bitcoins at a greater efficiency than anything else on the market for the foreseeable future.This device is designed by Swedens ORSoC engineers, and will offer industry leading performance and power consumption per Gigahash (Gh).550Gh/s per device.28nm standard cell ASIC mining chips (which are being designed exclusively for KnCMiner by ORSoC).Embedded Custom Beaglebone Linux device to allow for standalone Jupiter Bitcoin mining.Shipping for purchases made today begins mid Nov 2013. Order will be placed as soon as funds are ready. 110$ pay with Bitcoin 55 total Shares Left 32/55SOLD=23each share is 10ghsShareholder information posted here payment to the above address and post here for confirmations!* PM me/and post the transaction ID (txid) in this thread. **ONLY use sending addresses you fully control.** I will use the\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KNC Jupiter rig, power supply, 28nm standard cell ASIC mining chips, Embedded Custom Beaglebone Linux device\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-11 19:52:17',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [CANCELED] Jupiter are SOLD OUT - Escrow by SebastianJu\\n### Original post:\\nNovember Jupiter KnCMiners are SOLD OUT. Thanks SebastianJu for the support.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Jupiter KnCMiners\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-11 20:52:12',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN IN-STOCK] batch #32/31 .035 btc/USB (LIMITED # Remain!!!) 0.75 btc/Blade\\n### Original post:\\n(^_^); 2; .07; \\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSold out of USBs... No mas!Blades are in stock.\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nTwo things:What do we do if we got a stick or two that need replaced?And can you please update your sig to a final number of Tera/petahash you\\'ve sold to the world?Seems like the difficulty isn\\'t climbing as high now that the USB product is gone...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n[/quote]Seems like the difficulty isn\\'t climbing as high now that the USB product is gone...[/quote]I agree. Thanks Canary! I think the diff drop is due to the Typhoon in Asia knocking out a lot of the infrastructure there.... Just a guess.\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\ncontact the reseller you purchased from to determine if covered by warranty policy.maybe later, but the measure in Th is becoming irrelevant quickly, I\\'ll have to think about a more meaningful measure or I\\'m actually tempted to replace with something else.USBs, at this point, have a negligible effect on the network speed rise, and thus difficulty. look to bitfury chip based devices and KNC products for the most recent effect. Later to follow with more ASIC products from the usual suspects.\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\ndifficulty is projected to rise in ~1079 blocks by 7.4% atm (and it will likely rise more).the large/faster the network becomes, it also becomes more resilient to outages and disruptions (not to diminish the human toll and suffering due to this disaster).hey, is there a btc fund raiser to help the victims yet?\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: USBs, Blades, Typhoon, bitfury chip based devices, KNC products, ASIC products\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-12 03:14:15',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN, 100/100 avail.]R15x: 4 KnC Jupiters, $110 = 11GH/s. Nov. + DZ MC Bonuses\\n### Original post:\\nHi guys/gals,Stopping by before I head to work/work to get things done with my lab\\'s network without co-workers bugging me.I love it when I go to sleep with something like 23 shares confirmed, wake up the next day, and we\\'re sold out. Due to overwhelming demand: 2 more KnC Jupiters for R15C and R15D have been added thanks to GG bobsag3!==Also, re: ScryptWe have been looking at Scrypt based mining as a means of diversifying our Miners Co-op, and promoting 3 coin arbitrage for one of our pro arms of the DZ MC.If you know of anything promising, please send a Co-op leader (such as bobsag3, -Redacted-, or Thomas_s.) your info.===100 GB shares available (or less) out of 200.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nSo when the website will open? Currently R15 is closed there..\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nSince C and D were ordered a bit later, same terms? Will R15 be combined?\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\n@bobsag3, DZ is super busy, but you have a CC of my latest PM to him. Anyway, I\\'m about to get another fiat loan. Let\\'s hope it doesn\\'t get all used up. (priorities and such.)\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nYeah, let me know when you decide you are good to proceed and ill chip in\\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nOK, since R15x is listed here as open but on DZMC website it is still closed AND I need to get some sleep...Reserving 6 shares in R15.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nI would like to reserve 6 R15 shares. thank you\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nIn for 20 shares, please let me know when it is open.PM sent to Thomas_SThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\nWhat\\'s the estimated time for additional 2 jupiters to start hashing? If I order additional two share to the ones I ordered last weekend, how will they be managed compared to the ones already in the queue?\\n\\n### Reply 9:\\nWe attempted to add 2 to our original order but they were sold out before we could get them, R15 only consists of 2 Jupiters.\\n\\n### Reply 10:\\nwell crud\\n\\n### Reply 11:\\nWhat was the new order cut off for making it into R15 (not counting R13 transfers)?\\n\\n### Reply 12:\\nIt looks like all orders are accounted for (a few missing payout address\\')Highest order# 631.If you are unsure if your on the list (missed an email maybe?) you can PM me with your order# and I can check.\\n\\n### Reply 13:\\nAh thanks, no worries, order #608 here I already have a confirmation from you in PM with my email and payout address. I was just a bit concerned how quickly orders filled in.\\n\\n### Reply 14:\\nI\\'m slightly confused. Are the Jupiters shipping mid-Nov and arriving in early Dec? Or Arriving late-Nov?