After reading this book, and others of its ilk, it's clear to me that the author and those like him have tapped into a profitable market of Clinton-haters. The author's allegations, half-truths and inuendo are largely unsupported and not credible. Has the author (or anybody else) asked himself, "what does Clinton have to gain by committing treasonous acts like those described" and why would the cabinet, including a Republican Def Secy, and the Joint Chiefs not stand up to such acts?The only thing more disturbing than reading the book was reading the reviews of the other right wing nuts.