Create README.md

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+---
+license: other
+license_name: gemma-terms-of-use
+license_link: https://ai.google.dev/gemma/terms
+---
+
+# Gemma Model Card
+
+**Model Page**: [Gemma](https://ai.google.dev/gemma/docs)
+
+This model card corresponds to the 2B and 7B Instruct versions of the Gemma model's Guff.
+
+***The contents of this card have been copied from [Google's Gemma](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-7b) Page***
+
+**Resources and Technical Documentation**:
+
+* [Responsible Generative AI Toolkit](https://ai.google.dev/responsible)
+* [Gemma on Kaggle](https://www.kaggle.com/models/google/gemma)
+* [Gemma on Vertex Model Garden](https://console.cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/publishers/google/model-garden/335?version=gemma-7b-gg-hf)
+
+**Terms of Use**: [Terms](https://www.kaggle.com/models/google/gemma/license/consent)
+
+**Authors**: Google
+
+## Model Information
+
+Summary description and a brief definition of inputs and outputs.
+
+### Description
+
+Gemma is a family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models from Google,
+built from the same research and technology used to create the Gemini models.
+They are text-to-text, decoder-only large language models, available in English,
+with open weights, pre-trained variants, and instruction-tuned variants. Gemma
+models are well-suited for a variety of text-generation tasks, including
+question-answering, summarization, and reasoning. Their relatively small size
+makes it possible to deploy them in environments with limited resources such as
+a laptop, desktop, or your cloud infrastructure, democratizing access to
+state-of-the-art AI models and helping foster innovation for everyone.
+
+#### Model Usage
+- Since this is a `guff`, it can be run locally using
+  - Ollama
+  - Llama.cpp
+  - LM Studio
+  - And Many More
+
+### Inputs and outputs
+
+*   **Input:** Text string, such as a question, a prompt, or a document to be
+    summarized.
+*   **Output:** Generated English-language text in response to the input, such
+    as an answer to a question, or a summary of a document.
+
+## Model Data
+
+Data used for model training and how the data was processed.
+
+### Training Dataset
+
+These models were trained on a dataset of text data that includes a wide variety
+of sources, totaling 6 trillion tokens. Here are the key components:
+
+* Web Documents: A diverse collection of web text ensures the model is exposed
+  to a broad range of linguistic styles, topics, and vocabulary. Primarily
+  English-language content.
+* Code: Exposing the model to code helps it learn the syntax and patterns of
+  programming languages, which improves its ability to generate code or
+  understand code-related questions.
+* Mathematics: Training on mathematical text helps the model learn logical
+  reasoning, and symbolic representation, and address mathematical queries.
+
+The combination of these diverse data sources is crucial for training a powerful
+language model that can handle a wide variety of different tasks and text
+formats.
+
+### Data Preprocessing
+
+Here are the key data cleaning and filtering methods applied to the training
+data:
+
+* CSAM Filtering: Rigorous CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) filtering was
+  applied at multiple stages in the data preparation process to ensure the
+  exclusion of harmful and illegal content
+* Sensitive Data Filtering: As part of making Gemma pre-trained models safe and
+  reliable, automated techniques were used to filter out certain personal
+  information and other sensitive data from training sets.
+* Additional methods: Filtering based on content quality and safely in line with
+  [our policies](https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/documents/2023_Google_AI_Principles_Progress_Update.pdf#page=11).
+
+## Implementation Information
+
+Details about the model internals.
+
+### Hardware
+
+Gemma was trained using the latest generation of
+[Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)](https://cloud.google.com/tpu/docs/intro-to-tpu) hardware (TPUv5e).
+
+Training large language models requires significant computational power. TPUs,
+designed specifically for matrix operations common in machine learning, offer
+several advantages in this domain:
+
+* Performance: TPUs are specifically designed to handle the massive computations
+  involved in training LLMs. They can speed up training considerably compared to
+  CPUs.
+* Memory: TPUs often come with large amounts of high-bandwidth memory, allowing
+  for the handling of large models and batch sizes during training. This can
+  lead to better model quality.
+* Scalability: TPU Pods (large clusters of TPUs) provide a scalable solution for
+  handling the growing complexity of large foundation models. You can distribute
+  training across multiple TPU devices for faster and more efficient processing.
+* Cost-effectiveness: In many scenarios, TPUs can provide a more cost-effective
+  solution for training large models compared to CPU-based infrastructure,
+  especially when considering the time and resources saved due to faster
+  training.
+* These advantages are aligned with
+  [Google's commitments to operate sustainably](https://sustainability.google/operating-sustainably/).
+
+### Software
+
+Training was done using [JAX](https://github.com/google/jax) and [ML Pathways](https://blog.google/technology/ai/introducing-pathways-next-generation-ai-architecture).