\\n\\n### Reply 15:\\nThey are november -order jupiters, so they will ship with KnCs november batch\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-12 04:52:58',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] New Price RED FURY - USB Miners - USA Group Buy\\n### Original post:\\nas of today they are not running on bitminter. two of us have the same problem. I will f with it and ask doc h if he has any ideas\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nYes, we have lowered the price to reflect the continuing jump in the BTC/USD exchange rate.New price is .39 BTCGet \\'em now before something else happens...\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nYes, we have lowered the price to reflect the continuing jump in the BTC/USD exchange rate.New price is .32 BTCGet \\'em now before something else happens...\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nYes, we have lowered the price to reflect the continuing jump in the BTC/USD exchange rate.New price is .35 BTCGet \\'em now before something else happens...\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nI may want some more. I am waiting on the last three I ordered.. The long holiday weekend has delayed shipping. When I get the 3 and set them up I will pm you for more. thanks Phil\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: Red Fury - USB Miners\\nHardware ownership: True, True, True, True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-12 18:38:29',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [OPEN] ASICMiner Blades 10.7gh - .70 BTC - Free Ship - Pre-made power connectors\\n### Original post:\\nafter many attempts at using mining proxy ive decided its a pos. its easier to just use bfgminer as it has the proxy support built in.\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: ASICMiner Blades 10.7gh\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ('2013-11-10 21:02:57',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [Open] Jupiter KnCMiner Shares - Escrow by SebastianJu *Updated W/New Miner\\n### Original post:\\nTo anyone who might be interested, I can have 500 GH/s installed and mining within one hour from now. I have access to about 2+TH/s of Bitfury mining equipment from a source locally. The price for 500 GH/s is 50 BTC. Because I have a local source for the hardware, I can turn generated revenues into more hashing power within a matter of a few hours instead of weeks or months, that means I can leverage investments quickly! My companies focus is to rapidly reinvest earnings through various strategies. Invest once and let us do the work for you!\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nI have updated the share count, we have a total investment of 6.5 BTC thus far. There is still time to get in on the November delivery if we don\\'t waste any time!\\n\\n### Reply 2:\\nPosted this in the official thread.\\n\\n### Reply 3:\\nForgot to add the address!\\n\\n### Reply 4:\\nWith the price of Bitcoin being at an all-time high of over $350 I think it is a good time to make our move on hardware purchases. To encourage investment, I am offering Founders Contract status to every BTC investment made today no matter the amount! I will also give a 15% deposit credit for all investments and 20% of all hashing power will be dedicated to pure outlays (each investor will get an even amount of 20% of generated bitcoin based on their total BTC investment.) To summaries: Every investor will receive a 15% credit in their account and Every investor will get a portion of 25% of the companies profits. I need to raise 250 BTC for an early Dec. Terraminer preorder for 10 TH/s + 19 BTC for the current Jupiter KnCMiner HPC.This offer is only good at the ~ $300 BTC exchange rate, if the price falls to far I will have to adjust the totals.I have added an easy payment and signup form to the company forum. Click Here!Don\\'t worry about what kind of options you want for your share position, I will honor any request you wish at anytime you decide, this way we can take advantage of the current price of BTC and not waste time on other things that can easily be worked out.Time is of \\n\\n### Reply 5:\\nI have added an easy payment and signup form to the company forum. Click Here!This has been added to the post above.\\n\\n### Reply 6:\\nExcellent job on the easy buy form and the live view! The \"I\\'m not sure what type of share\" box is perfect.\\n\\n### Reply 7:\\nThanks!\\n\\n### Reply 8:\\ntick.. tock.. tick.. tock.. tic....[EDIT:] Time is up....\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: 500 GH/s mining setup, 2+TH/s Bitfury mining equipment, Terraminer, Jupiter KnCMiner HPC\\nHardware ownership: True, True, False, False'),\n", + " ('2013-11-13 05:01:08',\n", + " 'User:\\nIn the given Bitcoin forum thread, pay close attention to the language used when mentioning hardware pieces. Look for explicit statements indicating ownership or hypothetical discussions.\\n\\n```thread\\nDate: 2013-11\\nTopic: [CLOSED]R15x: 2 KnC Jupiters, $110 = 11GH/s. Nov. + DZ MC Bonuses\\n### Original post:\\nHey everyone. Sorry for the confusion. When I had left for work I thought we had the 3rd and 4th ones secured. Took a super long afternoon nap and am back to work.Please keep an eye out though for a R16 as there\\'s usually something cooking in this co-op and among all the contacts I have (will get to your PM(s) in a minute Dabs. Hope everything is well for you buddy, and that your area wasn\\'t hit too badly by the storm).==ZERO shares available.\\n\\n### Reply 1:\\nR16 now open\\n\\n\\n```\\n\\n\\n\\nReply with the hardware names, all in the same line, separated by commas. Then, on a new line, list \"True\" or \"False\" for each piece of hardware to indicate ownership status. True if the mention suggests concrete ownership by any user, and False if the hardware is discussed in a hypothetical or speculative way.\\n\\nAssistant:\\nSure! Here is the requested output, with the correct ownership status for each piece of hardware:\\nHardware names: KnC Jupiters\\nHardware ownership: True'),\n", + " ...]" + ] + }, + "execution_count": 55, + "metadata": {}, + "output_type": "execute_result" + } + ], + "source": [ + "df = pd.DataFrame(hardware_instances_inc_threads, columns=['date', 'thread'])\n", + "df = df.sort_values(by=['date'])\n", + "hardware_instances_inc_threads" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": 56, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "df.to_csv('hardware_instances_inc_threads.csv', index=False)" + ] + } + ], + "metadata": { + "kernelspec": { + "display_name": "py310", + "language": "python", + "name": "python3" + }, + "language_info": { + "codemirror_mode": { + "name": "ipython", + "version": 3 + }, + "file_extension": ".py", + "mimetype": "text/x-python", + "name": "python", + "nbconvert_exporter": "python", + "pygments_lexer": "ipython3", + "version": "3.10.13" + } + }, + "nbformat": 4, + "nbformat_minor": 2 +}