I became interested in Linda McCartney after seeing the TV movie about her. I think as a mother,wife,cook and friend she was terrific. But as an amateur photographer I am not that impressed by her pictures. Are the rave reviews as one reader suggests because she is "Linda McCartney"? If she was Linda Doe would the accolades still apply? I feel like I am looking at friend's photo albums.The most famous photo (not counting Linda's 60's) is the one of Paul holding infant Mary. It's a cute photo, in fact I have similar ones with my kids, but because we are not famous no one is telling me to publish a book and quite frankly I take really good pictures as good as Linda's. I guess it is in the eye of the beholder, this is a review and being honest I would take it from the library and not buy it.