+
+JAX allows researchers to take advantage of the latest generation of hardware,
+including TPUs, for faster and more efficient training of large models.
+
+ML Pathways is Google's latest effort to build artificially intelligent systems
+capable of generalizing across multiple tasks. This is specially suitable for
+[foundation models](https://ai.google/discover/foundation-models/), including large language models like
+these ones.
+
+Together, JAX and ML Pathways are used as described in the
+[paper about the Gemini family of models](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11805); "the 'single
+controller' programming model of Jax and Pathways allows a single Python
+process to orchestrate the entire training run, dramatically simplifying the
+development workflow."
+
+## Evaluation
+
+Model evaluation metrics and results.
+
+### Benchmark Results
+
+These models were evaluated against a large collection of different datasets and
+metrics to cover different aspects of text generation:
+
+| Benchmark                      | Metric        | 2B Params | 7B Params |
+| ------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------- | --------- |
+| [MMLU](https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300)                   | 5-shot, top-1 | 42.3        | 64.3      |
+| [HellaSwag](https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07830)         | 0-shot        |71.4        | 81.2      |
+| [PIQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11641)                   | 0-shot        | 77.3        | 81.2      |
+| [SocialIQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09728)      | 0-shot        | 59.7        | 51.8      |
+| [BooIQ](https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10044)                | 0-shot        | 69.4        | 83.2      |
+| [WinoGrande](https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10641)       | partial score | 65.4        | 72.3      |
+| [CommonsenseQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00937) | 7-shot        | 65.3        | 71.3      |
+| [OpenBookQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02789)       |               | 47.8        | 52.8      |
+| [ARC-e](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547)                  |               | 73.2        | 81.5      |
+| [ARC-c](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547)                   |               | 42.1        | 53.2      |
+| [TriviaQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.03551)           | 5-shot        | 53.2        | 63.4      |
+| [Natural Questions](https://github.com/google-research-datasets/natural-questions)  | 5-shot        | -       | 23        |
+| [HumanEval](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374)      | pass@1        | 22.0        | 32.3      |
+| [MBPP](https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07732)                   | 3-shot        | 29.2        | 44.4      |
+| [GSM8K](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14168)                | maj@1         | 17.7        | 46.4      |
+| [MATH](https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07732)                   | 4-shot        | 11.8          | 24.3      |
+| [AGIEval](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06364)           |               | 24.2        | 41.7      |
+| [BIG-Bench](https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04615)         |               | 35.2        | 55.1      |
+| ------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------- | --------- |
+| **Average**                    |               | **54.0**    | **56.4**  |
+
+## Ethics and Safety
+
+Ethics and safety evaluation approach and results.
+
+### Evaluation Approach
+
+Our evaluation methods include structured evaluations and internal red-teaming
+testing of relevant content policies. Red-teaming was conducted by a number of
+different teams, each with different goals and human evaluation metrics. These
+models were evaluated against a number of different categories relevant to
+ethics and safety, including:
+
+* Text-to-Text Content Safety: Human evaluation on prompts covering safety
+  policies including child sexual abuse and exploitation, harassment, violence
+  and gore, and hate speech.
+* Text-to-Text Representational Harms: Benchmark against relevant academic
+  datasets such as [WinoBias](https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06876) and [BBQ Dataset](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08193v2).
+* Memorization: Automated evaluation of memorization of training data, including
+  the risk of personally identifiable information exposure.
+* Large-scale harm: Tests for "dangerous capabilities," such as chemical,
+  biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) risks.
+
+### Evaluation Results
+
+The results of ethics and safety evaluations are within acceptable thresholds
+for meeting [internal policies](https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-uniblog-publish-prod/documents/2023_Google_AI_Principles_Progress_Update.pdf#page=11) for categories such as child
+safety, content safety, representational harms, memorization, large-scale harms.
+On top of robust internal evaluations, the results of well known safety
+benchmarks like BBQ, BOLD, Winogender, Winobias, RealToxicity, and TruthfulQA
+are shown here.
+
+| Benchmark                      | Metric        | 2B Params   | 7B Params |
+| ------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------- | --------- |
+| [RealToxicity](https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11462)        | average       | 6.86        | 7.90      |
+| [BOLD](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11718)                   |               | 45.57       | 49.08     |
+| [CrowS-Pairs](https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.154/)        | top-1         | 45.82       | 51.33     |
+| [BBQ Ambig](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08193v2)               | 1-shot, top-1 | 62.58       | 92.54     |
+| [BBQ Disambig](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08193v2)            | top-1         | 54.62       | 71.99     |
+| [Winogender](https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09301)       | top-1         | 51.25       | 54.17     |
+| [TruthfulQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07958)       |               | 44.84       | 31.81     |
+| [Winobias 1_2](https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06876)       |               | 56.12       | 59.09     |
+| [Winobias 2_2](https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06876)       |               | 91.10       | 92.23     |
+| [Toxigen](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.09509)             |               | 29.77       | 39.59     |
+| ------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------- | --------- |
+
+
+## Usage and Limitations
+
+These models have certain limitations that users should be aware of.
