Does the author have to repeat himself over and over again?"Psychological storm""As he was already dead""birth equals death"and on and on and on. He does not bother to try to get to the facts or get inside the mind of Scotty, instead he hypothysizes over and over again."a normal person would have said" then makes up what Scotty could have said.Oh god, I was so bored.Scotty may or may not have been a sociopath, no way to tell from this book. And to think Ablow is the "number one forensic psychiatrist in america?"No hope for america.And he wants to study sociopaths but didn't bother to study scotty at all in this book, lazy writing.As someone who shares similar character traits with Scotty I was interested in some insight but nothing to see here.