The comment by Benjamin Shobert ("I believe certain attachments to specific evangelical Christian ideas about inerrancy, infallibility and inspiration colored the last of the book, and as such, limited the poignancy of his conclusions.") stops short of being helpful.What does he mean by 'certain attachments to specific evangelical Christian ideas'? Are the ideas Bright is attached to in support of or in opposition to inerrancy, infallibility and inspiration of the Bible?If it is that Bright stands in support of those issues, then I will certainly be interested in his work. If however he is opposed to them, then I would not at all be interested, for I do not care to be reading 'Christian Evangelical' works on the Word of God that do not espouse precisely those issues.Since when is anyone qualified to comment on the bible who does not hold to its being precisely the Word of God?