Anti-latinism and anti-christianism appear to be standards for celtic divination, blaming these groups on page 31 for destroying the druid religion. His history of ogam is conflicted. He says on page 14 that ogam was invented around 300 c.e. by a man, but on page 11 says a god invented it. So which is it? He also associates ogam with the druids, which is a bit strained since he acknowledges that ogam is a post-christian invention, after the Latins and Christians finished destroying druidism. He also makes the error of fixating on tree ogam, even though he knows that the letter names are unrelated to trees, and dismisses all the other types of ogam (listed in the Auraicept na n-Eces) as encyclopediac lists (page 26), but the tree list is one of these. And last, Mr. Graves and his White Goddess book, which Mr. Mountfort is well aware that scholars reject, but pleads that it has 'profound insight'(page 200).