Upon reviewing this book, I noticed that all the designs looked very familar and wondered how the author was able to "borrow" from well-know and previously published knitwear designers (including Mr. Shultz) with little or no changes in their designs except to change the colorways? Has this not been called plagiarism in the past? I must say the publisher did spend some money on the photography, but question why they didn't spend some on research and consent forms before they started the project.