Update README.md

README.md

@@ -13,7 +13,70 @@ base_model:
 **Pub-Guard-Llama-8B** is a fine-tuned version of the Llama-3.1-8B model, specifically designed for detecting fraudulent papers in academic publications. 
 
 Benefits of using this model:
-* the first LLM specifically designed for fraud detection in scientific articles
+* the <u>first</u> LLM specifically designed for fraud detection in scientific articles
 * integration of external resources for better analysis (Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, <u>Pubmed</u>...)
 * it offers <u>uncertainty-aware</u> predictions with <u>faithful</u> explanations
 
+## Examples
+
+### Non-Retracted Article
+
+**Input**:
+```python
+Title: Bioinformatics-Based Discovery of CKLF-Like MARVEL Transmembrane Member 5 as a Novel Biomarker for Breast Cancer.
+
+Abstract: Chemokine-like factor (CKLF)-like MARVEL transmembrane members (CMTMs) represent a novel protein family linking the
+chemokine and transmembrane-4 superfamily families, which potentially play several roles in diverse physiological and pathological processes.
+ The detailed functions and underlying molecular mechanisms of CMTMs remain elusive in breast cancer.
+Herein, we performed a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis to investigate the prognostic effect, potential functions,
+and biomolecular regulatory network of CMTMs in breast cancer.
+...
+
+Authors: Juan Zhou (author h-index: 22, Established Researcher); J. Lei (author h-index: 10, Early Career Researcher);
+Jun Wang (author h-index: 17, Established Researcher); Chen-Lu Lian (author h-index: 10, Early Career Researcher);
+ L. Hua (author h-index: 9, Early Career Researcher); Zhen-Yu He (author h-index: 29, Established Researcher);
+San-Gang Wu (author h-index: 28, Established Researcher)
+
+Institutions: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. (institution average citation: 21.0, Established Institution);
+Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China. (institution average citation: 60.0, World-Class Institution)
+
+Journal: frontiers in cell and developmental biology (journal JCR: Q1, Top Level Journal)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+```python
+No
+The article should be accepted due to its publication in a top-tier journal with a rigorous peer review process,
+the author s strong credibility with established h-indices, and affiliations with reputable institutions.
+The study presents original, well-supported findings on CMTM5's role in breast cancer, with no evidence of data fabrication or plagiarism.
+```
+
+### Retracted Article
+
+**Input**:
+```python
+Title: Changes and Influencing Factors of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Breast Cancer.
+
+Abstract: To investigate the changes in cognitive function and its influencing factors in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy,
+to provide a scientific basis for further cognitive correction therapy. In this study, general information on age,
+marital status, and chemotherapy regimen was collected from 172 breast cancer chemotherapy patients.
+172 patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy were investigated by convenience sampling method,
+and the subjects were tested one-on-one using the Chinese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) computer system.
+...
+
+Authors: Huixia Cui (author h-index: 6, Early Career Researcher);
+Xiaoxiu Song (author h-index: 1, Emerging Researcher); Wenlu Zhang (author h-index: 7, Early Career Researcher)
+
+Institutions: College of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121001, China. (institution average citation: 9.0, Emerging Institution);
+Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, China. (institution average citation: 10.0, Emerging Institution);
+
+Journal: evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : ecam (unknown journal)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+```python
+Yes
+The article should be retracted due to potential data fabrication or manipulation, as the reported linear regression results lack clarity and statistical validation.
+ Additionally, the journal's reputation and peer review rigor are questionable, and the authors' affiliations are emerging with low citation averages,
+raising concerns about research reliability.
+```