[ WP ] Dscribe depression in a contextless monologue .

In a way, it's sort of like an answer without a question, yet at the same time, a question missing its answer. 
 
 Human nature, its own curiosity, mandates that the question-answer relationship be filled no matter what. There has to be a reason for a thing to result, and a result for something that exists for a reason. 
 
 Happiness, anger, emptiness, sadness, fulfillment, satisfaction, irritation. To be short, all of these things are neither a result nor a cause of the question-answer relationship. They're only variables. To consider them to be a factor in the relationship is nothing short of generalization itself. 
 
 The experience trying to drudge through this sea of curiosity to find the two matching parts is an odd one. It sometimes differs from person to person, as if they're riding on boats built on a different background material. It's not so much sometimes as always however. 
 
 On this little seabound journey to the pieces, however, there comes yet another session of curiosity-bound explosion that forces a person to sit on their raft, whether it remains in movement or not. Should they have the question, they will create more for themselves to search answers for. Should they have the answer, then they will try to mitigate their pool of information to create more and more answers for the question. 
 
 It does n't make sense, really. Not a single straw could be bent or unbent with such an unsatisfying round of thought. Most people, knowing this, may seek or not seek help. Perhaps they feel that someone could provide them for said question, or maybe even the answer. Many a people even argue that this is the best, this is the only course of action that can be taken to fulfill the curiosity. 
 
 I do n't consider myself such an expert on the matter. But, I will argue that the problem within that line of thinking, is that a person assumes that someone will have both a question and an answer worked out for them to receive. This is n't exactly true. The simple truth is that there is a lack of question and answer in everyone. Everyone but the person at hand. 
 
 People face their own questions and their own answers. That's all there is to it. To judge a moment of weakness on something that a person believes to be universal is a poor abuse of knowledge. The spur of curiosity can occur at any moment. An answer might resurge itself through sheer willpower or a chain of experience-after-experience-after-experience. This merely leads to an answer clashing against itself in a manner that has no real conclusion. No good ending, no satisfaction. 
 
 It's often said that in these times, good drink and bitter pills are good solutions. I'd agree with this. Such an odd relaxant or stimulant of the brain to satisfy the curiosity would be more useful than a reliance on a person, as in this case, the person achieves their means of satisfaction by their own brain. Yet, this is n't exactly such a good idea either. If such a deep problem of mine could be solved through such a simple mean, thinks the person, then is it really such a deep problem? 
 
 I could safely say that I do n't know the answer to that question, much less the question being asked. 
 
 All-in-all, the whole disease is a rather peculiar malady, in a matter much like a question and an answer. What works for one, enrages other at the very thought of suggestion, yet the maintenance of such the depressing question brings about nothing than sympathy from the observer and pain in the one being so questioned. 
 
 Odd, very odd.
