I found this book to be heavily biased toward the orthodox or fundamentalist point of view. He only interviews conservative scholars. He doesn't speak to or interview scholars who offer an opposing point of view. Though this writer bills himself as an investigative journalist I don't believe he truly does a thorough investigation of all points of view. He seems to ignore or gloss over evidence that would give an opposing point of view. If you want to see both sides of the argument I would read this in conjunction with Earl Doherty's "Challenging The Verdict" which is a rebuttal to "Case For Christ".