[ WP ] The Three Little Pigs sue the Big Bad Wolf for property damage .

`` All rise, the honorable Judge Johns presiding'' 
 
 The court room grew to the sounds of shuffled feet and chairs moving as the presided over rose. 
 
 `` You may be seated. We are here today to discuss the matter at hand case number 23-5667: Pigs v. Wolf brought here today in the court of Common Pleas of Fairytale County. Plaintiffs counsel you may begin your opening remarks'' The judge ordered. 
 
 `` Thank you your honor. It is my intention today to prove that defendant Wolf attempted to gain unlawful entry into the Pig homes. A little background, My clients live at 12 14 and 16 Cherry Tree lane and in three separate incidents defendant Wolf approached the homes and threatened damage on the property if he was not allowed in. The plaintiffs in all three incidents refused entry and were met with physical force in the form of a superior-in-intensity discharge of air from defendants lungs and fell the first two homes located at 12 and 14 Cherry Tree lane. Its a miracle my clients made it out and to the home at 16 Cherry Tree ln. It is our hope that this honorable court grant judgement in our favor and see that defendant is removed from the public and placed in confinement and that he pay damages in the sum of no less than 3 million dollars. That's 2 million in compensation for the loss of the pigs homes and 1 million in punitive damages. Nothing further your honor.'' The plaintiffs counsel sat down. 
 
 `` Very good, Defendants counsel you may begin.'' 
 
 `` Thank you your honor. If it pleases the court Id like to begin by saying that my client is the real victim. If I may Id like to present video testimony discussing the nature of my clients species and that this so called `` act of destruction'' was nothing more than an attempt at prolonging his own life'' Defendants counsel said. 
 
 `` Ill allow it'' The judge rumbled. 
 
 `` Thank you your honor. Play the tape please'' 
 
 The tape played and showed a researcher who studied the habits of wolves and how they will hunt and track for days in order to eat. 
 
 `` You see? my client is not some monster, some criminal, some maniac, he simply wants to continue to live, is that so wrong?'' 
 
 `` Your honor I object!'' Cried plaintiffs counsel 
 
 `` On what grounds?'' 
 
 `` On the grounds that this court is not interested in an emotional appeal to the barbaric nature of an attempted murder!'' Shouted Plaintiffs counsel 
 
 `` Sustained, on the grounds that Defendant makes these statements relevant to this case.'' Ordered the judge. 
 
 `` Very well your honor, I call my client Mr. Wolf to the stand.'' The audience gasped! 
 
 `` Mr. Wolf, is it true you are in fact a wolf?'' 
 
 `` uh, yes'' 
 
 `` Then as a wolf you often need to feed in order to live?'' 
 
 `` uhh yes'' 
 
 `` And when you were attempting to get into the homes of the pigs did you ever once say'Im going to eat you'?'' 
 
 `` No sir'' 
 
 `` So plaintiffs decided you were trying to eat them with no real reason other than you're a wolf! You just wanted something to eat! You didnt want to eat them! Just something from their fridge perhaps!'' 
 
 `` yes exactly'' 
 
 `` You see? My client is a victim of discrimination! sure! A lone wolf, so desperate for food he went door to door BEGGING! and Plaintiffs were too caught up on their preconceived notions of wolves they did not stop to think that you were just a cold and hungry wolf looking for a handout. Thank you Mr. Wolf you may be seated.'' Defendants counsel sat. 
 
 `` Your honor this is preposterous! My clients were terrorized by the defendant and had their homes DESTROYED!'' pleaded Plaintiffs counsel 
 
 `` What proof do you have that Mr. Wolf knocked the houses down?'' The judge requested 
 
 `` My clients witnessed it!'' 
 
 `` From behind their walls?'' 
 
 `` No! I mean... they heard him'' 
 
 `` So they did not witness it and you have no other witnesses?'' 
 
 `` Well... No your honor but..'' 
 
 `` Ive seen enough. This court enters in favor of Defendant citing lack of physical evidence to prove the allegations set forth. Case dismissed. We move now to the next case'Bears v. Locks' in the matter of home invasion.''
