[ WP ] in 500 years , a well- meaning historian does a retrospective of the 2015 supreme Court decisions and though factually accurate makes a lot of incorrect nuanced assumptions .

Ah students, someone during discussion jive last night posted to our watches what to make of 2015 SUPREME court decisions. Before we all hook into the holosystem, I want to address that in tongue speak. Back when the united states was in season, remember, there was a judicial `` sweep'' month near the end of a president's term. An almost theatrical performance that was utilized to confirm the facets of the then current federation. This human court got to decide for everyone, a bit like the AI elder ethics panel today. 
 
 In this `` racial'' society, they were over concerned with appearance and styles, down from what people wore, what they looked like, whether they deserved love ( healthcare and otherwise ), and lots of public guilt about intimacy and eating. In 2015, with a president who was `` mixed-race'' which they called, for an unknown reason, `` black'', all rallied around and stopped flying an offensive and weirdly violent battle flag, known from a well-known pre-holovid called the `` dukes of hazing''. This flag was replaced with a colorful one known as the rainbow flag, which represented all different flags and happy marriages, in general. 
 
 Although it is thought that some people were very loving in private, it was seen almost as a radical thing to be loving in public and this SUPREME court went on point and changed it to be allowed, which was underlined in a law called Obamacares which made it finally okay to accept help from people who were different then you and respect each other privately as well as publicly, even if it was all on google. 
 
 Very excited time. Any questions? Okay. Hook in and connect. 
 
 