+
+### Intended Usage
+
+Open Large Language Models (LLMs) have a wide range of applications across
+various industries and domains. The following list of potential uses is not
+comprehensive. The purpose of this list is to provide contextual information
+about the possible use-cases that the model creators considered as part of model
+training and development.
+
+* Content Creation and Communication
+  * Text Generation: These models can be used to generate creative text formats
+    such as poems, scripts, code, marketing copy, and email drafts.
+  * Chatbots and Conversational AI: Power conversational interfaces for customer
+    service, virtual assistants, or interactive applications.
+  * Text Summarization: Generate concise summaries of a text corpus, research
+    papers, or reports.
+* Research and Education
+  * Natural Language Processing (NLP) Research: These models can serve as a
+    foundation for researchers to experiment with NLP techniques, develop
+    algorithms, and contribute to the advancement of the field.
+  * Language Learning Tools: Support interactive language learning experiences,
+    aiding in grammar correction or providing writing practice.
+  * Knowledge Exploration: Assist researchers in exploring large bodies of text
+    by generating summaries or answering questions about specific topics.
+
+### Limitations
+
+* Training Data
+  * The quality and diversity of the training data significantly influence the
+    model's capabilities. Biases or gaps in the training data can lead to
+    limitations in the model's responses.
+  * The scope of the training dataset determines the subject areas the model can
+    handle effectively.
+* Context and Task Complexity
+  * LLMs are better at tasks that can be framed with clear prompts and
+    instructions. Open-ended or highly complex tasks might be challenging.
+  * A model's performance can be influenced by the amount of context provided
+    (longer context generally leads to better outputs, up to a certain point).
+* Language Ambiguity and Nuance
+  * Natural language is inherently complex. LLMs might struggle to grasp subtle
+    nuances, sarcasm, or figurative language.
+* Factual Accuracy
+  * LLMs generate responses based on information they learned from their
+    training datasets, but they are not knowledge bases. They may generate
+    incorrect or outdated factual statements.
+* Common Sense
+  * LLMs rely on statistical patterns in language. They might lack the ability
+    to apply common sense reasoning in certain situations.
+
+### Ethical Considerations and Risks
+
+The development of large language models (LLMs) raises several ethical concerns.
+In creating an open model, we have carefully considered the following:
+
+* Bias and Fairness
+  * LLMs trained on large-scale, real-world text data can reflect socio-cultural
+    biases embedded in the training material. These models underwent careful
+    scrutiny, input data pre-processing described and posterior evaluations
+    reported in this card.
+* Misinformation and Misuse
+  * LLMs can be misused to generate text that is false, misleading, or harmful.
+  * Guidelines are provided for responsible use with the model, see the
+    [Responsible Generative AI Toolkit](http://ai.google.dev/gemma/responsible).
+* Transparency and Accountability:
+  * This model card summarizes details on the models' architecture,
+    capabilities, limitations, and evaluation processes.
+  * A responsibly developed open model offers the opportunity to share
+    innovation by making LLM technology accessible to developers and researchers
+    across the AI ecosystem.
+
+Risks identified and mitigations:
+
+* Perpetuation of biases: It's encouraged to perform continuous monitoring
+  (using evaluation metrics, human review) and the exploration of de-biasing
+  techniques during model training, fine-tuning, and other use cases.
+* Generation of harmful content: Mechanisms and guidelines for content safety
+  are essential. Developers are encouraged to exercise caution and implement
+  appropriate content safety safeguards based on their specific product policies
+  and application use cases.
+* Misuse for malicious purposes: Technical limitations and developer and
+  end-user education can help mitigate against malicious applications of LLMs.
+  Educational resources and reporting mechanisms for users to flag misuse are
+  provided. Prohibited uses of Gemma models are outlined in the
+  [Gemma Prohibited Use Policy](https://ai.google.dev/gemma/prohibited_use_policy).
+* Privacy violations: Models were trained on data filtered for removal of PII
+  (Personally Identifiable Information). Developers are encouraged to adhere to
+  privacy regulations with privacy-preserving techniques.
+
+### Benefits
+
+At the time of release, this family of models provides high-performance open
+large language model implementations designed from the ground up for Responsible
+AI development compared to similarly sized models.
+
+Using the benchmark evaluation metrics described in this document, these models
+have shown to provide superior performance to other, comparably-sized open model
+alternatives.