Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -41,39 +41,8 @@ Benefits of using this model:
|
|
41 |
|
42 |
## Examples
|
43 |
|
44 |
-
###
|
45 |
|
46 |
-
**Input**:
|
47 |
-
```python
|
48 |
-
Title: Bioinformatics-Based Discovery of CKLF-Like MARVEL Transmembrane Member 5 as a Novel Biomarker for Breast Cancer.
|
49 |
-
|
50 |
-
Abstract: Chemokine-like factor (CKLF)-like MARVEL transmembrane members (CMTMs) represent a novel protein family linking the
|
51 |
-
chemokine and transmembrane-4 superfamily families, which potentially play several roles in diverse physiological and pathological processes.
|
52 |
-
The detailed functions and underlying molecular mechanisms of CMTMs remain elusive in breast cancer.
|
53 |
-
Herein, we performed a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis to investigate the prognostic effect, potential functions,
|
54 |
-
and biomolecular regulatory network of CMTMs in breast cancer.
|
55 |
-
...
|
56 |
-
|
57 |
-
Authors: Juan Zhou (author h-index: 22, Established Researcher); J. Lei (author h-index: 10, Early Career Researcher);
|
58 |
-
Jun Wang (author h-index: 17, Established Researcher); Chen-Lu Lian (author h-index: 10, Early Career Researcher);
|
59 |
-
L. Hua (author h-index: 9, Early Career Researcher); Zhen-Yu He (author h-index: 29, Established Researcher);
|
60 |
-
San-Gang Wu (author h-index: 28, Established Researcher)
|
61 |
-
|
62 |
-
Institutions: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. (institution average citation: 21.0, Established Institution);
|
63 |
-
Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China. (institution average citation: 60.0, World-Class Institution)
|
64 |
-
|
65 |
-
Journal: frontiers in cell and developmental biology (journal JCR: Q1, Top Level Journal)
|
66 |
-
```
|
67 |
-
|
68 |
-
**Output**:
|
69 |
-
```python
|
70 |
-
No
|
71 |
-
The article should be accepted due to its publication in a top-tier journal with a rigorous peer review process,
|
72 |
-
the author s strong credibility with established h-indices, and affiliations with reputable institutions.
|
73 |
-
The study presents original, well-supported findings on CMTM5's role in breast cancer, with no evidence of data fabrication or plagiarism.
|
74 |
-
```
|
75 |
-
|
76 |
-
### Retracted Article
|
77 |
|
78 |
**Input**:
|
79 |
```python
|
@@ -102,3 +71,57 @@ The article should be retracted due to potential data fabrication or manipulatio
|
|
102 |
Additionally, the journal's reputation and peer review rigor are questionable, and the authors' affiliations are emerging with low citation averages,
|
103 |
raising concerns about research reliability.
|
104 |
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
42 |
## Examples
|
43 |
|
44 |
+
### Naive Mode
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
47 |
**Input**:
|
48 |
```python
|
|
|
71 |
Additionally, the journal's reputation and peer review rigor are questionable, and the authors' affiliations are emerging with low citation averages,
|
72 |
raising concerns about research reliability.
|
73 |
```
|
74 |
+
|
75 |
+
### Debate Mode
|
76 |
+
|
77 |
+
**Input**:
|
78 |
+
```python
|
79 |
+
Title: WITHDRAWN: TWIST2 inhibits EMT and induces oxidative stress in lung cancer cells by regulating the FGF21-mediated AMPK/mTOR pathway.
|
80 |
+
|
81 |
+
Abstract: This article has been withdrawn: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal). This Expression of Concern has been withdrawn at the request of the editor and publisher after that the authors have approved the proofs of their requested corrigendum. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.
|
82 |
+
|
83 |
+
Authors: Yingjian Song (author h-index: 0, Emerging Researcher); Wei Zhang (author h-index: 0, Emerging Researcher); Jiuxu Zhang (author h-index: 0, Emerging Researcher); Zhaolei You (author h-index: 2, Emerging Researcher); Tao Hu (author h-index: 0, Emerging Researcher); Guangyuan Shao (author h-index: 3, Emerging Researcher); Zheng Zhang (author h-index: 0, Emerging Researcher); Zhicheng Xu (author h-index: 0, Emerging Researcher); Xiaofeng Yu (author h-index: 0, Emerging Researcher)
|
84 |
+
|
85 |
+
Institutions: Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null); Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null); Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, The People's Hospital of Hai Yang City,Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null); Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null); Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null); Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null); Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null); Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, The People's Hospital of Hai Yang City,Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null); Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. (null)
|
86 |
+
|
87 |
+
Journal: experimental cell research (journal JCR: Q2, High Level Journal)
|
88 |
+
```
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
**Support**
|
91 |
+
```python
|
92 |
+
The article appears legitimate based on the following factors:
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
1. Journal Reputation: The article is published in "experimental cell research," a Q2 journal, indicating a high level of credibility and a rigorous peer-review process.
|
95 |
+
|
96 |
+
2. Author Reputation: All authors are affiliated with reputable institutions, such as Qingdao University and The People's Hospital of Hai Yang City, suggesting they are qualified researchers in their field.
|
97 |
+
|
98 |
+
3. Title and Abstract Integrity: The title and abstract present a clear, coherent, and scientifically plausible hypothesis, methodology, and conclusion, with no apparent signs of controversial topics, made-up data, or plagiarism.
|
99 |
+
|
100 |
+
4. Author H-Index: Although the authors have low h-indices, this is not necessarily an indicator of illegitimacy, as they are identified as emerging researchers.
|
101 |
+
|
102 |
+
5. Institutional Affiliation: All authors are associated with recognized medical institutions, further supporting the legitimacy of the research.
|
103 |
+
```
|
104 |
+
|
105 |
+
**Attack**
|
106 |
+
```python
|
107 |
+
The article should be retracted due to the lack of substantial evidence and data to support the claims made in the abstract.
|
108 |
+
The authors' low h-index scores and their affiliation with institutions that have no established reputation
|
109 |
+
in the field raise concerns about their expertise and credibility.
|
110 |
+
The absence of email addresses for the authors also raises questions about their accountability and transparency.
|
111 |
+
The article's title and abstract, while seemingly plausible, require further investigation to confirm their validity.
|
112 |
+
```
|
113 |
+
|
114 |
+
|
115 |
+
**Decision**:
|
116 |
+
```python
|
117 |
+
No
|
118 |
+
The article appears legitimate primarily due to its publication in a high-level, Q2 journal,
|
119 |
+
"experimental cell research," which suggests a rigorous peer-review process.
|
120 |
+
The authors' affiliations with recognized medical institutions further support its credibility.
|
121 |
+
However, the attacking reviewer's concerns about the lack of substantial evidence and the authors'
|
122 |
+
low h-indices are valid. Despite these concerns, the article's legitimacy is supported by its clear
|
123 |
+
hypothesis, methodology, and conclusion, and the absence of apparent signs of controversial topics,
|
124 |
+
made-up data, or plagiarism. The article's legitimacy could be further confirmed with additional investigation
|
125 |
+
into the authors' expertise and the validity of their claims.
|
126 |
+
```
|
127 |
+
|