[ WP ] Two time travelers from the future arrive in the present day . One claims that the future is a utopian paradise , the other claims that it 's a hellish dystopia . Both of them are lying .

`` You're both lying-'' 
 
 `` No we're not.'' 
 
 `` You just addressed yourselves as collective'we' when in fact it's not a collective'we' when both of things you're saying contradicts the other.'' 
 
 `` Well, yes to someone like you but in our time both can exist.'' 
 
 `` How?'' 
 
 `` Well if you look at time in a non-subjective, non-linear -'' 
 
 `` If you quote Doctor Who again, I'm to bitch slap the both of you.'' 
 
 `` But he has a point, The Doctor... `` 
 
 `` No, time is n't wibbley-wobbley. DAMN IT! You have me doing it now. Both realities ca n't possibly exist.'' 
 
 `` How would you know? How do you know that your reality is n't just one side of the coin?'' 
 
 I'm going to have an aneurysm dealing with these two. These men appeared out of the blue at the summit of my perfect plateau overlooking the city. One wore a comically patchwork suit, while the other wore a rather nice black italian tux. Upon seeing my shock, they deduced the time of day, day, month, year, and geographical location. I thought it would be more impressive than simply looking at their watches. 
 
 The black tux spoke of utopian paradise, peace, FTL, and many other fantastic things that I really had a hard time grasping. The comical one spoke of death, plagues, the end of the world, no mention of the second-coming, and the looming black hole that would soon be seen in the sol system. The Political situation of the world was either anarchy or unified world government. But it seemed that through talking to them I understood something perfectly clear.... 
 
 Both realities existed. It was n't so much as both lying but both telling the truth. What was a perfect world to one was hell for another. What one could perceive as anarchy was in fact world peace. In a way, it made sense. That nothing in this world is truly perfect or truly hell but a cross between the two. In having `` anarchy'' but world peace, would mean that the governments were united and that the only unrest came from the people. So no wars but there were riots. Technology meant people could be cured of everything, the problem is... super viruses and bacterial adaptation meant every month or so a new pathogen would decimate a group of people or at least cause 10 million people to be in the hospital for a month. They were very little deaths but constant suffering. 
 
 `` So is there anything I should know about the future that might help me today?'' 
 
 `` Nope, have a nice day. We're just here on Holiday, enjoy your evening!'' 
 
 That even if things were perfect or if things were hell. I should be happy for this world I'm in. There's hope in suffering and there's pain in life. I probably wo n't feel my legs tomorrow. I may not be able to walk for a few days but to see this view was worth it. I know, not quite the ending you were hoping for. Life rarely has perfect endin-
