In the review of March 23 the "scholastic" author has asked me (since he cannot submit a second review of his own) to point out that, obviously, the Gospel of LUKE was written prior to Luke's sequel, ACTS, and not the other way around.Sorry, for that inadvertent error.Incidentally, that fact makes LUKE an even earlier composition, chronologically, since ACTS was clearly finished while both Peter and Paul were still alive.