Dr. Geisler believes in the bodily resurrection of Christ, and sets out to prove it in this book. His goal is noble; but his method is deplorable. He generally defends his position for the BODILY resurrection with Scriptures that deal with just the resurrection in general. For example, he uses I Cor 15 (If Christ be not raised, then our faith is in vain...) to argue that all who deny the BODILY resurrection of Christ deny the foundation of Christianity. In fact, this Scripture merely talks of the resurrection of Christ, bodily or otherwise. I am in agreement with Geisler's thesis; but his argument is contrived at best, and is not a reliable overall defense of bodily resurrection. To his credit, though, he does bring up some good points in favor of his thesis, but for the most part his argument manipulates Scripture to attack "unorthodoxy".