The text argues that the band's music was ruined because they signed with a big record label. However, this isn't necessarily true. For instance, the causation could go the other way: the band's music changed, which led to a big record label signing them. In this case, the change in the music came first. This illustrates a type of logical fallacy known as false causation.
Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
My favorite band signed with this huge record label, and then their next album was terrible. Basically, signing with a big label ruined their music.
A: circular reasoning: an argument that supports a claim with the claim itself
B: appeal to nature: the assumption that natural things are always good
C: false causation: the assumption that because two things happened together, one caused the other