I have no problem with there being differing interpretations of ACIM. I have a big problem with the distorted and inaccurate portrayal of Wapnicks' teachings.I am not a "Wapnickian" and I also question some of what he writes. But these guys have gone so far overboard they have no credability. They have shot themselves in the foot.My understanding of the Course continues to grow. What I thought a few years ago is no longer what I think now. I hope what I think five years from now will be different. I would not say that someone's view was wrong. But I would and will say this book is intellectually dishonest and has an egoistic undertone. Don't look here to learn Wapnick's positions. Read his work.